AR101 Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy

Standardizing outcomes in food allergy research: aligning clinical trials with patient priorities

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review explores the clinical outcomes used in immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated food allergy (FA) intervention studies, emphasizing unmet need for patient-centred outcomes. Standardizing outcome measurement is critical as research into FA treatments, particularly food immunotherapy, expands. Here we discuss how outcomes should reflect the multidimensional impact of FA on people's lives.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current evidence reveals a discrepancy between clinical trial outcomes and those most valued by patients and carers. While trials often prioritize changes in reactivity thresholds or immunological markers, patients and carers emphasize need in reducing severe reactions, improving quality of life, and enhancing confidence in disease management. This disparity highlights importance of harmonization efforts to guide FA research.The Core Outcome Measures for Food Allergy (COMFA) initiative recently identified two core outcomes - 'allergic symptoms' and 'quality of life' - through an international consensus process involving patients, caregivers, clinicians, and researchers. Outcomes like 'desensitization' and 'remission/sustained unresponsiveness' were considered important but were not seen as the most critical.

SUMMARY

Developing and implementing a COS for FA intervention studies is essential to align research with patient priorities, ensuring meaningful improvements in routine clinical care. Standardized outcome measurement will generate robust evidence, inform clinical practice, and empower patients and caregivers in decision-making about FA management.

Biomarker-driven drug development for allergic diseases and asthma: An FDA public workshop

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) hosted a workshop on February 22, 2024, to discuss the status of biomarkers in drug development for allergic asthma and food allergy. The workshop provided a forum for open discussion among regulators, academicians, National Institutes of Health staff and industry to inform stakeholders of the requirements for the FDA to adopt a biomarker as a surrogate end point for a clinical trial, and to inform FDA of the status of various biomarkers in development. The workshop was divided into 3 sessions: (1) FDA and European Union regulators discussing regulatory perspectives on use of biomarkers in drug development programs, (2) investigators discussing biomarkers for pediatric and adult asthma, and (3) investigators discussing biomarkers for food allergy. In this report, we review the information presented at the workshop and summarize the current status of potential biomarkers for these allergic diseases.

Antigenic determinants underlying IgE-mediated anaphylaxis to peanut

BACKGROUND

Studies of human IgE and its targeted epitopes on allergens have been very limited. We established a method to immortalize IgE-encoding B cells from patients with allergy.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to develop an unbiased and comprehensive panel of peanut-specific human IgE mAbs to characterize key immunodominant antigenic regions and epitopes on peanut allergens to map molecular interactions responsible for inducing anaphylaxis.

METHODS

Using human hybridoma technology to immortalize IgE-encoding B cells from peripheral blood of subjects with severe peanut allergy, we generated a panel of naturally occurring human IgE mAbs in an unbiased manner. Isolated IgE mAbs were characterized extensively in allergen binding assays, peptide array analysis, antigenic mapping, binding kinetic analysis, serum blocking, skin testing inhibition, and functional assessment using human FCεRI transgenic mice.

RESULTS

We created a large panel of 54 peanut-specific IgE mAbs, of which 63% were specific for Ara h 2 and/or Ara h 6. Pairs of IgE mAbs with the same antigen specificity but different binding sites were able to mediate passive systemic anaphylaxis in FCεRI transgenic mice. A single mAb targeting the repetitive motif on Ara h 2 was able to induce degranulation and anaphylaxis on its own. IgG1 switch variant immunoglobulins of the IgE mAb inhibited binding of 30% to 60% of patients' IgE to peanut extract (ImmunoCAP) and reduced peanut extract-induced skin wheal sizes by 1.6 to 7.4 mm in patients with peanut allergy.

CONCLUSION

We created a molecular map of the IgE antibody response to the most important peanut allergen proteins to enable the design of new allergy immunotherapies and vaccines.

Anaphylaxis in children: Latest insights

Background: The diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis in pediatric populations can be a particularly formidable challenge due to its variable definitions and atypical symptom presentation, which can often masquerade as other conditions. This complexity often leads to delays in early recognition and timely intervention. Most pediatric anaphylaxis guidelines emphasize the importance of identifying and avoiding triggers, ensuring accurate dosing and prompt administration of epinephrine to prevent severe complications. There is also growing scientific interest in strategies to intervene early in food allergy development to prevent allergies and protect infants and children from severe allergic reactions. Objective: This report aimed to review key aspects of the pathophysiology, epidemiology, management, and prevention of anaphylaxis in the pediatric population. Also, approved treatment modalities and future research to treat and prevent anaphylactic reactions are discussed. Methods: A review of the medical literature was conducted by using terms that included anaphylaxis, severe allergic reaction, pediatric, prevalence, desensitization, and immunotherapy. Results: Food allergies remain the leading trigger of pediatric anaphylaxis, followed by Hymenoptera venom, whereas drug allergies are less common in children compared with adults. A review of the literature underscores the importance of recognizing early signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis, particularly in preverbal infants, of identifying and eliminating key triggers and of prompt epinephrine administration in the immediate management of pediatric anaphylaxis. Advances in oral immunotherapy and other treatments (e.g., biologics) provide new management options. Notably, anti-immunoglobulin E therapy with omalizumab has shown substantial protection against reactions to accidental food exposure in children as young as 1 year old and with food allergy. Conclusion: This report explores critical aspects of anaphylaxis that affect allergic diseases in infants and children. Gaining a deeper understanding of age-specific triggers and the diverse symptoms of anaphylaxis will significantly enhance diagnosis, treatment, and prevention strategies, ultimately improving the timeliness of interventions. Recent approvals of novel therapies for food allergies, along with promising developments for future treatment and prevention of anaphylaxis in pediatric populations, hold exciting potential for better management of these conditions.

Long-Term Safety of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy in Peanut-Allergic Children: An Open-Label Active Treatment (REALISE Study)

BACKGROUND

Owing to limited treatment options for peanut allergy, patients remain at risk for allergic reactions due to accidental exposure. Epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) is a novel treatment being investigated for peanut allergy.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed long-term safety of EPIT with VIASKIN peanut patch 250 μg (VP250) via an open-label extension of the REAL Life Use and Safety of EPIT (REALISE) trial.

METHODS

REALISE was a phase 3 trial in peanut-allergic children aged 4 through 11 years that included a 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment phase, followed by an open-label, single-arm, active treatment period for up to 36 months.

RESULTS

Of the 392 participants (male 54.8%; median age 7.2 y) who received at least 1 dose of treatment, 77.8% completed the 36-month active treatment. Mean adherence to treatment was high at 96.4%. Most participants (98.7%) experienced at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); the majority were mild or moderate and decreased in frequency and severity over time. Most participants (94.6%) experienced at least 1 treatment-related TEAE. Local skin reactions were the most common treatment-related TEAE with the incidence decreasing from year 1 (87.8%) to year 3 (19.2%). Serious treatment-related TEAEs were reported in 2 participants. No specific safety signals were identified in the 14 participants enrolled with a history of severe anaphylaxis (Anaphylaxis Staging System grade 3).

CONCLUSION

Consistent with previous phase 3 studies, long-term EPIT with VIASKIN peanut patch 250 μg was well tolerated with high adherence in peanut-allergic children aged 4 through 11 years (clinicaltrials.gov; NCT: NCT02916446).

