Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy in lung cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the treatment mode of lung cancer, extending the survival time of patients unprecedentedly. Once patients respond to ICIs, the median duration of response is usually longer than that achieved with cytotoxic or targeted drugs. Unfortunately, there is still a large proportion of lung cancer patients do not respond to ICI. Effective biomarkers are crucial for identifying lung cancer patients who can benefit from them. The first predictive biomarker is programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), but its predictive value is limited to specific populations. With the development of single-cell sequencing and spatial imaging technologies, as well as the use of deep learning and artificial intelligence, the identification of predictive biomarkers has been greatly expanded. In this review, we will dissect the biomarkers used to predict ICIs efficacy in lung cancer from the tumor-immune microenvironment and host perspectives, and describe cutting-edge technologies to further identify biomarkers.

Immunotherapy resistance in solid tumors: mechanisms and potential solutions

While the emergence of immunotherapies has fundamentally altered the management of solid tumors, cancers exploit many complex biological mechanisms that result in resistance to these agents. These encompass a broad range of cellular activities - from modification of traditional paradigms of immunity via antigen presentation and immunoregulation to metabolic modifications and manipulation of the tumor microenvironment. Intervening on these intricate processes may provide clinical benefit in patients with solid tumors by overcoming resistance to immunotherapies, which is why it has become an area of tremendous research interest with practice-changing implications. This review details the major ways cancers avoid both natural immunity and immunotherapies through primary (innate) and secondary (acquired) mechanisms of resistance, and it considers available and emerging therapeutic approaches to overcoming immunotherapy resistance.

Risk and safety profile in checkpoint inhibitors on non-small-cel lung cancer: A systematic review

Treating non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has gained increased importance in recent years due to the high mortality rate and dismal five-year survival rate. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are a promising approach with exceptional outcomes in NSCLC thanks to the antigenic nature of cells. Conversely, immune system over-stimulation with ICI is a double-edged sword that can lead to various negative effects ranging from mild to life-threatening. This review explores current breakthroughs in nanoparticle-based ICI and their limitations. The PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were examined for relevant publications. Thirty-eight trials (N = 16,781) were included in the analyses. The mixed effects analyses on quantifying the treatment effect contributed significantly to the subgroups within studies for ICI treatment effect. Models confirmed ICI's higher impact on treatment effectivity and the decrease in respondents' mortality compared to conventional treatment regiments. ICI might be used as first-line therapy due to their proven effectiveness and safety profile.

BioKGrapher: Initial evaluation of automated knowledge graph construction from biomedical literature

Background The growth of biomedical literature presents challenges in extracting and structuring knowledge. Knowledge Graphs (KGs) offer a solution by representing relationships between biomedical entities. However, manual construction of KGs is labor-intensive and time-consuming, highlighting the need for automated methods. This work introduces BioKGrapher, a tool for automatic KG construction using large-scale publication data, with a focus on biomedical concepts related to specific medical conditions. BioKGrapher allows researchers to construct KGs from PubMed IDs. Methods The BioKGrapher pipeline begins with Named Entity Recognition and Linking (NER+NEL) to extract and normalize biomedical concepts from PubMed, mapping them to the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS). Extracted concepts are weighted and re-ranked using Kullback-Leibler divergence and local frequency balancing. These concepts are then integrated into hierarchical KGs, with relationships formed using terminologies like SNOMED CT and NCIt. Downstream applications include multi-label document classification using Adapter-infused Transformer models. Results BioKGrapher effectively aligns generated concepts with clinical practice guidelines from the German Guideline Program in Oncology (GGPO), achievingF 1 -Scores of up to 0.6. In multi-label classification, Adapter-infused models using a BioKGrapher cancer-specific KG improved microF 1 -Scores by up to 0.89 percentage points over a non-specific KG and 2.16 points over base models across three BERT variants. The drug-disease extraction case study identified indications for Nivolumab and Rituximab. Conclusion BioKGrapher is a tool for automatic KG construction, aligning with the GGPO and enhancing downstream task performance. It offers a scalable solution for managing biomedical knowledge, with potential applications in literature recommendation, decision support, and drug repurposing.

PI3K/AKT/mTOR and PD‑1/CTLA‑4/CD28 pathways as key targets of cancer immunotherapy (Review)

T cells play an important role in cancer, and energy metabolism can determine both the proliferation and differentiation of T cells. The inhibition of immune checkpoint molecules programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) are a promising cancer treatment. In recent years, research on CD28 has increased. Although numerous reports involve CD28 and its downstream PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling mechanisms in T cell metabolism, they have not yet been elucidated. A literature search strategy was used for the databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library to ensure broad coverage of medical and scientific literature, using a combination of keywords including, but not limited to, 'lung cancer' and 'immunotherapy'. Therefore, the present study reviewed the interaction and clinical application of the PD-1/CTLA-4/CD28 and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways in T cells, aiming to provide a theoretical basis for immunotherapy in clinical cancer patients.

Racial/ethnic differences in survival and treatment response with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) remains under investigation, particularly about its effectiveness across different ethnicities. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the potential benefits of adding PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors for treatment, stratified by ethnicity.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the use of PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors to treat patients with resectable NSCLC. The outcomes evaluated were disease-free survival/event-free survival (DFS/EFS), major pathological response (MPR), and pathological complete response (pCR). Hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed for all endpoints using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models. Statistical analyses were performed with R Software, version 4.2.3.

RESULTS

A total of six RCTs comprising 3,827 patients with NSCLC were included. In populations of Asian descent, PD1/PD-L1 significantly improved DFS/EFS (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.44-0.78), MPR (RR 5.76; 95% CI 3.58-9.28), and pCR (RR 25.00; 95% CI 6.17-101.36). Similarly, patients of European ancestry experienced significantly improved DFS/EFS (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.65-0.90), MPR (RR 2.75; 95% CI 2.00-3.77), and pCR (RR 4.53; 95% CI 2.69-7.6) with PD1/PD-L1 therapy. Notably, patients with mixed ethnicity also demonstrated significant improvement in MPR (RR 4.05; 95% CI 2.60-6.33) and pCR (RR 8.44; 95% CI 3.75-19.00) when receiving PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive meta-analysis suggests that incorporating PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors into treatments offers a promising benefit for patients with resectable NSCLC, regardless of ethnicity. Future studies with in-depth molecular characterization of patients can further refine these findings and potentially guide the development of personalized treatment strategies based on individual ethnic backgrounds.

Adjuvant immunotherapy in patients with resected gastric and oesophagogastric junction cancer following preoperative chemotherapy with high risk for recurrence (ypN+ and/or R1): European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 1707 VESTIGE study

BACKGROUND

Patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma with tumour-positive lymph nodes (ypN+) or positive surgical margins (R1) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection are at high risk of recurrence. Adjuvant nivolumab is effective in oesophageal/oesophagogastric junction cancer and residual pathological disease following chemoradiation and surgery. Immune checkpoint inhibition has shown efficacy in advanced gastroesophageal cancer. We hypothesised that nivolumab/ipilimumab would be more effective than adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk (ypN+ and/or R1) patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

VESTIGE was an academic international, multicentre, open-label, randomised phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of adjuvant nivolumab/ipilimumab versus chemotherapy in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma at high risk of recurrence. Patients were randomised 1:1 to receive standard adjuvant chemotherapy (same regimen as neoadjuvant) or nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg IV every 6 weeks for 1 year. Key inclusion criteria included ypN+ and/or R1 status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival in the intent-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, loco-regional and distant failure rates and safety according to NCI-CTCAE v5.0.

FINDINGS

The independent Data Monitoring Committee reviewed data from 189 of the planned 240 patients in June 2022 and recommended stopping recruitment due to futility. At the time of final analysis, median follow-up was 25.3 months for 195 patients (98 nivolumab/ipilimumab and 97 chemotherapy). Median disease-free survival for the nivolumab/ipilimumab group was 11.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.4-16.8 months) versus 20.8 months (95% CI, 15.0-29.9 months) for the chemotherapy group, HR 1.55 (95% CI, 1.07- 2.25, one-sided P=0.99). The 12-month disease-free survival rates were 47.1% and 64.0%, respectively. There were no toxicity concerns or excess early discontinuations.

INTERPRETATION

Nivolumab/ipilimumab did not improve disease-free survival compared to chemotherapy in patients with ypN+ and/or R1 gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery.

