Regulators of G protein signaling proteins as determinants of the rate of desensitization of presynaptic calcium channels

Inhibitory Signaling to Ion Channels in Hippocampal Neurons Is Differentially Regulated by Alternative Macromolecular Complexes of RGS7

The neuromodulatory effects of GABA on pyramidal neurons are mediated by GABA_B receptors (GABA_BRs) that signal via a conserved G-protein-coupled pathway. Two prominent effectors regulated by GABA_BRs include G-protein inwardly rectifying K⁺ (GIRK) and P/Q/N type voltage-gated Ca²⁺ (Ca_V2) ion channels that control excitability and synaptic output of these neurons, respectively. Regulator of G-protein signaling 7 (RGS7) has been shown to control GABA_B effects, yet the specificity of its impacts on effector channels and underlying molecular mechanisms is poorly understood. In this study, we show that hippocampal RGS7 forms two distinct complexes with alternative subunit configuration bound to either membrane protein R7BP (RGS7 binding protein) or orphan receptor GPR158. Quantitative biochemical experiments show that both complexes account for targeting nearly the entire pool of RGS7 to the plasma membrane. We analyzed the effect of genetic elimination in mice of both sexes and overexpression of various components of RGS7 complex by patch-clamp electrophysiology in cultured neurons and brain slices. We report that RGS7 prominently regulates GABA_BR signaling to Ca_V2, in addition to its known involvement in modulating GIRK. Strikingly, only complexes containing R7BP, but not GPR158, accelerated the kinetics of both GIRK and Ca_V2 modulation by GABA_BRs. In contrast, GPR158 overexpression exerted the opposite effect and inhibited RGS7-assisted temporal modulation of GIRK and Ca_V2 by GABA. Collectively, our data reveal mechanisms by which distinctly composed macromolecular complexes modulate the activity of key ion channels that mediate the inhibitory effects of GABA on hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This study identifies the contributions of distinct macromolecular complexes containing a major G-protein regulator to controlling key ion channel function in hippocampal neurons with implications for understanding molecular mechanisms underlying synaptic plasticity, learning, and memory.

Peripheral nerve injury induces loss of nociceptive neuron-specific Gαi-interacting protein in neuropathic pain rat

BACKGROUND

Gαi-interacting protein (GINIP) is expressed specifically in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons and functions in modulation of peripheral gamma-aminobutyric acid B receptor (GBR). Genetic deletion of GINIP leads to impaired responsiveness to GBR agonist-mediated analgesia in rodent. It is, however, not defined whether nerve injury changes GINIP expression.

RESULTS

Immunolabeling with validated antibody revealed GINIP expression in ~40% of total lumbar DRG neurons in normal adult rats. GINIP immunoreactivity was detected in ~80% of IB4-positive (nonpeptidergic) and ~30% of CGRP-positive (peptidergic) neurons. GINIP immunoreactivity in the spinal cord dorsal horn was colabeled with IB4 and partially with CGRP. In addition, GINIP was expressed in DRG neurons immunopositive for GBR1, GBR2, Gαi(s), and Gαo and was also extensively colabeled with multiple nociceptive neuronal markers, including Trpv1, NaV1.7, CaV2.2α1b, CaV3.2α1b, TrkA, and Trek2. Peripheral nerve injury by L5 spinal nerve ligation significantly decreased the proportion of GINIP immunoreactivity-positive neurons from 40 ± 8.4% to 0.8 ± 0.1% (p < 0.01, mean ± SD, four weeks after spinal nerve ligation) and the total GINIP protein to 1.3% ± 0.04% of its basal level (p < 0.01, n = 6 animals in each group, two weeks after spinal nerve ligation) in the ipsilateral L5 DRGs.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that GINIP is predominantly expressed by small nonpeptidergic nociceptive neurons and that nerve injury triggers loss of GINIP expression. Signal transduction roles of GINIP may be diverse as it colabeled with various subgroups of nociceptive neurons. Future studies may investigate details of the signaling mechanism engaged by GINIP, as well as the pathophysiological significance of lost expression of GINIP in neuropathic pain.

Hippocampal transcriptional and neurogenic changes evoked by combination yohimbine and imipramine treatment

Adjunct α2-adrenoceptor antagonism is a potential strategy to accelerate the behavioral effects of antidepressants. Co-administration of the α2-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine hastens the behavioral and neurogenic effects of the antidepressant imipramine. We examined the transcriptional targets of short duration (7days), combination treatment of yohimbine and imipramine (Y+I) within the adult rat hippocampus. Using microarray and qPCR analysis we observed functional enrichment of genes involved in intracellular signaling cascades, plasma membrane, cellular metal ion homeostasis, multicellular stress responses and neuropeptide signaling pathways in the Y+I transcriptome. We noted reduced expression of the α2A-adrenoceptor (Adra2a), serotonin 5HT2C receptor (Htr2c) and the somatostatin receptor 1 (Sstr1), which modulate antidepressant action. Further, we noted a regulation of signaling pathway genes like inositol monophosphatase 2 (Impa2), iodothyronine deiodinase 3 (Dio3), regulator of G-protein signaling 4 (Rgs4), alkaline ceramidase 2 (Acer2), doublecortin-like kinase 2 (Dclk2), nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells inhibitor, alpha (Nfkbia) and serum/glucocorticoid-regulated kinase 1 (Sgk1), several of which are implicated in the pathophysiology of mood disorders. Comparative analysis revealed an overlap in the hippocampal regulation of Acer2, Nfkbia, Sgk1 and Impa2 between Y+I treatment, the fast-acting electroconvulsive seizure (ECS) paradigm, and the slow-onset chronic (21days) imipramine treatment. Further, Y+I treatment enhanced the quiescent neural progenitor pool in the hippocampal neurogenic niche similar to ECS, and distinct from chronic imipramine treatment. Taken together, our results provide insight into the molecular and cellular targets of short duration Y+I treatment, and identify potential leads for the development of rapid-action antidepressants.

GABAB receptor coupling to G-proteins and ion channels

GABA(B) receptors have been found to play a key role in regulating membrane excitability and synaptic transmission in the brain. The GABA(B) receptor is a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) that associates with a subset of G-proteins (pertussis toxin sensitive Gi/o family), that in turn regulate specific ion channels and trigger cAMP cascades. In this review, we describe the relationships between the GABA(B) receptor, its effectors and associated proteins that mediate GABA(B) receptor function within the brain. We discuss a unique feature of the GABA(B) receptor, the requirement for heterodimerization to produce functional receptors, as well as an increasing body of evidence that suggests GABA(B) receptors comprise a macromolecular signaling heterocomplex, critical for efficient targeting and function of the receptors. Within this complex, GABA(B) receptors associate specifically with Gi/o G-proteins that regulate voltage-gated Ca(2+) (Ca(V)) channels, G-protein activated inwardly rectifying K(+) (GIRK) channels, and adenylyl cyclase. Numerous studies have revealed that lipid rafts, scaffold proteins, targeting motifs in the receptor, and regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins also contribute to the function of GABA(B) receptors and affect cellular processes such as receptor trafficking and activity-dependent desensitization. This complex regulation of GABA(B) receptors in the brain may provide opportunities for new ways to regulate GABA-dependent inhibition in normal and diseased states of the nervous system.

Molecular mechanisms of go signaling

Go is the most abundant G protein in the central nervous system, where it comprises about 1% of membrane protein in mammalian brains. It functions to couple cell surface receptors to intercellular effectors, which is a critical process for cells to receive, interpret and respond to extracellular signals. Go protein belongs to the pertussis toxin-sensitive Gi/Go subfamily of G proteins. A number of G-protein-coupled receptors transmit stimuli to intercellular effectors through Go. Go regulates several cellular effectors, including ion channels, enzymes, and even small GTPases to modulate cellular function. This review summarizes some of the advances in Go research and proposes areas to be further addressed in exploring the functional role of Go.

