1
|
Kasparoglu S, Meskhidze N, Petters MD. Aerosol mixing state, new particle formation, and cloud droplet number concentration in an urban environment. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2024; 951:175307. [PMID: 39142408 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 07/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/04/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024]
Abstract
Anthropogenically derived aerosols have been hypothesized to influence convective precipitation by increasing the available pool of cloud condensation nuclei. Here, we present a synthesis of aerosol size distribution and subsaturated hygroscopicity measurements between 15 and 250 nm diameter particles during the TRacking Aerosol Convection interactions ExpeRiment (TRACER). We found that the aerosol is externally mixed and can be described by a quasi-two-component description comprising a more and less hygroscopic mode. The mean hygroscopicity parameters for these modes across all sizes were 0.03 ± 0.04 and 0.22 ± 0.08 with no significant dependence on particle size. The number fraction of the more hygroscopic mode is 40 % for particles between 15 and 40 nm and gradually increases to ~70 % for particles >100 nm. Winds from the southerly direction feature particles with larger hygroscopicity parameters and have a larger fraction of particles in the more hygroscopic mode. The hygroscopicity parameter exhibits diurnal cycles that are consistent with condensation of a species with a hygroscopicity parameter ~0.1 which corresponds to values expected for secondary organic aerosol. We also identified nine small particle events that were attributed to particle formation by nucleation. The data are consistent with new particle formation having occurred aloft, followed by downward mixing with daytime turbulence. The species that are responsible for modal growth had hygroscopicity parameters varying between 0.05 and 0.34. These values systematically depended on the wind sector, suggesting that the chemical composition of the precursors differed. Hourly cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and cloud droplet number concentration (CDNC) values derived from the aerosol size distribution, subsaturated hygroscopicity measurements, and adiabatic parcel model simulations showed a dynamic range of a factor of 2-3 in CDNC depending on the wind sector, with lower values associated with southerly onshore flow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabin Kasparoglu
- Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA; Air Quality Research Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| | - Nicholas Meskhidze
- Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| | - Markus D Petters
- Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA; Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA; Center for Environmental Research and Technology (CE-CERT), University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA 92507, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Redemann J, Gao L. A machine learning paradigm for necessary observations to reduce uncertainties in aerosol climate forcing. Nat Commun 2024; 15:8343. [PMID: 39333149 PMCID: PMC11437084 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52747-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 09/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Uncertainties in estimates of climate cooling by anthropogenic aerosols have not decreased significantly in the last two decades, partly because observational constraints on crucial aerosol properties simulated in Earth System Models are insufficient. To help address this insufficiency in aerosol observations, we describe a paradigm for deriving higher-level aerosol properties with machine learning algorithms that use only lidar observations and reanalysis data as predictors. Our paradigm employs high-accuracy suborbital lidar and collocated in situ measurements to train and test two fully-connected neural network algorithms. We use two lidar data sets as input to our machine learning algorithms. The first data set consists of suborbital lidar observations not previously used in the training of the machine learning algorithms. The second data set consists of simulated UV-only observations to preview the algorithms' predictive capabilities in anticipation of data from the ATmospheric LIDar system on the EarthCARE satellite, which was launched in May 2024. Here we show that our algorithms predict two crucial aerosol properties, aerosol light absorption and cloud condensation nuclei concentrations with unprecedented accuracy, yielding mean relative errors of 21% and 13%, respectively, when suborbital lidar data are used as predictors. These errors represent significant improvements over conventional aerosol retrievals. Applied to future satellite missions, the paradigm presented here has great potential for constraining Earth System Models and reducing uncertainties in their estimates of aerosol climate forcing and future global warming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Redemann
- School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
| | - Lan Gao
- School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Su T, Li Z, Henao NR, Luan Q, Yu F. Constraining effects of aerosol-cloud interaction by accounting for coupling between cloud and land surface. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2024; 10:eadl5044. [PMID: 38781324 PMCID: PMC11114194 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adl5044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Aerosol-cloud interactions (ACIs) are vital for regulating Earth's climate by influencing energy and water cycles. Yet, effects of ACI bear large uncertainties, evidenced by systematic discrepancies between observed and modeled estimates. This study quantifies a major bias in ACI determinations, stemming from conventional surface or space measurements that fail to capture aerosol at the cloud level unless the cloud is coupled with land surface. We introduce an advanced approach to determine radiative forcing of ACI by accounting for cloud-surface coupling. By integrating field observations, satellite data, and model simulations, this approach reveals a drastic alteration in aerosol vertical transport and ACI effects caused by cloud coupling. In coupled regimes, aerosols enhance cloud droplet number concentration across the boundary layer more homogeneously than in decoupled conditions, under which aerosols from the free atmosphere predominantly affect cloud properties, leading to marked cooling effects. Our findings spotlight cloud-surface coupling as a key factor for ACI quantification, hinting at potential underassessments in traditional estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianning Su
- Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center & AOSC, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Zhanqing Li
- Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center & AOSC, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Natalia Roldan Henao
- Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center & AOSC, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Qingzu Luan
- Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center & AOSC, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Fangqun Yu