Insight of immune checkpoint inhibitor related myocarditis

As the understanding of immune-related mechanisms in the development and progression of cancer advances, immunotherapies, notably Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs), have become integral in comprehensive cancer treatment strategies. ICIs reactivate T-cell cytotoxicity against tumors by blocking immune suppressive signals on T cells, such as Programmed Death-1 (PD-1) and Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte Antigen-4 (CTLA-4). Despite their beneficial effects, ICIs are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), manifesting as autoimmune side effects across various organ systems. A particularly alarming irAE is life-threatening myocarditis. This rare but severe side effect of ICIs leads to significant long-term cardiac complications, including arrhythmias and heart failure, and has been observed to have a mortality rate of up to 50% in affected patients. This greatly limits the clinical application of ICI-based immunotherapy. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of the current knowledge regarding the diagnosis and management of ICI-related myocarditis. We also discuss the utility of preclinical mouse models in understanding and addressing this critical challenge.

Overcoming tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in lung cancer brain metastasis with CTLA4 blockade

Lung cancer brain metastasis (LCBM) poses a significant clinical challenge due to acquired resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. To elucidate its underlying mechanisms, we employed single-cell RNA sequencing analysis on surgically obtained LCBM samples with diverse genetic backgrounds and TKI treatment histories. Our study uncovers that TKI treatment elevates the immune checkpoint CTLA4 expression in T cells, promoting an immune-suppressive microenvironment. This immunomodulation is initiated by tumor-derived HMGB1 in response to TKIs. In LCBM syngeneic murine models with TKI-sensitive or TKI-resistant EGFR mutations, combining CTLA4 blockade with TKIs demonstrates enhanced efficacy over TKI monotherapy or TKIs with PD1 blockade. These findings provide insights into the TKI resistance mechanisms and highlight the potential of CTLA4 blockade in effectively overcoming TKI resistance in LCBM.

Immunotherapeutic and Targeted Strategies for Managing Brain Metastases from Common Cancer Origins: A State-of-the-Art Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review examines contemporary strategies for managing brain metastases (BM) from common cancers such as lung, breast, and melanoma. We evaluate the efficacy and applicability of targeted therapies and immunotherapies, exploring their potential to cross the blood-brain barrier and improve patient outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have shown that tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and ADCs effectively treat BM. These treatments can overcome the challenges posed by the blood-brain barrier and improve therapeutic outcomes. ADCs are promising because they can deliver cytotoxic agents directly to tumor cells, which reduces systemic toxicity and increases drug delivery efficiency to the brain. Personalized medicine is becoming increasingly significant in treatment decisions, with biomarkers playing an essential role. Advances in molecular genetics and drug development have led to more refined treatments, emphasizing the precision medicine framework. The management of BM is evolving, driven by drug efficacy, resistance mechanisms, and the need for personalized medicine. Integrating ADCs into treatment regimens represents a significant advancement in targeting metastatic brain tumors. Despite these advances, BM management still presents considerable challenges, requiring ongoing research and multi-institutional trials to optimize therapeutic strategies. This review outlines the current state and future directions in treating BM, highlighting the critical need for continued innovation and comprehensive clinical evaluations to improve survival rates and quality of life for affected patients.

Comparison of immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy or ipilimumab plus nivolumab-based therapy for NSCLC patients with PD-L1 TPS (1-49 %): TOPGAN2023-01

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy is now a standard treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether ICI plus chemotherapy (ICI-chemo) or ipilimumab plus nivolumab (I-N)-based therapy is superior for patients with NSCLC with a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) of 1-49 % has not been evaluated.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included NSCLC patients with a TPS score of 1-49 %, who began first-line chemotherapy. Propensity score matching analysis was used to adjust for various confounders and evaluate treatment efficacy.

RESULTS

A total of 401 patients were enrolled, of whom 308 received ICI-chemo and 93 received I-N-based therapy. The median OS was 21.0 months in the ICI-chemo group and 20.0 months in the I-N-based therapy group. After propensity score matching, there was no difference in OS or PFS between the ICI-chemo group and the I-N-based therapy group (OS: hazard ratios (HR), 0.83; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.54-1.26, PFS: HR, 0.72; 95 % CI, 0.52-1.00). Among PD-L1 TPS 25-49 %, there was a tendency for OS to be favorable for the ICI-chemo group (OS: HR, 0.30; 95 % CI, 0.09-0.85). Treatment discontinuation occurred for 26.2 % of the patients in the ICI-chemo group and 41.9 % in the I-N-based therapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among PD-L1 TPS 1-49 %, there was no significant difference in survival outcomes between the ICI-chemo group and the I-N-based therapy group. Based on the results of a subgroup analysis, ICI-chemo may be superior for treating NSCLC with a TPS of 25-49 %.

Long-Term Clinical, Radiological, and Mortality Outcomes Following Pneumonitis in Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Retrospective Analysis

AIMS

Despite known short-term mortality risk of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) pneumonitis, its impact on 1-year mortality, long-term pulmonary function, symptom persistence, and radiological resolution remains unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 71 nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with anti-PD(L)1 monoclonal antibodies between 2018-2021, who developed pneumonitis. Clinical and demographic covariates were collected from electronic medical record. Cox regression assessed associations with mortality, while logistic regression evaluated associations with persistent symptoms, hypoxemia, and radiological resolution.

RESULTS

Steroid-refractory pneumonitis (hazard ratio [HR] = 15.1, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]:3.9-57.8, P < .0001) was associated with higher 1-year mortality compared to steroid-responsive cases. However, steroid-resistant (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, 95% CI: 0.4-5.1, P = .58) and steroid-dependent (OR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.1-1.2, P = .08) pneumonitis were not. Nonadenocarcinoma histology (OR = 6.7, 95% CI: 1.6-46.6, P = .01), grade 3+ pneumonitis (OR = 4.6, 95% CI: 1.3-22.7, P = .03), and partial radiological resolution (OR = 6.3, 95% CI: 1.8-23.8, P = .004) were linked to increased pulmonary symptoms after pneumonitis resolution. Grade 3+ pneumonitis (OR = 8.1, 95% CI: 2.3-31.5, P = .001) and partial radiological resolution (OR = 5.45, 95% CI: 1.29-37.7, P = .03) associated with residual hypoxemia. Nonadenocarcinoma histology (OR = 3.6, 95% CI: 1.01-17.6, P = .06) and pretreatment ILAs (OR = 4.8, 95% CI: 1.14-33.09, P = .05) were associated with partial radiological resolution.

CONCLUSIONS

Steroid refractory pneumonitis increases 1-year mortality in NSCLC patients. Pretreatment ILAs may signal predisposition to fibrosis-related outcomes, seen as partial resolution, which in turn is associated with postresolution symptoms and residual hypoxemia. These findings offer insights for identifying patients at risk of adverse outcomes post-pneumonitis resolution.

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer with untreated brain metastases: A multicenter single-arm phase 2 trial (NIke, LOGiK 2004)

BACKGROUND

The effect of dual immunotherapy combined with platinum-based chemotherapy on untreated brain metastases derived from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has remained unclear.

METHODS

This multicenter single-arm phase 2 study enrolled patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced NSCLC and at least one brain metastasis ≥ 5 mm in size that had not been previously treated. Patients received nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined with platinum-doublet chemotherapy (two cycles), followed by nivolumab-ipilimumab alone. The primary endpoint of the study was intracranial response rate as determined by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) for brain metastases of ≥ 5 mm as target lesions.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients from 18 institutions was enrolled in this study. The median age was 66.5 years (range, 47-83 years), and 26 patients (87 %) had a non-squamous cell carcinoma histology. The median size of all target brain lesions was 8.4 mm, with a range of 5-39 mm. The intracranial response rate assessed by modified RECIST was 50.0 % (95 % CI, 33.2-66.8 %), with the rate of complete response being 20.0 %, and the study met its primary endpoint. The systemic response rate was 53.3 % (95 % CI, 36.1-69.8 %), and responses for intracranial and extracranial lesions were generally consistent. The median intracranial progression-free survival was 8.1 months, and both the median intracranial duration of response and time to brain radiotherapy were not reached.

CONCLUSION

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy showed promising intracranial activity in NSCLC patients with untreated brain metastases.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

jRCT071210019.

