Molecular basis of V2 vasopressin receptor/Gs coupling selectivity

Bringing GPCR Structural Biology to Medical Applications: Insights from Both V2 Vasopressin and Mu-Opioid Receptors

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are versatile signaling proteins that regulate key physiological processes in response to a wide variety of extracellular stimuli. The last decade has seen a revolution in the structural biology of clinically important GPCRs. Indeed, the improvement in molecular and biochemical methods to study GPCRs and their transducer complexes, together with advances in cryo-electron microscopy, NMR development, and progress in molecular dynamic simulations, have led to a better understanding of their regulation by ligands of different efficacy and bias. This has also renewed a great interest in GPCR drug discovery, such as finding biased ligands that can either promote or not promote specific regulations. In this review, we focus on two therapeutically relevant GPCR targets, the V2 vasopressin receptor (V2R) and the mu-opioid receptor (µOR), to shed light on the recent structural biology studies and show the impact of this integrative approach on the determination of new potential clinical effective compounds.

Arginine vasopressin: Direct and indirect action on metabolism

From its identification and isolation in 1954, arginine vasopressin (AVP) has attracted attention, not only for its peripheral functions such as vasoconstriction and reabsorption of water from kidney, but also for its central effects. As there is now considerable evidence that AVP plays a crucial role in feeding behavior and energy balance, it has become a promising therapeutic target for treating obesity or other obesity-related metabolic disorders. However, the underlying mechanisms for AVP regulation of these central processes still remain largely unknown. In this review, we will provide a brief overview of the current knowledge concerning how AVP controls energy balance and feeding behavior, focusing on physiological aspects including the relationship between AVP, circadian rhythmicity, and glucocorticoids.

In-frame fusion of SUMO1 enhances βarrestin2's association with activated GPCRs as well as with nuclear pore complexes

Small ubiquitin like modifier (SUMO) conjugation or SUMOylation of βarrestin2 promotes its association with the clathrin adaptor protein AP2 and facilitates rapid β₂ adrenergic receptor (β₂AR) internalization. However, disruption of the consensus SUMOylation site in βarrestin2, did not prevent βarrestin2's association with activated β₂ARs, dopamine D₂ receptors (D₂Rs), angiotensin type 1a receptors (AT_1aRs) and V₂ vasopressin receptors (V₂Rs). To address the role of SUMOylation in the trafficking of βarrestin and GPCR complexes, we generated and characterized a yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) tagged βarrestin2-SUMO1 chimeric protein, which is resistant to de-SUMOylation. In HEK-293 cells, YFP-SUMO1 predominantly localized in the nucleus, whereas YFP-βarrestin2 is cytoplasmic. YFP-βarrestin2-SUMO1 in addition to being cytoplasmic, is localized at the nuclear membrane. Nonetheless, βarrestin2-SUMO1 associated robustly with agonist-activated β₂ARs as evaluated by co-immunoprecipitation, confocal microscopy and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET). βarrestin2-SUMO1 associated strongly with the D₂R, which forms transient complexes with βarrestin2. But, βarrestin2-SUMO1 and βarrestin2 showed equivalent binding with the V₂R, which forms stable complexes with βarrestin2. βarrestin2 expression level directly correlated with the steady state levels of the unmodified form of RanGAP1, which upon SUMOylation associates with nuclear membrane. On the other hand, βarrestin2-SUMO1 not only localized at the nuclear membrane, but also formed a macromolecular complex with RanGAP1. Taken together, our data suggest that SUMOylation of βarrestin2 promotes its protein interactions at both cell and nuclear membranes. Furthermore, βarrestin2-SUMO1 presents as a useful tool to characterize βarrestin2 recruitment to GPCRs, which form transient and unstable complex with βarrestin2.

Biased signaling of G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs): Molecular determinants of GPCR/transducer selectivity and therapeutic potential

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) convey signals across membranes via interaction with G proteins. Originally, an individual GPCR was thought to signal through one G protein family, comprising cognate G proteins that mediate canonical receptor signaling. However, several deviations from canonical signaling pathways for GPCRs have been described. It is now clear that GPCRs can engage with multiple G proteins and the line between cognate and non-cognate signaling is increasingly blurred. Furthermore, GPCRs couple to non-G protein transducers, including β-arrestins or other scaffold proteins, to initiate additional signaling cascades. Receptor/transducer selectivity is dictated by agonist-induced receptor conformations as well as by collateral factors. In particular, ligands stabilize distinct receptor conformations to preferentially activate certain pathways, designated 'biased signaling'. In this regard, receptor sequence alignment and mutagenesis have helped to identify key receptor domains for receptor/transducer specificity. Furthermore, molecular structures of GPCRs bound to different ligands or transducers have provided detailed insights into mechanisms of coupling selectivity. However, receptor dimerization, compartmentalization, and trafficking, receptor-transducer-effector stoichiometry, and ligand residence and exposure times can each affect GPCR coupling. Extrinsic factors including cell type or assay conditions can also influence receptor signaling. Understanding these factors may lead to the development of improved biased ligands with the potential to enhance therapeutic benefit, while minimizing adverse effects. In this review, evidence for ligand-specific GPCR signaling toward different transducers or pathways is elaborated. Furthermore, molecular determinants of biased signaling toward these pathways and relevant examples of the potential clinical benefits and pitfalls of biased ligands are discussed.

