Fexofenadine modulates T-cell function, preventing allergen-induced airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness

Co-treatment with Fexofenadine and Budesonide Increases FoxP3 Gene Expression in Patients with Allergic Rhinitis

BACKGROUND

T helper type 2 (Th2), Th17, and regulatory T cells (Tregs) play essential roles in the pathogenesis and control of allergic rhinitis (AR). Fexofenadine and budesonide are first-line treatments for AR. This study aimed to investigate the effect of co-treatment with fexofenadine and budesonide on the expression of Th2, Th17, and Treg-specific transcription factors (GATA-binding protein 3 [GATA-3], RAR-related orphan receptor gamma [RORγt], and forkhead box P3 [FoxP3], respectively) in AR patients.

METHODS

In this study, 29 AR patients were co-treated with fexofenadine and budesonide for 1 month. Blood was collected from AR patients before and after 1 month of treatment. The gene expression levels of GATA-3, RORγt, and FoxP3 transcription factors in blood samples were measured. In addition, serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels and eosinophil percentages in blood samples were determined.

FINDINGS

The expression level of FoxP3 increased significantly after treatment compared with that before treatment (P < .001). In contrast, GATA-3 and RORγt expression levels did not show any noticeable changes. In addition, the percentage of peripheral blood eosinophils significantly decreased (P < .01). Serum IgE levels decreased compared with those before treatment, but the difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, the clinical symptoms of the patients improved compared with those before treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that combined treatment with fexofenadine and budesonide increased the expression level of the FoxP3 gene, decreased the percentage of peripheral blood eosinophils, and improved the clinical symptoms of AR patients. This regimen appears to improve disease symptoms, at least in part by increasing the Treg population and decreasing the eosinophil population.

Fexofenadine Suppresses Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity in the Murine Model of Palladium Allergy

Palladium is frequently used in dental materials, and sometimes causes metal allergy. It has been suggested that the immune response by palladium-specific T cells may be responsible for the pathogenesis of delayed-type hypersensitivity in study of palladium allergic model mice. In the clinical setting, glucocorticoids and antihistamine drugs are commonly used for treatment of contact dermatitis. However, the precise mechanism of immune suppression in palladium allergy remains unknown. We investigated inhibition of the immune response in palladium allergic mice by administration of prednisolone as a glucocorticoid and fexofenadine hydrochloride as an antihistamine. Compared with glucocorticoids, fexofenadine hydrochloride significantly suppressed the number of T cells by interfering with the development of antigen-presenting cells from the sensitization phase. Our results suggest that antihistamine has a beneficial effect on the treatment of palladium allergy compared to glucocorticoids.

Combined blockade of the histamine H1 and H4 receptor suppresses peanut-induced intestinal anaphylaxis by regulating dendritic cell function

BACKGROUND

Signaling through histamine receptors on dendritic cells (DCs) may be involved in the effector phase of peanut-induced intestinal anaphylaxis.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine the role of histamine H1 (H1R) and H4 receptors (H4R) in intestinal allergic responses in a model of peanut allergy.

METHODS

Balb/c mice were sensitized and challenged with peanut. During the challenge phase, mice were treated orally with the H1R antagonist, loratadine, and/or the H4R antagonist, JNJ7777120. Bone marrow-derived DCs (BMDCs) were adoptively transferred to nonsensitized WT mice. Symptoms, intestinal inflammation, and mesenteric lymph node and intestine mucosal DCs were assessed. Effects of the drugs on DC chemotaxis, calcium mobilization, and antigen-presenting cell function were measured.

RESULTS

Treatment with loratadine or JNJ7777120 individually partially suppressed the development of diarrhea and intestinal inflammation and decreased the numbers of DCs in the mesenteric lymph nodes and lamina propria. Combined treatment with both drugs prevented the development of diarrhea and intestinal inflammation. In vitro, the combination suppressed DC antigen-presenting cell function to T helper cells and DC calcium mobilization and chemotaxis to histamine.

CONCLUSION

Blockade of both H1R and H4R in the challenge phase had additive effects in preventing the intestinal consequences of peanut sensitization and challenge. These effects were mediated through the limitation of mesenteric lymph node and intestinal DC accumulation and function. Identification of this histamine H1R/H4R-DC-CD4⁺ T-cell axis provides new insights into the development of peanut-induced intestinal allergic responses and for prevention and treatment of peanut allergy.

Evaluating the Anti-nociceptive and Anti-inflammatory Effects of Ketotifen and Fexofenadine in Rats

PURPOSE

As H1 and H3 receptors' roles has been defined in peripheral pains in some papers and because histamine is known for its role in inflammatory responses; this study investigated the possible analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of ketotifen and fexofenadine as relatively safe long acting anti histamines in both chronic chemical pain and acute inflammation in rats.

