Five-Year Outcomes after On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass

Cardiopulmonary bypass associated acute kidney injury: better understanding and better prevention

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is a common technique in cardiac surgery but is associated with acute kidney injury (AKI), which carries considerable morbidity and mortality. In this review, we explore the range and definition of CPB-associated AKI and discuss the possible impact of different disease recognition methods on research outcomes. Furthermore, we introduce the specialized equipment and procedural intricacies associated with CPB surgeries. Based on recent research, we discuss the potential pathogenesis of AKI that may result from CPB, including compromised perfusion and oxygenation, inflammatory activation, oxidative stress, coagulopathy, hemolysis, and endothelial damage. Finally, we explore current interventions aimed at preventing and attenuating renal impairment related to CPB, and presenting these measures from three perspectives: (1) avoiding CPB to eliminate the fundamental impact on renal function; (2) optimizing CPB by adjusting equipment parameters, optimizing surgical procedures, or using improved materials to mitigate kidney damage; (3) employing pharmacological or interventional measures targeting pathogenic factors.

Effects of different surgical strategies and left ventricular remodelling on the outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction

Background

Ischaemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) caused by coronary artery disease accounts for the largest proportion of heart failure cases with the worst prognosis. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the most effective treatment for ischaemic HFrEF. On-pump and off-pump are the two surgical methods used for CABG. Whether patients with HFrEF should undergo on- or off-pump CABG is controversial in coronary heart disease surgery. The left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVSEVI) is the gold standard for evaluating the severity of left ventricular remodelling; however, its effect on the perioperative risk and long-term survival rate of patients with HFrEF undergoing CABG remains unclear.

Methods

This single centre prospective cohort analysis included 118 coronary heart disease patients with symptoms and signs of heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of <40% who were enrolled consecutively from January 2019 to December 2023. Operative mortality, perioperative complications, and long-term survival were compared among patients treated with various LVESVIs and surgical methods. The primary outcomes were cardiac death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, and revascularization, (percutaneous coronary intervention or redo CABG) with a median follow-up of 38 ± 10 months.

Results

The 30-day postoperative mortality of 118 patients was 6.8%. Patients in the off-pump group had significantly higher perioperative mortality than those in the on-pump group (12.5% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.03). In the off-pump group, a higher proportion of patients required perioperative mechanical assistance, such as intra-aortic artery balloon pump (IABP) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), compared to those in the on-pump group (IABP: 75% vs. 47.4%, p = 0.004; ECMO: 22.5% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.000). Patients in the off-pump group were more likely to have postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) (35% vs. 14.1%, p = 0.01). In the on-pump group, the incidence of postoperative AF (25% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.02) and IABP use (62.5% vs. 36.9%, p = 0.03) were significantly higher in patients with more severe left ventricular remodelling than in those with less severe left ventricular remodelling. In the off-pump group, patients with more severe left ventricular remodelling had higher ECMO usage (38.9% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.04), incidence of postoperative AF (61.1% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.02), and perioperative mortality (22.2%). Major adverse cardiac event (MACE)-free survival rate was significantly higher in the on-pump group than in the off-pump group, and there was no significant difference in MACE free survival rates between the two groups of patients with different degrees of left ventricular remodelling.

Conclusion

On-pump bypass is a better surgical procedure for patients with ischaemic HFrEF, especially those with severe left ventricular remodelling. Left ventricular remodelling increases perioperative mortality but has no effect on long-term survival.

Surgical Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Underlying Atrial Fibrillation: State-of-the-Art Review

The number of individuals referred for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with preoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) is reported to be 8% to 20%. Atrial fibrillation is a known marker of high-risk patients as it was repeatedly found to negatively influence survival. Therefore, when performing surgical revascularization, consideration should be given to the concomitant treatment of the arrhythmia, the clinical consequences of the arrhythmia itself, and the selection of adequate surgical techniques. This state-of-the-art review aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current understanding of, advancements in, and optimal strategies for CABG in patients with underlying AF. The following topics are considered: stroke prevention, prophylaxis and occurrence of postoperative AF, the role of surgical ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion, and an on-pump vs off-pump strategy. Multiple acute complications can occur in patients with preexisting AF undergoing CABG, each of which can have a significant effect on patient outcomes. Long-term results in these patients and the future perspectives of this scientific area were also addressed. Preoperative arrhythmia should always be considered for surgical ablation because such an approach improves prognosis without increasing perioperative risk. While planning a revascularization strategy, it should be noted that although off-pump coronary artery bypass provides better short-term outcomes, conventional on-pump approach may be beneficial at long-term follow-up. By collecting the current evidence, addressing knowledge gaps, and offering practical recommendations, this state-of-the-art review serves as a valuable resource for clinicians involved in the management of patients with AF undergoing CABG, ultimately contributing to improved outcomes and enhanced patient care.

Outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting with multiple arterial grafting by pump status in men and women

BACKGROUND

Multiple arterial grafting (MAG) and off-pump surgery are strategies proposed to improve outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study was conducted to determine the impact of off-pump surgery on outcomes after CABG with MAG in men and women.

METHODS

This cohort study used population-based data to identify all Ontarians undergoing isolated CABG with MAG between October 2008 and September 2019. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; hospitalization for stroke, myocardial infarction hospitalization or heart failure, or repeat revascularization). Analysis used propensity-score overlap-weighted cause-specific Cox proportional hazard regression.

RESULTS

A total of 2989 women (1188 off-pump, 1801 on-pump) and 16,209 men (6065 off-pump, 10,144 on-pump) underwent MAG with a median follow-up of 5.0 years (interquartile range, 2.7-8.0) years. Compared to the on-pump approach, all-cause mortality was not changed with off-pump status (hazard ratio [HR] in women: 1.25 [95% CI, 0.83-1.88]; in men: 1.08 [95% CI, 0.85-1.37]). In women, the risk of MACCE was significantly higher off-pump (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.04-2.03), with nonsignificantly increased risk observed for all component outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing CABG with MAG, this population-based analysis found no association between pump status and survival in either men or women. However, it did suggest that off-pump MAG in women may be associated with an increased risk of MACCE.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with clampless aortic anastomosis devices: Aortic sealing devices versus automated anastomosis punching

Objectives

Clampless aortic anastomosis devices aim to lower stroke risk in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Two main strategies for clampless anastomosis devices emerged with automated anastomosis punching and aortic sealing devices, prompting the question of perioperative outcome differences.

Methods

All consecutive patients undergoing elective off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with a clampless aortic anastomosis device between September 2014 and December 2021 in 2 centers were retrospectively included. Cohorts were divided by the use of an automated anastomosis punching device or an aortic sealing device to achieve proximal anastomosis on the ascending aorta. To reach group comparability propensity score matching was performed. The primary end point was defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke and rethoracotomy. Secondary end points were perioperative outcome parameters.

Results

A total of 3703 patients were enrolled of whom 575 and 3128 were included in the automated anastomosis punching and the aortic sealing device group, respectively. By propensity score matching a total of 1150 patients were included with 575 in each group. The primary composite endpoint showed no significant difference with 6.3% versus 5.9% events (odds ratio, 0.9; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-1.53, P = .81). All-cause mortality (P = .36), stroke (P = .81), and rethoracotomy (P = .89) also exhibit no disparity. Operation time was significantly longer in the aortic sealing device cohort with 220.0 ± 50.8 minutes and 204.6 ± 53.8 minutes (P < .01).

Conclusions

Clampless aortic anastomosis strategies aortic sealing device and automated anastomosis punching did not differ in perioperative outcome parameters, whereas the implementation of aortic sealing devices were associated with a prolonged operation time without inducing any inferior clinical outcome.

