Androgen-specific gene activation via a consensus glucocorticoid response element is determined by interaction with nonreceptor factors

The relationship between sexual dimorphism and androgen response element proliferation in primate genomes

In the males of many vertebrate species, sexual selection has led to the evolution of sexually dimorphic traits, which often are developmentally controlled by androgen signaling involving androgen response elements (AREs). Evolutionary changes in the number and genomic locations of AREs can modify patterns of receptor regulation and potentially alter gene expression. Here, we use recently sequenced primate genomes to evaluate the hypothesis that the strength of sexual selection is related to the genome-wide number of AREs in a diversifying lineage. In humans, we find a higher incidence of AREs near male-biased genes and androgen-responsive genes when compared to randomly selected genes from the genome. In a set of primates, we find that gains or losses of AREs proximal to genes are correlated with changes in male expression levels and the degree of sex-biased expression of those genes. In a larger set of primates, we find that increases in indicators of sexual selection are correlated with genome-wide ARE counts. Our results suggest that the responsiveness of the genome to androgens in humans and their close relatives has been shaped by sexual selection that arises from competition among males for mating access to females.

Characterization of a hormone response element in the mouse N-acetyltransferase 2 (Nat2*) promoter

Multiple variant alleles of the human arylamine N-acetyltransferase genes, NAT1* and NAT2*, alter the capacity of individuals to metabolize arylamines by N-acetylation. Although biochemical and genetic studies have improved our understanding of the molecular basis of the acetylation polymorphism in humans and other mammals, regulation of NAT* gene expression is not understood. In the present study, a segment of the 5'-untranslated region of mouse Nat2* was sequenced and characterized. Primer extension analysis and RNase protection assays exposed multiple transcription initiation sites located 112 to 151 bases upstream of the translational start site. Computer sequence analysis revealed a promoter-like region located within the region 530 bases upstream of the translational start site consisting of TATA boxes, upstream promoter elements such as a CAAT box and Sp1 binding site, regulatory elements such as a palindromic hormone response element (HRE), and enhancer regions such as an AP-1 transcription factor binding site. Transient expression of CAT reporter constructs of the mouse Nat2*-palindromic HRE demonstrated positive regulation of the HSV-thymidine kinase 1 (tk1) promoter and induced the expression of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT). This induction was initiated by the addition of hormones such as 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) or dexamethasone and was entirely dependent on the presence of androgen or glucocorticoid receptors, respectively. Together with recent discoveries regarding the effects of testosterone on the expression of Nat2* in mouse kidney during development, the findings reported in this article suggest that the HRE found in the promoter region of Nat2* is a potential candidate for the mediation of androgenic regulation of Nat2* in mouse kidney.

Role of androgens in dhea-induced rack1 expression and cytokine modulation in monocytes

Background

Over the past fifteen years, we have demonstrated that cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) have opposite effects on the regulation of protein kinase C (PKC) activity in the context of the immune system. The anti-glucocorticoid effect of DHEA is also related to the regulation of splicing of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), promoting the expression of GRβ isoform, which acts as a negative dominant form on GRα activity. Moreover, it is very well known that DHEA can be metabolized to androgens like testosterone, dihydrotestosterone (DHT), and its metabolites 3α-diol and 3β-diol, which exert their function through the binding of the androgen receptor (AR). Based on this knowledge, and on early observation that castrated animals show results similar to those observed in old animals, the purpose of this study is to investigate the role of androgens and the androgen receptor (AR) in DHEA-induced expression of the PKC signaling molecule RACK1 (Receptor for Activated C Kinase 1) and cytokine production in monocytes.

Results

Here we demonstrated the ability of the anti-androgen molecule, flutamide, to counteract the stimulatory effects of DHEA on RACK1 and GRβ expression, and cytokine production. In both THP-1 cells and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), flutamide blocked the effects of DHEA, suggesting a role of the AR in these effects. As DHEA is not considered a direct AR agonist, we investigated the metabolism of DHEA in THP-1 cells. We evaluated the ability of testosterone, DHT, and androstenedione to induce RACK1 expression and cytokine production. In analogy to DHEA, an increase in RACK1 expression and in LPS-induced IL–8 and TNF–α production was observed after treatment with these selected androgens. Finally, the silencing of AR with siRNA completely prevented DHEA-induced RACK1 mRNA expression, supporting the idea that AR is involved in DHEA effects.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that the conversion of DHEA to active androgens, which act via AR, is a key mechanism in the effect of DHEA on RACK1 expression and monocyte activation. This data supports the existence of a complex hormonal balance in the control of immune modulation, which can be further studied in the context of immunosenescence and endocrinosenescence.

Determinants of Receptor- and Tissue-Specific Actions in Androgen Signaling

The physiological androgens testosterone and 5α-dihydrotestosterone regulate the development and maintenance of primary and secondary male sexual characteristics through binding to the androgen receptor (AR), a ligand-dependent transcription factor. In addition, a number of nonreproductive tissues of both genders are subject to androgen regulation. AR is also a central target in the treatment of prostate cancer. A large number of studies over the last decade have characterized many regulatory aspects of the AR pathway, such as androgen-dependent transcription programs, AR cistromes, and coregulatory proteins, mostly in cultured cells of prostate cancer origin. Moreover, recent work has revealed the presence of pioneer/licensing factors and chromatin modifications that are important to guide receptor recruitment onto appropriate chromatin loci in cell lines and in tissues under physiological conditions. Despite these advances, current knowledge related to the mechanisms responsible for receptor- and tissue-specific actions of androgens is still relatively limited. Here, we review topics that pertain to these specificity issues at different levels, both in cultured cells and tissues in vivo, with a particular emphasis on the nature of the steroid, the response element sequence, the AR cistromes, pioneer/licensing factors, and coregulatory proteins. We conclude that liganded AR and its DNA-response elements are required but are not sufficient for establishment of tissue-specific transcription programs in vivo, and that AR-selective actions over other steroid receptors rely on relaxed rather than increased stringency of cis-elements on chromatin.

Enhanced mesenteric arterial responsiveness to angiotensin II is androgen receptor-dependent in prenatally protein-restricted adult female rat offspring

Gestational protein restriction results in intrauterine growth restriction and hypertension in adult female growth-restricted rats. Enhanced vascular responsiveness to angiotensin II is observed, and blockade of the renin-angiotensin system abolishes hypertension in adult growth-restricted rats, suggesting that the renin-angiotensin system contributes to intrauterine growth restriction-induced hypertension. Moreover, growth-restricted adult rats have higher plasma testosterone levels, and antiandrogen treatment abolishes hypertension, indicating an important role for testosterone. We hypothesized that androgens may play a pivotal role in the enhanced responsiveness to Ang II and hypertension. Female offspring of pregnant rats fed 20% protein (control) or 6% protein diet (protein restricted), at 6 mo of age, were studied. Plasma testosterone and mean arterial pressure in protein-restricted offspring were significantly higher compared to controls. Flutamide treatment (10 mg/kg/day subcutaneously for 10 days) reduced mean arterial pressure in protein-restricted offspring but was without significant effect in controls. Vascular Agtr1/Agtr2 ratio was significantly higher in protein-restricted offspring, an effect that was reversed by flutamide. Flutamide treatment did not have any effect on Agtr1/Agtr2 ratio in controls. Enhanced contractile response to angiotensin II in mesenteric arteries was observed in protein-restricted offspring compared with control. Flutamide treatment reversed the enhanced contractile response to angiotensin II in protein-restricted offspring without significant effect in controls. Vascular reactivity to phenylephrine was similar between the control and protein-restricted offspring with and without flutamide treatment, suggesting that enhanced contractile response and flutamide's reversal effect is specific to angiotensin II. These results suggest that prenatally protein-restricted rats exhibit an enhanced responsiveness to angiotensin II that is testosterone-dependent.

