Structural basis for GPCR-independent activation of heterotrimeric Gi proteins

Design, synthesis, and analysis of macrobicyclic peptides for targeting the Gαi protein

Bicyclic peptides are important chemical tools that can function, for example, as bioactive ligands switching on/off signaling pathways mediated by guanine nucleotide-binding proteins as bicycles are more broadly applicable. Despite their relevance in medicinal chemistry, the synthesis of such peptides is challenging, and the final yield is highly dependent on the chemical composition and physicochemical properties of the scaffold. We recently discovered novel, state-specific peptide modulators targeting the Gαi protein, namely, GPM-2/GPM-3, by screening a one-bead-two-compound combinatorial library. A more detailed analysis, including sequence alignments and computer-assisted conformational studies based on the hit compounds, revealed the new peptide 10 as a potential macrobicyclic Gαi ligand sharing high sequence similarity to the known Gαi modulators. The Gαs protein was included in this study for comparison and to unravel the criteria for the specificity of modulator binding to Gαi versus Gαs. This work provides in-depth computer-assisted experimental studies for the analysis of novel macrobicyclic, library-derived Gαi protein ligands. The sequence and structural comparison of 10 with the lead compounds GPM-2 and GPM-3 reveals the importance of the size and amino acid composition of one ring of the bicyclic system and suggests features enhancing the binding affinity of the peptides to the Gαi protein.

Mechanistic insights into G-protein activation via phosphorylation mediated non-canonical pathway

Activation of heterotrimeric G-proteins (Gαβγ) downstream to receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) is a well-established crosstalk between the signaling pathways mediated by G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and RTKs. While GPCR serves as a guanine exchange factor (GEF) in the canonical activation of Gα that facilitates the exchange of GDP for GTP, the mechanism through which RTK phosphorylations induce Gα activation remains unclear. Recent experimental studies revealed that the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a well-known RTK, phosphorylates the helical domain tyrosine residues Y154 and Y155 and accelerates the GDP release from the Gαi3, a subtype of Gα-protein. Using well-tempered metadynamics and extensive unbiased molecular dynamics simulations, we captured the GDP release event and identified the intermediates between bound and unbound states through Markov state models. In addition to weakened salt bridges at the domain interface, phosphorylations induced the unfolding of helix αF, which contributed to increased flexibility near the hinge region, facilitating a greater distance between domains in the phosphorylated Gαi3. Although the larger domain separation in the phosphorylated system provided an unobstructed path for the nucleotide, the accelerated release of GDP was attributed to increased fluctuations in several conserved regions like P-loop, switch 1, and switch 2. Overall, this study provides atomistic insights into the activation of G-proteins induced by RTK phosphorylations and identifies the specific structural motifs involved in the process. The knowledge gained from the study could establish a foundation for targeting non-canonical signaling pathways and developing therapeutic strategies against the ailments associated with dysregulated G-protein signaling.

Non-canonical G protein signaling

The original paradigm of classical - also referred to as canonical - cellular signal transduction of heterotrimeric G proteins (G protein) is defined by a hierarchical, orthograde interaction of three players: the agonist-activated G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), which activates the transducing G protein, that in turn regulates its intracellular effectors. This receptor-transducer-effector concept was extended by the identification of regulators and adapters such as the regulators of G protein signaling (RGS), receptor kinases like βARK, or GPCR-interacting arrestin adapters that are integrated into this canonical signaling process at different levels to enable fine-tuning. Finally, the identification of atypical signaling mechanisms of classical regulators, together with the discovery of novel modulators, added a new and fascinating dimension to the cellular G protein signal transduction. This heterogeneous group of accessory G protein modulators was coined "activators of G protein signaling" (AGS) proteins and plays distinct roles in canonical and non-canonical G protein signaling pathways. AGS proteins contribute to the control of essential cellular functions such as cell development and division, intracellular transport processes, secretion, autophagy or cell movements. As such, they are involved in numerous biological processes that are crucial for diseases, like diabetes mellitus, cancer, and stroke, which represent major health burdens. Although the identification of a large number of non-canonical G protein signaling pathways has broadened the spectrum of this cellular communication system, their underlying mechanisms, functions, and biological effects are poorly understood. In this review, we highlight and discuss atypical G protein-dependent signaling mechanisms with a focus on inhibitory G proteins (Gi) involved in canonical and non-canonical signal transduction, review recent developments and open questions, address the potential of new approaches for targeted pharmacological interventions.

Heterotrimeric G protein signaling without GPCRs: The Gα-binding-and-activating (GBA) motif

Heterotrimeric G proteins (Gαβγ) are molecular switches that relay signals from 7-transmembrane receptors located at the cell surface to the cytoplasm. The function of these receptors is so intimately linked to heterotrimeric G proteins that they are named G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), showcasing the interdependent nature of this archetypical receptor-transducer axis of transmembrane signaling in eukaryotes. It is generally assumed that activation of heterotrimeric G protein signaling occurs exclusively by the action of GPCRs, but this idea has been challenged by the discovery of alternative mechanisms by which G proteins can propagate signals in the cell. This review will focus on a general principle of G protein signaling that operates without the direct involvement of GPCRs. The mechanism of G protein signaling reviewed here is mediated by a class of G protein regulators defined by containing an evolutionarily conserved sequence named the Gα-binding-and-activating (GBA) motif. Using the best characterized proteins with a GBA motif as examples, Gα-interacting vesicle-associated protein (GIV)/Girdin and dishevelled-associating protein with a high frequency of leucine residues (DAPLE), this review will cover (i) the mechanisms by which extracellular cues not relayed by GPCRs promote the coupling of GBA motif-containing regulators with G proteins, (ii) the structural and molecular basis for how GBA motifs interact with Gα subunits to facilitate signaling, (iii) the relevance of this mechanism in different cellular and pathological processes, including cancer and birth defects, and (iv) strategies to manipulate GBA-G protein coupling for experimental therapeutics purposes, including the development of rationally engineered proteins and chemical probes.