Molecular cloning, sequencing and phylogeny of vasotocin receptor genes in the air-breathing catfish Heteropneustes fossilis with sex dimorphic and seasonal variations in tissue expression

Vasotocin (VT) is the ortholog of vasopressin (VP) in non-mammalian vertebrates and is known for multiple functions. Teleost fishes have a complete repertoire of known VP/VT receptor subtypes (vasopressin type, VR): two V1A subtypes (V1Aa and V1Ab or V1a1 and V1a2) and five V2 subtypes (V2A1, V1A2, V2B1, V2B2 and V2C). Full-length cDNAs of v1a1, v1a2 and v2 (v2a1) with ORFs of 1,308, 1,137 and 1,527 bp, respectively, were cloned and characterized in the catfish Heteropneustes fossilis (Siluriformes, Ostariophysi). BLAST analysis revealed that the genes encoded three VT receptors, V1a1, V1a2 and V2 of 436, 379 and 509 amino acid residues, respectively. The predicted proteins showed typical features of the seven-transmembrane domain receptor core structure with hallmark triplets Asp-Arg-Tyr/Asp-Arg-His (DRY/DRH) and the variable intracellular loop III of vertebrate neurohypophysial hormone receptors. Phylogenetic analysis of the deduced protein sequences revealed that they clustered with the V1Aa, V1Ab and V2A1, respectively, of other teleosts. The V2R has a sequence identity of 70-76% with V2A1 than with the V2B type (sequence identity 43-49%). Semiquantitative PCR analysis showed that the receptor gene transcripts were expressed ubiquitously in the tissues examined (brain, pituitary, gonads, liver, muscle, kidney and gills) and displayed sex and seasonal fluctuations in a tissue-specific manner. The results form a basis for functional studies on the VT receptors in the catfish.

Regulation of Neuronal Activity in Hypothalamic Vasopressin Neurons

Vasopressin is a peptide hormone secreted from the posterior pituitary gland in response to various physiological and/or pathological stimuli, including changes in body fluid volume and osmolality and stress exposure. Vasopressin secretion is controlled by the electrical activity of the vasopressinergic magnocellular neurosecretory cells located in the hypothalamic supraoptic nucleus and paraventricular nucleus. Vasopressin release can occur somatodendritically in the hypothalamus or at the level of pituitary axon terminals. The electrical activity of the vasopressin neurons assumes specific patterns of electrical discharge that are under the control of several factors, including the intrinsic properties of the neuronal membrane and synaptic and hormonal inputs. It is increasingly clear that glial cells perform critical signaling functions that contribute to signal transmission in neural circuits. Astrocytes contribute to neuronal signaling by regulating synaptic and extrasynaptic neurotransmission, as well as by mediating bidirectional neuronal-glial transmission. We recently discovered a novel form of neuronal-glial signaling that exploits the full spatial domain of astrocytes to transmit dendritic retrograde signals from vasopressin neurons to distal upstream neuronal targets. This retrograde trans-neuronal-glial transmission allows the vasopressin neurons to regulate their synaptic inputs by controlling upstream presynaptic neuron firing, thus providing a powerful means of controlling hormonal output.

Structural features of the G-protein/GPCR interactions

BACKGROUND

The details of the functional interaction between G proteins and the G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) have long been subjected to extensive investigations with structural and functional assays and a large number of computational studies.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

The nature and sites of interaction in the G-protein/GPCR complexes, and the specificities of these interactions selecting coupling partners among the large number of families of GPCRs and G protein forms, are still poorly defined.

MAJOR CONCLUSIONS

Many of the contact sites between the two proteins in specific complexes have been identified, but the three dimensional molecular architecture of a receptor-Gα interface is only known for one pair. Consequently, many fundamental questions regarding this macromolecular assembly and its mechanism remain unanswered.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

In the context of current structural data we review the structural details of the interfaces and recognition sites in complexes of sub-family A GPCRs with cognate G-proteins, with special emphasis on the consequences of activation on GPCR structure, the prevalence of preassembled GPCR/G-protein complexes, the key structural determinants for selective coupling and the possible involvement of GPCR oligomerization in this process.

Functional fusions of T4 lysozyme in the third intracellular loop of a G protein-coupled receptor identified by a random screening approach in yeast

The insertion of a stable soluble protein into loops of transmembrane proteins has proved to be a successful approach for enhancing their stabilities and crystallization, and may also be useful in contexts where the inserted proteins can modulate or report on the activities of membrane proteins. While the use of T4 lysozyme to replace portions of the third intracellular loops of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has allowed determination of the structures of members of this important class of receptors, the creation of such fusion proteins generally leads to loss of signaling function of the resulting fusion protein, since the third intracellular loops of GPCRs play critical roles in their interactions with G proteins. We describe here a random screening approach allowing insertion of T4 lysozyme into diverse positions in the third loop of the yeast α-pheromone receptor, a GPCR encoded by the yeast STE2 gene. Insertions were accompanied by varying extents of deletion or duplication of the loop. A set of phenotypic screens allow detection of potentially rare variant receptors that are expressed, bind to agonist and are capable of signal transduction via activation of the cognate G protein. A large fraction of screened full-length receptor variants containing at least partial duplications of the loop on either side of the inserted T4 lysozyme retain the ability to activate the downstream signaling pathway in response to binding of ligand. However, we were unable to identify any receptors with truncated C-termini that retain significant signaling function in the presence of inserted T4 lysozyme. Our results establish the feasibility of creating functional receptors containing insertions of T4 lysozyme in their third intracellular loops.