Synthetic and Biogenic Materials for Oral Delivery of Biologics: From Bench to Bedside

The development of nucleic acid and protein drugs for oral delivery has lagged behind their production for conventional nonoral routes. Over the past decade, the evolution of DNA- and RNA-based technologies combined with the innovation of state-of-the-art delivery vehicles for nucleic acids has brought rapid advancements to the biopharmaceutical field. Nucleic acid therapies have the potential to achieve long-lasting effects, or even cures, by inhibiting or editing genes, which is not possible with conventional small-molecule drugs. However, challenges and limitations must be addressed before these therapies can provide cures for chronic conditions and rare diseases, rather than only offering temporary relief. Nucleic acids and proteins face premature degradation in the acidic, enzyme-rich stomach environment and are rapidly cleared by the liver. To overcome these challenges, various delivery vehicles have been developed to transport therapeutic compounds to the intestines, where the active compounds are released and gut microbiota and mucosal immune system also play an important role. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the promises and pitfalls associated with the oral route of administration of biologics, current delivery systems, applications of orally delivered therapeutics, and the challenges and considerations for translation of nucleic acid and protein therapeutics into clinical practice.

Oral Immunotherapy in Peanut-Allergic Adults Using Real-World Materials

BACKGROUND

Peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT) has shown effectiveness in achieving desensitization of children; however, evidence in adults is lacking.

METHODS

This phase II trial evaluated peanut OIT in peanut-allergic adults using real-world peanut products. A Simon's minimax two-stage design, incorporating a stop:go for futility, was employed. A separate untreated control group was also recruited for comparison of mechanistic parameters. Participants underwent baseline double-blind placebo-control food challenges (DBPCFC) with peanut protein doses of 0.3 to 300 mg. Reacting participants were initiated on daily OIT with 2-weekly updosing until reaching a maintenance dose of 1000 mg (four large peanuts). The primary outcome was the proportion of OIT participants who tolerated a cumulative dose of 1.4 g peanut protein during exit DBPCFC (doses provided 0.3-3000 mg).

RESULTS

Twenty-one adults (8 female; mean age 24.2 years [SD 4.9]) were enrolled in the OIT group, with 67% achieving the daily maintenance dose and meeting the primary endpoint. Three withdrew due to adverse reactions, and a further three did not complete the trial for reasons unrelated to OIT. The median tolerated dose increased from 30 mg (equivalent to approximately 1/8th of a peanut) to 3000 mg (12 peanuts) at the exit challenge, representing a 100-fold increase (p < 0.0001). OIT was associated with an improvement in QoL measures. Suppression of peanut skin prick test sizes and induction of peanut-specific IgG were observed in OIT but not in control participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Peanut OIT appears to be an efficacious treatment for adults with peanut allergy. Further studies are needed for confirmation and to characterize safety profiles in different adult subgroups.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Grown Up Peanut Immunotherapy (GUPI) study; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03648320.

Elucidation of Desensitization Mechanisms Induced by Oral Immunotherapy in a Rat Model of Ovalbumin Allergy

Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a promising approach for treating food allergy. Here, we elucidated the mechanisms of desensitization induced by OIT in rats sensitized to ovalbumin (OVA). The desensitization was induced by ingestion of OVA three times per week after sensitization in rats. OIT suppressed the decrease in rectal temperature and increase in plasma histamine levels induced by OVA injection immediately and 4 weeks after OIT completion. Plasma OVA-specific IgE (sIgE) levels did not differ between the non-OIT and OIT groups, but OVA-specific IgG1 levels were higher in the OIT group than in the non-OIT group at both timepoints. To evaluate IgG's effect on IgE crosslinking with OVA, amplified luminescence proximity homogeneous assay involving crosslinking (AlphaCL) was performed. When IgG was removed using a Protein G column, the AlphaCL signal was significantly increased, especially in the OIT group, indicating that OIT-induced IgG inhibited the sIgE response. The proportions of cluster of differentiation (CD)4+ cells and CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ cells in mesenteric lymph nodes and spleen were similar between the two groups. These findings indicate that OIT attenuates systemic allergic responses by inhibiting sIgE binding to OVA through increased IgG. Our model is useful for understanding the mechanisms of OIT and optimizing therapeutic strategies for ameliorating food allergies.

Baseline basophil activation and early suppression is associated with clinical outcome after peanut sublingual immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) was recently shown to safely induce desensitization and remission of peanut allergy in 1- to 4-year-old children.

OBJECTIVE

Basophil activation has been shown to be suppressed in allergen-specific immunotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the timing of basophil suppression during peanut SLIT and its impact on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 50 children with peanut allergy were enrolled in a peanut SLIT trial and randomized to active peanut or placebo SLIT for 36 months followed by a 3-month avoidance period to evaluate remission. To measure basophil activation by CD63 and CD203c, blood was collected at baseline and again at 12, 24, 36, and 39 months.

RESULTS

For participants receiving peanut SLIT, basophil activation based on CD63 expression was significantly reduced by 12 months and continued to decrease throughout peanut SLIT, whereas CD63 activation in participants receiving placebo remained unchanged from 0 to 36 months. CD203c expression remained unchanged for both peanut SLIT and placebo participants throughout the trial. Actively treated participants who achieved remission had lower CD63 expression at baseline and significant suppression of CD63 expression by 12 months, whereas participants who failed treatment had higher CD63 expression at baseline and lack of suppression by 12 months. Lower basophil activation in those achieving remission, compared to those who failed treatment, remained present for up to 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Following peanut SLIT, participants who achieved remission had significantly suppressed basophil activation by 12 months compared to unsuccessful participants who were not desensitized, suggesting that early suppression of basophils may be indicative of peanut SLIT efficacy.

Clinical studies in Myxomatous Mitral Valve Disease dogs: most prescribed ACEI inhibits ACE2 enzyme activity and ARB increases AngII pool in plasma

The hypertension patient population has doubled since 1990, affecting 1.3 billion globally and >75% live in low-and middle-income countries. Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEI) and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) are the most prescribed drugs (>160 million times in the US), but mortality increased >30% since 1990s globally. Clinical relevance of Myxomatous Mitral Valve Disease (MMVD) is directly linked to WHO group 2 pulmonary hypertension, with no disease specific therapies. Therefore, MMVD pet dogs with elevated systolic blood pressure treated with ACEI/ARB, were supplemented with oral ACE2 enzyme and Angiotensin1-7 (Ang1-7) bioencapsulated in plant cells. The oral ACE2/Ang1-7 was well tolerated by healthy and MMVD dogs with no adverse events and increased sACE2 activity by 670-755% with ARB (Telmisartan) than with ACEI (Enalapril) background therapy. In vitro rhACE2 activity was inhibited >90% by ACEIs enalapril/benazeprilat at higher doses but lisinopril inhibited at much lower doses. Membrane ACE2 activity evaluated in exosomes was 43-fold higher than the sACE2 and this was also inhibited 211% by ACEI, when compared to ARB. Background ACEI treatment reduced the Ang-II pool by 11-20-fold and proportionately decreased the abundance of Ang1-7 + Ang1-5 peptides. In contrast, ARB treatment increased Ang-II pool 11-20-fold and Ang1-7 + Ang1-5 by 160-260%. Systolic blood pressure was regulated by ARB better than ACEI, despite very high Ang-II levels. This first report on evaluation of metabolic pools in the RAS pathway identifies surprising interactions between ACEI/ARB/ACE2 and significant changes in key molecular dynamics. Affordable biologics developed in plant cells may offer potential new treatment options for hypertension.

The ethics of food allergy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ethical dilemmas are a common occurrence in the provision of care to individuals with food allergies. Thus, an understanding of medical ethics is essential for allergists/immunologists.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the importance of medical ethics in the clinical practice of food allergy, there has been little published on this topic. Some international allergy societies have published ethical guidelines. Further investigation on medical ethics in food allergy is required.

SUMMARY

This review describes key ethical principles in relation to food allergy testing, oral food challenges, and various management strategies, including avoidance, omalizumab and oral immunotherapy. This review demonstrates the necessity for education and research on medical ethics in food allergy.