Origin of the voltage dependence of G-protein regulation of P/Q-type Ca2+ channels

G-protein (Gbetagamma)-mediated voltage-dependent inhibition of N- and P/Q-type Ca(2+) channels contributes to presynaptic inhibition and short-term synaptic plasticity. The voltage dependence derives from the dissociation of Gbetagamma from the inhibited channels, but the underlying molecular and biophysical mechanisms remain largely unclear. In this study we investigated the role in this process of Ca(2+) channel beta subunit (Ca(v)beta) and a rigid alpha-helical structure between the alpha-interacting domain (AID), the primary Ca(v)beta docking site on the channel alpha(1) subunit, and the pore-lining IS6 segment. Gbetagamma inhibition of P/Q-type channels was reconstituted in giant inside-out membrane patches from Xenopus oocytes. Large populations of channels devoid of Ca(v)beta were produced by washing out a mutant Ca(v)beta with a reduced affinity for the AID. These beta-less channels were still inhibited by Gbetagamma, but without any voltage dependence, indicating that Ca(v)beta is indispensable for voltage-dependent Gbetagamma inhibition. A truncated Ca(v)beta containing only the AID-binding guanylate kinase (GK) domain could fully confer voltage dependence to Gbetagamma inhibition. Gbetagamma did not alter inactivation properties, and channels recovered from Gbetagamma inhibition exhibited the same activation property as un-inhibited channels, indicating that Gbetagamma does not dislodge Ca(v)beta from the inhibited channel. Furthermore, voltage-dependent Gbetagamma inhibition was abolished when the rigid alpha-helix between the AID and IS6 was disrupted by insertion of multiple glycines, which also eliminated Ca(v)beta regulation of channel gating, revealing a pivotal role of this rigid alpha-helix in both processes. These results suggest that depolarization-triggered movement of IS6, coupled to the subsequent conformational change of the Gbetagamma-binding pocket through a rigid alpha-helix induced partly by the Ca(v)beta GK domain, causes the dissociation of Gbetagamma and is fundamental to voltage-dependent Gbetagamma inhibition.

Direct G protein modulation of Cav2 calcium channels

The regulation of presynaptic, voltage-gated calcium channels by activation of heptahelical G protein-coupled receptors exerts a crucial influence on presynaptic calcium entry and hence on neurotransmitter release. Receptor activation subjects presynaptic N- and P/Q-type calcium channels to a rapid, membrane-delimited inhibition-mediated by direct, voltage-dependent interactions between G protein betagamma subunits and the channels-and to a slower, voltage-independent modulation involving soluble second messenger molecules. In turn, the direct inhibition of the channels is regulated as a function of many factors, including channel subtype, ancillary calcium channel subunits, and the types of G proteins and G protein regulatory factors involved. Twenty-five years after this mode of physiological regulation was first described, we review the investigations that have led to our current understanding of its molecular mechanisms.

RGS4 Modulates Serotonin Signaling in Prefrontal Cortex and Links to Serotonin Dysfunction in a Rat Model of Schizophrenia

Regulator of G protein signaling 4 (RGS4) has recently been identified as one of the genes linked to the susceptibility of schizophrenia. However, the functional roles of RGS4 and how it may be involved in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia remain largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the possible impact of RGS4 on the function of serotonin and dopamine receptors, two main targets for schizophrenia treatment. Activation of serotonin 5-HT(1A) receptors or dopamine D(4) receptors down-regulates the function of NMDA receptor (NMDAR) channel, a key player controlling cognition and emotion, in pyramidal neurons of prefrontal cortex (PFC). Blocking RGS4 function significantly potentiated the 5-HT(1A) regulation of NMDAR current; conversely, overexpression of RGS4 attenuated the 5-HT(1A) effect. In contrast, the D(4) regulation of NMDAR current was not altered by RGS4 manipulation. Moreover, the 5-HT(1A) regulation of NMDA receptors was significantly enhanced in a subset of PFC pyramidal neurons from rats treated with subchronic phencyclidine, an animal model of schizophrenia, which was found to be associated with specifically decreased RGS4 expression in these cells. Thus, our study has revealed an important coupling of RGS4 to serotonin signaling in cortical neurons and provided a molecular and cellular mechanism underlying the potential involvement of RGS4 in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.

How regulators of G protein signaling achieve selective regulation

The regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) are a family of cellular proteins that play an essential regulatory role in G protein-mediated signal transduction. There are multiple RGS subfamilies consisting of over 20 different RGS proteins. They are basically the guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase)-accelerating proteins that specifically interact with G protein alpha subunits. RGS proteins display remarkable selectivity and specificity in their regulation of receptors, ion channels, and other G protein-mediated physiological events. The molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying such selectivity are complex and cooperate at many different levels. Recent research data have provided strong evidence that the spatiotemporal-specific expression of RGS proteins and their target components, as well as the specific protein-protein recognition and interaction through their characteristic structural domains and functional motifs, are determinants for RGS selectivity and specificity. Other molecular mechanisms, such as alternative splicing and scaffold proteins, also significantly contribute to RGS selectivity. To pursue a thorough understanding of the mechanisms of RGS selective regulation will be of great significance for the advancement of our knowledge of molecular and cellular signal transduction.

Adrenergic modulation of NMDA receptors in prefrontal cortex is differentially regulated by RGS proteins and spinophilin

The noradrenergic system in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is involved in many physiological and psychological processes, including working memory and mood control. To understand the functions of the noradrenergic system, we examined the regulation of NMDA receptors (NMDARs), key players in cognition and emotion, by alpha1- and alpha2-adrenergic receptors (alpha1-ARs, alpha2-ARs) in PFC pyramidal neurons. Applying norepinephrine or a norepinephrine transporter inhibitor reduced the amplitude but not paired-pulse ratio of NMDAR-mediated excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSC) in PFC slices. Specific alpha1-AR or alpha2-AR agonists also decreased NMDAR-EPSC amplitude and whole-cell NMDAR current amplitude in dissociated PFC neurons. The alpha1-AR effect depended on the phospholipase C-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-Ca(2+) pathway, whereas the alpha2-AR effect depended on protein kinase A and the microtubule-based transport of NMDARs that is regulated by ERK signaling. Furthermore, two members of the RGS family, RGS2 and RGS4, were found to down-regulate the effect of alpha1-AR on NMDAR currents, whereas only RGS4 was involved in inhibiting alpha2-AR regulation of NMDAR currents. The regulating effects of RGS2/4 on alpha1-AR signaling were lost in mutant mice lacking spinophilin, which binds several RGS members and G protein-coupled receptors, whereas the effect of RGS4 on alpha2-AR signaling was not altered in spinophilin-knockout mice. Our work suggests that activation of alpha1-ARs or alpha2-ARs suppresses NMDAR currents in PFC neurons by distinct mechanisms. The effect of alpha1-ARs is modified by RGS2/4 that are recruited to the receptor complex by spinophilin, whereas the effect of alpha2-ARs is modified by RGS4 independent of spinophilin.

Genome-scale analysis reveals Sst2 as the principal regulator of mating pheromone signaling in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

A common property of G protein-coupled receptors is that they become less responsive with prolonged stimulation. Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS proteins) are well known to accelerate G protein GTPase activity and do so by stabilizing the transition state conformation of the G protein alpha subunit. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae there are four RGS-homologous proteins (Sst2, Rgs2, Rax1, and Mdm1) and two Galpha proteins (Gpa1 and Gpa2). We show that Sst2 is the only RGS protein that binds selectively to the transition state conformation of Gpa1. The other RGS proteins also bind Gpa1 and modulate pheromone signaling, but to a lesser extent and in a manner clearly distinct from Sst2. To identify other candidate pathway regulators, we compared pheromone responses in 4,349 gene deletion mutants representing nearly all nonessential genes in yeast. A number of mutants produced an increase (sst2, bar1, asc1, and ygl024w) or decrease (cla4) in pheromone sensitivity or resulted in pheromone-independent signaling (sst2, pbs2, gas1, and ygl024w). These findings suggest that Sst2 is the principal regulator of Gpa1-mediated signaling in vivo but that other proteins also contribute in distinct ways to pathway regulation.