A living biosensor model to dynamically trace glucocorticoid transcriptional activity during development and adult life in zebrafish

Glucocorticoids (GCs) modulate many cellular processes through the binding of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) to specific responsive elements located upstream of the transcription starting site or within an intron of GC target genes. Here we describe a transgenic fish line harboring a construct with nine GC-responsive elements (GREs) upstream of a reporter (EGFP) coding sequence. Transgenic fish exhibit strong fluorescence in many known GC-responsive organs. Moreover, its enhanced sensitivity allowed the discovery of novel GC-responsive tissue compartments, such as fin, eyes, and otic vesicles. Long-term persistence of transgene expression is seen during adult stages in several organs. Pharmacological and genetic analysis demonstrates that the transgenic line is highly responsive to drug administration and molecular manipulation. Moreover, reporter expression is sensitively and dynamically modulated by the photoperiod, thus proving that these fish are an in vivo valuable platform to explore GC responsiveness to both endogenous and exogenous stimuli.

Gestational exposure to elevated testosterone levels induces hypertension via heightened vascular angiotensin II type 1 receptor signaling in rats

Pre-eclampsia is a life-threatening pregnancy disorder whose pathogenesis remains unclear. Plasma testosterone levels are elevated in pregnant women with pre-eclampsia and polycystic ovary syndrome, who often develop gestational hypertension. We tested the hypothesis that increased gestational testosterone levels induce hypertension via heightened angiotensin II signaling. Pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats were injected with vehicle or testosterone propionate from Gestational Day 15 to 19 to induce a 2-fold increase in plasma testosterone levels, similar to levels observed in clinical conditions like pre-eclampsia. A subset of rats in these two groups was given losartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist by gavage during the course of testosterone exposure. Blood pressure levels were assessed through a carotid arterial catheter and endothelium-independent vascular reactivity through wire myography. Angiotensin II levels in plasma and angiotensin II type 1 receptor expression in mesenteric arteries were also examined. Blood pressure levels were significantly higher on Gestational Day 20 in testosterone-treated dams than in controls. Treatment with losartan during the course of testosterone exposure significantly attenuated testosterone-induced hypertension. Plasma angiotensin II levels were not significantly different between control and testosterone-treated rats; however, elevated testosterone levels significantly increased angiotensin II type 1 receptor protein levels in the mesenteric arteries. In testosterone-treated rats, mesenteric artery contractile responses to angiotensin II were significantly greater, whereas contractile responses to K(+) depolarization and phenylephrine were unaffected. The results demonstrate that elevated testosterone during gestation induces hypertension in pregnant rats via heightened angiotensin II type 1 receptor-mediated signaling, providing a molecular mechanism linking elevated maternal testosterone levels with gestational hypertension.

Endogenous retrovirus-K promoter: a landing strip for inflammatory transcription factors?

Humans are symbiotic organisms; our genome is populated with a substantial number of endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), some remarkably intact, while others are remnants of their former selves. Current research indicates that not all ERVs remain silent passengers within our genomes; re-activation of ERVs is often associated with inflammatory diseases. ERVK is the most recently endogenized and transcriptionally active ERV in humans, and as such may potentially contribute to the pathology of inflammatory disease. Here, we showcase the transcriptional regulation of ERVK. Expression of ERVs is regulated in part by epigenetic mechanisms, but also depends on transcriptional regulatory elements present within retroviral long terminal repeats (LTRs). These LTRs are responsive to both viral and cellular transcription factors; and we are just beginning to appreciate the full complexity of transcription factor interaction with the viral promoter. In this review, an exploration into the inflammatory transcription factor sites within the ERVK LTR will highlight the possible mechanisms by which ERVK is induced in inflammatory diseases.

Structural basis for nuclear hormone receptor DNA binding

The gene family of nuclear receptors is characterized by the presence of a typical, well conserved DNA-binding domain. In general, two zinc coordinating modules are folded such that an α-helix is inserted in the major groove of the DNA-helix displaying a sequence similar to one of two hexameric consensus motifs. Both zinc molecules coordinate four cysteines. Although the DNA-binding domains as well as the hormone response elements are very similar, each nuclear receptor will affect transcription of a specific set of target genes. This is in part due to some important receptor-specific variations on the general theme of DNA interaction. For most nuclear receptors, the DNA-binding domain dimerizes on DNA, which explains why most hormone response elements consist of a repeat of two hexamers. The hexamer dimers can be organized either as direct, inverted or everted repeats with spacers of varying lengths. The DNA can be bound by homodimers, heterodimers and for some orphan receptors, as monomer. Another key element for DNA binding by nuclear receptors is the carboxy-terminal extension of the DNA-binding domain extending into the hinge region. This part not only co-determines sequence specificity, but also affects other functions of the receptors like nuclear translocation, intranuclear mobility and transactivation potential. Moreover, allosteric signals passing through towards other receptor domains, explain why to some extent, the DNA elements can also be considered as controlling ligands.

The rules of DNA recognition by the androgen receptor

The androgen receptor (AR) and glucocorticoid, progestagen, and mineralocorticoid receptors all recognize classical DNA response elements that are organized as inverted repeats of 5'-AGAACA-3'-like motifs with a three-nucleotide spacer. Next to such elements, the AR also recognizes a second type of androgen response element (ARE), the so-called selective AREs, which resemble more the direct repeats of the same hexamer. In this work, we show that not only the AR but also the progestagen receptor can recognize the selective AREs, whereas neither glucocorticoid nor mineralocorticoid receptor can. Recently, genomic AR-binding fragments have been postulated to contain AR-binding sites that diverge considerably from the classical ARE consensus. Extensive mutational analyses of these candidate motifs, however, reinstalls the values of the consensus sequence for the AREs as mentioned above, the importance of their dimeric nature and the presence of exactly three-nucleotide spacing. We developed a position-specific probability matrix that was used to predict with higher accuracy new AREs in different AR-binding regions. So far, all AR-binding genomic fragments that were analyzed contain AREs defined as receptor-dimer binding motifs with the ability to confer responsiveness to a reporter gene.

Evolutionary origin of regulatory regions of retrogenes in Drosophila

Background

Retrogenes are processed copies of other genes. This duplication mechanism produces a copy of the parental gene that should not contain introns, and usually does not contain cis-regulatory regions. Here, we computationally address the evolutionary origin of promoter and other cis-regulatory regions in retrogenes using a total of 94 Drosophila retroposition events we recently identified. Previous tissue expression data has revealed that a large fraction of these retrogenes are specifically and/or highly expressed in adult testes of Drosophila.

Results

In this work, we infer that retrogenes do not generally carry regulatory regions from aberrant upstream or normal transcripts of their parental genes, and that expression patterns of neighboring genes are not consistently shared by retrogenes. Additionally, transposable elements do not appear to substantially provide regulatory regions to retrogenes. Interestingly, we find that there is an excess of retrogenes in male testis neighborhoods that is not explained by insertional biases of the retroelement machinery used for retroposition.

Conclusion

We conclude that retrogenes' regulatory regions mostly do not represent a random set of existing regulatory regions. On the contrary, our conclusion is that selection is likely to have played an important role in the persistence of autosomal testis biased retrogenes. Selection in favor of retrogenes inserted in male testis neighborhoods and at the sequence level to produce testis expression is postulated to have occurred.

1alpha,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 down-regulates expression of prostate specific membrane antigen in prostate cancer cells

BACKGROUND

Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression correlates with prostate cancer grade and is increased in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. The increased expression of PSMA following androgen deprivation therapy may be a consequence of the down-regulation of PSMA expression by androgen. Moreover, 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25-VD) has been shown to suppress prostate cancer progression as well as cell motility and invasion. Since PSMA is positively correlated with both of these characteristics, we hypothesized that 1,25-VD would regulate PSMA expression.