Evolving Food Allergy Clinical Trials to Become More Patient-Centered

The current US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) paradigm may not fully capture important patient-centered outcomes or measure a primary outcome that is truly meaningful to patients. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are standardized tools measuring the patient's experience in food allergy clinical trials, which can help support shared decision-making (SDM) and further our understanding of treatment impact. Food allergy PROMs include quality of life (QoL), health state utility (HSU), severity, and self-efficacy measures. Currently, FDA registration trials for product approval only consider a fixed increase in allergen threshold from pre-to-post intervention as a primary outcome (vs a more flexible "X-fold" increase not accounting for an upper and lower specific threshold), though many use QoL as a secondary outcome for patient-centered assessment of treatment impact. Currently used QoL PROMs were not designed to measure change on therapy nor measure HSU (eg, quantitative risk a patient may be willing to take to improve their current health), which can be used to determine therapy value. Although the current paradigm for primary and secondary outcomes in food allergy clinical trials was appropriate at the early stages of food allergy therapy development when conceived in the late 2000s and early 2010s, in the 2020s, these outcome choices risk being stagnant and outdated. As such, the current paradigm for food allergy outcomes should evolve to incorporate more patient-centered primary outcome measures that patient data indicate are meaningful, so outcomes more realistically reflect a therapy's impact. This evolution will better support SDM discussions as patients consider their therapy options and can inform new product development.

Efficacy of omalizumab in food allergic adults - A retrospective analysis

Background

IgE-mediated food allergy poses a significant public health concern, currently with no approved therapies for adults in Europe. Omalizumab (OMA) used as monotherapy or in conjunction with oral immunotherapy (OIT) has been suggested as an efficacious treatment for severe food allergy. The aim of this study was to analyze real-world data from food-allergic patients treated with OMA.

Methods

We included food-allergic patients treated with OMA between 2002 and 2022 throughout Europe. Treatment responders (TR) were identified based on the unresponsiveness to related food allergens (determined by food challenge), reduction in the severity of food allergy and absence of anaphylactic reactions.

Results

Sixty-two patients (female n = 39/62, 62.9%; mean age 30.6 years) were included into this analysis, most of whom were polysensitized to more than 2 food allergens (n = 40/62, 64.5%); 45/62 patients (72.6%) received OMA in conjunction with OIT, while the remaining patients underwent OMA monotherapy. The eliciting food allergens were tree nuts (n = 27/62, 43.5%), cow's milk (n = 26/62, 41.9%), and vegetables (n = 25/62, 40.3%). In most cases, OMA was initiated with 300 mg q4w (n = 51/62, 82.3%) dosing. Treatment was tolerated exceptionally well.Fifty-two (52/62) patients (83.9%) were classified as treatment responders. Six (6/62) patients (9.7%) developed unresponsiveness, 6/62 (9.7%) had a reduction of the severity of food allergy, and 40/62 (64.5%) had no further anaphylactic reactions during treatment. One (1/62) patient (1.6%) undergoing monotherapy was a non-responder, exhibiting repeated anaphylactic reactions to accidental exposures, and 10/62 patients (16.1%) reported anaphylactic reactions during treatment. In most of these cases, cofactors (n = 5/10, 50%) were present.

Conclusion

Our real-world evidence data indicate efficacy and tolerability of OMA for the treatment of IgE-mediated food allergy with and without OIT. As the onset of food related reactions upon treatment was frequently linked to the presence of cofactors, these should be identified and considered in patients with food allergy-not only for diagnosis, but also in treatment settings.

Oral Immunotherapy Should Play a Key Role in Preschool Food Allergy Management

Food allergies pose significant challenges including the risk for severe allergic reactions. This review article highlights the advantages and disadvantages of the historic standard management approach-avoidance and carrying epinephrine in case of accidental ingestion-and argues, based on accumulating evidence, that oral immunotherapy (OIT) should play a key role in preschool food allergy management. Firstly, our review will highlight pitfalls with the 'wait-and-see' approach to natural resolution of food allergies, with recent data pointing to lower resolution than previously thought. For those who do not outgrow their allergies, waiting until school age to offer OIT means missing the window of opportunity where OIT is safest, and prolongs unnecessary dietary restrictions. For those who do outgrow their allergies, research indicates they may not reintroduce the food due to fear and aversion and can become re-sensitised, putting them at risk of severe reactions. Secondly, the risks associated with allergen avoidance are higher than previously believed. Allergen avoidance is imperfect and carries an increased risk of severe reactions when compared with the risk of severe reactions while on OIT, particularly in preschoolers. Although an allergic reaction can be stressful, it is preferable to have this occur during OIT where caregivers are vigilant following a scheduled dose, rather than having this occur at a potentially unexpected time following an accidental exposure. Lastly, there is a growing body of evidence supporting favourable safety and effectiveness of OIT in preschoolers, and preliminary data suggesting higher likelihood of remission in infants. OIT has the potential to significantly improve quality of life, and future research is needed to answer this important question in preschoolers. In summary, while ongoing research will further clarify cost-effectiveness, long-term adherence and psychosocial impacts of OIT, this review suggests that OIT should play a key role in preschool food allergy management.

Updates in Food Anaphylaxis Management

The management of food allergy has evolved over the past several years with regulatory approval of food allergy therapeutics as well as the common practice of oral immunotherapy. Whether a patient or family chooses one of these therapies or avoidance, they are still considered at risk of reaction, and thus clinicians still need to stay up to date with the latest advancements in the management of anaphylaxis in patients with food allergy. This review will highlight some of these updates, starting with the definition, diagnosis, and classifications of anaphylaxis. It will then review the latest updates in the management of food anaphylaxis in the community. Finally, the review will discuss the latest in epinephrine including recommendations on epinephrine dosing and novel routes of epinephrine administration.

Treatment of Food Allergy: Immunotherapy, Omalizumab, or Both

Food allergy is a common disease that has substantial impacts on the quality of life of patients and their families, and all reactions have the potential for causing life-threatening anaphylaxis. Food-allergic individuals currently have 2 Food and Drug Administration- approved therapeutic options available to them aside from life-long allergen avoidance: oral immunotherapy (OIT) and omalizumab. OIT for food allergy has been extensively studied in clinical trials and currently provides the greatest level of protection; however, it also has a high burden of treatment. Studies suggest that more successful OIT outcomes may be attained with earlier intervention; however, early OIT presents its own challenges. Omalizumab, recently Food and Drug Administration-approved, is a biologic targeting IgE, a major driver of allergic reactions. In contrast to OIT, omalizumab monotherapy offers a low treatment burden therapeutic option that provides a safety net against reactions to accidental ingestion of multiple allergens. In addition, omalizumab has been investigated as an adjunct to OIT, improving the speed and safety of single-allergen or multiallergen OIT. Here, we discuss the clinical use of these therapeutic options and provide a guide for shared decision making between patients and physicians about what therapeutic option might be more appropriate.

Randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 1 safety study of oral mucosal immunotherapy in adults with peanut allergy

BACKGROUND

Oral mucosal immunotherapy (OMIT) involves the use of a specifically formulated toothpaste to deliver allergenic proteins to immunologically active areas of the oral cavity. This represents a novel delivery mechanism with several features designed to improve food allergy desensitization. OMIT has advantages over other approaches to allergy immunotherapy due to its targeted delivery and simplified administration.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety, tolerability, and adherence to OMIT with INT301 in adults with peanut allergy.