Spatial multiplex analysis of lung cancer reveals that regulatory T cells attenuate KRAS-G12C inhibitor-induced immune responses

Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS)-G12C inhibition causes remodeling of the lung tumor immune microenvironment and synergistic responses to anti-PD-1 treatment, but only in T cell infiltrated tumors. To investigate mechanisms that restrain combination immunotherapy sensitivity in immune-excluded tumors, we used imaging mass cytometry to explore cellular distribution in an immune-evasive KRAS mutant lung cancer model. Cellular spatial pattern characterization revealed a community where CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and dendritic cells were gathered, suggesting localized T cell activation. KRAS-G12C inhibition led to increased PD-1 expression, proliferation, and cytotoxicity of CD8+ T cells, and CXCL9 expression by dendritic cells, indicating an effector response. However, suppressive regulatory T cells (Tregs) were also found in frequent contact with effector T cells within this community. Lung adenocarcinoma clinical samples showed similar communities. Depleting Tregs led to enhanced tumor control in combination with anti-PD-1 and KRAS-G12C inhibitor. Combining Treg depletion with KRAS inhibition shows therapeutic potential for increasing antitumoral immune responses.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line treatment for brain metastases in stage IV NSCLC patients without driver mutations

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) therapy with or without chemotherapy has been established as the first-line treatment for patients with non-oncogene addicted advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Yet some clinical settings, such as the treatment sequence in patients with brain metastases, have barely been evidenced. Although ICIs cannot directly cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), evidence suggests that BBB damage could allow ICIs into the central nervous system, or that they can have an indirect effect on the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and cause an anti-tumor response. Pivotal phase III trials have included a highly selected population but offer few data on these patients. Here we first review how ICIs can indirectly shape the brain metastases microenvironment through different mechanisms, and some possible causes of ICIs resistance. We also analyze the evidence reported in pivotal phase III trials and phase II trials focused on NSCLC brain metastases for first-line treatment, and the evidence for upfront or delayed local brain therapy. Finally, we discuss the best evidence-based approach to treat NSCLC patients with brain metastases and propose future research.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for NSCLC in patients with different age: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This article is a Meta-analysis aiming to systematically evaluate the difference in efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by age.

METHODS

We performed a Meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials concerning for patients with NSCLC by age. We compared overall survival among three groups (age <65 years, age 65-75 years, age ≥75 years). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were collected and pooled.

RESULTS

A total of 10,291 patients from 17 RCTs were included. In the group under age 65 years, immune checkpoint inhibitor can significantly prolong the overall survival of patients with NSCLC (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.66∼0.81, P < 0.00001). In the age 65-75 years group, immune checkpoint inhibitors prolonged overall survival in patients with NSCLC (HR = 0.78, 95% CI:0.71∼0.84, P < 0.00001). However, it has no significant effect on the overall survival of NSCLC patients (HR = 0.88, 95% CI:0.72∼1.08, P > 0.05) in the group older than 75 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Immune checkpoint inhibitors prolonged the overall survival of NSCLC patients in the age <65 years group and the age 65-75 years group, but in the age ≥75 years group, there was no significant effect on overall survival. This may be related to innate immune and adaptive immune dysregulation due to "immunosenescence" in older patients.

Comparison of platinum combination chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab versus platinum combination chemotherapy plus nivolumab-ipilimumab for treatment-naive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Japan (JCOG2007): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

The combination of platinum-based chemotherapy and an antibody to PD-1 or to its ligand PD-L1, with or without an antibody to CTLA-4, has improved the survival of individuals with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, no randomised controlled trial has evaluated the survival benefit of adding a CTLA-4 inhibitor to platinum-based chemotherapy plus a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor.

METHODS

This open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial was conducted at 48 hospitals in Japan. Eligible patients were aged 20 years or older with previously untreated advanced NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients with known driver oncogenes were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive platinum-based chemotherapy (four cycles) plus pembrolizumab (pembrolizumab group) or platinum-based chemotherapy (two cycles) plus nivolumab-ipilimumab (nivolumab-ipilimumab group). The primary endpoint was overall survival and assessed in all randomly assigned patients on an intention-to-treat basis. The trial is registered in the Japan Registry for Clinical Trials, jRCTs031210013, and is now closed to new enrolment and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between patient accrual initiation on April 6, 2021, and discontinuation of the trial on March 30, 2023, 11 (7%) of 148 patients in the nivolumab-ipilimumab group had a treatment-related death. Because of the high number of treatment-related deaths, patient accrual was terminated early, resulting in 295 patients (236 [80%] male and 59 [20%] female) enrolled; the primary analysis was done on the basis of 117 deaths (fewer than the required 329 deaths). By May 25, 2023 (data cutoff), overall survival did not differ significantly between the nivolumab-ipilimumab group and the pembrolizumab group (median 23·7 months [95% CI 17·6-not estimable] vs 20·5 months [17·6-not estimable], respectively; hazard ratio 0·98 [90% CI 0·72-1·34]; p=0·46). Non-haematological adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in 87 (60%) of 146 patients in the nivolumab-ipilimumab group and 59 (41%) of 144 patients in the pembrolizumab group. The pembrolizumab group tended to have a better quality of life compared with the nivolumab-ipilimumab group.

INTERPRETATION

The safety and efficacy data suggest an unfavourable benefit-risk profile for nivolumab-ipilimumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy relative to pembrolizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC, although a definitive conclusion awaits an updated analysis of overall survival.

FUNDING

The National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund and Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development.

Treatment-Switching Adjustment of Overall Survival in CheckMate 227 Part 1 Evaluating First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Chemotherapy for Metastatic Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVES

CheckMate 227 (NCT02477826) evaluated first-line nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 1% or < 1% and no EGFR/ALK alterations. However, many patients randomized to chemotherapy received subsequent immunotherapy. Here, overall survival (OS) and relative OS benefit of nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab were adjusted for potential bias introduced by treatment switching.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Treatment-switching adjustment analyses were conducted following the NICE Decision Support Unit Technical Support Document 16, for CheckMate 227 Part 1 OS data from treated patients (database lock, July 2, 2019). Inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) was used in the base-case analysis; other methods were explored as sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Of 1166 randomized patients, 391 (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 185 (PD-L1 < 1%) patients received nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab; 387 (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 183 (PD-L1 < 1%) patients received chemotherapy, with 29.3-month minimum follow-up. Among chemotherapy-treated patients, 169/387 (43.7%; PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 66/183 (36.1%; PD-L1 < 1%) switched to immunotherapy poststudy. Among treated patients, median OS was 17.4 months with nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus 14.9 months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.95) in the PD-L1 ≥ 1% subgroup and 17.1 versus 12.4 months (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49-0.80) in the PD-L1 < 1% subgroup. After treatment-switching adjustment using IPCW, the HR (95% CI) for OS for nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus chemotherapy was reduced to 0.68 (0.56-0.83; PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 0.53 (0.40-0.69; PD-L1 < 1%). Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of the results.

CONCLUSION

Treatment-switching adjustments resulted in a greater estimated relative OS benefit with first-line nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC.

Targeted Therapies, Novel Antibodies, and Immunotherapies in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Clinical Evidence and Drug Approval Patterns

Since 2011, the US FDA has approved 30 new drugs for use in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), mainly comprising tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors. NSCLC with oncogene driver alterations is amenable to treatment with targeted drugs, usually small-molecule inhibitors. In these cases, the demonstration of high overall response rates, coupled with a lasting duration of response, has allowed for accelerated approval in the United States, based on single-cohort or multicohort trials. Confirmatory clinical evidence was subsequently provided through postmarketing trials. In NSCLC without such driver alterations, regulatory agencies in both the United States and the European Union set clinical evidence expectations that foster the conduct of studies primarily focused on determining survival or event-free survival, based on randomized controlled trial designs. This review analyzes the approval patterns of novel therapeutics for NSCLC with a focus on small-molecule inhibitors that target driver alterations, as well as biologics. The latter include mAbs inhibiting immune checkpoints like PD-(L)1 or cell surface receptors and antibody-drug conjugates, highly potent biologics linked to a cytotoxic compound. The differentiation of NSCLC into oncogene- and non-oncogene-addicted subtypes determines drug development strategies, the extent of the clinical development program, access to orphan drug development incentives, and regulatory approval strategies.

Pan-Cancer Survival Impact of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in a National Healthcare System

BACKGROUND

The cumulative, health system-wide survival benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is unclear, particularly among real-world patients with limited life expectancies and among subgroups poorly represented on clinical trials. We sought to determine the health system-wide survival impact of ICIs.

METHODS

We identified all patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA-4 inhibitors from 2010 to 2023 in the national Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system (ICI cohort) and all patients who received non-ICI systemic therapy in the years before ICI approval (historical control). ICI and historical control cohorts were matched on multiple cancer-related prognostic factors, comorbidities, and demographics. The effect of ICI on overall survival was quantified with Cox regression incorporating matching weights. Cumulative life-years gained system-wide were calculated from the difference in adjusted 5-year restricted mean survival times.