Moving beyond the arabidopsis-centric view of G-protein signaling in plants

Heterotrimeric G-protein-mediated signaling is a key mechanism to transduce a multitude of endogenous and environmental signals in diverse organisms. The scope and expectations of plant G-protein research were set by pioneering work in metazoans. Given the similarity of the core constituents, G-protein-signaling mechanisms were presumed to be universally conserved. However, because of the enormous diversity of survival strategies and endless forms among eukaryotes, the signal, its interpretation, and responses vary even among different plant groups. Earlier G-protein research in arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) has emphasized its divergence from Metazoa. Here, we compare recent evidence from diverse plant lineages with the available arabidopsis G-protein model and discuss the conserved and novel protein components, signaling mechanisms, and response regulation.

Bicyclic Peptide Library Screening for the Identification of Gαi Protein Modulators

Noncanonical G protein activation and inactivation, particularly for the Gαi/s protein subfamilies, have long been a focus of chemical research. Combinatorial libraries were already effectively applied to identify modulators of the guanine-nucleotide exchange, as can be exemplified with peptides such as KB-752 and GPM-1c/d, the so-called guanine-nucleotide exchange modulators. In this study, we identified novel bicyclic peptides from a combinatorial library screening that show prominent properties as molecular switch-on/off modulators of Gαi signaling. Among the series of hits, the exceptional paradigm of GPM-3, a protein and state-specific bicyclic peptide, is the first chemically identified GAP (GTPase-activating protein) modulator with a high binding affinity for Gαi protein. Computational analyses identified and assessed the structure of the bicyclic peptides, novel ligand-protein interaction sites, and their subsequent impact on the nucleotide binding site. This approach can therefore lead the way for the development of efficient chemical biological probes targeting Gαi protein modulation within a cellular context.

Gαs slow conformational transition upon GTP binding and a novel Gαs regulator

G proteins are major signaling partners for G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Although stepwise structural changes during GPCR-G protein complex formation and guanosine diphosphate (GDP) release have been reported, no information is available with regard to guanosine triphosphate (GTP) binding. Here, we used a novel Bayesian integrative modeling framework that combines data from hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry, tryptophan-induced fluorescence quenching, and metadynamics simulations to derive a kinetic model and atomic-level characterization of stepwise conformational changes incurred by the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR)-Gs complex after GDP release and GTP binding. Our data suggest rapid GTP binding and GTP-induced dissociation of Gαs from β2AR and Gβγ, as opposed to a slow closing of the Gαs α-helical domain (AHD). Yeast-two-hybrid screening using Gαs AHD as bait identified melanoma-associated antigen D2 (MAGE D2) as a novel AHD-binding protein, which was also shown to accelerate the GTP-induced closing of the Gαs AHD.

Small-molecule targeting of GPCR-independent noncanonical G-protein signaling in cancer

Activation of heterotrimeric G-proteins (Gαβγ) by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is a quintessential mechanism of cell signaling widely targeted by clinically approved drugs. However, it has become evident that heterotrimeric G-proteins can also be activated via GPCR-independent mechanisms that remain untapped as pharmacological targets. GIV/Girdin has emerged as a prototypical non-GPCR activator of G proteins that promotes cancer metastasis. Here, we introduce IGGi-11, a first-in-class small-molecule inhibitor of noncanonical activation of heterotrimeric G-protein signaling. IGGi-11 binding to G-protein α-subunits (Gαi) specifically disrupted their engagement with GIV/Girdin, thereby blocking noncanonical G-protein signaling in tumor cells and inhibiting proinvasive traits of metastatic cancer cells. In contrast, IGGi-11 did not interfere with canonical G-protein signaling mechanisms triggered by GPCRs. By revealing that small molecules can selectively disable noncanonical mechanisms of G-protein activation dysregulated in disease, these findings warrant the exploration of therapeutic modalities in G-protein signaling that go beyond targeting GPCRs.

