A 5-HT4 receptor transmembrane network implicated in the activity of inverse agonists but not agonists

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CX. Classification of Receptors for 5-hydroxytryptamine; Pharmacology and Function

5-HT receptors expressed throughout the human body are targets for established therapeutics and various drugs in development. Their diversity of structure and function reflects the important role 5-HT receptors play in physiologic and pathophysiological processes. The present review offers a framework for the official receptor nomenclature and a detailed understanding of each of the 14 5-HT receptor subtypes, their roles in the systems of the body, and, where appropriate, the (potential) utility of therapeutics targeting these receptors. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This review provides a comprehensive account of the classification and function of 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors, including how they are targeted for therapeutic benefit.

Aminergic GPCR-Ligand Interactions: A Chemical and Structural Map of Receptor Mutation Data

The aminergic family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) plays an important role in various diseases and represents a major drug discovery target class. Structure determination of all major aminergic subfamilies has enabled structure-based ligand design for these receptors. Site-directed mutagenesis data provides an invaluable complementary source of information for elucidating the structural determinants of binding of different ligand chemotypes. The current study provides a comparative analysis of 6692 mutation data points on 34 aminergic GPCR subtypes, covering the chemical space of 540 unique ligands from mutagenesis experiments and information from experimentally determined structures of 52 distinct aminergic receptor-ligand complexes. The integrated analysis enables detailed investigation of structural receptor-ligand interactions and assessment of the transferability of combined binding mode and mutation data across ligand chemotypes and receptor subtypes. An overview is provided of the possibilities and limitations of using mutation data to guide the design of novel aminergic receptor ligands.

Human 5-HT₄receptor stimulation in atria of transgenic mice

In human atrium, serotonin (5-HT) exerts pleiotropic effects, which are thought to be mediated via 5-HT4 receptors. Here, we used transgenic mice (TG) that overexpress the human 5-HT4(a) receptor under control of the heart-specific α-myosin heavy chain promoter in the atria (and ventricles). Contractile studies were performed in isolated electrically driven left atrial preparations and spontaneously beating right atrial preparation of TG and littermate control mice (wild type (WT)). 5-HT increased force of contraction and phospholamban phosphorylation on serine 16 only in left atrial preparations from TG but not from WT. In contrast, β-adrenoceptor stimulation of left atrial preparations by isoprenaline increased force of contraction with similar pEC50 values and to a similar maximum extent in both TG and WT. The contractile effects of 5-HT in left atrial preparations from TG could be blocked by the 5-HT4 receptor-specific antagonists GR125487 or GR113808. In right atrial preparations from WT and TG, the β-adrenoceptor agonist isoprenaline exerted a positive chronotropic effect with similar pEC50 values and similar maximum effects. Only in right atrial preparations from TG but not WT, 5-HT exerted a positive chronotropic effect that could be attenuated by 5-HT4 receptor-specific antagonists. Finally, in left atrial preparations of TG, a higher incidence of arrhythmias was noted compared to WT. The present data indicate that the human 5-HT4 receptors expressed in mouse atria are functional. This is the first transgenic model to study this human receptor in the atrium ex vivo or in vivo.

Cardiac overexpression of the human 5-HT4 receptor in mice

Serotonin (5-HT) exerts pleiotropic effects in the human cardiovascular system. Some of the effects are thought to be mediated via 5-HT(4) receptors, which are expressed in the human atrium and in ventricular tissue. However, a true animal model to study these receptors in more detail has been hitherto lacking. Therefore, we generated, for the first time, a transgenic (TG) mouse with cardiac myocyte-specific expression of the human 5-HT(4) receptor. RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry revealed expression of the receptor at the mRNA and protein levels. Stimulation of isolated cardiac preparations by isoproterenol increased phospholamban phosphorylation at Ser(16) and Thr(17) sites. 5-HT increased phosphorylation only in TG mice but not in wild-type (WT) mice. Furthermore, 5-HT increased contractility in isolated perfused hearts from TG mice but not WT mice. These effects of 5-HT could be blocked by the 5-HT(4) receptor-selective antagonist GR-125487. An intravenous infusion of 5-HT increased left ventricular contractility in TG mice but not in WT mice. Similarly, the increase in contractility by 5-HT in isolated cardiomyocytes from TG mice was accompanied by and probably mediated through an increase in L-type Ca(2+) channel current and in Ca(2+) transients. In intact animals, echocardiography revealed an inotropic and chronotropic effect of subcutaneously injected 5-HT in TG mice but not in WT mice. In isolated hearts from TG mice, spontaneous polymorphic atrial arrhythmias were noted. These findings demonstrate the functional expression of 5-HT(4) receptors in the heart of TG mice, and a potential proarrhythmic effect in the atrium. Therefore, 5-HT(4) receptor-expressing mice might be a useful model to mimic the human heart, where 5-HT(4) receptors are present and functional in the atrium and ventricle of the healthy and failing heart, and to investigate the influence of 5-HT in the development of cardiac arrhythmias and heart failure.