RESULTS

There were 27,322 patients in the ICI cohort and 69,801 patients in the historical control cohort. Among ICI patients, the most common cancer types were NSCLC (46%) and melanoma (10%). ICI demonstrated a large OS benefit in most cancer types with heterogeneity across cancer types (NSCLC: adjusted HR [aHR] 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-0.58, p < 0.001; urothelial: aHR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-1.01, p = 0.066). The relative benefit of ICI was stable across patient age, comorbidity, and self-reported race subgroups. Across VHA, 15,859 life-years gained were attributable to ICI within 5-years of treatment, with NSCLC contributing the most life-years gained.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated substantial increase in survival due to ICIs across a national health system, including in patient subgroups poorly represented on clinical trials.

The efficacy and safety of a novel PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody cadonilimab (AK104) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

For patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have received frontline immunochemotherapy, subsequent treatment options are limited. As the first dual programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 bispecific antibody approved globally, cadonilimab demonstrated potential antitumor activity in advanced NSCLC patients resistant to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected efficacy and safety data from advanced NSCLC patients treated with cadonilimab-based regimens in later therapy lines.

RESULTS

A total of 41 advanced NSCLC patients refractory to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy were enrolled. More than half of the patients received cadonilimab-based regimen as a fourth or later line of treatment. At the data cutoff date, treatment efficacy could be evaluated in 23 patients. One patient (4.3%) achieved partial response, eight patients (34.8%) experienced stable disease, and 14 patients (60.9%) progressed. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 4.3% and 39.1%, respectively. The median progression-free survival for all evaluated patients was 108.0 days. Due to the short follow-up period, the median overall survival has not yet been reached. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and immune-related AEs occurred in 63.4% and 22% patients, respectively. The most common TRAEs included gamma-glutamyl transferase elevation (17.1%), coughing (14.6%), and fatigue (12.2%). Five patients (12.2%) experienced grade ≥3 TRAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

In this heavily pretreated cohort of advanced NSCLC patients, cadonilimab-based regimens showed moderate antitumor efficacy with a generally tolerable and manageable safety profile. However, more evidence is needed to support the administration of cadonilimab in NSCLC patients refractory to previous anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus carboplatin-based doublet as first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer aged ≥70 years or with an ECOG performance status of 2 (GFPC 08-2015 ENERGY): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

Combined treatment with anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies has shown superiority over chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but data for older patients (aged ≥70 years) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1 or those with an ECOG performance status of 2 are scarce. We aimed to test the superiority of the PD-1 antibody nivolumab and the CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab over platinum-based doublet chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with NSCLC aged 70 years or older or with an ECOG performance status of 2.

METHODS

This open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was done at 30 hospitals and cancer centres in France. Eligible patients had stage IV histologically proven NSCLC, with no known oncogenic alterations, and were either aged 70 years or older with ECOG performance status of 0-2 or younger than 70 years with an ECOG performance status of 2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally, using a computer-generated algorithm stratified by age (<70 vs ≥70 years), ECOG performance status (0-1 vs 2), and histology (squamous vs non-squamous) to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab or platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (carboplatin [area under the curve ≤700 mg] plus pemetrexed [500 mg/m2 intravenous infusion every 3 weeks] or carboplatin [on day 1; area under the curve ≤700 mg] plus paclitaxel [90 mg/m2 as intravenous infusion on days 1, 5, and 15, every 4 weeks]). The primary endpoint was overall survival; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and safety. All efficacy analyses were performed in the intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned patients. Safety was analysed in the safety analysis set, which included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and who had at least one safety follow-up. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03351361.

FINDINGS

The trial was stopped early for futility on the basis of a pre-planned interim analysis after 33% of the expected events had occurred. Between Feb 12, 2018, and Dec 15, 2020, 217 patients were randomly assigned, of whom 216 patients were included in the final analysis, with 109 patients in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group and 107 in the chemotherapy group; median age was 74 years (IQR 70-78). Median overall survival was 14·7 months (95% CI 8·0-19·7) in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group and 9·9 months (7·7-12·3) in chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·85 [95% CI 0·62-1·16]). Among patients aged 70 years or older with an ECOG performance status of 0-1 (median age 76 years [IQR 73-79]), median overall survival was longer in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group than the chemotherapy group: 22·6 months (95% CI 18·1-36·0) versus 11·8 months (8·9-20·5; HR 0·64 [95% CI 0·46-0·96]). Among patients with an ECOG performance status of 2 (median age 69 years [IQR 63-75]), median overall survival was 2·9 months (95% CI 1·4-4·8) in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group versus 6·1 months (3·5-10·4) in the chemotherapy group (HR 1·32 [95% CI 0·82-2·11]). No new safety signals were reported. The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (28 [27%] of 103 patients) in the chemotherapy group and endocrine disorders (five [5%] of 105 patients), cardiac disorders (ten [10%] patients), and gastrointestinal disorders (11 [11%] patients) in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group.

INTERPRETATION

The study showed no benefit of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination in the overall study population. As a result of early stopping, the trial was underpowered for primary and secondary endpoints; however, the finding of better survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab compared with platinum doublet in the subgroup of older patients with NSCLC with an ECOG performance status of 0-1 warrants further study.

FUNDING

Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Treatment of brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: preclinical, clinical, and translational research

Lung cancer is the second most common type of cancer and is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Approximately 10-40% of patients with solid tumors develop brain metastases, with non-small cell lung cancer accounting for approximately 50% of all cases of patients with brain metastases. Many management options are available which can include surgery, radiation, and systemic therapy. A variety of factors go into the selection of management of brain metastases. In this review, we will focus on the treatment strategies and optimizing the management of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Engineering dendritic cell biomimetic membrane as a delivery system for tumor targeted therapy

Targeted immunotherapies make substantial strides in clinical cancer care due to their ability to counteract the tumor's capacity to suppress immune responses. Advances in biomimetic technology with minimally immunogenic and highly targeted, are addressing issues of targeted drug delivery and disrupting the tumor's immunosuppressive environment to trigger immune activation. Specifically, the use of dendritic cell (DC) membranes to coat nanoparticles ensures targeted delivery due to DC's unique ability to activate naive T cells, spotlighting their role in immunotherapy aimed at disrupting the tumor microenvironment. The potential of DC's biomimetic membrane to mediate immune activation and target tumors is gaining momentum, enhancing the effectiveness of cancer treatments in conjunction with other immune responses. This review delves into the methodologies behind crafting DC membranes and the fusion of dendritic and tumor cell membranes for encapsulating therapeutic nanoparticles. It explores their applications and recent advancements in combating cancer, offering an all-encompassing perspective on DC biomimetic nanosystems, immunotherapy driven by antigen presentation, and the collaborative efforts of drug delivery in chemotherapy and photodynamic therapies. Current evidence shows promise in augmenting combined therapeutic approaches for cancer treatment and holds translational potential for various cancer treatments in a clinical setting.

Spartalizumab in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy with or without canakinumab in patients with PD-L1-unselected, metastatic NSCLC

BACKGROUND

Despite promising outcomes of treatment with anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1/PD-ligand (L)1 agents in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy (PDC) in the first-line setting, a significant unmet medical need remains in patients with PD-L1-unselected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This multicenter, open-label, phase 1b study comprising dose-confirmation and dose-expansion parts investigated the combination of spartalizumab and various PDC regimens, with or without canakinumab, in treatment-naïve patients with PD-L1-unselected, metastatic NSCLC. The primary objectives were to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended dose for expansion (RDE) of spartalizumab, with or without canakinumab, in combination with PDC in the dose-confirmation part and antitumor activity of spartalizumab in the dose-expansion part.

RESULTS

The MTD/RDE of spartalizumab was 300 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W) when administered with either gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2)/cisplatin (75 mg/m2) (group A; no dose-limiting toxicities [DLTs]), pemetrexed (500 mg/m2)/cisplatin (group B; 2 DLTs: grade 2 posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and grade 4 hyponatremia), or paclitaxel (200 mg/m2)/carboplatin area under the curve 6 min*mg/mL (group C; 1 DLT: grade 4 neutropenic colitis). The RDE of canakinumab combined with spartalizumab and pemetrexed/cisplatin (group E; no DLTs) was 200 mg Q3W (no dose-expansion part was initiated). No new safety signals were identified. In groups A, B, C, and E, the overall response rates were 57.6%, 55.3%, 51.5%, and 57.1%, respectively. Group B compared with other groups had the longest median progression-free survival (10.4 months vs. 6.2-7.5 months), overall survival (29.7 months vs. 16.1-21.0 months), and duration of response (30.1 months vs. 6.0-8.2 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of spartalizumab and PDC, with or without canakinumab, was well tolerated across treatment groups. The antitumor activity across treatment groups was comparable with that of pembrolizumab and pemetrexed combination. Canakinumab did not appear to improve the antitumor activity when combined with spartalizumab, pemetrexed and cisplatin.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered in Clinicaltrials.gov with identifier no. NCT03064854. Date of Registration: 06 February 2017.