METHODS

The Oral Mucosal Escalation Goal Assessment study enrolled 32 adults, aged 18 to 55 years, with peanut allergy in a 3:1 ratio to receive either an escalating dose of INT301 or a placebo. Entry criteria included a positive skin prick test result with a wheal diameter greater than or equal to 3 mm than control and/or peanut-specific IgE level greater than or equal to 0.35 kU/L. Subjects were required to fail an oral food challenge less than or equal to 100 mg dose of peanut protein. Safety and tolerability were monitored in the 48-week trial period.

RESULTS

All active subjects (100%) tolerated the prespecified protocol at the highest dose. No moderate or severe systemic reactions were observed in the active participants. Nonsystemic adverse reactions were mostly local (oral and nasal cavities), mild and transient. Active subjects adhered to the treatment for 97% of the days in the study, with no withdrawals due to study medication.

CONCLUSION

In the Oral Mucosal Escalation Goal Assessment trial, INT301 met all primary and secondary end points of safety, tolerability, and adherence. Thus, OMIT seems to be a safe and convenient option for individuals with food allergies. These results support the need for further evaluation in the pediatric population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04603300.

Infant and Toddler Peanut Oral Immunotherapy: Initiation Before Age 2 Increases Ad Libitum Peanut Consumption

BACKGROUND

Peanut oral immunotherapy (POIT) has promising potential of disease modification, but there are no studies to date evaluating high-dose POIT, leading to ad libitum (ad lib) consumption of peanut products, especially in children 6 months to 4 years of age.

OBJECTIVE

To report real-world outcomes of high-dose POIT in children 6 months to 4 years of age, including adverse events, achievement of ad lib consumption, and the impact of age on these outcome measures.

METHODS

Patients 6 months to 4 years of age with a diagnosis of peanut allergy were enrolled in a POIT protocol with a goal dose of 3000 mg. Demographics along with POIT and clinical outcomes 6 months after POIT are reported.

RESULTS

Sixty children, with a median age of 16 months, started POIT. Three (5%) were lost to follow-up, and 6 (10%) discontinued POIT because of recurrent adverse events or the inability to consume daily peanut protein. Fifty-one (85%) children completed POIT in a median of 7 months and were consuming ad lib peanut products for a duration of 6 months after completion of the POIT protocol. Sixteen (26.7%) children experienced a total of 22 adverse reactions during POIT. Initiating POIT before 24 months of age increased the likelihood of ad lib peanut consumption by an odds ratio of 11.69 (1.19-114.31, P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that high-dose POIT in infants and toddlers is well tolerated and can lead to ad lib introduction of dietary peanut products into the diet, especially if initiated before 2 years of age.

Moving Beyond Desensitization to Tolerance in Food Allergy

Management of IgE-mediated food allergy is shifting from reactive management strategies (allergen avoidance and ready access to autoinjectable epinephrine in case of exposure) to proactive therapies. These therapies are in various stages of clinical development and implementation; the two main approaches include allergen-specific or active therapies (induce the immune system to produce a protective response to the allergen; eg, Food and Drug Administration-approved AR101/Palforzia (peanut [Arachis hypogaea] Allergen Powder-dnfp; PTAH, also known as AR101) (Aimmune Therapeutics, Inc., Brisbane, CA) for peanut allergy), and allergen-agnostic, passive therapies (provide the body with the tools needed to suppress immediate hypersensitivity reactions in a nonspecific manner; eg, Food and Drug Administration-approved omalizumab). These therapies provide a similar degree of protection, specifically desensitization (increased reaction threshold while receiving food allergy therapy, bite safety), but differ in mechanisms, dosing protocols, and side effects. The goals of therapeutics in development are shifting to sustained unresponsiveness or remission (absence of clinical reactivity after allergen and food allergy therapy avoidance, typically for weeks to months) and tolerance (no clinical reaction or free ingestion of the allergen). As the food allergy management repertoire expands, important considerations in selecting a therapy will be patient-specific and include mode of delivery, dosing regimens, side-effect profiles, and goals or outcomes. The role of shared decision making and implementation strategies to support equitable access across patient populations and clinical contexts will be critical to move an increasing number of patients beyond desensitization to tolerance, if they wish.

New approaches in childhood IgE-mediated food allergy treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to provide an overview of the current and future treatment options for children with food allergies (FAs), highlighting the latest research findings and the potential impact of these new approaches on improving patients' and caregivers' quality of life.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the last decade, many promising approaches have emerged as an alternative to the standard avoidance of the culprit food with the risk of severe accidental reactions. Desensitization through oral immunotherapy has been introduced in clinical settings as a therapeutic approach, and more recently also omalizumab. In addition, alternative routes of administration for immunotherapy, other biologics, small molecules, probiotics or prebiotics, microbiota transplantation therapy, IGNX001, and PVX108 are being investigated.

SUMMARY

The portfolio of available treatment options for food allergies is increasing but several relevant unmet needs remain. This review aims to provide a brief overview of the existing and future treatment options for IgE-mediated food allergies.

Epicutaneous immunotherapy: A review of safety and efficacy

Epcutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) is a novel, non-oral route of allergen immunotherapy, utilizing the skin and its robust density of epidermal Langerhans cells (LC) for antigen presentation. This space is non-vascularized and impermeable, which limits allergen exposure into the bloodstream but preserves antigen presentation to regional lymph nodes to generate gut-homing regulatory T cells. The EPIT patch utilizes natural water loss from the skin to absorb electrosprayed allergen through condensation. EPIT represents an alternative, non-oral route of immunotherapy for food allergy, with good efficacy and strong safety profiles across multiple phase 2 and 3 studies for milk and peanut. Efficacy appears the best in very young children (1-3 years old), which has been shown to continue to enhance with extended treatment duration up to 36 months. Efficacy in slightly older children ages 4-11 years of age is less clear, but appears to be better in children ages 4-7 years of age. In clinical trials of milk and peanut EPIT, most subjects experienced adverse effects, mainly mild-to-moderate skin reactions localized around the patch placement site, which improve with continued duration of wear. Rates of treatment-related anaphylaxis have been very low across all studies and ages, ranging from 1.6% to 4%, and were lowest in the infant and toddler population. While further studies of safety (1- to 3-year-olds) and efficacy (4- to 7-year-olds) are ongoing, EPIT is a potentially valuable addition to the current landscape of food allergy therapies, in particular for infants and toddlers where families may be seeking a non-oral route of treatment.

Dupilumab as an Adjunct to Oral Immunotherapy in Pediatric Patients With Peanut Allergy

BACKGROUND

Peanut allergy is a common, life-threatening food allergy in children. We evaluated whether dupilumab, which blocks the activity of interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13, enhances the efficacy of oral immunotherapy (OIT) AR101 in pediatric patients with peanut allergy.

METHODS

A Phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study was conducted in the USA (NCT03682770) in pediatric patients (6-≤ 17 years old) with confirmed peanut allergy. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive dupilumab + OIT or placebo + OIT during a 28-40-week up-dosing period. Patients in the dupilumab + OIT group were re-randomized 1:1 and received dupilumab + OIT or placebo + OIT during 24-week OIT maintenance, undergoing a 2044 mg (cumulative) of peanut protein double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) following up-dosing, maintenance, and at 12-week post-treatment follow-up.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 148 patients, 123 of whom were included in the modified full analysis set, with a mean age of 11.1 years. Dupilumab + OIT treatment (n = 84) led to a 20.2% increase (p < 0.05) in the number of patients who passed a DBPCFC to 2044 mg (cumulative) of peanut protein following the up-dosing period versus placebo (OIT alone, n = 39). Following the OIT maintenance period, continuous dupilumab treatment improved the number of patients who passed a DBPCFC to 2044 mg (cumulative) of peanut protein versus patients continuously on OIT alone (16.6% difference [95% CI -9.7, 42.8], p = 0.2123). Safety was consistent with known dupilumab safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Dupilumab provided a modest increase efficacy of OIT in children and adolescents with peanut allergy, though it did not provide protection against OIT-related anaphylaxis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03793608.