Involvement of tryptophan W276 and of two surrounding amino acid residues in the high constitutive activity of the ghrelin receptor GHS-R1a

The human ghrelin receptor (GHS-R1a) is known to display a high level of signaling in the absence of ligand. The Trp276, located in the fully conserved CWXP motif of G protein-coupled receptors, is believed to function as a rotameric switch in these receptors. A comparative modelling of GHS-R1a with the motilin receptor, the most related G protein-coupled receptor to GHS-R1a known to date, but characterized by a very low ligand-independent signaling level, revealed that only two surrounding residues of Trp276, that are Val131 and Ile134, were different from these receptors. We mutated them at once in GHS-R1a to create a "motilin receptor-like" environment of Trp276 in order to study the consequences on GHS-R1a activation. We studied the pharmacological properties of the W276A, V131L-I134M GHS-R1a mutants. Basal as well as maximal ghrelin-induced signaling was assessed both by inositol-phosphate accumulation and SRE pathways. As compared to the wild type receptor, the SRE-luciferase assay displayed a markedly impaired basal activity for W276A whereas that of V131L-I134M was, strikingly, two fold increased. Nevertheless, the efficacy of ghrelin to bind or to stimulate mutant receptors remained unchanged. It is concluded that Trp276, Val131 and Ile134 have a significant impact on constitutive signaling of GHS-R1a, V131L-I134M being the first example of a GHS-R1a mutant with a higher basal activity than the wild type receptor.

A conserved aromatic lock for the tryptophan rotameric switch in TM-VI of seven-transmembrane receptors

The conserved tryptophan in position 13 of TM-VI (Trp-VI:13 or Trp-6.48) of the CWXP motif located at the bottom of the main ligand-binding pocket in TM-VI is believed to function as a rotameric microswitch in the activation process of seven-transmembrane (7TM) receptors. Molecular dynamics simulations in rhodopsin demonstrated that rotation around the chi1 torsion angle of Trp-VI:13 brings its side chain close to the equally highly conserved Phe-V:13 (Phe-5.47) in TM-V. In the ghrelin receptor, engineering of high affinity metal-ion sites between these positions confirmed their close spatial proximity. Mutational analysis was performed in the ghrelin receptor with multiple substitutions and with Ala substitutions in GPR119, GPR39, and the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor as well as the NK1 receptor. In all of these cases, it was found that mutation of the Trp-VI:13 rotameric switch itself eliminated the constitutive signaling and strongly impaired agonist-induced signaling without affecting agonist affinity and potency. Ala substitution of Phe-V:13, the presumed interaction partner for Trp-VI:13, also in all cases impaired both the constitutive and the agonist-induced receptor signaling, but not to the same degree as observed in the constructs where Trp-VI:13 itself was mutated, but again without affecting agonist potency. In a proposed active receptor conformation generated by molecular simulations, where the extracellular segment of TM-VI is tilted inwards in the main ligand-binding pocket, Trp-VI:13 could rotate into a position where it obtained an ideal aromatic-aromatic interaction with Phe-V:13. It is concluded that Phe-V:13 can serve as an aromatic lock for the proposed active conformation of the Trp-VI:13 rotameric switch, being involved in the global movement of TM-V and TM-VI in 7TM receptor activation.