Structural insights into biased G protein-coupled receptor signaling revealed by fluorescence spectroscopy

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are seven-transmembrane proteins that mediate most cellular responses to hormones and neurotransmitters, representing the largest group of therapeutic targets. Recent studies show that some GPCRs signal through both G protein and arrestin pathways in a ligand-specific manner. Ligands that direct signaling through a specific pathway are known as biased ligands. The arginine-vasopressin type 2 receptor (V2R), a prototypical peptide-activated GPCR, is an ideal model system to investigate the structural basis of biased signaling. Although the native hormone arginine-vasopressin leads to activation of both the stimulatory G protein (Gs) for the adenylyl cyclase and arrestin pathways, synthetic ligands exhibit highly biased signaling through either Gs alone or arrestin alone. We used purified V2R stabilized in neutral amphipols and developed fluorescence-based assays to investigate the structural basis of biased signaling for the V2R. Our studies demonstrate that the Gs-biased agonist stabilizes a conformation that is distinct from that stabilized by the arrestin-biased agonists. This study provides unique insights into the structural mechanisms of GPCR activation by biased ligands that may be relevant to the design of pathway-biased drugs.

Molecular evolution of the neuropeptide S receptor

The neuropeptide S receptor (NPSR) is a recently deorphanized member of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily and is activated by the neuropeptide S (NPS). NPSR and NPS are widely expressed in central nervous system and are known to have crucial roles in asthma pathogenesis, locomotor activity, wakefulness, anxiety and food intake. The NPS-NPSR system was previously thought to have first evolved in the tetrapods. Here we examine the origin and the molecular evolution of the NPSR using in-silico comparative analyses and document the molecular basis of divergence of the NPSR from its closest vertebrate paralogs. In this study, NPSR-like sequences have been identified in a hemichordate and a cephalochordate, suggesting an earlier emergence of a NPSR-like sequence in the metazoan lineage. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that the NPSR is most closely related to the invertebrate cardioacceleratory peptide receptor (CCAPR) and the group of vasopressin-like receptors. Gene structure features were congruent with the phylogenetic clustering and supported the orthology of NPSR to the invertebrate NPSR-like and CCAPR. A site-specific analysis between the vertebrate NPSR and the well studied paralogous vasopressin-like receptor subtypes revealed several putative amino acid sites that may account for the observed functional divergence between them. The data can facilitate experimental studies aiming at deciphering the common features as well as those related to ligand binding and signal transduction processes specific to the NPSR.

Expression, purification and NMR characterization of the cyclic recombinant form of the third intracellular loop of the vasopressin type 2 receptor

The vasopressin type 2 (V2R) receptor belongs to the class of G-protein coupled receptors. It is mainly expressed in the membrane of kidney tubules, where it is activated by the extracellular arginine vasopressin. In men, inactivating and activating mutations cause nephrogenic diabetes insipidus and the nephrogenic syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis respectively. Like most GPCRs, V2R's third intracellular loop (V2R-i3) is involved in the binding and activation of its major effector, the GαS protein. We overexpressed the V2R₂₂₄₋₂₇₄ fragment corresponding to V2R-i3 as a fusion protein with thioredoxin A at the N-terminus and a hexahistidine tag between the two proteins. Recombinant V2R-i3 was designed to harbor N- and C-terminal cysteines, in order to introduce a disulfide bond between N- and C-terminal extremities and hence reproduce the hairpin fold presumably present in the full-length receptor. The fusion protein was produced as inclusion bodies in Escherichia coli and purified by nickel affinity chromatography under denaturing conditions. After a refolding step, thioredoxin and hexahistidine tags were specifically cleaved with the tobacco etch virus protease. The hydrolysis yield, initially very low, increased up to 80% thanks to optimization of buffers and refolding methods. The cleaved fragment, V2₂₂₄₋₂₇₄, devoid of any tag, was then eluted with low imidazole concentrations in a second nickel affinity chromatography in denaturing conditions. The final yield was sufficient to prepare a ¹⁵N-¹³C labeled NMR sample suitable for triple resonance experiments. We assigned all NMR resonances and confirmed the correct peptide sequence. As expected, the peptide forms a hairpin stabilized by a disulfide bond between its N- and C-terminal parts, thus mimicking its native structure in the full-length receptor. This study may provide a strategy for producing and studying the structure/function relationship of GPCR fragments.

Excitatory action of vasopressin in the brain of the rat: role of cAMP signaling

Brain vasopressin plays a role in behavioral and cognitive functions and in pathological conditions. Relevant examples are pair bonding, social recognition, fear responses, stress disorders, anxiety and depression. At the neuronal level, vasopressin exerts its effects by binding to V1a receptors. In the brainstem, vasopressin can excite facial motoneurons by generating a sustained inward current which is sodium-dependent, tetrodotoxin-insensitive and voltage-gated. This effect is independent of intracellular calcium mobilization and is unaffected by phospholipase Cβ (PLCβ) or protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitors. There are two major unsolved problems. (i) What is the intracellular signaling pathway activated by vasopressin? (ii) What is the exact nature of the vasopressin-sensitive cation channels? We performed recordings in brainstem slices. Facial motoneurons were voltage-clamped in the whole-cell configuration. We show that a major fraction, if not the totality, of the peptide effect was mediated by cAMP signaling and that the vasopressin-sensitive cation channels were directly gated by cAMP. These channels appear to exclude lithium, are suppressed by 2-aminoethoxydiphenylborane (2-APB) and flufenamic acid (FFA) but not by ruthenium red or amiloride. They are distinct from transient receptor channels and from cyclic nucleotide-regulated channels involved in visual and olfactory transduction. They present striking similarities with cation channels present in a variety of molluscan neurons. To our knowledge, the presence in mammalian neurons of channels having these properties has not been previously reported. Our data should contribute to a better knowledge of the neural mechanism of the central actions of vasopressin, and may be potentially significant in view of clinical applications.