- Atmospheric Sciences Research Center, University at Albany, Albany, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sanchez KJ, Painemal D, Brown MD, Crosbie EC, Gallo F, Hair JW, Hostetler CA, Jordan CE, Robinson CE, Scarino AJ, Shingler TJ, Shook MA, Thornhill KL, Wiggins EB, Winstead EL, Ziemba LD, Chambers S, Williams A, Humphries RS, Keywood MD, Ward JP, Cravigan L, McRobert IM, Flynn C, Kulkarni GR, Russell LM, Roberts GC, McFarquhar GM, Nenes A, Woods SF, Reid JS, Small-Griswold J, Brooks S, Kirschler S, Voigt C, Wang J, Delene DJ, Quinn PK, Moore RH. Multi-campaign ship and aircraft observations of marine cloud condensation nuclei and droplet concentrations. Sci Data 2023; 10:471. [PMID: 37474611 PMCID: PMC10359301 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02372-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
In-situ marine cloud droplet number concentrations (CDNCs), cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), and CCN proxies, based on particle sizes and optical properties, are accumulated from seven field campaigns: ACTIVATE; NAAMES; CAMP2EX; ORACLES; SOCRATES; MARCUS; and CAPRICORN2. Each campaign involves aircraft measurements, ship-based measurements, or both. Measurements collected over the North and Central Atlantic, Indo-Pacific, and Southern Oceans, represent a range of clean to polluted conditions in various climate regimes. With the extensive range of environmental conditions sampled, this data collection is ideal for testing satellite remote detection methods of CDNC and CCN in marine environments. Remote measurement methods are vital to expanding the available data in these difficult-to-reach regions of the Earth and improving our understanding of aerosol-cloud interactions. The data collection includes particle composition and continental tracers to identify potential contributing CCN sources. Several of these campaigns include High Spectral Resolution Lidar (HSRL) and polarimetric imaging measurements and retrievals that will be the basis for the next generation of space-based remote sensors and, thus, can be utilized as satellite surrogates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Painemal
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, 23681, USA
- Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA, 23666, USA
| | - Matthew D Brown
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, 23681, USA
- Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA, 23666, USA
| | - Ewan C Crosbie
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, 23681, USA
- Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA, 23666, USA
| | - Francesca Gallo
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, 23681, USA
- NASA Postdoctoral Program, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN, 837830, USA
| | | | | | - Carolyn E Jordan
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, 23681, USA
- National Institute of Aerospace, Hampton, VA, 23666, USA
| | - Claire E Robinson
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, 23681, USA
- Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA, 23666, USA
| | - Amy Jo Scarino
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, 23681, USA
- Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA, 23666, USA
| | | | | | - Kenneth L Thornhill
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, 23681, USA
- Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA, 23666, USA
| | | | - Edward L Winstead
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, 23681, USA
- Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA, 23666, USA
| | - Luke D Ziemba
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, 23681, USA
| | - Scott Chambers
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Lucas Heigths, NSW, 2232, Australia
| | - Alastair Williams
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Lucas Heigths, NSW, 2232, Australia
| | - Ruhi S Humphries
- Climate Science Centre, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale, Australia
| | - Melita D Keywood
- Climate Science Centre, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale, Australia
| | - Jason P Ward
- Climate Science Centre, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale, Australia
| | - Luke Cravigan
- School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Ian M McRobert
- Engineering and Technology Program, CSIRO National Collections and Marine Infrastructure, Hobart, Australia
| | - Connor Flynn
- School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA
| | - Gourihar R Kulkarni
- Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, USA
| | | | - Gregory C Roberts
- Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques, UMR3589, Toulouse, France
| | - Greg M McFarquhar
- School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA
- Cooperative Institute for Severe and High-Impact Weather Research and Operations, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Athanasios Nenes
- Laboratory of atmospheric processes and their impacts (LAPI), ENAC/IIE, Ecole polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Institute for Chemical Engineering Sciences, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (ICE-HT/FORTH), Patra, Greece
| | - Sarah F Woods
- Stratton Park Engineering Company (SPEC), Boulder, CO, 80301, USA
| | | | | | | | - Simon Kirschler
- Institute for Atmospheric Physics, DLR, German Aerospace Center, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
- Institute for Atmospheric Physics, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christianne Voigt
- Institute for Atmospheric Physics, DLR, German Aerospace Center, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
- Institute for Atmospheric Physics, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jian Wang
- Center for Aerosol Science and Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Convective Entrainment Rate over the Tibetan Plateau and Its Adjacent Regions in the Boreal Summer Using SNPP-VIIRS. REMOTE SENSING 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/rs14092073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The entrainment rate (λ) is difficult to estimate, and its uncertainties cause a significant error in convection parameterization and precipitation simulation, especially over the Tibetan Plateau, where observations are scarce. The λ over the Tibetan Plateau, and its adjacent regions, is estimated for the first time using five-year satellite data and a reanalysis dataset. The λ and cloud base environmental relative humidity (RH) decrease with an increase in terrain height. Quantitatively, the correlation between λ and RH changes from positive at low terrain heights to negative at high terrain heights, and the underlying mechanisms are here interpreted. When the terrain height is below 1 km, large RH decreases the difference in moist static energy (MSE) between the clouds and the environment and increases λ. When the terrain height is above 1 km, the correlation between λ and RH is related to the difference between MSE turning point and cloud base, because of decreases in specific humidity near the surface with increasing terrain height. These results enhance the theoretical understanding of the factors affecting λ and pave the way for improving the parameterization of λ.
