1
|
Mwaanga G, Ford J, Yukich J, Chanda B, Ashton RA, Chanda J, Munsanje B, Muntanga E, Mulota M, Simuyandi C, Mulala B, Simubali L, Saili K, Simulundu E, Miller J, Hamainza B, Orange E, Wagman J, Mburu MM, Harris AF, Entwistle J, Littrell M. Residual bioefficacy of attractive targeted sugar bait stations targeting malaria vectors during seasonal deployment in Western Province of Zambia. Malar J 2024; 23:169. [PMID: 38811947 PMCID: PMC11138038 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-024-04990-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The primary vector control interventions in Zambia are long-lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying. Challenges with these interventions include insecticide resistance and the outdoor biting and resting behaviours of many Anopheles mosquitoes. Therefore, new vector control tools targeting additional mosquito behaviours are needed to interrupt transmission. Attractive targeted sugar bait (ATSB) stations, which exploit the sugar feeding behaviours of mosquitoes, may help in this role. This study evaluated the residual laboratory bioefficacy of Westham prototype ATSB® Sarabi v.1.2.1 Bait Station (Westham Ltd., Hod-Hasharon, Israel) in killing malaria vectors in Western Province, Zambia, during the first year of a large cluster randomized phase-III trial (Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT04800055). METHODS This was a repeat cross-sectional study conducted within three districts, Nkeyema, Kaoma, and Luampa, in Western Province, Zambia. The study was conducted in 12 intervention clusters among the 70 trial clusters (35 interventions, 35 controls) between December 2021 and June 2022. Twelve undamaged bait stations installed on the outer walls of households were collected monthly (one per cluster per month) for bioassays utilizing adult female and male Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (Kisumu strain) mosquitoes from a laboratory colony. RESULTS A total of 84 field-deployed ATSB stations were collected, and 71 ultimately met the study inclusion criteria for remaining in good condition. Field-deployed stations that remained in good condition (intact, non-depleted of bait, and free of dirt as well as mold) retained high levels of bioefficacy (mean induced mortality of 95.3% in males, 71.3% in females, 83.9% combined total) over seven months in the field but did induce lower mortality rates than non-deployed ATSB stations (mean induced mortality of 96.4% in males, 87.0% in females, 91.4% combined total). There was relatively little variation in corrected mortality rates between monthly rounds for those ATSB stations that had been deployed to the field. CONCLUSION While field-deployed ATSB stations induced lower mortality rates than non-deployed ATSB stations, these stations nonetheless retained relatively high and stable levels of bioefficacy across the 7-month malaria transmission season. While overall mean mosquito mortality rates exceeded 80%, mean mortality rates for females were 24 percentage points lower than among males and these differences merit attention and further evaluation in future studies. The duration of deployment was not associated with lower bioefficacy. Westham prototype ATSB stations can still retain bioefficacy even after deployment in the field for 7 months, provided they do not meet predetermined criteria for replacement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jacob Ford
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Department of Tropical Medicine, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, USA
| | - Joshua Yukich
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Department of Tropical Medicine, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, USA
| | | | - Ruth A Ashton
- Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Department of Tropical Medicine, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lucas ER, Nagi SC, Kabula B, Batengana B, Kisinza W, Egyir-Yawson A, Essandoh J, Dadzie S, Chabi J, Van't Hof AE, Rippon EJ, Pipini D, Harding NJ, Dyer NA, Clarkson CS, Miles A, Weetman D, Donnelly MJ. Copy number variants underlie the major selective sweeps in insecticide resistance genes in Anopheles arabiensis from Tanzania. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.03.11.583874. [PMID: 38559088 PMCID: PMC10979859 DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.11.583874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
To keep ahead of the evolution of resistance to insecticides in mosquitoes, national malaria control programmes must make use of a range of insecticides, both old and new, while monitoring resistance mechanisms. Knowledge of the mechanisms of resistance remains limited in Anopheles arabiensis, which in many parts of Africa is of increasing importance because it is apparently less susceptible to many indoor control interventions. Furthermore, comparatively little is known in general about resistance to non-pyrethroid insecticides such as pirimiphos-methyl (PM), which are crucial for effective control in the context of resistance to pyrethroids. We performed a genome-wide association study to determine the molecular mechanisms of resistance to deltamethrin (commonly used in bednets) and PM, in An. arabiensis from two regions in Tanzania. Genomic regions of positive selection in these populations were largely driven by copy number variants (CNVs) in gene families involved in resistance to these two insecticides. We found evidence of a new gene cluster involved in resistance to PM, identifying a strong selective sweep tied to a CNV in the Coeae2g-Coeae6g cluster of carboxylesterase genes. Using complementary data from An. coluzzii in Ghana, we show that copy number at this locus is significantly associated with PM resistance. Similarly, for deltamethrin, resistance was strongly associated with a novel CNV allele in the Cyp6aa / Cyp6p cluster. Against this background of metabolic resistance, target site resistance was very rare or absent for both insecticides. Mutations in the pyrethroid target site Vgsc were at very low frequency in Tanzania, yet combining these samples with three An. arabiensis individuals from West Africa revealed a startling diversity of evolutionary origins of target site resistance, with up to 5 independent origins of Vgsc-995 mutations found within just 8 haplotypes. Thus, despite having been first recorded over 10 years ago, Vgsc resistance mutations in Tanzanian An. arabiensis have remained at stable low frequencies. Overall, our results provide a new copy number marker for monitoring resistance to PM in malaria mosquitoes, and reveal the complex picture of resistance patterns in An. arabiensis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric R Lucas
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK
| | - Sanjay C Nagi
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK
| | - Bilali Kabula
- National Institute for Medical Research, Amani Research Centre, P.O. Box 81, Muheza, Tanzania
| | - Bernard Batengana
- National Institute for Medical Research, Amani Research Centre, P.O. Box 81, Muheza, Tanzania
| | - William Kisinza
- National Institute for Medical Research, Amani Research Centre, P.O. Box 81, Muheza, Tanzania
| | | | - John Essandoh
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana
| | - Sam Dadzie
- Department of Parasitology, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
| | - Joseph Chabi
- Department of Parasitology, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
| | - Arjen E Van't Hof
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK
- Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, Branišovská 31, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
| | - Emily J Rippon
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK
| | - Dimitra Pipini
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK
| | - Nicholas J Harding
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Naomi A Dyer
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK
| | - Chris S Clarkson
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, United Kingdom
| | - Alistair Miles
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, United Kingdom
| | - David Weetman
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK
| | - Martin J Donnelly
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ferriss E, Chaponda M, Muleba M, Kabuya JB, Lupiya JS, Riley C, Winters A, Moulton LH, Mulenga M, Norris DE, Moss WJ. The Impact of Household and Community Indoor Residual Spray Coverage with Fludora Fusion in a High Malaria Transmission Setting in Northern Zambia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2023; 109:248-257. [PMID: 37364860 PMCID: PMC10397455 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Zambia's National Malaria Elimination Program transitioned to Fludora Fusion in 2019 for annual indoor residual spraying (IRS) in Nchelenge District, an area with holoendemic malaria transmission. Previously, IRS was associated with reductions in parasite prevalence during the rainy season only, presumably because of insufficient residual insecticide longevity. This study assessed the impact of transitioning from Actellic 300CS to long-acting Fludora Fusion using active surveillance data from 2014 through 2021. A difference-in-differences analysis estimated changes in rainy season parasite prevalence associated with living in a sprayed house, comparing insecticides. The change in the 2020 to 2021 dry season parasite prevalence associated with living in a house sprayed with Fludora Fusion was also estimated. Indoor residual spraying with Fludora Fusion was not associated with decreased rainy season parasite prevalence compared with IRS with Actellic 300CS (ratio of prevalence ratios [PRs], 1.09; 95% CI, 0.89-1.33). Moreover, living in a house sprayed with either insecticide was not associated with decreased malaria risk (Actellic 300CS: PR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.86-1.10; Fludora Fusion: rainy season PR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.89-1.25; dry season PR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.99-1.48). In contrast, each 10% increase in community IRS coverage was associated with a 4% to 5% reduction in parasite prevalence (rainy season: PR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.97; dry season: PR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99), suggesting a community-level protective effect, and corroborating the importance of high-intervention coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Ferriss
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Anna Winters
- Akros, Lusaka, Zambia
- University of Montana, Missoula, Montana
| | - Lawrence H. Moulton
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
- Pfizer Canada, Quebec, Canada
| | - Modest Mulenga
- Directorate of Research and Postgraduate Studies, Lusaka Apex Medical University, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Douglas E. Norris
- W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - William J. Moss
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
- W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hardy H, Harte SJ, Hopkins RJ, Mnyone L, Hawkes FM. The influence of manure-based organic fertilisers on the oviposition behaviour of Anopheles arabiensis. Acta Trop 2023:106954. [PMID: 37244404 DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2023.106954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
The rice agroecosystem provides suitable breeding habitat for many malaria vector species, and rice-adjacent communities are consequently exposed to a greater malaria transmission risk than non-rice-associated communities. As part of efforts to expand rice production in Africa, sustainable and climate-adapted practices such as the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) are being promoted. SRI encourages the use of organic fertilisers (OFs) such as cow and chicken dung, as opposed to inorganic industrially produced fertilisers, due to their lower resource cost, apparent benefit to the rice agroecosystem and as a means to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the production of industrial fertilisers. However, the impact of OFs on mosquito fauna is not well documented and may have knock-on consequences on malaria transmission risk. Here, we demonstrate, using dual choice egg count assays, that both cow and chicken dung modulate the oviposition behaviour of Anopheles arabiensis, a major malaria vector in Sub-Saharan Africa. A significantly reduced proportion of eggs were laid in water treated with either cow or chicken dung compared to untreated water, with higher dung concentrations resulting in further reduced proportions. When presented in competition, significantly fewer eggs were laid in water treated with chicken dung than with cow dung. Moreover, there was no evidence of egg retention in any experiment, including in no-choice experiments where only dung-containing dishes were available. These results suggest both cow and chicken dung may act as oviposition deterrents to malaria vector species and that the application of manure-based OFs in rice agriculture may modulate the oviposition behaviour of An. gambiae s.l. within agroecosystems. Quantification of the ammonia present in dung-infused water showed higher concentrations were present in the chicken dung infusion, which may be one contributing factor to the difference in observed deterrence between the two dung types. Deterrence of mosquito oviposition in OF-treated farms may potentially affect the overall production of malaria vectors within rice fields and their contribution to local malaria transmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harrison Hardy
- Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, UK..
| | - Steven J Harte
- Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, UK..
| | | | - Ladslaus Mnyone
- Institute of Pest Management, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania.; Department of Science, Technology and Innovation, Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Tanzania..