Midterm Clinical Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Reverse Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: A Single-Center Experience

Outcomes of robotic-assisted reverse hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) remain hindered. We aimed to analyze midterm clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted reverse HCR. All consecutive 285 patients who underwent reverse robotic-assisted HCR between September 2005 and July 2021 were included. Reverse HCR comprises percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in non-left anterior descending (LAD) coronary arteries was performed within 30 days before robotic-assisted left internal thoracic artery (LITA) harvesting and LITA-to-LAD manual anastomosis through a 4-cm left minithoracotomy. Dual antiplatelet therapy was not interrupted in any patient. Preoperatively, mean age was 70.2 years (±11.2). Before surgery, 168 patients received 1 stent, 112 patients 2 stents, and 5 patients 3 stents. Intraoperatively, mean operating room time was 5.9 hours (±1); no case was converted to full sternotomy, whereas 9 patients (3.1%) received intraoperative blood product transfusions. Postoperatively, a small incidence of stroke, 1 (0.3%), reoperation for bleeding, 7 (2.4%), blood product transfusions, 48 (16.8%), and hospital stay (4.8 days) was observed. At 30-day follow-up, 1 patient (0.3%) underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with stent on a surgical LITA-LAD anastomosis owing to graft failure. Mean follow-up was 4.2 years. Reported midterm outcomes included all-cause death in 31 patients (10.9%), major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in 102 of 285 (35.9%), nonfatal stroke in 2 of 285 (0.7%), myocardial infarction in 17 of 285 (5.9%), and repeat intervention in 50 of 285 patients (17.5%). This single-center study reports effective and safe clinical outcomes at midterm follow-up of reverse HCR procedures for treating multivessel coronary artery disease.

Is Single LIMA-LAD Bypass Appropriate for OPCAB Training?

BACKGROUND

 A significant impact of surgeons' experience on outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) has been recognized through previous large-scale studies. However, a safe, effective, and concrete OPCAB training was yet to be identified. We evaluate a safety of our OPCAB training model with single left internal mammary artery (LIMA)-left anterior descending artery (LAD) as a reasonable first step.

METHODS

 Between January 2010 and June 2019, 180 patients with an isolated single coronary bypass of the LAD using LIMA as an in situ graft via median sternotomy fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Coronary arterial bypass under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), utilizing other graft material, minimal invasive direct coronary arterial bypass through left-sided thoracotomy, and multiple diseased coronary artery disease were excluded. The primary outcome is an early postoperative outcome (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCEs]: myocardial infarction, coronary re-revascularization, stroke, acute renal failure, and all causes of death) between residents in training under supervision (group 1: n = 63) and experienced surgeons (group 2: n = 117). Trainees were already experienced in on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

RESULTS

 Preoperative variables were comparable. There was no significant difference in the rate of MACCEs between the two groups including hospital mortality (p = 1.000), perioperative myocardial infarction (p = 0.246), stroke (p = 0.655), and acute renal failure (p = 0.175).

CONCLUSION

 The early postoperative outcome of off-pump LIMA to the LAD performed by trainees was comparable to those by experienced surgeons. Single LIMA-LAD was safely performed by trainees under supervision without CPB. In order to master OPCAB technique, single LAD bypass might be a reasonable first step to get into touch with the technical characteristics of this special procedure.

Comparison between Off-Pump and On-Pump Beating Heart Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

BACKGROUND

 Although coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is performed via three different techniques, conventional, on-pump beating heart CABG (ONBHCAB), or off-pump CABG (OPCAB), data are limited to compare ONBHCAB with OPCAB.

METHODS

 We retrospectively investigated the postoperative cardiac biomarkers, creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), and troponin I (cTnI), and early and late outcomes in 806 patients undergoing isolated ONBHCAB or OPCAB between February 2008 and September 2022. To eliminate the bias between different groups, propensity score matching was conducted to validate the findings.

RESULTS

 After matching, the number of each study group totaled 270 patients. In both complete and matched cohorts, early outcomes, including morbidities and mortalities, were similar. However, cTnI and CK-MB levels were significantly higher after ONBHCAB than after OPCAB with median peak cTnI of 9.85 versus 4.60 ng/mL and median peak CK-MB of 48.45 versus 17.10 ng/mL in the matched cohort, which were quite low, below the threshold for values defining perioperative myocardial infarction. At follow-up of 73 ± 45 months, the overall actuarial survival rates were similar between the ONBHCAB and OPCAB patients (86 vs. 87% at 5 years and 64 vs. 68% at 10 years, respectively, in the matched cohort).

CONCLUSION

 ONBHCAB may be a comparable alternative to OPCAB with similar early and late outcomes, despite higher elevation of postoperative cardiac biomarkers. ONBHCAB provides more efficient hemodynamic support, providing a better surgical visual field, than OPCAB while reducing the risk of incomplete revascularization.

Propensity score-matched comparison of total arterial off- and on-pump coronary artery bypass with complete revascularization

Little is known regarding the long-term (> 10 years) outcomes and risk factors of total arterial coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study evaluated the long-term outcomes and risk factors for all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) following total arterial on-pump CABG (ONCAB) or off-pump CABG (OPCAB) with complete revascularization. This retrospective cohort analysis enrolled patients with stable angina who underwent total arterial CABG with complete revascularization in our institute between July 2000 and June 2019. The endpoints were all-cause mortality and MACCE incidence, including a comparison between OPCAB and ONCAB. Long-term (10-year) outcomes were analyzed using propensity score-matched pairs, and risk factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Overall, 401 patients who underwent primary total arterial CABG were classified into the OPCAB (n = 269) and ONCAB (n = 132) groups. Using propensity score matching (PSM), 88 patients who underwent OPCAB were matched with 88 patients who underwent ONCAB. The mean follow-up period was 7.9 ± 6.3 years. No significant difference in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-2.04; p = 0.9138) and MACCE incidence (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-1.65; p = 0.7901) was observed between the two groups. Renal failure requiring dialysis was a significant risk factor for mortality (p < 0.0001) and MACCEs (p = 0.0003). Long-term outcomes of total arterial OPCAB and ONCAB with complete revascularization showed similar findings using PSM. Renal failure requiring dialysis was a significant risk factor for mortality and morbidity.Journal standard instruction requires an unstructured abstract; hence the headings provided in abstract were deleted. Kindly check and confirm.Thank you for your kindness.Clinical registration number 5598, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital.

Risk predictors of race disparity in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a propensity-matched analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare long-term prognosis after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting between white and black patients and to investigate risk factors for poorer outcomes among the latest.

METHODS

All consecutive 4766 black and white patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting between May 2005 and June 2021 at our institution were included. Primary outcomes were long-term incidence of all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in black versus white patients. A propensity-matched analysis was used 2 compare groups.

RESULTS

After matching, 459 patients were included in each black and white groups while groups were correctly balanced. The mean age was 70.4 vs 70.6 years old (P = 0.7) in black and white groups, respectively. Intraoperatively, mean operating room time and blood product transfusion, were higher in the black group while incidence of extubation in the operating room was higher in the white one. Postoperatively, hospital length of stay was higher in the black cohort. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was not different among groups. The median follow-up time was 4 years. Primary outcome of all-cause death was higher in the black versus the white, respectively. Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events incidence was twice higher in the black compared to the white cohort (7.6% vs 3.7%, P = 0.013). Risk predictors for all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in blacks were creatinine level, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ejection fraction <50% and preoperative atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSIONS

Racial disparities persist in a high-volume centre. Despite no preoperative difference, black minority has a higher incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events.

Long-term clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical coronary artery revascularisation

BACKGROUND

Patients who are not candidates for traditional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and amenable only for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stents can receive the "gold standard" left internal thoracic artery (LITA) to left anterior descending artery (LAD) anastomosis through robotic-assisted CABG and PCI to non-LAD coronary targets.

AIMS

We aimed to analyse clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted CABG.

METHODS

A total of 2,280 consecutive patients who had undergone robotic-assisted CABG between May 2005 and June 2021 were included in our study. Robotic-assisted LITA harvest was followed by LITA-LAD manual anastomosis through a 4 cm left thoracotomy. Hybrid coronary intervention (HCR) consists of stent implantation in a non-LAD coronary artery performed within 7 days after robotic-assisted LITA-LAD. We performed a propensity-adjusted analysis comparison after dividing all robotic-assisted CABG patients into three time periods: 2005-2010, 615 patients; 2011-2016, 904 patients; and 2017-2021, 761 patients.