METHODS

LNCaP prostate cancer cells were treated with 1,25-VD, followed by analysis of cell surface PSMA expression. The PSMA enhancer, located within the third intron of the PSMA gene, was cloned into a reporter vector and regulation by 1,25-VD was investigated. The role of the androgen receptor (AR) in 1,25-VD mediated suppression of PSMA expression was examined using Casodex and AR specific siRNA.

RESULTS

Surface expression of PSMA was significantly decreased in a dose-dependent manner by 10 nM 1,25-VD or greater. Regulation by 1,25-VD occurred at the level of the PSMA enhancer. Over-expression of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) also decreased expression of PSMA. Additionally, suppression of AR translation using siRNA technology blocked the suppressive effect of 1,25-VD on PSMA expression, however inhibition of PSMA expression by 1,25-VD occurred in the absence of androgens.

CONCLUSIONS

Suppression of PSMA by 1,25-VD occurs at the level of the PSMA enhancer and is elevated by over-expression of the VDR. This regulation involves the AR, but is not dependent on the presence of androgens.

Identification of androgen-selective androgen-response elements in the human aquaporin-5 and Rad9 genes

The AR (androgen receptor) is known to influence the expression of its target genes by binding to different sets of AREs (androgen-response elements) in the DNA. One set consists of the classical steroid-response elements which are partial palindromic repeats of the 5'-TGTTCT-3' steroid-receptor monomer-binding element. The second set contains motifs that are AR-specific and that are proposed to be partial direct repeats of the same motif. On the basis of this assumption, we used an in silico approach to identify new androgen-selective AREs in the regulatory regions of known androgen-responsive genes. We have used an extension of the NUBIScan algorithm to screen a collection of 85 known human androgen-responsive genes compiled from literature and database searches. We report the evaluation of the most promising hits resulting from this computational search by in vitro DNA-binding assays using full-size ARs and GRs (glucocorticoid receptors) as well as their isolated DBDs (DNA-binding domains). We also describe the ability of some of these motifs to confer androgen-, but not glucocorticoid-, responsiveness to reporter-gene expression. The elements found in the aquaporin-5 and the Rad9 (radiation-sensitive 9) genes showed selective AR versus GR binding in band-shift assays and a strong activity and selectivity in functional assays, both as isolated elements and in their original contexts. Our data indicate the validity of the hypothesis that selective AREs are recognizable as direct 5'-TGTTCT-3' repeats, and extend the list of currently known selective elements.

Huntington's disease and dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy: proteins, pathogenesis and pathology

Each of the glutamine repeat neurodegenerative diseases has a particular pattern of pathology largely restricted to the CNS. However, there is considerable overlap among the regions affected, suggesting that the diseases share pathogenic mechanisms, presumably involving the glutamine repeats. We focus on Huntington's disease (HD) and Dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA) as models for this family of diseases, since they have striking similarities and also notable differences in their clinical features and pathology. We review the pattern of pathology in adult and juvenile onset cases. Despite selective pathology, the disease genes and their protein products (huntingtin and atrophin-1) are widely expressed. This presents a central problem for all the glutamine repeat diseases-how do widely expressed gene products give rise to restricted pathology? The pathogenic effects are believed to occur via a "gain of function" mechanism at the protein level. Mechanisms of cell death may include excitotoxicity, metabolic toxicity, apoptosis, and free radical stress. Emerging data indicate that huntingtin and atrophin-1 may have distinct protein interactions. The specific interaction partners may help explain the selective pathology of these diseases.

Transposable elements donate lineage-specific regulatory sequences to host genomes

The evolutionary implications of transposable element (TE) influences on gene regulation are explored here. An historical perspective is presented to underscore the importance of TE influences on gene regulation with respect to both the discovery of TEs and the early conceptualization of their potential impact on host genome evolution. Evidence that points to a role for TEs in host gene regulation is reviewed, and comparisons between genome sequences are used to demonstrate the fact that TEs are particularly lineage-specific components of their host genomes. Consistent with these two properties of TEs, regulatory effects and evolutionary specificity, human-mouse genome wide sequence comparisons reveal that the regulatory sequences that are contributed by TEs are exceptionally lineage specific. This suggests a particular mechanism by which TEs may drive the diversification of gene regulation between evolutionary lineages.

The mechanisms of differential glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid action in the brain and peripheral tissues

Mineralocorticoids and glucocorticoids are key categories of adrenocorticosteroid hormones that mediate distinct physiological responses. While the primary role of aldosterone, the major mineralocorticoid, is in regulating sodium homeostasis, the major role of the glucocorticoids is mediating the catabolic response to stress. Over the past two decades, these adrenocorticosteroid hormones have been the subject of considerable attention due to the paradox that despite exerting greatly different physiological effects, they act through very closely related receptors and a common DNA response element. This review will examine the research focused on the mechanisms of selective adrenocorticosteroid action. In general, it has been demonstrated that differential adrenocorticosteroid action is mediated at pre-receptor, receptor, and post-receptor levels, depending on the target tissue and physiological environment. The marked neuroendocrine pathophysiologies resulting from perturbations in this complex system make it imperative that further research into mechanisms of coordination of the three levels of adrenocorticosteroid control be conducted.

Polymorphisms of the porcine androgen receptor gene affecting its amino acid sequence and expression level

Diverse physiological effects of the androgen receptor (AR), a nuclear transcription factor, and its mapping position within a quantitative trait loci (QTL) region on chromosome X propose it as an interesting candidate gene for pig reproduction and performance. Therefore, the aims of this study were isolation of the gene and detection of polymorphisms as a tool for association study and analysis of functional properties of the porcine AR. The mRNA and promoter sequences were obtained and screened for polymorphisms. Based on comparative sequencing, eight single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), TG- and T-insertion/deletetion polymorphisms (INDELs) upstream transcription initiation sites, three SNPs in the 5'-untranslated region (UTR), one microsatellite (CCTTT)n in the intron of 5'-UTR, and a CAG-INDEL in exon 1 were detected. Two haplotypes originated from Duroc and Berlin Miniature Pig were segregating in the DUMI-F2 resource population. Characterization of the porcine AR promoter showed two conserved transcription start sites, a consensus sequence of GC-box and a homopurine/homopyrimidine stretch at similar locations compared to the human, rat and mouse as well as sequences similar to androgen response elements (ARE). The AR mRNA expression levels determined by real-time RT-PCR in various tissues of female pigs were high in ovary (100%) and adrenal gland (83.9% relative to ovary), moderate in uterus (61.6%) and liver (47.4%), and low in pituitary gland (1.3%) as well as in tonsil, muscle, mammary gland, leukocyte and jejunum (less than 1%). Detection of the AR mRNA transcripts in liver revealed that hemizygous males carrying the AR haplotype descended from Berlin Miniature pig had higher relative AR expressions than did those with the Duroc haplotype. Here we showed that the porcine AR is a highly polymorphic gene. Polymorphisms identified in the present study affect the predicted amino acid sequence as well as consensus transcription factor binding sites and are associated with the allele-specific differences of the AR mRNA transcript level in liver, reinforcing AR as a potential candidate gene for traits related to pig reproduction and performance.