Peanut Oral Immunotherapy in Children with High-Threshold Peanut Allergy

BACKGROUND

Approved therapeutics for peanut allergy are not designed for the many patients with allergic reactions to more than one peanut.

METHODS

We randomly assigned (1:1) participants 4 to 14 years of age reacting to a challenge of between 443 mg and 5043 mg of peanut protein to peanut oral immunotherapy (P-OIT) using home-measured peanut butter versus peanut avoidance. The primary end point was the difference between groups in the proportion tolerating a two-dose-level increase or 9043 mg of peanut protein. For ingestion participants tolerating 9043 mg, sustained unresponsiveness (tolerance off treatment) was tested after 16 weeks of ad lib ingestion followed by 8 weeks of abstinence.

RESULTS

Of 73 participants, 38 were randomly assigned to P-OIT and 35 to avoidance. Thirty-two of 38 participants in the ingestion group (84.2%) and 30 of 35 in the avoidance group (85.7%) underwent the primary outcome food challenge. The primary analysis with prespecified multiple imputation for missing values showed 100% success for ingestion versus 21.0% for avoidance (between-group difference, 79.0 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 64.6 to 93.5; P<0.001). All 32 treated and 3 out of 30 avoiders (10%) tolerated 9043 mg. In the intention-to-treat analysis, sustained unresponsiveness occurred in 68.4% (26/38) on P-OIT versus 8.6% (3/35) tolerating 9043 mg among those avoiding (between-group difference, 59.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 42.4 to 77.3). No dosing reactions were greater than grade 1 severity, and no serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial of P-OIT using store-bought, home-measured peanut versus peanut avoidance in high-threshold peanut allergy, those treated achieved significantly higher rates of desensitization with a durable response off treatment. (Funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [UL1TR004419] and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious [U19AI136053]; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03907397.).

Baseline epitope-specific IgE profiles are predictive of sustained unresponsiveness or high threshold 1-year post oral immunotherapy in the POISED trial

BACKGROUND

Results from the POISED trial suggest that discontinuation of peanut oral immunotherapy can increase the risk of regaining clinical reactivity to peanut.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether patients who achieved sustained unresponsiveness (SU) or sustained high threshold (SHT) have different baseline sequential epitope-specific IgE profiles than patients who achieved transient desensitization.

METHODS

Subjects in the POISED trial (NCT02103270) were randomized to peanut (n = 95) or placebo (n = 25) for 24 months. Oral immunotherapy-desensitized subjects were then assigned to no peanut (PN-0) (n = 51) or 300 mg peanut (PN-300) (n = 30) for 12 months. SU and SHT were determined by subjects in PN-0 and PN-300, respectively, passing 4000-mg peanut oral challenge. Specific IgE and IgG4 levels to peanut; Ara h 1, Ara h 2, and Ara h 3 proteins; and 64 allergenic epitopes were measured. We developed machine learning models with bootstrap simulations using baseline data to predict SU/SHT.

RESULTS

Of 80 (84%) subjects who were desensitized to peanut, 13% (n = 8) and 37% (n = 13) achieved SU/SHT in PN-0 and PN-300 groups. Decreases in epitope-and protein-specific IgE levels and increases in IgG4 levels were observed during 2 years of oral immunotherapy. At baseline, patients with SU in PN-0, but not PN-300, group had lower epitope-specific IgE and protein-specific IgE levels compared with the transient desensitization group. A machine learning model with 12 baseline epitope-specific IgEs and age could predict SU/SHT with accuracy of 94%, area under the curve 0.97, sensitivity 1.00, and specificity 0.91.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects who achieved SU/SHT had different baseline protein- and epitope-specific IgE profiles than subjects with transient desensitization. These profiles may help identify patients with an increased likelihood of achieving SU/SHT.

Prophylactic Peanut Allergen Ara h 6 Sublingual Immunotherapy Drives Expansion of FoxP3 +Helios- Regulatory T Cells in the Absence of Allergen-Specific IgA

Insights into the underlying immunological mechanisms of prophylactic sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) may support the development of new strategies for improved prevention and treatment of food allergy. Here, we investigated the humoral, regulatory and sublingual tissue immune response to prophylactic SLIT administration of a single purified peanut allergen in Brown Norway (BN) rats. BN rats received daily sublingual administration of peanut allergen Ara h 6 for three weeks. Suppression of sensitisation was evaluated by subsequent intraperitoneal administration of Ara h 6. Ara h 6-specific IgE, IgA, IgG1 and IgG2a-c levels were measured in serum. The frequency of regulatory T (Treg) cells was analysed using flow cytometry. The sublingual tissue response to Ara h 6 was analysed by transcriptional profiling using mRNA-sequencing. Ara h 6 SLIT protected rats from subsequent sensitisation without inducing a detectable humoral immune response (Ara h 6-specific IgE, IgA, IgG1 and IgG2a-c) in serum. SLIT furthermore promoted the relative expansion of induced Helios- Treg cells within the conventional CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Treg population in sublingual draining lymph nodes and blood. In conclusion, prophylactic Ara h 6 SLIT drives the relative expansion of induced Helios- Treg cells in the absence of Ara h 6-specific IgA highlighting a potential novel IgA-independent Treg-related immune response at the sublingual mucosal site.

Peanut Genotypes with Reduced Content of Immunogenic Proteins by Breeding, Biotechnology, and Management: Prospects and Challenges

Peanut allergies affect millions of people worldwide, often causing life-threatening reactions and necessitating strict avoidance. Recent advancements in oral immunotherapy, such as Palforzia™, and IgE-mediated treatments (e.g., Xolair), have improved care options; however, their high costs limit accessibility and widespread utility. To address these challenges, researchers are employing conventional breeding and advanced molecular tools, such as CRISPR editing, to develop peanut lines with reduced levels of major allergenic proteins (Ara h1, Ara h2, Ara h3, and Ara h6). These reduced-immunogenicity genotypes retain their agronomic viability, flavor, and nutritional quality to some extent, offering the potential for cost-effective oral immunotherapy and safe food options for use in public spaces by non-allergic individuals. Rigorous evaluation, including immunological assays and human feeding trials, is essential to confirm their effectiveness in reducing allergic reactions. Adoption will depend on the establishment of clear regulatory guidelines, stakeholder education, and transparent communication of the benefits and risks. With sustained research, public trust, and supportive policies, reduced-immunogenicity peanuts could substantially lower the global burden of peanut allergies. This communication examined the impact of peanut allergies worldwide and explored strategies to develop peanut genotypes with reduced allergen content, including conventional breeding and advanced genetic engineering. It also addressed the challenges associated with these approaches, such as policy and regulatory hurdles, and outlined key requirements for their successful adoption by farmers and consumers.

Food oral immunotherapy

Food oral immunotherapy (OIT) is an option for the treatment of immunoglobin E (IgE)-mediated food allergy that involves administering gradually increasing doses of an allergenic food over time (under medical supervision) with the goal of desensitizing an individual to the food allergen. Current Canadian clinical practice guidelines for OIT recommend this form of therapy as an option in patients with food allergy. The intervention should be prioritized in the infant and toddler population, in which it is particularly well tolerated and can lead to sustained unresponsiveness (also sometimes referred to as remission). In this article, we provide an overview of OIT and discuss the role non-allergist clinicians can play in caring for patients undergoing OIT.