Structural insight into TIPE1 functioning as a lipid transfer protein

As a member of the tumor necrosis factor-α-induced protein 8 (TNFAIP8/TIPE) family, TIPE1 has been found to be associated with many cellular signaling pathways in regulating apoptosis, autophagy, and tumorigenesis. However, the position of TIPE1 in the signaling network remains elusive. Here we present the crystal structure of zebrafish TIPE1 in complex with phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) at a resolution of 1.38 Å. By comparison with structures of other three TIPE family proteins, a universal phospholipid-binding mode was proposed. Namely, the hydrophobic cavity binds to fatty acid tails, while 'X-R-R' triad nearby the entrance of cavity recognizes the phosphate group head. Using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we further elaborated the mechanism of how the lysine-rich N-terminal domain assisting TIPE1 to favorably bind to phosphatidylinositol (PI). Beside small molecule substrate, we identified Gαi3 as a direct-binding partner of TIPE1 using GST pull-down assay and size-exclusion chromatography. Analyses of key-residue mutations and predicted complex structure revealed that the binding mode of TIPE1 to Gαi3 could be non-canonical. In summary, our findings narrowed down TIPE1's position in Gαi3-related and PI-inducing signaling pathways.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

A circuit for secretion-coupled cellular autonomy in multicellular eukaryotic cells

Cancers represent complex autonomous systems, displaying self-sufficiency in growth signaling. Autonomous growth is fueled by a cancer cell's ability to "secrete-and-sense" growth factors (GFs): a poorly understood phenomenon. Using an integrated computational and experimental approach, here we dissect the impact of a feedback-coupled GTPase circuit within the secretory pathway that imparts secretion-coupled autonomy. The circuit is assembled when the Ras-superfamily monomeric GTPase Arf1, and the heterotrimeric GTPase Giαβγ and their corresponding GAPs and GEFs are coupled by GIV/Girdin, a protein that is known to fuel aggressive traits in diverse cancers. One forward and two key negative feedback loops within the circuit create closed-loop control, allow the two GTPases to coregulate each other, and convert the expected switch-like behavior of Arf1-dependent secretion into an unexpected dose-response alignment behavior of sensing and secretion. Such behavior translates into cell survival that is self-sustained by stimulus-proportionate secretion. Proteomic studies and protein-protein interaction network analyses pinpoint GFs (e.g., the epidermal GF) as key stimuli for such self-sustenance. Findings highlight how the enhanced coupling of two biological switches in cancer cells is critical for multiscale feedback control to achieve secretion-coupled autonomy of growth factors.

Small-molecule targeting of GPCR-independent non-canonical G protein signaling inhibits cancer progression

Activation of heterotrimeric G-proteins (Gαβγ) by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is a quintessential mechanism of cell signaling widely targeted by clinically-approved drugs. However, it has become evident that heterotrimeric G-proteins can also be activated via GPCR-independent mechanisms that remain untapped as pharmacological targets. GIV/Girdin has emerged as a prototypical non-GPCR activator of G proteins that promotes cancer metastasis. Here, we introduce IGGi-11, a first-in-class smallmolecule inhibitor of non-canonical activation of heterotrimeric G-protein signaling. IGGi-11 binding to G-protein α-subunits (Gαi) specifically disrupted their engagement with GIV/Girdin, thereby blocking non-canonical G-protein signaling in tumor cells, and inhibiting pro-invasive traits of metastatic cancer cells in vitro and in mice. In contrast, IGGi-11 did not interfere with canonical G-protein signaling mechanisms triggered by GPCRs. By revealing that small molecules can selectively disable non-canonical mechanisms of G-protein activation dysregulated in disease, these findings warrant the exploration of therapeutic modalities in G-protein signaling that go beyond targeting GPCRs.

Regulation of DNA damage response by trimeric G-proteins

Upon sensing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), eukaryotic cells either die or repair DSBs via one of the two competing pathways, i.e., non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR). We show that cell fate after DSBs hinges on GIV/Girdin, a guanine nucleotide-exchange modulator of heterotrimeric Giα•βγ protein. GIV suppresses HR by binding and sequestering BRCA1, a key coordinator of multiple steps within the HR pathway, away from DSBs; it does so using a C-terminal motif that binds BRCA1's BRCT-modules via both phospho-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Using another non-overlapping C-terminal motif GIV binds and activates Gi and enhances the "free" Gβγ→PI-3-kinase→Akt pathway, which promotes survival and is known to suppress HR, favor NHEJ. Absence of GIV, or loss of either of its C-terminal motifs enhanced cell death upon genotoxic stress. Because GIV selectively binds other BRCT-containing proteins suggests that G-proteins may fine-tune sensing, repair, and survival after diverse types of DNA damage.

Design principles of improving the dose-response alignment in coupled GTPase switches

"Dose-response alignment" (DoRA), where the downstream response of cellular signaling pathways closely matches the fraction of activated receptor, can improve the fidelity of dose information transmission. The negative feedback has been experimentally identified as a key component for DoRA, but numerical simulations indicate that negative feedback is not sufficient to achieve perfect DoRA, i.e., perfect match of downstream response and receptor activation level. Thus a natural question is whether there exist design principles for signaling motifs within only negative feedback loops to improve DoRA to near-perfect DoRA. Here, we investigated several model formulations of an experimentally validated circuit that couples two molecular switches-mGTPase (monomeric GTPase) and tGTPase (heterotrimeric GTPases) - with negative feedback loops. In the absence of feedback, the low and intermediate mGTPase activation levels benefit DoRA in mass action and Hill-function models, respectively. Adding negative feedback has versatile roles on DoRA: it may impair DoRA in the mass action model with low mGTPase activation level and Hill-function model with intermediate mGTPase activation level; in other cases, i.e., the mass action model with a high mGTPase activation level or the Hill-function model with a non-intermediate mGTPase activation level, it improves DoRA. Furthermore, we found that DoRA in a longer cascade (i.e., tGTPase) can be obtained using Hill-function kinetics under certain conditions. In summary, we show how ranges of activity of mGTPase, reaction kinetics, the negative feedback, and the cascade length affect DoRA. This work provides a framework for improving the DoRA performance in signaling motifs with negative feedback.