RESULTS

The mean age increased from 64.5 years in the first time period to 65.8 years in the second time period to 68.1 years in the third (p<0.0001). Operative time was progressively reduced in the three periods (6.4; 6.2; 5.5 hours; p<0.001). The incidence of conversion to sternotomy remained similar for each period (1.8%; 1.7%; 1.5%; p=0.53). Thirty-day mortality in the three periods included 9 (1.4%), 9 (1.0%), and 7 (0.9%) patients, respectively (p=0.91), while 8 (0.3%) patients had PCI with stents in the entire group. The mean follow-up for the entire population was 4.2 years. At follow-up, the rates of all-cause death, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, non-fatal stroke, and repeat revascularisation with stents were significantly decreased from the first to the last period (pË0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic-assisted CABG and HCR provide good long-term outcomes in patients who are not candidates for conventional CABG.

Comparative efficacy on outcomes of C-CABG, OPCAB, and ONBEAT in coronary heart disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IMPORTANCE

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the gold standard for the treatment of multivessel and left main coronary heart disease. However, the current evidence about the optimal surgical revascularization strategy is inconsistent and is not sufficient to allow for definite conclusions. Thus, this topic needs to be extensively discussed.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of off-pump CABG (OPCAB), conventional on-pump CABG (C-CABG), and on-pump beating heart (ONBEAT) CABG via an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Registry were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials that were published in English before 1 December 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

Published trials that included patients who received OPCAB, C-CABG, and ONBEAT CABG were selected.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two authors independently screened the search results, assessed the full texts to identify eligible studies and the risk of bias of the included studies, and extracted data. All processes followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was postoperative mortality in patients who underwent C-CABG, OPCAB, or ONBEAT CABG. The secondary outcomes were postoperative myocardial infarction, stroke, and renal impairment in the three groups. The time point for analysis of outcomes was all time periods during the postoperative follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 39 385 patients (83 496.2 person-years) in 65 studies who fulfilled the prespecified criteria were included. In the network meta-analysis, OPCAB was associated with an increase of 12% in the risk of all-cause mortality when compared with C-CABG [odds ratio (OR): 1.12; 95% CI: 1.04-1.21], a reduction of 49% in the risk of myocardial infarction when compared with ONBEAT (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.26-0.99), a reduction of 16% in the risk of stroke when compared with C-CABG (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.99) and a similar risk of renal impairment when compared with C-CABG and ONBEAT.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

OPCAB was associated with higher all-cause mortality but lower postoperative stroke compared with C-CABG. OPCAB was associated with a lower postoperative myocardial infarction than that of ONBEAT. Early mortality was comparable among OPCAB, ONBEAT, and C-CABG.

Five-year outcomes of off and on-pump CABG: Insights from PROMOTE Patency Trial

BACKGROUND

There are limited studies reporting follow-up outcome data comparing of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) with on-pump (ONCAB) technique. The aim of the study was to report the 5-year clinical outcomes of OPCAB and ONCAB in a post hoc analysis of the PROMOTE patency trial.

METHODS

From March 2016 through March 2017, a total of 321 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were randomised to either the off-pump or the on-pump technique. Data on all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), repeat revascularisation and need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) were recorded. The composite and each of these individual outcomes are reported at 5-year interval.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 65.9 months (±3.39). A total of 275 (85.93%) patients followed up at the 5-year interval who underwent CABG by the off-pump (n  =  158) and the on-pump (n  =  162) technique. The all-cause mortality was 8.9% and 5.7% in ONCAB and OPCAB, respectively (hazard ratio [HR]  =  0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-1.57, p  =  0.31). The composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal MI, non-fatal CVA, RRT and need for repeat revascularisation was comparable in both groups (7.1% vs. 11.9%, HR  =  0.57; 95% CI 0.25-1.31, p  =  0.18 in OPCAB and ONCAB, respectively). The rates of 5-year non-fatal MI (p  =  0.2), non-fatal CVA (p  =  0.36) and need for repeat revascularisation (p  =  1) were similar in both groups. A sub-group analysis did not show any significant interaction or effect modification with either of the techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

The 5-year clinical outcomes of OPCAB are comparable to ONCAB in low-risk patients undergoing CABG. Off-pump coronary artery bypass had no additional benefit in any subgroup.

Association of Hospital Volume and Outcomes Following Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

BACKGROUND

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has been used to mitigate the negative systemic effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. Recent consortium and single-institution studies suggest an association between operator experience and long-term survival. We thus aimed to ascertain the relationship between institutional OPCAB volume and outcomes using a contemporary nationwide all-payer database.

METHODS

Adult admissions for elective isolated OPCAB were identified from the 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. The primary outcome was major adverse events (MAE), defined as a composite of mortality, reoperation, prolonged mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury requiring dialysis, or perioperative stroke during the index hospitalisation. Secondary outcomes included temporal trends, postoperative length of stay (pLOS), hospitalisation costs, non-home discharge, and 30-day readmission rate. High-volume hospitals (HVH) were defined to have annual caseloads >35 based on cubic spline analysis.

RESULTS

Of an estimated 41,154 patients, 59.9% were treated at HVH. The proportion of coronary artery bypass grafting operations that were OPCAB significantly decreased from 21.1% in 2016 to 18.3% in 2019. After adjustment, HVH status was associated with lower adjusted odds of MAE (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.88), compared to others. HVH were also associated with shorter pLOS (β -0.10, 95% -0.13, -0.07), reduced costs (β -US$4,900, - US$6,300, - US$3,600), non-home discharge (AOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.45-0.64), and 30-day readmission (AOR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that OPCAB requires a distinct set of surgical expertise and institutional aptitude. As a result, centralisation of care to centres of excellence should be considered.

Off-pump CABG surgery in left main coronary artery disease: a single-center prospective registry

Background and objective

The treatment of left main (LM) coronary artery disease (CAD) requires complex decision-making. Patients with left main multi-vessel coronary artery disease (LM CAD) have concerns regarding incomplete revascularization and reduced survival with off-pump (OPCAB) when compared with on-pump (ONCAB) coronary bypass surgery. To evaluate outcomes among high-risk LM CAD patients undergoing OPCAB, we performed a registry-based prospective study.

Methods

We performed 4868 coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgeries from Jan 2013 to Jun 2019 with 4662 (95.8%) OPCAB. In OPCAB cohort, we had 1323 patients (28.4%) with significant LM (> 50%) triple vessel CAD. Data regarding clinical features, extent of CAD, operative details, in-hospital outcomes, and 3-year follow-up were obtained. Descriptive statistics are reported.

Results

The study cohort (n = 1323) was aged 63 ± 9 years with men 88.4%. Tobacco use was in 328 (24.8%), diabetes 598 (45.2%), previous myocardial infarction 463 (35.0%), previous coronary intervention 40 (3.0%), and congestive heart failure in 54 (4.1%). All patients had LM (100.0%) with triple vessel disease in 99.4% (LAD, left anterior descending 100.0%; LCX, left circumflex 99.4%; RCA, right coronary artery 78.7%). Vessels bypassed/patient were 2.7 ± 0.4 with 3.2 ± 0.7 total grafts and 2.1 ± 0.8 venous grafts. In total, 1278 (96.5%) patients received left internal mammary artery (LIMA), 63(4.7%) bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA), and 74 (5.6%) radial artery grafts. There was no patient with conversion from OPCAB to ONCAB. In-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: all-cause deaths, myocardial infarction, and stroke) were in 21 (1.6%). At 3-year follow-up (n = 1041), MACE rates were in 84 (8.1%) and cardiovascular deaths in 28 (2.7%).

Conclusions

This study shows that off-pump CABG surgery is safe in patients with LM CAD. There is low in-hospital mortality and MACE and 3-year outcomes are similar to the published data of LM CAD patients who undergo on-pump CABG.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-023-01526-3.

Impact of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on 10-year mortality versus percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVES

The very long-term mortality of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a randomized complex coronary artery disease population is unknown. This study aims to investigate the impact of on-pump and off-pump CABG versus PCI on 10-year all-cause mortality.

METHODS

The SYNTAX trial randomized 1800 patients with three-vessel and/or left main coronary artery disease to PCI or CABG and assessed their survival at 10 years. In this sub-study, the hazard of mortality over 10 years was compared according to the technique of revascularization: on-pump CABG (n = 725), off-pump CABG (n = 128) and PCI (n = 903).