Roads to remission: evolving treatment concepts in type 2 inflammatory diseases

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) characterised by type 2 inflammation, including asthma, allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, atopic dermatitis, food allergies and eosinophilic esophagitis, are increasing in prevalence worldwide. Currently, there is a major paradigm shift in the management of these diseases, towards the concept of disease modification and the treatment goal remission, regardless of severity and age. Remission as a treatment goal in chronic inflammatory NCDs was first introduced in rheumatoid arthritis, and then adopted in other non-type 2 inflammatory diseases. Among diseases with type 2 Inflammation, this concept is novel and currently most advanced in asthma. This new paradigm has been developed based on a better understanding of the pathophysiology of type 2 inflammation and the advent of highly effective drugs selectively interfering with type 2 pathways. Here, we review the evolution of the new remission concepts in type 2 inflammatory diseases and discuss associated challenges and future research needs.

Funding

None.

Maternal supplementation with α-tocopherol inhibits the development of offspring food allergy, H1R signaling and ultimately anaphylaxis early in life

Food allergy has had a rapid rise in prevalence, and thus it is important to identify approaches to limit the development of food allergy early in life. Because maternal dietary supplementation with α-tocopherol (α-T), an isoform of vitamin E, during pregnancy and nursing increases neonate plasma levels of α-T and can limit neonate development of other allergies, we hypothesized that α-T can limit development of food allergy. To assess this, male mice with mutations in their skin barrier genes (FT-/- mice) were mated with wild-type females that received a diet supplemented with α-tocopherol or a control diet. Starting at postnatal day 3, these FT+/- pups were sensitized 4 to 5 times over 2.5 weeks by skin co-exposure to the food allergen peanut extract (PNE) and the environmental allergen Alternaria alternata (Alt). Control pups were exposed to saline, PNE only or Alt only. Supplementation with α-T blocked Alt+PNE sensitization (anti-PNE-specific IgE), without blocking Alt+PNE-stimulated skin IL33, Areg, OSM, CCL11, TSLP or plasma MCPT1. However, supplementation with α-T blocked mast cell activation, the increase in plasma histamine in Alt+PNE sensitized pups, histamine receptor stimulation of endothelial PKCα signaling, and ultimately oral PNE-induced anaphylaxis in Alt+PNE sensitized mice. Thus, maternal supplementation with α-tocopherol reduced development of food allergy and anaphylaxis in neonates. These results have implications for supplementation of mothers with α-tocopherol to limit development of food allergy in neonates with skin barrier mutations.

ADP101 multifood oral immunotherapy for food-allergic patients: Harmony phase 1/2 randomized clinical trial

Background

Oral immunotherapy is an established approach to desensitize the immune system in the context of allergic disease; however, the only currently approved product is for peanut allergy. ADP101 is a novel, pharmaceutical-grade, multifood oral immunotherapy in development to simultaneously treat single or multiple food allergies, containing allergenic proteins from 15 foods in equal parts by protein weight.

Objective

The phase 1/2 Harmony trial (NCT04856865) evaluated efficacy and safety of ADP101 in participants with qualifying allergy to 1 to 5 foods in ADP101, defined as dose-limiting symptoms with a ≤100 mg challenge dose during double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC).

Methods

Participants were randomized to low-dose (1500 mg/d; 100 mg protein per food) or high-dose (4500 mg/d; 300 mg protein per food) ADP101, or matched placebo, with dose escalation followed by daily maintenance dosing over 40 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants tolerating a ≥600 mg challenge dose of a single qualifying food without dose-limiting symptoms at the Week 40 Exit DBPCFC (ie, responders).

Results

In the primary analysis population (61 pediatric participants aged 4-17 years), a greater response rate was observed in both the high-dose ADP101 (55.0%) and low-dose ADP101 (38.1%) groups compared with pooled placebo (20.0%) (nominal P = .048, P = .306, respectively; adjusted for multiple comparisons, P = .097, P = .306, respectively). Desensitization to ≥2 foods was observed in individuals with multiple food allergies, as was desensitization at levels over 600 mg. ADP101-treated participants showed an overall reduction in skin-prick test reactivity, with an increase in maximum tolerated dose across the majority of foods tested. Adverse events were mostly mild or moderate, with no life-threatening events or deaths.

Conclusions

The study did not meet its primary endpoint, but ADP101 demonstrated a favorable safety profile and increased the reactive threshold in DBPCFC in pediatric participants with single or multiple food allergies across multiple endpoints, warranting further clinical investigation.

Allergen-Encapsulating Nanoparticles Reprogram Pathogenic Allergen-Specific Th2 Cells to Suppress Food Allergy

Food allergy is a prevalent, potentially deadly disease caused by inadvertent sensitization to benign food antigens. Pathogenic Th2 cells are a major driver for disease, and allergen-specific immunotherapies (AIT) aim to increase the allergen threshold required to elicit severe allergic symptoms. However, the majority of AIT approaches require lengthy treatments and convey transient disease suppression, likely due to insufficient targeting of pathogenic Th2 responses. Here, the ability of allergen-encapsulating nanoparticles to directly suppress pathogenic Th2 responses and reactivity is investigated in a mouse model of food allergy. NPs associate with pro-tolerogenic antigen presenting cells, provoking accumulation of antigen-specific, functionally suppressive regulatory T cells in the small intestine lamina propria. Two intravenous doses of allergen encapsulated in poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles (NPs) significantly reduces oral food challenge (OFC)-induced anaphylaxis. Importantly, NP treatment alters the fates of pathogenic allergen-specific Th2 cells, reprogramming these cells toward CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory and CD73+FR4+ anergic phenotypes. NP-mediated reductions in the frequency of effector cells in the gut and mast cell degranulation following OFC are also demonstrated. These studies reveal mechanisms by which an allergen-encapsulating NP therapy and, more broadly, allergen-specific immunotherapies, can rapidly attenuate allergic responses by targeting pathogenic Th2 cells.

Challenges in designing interventions for food insecure families with food allergy in a Californian latinx cohort

Food allergy poses substantial social, economic, and quality of life burdens which are even heavier for families that are struggling with food insecurity. In the United States (US), food insecurity disproportionately affects vulnerable and historically marginalized communities, such as Latino/a/x and Black households. Targeting these disparities via our recent Food Equality Initiative (FEI) research intervention was challenging due to the barriers faced by the target underserved populations, which included poor digital literacy, language barriers, and limited access to necessary resources. These barriers hindered our efforts to promote access to nutritious and safe food options for food-insecure families, potentially further exacerbating health disparities. Here we discuss common challenges and opportunities associated with conducting research interventions in underserved communities in the US-leveraging our experiences designing and implementing an intervention to improve food allergy management through supplemental nutrition assistance in a predominantly Spanish-speaking, lower-income neighborhood in Northern California. We also provide recommendations for other researchers regarding how to tailor research strategies to address these challenges, and in so doing reduce health disparities and promote positive health outcomes for vulnerable and historically marginalized communities.

Effects of Food Processing on Allergenicity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is an increasing awareness among clinicians that industrial and household food processing methods can increase or decrease the allergenicity of foods. Modification to allergen properties through processing can enable dietary liberations. Reduced allergenicity may also allow for lower risk immunotherapy approaches. This review will equip physicians, nurses, dieticians and other health care providers with an updated overview of the most clinically oriented research in this field. We summarize studies assessing the allergenicity of processed foods through clinically accessible means, such as oral food challenges, skin prick tests, and sIgE levels.