Dancing with complement C4 and the RP-C4-CYP21-TNX (RCCX) modules of the major histocompatibility complex

The number of the complement component C4 genes varies from 2 to 8 in a diploid genome among different human individuals. Three quarters of the C4 genes in Caucasian populations have the endogenous retrovirus, HERV-K(C4), in the ninth intron. The remainder does not. The C4 serum proteins are highly polymorphic and their concentrations vary from 100 to approximately 1000 microg/ml. There are two distinct classes of C4 protein, C4A and C4B, which have diversified to fulfill (a) the opsonization/immunoclearance purposes and (b) the well-known complement function in the killing of microbes by lysis and neutralization, respectively. Many infectious and autoimmune diseases are associated with complete or partial deficiency of C4A and/or C4B. The adverse effects of high C4 gene dosages, however, are just emerging, as the concepts of human C4 genetics are revised and accurate techniques are applied to distinguish partial deficiencies from differential expression caused by unequal C4A and C4B gene dosages and gene sizes. This review attempts to dissect the sophisticated genetics of complement C4A and C4B. The emphases are on the qualitative and quantitative diversities of C4 genotypes and phenotypes. The many allotypic variants and the processed products of human and mouse C4 proteins are described. The modular variation of C4 genes together with the serine/threonine nuclear kinase gene RP, the steroid 21-hydroxylase CYP21, and extracellular matrix protein TNX (RCCX modules) are investigated for the effects on homogenization of C4 protein polymorphisms, and on the unequal genetic crossovers that knocked out the functions of CYP21 and/or TNX. Furthermore, the influence of the endogenous retrovirus HERV-K(C4) on C4 gene expression and the dispersal of HERV-K(C4) family members in the human genome are discussed.

Genomic organization of the mammalian MHC

The Human Genome Project transformed the quest of more than 50 years to understand the major histocompatibility complex (Mhc). The sequence of the Mhc from human and mouse, together with a large amount of sequence and mapping information from several other species, allows us to draw general conclusions about the organization and origin of this crucial part of the immune system. The Mhc is a mosaic of stretches formed by conserved and nonconserved genes. Surprisingly, of the approximately 3.6-Mb Mhc, the stretches that encode the class I and class II genes, which epitomize the Mhc, are the least conserved part, whereas the approximately 1.7-Mb stretches that encode at least 115 other genes are highly conserved. We summarize the available data to answer the questions (a) What is the Mhc? and (b) How can we define it in a general, not species-specific, way? Knowing what is essential and what is incidental helps us understand the fundamentals of the Mhc, and defining the species differences makes the model organisms more useful.

Steroid hormone receptor signaling in cancer

SHRs function as hormone activated, sequence specific DNA binding transcription factors that recruit multiple coactivator and other proteins to specific genes and generally stimulate transcription of these genes. SHR may have further genomic actions, that do not involve direct DNA binding, through protein-protein interactions with other sequence specific transcription factors, although these may still involve weak binding to nonconsensus steroid responsive elements in vivo. SHRs also appear to have nongenomic effects mediated through interactions with cytoplasmic signaling proteins. The major functions of SHRs in normal adult tissues appear to involve stimulation of differentiation, rather than proliferation. In contrast, the ER alpha and AR directly stimulate the growth of breast and prostate cancers, respectively, indicating a critical change in their functions. The ER alpha and AR appear to undergo further adaptation in tumor cells in response to hormonal therapies, that render these therapies ineffective. Understanding the molecular basis for these changes in SHR function during cancer development and progression may provide new targets for the generation of drugs to prevent and treat steroid stimulated cancers.

Ligand activation of the androgen receptor downregulates E-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion and promotes apoptosis of prostatic cancer cells

Androgen independence is the major cause of endocrine therapy failure in advanced prostate cancer (PC). To examine the effects of human androgen receptor (AR) expression on growth of human PC cells, transfection of full-length AR cDNA in an androgen-insensitive human prostatic adenocarcinoma cell line (DU145) was performed. Transcriptional activity of AR was confirmed by the MMTV luciferase assay and AR expression was assessed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, Western blotting, and immunocytochemistry. Two stable transfectant cell lines expressing functional AR were established and passaged over 60 times. Under standard culture conditions, AR expression in transfected cells was predominantly cytoplasmic. Exposure to dihydrotestosterone (DHT; 60 pM-10 nM) resulted in a rapid (maximal at 30 minutes) translocation of AR to the nucleus. Treatment with DHT (5 nM) caused a significant reduction in cell-cell adhesion and aggregation accompanied by a decrease in E-cadherin expression. This was associated with up to 40% inhibition of proliferation and approximately two-fold increase in apoptosis. These results suggest that gene transfer-mediated AR expression in DU145 cells confers sensitivity to DHT, modulates cell-cell adhesion through E-cadherin, and suppresses cell growth by inhibiting proliferation and promoting apoptosis. This provides amodelfor studies ofAR-regulated cell signalling and identification of novel androgen-regulated genes in PC.

Effect of gonadal steroids on progesterone receptor, estrogen receptor, and vitellogenin expression in male turtles (Chrysemys picta)

Hepatic vitellogenin (vtg) is a yolk precursor protein sequestered in follicular oocytes as nutrient supply for developing embryos in nonmammalian vertebrates. In prior research studies we have demonstrated that both progesterone (P) and testosterone (T) inhibit estrogen (E)-induced vitellogenesis in the male fresh water turtle (Chrysemys picta), and have suggested that these hormones may be involved in multihormonal regulation of vitellogenesis in the female turtle. However, the modes of action of progesterone and testosterone on estrogen-induced vitellogenesis are not known. We have proposed that progesterone inhibits vitellogenesis by modulation of progesterone receptor A (PRA) or B (PRB) isoforms and/or estrogen receptor (ER) gene transcription. In this study, we compare the vitellogenic responses of reproductively inactive male turtles to estradiol 17beta in the presence of exogenous testosterone or progesterone. Northern blot analysis was used to monitor the changes in vtg mRNA, ER mRNA, and PR mRNA expression; Western blotting to determine changes in PR isoform expression and a homologous ELISA for measurement of plasma vtg. Progesterone and testosterone reduced estrogen-induced vtg mRNA expression, but plasma vtg was not significantly reduced by these steroids. PRA and PRB were transcribed even though ER mRNA could not be detected, suggesting constitutive PR expression. However, in the presence of estradiol 17beta, both PR isoforms and mRNA transcripts were increased as a correlate of ER mRNA transcription, suggesting both transcriptional and translational effects; these effects were inhibited by testosterone and progesterone treatments. Since ER mRNA was sharply reduced by both testosterone and progesterone, and estradiol 17 beta increased PR mRNA transcription and translation, it is likely that the action of progesterone in reducing vtg mRNA is indirect via down regulation of ER mRNA, thus ER. This study provides further information on the role of progesterone and testosterone in the regulation of hepatic vitellogenesis, suggesting regulation of vitellogenesis mainly via modulation of hepatic ER mRNA.

Identification of an androgen-dependent enhancer within the prostate stem cell antigen gene

Prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) is emerging as an important diagnostic marker and therapeutic target in prostate cancer. Previous studies indicated that PSCA was directly regulated by androgens, but the mechanism has not been elucidated. Here we describe the identification of a compact cell-specific and androgen-responsive enhancer between 2.7 and 3 kb upstream of the transcription start site. The enhancer functions autonomously when positioned immediately adjacent to a minimal promoter. Deoxyribonuclease I footprinting analysis with recombinant androgen receptor (AR) reveals that the enhancer contains two AR binding sites at one end. Mutational analysis of the AR binding sites revealed the importance of the higher affinity one. The dissociation constant of the high affinity binding site (androgen response element I) was determined to be approximately 87 nM. The remainder of the enhancer contains elements that function synergistically with the AR. We discuss the structural organization of the PSCA enhancer and compare it with that found in other AR-regulated genes.