Collapse
|
6
|
Quick Predictions of Onset Times and Rain Amounts from Monsoon Showers over Urban Built Environments. ATMOSPHERE 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/atmos13030370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
Predicting the onset times of precipitation over densely populated cities for the purposes of timely evacuation is a challenge. This paper explored a flooding event over an urban built environment in a South Asian mega city, Chennai, where extant urban planning models rely on predicted rainwater amounts for early warning and impact assessment studies. However, the time duration of flooding events is related to the nature of the urban sprawl in the built environment. Any evacuation measure is invariably tied down to the time duration over which the precipitation event occurs, and therefore to the expected time of a precipitation event to begin. In this context, a crucial parameter useful to municipal authorities is the onset time of precipitation. This study used optimised analytical formulations to predict this time, and the derived analytical expressions for the case study yielded comparable times estimated from a computer-intensive full-scale large eddy model within an accuracy of 2%. It is suggested that municipal authorities (who are non-experts in fluid mechanics) use this early prediction for the purposes of quick alerts to a congested city’s most vulnerable citizens within urban sprawls. However, for the procedure to work at its best, it involves a two-stage procedure. The first step involves the use of a parcel model to obtain the expected cloud droplet spectral spreads based on the prevailing dynamical characterisations. The second step involves an optimisation procedure involving cloud spectral properties from the first step to quantify both the auto-conversion rates and the threshold. Thereafter, an onset time calculation based on cloud properties is estimated. These new results are cast in closed form for easy incorporation into meteorological applications over a variety of urban scales. Rain mass amounts were also predicted analytically and used to configure Aeronautical Reconnaissance Coverage Geographic Information System (ARCGIS) to compute low drainage flow rates over the vulnerable parts of Chennai city. It was found that heavy precipitation over the North Chennai region yielded discharge rates to the tune of ~250 m3s−1 during a 24 h period, causing intense flooding in the low-lying areas around the Cooum River basin with a large population density, with estimates sufficiently corroborating observations.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Evaluation of the cloud seeding effect is a challenge due to lack of directly physical observational evidence. In this study, an approach for directly observing the cloud seeding effect is proposed using a 1548 nm coherent Doppler wind lidar (CDWL). Normalized skewness was employed to identify the components of the reflectivity spectrum. The spectrum detection capability of a CDWL was verified by a 24.23-GHz Micro Rain Radar (MRR) in Hefei, China (117°15′ E, 31°50′ N), and different types of lidar spectra were detected and separated, including aerosol, turbulence, cloud droplet, and precipitation. Spectrum analysis was applied as a field experiment performed in Inner Mongolia, China (112°39′ E, 42°21′ N ) to support the cloud seeding operation for the 70th anniversary of China’s national day. The CDWL can monitor the cloud motion and provide windshear and turbulence information ensuring operation safety. The cloud-precipitation process is detected by the CDWL, microwave radiometer (MWR) and Advanced Geosynchronous Radiation Imager (AGRI) in FY4A satellites. In particular, the spectrum width and skewness of seeded cloud show a two-layer structure, which reflects cloud component changes, and it is possibly related to cloud seeding effects. Multi-component spectra are separated into four clusters, which are well distinguished by spectrum width and vertical velocity. In general, our findings provide new evidence that the reflectivity spectrum of CDWL has potential for assessing cloud seeding effects.
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhang Y, Tao J, Ma N, Kuang Y, Wang Z, Cheng P, Xu W, Yang W, Zhang S, Xiong C, Dong W, Xie L, Sun Y, Fu P, Zhou G, Cheng Y, Su H. Predicting cloud condensation nuclei number concentration based on conventional measurements of aerosol properties in the North China Plain. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2020; 719:137473. [PMID: 32126407 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Revised: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) play an important role in the formation and evolution of cloud droplets. However, the dataset of global CCN number concentration (NCCN) is still scarce due to the lack of direct CCN measurements, hindering an accurate evaluation of its climate effects. Alternative approaches to determine NCCN have thus been proposed to calculate NCCN based on measurements of other aerosol properties, such as particle number size distribution, bulk aerosol chemical composition and aerosol optical properties. To better understand the interaction between haze pollution and climate, we performed direct CCN measurements in the winter of 2018 at the Gucheng site, a typical polluted suburban site in North China Plain (NCP). The results show that the average CCN concentrations were 3.81 × 103 cm-3, 5.35 × 103 cm-3, 9.74 × 103 cm-3, 1.27 × 104 cm-3, 1.44 × 104 cm-3 at measured supersaturation levels of 0.114%, 0.148%, 0.273%, 0.492% and 0.864%, respectively. Based on these observational data, we have further investigated two methods of calculating NCCN from: (1) bulk aerosol chemical composition and particle number size distribution; (2) bulk aerosol chemical composition and aerosol optical properties. Our results showed that both methods could well reproduce the observed concentration (R2 > 0.88) and variability of NCCN with a 9% to 23% difference in the mean value. Further error analysis shows that the estimated NCCN tends to be underestimated by about 20% during the daytime while overestimated by <10% at night compared with the measured NCCN. These results provide quantitative instructions for the NCCN prediction based on conventional aerosol measurements in the NCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanyan Zhang
- Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511443, China
| | - Jiangchuan Tao
- Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511443, China.
