1
|
Wang Z, Wang R, Wu P, Li B, Li Y, Liu Y, Wang X, Yang P, Tian H, Tian H. Optimization of Population-Level Testing, Contact Tracing, and Isolation in Emerging COVID-19 Outbreaks: a Mathematical Modeling Study - Tonghua City and Beijing Municipality, China, 2021-2022. China CDC Wkly 2023; 5:82-89. [PMID: 36777897 PMCID: PMC9902757 DOI: 10.46234/ccdcw2023.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The transmissibility of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant poses challenges for the existing measures containing the virus in China. In response, this study investigates the effectiveness of population-level testing (PLT) and contact tracing (CT) to help curb coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) resurgences in China. Methods Two transmission dynamic models (i.e. with and without age structure) were developed to evaluate the effectiveness of PLT and CT. Extensive simulations were conducted to optimize PLT and CT strategies for COVID-19 control and surveillance. Results Urban Omicron resurgences can be controlled by multiple rounds of PLT, supplemented by CT - as long as testing is frequent. This study also evaluated the time needed to detect COVID-19 cases for surveillance under different routine testing rates. The results show that there is a 90% probability of detecting COVID-19 cases within 3 days through daily testing. Otherwise, it takes around 7 days to detect COVID-19 cases at a 90% probability level if biweekly testing is used. Routine testing applied to the age group 21-60 for COVID-19 surveillance would achieve similar performance to that applied to all populations. Discussion Our analysis evaluates potential PLT and CT strategies for COVID-19 control and surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zengmiao Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Center for Global Change and Public Health, College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Ruixue Wang
- School of National Safety and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Peiyi Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Center for Global Change and Public Health, College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Bingying Li
- State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Center for Global Change and Public Health, College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Yidan Li
- State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Center for Global Change and Public Health, College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Yonghong Liu
- Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoli Wang
- Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Yang
- Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China
| | - Huaiyu Tian
- State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Center for Global Change and Public Health, College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China,Huaiyu Tian,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Z, Wu P, Wang J, Lourenço J, Li B, Rader B, Laine M, Miao H, Wang L, Song H, Bharti N, Brownstein JS, Bjornstad ON, Dye C, Tian H. Assessing the asymptomatic proportion of SARS-CoV-2 infection with age in China before mass vaccination. J R Soc Interface 2022; 19:20220498. [PMCID: PMC9554520 DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Some asymptomatic individuals carrying SARS-CoV-2 can transmit the virus and contribute to outbreaks of COVID-19. Here, we use detailed surveillance data gathered during COVID-19 resurgences in six cities of China at the beginning of 2021 to investigate the relationship between asymptomatic proportion and age. Epidemiological data obtained before mass vaccination provide valuable insights into the nature of pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2. The data were collected by multiple rounds of city-wide PCR testing with contact tracing, where each patient was monitored for symptoms through the whole course of infection. The clinical endpoint (asymptomatic or symptomatic) for each patient was recorded (the pre-symptomatic patients were classified as symptomatic). We find that the proportion of infections that are asymptomatic declines with age (coefficient = −0.006, 95% CI: −0.008 to −0.003, p < 0.01), falling from 42% (95% CI: 6–78%) in age group 0–9 years to 11% (95% CI: 0–25%) in age group greater than 60 years. Using an age-stratified compartment model, we show that this age-dependent asymptomatic pattern, together with the distribution of cases by age, can explain most of the reported variation in asymptomatic proportions among cities. Our analysis suggests that SARS-CoV-2 surveillance strategies should take account of the variation in asymptomatic proportion with age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zengmiao Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Center for Global Change and Public Health, College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Peiyi Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Center for Global Change and Public Health, College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jingyuan Wang
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, People's Republic of China,Peng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China
| | - José Lourenço
- Biosystems and Integrative Sciences Institute, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Bingying Li
- State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Center for Global Change and Public Health, College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Benjamin Rader
- Computational Epidemiology Lab, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marko Laine
- Meteorological Research Unit, Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hui Miao
- Department of Statistics, College of Art and Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Ligui Wang
- Center of Disease Control and Prevention, PLA, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongbin Song
- Center of Disease Control and Prevention, PLA, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Nita Bharti
- Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - John S. Brownstein
- Computational Epidemiology Lab, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ottar N. Bjornstad
- Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA,Department of Entomology, College of Agricultural Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | | | - Huaiyu Tian