Functional interplay between two response elements with distinct binding characteristics dictates androgen specificity of the mouse sex-limited protein enhancer

Many of the aspects involved in steroid-specific transcriptional regulation are still unsolved to date. We describe here the detailed characterization of the mouse sex-limited protein enhancer as a paradigm for androgen-specific control of gene expression. By deletion analysis, we delineate the minimal enhancer region displaying androgen sensitivity and specificity. We also show that each of the three hormone response elements (HRE), which constitute this minimal enhancer region, is essential but not sufficient for its functionality. When investigated as isolated elements, HRE1 is inactive and HRE3 is a potent androgen response element as well as GRE. Only the non-canonical HRE2 (5-TGGTCAgccAGTTCT-3') is capable of conferring an androgen-specific transcriptional response to a heterologous promoter. This finding is correlated with the fact that HRE2 is recognized in binding assays in vitro by the DNA-binding domain (DBD) of the androgen but not the glucocorticoid receptor, while HRE3 is recognized by both DBDs. Differential binding of the androgen receptor to HRE2 in the context of the enhancer was analyzed in more detail in footprinting assays in vitro. In transient transfection experiments using chimeric receptors, the inability of the glucocorticoid receptor to transactivate via the slp-ARU as well as the isolated slp-HRE2 was rescued by the replacement of its DNA-binding domain with that of the androgen receptor. Our data suggest that the functional interplay between the weak, but highly androgen-specific HRE2 and the adjacent strong, but non-selective HRE3 is the major determinant in the generation of androgen specificity of transcriptional response via the sex-limited protein enhancer.

Molecular biology of the androgen receptor

Androgen receptor (AR) is a member of the steroid hormone receptor family of molecules. AR primarily is responsible for mediating the physiologic effects of androgens by binding to specific DNA sequences that influence transcription of androgen-responsive genes. The three-dimensional structure of the AR ligand-binding domain has shown it is similar to other steroid hormone receptors and that ligand binding alters the protein conformation to allow binding of coactivator molecules that amplify the hormone signal and mediate transcriptional initiation. However, AR also undergoes intramolecular interactions that regulate its interactions with coactivators and influence its activity. A large number of naturally occurring mutations of the human AR gene have provided important information about AR molecular structure and intermolecular interactions. AR is also a critical mediator of prostate cancer promotion, conferring growth signals to prostate cancer cells throughout the natural history of the disease. Late-stage prostate cancer, unresponsive to hormonal deprivation, sustains AR signaling through a diverse array of molecular strategies. Variations in the AR gene may also confer genetic predisposition to prostate cancer development and severity. Further understanding of AR action and new strategies to interfere with AR signaling hold promise for improving prostate cancer therapy.

Androgen receptor interactions with Oct-1 and Brn-1 are physically and functionally distinct

POU domain proteins interact positively or negatively with steroid hormone receptors, depending on the precise array of these and other factors assembled on target gene promoters. Octamer transcription factor 1 (Oct-1), a ubiquitous POU factor, is implicated in androgen induction of the mouse sex-limited protein (Slp) gene based on protein-DNA interaction studies. However, direct evidence for a role of Oct-1 in the hormone response has been difficult to obtain. Brain 1 (Brn-1), another POU factor, is more tissue-specific, expressing in brain and also in kidney, which is a major site of Slp synthesis. We compared the interaction of the androgen receptor (AR) with Oct-1 and Brn-1 to reveal the more likely candidate for regulation of Slp. In transfection, addition of either Oct-1 or Brn-1 reduced AR activation, regardless of the presence of an octamer-like sequence in the enhancer, suggesting interference was indirect. However, when the octamer-like element was changed to a consensus octamer site, Brn-1, but not Oct-1, strongly enhanced androgen activation. This correlated with Brn-l's preference for the consensus octamer sequence in DNA binding assays. Direct interaction of AR with glutathione-S-transferase-(GST)-fused Oct-1 was DNA-dependent, while Brn-l-AR association was not. Chimeric Brn-1 and Oct-1 POU domains demonstrated that the DNA-dependent AR interaction relied on the origin of the POU homeodomain. However, in the context of full-length Brn-1 and Oct-1 chimeric proteins, the POU homedomain was not sufficient to confer the distinct behaviors of these factors in vivo, but instead revealed the importance of an N-terminal transactivation domain in Brn-1. These results demonstrate that functional interaction of Oct-1 and Brn-1 with AR is determined by the precise sequence of the octamer binding site, and by differential interaction of the POU factors with AR and other components of the transcriptional machinery.

In vivo analysis of the model tyrosine aminotransferase gene reveals multiple sequential steps in glucocorticoid receptor action

We are studying the mechanisms of transcriptional activation by nuclear receptors and we focus our studies on the glucocorticoid regulation of the model tyrosine aminotransferase gene. Rather than using in vitro biochemical approaches, we determine the actual events occurring in the cells. Our experimental approaches include genomic footprinting, chromatin immunoprecipitation, in situ hybridization and transgenic mice. Our results show that the glucocorticoid receptor uses a dynamic multistep mechanism to recruit successively accessory DNA binding proteins that assist in the activation process. Chromatin is first remodelled, DNA is then demethylated, and the synthesis of an accessory factor is induced. Efficient transcription induction is finally achieved upon the formation of a 'stable' multiprotein complex interacting with the regulatory element. We discuss: the relative contribution of histone acetyltransferases and ATP-dependent remodelling machines to the chromatin remodelling event; the nature of the remodelled state; the contribution of regulated DNA demethylation to gene memory during development; the mechanisms of regulated DNA demethylation; the dynamics of protein recruitment at regulatory elements; the control of the frequency of transcription pulses and the control levels of the cell-type specificity of the glucocorticoid response.

Oct-1 preferentially interacts with androgen receptor in a DNA-dependent manner that facilitates recruitment of SRC-1

Gene regulation by steroid hormone receptors depends on the particular character of the DNA response element, the array of neighboring transcription factors, and recruitment of coactivators that interface with the transcriptional machinery. We are studying these complex interactions for the androgen-dependent enhancer of the mouse sex-limited protein (Slp) gene. This enhancer has, in addition to multiple androgen receptor (AR)-binding sites, a central region (FPIV) with a binding site for the ubiquitous transcription factor Oct-1 that appears crucial for hormonal regulation in vivo. To examine the role of Oct-1 in androgen-specific gene activation, we tested the interaction of Oct-1 with AR versus glucocorticoid receptor (GR) in vivo and in vitro. Oct-1 coimmunoprecipitated from cell lysates with both AR and GR, but significant association with AR required both proteins to be DNA-bound. This was confirmed by sensitivity of the protein association to treatment with ethidium bromide or micrococcal nuclease. Addition of DNA to micrococcal nuclease-treated samples restored interaction, even when binding sites were on separate DNA molecules, suggesting association was due to direct protein-protein interaction and not indirect tethering via the DNA. AR/GR chimeras revealed that interaction of the N and C termini of AR was required to communicate the DNA-bound state that enhances interaction with Oct-1. Protease digestion assays of hormone-bound receptors revealed further conformational changes in the ligand binding domain of AR, but not GR, upon DNA binding. Furthermore, these conformational changes led to increased interaction with the coactivator SRC-1, via the NID 4 domain, suggesting DNA binding facilitates recruitment of SRC-1 by the AR-Oct-1 complex. Altogether, these results suggest that the precise arrangement of binding sites in the Slp enhancer ensures proper hormonal response by imposing differential interactions between receptors and Oct-1, which in turn contributes to SRC-1 recruitment to the promoter.