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chanda J, Wagman J, Chanda B, Kaniki T, Ng’andu M, Muyabe R, Mwenya M, Sakala J, Miller J, Mwaanga G, Simubali L, Mburu MM, Simulundu E, Mungo A, Fraser K, Mwandigha L, Ashton R, Yukich J, Harris AF, Burkot TR, Orange E, Littrell M, Entwistle J. Feeding rates of malaria vectors from a prototype attractive sugar bait station in Western Province, Zambia: results of an entomological validation study. Malar J 2023; 22:70. [PMID: 36855105 PMCID: PMC9974387 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-023-04491-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Attractive targeted sugar bait (ATSB) stations are a promising new approach to malaria vector control that could compliment current tools by exploiting the natural sugar feeding behaviors of mosquitoes. Recent proof of concept work with a prototype ATSB® Sarabi Bait Station (Westham Co., Hod-Hasharon, Israel) has demonstrated high feeding rates and significant reductions in vector density, human biting rate, and overall entomological inoculation rate for Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) in the tropical savannah of western Mali. The study reported here was conducted in the more temperate, rainier region of Western Province, Zambia and was designed to confirm the primary vector species in region and to estimate corresponding rates of feeding from prototype attractive sugar bait (ASB) Sarabi Bait Stations. METHODS The product evaluated was the Sarabi v1.1.1 ASB station, which did not include insecticide but did include 0.8% uranine as a dye allowing for the detection, using UV fluorescence light microscopy, of mosquitoes that have acquired a sugar meal from the ASB. A two-phase, crossover study design was conducted in 10 village-based clusters in Western Province, Zambia. One study arm initially received 2 ASB stations per eligible structure while the other initially received 3. Primary mosquito sampling occurred via indoor and outdoor CDC Miniature UV Light Trap collection from March 01 through April 09, 2021 (Phase 1) and from April 19 to May 28, 2021 (Phase 2). RESULTS The dominant vector in the study area is Anopheles funestus s.l., which was the most abundant species group collected (31% of all Anophelines; 45,038/144,5550), had the highest sporozoite rate (3.16%; 66 positives out of 2,090 tested), and accounted for 94.3% (66/70) of all sporozoite positive specimens. Of those An. funestus specimens further identified to species, 97.2% (2,090/2,150) were An. funestus sensu stricto (s.s.). Anopheles gambiae s.l. (96.8% of which were Anopheles arabiensis) is a likely secondary vector and Anopheles squamosus may play a minor role in transmission. Overall, 21.6% (9,218/42,587) of An. funestus specimens and 10.4% (201/1,940) of An. gambiae specimens collected were positive for uranine, translating into an estimated daily feeding rate of 8.9% [7.7-9.9%] for An. funestus (inter-cluster range of 5.5% to 12.7%) and 3.9% [3.3-4.7%] for An. gambiae (inter-cluster range of 1.0-5.2%). Feeding rates were no different among mosquitoes collected indoors or outdoors, or among mosquitoes from clusters with 2 or 3 ASBs per eligible structure. Similarly, there were no correlations observed between feeding rates and the average number of ASB stations per hectare or with weekly rainfall amounts. CONCLUSIONS Anopheles funestus and An. gambiae vector populations in Western Province, Zambia readily fed from the prototype Sarabi v1.1.1 ASB sugar bait station. Observed feeding rates are in line with those thought to be required for ATSB stations to achieve reductions in malaria transmission when used in combination with conventional control methods (IRS or LLIN). These results supported the decision to implement a large-scale, epidemiological cluster randomized controlled trial of ATSB in Zambia, deploying 2 ATSB stations per eligible structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jimmy Sakala
- PATH, Lusaka, Zambia ,Present Address: Jhpeigo, Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Keith Fraser
- grid.7445.20000 0001 2113 8111Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Lazaro Mwandigha
- grid.7445.20000 0001 2113 8111Imperial College London, London, UK ,grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Present Address: University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ruth Ashton
- grid.265219.b0000 0001 2217 8588School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, USA
| | - Joshua Yukich
- grid.265219.b0000 0001 2217 8588School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, USA
| | | | - Thomas R. Burkot
- grid.1011.10000 0004 0474 1797Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia
| | - Erica Orange
- grid.415269.d0000 0000 8940 7771PATH, Seattle, USA
| | - Megan Littrell
- grid.416809.20000 0004 0423 0663PATH, Washington, DC USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
An Overview of Malaria Transmission Mechanisms, Control, and Modeling. Med Sci (Basel) 2022; 11:medsci11010003. [PMID: 36649040 PMCID: PMC9844307 DOI: 10.3390/medsci11010003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
In sub-Saharan Africa, malaria is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity. As a result of the interplay between many factors, the control of this disease can be challenging. However, few studies have demonstrated malaria's complexity, control, and modeling although this perspective could lead to effective policy recommendations. This paper aims to be a didactic material providing the reader with an overview of malaria. More importantly, using a system approach lens, we intend to highlight the debated topics and the multifaceted thematic aspects of malaria transmission mechanisms, while showing the control approaches used as well as the model supporting the dynamics of malaria. As there is a large amount of information on each subject, we have attempted to provide a basic understanding of malaria that needs to be further developed. Nevertheless, this study illustrates the importance of using a multidisciplinary approach to designing next-generation malaria control policies.
Collapse
|
7
|
Malaria vector feeding, peak biting time and resting place preference behaviors in line with Indoor based intervention tools and its implication: scenario from selected sentinel sites of Ethiopia. Heliyon 2022; 8:e12178. [PMID: 36578426 PMCID: PMC9791363 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
In Ethiopia, malaria incidence has significantly reduced in the past decade through the combined use of conventional vector control approaches and treatment using antimalarial drugs. However, the sustainability of this achievement is threatened by the shift in biting and resting behaviors and emergence of insecticide resistance by the primary malaria vector. Therefore, continuous monitoring of the behaviour of malaria mosquitoes in different sentinel sites is crucial to design effective prevention and control methods in the local context. Entomological investigations were conducted in three sentinel sites for five consecutive months during the major malaria transmission season. The species composition, population dynamics, biting and resting behaviours of malaria vectors were determined using center for disease control and prevention (CDC) light trap, human landing catch (HLC), pyrethrum spray catch (PSC) and Pitfall shelter collection (PFS). Accordingly, 10 households for CDC, 10 households for PSC, 10 households for PFS and 5 households for HLC from each site were randomly enrolled for mosquito collection. A total of 8,297 anopheline mosquitoes were collected from the three sites, out of which 4,525 (54.5 %) were An. gambiae, s.l. 2,028 (24.4 %) were An. pharoensis, 160 (1.9 %) were An. funestus and the rest 1,584 (19 %) were other anophelines (An. coustani, An. cinerus and An. tenebrosus). No significant variation (P = 0.476) was observed between indoor (25.2/trap-night and outdoor collections (20.1/trap-night). Six hundred seventy six (43.3%) of An. gambiae s.l. (primary vector) were collected between 18:00 and 22:00 h. Biting activity declined between 00:00 and 02:00 h. The national malaria control program should pay close attention to the shifting behavior of vector mosquitoes as the observed outdoor feeding tendency of the vector population could pose challenges to the indoor intervention tools IRS and LLINs.
Collapse
|
8
|
Oladipo HJ. Increasing challenges of malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa: Priorities for public health research and policymakers. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2022; 81:104366. [PMID: 36046715 PMCID: PMC9421173 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The ever-increasing cases and mortality due to malaria remains one of the most important public health threats, especially in sub-Saharan Africa-where this burden is considerably high. In 2020, sub-Saharan Africa accounted for about 95% of all cases and 96% of all malaria deaths with about 80% of these deaths reported in children under the age of 5. This review, adopting a public health focus, aimed to understand the challenges of malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa despite ongoing public health interventions. Our review highlights two important findings. First, the increasing resistance of malaria parasites to artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) and its partner drugs coupled with increased vector resistance to pyrethroids and insecticides is reversing the progress of public health interventions in keeping malaria under control. Second, the wanning for the efficacy of the WHO-approved vaccine i.e. RTS,S from 60 to 70% following 18 months of observation, and its short-term availability remains an impediment to achieving the WHO target of producing malaria vaccines with more than 75% efficacy by 2030. Our findings underline the need to reassess research priorities with a focus on vaccine production in sub-Saharan Africa. Furthermore, African governments and policymakers must be committed to invest both the political and financial capital in vaccine production and distribution.