Effect of α-helical domain of Gi/o α subunit on GDP/GTP turnover

Heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) are composed of α, β, and γ subunits, and Gα has a GDP/GTP-binding pocket. When a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) interacts with Gα, GDP is released, and GTP interacts to Gα. The GTP-bound activated Gα dissociates from GEF and Gβγ, mediating the induction of various intracellular signaling pathways. Depending on the sequence similarity and cellular function, Gα subunits are subcategorized into four subfamilies: Gαi/o, Gαs, Gαq/11, and Gα12/13. Although the Gαi/o subtype family proteins, Gαi3 and GαoA, share similar sequences and functions, they differ in their GDP/GTP turnover profiles, with GαoA possessing faster rates than Gαi3. The structural factors responsible for these differences remain unknown. In this study, we employed hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry and mutational studies to investigate the factors responsible for these functional differences. The Gα subunit consists of a Ras-like domain (RD) and an α-helical domain (AHD). The RD has GTPase activity and receptor-binding and effector-binding regions; however, the function of the AHD has not yet been extensively studied. In this study, the chimeric construct containing the RD of Gαi3 and the AHD of GαoA showed a GDP/GTP turnover profile similar to that of GαoA, suggesting that the AHD is the major regulator of the GDP/GTP turnover profile. Additionally, site-directed mutagenesis revealed the importance of the N-terminal part of αA and αA/αB loops in the AHD for the GDP/GTP exchange. These results suggest that the AHD regulates the nucleotide exchange rate within the Gα subfamily.

Allosteric couplings upon binding of RfaH to transcription elongation complexes

In every domain of life, NusG-like proteins bind to the elongating RNA polymerase (RNAP) to support processive RNA synthesis and to couple transcription to ongoing cellular processes. Structures of factor-bound transcription elongation complexes (TECs) reveal similar contacts to RNAP, consistent with a shared mechanism of action. However, NusG homologs differ in their regulatory roles, modes of recruitment, and effects on RNA synthesis. Some of these differences could be due to conformational changes in RNAP and NusG-like proteins, which cannot be captured in static structures. Here, we employed hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to investigate changes in local and non-local structural dynamics of Escherichia coli NusG and its paralog RfaH, which have opposite effects on expression of xenogenes, upon binding to TEC. We found that NusG and RfaH regions that bind RNAP became solvent-protected in factor-bound TECs, whereas RNAP regions that interact with both factors showed opposite deuterium uptake changes when bound to NusG or RfaH. Additional changes far from the factor-binding site were observed only with RfaH. Our results provide insights into differences in structural dynamics exerted by NusG and RfaH during binding to TEC, which may explain their different functional outcomes and allosteric regulation of transcriptional pausing by RfaH.

Targeting Gαi/s Proteins with Peptidyl Nucleotide Exchange Modulators

Chemical probes that specifically modulate the activity of heterotrimeric G proteins provide excellent tools for investigating G protein-mediated cell signaling. Herein, we report a family of selective peptidyl Gαi/s modulators derived from peptide library screening and optimization. Conjugation to a cell-penetrating peptide rendered the peptides cell-permeable and biologically active in cell-based assays. The peptides exhibit potent guanine-nucleotide exchange modulator-like activity toward Gαi and Gαs. Molecular docking and dynamic simulations revealed the molecular basis of the protein-ligand interactions and their effects on GDP binding. This study demonstrates the feasibility of developing direct Gαi/s modulators and provides a novel chemical probe for investigating cell signaling through GPCRs/G proteins.

Delineating the activation mechanism and conformational landscape of a class B G protein-coupled receptor glucagon receptor

Class B G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are important targets in the treatment of metabolic syndrome and diabetes. Although multiple structures of class B GPCRs-G protein complexes have been elucidated, the detailed activation mechanism of the receptors remains unclear. Here, we combine Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics simulations and Markov state models (MSM) to investigate the activation mechanism of a canonical class B GPCR, human glucagon receptor-GCGR, including the negative allosteric modulator-bound inactive state, the agonist glucagon-bound active state, and both glucagon- and Gs-bound fully active state. The free-energy landscapes of GCGR show the conformational ensemble consisting of three activation-associated states: inactive, active, and fully active. The structural analysis indicates the high dynamics of GCGR upon glucagon binding with both active and inactive conformations in the ensemble. Significantly, the H8 and TM6 exhibits distinct features from the inactive to the active states. The additional simulations demonstrate the role of H8 in the recruitment of Gs. Gs binding presents a crucial function of stabilizing the glucagon binding site and MSM highlights the absolute requirement of Gs to help the GCGR reach the fully active state. Together, our results reveal the detailed activation mechanism of GCGR from the view of conformational dynamics.