The androgen receptor (AR) amino-terminus imposes androgen-specific regulation of AR gene expression via an exonic enhancer

Androgen and glucocorticoid receptor (AR, GR), two closely related members of the nuclear receptor superfamily, can recognize a similar cis-acting DNA sequence, or hormone response element (HRE). Despite this apparent commonality, these receptors regulate distinct target genes in vivo. The AR gene itself is regulated by AR but not GR in a variety of cell types, including osteoblast-like cells, as shown here. To understand this specificity, we first identified the DNA sequences responsible for androgen-mediated up-regulation of AR messenger RNA. A 6.5-kb region encompassing exon D, intron 4, and exon E of the AR gene contains four exonic HREs and exhibits cell type-specific, AR-mediated transcriptional enhancement when placed upstream of a heterologous promoter and reporter gene. A 350-bp fragment consisting of just exons D and E exhibits the same cell- and androgen-specificity as the 6.5-kb region, as well as the native AR gene. Consistent with a role for the exonic HREs, androgen regulation via this intragenic enhancer requires the HREs as well as a functional receptor DNA binding domain. A panel of AR/GR chimeric receptors was used to test which AR domains (amino-terminal, DNA binding or ligand binding) confer androgen-specific regulation of the 350-bp enhancer. Only chimeric receptors containing the amino-terminus of AR induced reporter gene activity from the AR gene enhancer. Further, a constitutively active AR consisting of only the AR amino-terminus and DNA binding domain (AA phi) retained the capacity to activate the internal responsive region, unlike a constitutively active chimera harboring the GR amino-terminus and AR DNA binding domain (GA phi). Thus, the AR amino terminus is the sole determinant for androgen-specific regulation of the AR gene internal enhancer. These findings support a model in which the amino termini of ARs bound to HREs within the AR gene interact with an exclusive auxiliary factor(s) to elicit androgen-specific regulation of AR messenger RNA. This is the first example of androgen-specific response in which the necessary and sufficient distinguishing capacity resides within the AR amino terminus.

Two classes of androgen receptor elements mediate cooperativity through allosteric interactions

Genes uniquely regulated by the androgen receptor (AR) typically contain multiple androgen response elements (AREs) that in isolation are of low DNA binding affinity and transcriptional activity. However, specific combinations of AREs in their native promoter context result in highly cooperative DNA binding by AR and high levels of transcriptional activation. We demonstrate that the natural androgen-regulated promoters of prostate specific antigen and probasin contain two classes of AREs dictated by their primary nucleotide sequence that function to mediate cooperativity. Class I AR-binding sites display conventional guanine contacts. Class II AR-binding sites have distinctive atypical sequence features and, upon binding to AR, the DNA structure is dramatically altered through allosteric interactions with the receptor. Class II sites stabilize AR binding to adjacent class I sites and result in synergistic transcriptional activity and increased hormone sensitivity. We have determined that the specific nucleotide variation within the AR binding sites dictate differential functions to the receptor. We have identified the role of individual nucleotides within class II sites and predicted consensus sequences for class I and II sites. Our data suggest that this may be a universal mechanism by which AR achieved unique regulation of target genes through complex allosteric interactions dictated by primary binding sequences.

An androgen response element mediates LNCaP cell dependent androgen induction of the hK2 gene

Human glandular kallikrein (hK2) is an androgen regulated protein primarily expressed in the prostate and recently identified as a novel prostate cancer marker. A 5 kb 5' flanking region of the hK2 gene was isolated and sequenced to characterize the regulatory mechanisms for the expression of hK2 in the androgen responsive prostate cell line, LNCaP. Using gene transfer, gel shift, and mutagenesis assays we have identified an ARE in the 5' far upstream promoter region of the hK2 gene that is crucial for its regulation in LNCaP cells. This study further demonstrated that the hK2 upstream ARE plays a predominant role in androgenic response. More interestingly, previously identified AREs in the prostate specific antigen promoter and the hK2 proximal promoter exert little activity in LNCaP cells. This study for the first time identifies a unique ARE that alone mediates the function of the androgen receptor in LNCaP cells in a cell dependent manner. This study also examines the activity of this ARE with 1alpha, 25 dihydroxy-vitamin D3 on the expression of the hK2 gene in LNCaP cells.

A role for GATA transcription factors in the androgen regulation of the prostate-specific antigen gene enhancer

The transgenic mouse line Ggamma/T-15 containing the fetal globin promoter linked to SV40 T antigen unexpectedly results in androgen-independent prostate carcinomas. Given the key role of GATA-1 transcription factor in fetal globin gene promoter activity, we investigated whether specific GATA family members are expressed in the prostate and whether they can regulate prostate-specific genes. We found that GATA-2 and -3 are the predominant GATA family members expressed in human and mouse prostate and that GATA mRNA levels are not regulated by androgen. We identified six GATA sites flanking an androgen-response element located in the far-upstream enhancer of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) gene. These GATA sites are targets for GATA factors and are essential for optimal androgen induction of transfected PSA enhancer/promoter plasmids in LNCaP, a PSA and androgen receptor expressing human prostate cancer cell line. Our results suggest that prostatic GATA-2 and -3 are involved in the androgen regulation of the PSA gene.

A natural sequence consisting of overlapping glucocorticoid-responsive elements mediates glucocorticoid, but not androgen, regulation of gene expression

Cytosolic aspartate aminotransferase (cAspAT) is regulated by glucocorticoids in rat liver and kidney. Part of this regulation is mediated by an unusual glucocorticoid-responsive element (GRE)-like sequence called GRE A. GRE A is composed of two overlapping imperfect GREs, each comprising a conserved half-site (half-sites 1 and 4 respectively) and a poorly conserved half-site (half-sites 2 and 3 respectively). The sequence binds co-operatively two dimers of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and mediates efficient glucocorticoid regulation of gene expression. Analysis of deletions of the cAspAT gene promoter and subcloning of GRE A upstream of the thymidine kinase promoter indicate that this sequence is responsive to glucocorticoids, but not to androgens. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays indicate that the GRE A unit does not bind the androgen receptor (AR). The modification of three nucleotides in the poorly conserved half-sites 2 and 3, converting GRE A into two overlapping high-affinity GREs (ov-cGRE), resulted in co-operative binding of the AR. Furthermore, ov-cGRE efficiently mediated androgen regulation of the thymidine kinase promoter. A single base modification in half-site 2 or 3 in GRE A allowed the binding of the AR as one or two dimers respectively, and restored transcriptional activation by androgens only in the latter case. Thus the poor affinity of the AR for half-sites 2 and 3 prevented its binding to GRE A, indicating that the overlapping GRE A sequence of the cAspAT gene promoter discriminates a glucocorticoid-mediated from an androgen-mediated response.

Change of specificity mutations in androgen-selective enhancers. Evidence for a role of differential DNA binding by the androgen receptor

The androgen and glucocorticoid receptors recognize identical DNA motifs, leaving unanswered the question of how steroid specificity of transcriptional regulation is established in cells containing both receptors. Here, we provide evidence that subtle differences in low affinity DNA recognition might be a crucial element in the generation of steroid-specific responses. Here we identify simple hormone response elements in the mouse sex-limited protein enhancer and the human secretory component androgen response unit to be essential for the androgen specificity of both enhancers. We describe specific in vitro binding to these motifs by the DNA-binding domain of the androgen but not the glucocorticoid receptor. Both elements can be considered partial direct repeats of the 5'-TGTTCT-3' core binding motif. In addition, we show that specific point mutations in their left half-sites, essentially changing the nature of the repeats, strongly enhance the glucocorticoid sensitivity of the respective enhancers, whereas they have no effect on their androgen responsiveness. Accordingly, these mutations allow specific binding of the glucocorticoid receptor DNA-binding domain to both elements in vitro. With these experiments, we demonstrate that differential recognition by the androgen receptor of nonconventional steroid response elements is, at least in some cases, an important mechanism in androgen-specific transcriptional regulation.

Immunolocalization of the keratinocyte growth factor in benign and neoplastic human prostate and its relation to androgen receptor

BACKGROUND

Growth and development of the prostate are androgen-dependent. Keratinocyte growth factor (KGF), widely expressed by mesenchymal cells, is thought to act like an andromedin between stroma and epithelium of the prostate. Since KGF has recently emerged as an autocrine mediator in prostate cancer, we investigated the role KGF plays in the human prostate and its relationship to androgen receptor (AR).