Collapse
|
9
|
Matowo J, Weetman D, Pignatelli P, Wright A, Charlwood JD, Kaaya R, Shirima B, Moshi O, Lukole E, Mosha J, Manjurano A, Mosha F, Rowland M, Protopopoff N. Expression of pyrethroid metabolizing P450 enzymes characterizes highly resistant Anopheles vector species targeted by successful deployment of PBO-treated bednets in Tanzania. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0249440. [PMID: 35073324 PMCID: PMC8786186 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Long lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are a proven tool to reduce malaria transmission, but in Africa efficacy is being reduced by pyrethroid resistance in the major vectors. A previous study that was conducted in Muleba district, Tanzania indicated possible involvement of cytochrome P450 monooxygenases in a pyrethroid resistance in An. gambiae population where pre-exposure to piperonyl butoxide (PBO) followed by permethrin exposure in CDC bottle bioassays led to partial restoration of susceptibility. PBO is a synergist that can block pyrethroid-metabolizing enzymes in a mosquito. Insecticide resistance profiles and underlying mechanisms were investigated in Anopheles gambiae and An. funestus from Muleba during a cluster randomized trial. Diagnostic dose bioassays using permethrin, together with intensity assays, suggest pyrethroid resistance that is both strong and very common, but not extreme. Transcriptomic analysis found multiple P450 genes over expressed including CYP6M2, CYP6Z3, CYP6P3, CYP6P4, CYP6AA1 and CYP9K1 in An. gambiae and CYP6N1, CYP6M7, CYP6M1 and CYP6Z1 in An. funestus. Indeed, very similar suites of P450 enzymes commonly associated with resistant populations elsewhere in Africa were detected as over expressed suggesting a convergence of mechanisms across Sub-Saharan African malaria vectors. The findings give insight into factors that may correlate with pyrethroid PBO LLIN success, broadly supporting model predictions, but revision to guidelines previously issued by the World Health Organization is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johnson Matowo
- Department of Medical Parasitology and Entomology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - David Weetman
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Patricia Pignatelli
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Alexandra Wright
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jacques D. Charlwood
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Kaaya
- Department of Medical Parasitology and Entomology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - Boniface Shirima
- Department of Medical Parasitology and Entomology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - Oliva Moshi
- Department of Medical Parasitology and Entomology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - Eliud Lukole
- Department of Parasitology, National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza Medical Research Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania
| | - Jacklin Mosha
- Department of Parasitology, National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza Medical Research Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania
| | - Alphaxard Manjurano
- Department of Parasitology, National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza Medical Research Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania
| | - Franklin Mosha
- Department of Medical Parasitology and Entomology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - Mark Rowland
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Natacha Protopopoff
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) are used to prevent malaria transmission. Both interventions use insecticides to kill mosquitoes that bite and rest indoors. Adding IRS to ITNs may improve malaria control simply because two interventions can be better than one. Furthermore, IRS may improve malaria control where ITNs are failing due to insecticide resistance. Pyrethroid insecticides are the predominant class of insecticide used for ITNs, as they are more safe than other insecticide classes when in prolonged contact with human skin. While many mosquito populations have developed some resistance to pyrethroid insecticides, a wider range of insecticides can be used for IRS. This review is an update of the previous Cochrane 2019 edition. OBJECTIVES To summarize the effect on malaria of additionally implementing IRS, using non-pyrethroid-like or pyrethroid-like insecticides, in communities currently using ITNs. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register; CENTRAL; MEDLINE; and five other databases for records from 1 January 2000 to 8 November 2021, on the basis that ITN programmes did not begin to be implemented as policy before the year 2000. SELECTION CRITERIA We included cluster-randomized controlled trials (cRCTs), interrupted time series (ITS), or controlled before-after studies (CBAs) comparing IRS plus ITNs with ITNs alone. We included studies with at least 50% ITN ownership (defined as the proportion of households owning one or more ITN) in both study arms. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed studies for eligibility, analyzed risk of bias, and extracted data. We used risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We stratified by type of insecticide, 'pyrethroid-like' and 'non-pyrethroid-like'; the latter could improve malaria control better than adding IRS insecticides that have the same way of working as the insecticide on ITNs ('pyrethroid-like'). We used subgroup analysis of ITN usage in the studies to explore heterogeneity. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS Eight cRCTs (10 comparisons), one CBA, and one ITS study, all conducted since 2008 in sub-Saharan Africa, met our inclusion criteria. The primary vectors in all sites were mosquitoes belonging to the Anopheles gambiae s.l. complex species; five studies in Benin, Mozambique, Ghana, Sudan, and Tanzania also reported the vector Anopheles funestus. Five cRCTs and both quasi-experimental design studies used insecticides with targets different to pyrethroids (two used bendiocarb, three used pirimiphos-methyl, and one used propoxur. Each of these studies were conducted in areas where the vectors were described as resistant or highly resistant to pyrethroids. Two cRCTs used dichloro-diphenyl-trichlorethane (DDT), an insecticide with the same target as pyrethroids. The remaining cRCT used both types of insecticide (pyrethroid deltamethrin in the first year, switching to bendiocarb for the second year). Indoor residual spraying using 'non-pyrethroid-like' insecticides Six studies were included (four cRCTs, one CBA, and one ITS). Our main analysis for prevalence excluded a study at high risk of bias due to repeated sampling of the same population. This risk did not apply to other outcomes. Overall, the addition of IRS reduced malaria parasite prevalence (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.88; 4 cRCTs, 16,394 participants; high-certainty evidence). IRS may also reduce malaria incidence on average (rate ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.23; 4 cRCTs, 323,631 child-years; low-certainty evidence) but the effect was absent in two studies. Subgroup analyses did not explain the qualitative heterogeneity between studies. One cRCT reported no effect on malaria incidence or parasite prevalence in the first year, when a pyrethroid-like insecticide was used for IRS, but showed an effect on both outcomes in the second year, when a non-pyrethroid-like IRS was used. The addition of IRS may also reduce anaemia prevalence (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.31; 3 cRCTs, 4288 participants; low-certainty evidence). Four cRCTs reported the impact of IRS on entomological inoculation rate (EIR), with variable results; overall, we do not know if IRS had any effect on the EIR in communities using ITNs (very low-certainty evidence). Studies also reported the adult mosquito density and the sporozoite rate, but we could not summarize or pool these entomological outcomes due to differences in the reported data. Three studies measured the prevalence of pyrethroid resistance before and after IRS being introduced: there was no difference detected, but these data are limited. Indoor residual spraying using 'pyrethroid-like' insecticides Adding IRS using a pyrethroid-like insecticide did not appear to markedly alter malaria incidence (rate ratio 1.07, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.43; 2 cRCTs, 15,717 child-years; moderate-certainty evidence), parasite prevalence (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.44; 3 cRCTs, 10,820 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), or anaemia prevalence (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.40; 1 cRCT, 4186 participants; low-certainty evidence). Data on EIR were limited so no conclusion was made (very low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS in communities using ITNs, the addition of IRS with 'non-pyrethroid-like' insecticides was associated with reduced malaria prevalence. Malaria incidence may also be reduced on average, but there was unexplained qualitative heterogeneity, and the effect may therefore not be observed in all settings. When using 'pyrethroid-like' insecticides, there was no detectable additional benefit of IRS in communities using ITNs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Pryce
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Nancy Medley
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Leslie Choi
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Elmardi KA, Adam I, Malik EM, Kafy HT, Abdin MS, Kleinschmidt I, Kremers S. Impact of malaria control interventions on malaria infection and anaemia in areas with irrigated schemes: a cross-sectional population-based study in Sudan. BMC Infect Dis 2021; 21:1248. [PMID: 34906083 PMCID: PMC8670187 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06929-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background While the overall burden of malaria is still high, the global technical strategy for malaria advocates for two sets of interventions: vector control-based prevention and diagnosis and prompt effective treatment of malaria cases. This study aimed to assess the performance of malaria interventions on malaria infection and anaemia in irrigated areas in Sudan. Methods Based on the Sudan 2016 national malaria indicator survey, data for two states (Gezira and Sennar), characterized by large-irrigated schemes, were analysed. Four community-level malaria interventions were used as contextual variables: utilization of malaria diagnosis, utilization of Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), utilization of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and coverage with indoor residual spraying (IRS). Association between these interventions and two outcomes: malaria infection and anaemia, was assessed separately. Malaria infection was assessed in all age groups while anaemia was assessed in children under 5 years. Multilevel multiple logistic regression analysis were conducted. Results Among 4478 individuals involved in this study distributed over 47 clusters, the overall malaria infection rate was 3.0% and 56.5% of the children under 5 years (total = 322) were anaemic. Except for IRS coverage (69.6%), the average utilization of interventions was relatively low: 52.3% for utilization of diagnosis, 33.0% for utilization of ACTs and 18.6% for LLINs utilization. The multi-level multiple logistic regression model showed that only IRS coverage was associated with malaria infection (Odds ratio 0.83 per 10% coverage, 95%Confidence Interval (95%CI) 0.74–0.94, p = 0.003) indicating that a higher level of IRS coverage was associated with less malaria infection. Anaemia was not associated with any intervention (all p values larger than 0.1). Conclusions Malaria transmission in Gezira and Sennar areas is low. IRS, with insecticide to which vectors are susceptible, is an effective malaria control intervention in irrigated schemes. Community utilization of other interventions was not associated with malaria infection in this study. This may be due to the low utilization of these interventions. However, individual use of LLINs provide personal protection. This study failed to establish an association between anaemia and malaria control interventions in low transmission areas. The higher level of malaria infection in urban areas is a cause for concern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalid Abdelmutalab Elmardi
- Health Information, Monitoring and Evaluation and Evidence Department, Federal Ministry of Health, Khartoum, Sudan. .,Department of Health Promotion, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Ishag Adam
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unaizah College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Unaizah, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Hmooda Toto Kafy
- Directorate General of Primary Health Care, Federal Ministry of Health, Khartoum, Sudan
| | - Mogahid Sheikheldien Abdin
- Health Information, Monitoring and Evaluation and Evidence Department, Federal Ministry of Health, Khartoum, Sudan
| | - Immo Kleinschmidt
- MRC International Statistics and Epidemiology Group, Departments of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.,Wits Research Institute for Malaria, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.,Southern African Development Community Malaria Elimination Eight Secretariat, Windhoek, Namibia
| | - Stef Kremers
- Department of Health Promotion, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Namuganga JF, Epstein A, Nankabirwa JI, Mpimbaza A, Kiggundu M, Sserwanga A, Kapisi J, Arinaitwe E, Gonahasa S, Opigo J, Ebong C, Staedke SG, Shililu J, Okia M, Rutazaana D, Maiteki-Sebuguzi C, Belay K, Kamya MR, Dorsey G, Rodriguez-Barraquer I. The impact of stopping and starting indoor residual spraying on malaria burden in Uganda. Nat Commun 2021; 12:2635. [PMID: 33976132 PMCID: PMC8113470 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22896-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The scale-up of malaria control efforts has led to marked reductions in malaria burden over the past twenty years, but progress has slowed. Implementation of indoor residual spraying (IRS) of insecticide, a proven vector control intervention, has been limited and difficult to sustain partly because questions remain on its added impact over widely accepted interventions such as bed nets. Using data from 14 enhanced surveillance health facilities in Uganda, a country with high bed net coverage yet high malaria burden, we estimate the impact of starting and stopping IRS on changes in malaria incidence. We show that stopping IRS was associated with a 5-fold increase in malaria incidence within 10 months, but reinstating IRS was associated with an over 5-fold decrease within 8 months. In areas where IRS was initiated and sustained, malaria incidence dropped by 85% after year 4. IRS could play a critical role in achieving global malaria targets, particularly in areas where progress has stalled.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adrienne Epstein
