Expression of the rat m4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor gene is regulated by the neuron-restrictive silencer element/repressor element 1

REST Is Not Resting: REST/NRSF in Health and Disease

Chromatin modifications play a crucial role in the regulation of gene expression. The repressor element-1 (RE1) silencing transcription factor (REST), also known as neuron-restrictive silencer factor (NRSF) and X2 box repressor (XBR), was found to regulate gene transcription by binding to chromatin and recruiting chromatin-modifying enzymes. Earlier studies revealed that REST plays an important role in the development and disease of the nervous system, mainly by repressing the transcription of neuron-specific genes. Subsequently, REST was found to be critical in other tissues, such as the heart, pancreas, skin, eye, and vascular. Dysregulation of REST was also found in nervous and non-nervous system cancers. In parallel, multiple strategies to target REST have been developed. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive summary of the research progress made over the past 28 years since the discovery of REST, encompassing both physiological and pathological aspects. These insights into the effects and mechanisms of REST contribute to an in-depth understanding of the transcriptional regulatory mechanisms of genes and their roles in the development and progression of disease, with a view to discovering potential therapeutic targets and intervention strategies for various related diseases.

Commensal Bacteria Regulate Gene Expression and Differentiation in Vertebrate Olfactory Systems Through Transcription Factor REST

Sensory systems such as the olfactory system detect chemical stimuli and thereby determine the relationships between the animal and its surroundings. Olfaction is one of the most conserved and ancient sensory systems in vertebrates. The vertebrate olfactory epithelium is colonized by complex microbial communities, but microbial contribution to host olfactory gene expression remains unknown. In this study, we show that colonization of germ-free zebrafish and mice with microbiota leads to widespread transcriptional responses in olfactory organs as measured in bulk tissue transcriptomics and RT-qPCR. Germ-free zebrafish olfactory epithelium showed defects in pseudostratification; however, the size of the olfactory pit and the length of the cilia were not different from that of colonized zebrafish. One of the mechanisms by which microbiota control host transcriptional programs is by differential expression and activity of specific transcription factors (TFs). REST (RE1 silencing transcription factor, also called NRSF) is a zinc finger TF that binds to the conserved motif repressor element 1 found in the promoter regions of many neuronal genes with functions in neuronal development and differentiation. Colonized zebrafish and mice showed increased nasal expression of REST, and genes with reduced expression in colonized animals were strongly enriched in REST-binding motifs. Nasal commensal bacteria promoted in vitro differentiation of Odora cells by regulating the kinetics of REST expression. REST knockdown resulted in decreased Odora cell differentiation in vitro. Our results identify a conserved mechanism by which microbiota regulate vertebrate olfactory transcriptional programs and reveal a new role for REST in sensory organs.

RE1-silencing transcription factor controls the acute-to-chronic neuropathic pain transition and Chrm2 receptor gene expression in primary sensory neurons

Neuropathic pain is associated with persistent changes in gene expression in primary sensory neurons, but the underlying epigenetic mechanisms that cause these changes remain unclear. The muscarinic cholinergic receptors (mAChRs), particularly the M2 subtype (encoded by the cholinergic receptor muscarinic 2 (Chrm2) gene), are critically involved in the regulation of spinal nociceptive transmission. However, little is known about how Chrm2 expression is transcriptionally regulated. Here we show that nerve injury persistently increased the expression of RE1-silencing transcription factor (REST, also known as neuron-restrictive silencing factor [NRSF]), a gene-silencing transcription factor, in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG). Remarkably, nerve injury-induced chronic but not acute pain hypersensitivity was attenuated in mice with Rest knockout in DRG neurons. Also, siRNA-mediated Rest knockdown reversed nerve injury-induced chronic pain hypersensitivity in rats. Nerve injury persistently reduced Chrm2 expression in the DRG and diminished the analgesic effect of muscarine. The RE1 binding site on the Chrm2 promoter is required for REST-mediated Chrm2 repression, and nerve injury increased the enrichment of REST in the Chrm2 promoter in the DRG. Furthermore, Rest knockdown or genetic ablation in DRG neurons normalized Chrm2 expression and augmented muscarine's analgesic effect on neuropathic pain and fully reversed the nerve injury-induced reduction in the inhibitory effect of muscarine on glutamatergic input to spinal dorsal horn neurons. Our findings indicate that nerve injury-induced REST up-regulation in DRG neurons plays an important role in the acute-to-chronic pain transition and is essential for the transcriptional repression of Chrm2 in neuropathic pain.

M(4) muscarinic receptors and locomotor activity regulation

M(4) muscarinic receptors (M(4) MR) represent a subfamily of G-protein coupled receptors serving a substantial role in spontaneous locomotor activity regulation, cognition and modulation of cholinergic system. With increasing body of literature discussing the role of M(4) MR some controversies arose. Thus, we try here to summarize the current evidence regarding the M(4) MR, with the special focus on their role in Locomotor activity control. We review the molecular function of M(4) MR in specific brain areas implicated in locomotor regulation, and shortly in other CNS processes that could be connected to locomotor activity. We also focus on brain areas implicated in locomotor activity biorhythm changes like suprachiasmatic nucleus, subparaventricular zone posterior hypothalamic area, striatum and thalamus. Gender-related aspects and differences in locomotor activity in males and females are discussed further.

Establishment of an intermittent cold stress model using Tupaia belangeri and evaluation of compound C737 targeting neuron-restrictive silencer factor

Previous studies have shown that intermittent cold stress (ICS) induces depression-like behaviors in mammals. Tupaia belangeri (the tree shrew) is the only experimental animal other than the chimpanzee that has been shown to be susceptible to infection by hepatitis B and C viruses. Moreover, full genome sequence analysis has revealed strong homology between host proteins in Tupaia and in humans and other primates. Tupaia neuromodulator receptor proteins are also known to have a high degree of homology with their corresponding primate proteins. Based on these similarities, we hypothesized that induction of ICS in Tupaia would provide a useful animal model of stress responses. We exposed young adult Tupaia to ICS and observed decreases in body temperature and body weight in both female and male Tupaia, suggesting that Tupaia are an appropriate animal model for ICS studies. We further examined the efficacy of a new small-molecule compound, C737, against the effects of ICS. C737 mimics the helical structure of neuron-restrictive silencer factor (NRSF/REST), which regulates a wide range of target genes involved in neuronal function and pain modulation. Treatment with C737 significantly reduced stress-induced weight loss in female Tupaia; these effects were stronger than those elicited by the antidepressant agomelatine. These results suggest that Tupaia represents a useful non-rodent ICS model. Our data also provide new insights into the function of NRSF/REST in stress-induced depression and other disorders with epigenetic influences or those with high prevalence in women.

Neural restrictive silencer factor and choline acetyltransferase expression in cerebral tissue of Alzheimer's Disease patients: A pilot study

Decreased Choline Acetyltransferase (ChAT) brain level is one of the main biochemical disorders in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). In rodents, recent data show that the CHAT gene can be regulated by a neural restrictive silencer factor (NRSF). The aim of the present work was to evaluate the gene and protein expression of CHAT and NRSF in frontal, temporal, entorhinal and parietal cortices of AD patient brains. Four brains from patients with AD and four brains from subjects without dementia were studied. Cerebral tissues were obtained and processed by the guanidine isothiocyanate method for RNA extraction. CHAT and NRSF gene and protein expression were determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Western blotting. CHAT gene expression levels were 39% lower in AD patients as compared to the control group (p < 0.05, U test). ChAT protein levels were reduced by 17% (p = 0.02, U test). NRSF gene expression levels were 86% higher in the AD group (p = 0.001, U test) as compared to the control group. In the AD subjects, the NRSF protein levels were 57% higher (p > 0.05, U test) than in the control subjects. These findings suggest for the first time that in the brain of AD patients high NRSF protein levels are related to low CHAT gene expression levels.