METHODS

Normal (n = 13), benign hyperplastic (n = 5), and neoplastic (n = 14) human prostate tissues as well as cultured epithelial and stromal cells were analyzed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), Western blot analysis, and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting showed KGF expression in stromal cultured cells of the normal prostate but not in epithelial cells. Using immunohistochemistry, KGF was found to be localized in fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells, independent of prostate disease. There was KGF expression in epithelial cells of BPH and prostate cancer. Human androgen receptor was uniformly expressed in the same secretory glandular cells that were positive for KGF in BPH and prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide evidence that KGF is a stromal-derived mediator, recently shown to act in a paracrine manner in normal prostate but now detected in epithelial cells in prostate cancer and BPH. These findings support the hypothesis that KGF might act as an autocrine factor in prostate cancer and BPH.

AML3/CBFalpha1 is required for androgen-specific activation of the enhancer of the mouse sex-limited protein (Slp) gene

A complex 120-base pair enhancer, derived from the mouse sex-limited protein (Slp) gene, is activated solely by the androgen receptor (AR) in specific tissues, although it contains a hormone response element recognized by several steroid receptors. The generation of this transcriptional specificity has been ascribed to the interactions of the receptor with tissue-specific nonreceptor factors bound to accessory sites within the enhancer. Protein-DNA interaction assays revealed two factors binding the 5' part of the enhancer that differ widely in abundance between cells showing AR-specific activation of the Slp element compared with those that also permit activation by glucocorticoid receptor (GR). The factor designated B formed a complex centered on the sequence TGTGGT, a core motif recognized by members of the AML/CBFalpha transcription factor family. This complex was competed by a high affinity binding site specific for AML/CBFalpha and was specifically supershifted by an antibody to AML3/CBFalpha1, placing factor B within the AML3/CBFalpha1 subclass. Interestingly, this factor was shown to bind to a second site in the 3' part of the enhancer, positioned between the two critical AR binding sites. Transfection studies revealed that AML1-ETO, a dominant-negative AML/CBFalpha construct, abrogated AR induction of the enhancer, but not of simple hormone response elements. Furthermore, overexpression of AML3/CBFalpha1 could rescue the AML1-ETO repression. Finally, glutathione S-transferase-AML/CBFalpha fusion proteins demonstrated direct interaction between AML/CBFalpha and steroid receptors. Although this interaction was equivalent between AML1/CBFalpha2 and AR or GR, AML3/CBFalpha1 showed stronger interaction with AR than with GR. These data demonstrate that AML3/CBFalpha1 is functionally required for hormonal induction of the Slp enhancer and that direct, preferential protein-protein interactions may contribute to AR-specific activation. These results demonstrate an intriguing role of AML3/CBFalpha1 in steroid- as well as tissue-specific activation of target genes.

Selective binding of steroid hormone receptors to octamer transcription factors determines transcriptional synergism at the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter

Transcriptional synergism between glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and octamer transcription factors 1 and 2 (Oct-1 and Oct-2) in the induction of mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) transcription has been proposed to be mediated through directed recruitment of the octamer factors to their binding sites in the viral long terminal repeat. This recruitment correlates with direct binding between the GR DNA binding domain and the POU domain of the octamer factors. In present study, in vitro experiments identified several nuclear hormone receptors to have the potential to bind to the POU domains of Oct-1 and Oct-2 through their DNA binding domains, suggesting that POU domain binding may be a property shared by many nuclear hormone receptors. However, physiologically relevant binding to the POU domain appeared to be a property restricted to only a few nuclear receptors as only GR, progesterone receptor (PR), and androgen receptor (AR), were found to interact physically and functionally with Oct-1 and Oct-2 in transfected cells. Thus GR, PR, and AR efficiently promoted the recruitment of Oct-2 to adjacent octamer motifs in the cell, whereas mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), estrogen receptor alpha, and retinoid X receptor failed to facilitate octamer factor DNA binding. For MMTV, although GR and MR both induced transcription efficiently, mutation of the promoter proximal octamer motifs strongly decreased GR-induced transcription without affecting the total level of reporter gene activity in response to MR. These results suggest that the configuration of the hormone response element within the MMTV long terminal repeat may promote a dependence for the glucocorticoid response upon the recruitment of octamer transcription factors to their response elements within the viral promoter.

Comparison of chromatin remodeling and transcriptional activation of the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter by the androgen and glucocorticoid receptor

We examined the interaction between the androgen (AR) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) at the transcriptional level using mouse fibroblast cell lines harboring an integrated mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter. We found that the AR, after induction with dihydrotestosterone (DHT), caused a progressive increase in MMTV-CAT reporter activity over 72 h which was correlated to an increase in chromatin remodeling of the MMTV promoter in the vicinity of the hormone response element (HRE). In contrast, stimulation of the GR by the synthetic glucocorticoid dexamethasone (Dex) caused a transient increase in MMTV transcriptional activity which returned to basal levels after 72 h. These changes were correlated to a transient increase in chromatin remodeling in the region of the HRE. Neither cotreatment nor pretreatment with Dex affected the DHT response. In fact, there was a more than additive effect of the two hormones on transcription at early time points. This suggests that the inability of GR to remodel chromatin, after 24 h of hormone treatment, is most likely related to changes in the GR itself and not the chromatin remodeling process. Consistent with this, nuclear GR levels dropped by greater than 50% after Dex treatment whereas the AR was induced fourfold after 24 h of DHT treatment. We conclude that a promoter with an ordered chromatin structure can still respond to androgens even after its glucocorticoid responsiveness is lost. This may be one mechanism cells utilize to establish target gene specificity for nuclear receptors that recognize identical DNA sequences.

Pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases associated with expanded glutamine repeats: new answers, new questions

Eight diseases are now known to be caused by an expansion mutation of the trinucleotide repeat CAG encoding glutamine. Each disease is caused by a CAG expansion in a different gene, and the genes bear no similarity to each other except for the presence of the repeat. Nonetheless, the essential feature of all of these disorders is neurodegeneration in a set of overlapping cortical and subcortical regions. Disease age of onset, and in some cases severity, is correlated with repeat length. These and other observations have led to the hypothesis that CAG expansion causes disease by a toxic gain-of-function of the encoded stretch of polyglutamine residues. Expansion-induced abnormalities of cytoskeletal function or neuronal signalling processes may contribute to the pathogenic process. In addition, theoretical and experimental analysis of the chemistry of uninterrupted stretches of glutamine residues suggest that polyglutamine-containing proteins or protein fragments may aggregate, via a "polar zipper", into beta pleated sheets. Recent findings have now established the presence of such aggregates in selected regions of brain from affected individuals, in transgenic mice expressing expanded repeats, and in isolated cells transfected with expanded repeats. The aggregates are most prominently manifest as neuronal intranuclear inclusion bodies. As the investigation of the link between these inclusions and cell dysfunction and death continues, it is possible that new avenues for therapeutic intervention will emerge.

Differential regulation of androgen and glucocorticoid receptors by retinoblastoma protein

The androgen receptor (AR) plays a major role in the development and maintenance of male primary and secondary sexual characteristics. The growth promoting effects of androgens are clearly seen in prostate cancer where treatment by androgen ablation usually leads to tumor regression, followed sometime later, by growth of tumor cells that are resistant to endocrine therapy. We have found that the level of pRB in cells controls AR activity. Overexpression of pRB leads to increased transcriptional activity of the AR. This is similar to the previously reported potentiation of glucocorticoid receptor activity by pRB. In contrast, loss of pRB activity inhibits AR but not glucocorticoid receptor activity. This inhibition correlates with the unique ability of the AR to form a protein-protein complex with pRB in vitro. The site of interaction with pRB lies within the N-terminal domain of the AR and co-localizes with the region of the AR that specifies a requirement for pRB. Thus, the AR has a novel requirement for pRB raising the possibility that the growth promoting activity of AR is due to its direct interaction with pRB. Furthermore, loss of pRB activity during progression of prostate cancer may directly result in a decreased response to androgens.