METHODS

In this study, male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 225-250 grams were used. In order to evaluate the chemical chronic pain, sub-plantar injection of formalin applied and the pain scores were recorded every 15 seconds during 60 minutes. Carrageenan injection to the right hind paw was used for induction of acute inflammation and the paw edema was measured every 60 minutes for 4 hours.

RESULTS

Based on the results, both ketotifen and fexofenadine were able to significantly diminish chemical acute and chronic pain as well as inflammation in comparison with the control group and the effects were acceptable according to the standard treatment. Both effects for fexofenadine started later than those of ketotifen.

CONCLUSION

According to the outcomes of the study, ketotifen and fexofenadine demonstrated significant analgesic and anti-inflammatory characteristics in both models of chemical pain and acute inflammation in laboratory animals.

Asthma in children and adolescents: a comprehensive approach to diagnosis and management

Asthma is a chronic disease that has a significant impact on quality of life and is particularly important in children and adolescents, in part due to the higher incidence of allergies in children. The incidence of asthma has increased dramatically during this time period, with the highest increases in the urban areas of developed countries. It seems that the incidence in developing countries may follow this trend as well. While our knowledge of the pathophysiology of asthma and the available of newer, safer medication have both improved, the mortality of the disease has undergone an overall increase in the past 30 years. Asthma treatment goals in children include decreasing mortality and improving quality of life. Specific treatment goals include but are not limited to decreasing inflammation, improving lung function, decreasing clinical symptoms, reducing hospital stays and emergency department visits, reducing work or school absences, and reducing the need for rescue medications. Non-pharmacological management strategies include allergen avoidance, environmental evaluation for allergens and irritants, patient education, allergy testing, regular monitoring of lung function, and the use of asthma management plans, asthma control tests, peak flow meters, and asthma diaries. Achieving asthma treatment goals reduces direct and indirect costs of asthma and is economically cost-effective. Treatment in children presents unique challenges in diagnosis and management. Challenges in diagnosis include consideration of other diseases such as viral respiratory illnesses or vocal cord dysfunction. Challenges in management include evaluation of the child’s ability to use inhalers and peak flow meters and the management of exercise-induced asthma.

Sphingolipids: a potential molecular approach to treat allergic inflammation

Allergic inflammation is an immune response to foreign antigens, which begins within minutes of exposure to the allergen followed by a late phase leading to chronic inflammation. Prolonged allergic inflammation manifests in diseases such as urticaria and rhino-conjunctivitis, as well as chronic asthma and life-threatening anaphylaxis. The prevalence of allergic diseases is profound with 25% of the worldwide population affected and a rising trend across all ages, gender, and racial groups. The identification and avoidance of allergens can manage this disease, but this is not always possible with triggers being common foods, prevalent air-borne particles and only extremely low levels of allergen exposure required for sensitization. Patients who are sensitive to multiple allergens require prophylactic and symptomatic treatments. Current treatments are often suboptimal and associated with adverse effects, such as the interruption of cognition, sleep cycles, and endocrine homeostasis, all of which affect quality of life and are a financial burden to society. Clearly, a better therapeutic approach for allergic diseases is required. Herein, we review the current knowledge of allergic inflammation and discuss the role of sphingolipids as potential targets to regulate inflammatory development in vivo and in humans. We also discuss the benefits and risks of using sphingolipid inhibitors.

C-027 inhibits IgE-mediated passive sensitization bronchoconstriction and acts as a histamine and serotonin antagonist in human airways

Atopic asthma is poorly controlled by current therapies. Newer therapies and novel antihistamines are, therefore, required to treat patients whose atopic asthma is not controlled. For the first time, C-027 is shown to antagonize histamine, IgE-mediated and serotonin-induced contraction in human airways and vessels. Human precision-cut lung slices (PCLS, 250 μm thick), containing an airway or blood vessel, were pretreated with either C-027 (2 hours) or with vehicle alone and were contracted with histamine or serotonin. Known antihistamine was used as a comparator in antihistamine studies. Also, human airways were contracted via IgE passive sensitization in the presence or absence of C-027 or fexofenadine. Affinity of C-027 toward human G-protein coupled receptors was also determined, as well as the drug's biodistribution in murine model. C-027 was shown to have the highest affinity toward human histamine and serotonin receptors. Subsequently, C-027 was shown to antagonize histamine- and serotonin-induced airway and vascular smooth muscle contraction, respectively, and histamine-released bronchocontraction mediated by IgE passive sensitization in human small airways. C-027 also inhibited histamine-mediated single-cell calcium ion release. Low levels of C-027 were found in murine brain tissue. Collectively, these data suggest that C-027 markedly inhibits IgE-induced bronchoconstriction and antagonizes histamine and serotonin-contraction with little biodistribution in the brain. The compound may offer a future therapy for allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with asthma.

The role of histamine in asthma

Histamine is a ubiquitous inflammatory mediator intimately associated with the pathology of allergy. Traditional antihistamines, targeting the histamine H1 receptor, have failed to demonstrate a significant role for histamine in asthma. Novel immunomodulatory roles for histamine and the discovery of a novel histamine receptor, the histamine H4 receptor, have resulted in a reassessment of its importance in asthma.