RESULTS

There was substantial inter-site variation in the use of off-pump CABG despite baseline characteristics being largely homogeneous among the 3 groups. The crude rate of mortality was significantly lower following on-pump CABG versus PCI [25.6% vs 28.4%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.96], while it was comparable between off-pump CABG and PCI (28.5% vs 28.4%, HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.69-1.40). After adjusting for the 9 variables included in the SYNTAX score II 2020, 10-year mortality remained significantly lower with on-pump CABG than PCI (HR 0.75 against PCI, P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

In the SYNTAXES trial, 10-year mortality adjusted for major confounders was significantly lower following on-pump CABG compared to PCI. There was no evidence for unadjusted difference between off-pump CABG and PCI, although the unadjusted estimated HR had a wide CI. Site heterogeneity in the technique used in bypass surgery has had measurable effects on treatment performance.

Minimal-Access Coronary Revascularization: Past, Present, and Future

Minimal-access cardiac surgery appears to be the future. It is increasingly desired by cardiologists and demanded by patients who perceive superiority. Minimal-access coronary artery revascularisation has been increasingly adopted throughout the world. Here, we review the history of minimal-access coronary revascularization and see that it is almost as old as the history of cardiac surgery. Modern minimal-access coronary revascularization takes a variety of forms-namely minimal-access direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB), hybrid coronary revascularisation (HCR), and totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (TECAB). It is noteworthy that there is significant variation in the nomenclature and approaches for minimal-access coronary surgery, and this truly presents a challenge for comparing the different methods. However, these approaches are increasing in frequency, and proponents demonstrate clear advantages for their patients. The challenge that remains, as for all areas of surgery, is demonstrating the superiority of these techniques over tried and tested open techniques, which is very difficult. There is a paucity of randomised controlled trials to help answer this question, and the future of minimal-access coronary revascularisation, to some extent, is dependent on such trials. Thankfully, some are underway, and the results are eagerly anticipated.

Early and midterm outcomes after off pump coronary artery bypass surgery

Purpose

There has been debate whether off pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB) has results comparable to conventional on pump bypass surgery. This has led to the low uptake of OPCAB in the West. In India, OPCAB is the default mode of coronary revascularization. However, there is scarce data on mid-term outcomes of OPCAB in our patients. This study aims to evaluate both short and mid-term mortality and analyze factors associated with mortality.

Methods

This is a single center study of all consecutive patients undergoing isolated OPCAB from October 2014 to December 2019. Patient data was collected from hospital records and follow-up was from the hospital electronic medical records and telephone interviews. Mortality and factors contributing to survival were analyzed.

Results

Operative mortality was 2.3%. Mid-term mortality was 5.5%. Preoperative renal dysfunction, post-operative renal failure, use of the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), re-exploration for bleeding, postoperative stroke, ventilation > 24 h, and postoperative atrial fibrillation were associated with operative mortality. Factors associated with mid-term mortality were age > 62 years, postoperative renal failure, IABP usage, ventilation time > 24 h, and postoperative atrial fibrillation. The mean survival time was 2343.55 + / - 15.27 days and 6-year survival was 88.7%.

Conclusion

OPCAB can safely be performed with satisfactory short and mid-term outcomes. Further corroborative studies from different regions of the country or a multi-center study will help to establish the suitability of the technique in Indian patients.

The outcomes of three different techniques of coronary artery bypass grafting: On-pump arrested heart, on-pump beating heart, and off-pump

OBJECTIVE

Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or on-pump arrested heart CABG (ONCAB) is a standard and simple technique. However, adverse effects can occur due to the use of aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass. Performing off-pump CABG (OPCAB) aims to avoid these adverse effects but may result in incomplete revascularization. On-pump beating heart CABG (ONBHCAB) combines the benefits of both ONCAB and OPCAB. This study focuses on comparing the short- and long-term outcomes of different CABG techniques.

METHOD

Retrospective observational cohort included 2,028 patients who underwent ONCAB, OPCAB, and ONBHCAB. The short-term outcomes including postoperative ischemic injury, hemodynamic functions, and adverse events were compared. The long-term outcomes were overall survival and the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Propensity score matching ensured comparability among the three patient groups.

RESULTS

After matching, there were no differences in baseline characteristics. Regarding ischemic injury, OPCAB showed the lowest peak cardiac enzyme levels (all p≤0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the change of hemodynamic function (cardiac index) between the three groups (p = 0.158). Ten-year survival for OPCAB, ONBHCAB, and ONCAB were 80.5%, 75.9%, and 73.7%, respectively. OPCAB was associated with a significant reduction in mortality risk and MACE when compared to others (Mortality HR = 0.33, p = 0.001, MACE HR = 0.52, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

OPCAB implementation resulted in a lower occurrence of postoperative ischemic injury than ONCAB and ONBHCAB. No differences in postoperative hemodynamic function in all three techniques were observed. OPCAB respectively were preferable techniques beneficial for long-term outcomes.

Acute clinical and financial outcomes of on- versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in octogenarians

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery bypass surgery in octogenarians is associated with increased postoperative morbidity. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery eliminates potential complications of cardiopulmonary bypass, but its use remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and financial impact of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery compared to conventional coronary artery bypass surgery among this high-risk population.

METHODS

Patients ≥80 years undergoing first-time, isolated, elective coronary artery bypass surgery were identified using the 2010-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients were grouped into off-pump or conventional coronary artery bypass surgery cohorts. Multivariable models were developed to assess the independent associations between off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery and key outcomes.

RESULTS

Of ∼56,158 patients, 13,940 (24.8%) underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. On average, the off-pump cohort was more likely to undergo single-vessel bypass (37.3 vs 19.7%, P < .001). After adjustment, undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery was associated with similar odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.73-1.12) relative to conventional bypass. Additionally, the off-pump and conventional coronary artery bypass surgery groups were comparable in odds of postoperative stroke (adjusted odds ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.78-1.35), cardiac arrest (adjusted odds ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.71-1.37), ventricular fibrillation (adjusted odds ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.60-1.31), tamponade (adjusted odds ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 0.74-1.97), and cardiogenic shock (adjusted odds ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.75-1.17). However, the off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery cohort was linked with an increased likelihood of ventricular tachycardia (adjusted odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.49) and myocardial infarction (adjusted odds ratio 1.34, 95% confidence interval 1.16-1.55). Furthermore, those undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery demonstrated reduced odds of non-home discharge (adjusted odds ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.83-0.99) and a decrement in hospitalization expenditures ($-1,290, 95% confidence interval -$2,370 to $200).

CONCLUSION

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery was linked with increased odds of ventricular tachycardia and myocardial infarction, but no difference in mortality. Our findings point to the safety of conventional coronary artery bypass surgery in octogenarians. Yet, future work is needed to consider long-term outcomes in this complex surgical cohort.

Early and mid-term outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with triple-vessel coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY

Several studies have compared early and late outcomes of on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and off-pump CABG. However, there is still an ongoing debate on this matter, especially in patients with triple-vessel coronary artery disease (3VD).

METHODS

We randomly assigned 274 consecutive patients with 3VD to two equal groups to undergo on-pump CABG or off-pump CABG. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), including all-cause mortality, acute coronary syndrome, stroke or transient ischemic attack, and the need for repeat revascularization. The secondary outcomes were postoperative infection, ventilation time, ICU admission duration, hospital stay length, and renal failure after surgery.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 31.2 months (range 24.6-35.2 months). The mean age of patients was 61.4 ± 9.3 years (range: 38-86), and 207 (78.7%) were men. There were 15 (11.2%) and 9 (7.0%) MACCE occurrences in on-pump and off-pump groups, respectively (P value = 0.23). MACCE components including all-cause death, non-fatal MI, CVA, and revascularization did not significantly differ between on-pump and off-pump groups. We observed no difference in the occurrence of MACCE between off-pump and on-pump groups in multivariable regression analysis (HR = 0.57; 95% CI 0.24-1.32; P value = 0.192). There were no statistical differences in postoperative outcomes between the off-pump and on-pump CABG groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-pump CABG is an equal option to on-pump CABG for 3VD patients with similar rates of MACCE and postoperative complications incidence when surgery is performed in the same setting by an expert surgeon in both methods. (IRCT20190120042428N1).

Impact of Surgeon Experience and Centre Volume on Outcome After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Results From the European Multicenter Study on Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (E-CABG) Registry

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of surgeon experience and centre volume on early operative outcomes in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery.