Molecular properties of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, which comprise five subtypes (M1-M5 receptors), are expressed in both the CNS and PNS (particularly the target organs of parasympathetic neurons). M1-M5 receptors are integral membrane proteins with seven transmembrane segments, bind with acetylcholine (ACh) in the extracellular phase, and thereafter interact with and activate GTP-binding regulatory proteins (G proteins) in the intracellular phase: M1, M3, and M5 receptors interact with Gq-type G proteins, and M2 and M4 receptors with Gi/Go-type G proteins. Activated G proteins initiate a number of intracellular signal transduction systems. Agonist-bound muscarinic receptors are phosphorylated by G protein-coupled receptor kinases, which initiate their desensitization through uncoupling from G proteins, receptor internalization, and receptor breakdown (down regulation). Recently the crystal structures of M2 and M3 receptors were determined and are expected to contribute to the development of drugs targeted to muscarinic receptors. This paper summarizes the molecular properties of muscarinic receptors with reference to the historical background and bias to studies performed in our laboratories.

Neuron-restrictive silencer factor functions to suppress Sp1-mediated transactivation of human secretin receptor gene

In the present study, a functional neuron restrictive silencer element (NRSE) was initially identified in the 5' flanking region (-83 to -67, relative to ATG) of human secretin receptor (hSCTR) gene by promoter assays coupled with scanning mutation analyses. The interaction of neuron restrictive silencer factor (NRSF) with this motif was later indicated via gel mobility shift and ChIP assays. The silencing activity of NRSF was confirmed by over-expression and also by shRNA knock-down of endogenous NRSF. These studies showed an inverse relationship between the expression levels of NRSF and hSCTR in the cells. As hSCTR gene was previously shown to be controlled by two GC-boxes which are regulated by the ratio of Sp1 to Sp3, in the present study, the functional interactions of NRSF and Sp proteins to regulate hSCTR gene was investigated. By co-immunoprecipitation assays, we found that NRSF could be co-precipitated with Sp1 as well as Sp3 in PANC-1 cells. Interestingly, co-expressions of these factors showed that NRSF could suppress Sp1-mediated, but not Sp3-mediated, transactivation of hSCTR. Taken together, we propose here that the down-regulatory effects of NRSF on hSCTR gene expression are mediated via its suppression on Sp1-mediated transactivation.

Identification of the sensory neuron specific regulatory region for the mouse gene encoding the voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1.8

Voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSC) are critical membrane components that participate in the electrical activity of excitable cells. The type one VGSC family includes the tetrodotoxin insensitive sodium channel, Na(V)1.8, encoded by the Scn10a gene. Na(V)1.8 expression is restricted to small and medium diameter nociceptive sensory neurons of the dorsal root ganglia and cranial sensory ganglia. To understand the stringent transcriptional regulation of the Scn10a gene, the sensory neuron specific promoter was functionally identified. While identifying the mRNA 5'-end, alternative splicing within the 5'-UTR was observed to create heterogeneity in the RNA transcript. Four kilobases of upstream genomic DNA was cloned and the presence of tissue specific promoter activity was tested by microinjection and adenoviral infection of fluorescent protein reporter constructs into primary mouse and rat neurons, and cell lines. The region contained many putative transcription factor-binding sites and strong homology with the predicted rat ortholog. Homology to the predicted human ortholog was limited to the proximal end and several conserved cis elements were noted. Two regulatory modules were identified by microinjection of reporter constructs into dorsal root ganglia and superior cervical ganglia neurons: a neuron specific proximal promoter region between -1.6 and -0.2 kb of the transcription start site cluster, and a distal sensory neuron switch region beyond -1.6 kb that restricted fluorescent protein expression to a subset of primary sensory neurons.

Chromatin crosstalk in development and disease: lessons from REST

Protein complexes that contain chromatin-modifying enzymes have an important role in regulating gene expression. Recent studies have shown that a single transcription factor, the repressor element 1-silencing transcription factor (REST), can act as a hub for the recruitment of multiple chromatin-modifying enzymes, uncovering interdependencies among individual enzymes that affect gene regulation. Research into the function of REST and its corepressors has provided novel insight into how chromatin-modifying proteins cooperate, and how alterations in this function cause disease. These mechanisms will be relevant to the combinatorial functioning of modular transcriptional regulators that work together to regulate a common promoter; they should also identify targets for potential therapies for a range of human diseases.

Reciprocal actions of REST and a microRNA promote neuronal identity

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are implicated in both tissue differentiation and maintenance of tissue identity. In most cases, however, the mechanisms underlying their regulation are not known. One brain-specific miRNA, miR-124a, decreases the levels of hundreds of nonneuronal transcripts, such that its introduction into HeLa cells promotes a neuronal-like mRNA profile. The transcriptional repressor, RE1 silencing transcription factor (REST), has a reciprocal activity, inhibiting the expression of neuronal genes in nonneuronal cells. Here, we show that REST regulates the expression of a family of miRNAs, including brain-specific miR-124a. In nonneuronal cells and neural progenitors, REST inhibits miR-124a expression, allowing the persistence of nonneuronal transcripts. As progenitors differentiate into mature neurons, REST leaves miR-124a gene loci, and nonneuronal transcripts are degraded selectively. Thus, the combined transcriptional and posttranscriptional consequences of REST action maximize the contrast between neuronal and nonneuronal cell phenotypes.

Mechanisms and perspectives on differentiation of autonomic neurons

Neurons share many features in common but are distinguished by expression of phenotypic characteristics that define their specific function, location, or connectivity. One aspect of neuronal fate determination that has been extensively studied is that of neurotransmitter choice. The generation of diversity of neuronal subtypes within the developing nervous system involves integration of extrinsic and intrinsic instructive cues resulting in the expression of a core set of regulatory molecules. This review focuses on mechanisms of growth and transcription factor regulation in the generation of peripheral neural crest-derived neurons. Although the specification and differentiation of noradrenergic neurons are the focus, I have tried to integrate these into a larger picture providing a general roadmap for development of autonomic neurons. There is a core of DNA binding proteins required for the development of sympathetic, parasympathetic, and enteric neurons, including Phox2 and MASH1, whose specificity is regulated by the recruitment of additional transcriptional regulators in a subtype-specific manner. For noradrenergic neurons, the basic helix-loop-helix DNA binding protein HAND2 (dHAND) appears to serve this function. The studies reviewed here support the notion that neurotransmitter identity is closely linked to other aspects of neurogenesis and reveal a molecular mechanism to coordinate expression of pan-neuronal genes with cell type-specific genes.

Neuron-restrictive silencer factor (NRSF) functions as a repressor in neuronal cells to regulate the mu opioid receptor gene

The mu opioid receptor (MOR) is expressed in the central nervous system and specific cell lines with varying expression levels perhaps playing important roles. One of the neuronal-specific transcription regulators, neuron-restrictive silencer factor (NRSF), has been shown to repress the expression of neuron-specific genes in non-neuronal cells. However, we showed here that the neuron-restrictive silencer element (NRSE) of MOR functions as a critical regulator to repress the MOR gene expression in specific neuronal cells depending on NRSF expression level. Using co-transfection studies, we showed that the NRSE of the MOR promoter is functional in NRSF-positive cells (NS20Y and HeLa) but not in NRSF-negative cells (PC12). NRSF binds to the NRSE of the MOR gene in a sequence-specific manner confirmed by supershift and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, respectively. The suppression of NRSF activity with either trichostatin A or a dominant-negative NRSF induced MOR promoter activity and transcription of the MOR gene. When the NRSF was disrupted in NS20Y and HeLa cells using small interfering RNA, the transcription of the endogenous target MOR gene increased significantly. This provides direct evidence the role of NRSF in the cells and also indicates that NRSF expression is regulated by post-translational modification in neuronal NMB cells. Our data suggested that NRSF can function as a repressor of MOR transcription in specific cells, via a mechanism dependent on the MOR NRSE.