RECENT FINDINGS

Baking, boiling, canning, fermenting, pasteurizing, peeling, powdering, and roasting heterogenously impact the likelihood of reactivity in egg-, milk-, peanut- and other legume-, tree nut-, fruit-, and seafood-allergic patients. These variations may be due to the use of different temperatures, duration of processing, presence of a matrix, and the specific allergens involved, among other factors. Accurate prediction of tolerance to processed allergens with skin prick tests and sIgE levels remains largely elusive. Food allergy management strategies, especially with milk and egg, have capitalized on the decreased allergenicity of baking. Many milk- and egg-allergic patients tolerate baked and heated forms of these allergens, and the use of these processed foods in oral immunotherapy (OIT) continues to be extensively investigated. Heat is also well recognized to reduce allergic symptoms from some fruits and vegetables in food-pollen syndrome. Other forms of processing such as boiling, fermenting, and canning can reduce allergenicity to a diverse array of foods. Roasting, on the other hand, may increase allergenicity. The application of food processing to food allergy treatments remains largely unexplored by large clinical studies and provides a key avenue for future research. The recognition that food allergy represents a spectrum of hypersensitivity, rather than an all-or-nothing phenomenon, has led to approaches to enable dietary liberation with processed, less-allergenic foods and their use in food allergy immunotherapies.

Epicutaneous immunotherapy for food allergy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is ongoing debate about the safety and efficacy of epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) in treating food allergies. The systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EPIT.

METHODS

We systematically searched international trial registers (ClinicalTrials.gov), PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science from the inception of the database until June 25, 2023. Two authors independently screened potential studies based on the following criteria: food allergy, epidermal immunotherapy, and randomized controlled trials(RCTs). The risk-of-bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias 2 (ROB 2) tool. The primary outcomes included desensitization, local adverse events, systemic adverse events, and quality of life. Secondary outcomes included epinephrine utilization, topical medication utilization, and severe adverse events. We assessed certainty of evidence by the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Ten studies involving 1970 participants were included. Ten high-quality RCTs focusing on peanut allergy and cow's milk allergy were included in the analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that EPIT promoted desensitization in patients with food allergy (RR 2.11, 95% CI 1.72-2.58; I 2 = 0%, high certainty), particularly in aged ≤ 11 years (RR 3.84, 95% CI 2.39-6.26; I 2 = 34%). Additionally, treatment duration ≥ 52 weeks was found to increase immune tolerance (RR 3.37, 95% CI 2.39-4.75; I 2 = 13%). Patients who undergo EPIT treatment not only raised the local adverse reactions (RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.10-2.41; I 2 = 82%, low certainty) but also raised systemic adverse reactions (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.01-2.28; I 2 = 0%, high certainty).

CONCLUSION

After EPIT treatment, patients with food allergy can effectively increase their immune tolerance to food. However, it also significantly increases mild-to-moderate anaphylaxis. There is limited data on the impact of EPIT on quality of life and other food allergic diseases, indicating a need for further research.

Anti-IgE and food allergy

Food allergy is a growing problem that can have a significant impact on both the individual, the family, and society. We are entering a new era of food allergy management with the recent US Food and Drug Administration approvals of 2 therapies for food allergy. IgE is now known to play a critical role in allergic diseases, including food allergy. Ant-IgE therapy has been under investigation for decades and is now approved for asthma, urticaria, nasal polyps, and most recently, IgE-mediated food allergy. Here, we evaluate what is known about the safety and efficacy of anti-IgE therapy as monotherapy and in combination with oral immunotherapy. In addition, we will highlight important practical considerations and key knowledge gaps.

Food allergy yardstick: Where does omalizumab fit?

Food allergy management has greatly evolved in the last several years, moving from passive approaches, such as strict food allergen avoidance, to more active treatments, including regulatory approval of the first specifically indicated immunotherapy product (for peanut) in 2020. In 2024, a second therapy, omalizumab, received regulatory approval for the treatment of 1 or more IgE-mediated food allergies, providing clinicians with multiple treatment options to offer patients and families. With this expanded armamentarium of food allergy treatment options, the practicing clinician requires detailed knowledge of benefits and risks of omalizumab, how omalizumab fits into the management landscape, and how to use shared decision-making to optimize therapy. This yardstick aims to provide the clinician with a review of data leading to omalizumab's food allergy indication and an evidence-based expert opinion approach regarding on how best to use this and other therapies available to optimize patient management.

Addressing health disparities in food allergy: A Position Statement of the AAAAI Prior Authorization Task Force

Self-reported food allergies (FAs) affect approximately 8% of the US pediatric and approximately 10% of the adult population, which reflects potentially disproportionate increases among ethnically and racially minoritized groups. Multiple gaps and unmet needs exist regarding FA disparities. There is reported evidence of disparities in FA outcomes, and the FA burden may also be disproportionate in low-income families. Low family income has been associated with higher emergency care spending and insecure access to allergen-free food. Pharmacoinequity arises in part as a result of structural racism still experienced by historically marginalized populations today. Historically redlined communities continue to experience greater rates of neighborhood-level air pollution and indoor allergen exposure, lack of transportation to medical appointments, poverty, and lower prescription rates of necessary medications. Clinical research needs racially and ethnically diverse participation to ensure generalizability of research findings and equitable access to medical advances, but race reporting in clinical trials has been historically poor. Addressing health disparities in FA is a priority of clinical care, with professional organizations such as the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology having a prominent role to play in mitigating the challenges faced by these individuals. In this position statement we recommend some key steps to address this important issue.

Food Allergy Genetics and Epigenetics: A Review of Genome-Wide Association Studies

In this review, we provide an overview of food allergy genetics and epigenetics aimed at clinicians and researchers. This includes a brief review of the current understanding of genetic and epigenetic mechanisms, inheritance of food allergy, as well as a discussion of advantages and limitations of the different types of studies in genetic research. We specifically focus on the results of genome-wide association studies in food allergy, which have identified 16 genetic variants that reach genome-wide significance, many of which overlap with other allergic diseases, including asthma, atopic dermatitis, and allergic rhinitis. Identified genes for food allergy are mainly involved in epithelial barrier function (e.g., FLG, SERPINB7) and immune function (e.g., HLA, IL4). Epigenome-wide significant findings at 32 loci are also summarized as well as 14 additional loci with significance at a false discovery of < 1 × 10-4. Integration of epigenetic and genetic data is discussed in the context of disease mechanisms, many of which are shared with other allergic diseases. The potential utility of genetic and epigenetic discoveries is deliberated. In the future, genetic and epigenetic markers may offer ways to predict the presence or absence of clinical IgE-mediated food allergy among sensitized individuals, likelihood of development of natural tolerance, and response to immunotherapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Children With Peanut Allergy: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase II Study

BACKGROUND

Peanut allergy is a potentially life-threatening food allergy in children. This study explored whether dupilumab, a human monoclonal immunoglobulin (Ig)G4 antibody that blocks the activity of interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13, improved safety and desensitization to peanut exposure in children with peanut allergy.

METHODS

A Phase II, 24-week, multicenter, single-arm, open-label, proof-of-concept study was conducted in the USA and Canada (NCT03793608). Children/adolescents with peanut allergy received subcutaneous dupilumab 300 mg (≥ 60 kg) or 200 mg (≥ 20 to < 60 kg) every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants who passed a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) with ≥ 444 mg (cumulative) of peanut protein at week 24. Secondary endpoints included safety measures (Consortium of Food Allergy Research grading system) and change from baseline in peanut-specific (ps)-IgG4, total IgE, and ps-IgE.

RESULTS

Twenty-four participants enrolled and received dupilumab: 75.0% were male, 79.2% were white, mean (standard deviation) age was 11.7 (3.3) years. Most (95.8%) participants had not received allergen immunotherapy. Two participants (8.3%) achieved the primary endpoint and passed the DBPCFC at week 24. Fifteen participants (62.5%) reported 66 treatment-emergent adverse events, all being mild or in moderate intensity. At the week 24 DBPCFC, 8 participants (33.3%) had a grade 2 allergic reaction (no grade 3 or above); 10 (41.7%) used adrenaline as a rescue medication. Dupilumab treatment resulted in a median reduction of total and ps-IgE of -54% and -49%, respectively, and a 0% change in ps-IgG4.