Rebooting the Adaptive Immune Response in Immunotherapy-Resistant Lung Adenocarcinoma Using a Supramolecular Albumin

Despite the availability of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICBs) significantly prolonging the life expectancy of some lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients, their implementation and long-term effectiveness are hampered by the growing issue of acquired resistance. Herein, the bioinformatics analysis of immunotherapy-resistant LUAD patients and the system analysis of Anti-PD1-resistant mice models once again validate that the resistance-associated Wnt/β-catenin pathway offers a promising avenue for ICB sensitization. Consequently, a mild and convenient self-assembly between albumin and carnosic acid (CA), a Wnt inhibitor is employed, to develop a supramolecular albumin known as ABCA, serving as a reactivator for ICB. As anticipated, ABCA effectively suppress the Wnt/β-catenin cascade in vitro and leads to significant inhibition of cell proliferation while promoting apoptosis. Most notably, ABCA restores the anticancer efficacy of Anti-PD1 in immunotherapy-resistant LUAD orthotopic allografting mice models by reinvigorating the adaptive immune response mediated by T lymphocytes. Furthermore, ABCA exhibits minimal adverse effects during treatment and high-dose toxicity tests, underscoring its excellent potential for clinical translation. Collectively, the present work possesses the potential to provide innovative perspectives on the advancement of optimized immunotherapies targeting drug resistance, while also presenting a promising avenue for translating Wnt inhibitors into immunotherapeutic drugs for their clinical application.

Is modulation of immune checkpoints on glioblastoma-infiltrating myeloid cells a viable therapeutic strategy?

The field of immunology has traditionally focused on immune checkpoint modulation of adaptive immune cells. However, many malignancies such as glioblastoma are mostly devoid of T cells and rather are enriched with immunosuppressive myeloid cells of the innate immune system. While some immune checkpoint targets are shared between adaptive and innate immunity, myeloid-specific checkpoints could also serve as potential therapeutics. To better understand the impact of immune checkpoint blockade on myeloid cells, we systematically summarize the current literature focusing on the direct immunological effects of PD-L1/PD-1, CD24/Siglec-10, collagen/LAIR-1, CX3CL1/CX3CR1, and CXCL10/CXCR3. By synthesizing the molecular mechanisms and the translational implications, we aim to prioritize agents in this category of therapeutics for glioblastoma.

Oral Lichenoid lesions induced by programmed cell death protein 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 bispecific antibody: a case report

BACKGROUND

Cadonilimab is the first approved dual immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), currently utilized for the treatment of various solid tumors. Oral mucosal adverse reactions, such as oral lichenoid lesions, represent one of the most prevalent immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint antibodies. However, reports detailing oral side effects specifically linked to Cadonilimab are lacking. Documenting these side effects is essential to alert oncologists and stomatologists, facilitating timely intervention for affected patients.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a case involving a 35-year-old male patient diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma who received Cadonilimab following hepatectomy and subsequently developed extensive oral lichenoid lesions along with mucosal erosion at 13-14 weeks post-treatment initiation. A biopsy was conducted revealing immunohistochemical findings of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD20 + lymphocytes, CD68 + macrophages, and α-SMA + myofibroblasts infiltrating the tissue of the oral lichenoid lesions. The patient's oral lesions improved after administration of systemic and local glucocorticoid therapy alongside cessation of Cadonilimab treatment.

CONCLUSION

This report marks the first documented instance of an oral adverse effect associated with Cadonilimab use. It underscores that administration of this agent may lead to significant lichenoid lesions and erosions within the oral cavity-an issue warranting increased vigilance from both oncologists and stomatologists.

First reported advanced pancreatic cancer with hyperprogression treated with PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy: a case report and literature review

Pancreatic cancer is among the most immune-resistant tumor types due to its unique tumor microenvironment and low cancer immunogenicity. Single-agent immune modulators have thus far proven clinically ineffective. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that combination of these modulators with other strategies could unlock the potential of immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer. Herein, we describe the case of a 59-year-old male with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, referred to our center to receive immunotherapy (serplulimab, a novel anti-PD-1 antibody) combined with chemotherapy (gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel). During the initial three treatment cycles, the patient was assessed as having stable disease (SD) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. However, following two additional cycles of combination therapy, the primary tumor mass increased from 4.9 cm to 13.2 cm, accompanied by the development of new lung lesions, ascites, and pelvic metastases. He succumbed to respiratory failure one month later. Retrospective analysis revealed that the patient had MDM4 amplification, identified as a high-risk factor for hyperprogressive disease (HPD). To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of HPD in pancreatic cancer with multiple metastases treated using combination therapy. We investigated the potential mechanisms and reviewed the latest literature on predictive factors for HPD. These findings suggest that while chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy may hold promise for treating pancreatic cancer, it is imperative to identify and closely monitor patients with high-risk factors for HPD when using immunotherapy.

A tumor cornification and immune-infiltration-based scheme for anti-PD-1 plus chemotherapy response in advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (combo) exhibits significantly prolonged survival for squamous cell lung cancer (LUSC). An exploration of predictive biomarkers is still needed.

METHODS

High-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of 349 LUSC samples from the randomized, multi-center, phase 3 trial ORIENT-12 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03629925) was conducted for biomarker discovery, followed by flow cytometry and multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) in additional clinical cohorts, and in vitro experiments were performed for verification.

RESULTS

A high abundance of activated CD8+ T and CD56bright natural killer (NK) cells benefited patients' outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS]; overall survival [OS]) with combo treatment. Tumor cornification level remarkably affected the infiltration of the two crucial immune cells. Thus, a novel scheme of LUSC immune infiltration and cornification characterization-based classification (LICC) was established for combo efficacy prediction. Patients who received combo treatment achieved significant PFS improvements in LICC1 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-0.75, p = 0.0029) and LICC2 (HR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.17-0.58, p = 0.0002) subtypes but not in the LICC3 subtype (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.60-1.23, p = 0.4053). Via single-cell RNA-seq analysis, the tumor cornification signal was mainly mapped to SPRR3+ tumor cells, whose relationships with activated CD8+ T or CD56bright NK cells were verified using flow cytometry and mIHC. Our data suggest that SPRR3+ tumor cells might evade immune surveillance via the CD24-SIGLEC10 (M2 macrophage) axis to maintain a suppressive tumor microenvironment.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor cornification greatly impacts immune infiltration, and the LICC scheme may guide clinical medication of anti-PD-1+chemo treatment in patients with LUSC.

FUNDING

The study was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China, the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Shanghia Multidisplinary Cooperation Building Project for Diagnosis and Treatment of Major Disease, and Innovent Biologics, Inc.

Prognostic and predictive factors in advanced upper gastrointestinal cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current evidence

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown encouraging treatment efficacy for upper gastrointestinal cancers (UGICs). However, durable clinical responses only existed in a minority of patients. We evaluated evidence predicting survival benefits to identify the optimal population followed by ICI-based therapy.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify clinical trials for UGICs with ICI-based therapy. The outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation System (GRADE).

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies comprising 12,440 patients were included for quantitative synthesis. Patients with PD-L1-positive (OR = 2.08, p < 0.00001), EBV+ (OR = 8.47, p = 0.003) tumors were more likely to respond to ICI treatment. Moreover, OS was significantly improved with the statistical subgroup difference concerning sex (p = 0.02) and region (p = 0.02). An exploratory subgroup analysis showed significantly improved OS with ICI plus chemotherapy in patients with CPS ≥ 10 (HR = 0.66, p = 0.001) and CPS ≥ 1 (HR = 0.75, p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

UGIC patients with PD-L1-positive, EBV + status are associated with a better therapeutic response to ICI-based therapy. The male patients and Asian patients could derive more survival benefits following ICI treatment than female and non-Asian ones. A combination of prognostic and predictive factors was suggested to help guide immunotherapy decision-making in UGIC patients.