| | - Nan Ma
- Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511443, China
| | - Ye Kuang
- Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511443, China
| | - Zhibin Wang
- Research Center for Air Pollution and Health, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Peng Cheng
- Institute of Mass Spectrometer and Atmospheric Environment, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wanyun Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather, Key Laboratory for Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Composition, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Wenda Yang
- Institute of Mass Spectrometer and Atmospheric Environment, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shaobin Zhang
- Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511443, China
| | - Chun Xiong
- Research Center for Air Pollution and Health, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Wenlin Dong
- Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511443, China
| | - Linhong Xie
- Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511443, China
| | - Yele Sun
- State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China; College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
| | - Pingqing Fu
- Institute of Surface-Earth System Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
| | - Guangsheng Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather, Key Laboratory for Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Composition, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Yafang Cheng
- Multiphase Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz 55128, Germany
| | - Hang Su
- Multiphase Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz 55128, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sorooshian A, Corral AF, Braun RA, Cairns B, Crosbie E, Ferrare R, Hair J, Kleb MM, Mardi AH, Maring H, McComiskey A, Moore R, Painemal D, Jo Scarino A, Schlosser J, Shingler T, Shook M, Wang H, Zeng X, Ziemba L, Zuidema P. Atmospheric Research Over the Western North Atlantic Ocean Region and North American East Coast: A Review of Past Work and Challenges Ahead. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH. ATMOSPHERES : JGR 2020; 125:10.1029/2019jd031626. [PMID: 32699733 PMCID: PMC7375207 DOI: 10.1029/2019jd031626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Decades of atmospheric research have focused on the Western North Atlantic Ocean (WNAO) region because of its unique location that offers accessibility for airborne and ship measurements, gradients in important atmospheric parameters, and a range of meteorological regimes leading to diverse conditions that are poorly understood. This work reviews these scientific investigations for the WNAO region, including the East Coast of North America and the island of Bermuda. Over 50 field campaigns and long-term monitoring programs, in addition to 715 peer-reviewed publications between 1946 and 2019 have provided a firm foundation of knowledge for these areas. Of particular importance in this region has been extensive work at the island of Bermuda that is host to important time series records of oceanic and atmospheric variables. Our review categorizes WNAO atmospheric research into eight major categories, with some studies fitting into multiple categories (relative %): Aerosols (25%), Gases (24%), Development/Validation of Techniques, Models, and Retrievals (18%), Meteorology and Transport (9%), Air-Sea Interactions (8%), Clouds/Storms (8%), Atmospheric Deposition (7%), and Aerosol-Cloud Interactions (2%). Recommendations for future research are provided in the categories highlighted above.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armin Sorooshian
- Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
- Department of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Andrea F. Corral
- Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Rachel A. Braun
- Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Brian Cairns
- NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY
| | - Ewan Crosbie
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA
- Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA
| | | | | | | | - Ali Hossein Mardi
- Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | | | | | | | - David Painemal
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA
- Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA
| | - Amy Jo Scarino
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA
- Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA
| | - Joseph Schlosser
- Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | | | | | - Hailong Wang
- Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA
| | - Xubin Zeng
- Department of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | | | - Paquita Zuidema
- Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rosenfeld D, Zhu Y, Wang M, Zheng Y, Goren T, Yu S. Aerosol-driven droplet concentrations dominate coverage and water of oceanic low-level clouds. Science 2019; 363:science.aav0566. [PMID: 30655446 DOI: 10.1126/science.aav0566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
A lack of reliable estimates of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) aerosols over oceans has severely limited our ability to quantify their effects on cloud properties and extent of cooling by reflecting solar radiation-a key uncertainty in anthropogenic climate forcing. We introduce a methodology for ascribing cloud properties to CCN and isolating the aerosol effects from meteorological effects. Its application showed that for a given meteorology, CCN explains three-fourths of the variability in the radiative cooling effect of clouds, mainly through affecting shallow cloud cover and water path. This reveals a much greater sensitivity of cloud radiative forcing to CCN than previously reported, which means too much cooling if incorporated into present climate models. This suggests the existence of compensating aerosol warming effects yet to be discovered, possibly through deep clouds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Rosenfeld
- Institute of Earth Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel. .,School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, China
| | - Yannian Zhu
- Meteorological Institute of Shaanxi Province, Xi'an, China
| | - Minghuai Wang
- School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, China. .,Joint International Research Laboratory of Atmospheric and Earth System Sciences and Institute for Climate and Global Change Research, Nanjing University, China
| | - Youtong Zheng
- Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Tom Goren
- University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Shaocai Yu
- Research Center for Air Pollution and Health; Key Laboratory of Environmental Remediation and Ecological Health, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P.R. China. .,Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91123, USA.,Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen, Fujian 361021, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ma PL, Rasch PJ, Chepfer H, Winker DM, Ghan SJ. Observational constraint on cloud susceptibility weakened by aerosol retrieval limitations. Nat Commun 2018; 9:2640. [PMID: 29980669 PMCID: PMC6035237 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05028-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2017] [Accepted: 06/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Aerosol-cloud interactions remain a major uncertainty in climate research. Studies have indicated that model estimates of cloud susceptibility to aerosols frequently exceed satellite estimates, motivating model reformulations to increase agreement. Here we show that conventional ways of using satellite information to estimate susceptibility can serve as only a weak constraint on models because the estimation is sensitive to errors in the retrieval procedures. Using instrument simulators to investigate differences between model and satellite estimates of susceptibilities, we find that low aerosol loading conditions are not well characterized by satellites, but model clouds are sensitive to aerosol perturbations in these conditions. We quantify the observational requirements needed to constrain models, and find that the nighttime lidar measurements of aerosols provide a better characterization of tenuous aerosols. We conclude that observational uncertainties and limitations need to be accounted for when assessing the role of aerosols in the climate system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Po-Lun Ma
- Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 902 Battelle Boulevard, MSIN K9-30, Richland, WA, 99354, USA.