GABAA receptors: building the bridge between subunit mRNAs, their promoters, and cognate transcription factors

The type A gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA(A)) receptors mediate the majority of fast inhibitory neurotransmission in the CNS, and alterations in GABA(A) receptor function is believed to be involved in the pathology of several neurological and psychiatric illnesses, such as epilepsy, anxiety, Alzheimer's disease, and schizophrenia. GABA(A) receptors can be assembled from eight distinct subunit families defined by sequence similarity: alpha(1-6), beta(1-3), gamma(1-3), delta, pi, theta, and rho(1-3). The regulation of GABA(A) receptor function in the brain is a highly compensating system, influencing both the number and the composition of receptors at the cell surface. While transcriptional and translational points of control operate in parallel, it is becoming increasingly evident that many functional changes in GABA(A) receptors reflect the differential gene regulation of its subunits. The fact that certain GABA(A) receptor subunit genes are transcribed in distinct cell types during specific periods of development strongly suggests that genetic control plays a major role in the choice of subunit variants available for receptor assembly. This review focuses on the physiological conditions that alter subunit mRNA levels, the promoters that may control such levels, and the use of a conceptual framework created by bioinformatics to study coordinate and independent GABA(A) receptor subunit gene regulation. As this exciting field moves closer to identifying the language hidden inside the chromatin of GABA(A) receptor subunit gene clusters, future experiments will be aimed at testing models generated by computational analysis with biologically relevant in vivo and in vitro assays. It is hoped that through this functional genomic approach there will be the identification of new targets for therapeutic intervention.

Genome-wide analysis of repressor element 1 silencing transcription factor/neuron-restrictive silencing factor (REST/NRSF) target genes

The completion of whole genome sequencing projects has provided the genetic instructions of life. However, whereas the identification of gene coding regions has progressed, the mapping of transcriptional regulatory motifs has moved more slowly. To understand how distinct expression profiles can be established and maintained, a greater understanding of these sequences and their trans-acting factors is required. Herein we have used a combined in silico and biochemical approach to identify binding sites [repressor element 1/neuron-restrictive silencer element (RE1/NRSE)] and potential target genes of RE1 silencing transcription factor/neuron-restrictive silencing factor (REST/NRSF) within the human, mouse, and Fugu rubripes genomes. We have used this genome-wide analysis to identify 1,892 human, 1,894 mouse, and 554 Fugu RE1/NRSEs and present their location and gene linkages in a searchable database. Furthermore, we identified an in vivo hierarchy in which distinct subsets of RE1/NRSEs interact with endogenous levels of REST/NRSF, whereas others function as bona fide transcriptional control elements only in the presence of elevated levels of REST/NRSF. These data show that individual RE1/NRSE sites interact differentially with REST/NRSF within a particular cell type. This combined bioinformatic and biochemical approach serves to illustrate the selective manner in which a transcription factor interacts with its potential binding sites and regulates target genes. In addition, this approach provides a unique whole-genome map for a given transcription factor-binding site implicated in establishing specific patterns of neuronal gene expression.

Novel Polymorphisms Influencing Transcription of the Human CHRM2 Gene in Airway Smooth Muscle

Muscarinic receptors are a functionally important family of G-protein-coupled receptors. Using a combination of rapid amplification of 5' cDNA ends and reporter gene assays, we characterized the 5' untranslated region of the CHRM2 gene as expressed in human airway smooth muscle (HASM) cells. A splice site is present 46 bp upstream from the ATG start codon. Five exons with alternative splicing patterns are present upstream of this splice site, separated by introns ranging from 87 bp to > 145 kb. There is evidence for the gene being under the control of a TATA-less promoter with Sp1, GATA, and activator protein-2 binding sites. Multiple transcription start sites (TSSs) were identified. We identified a novel 0.5-kb hypervariable region located 648 bp upstream of the most 5' TSS, a multiallelic (CA) tandem repeat 96 bp downstream of the most 5' TSS, and a common C-->A SNP located 136 bp upstream of the most 5' TSS. Functional studies in primary HASM cells and the BEAS-2B cell line demonstrated highest promoter activity to be upstream of the most 3' TSS, with potential repressor elements operating in a cell type-dependent manner, located upstream of the most 5' TSS. We present functional data to show that the CA repeat may influence the transcription of the gene in HASM and BEAS-2B cells.

A restrictive element 1 (RE-1) in the VIP gene modulates transcription in neuronal and non-neuronal cells in collaboration with an upstream tissue specifier element

The vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) gene has been studied extensively as a prototype neuronal gene containing multiple cis-active elements that confer responsiveness to cell lineage, neurotrophic, and activity-dependent intrinsic and extrinsic cues. However, reporter genes containing the presumptive complete regulatory region 5' to the start of transcription do not confer tissue-specific gene expression in vivo. We therefore sought cis-regulatory elements downstream of the transcriptional start that might confer additional tissue-specific and tissue-restrictive properties to the VIP transcriptional unit. We report here a repressor element, similar to the canonical restrictive element-1 (RE-1), located within the first non-coding exon of the human VIP gene. The ability of this element to regulate VIP reporter gene expression in neuroblastoma and fibroblastic cells was examined. Endogenous VIP expression is high in SH-EP neuroblastoma cells, low but inducible in SH-SY5Y cells, and absent in HeLa cells. Endogenous RE-1 silencer factor (REST) expression was highest in SH-EP and HeLa cells, and significantly lower in SH-SY5Y cells. Transient transfection of a VIP reporter gene containing a mutated RE-1 sequence revealed an RE-1-dependent regulation of VIP gene expression in all three cell types, with regulation greatest in cells (SH-EP, HeLa) with highest levels of REST expression. Serial truncation of the VIP reporter gene further revealed a specific interaction between the RE-1 and a tissue-specifier element located 5 kb upstream in the VIP gene. Thus, REST can regulate VIP gene expression in both neuroblastic and non-neuronal cells, but requires coupling to the upstream tissue specifier element.

Interaction of the repressor element 1-silencing transcription factor (REST) with target genes

The repressor element 1-silencing transcription factor (REST) has been proposed to restrict expression of repressor element 1 (RE1) bearing genes to differentiated neurons by silencing their expression in non-neural tissue. Here, we have examined the interaction of REST with the M(4) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor gene. We show that REST binds to the RE1 of the M(4) gene in those cell lines and brain regions where the M(4) gene is expressed but not in those where the M(4) is not expressed. Furthermore, in cells that express M(4), the presence of REST represses but is insufficient to silence transcription of M(4). In non-neural cells REST is absent from the RE1 of the silent M(4) gene and perturbation of REST function fails to induce M(4) expression. We propose that REST acts to regulate expression levels of some RE1-bearing genes in neural cells, thereby playing an important role in defining neuronal activity.

Distinct RE-1 Silencing Transcription Factor-containing Complexes Interact with Different Target Genes

Establishment of neuronal identity requires co-ordinated expression of specific batteries of genes. These programs of gene expression are executed by activation of neuron-specific genes in neuronal cells and their repression in non-neuronal cells. Such co-ordinate regulation requires that individual activators and repressors regulate transcription from specific subsets of their potential target genes, yet we know little of the mechanisms that underlie this selective process. The RE-1 silencing transcription factor (REST) is a repressor that is proposed to silence transcription of numerous neuron-specific genes in non-neuronal cells via recruitment of two independent histone deacetylase (HDAC)-containing co-repressor complexes. However, in vivo, REST appears to be an obligate silencer for only a minority of RE-1-bearing genes. Here we examine the interaction of REST, Co-REST, Sin3A, HDAC1, and HDAC2 with two archetypical endogenous target genes, the M4 muscarinic receptor and the sodium type II channel (NaV1.2) genes. We find that these genes are present in distinct chromosomal domains. The NaV1.2 gene is actively transcribed but repressed by REST independently of histone deacetylation or DNA methylation and does not co-localize with epigenetic markers of silence, including dimethylation of H3K9 and HP1. In contrast, the M4 gene is maintained in a silent state independently of REST and co-localizes with dimethylated H3K9 and HP1alpha and HP1gamma, characteristic of silenced or senescent euchromatic DNA. This contrasts with the coordinate REST-dependent regulation of this locus reported previously. Taken together, we infer that distinct repressor complexes and mechanisms are operative at particular loci even in cell lines derived from a common embryological origin.