The novel and potent CD40 agonist KHK2840 augments the antitumor efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibody and paclitaxel

Lack of tumor-reactive cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) limits the antitumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). CD40 agonists have been expected to overcome this limitation by generating tumor-reactive CTLs. However, the clinical efficacy of CD40 agonistic antibodies is not as good as in non-clinical studies. The novel human CD40 (hCD40) agonist KHK2840 is a fully human anti-CD40 IgG2 agonistic antibody that is Fc-engineered to minimize complement-dependent cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Compared to other hCD40 agonists, KHK2840 exhibited the most potent hCD40 agonistic signal in tumor-bearing hCD40 transgenic mice and human peripheral blood B cells. Moreover, KHK2840 enhanced the antitumor efficacy of the antiprogrammed cell death 1 antibody and paclitaxel. Comprehensive immune profiling revealed that the antitumor immune response of the triple combination involved tumor-draining lymph nodes in addition to tumor microenvironments. This suggests that a coordinated antitumor immune response between tumors and lymph nodes may underlie the synergistic antitumor efficacy of the triple combination therapy. Finally, a toxicology study in cynomolgus monkeys demonstrated that KHK2840 activated the CD40 signal with tolerable toxicological properties. These results indicate that KHK2840 is a novel and potent hCD40 agonistic antibody for cancer immunotherapy, which is expected to augment the antitumor efficacy of ICIs and chemotherapy.

Analysis of the association between immune-related adverse events and the effectiveness in patients with advanced non-small-cell-lung cancer

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved lung cancer treatment but are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This study analyzes the relationship between irAEs and treatment effectiveness in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of NSCLC patients treated with ICIs from March 2019 to October 2022 at Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen). Patients were divided into irAE and non-irAE groups, and treatment outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 154 patients were included, with 36.4% in the irAE group and 63.6% in the non-irAE group. Most irAEs were Grade 1-2 (86.4%), with 13.6% being Grade 3 or higher. The irAE group had higher disease control rates (DCR: 94.6% vs. 76.5%, P = 0.004) and objective response rates (ORR: 42.9% vs. 26.5%, P = 0.037). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in the irAE group (18 vs. 9 months, HR: 0.53, P = 0.001), as was overall survival (OS: 39.5 vs. 16 months, HR: 0.46, P = 0.001). Landmark analysis at 6 and 12 weeks confirmed that irAEs were associated with improved outcomes. Moreover, patients who experienced two or more adverse events during treatment had significantly longer OS compared to those who had only one or no adverse events (41.6 months vs. 34.0 vs. 23.6, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Patients with irAEs demonstrated better outcomes, including ORR, DCR, PFS, and OS. Further studies on biomarkers and irAE incidence are warranted to improve lung cancer management.

Effect of smoking status on immunotherapy for lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Recent studies have yielded conflicting results regarding the relationship between smoking history and the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for advanced lung cancer. While some studies have suggested that smoking may enhance the response to immunotherapy in patients with lung cancer, other findings indicate the contrary. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to thoroughly examine this association.

Methods

We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for clinical trials comparing immunotherapy with conventional chemotherapy as the primary treatment for advanced lung cancer. A random effects model was used to synthesize hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS). We also conducted predefined subgroup analyses to investigate the efficacy disparities between never-smokers and smokers who were administered immunotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy, as well as the differences between former and current smokers under similar treatment modalities.

Results

Our analysis included data from 17 Phase III clinical trials involving 10,283 patients. The findings indicate that immunotherapy benefits both smokers and never-smokers with lung cancer or non-small cell lung cancer, yielding pooled HRs for OS of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.59-0.92) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.67-0.80), respectively. A significant interaction effect was not observed (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.77-1.24, pinteraction = 0.14), and the tumor type, immunotherapy combination, and type of immunotherapy did not differ among the groups in the subgroup analyses. Similarly, both former and current smokers experienced a significant survival benefit from immunotherapy, with pooled HRs for OS of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.68-0.91) and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59-0.87), respectively. However, a significant interaction effect was also not observed (HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.74-1.11, pinteraction = 0.14).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that smoking status does not affect the effectiveness of immunotherapy for lung cancer treatment. However, additional high-quality clinical trials are needed to confirm this conclusion.

Systematic review registration

https://inplasy.com/register/, identifier INPLASY2023110058.

Long-Term Survival Outcomes With First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab-Based Treatment in Patients With Metastatic NSCLC and Tumor Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Lower Than 1%: A Pooled Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab-based treatment regimens have shown long-term, durable efficacy benefits in patients with metastatic NSCLC. Here we report clinical outcomes from a pooled analysis of patients with metastatic NSCLC and tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) lower than 1% treated with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with or without two cycles of chemotherapy versus up to four cycles of chemotherapy in the randomized phase 3 CheckMate 227 and CheckMate 9LA studies.

METHODS

Patients were aged 18 years or older and had stage IV or recurrent NSCLC with no sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations. Assessments included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, duration of response, and safety.

RESULTS

In patients with tumor PD-L1 lower than 1% in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab with or without chemotherapy (n = 322) versus chemotherapy (n = 315) arms, median OS was 17.4 versus 11.3 months, respectively, (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-0.76; 5-y OS rate, 20% versus 7%) at a median follow-up of 73.7 months. The OS benefit was observed across key subgroups, including difficult-to-treat populations such as those with baseline brain metastases (HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26-0.75) or squamous NSCLC (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.36-0.72). In the overall pooled population, the median PFS was 5.4 versus 4.9 months (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.60-0.87; 5-y PFS rate, 9% versus 2%), the objective response rate was 29% versus 22%, and the median duration of response was 18.0 versus 4.6 months. No new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSION

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab with or without chemotherapy provides a long-term, durable clinical benefit in patients with metastatic NSCLC and tumor PD-L1 lower than 1%, supporting the use of this strategy as a first-line treatment option in this population with high unmet need.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONS

NCT02477826, NCT03215706.

Harmonizing tumor mutational burden analysis: Insights from a multicenter study using in silico reference data sets in clinical whole-exome sequencing (WES)

OBJECTIVES

Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is a significant biomarker for predicting immune checkpoint inhibitor response, but the clinical performance of whole-exome sequencing (WES)-based TMB estimation has received less attention compared to panel-based methods. This study aimed to assess the reliability and comparability of WES-based TMB analysis among laboratories under routine testing conditions.

METHODS

A multicenter study was conducted involving 24 laboratories in China using in silico reference data sets. The accuracy and comparability of TMB estimation were evaluated using matched tumor-normal data sets. Factors such as accuracy of variant calls, limit of detection (LOD) of WES test, size of regions of interest (ROIs) used for TMB calculation, and TMB cutoff points were analyzed.

RESULTS

The laboratories consistently underestimated the expected TMB scores in matched tumor-normal samples, with only 50% falling within the ±30% TMB interval. Samples with low TMB score (<2.5) received the consensus interpretation. Accuracy of variant calls, LOD of the WES test, ROI, and TMB cutoff points were important factors causing interlaboratory deviations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights real-world challenges in WES-based TMB analysis that need to be improved and optimized. This research will aid in the selection of more reasonable analytical procedures to minimize potential methodologic biases in estimating TMB in clinical exome sequencing tests. Harmonizing TMB estimation in clinical testing conditions is crucial for accurately evaluating patients' response to immunotherapy.

High-cost treatments for advanced lung cancer in Japan (Lung Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group)

BACKGROUND

The treatment of lung cancer has made dramatic progress in the past decade, but due to the high cost of drugs, the total pharmaceutical cost has been rising explosively. There are currently no data available in Japan on which regimens are used, to what extent they are used, and what their total cost is.

METHODS

Sixty Japanese centers belonging to the Lung Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group were surveyed for information about the first-line treatment for advanced lung cancer in practice from July 2021 to June 2022. Three types of cancer were included: driver gene mutation-negative NSCLC, EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, and extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

RESULTS

Recent treatment costs for ICIs or ICI plus chemotherapy were about 20-55 times higher than those for conventional chemotherapy. Of the 3738 patients with driver gene aberration-negative NSCLC, 2573 (68.8%) received treatments with monthly cost of 500 000 Japanese yen (JPY) or more; 2555 (68.4%) received ICI therapy. Of the 1486 patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, 1290 (86.8%) received treatments with a monthly cost of 500 000 JPY or more; 1207 (81.2%) received osimertinib. ICI treatments with a monthly cost of 500 000 JPY or more were administered to 607 (56.3%) of 1079 patients with ES-SCLC. Elderly NSCLC patients received slightly more high-cost treatment than younger patients.

CONCLUSION

Recent treatments cost many times more than conventional chemotherapy. This study revealed that high-cost treatments were widely used in advanced lung cancer and some of high-cost treatments were used despite the lack of clear evidence. Physicians should pay attention to the cost of treatments they use.