Fexofenadine hydrochloride in the treatment of allergic disease: a review

Fexofenadine is a selective, non-sedating H1 receptor antagonist, marketed in the United States since 2000. The FDA approved an oral suspension in 2006, for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria in children. The tablet, capsule, and oral suspension are bioequivalent. Although fexofenadine does not use P450 CYP 3A4 it does interact with a number of drugs at P-glycoprotein and organic anion transporter polypeptides. The risk of toxicity from other drugs may increase with the administration of fexofenadine. Orange and grapefruit juices reduce the bioavailability of fexofenadine. Fexofenadine has been shown to have an impact on inflammatory mediators, other than histamine, such as decreasing the production of LTC₄, LTD₄, LTE₄, PGE₂, and PGF_2α; inhibiting cyclo-oxygenase 2, thromboxane; limiting iNOS generation of NO; decreasing cytokine levels (ICAM-1, ELAM-1, VCAM-1, RANTES, I-TAC, MDC, TARC, MMP-2, MMP-9, tryptase); and diminishing eosinophil adherence, chemotaxis, and opsonization of particles. These effects may provide benefit to some of the inflammatory responses of an acute allergic reaction and provide a basis for future development of H1 antagonists with stronger anti-inflammatory effects. These studies also support the contention that fexofenadine is effective for the treatment of allergic rhinits and chronic idiopathic urticaria.

The role of histamine H1 and H4 receptors in allergic inflammation: the search for new antihistamines

Histamine has a key role in allergic inflammatory conditions. The inflammatory responses resulting from the liberation of histamine have long been thought to be mediated by the histamine H1 receptor, and H1-receptor antagonists--commonly known as antihistamines--have been used to treat allergies for many years. However, the importance of histamine in the pathology of conditions such as asthma and chronic pruritus may have been underestimated. Here, we review accumulating evidence suggesting that histamine indeed has roles in inflammation and immune function modulation in such diseases. In particular, the discovery of a fourth histamine receptor (H4) and its expression on numerous immune and inflammatory cells has prompted a re-evaluation of the actions of histamine, suggesting a new potential for H4-receptor antagonists and a possible synergy between H1 and H4-receptor antagonists in targeting various inflammatory conditions.

A dual antagonist for chemokine CCR3 receptor and histamine H1 receptor

Eosinophilic chemokines and histamine play distinct but important roles in allergic diseases. Inhibition of both eosinophilic chemokines and histamine, therefore, is an ideal strategy for the treatment of allergic inflammation, such as asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis. YM-344484 was found to potently inhibit both the CCL11-induced Ca2+ influx in human CCR3-expressing cells (Kb=1.8 nM) and histamine-induced Ca2+ influx in histamine H1 receptor-expressing PC3 cells (Kb=47 nM). YM-344484 also inhibited the CCL11-induced chemotaxis of human CCR3-expressing cells (IC50=6.2 nM) and CCL11-induced eosinophil-derived neurotoxin release from human eosinophils (IC50=19 nM). Orally administered YM-344484 inhibited the increase in histamine-induced vascular permeability in mice (82% inhibition at a dose of 10 mg/kg) and the accumulation of eosinophils in a mouse asthma model (74% at a dose of 300 mg/kg). These results indicate that YM-344484, a novel and functional dual antagonist for chemokine CCR3 receptor and histamine H1 receptor, is an attractive candidate for development as a novel anti-allergic inflammation drug.

Histamine receptors in immune regulation and allergen-specific immunotherapy

The cells involved in the regulation of immune responses and hematopoiesis express histamine receptors and secrete histamine. Histamine acting through four types of its receptors has been shown not only to affect chronic inflammatory responses but also to regulate several essential events in the immune response. Histamine signals have a role in the mechanisms of tolerance induced during allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT), acting mainly through its receptor (HR) type 2. It positively interferes with the peripheral antigen tolerance induced by T regulatory cells in several pathways. The rationale for the concomitant use of H1 antihistamines during SIT is diverse and includes reduction of its immediate side effects as well as enhancement of mechanisms of specific tolerance and anti-inflammatory effects of vaccination.

Safety and tolerability of increased rate of infusion of intravenous immunoglobulin G, 10% in antibody-deficient patients

The incidence and severity of infusion-related adverse events (AEs) after infusions of IGIV-C, 10%, (Gamunex) at 0.14 mL/kg/min versus 0.08 mL/kg/min (standard rate) were compared. Patients with confirmed PID received two infusions 3-4 weeks apart with IGIV-C, 10% 400-600 mg/kg. Patients received their first infusion at 0.08 or 0.14 mL/kg/min and their second infusion 3-4 weeks later at the alternate rate, at an established step-wise rate increase. Ninety-seven of 100 patients remained valid for safety assessment. There were three infusion-related reactions at the standard rate and five at the increased rate. The incidence of all reported AEs was similar for both rates. Despite the time required for step-wise increases in infusion rate, the increased rate resulted in a shortened overall infusion time. Increasing the rate of infusion of IGIV-C, 10% by 75% up to 0.14 mL/kg/min (840 mg/kg/h) was well tolerated, suggesting safe administration of IGIV-C, 10% at this rate.