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Joaniter I Nankabirwa
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
- Department of Medicine, Makerere University, College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Arthur Mpimbaza
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
- Child Health and Development Centre, Makerere University, College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Moses Kiggundu
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - James Kapisi
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | | | - Jimmy Opigo
- National Malaria Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Chris Ebong
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Josephat Shililu
- US President's Malaria Initiative - VectorLink Uganda Project, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Michael Okia
- US President's Malaria Initiative - VectorLink Uganda Project, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Damian Rutazaana
- National Malaria Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Kassahun Belay
- US President's Malaria Initiative, USAID/Uganda Senior Malaria Advisor, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Moses R Kamya
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
- Department of Medicine, Makerere University, College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Grant Dorsey
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Alonso S, Chaccour CJ, Wagman J, Candrinho B, Muthoni R, Saifodine A, Saute F, Robertson M, Zulliger R. Cost and cost-effectiveness of indoor residual spraying with pirimiphos-methyl in a high malaria transmission district of Mozambique with high access to standard insecticide-treated nets. Malar J 2021; 20:143. [PMID: 33691706 PMCID: PMC7948350 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-021-03687-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As malaria cases increase in some of the highest burden countries, more strategic deployment of new and proven interventions must be evaluated to meet global malaria reduction goals. METHODS The cost and cost-effectiveness of indoor residual spraying (IRS) with pirimiphos-methyl (Actellic®300 CS) were assessed in a high transmission district (Mopeia) with high access to pyrethroid insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), compared to ITNs alone. The major mosquito vectors in the area were susceptible to primiphos-methyl, but resistant to pyrethoids. A decision analysis approach was followed to conduct deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses in a theoretical cohort of 10,000 children under five years of age (U5) and 10,000 individuals of all ages, separately. Model parameters and distributions were based on prospectively collected cost and epidemiological data from a cluster-randomized control trial and a literature review. The primary analysis used health facility-malaria incidence, while community cohort incidence and cross-sectional prevalence rates were used in sensitivity analyses. Lifetime costs, malaria cases, deaths and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) were calculated to determine the incremental costs per DALY averted through IRS. RESULTS The average IRS cost per person protected was US$8.26 and 51% of the cost was insecticide. IRS averted 46,609 (95% CI 46,570-46,646) uncomplicated and 242 (95% CI 241-243) severe lifetime cases in a theoretical children U5 cohort, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$400 (95% CI 399-402) per DALY averted. In the all-age cohort, the ICER was higher: US$1,860 (95% CI 1,852-1,868) per DALY averted. Deterministic and probabilistic results were consistent. When adding the community protective effect of IRS, the cost per person protected decreased (US$7.06) and IRS was highly cost-effective in children U5 (ICER = US$312) and cost-effective in individuals of all ages (ICER = US$1,431), compared to ITNs alone. CONCLUSION This study provides robust evidence that IRS with pirimiphos-methyl can be cost-effective in high transmission regions with high pyrethroid ITN coverage where the major vector is susceptible to pirimiphos-methyl but resistant to pyrethroids. The finding that insecticide cost is the main driver of IRS costs highlights the need to reduce the insecticide price without jeopardizing effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02910934 (Registered 22 September 2016). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02910934?term=NCT02910934&draw=2&rank=1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergi Alonso
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Parasitology, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK. .,Centro de Investigação Em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique. .,ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Carlos J Chaccour
- Centro de Investigação Em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique.,ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Abuchahama Saifodine
- U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, US Agency for International Development, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Francisco Saute
- Centro de Investigação Em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique
| | | | - Rose Zulliger
- U.S. President's Malaria Initiative and Malaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Maputo, Mozambique
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bath D, Cook J, Govere J, Mathebula P, Morris N, Hlongwana K, Raman J, Seocharan I, Zitha A, Zitha M, Mabuza A, Mbokazi F, Machaba E, Mabunda E, Jamesboy E, Biggs J, Drakeley C, Moonasar D, Maharaj R, Coetzee M, Pitt C, Kleinschmidt I. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of reactive, targeted indoor residual spraying for malaria control in low-transmission settings: a cluster-randomised, non-inferiority trial in South Africa. Lancet 2021; 397:816-827. [PMID: 33640068 PMCID: PMC7910276 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00251-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing insecticide costs and constrained malaria budgets could make universal vector control strategies, such as indoor residual spraying (IRS), unsustainable in low-transmission settings. We investigated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a reactive, targeted IRS strategy. METHODS This cluster-randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial compared reactive, targeted IRS with standard IRS practice in northeastern South Africa over two malaria seasons (2015-17). In standard IRS clusters, programme managers conducted annual mass spray campaigns prioritising areas using historical data, expert opinion, and other factors. In targeted IRS clusters, only houses of index cases (identified through passive surveillance) and their immediate neighbours were sprayed. The non-inferiority margin was 1 case per 1000 person-years. Health service costs of real-world implementation were modelled from primary and secondary data. Incremental costs per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) were estimated and deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses conducted. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02556242. FINDINGS Malaria incidence was 0·95 per 1000 person-years (95% CI 0·58 to 1·32) in the standard IRS group and 1·05 per 1000 person-years (0·72 to 1·38) in the targeted IRS group, corresponding to a rate difference of 0·10 per 1000 person-years (-0·38 to 0·59), demonstrating non-inferiority for targeted IRS (p<0·0001). Per additional DALY incurred, targeted IRS saved US$7845 (2902 to 64 907), giving a 94-98% probability that switching to targeted IRS would be cost-effective relative to plausible cost-effectiveness thresholds for South Africa ($2637 to $3557 per DALY averted). Depending on the threshold used, targeted IRS would remain cost-effective at incidences of less than 2·0-2·7 per 1000 person-years. Findings were robust to plausible variation in other parameters. INTERPRETATION Targeted IRS was non-inferior, safe, less costly, and cost-effective compared with standard IRS in this very-low-transmission setting. Saved resources could be reallocated to other malaria control and elimination activities. FUNDING Joint Global Health Trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Bath
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | - Jackie Cook
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - John Govere
- Wits Research Institute for Malaria, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Phillemon Mathebula
- Wits Research Institute for Malaria, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Natashia Morris
- Health GIS Centre, South African Medical Research Council, Durban, South Africa
| | - Khumbulani Hlongwana
- School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Jaishree Raman
- Wits Research Institute for Malaria, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Centre for Emerging, Zoonotic and Parasitic Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa; Institute for Sustainable Malaria Control, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Ishen Seocharan
- Biostatistics Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Durban, South Africa
| | - Alpheus Zitha
- Mpumalanga Provincial Malaria Control Programme, Nelspruit, South Africa
| | - Matimba Zitha
- Wits Research Institute for Malaria, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Aaron Mabuza
- Mpumalanga Provincial Malaria Control Programme, Nelspruit, South Africa
| | - Frans Mbokazi
- Mpumalanga Provincial Malaria Control Programme, Nelspruit, South Africa
| | - Elliot Machaba
- Limpopo Provincial Malaria Control Programme, Polokwane, South Africa
| | - Erik Mabunda
- Limpopo Provincial Malaria Control Programme, Polokwane, South Africa
| | - Eunice Jamesboy
- Wits Research Institute for Malaria, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Centre for Emerging, Zoonotic and Parasitic Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Joseph Biggs
- Department of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Chris Drakeley
- Department of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Devanand Moonasar
- School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; South Africa National Malaria Programme, National Department of Health, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Rajendra Maharaj
- Office of Malaria Research, South African Medical Research Council, Durban, South Africa; Institute for Sustainable Malaria Control, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Maureen Coetzee
- Wits Research Institute for Malaria, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Centre for Emerging, Zoonotic and Parasitic Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Catherine Pitt
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Immo Kleinschmidt
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Wits Research Institute for Malaria, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Southern African Development Community Malaria Elimination Eight Secretariat, Windhoek, Namibia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Soma DD, Zogo B, Taconet P, Somé A, Coulibaly S, Baba-Moussa L, Ouédraogo GA, Koffi A, Pennetier C, Dabiré KR, Moiroux N. Quantifying and characterizing hourly human exposure to malaria vectors bites to address residual malaria transmission during dry and rainy seasons in rural Southwest Burkina Faso. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:251. [PMID: 33516197 PMCID: PMC7847557 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10304-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To sustain the efficacy of malaria vector control, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the combination of effective tools. Before designing and implementing additional strategies in any setting, it is critical to monitor or predict when and where transmission occurs. However, to date, very few studies have quantified the behavioural interactions between humans and Anopheles vectors in Africa. Here, we characterized residual transmission in a rural area of Burkina Faso where long lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) are widely used. Methods We analysed data on both human and malaria vectors behaviours from 27 villages to measure hourly human exposure to vector bites in dry and rainy seasons using a mathematical model. We estimated the protective efficacy of LLINs and characterised where (indoors vs. outdoors) and when both LLIN users and non-users were exposed to vector bites. Results The percentage of the population who declared sleeping under a LLIN the previous night was very high regardless of the season, with an average LLIN use ranging from 92.43 to 99.89%. The use of LLIN provided > 80% protection against exposure to vector bites. The proportion of exposure for LLIN users was 29–57% after 05:00 and 0.05–12% before 20:00. More than 80% of exposure occurred indoors for LLIN users and the estimate reached 90% for children under 5 years old in the dry cold season. Conclusions LLINs are predicted to provide considerable protection against exposure to malaria vector bites in the rural area of Diébougou. Nevertheless, LLIN users are still exposed to vector bites which occurred mostly indoors in late morning. Therefore, complementary strategies targeting indoor biting vectors in combination with LLIN are expected to be the most efficient to control residual malaria transmission in this area. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-10304-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D D Soma
- Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso. .,Université Nazi Boni (UNB), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso. .,MIVEGEC, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.
| | - B Zogo
- MIVEGEC, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.,Institut Pierre Richet (IPR), Bouaké, Côte d'Ivoire.,Université d'Abomey Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Benin
| | - P Taconet
- Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.,MIVEGEC, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France
| | - A Somé
- Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
| | - S Coulibaly
- Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
| | | | - G A Ouédraogo
- Université Nazi Boni (UNB), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
| | - A Koffi
- Institut Pierre Richet (IPR), Bouaké, Côte d'Ivoire
| | - C Pennetier
- MIVEGEC, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.,Institut Pierre Richet (IPR), Bouaké, Côte d'Ivoire
| | - K R Dabiré
- Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
| | - N Moiroux
- Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.,MIVEGEC, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Syme T, Fongnikin A, Todjinou D, Govoetchan R, Gbegbo M, Rowland M, Akogbeto M, Ngufor C. Which indoor residual spraying insecticide best complements standard pyrethroid long-lasting insecticidal nets for improved control of pyrethroid resistant malaria vectors? PLoS One 2021; 16:e0245804. [PMID: 33507978 PMCID: PMC7842967 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Where resources are available, non-pyrethroid IRS can be deployed to complement standard pyrethroid LLINs with the aim of achieving improved vector control and managing insecticide resistance. The impact of the combination may however depend on the type of IRS insecticide deployed. Studies comparing combinations of pyrethroid LLINs with different types of non-pyrethroid IRS products will be necessary for decision making. Methods The efficacy of combining a standard pyrethroid LLIN (DuraNet®) with IRS insecticides from three chemical classes (bendiocarb, chlorfenapyr and pirimiphos-methyl CS) was evaluated in an experimental hut trial against wild pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles gambiae s.l. in Cové, Benin. The combinations were also compared to each intervention alone. WHO cylinder and CDC bottle bioassays were performed to assess susceptibility of the local An. gambiae s.l. vector population at the Cové hut site to insecticides used in the combinations. Results Susceptibility bioassays revealed that the vector population at Cové, was resistant to pyrethroids (<20% mortality) but susceptible to carbamates, chlorfenapyr and organophosphates (≥98% mortality). Mortality of wild free-flying pyrethroid resistant An. gambiae s.l. entering the hut with the untreated net control (4%) did not differ significantly from DuraNet® alone (8%, p = 0.169). Pirimiphos-methyl CS IRS induced the highest mortality both on its own (85%) and in combination with DuraNet® (81%). Mortality with the DuraNet® + chlorfenapyr IRS combination was significantly higher than each intervention alone (46% vs. 33% and 8%, p<0.05) demonstrating an additive effect. The DuraNet® + bendiocarb IRS combination induced significantly lower mortality compared to the other combinations (32%, p<0.05). Blood-feeding inhibition was very low with the IRS treatments alone (3–5%) but increased significantly when they were combined with DuraNet® (61% - 71%, p<0.05). Blood-feeding rates in the combinations were similar to the net alone. Adding bendiocarb IRS to DuraNet® induced significantly lower levels of mosquito feeding compared to adding chlorfenapyr IRS (28% vs. 37%, p = 0.015). Conclusions Adding non-pyrethroid IRS to standard pyrethroid-only LLINs against a pyrethroid-resistant vector population which is susceptible to the IRS insecticide, can provide higher levels of vector mosquito control compared to the pyrethroid net alone or IRS alone. Adding pirimiphos-methyl CS IRS may provide substantial improvements in vector control while adding chlorfenapyr IRS can demonstrate an additive effect relative to both interventions alone. Adding bendiocarb IRS may show limited enhancements in vector control owing to its short residual effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Syme
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, United Kingdom
- Centre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Benin, West Africa
- Panafrican Malaria Vector Research Consortium (PAMVERC), Benin, West Africa
| | - Augustin Fongnikin
- Centre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Benin, West Africa
- Panafrican Malaria Vector Research Consortium (PAMVERC), Benin, West Africa
| | - Damien Todjinou
- Centre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Benin, West Africa
- Panafrican Malaria Vector Research Consortium (PAMVERC), Benin, West Africa
| | - Renaud Govoetchan
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, United Kingdom
- Centre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Benin, West Africa
- Panafrican Malaria Vector Research Consortium (PAMVERC), Benin, West Africa
| | - Martial Gbegbo
- Centre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Benin, West Africa
- Panafrican Malaria Vector Research Consortium (PAMVERC), Benin, West Africa
| | - Mark Rowland
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, United Kingdom
- Panafrican Malaria Vector Research Consortium (PAMVERC), Benin, West Africa
| | - Martin Akogbeto
- Centre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Benin, West Africa
- Panafrican Malaria Vector Research Consortium (PAMVERC), Benin, West Africa
| | - Corine Ngufor
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, United Kingdom
- Centre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Benin, West Africa
- Panafrican Malaria Vector Research Consortium (PAMVERC), Benin, West Africa
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wagman JM, Varela K, Zulliger R, Saifodine A, Muthoni R, Magesa S, Chaccour C, Gogue C, Tynuv K, Seyoum A, Dengela D, Saúte F, Richardson JH, Fornadel C, Linton YM, Slutsker L, Candrinho B, Robertson M. Reduced exposure to malaria vectors following indoor residual spraying of pirimiphos-methyl in a high-burden district of rural Mozambique with high ownership of long-lasting insecticidal nets: entomological surveillance results from a cluster-randomized trial. Malar J 2021; 20:54. [PMID: 33478533 PMCID: PMC7819201 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-021-03583-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The need to develop new products and novel approaches for malaria vector control is recognized as a global health priority. One approach to meeting this need has been the development of new products for indoor residual spraying (IRS) with novel active ingredients for public health. While initial results showing the impact of several of these next-generation IRS products have been encouraging, questions remain about how to best deploy them for maximum impact. To help address these questions, a 2-year cluster-randomized controlled trial to measure the impact of IRS with a microencapsulated formulation of pirimiphos-methyl (PM) in an area with high ownership of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) was conducted in a high-transmission district of central Mozambique with pyrethroid resistant vectors. Presented here are the results of the vector surveillance component of the trial. Methods The 2 year, two-armed trial was conducted in Mopeia District, Zambezia Province, Mozambique. In ten sentinel villages, five that received IRS with PM in October–November 2016 and again in October–November 2017 and five that received no IRS, indoor light trap collections and paired indoor-outdoor human landing collections catches (HLCs) were conducted monthly from September 2016 through October 2018. A universal coverage campaign in June 2017, just prior to the second spray round, distributed 131,540 standard alpha-cypermethrin LLINs across all study villages and increased overall net usage rates in children under 5 years old to over 90%. Results The primary malaria vector during the trial was Anopheles funestus sensu lato (s.l.), and standard World Health Organization (WHO) tube tests with this population indicated variable but increasing resistance to pyrethroids (including alpha-cypermethrin, from > 85% mortality in 2017 to 7% mortality in 2018) and uniform susceptibility to PM (100% mortality in both years). Over the entire duration of the study, IRS reduced An. funestus s.l. densities by 48% (CI95 33–59%; p < 0.001) in indoor light traps and by 74% (CI95 38–90%; p = 0.010) during indoor and outdoor HLC, though in each study year reductions in vector density were consistently greatest in those months immediately following the IRS campaigns and waned over time. Overall there was no strong preference for An. funestus to feed indoors or outdoors, and these biting behaviours did not differ significantly across study arms: observed indoor-outdoor biting ratios were 1.10 (CI95 1.00–1.21) in no-IRS villages and 0.88 (CI95 0.67–1.15) in IRS villages. The impact of IRS was consistent in reducing HLC exposures both indoors (75% reduction: CI95 47–88%; p = 0. < 0.001) and outdoors (68% reduction: CI95 22–87%; p = 0.012). While substantially fewer Anopheles gambiae s.l. were collected during the study, trends show a similar impact of IRS on this key vector group as well, with a 33% (CI95 7–53%; p = 0.019) reduction in mosquitoes collected in light traps and a non-statistically significant 39% reduction (p = 0.249) in HLC landing rates. Conclusion IRS with PM used in addition to pyrethroid-only LLINs substantially reduced human exposures to malaria vectors during both years of the cluster-randomized controlled trial in Mopeia—a high-burden district where the primary vector, An. funestus s.l., was equally likely to feed indoors or outdoors and demonstrated increasing resistance to pyrethroids. Findings suggest that IRS with PM can provide effective vector control, including in some settings where pyrethroid-only ITNs are widely used. Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT02910934. Registered 22 September 2016, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02910934.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Rose Zulliger
- US President's Malaria Initiative, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Abuchahama Saifodine
- US President's Malaria Initiative, US Agency for International Development, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Rodaly Muthoni
- PMI VectorLink Project, Abt Associates, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Stephen Magesa
- PMI VectorLink Project, Abt Associates, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Carlos Chaccour
- Centro de Investigação Em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique.,Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Aklilu Seyoum
- PMI VectorLink Project, Abt Associates, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Dereje Dengela
- PMI VectorLink Project, Abt Associates, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Francisco Saúte
- Centro de Investigação Em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique
| | | | | | - Yvonne-Marie Linton
- Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit, Suitland, MD, USA.,Smithsonian Institution-National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Elnaiem DEA, Dakein O, Alawad AMA, Alsharif B, Khogali A, Jibreel T, Osman OF, Has’san H, Atia AM, Elhag M, Den Boer M, Ritmeijer K, Bern C, Alvar J, Khalid N, Courtenay O. Outdoor Residual Insecticide Spraying (ODRS), a New Approach for the Control of the Exophilic Vectors of Human Visceral Leishmaniasis: Phlebotomus orientalis in East Africa. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2020; 14:e0008774. [PMID: 33079934 PMCID: PMC7598920 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) due to Leishmania donovani is a neglected protozoan parasitic disease in humans, which is usually fatal if untreated. Phlebotomus orientalis, the predominant VL vector in East Africa, is a highly exophilic/exophagic species that poses a major challenge to current Integrated Vector Management (IVM). Here we report results of pilot studies conducted in rural villages in Gedarif state, Sudan, to evaluate outdoor residual spraying of 20mg active ingredient (a.i.) /m2 deltamethrin insecticide applied to the characteristic household compound boundary reed fence and to the outside of household buildings (Outdoor Residual Insecticide Spraying, ODRS), and as an alternative, spraying restricted to the boundary fence only (Restricted Outdoor Residual Insecticide Spraying, RODRS). Four to six clusters of 20 households were assigned to insecticide treatments or control in three experiments. Changes in sand fly numbers were monitored over 2,033 trap-nights over 43–76 days follow-up in four sentinel houses per cluster relative to unsprayed control clusters. Sand fly numbers were monitored by sticky traps placed on the ground on the inside (“outdoor”) and the outside (“peridomestic”) of the boundary fence, and by CDC light traps suspended outdoors in the household compound. The effects of ODRS on sand fly numbers inside sleeping huts were monitored by insecticide knockdown. After a single application, ODRS reduced P. orientalis abundance by 83%-99% in outdoor and peridomestic trap locations. ODRS also reduced numbers of P. orientalis found resting inside sleeping huts. RODRS reduced outdoor and peridomestic P. orientalis by 60%-88%. By direct comparison, RODRS was 58%-100% as effective as ODRS depending on the trapping method. These impacts were immediate on intervention and persisted during follow-up, representing a large fraction of the P. orientalis activity season. Relative costs of ODRS and RODRS delivery were $5.76 and $3.48 per household, respectively. The study demonstrates the feasibility and high entomological efficacy of ODRS and RODRS, and the expected low costs relative to current IVM practises. These methods represent novel sand fly vector control tools against predominantly exophilic/exophagic sand fly vectors, aimed to lower VL burdens in Sudan, with potential application in other endemic regions in East Africa. Phlebotomus orientalis is the predominant vector of visceral leishmaniasis (VL, kala azar) in Sudan and other countries of East Africa, where the disease causes high morbidity and mortality. This sylvatic sand fly species is abundant in wild habitats characterized by presence of black cotton soil and vegetation dominated by Balanites aegyptiaca and/or Acacia seyal trees. In villages, the vector bites people in the household yard and in nearby peri-domestic locations, exhibiting limited indoor resting behaviour. The marked exophagic and exophilic behaviours of P. orientalis represent a profound challenge for VL control by excluding indoor residual spraying of insecticides (IRS) and compromising the efficacy of insecticide-impregnated bednets (ITNs). In this study, we evaluated the entomological efficacy of residual pyrethroid applied outdoors to household boundary fences and the exterior walls of household huts (outdoor residual insecticide spraying, ODRS), to reduce the abundance of P. orientalis inside and outside houses. We also evaluated the entomological impact of a restricted outdoor residual insecticide spraying (RODRS), whereby insecticide was applied only to the boundary fence. The study was carried out in June 2016-June 2017 in Jebel-Algana and Umsalala villages, Gedarif state, eastern Sudan, which are highly endemic for VL. The results showed that a single ODRS application of 20mg a.i. /m2 2.8% deltamethrin provided average reductions of 83%-99% in outdoor and peridomestic P. orientalis sand fly numbers relative to unsprayed control clusters. RODRS reduced outdoor and peridomestic P. orientalis by 60%-88%. The average cost of ODRS and RODRS per household were $5.76 and $3.48, respectively. The costs of these community-based control measures were substantially lower than the costs of LLINs, which is the only evidence-based tool used to protect against VL in the area. Future studies should evaluate the impact of ODRS/RODRS transmission of VL incidence in endemic villages and in seasonal agricultural farms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dia-Eldin A. Elnaiem
- Department of Natural Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, MD, United States of America
- * E-mail: (DEAE); (OC)
| | - Osman Dakein
- Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Khartoum, Sudan
- Kala azar Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University for Gedarif, Gedarif, Sudan
| | - Ahmed Mohammed-Ali Alawad
- Ministry of Health, Gedarif state, Sudan