RGS17/RGSZ2 and the RZ/A family of regulators of G-protein signaling

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS proteins) comprise over 20 different proteins that have been classified into subfamilies on the basis of structural homology. The RZ/A family includes RGSZ2/RGS17 (the most recently discovered member of this family), GAIP/RGS19, RGSZ1/RGS20, and the RGSZ1 variant Ret-RGS. The RGS proteins are GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) that turn off G-proteins and thus negatively regulate the signaling of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). In addition, some RZ/A family RGS proteins are able to modify signaling through interactions with adapter proteins (such as GIPC and GIPN). The RZ/A proteins have a simple structure that includes a conserved amino-terminal cysteine string motif, RGS box and short carboxyl-terminal, which confer GAP activity (RGS box) and the ability to undergo covalent modification and interact with other proteins (amino-terminal). This review focuses on RGS17 and its RZ/A sibling proteins and discusses the similarities and differences among these proteins in terms of their palmitoylation, phosphorylation, intracellular localization and interactions with GPCRs and adapter proteins. The specificity of these RGS protein for different Galpha proteins and receptors, and the consequences for signaling are discussed. The tissue and brain distribution, and the evolving understanding of the roles of this family of RGS proteins in receptor signaling and brain function are highlighted.

N-terminally truncated variant of the mouse GAIP/RGS19 lacks selectivity of full-length GAIP/RGS19 protein in regulating ORL1 receptor signaling

The regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) are a family of proteins with conserved RGS domains and play essential roles in regulating G protein-mediated signal transduction and physiological events. GAIP/RGS19 (G alpha interacting protein, also classified as RGS19), a member of the RGS family, has been shown to negatively regulate the signaling of many G protein-coupled receptors, including the opioid receptors. Two GAIP/RGS19 mRNA variants, resulted from an alternative splicing of exon 2 of the GAIP/RGS19 gene, were identified in multiple mouse tissues. One of the transcripts consists of a complete set of exons and encodes a full-length GAIP/RGS19 protein, and the other does not have exon 2 and therefore encodes an N-terminal 22 residue truncated short GAIP/RGS19 protein. When co-expressed with either the opioid-receptor-like (ORL1) receptor or one of the mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors, by transfecting dual-expression plasmids into COS-7 cells, the full-length GAIP/RGS19 was more effective than the N-terminally truncated variant and was more selective in regulating the ORL1 receptor signaling than in regulating the mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors, as measured by the effectiveness to increase the agonist-stimulated GTPase activity and to reverse the agonist-induced inhibition of cyclic AMP accumulation. In the same assays, the N-terminally truncated GAIP/RGS19 did not distinguish ORL1 from the mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors. In contrast, co-expression of RGS4 with either ORL1 or opioid receptors showed the selectivity of RGS4 for regulating opioid receptors was mu > kappa > delta > ORL1, an order completely different from that of GAIP/RGS19. The results suggest that GAIP/RGS19 prefers regulating ORL1 receptor signaling over other opioid receptors, and that the N-terminal domain of GAIP/RGS19 plays a crucial role in its receptor preference.

Differential effects of regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins on serotonin 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, and dopamine D2 receptor-mediated signaling and adenylyl cyclase activity

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins function as GTPase accelerating proteins (GAP) for Galpha subunits, attenuating G-protein-coupled receptor signal transduction. The present study tested the ability of members of different subfamilies of RGS proteins to modulate both G-protein-dependent and -independent signaling in mammalian cells. RGS4, RGS10, and RGSZ1 significantly attenuated Galphai-mediated signaling by 5-HT1A, but not by dopamine D2, receptor-expressing cells. Additionally, RGS4 and RGS10 significantly inhibited forskolin-stimulated cAMP production in both cell lines. In contrast, RGS2, RGS7, and RGSZ1 had no effect on forskolin-stimulated cAMP production in these cells. RGS2 and RGS7 significantly decreased Galphaq-mediated signaling by 5-HT2A receptors, confirming that the RGS4 and RGS10 effects on forskolin-stimulated cAMP production were specific, and not simply due to overexpression. Interestingly, similar expression levels of RGS4 protein resulted in greater inhibition of G-protein-independent cAMP production compared to G-protein-dependent GAP activity. Our results suggest specificity and selectivity of RGS proteins on G-protein-dependent and -independent signaling in mammalian cells.

Assays of RGS3 activation and modulation

Regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins accelerate the intrinsic GTPase activity of Galpha subunits, terminating G-protein signaling. Although the structure and the downstream effectors of RGS proteins have been investigated extensively, the mechanisms underlying their activation are still largely unexplored. Recent investigations of RGS proteins in intact cells are starting to shed some light on this issue. In particular, the retrovirus-mediated overexpression of individual RGS3 isoforms showed that activation of RGS3s requires Ca2+ binding to an EF-like domain, and such Ca2+ binding promotes the rapid desensitization of Go-mediated inhibition of N-type Ca2+ (N) channels. This article provides detailed information on the use and power of retrovirus-mediated overexpression of RGS proteins in dorsal root ganglion neurons to isolate and identify the mechanisms underlying the initiation of RGS3-dependent inhibitory activity.

Endogenous RGS proteins enhance acute desensitization of GABA(B) receptor-activated GIRK currents in HEK-293T cells

The coupling of GABA(B) receptors to G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels constitutes an important inhibitory pathway in the brain. Here, we examined the mechanism underlying desensitization of agonist-evoked currents carried by homomeric GIRK2 channels expressed in HEK-293T cells. The canonical GABA(B) receptor agonist baclofen produced GIRK2 currents that decayed by 57.3+/-1.4% after 60 s of stimulation, and then deactivated rapidly (time constant of 3.90+/-0.21 s) upon removal of agonist. Surface labeling studies revealed that GABA(B) receptors, in contrast to micro opioid receptors (MOR), did not internalize with a sustained stimulation for 10 min, excluding receptor redistribution as the primary mechanism for desensitization. Furthermore, heterologous desensitization was observed between GABA(B) receptors and MOR, implicating downstream proteins, such G-proteins or the GIRK channel. To investigate the G-protein turnover cycle, the non-hydrolyzable GTP analogue (GTPgammaS) was included in the intracellular solution and found to attenuate desensitization to 38.3+/-2.0%. The extent of desensitization was also reduced (45.3+/-1.3%) by coexpressing a mutant form of the Galphaq G-protein subunit that has been designed to sequester endogenous RGS proteins. Finally, reconstitution of GABA(B) receptors with Galphao G-proteins rendered insensitive to RGS resulted in significantly less desensitization (28.5+/-3.2%). Taken together, our results demonstrate that endogenous levels of RGS proteins effectively enhance GABA(B) receptor-dependent desensitization of GIRK currents.

Measuring the modulatory effects of RGS proteins on GIRK channels

Discovery of "regulators of G-protein signaling" (RGS) as GTPase-activating proteins for heterotrimeric G proteins has provided a highly sought "missing link," reconciling past discrepancies between the in vitro GTPase activity of purified G proteins and the kinetics of physiological responses mediated by G-protein signaling in vivo. With the number of RGS genes in the mammalian genome at more than 30, associating specific RGS proteins to specific G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling events has become a focus of RGS investigators. The ubiquitous expression of multiple RGS proteins has complicated this effort, yet the outlook has been encouraged with the identification of RGS9 as the determinant mediating rapid recovery of the transducin-dependent photoresponse. G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels that mediate inhibitory synaptic transmission via GPCR activation of pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins are similarly accelerated by RGS proteins when reconstituted in heterologous cell expression systems and fully reproduce the gating properties of native GIRK channels in neurons and cardiomyocytes. The endogenous neuronal and cardiac RGS protein(s) that accelerate GPCR-->GIRK channel-gating kinetics are currently not known. This article describes methods used to measure the receptor-dependent GIRK channel-gating parameters reconstituted in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells and Xenopus oocytes, as well as rat atrial myocytes and rat cerebellar granule neurons as model cells with native GPCR-->GIRK channel signaling. Applications of these methods for structure-function-based studies of RGS proteins, G proteins, and GPCRs are discussed. We also describe single cell reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction methods developed to profile atrial myocyte and neuronal RGS expression to identify specific RGS proteins for targeted knockdown or knockout.