- State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Center for Global Change and Public Health, College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Klann JG, Strasser ZH, Hutch MR, Kennedy CJ, Marwaha JS, Morris M, Samayamuthu MJ, Pfaff AC, Estiri H, South AM, Weber GM, Yuan W, Avillach P, Wagholikar KB, Luo Y, Omenn GS, Visweswaran S, Holmes JH, Xia Z, Brat GA, Murphy SN. Distinguishing Admissions Specifically for COVID-19 From Incidental SARS-CoV-2 Admissions: National Retrospective Electronic Health Record Study. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e37931. [PMID: 35476727 PMCID: PMC9119395 DOI: 10.2196/37931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Admissions are generally classified as COVID-19 hospitalizations if the patient has a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. However, because 35% of SARS-CoV-2 infections are asymptomatic, patients admitted for unrelated indications with an incidentally positive test could be misclassified as a COVID-19 hospitalization. Electronic health record (EHR)-based studies have been unable to distinguish between a hospitalization specifically for COVID-19 versus an incidental SARS-CoV-2 hospitalization. Although the need to improve classification of COVID-19 versus incidental SARS-CoV-2 is well understood, the magnitude of the problems has only been characterized in small, single-center studies. Furthermore, there have been no peer-reviewed studies evaluating methods for improving classification. OBJECTIVE The aims of this study are to, first, quantify the frequency of incidental hospitalizations over the first 15 months of the pandemic in multiple hospital systems in the United States and, second, to apply electronic phenotyping techniques to automatically improve COVID-19 hospitalization classification. METHODS From a retrospective EHR-based cohort in 4 US health care systems in Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and Illinois, a random sample of 1123 SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive patients hospitalized from March 2020 to August 2021 was manually chart-reviewed and classified as "admitted with COVID-19" (incidental) versus specifically admitted for COVID-19 ("for COVID-19"). EHR-based phenotyping was used to find feature sets to filter out incidental admissions. RESULTS EHR-based phenotyped feature sets filtered out incidental admissions, which occurred in an average of 26% of hospitalizations (although this varied widely over time, from 0% to 75%). The top site-specific feature sets had 79%-99% specificity with 62%-75% sensitivity, while the best-performing across-site feature sets had 71%-94% specificity with 69%-81% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS A large proportion of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive admissions were incidental. Straightforward EHR-based phenotypes differentiated admissions, which is important to assure accurate public health reporting and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey G Klann
- Laboratory of Computer Science, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Zachary H Strasser
- Laboratory of Computer Science, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Meghan R Hutch
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Chris J Kennedy
- Center for Precision Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jayson S Marwaha
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Michele Morris
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | | | - Ashley C Pfaff
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Hossein Estiri
- Laboratory of Computer Science, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Andrew M South
- Section of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Brenner Children's, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, United States
| | | | | | | | - Kavishwar B Wagholikar
- Laboratory of Computer Science, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Yuan Luo
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Gilbert S Omenn
- Center for Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Shyam Visweswaran
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - John H Holmes
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Zongqi Xia
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | | | - Shawn N Murphy
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Klann JG, Strasser ZH, Hutch MR, Kennedy CJ, Marwaha JS, Morris M, Samayamuthu MJ, Pfaff AC, Estiri H, South AM, Weber GM, Yuan W, Avillach P, Wagholikar KB, Luo Y, Omenn GS, Visweswaran S, Holmes JH, Xia Z, Brat GA, Murphy SN. Distinguishing Admissions Specifically for COVID-19 from Incidental SARS-CoV-2 Admissions: A National EHR Research Consortium Study. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2022:2022.02.10.22270728. [PMID: 35350202 PMCID: PMC8963684 DOI: 10.1101/2022.02.10.22270728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Admissions are generally classified as COVID-19 hospitalizations if the patient has a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. However, because 35% of SARS-CoV-2 infections are asymptomatic, patients admitted for unrelated indications with an incidentally positive test could be misclassified as a COVID-19 hospitalization. EHR-based studies have been unable to distinguish between a hospitalization specifically for COVID-19 versus an incidental SARS-CoV-2 hospitalization. From a retrospective EHR-based cohort in four US healthcare systems, a random sample of 1,123 SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive patients hospitalized between 3/2020â€"8/2021 was manually chart-reviewed and classified as admitted-with-COVID-19 (incidental) vs. specifically admitted for COVID-19 (for-COVID-19). EHR-based phenotyped feature sets filtered out incidental admissions, which occurred in 26%. The top site-specific feature sets had 79-99% specificity with 62-75% sensitivity, while the best performing across-site feature set had 71-94% specificity with 69-81% sensitivity. A large proportion of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive admissions were incidental. Straightforward EHR-based phenotypes differentiated admissions, which is important to assure accurate public health reporting and research.
Collapse
|