5-HT(4) receptors: history, molecular pharmacology and brain functions

Twenty years ago, we started the characterization of a 5-HT receptor coupled to cAMP production in neurons. This receptor obviously had a different pharmacology to the other 5-HT receptors described at that time, i.e. the 5-HT(1), 5-HT(2), 5-HT(3) receptors. We proposed to name it the 5-HT(4) receptor. Nowadays, 5-HT(4) receptors are one of the most studied GPCRs belonging to the "rhodopsin" family. Thanks to the existence of a great variety of ligands with inverse agonist, partial agonist, agonist and antagonist profiles, the pharmacological and physiological properties of this receptor are beginning to emerge. Although some 5-HT(4) partial agonists have been on the market for gastro-intestinal pathologies, 5-HT(4) receptor drugs have still to be commercialized for brain disorders. However, since 5-HT(4) receptors have recognized effects on memory, depression and feeding in animal models, there is still hope for a therapeutic destiny of this interesting target in brain disorders.

5-HT4 receptor agonists: similar but not the same

5-Hydroxytryptamine(4) (5-HT(4)) receptors are an interesting target for the management of patients in need of gastrointestinal (GI) promotility treatment. They have proven therapeutic potential to treat patients with GI motility disorders. Lack of selectivity for the 5-HT(4) receptor has limited the clinical success of the agonists used until now. For instance, next to their affinity for 5-HT(4) receptors, both cisapride and tegaserod have appreciable affinity for other receptors, channels or transporters [e.g. cisapride: human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) is K(+) channel and tegaserod: 5-HT(1) and 5-HT(2) receptors]. Adverse cardiovascular events observed with these compounds are not 5-HT(4) receptor-related. Recent efforts have led to the discovery of a series of selective 5-HT(4) receptor ligands, with prucalopride being the most advanced in clinical development. The selectivity of these new compounds clearly differentiates them from the older generation compounds by minimizing the potential of target-unrelated side effects. The availability of selective agonists enables the focus to shift to the exploration of 5-HT(4) receptor-related differences between agonists. Based on drug- and tissue-related properties (e.g. differences in receptor binding, receptor density, effectors, coupling efficiency), 5-HT(4) receptor agonists are able to express tissue selectivity, i.e. behave as a partial agonist in some and as a full agonist in other tissues. Furthermore, the concept of ligand-directed signalling offers great opportunities for future drug development by enlarging the scientific basis for the generation of agonist-specific effects in different cell types, tissues or organs. Selective 5-HT(4) receptor agonists might thus prove to be innovative drugs with an attractive safety profile for better treatment of patients suffering from hypomotility disorders.

Modifying ligand-induced and constitutive signaling of the human 5-HT4 receptor

G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) signal through a limited number of G-protein pathways and play crucial roles in many biological processes. Studies of their in vivo functions have been hampered by the molecular and functional diversity of GPCRs and the paucity of ligands with specific signaling effects. To better compare the effects of activating different G-protein signaling pathways through ligand-induced or constitutive signaling, we developed a new series of RASSLs (receptors activated solely by synthetic ligands) that activate different G-protein signaling pathways. These RASSLs are based on the human 5-HT_4b receptor, a GPCR with high constitutive G_s signaling and strong ligand-induced G-protein activation of the G_s and G_s/q pathways. The first receptor in this series, 5-HT₄-D¹⁰⁰A or Rs1 (RASSL serotonin 1), is not activated by its endogenous agonist, serotonin, but is selectively activated by the small synthetic molecules GR113808, GR125487, and RO110-0235. All agonists potently induced G_s signaling, but only a few (e.g., zacopride) also induced signaling via the G_q pathway. Zacopride-induced G_q signaling was enhanced by replacing the C-terminus of Rs1 with the C-terminus of the human 5-HT_2C receptor. Additional point mutations (D⁶⁶A and D⁶⁶N) blocked constitutive G_s signaling and lowered ligand-induced G_q signaling. Replacing the third intracellular loop of Rs1 with that of human 5-HT_1A conferred ligand-mediated G_i signaling. This G_i-coupled RASSL, Rs1.3, exhibited no measurable signaling to the G_s or G_q pathway. These findings show that the signaling repertoire of Rs1 can be expanded and controlled by receptor engineering and drug selection.