RGS12 interacts with the SNARE-binding region of the Cav2.2 calcium channel

Activation of GABAB receptors in chick dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons inhibits the Cav2.2 calcium channel in both a voltage-dependent and voltage-independent manner. The voltage-independent inhibition requires activation of a tyrosine kinase that phosphorylates the alpha1 subunit of the channel and thereby recruits RGS12, a member of the "regulator of G protein signaling" (RGS) proteins. Here we report that RGS12 binds to the SNARE-binding or "synprint" region (amino acids 726-985) in loop II-III of the calcium channel alpha1 subunit. A recombinant protein encompassing the N-terminal PTB domain of RGS12 binds to the synprint region in protein overlay and surface plasmon resonance binding assays; this interaction is dependent on tyrosine phosphorylation and yet is within a sequence that differs from the canonical NPXY motif targeted by other PTB domains. In electrophysiological experiments, microinjection of DRG neurons with synprint-derived peptides containing the tyrosine residue Tyr-804 altered the rate of desensitization of neurotransmitter-mediated inhibition of the Cav2.2 calcium channel, whereas peptides centered about a second tyrosine residue, Tyr-815, were without effect. RGS12 from a DRG neuron lysate was precipitated using synprint peptides containing phosphorylated Tyr-804. The high degree of conservation of Tyr-804 in the SNARE-binding region of Cav2.1 and Cav2.2 calcium channels suggests that this region, in addition to the binding of SNARE proteins, is also important for determining the time course of the modulation of calcium current via tyrosine phosphorylation.

RGS9-2 modulates D2 dopamine receptor-mediated Ca2+ channel inhibition in rat striatal cholinergic interneurons

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins negatively regulate receptor-mediated second messenger responses by enhancing the GTPase activity of Galpha subunits. We describe a receptor-specific role for an RGS protein at the level of an individual brain neuron. RGS9-2 and Gbeta(5) mRNA and protein complexes were detected in striatal cholinergic and gamma-aminobutyric acidergic neurons. Dialysis of cholinergic neurons with RGS9 constructs enhanced basal Ca(2+) channel currents and reduced D(2) dopamine receptor modulation of Cav2.2 channels. These constructs did not alter M(2) muscarinic receptor modulation of Cav2.2 currents in the same neuron. The noncatalytic DEP-GGL domain of RGS9 antagonized endogenous RGS9-2 activity, enhancing D(2) receptor modulation of Ca(2+) currents. In vitro, RGS9 constructs accelerated GTPase activity, in agreement with electrophysiological measurements, and did so more effectively at Go than Gi. These results implicate RGS9-2 as a specific regulator of dopamine receptor-mediated signaling in the striatum and identify a role for GAP activity modulation by the DEP-GGL domain.

Abnormal B-cell responses to chemokines, disturbed plasma cell localization, and distorted immune tissue architecture in Rgs1-/- mice

Normal lymphoid tissue development and function depend upon chemokine-directed cell migration. Since chemokines signal through heterotrimeric G-protein-coupled receptors, RGS proteins, which act as GTPase-activating proteins for Galpha subunits, likely fine tune the cellular responses to chemokines. Here we show that Rgs1(-/-) mice possess B cells that respond excessively and desensitize improperly to the chemokines CXCL12 and CXCL13. Many of the B-cell follicles in the spleens of Rgs1(-/-) mice have germinal centers even in the absence of immune stimulation. Furthermore, immunization of these mice leads to exaggerated germinal center formation; partial disruption of the normal architecture of the spleen and Peyer's patches; and abnormal trafficking of immunoglobulin-secreting cells. These results reveal the importance of a regulatory mechanism that limits and desensitizes chemokine receptor signaling.

Comparative Studies of Molecular Mechanisms of Dopamine D2 and D3 Receptors for the Activation of Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase

Dopamine D(2) and D(3) receptors (D(2)R/D(3)R), which have similar structural architecture as well as functional similarities, are expressed in the same brain dopaminergic neurons. It is intriguing that two receptor proteins with virtually the same functional roles are expressed in the same neuron. Recently we have shown that D(2)R and D(3)R possess different regulatory processes including intracellular trafficking properties, which implies that they might employ different signaling mechanisms for regulation of the same cellular processes. Here we studied the signaling pathways of ERK activation mediated by D(2)R and D(3)R in HEK-293 cells and corroborated them with concomitant studies in COS-7 cells and C6 cells. Our results show that Src, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and atypical protein kinase C were commonly involved in D(2)R-/D(3)R-mediated ERK activation. However, beta-arrestin and sequestration of D(2)R/D(3)R were found not to be involved. ERK activations mediated by D(3)R, but not D(2)R, were blocked by betaARK-CT, AG1478 epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, and by dominant negative mutants of Ras and Raf, suggesting the involvement of the Gbetagamma(i) pathway. The alpha-subunit of G(o) (Galpha(o)) was able to couple with D(3)R to mediate ERK activation. We conclude that D(3)R mainly utilizes the betagamma pathway of G(i) protein, which involves the transactivation of EGFR in HEK-293 cells. In contrast, the alpha-subunit of the G(i) protein plays a main role in D(2)R-mediated ERK activation. Our study suggests one example of intricate cellular regulations in the brain, that is, dopaminergic neurons could regulate ERK activity more flexibly through alternative usage of either the D(2)R or D(3)R pathway depending on the cellular situation.

Evaluating Chick Gα-Interacting Protein Selectivity

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins constitute a large family of GTPase-accelerating proteins (GAPs) for heterotrimeric G proteins. More than 30 RGS genes have been identified in mammals. One of these, the Galpha-interacting protein (GAIP), interacts preferentially with members of the G(i/o) subfamily of G-protein alpha subunits in mammalian cells. A unique isoform of GAIP, derived from embryonic chicken dorsal root ganglion neurons, has a short N terminus that is only 41% identical to known mammalian orthologs. Consistent with this unique primary structure, chick GAIP has higher target specificity than its mammalian counterparts. This article describes both in vitro and in vivo methods used to characterize chick GAIP selectivity.

Phosphoinositide 3-kinase cascade facilitates mu-opioid desensitization in sensory neurons by altering G-protein-effector interactions

Signaling via G-protein-coupled receptors undergoes desensitization after prolonged agonist exposure. Here we investigated the role of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and its downstream pathways in desensitization of micro-opioid inhibition of neuronal Ca2+ channels. In cultured mouse dorsal root ganglion neurons, two mechanistically different forms of desensitization were observed after acute or chronic treatment with the micro agonist [D-Ala2, N-MePhe4, Gly-ol5]-enkephalin (DAMGO). Chronic DAMGO desensitization was heterologous in nature and significantly attenuated by blocking the activity of PI3K or mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). A combined application of PI3K and MAPK inhibitors showed no additive effect, suggesting that these two kinases act in a common pathway to facilitate chronic desensitization. Acute DAMGO desensitization, however, was not affected by the inhibitors. Furthermore, upregulation of the PI3K-Akt pathway in mutant mice lacking phosphatase and tensin homolog, a lipid phosphatase counteracting PI3K, selectively enhanced chronic desensitization in a PI3K- and MAPK-dependent manner. Using the prepulse facilitation (PPF) test, we further examined changes in the voltage-dependent component of DAMGO action that requires direct interactions between betagamma subunits of G-proteins and Ca2+ channels. DAMGO-induced PPF was diminished after chronic treatment, suggesting disruption of G-protein-channel interactions. Such disruption could occur at the postreceptor level, because chronic DAMGO also reduced GTPgammaS-induced PPF that was independent of receptor activation. Again, inhibition of PI3K or MAPK reduced desensitization of PPF. Our data suggest that the PI3Kcascade involving MAPK and Akt enhances micro-opioid desensitization via postreceptor modifications that interfere with G-protein-effector interactions.