Transcription of the M1 muscarinic receptor gene in neurons and neuronal progenitors of the embryonic rat forebrain

Development of the nervous system is accompanied by expansion and differentiation of the neuronal progenitors within the embryonic neuroepithelium. Although the role of growth factors in this process is well documented, there is increasing evidence for a role of neurotransmitters. Acetylcholine is known to exert many actions on developing neural cells, but its potential role in neurogenesis is unclear. Here, we show that the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor is expressed in the neuroepithelium of the rat forebrain, where it is found on both nestin+ progenitor cells and TuJ1+ newly differentiated neurons. Furthermore, transcription is governed, at least in part, by regulatory cis elements that are also responsible for driving transcription in neuroblastoma cells. This represents the first demonstration of M1 receptors on neuronal progenitor cells and supports the notion that M1 muscarinic receptors may play a role in development of the nervous system prior to the onset of synaptogenesis and their subsequent role in neurotransmission.

The role of the RE1 element in activation of the NR1 promoter during neuronal differentiation

To understand the genetic mechanism controlling the expression of the NMDA subtype of glutamate receptors during neuronal differentiation, we studied activation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit 1 (NR1) gene and the role of the repressor element-1 (RE1) element in NR1 promoter activation. Following neuronal differentiation of P19 embryonic carcinoma cells, the NR1 transcription rate and mRNA level were significantly increased, while the nuclear level of the repressor RE1 silencing transcription factor (REST)/neuron-restriction silencer factor (NRSF) was reduced. Nuclear REST/NRSF from undifferentiated cells formed a large complex with the NR1 RE1 element. While this complex was significantly reduced after the differentiation, REST/NRSF from differentiated cells formed a new, faster migrating complex. In transient transfections, deletion of the RE1 element increased activity of the 5.4-kb NR1 promoter sixfold in undifferentiated cells, but only induced approximately 1.4-fold increase in differentiated cells. Forced expression of REST/NRSF in differentiated cells suppressed the promoter, while forced expression of a dominant-negative REST/NRSF induced promoter activity as well as the mRNA of the NR1 gene in undifferentiated cells. In stable transfectants, the wild-type promoter showed a robust increase in activity following differentiation in a pattern similar to the NR1 mRNA increase. Conversely, the promoter lacking the RE1 element showed only a moderate increase. Our data suggest that the NR1 gene up-regulation during neuronal differentiation is controlled by its promoter activation, which is largely determined by the interaction between the RE1 element and the repressor REST/NRSF.

Ischemic insults derepress the gene silencer REST in neurons destined to die

A subset of genes implicated in genetic and acquired neurological disorders encode proteins essential to neural patterning and neurogenesis. The gene silencing transcription factor neuronal repressor element-1 silencing transcription factor (REST)/neuron-restrictive silencer factor (NRSF) plays a critical role in elaboration of the neuronal phenotype. In neural progenitor and non-neural cells, REST acts by repression of a subset of neural genes important to synaptic plasticity and synaptic remodeling, including the AMPA receptor (AMPAR) subunit GluR2. Here we show that global ischemia triggers REST mRNA and protein expression. REST suppresses GluR2 promoter activity and gene expression in neurons destined to die. Because the GluR2 subunit governs AMPAR Ca2+ permeability, these changes are expected to have profound effects on neuronal survival. In keeping with this concept, acute knockdown of the REST gene by antisense administration prevents GluR2 suppression and rescues post-ischemic neurons from ischemia-induced cell death in an in vitro model. To our knowledge, our study represents the first example of ischemia-induced induction of a master transcriptional regulator gene and its protein expression critical to neural differentiation and patterning in adult neurons. Derepression of REST is likely to be an important mechanism of insult-induced neuronal death.

Transcription factor REST dependent proteins are comparable between Down Syndrome and control brains: challenging a hypothesis

Impairment of the RE-1-silencing transcription factor (REST) and REST-dependent genes in Down Syndrome (DS) neuronal progenitor cells and neurospheres has been published recently. As dysregulation of this system has been shown at the RNA level and considering the long and unpredictable way from RNA to proteins, and as it is the proteins that do the function in brain, we decided to test this hypothesis at the protein level. Cortex of brains of patients with Down Syndrome at the early second trimester were used. REST-dependent structures as synapsin I, brain derived neurotrophic factor BDNF and neuronal growth-associated protein SCG10 were determined at the protein level using immunoblotting. Proteins were comparably expressed in fetal Down syndrome and control brains. Even when normalized versus housekeeping genes (glyceraldehyde-6-phosphate-dehydrogenease) and a marker for neuronal density (neuron-specific enolase) DS results were resembling controls. Therefore, we cannot confirm the REST-hypothesis by our studies in the 18/19th week of gestation at the protein level in brain and taking into account that the hypothesis was based upon studies in progenitor cells.

Corepressor-dependent silencing of chromosomal regions encoding neuronal genes

The molecular mechanisms by which central nervous system-specific genes are expressed only in the nervous system and repressed in other tissues remain a central issue in developmental and regulatory biology. Here, we report that the zinc-finger gene-specific repressor element RE-1 silencing transcription factor/neuronal restricted silencing factor (REST/NRSF) can mediate extraneuronal restriction by imposing either active repression via histone deacetylase recruitment or long-term gene silencing using a distinct functional complex. Silencing of neuronal-specific genes requires the recruitment of an associated corepressor, CoREST, that serves as a functional molecular beacon for the recruitment of molecular machinery that imposes silencing across a chromosomal interval, including transcriptional units that do not themselves contain REST/NRSF response elements.

Effect of the ubiquitous transcription factors, SP1 and MAZ, on NMDA receptor subunit type 1 (NR1) expression during neuronal differentiation

The silencer factor NRSF/REST has been reported to restrict expression to neurons of a variety of genes, including that encoding NMDA receptor subunit type 1 (NR1), by suppressing transcription in nonneuronal cells. However, we recently reported that in addition to the absence of NRSF/REST-binding activity, another neuron-specific mechanism is necessary for high level expression of the NR1 gene in neurons. In this study, we explored the mechanism of induction of NR1 promoter activity during neuronal differentiation of the P19 cell line. We identified a 27 base pair GC-rich region in the promoter as an important element responsible for induction of the NR1 gene after neuronal differentiation. We found that the ubiquitous transcription factors SP1 and MAZ bind to this GC-rich region. Surprisingly, the binding activities of SP1 and MAZ are not remarkably changed after neuronal differentiation. Mutations in the SP1 and MAZ sites impair binding of SP1 and MAZ proteins and also decrease NR1 promoter activity. These findings suggest that SP1 and MAZ mediate enhancement of NR1 promoter activity during neuronal differentiation despite the fact that their binding activity does not change.