Conformational state of human cardiac 5-HT(4(g)) receptors influences the functional effects of polyclonal anti-5-HT(4) receptor antibodies

The functional effects of the anti-G21V antibody directed against the second extracellular loop of human heart 5-HT(4) receptors can differ when the receptors are expressed in different cell lines. Here, we extend these studies to show variation in the responses of 5-HT(4(g)) receptors to the antibody within the same expression system. In a previous report no effect of the anti-G21V antibodies had been shown upon 5-HT(4(g)) receptors expressed in CHO cells. Here the same antibodies alone or when added before 5-HT had a functional "inverse-agonist like" effect upon 5-HT(4(g)) receptors expressed in a separate line of CHO cells. Although these CHO cells showed a lower efficacy of cAMP production evoked by 5-HT than the previous report they express a similar h5-HT(4(g)) receptor density. Inhibition of either phosphodiesterases or Gi proteins had no effect upon the action of the antibody. Conformational states of the 5-HT(4) receptor and/or equilibrium between different states of receptors may then determine the functional effect of antibodies against this receptor.

Point mutations in the transmembrane region of GABAB2 facilitate activation by the positive modulator N,N'-dicyclopentyl-2-methylsulfanyl-5-nitro-pyrimidine-4,6-diamine (GS39783) in the absence of the GABAB1 subunit

GABA(B) receptors are heterodimers of two subunits, GABA(B1) (GB1) and GABA(B2) (GB2). Agonists such as GABA and baclofen bind to the GB1 subunit only, whereas GB2 is essential for G protein activation. Positive allosteric modulators enhance the potency and efficacy of agonists at GABA(B) receptors and are of particular interest because they lack the sedative and muscle relaxant properties of agonists. In this study, we aimed to characterize the interaction of the positive modulator N,N'-dicyclopentyl-2-methylsulfanyl-5-nitro-pyrimidine-4,6-diamine (GS39783) with the GABA(B) receptor heterodimer. Using functional guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate binding assays, we observed positive modulation by GS39783 in different vertebrate species but not in Drosophila melanogaster. However, coexpression of D. melanogaster GB1 with rat GB2 yielded functional receptors positively modulated by GS39783. Together with data from rat/D. melanogaster GB2 subunit chimeras, this pointed to a critical role of the GB2 transmembrane region for positive modulation. We further characterized GS39783 function using point mutations. GS39783 positively modulated GABA responses but also showed considerable agonistic activity at heterodimers containing a mutant rat GB2 subunit with three amino acid substitutions in transmembrane domain VI. It was surprising that in contrast to wild-type rat GB2, this mutant subunit was also activated by GS39783 when expressed without GB1. The mutations of both G706T and A708P are necessary and sufficient for activation and identify a key region for the effect of GS39783 in the GB2 transmembrane region. Our data show that mutations of specific amino acids in GB2 can induce agonism in addition to positive modulation and facilitate GB2 activation in the absence of GB1.

Comparison of the binding pockets of two chemically unrelated allosteric antagonists of the mGlu5 receptor and identification of crucial residues involved in the inverse agonism of MPEP

Fenobam [N-(3-chlorophenyl)-N'-(4,5-dihydro-1-methyl-4-oxo-1H-imidazole-2-yl)urea], a clinically validated non-benzodiazepine anxiolytic, has been shown to be a potent and non-competitive metabotropic glutamate (mGlu)-5 receptor antagonist. In the present study, we have used the site-directed mutagenesis coupled with three-dimensional receptor-based pharmacophore modelling to elucidate the interacting mode of fenobam within the seven-transmembrane domain (7TMD) of mGlu5 receptor and its comparison with that of 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)pyridine (MPEP), the prototype antagonist. The common residues involved in the recognition of MPEP and fenobam include Pro654(3.36), Tyr658(3.40), Thr780(6.44), Trp784(6.48), Phe787(6.51), Tyr791(6.55) and Ala809(7.47). The differentiating residues between both modulators' interacting modes are Arg647(3.29), Ser657(3.39) and Leu743(5.47). Our data suggest that these chemically unrelated mGlu5 antagonists act similarly, probing a functionally unique region of the 7TMD. Using [3H]inositol phosphates accumulation assay, we have also identified the critical residues involved in the inverse agonist effect of MPEP. The mutation W784(6.48)A completely blocked the inverse agonist activity of MPEP; two mutations F787(6.51)A and Y791(6.55)A, caused a drastic decrease in the MPEP inverse agonism. Furthermore, these three mutations led to an increased efficacy of quisqualate without having any effect on its potency. The fact that the residues Trp784(6.48) and Phe787(6.51) are essential equally in antagonism and inverse agonism effects emphasizes again the key role of these residues and the involvement of a common transmembrane network in receptor inactivation by MPEP.