Differential interaction of GRK2 with members of the G alpha q family

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins bind to active G alpha subunits and accelerate the rate of GTP hydrolysis and/or block interaction with effector molecules, thereby decreasing signal duration and strength. RGS proteins are defined by the presence of a conserved 120-residue region termed the RGS domain. Recently, it was shown that the G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) contains an RGS domain that binds to the active form of G alpha(q). Here, the ability of GRK2 to interact with other members of the G alpha(q) family, G alpha(11), G alpha(14), and G alpha(16), was tested. The signaling of all members of the G alpha(q) family, with the exception of G alpha(16), was inhibited by GRK2. Immunoprecipitation of full-length GRK2 or pull down of GST-GRK2-(45-178) resulted in the detection of G alpha(q), but not G alpha(16), in an activation-dependent manner. Moreover, activated G alpha(16) failed to promote plasma membrane (PM) recruitment of a GRK2-(45-178)-GFP fusion protein. Assays with chimeric G alpha(q)(-)(16) subunits indicated that the C-terminus of G alpha(q) mediates binding to GRK2. Despite showing no interaction with GRK2, G alpha(16) does interact with RGS2, in both inositol phosphate and PM recruitment assays. Thus, GRK2 is the first identified RGS protein that discriminates between members of the G alpha(q) family, while another RGS protein, RGS2, binds to both G alpha(q) and G alpha(16).

RGS3 mediates a calcium-dependent termination of G protein signaling in sensory neurons

G proteins modulate synaptic transmission. Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins accelerate the intrinsic GTPase activity of Galpha subunits, and thus terminate G protein activation. Whether RGS proteins themselves are under cellular control is not well defined, particularly in native cells. In dorsal root ganglion neurons overexpressing RGS3, we find that G protein signaling is rapidly terminated (or "desensitized") by calcium influx through voltage-gated channels. This rapid desensitization is most likely mediated by direct binding of calcium to RGS3, as deletion of an EF-hand domain in RGS3 abolishes both the desensitization (observed physiologically) and a calcium-RGS3 interaction (observed in a gel-shift assay). A naturally occurring variant of RGS3 that lacks the EF hand neither binds calcium nor produces rapid desensitization, giving rise instead to a slower calcium-dependent desensitization that is attenuated by a calmodulin antagonist. Thus, activity-evoked calcium entry in sensory neurons may provide differential control of G protein signaling, depending on the isoform of RGS3 expressed in the cells. In complex neural circuits subjected to abundant synaptic inhibition by G proteins (as occurs in dorsal spinal cord), rapid termination of inhibition by electrical activity by EF hand-containing RGS3 may ensure the faithful transmission of information from the most active sensory inputs.

Regulators of G-protein signalling: multifunctional proteins with impact on signalling in the cardiovascular system

Regulator of G-protein signalling (RGS) proteins form a superfamily of at least 25 proteins, which are highly diverse in structure, expression patterns, and function. They share a 120 amino acid homology domain (RGS domain), which exhibits GTPase accelerating activity for alpha-subunits of heterotrimeric G-proteins, and thus, are negative regulators of G-protein-mediated signalling. Based on the organisation of the Rgs genes, structural similarities, and differences in functions, they can be divided into at least six subfamilies of RGS proteins and three more families of RGS-like proteins. Many of these proteins regulate signalling processes within cells, not only via interaction with G-protein alpha-subunits, but are G-protein-regulated effectors, Gbetagamma scavenger, or scaffolding proteins in signal transduction complexes as well. The expression of at least 16 different RGS proteins in the mammalian or human myocardium have been described. A subgroup of at least eight was detected in a single atrial myocyte. The exact functions of these proteins remain mostly elusive, but RGS proteins such as RGS4 are involved in the regulation of G(i)-protein betagamma-subunit-gated K(+) channels. An up-regulation of RGS4 expression has been consistently found in human heart failure and some animal models. Evidence is increasing that the enhanced RGS4 expression counter-regulates the G(q/11)-induced signalling caused by hypertrophic stimuli. In the vascular system, RGS5 seems to be an important signalling regulator. It is expressed in vascular endothelial cells, but not in cultured smooth muscle cells. Its down-regulation, both in a model of capillary morphogenesis and in an animal model of stroke, render it a candidate gene, which may be involved in the regulation of capillary growth, angiogenesis, and in the pathophysiology of stroke.

Endogenous RGS proteins facilitate dopamine D(2S) receptor coupling to G(alphao) proteins and Ca2+ responses in CHO-K1 cells

The role of RGS proteins on dopaminergic D2S receptor (D2SR) signalling was investigated in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cells, using recombinant RGS protein- and PTX-insensitive G alphao proteins. Dopamine-mediated [35S]GTPgammaS binding was attenuated by more than 60% in CHO-K1 D2SR cells coexpressing a RGS protein- and PTX-insensitive G(alphao)Gly184Ser:Cys351Ile protein versus cells coexpressing a similar amount of PTX-insensitive G alphaoCys351Ile protein. Dopamine-agonist-mediated Ca2+ responses were dependent on the coexpression with a G alphao Cys351Ile protein and were fully abolished upon coexpression with a G alphaoGly184Ser:Cys351Ile protein. These results suggest that interactions between the G alphao protein and RGS proteins are involved in efficient D2SR signalling.

Regulator of G protein signaling Z1 (RGSZ1) interacts with Galpha i subunits and regulates Galpha i-mediated cell signaling

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins constitute a family of over 20 proteins that negatively regulate heterotrimeric G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathways by enhancing endogenous GTPase activities of G protein alpha subunits. RGSZ1, one of the RGS proteins specifically localized to the brain, has been cloned previously and described as a selective GTPase accelerating protein for Galpha(z) subunit. Here, we employed several methods to provide new evidence that RGSZ1 interacts not only with Galpha(z,) but also with Galpha(i), as supported by in vitro binding assays and functional studies. Using glutathione S-transferase fusion protein pull-down assays, glutathione S-transferase-RGSZ1 protein was shown to bind (35)S-labeled Galpha(i1) protein in an AlF(4)(-)dependent manner. The interaction between RGSZ1 and Galpha(i) was confirmed further by co-immunoprecipitation studies and yeast two-hybrid experiments using a quantitative luciferase reporter gene. Extending these observations to functional studies, RGSZ1 accelerated endogenous GTPase activity of Galpha(i1) in single-turnover GTPase assays. Human RGSZ1 functionally regulated GPA1 (a yeast Galpha(i)-like protein)-mediated yeast pheromone response when expressed in a SST2 (yeast RGS protein) knockout strain. In PC12 cells, transfected RGSZ1 blocked mitogen-activated protein kinase activity induced by UK14304, an alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor agonist. Furthermore, RGSZ1 attenuated D2 dopamine receptor agonist-induced serum response element reporter gene activity in Chinese hamster ovary cells. In summary, these data suggest that RGSZ1 serves as a GTPase accelerating protein for Galpha(i) and regulates Galpha(i)-mediated signaling, thus expanding the potential role of RGSZ1 in G protein-mediated cellular activities.