METHOD

Of 7,352 patients in the European Multicenter Study on Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (E-CABG) registry, 1,549 underwent OPCAB and were included in the present analysis. Using adjusted regression analysis, we compared major early adverse events after procedures performed by experienced OPCAB surgeons (i.e., ≥20 cases per year; n=1,201) to those performed by non-OPCAB surgeons (n=348). Furthermore, the same end points were compared between procedures performed by OPCAB surgeons in high OPCAB volume centres (off-pump technique used in >50% of cases; n=894) and low OPCAB volume centres (n=307).

RESULTS

In the experienced OPCAB surgeon group, we observed shorter procedure times (β -43.858, 95% confidence interval [CI] -53.322 to -34.393; p<0.001), a lower rate of conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass (odds ratio [OR] 0.284, 95% CI 0.147-0.551; p<0.001), a lower rate of prolonged inotrope or vasoconstrictor use (OR 0.492, 95% CI 0.371-0.653; p<0.001), a lower rate of early postprocedural percutaneous coronary interventions (OR 0.335, 95% CI 0.169-0.663; p=0.002), and lower 30-day mortality (OR 0.423, 95% CI 0.194-0.924; p=0.031). In high OPCAB volume centres, we found a lower rate of prolonged inotrope use (OR 0.584, 95% CI 0.419-0.814; p=0.002), a lower rate of postprocedural acute kidney injury (OR 0.382, 95% CI 0.198-0.738; p=0.004), shorter duration of intensive care unit (β -1.752, 95% CI -2.240 to -1.264; p<0.001) and hospital (β -1.967; 95% CI -2.717 to -1.216; p<0.001) stays, and lower 30-day mortality (OR 0.316, 95% CI 0.114-0.881; p=0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeon experience and centre volume may play an important role on the early outcomes after OPCAB surgery.

15-year outcomes of the JOCRI study (JOCRIED study): a randomised comparison of off-pump and on-pump multiple arterial coronary revascularisation

OBJECTIVE

The Japanese Off-Pump Coronary Revascularization Investigation (JOCRI) study reported a non-significant difference in early outcomes and graft patency between off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in 2005. The JOCRIED study aimed to review the long-term outcomes of the JOCRI study participants.

METHOD AND RESULTS

The JOCRIED study enrolled 123 of the JOCRI study participants completing the clinical follow-up between August 2018 and August 2020; 61 patients in the off-pump group and 62 patients in the on-pump group. The follow-up period was 13.8 ± 2.8 years. The groups were compared regarding mortality, the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and repeat revascularisation. The 15-year cumulative survival rate (off-pump vs on-pump, respectively; 77.7% vs 75.3%; p = 0.85), major adverse events-free survival rate (62.5% vs 55.6%; p = 0.27) and repeat revascularisation-free rate (84.8% vs 78.0%; p = 0.16) were not significantly different between the two groups. Revascularisation was the most common major adverse events in the JOCRIED participants. Although percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 8 patients (13%) in the off-pump group and in 14 patients (23%) in the on-pump group (p = 0.23), no patients underwent redo coronary artery bypass grafting.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides comparable 15-year outcomes to on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Vein Graft Use and Long-Term Survival Following Coronary Bypass Grafting

BACKGROUND

Although placement of at least 1 arterial graft during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has a proven survival benefit, it is unknown what degree of revascularization with saphenous vein grafting (SVG) is associated with improved survival.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to determine whether undergoing surgery performed by a surgeon who is liberal with vein graft utilization is associated with improved survival in patients undergoing single arterial graft CABG (SAG-CABG).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational study of SAG-CABG performed in Medicare beneficiaries from 2001 to 2015. Surgeons were stratified by number of SVG utilized per SAG-CABG into conservative (≥1 SD below mean), average (within 1 SD of mean), and liberal (≥1 SD above mean). Long-term survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared among surgeon groups before and after augmented inverse-probability weighting.

RESULTS

There were 1,028,264 Medicare beneficiaries undergoing SAG-CABG from 2001 to 2015 (mean age 72.0 ± 7.9 years, 68.3% male). Over time, 1-vein and 2-vein SAG-CABG utilization increased, whereas 3-vein and ≥4-vein SAG-CABG utilization decreased (P < 0.001). Surgeons who were conservative vein graft users performed a mean 1.7 ± 0.2 vein grafts per SAG-CABG, whereas those who were liberal vein graft users performed a mean 2.9 ± 0.2 vein grafts per SAG-CABG. Weighted analysis demonstrated no difference in median survival among patients undergoing SAG-CABG by liberal vs conservative vein graft users (adjusted median survival difference 27 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing SAG-CABG, there is no association between surgeon proclivity for vein graft utilization and long-term survival, suggesting that a conservative approach to vein graft utilization is reasonable.

Perioperative Management of the Patient at High-Risk for Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most common major complications of cardiac surgery, and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Cardiac surgery-associated AKI has a complex, multifactorial etiology, including numerous factors such as primary cardiac dysfunction, hemodynamic derangements of cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass, and the possibility of a large volume of blood transfusion. There are no truly effective pharmacologic therapies for the management of AKI, and, therefore, anesthesiologists, intensivists, and cardiac surgeons must remain vigilant and attempt to minimize the risk of developing renal dysfunction. This narrative review describes the current state of the scientific literature concerning the specific aspects of cardiac surgery-associated AKI, and presents it in a chronological fashion to aid the perioperative clinician in their approach to this high-risk patient group. The evidence was considered for risk prediction models, preoperative optimization, and the intraoperative and postoperative management of cardiac surgery patients to improve renal outcomes.

Health-related quality of life impacts upon 5-year survival after coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

Poor preoperative health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has been associated with reduced short-term survival after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery; however, its impact on long-term mortality is unknown. This study's objective was to determine if baseline HRQoL status predicts 5-year post-CABG mortality.

METHODS

This prespecified, randomized on/off bypass follow-up study (ROOBY-FS) subanalysis compared baseline patient characteristics and HRQoL scores, obtained from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and Veterans RAND Short Form-36 (VR-36), between 5-year post-CABG survivors and nonsurvivors. Standardized subscores were calculated for each questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression assessed whether HRQoL survey subcomponents independently predicted 5-year mortality (p ≤ .05).

RESULTS

Of the 2203 ROOBY-FS enrollees, 2104 (95.5%) completed baseline surveys. Significant differences between 5-year post-CABG deaths (n = 286) and survivors (n = 1818) included age, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, renal dysfunction, diabetes, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, atrial fibrillation, depression, non-White race/ethnicity, lower education status, and off-pump CABG. Adjusting for these factors, baseline VR-36 physical component summary score (p = .01), VR-36 mental component summary score (p < .001), and SAQ physical limitation score (p = .003) were all associated with 5-year all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-CABG HRQoL scores may provide clinically relevant prognostic information beyond traditional risk models and prove useful for patient-provider shared decision-making and enhancing pre-CABG informed consent.

Stroke and mortality rates after off-pump vs. pump-assisted/no-clamp coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND

Ascending aorta manipulation during on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery can release embolic matter and may cause stroke. Strategies for lowering the stroke rate associated with coronary artery bypass grafting surgery include off-pump surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass and pump-assisted surgery with minimal aortic manipulation (i.e., without aortic cross-clamping). We examined whether one approach is superior to the other in reducing stroke and perioperative mortality rates.

METHODS

We reviewed consecutive elective, urgent, and emergency off-pump/no-bypass and pump-assisted/no-clamp coronary artery bypass grafting procedures performed by a single surgeon at our institution from June 2011 through October 2017.

RESULTS

Of 570 patients analyzed, 395 (69.3%) underwent off-pump/no-bypass surgery, 43 (7.5%) underwent pump-assisted/no-clamp surgery, and 132 (23.2%) transitioned mid-procedure from off-pump/no-bypass to pump-assisted/no-clamp surgery. Patients who were >70 years old, were female, or had diabetes, cardiomegaly, or a history of myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure were more likely to undergo pump-assisted/no-clamp surgery or the combined technique. None of the pump-assisted/no-clamp patients had a stroke, versus 0.3% of the off-pump/no-bypass patients and 0.8% of the combination patients. Stroke and in-hospital mortality rates did not differ by technique.