Molecular cloning and characterization of V2-type receptor in two ray-finned fish, gray bichir, Polypterus senegalus and medaka, Oryzias latipes

In tetrapods, vasopressin (VP) and vasotocin (VT) are involved in various aspects of physiology and behavior including osmoregulation, cardiovascular function, reproduction, stress response and social behavior. Pharmacological and molecular studies have identified three types of VP/VT receptors, V1a-type (V1aR), V1b-type (V1bR) and V2-type (V2R). On the other hand, only V1aR has so far been identified in teleosts. In the present study, we successfully cloned V2Rs from two ray-finned fish, gray bichir and medaka. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the cloned receptors belong to the V2R group of lobe-finned fish and tetrapods. The amino acid sequences of bichir V2R and medaka V2R were high identity (60-65.5% and 53.2-80.9%, respectively) with other known V2R members, respectively. Reverse transcriptase PCR revealed that ray-finned fish V2R transcripts have been detected in various tissues including brain, gill, heart, liver, kidney and reproductive organs, suggesting that ray-finned fish V2R might mediate multiple functions of VT. In functional analysis, the cells transfected with the cloned receptors responded with the accumulation of intracellular cAMP in a concentration-dependent manner following VT stimulation, but not respond with [Ca(2+)]i. Furthermore, pretreatment with mammalian V2R antagonist (OPC-31260) to the cells transfected with medaka V2R significantly inhibited an increase of the VT-induced intracellular cAMP. These results suggest that ray-finned fish possess a functional V2R linked to adenylate cyclase and the cAMP signaling pathway as well as V2Rs of lobe-finned fish and tetrapods. Thus, the present study suggests that functional V2R evolved prior to the divergence of the ray- and lobe-finned fish lineages.

Identification of multiple vasotocin receptor cDNAs in teleost fish: sequences, phylogenetic analysis, sites of expression, and regulation in the hypothalamus and gill in response to hyperosmotic challenge

Vasopressin and its homolog vasotocin regulate hydromineral balance, stress responses, and social behaviors in vertebrates. In mammals, the functions of vasopressin are mediated via three classes of membrane-bound receptors: V1a-type, V1b-type and V2-type. To date, however, only a single class of vasotocin receptor has been identified in teleost fish. Here, cDNAs encoding three putative vasotocin receptors - two distinct V1a-type receptor paralogs (V1a1 and V1a2) and a previously undescribed V2-type receptor (V2) - and a single isotocin receptor were isolated and sequenced from the Amargosa pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis amargosae). RT-PCR revealed that mRNAs for these receptors differed in expression patterns with V1a1 mRNAs abundant in the brain, pituitary and testis, V1a2 transcripts at greatest levels in brain, heart and muscle, V2 transcripts most common in the gills, heart and kidney, and isotocin receptor mRNAs abundant in the midbrain, pituitary and gonads. In response to an acute hyperosmotic challenge, pro-vasotocin and V2 mRNA levels in the hypothalamus decreased, while transcripts of V1a1 in the hypothalamus and V1a2 in the gills increased. Partial transcripts for structurally related V2-type, as well as multiple V1a-type, receptors were also identified in other teleosts, suggesting that multiple vasotocin receptors may be present in many Actinopterygii fishes.

Targeting V1A-vasopressin receptors with [Arg6, D-Trp7,9, NmePhe8]-substance P (6-11) identifies a strategy to develop novel anti-cancer therapies

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The anti-cancer agent [Arg(6), D-Trp(7,9), N(me)Phe(8)]-substance P (6-11) (SP-G) modulates gastrin releasing peptide (GRP) and arginine vasopressin signalling in small cell lung cancer cells leading to growth arrest and apoptosis. We have shown that SP-G acts as a biased agonist at GRP receptors. This work examines the hypothesis that SP-G acts as a biased agonist at the V(1A) vasopressin receptor.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The human V(1A) receptor was expressed in CHO-K1 cells. Extracellular regulated kinase (ERK) activation and intracellular Ca(2+) were measured using activation state-specific antibodies and Fura-2-AM respectively. The effect of SP-G on tumourigenicity was assessed by colony assay.

KEY RESULTS

In V(1A) receptor expressing cells, SP-G caused a sustained activation of ERK via a stimulation of V(1A) receptor coupling to G(i). Inhibition of G(i) with Pertussis toxin attenuated the inhibition by SP-G of the growth of CHO-K1 cells stably expressing the V(1A) receptor. Chimeric V(1A) receptors containing the second or third intracellular loop of the V(2) receptor were capable of binding vasopressin and SP-G but had altered ability to activate phospholipase C (PLC) and ERK. The second intracellular loop of the V(1A) receptor was essential for vasopressin-stimulated PLC and ERK activation but not for SP-G-induced ERK activation.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

This work provides mechanistic insight, for biased agonists at V(1A) receptors and highlights a potential role for such agents as anti-cancer agents.

Structure of the third intracellular loop of the vasopressin V2 receptor and conformational changes upon binding to gC1qR

The V2 vasopressin receptor is a G-protein-coupled receptor that regulates the renal antidiuretic response. Its third intracellular loop is involved in the coupling not only with the GalphaS protein but also with gC1qR, a potential chaperone of G-protein-coupled receptors. In this report, we describe the NMR solution structure of the V2 i3 loop under a cyclized form (i3_cyc) and characterize its interaction with gC1qR. i3_cyc formed a left-twisted alpha-helical hairpin structure. The building of a model of the entire V2 receptor including the i3_cyc NMR structure clarified the side-chain orientation of charged residues, in agreement with literature mutagenesis reports. In the model, the i3 loop formed a rigid helical column, protruding deep inside the cytoplasm, as does the i3 loop in the recently elucidated structure of squid rhodopsin. However, its higher packing angle resulted in a different structural motif at the intracellular interface, which may be important for the specific recognition of GalphaS. Moreover, we could estimate the apparent K(d) of the i3_cyc/gC1qR complex by anisotropy fluorescence. Using a shorter and more soluble version of i3_cyc, which encompassed the putative site of gC1qR binding, we showed by NMR saturation transfer difference spectroscopy that the binding surface corresponded to the central arginine cluster. Binding to gC1qR induced the folding of the otherwise disordered short peptide into a spiral-like path formed by a succession of I and IV turns. Our simulations suggested that this folding would rigidify the arginine cluster in the entire i3 loop and would alter the conformation of the cytosolic extensions of TM V and TM VI helices. In agreement with this conformational rearrangement, we observed that binding of gC1qR to the full-length receptor modifies the intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence binding curves of V2 to an antagonist.