An N-terminal region of Caenorhabditis elegans RGS proteins EGL-10 and EAT-16 directs inhibition of G(alpha)o versus G(alpha)q signaling

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins contain an RGS domain that inhibits G(alpha) signaling by activating G(alpha) GTPase activity. Certain RGS proteins also contain a Ggamma-like (GGL) domain and a poorly characterized but conserved N-terminal region. We assessed the functions of these subregions in the Caenorhabditis elegans RGS proteins EGL-10 and EAT-16, which selectively inhibit GOA-1 (G(alpha)(o)) and EGL-30 (G(alpha)(q)), respectively. Using transgenes in C. elegans, we expressed EGL-10, EAT-16, their subregions, or EGL-10/EAT-16 chimeras. The chimeras showed that the GGL/RGS region of either protein can act on either GOA-1 or EGL-30 and that a key factor determining G(alpha) target selectivity is the manner in which the N-terminal and GGL/RGS regions are linked. We also found that coexpressing N-terminal and GGL/RGS fragments of EGL-10 gave full EGL-10 activity, whereas either fragment alone gave little activity. Biochemical analysis showed that coexpressing the two fragments caused both to increase in abundance and also caused the GGL/RGS fragment to move to the membrane, where the N-terminal fragment is localized. By coimmunoprecipitation, we found that the N-terminal fragment complexes with the C-terminal fragment and its associated Gbeta subunit, GPB-2. We conclude that the N-terminal region directs inhibition of G(alpha) signaling by forming a complex with the GGL/RGS region and affecting its stability, membrane localization, and G(alpha) target specificity.

Reconstituted slow muscarinic inhibition of neuronal (Ca(v)1.2c) L-type Ca2+ channels

Ca(2+) influx through L-type channels is critical for numerous physiological functions. Relatively little is known about modulation of neuronal L-type Ca(2+) channels. We studied modulation of neuronal Ca(V)1.2c channels heterologously expressed in HEK293 cells with each of the known muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes. Galphaq/11-coupled M1, M3, and M5 receptors each produced robust inhibition of Ca(V)1.2c, whereas Galphai/o-coupled M2 and M4 receptors were ineffective. Channel inhibition through M1 receptors was studied in detail and was found to be kinetically slow, voltage-independent, and pertussis toxin-insensitive. Slow inhibition of Ca(V)1.2c was blocked by coexpressing RGS2 or RGS3T or by intracellular dialysis with antibodies directed against Galphaq/11. In contrast, inhibition was not reduced by coexpressing betaARK1ct or Galphat. These results indicate that slow inhibition required signaling by Galphaq/11, but not Gbetagamma, subunits. Slow inhibition did not require Ca(2+) transients or Ca(2+) influx through Ca(V)1.2c channels. Additionally, slow inhibition was insensitive to pharmacological inhibitors of phospholipases, protein kinases, and protein phosphatases. Intracellular BAPTA prevented slow inhibition via a mechanism other than Ca(2+) chelation. The cardiac splice-variant of Ca(V)1.2 (Ca(V)1.2a) and a splice-variant of the neuronal/neuroendocrine Ca(V)1.3 channel also appeared to undergo slow muscarinic inhibition. Thus, slow muscarinic inhibition may be a general characteristic of L-type channels having widespread physiological significance.

Unique isoform of Galpha -interacting protein (RGS-GAIP) selectively discriminates between two Go-mediated pathways that inhibit Ca2+ channels

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins constitute a large family of GTPase-activating proteins for heterotrimeric G proteins. More than 20 RGS genes have been identified in mammals. One of these, the Galpha-interacting protein (GAIP), preferentially interacts with members of the G(i)/G(o) subfamily of G proteins in mammalian cells, but its selectivity among members of this subfamily in vitro is limited. Here we report the cloning and functional characterization of a unique cDNA isoform of GAIP, derived from embryonic chicken dorsal root ganglion neurons. Chick GAIP is composed of 199 amino acids, organized into a conserved RGS domain (85% identical to human GAIP), and a unique, short N terminus (only 41% identical, 50% homologous to known mammalian orthologues). Consistent with this unique primary structure, chick GAIP has physiological properties that distinguish it from mammalian GAIPs. We have explored the selectivity of chick GAIP in electrophysiological assays of two G(o)-mediated forms of Ca(2+) channel inhibition produced by gamma-aminobutyric acid in chick dorsal root ganglion neurons, voltage-independent inhibition (mediated by G(o)alpha) and voltage-dependent inhibition (mediated by G(o)betagamma). Dialyzing recombinant chick GAIP in these cells selectively reduced voltage-independent inhibition without affecting voltage-dependent inhibition. Mammalian GAIP, tested under identical conditions in previous studies, demonstrated no selectivity between these two inhibitory processes; thus, our results suggest that the functional specificity of chick GAIP is likely to be determined by its unique N terminus.

Abused Drugs Modulate RGS4 mRNA Levels in Rat Brain: Comparison Between Acute Drug Treatment and a Drug Challenge after Chronic Treatment

While different classes of abused drugs interact with distinct signaling substrates, it appears that all utilize receptors in the mesolimbic dopamine system to mediate their reinforcing effects. The regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins modulate G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling by increasing the rate of GTP hydrolysis of G proteins. This study was undertaken to determine whether morphine, cocaine, or amphetamine would modulate RGS4 mRNA levels in relevant brain regions. Acute administration of morphine and cocaine decreased levels of RGS4 mRNA in the reticulotegmental pontine nucleus (RtTg) and locus coeruleus (LC). Increases in RGS 4 mRNA levels were observed in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and dorsal central gray (CGD). Acute drug challenge after chronic drug administration increased RGS4 mRNA in the CGD and decreased RGS4 levels in the red nucleus and RtTg. Interestingly, the LC exhibited biphasic modulation, with decreased RGS4 mRNA levels after acute administration and increased levels after chronic administration. These findings indicate that RGS4 mRNA levels are modulated in a similar manner by different drugs of abuse and imply that a common substrate could mediate some effects of abused drugs.

Receptor-selective effects of endogenous RGS3 and RGS5 to regulate mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in rat vascular smooth muscle cells

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins compose a highly diverse protein family best known for inhibition of G protein signaling by enhancing GTP hydrolysis by Galpha subunits. Little is known about the function of endogenous RGS proteins. In this study, we used synthetic ribozymes targeted to RGS2, RGS3, RGS5, and RGS7 to assess their function. After demonstrating the specificity of in vitro cleavage by the RGS ribozymes, rat aorta smooth muscle cells were used for transient transfection with the RGS-specific ribozymes. RGS3 and RGS5 ribozymes differentially enhanced carbachol- and angiotensin II-induced MAP kinase activity, respectively, whereas RGS2 and RGS7 ribozymes had no effect. This enhancement was pertussis toxin-insensitive. Thus RGS3 is a negative modulator of muscarinic m3 receptor signaling, and RGS5 is a negative modulator of angiotensin AT1a receptor signaling through G(q/11). Also, RGS5 ribozyme enhanced angiotensin-stimulated inositol phosphate release. These results indicate the feasibility of using the ribozyme technology to determine the functional role of endogenous RGS proteins in signaling pathways and to define novel receptor-selective roles of endogenous RGS3 and RGS5 in modulating MAP kinase responses to either carbachol or angiotensin.

G protein specificity: traffic direction required

This review focuses on the coupling specificity of the Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits of pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive G(i/o) proteins that mediate diverse signaling pathways, including regulation of ion channels and other effectors. Several lines of evidence indicate that specific combinations of G protein alpha, beta and gamma subunits are required for different receptors or receptor-effector networks, and that a higher degree of specificity for Galpha and Gbetagamma is observed in intact systems than reported in vitro. The structural determinants of receptor-G protein specificity remain incompletely understood, and involve receptor-G protein interaction domains, and perhaps other scaffolding processes. By identifying G protein specificity for individual receptor signaling pathways, ligands targeted to disrupt individual pathways of a given receptor could be developed.