Histamine type 1 receptor deficiency reduces airway inflammation in a murine asthma model

BACKGROUND

Histamine plays an important role in immediate and late immune responses. The histamine type 1 (H1) receptor is expressed on several immune cell populations, but its role in a murine model of asthma remains unclear. The present study evaluated the role of histamine H1 receptors in airway allergic inflammation by comparing the development of bronchial asthma in histamine H1 receptor gene knockout (H1RKO) and wild-type mice.

METHODS

H1RKO and wild-type mice were sensitized by intraperitoneal injection of ovalbumin (OVA) or saline, and then challenged with aerosolized OVA or saline. Ventilatory timing in response to inhaled methacholine was measured, and samples of blood, bronchoalveolar lavage, and lung tissues were taken 24 h after the last OVA challenge.

RESULTS

OVA-treatedwild-type mice showed significantly increased airway eosinophilic infiltration, and airway response to methacholine compared to OVA-treated H1RKO mice. The serum level of immunoglobulin E and levels of interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-13, and TGF-beta1 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were lower in OVA-treated H1RKO mice than in OVA-treated wild-type mice, but there was no significant difference in interferon-gamma expression. Overall, deletion of histamine H1 receptors reduced allergic responses in a murine model of bronchial asthma.

CONCLUSION

Histamine plays an important role via H1 receptors in the development of T helper type 2 responses to enhance airway inflammation.

The H1 histamine receptor regulates allergic lung responses

Histamine, signaling via the type 1 receptor (H1R), has been shown to suppress Th2 cytokine production by in vitro cultured T cells. We examined the role of H1R in allergic inflammation in vivo using a murine asthma model. Allergen-stimulated splenic T cells from sensitized H1R-/- mice exhibited enhanced Th2 cytokine production. Despite this Th2 bias, allergen-challenged H1R-/- mice exhibited diminished lung Th2 cytokine mRNA levels, airway inflammation, goblet cell metaplasia, and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR). Restoration of pulmonary Th2 cytokines in H1R-/- mice by intranasal IL-4 or IL-13 restored inflammatory lung responses and AHR. Further investigation revealed that histamine acts as a T cell chemotactic factor and defective T cell trafficking was responsible for the absence of lung inflammation. Cultured T cells migrated in response to histamine in vitro, but this was ablated by blockade of H1R but not H2R. In vivo, allergen-specific WT but not H1R-/- CD4+ T cells were recruited to the lungs of naive recipients following inhaled allergen challenge. H1R-/- T cells failed to confer airway inflammation or AHR observed after transfer of WT T cells. Our data establish a role for histamine and H1R in promoting the migration of Th2 cells into sites of allergen exposure.

Transcriptional up-regulation of histamine receptor-1 in epithelial, mucus and inflammatory cells in perennial allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Histamine receptors play an important role in the pathogenesis of nasal allergy. Activation of histamine receptor 1 (H1R) and 2 (H2R) can cause allergic symptoms which can be blocked effectively by antihistamines. H1R and H2R transcript levels have been found to be up-regulated in perennial - but not in seasonal - allergic rhinitis (AR). The present study aimed to explore H1R and H2R expression in complex tissues of the nasal mucosa of perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR).

METHODS

Ten patients with PAR and 13 non-AR subjects were recruited for the study by medical history, physical examination and laboratory screening tests. In this study, we have analysed single cells dissected from the nasal mucosa biopsies by laser-assisted microdissection. H1R mRNA expression was analysed in different cell types such as epithelial, endothelial, mucus and inflammatory cells isolated from the nasal mucosa of PAR in comparison with non-AR subjects.

RESULTS

H1R mRNA gene expression level was significantly increased in the nasal mucosa of PAR in comparison with non-AR (P<0.0001). H1R mRNA was significantly elevated in epithelial (P<0.001) and mucus cells (P<0.05) of PAR in comparison with non-AR whereas H1R gene expression levels in endothelial cells between both groups were not changed (P=0.23). Interestingly, inflammatory cells in the nasal mucosa of PAR patients were also strongly expressed H1R mRNA (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The present study indicates that PAR alters the expression of H1R mRNA in epithelial, mucus and inflammatory cells of the nasal mucosa and but not in endothelial cells. Therefore, epithelial, mucus and inflammatory cells may play an important role in histamine-mediated allergic airway inflammation in PAR.