Phosphorylation analysis of G protein-coupled receptor by mass spectrometry: identification of a phosphorylation site in V2 vasopressin receptor

Phosphorylation plays vital roles in the regulation and function of the V2 vasopressin receptor (V2R), a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that is responsible for maintaining water homeostasis in the kidney. Through a combination of immunoaffinity purification, immobilized metal affinity chromatography, and nanoflow liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, we identified a novel phosphorylation site (Ser(255)) in the third intracellular loop of human V2R. We showed that the third intracellular loop could be phosphorylated in vitro by protein kinase A, but not by Akt kinase, although sequence motif analysis predicated otherwise. The analytical procedures and methodologies described in this study should be generally applicable for identifying the endogenous phosphorylation sites in other GPCRs, overcoming the limitations of conventional approaches such as sequence motif analysis and site-directed mutagenesis.

A Comprehensive Structure-Function Map of the Intracellular Surface of the Human C5a Receptor

Within any given cell many G protein-coupled receptors are expressed in the presence of multiple G proteins, yet most receptors couple to a specific subset of G proteins to elicit their programmed response. Numerous studies demonstrate that the carboxyl-terminal five amino acids of the Galpha subunits are a major determinant of specificity, however the receptor determinants of specificity are less clear. We have used a collection of 133 functional mutants of the C5a receptor obtained in a mutagenesis screen targeting the intracellular loops and the carboxyl terminus (Matsumoto, M. L., Narzinski, K., Kiser, P. D., Nikiforovich, G. V., and Baranski, T. J. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282, 3105-3121) to investigate how specificity is encoded. Each mutant, originally selected for its ability to signal through a nearly full-length Galpha(i) in yeast, was tested to see whether it could activate three versions of chimeric Galpha subunits consisting of Gpa1 fused to the carboxyl-terminal five amino acids of Galpha(i), Galpha(q), or Galpha(s) in yeast. Surprisingly the carboxyl-terminal tail of the C5a receptor is the most important specificity determinant in that nearly all mutants in this region showed a gain in coupling to Galpha(q) and/or Galpha(s). More than half of the receptors mutated in the second intracellular loop also demonstrated broadened G protein coupling. Given a lack of selective advantage for this broadened signaling in the initial screen, we propose a model in which the carboxyl-terminal tail acts together with the intracellular loops to generate a specificity filter for receptor-G protein interactions that functions primarily to restrict access of incorrect G proteins to the receptor.

A comprehensive structure-function map of the intracellular surface of the human C5a receptor. I. Identification of critical residues

G protein-coupled receptors are one of the largest protein families in nature; however, the mechanisms by which they activate G proteins are still poorly understood. To identify residues on the intracellular face of the human C5a receptor that are involved in G protein activation, we performed a genetic analysis of each of the three intracellular loops and the carboxyl-terminal tail of the receptor. Amino acid substitutions were randomly incorporated into each loop, and functional receptors were identified in yeast. The third intracellular loop contains the largest number of preserved residues (positions resistant to amino acid substitutions), followed by the second loop, the first loop, and lastly the carboxyl terminus. Surprisingly, complete removal of the carboxyl-terminal tail did not impair C5a receptor signaling. When mapped onto a three-dimensional structural model of the inactive state of the C5a receptor, the preserved residues reside on one half of the intracellular surface of the receptor, creating a potential activation face. Together these data provide one of the most comprehensive functional maps of the intracellular surface of any G protein-coupled receptor to date.

Molecular basis and clinical features of nephrogenic diabetes insipidus

Maintenance of water and electrolyte homeostasis is central to mammalian survival and, therefore, under stringent hormonal control. Water homeostasis is achieved by balancing fluid intake with water excretion, governed by the antidiuretic action of arginine vasopressin. Arginine vasopressin stimulation of renal V₂ vasopressin receptors in the basolateral membrane of principal cells induces aquaporin-2-mediated water reabsorption in the kidney. The importance of this system is apparent when mutations inactivate V₂ vasopressin receptors and aquaporin-2 and cause the clinical phenotype of nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. To date, over 190 mutations in the V₂ vasopressin receptors gene (AVPR2) and approximately 38 mutations in the aquaporin-2 gene have been identified in patients with inherited nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. Extensive in vitro expression and mutagenesis studies of V₂ vasopressin receptors and aquaporin-2 have provided detailed insights into the molecular mechanisms of G-protein-coupled receptor and water channel dysfunction per se. Targeted deletions of AVPR2 and AQP2 in mice have extended the knowledge of nephrogenic diabetes insipidus pathophysiology and have stimulated testing of old and new ideas to therapeutically restore normal kidney function in animal models and patients with this disease. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge relevant to understand the molecular basis of inherited nephrogenic diabetes insipidus forms and the rationales for the current pharmacological treatment of patients with this illness.

Design and synthesis of cyclic and linear peptide-agarose tools for baiting interacting protein partners of GPCRs

A ligation strategy for the synthesis of cyclic and linear peptides covalently linked to agarose beads designed as baits to identify new interacting partners of intracellular loops of the V2 vasopressin receptor, a member of the G-protein-coupled receptor family, is reported. The peptide-resin conjugates were subsequently shown to interact specifically with a fraction of proteins present in cellular lysates.