| | - Philip J Rasch
- Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 902 Battelle Boulevard, MSIN K9-30, Richland, WA, 99354, USA
| | - Hélène Chepfer
- Laboratoire Météorologie Dynamique, Institute Pierre Simon Laplace, Sorbonne Université, 4, Place Jussieu, 75005, Paris, France
- École Polytechnique, Centre National Recherche Scientifique, Route de Saclay, 91120, Palaiseau, France
| | - David M Winker
- NASA Langley Research Center, MS/475, Hampton, VA, 23681, USA
| | - Steven J Ghan
- Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 902 Battelle Boulevard, MSIN K9-30, Richland, WA, 99354, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Grosvenor DP, Sourdeval O, Zuidema P, Ackerman A, Alexandrov MD, Bennartz R, Boers R, Cairns B, Chiu JC, Christensen M, Deneke H, Diamond M, Feingold G, Fridlind A, Hünerbein A, Knist C, Kollias P, Marshak A, McCoy D, Merk D, Painemal D, Rausch J, Rosenfeld D, Russchenberg H, Seifert P, Sinclair K, Stier P, van Diedenhoven B, Wendisch M, Werner F, Wood R, Zhang Z, Quaas J. Remote Sensing of Droplet Number Concentration in Warm Clouds: A Review of the Current State of Knowledge and Perspectives. REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS (WASHINGTON, D.C. : 1985) 2018; 56:409-453. [PMID: 30148283 PMCID: PMC6099364 DOI: 10.1029/2017rg000593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2017] [Revised: 04/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
The cloud droplet number concentration (N d) is of central interest to improve the understanding of cloud physics and for quantifying the effective radiative forcing by aerosol-cloud interactions. Current standard satellite retrievals do not operationally provide N d, but it can be inferred from retrievals of cloud optical depth (τ c) cloud droplet effective radius (r e) and cloud top temperature. This review summarizes issues with this approach and quantifies uncertainties. A total relative uncertainty of 78% is inferred for pixel-level retrievals for relatively homogeneous, optically thick and unobscured stratiform clouds with favorable viewing geometry. The uncertainty is even greater if these conditions are not met. For averages over 1° ×1° regions the uncertainty is reduced to 54% assuming random errors for instrument uncertainties. In contrast, the few evaluation studies against reference in situ observations suggest much better accuracy with little variability in the bias. More such studies are required for a better error characterization. N d uncertainty is dominated by errors in r e, and therefore, improvements in r e retrievals would greatly improve the quality of the N d retrievals. Recommendations are made for how this might be achieved. Some existing N d data sets are compared and discussed, and best practices for the use of N d data from current passive instruments (e.g., filtering criteria) are recommended. Emerging alternative N d estimates are also considered. First, new ideas to use additional information from existing and upcoming spaceborne instruments are discussed, and second, approaches using high-quality ground-based observations are examined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Odran Sourdeval
- Leipzig Institute for MeteorologyUniversität LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - Paquita Zuidema
- Department of Atmospheric SciencesRosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric ScienceMiamiFLUSA
| | | | - Mikhail D. Alexandrov
- NASA Goddard Institute for Space StudiesNew YorkNYUSA
- Department of Applied Physics and Applied MathematicsColumbia UniversityNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Ralf Bennartz
- Department of Earth and Environmental SciencesVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleTNUSA
- Space Science and Engineering CenterUniversity of Wisconsin‐MadisonMadisonWIUSA
| | - Reinout Boers
- Royal Netherlands Meteorological InstituteDe BiltThe Netherlands
| | - Brian Cairns
- NASA Goddard Institute for Space StudiesNew YorkNYUSA
| | - J. Christine Chiu
- Department of Atmospheric ScienceColorado State UniversityFort CollinsCOUSA
| | - Matthew Christensen
- Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryHarwellUK
- Department of PhysicsUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Hartwig Deneke
- Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric ResearchLeipzigGermany
| | - Michael Diamond
- Department of Atmospheric SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWAUSA
| | - Graham Feingold
- Chemical Sciences Division, Earth System Research LaboratoryNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationBoulderCOUSA
| | - Ann Fridlind
- NASA Goddard Institute for Space StudiesNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Anja Hünerbein
- Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric ResearchLeipzigGermany
| | | | - Pavlos Kollias
- School of Marine and Atmospheric SciencesStony Brook UniversityStony BrookNYUSA
| | | | - Daniel McCoy
- School of Earth and EnvironmentUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
| | - Daniel Merk
- Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric ResearchLeipzigGermany
| | | | - John Rausch
- Department of Earth and Environmental SciencesVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleTNUSA
| | - Daniel Rosenfeld
- Institute of Earth SciencesThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | - Herman Russchenberg
- Department of Geoscience and Remote SensingDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
| | - Patric Seifert
- Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric ResearchLeipzigGermany
| | - Kenneth Sinclair
- NASA Goddard Institute for Space StudiesNew YorkNYUSA
- Department of Earth and Environmental EngineeringColumbia UniversityNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Philip Stier
- Department of PhysicsUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Bastiaan van Diedenhoven
- NASA Goddard Institute for Space StudiesNew YorkNYUSA
- Center for Climate Systems ResearchColumbia UniversityNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Manfred Wendisch
- Leipzig Institute for MeteorologyUniversität LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - Frank Werner
- Joint Center for Earth Systems TechnologyBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Robert Wood