- Blue Nile Health Institute, Gezira University, Wad Medani, Sudan
| | - Bashir Alsharif
- Departamento de Entomologia, CPqAM, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Recife, Brasil and Dept of Medical Entomology, National Public Health Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Sudan
| | - Altayeb Khogali
- Blue Nile Health Institute, Gezira University, Wad Medani, Sudan
| | - Tayseer Jibreel
- Blue Nile Health Institute, Gezira University, Wad Medani, Sudan
| | - Omran F. Osman
- Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Khartoum, Sudan
| | - Hassan Has’san
- Ministry of Health, Gedarif state, Sudan
- Blue Nile Health Institute, Gezira University, Wad Medani, Sudan
| | | | - Mousab Elhag
- Director, Directorate of Communicable Diseases, Federal Ministry of Health, Khartoum, Sudan
| | | | | | - Caryn Bern
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Jorge Alvar
- Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Noteila Khalid
- Department of Zoology, Ibn Sina University, Khartoum, Sudan
| | - Orin Courtenay
- Zeeman Institute and School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom
- * E-mail: (DEAE); (OC)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zinszer K, Charland K, Vahey S, Jahagirdar D, Rek JC, Arinaitwe E, Nankabirwa J, Morrison K, Sadoine ML, Tutt-Guérette MA, Staedke SG, Kamya MR, Greenhouse B, Rodriguez-Barraquer I, Dorsey G. The Impact of Multiple Rounds of Indoor Residual Spraying on Malaria Incidence and Hemoglobin Levels in a High-Transmission Setting. J Infect Dis 2020; 221:304-312. [PMID: 31599325 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiz453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Indoor residual spraying (IRS) is widely used as a vector control measure, although there are conflicting findings of its effectiveness in reducing malaria incidence. The objective of this study was to estimate the effect of multiple IRS rounds on malaria incidence and hemoglobin levels in a cohort of children in rural southeastern Uganda. METHODS The study was based upon a dynamic cohort of children aged 0.5-10 years enrolled from August 2011 to June 2017 in Nagongera Subcounty. Confirmed malaria infections and hemoglobin levels were recorded over time for each participant. After each of 4 rounds of IRS, malaria incidence, hemoglobin levels, and parasite density were evaluated and compared with pre-IRS levels. Analyses were carried out at the participant level while accounting for repeated measures and clustering by household. RESULTS Incidence rate ratios comparing post-IRS to pre-IRS incidence rates for age groups 0-3, 3-5, and 5-11 were 0.108 (95% confidence interval [CI], .078-.149), 0.173 (95% CI, .136-.222), and 0.226 (95% CI, .187-.274), respectively. The mean hemoglobin levels significantly increased from 11.01 (pre-IRS) to 12.18 g/dL (post-IRS). CONCLUSIONS Our study supports the policy recommendation of IRS usage in a stable and perennial transmission area to rapidly reduce malaria transmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Zinszer
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Centre de recherche en santé publique, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Katia Charland
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sarah Vahey
- Centre de recherche en santé publique, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Deepa Jahagirdar
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - John C Rek
- Infectious Disease Research Collaboration, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Emmanuel Arinaitwe
- Infectious Disease Research Collaboration, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Joaniter Nankabirwa
- Infectious Disease Research Collaboration, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Margaux L Sadoine
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Centre de recherche en santé publique, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marc-Antoine Tutt-Guérette
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Centre de recherche en santé publique, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sarah G Staedke
- Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Moses R Kamya
- Infectious Disease Research Collaboration, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.,Department of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Bryan Greenhouse
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Grant Dorsey
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lucas ER, Rockett KA, Lynd A, Essandoh J, Grisales N, Kemei B, Njoroge H, Hubbart C, Rippon EJ, Morgan J, Van't Hof AE, Ochomo EO, Kwiatkowski DP, Weetman D, Donnelly MJ. A high throughput multi-locus insecticide resistance marker panel for tracking resistance emergence and spread in Anopheles gambiae. Sci Rep 2019; 9:13335. [PMID: 31527637 PMCID: PMC6746726 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-49892-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The spread of resistance to insecticides in disease-carrying mosquitoes poses a threat to the effectiveness of control programmes, which rely largely on insecticide-based interventions. Monitoring mosquito populations is essential, but obtaining phenotypic measurements of resistance is laborious and error-prone. High-throughput genotyping offers the prospect of quick and repeatable estimates of resistance, while also allowing resistance markers to be tracked and studied. To demonstrate the potential of highly-mulitplexed genotypic screening for measuring resistance-association of mutations and tracking their spread, we developed a panel of 28 known or putative resistance markers in the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiae, which we used to screen mosquitoes from a wide swathe of Sub-Saharan Africa (Burkina Faso, Ghana, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Kenya). We found resistance association in four markers, including a novel mutation in the detoxification gene Gste2 (Gste2-119V). We also identified a duplication in Gste2 combining a resistance-associated mutation with its wild-type counterpart, potentially alleviating the costs of resistance. Finally, we describe the distribution of the multiple origins of kdr resistance, finding unprecedented diversity in the DRC. This panel represents the first step towards a quantitative genotypic model of insecticide resistance that can be used to predict resistance status in An. gambiae.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric R Lucas
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
| | - Kirk A Rockett
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Amy Lynd
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
| | - John Essandoh
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.,Department of Wildlife and Entomology, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana
| | - Nelson Grisales
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.,Abt Associates, 6130 Executive BLVD, Rockville, MD, United States
| | - Brigid Kemei
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Harun Njoroge
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
| | - Christina Hubbart
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Emily J Rippon
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
| | - John Morgan
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
| | - Arjen E Van't Hof
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
| | - Eric O Ochomo
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Dominic P Kwiatkowski
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK.,Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - David Weetman
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
| | - Martin J Donnelly
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.,Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Corbel V, Durot C, Achee NL, Chandre F, Coulibaly MB, David JP, Devine GJ, Dusfour I, Fonseca DM, Griego J, Juntarajumnong W, Lenhart A, Kasai S, Martins AJ, Moyes C, Ng LC, Pinto J, Pompon JF, Muller P, Raghavendra K, Roiz D, Vatandoost H, Vontas J, Weetman D. Second WIN International Conference on "Integrated approaches and innovative tools for combating insecticide resistance in vectors of arboviruses", October 2018, Singapore. Parasit Vectors 2019; 12:331. [PMID: 31269996 PMCID: PMC6610869 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-019-3591-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The past 40 years have seen a dramatic emergence of epidemic arboviral diseases transmitted primarily by mosquitoes. The frequency and magnitude of the epidemics, especially those transmitted by urban Aedes species, have progressively increased over time, accelerating in the past 10 years. To reduce the burden and threat of vector-borne diseases, the World Health Organization (WHO) has recently adopted the Global Vector Control Response (GVCR) in order to support countries in implementing effective sustainable vector control. The evidence-base to support vector control is however limited for arboviral diseases which make prioritization difficult. Knowledge gaps in the distribution, mechanisms and impact of insecticide resistance on vector control impedes the implementation of locally tailored Aedes control measures. This report summarizes the main outputs of the second international conference of the Worldwide Insecticide resistance Network (WIN) on "Integrated approaches and innovative tools for combating insecticide resistance in arbovirus vectors" held in Singapore, 1-3 October 2018. The aims of the conference were to review progress and achievements made in insecticide resistance surveillance worldwide, and to discuss the potential of integrated vector management and innovative technologies for efficiently controlling arboviral diseases. The conference brought together 150 participants from 26 countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Corbel
- Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Maladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs, Ecologie, Génétique, Evolution et Contrôle (MIVEGEC UM1-CNRS 5290-IRD 224), B.P. 64501, 911 Avenue Agropolis, 34394 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | - Claire Durot
- Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Maladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs, Ecologie, Génétique, Evolution et Contrôle (MIVEGEC UM1-CNRS 5290-IRD 224), B.P. 64501, 911 Avenue Agropolis, 34394 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | - Nicole L. Achee
- Department of Biological Sciences, Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame (UND), 239 Galvin Life Science Center, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
| | - Fabrice Chandre
- Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Maladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs, Ecologie, Génétique, Evolution et Contrôle (MIVEGEC UM1-CNRS 5290-IRD 224), B.P. 64501, 911 Avenue Agropolis, 34394 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | | | - Jean-Philippe David
- Laboratoire d’Ecologie Alpine (LECA), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), UMR 5553, CNRS, Université Grenoble-Alpes, Domaine universitaire de Saint-Martin d’Hères, 2233 rue de la piscine, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9, France
| | - Gregor J. Devine
- Mosquito Control Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Queensland 4006 Australia
| | - Isabelle Dusfour
- Institut Pasteur de la Guyane (IPG), 23 avenue Pasteur B.P. 6010, 97306 Cayenne Cedex, French Guiana
| | - Dina M. Fonseca
- Rutgers University (RU), Center for Vector Biology, 180 Jones Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
| | - John Griego
- Department of Biological Sciences, Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame (UND), 239 Galvin Life Science Center, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
| | - Waraporn Juntarajumnong
- Department of Entomology, Kasetsart University (KU), 50 Ngam Wong Wan Rd, Ladyaow Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900 Thailand
| | - Audrey Lenhart
- Center for Global Health/Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria/Entomology Branch, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, MS G-49; Bldg. 23, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
| | - Shinji Kasai
- Department of Medical Entomology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, 1-23-1 Toyama, Shinjukuku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ademir J. Martins
- Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Avenida Brasil, 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, RJ CEP: 21040-360 Brazil
| | - Catherine Moyes
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF UK
| | - Lee Ching Ng
- Environmental Health Institute (EHI), National Environment Agency (NEA), 11 Biopolis Way, Helios Block, #04-03/04 & #06-05/08, Singapore, Singapore
| | - João Pinto
- Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, UNL, Rua da Junqueira 100, 1349-008 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Julien F. Pompon
- Programme in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, 169857 Singapore
| | - Pie Muller
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, PO Box 4002, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4001 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Kamaraju Raghavendra
- Department of Health Research, ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research (NIMR), GoI Sector 8, Dwarka, Delhi 110 077 India
| | - David Roiz
- Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Maladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs, Ecologie, Génétique, Evolution et Contrôle (MIVEGEC UM1-CNRS 5290-IRD 224), B.P. 64501, 911 Avenue Agropolis, 34394 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | - Hassan Vatandoost
- Department of Medical Entomology & Vector Control, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), School of Public Health and Institute for Environmental Research, Pour Sina Street, P.O. Box: 14155-6446, Tehran, Iran
| | - John Vontas
- Institute Molecular Biology and Biotechnology (IMBB), Foundation for Research and Technology (FORTH), Panepistimioupoli, Voutes, 70013 Heraklio, Crete Greece
- Pesticide Science Laboratory, Agricultural University of Athens, Ieara Odoes 75, 118 Athens, Greece
| | - David Weetman