A role for K268 in V2R folding

The V2 vasopressin receptor, a member of the rhodopsin subfamily of GPCRs, mediates arginine vasopressin control of water reabsorption in the kidney by activating Gs. Requirement of the third intracellular loop of the V2R for G(s) activation was identified by introducing V2R segments into the Gq coupled V1aR [Liu, J. and Wess, J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 8772-8778]; the same approach recognized glutamate 231 and glutamine 225 at the amino terminus of loop 3i as being needed for signal transduction. Site-directed mutagenesis of the V2R confirmed their observations. Recently, we found that a positively charged amino acid at codon 268 is essential for V2R expression, although a double-mutant bearing lysine at position 231 and glutamic acid at position 268 was expressed at higher levels than the wild type V2R and displayed unchanged ligand-binding affinity. Ligand-induced internalization and phosphorylation of the double-mutant receptor was indistinguishable from that observed with the wild type protein but signaling activity was greatly diminished. The data suggested these two amino acids might interact with each other and might play a role in promoting GDP/GTP exchange.

A cyclic peptide mimicking the third intracellular loop of the V2 vasopressin receptor inhibits signaling through its interaction with receptor dimer and G protein

In this study, we investigated the mechanism by which a peptide mimicking the third cytoplasmic loop of the vasopressin V2 receptor inhibits signaling. This loop was synthesized as a cyclic peptide (i3 cyc) that adopted defined secondary structure in solution. We found that i3 cyc inhibited the adenylyl cyclase activity induced by vasopressin or a nonhydrolyzable analog of GTP, guanosine 5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate. This peptide also affected the specific binding of [3H]AVP by converting vasopressin binding sites from a high to a low affinity state without any effect on the global maximal binding capacity. The inhibitory actions of i3 cyc could also be observed in the presence of maximally uncoupling concentration of guanosine 5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate, indicating a direct effect on the receptor itself and not exclusively on the interaction between the Gs protein and the V2 receptor (V2-R). Bioluminescence resonance energy-transfer experiments confirmed this assumption, because i3 cyc induced a significant inhibition of the bioluminescence resonance energy-transfer signal between the Renilla reniformis luciferase and the enhanced yellow fluorescent protein fused V2-R. This suggests that the proper arrangement of the dimer could be an important prerequisite for triggering Gs protein activation. In addition to its effect on the receptor itself, the peptide exerted some of its actions at the G protein level, because it could also inhibit guanosine 5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate-stimulated AC activity. Taken together, the data demonstrate that a peptide mimicking V2-R third intracellular loop affects both the dimeric structural organization of the receptor and has direct inhibitory action on Gs.

Calmodulin interacts with the V2 vasopressin receptor: elimination of binding to the C terminus also eliminates arginine vasopressin-stimulated elevation of intracellular calcium

To identify molecules that might contribute to V2 vasopressin receptor (V2R) trafficking or signaling, we searched for novel interacting proteins with this receptor. Preliminary data, using the V2R C terminus as bait in a yeast two-hybrid screen, revealed calmodulin as a binding partner. Because calmodulin interacts with other G protein-coupled receptors, we explored this interaction and its possible functional relevance in greater detail. A Ca2+ -dependent interaction occurs between calmodulin-linked agarose and the holo-V2R as well as the V2R C terminus. Truncation and site-directed mutagenesis of the V2R C terminus revealed an involvement of an RGR sequence in this interaction. NMR studies showed that a peptide fragment of the V2R C terminus containing the RGR sequence binds to calmodulin in a Ca2+ -dependent manner with a Kd < or =1.5 microm; concentration-dependent binding of the V2R C terminus to calmodulin-agarose was used to estimate a Kd value of approximately 200 nm for this entire C-terminal sequence as expressed in mammalian cells. Madin-Darby canine kidney II cells stably expressing either wild type or a mutant V2R, in which the RGR C-terminal sequence was mutated to alanines (AAA V2R), revealed that the steady-state localization and agonist-induced internalization of the AAA V2R resembled that of the wild type V2R in polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney II cells. V2R binding of agonist similarly was unchanged in the AAA V2R, as was the concentration response for arginine vasopressin (AVP)-stimulated cAMP accumulation. Most interestingly, AVP-induced increases in intracellular Ca2+ observed for the wild type V2R were virtually eliminated for the AAA V2R. Taken together, the data suggest that a C-terminal region of the V2R important for calmodulin interaction is also important in modulation of V2R elevation of intracellular Ca2+, a prerequisite for AVP-induced fusion of aquaporin-containing vesicles with the apical surface of renal epithelial cells.

Neuroendocrine control of body fluid metabolism

Mammals control the volume and osmolality of their body fluids from stimuli that arise from both the intracellular and extracellular fluid compartments. These stimuli are sensed by two kinds of receptors: osmoreceptor-Na+ receptors and volume or pressure receptors. This information is conveyed to specific areas of the central nervous system responsible for an integrated response, which depends on the integrity of the anteroventral region of the third ventricle, e.g., organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis, median preoptic nucleus, and subfornical organ. The hypothalamo-neurohypophysial system plays a fundamental role in the maintenance of body fluid homeostasis by secreting vasopressin and oxytocin in response to osmotic and nonosmotic stimuli. Since the discovery of the atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), a large number of publications have demonstrated that this peptide provides a potent defense mechanism against volume overload in mammals, including humans. ANP is mostly localized in the heart, but ANP and its receptor are also found in hypothalamic and brain stem areas involved in body fluid volume and blood pressure regulation. Blood volume expansion acts not only directly on the heart, by stretch of atrial myocytes to increase the release of ANP, but also on the brain ANPergic neurons through afferent inputs from baroreceptors. Angiotensin II also plays an important role in the regulation of body fluids, being a potent inducer of thirst and, in general, antagonizes the actions of ANP. This review emphasizes the role played by brain ANP and its interaction with neurohypophysial hormones in the control of body fluid homeostasis.