B cell epitope mapping: The journey to better vaccines and therapeutic antibodies

B-cell epitope mapping is an approach that can identify and characterise specific antigen binding sites of B-cell receptors and secreted antibodies. The ability to determine the antigenic clusters of amino acids bound by B-cell clones provides unprecedented detail that will aid in developing novel and effective vaccine targets and therapeutic antibodies for various diseases. Here, we discuss conventional approaches and emerging techniques that are used to map B-cell epitopes.

Preclinical investigations and a first-in-human phase 1a trial of JS007, a novel anti-CTLA-4 antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Blocking cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) shows substantial antitumor efficacy. Here, we report the preclinical data and outcomes of a first-in-human phase 1a trial of JS007, a novel anti-CTLA-4 antibody, in advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

In preclinical studies, both in vitro characteristics and in vivo characteristics of JS007 were investigated. The clinical trial included a dose escalation phase and a dose expansion phase. Eligible patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors were enrolled. In the dose escalation phase, JS007 was administered intravenously every 3 weeks at doses of 0.03, 0.3, 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg. Then, 3 and 10 mg/kg were chosen for the dose expansion phase. The primary endpoints included the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of JS007 based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and safety.

RESULTS

JS007 could effectively bind to CTLA-4 and induce an immune response in vitro. Potent in vivo antitumor activity of JS007 was observed. Increased T cell infiltration and T regulatory (Treg) cell depletion in tumor microenvironment of cancer cell xenografts were detected after treated with JS007. Pharmacological analysis in experimental animals showed a dose-proportional increase in exposure. In the clinical trial, a total of 28 patients were treated with JS007 across 5 dose levels. No DLTs occurred. The MTD did not reach at the highest dose tested (10 mg/kg). Twenty-three (82.1%) patients experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). The incidence of Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs was 28.6% (8/28) with alanine aminotransferase increase (7.1%, 2/28) being the most frequently reported TRAE. No severe immune-related adverse event (irAE) occurred. Pharmacological profiles of JS007 in patients were similar to those in animal models. Serum concentration of JS007 showed a dose-dependent escalation, and the half-life of JS007 was 9.4 ~ 12.2 days. Treatment-induced anti-drug antibody was detected in 2 patients. The disease control rate was 50% (14/28), and the median overall survival was 14.7 months.

CONCLUSIONS

JS007 preliminarily demonstrates good tolerance and encouraging antitumor activity in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05049265 (Sep 20, 2021).

Long-term progression-free survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients: a spotlight on bevacizumab and its biosimilars

INTRODUCTION

In the era of immunotherapy, bevacizumab seems to be losing its place in NSCLC treatment algorithms. The aim of this work is to try to define the advantages and disadvantages of NSCLC treatment with bevacizumab in combination regimens.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a literature search in PubMed and Google Scholar to review the most important topics regarding bevacizumab treatment in NSCLC, with or without driver mutations, including trials with checkpoint inhibitors. Special emphasis was placed on the analysis of data on the treatment of patients with CNS metastases.

EXPERT OPINION

Bevacizumab is an antiangiogenic compound whose addition to chemotherapy made the first major breakthrough in the treatment of NSCLC. However, for the last 10 years or so, the use of combination immunotherapy regimens has suppressed the use and acquisition of new knowledge about bevacizumab. Newer data are primarily related to the treatment of EGFR-positive NSCLC patients with bevacizumab, with only a few larger studies investigating the use of a combination of bevacizumab and checkpoint inhibitors. The basic task remains to define the place of bevacizumab in treatment algorithms.

Racial and socioeconomic disparities in survival among patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have profoundly impacted survival among patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. However, population-based studies evaluating this impact on survival by race and socioeconomic factors are lacking.

METHODS

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program-Medicare database to identify patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed between 2015 and 2019. The primary study outcomes were the receipt of an immune checkpoint inhibitor and overall survival. χ2 tests and logistic regression were used to identify demographic factors associated with receipt of immune checkpoint inhibitors. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate 2-year overall survival rates, and log-rank tests were used to compare survival by race and ethnicity.

RESULTS

Of 17 134 patients, approximately 39% received an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Those diagnosed with cancer recently (in 2019); who are relatively younger (aged younger than 85 years); non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Asian, or Hispanic; living in high socioeconomic status or metropolitan areas; not Medicaid eligible; and with adenocarcinoma histology were more likely to receive immune checkpoint inhibitors. The 2-year overall survival rate from diagnosis was 21% for the overall population. The 2-year overall survival rate from immune checkpoint inhibitor initiation was 30%, among those who received at least 1 cycle and 11% among those who did not receive immune checkpoint inhibitors. The 2-year overall survival rates were higher among non-Hispanic White (22%) and non-Hispanic Asian (23%) patients compared with non-Hispanic Black (15%) and Hispanic (17%) patients. There was no statistically significant racial differences in survival for those who received immune checkpoint inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

Immune checkpoint inhibitor utilization rates and the resulting outcomes were inferior for certain vulnerable groups, mandating the need for strategies to improve access to care.

Tumour mutational burden: clinical utility, challenges and emerging improvements

Tumour mutational burden (TMB), defined as the total number of somatic non-synonymous mutations present within the cancer genome, varies across and within cancer types. A first wave of retrospective and prospective research identified TMB as a predictive biomarker of response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors and culminated in the disease-agnostic approval of pembrolizumab for patients with TMB-high tumours based on data from the Keynote-158 trial. Although the applicability of outcomes from this trial to all cancer types and the optimal thresholds for TMB are yet to be ascertained, research into TMB is advancing along three principal avenues: enhancement of TMB assessments through rigorous quality control measures within the laboratory process, including the mitigation of confounding factors such as limited panel scope and low tumour purity; refinement of the traditional TMB framework through the incorporation of innovative concepts such as clonal, persistent or HLA-corrected TMB, tumour neoantigen load and mutational signatures; and integration of TMB with established and emerging biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression, microsatellite instability, immune gene expression profiles and the tumour immune contexture. Given its pivotal functions in both the pathogenesis of cancer and the ability of the immune system to recognize tumours, a profound comprehension of the foundational principles and the continued evolution of TMB are of paramount relevance for the field of oncology.

Targeting PD-1/PD-L1 in tumor immunotherapy: Mechanisms and interactions with host growth regulatory pathways

Tumor immunotherapy has garnered considerable attention, emerging as a new standard of care in cancer treatment. The conventional targets, such as VEGF and EGFR, have been extended to others including BRAF and PD-1/PD-L1, which have shown significant potential in recent cancer treatments. This review aims to succinctly overview the impact and mechanisms of therapies that modulate PD-1/PD-L1 expression by targeting VEGF, EGFR, LAG-3, CTLA-4 and BRAF. We investigated how modulation of PD-1/PD-L1 expression impacts growth factor signaling, shedding light on the interplay between immunomodulatory pathways and growth factor networks within the tumor microenvironment. By elucidating these interactions, we aim to provide insights into novel potential synergistic therapeutic strategies for cancer immunotherapy.

[First-line immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed with brain metastases]

INTRODUCTION

Up to 30% patients newly diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with brain metastases. In the absence of oncogenic addiction, first-line immunotherapy, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, is the current standard of care. This review aims to synthesize the available data regarding the efficacy of immunotherapy in these patients, and to discuss the possibility of its being coordinated with local treatments such as radiotherapy.

STATE OF THE ART

NSCLC patients with brain metastases appear to have survival benefits with immunotherapy similar to those of NSCLC patients without brain metastases. However, this finding is based on mainly prospective studies having included highly selected patients with pre-treated and stable brain metastases. Several retrospective studies and two prospective single-arm studies have confirmed the intracranial efficacy of immunotherapy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy.

PERSPECTIVES

The indications and optimal timing for cerebral radiotherapy remain subjects of debate. To date, there exists no randomized study assessing the addition of brain radiotherapy to first-line immunotherapy. That said, a recent meta-analysis showed increased intracerebral response when radiotherapy complemented immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

For NSCLC patients with brain metastases, the available data suggest a clear benefit of first-line immunotherapy, whether alone or combined with chemotherapy. However, most of these data are drawn from retrospective, non-randomized studies with small sample sizes.

Prognostic Implications of Timing of Immunotherapy in Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background

Currently, the established approach for addressing stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involves combining chemotherapy with immunotherapy. However, the necessity for molecular analysis prior to commencing immunotherapy often results in a delay in its initiation following the commencement of chemotherapy. Therefore, this study aimed to study the significance of postponing immunotherapy on pertinent patient outcomes.