CONCLUSIONS

A hybrid strategy incorporating off-pump, pump-assisted, and combined off-pump/pump-assisted techniques achieved very low stroke rates in patients undergoing coronary revascularization. Perioperative mortality was similar for all three techniques. Avoiding aortic clamping may be crucial for decreasing CABG-related stroke rates. Off-pump/no-bypass surgery had no significant advantage over the pump-assisted/no-clamp or combined techniques in reducing the stroke rate after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

Coronary artery bypass surgery for acute coronary syndrome: A network meta-analysis of on-pump cardioplegic arrest, off-pump, and on-pump beating heart strategies

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome is a high-risk procedure, and the best strategy for myocardial revascularisation remains debated. This study compares the 30-day mortality benefit of on-pump CABG (ONCAB), off-pump CABG (OPCAB), and on-pump beating heart CABG (OnBHCAB) strategies.

METHODS

A systematic search of three electronic databases was conducted for studies comparing ONCAB with OPCAB or OnBHCAB in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The primary outcome, 30-day mortality, was compared using a Bayesian hierarchical network meta-analysis (NMA). A random effects consistency model was applied, and direct and indirect comparisons were made to determine the relative effectiveness of each strategy on postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

One randomised controlled trial and eighteen observational studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria were identified. A total of 4320, 5559, and 1962 patients underwent ONCAB, OPCAB, and OnBHCAB respectively. NMA showed that OPCAB had the highest probability of ranking as the most effective treatment in terms of 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.50; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.23-1.00), followed by OnBHCAB (OR, 0.62; 95% CrI, 0.20-1.57), however the 95% CrI crossed or included unity. A subgroup NMA of nine studies assessing only acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients demonstrated a 72% reduction in likelihood of 30-day mortality after OPCAB (CrI, 0.07-0.83). No significant increase in rate of stroke, renal dysfunction or length of intensive care unit stay was found for either strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Although no single best surgical revascularisation approach in ACS patients was identified, the significant mortality benefit with OPCAB seen with AMI suggests high acuity patients may benefit most from avoiding further myocardial injury associated with cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest.

Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: A Valuable 2-Day Experience

Currently, coronary artery disease (CAD) has been identified as the leading cause of mortality in Malaysia and in other countries worldwide. Genetic predisposition and comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus, gender, lifestyle, and several other risk factors can contribute to the development of CAD. Pharmacological and surgical treatments play a vital role in improving the quality of life of patients with CAD. New surgical techniques and continuous interventions have been introduced to improve the treatment outcome. Recently, cardiothoracic teams from Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) and Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) have conducted a 2-day live workshop on off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery. In this brief communication, we share the highlights and clinical tips of the OPCAB surgery gained from the collaboration.

Early and Long-Term Outcomes after On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction and a Giant Left Ventricle

Introduction: No previous studies comparing the outcomes between off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (off-pump CABG, OPCAB) and on-pump CABG (ONCAB) have been performed in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) and a giant left ventricle. We aimed to investigate whether such patients could benefit from OPCAB. Methods: From January 2011 to January 2021, a total of 98 patients with severe LVD and a giant left ventricle underwent isolated CABG (ONCAB 46, OPCAB 52) in Wuhan Union Hospital. The clinical data were collected retrospectively and propensity score matching was performed to adjust baseline characteristics. Results: After propensity matching, the two groups were comparable in baseline variables. The OPCAB group had a higher rate of incomplete revascularization than the ONCAB group (25.0% vs. 9.1%; p = 0.047). The 30-day mortality was similar between the matched groups (4.5% vs. 4.5%; p = 1.000) but the OPCAB group had a lower risk of postoperative IABP usage (9.1% vs. 25.0%; p = 0.047) and renal insufficiency (11.4% vs. 29.5%; p = 0.034). The long-term probability of survival (log-rank test, p = 0.450) was similar between the two groups but the OPCAB group had a lower probability of major adverse cardiovascular events (log-rank test, p = 0.038). Conclusions: For patients with severe LVD and a giant left ventricle, OPCAB reduced early postoperative complications while sacrificing long-term quality of life compared to those having ONCAB.

An overlap-weighted analysis on 10-year survival of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery grafting in multivessel coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The introduction of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery intended to overcome some of the conventional on-pump procedure limitations by avoiding potentially harmful adverse effects of extracorporeal circulation and aortic cross-clamping. However, the doubt remains on whether it is associated with worse long-term outcomes. To compare long-term survival in patients with multivessel ischemic heart disease undergoing off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 4788 consecutive patients undergoing primary isolated multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, performed from 2000 to 2015, in Northern Portugal. Among the study population, we identified 1616 and 3172 patients that underwent off-pump and on-pump coronary artery grafting, respectively. We employed a propensity-score-based overlap weighting (OW) algorithm to restrict confounding by indication. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 10 years.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study population was 63.9 (±9.8) years, and 951 (19.9%) were females. OW was effective in eliminating differences in all major baseline characteristics. Follow-up was 100% complete. The median follow-up time was 12.80 (9.62, 16.62) years. The primary endpoint of all-cause mortality at 10 years occurred in 431 patients (26.7%) in the off-pump group, as compared with 863 (27.2%) in the on-pump group (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.04; p = .196).

CONCLUSIONS

In this longitudinal, population-level comparison of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery for treating multivessel coronary artery disease, the primary outcome of long-term mortality was identical among both patients' groups.

Off-pump or on-pump coronary artery bypass at 30 days: A propensity matched analysis

Introduction

This study was to determine whether coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump CABG, OPCAB) could reduce early postoperative mortality and major complications compared with conventional coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump CABG, ONCAB) by experienced surgeons.

Material and methods

From January 2016 to June 2020, isolated CABG was performed in 1200 patients (ONCAB 429, OPCAB 771) in Wuhan Union Hospital. The propensity score matching was used to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics between the ONCABG and OPCABG groups. After 1:1 matching, 404 pairs for each group were selected to compare outcomes within 30 days after surgery. All the operations were completed by experienced surgeons that had completed more than 500 on-pump and 200 off-pump CABG, respectively.

Results

After propensity matching, the two groups were comparable in terms of preoperative characteristics. The OPCAB group had less vein graft (2.5 ± 1.0 vs. 2.7 ± 0.9; P &lt; 0.001) and a higher rate of incomplete revascularization (12.4 vs. 8.2%; P &lt; 0.049) than the ONCAB group. There was no significant difference in early postoperative mortality between ONCAB and OPCAB groups (2.2 vs. 2.2%; P = 1.00). However, patients in the OPCAB group had a lower risk of postoperative stroke (1.5 vs. 4.7%; P = 0.008), new-onset renal insufficiency (8.9 vs. 18.8%; P &lt; 0.001), respiratory failure (2.2 vs. 7.2%; P = 0.001), reoperation for bleeding (0.5 vs. 2.7%; P = 0.001), and required less ventilator assistance time (33.4 ± 37.9 h vs. 51.0 ± 66.1 h; P &lt; 0.001) and intensive care unit (ICU) time (3.7 ± 2.7 days vs. 4.8 ± 4.3 days; P &lt; 0.001).

Conclusions

In our study, patients undergoing OPCAB had fewer postoperative complications and a faster recovery. It is a feasible and safe surgical approach to achieve revascularization when performed by experienced surgeons.

Revascularization strategies for patients with established chronic coronary syndrome

Coronary artery disease is the most common type of cardiovascular disease, leading to high mortality rates worldwide. Although the vast majority can be treated effectively and safely by medical therapy, revascularization strategies remain essential for numerous patients. Outcomes of both percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting improve in a rapid pace, resulting from technical innovation and ongoing research. Progress has been achieved by technical improvements in coronary stents, optimal coronary target and graft selection, and the availability of minimally invasive surgical strategies. Besides technical progress, evidence-based patient-tailored decision-making by the Heart Team is the basic precondition for optimal outcome. The combination of fast innovation and long-term clinical evaluations creates a dynamic field. Research outcomes should be carefully interpreted according to the techniques used and the trial's design. Therefore, more and more trial outcomes suggest that revascularization strategies should be tailored towards the specific patient. Although the European Society of Cardiology/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery guidelines on myocardial revascularization date from 2018 and a large variety of trial outcomes on revascularization strategies in chronic coronary syndrome have been published since, we aim to provide an updated overview within this review.