NRSF/REST confers transcriptional repression of the GPR10 gene via a putative NRSE/RE-1 located in the 5' promoter region

The G protein-coupled receptor GPR10 is highly localized to areas of the brain. In an effort to reveal transcriptional determinants of this tissue specificity, we recognized a putative NRSE (neuron-restrictive silencer element) located in the 5' promoter region of the gene. The cognate NRSE binding protein NRSF (neuron-restrictive silencer factor) restricts gene expression to mature neurons and endocrine cells by repressing their transcription in non-neuronal/-endocrine cells. In cell lines where NRSF-mediated gene repression has been functionally established, the activity of the GPR10 promoter was repressed in a manner consistent with NRSE-dependent regulation. A specific point mutation to confer non-functionality of the NRSE revealed a 10-fold de-repression of reporter gene expression. In contrast, in the GPR10-expressing cell line GH3, mRNA transcripts of NRSF were undetectable and suppression of promoter activity was not observed. However, transfection of a rat NRSF expression vector resulted in significant repression of transcription, which was reversed by mutation of the NRSE. In conclusion, we demonstrate that the GPR10 gene is specifically regulated by NRSF, and suggest this to be a contributory factor in the tissue-specific distribution of GPR10 in vivo.

REST mRNA expression in normal and regenerating avian auditory epithelium

Hair cells (HCs) and supporting cells (SCs) in the auditory epithelium initially arise from a sheet of undifferentiated cells. Although much has been learned about the initial steps leading to the fate determination of HCs and SCs, respectively, little is known about what molecular events 'finalize' cell fate determination. We investigated the role of repressor element-1 (RE-1) silencing transcription factor (REST), whose inactivation is known to be a requirement for a cell to assume a neuronal identity. Here we show by in situ hybridization (ISH) that SCs express REST messenger RNA (mRNA) but sensory HCs lack detectable expression. Using a more sensitive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay, however, we detected the presence of a neuron-specific splice variant in the epithelium, suggesting that HCs express REST mRNA at levels too low to be detectable by ISH. In regenerating auditory epithelium, we found that REST mRNA was expressed and upregulated in all remaining cells in the damaged region of the epithelium, consistent with its expression pattern during development prior to neurogenesis. Surprisingly, REST mRNA was also upregulated in SCs in the apical, undamaged region of the epithelium, and readily detectable by ISH in the HCs in this region. This finding suggests that the grossly undamaged region of the epithelium is in fact biochemically altered towards a 'less developed' state. Our results indicate that REST inactivation is an important step in finalizing HC fate in the chick inner ear.

Structure and transcription of the human m3 muscarinic receptor gene

We have isolated and characterized the human m3 muscarinic receptor gene and its promoter. Using 5' rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE), internal polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and homology searching to identify EST clones, we determined that the cDNA encoding the m3 receptor comprises 4,559 bp in 8 exons, which are alternatively spliced to exclude exons 2, 4, 6, and/or 7; the receptor coding sequence occurs within exon 8. Analysis of P1 artificial chromosome (PAC) and bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones and of PCR- amplified genomic DNA, and homology searching of human chromosome 1 sequence provided from the Sanger Centre (Hinxton, Cambridge, UK) revealed that the m3 muscarinic receptor gene spans at least 285 kb. A promoter fragment containing bp -1240 to +101 (relative to the most 5' transcription start site) exhibited considerable transcriptional activity during transient transfection in cultured subconfluent, serum-fed canine tracheal myocytes, and 5' deletion analysis of promoter function revealed the presence of positive transcriptional regulatory elements between bp -526 and -269. Sequence analysis disclosed three potential AP-2 binding sites in this region; five more AP-2 consensus binding motifs occur between bp -269 and +101. Cotransfection with a plasmid expressing human AP-2alpha substantially increased transcription from m3 receptor promoter constructs containing 526 or 269 bp of 5' flanking DNA. Furthermore, m3 receptor promoter activity was enhanced by long-term serum deprivation of canine tracheal myocytes, a treatment that is known to increase AP-2 transcription-promoting activity in these cells. Together, these data suggest that expression of the human m3 muscarinic receptor gene is regulated in part by AP-2 in airway smooth muscle.

REST4-mediated modulation of REST/NRSF-silencing function during BDNF gene promoter activation

Neural-restrictive silencer element (NRSE)/repressor element-1 (RE1) regulates neuron-specific gene expression by binding the transcriptional factor REST/NRSF which functions as a silencer in nonneuronal cells. In neuronal cells, a truncated, neuronal-specific REST/NRSF isoform, REST4, has been found but little is known about its function. To address this, we investigated the effect of REST/NRSF and REST4 on the activity-dependent activation of BDNF gene promoter I (BDNFp-I) using cultured rat cortical neurons. REST/NRSF markedly repressed the transcriptional activation of BDNFp-I, whereas the effect of REST4 was weak, depending upon the NRSE/RE1 sequence. In addition, REST4 enhanced the basal transcriptional activity of BDNFp-I. Coexpression of REST4 with REST/NRSF competitively inhibited the silencing effect of REST/NRSF on the activation of BDNFp-I. Although REST4 itself has a weak repressive effect on activation of the BDNF gene via NRSE/RE1, it can compete the silencing effect of REST/NRSF, suggesting a primary role for REST4 in preventing the neuron-specific gene from being inactivated by REST/NRSF and allowing gene activation in response to a variety of neuronal stimuli.

Regulation of neuronal traits by a novel transcriptional complex

The transcriptional repressor, REST, helps restrict neuronal traits to neurons by blocking their expression in nonneuronal cells. To examine the repercussions of REST expression in neurons, we generated a neuronal cell line that expresses REST conditionally. REST expression inhibited differentiation by nerve growth factor, suppressing both sodium current and neurite growth. A novel corepressor complex, CoREST/HDAC2, was shown to be required for REST repression. In the presence of REST, the CoREST/HDAC2 complex occupied the native Nav1.2 sodium channel gene in chromatin. In neuronal cells that lack REST and express sodium channels, the corepressor complex was not present on the gene. Collectively, these studies define a novel HDAC complex that is recruited by the C-terminal repressor domain of REST to actively repress genes essential to the neuronal phenotype.

Identification of a neurorestrictive suppressor element (NRSE) in the human mu-opioid receptor gene

Analysis of the DNA sequence of the human mu-opioid receptor gene (MOR) revealed that a region overlapping the start codon was substantially homologous to a DNA element named the neurorestrictive suppressor element (NRSE) or restrictive element 1 (RE-1). Transient transfection experiments in the L929 and HEK non-neural cell lines showed that expression of a MOR promoter/reporter gene construct was suppressed in non-neural cell lines by inclusion of this MOR NRSE. Expression from a thymidine kinase promoter was also suppressed when the MOR NRSE was inserted upstream or downstream of the reporter gene. The MOR NRSE did not suppress expression of the reporter gene in neural derived cell lines, IMR-32 and Neuro 2a. The transcription factor REST which binds NRSE thereby enacting the suppression of transcription, was encoded in a plasmid and co-transfected into the IMR-32 cells. The REST co-transfected neuronal derived (IMR-32) cells became sensitive to the MOR NRSE mediated suppression of reporter gene expression. Electrophoretic mobility shift experiments revealed that oligonucleotides containing the MOR NRSE were bound by a factor from nuclear extracts of non-neural cell lines, HeLa and Jurkat. This binding was specifically competed by oligonucleotides containing NRSE sequences previously shown to suppress transcription through REST. Thus an NRSE element overlapping the human MOR start codon suppresses gene expression in non-neural cell lines and may help direct neural tissue specific expression of MOR.