- Department of Atmospheric SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWAUSA
| | | | - Johannes Quaas
- Leipzig Institute for MeteorologyUniversität LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kahn RA, Berkoff TA, Brock C, Chen G, Ferrare RA, Ghan S, Hansico TF, Hegg DA, Martins JV, McNaughton CS, Murphy DM, Ogren JA, Penner JE, Pilewskie P, Seinfeld JH, Worsnop DR. SAM-CAAM: A Concept for Acquiring Systematic Aircraft Measurements to Characterize Aerosol Air Masses. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY 2017; 98:2215-2228. [PMID: 29290633 PMCID: PMC5745363 DOI: 10.1175/bams-d-16-0003.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
A modest operational program of systematic aircraft measurements can resolve key satellite-aerosol-data-record limitations. Satellite observations provide frequent, global aerosol-amount maps, but offer only loose aerosol property constraints needed for climate and air quality applications. We define and illustrate the feasibility of flying an aircraft payload to measure key aerosol optical, microphysical, and chemical properties in situ. The flight program could characterize major aerosol air-mass types statistically, at a level-of-detail unobtainable from space. It would: (1) enhance satellite aerosol retrieval products with better climatology assumptions, and (2) improve translation between satellite-retrieved optical properties and species-specific aerosol mass and size simulated in climate models to assess aerosol forcing, its anthropogenic components, and other environmental impacts. As such, Systematic Aircraft Measurements to Characterize Aerosol Air Masses (SAM-CAAM) could add value to data records representing several decades of aerosol observations from space, improve aerosol constraints on climate modeling, help interrelate remote-sensing, in situ, and modeling aerosol-type definitions, and contribute to future satellite aerosol missions. Fifteen Required Variables are identified, and four Payload Options of increasing ambition are defined, to constrain these quantities. "Option C" could meet all the SAM-CAAM objectives with about 20 instruments, most of which have flown before, but never routinely several times per week, and never as a group. Aircraft integration, and approaches to data handling, payload support, and logistical considerations for a long-term, operational mission are discussed. SAM-CAAM is feasible because, for most aerosol sources and specified seasons, particle properties tend to be repeatable, even if aerosol loading varies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralph A Kahn
- Earth Science Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771
| | | | - Charles Brock
- Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory Boulder CO 80305
| | - Gao Chen
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton VA 23681
| | | | - Steven Ghan
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Department of Energy, Richland WA 99352
| | - Thomas F Hansico
- Earth Science Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771
| | - Dean A Hegg
- Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195
| | - J Vanderlei Martins
- Physics Department and Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore MD
| | - Cameron S McNaughton
- Golder Associates Ltd. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada S7H 0T4 and Department of Oceanography, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, 96822
| | - Daniel M Murphy
- Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory Boulder CO 80305
| | - John A Ogren
- University of Colorado/Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences Boulder CO 80303
| | - Joyce E Penner
- Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109
| | - Peter Pilewskie
- Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences University of Colorado, Boulder CO 80303
| | | | - Douglas R Worsnop
- Center for Aerosol and Cloud Chemistry, Aerodyne Research, Inc. Billerica MA 01821
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gryspeerdt E, Quaas J, Ferrachat S, Gettelman A, Ghan S, Lohmann U, Morrison H, Neubauer D, Partridge DG, Stier P, Takemura T, Wang H, Wang M, Zhang K. Constraining the instantaneous aerosol influence on cloud albedo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017; 114:4899-4904. [PMID: 28446614 PMCID: PMC5441736 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1617765114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Much of the uncertainty in estimates of the anthropogenic forcing of climate change comes from uncertainties in the instantaneous effect of aerosols on cloud albedo, known as the Twomey effect or the radiative forcing from aerosol-cloud interactions (RFaci), a component of the total or effective radiative forcing. Because aerosols serving as cloud condensation nuclei can have a strong influence on the cloud droplet number concentration (Nd ), previous studies have used the sensitivity of the Nd to aerosol properties as a constraint on the strength of the RFaci. However, recent studies have suggested that relationships between aerosol and cloud properties in the present-day climate may not be suitable for determining the sensitivity of the Nd to anthropogenic aerosol perturbations. Using an ensemble of global aerosol-climate models, this study demonstrates how joint histograms between Nd and aerosol properties can account for many of the issues raised by previous studies. It shows that if the anthropogenic contribution to the aerosol is known, the RFaci can be diagnosed to within 20% of its actual value. The accuracy of different aerosol proxies for diagnosing the RFaci is investigated, confirming that using the aerosol optical depth significantly underestimates the strength of the aerosol-cloud interactions in satellite data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Gryspeerdt
- Institute for Meteorology, Universität Leipzig, 04109 Leipzig, Germany;
- Space and Atmospheric Physics Group, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
| | - Johannes Quaas
- Institute for Meteorology, Universität Leipzig, 04109 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Sylvaine Ferrachat
- Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Steven Ghan
- Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352
| | - Ulrike Lohmann
- Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hugh Morrison