Methods

Using the National Cancer Database (NCBD), patients diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC between 2017 and 2018 were screened. Inclusion criteria comprised those treated with multi-agent chemotherapy as the first-line therapy within 30 days of treatment, surviving beyond 2 months of diagnosis, and absence of neuroendocrine pathology. Patients were grouped among those receiving immunotherapy within 30 days of chemotherapy, immunotherapy within 31 - 60 days of chemotherapy, or chemotherapy alone. Clinical characteristics were collected and their correlation with the timing of immunotherapy was evaluated. The impact of delaying immunotherapy on overall survival (OS) was investigated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was employed to identify independent prognostic variables associated with OS.

Results

Our cohort comprised 99,008 patients with clinical stage IV NSCLC diagnosed between 2017 and 2018, which were distributed in the three treatment groups described above. Patients receiving immunotherapy within 30 days of chemotherapy showed greater OS in contrast to both those subjected to delayed immunotherapy (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64 - 0.87, P = 0.0003). Subsequent multivariate regression analysis showed that postponing immunotherapy, older age, male sex, white race, non-adenocarcinoma histology, higher clinical N stage, use of radiation treatment, and presence of liver metastasis were all associated with worse OS.

Conclusions

Introducing immunotherapy within the first 30 days of chemotherapy initiation significantly increases survival in patients with stage IV NSCLC.

Immune Cell Dynamics in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC Treated With Afatinib and Pembrolizumab: Results From a Phase IB Study

Introduction

EGFR-mutated NSCLC is minimally responsive to programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed death-ligand 1 blockade. We evaluated the safety, tolerability, and immunomodulatory effects of the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) afatinib in combination with the programmed cell death protein 1 antibody pembrolizumab in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Methods

Patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC with progression (PD) on previous EGFR TKI(s), aged above or equal to 18 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status less than or equal to 1, acceptable organ function, no significant autoimmune disease, measurable disease, and controlled brain metastases were eligible. Primary end point was determination of the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose. Serial specimens were collected to assess for alterations in cytokines and immune cell subsets by quantitative immunofluorescence in tissue and Luminex and flow cytometry in the blood.

Results

A total of 11 patients were enrolled, six in dose finding and five in dose expansion. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The maximum tolerated dose was determined to be afatinib 40 mg orally daily and pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 21 days. Four (36%) patients had immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Ten patients were assessable for response: two partial response, seven stable disease, and one PD. Peripheral natural killer and natural killer T-cells (p = 0.027, p = 0.01) increased and exhausted CD8+ T-cells decreased on treatment (p = 0.0035). Peripheral CD4/CD8 T-cells (area under the curve = 0.96, p = 0.042) and central memory T-cells (CD4/CD8) (area under the curve = 1.0, p = 0.0006) increased in patients who had disease control more than 6 months or partial response to afatinib/pembrolizumab as did CD3+ T-cells in a patient with progression-free survival more than 6 months after afatinib/pembrolizumab treatment.

Conclusions

Afatinib and pembrolizumab were found to have modest activity associated with irAEs after PD on previous EGFR TKI setting. Proinflammatory changes in immune cell subsets in tissue and blood were detected and associated with antitumor activity and irAEs.

Intrapatient variation in PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden and the impact on outcomes to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Programmed death receptor ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) are key predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data on their variation across multiple samples are limited.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with NSCLC and multiple PD-L1 TPS and/or TMB assessments were included. Clinicopathologic and genomic data were analyzed according to PD-L1 and TMB variation.

RESULTS

In total, 402 PD-L1 sample pairs and 413 TMB sample pairs were included. Concordance between pairs was moderate for PD-L1 (ρ = 0.53, P < 0.0001) and high for TMB (ρ = 0.80, P < 0.0001). Shorter time between biopsies correlated with higher concordance in PD-L1, but not in TMB. Major increases (ΔTPS ≥ +50%) and decreases (ΔTPS ≤ -50%) in PD-L1 were observed in 9.7% and 8.0% of cases, respectively. PD-L1, but not TMB, decreased with intervening ICI (P = 0.02). Acquired copy number loss of CD274, PDCD1LG2, and JAK2 were associated with major decrease in PD-L1 (q < 0.05). Among patients with multiple PD-L1 assessments before ICI, cases where all samples had a PD-L1 ≥1%, compared to cases with at least one sample with PD-L1 <1% and another with PD-L1 ≥1%, achieved improved objective response rate and progression-free survival (PFS). Among patients with at least one PD-L1 <1% and one ≥1% before ICI, cases where the most proximal sample was PD-L1 ≥1% had longer median PFS compared to cases where the most proximal PD-L1 was <1%. Among patients with multiple TMB assessments before ICI, patients with a TMB ≥10 mut/Mb based on the most recent assessment, as compared to those with a TMB <10 mut/Mb, achieved improved PFS and overall survival to ICI; instead, no differences were observed when patients were categorized using the oldest TMB assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite intrapatient concordance in PD-L1 and TMB, variation in these biomarkers can influence ICI outcomes, warranting consideration for reassessment before ICI initiation when feasible.

Personalized prediction of immunotherapy response in lung cancer patients using advanced radiomics and deep learning

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer (LC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, and immunotherapy (IO) has shown promise in treating advanced-stage LC. However, identifying patients likely to benefit from IO and monitoring treatment response remains challenging. This study aims to develop a predictive model for progression-free survival (PFS) in LC patients with IO based on clinical features and advanced imaging biomarkers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 206 LC patients receiving IO treatment. Pre-treatment computed tomography images were used to extract advanced imaging biomarkers, including intratumoral and peritumoral-vasculature radiomics. Clinical features, including age, gene status, hematology, and staging, were also collected. Key radiomic and clinical features for predicting IO outcomes were identified using a two-step feature selection process, including univariate Cox regression and chi-squared test, followed by sequential forward selection. The DeepSurv model was constructed to predict PFS based on clinical and radiomic features. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and concordance index (C-index).

RESULTS

Combining radiomics of intratumoral heterogeneity and peritumoral-vasculature with clinical features demonstrated a significant enhancement (p < 0.001) in predicting IO response. The proposed DeepSurv model exhibited a prediction performance with AUCs ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 and a C-index of 0.83. Furthermore, the predicted personalized PFS curves revealed a significant difference (p < 0.05) between patients with favorable and unfavorable prognoses.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrating intratumoral and peritumoral-vasculature radiomics with clinical features enabled the development of a predictive model for PFS in LC patients with IO. The proposed model's capability to estimate individualized PFS probability and differentiate the prognosis status held promise to facilitate personalized medicine and improve patient outcomes in LC.

Phase II basket trial of dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in rare tumors (DART) SWOG S1609: the desmoid tumors

BACKGROUND

Dual inhibition using anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) checkpoint inhibitors has proven effective in many cancers. However, its efficacy in rare solid cancers remains unclear. Desmoid tumors are ultrarare soft-tissue tumors, traditionally treated with surgery. This study reviews the first results of using ipilimumab and nivolumab in the desmoid tumor cohort of the SWOG S1609 Dual Anti-CTLA-4 & Anti-PD-1 blockade in Rare Tumors (DART) trial.

METHODS

DART is a prospective/open-label/multicenter (1,016 US sites)/multicohort phase II trial of ipilimumab (1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks) plus nivolumab (240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks) that opened at 1,016 US sites. The primary endpoint included overall response rate (ORR) defined as confirmed complete (CR) and partial responses (PR) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v.1.1. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR; stable disease (SD) ≥6 months plus CR and PR) and toxicity.

RESULTS

Sixteen evaluable patients (median age: 37) with desmoid tumors and a median of 1.5 prior therapies (with no prior exposure to immunotherapy) were analyzed. The tumors varied in location (eight abdomen, three lower limb, two upper limb, two pelvis, and one neck). ORR was 18.8% (3/16; 3 confirmed PR): 40% regression (PFS 30+ months), 83% regression (PFS 16 months) and 71% regression (PFS 8.4 months). Seven additional patients (43.8%) had prolonged SD over 6 months (PFS: 16.5, 22.4+, 22.6, 30.1, 38.2+, 48.3+ and 60.7+ months). Overall CBR was 62.5% (10/16). Median PFS was 19.4 months, with 6-month PFS of 73% and 1-year PFS of 67%. All patients were alive at 1 year; median OS was not assessable, as 13 patients were alive at analysis. Common adverse events included fatigue, nausea and hypothyroidism, with 50% experiencing grade 3-4 events. There were no grade 5 events.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab in desmoid tumors yielded an ORR of 18.8% and a CBR of 62.5% with durable responses seen. This is the first prospective study exploring the efficacy of this combination in this rare disease. Ongoing studies aim to identify markers for response and resistance. Expanded trials are necessary.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02834013.