Cell-type non-selective transcription of mouse and human genes encoding neural-restrictive silencer factor

Neural-restrictive silencer (NRS) has been identified in at least twenty neuron-specific genes, and its nuclear DNA-binding factor, NRSF (also known as RE1-silencing transcription factor (REST)), has been cloned from human and rat, and was shown to repress transcription by recruiting corepressors mSin3 and/or CoREST via its N- and C-terminal domains, leading to chromatin reorganization by mSin3-associated histone deacetylase, HDAC. However, it is largely unknown how NRSF gene expression is regulated. To elucidate the mechanisms for gene expression of NRSF, we isolated the transcriptional unit of the NRSF gene from mouse and human, identified three 5'-non-coding exons in addition to three coding exons, determined transcription start sites, and identified two basal promoter activities in the upstream of the first two non-coding exons. Both promoters functioned equally in neuronal and non-neuronal cells, suggesting that levels of initial transcripts of NRSF gene are similar in neuronal and non-neuronal cells. These results suggest that the level of NRSF gene expression is not determined by transcription per se, and rather is modulated at the post-transcriptional level, e.g. splicing, mRNA stability, and/or post-translational modifications, in a cell-specific manner. Consistent with this idea, NRSF protein was apparently present even in neuronal cells and tissues, but was unable to bind to the NRS element, suggesting that NRSF is regulated at least in part post-translationally.

Structure of the human M(2) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor gene and its promoter

The M(2) muscarinic receptor inhibits the release of acetylcholine from cholinergic fibers in the lungs and elsewhere. In airway parasympathetic neurons, M(2) receptor expression is decreased by viral infections and by interferon-gamma, increasing actylcholine release. Dexamethasone increases M(2) receptor expression, decreasing acetylcholine release. We carried out 5' rapid amplification of cDNA ends beginning with mRNA from human heart and IMR32 human neuroblastoma cells. This demonstrated a 5' UTR of 100 BP, corresponding to two sequences on chromosome 7, separated by a 22.6 kB intron. The splice acceptor site is at -45 relative to the initiating atg. The 3000 BP upstream of 5' RACE product were subcloned into a pGL3 luciferase reporter vector. Deletional constructs were expressed in IMR32 cells. These demonstrated that 412 BP provided full expression of the reporter gene, and suggested a repressor element between -1848 and -1510.

The basic helix-loop-helix protein, sharp-1, represses transcription by a histone deacetylase-dependent and histone deacetylase-independent mechanism

Many aspects of neurogenesis and neuronal differentiation are controlled by basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins. One such factor is SHARP-1, initially identified on the basis of its sequence similarity to hairy. Unlike hairy, and atypically for bHLHs, SHARP-1 is expressed late in development, suggestive of a role in terminal aspects of differentiation. Nevertheless, the role of SHARP-1 and the identity of its target genes remain unknown. During the course of a one-hybrid screen for transcription factors that bind to regulatory domains of the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor gene, we isolated the bHLH transcription factor SHARP-1. In this study, we investigated the functional role of SHARP-1 in regulating transcription. Fusion proteins of SHARP-1 tethered to the gal4 DNA binding domain repress both basal and activated transcription when recruited to either a TATA-containing or a TATAless promoter. Furthermore, we identified two independent repression domains that operate via distinct mechanisms. Repression by a domain in the C terminus is sensitive to the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A, whereas repression by the bHLH domain is insensitive to TSA. Furthermore, overexpression of SHARP-1 represses transcription from the M(1) promoter. This study represents the first report to assign a function to, and to identify a target gene for, the bHLH transcription factor SHARP-1.

The neuron-restrictive silencer element-neuron-restrictive silencer factor system regulates basal and endothelin 1-inducible atrial natriuretic peptide gene expression in ventricular myocytes

Induction of the atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) gene is a common feature of ventricular hypertrophy. A number of cis-acting enhancer elements for several transcriptional activators have been shown to play central roles in the regulation of ANP gene expression, but much less is known about contributions made by transcriptional repressors. The neuron-restrictive silencer element (NRSE), also known as repressor element 1, mediates repression of neuronal gene expression in nonneuronal cells. We found that NRSE, which is located in the 3' untranslated region of the ANP gene, mediated repression of ANP promoter activity in ventricular myocytes and was also involved in the endothelin 1-induced increase in ANP gene transcription. The repression was conferred by a repressor protein, neuron-restrictive silencer factor (NRSF). NRSF associated with the transcriptional corepressor mSin3 and formed a complex with histone deacetylase (HDAC) in ventricular myocytes. Trichostatin A (TSA), a specific HDAC inhibitor, relieved NRSE-mediated repression of ANP promoter activity, and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed the involvement of histone deacetylation in NRSE-mediated repression of ANP gene expression. Furthermore, in myocytes infected with recombinant adenovirus expressing a dominant-negative form of NRSF, the basal level of endogenous ANP gene expression was increased and a TSA-induced increase in ANP gene expression was apparently attenuated, compared with those in myocytes infected with control adenovirus. Our findings show that an NRSE-NRSF system plays a key role in the regulation of ANP gene expression by HDAC in ventricular myocytes and provide a new insight into the role of the NRSE-NRSF system outside the nervous system.

Expression patterns of mouse repressor element-1 silencing transcription factor 4 (REST4) and its possible function in neuroblastoma

The expression pattern of the repressor element-1 silencing transcription factor (REST) also known as the neuron-restrictive silencer factor (NRSF) and its truncated forms have been analyzed in the neuroblastoma cell lines, NS20Y and NIE115 and in NIH3T3 cells. The neuroblastoma cell lines express transcripts of REST/NRSF and its neuron-specific truncated form REST4; with REST4 being the major transcript. NIH3T3 cells express predominantly REST/NRSF, with no detectable REST4. The cellular localization of REST4, determined using a REST4-GFP fusion protein, was shown to be nuclear. Mutational analysis implicates the zinc finger domains as the nuclear-targeting signal. Analysis of reporter-gene activities in the NS20Y cell line showed that the presence of four RE-1/NRSE sequences did not affect promoter activity. However, coexpression of exogenous REST4 produces a small increase in promoter activity of the reporter plasmid, whereas expression of exogenous REST/NRSF leads to repression. In the NIH3T3 cell line, the RE-1/NRSE sequence leads to repression of reporter-gene activity, whereas introduction of exogenous REST4 leads to de-repression. These data indicate that REST4 does not act as a transcriptional repressor. However, they support a mechanism where REST4 can block the repressor activity of REST/NRSF.

Constitutive expression of the neuron-restrictive silencer factor (NRSF)/REST in differentiating neurons disrupts neuronal gene expression and causes axon pathfinding errors in vivo

The neuron-restrictive silencer factor (NRSF; also known as REST for repressor element-1 silencing transcription factor) is a transcriptional repressor of multiple neuronal genes, but little is known about its function in vivo. NRSF is normally down-regulated upon neuronal differentiation. Constitutive expression of NRSF in the developing spinal cord of chicken embryos caused repression of two endogenous target genes, N-tubulin and Ng-CAM, but did not prevent overt neurogenesis. Nevertheless, commissural neurons that differentiated while constitutively expressing NRSF showed a significantly increased frequency of axon guidance errors. These data suggest that down-regulation of NRSF is necessary for the proper development of at least some classes of neurons in vivo.

Transcriptional repression by neuron-restrictive silencer factor is mediated via the Sin3-histone deacetylase complex

A large number of neuron-specific genes characterized to date are under the control of negative transcriptional regulation. Many promoter regions of neuron-specific genes possess the repressor element repressor element 1/neuron-restrictive silencing element (RE1/NRSE). Its cognate binding protein, REST/NRSF, is an essential transcription factor; its null mutations result in embryonic lethality, and its dominant negative mutants produce aberrant expression of neuron-specific genes. REST/NRSF acts as a regulator of neuron-specific gene expression in both nonneuronal tissue and developing neurons. Here, we shown that heterologous expression of REST/NRSF in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is able to repress transcription from yeast promoters engineered to contain RE1/NRSEs. Moreover, we have taken advantage of this observation to show that this repression requires both yeast Sin3p and Rpd3p and that REST/NRSF physically interacts with the product of the yeast SIN3 gene in vivo. Furthermore, we show that REST/NRSF binds mammalian SIN3A and HDAC-2 and requires histone deacetylase activity to repress neuronal gene transcription in both nonneuronal and neuronal cell lines. We show that REST/NRSF binding to RE1/NRSE is accompanied by a decrease in the acetylation of histones around RE1/NRSE and that this decrease requires the N-terminal Sin3p binding domain of REST/NRSF. Taken together, these data suggest that REST/NRSF represses neuronal gene transcription by recruiting the SIN3/HDAC complex.