- National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80305
| | - David Neubauer
- Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Daniel G Partridge
- Department of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
- Bert Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Mathematics, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QF, United Kingdom
| | - Philip Stier
- Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Planetary Physics, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PU, United Kingdom
| | - Toshihiko Takemura
- Research Institute for Applied Mathematics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 816-8580, Japan
| | - Hailong Wang
- Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352
| | - Minghuai Wang
- Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352
- Institute for Climate and Global Change Research, Nanjing University, 210023 Nanjing, China
- School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, 210023 Nanjing, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Climate Change, 210023 Nanjing, China
| | - Kai Zhang
- Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Schmale J, Henning S, Henzing B, Keskinen H, Sellegri K, Ovadnevaite J, Bougiatioti A, Kalivitis N, Stavroulas I, Jefferson A, Park M, Schlag P, Kristensson A, Iwamoto Y, Pringle K, Reddington C, Aalto P, Äijälä M, Baltensperger U, Bialek J, Birmili W, Bukowiecki N, Ehn M, Fjæraa AM, Fiebig M, Frank G, Fröhlich R, Frumau A, Furuya M, Hammer E, Heikkinen L, Herrmann E, Holzinger R, Hyono H, Kanakidou M, Kiendler-Scharr A, Kinouchi K, Kos G, Kulmala M, Mihalopoulos N, Motos G, Nenes A, O'Dowd C, Paramonov M, Petäjä T, Picard D, Poulain L, Prévôt ASH, Slowik J, Sonntag A, Swietlicki E, Svenningsson B, Tsurumaru H, Wiedensohler A, Wittbom C, Ogren JA, Matsuki A, Yum SS, Myhre CL, Carslaw K, Stratmann F, Gysel M. Collocated observations of cloud condensation nuclei, particle size distributions, and chemical composition. Sci Data 2017; 4:170003. [PMID: 28291234 PMCID: PMC5349251 DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2016] [Accepted: 12/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) number concentrations alongside with submicrometer particle number size distributions and particle chemical composition have been measured at atmospheric observatories of the Aerosols, Clouds, and Trace gases Research InfraStructure (ACTRIS) as well as other international sites over multiple years. Here, harmonized data records from 11 observatories are summarized, spanning 98,677 instrument hours for CCN data, 157,880 for particle number size distributions, and 70,817 for chemical composition data. The observatories represent nine different environments, e.g., Arctic, Atlantic, Pacific and Mediterranean maritime, boreal forest, or high alpine atmospheric conditions. This is a unique collection of aerosol particle properties most relevant for studying aerosol-cloud interactions which constitute the largest uncertainty in anthropogenic radiative forcing of the climate. The dataset is appropriate for comprehensive aerosol characterization (e.g., closure studies of CCN), model-measurement intercomparison and satellite retrieval method evaluation, among others. Data have been acquired and processed following international recommendations for quality assurance and have undergone multiple stages of quality assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Schmale
- Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen 5232, Switzerland
| | - Silvia Henning
- Experimental Aerosol &Cloud Microphysics, Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Permoserstrasse 15, Leipzig 04318, Germany
| | - Bas Henzing
- Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, Princetonlaan 6, Utrecht 3584, The Netherlands
| | - Helmi Keskinen
- Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, Helsinki 00014, Finland.,Hyytiälä Forestry Field Station, Hyytiäläntie 124, Korkeakoski 35500, Finland
| | - Karine Sellegri
- Laboratoire de Météorologie Physique, 4 Avenue Blaise Pascal, Aubiere, Cedex 63178, France
| | - Jurgita Ovadnevaite
- School of Physics and CCAPS, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland
| | - Aikaterini Bougiatioti
- ECPL, Department of Chemistry, University of Crete, Voutes, Heraklion 71003, Greece.,IERSD, National Observatory of Athens, P. Penteli, Athens 15236, Greece
| | - Nikos Kalivitis
- ECPL, Department of Chemistry, University of Crete, Voutes, Heraklion 71003, Greece.,IERSD, National Observatory of Athens, P. Penteli, Athens 15236, Greece
| | - Iasonas Stavroulas
- ECPL, Department of Chemistry, University of Crete, Voutes, Heraklion 71003, Greece.,IERSD, National Observatory of Athens, P. Penteli, Athens 15236, Greece
| | - Anne Jefferson
- Cooperative Institute for Research in the Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
| | - Minsu Park
- Department of Atmospheric Science, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, South Korea
| | - Patrick Schlag
- Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, University of Utrecht, Utrecht 3508 TC, The Netherlands.,Institute for Energy and Climate Research (IEK-8): Troposphere, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich 52425, Germany
| | | | - Yoko Iwamoto
- Institute of Nature and Environmental Technology, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan.,Faculty of Science Division I, Department of Physics, Tokyo University of Science, 1-3 Kagurazaka, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8601, Japan
| | - Kirsty Pringle
- School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Carly Reddington
- School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Pasi Aalto
- Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, Helsinki 00014, Finland
| | - Mikko Äijälä
- Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, Helsinki 00014, Finland
| | - Urs Baltensperger
- Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen 5232, Switzerland
| | - Jakub Bialek
- School of Physics and CCAPS, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland
| | - Wolfram Birmili
- Experimental Aerosol &Cloud Microphysics, Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Permoserstrasse 15, Leipzig 04318, Germany.,Federal Environment Agency, Corrensplatz 1, Berlin 14195, Germany
| | - Nicolas Bukowiecki
- Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen 5232, Switzerland
| | - Mikael Ehn
- Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, Helsinki 00014, Finland
| | - Ann Mari Fjæraa
- NILU -Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Instituttveien 18, Kjeller 2007, Norway
| | - Markus Fiebig
- NILU -Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Instituttveien 18, Kjeller 2007, Norway
| | - Göran Frank
- Department of Physics, Lund University, Lund 221 00, Sweden
| | - Roman Fröhlich
- Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen 5232, Switzerland
| | - Arnoud Frumau
- Energy Research Center of the Netherlands, Petten 1755 ZG, The Netherlands
| | - Masaki Furuya
- Institute of Nature and Environmental Technology, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan
| | - Emanuel Hammer
- Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen 5232, Switzerland.,Grolimund+Partner AG, Thunstrasse 101a, Bern 3006, Switzerland
| | - Liine Heikkinen
- Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, Helsinki 00014, Finland
| | - Erik Herrmann
- Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen 5232, Switzerland
| | - Rupert Holzinger
- Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, University of Utrecht, Utrecht 3508 TC, The Netherlands
| | - Hiroyuki Hyono
- Institute of Nature and Environmental Technology, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan
| | - Maria Kanakidou
- ECPL, Department of Chemistry, University of Crete, Voutes, Heraklion 71003, Greece
| | - Astrid Kiendler-Scharr
- Institute for Energy and Climate Research (IEK-8): Troposphere, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich 52425, Germany
| | - Kento Kinouchi
- Institute of Nature and Environmental Technology, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan
| | - Gerard Kos
- Energy Research Center of the Netherlands, Petten 1755 ZG, The Netherlands
| | - Markku Kulmala
- Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, Helsinki 00014, Finland
| | - Nikolaos Mihalopoulos
- ECPL, Department of Chemistry, University of Crete, Voutes, Heraklion 71003, Greece.,IERSD, National Observatory of Athens, P. Penteli, Athens 15236, Greece
| | - Ghislain Motos
- Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen 5232, Switzerland
| | - Athanasios Nenes
- IERSD, National Observatory of Athens, P. Penteli, Athens 15236, Greece.,School of Chemical &Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.,Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas, Heraklion, Crete GR 700 13, Greece.,School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta GA 30332, USA
| | - Colin O'Dowd
- School of Physics and CCAPS, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland
| | - Mikhail Paramonov
- Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, Helsinki 00014, Finland.,Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, Federal Institute of Technology, Universitätsstrasse 16, Zurich 8092, Switzerland
| | - Tuukka Petäjä
- Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, Helsinki 00014, Finland
| | - David Picard
- Laboratoire de Météorologie Physique, 4 Avenue Blaise Pascal, Aubiere, Cedex 63178, France
| | - Laurent Poulain
- Experimental Aerosol &Cloud Microphysics, Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Permoserstrasse 15, Leipzig 04318, Germany
| | | | - Jay Slowik
- Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen 5232, Switzerland
| | - Andre Sonntag
- Experimental Aerosol &Cloud Microphysics, Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Permoserstrasse 15, Leipzig 04318, Germany
| | | | | | - Hiroshi Tsurumaru
- Institute of Nature and Environmental Technology, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan
| | - Alfred Wiedensohler
- Experimental Aerosol &Cloud Microphysics, Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Permoserstrasse 15, Leipzig 04318, Germany
| | - Cerina Wittbom
- Department of Physics, Lund University, Lund 221 00, Sweden
| | - John A Ogren
- Cooperative Institute for Research in the Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
| | - Atsushi Matsuki
- Institute of Nature and Environmental Technology, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan
| | - Seong Soo Yum
- Department of Atmospheric Science, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, South Korea
| | | | - Ken Carslaw
- Faculty of Science Division I, Department of Physics, Tokyo University of Science, 1-3 Kagurazaka, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8601, Japan
| | - Frank Stratmann
- Experimental Aerosol &Cloud Microphysics, Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Permoserstrasse 15, Leipzig 04318, Germany
| | - Martin Gysel
- Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen 5232, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Improving our fundamental understanding of the role of aerosol-cloud interactions in the climate system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016; 113:5781-90. [PMID: 27222566 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1514043113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The effect of an increase in atmospheric aerosol concentrations on the distribution and radiative properties of Earth's clouds is the most uncertain component of the overall global radiative forcing from preindustrial time. General circulation models (GCMs) are the tool for predicting future climate, but the treatment of aerosols, clouds, and aerosol-cloud radiative effects carries large uncertainties that directly affect GCM predictions, such as climate sensitivity. Predictions are hampered by the large range of scales of interaction between various components that need to be captured. Observation systems (remote sensing, in situ) are increasingly being used to constrain predictions, but significant challenges exist, to some extent because of the large range of scales and the fact that the various measuring systems tend to address different scales. Fine-scale models represent clouds, aerosols, and aerosol-cloud interactions with high fidelity but do not include interactions with the larger scale and are therefore limited from a climatic point of view. We suggest strategies for improving estimates of aerosol-cloud relationships in climate models, for new remote sensing and in situ measurements, and for quantifying and reducing model uncertainty.
Collapse
|