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L35QA UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) are used to control malaria vectors. Both strategies use insecticides to kill mosquitoes that bite and rest indoors. For ITNs, the World Health Organization (WHO) only recommended pyrethroids until 2018, but mosquito vectors are becoming resistant to this insecticide. For IRS, a range of insecticides are recommended. Adding IRS to ITNs may improve control, simply because two interventions may be better than one; it may improve malaria control where ITNs are failing due to pyrethroid resistance; and it may slow the emergence and spread of pyrethroid resistance. OBJECTIVES To summarize the effect on malaria of additionally implementing IRS, using non-pyrethroid-like or pyrethroid-like insecticides, in communities currently using ITNs. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE; Embase; LILACS; the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform; ClinicalTrials.gov; and the ISRCTN registry up to 18 March 2019. SELECTION CRITERIA Cluster-randomized controlled trials (cRCTs), interrupted time series (ITS), or controlled before-and-after studies (CBAs) comparing IRS plus ITNs with ITNs alone. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed trials for eligibility, analyzed risk of bias, and extracted data. We used risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We stratified by type of insecticide: 'non-pyrethroid-like', as this could improve malaria control better than adding IRS insecticides that have the same way of working as the insecticide on ITNs ('pyrethroid-like'). We used subgroup analysis of ITN usage in the trials to explore heterogeneity. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS Six cRCTs (eight comparisons) met our inclusion criteria conducted since 2008 in sub-Saharan Africa. Malaria transmission in all sites was from mosquitoes belonging to the Anopheles gambiae s.l. complex species; two trials in Benin and Tanzania also reported the vector Anopheles funestus. Three trials used insecticide with targets different to pyrethroids (two used bendiocarb and one used pirimiphos-methyl); two trials used dichloro-diphenyl-trichlorethane (DDT), an insecticide with the same target as pyrethroids; and one trial used both types of insecticide (pyrethroid deltamethrin in the first year, switching to bendiocarb for the second-year). ITN usage was greater than 50% in three trials, and less than 50% in the remainder.Indoor residual spraying using 'non-pyrethroid-like' insecticides Adding IRS with a non-pyrethroid-like insecticide had mixed results. Overall, we do not know if the addition of IRS impacted on malaria incidence (rate ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.86; 2 cRCTs, 566 child-years; very low-certainty evidence); it may have reduced malaria parasite prevalence (0.67, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.28; 5 comparisons from 4 cRCTs, 10,440 participants; low-certainty evidence); and it may have reduced the prevalence of anaemia (RR CI 0.46, 95% 0.18 to 1.20; 3 comparisons from 2 cRCTs, 2026 participants; low-certainty evidence). Three trials reported the impact on EIR, with variable results; overall, we do not know if IRS had any effect on the EIR in communities using ITNs (very low-certainty evidence). Trials also reported the adult mosquito density and the sporozoite rate, but we could not summarize or pool these entomological outcomes due to unreported data. ITN usage did not explain the variation in malaria outcomes between different studies. One trial reported no effect on malaria incidence or parasite prevalence in the first year, when the insecticide used for IRS had the same target as pyrethroids, but showed an effect on both outcomes in the second year, when the insecticide was replaced by one with a different target.Two trials measured the prevalence of pyrethroid resistance before and after IRS being introduced: no difference was detected, but these data are limited.Indoor residual spraying using 'pyrethroid-like' insecticidesAdding IRS using a pyrethroid-like insecticide did not appear to markedly alter malaria incidence (rate ratio 1.07, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.43; 2 cRCTs, 15,717 child-years; moderate-certainty evidence), parasite prevalence (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.44; 3 cRCTs, 10,820 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), or anaemia prevalence (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.40; 1 cRCT, 4186 participants; low-certainty evidence). Data on the entomological inoculation rate (EIR) were limited, and therefore we do not know if IRS had any effect on the EIR in communities using ITNs (very low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Four trials have evaluated adding IRS using 'non-pyrethroid-like' insecticides in communities using ITNs. Some of these trials showed effects, and others did not. Three trials have evaluated adding IRS using 'pyrethroid-like' insecticides in communities using ITNs, and these studies did not detect an additional effect of the IRS. Given the wide geographical variety of malaria endemicities, transmission patterns, and insecticide resistance, we need to be cautious with inferences to policy from the limited number of trials conducted to date, and to develop relevant further research to inform decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie Choi
- Liverpool School of Tropical MedicineDepartment of Clinical SciencesPembroke PlaceLiverpoolUKL3 5QA
| | - Joseph Pryce
- Liverpool School of Tropical MedicineDepartment of Clinical SciencesPembroke PlaceLiverpoolUKL3 5QA
| | - Paul Garner
- Liverpool School of Tropical MedicineDepartment of Clinical SciencesPembroke PlaceLiverpoolUKL3 5QA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ngwej LM, Hattingh I, Mlambo G, Mashat EM, Kashala JCK, Malonga FK, Bangs MJ. Indoor residual spray bio-efficacy and residual activity of a clothianidin-based formulation (SumiShield ® 50WG) provides long persistence on various wall surfaces for malaria control in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Malar J 2019; 18:72. [PMID: 30866934 PMCID: PMC6417189 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-019-2710-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bio-efficacy and residual activity of SumiShield® 50WG (50%, w/w) with active ingredient clothianidin, a neonicotinoid compound, was assessed using an insecticide-susceptible laboratory strain of Anopheles arabiensis. Implications of the findings are examined in the context of potential alternative insecticides for indoor residual spraying in Lualaba Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo. METHODS Contact surface bioassays were conducted for 48 weeks on four types of walls (unbaked clay, baked clay, cement, painted cement) in simulated semi-field experimental conditions using two different doses of clothianidin active ingredient (200 mg ai/sq m and 300 mg ai/sq m). Additionally, two types of walls (painted cement and baked clay) were examined in occupied houses using the 300-mg dosage. Laboratory-reared An. arabiensis were exposed to treated surfaces or untreated (controls) for 30 min. Mortality was recorded at 24-h intervals for 120 h. RESULTS Under semi-field experimental conditions, there was no significant difference in mortality over time between the two doses of clothianidin. The mortality rates remained above 60% up to 48 weeks on all four wall surface types. The formulation performed better on cement and unbaked clay with a mean final mortality rate above 90%. Under natural conditions, there was no significant difference in response between baked clay and painted cement walls with a mean final mortality rate above 90%. The insecticide also performed significantly better in natural settings compared to semi-field experimental conditions. CONCLUSION Depending on the type of experimental surface, the residual activity of the two doses of clothianidin was between 28 and 48 weeks based on a 60% mortality endpoint. Clothianidin at 300 mg ai/sq m applied on two house walls (baked clay or painted cement) performed equally well (> 80% mortality) on both surfaces up to week 41 (approximately 9.5 months). Extended bioassay holding periods (up to 120 h) may present with excess natural mortality in the untreated controls, thus complicating analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonard M Ngwej
- China Molybdenum Co., Ltd./International SOS Malaria Control Programme, Tenke Fungurume Mining, Fungurume, Lualaba Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
- School of Public Health, University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
| | - Izak Hattingh
- China Molybdenum Co., Ltd./International SOS Malaria Control Programme, Tenke Fungurume Mining, Fungurume, Lualaba Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Godwill Mlambo
- China Molybdenum Co., Ltd./International SOS Malaria Control Programme, Tenke Fungurume Mining, Fungurume, Lualaba Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Emmanuel M Mashat
- China Molybdenum Co., Ltd./International SOS Malaria Control Programme, Tenke Fungurume Mining, Fungurume, Lualaba Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Jean-Christophe K Kashala
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Françoise K Malonga
- School of Public Health, University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Michael J Bangs
- China Molybdenum Co., Ltd./International SOS Malaria Control Programme, Tenke Fungurume Mining, Fungurume, Lualaba Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Public Health & Malaria Control Department, PT Freeport Indonesia, International SOS, Jl. Kertajasa, Kuala Kencana, Papua, 99920, Indonesia
- Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tokponnon FT, Sissinto Y, Ogouyémi AH, Adéothy AA, Adechoubou A, Houansou T, Oke M, Kinde-Gazard D, Massougbodji A, Akogbeto MC, Cornelie S, Corbel V, Knox TB, Mnzava AP, Donnelly MJ, Kleinschmidt I, Bradley J. Implications of insecticide resistance for malaria vector control with long-lasting insecticidal nets: evidence from health facility data from Benin. Malar J 2019; 18:37. [PMID: 30744666 PMCID: PMC6371432 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-019-2656-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2018] [Accepted: 01/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Insecticide-based interventions have averted more than 500 million malaria cases since 2000, but insecticide resistance in mosquitoes could bring about a rebound in disease and mortality. This study investigated whether insecticide resistance was associated with increased incidence of clinical malaria. METHODS In an area of southern Benin with insecticide resistance and high use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), malaria morbidity and insecticide resistance were measured simultaneously in 30 clusters (villages or collections of villages) multiple times over the course of 2 years. Insecticide resistance frequencies were measured using the standard World Health Organization bioassay test. Malaria morbidity was measured by cases recorded at health facilities both in the whole population using routinely collected data and in a passively followed cohort of children under 5 years old. RESULTS There was no evidence that incidence of malaria from routinely collected data was higher in clusters with resistance frequencies above the median, either in children aged under 5 (RR = 1.27 (95% CI 0.81-2.00) p = 0.276) or in individuals aged 5 or over (RR = 1.74 (95% CI 0.91-3.34) p = 0.093). There was also no evidence that incidence was higher in clusters with resistance frequencies above the median in the passively followed cohort (RR = 1.11 (0.52-2.35) p = 0.777). CONCLUSIONS This study found no association between frequency of resistance and incidence of clinical malaria in an area where ITNs are the principal form of vector control. This may be because, as other studies have shown, ITNs continue to offer some protection from malaria even in the presence of insecticide resistance. Irrespective of resistance, nets provide only partial protection so the development of improved or supplementary vector control tools is required to reduce Africa's unacceptably high malaria burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filémon T Tokponnon
- National Malaria Control Programme, Cotonou, Benin.,Ministry of Health, Cotonou, Benin
| | - Yolande Sissinto
- Faculté des Sciences de la Santé de l'Université d'Abomey Calavi, Cotonou, Benin
| | | | - Adicath Adéola Adéothy
- National Malaria Control Programme, Cotonou, Benin.,Faculté des Sciences de la Santé de l'Université d'Abomey Calavi, Cotonou, Benin
| | - Alioun Adechoubou
- National Malaria Control Programme, Cotonou, Benin.,Ministry of Health, Cotonou, Benin
| | | | - Mariam Oke
- National Malaria Control Programme, Cotonou, Benin.,Ministry of Health, Cotonou, Benin
| | | | - Achille Massougbodji
- Faculté des Sciences de la Santé de l'Université d'Abomey Calavi, Cotonou, Benin
| | | | - Sylvie Cornelie
- Maladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs, Ecologie, Génétique, Evolution et Contrôle (MIVEGEC), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), CNRS, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Vincent Corbel
- Maladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs, Ecologie, Génétique, Evolution et Contrôle (MIVEGEC), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), CNRS, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Tessa B Knox
- Global Malaria Programme, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Martin J Donnelly
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Immo Kleinschmidt
- MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - John Bradley
- MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Implications of insecticide resistance for malaria vector control with long-lasting insecticidal nets: trends in pyrethroid resistance during a WHO-coordinated multi-country prospective study. Parasit Vectors 2018; 11:550. [PMID: 30348209 PMCID: PMC6198431 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-018-3101-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2018] [Accepted: 09/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing pyrethroid resistance has been an undesirable correlate of the rapid increase in coverage of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) since 2000. Whilst monitoring of resistance levels has increased markedly over this period, longitudinal monitoring is still lacking, meaning the temporal and spatial dynamics of phenotypic resistance in the context of increasing ITN coverage are unclear. METHODS As part of a large WHO-co-ordinated epidemiological study investigating the impact of resistance on malaria infection, longitudinal monitoring of phenotypic resistance to pyrethroids was undertaken in 290 clusters across Benin, Cameroon, India, Kenya and Sudan. Mortality in response to pyrethroids in the major anopheline vectors in each location was recorded during consecutive years using standard WHO test procedures. Trends in mosquito mortality were examined using generalised linear mixed-effect models. RESULTS Insecticide resistance (using the WHO definition of mortality < 90%) was detected in clusters in all countries across the study period. The highest mosquito mortality (lowest resistance frequency) was consistently reported from India, in an area where ITNs had only recently been introduced. Substantial temporal and spatial variation was evident in mortality measures in all countries. Overall, a trend of decreasing mosquito mortality (increasing resistance frequency) was recorded (Odds Ratio per year: 0.79 per year (95% CI: 0.79-0.81, P < 0.001). There was also evidence that higher net usage was associated with lower mosquito mortality in some countries. DISCUSSION Pyrethroid resistance increased over the study duration in four out of five countries. Insecticide-based vector control may be compromised as a result of ever higher resistance frequencies.