Absence of binding activity of neuron-restrictive silencer factor is necessary, but not sufficient for transcription of NMDA receptor subunit type 1 in neuronal cells

Neuron-restrictive silencer factor (NRSF, also termed REST) has been proposed to restrict expression of a set of genes to neurons by blocking their transcription in nonneuronal cells. The N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor subunit type I (NR1) gene contains a consensus sequence for the NRSF/REST binding site (NRSE/RE1). In this study, we evaluated the contribution of NRSF/REST to neuronal specificity of the NR1 gene. NR1 mRNA expression correlates with the absence of NRSF/REST binding activity, rather than expression of NRSF/REST protein, in several cell lines, suggesting that the absence of NRSF/REST-binding activity is necessary for the expression of the NR1 gene. HeLa cells, which do not express the NR1 gene, have NRSF/REST binding activity to the NR1 NRSE/RE1, resulting in inhibition of NR1 promoter activity. However, we also found that two nonneuronal cell lines (C6 glioma and P19 embryonal carcinoma) that lack NRSF/REST-binding activity, manifest only small amounts of NR1 mRNA compared to neuronal cell lines (PC12 pheochromocytoma and neuronally differentiated P19 cells). The enhancement of NR1 mRNA levels during neuronal differentiation of P19 cells is accompanied by an increase in NR1 promoter activity in an NRSF/REST-binding independent manner. Our results suggest therefore that the absence of NRSF/REST-binding activity is necessary but not sufficient for robust NR1 transcription in neuronal cells.

PD 102807, a novel muscarinic M4 receptor antagonist, discriminates between striatal and cortical muscarinic receptors coupled to cyclic AMP

In membranes of Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing the cloned human M1-M4 muscarinic receptor subtypes, PD 102807, a novel M4 selective antagonist, was found to counteract the M4 receptor-induced stimulation of [35S]-GTPgammaS binding to membrane G proteins with a pK(B) of 7.40, a value which was 63-, 33- and 10-fold higher than those displayed at M1 (pK(B) = 5.60), M2 (pK(B) = 5.88) and M3 (pK(B) = 6.39) receptor subtypes, respectively. In rat striatal membranes, PD 102807 antagonized the muscarinic inhibition of dopamine (DA) D1 receptor-stimulated adenylyl cyclase with a pK(B) value of 7.36. In contrast, in membranes of rat frontal cortex, PD 102807 displayed lower potencies in antagonizing either the muscarinic facilitation of corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH)-stimulated adenylyl cyclase (pK(B) = 5.79) or inhibition of Ca2+/calmodulin (Ca2+/CaM)-stimulated enzyme activity (pK(B) = 5.95). In each response investigated, PD 102807 interacted with muscarinic receptors in a manner typical of a simple competitive antagonist. These data provide additional evidence that PD 102807 is a M4-receptor preferring antagonist and that this compound can discriminate the striatal muscarinic receptors inhibiting DA D1 receptor activity from the cortical receptors mediating the potentiation of CRH receptor signalling and the inhibition of Ca2+/CaM-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity.

Neural restrictive silencer factor recruits mSin3 and histone deacetylase complex to repress neuron-specific target genes

Accumulative evidence suggests that more than 20 neuron-specific genes are regulated by a transcriptional cis-regulatory element known as the neural restrictive silencer (NRS). A trans-acting repressor that binds the NRS, NRSF [also designated RE1-silencing transcription factor (REST)] has been cloned, but the mechanism by which it represses transcription is unknown. Here we show evidence that NRSF represses transcription of its target genes by recruiting mSin3 and histone deacetylase. Transfection experiments using a series of NRSF deletion constructs revealed the presence of two repression domains, RD-1 and RD-2, within the N- and C-terminal regions, respectively. A yeast two-hybrid screen using the RD-1 region as a bait identified a short form of mSin3B. In vitro pull-down assays and in vivo immunoprecipitation-Western analyses revealed a specific interaction between NRSF-RD1 and mSin3 PAH1-PAH2 domains. Furthermore, NRSF and mSin3 formed a complex with histone deacetylase 1, suggesting that NRSF-mediated repression involves histone deacetylation. When the deacetylation of histones was inhibited by tricostatin A in non-neuronal cells, mRNAs encoding several neuronal-specific genes such as SCG10, NMDAR1, and choline acetyltransferase became detectable. These results indicate that NRSF recruits mSin3 and histone deacetylase 1 to silence neural-specific genes and suggest further that repression of histone deacetylation is crucial for transcriptional activation of neural-specific genes during neuronal terminal differentiation.

Protein kinase A regulates cholinergic gene expression in PC12 cells: REST4 silences the silencing activity of neuron-restrictive silencer factor/REST

The role of protein kinase A in regulating transcription of the cholinergic gene locus, which contains both the vesicular acetylcholine transporter gene and the choline acetyltransferase gene, was investigated in PC12 cells and a protein kinase A-deficient PC12 mutant, A126.1B2, in which transcription of the gene is reduced. The site of action of protein kinase A was localized to a neuron-restrictive silencer element/repressor element 1 (NRSE/RE-1) sequence within the cholinergic gene. Neuron-restrictive silencer factor (NRSF)/RE-1-silencing transcription factor (REST), the transcription factor which binds to NRSE/RE-1, was expressed at similar levels in both PC12 and A126.1B2 cells. Although nuclear extracts containing NRSF/REST from A126.1B2 exhibited binding to NRSE/RE-1, nuclear extracts from PC12 cells did not. The NRSF/REST isoform REST4 was expressed in PC12 cells but not in A126.1B2. REST4 inhibited binding of NRSF/REST to NRSE/RE-1 as determined by gel mobility shift assays. Coimmunoprecipitation was used to demonstrate interaction between NRSF/REST and REST4. Expression of recombinant REST4 in A126.1B2 was sufficient to transcriptionally activate the cholinergic gene locus. Thus, in PC12 cells, protein kinase A promotes the production of REST4, which inhibits repression of the cholinergic gene locus by NRSF/REST.

Silencer-mediated repression and non-mediated activation of BDNF and c-fos gene promoters in primary glial or neuronal cells

Although the neuron-restrictive silencer element (NRSE/Regard) has been shown to function as a negative-acting DNA regulatory element to prevent the expression of neuron-specific genes in non-neuronal cells, little is known about its silencing effect on transcription in primary glial cells nor its effect on transcriptional activation in primary neurons. By DNA transfection in primary cultures of rat cortical neuronal or glial cells, we investigated the effect of NRSE on transcription mediated by the BDNF promoter I or c-fos promoter to which NRSE sequences derived from the SCG10 gene were linked. Transfection of plasmid DNAs to NIH3T3 fibroblasts resulted in a marked repressive effect of NRSE on BDNF promoter I- or c-fos promoter-mediated transcription. In primary neuronal cells, however, NRSE did not repress the basal promoter activities of BDNF and c-fos genes and allowed the transcriptional activation of these genes induced by membrane depolarization although NRSE slightly reduced the magnitude of BDNF promoter I activation. In contrast to neuronal cells, a marked repression of basal promoter activities of both genes was detected in primary glial culture and a two base pair-mutation of NRSE partially recovered the repression. These results indicate that NRSE negatively acts on its linked promoters in primary glial cells and does not interfere an activation of linked promoters in neuronal cells.