Multiple receptor domains interact to permit, or restrict, androgen-specific gene activation

A critical problem within transcription factor families is how diverse regulatory programs are directed by highly related members. Androgen and glucocorticoid receptors (AR, GR) recognize a consensus DNA hormone response element (HRE), but they activate target genes with precise specificity, largely dependent on the promoter and cell context. We have assessed the role of different receptor domains in hormone-specific response by testing chimeras of AR and GR for their ability to activate the androgen-specific enhancer of the mouse sex-limited protein (Slp) gene. Although all of the mutant receptors activated simple HREs, only a few activated the androgen-specific element. One component shared by receptors functional on the AR-specific target was the AR DNA binding domain. Activation was not due to differential DNA affinity but rather to the AR DNA binding domain escaping suppression directed at the GR DNA binding domain in this enhancer context. A further mechanism increasing specific activation was cooperation of receptors at multiple and weak HREs, which was accentuated in the presence of both the AR N terminus and ligand binding domain. These domains together increased recognition of weak HREs, as demonstrated by in vitro DNase I footprinting and transactivation of mutant enhancers. Further, AR N-terminal subdomains reported to interact directly with the ligand binding domain relieved an inhibitory effect imposed by that domain. Therefore, functions intrinsic to AR augment steroid-specific gene activation, by evading negative regulation operating on the domains of other receptors and by enhancing cooperativity through intra- and inter-receptor domain interactions. These subtle distinctions in AR and GR behavior enforce transcriptional specificity established by the context of nonreceptor factors.

Male-specific transcription initiation of the C4-Slp gene in mouse liver follows activation of STAT5

The mouse genes encoding the constitutively expressed complement component C4 and its closely related isoform C4-Slp (sex-limited protein), which is expressed only in male animals of several strains, provide a unique model to study sequence elements and trans-acting factors responsible for androgen responsiveness. Our previous studies have shown that hormonal induction of C4-Slp is mediated by a sex-specific pattern of growth hormone secretion. Promoter analyses in vitro have led to contradictory conclusions concerning the significance of C4-Slp-specific sequences in the 5' flanking region. Mutant mice carrying the H-2(aw18) haplotype, which is characterized by a large deletion in the S region covering the C4 and 21-OHase A genes, permit the direct in vivo analysis of C4-Slp transcription, unhindered by the presence of C4. Run-on analysis of transcription in liver nuclei of males and females of this strain demonstrated a 100-fold higher transcriptional activity in males, essentially determined at the transcription initiation level. The androgen dependence of transcription initiation was confirmed by run-on analysis of testosterone-treated females, where transcriptional activity started after 6 days of androgen treatment and reached male levels after 20 days. Conversely, the growth hormone-regulated activity of transcription factor STAT5 was already detected in liver nuclei after 48 hr of androgen treatment. Furthermore, we demonstrate that activated STAT5 recognizes in vitro two upstream gamma interferon-activated sequence (GAS) elements of the C4-Slp gene, centered at positions -1969 and -1831. We postulate that binding of STAT5 to these C4-Slp-specific GAS elements plays a crucial role in the chromatin remodelings that lead to transcriptional competence of the C4-Slp gene in the liver.

Relative activity and specificity of promoters from prostate-expressed genes

BACKGROUND

To evaluate their relative activity and specificity for prostate cells promoter and regulatory regions from three prostate-expressed genes-prostate-specific antigen (PSA), probasin, and relaxin H2-have been compared in prostate cell lines and in lines of breast, bladder, liver, kidney, lung, and ovarian origin.

METHODS

After transfection into different cell types, the activity of promoters was assayed using linked reporter genes and normalized against that of the Rous sarcoma virus. Activity was measured both in the presence and in the absence of co-transfected androgen receptor (AR).

RESULTS

PSA and probasin regulatory regions showed strong responsiveness to co-transfection of the AR in most cell types. The core PSA promoter region showed low activity and specificity, but the specificity and level of expression were substantially increased by inclusion of upstream sequences, particularly the enhancer region. Probasin promoter fragments showed specificity of expression for prostate cell lines but required AR for significant levels of expression. Relaxin promoter fragments directed significant AR-inducible expression in prostate cells but showed little specificity and variable AR responsiveness in other cell types.

CONCLUSIONS

Of regulatory regions tested, a 430-base pair probasin promoter and PSA enhancer/core promoter showed the best combination of AR-stimulated prostate cell expression with limited expression in other cell types.

Androgen receptor gene and hormonal therapy failure of prostate cancer

Androgen receptor (AR) is a nuclear transcription factor that binds male sex steroids and mediates the biological effects of these hormones to the target cells, such as the epithelial cells of the prostate gland, by activating transcription of androgen-dependent genes. Withdrawal of androgens or the peripheral blockade of androgen action remain the critical therapeutic options for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. However, after initial regression, many prostate cancers become hormone refractory and progress further with eventual fatal outcome. Understanding the mechanisms of tumor progression and endocrine therapy failure is an important goal. A large number of different molecular mechanisms may be responsible for development of hormone-refractory recurrent tumors. Many of these involve the AR gene and its complex downstream signaling pathways. The role of AR mutations and altered transactivational properties of the receptor have received the most attention as causative factors for progression. However, other mechanisms, such as AR gene amplification and overexpression or increased local bioconversion of androgens, may contribute to the development of progression by mechanisms that involve androgen-dependent cell growth. Here we review the role of the AR gene and its putative downstream effector pathways during human prostate cancer progression and endocrine therapy failure.

Androgen induction of the SVS family related protein MSVSP99: identification of a functional androgen response element

The gene encoding MSVSP99 (mouse seminal vesicle secretory protein of 99 amino acids) is specifically expressed in the mouse seminal vesicle under androgenic control. To study hormonal regulation, fragments of the 5'-flanking region, extending from -2365 to +16 were linked to the chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) gene and cotransfected with an androgen receptor expression vector into CV-1 cells. A minimal region (-387 to +16) was sufficient for full androgen induction. Further deletion, up to nt-261, almost completely abolished androgen inducibility. DNase I footprinting and band-shift assays, using the DNA binding domain of the androgen receptor (AR-DBD), revealed three AR binding sites: two putative androgen response elements (AREs) occurring at positions -361 (AREd) and -208 (AREp), and an androgen receptor binding region (ARBR) located between positions -317 and -293. Transient transfection assays revealed that site-directed mutation in AREp abolished androgen induced expression, whereas mutation in AREd or in ARBR had no effect. The results demonstrate that AREp is a functional sequence that must cooperate with additional cis-acting elements, located between -387 and -261, for androgen induction of the MSVSP99 gene.

Both androgen receptor and glucocorticoid receptor are able to induce prostate-specific antigen expression, but differ in their growth-stimulating properties of LNCaP cells

Androgen receptor-positive LNCaP cells were stably transfected with a rat glucocorticoid receptor (GR) expression plasmid. Ligand-binding studies in the generated cell lines revealed high-affinity binding of the cognate ligands to their receptors. Transfection experiments with the newly derived cell lines showed that, like androgen receptor, GR can induce activity of a prostate-specific antigen promoter fragment linked to the luciferase gene. Similarly, dexamethasone can stimulate expression of endogenous prostate-specific antigen messenger RNA. Cell proliferation could be induced by R1881. In contrast, dexamethasone treatment of the GR-positive sublines had no stimulatory effect on cell growth. Using the differential display technique, a so far unknown complementary DNA fragment, designated 21.1, specifically induced by androgens and not by glucocorticoids, has been identified. In conclusion, the newly generated cell lines, together with the parental LNCaP cell line, form an attractive system with which to study the mechanism of specificity of steroid hormone regulation of gene expression.