Histamine receptors are hot in immunopharmacology

In addition to its well-characterized effects in the acute allergic inflammatory responses, histamine has been demonstrated to affect chronic inflammation and regulate several essential events in the immune response. Histamine can selectively recruit the major effector cells into tissue sites and affect their maturation, activation, polarization, and other functions leading to chronic inflammation. Histamine also regulates dendritic cells, T cells and B cells, as well as related antibody isotype responses. In addition, acting through its receptor 2, histamine positively interferes with the peripheral antigen tolerance induced by T regulatory cells in several pathways. The diverse effects of histamine on immune regulation appear to be due to differential expression and regulation of 4 types of histamine receptors and their distinct intracellular signals. In addition, differences in affinities of these receptors for histamine is highly decisive for the biological effects of histamine and drugs that target histamine receptors. This article highlights recent discoveries in histamine immunobiology and discusses their relevance in allergic inflammation.

Differential effects of fexofenadine on arachidonic acid metabolism in cultured human monocytes

The relief of nasal congestion with the antihistamine fexofenadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis is thought to be due to its additional anti-inflammatory properties. The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro effects of fexofenadine on stimulated arachidonic acid metabolism. Human monocytes, isolated from blood and donated by 5 healthy volunteers, were either incubated for 20 h with 10 microg/ml lipopolysaccharide, with and without fexofenadine (10(-8)-10(-3) mol/l, n = 8-19), or were incubated for 20 h, with and without fexofenadine, and then stimulated with 0.5 mg/ml zymosan for 2 h. Leukotriene B4 (LTB4), LTC4, LTD4 and LTE4, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and F2alpha (PGF2alpha) production was determined by enzyme immunoassay. Zymosan-stimulated production of LTC4, LTD4 and LTE4 was significantly inhibited by clinically relevant concentrations of fexofenadine HCl: 10(-7) mol/l (22% inhibition vs. control, p = 0.008) and 10(-6) mol/l (24% inhibition vs. control, p = 0.020). Higher concentrations of fexofenadine (10(-4) and 10(-3) mol/l) inhibited LTB(4) generation. Lipopolysaccharide-stimulated production of PGE2 was significantly inhibited by fexofenadine HCl 10(-6) mol/l (26% inhibition, p = 0.035) and 10(-5) mol/l (40% inhibition, p = 0.001). Higher concentrations of fexofenadine HCl (10(-4) and 10(-3) mol/l) significantly inhibited PGF2alpha production by 50% (p = 0.026) and 63% (p = 0.001), respectively. Fexofenadine, at both clinically relevant and higher concentrations, inhibits LTC4, LTD4, LTE4 and PGE2 in cultured human monocytes. These additional anti-inflammatory properties may underlie the relief of nasal congestion observed in clinical studies.

Effects of fexofenadine hydrochloride in a guinea pig model of antigen-induced rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis is an inflammatory disease of the nasal mucosa, induced by histamine, leukotrienes, and other substances released from mast cells. Fexofenadine hydrochloride, the active metabolite of terfenadine, is a novel, nonsedating antiallergic drug having H1 receptor antagonistic activity. Fexofenadine is effective for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. However, its mechanism of action in attenuating nasal congestion has not yet been elucidated. Therefore, we first examined the effects of fexofenadine on a guinea pig model of antigen-induced rhinitis. We also evaluated the effects of mepyramine, zafirlukast and ramatroban in this model; these drugs are an H1 receptor antagonist, a selective leukotriene antagonist and a selective thromboxane antagonist, respectively. Rhinitis was induced by ovalbumin (OVA) instillation into the nasal cavity of animals that had been sensitized by two earlier OVA injections (s.c. and i.p.). The nasal airway resistance was measured for 45 min after the challenge. Fexofenadine hydrochloride (20 mg/kg) and terfenadine (20 mg/kg) administered orally 70 min prior to the challenge significantly inhibited (fexofenadine, p < 0.001, terfenadine, p < 0.05) the increase in nasal airway resistance. Ramatroban (30 mg/kg) administered orally 60 min prior to the challenge also significantly inhibited (p < 0.05) the increase in nasal airway resistance. In contrast, mepyramine (3 mg/kg i.v.) and zafirlukast (3 mg/kg p.o.) failed to reduce the increase in nasal airway resistance. These results suggest that thromboxane may be involved in the increase in the nasal airway resistance in this model. Accordingly, fexofenadine may reduce the increase in nasal airway resistance by inhibiting the release of chemical mediators, including thromboxane, that are involved in the increase in nasal airway resistance in this model.

The efficacy of short-term administration of 3 antihistamines vs placebo under natural exposure to Japanese cedar pollen

BACKGROUND

Japanese cedar pollinosis, a common disease with morbidity of approximately 20% in the Japanese population, is characterized by subjectively irritating symptoms during an annual 3-month period.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of cetirizine hydrochloride, loratadine, and fexofenadine hydrochloride in reducing pollinosis symptoms induced while walking in a park during the pollen season.