Ten-year outcomes after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: an inverse probability of treatment weighting comparative study

AIMS

The debate on the advantages and limitations of off-pump myocardial revascularization (OPCAB) on long-term outcomes has not still arrived to a conclusion. This study was designed to compare the impact of OPCAB vs, on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on long-term mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs).

METHODS

The PRIORITY project was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of two large prospective multicenter cohort studies on CABG. Data on isolated CABG were linked to two administrative datasets. The inverse probability of treatment weight was employed to balance the treatment groups. Time-to-event methods were employed to analyze endpoints.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 10 988 patients who underwent isolated CABG (27.2% OPCAB). The median follow-up time was 7.9 years and was 100% complete. Unadjusted long-term survival was significantly worst for OPCAB, confirmed by weighted models (hazard ratio 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.14, P = 0.01). OPCAB was associated to an increased risk of MACCE at 10 years (weighted hazard ratio 1.18, 95% CI 1.12-1.23, P < 0.001). Inside the MACCEs, OPCAB was significantly related to increased incidence of repeat revascularization (hazard ratio 2.27, 95% CI 1.39-3.85, P < 0.001, in the first 6 months, hazard ratio 1.19, 95% CI 1.09-1.32, P < 0.001 afterward) and stroke (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% CI 1.10-1.35, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that OPCAB was associated with an increased risk of mortality, repeat myocardial revascularization and stroke at 10 years compared with on-pump CABG.

Guidelines on enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass or off-pump

OBJECTIVE

To provide recommendations for enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERACS) based on a multimodal perioperative medicine approach in adult cardiac surgery patients with the aim of improving patient satisfaction, reducing postoperative mortality and morbidity, and reducing the length of hospital stay.

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 20 experts from the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Société française d'anesthésie et de réanimation, SFAR) and the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (Société française de chirurgie thoracique et cardio-vasculaire, SFCTCV) was convened. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guideline process was conducted independently of any industry funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide the assessment of the quality of evidence.

METHODS

Six fields were defined: (1) selection of the patient pathway and its information; (2) preoperative management and rehabilitation; (3) anaesthesia and analgesia for cardiac surgery; (4) surgical strategy for cardiac surgery and bypass management; (5) patient blood management; and (6) postoperative enhanced recovery. For each field, the objective of the recommendations was to answer questions formulated according to the PICO model (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome). Based on these questions, an extensive bibliographic search was carried out and analyses were performed using the GRADE approach. The recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE methodology and then voted on by all the experts according to the GRADE grid method.

RESULTS

The SFAR/SFCTCV guideline panel provided 33 recommendations on the management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass or off-pump. After three rounds of voting and several amendments, a strong agreement was reached for the 33 recommendations. Of these recommendations, 10 have a high level of evidence (7 GRADE 1+ and 3 GRADE 1-); 19 have a moderate level of evidence (15 GRADE 2+ and 4 GRADE 2-); and 4 are expert opinions. Finally, no recommendations were provided for 3 questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong agreement existed among the experts to provide recommendations to optimise the complete perioperative management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Graft Flow Evaluation with Intraoperative Transit-Time Flow Measurement in Off-Pump versus On-Pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Objective

We aimed to compare transit-time flow measurement (TTFM) parameters for on-pump (ONCAB) and off-pump (OPCAB) coronary artery bypass procedures.

Methods

The database of the Registry for Quality AssESsmenT with Ultrasound Imaging and TTFM in Cardiac Bypass Surgery (REQUEST) study was retrospectively reviewed. Only single grafts were included (ie, no sequential or Y/T grafts). Primary end points were mean graft flow (MGF), pulsatility index (PI), diastolic fraction (DF), and backflow (BF). Unadjusted and propensity score-matching comparisons were performed.

Results

Of 1016 patients in the REQUEST registry, 846 had at least 1 graft for which TTFM was performed. Of these, 512 patients (60.6%) underwent ONCAB and 334 (39.4%) OPCAB procedures. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) during measurements was higher in the OPCAB group. After propensity score-matching, 312 well balanced pairs were left. In these matched patients, MGF was higher for the ONCAB versus the OPCAB group (32 vs 28 mL/min, respectively, for all grafts [P < .001]; 30 vs 27 mL/min for arterial grafts [P = .002]; and 35 vs 31 mL/min for venous grafts [P = .006], respectively). PI was lower in the ONCAB group (2.1 vs 2.3, for all grafts; P < .001). Diastolic fraction was slightly lower in the ONCAB group (65% vs 67.5%; P < .001). The backflow was also lower in the ONCAB group (0.6 vs 1.3; P < .001) with trends similar to MGF and PI for venous and arterial grafts. There were 21 (3.3%) revisions in the OPCAB group and 14 (2.1%) in the ONCAB group (P = .198).

Conclusions

ONCAB surgery was associated with higher MGF and lower PI values, especially in venous grafts. Different TTFM cutoff values for ONCAB versus OPCAB surgery might be considered.

A Meta-Analysis of Early, Mid-term and Long-Term Mortality of On-Pump vs. Off-Pump in Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

We aimed to compare the early, mid-term, and long-term mortality between on-pump vs. off-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We conducted a systematic search for studies comparing clinical outcomes of patients who underwent on-pump vs. off-pump redo CABG. We pooled the relevant studies quantitatively to compare the early (perioperative period, whether in hospital or within 30 days after discharge), mid-term (≥1 year and &lt;5 years), and long-term (≥5 year) mortality of on-pump vs. off-pump redo CABG. A random-effect model was applied when there was high heterogeneity (I2 &gt; 50%) between studies. Otherwise, a fixed-effect model was utilized. After systematic literature searching, 22 studies incorporating 5,197 individuals (3,215 in the on-pump group and 1,982 in the off-pump group) were identified. A pooled analysis demonstrated that compared with off-pump redo CABG, on-pump redo CABG was associated with higher early mortality (OR 2.11, 95%CI: 1.54–2.89, P &lt; 0.00001). However, no significant difference was noted in mid-term mortality (OR 1.12, 95%CI: 0.57–2.22, P = 0.74) and long-term mortality (OR 1.12, 95%CI: 0.41–3.02, P = 0.83) between the two groups. In addition, the complete revascularization rate was higher in the on-pump group than the off-pump group (OR 2.61, 95%CI: 1.22–5.60, P = 0.01). In conclusion, the off-pump technique is a safe and efficient alternative to the on-pump technique, with early survival advantage and similar long-term mortality to the on-pump technique in the setting of redo CABG, especially in high-risk patients.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42021244721.

Serum FGF21 Levels Predict the MACE in Patients With Myocardial Infarction After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Objectives

Prognosis evaluation in myocardial infarction (MI) patients with major adverse clinical events (MACE) who have undergone coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is greatly important to identify high-risk patients. Elevated metabolic hormone fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) is associated with the risk of MI. The aim of this study is to assess the relationship between FGF21 and the incidence of MACE in patients with MI after CABG surgery.

Methods

Patients with three-vessel disease who were scheduled for first-time isolated CABG were enrolled in this project and underwent to evaluate the incidence of MACE during 48 h after CABG surgery, as well as to collect serum samples for FGF21 levels in both preoperative- and postoperative-CABG (pre-CABG and post-CABG).

Results

A total of 265 patients with MI undergoing CABG were enrolled in this study, 21 patients experienced MACE during the 48 h after CAGB surgery. Serum FGF21 levels of patients with MACE at post-CABG were significantly higher than that in patients without MACE [553.7 (433.6) vs. 291.7 (334.4), p &lt; 0.001]. Furthermore, among 81 individuals of these 265 patients, a lower level of FGF21 in preoperative-CABG (pre-CABG) and a higher level of FGF21 at postoperative-CABG (post-CABG) were observed in MI patients with MACE as compared to those without MACE respectively [ (275.0 (260.4) vs. 410.3 (420.7), p = 0.049; 550.7 (519.9) vs. 370.6 (441.2), p = 0.031]. In addition, serum FGF21 levels of MI patients with MACE at post-CABG were significantly increased compared with the baseline levels in pre-CABG [550.7 (519.9) vs.275.0 (260.4) p &lt; 0.001]. However, these profiles were not observed in patients without MACE [410.3 (420.7) vs. 370.6 (441.2), p=0.2137]. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that both serum FGF21 and CK-MB levels at post-CABG were independently associated with the incidence of MACE in patients with MI after CABG surgery. Finally, ROC analysis for FGF21 levels of 265 MI patients at post-CABG identified 455.4 pg/ml as an optimal cut-off value to predict MACE, with a sensitivity and specificity of 91.7 and 68.4% respectively.