Regulators of G-protein signalling as new central nervous system drug targets

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are major targets for drug discovery. The regulator of G-protein signalling (RGS)-protein family has important roles in GPCR signal transduction. RGS proteins contain a conserved RGS-box, which is often accompanied by other signalling regulatory elements. RGS proteins accelerate the deactivation of G proteins to reduce GPCR signalling; however, some also have an effector function and transmit signals. Combining GPCR agonists with RGS inhibitors should potentiate responses, and could markedly increase the agonist's regional specificity. The diversity of RGS proteins with highly localized and dynamically regulated distributions in brain makes them attractive targets for pharmacotherapy of central nervous system disorders.

Profile of RGS expression in single rat atrial myocytes

'Regulators of G protein signaling' (RGS proteins) are members of a large family of GTPase-activating proteins that are differentially expressed in various cell types and accelerate the termination of heterotrimeric G protein signaling. To identify RGS proteins that may affect autonomic regulation of atrial excitability, we screened the expression of nineteen RGS genes (RGS subfamilies A, B, C, and D) in single spontaneously beating rat atrial myocytes maintained in primary culture. Expression profiling by single-cell reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis revealed that seven distinct RGS genes are endogenously expressed in atrial myocytes which were also identified in poly(A)(+) mRNA from rat atria (RGS2, RGS3, RGS4, RGS6, RGS10, GAIP, and RGSZ2). Other RGS transcripts were detected in atrial poly(A)(+) mRNA but not single atrial myocytes (RGS5, RGS12, RGS16, and RGS18), and therefore are likely to originate from non-myocyte sources in atrial tissue. The single-cell RT-PCR experiments also led to the identification of putative splice variants for RGS6 and GAIP. Immunocytochemistry using RGS-specific antibodies confirmed the presence of selected RGS proteins in the cultured atrial myocytes. These results demonstrate a rich diversity of RGS expression in atrial myocytes whose specific role in G-protein signaling is yet to be determined. The identification of endogenous RGS proteins in atrial myocytes will facilitate targeted suppression and/or deletion studies to determine how each RGS protein may affect atrial excitability and its short-term and long-term regulation by G-protein signaling events.

Bridging with GAPs: receptor communication through RGS proteins

The regulators of heterotrimeric guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-binding protein (G protein) signaling (RGS proteins) were named for their ability to act as GTP-activating proteins (GAPs) for G proteins and, thus, limit the signal generated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In addition to this characteristic biochemical trait, RGS proteins constitute a large family of structurally diverse proteins with variable sequence motifs that permit additional specific interactions. RGS proteins may also serve as a bridge from GPCRs to receptor tyrosine kinases or transmembrane channels, allowing signals from GPCRs to regulate signaling through other types of receptors, and vice versa.

RGS2 blocks slow muscarinic inhibition of N-type Ca(2+) channels reconstituted in a human cell line

1. Native N-type Ca(2+) channels undergo sustained inhibition through a slowly activating pathway linked to M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors and Galphaq/11 proteins. Little is known concerning the regulation of this slow inhibitory pathway. We have reconstituted slow muscarinic inhibition of N-type channels in HEK293 cells (a human embryonic kidney cell line) by coexpressing cloned alpha1B (Ca(V)2.2) Ca(2+) channel subunits and M1 receptors. Expressed Ca(2+) currents were recorded using standard whole-cell, ruptured-patch techniques. 2. Rapid application of carbachol produced two kinetically distinct components of Ca(2+) channel inhibition. The fast component of inhibition had a time constant of < 1 s, whereas the slow component had a time constant of 5-40 s. Neither component of inhibition was reduced by pertussis toxin (PTX) or staurosporine. 3. The fast component of inhibition was selectively blocked by the Gbetagamma-binding region of beta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1, suggesting that fast inhibition is mediated by Gbetagamma released from Galphaq/11. 4. The slow component of inhibition was selectively blocked by regulator of G protein signalling 2 (RGS2), which preferentially interacts with Galphaq/11 proteins. RGS2 also attenuated channel inhibition produced by intracellular dialysis with non-hydrolysable GTPgammaS. Together these results suggest that RGS2 selectively blocked slow inhibition by functioning as an effector antagonist, rather than as a GTPase-accelerating protein (GAP). 5. These experiments demonstrate that slow muscarinic inhibition of N-type Ca(2+) channels can be reconstituted in non-neuronal cells, and that RGS2 can selectively block slow muscarinic inhibition while leaving fast muscarinic inhibition intact. These results identify RGS2 as a potential physiological regulator of the slow muscarinic pathway.

Agonist trafficking of G(i/o)-mediated alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor responses in HEL 92.1.7 cells

1. The ability of 19 agonists to elevate Ca(2+) and inhibit forskolin-induced cyclic AMP elevation through alpha(2A)-adrenoceptors in HEL 92.1.7 cells was investigated. Ligands of catecholamine-like- (five), imidazoline- (nine) and non-catecholamine-non-imidazoline-type (five) were included. 2. The relative maximum responses were similar in both assays. Five ligands were full or nearly full agonists, six produced 20 - 70% of the response to a full agonist and the remaining eight gave lower responses (< 20%) so that their potencies were difficult to evaluate. 3. Marked differences in the potencies of the agonists with respect to the two measured responses were seen. The catecholamines were several times less potent in decreasing cyclic AMP than in increasing Ca(2+), whereas the other, both imidazoline and ox-/thiazoloazepine ligands, were several times more potent with respect to the former than the latter response. For instance, UK14,304 was more potent than adrenaline with respect to the cyclic AMP response but less potent than adrenaline with respect to the Ca(2+) response. 4. All the responses were sensitive to pertussis toxin-pretreatment. Also the possible role of PLA(2), beta-adrenoceptors or ligand transport or metabolism as a source of error could be excluded. The results suggest that the active receptor states produced by catecholamines and the other agonists are markedly different and therefore have different abilities to activate different signalling pathways.

Regional distribution of regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) 1, 2, 13, 14, 16, and GAIP messenger ribonucleic acids by in situ hybridization in rat brain

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins are a novel family of GTPase-activating proteins that interact with Galpha subunits of the Gi/o, Gz, Gq and G(12/13) subfamilies to dampen G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated signaling by accelerating intrinsic Galpha-GTPase activity. In the present study, we report on messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) localization in rat brain of six RGS genes by in situ hybridization. The distribution patterns of RGS2, RGS13, RGS14 and GAIP (Galpha interacting protein) overlapped in most brain regions examined. Highest regional expression was observed for RGS2 in the cerebral cortical layers, striatum, hippocampal formation, several thalamic and hypothalamic nuclei and hindbrain regions such as the pontine, interpeduncular and dorsal raphe nuclei. Levels of RGS14 mRNA closely paralleled those of RGS2 expression levels throughout most brain regions. RGS13 mRNA was enriched in the hippocampal formation, amygdala, mammillary nuclei as well as the pontine and interpeduncular nuclei. GAIP expression levels were highest in the hippocampal formation with moderate to low levels present in all other regions studied. Of the six RGS genes probed, RGS16 mRNA displayed a discrete localization predominantly in the thalamic midline/intralaminar and principal relay nuclei, and the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus. RGS1 mRNA signal was not detected in brain. In conclusion, the in situ hybridization studies for RGS2, RGS13, RGS14, RGS16 and GAIP mRNAs extend our knowledge of the distribution of RGS genes expressed in the rat central nervous system, and indicate overlapping RGS-enriched regions that may be indicative of functional diversification in GPCR signaling pathway modulation.