Collapse
|
26
|
Kleinschmidt I, Bradley J, Knox TB, Mnzava AP, Kafy HT, Mbogo C, Ismail BA, Bigoga JD, Adechoubou A, Raghavendra K, Cook J, Malik EM, Nkuni ZJ, Macdonald M, Bayoh N, Ochomo E, Fondjo E, Awono-Ambene HP, Etang J, Akogbeto M, Bhatt RM, Chourasia MK, Swain DK, Kinyari T, Subramaniam K, Massougbodji A, Okê-Sopoh M, Ogouyemi-Hounto A, Kouambeng C, Abdin MS, West P, Elmardi K, Cornelie S, Corbel V, Valecha N, Mathenge E, Kamau L, Lines J, Donnelly MJ. Implications of insecticide resistance for malaria vector control with long-lasting insecticidal nets: a WHO-coordinated, prospective, international, observational cohort study. THE LANCET. INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2018; 18:640-649. [PMID: 29650424 PMCID: PMC5968369 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(18)30172-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 151] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2017] [Revised: 02/13/2018] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Scale-up of insecticide-based interventions has averted more than 500 million malaria cases since 2000. Increasing insecticide resistance could herald a rebound in disease and mortality. We aimed to investigate whether insecticide resistance was associated with loss of effectiveness of long-lasting insecticidal nets and increased malaria disease burden. METHODS This WHO-coordinated, prospective, observational cohort study was done at 279 clusters (villages or groups of villages in which phenotypic resistance was measurable) in Benin, Cameroon, India, Kenya, and Sudan. Pyrethroid long-lasting insecticidal nets were the principal form of malaria vector control in all study areas; in Sudan this approach was supplemented by indoor residual spraying. Cohorts of children from randomly selected households in each cluster were recruited and followed up by community health workers to measure incidence of clinical malaria and prevalence of infection. Mosquitoes were assessed for susceptibility to pyrethroids using the standard WHO bioassay test. Country-specific results were combined using meta-analysis. FINDINGS Between June 2, 2012, and Nov 4, 2016, 40 000 children were enrolled and assessed for clinical incidence during 1·4 million follow-up visits. 80 000 mosquitoes were assessed for insecticide resistance. Long-lasting insecticidal net users had lower infection prevalence (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0·63, 95% CI 0·51-0·78) and disease incidence (adjusted rate ratio [RR] 0·62, 0·41-0·94) than did non-users across a range of resistance levels. We found no evidence of an association between insecticide resistance and infection prevalence (adjusted OR 0·86, 0·70-1·06) or incidence (adjusted RR 0·89, 0·72-1·10). Users of nets, although significantly better protected than non-users, were nevertheless subject to high malaria infection risk (ranging from an average incidence in net users of 0·023, [95% CI 0·016-0·033] per person-year in India, to 0·80 [0·65-0·97] per person year in Kenya; and an average infection prevalence in net users of 0·8% [0·5-1·3] in India to an average infection prevalence of 50·8% [43·4-58·2] in Benin). INTERPRETATION Irrespective of resistance, populations in malaria endemic areas should continue to use long-lasting insecticidal nets to reduce their risk of infection. As nets provide only partial protection, the development of additional vector control tools should be prioritised to reduce the unacceptably high malaria burden. FUNDING Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, UK Medical Research Council, and UK Department for International Development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Immo Kleinschmidt
- MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - John Bradley
- MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | - Hmooda Toto Kafy
- Federal Ministry of Health, Khartoum, Sudan; School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Charles Mbogo
- KEMRI Centre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Bashir Adam Ismail
- School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia; Khartoum Malaria Free Initiative, Khartoum, Sudan
| | - Jude D Bigoga
- National Reference Unit (NRU) for Vector Control, The Biotechnology Center, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| | - Alioun Adechoubou
- Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme (PNLP), Ministère de la Santé, Cotonou, Benin
| | - Kamaraju Raghavendra
- National Institute of Malaria Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Department of Health Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Jackie Cook
- MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Elfatih M Malik
- University of Khartoum, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, Khartoum, Sudan
| | | | | | - Nabie Bayoh
- KEMRI/CDC Research and Public Health Collaboration, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Eric Ochomo
- KEMRI/CDC Research and Public Health Collaboration, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Etienne Fondjo
- National Malaria Control Program, Ministry of Public Health, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| | - Herman Parfait Awono-Ambene
- Organisation de Coordination pour la lutte contre les Endemies en Afrique Centrale (OCEAC), Yaoundé, Cameroon
| | - Josiane Etang
- Organisation de Coordination pour la lutte contre les Endemies en Afrique Centrale (OCEAC), Yaoundé, Cameroon; Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon
| | - Martin Akogbeto
- Centre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou, Cotonou, Benin
| | - Rajendra M Bhatt
- National Institute of Malaria Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Department of Health Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Mehul Kumar Chourasia
- National Institute of Malaria Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Department of Health Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Dipak K Swain
- National Institute of Malaria Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Department of Health Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Teresa Kinyari
- University of Nairobi, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Department of Medical Physiology, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | | | - Mariam Okê-Sopoh
- Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme (PNLP), Ministère de la Santé, Cotonou, Benin
| | | | - Celestin Kouambeng
- National Malaria Control Program, Ministry of Public Health, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| | | | - Philippa West
- MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Sylvie Cornelie
- Maladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs, Ecologie, Génétique, Evolution et Contrôle (MIVEGEC), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), CNRS, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Vincent Corbel
- Maladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs, Ecologie, Génétique, Evolution et Contrôle (MIVEGEC), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), CNRS, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Neena Valecha
- National Institute of Malaria Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Department of Health Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Evan Mathenge
- KEMRI Eastern and Southern Africa Centre of International Parasite Control, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Luna Kamau
- KEMRI Centre for Biotechnology and Research Development, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Jonathan Lines
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Martin James Donnelly
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK; Malaria Programme, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ismail BA, Kafy HT, Sulieman JE, Subramaniam K, Thomas B, Mnzava A, Abu Kassim NF, Ahmad AH, Knox TB, Kleinschmidt I, Donnelly MJ. Temporal and spatial trends in insecticide resistance in Anopheles arabiensis in Sudan: outcomes from an evaluation of implications of insecticide resistance for malaria vector control. Parasit Vectors 2018; 11:122. [PMID: 29499751 PMCID: PMC5834846 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-018-2732-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2017] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) (with pyrethroids) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) are the cornerstones of the Sudanese malaria control program. Insecticide resistance to the principal insecticides in LLINs and IRS is a major concern. This study was designed to monitor insecticide resistance in Anopheles arabiensis from 140 clusters in four malaria-endemic areas of Sudan from 2011 to 2014. All clusters received LLINs, while half (n = 70), distributed across the four regions, had additional IRS campaigns. Methods Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) mosquitoes were identified to species level using PCR techniques. Standard WHO insecticide susceptibility bioassays were carried out to detect resistance to deltamethrin (0.05%), DDT (4%) and bendiocarb (0.1%). TaqMan assays were performed on random samples of deltamethrin-resistant phenotyped and pyrethrum spray collected individuals to determine Vgsc-1014 knockdown resistance mutations. Results Anopheles arabiensis accounted for 99.9% of any anopheline species collected across all sites. Bioassay screening indicated that mosquitoes remained susceptible to bendiocarb but were resistance to deltamethrin and DDT in all areas. There were significant increases in deltamethrin resistance over the four years, with overall mean percent mortality to deltamethrin declining from 81.0% (95% CI: 77.6–84.3%) in 2011 to 47.7% (95% CI: 43.5–51.8%) in 2014. The rate of increase in phenotypic deltamethrin-resistance was significantly slower in the LLIN + IRS arm than in the LLIN-only arm (Odds ratio 1.34; 95% CI: 1.02–1.77). The frequency of Vgsc-1014F mutation varied spatiotemporally with highest frequencies in Galabat (range 0.375–0.616) and New Halfa (range 0.241–0.447). Deltamethrin phenotypic-resistance correlated with Vgsc-1014F frequency. Conclusion Combining LLIN and IRS, with different classes of insecticide, may delay pyrethroid resistance development, but the speed at which resistance develops may be area-specific. Continued monitoring is vital to ensure optimal management and control. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13071-018-2732-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bashir Adam Ismail
- Khartoum Malaria Free Initiative, PO Box 1517, Khartoum, Khartoum State, Sudan. .,School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Minden, Pulau Penang, Malaysia.
| | - Hmooda Toto Kafy
- School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Minden, Pulau Penang, Malaysia.,Integrated Vector Management Unit, Federal Ministry of Health, PO Box 303, Khartoum, Sudan
| | - Jihad Eltaher Sulieman
- Sennar Malaria Research and Training Centre, Federal Ministry of Health, PO Box 303, Sennar, Sudan
| | - Krishanthi Subramaniam
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
| | - Brent Thomas
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
| | - Abraham Mnzava
- African Leaders Malaria Alliance (ALMA), 14 Kanisa Road, Corridor Area, P.O. Box 1973, Arusha, Tanzania
| | - Nur Faeza Abu Kassim
- School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Minden, Pulau Penang, Malaysia
| | - Abu Hassan Ahmad
- School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Minden, Pulau Penang, Malaysia
| | - Tessa B Knox
- Global Malaria Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Immo Kleinschmidt
- MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Martin J Donnelly
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Resistance to first-line treatments for Plasmodium falciparum malaria and the insecticides used for Anopheles vector control are threatening malaria elimination efforts. Suboptimal responses to drugs and insecticides are both spreading geographically and emerging independently and are being seen at increasing intensities. Whilst resistance is unavoidable, its effects can be mitigated through resistance management practices, such as exposing the parasite or vector to more than one selective agent. Resistance contributed to the failure of the 20th century Global Malaria Eradication Programme, and yet the global response to this issue continues to be slow and poorly coordinated-too often, too little, too late. The Malaria Eradication Research Agenda (malERA) Refresh process convened a panel on resistance of both insecticides and antimalarial drugs. This paper outlines developments in the field over the past 5 years, highlights gaps in knowledge, and proposes a research agenda focused on managing resistance. A deeper understanding of the complex biological processes involved and how resistance is selected is needed, together with evidence of its public health impact. Resistance management will require improved use of entomological and parasitological data in decision making, and optimisation of the useful life of new and existing products through careful implementation, combination, and evaluation. A proactive, collaborative approach is needed from basic science and the development of new tools to programme and policy interventions that will ensure that the armamentarium of drugs and insecticides is sufficient to deal with the challenges of malaria control and its elimination.
Collapse
|