CONCLUSIONS

Dupilumab monotherapy treatment for 24 weeks did not improve desensitization to peanut exposure after food challenge.

Dietary fiber pectin alters the gut microbiota and diminishes the inflammatory immune responses in an experimental peach allergy mouse model

Since therapeutic options are limited the utilization of prebiotics is suggested to prevent food allergies (FAs). Using an experimental peach allergy model we explored the effect of dietary fiber pectin, a high-methoxyl heteropolysaccharide, on the manifestation of FA. CBA/J mice were sensitized, subsequently orally boosted and provoked with peach peel extract. For dietary intervention, mice were fed a pectin containing diet before (primary-preventive) or after (secondary-preventive) sensitization. Non-treated allergic and sham-treated mice were fed a diet containing 20% cellulose. Fecal microbiota, humoral and intestinal immune cell responses were analyzed. Pectin remarkably affected the gut microbiota composition and diversity, promoting mainly the growth of Bacteroides. The frequency of mast cells, macrophages, and CD3+T cells in the lamina propria of the small intestine was reduced, whereas the frequency of B cells and CD4+T cell subpopulation was enhanced. Pectin intervention in the primary-preventive stetting significantly triggered serum IgA levels, whereas production of IgE and mMCPT-1 was reduced. Remarkably, in both settings peach allergen-specific IgG1/IgG2a ratio and specific IgE were significantly reduced to baseline. The data suggest, that dietary supplementation of pectin in both intervention approaches can diminish inflammatory responses and signs of allergic immune responses, accompanied by alteration of the gut microbiota composition.

Upper airway comorbidities of asthma

Asthma, characterized as a chronic heterogeneous airway disease, often presents with common comorbid conditions. The concept of "one airway, one disease" was coined more than 20 years ago, emphasizing the connection between asthma and upper airway comorbidities (UACs) such as allergic or nonallergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps, and aspirin/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease. Since then, numerous studies have demonstrated that UACs are closely related and affect asthma phenotypes. Recognizing these UACs and managing them are crucial aspects of comprehensive asthma care. Addressing these conditions as part of asthma treatment can lead to better control of symptoms, improved lung function, and better quality of life. Moreover, it is important to explore the field of respiratory biologics, which represents the latest advancements in medical treatment options for patients with asthma and UACs.

Improving Adherence Through Collaboration and Care Coordination in the Management of Food Allergies and Asthma

Food allergies and asthma significantly impact individual health and global health care systems. Despite established management protocols for asthma and the emerging use of oral immunotherapy for food allergy, adherence to treatments remains a challenge for health care professionals and patients. This review explores the differences in adherence required of asthma and food-allergy treatments and strategies to improve adherence. We highlight the role of collaborative care coordination among health care professionals in enhancing adherence in asthma and food-allergy management and improving patient outcomes.

Probiotics as adjuvants to mitigate adverse reactions and enhance effectiveness in Food Allergy Immunotherapy

In the past decades, food allergies became increasingly dominant since early childhood, leading to a lower quality of life and to increasing costs addressed by the health care system. Beside standard avoidance of specific allergens and drug treatments following allergen exposure, a great deal of research has lately focused on Food Allergy Allergen Immunotherapy (FA-AIT). SCIT and EPIT (Subcutaneous and Epicutaneous Immunotherapy), OIT (Oral Immunotherapy), and SLIT (Sublingual Immunotherapy) consist in gradual exposure to allergens to desensitize and achieve tolerance once therapy has ended. Although promising, FA-AIT may bring acute local and systemic adverse reactions. To enhance efficacy, safety and convenience of AIT, the quest of potential adjuvants to mitigate the adverse reactions becomes crucial. Immunomodulatory activities, such as that of increasing the regulatory T cells and decreasing the IgE, have been observed in specific probiotics' strains and multiple studies elucidated the role of gut microbiota as a major interplayer among the host and its immune system. In this review, the microbiome modulation is shown as potential AIT adjuvant, nevertheless the need of more clinical studies in the near future is pivotal to assess the efficacy of targeted bacterial therapies and faecal microbiota transplantation.

T follicular helper cells in food allergy

T follicular helper (Tfh) cells help direct the production of antibodies by B cells. In addition to promoting antibody responses to vaccination and infection, Tfh cells have been found to mediate antibody production to food antigens. Work over the past decade has delineated the specific phenotypes of Tfh cells that induce antibodies to food while also clarifying the divergent Tfh cell requirement for different food-specific antibody isotypes. Furthermore, Tfh and antibody responses to food can occur at multiple barrier sites - namely, skin, airway, and gut. Depending on the context of food antigen exposure, the immune response to food at these sites can be protective, as in the case of tolerance or immunotherapy, or pathogenic, as in the case of allergy. This review will highlight recent advances in our understanding of how Tfh cells promote antibodies to food as well as future avenues for continued discovery.

Characterization of the Gut and Skin Microbiome over Time in Young Children with IgE-Mediated Food Allergy

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The prevalence of food allergy (FA) in children is increasing. Dysbiosis of the microbiome has been linked to FA but needs to be better understood. We aimed to characterize the gut and skin microbiome of young food-allergic children over time and within different types of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated FA.

METHODS

We studied 23 patients, as a pilot study of an ongoing prospective multicenter cohort study including children < 2y with newly diagnosed IgE-mediated FA. Samples (feces/skin swabs) were collected at enrollment and at 1-year follow-up and sequenced for the bacterial 16S rRNA gene (hypervariable v1-v2 region).

RESULTS

Gut and skin bacterial diversity was significantly higher in patients compared with controls and increased over time (beta test, Shannon diversity, p < 0.01). Within different types of IgE-mediated FA, bacterial diversity was similar. Community composition differed significantly over time and within IgE-mediated FA types (PERMANOVA: p < 0.01). Several significantly different genus abundances were revealed. We observed a positive correlation between high total IgE and a high abundance of the genus Collinsella in patients with a higher number of allergies/sensitizations (≥3), and patients with tree nut and/or peanut allergy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed an increased bacterial diversity in children with FA compared with non-atopic children. Importantly, the gut and skin microbiome differed in their composition over time and within different types of IgE-mediated FA. These findings contribute to the understanding of microbiome changes in children with FA and indicate the potential of the genus Collinsella as a biomarker for tree nut and/or peanut allergy and possibly for allergy persistence.

AAAAI-EAACI PRACTALL: Standardizing oral food challenges-2024 Update

This common statement of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI) and The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) provides an update of the 2012 published guidelines on food challenges. The guidelines equally address food challenges in the research and the clinical settings. They first address the diagnostic tests which can guide the decision to conduct a challenge. Safety of food challenges is prime, and the various procedures and safety issues as well as medications potentially involved in challenges are extensively discussed. Challenges are suggested to be conducted with semi-logarithmic incremental doses based on the protein content, typically for IgE-mediated food allergy with intervals of 20-30 min between doses. Specific protocols for other types of reactions such atopic dermatitis or gastrointestinal food allergy are detailed separately. Proper stopping criteria are essential in order to reduce the risk of false-positive diagnoses, but also severe reactions. The guidelines recommend criteria based on "go on," "stop," or "observation." These revised guidelines will clearly provide much needed guidance for food challenges in the research and clinical settings. They will continue to evolve with new diagnostic tests or new needs in the field of food allergy.