Administration of myr(+)-G(i2)alpha subunits prevents acute tolerance (tachyphylaxis) to mu-opioid effects in mice

The administration of efficacious doses of morphine or beta-endorphin causes acute tolerance (tachyphylaxis) to the effects of additional administrations of these opioids. Mice intracerebroventricularly (icv)-injected with biologically active myristoylated (myr(+))-G(i2)alpha subunits developed no tachyphylaxis to morphine antinociception in the tail-flick test. This treatment increased the potency of opioid-induced analgesia during the declining phase. Moreover, animals showing tachyphylaxis to opioid effects exhibited normal responses to the agonists after icv-administration of myr(+)-G(i2)alpha subunits. In morphine tolerant/dependent mice, an icv dose of 12 pmol/mouse myr(+)-G(i2)alpha subunits facilitated complete restoration of morphine antinociception in only 4 or 5 days instead of the 10 to 11 days required for post-dependent mice. This was observed when myr(+)-G alpha subunits were injected within the first 24 h of chronic morphine administration -- but not later when long-term tolerance takes place. These results suggest that during the course of an opioid effect a progressive reduction of receptor-regulated G-proteins occurs, and hence tachyphylaxis develops. Exogenous administration of myr(+)-G alpha subunits may be of therapeutic potential in improving agonist activity and accelerating the recovery of post-dependent receptors.

RGS proteins provide biochemical control of agonist-evoked [Ca2+]i oscillations

Agonist-evoked [Ca2+]i oscillations have been considered a biophysical phenomenon reflecting the regulation of the IP3 receptor by [Ca2+]i. Here we show that [Ca2+]i oscillations are a biochemical phenomenon emanating from regulation of Ca2+ signaling by the regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins. [Ca2+]i oscillations evoked by G protein-coupled receptors require the action of RGS proteins. Inhibition of endogenous RGS protein action disrupted agonist-evoked [Ca2+]i oscillations by a stepwise conversion to a sustained response. Based on these findings and the effect of mutant RGS proteins and anti-RGS protein antibodies on Ca2+ signaling, we propose that RGS proteins within the G protein-coupled receptor complexes provide a biochemical control of [Ca2+]i oscillations.

GTPase-activating proteins for heterotrimeric G proteins: regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) and RGS-like proteins

GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) regulate heterotrimeric G proteins by increasing the rates at which their subunits hydrolyze bound GTP and thus return to the inactive state. G protein GAPs act allosterically on G subunits, in contrast to GAPs for the Ras-like monomeric GTP-binding proteins. Although they do not contribute directly to the chemistry of GTP hydrolysis, G protein GAPs can accelerate hydrolysis >2000-fold. G protein GAPs include both effector proteins (phospholipase C-¿, p115RhoGEF) and a growing family of regulators of G protein signaling (RGS proteins) that are found throughout the animal and fungal kingdoms. GAP activity can sharpen the termination of a signal upon removal of stimulus, attenuate a signal either as a feedback inhibitor or in response to a second input, promote regulatory association of other proteins, or redirect signaling within a G protein signaling network. GAPs are regulated by various controls of their cellular concentrations, by complex interactions with G¿ or with G¿5 through an endogenous G-like domain, and by interaction with multiple other proteins.

RGS9 proteins facilitate acute tolerance to mu-opioid effects

This paper reports that regulators of G-protein signalling (RGS) proteins modulate the timing and amplitude of opioid signals by a push-pull mechanism. This is achieved without noticeable changes in the binding properties of opioids, e.g. beta-endorphin to mu-opioid receptors. The expression of RGS proteins was reduced by blocking their mRNA with antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN). Knock down of RGS2 or RGS3 diminished morphine and beta-endorphin analgesia, whereas that of RGS9 or RGS12 enhanced this activity. In mice with impaired RGS9, but not impaired RGS2, the potency and, in particular, the duration of opioid antinociception increased. Further, the animals did not exhibit acute tolerance generated by a single and efficacious dose of morphine, nor did they develop tolerance after a daily i.c.v. injection of the opioid for 4 days. In a model of sustained morphine treatment, the impairment of RGS9 proteins facilitated increases in the response to the delivered opioid. This was only effective for 2--3 h after the subcutaneous implantation of an oily morphine pellet; later, tolerance developed. To reduce the impact of the chronic morphine acting on opioid receptors, other RGS proteins presumably substitute the GTPase-activating function of RGS9 on morphine-activated G-alpha-GTP subunits. The desensitization of mu-opioid receptors appears to be a cell membrane-limited process facilitated by RGS9's sequestering of agonist-segregated G alpha subunits.

Tyrosine-kinase-dependent recruitment of RGS12 to the N-type calcium channel

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)B receptors couple to Go to inhibit N-type calcium channels in embryonic chick dorsal root ganglion neurons. The voltage-independent inhibition, mediated by means of a tyrosine-kinase pathway, is transient and lasts up to 100 seconds. Inhibition of endogenous RGS12, a member of the family of regulators of G-protein signalling, selectively alters the time course of voltage-independent inhibition. The RGS12 protein, in addition to the RGS domain, contains PDZ and PTB domains. Fusion proteins containing the PTB domain of RGS12 alter the rate of termination of the GABA(B) signal, whereas the PDZ or RGS domains of RGS 12 have no observable effects. Using primary dorsal root ganglion neurons in culture, here we show an endogenous agonist-induced tyrosine-kinase-dependent complex of RGS12 and the calcium channel. These results indicate that RGS12 is a multifunctional protein capable of direct interactions through its PTB domain with the tyrosine-phosphorylated calcium channel. Recruitment of RGS proteins to G-protein effectors may represent an additional mechanism for signal termination in G-protein-coupled pathways.

Endogenous regulators of G protein signaling proteins regulate presynaptic inhibition at rat hippocampal synapses

Presynaptic inhibition mediated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can develop and decay in a few seconds. This time course is too rapid to be accounted for by the intrinsic GTPase activity of Galpha subunits alone. Here, we test the hypothesis that endogenous regulators of G protein signaling (RGS proteins) are required for rapid, brief presynaptic inhibition. Endogenous G protein alpha subunits were uncoupled from GPCRs by treating cultures with pertussis toxin (PTX). Adenoviral expression of mutant PTX-insensitive (PTX-i) Galpha(i1-3) or Galpha(o) subunits rescued adenosine-induced presynaptic inhibition in cultured hippocampal neurons. Expression of double mutant Galpha(i1) or Galpha(o) subunits that were both PTX-insensitive and unable to bind RGS proteins (PTX/RGS-i) also rescued presynaptic inhibition. Presynaptic inhibition mediated by PTX/RGS-i subunits decayed much more slowly after agonist removal than that mediated by PTX-i subunits or native G proteins. The onset of presynaptic inhibition mediated by PTX/RGS-i Galpha(o) was also slower than that mediated by PTX-i Galpha(o). In contrast, the onset of presynaptic inhibition mediated by PTX/RGS-i Galpha(i1) was similar to that mediated by PTX-i Galpha(i1). These results suggest that endogenous RGS proteins regulate the time course of G protein signaling in mammalian central nervous system presynaptic terminals.

G protein modulation of recombinant P/Q-type calcium channels by regulators of G protein signalling proteins

1. Fast synaptic transmission is triggered by the activation of presynaptic Ca2+ channels which can be inhibited by Gbetagamma subunits via G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). Regulators of G protein signalling (RGS) proteins are GTPase-accelerating proteins (GAPs), which are responsible for >100-fold increases in the GTPase activity of G proteins and might be involved in the regulation of presynaptic Ca2+ channels. In this study we investigated the effects of RGS2 on G protein modulation of recombinant P/Q-type channels expressed in a human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cell line using whole-cell recordings. 2. RGS2 markedly accelerates transmitter-mediated inhibition and recovery from inhibition of Ba2+ currents (IBa) through P/Q-type channels heterologously expressed with the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2 (mAChR M2). 3. Both RGS2 and RGS4 modulate the prepulse facilitation properties of P/Q-type Ca2+ channels. G protein reinhibition is accelerated, while release from inhibition is slowed. These kinetics depend on the availability of G protein alpha and betagamma subunits which is altered by RGS proteins. 4. RGS proteins unmask the Ca2+ channel beta subunit modulation of Ca2+ channel G protein inhibition. In the presence of RGS2, P/Q-type channels containing the beta2a and beta3 subunits reveal significantly altered kinetics of G protein modulation and increased facilitation compared to Ca2+ channels coexpressed with the beta1b or beta4 subunit.