Conclusion

Serum FGF21 levels at post-CABG are independently associated with the incidence of MACE in patients with MI who have undergone CABG. Measurement of FGF21 may help distinguish patients with MI at a high risk of MACE after CABG surgery.

Ten-Year Outcomes of Off-Pump vs On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the Department of Veterans Affairs: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

The long-term benefits of off-pump ("beating heart") vs on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remain controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the 10-year outcomes and costs of off-pump vs on-pump CABG in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) trial.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

From February 27, 2002, to May 7, 2007, 2203 veterans in the ROOBY trial were randomly assigned to off-pump or on-pump CABG procedures at 18 participating VA medical centers. Per protocol, the veterans were observed for 10 years; the 10-year, post-CABG clinical outcomes and costs were assessed via centralized abstraction of electronic medical records combined with merges to VA and non-VA databases. With the use of an intention-to-treat approach, analyses were performed from May 7, 2017, to December 9, 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

On-pump and off-pump CABG procedures.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The 10-year coprimary end points included all-cause death and a composite end point identifying patients who had died or had undergone subsequent revascularization (ie, percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] or repeated CABG); these 2 end points were measured dichotomously and as time-to-event variables (ie, time to death and time to composite end points). Secondary 10-year end points included PCIs, repeated CABG procedures, changes in cardiac symptoms, and 2018-adjusted VA estimated costs. Changes from baseline to 10 years in post-CABG, clinically relevant cardiac symptoms were evaluated for New York Heart Association functional class, Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class, and atrial fibrillation. Outcome differences were adjudicated by an end points committee. Given that pre-CABG risks were balanced, the protocol-driven primary and secondary hypotheses directly compared 10-year treatment-related effects.

RESULTS

A total of 1104 patients (1097 men [99.4%]; mean [SD] age, 63.0 [8.5] years) were enrolled in the off-pump group, and 1099 patients (1092 men [99.5%]; mean [SD] age, 62.5 [8.5] years) were enrolled in the on-pump group. The 10-year death rates were 34.2% (n = 378) for the off-pump group and 31.1% (n = 342) for the on-pump group (relative risk, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.99-1.11; P = .12). The median time to composite end point for the off-pump group (4.6 years; IQR, 1.4-7.5 years) was approximately 4.3 months shorter than that for the on-pump group (5.0 years; IQR, 1.8-7.9 years; P = .03). No significant 10-year treatment-related differences were documented for any other primary or secondary end points. After the removal of conversions, sensitivity analyses reconfirmed these findings.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

No off-pump CABG advantages were found for 10-year death or revascularization end points; the time to composite end point was lower in the off-pump group than in the on-pump group. For veterans, in the absence of on-pump contraindications, a case cannot be made for supplanting the traditional on-pump CABG technique with an off-pump approach.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01924442.

Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Department of Veteran Affairs' Use and Outcomes

Background Coronary artery bypass can be performed off pump (OPCAB) without cardiopulmonary bypass. However, trends over time for OPCAB versus on-pump (ONCAB) use and long-term outcome has not been reported, nor has their long-term outcome been compared. Methods and Results We queried the national Veterans Affairs database (2005-2019) to identify isolated coronary artery bypass procedures. Procedures were classified as OPCAB on ONCAB using the as-treated basis. Trend analyses were performed to evaluate longitudinal changes in the preference for OPCAB. The median follow-up period was 6.6 (3.5-10) years. An inverse probability weighted Cox model was used to compare all-cause mortality between OPCAB and ONCAB. From 47 685 patients, 6759 (age 64±8 years) received OPCAB (14%). OPCAB usage declined from 16% (2005-2009) to 8% (2015-2019). Patients with triple vessel disease who received OPCAB received a lower mean number of grafts (2.8±0.8 versus 3.2±0.8; P<0.01). The ONCAB 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates were 82.9% (82.5-83.3), 60.4% (59.8-61.1), and 37.2% (36.1-38.4); correspondingly, OPCAB rates were 80.7% (79.7-81.7), 57.4% (56-58.7), and 34.1% (31.7-36.6) (P<0.01). OPCAB was associated with increased risk-adjusted all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.15 [1.13-1.18]; P<0.01) and myocardial infarction (incident rate ratio, 1.16 [1.05-1.28]; P<0.01). Conclusions Over 15 years, OPCAB use declined considerably in Veterans Affairs medical centers. In Veterans Affairs hospitals, late all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction rates were higher in the OPCAB cohort.

Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting; is it Still Relevant?

Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (OPCAB) experienced a resurgence in the 1980s -2000s and developed steadily with improvement of the instrumentation and techniques. However questions about graft patency and long-term survival of OPCAB patients still exist. This review attempts to explore the current relevance of OPCAB.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Device-Assisted Clampless Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Compared with Conventional On-Pump Technique

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of clampless off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (C-OPCAB) compared with conventional on-pump double clamping coronary artery bypass grafting (C-CABG).

METHODS

From October 2006 to December 2011, 366 patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. After propensity score matching of preoperative variables, 143 pairs were selected who received C-OPCAB with the use of device-assisted PAS-Port proximal venous graft anastomoses or C-CABG, performed by the same surgeon experienced in both techniques. Data of the two groups of patients were retrospectively analyzed up to 14 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

As compared with C-OPCAB, in the C-CABG patients, the performed number of grafts per patient was higher (2.9 ± 0.5 vs. 2.6 ± 0.6, p-value 0.0001). At 14 years, overall survival, including in-hospital death, was 64 ± 4.7% for the C-OPCAB vs. 55 ± 5.5% for the C-CABG, freedom from overall MACCEs 51 ± 6.2% vs. 41 ± 7.7%, and from late cardiac death 94 ± 2.4% vs. 96 ± 2.2% (p-value not significant, for all comparisons). No significant statistical differences were observed in the actual rates of adverse events during follow-up. Independent predictors of survival were advanced age at operation (p-value 0.001) and a lower mean value of preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (p-value 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Our single-center study analysis suggests that clampless OPCAB using device-assisted proximal anastomoses proved to be not inferior to double-clamping CABG in the long-term follow-up, provided that involved surgeons are familiar with both techniques. These conclusions are supported by a large and long-term follow-up period, eliminating potential bias, i.e., by means of the propensity score matching and analyzing single-surgeon experience.

2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The guideline for coronary artery revascularization replaces the 2011 coronary artery bypass graft surgery and the 2011 and 2015 percutaneous coronary intervention guidelines, providing a patient-centric approach to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing coronary revascularization as well as the supporting documentation to encourage their use.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2019 to September 2019, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, CINHL Complete, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2021, were also considered. Structure: Coronary artery disease remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Coronary revascularization is an important therapeutic option when managing patients with coronary artery disease. The 2021 coronary artery revascularization guideline provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to managing patients with coronary artery disease who are being considered for coronary revascularization, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' interests.

CSA-AKI: Incidence, Epidemiology, Clinical Outcomes, and Economic Impact

Cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI) is a common complication following cardiac surgery and reflects a complex biological combination of patient pathology, perioperative stress, and medical management. Current diagnostic criteria, though increasingly standardized, are predicated on loss of renal function (as measured by functional biomarkers of the kidney). The addition of new diagnostic injury biomarkers to clinical practice has shown promise in identifying patients at risk of renal injury earlier in their course. The accurate and timely identification of a high-risk population may allow for bundled interventions to prevent the development of CSA-AKI, but further validation of these interventions is necessary. Once the diagnosis of CSA-AKI is established, evidence-based treatment is limited to supportive care. The cost of CSA-AKI is difficult to accurately estimate, given the diverse ways in which it impacts patient outcomes, from ICU length of stay to post-hospital rehabilitation to progression to CKD and ESRD. However, with the global rise in cardiac surgery volume, these costs are large and growing.