GIV/Girdin, a non-receptor modulator for Gαi/s, regulates spatiotemporal signaling during sperm capacitation and is required for male fertility

For a sperm to successfully fertilize an egg, it must first undergo capacitation in the female reproductive tract and later undergo acrosomal reaction (AR) upon encountering an egg surrounded by its vestment. How premature AR is avoided despite rapid surges in signaling cascades during capacitation remains unknown. Using a combination of conditional knockout (cKO) mice and cell-penetrating peptides, we show that GIV (CCDC88A), a guanine nucleotide-exchange modulator (GEM) for trimeric GTPases, is highly expressed in spermatocytes and is required for male fertility. GIV is rapidly phosphoregulated on key tyrosine and serine residues in human and murine spermatozoa. These phosphomodifications enable GIV-GEM to orchestrate two distinct compartmentalized signaling programs in the sperm tail and head; in the tail, GIV enhances PI3K→Akt signals, sperm motility and survival, whereas in the head it inhibits cAMP surge and premature AR. Furthermore, GIV transcripts are downregulated in the testis and semen of infertile men. These findings exemplify the spatiotemporally segregated signaling programs that support sperm capacitation and shed light on a hitherto unforeseen cause of infertility in men.

Regulation of DNA damage response by trimeric G-protein Signaling.. [DOI: 10.1101/2021.07.21.452842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Upon sensing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), eukaryotic cells either die or repair DSBs via one of two competing pathways, i.e., non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR). We show that cell fate after DNA damage hinges on the guanine nucleotide-exchange modulator of heterotrimeric G-protein, Giα•βγ, GIV/Girdin. GIV suppresses HR by binding and sequestering BRCA1, a key coordinator of multiple steps within the HR pathway, away from DSBs; it does so using a C-terminal motif that binds BRCA1’s BRCT-modules via both phospho-dependent and -independent mechanisms. GIV promotes NHEJ, and binds and activates Gi and enhances the ‘free’ Gβγ→PI-3-kinase→Akt pathway, thus revealing the enigmatic origin of prosurvival Akt signals during dsDNA repair. Absence of GIV, or the loss of either of its two functions impaired DNA repair, and induced cell death when challenged with numerous cytotoxic agents. That GIV selectively binds few other BRCT-containing proteins suggests convergent signaling such that heterotrimeric G-proteins may finetune sensing, repair, and outcome after DNA damage.

GRAPHIC ABSTRACT

HIGHLIGHTS

Non-receptor G protein modulator, GIV/Girdin binds BRCA1

Binding occurs in both canonical and non-canonical modes

GIV sequesters BRCA1 away from dsDNA breaks, suppresses HR

Activation of Gi by GIV enhances Akt signals, favors NHEJ

IN BRIEF

In this work, the authors show that heterotrimeric G protein signaling that is triggered by non-receptor GEF, GIV/Girdin, in response to double-stranded DNA breaks is critical for decisive signaling events which favor non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and inhibit homologous recombination (HR).

Strategies towards Targeting Gαi/s Proteins: Scanning of Protein-Protein Interaction Sites To Overcome Inaccessibility

Heterotrimeric G proteins are classified into four subfamilies and play a key role in signal transduction. They transmit extracellular signals to intracellular effectors subsequent to the activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which are targeted by over 30 % of FDA-approved drugs. However, addressing G proteins as drug targets represents a compelling alternative, for example, when G proteins act independently of the corresponding GPCRs, or in cases of complex multifunctional diseases, when a large number of different GPCRs are involved. In contrast to Gαq, efforts to target Gαi/s by suitable chemical compounds has not been successful so far. Here, a comprehensive analysis was conducted examining the most important interface regions of Gαi/s with its upstream and downstream interaction partners. By assigning the existing compounds and the performed approaches to the respective interfaces, the druggability of the individual interfaces was ranked to provide perspectives for selective targeting of Gαi/s in the future.

Building unconventional G protein-coupled receptors, one block at a time

The structure, function, and dynamics of canonical activation of heterotrimeric G proteins by the seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been illustrated in detail. However, emerging studies during the past decade have started to shed light on how the same G proteins may also be accessed and modulated by a diverse family of receptors that are not conventional GPCRs. Can we learn about common themes and variations in how cells assemble these atypical GPCRs?

A Circuit for Secretion-coupled Cellular Autonomy in Multicellular Eukaryotes.. [DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.18.436048]

Cancers represent complex autonomous systems, displaying self-sufficiency in growth signaling. Autonomous growth is fueled by a cancer cell’s ability to ‘secrete-and-sense’ growth factors: a poorly understood phenomenon. Using an integrated systems and experimental approach, here we dissect the impact of a feedback-coupled GTPase circuit within the secretory pathway that imparts secretion-coupled autonomy. The circuit is assembled when the Ras-superfamily monomeric GTPase Arf1, and the heterotrimeric GTPase Giαβγ and their corresponding GAPs and GEFs are coupled by GIV/Girdin, a protein that is known to fuel aggressive traits in diverse cancers. One forward and two key negative feedback loops within the circuit create closed-loop control (CLC), allow the two GTPases to coregulate each other, and convert the expected switch-like behavior of Arf1-dependent secretion into an unexpected dose response alignment behavior of sensing and secretion. Such behavior translates into cell survival that is self-sustained by stimulus-proportionate secretion. Proteomic studies and protein-protein interaction network analyses pinpoint growth factors (e.g., the epidermal growth factor; EGF) as a key stimuli for such self-sustenance. Findings highlight how enhanced coupling of two biological switches in cancer cells is critical for multiscale feedback control to achieve secretion-coupled autonomy of growth factors.