Active peptidic mimics of the second intracellular loop of the V(1A) vasopressin receptor are structurally related to the second intracellular rhodopsin loop: a combined 1H NMR and biochemical study

Vasopressin (VP) receptors belong to the widespread G protein-coupled receptor family. The crucial role of VP receptor intracellular loops in the coupling with the heterotrimeric G proteins was previously demonstrated by construction of a vasopressin receptor chimera. Yet, no fine structural data are available concerning the receptor molecular determinants involved in their interactions with G proteins. In this study, we synthesized both a linear and a cyclic form of the second intracellular loop (i2) of the human V(1a) vasopressin receptor isoform that is important for the interaction between the alphaq/alpha11 G protein and the receptor. These two peptides are biologically active. They specifically inhibit vasopressin binding to the V(1a) receptor, suggesting that the corresponding endogenous peptides contribute to the structure of the vasopressin binding site via intra- or intermolecular interactions with the core of the V(1a) receptor. The i2 peptide structures were determined by (1)H NMR. Both exhibit a helix and helical elements in their N- and C-terminal parts, respectively, separated by a turn imposed by a proline residue. More interestingly, the central Pro-Leu motif conserved in many GPCRs and thought to be important for coupling to G proteins can adopt different conformations. The "U" shape structure of the i2 loop is compatible with its anchoring to transmembrane domains III and IV and is very similar to the shape of bovine rhodopsin i2. Altogether, these data contribute to a better understanding of the structure of a not yet crystallized GPCR using the mimetic peptide approach.

Science review: Vasopressin and the cardiovascular system part 1--receptor physiology

Vasopressin is emerging as a rational therapy for vasodilatory shock states. Unlike other vasoconstrictor agents, vasopressin also has vasodilatory properties. The goal of the present review is to explore the vascular actions of vasopressin. In part 1 of the review we discuss structure, signaling pathways, and tissue distributions of the classic vasopressin receptors, namely V₁ vascular, V₂ renal, V₃ pituitary and oxytocin receptors, and the P₂ class of purinoreceptors. Knowledge of the function and distribution of vasopressin receptors is key to understanding the seemingly contradictory actions of vasopressin on the vascular system. In part 2 of the review we discuss the effects of vasopressin on vascular smooth muscle and the heart, and we summarize clinical studies of vasopressin in shock states.

Role of intracellular loops of cannabinoid CB(1) receptor in functional interaction with G(alpha16)

The cannabinoid CB(1) but not the CB(2) receptor was demonstrated to couple via G(alpha16) to activate phospholipase C after co-expression in COS7 cells. Chimeric CB(1)/CB(2) receptors were used as a model to study receptor-G(alpha16) interaction. Sequences of the second and third intracellular loops and the carboxy-terminus were substituted from the CB(1) into the CB(2) receptor. Only the triple mutant with all three regions replaced activated phospholipase C to a similar extent as the CB(1) receptor, suggesting that all three intracellular regions are required for interacting with G(alpha16). Several sub-domains within the third intracellular loop were identified for receptor-G(alpha16) interaction.

Role of the human V1 vasopressin receptor COOH terminus in internalization and mitogenic signal transduction

We studied the role played by the intracellular COOH-terminal region of the human arginine vasopressin (AVP) V1-vascular receptor (V1R) in ligand binding, trafficking, and mitogenic signal transduction in Chinese hamster ovary cells stably transfected with the human AVP receptor cDNA clones that we had isolated previously. Truncations, mutations, or chimeric alterations of the V1R COOH terminus did not alter ligand binding, but agonist-induced V1R internalization and recycling were reduced in the absence of the proximal region of the V(1)R COOH terminus. Coupling to phospholipase C was altered as a function of the COOH-terminal length. Deletion of the proximal portion of the V1R COOH terminus or its replacement by the V2-renal receptor COOH terminus prevented AVP stimulation of DNA synthesis and progression through the cell cycle. Mutation of a kinase consensus motif in the proximal region of the V1R COOH terminus also abolished the mitogenic response. Thus the V1R cytoplasmic COOH terminus is not involved in ligand specificity but is instrumental in receptor trafficking and facilitates the interaction between the intracellular loops of the receptor, G protein, and phospholipase C. It is absolutely required for transmission of the mitogenic action of AVP, probably via a specific kinase phosphorylation site.

The basic and clinical pharmacology of nonpeptide vasopressin receptor antagonists

The neurohypophysial hormone arginine vasopressin (AVP) is a cyclic nonpeptide whose actions are mediated by the stimulation of specific G protein--coupled membrane receptors pharmacologically classified into V1-vascular (V1R), V2-renal (V2R) and V3-pituitary (V3R) AVP receptor subtypes. The random screening of chemical compounds and optimization of lead compounds recently resulted in the development of orally active nonpeptide AVP receptor antagonists. Potential therapeutic uses of AVP receptor antagonists include (a) the blockade of V1-vascular AVP receptors in arterial hypertension, congestive heart failure, and peripheral vascular disease; (b) the blockade of V2-renal AVP receptors in the syndrome of inappropriate vasopressin secretion, congestive heart failure, liver cirrhosis, nephrotic syndrome and any state of excessive retention of free water and subsequent dilutional hyponatremia; (c) the blockade of V3-pituitary AVP receptors in adrenocorticotropin-secreting tumors. The pharmacological and clinical profile of orally active nonpeptide vasopressin receptor antagonists is reviewed here.