METHODS

A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 113 individuals with Japanese cedar pollinosis during 2 days in March 2003 in Osaka Expo Park, Osaka, Japan. Participants (aged 20-57 years) were divided into 4 groups according to treatment assignment: cetirizine hydrochloride, 10 mg/d; fexofenadine hydrochloride, 120 mg/d; loratadine, 10 mg/d; and placebo (lactose), twice daily. Symptoms were recorded hourly during the study. Furthermore, all the patients completed the Japanese version of the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire before and after the trial.

RESULTS

Self-evaluated symptom scores in all 3 active treatment groups showed significant improvements compared with the placebo group. Furthermore, the cetirizine group showed significant improvement in the domains of frequency of nose blowing and nasal obstruction compared with placebo. In addition, improvement in Japanese Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire scores was higher in the cetirizine group than in the loratadine and placebo groups.

CONCLUSION

Cetirizine seems to be more effective than fexofenadine and loratadine at reducing subjective symptoms in this study population.

Histamine in allergic inflammation and immune modulation

Histamine, originally considered as a mediator of acute inflammatory and immediate hypersensitivity responses has also been demonstrated to affect chronic inflammation and regulate several essential events in the immune response. On the other hand, various cytokines control histamine synthesis, release and expression of histamine receptors (HRs). The cells involved in the regulation of immune response and hematopoiesis express HRs and also secrete histamine, which can selectively recruit the major effector cells into tissue sites and affect their maturation, activation, polarization and effector functions leading to chronic inflammation. Histamine, acting through its receptor type 2, positively interferes with the peripheral antigen tolerance induced by T regulatory cells in several pathways. Histamine also regulates antigen-specific Th1 and Th2 cells, as well as related antibody isotype responses. The diverse effects of histamine on immune regulation are due to differential expression and regulation of four HRs and their distinct intracellular signals. In addition, differences in affinities of these receptors are highly decisive on the biological effects of histamine and agents that target HRs. This article highlights the findings leading to a change of perspective in histamine immunobiology.

The effects of fexofenadine on eosinophilia and systemic anaphylaxis in mice infected with Trichinella spiralis

BACKGROUND

The effects of the non-impairing, H(1)-receptor antagonist fexofenadine were investigated in in vivo mouse models of eosinophilia and systemic anaphylaxis.

METHODS

Eosinophilia was investigated in C57BL/6 mice (n=5 per group) infected with Trichinella spiralis, with and without administration of fexofenadine HCl (5, 10 and 20 mg/kg/day). Eosinophilia was also studied, with and without fexofenadine administration, in mice with a congenital mast-cell deficiency (W/W(v)) and controls (+/+). The effect of fexofenadine HCl (20 mg/kg/day) on IL-5 and eotaxin blood levels was also investigated in C57BL/6 mice. In a separate model, systemic anaphylaxis was induced in C57BL/6 mice using T. spiralis antigen. Fexofenadine HCl (5, 10 and 20 mg/kg) or vehicle was administered 20 min before antigen challenge (n=5 per group). The effect of fexofenadine on systemic anaphylaxis caused by IgE and anti-IgE was also examined in CBF1 mice injected with serum from NC/Nga mice with high IgE levels. Rectal temperature was measured as an indicator of anaphylaxis.

RESULTS

In C57BL/6 mice, repetitive oral administration of fexofenadine HCl (5, 10 and 20 mg/kg/day) resulted in dose-dependent suppression of eosinophilia (p<0.05-0.0001). No suppression was observed in mast-cell deficient W/W(v) mice. In addition, single oral administration of fexofenadine HCl (10 and 20 mg/kg) significantly suppressed the decrease in rectal temperature (p<0.01), a marker for systemic anaphylaxis, in C57BL/6 mice. In CBF1 mice injected with serum from NC/Nga mice with high IgE levels, the decrease in rectal temperature was suppressed by single administration of fexofenadine HCl (10 and 20 mg/kg; p<0.01 and p<0.001, respectively). Fexofenadine had no effect on peripheral IL-5 and eotaxin levels.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that fexofenadine suppresses both eosinophilia and systemic anaphylaxis, both of which are fundamental reactions in allergic diseases.

Second-Generation Antihistamines

Antihistamines are useful medications for the treatment of a variety of allergic disorders. Second-generation antihistamines avidly and selectively bind to peripheral histamine H1 receptors and, consequently, provide gratifying relief of histamine-mediated symptoms in a majority of atopic patients. This tight receptor specificity additionally leads to few effects on other neuronal or hormonal systems, with the result that adverse effects associated with these medications, with the exception of noticeable sedation in about 10% of cetirizine-treated patients, resemble those of placebo overall. Similarly, serious adverse drug reactions and interactions are uncommon with these medicines. Therapeutic interchange to one of the available second-generation antihistamines is a reasonable approach to limiting an institutional formulary, and adoption of such a policy has proven capable of creating substantial cost savings. Differences in overall efficacy and safety between available second-generation antihistamines, when administered in equivalent dosages, are not large. However, among the antihistamines presently available, fexofenadine may offer the best overall balance of effectiveness and safety, and this agent is an appropriate selection for initial or switch therapy for most patients with mild or moderate allergic symptoms. Cetirizine is the most potent antihistamine available and has been subjected to more clinical study than any other. This agent is appropriate for patients proven unresponsive to other antihistamines and for those with the most severe symptoms who might benefit from antihistamine treatment of the highest potency that can be dose-titrated up to maximal intensity.