SYNOPSIS IMAGE

STANDFIRST TEXT

This work defines the inner workings of a Golgi-localized molecular circuitry comprised of coupled GTPases, which empowers cells to achieve self-sufficiency in growth factor signaling by creating a secrete-and-sense autocrine loop.

HIGHLIGHTS/MAIN FINDINGS

Modeling and experimental approaches were used to dissect a coupled GTPase circuit.

Coupling enables closed loop feedback and mutual control of GTPases.

Coupling generates dose response alignment behavior of sensing and secretion of growth factors.

Coupling is critical for multiscale feedback control to achieve secretion-coupled autonomy.

Conformational switch that induces GDP release from Gi

Heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) are composed of α, β, and γ subunits. Gα switches between guanosine diphosphate (GDP)-bound inactive and guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-bound active states, and Gβγ interacts with the GDP-bound state. The GDP-binding regions are composed of two sites: the phosphate-binding and guanine-binding regions. The turnover of GDP and GTP is induced by guanine nucleotide-exchange factors (GEFs), including G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), Ric8A, and GIV/Girdin. However, the key structural factors for stabilizing the GDP-bound state of G proteins and the direct structural event for GDP release remain unclear. In this study, we investigated structural factors affecting GDP release by introducing point mutations in selected, conserved residues in Gαi3. We examined the effects of these mutations on the GDP/GTP turnover rate and the overall conformation of Gαi3 as well as the binding free energy between Gαi3 and GDP. We found that dynamic changes in the phosphate-binding regions are an immediate factor for the release of GDP.

A long isoform of GIV/Girdin contains a PDZ-binding module that regulates localization and G-protein binding

PDZ domains are one of the most abundant protein domains in eukaryotes and are frequently found on junction-localized scaffold proteins. Various signaling molecules bind to PDZ proteins via PDZ-binding motifs (PBM) and fine-tune cellular signaling. However, how such interaction affects protein function is difficult to predict and must be solved empirically. Here we describe a long isoform of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor GIV/Girdin (CCDC88A) that we named GIV-L, which is conserved throughout evolution, from invertebrates to vertebrates, and contains a PBM. Unlike GIV, which lacks PBM and is cytosolic, GIV-L localizes onto cell junctions and has a PDZ interactome (as shown through annotating Human Cell Map and BioID-proximity labeling studies), which impacts GIV-L's ability to bind and activate trimeric G-protein, Gαi, through its guanine-nucleotide exchange modulator (GEM) module. This GEM module is found exclusively in vertebrates. We propose that the two functional modules in GIV may have evolved sequentially: the ability to bind PDZ proteins via the PBM evolved earlier in invertebrates, whereas G-protein binding and activation may have evolved later only among vertebrates. Phenotypic studies in Caco-2 cells revealed that GIV and GIV-L may have antagonistic effects on cell growth, proliferation (cell cycle), and survival. Immunohistochemical analysis in human colon tissues showed that GIV expression increases with a concomitant decrease in GIV-L during cancer initiation. Taken together, these findings reveal how regulation in GIV/CCDC88A transcript helps to achieve protein modularity, which allows the protein to play opposing roles either as a tumor suppressor (GIV-L) or as an oncogene (GIV).

Receptor tyrosine kinases activate heterotrimeric G proteins via phosphorylation within the interdomain cleft of Gαi

The molecular mechanisms by which receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and heterotrimeric G proteins, two major signaling hubs in eukaryotes, independently relay signals across the plasma membrane have been extensively characterized. How these hubs cross-talk has been a long-standing question, but answers remain elusive. Using linear ion-trap mass spectrometry in combination with biochemical, cellular, and computational approaches, we unravel a mechanism of activation of heterotrimeric G proteins by RTKs and chart the key steps that mediate such activation. Upon growth factor stimulation, the guanine-nucleotide exchange modulator dissociates Gαi•βγ trimers, scaffolds monomeric Gαi with RTKs, and facilitates the phosphorylation on two tyrosines located within the interdomain cleft of Gαi. Phosphorylation triggers the activation of Gαi and inhibits second messengers (cAMP). Tumor-associated mutants reveal how constitutive activation of this pathway impacts cell's decision to "go" vs. "grow." These insights define a tyrosine-based G protein signaling paradigm and reveal its importance in eukaryotes.

Evolution of Modularity, Interactome and Functions of GIV/Girdin (CCDC88A) from Invertebrates to Vertebrates.. [DOI: 10.1101/2020.09.28.317172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

PDZ domains are one of the most abundant protein domains in eukaryotes and frequently found on junction-localized scaffold proteins. Various signaling molecules bind to PDZ proteins via PDZ-binding motifs (PBM) and finetune cellular signaling. Here we describe the presence of a PBM on GIV/Girdin (CCDC88A) that is conserved throughout evolution, from invertebrates to vertebrates, and is generated as a long isoform-variant in humans, which we named GIV-L. Unlike GIV, which lacks PBM and is cytosolic, GIV-L localizes to the cell junctions, and has a unique PDZ-interactome, which impacts GIV-L’s ability to bind and activate trimeric G-protein, Gi through its guanine-nucleotide exchange modulator (GEM) module; the GEM module is found exclusively in vertebrates. Thus, the two functional modules in GIV evolved sequentially: the ability to bind PDZ proteins via the PBM evolved earlier in invertebrates, whereas G-protein binding and activation may have evolved later only among vertebrates. Phenotypic studies in Caco-2 cells revealed that GIV and GIV-L may have antagonistic effects on cell growth, proliferation (cell cycle), and survival. Immunohistochemical analyses in human colon tissues showed that GIV expression increases with a concomitant decrease in GIV-L during cancer initiation. Taken together, these findings reveal how GIV/CCDC88A in humans displays evolutionary flexibility in modularity, which allows the resultant isoforms to play opposing roles either as a tumor suppressor (GIV-L) or as an oncogene (GIV).