Single amino acid substitutions and deletions that alter the G protein coupling properties of the V2 vasopressin receptor identified in yeast by receptor random mutagenesis

To facilitate structure-function relationship studies of the V2 vasopressin receptor, a prototypical G(s)-coupled receptor, we generated V2 receptor-expressing yeast strains (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) that required arginine vasopressin-dependent receptor/G protein coupling for cell growth. V2 receptors heterologously expressed in yeast were unable to productively interact with the endogenous yeast G protein alpha subunit, Gpa1p, or a mutant Gpa1p subunit containing the C-terminal G alpha(q) sequence (Gq5). In contrast, the V2 receptor efficiently coupled to a Gpa1p/G alpha(s) hybrid subunit containing the C-terminal G alpha(s) sequence (Gs5), indicating that the V2 receptor retained proper G protein coupling selectivity in yeast. To gain insight into the molecular basis underlying the selectivity of V2 receptor/G protein interactions, we used receptor saturation random mutagenesis to generate a yeast library expressing mutant V2 receptors containing mutations within the second intracellular loop. A subsequent yeast genetic screen of about 30,000 mutant receptors yielded four mutant receptors that, in contrast to the wild-type receptor, showed substantial coupling to Gq5. Functional analysis of these mutant receptors, followed by more detailed site-directed mutagenesis studies, indicated that single amino acid substitutions at position Met(145) in the central portion of the second intracellular loop of the V2 receptor had pronounced effects on receptor/G protein coupling selectivity. We also observed that deletion of single amino acids N-terminal of Met(145) led to misfolded receptor proteins, whereas single amino acid deletions C-terminal of Met(145) had no effect on V2 receptor function. These findings highlight the usefulness of combining receptor random mutagenesis and yeast expression technology to study mechanisms governing receptor/G protein coupling selectivity and receptor folding.

Vasopressin receptors

The biological effects of arginine vasopressin (AVP) are mediated by three receptor subtypes: the V1a and V1b receptors that activate phospholipases via Gq/11, and the V2 receptor that activates adenylyl cyclase by interacting with Gs. Isolation of the cDNAs encoding the V1a and V1b receptor subtypes explained the tissue variability of V1 antagonist binding, whereas identification of the cDNA and gene encoding the V2 receptor provided the information to identify the mutations responsible for X-linked nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. Mutations that abrogate the production and/or release of AVP from the pituitary have diabetes insipidus as their most dramatic manifestation, indicating that the maintenance of water homeostasis is the most important physiological role of this neuropeptide. Evidence for a significant role of AVP in blood pressure control, although actively sought, has been scant.

Coupling of dopamine receptor subtypes to multiple and diverse G proteins

The family of five dopamine receptors subtypes activate cellular effector systems through G proteins. Historically, dopamine receptors were thought to only stimulate or inhibit adenylyl cyclase, by coupling to either G(s)alpha or G(i)alpha, respectively. Recent studies in transfected cells, reviewed here, have shown that multiple and highly diverse signaling pathways are activated by specific dopamine receptor subtypes. This multiplicity of signaling responses occurs through selective coupling to distinct G proteins and each of the receptors can interact with more than one G protein. Although some of the multiple coupling of dopamine receptors to different G proteins occurs from within the same family of G proteins, these receptors can also couple to G proteins belonging to different families. Such multiple interactions between receptors and G proteins elicits functionally distinct physiological effects which acts to enhance and subsequently suppress the original receptor response, and to activate apparently distinct signaling pathways. In the brain, where coexpression of functionally distinct receptors in heterogeneous cells further adds to the complexity of dopamine signaling, minor alterations in receptor/G protein coupling states during either development or in adults, may underlie the imbalanced signaling seen in dopaminergic-linked diseases such as schizophrenia, Parkinson's disease and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Molecular basis of ligand binding and receptor activation in the oxytocin and vasopressin receptor family

Although it is now widely accepted that G-protein-coupled receptors exist in at least two allosteric states, inactive and active, and that the spontaneous equilibrium between the two is regulated by various events including the binding of specific agonists and antagonists, the molecular counterparts of these functionally different states are still poorly understood. In this paper, we review our current knowledge concerning the structure-function relationships of the oxytocin and vasopressin receptors, focusing in particular on the process of receptor activation. Using a combined approach of site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modelling, we investigated the molecular events leading to agonist-dependent and -independent receptor activation in the human oxytocin receptor. Our analysis allows us to propose that the active conformations of this receptor are characterised by similar rearrangements of its cytosolic regions that ultimately lead to the opening of a putative docking site for the G-protein. Furthermore, the dynamics of these motions are similar to that observed in the alpha1B-adrenergic receptor, thus suggesting that, although activated by different ligands, the process of receptor isomerization in these two receptors is regulated by the same cluster of highly conserved residues and that common molecular events are responsible for receptor activation in different G-protein-coupled receptors.

Structural basis of G protein-coupled receptor function

The vast majority of extracellular signaling molecules, like hormones and neurotransmitters, interact with a class of membranous receptors characterized by a uniform molecular architecture of seven transmembrane alpha-helices linked by extra- and intracelluar peptide loops. In a reversible manner, binding of diverse agonists to heptahelical receptors leads to activation of a limited repertoire of heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) forwarding the signal to intracellular effectors such as enzymes and ion channels. Proper functioning of a G protein-coupled receptor is based on a complex interplay of structural determinants which are ultimately responsible for receptor folding, trafficking and transmembrane signaling. Applying novel biochemical and molecular biological methods interesting insights into receptor structure/function relationships became available. These studies have a significant impact on our understanding of the molecular basis of human diseases and may eventually lead to novel therapeutic strategies.