Oral administration of desloratadine prior to sensitization prevents allergen-induced airway inflammation and hyper-reactivity in mice

BACKGROUND

Histamine-1-receptor (H1R)-antagonists were shown to influence various immunological functions on different cell types and may thus be employed for immune-modulating strategies for the prevention of primary immune responses.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of an H1R-antagonist on allergen-induced sensitization, airway inflammation (AI) and airway hyper-reactivity (AHR) in a murine model.

METHODS

BALB/c mice were systemically sensitized with ovalbumin (OVA) (six times, days 1-14) and challenged with aerosolized allergen (days 28-30). One day prior to the first and 2 h prior to every following sensitization, mice received either 1 or 0.01 microg of desloratadine (DL) or placebo per os.

RESULTS

Sensitization with OVA significantly increased specific and total IgE and IgG1 serum levels, as well as in vitro IL-5 and IL-4 production by spleen and peribronchial lymph node (PBLN) cells. Sensitized and challenged mice showed a marked eosinophilic infiltration in broncho-alveolar lavage fluids and lung tissues, and developed in vivo AHR to inhaled methacholine. Oral treatment with DL prior to OVA sensitization significantly decreased production of OVA-specific IgG1, as well as in vitro Th2-cytokine production by spleen and PBLN cells, compared with OVA-sensitized mice. Moreover, eosinophilic inflammation and development of in vivo AHR were significantly reduced in DL-treated mice, compared with sensitized controls.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with H1R-anatagonist prior to and during sensitization suppressed allergen-induced Th2 responses, as well as development of eosinophilic AI and AHR. This underscores an important immune modulating function of histamine, and implies a potential role of H1R-anatagonists in preventive strategies against allergic diseases.

Induction and maintenance of airway responsiveness to allergen challenge are determined at the age of initial sensitization

Age is an important factor in determining the quantity and quality of immune responses when challenged with allergen. In a model of allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation, where the sensitization phase and challenge phases can be dissociated in time, we examined the impact of age on these two phases. Sensitization of young mice (1-20 wk), but not older animals (30-40 wk), led to the development of airway hyperresponsiveness, airway eosinophilia, Th2 cytokine responses, and allergen-specific IgE, regardless of the age when the challenge phase was conducted. Thus, age at the time of initial sensitization was shown to be the critical factor dictating the nature of the response to later allergen challenge, as older mice remained responsive to allergen challenge if sensitized at a young age. These effects were shown to be mediated by lung T cells from sensitized young mice. Moreover, the failure of old sensitized mice to mediate these effects was shown not to be the result of active suppression of the responses. These data define the importance of age at initial allergen exposure in dictating subsequent responses in the lung when exposed to allergen and may help to define why asthma, even in adults, is most often initiated in early childhood.

Anti-inflammatory activity of H1-receptor antagonists: review of recent experimental research

OBJECTIVE

To compare the anti-inflammatory effects of fexofenadine with other H(1)-receptor antagonists in vitro.

DATA SOURCES

Published literature.

STUDY SELECTION

Recent experimental studies on anti-inflammatory effects of H(1)-receptor antagonists. Databases searched: Medline, Medscape.

PERIOD COVERED

1990-2003. Search terms: second-, third-generation antihistamines; sedating, nonsedating antihistamines; in vitro anti-inflammatory activity; cetirizine; ebastine; loratadine; fexofenadine; desloratadine.

RESULTS

Second- and third-generation H(1)-receptor antagonists may demonstrate significant in vitro anti-inflammatory activity at concentrations considered to be clinically relevant. In some instances, higher (supraclinical) concentrations are required to achieve comparable effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Experimental research suggests that second- and third-generation H(1)-receptor antagonists may achieve anti-inflammatory effects in a clinical context. Further studies are required to support this conclusion.

Effects of fexofenadine on T-cell function in a murine model of allergen-induced airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness

There is renewed interest in antihistamines for the treatment of allergic asthma. A growing body of literature has shown that the newer compounds can affect inflammatory cell accumulation and cytokine/chemokine production. In a murine model of allergen-induced airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness, the ability of fexofenadine to affect these outcomes was tested in a primary sensitization and challenge model and after treatment of donor mice before the adoptive transfer of T cells into recipients receiving limited allergen exposure. Mice were sensitized and challenged with allergen (ovalbumin). Airway function after inhaled methacholine was monitored in parallel to the assessment of tissue and airway inflammation and cytokine production. In further experiments, lung T lymphocytes from sensitized/challenged donor mice were transferred into naive recipients before limited airway challenge with the allergen. Administration of fexofenadine before challenge but after sensitization was effective in preventing tissue eosinophilia and airway hyperresponsiveness. Moreover, the treatment of donor mice with fexofenadine before transfer of lung T cells effectively prevented airway hyperresponsiveness and eosinophilia in naive mice exposed to limited airway challenge. These data therefore support the potential for fexofenadine in the treatment of allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation.