Optogenetic activation of heterotrimeric G-proteins by LOV2GIVe, a rationally engineered modular protein

Heterotrimeric G-proteins are signal transducers involved in mediating the action of many natural extracellular stimuli and many therapeutic agents. Non-invasive approaches to manipulate the activity of G-proteins with high precision are crucial to understand their regulation in space and time. Here, we developed LOV2GIVe, an engineered modular protein that allows the activation of heterotrimeric G-proteins with blue light. This optogenetic construct relies on a versatile design that differs from tools previously developed for similar purposes, that is metazoan opsins, which are light-activated G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Instead, LOV2GIVe consists of the fusion of a G-protein activating peptide derived from a non-GPCR regulator of G-proteins to a small plant protein domain, such that light uncages the G-protein activating module. Targeting LOV2GIVe to cell membranes allowed for light-dependent activation of Gi proteins in different experimental systems. In summary, LOV2GIVe expands the armamentarium and versatility of tools available to manipulate heterotrimeric G-protein activity.

GIV/Girdin and Exo70 Collaboratively Regulate the Mammalian Polarized Exocytic Machinery

Polarized exocytosis is a fundamental process by which membranes and cargo proteins are delivered to the cell surface with precise spatial control. Although the need for the octameric exocyst complex is conserved from yeast to humans, what imparts spatial control is known only in yeast, i.e., a polarity scaffold called Bem1p. We demonstrate here that the mammalian scaffold protein, GIV/Girdin, fulfills the key criteria and functions of its yeast counterpart Bem1p; both bind Exo70 proteins via similar short-linear interaction motifs, and each prefers its evolutionary counterpart. Selective disruption of the GIV⋅Exo-70 interaction derails the delivery of the metalloprotease MT1-MMP to invadosomes and impairs collagen degradation and haptotaxis through basement membrane matrix. GIV's interacting partners reveal other components of polarized exocytosis in mammals. Findings expose how the exocytic functions aid GIV's pro-metastatic functions and how signal integration via GIV may represent an evolutionary advancement of the exocytic process in mammals.

GIV•Kindlin Interaction Is Required for Kindlin-Mediated Integrin Recognition and Activation

Cells perceive and respond to the extracellular matrix via integrin receptors; their dysregulation has been implicated in inflammation and cancer metastasis. Here we show that a guanine nucleotide-exchange modulator of trimeric-GTPase Gαi, GIV (a.k.a Girdin), directly binds the integrin adaptor Kindlin-2. A non-canonical short linear motif within the C terminus of GIV binds Kindlin-2-FERM3 domain at a site that is distinct from the binding site for the canonical NPxY motif on the -integrin tail. Binding of GIV to Kindlin-2 allosterically enhances Kindlin-2's affinity for β1-integrin. Consequently, integrin activation and clustering are maximized, which augments cell adhesion, spreading, and invasion. Findings elucidate how the GIV•Kindlin-2 complex has a 2-fold impact: it allosterically synergizes integrin activation and enables β1-integrins to indirectly access and modulate trimeric GTPases via the complex. Furthermore, Cox proportional-hazard models on tumor transcriptomics provide trans-scale evidence of synergistic interactions between GIV•Kindlin-2•β1-integrin on time to progression to metastasis.

•

GIV and Kindlin (K2), two integrin adaptors that promote metastasis, bind each other

•

Binding of GIV or integrin to K2 allosterically enhances GIV•K2•integrin complexes

•

Binding is required for the maximal recruitment of GIV and K2 to active integrins

•

Binding facilitates integrin clustering, activation, tumor cell adhesion, invasion

Regulating cellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate: "Sources," "sinks," and now, "tunable valves"

A number of hormones and growth factors stimulate target cells via the second messenger pathways, which in turn regulate cellular phenotypes. Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) is a ubiquitous second messenger that facilitates numerous signal transduction pathways; its production in cells is tightly balanced by ligand-stimulated receptors that activate adenylate cyclases (ACs), that is, "source" and by phosphodiesterases (PDEs) that hydrolyze it, that is, "sinks." Because it regulates various cellular functions, including cell growth and differentiation, gene transcription and protein expression, the cAMP signaling pathway has been exploited for the treatment of numerous human diseases. Reduction in cAMP is achieved by blocking "sources"; however, elevation in cAMP is achieved by either stimulating "source" or blocking "sinks." Here we discuss an alternative paradigm for the regulation of cellular cAMP via GIV/Girdin, the prototypical member of a family of modulators of trimeric GTPases, Guanine nucleotide Exchange Modulators (GEMs). Cells upregulate or downregulate cellular levels of GIV-GEM, which modulates cellular cAMP via spatiotemporal mechanisms distinct from the two most often targeted classes of cAMP modulators, "sources" and "sinks." A network-based compartmental model for the paradigm of GEM-facilitated cAMP signaling has recently revealed that GEMs such as GIV serve much like a "tunable valve" that cells may employ to finetune cellular levels of cAMP. Because dysregulated signaling via GIV and other GEMs has been implicated in multiple disease states, GEMs constitute a hitherto untapped class of targets that could be exploited for modulating aberrant cAMP signaling in disease states. This article is categorized under: Models of Systems Properties and Processes > Mechanistic Models Biological Mechanisms > Cell Signaling.