Neuron-targeted gene transfer by adenovirus carrying neural-restrictive silencer element

Adenovirus transfers genes to a wide range of cell types, but its application to neurons has been hampered by its reduced efficiency of infection as compared with that for glia. To achieve neuron-targeted gene transfer, we have produced an adenovirus carrying the reporter lacZ gene driven by the SCG10 minimum promoter containing the neural-restrictive silencer element (NRSE), which element selectively represses the transcription of genes in non-neuronal cells. When rat hippocampal slice cultures were infected with NRSE-bearing adenovirus, beta-galactosidase-positive cells were mostly pyramidal and granular neurons, whereas infection with virus carrying a mutated NRSE resulted in beta-galactosidase expression in both neurons and glia. The results suggest that the adenovirus carrying NRSE to be a useful tool for neurontargeted gene transfer.

TATA-driven transcriptional initiation and regulation of the rat serotonin 5-HT1A receptor gene

The transcriptional initiation and regulation of the rat serotonin 5-HT1A receptor gene were characterized. By three types of analyses, a single brain-specific site of transcriptional initiation was localized to -967 bp upstream of the translation initiation codon that is utilized both in hippocampus and in the rat raphe RN46A cell line. This major site of transcriptional initiation was located 58 bp downstream from a consensus TATA element, suggesting TATA-driven transcription of the rat 5-HT1A receptor. To identify the promoter activity of the receptor gene, progressive 5' deletions of the -2,719/-117-bp fragment of the 5-HT1A promoter linked to luciferase gene were transfected into 5-HT1A-negative (pituitary GH4C1, L6 myoblast, and C6 glioma) and 5-HT1A-positive (septal SN-48 and raphe RN46A) cell lines. Enhancer regions were identified within a fragment between nucleotides -426 and -117 that selectively enhanced transcription in 5-HT1A-positive cells. A nonselective enhancer/promoter that mediated expression in all cell lines was located upstream between -1,519 and -426 bp in a DNA segment containing consensus TATA, CCAAT, SP-1, and AP-1 elements as well as a poly-GT26 dinucleotide repeat. Strong repression of transcription in all cell lines was conferred by the region upstream of -1,519 bp that contains a 152-bp DNA segment with >80% identity to RANTES, tumor necrosis factor-beta, and other immune system genes. Our results indicate that TATA-driven expression of the 5-HT1A receptor is regulated by a novel proximal tissue-specific enhancer region, a nonselective promoter, and an upstream repressor region that is distinct from previously identified neuron-specific repressors.

Transcriptional repression by the zinc finger protein REST is mediated by titratable nuclear factors

The zinc finger protein REST (RE-1 silencing transcription factor) is a transcriptional repressor that inhibits neuronal gene transcription in non-neuronal tissues. REST may represent a master regulator of neuronal gene expression. REST contains two repressor domains located at the N- and C-termini of the molecule. To investigate the molecular mechanism of transcriptional repression by REST, in vivo competition experiments were performed. Both repression domains were expressed in the nucleus as fusion proteins with S. japonicum glutathione S-transferase (GST). The ability of these fusion proteins to block transcriptional repression mediated by the repressor domains of REST was tested. The results show that transcriptional repression by the N-terminal repression domain of REST could be overcome by expression of a GST fusion protein encoding the N-terminal, but not C-terminal repression domain, and vice versa, suggesting that both repression domains have to interact with distinct nuclear factors to exhibit biological activity. The GST-REST fusion proteins had no effect upon transcriptional repression mediated by the KRAB (Krüppel-associated box) domain, a strong mammalian repressor domain, or the repressor domain derived from the thyroid hormone receptors alpha. We conclude that REST has to interact with at least two distinct nuclear factors to inhibit transcription. These factors are distinct from the mammalian corepressor proteins KAP-1/KRIP-1 and N-CoR that mediate repression by the KRAB domain or the thyroid hormone receptor alpha. Thus, mammalian transcriptional repressors utilize different mechanisms to inhibit transcription by using different kinds of protein-protein interactions.

Neuron-specific and developmental regulation of the synapsin II gene expression in transgenic mice

Synapsin II, a major phosphoprotein of synaptic vesicles, is believed to function in neurotransmitter release as well as in synapse formation. The expression of the synapsin II gene is neuron-specific, and correlates temporally with synaptogenesis. To understand the mechanisms by which the expression of the synapsin II gene is regulated in vivo, we generated transgenic mice carrying a 5.1-kb 5'-flanking sequence of the murine synapsin II gene fused to the firefly luciferase reporter gene. The synapsin II-luciferase transgene is specifically expressed in neural tissues, such as brain and spinal cord, but not in non-neural tissues. Throughout the brain, the expression of the transgene is widely distributed, and restricted only to neuronal cells. Moreover, the expression of the transgene is developmentally regulated, with a temporal profile similar to that of endogenous synapsin II expression. These results indicate that the 5.1-kb flanking sequence of the murine synapsin II gene contains cis-regulatory elements that are required for directing neuron-specific and synaptogenesis-regulated expression in vivo.

Control elements of muscarinic receptor gene expression

Studies describing the structures of the M1, M2 and M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR) genes and the genetic elements that control their expression are reviewed. In particular, we focus on the role of the neuron-restrictive silencer element/restriction element-1 (NRSE/RE-1) in the regulation of the M4 mAChR gene. The NRSE/RE-1 was first identified as a genetic control element that prevents the expression of the SCG-10 and type II sodium channel (NaII) genes in non-neuronal cells in culture. The NRSE/RE-1 inhibits gene expression by binding the repressor/silencer protein NRSF/REST, which is present in many non-neuronal cell lines and tissues. Our studies show that although the expression of the M4 mAChR gene is inhibited by NRSF/REST, this inhibition is not always complete. Rather, the efficiency of silencing by NRSF/REST is different in different cells. A plausible explanation for this differential silencing is that the NRSF/RE-1 interacts with distinct sets of promoter binding proteins in different types of cells. We hypothesize that modulation of NRSF/REST silencing activity by these proteins contributes to the cell-specific pattern of expression of the M4 mAChR in neuronal and non-neuronal cells. Recent studies that suggest a more complex role for the NRSE/RE-1 in regulating gene expression are also discussed.

Repression and activation of muscarinic receptor genes

The specific cellular response to muscarinic receptor activation is dependent upon appropriate expression of each of the five muscarinic receptor genes by individual cells. Here we summarise recent work describing some of the genomic regulatory elements and transcriptional mechanisms that control expression of the M1 and M4 genes.

Transcriptional regulation of mouse mu-opioid receptor gene

Previously, the existence of dual promoters was reported in mouse mu-opioid receptor (mor) gene, with mor transcription in the mouse brain predominantly initiated by the proximal promoter. In this study, we further analyzed the proximal promoter region, base pairs -450 to -249, to identify cis-DNA regulatory elements and trans-acting protein factors that are important for mor promoter activity. The results revealed that a mor inverted GA (iGA) motif and a canonical Sp1 binding site are required for the promoter activity. Using electrophoretic mobility shift analysis, we identified nuclear proteins that specifically bind to the mor iGA motif and that are immunologically related to Sp1 and Sp3. Mutation of the mor iGA motif, resulting in a loss of Sp binding, led to a 50% decrease in activity. Mutation of the canonical Sp1 binding site yielded a lesser (approximately 25%) loss of activity. Mutation of both motifs together resulted in an approximately 70% decrease in activity. In cotransfection assays using Drosophila SL2 cells, Sp1 trans-activated the promoter in a manner dependent on the presence of mor iGA and canonical Sp1 binding motifs. Sp3 can also trans-activate the promoter, and furthermore, Sp1 and Sp3 can trans-activate the mor promoter additively. Our results suggest that combined or cooperative interaction of Sp transcription factors within the proximal promoter is necessary for activation of mor gene transcription.