Desloratadine inhibits allergen-induced airway inflammation and bronchial hyperresponsiveness and alters T-cell responses in murine models of asthma

BACKGROUND

Histamine elicits many features of immediate hypersensitivity reactions. Recent evidence indicates that H1 receptors modulate immune responses to antigens. Desloratadine (DL), a new, long-acting, H1 receptor antagonist, has both a potent antihistaminic function and anti-inflammatory properties.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the effect of DL on allergic-airway responses in mice after inhalation of the naturally occurring aeroallergen Aspergillus fumigatus (Af ) and to examine the effects of DL on specific immune responses to a defined protein antigen with the use of an ovalbumin (OVA) model of asthma.

METHODS

Mice were subjected either to repeated, intranasal application of Af extract or to intraperitoneal immunization with OVA, followed by inhalation challenge. DL or a control fluid was given daily throughout the sensitization process. Immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels, bronchoalveolar lavage-fluid cytokines and cytology, lung histology, and physiologic responses to methacholine were assessed in the allergen-treated mice. Anti-OVA IgE responses and OVA-driven T-cell cytokine production were examined.

RESULTS

Treatment with DL did not impair IgE production but did inhibit bronchial inflammation and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in both Af- and OVA-treated mice. This inhibition required that DL be administered concurrently with allergen sensitization, indicating that the attenuation of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and inflammation was not caused by anticholinergic receptor effects. OVA-responsive T cells from DL-treated mice exhibited depressed production of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 and normal amounts of interferon-gamma. The amounts of IL-5 and IL-13 were also diminished in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.

CONCLUSION

DL, given at the time of exposure to the allergen, inhibits T(H)2 responses, the induction of allergic pulmonary inflammation, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. These results suggest that DL or similar agents given during times of antigen exposure might alter disease progression in patients with respiratory allergy.

Histamine enhances TGF-beta1-mediated suppression of Th2 responses

Susceptibility of T cells to TGF-beta1 produced by regulatory T cells has an important impact on the induction and maintenance of peripheral tolerance and therefore on the development of autoimmunity, cancer, and allergy. Histamine not only mediates the deleterious effects of allergic reactions, it can also modulate the Th1/Th2 cell balance. We demonstrate that histamine dose-dependently enhanced TGF-beta1-mediated suppression and TGF-beta1 responsiveness of CD4+ T cells. This effect was mediated by the histamine 2 receptor (H2R), as demonstrated by receptor-specific agonists and antagonists. Furthermore, the histamine effect on TGF-beta1 responsiveness was cAMP/PKA dependent. This pathway is activated by the H2R, which is preferentially expressed on Th2 cells. Thus a higher additive effect of histamine on TGF-beta1 responsiveness was found in Th2 cells compared with Th1 cells. In fact, findings are confirmed by analysis of cytokine regulation, since activation of the H2R/cAMP pathway promoted TGF-beta1-mediated IL-4 inhibition but was ineffective in suppressing IFN-gamma. These results demonstrate that histamine supports TGF-beta1 susceptibility of T cells. Moreover, Th2 cells are more affected by histamine-enhanced TGF-beta1 suppression, which is particularly important for the regulation of allergen-specific T cells in allergic immune responses.

Advances in mechanisms of allergy

This review summarizes selected "mechanisms of allergy" articles appearing between 2001 and 2002 in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (JACI). Papers chosen include those dealing with human eosinophil and basophil biology from life to death, as well as studies with animal models of allergic disease, including knock-out mice, Brown Norway rats, and ovalbumin (OVA)-sensitized and challenged BALB/c mice, that further our understanding of mechanisms of allergic diseases. When appropriate, articles from other journals have been included to supplement the topics being presented.

Novel approaches in the treatment of allergic rhinitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The increasing prevalence of allergic rhinitis, its impact on individual quality of life and social costs, as well as its role as a risk factor for asthma, underline the need for improved treatment options for this disorder. We reviewed the recent literature published in English, dealing with relevant and appropriately controlled clinical trials on the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

RECENT FINDINGS

In addition to well established pharmacological therapies with antihistamines, corticosteroids, decongestants and mast cell stabilizers, new therapeutic options become increasingly important, including leukotriene modifiers, anti-immunoglobulin E antibodies, phosphodiesterase inhibitors and intranasal heparin; there also exist new developments in appropriate allergen specific immunotherapy.

SUMMARY

Promising results, both with established and novel treatment options, are communicated, but further studies are still necessary to confirm these data.