Ric-8A, a GEF, and a Chaperone for G Protein α-Subunits: Evidence for the Two-Faced Interface

Resistance to inhibitors of cholinesterase 8A (Ric-8A) is a prominent non-receptor GEF and a chaperone of G protein α-subunits (Gα). Recent studies shed light on the structure of Ric-8A, providing insights into the mechanisms underlying its interaction with Gα. Ric-8A is composed of a core armadillo-like domain and a flexible C-terminal tail. Interaction of a conserved concave surface of its core domain with the Gα C-terminus appears to mediate formation of the initial Ric-8A/GαGDP intermediate, followed by the formation of a stable nucleotide-free complex. The latter event involves a large-scale dislocation of the Gα α5-helix that produces an extensive primary interface and disrupts the nucleotide-binding site of Gα. The distal portion of the C-terminal tail of Ric-8A forms a smaller secondary interface, which ostensibly binds the switch II region of Gα, facilitating binding of GTP. The two-site Gα interface of Ric-8A is distinct from that of GPCRs, and might have evolved to support the chaperone function of Ric-8A.

DAPLE protein inhibits nucleotide exchange on Gαs and Gαq via the same motif that activates Gαi

Besides being regulated by G-protein-coupled receptors, the activity of heterotrimeric G proteins is modulated by many cytoplasmic proteins. GIV/Girdin and DAPLE (Dvl-associating protein with a high frequency of leucine) are the best-characterized members of a group of cytoplasmic regulators that contain a Gα-binding and -activating (GBA) motif and whose dysregulation underlies human diseases, including cancer and birth defects. GBA motif-containing proteins were originally reported to modulate G proteins by binding Gα subunits of the G_i/o family (Gα_i) over other families (such as G_s, G_q/11, or G_12/13), and promoting nucleotide exchange in vitro However, some evidence suggests that this is not always the case, as phosphorylation of the GBA motif of GIV promotes its binding to Gα_s and inhibits nucleotide exchange. The G-protein specificity of DAPLE and how it might affect nucleotide exchange on G proteins besides Gα_i remain to be investigated. Here, we show that DAPLE's GBA motif, in addition to Gα_i, binds efficiently to members of the G_s and G_q/11 families (Gα_s and Gα_q, respectively), but not of the G_12/13 family (Gα₁₂) in the absence of post-translational phosphorylation. We pinpointed Met-1669 as the residue in the GBA motif of DAPLE that diverges from that in GIV and enables better binding to Gα_s and Gα_q Unlike the nucleotide-exchange acceleration observed for Gα_i, DAPLE inhibited nucleotide exchange on Gα_s and Gα_q These findings indicate that GBA motifs have versatility in their G-protein-modulating effect, i.e. they can bind to Gα subunits of different classes and either stimulate or inhibit nucleotide exchange depending on the G-protein subtype.

Do All Roads Lead to Rome in G-Protein Activation?

High-resolution structural studies on G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have flourished recently, providing long-sought insights into the dynamic process of guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G-protein) activation. In parallel, analogous studies are starting to shed light on how the same G-proteins are activated by non-GPCR proteins. Can we learn about common themes and variations in G-protein activation from them?

Large-scale conformational rearrangement of the α5-helix of Gα subunits in complex with the guanine nucleotide exchange factor Ric8A

Resistance to inhibitors of cholinesterase 8A (Ric8A) protein is an important G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-independent regulator of G protein α-subunits (Gα), acting as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) and a chaperone. Insights into the complex between Ric8A and Gα hold the key to understanding the mechanisms underlying noncanonical activation of G-protein signaling as well as the folding of nascent Gα proteins. Here, we examined the structure of the complex of Ric8A with minimized Gα_i (miniGα_i) in solution by small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and exploited the scattering profile in modeling of the Ric8A/miniGα_i complex by steered molecular dynamics (SMD) simulations. A small set of models of the complex featured minimal clash scores, excellent agreement with the experimental SAXS data, and a large-scale rearrangement of the signal-transducing α5-helix of Gα away from its β-sheet core. The resulting interface involved the Gα α5-helix bound to the concave surface of Ric8A and the Gα β-sheet that wraps around the C-terminal part of the Ric8A armadillo domain, leading to a severe disruption of the GDP-binding site. Further modeling of the flexible C-terminal tail of Ric8A indicated that it interacts with the effector surface of Gα. This smaller interface may enable the Ric8A-bound Gα to interact with GTP. The two-interface interaction with Gα described here distinguishes Ric8A from GPCRs and non-GPCR regulators of G-protein signaling.