A chemogenomic analysis of the transmembrane binding cavity of human G-protein-coupled receptors

The amino acid sequences of 369 human nonolfactory G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been aligned at the seven transmembrane domain (TM) and used to extract the nature of 30 critical residues supposed--from the X-ray structure of bovine rhodopsin bound to retinal--to line the TM binding cavity of ground-state receptors. Interestingly, the clustering of human GPCRs from these 30 residues mirrors the recently described phylogenetic tree of full-sequence human GPCRs (Fredriksson et al., Mol Pharmacol 2003;63:1256-1272) with few exceptions. A TM cavity could be found for all investigated GPCRs with physicochemical properties matching that of their cognate ligands. The current approach allows a very fast comparison of most human GPCRs from the focused perspective of the predicted TM cavity and permits to easily detect key residues that drive ligand selectivity or promiscuity.

Structure-activity relationships of inverse agonists for G-protein-coupled receptors

It has been recently established that G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can be constitutively active, i.e., they can be active in the absence of an agonist. This activity can be inhibited by so-called inverse agonists. For a number of GPCRs, such inverse agonists have been developed and studied, now enabling for the first time a study into their structure-activity relationships.

Molecular Characterization of a Purified 5-HT4 Receptor

Serotonin 5-HT(4(a)) receptor, a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), was produced as a functional isolated protein using Escherichia coli as an expression system. The isolated receptor was characterized at the molecular level by circular dichroism (CD) and steady-state fluorescence. A specific change in the near-UV CD band associated with the GPCR disulfide bond connecting the third transmembrane domain to the second extracellular loop (e2) was observed upon agonist binding to the purified receptor. This is a direct experimental evidence for a change in the conformation of the e2 loop upon receptor activation. Different variations were obtained depending whether the ligand was an agonist (partial or full) or an inverse agonist. In contrast, antagonist binding did not induce any variation. These observations provide a first direct evidence for the fact that free (or antagonist-occupied), active (partial- or full agonist-occupied) and silent (inverse agonist-occupied) states of the receptor involve different arrangements of the e2 loop. Finally, ligand-induced changes in the fluorescence emission profile of the purified receptor confirmed that the partial agonist stabilized a single, well-defined, conformational state and not a mixture of different states. This result is of particular interest in a pharmacological perspective since it directly demonstrates that the efficacy of a drug is likely due to the stabilization of a ligand-specific state rather than selection of a mixture of different conformational states of the receptor.

A Model of Inverse Agonist Action at Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Type 1: Role of a Conserved Tryptophan in Helix 6

A binding pocket for thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) within the transmembrane helices of the TRH receptor type 1 (TRH-R1) has been identified based on experimental evidence and computer simulations. To determine the binding site for a competitive inverse agonist, midazolam, three of the four residues that directly contact TRH and other residues that restrain TRH-R1 in an inactive conformation were screened by mutagenesis and binding assays. We found that two residues that directly contact TRH, Asn-110 in transmembrane helix 3 (3.37) and Arg-306 in transmembrane helix 7 (7.39), were important for midazolam binding but another, Tyr-282 in transmembrane helix 6 (6.51), was not. A highly conserved residue, Trp-279 in transmembrane helix 6 (6.48), which was reported to be critical in stabilizing TRH-R1 in an inactive state but not for TRH binding, was critical for midazolam binding. We used our previous model of the unoccupied TRH-R1 to generate a model of the TRH-R1/midazolam complex. The experimental results and the molecular model of the complex suggest that midazolam binds to TRH-R1 within a transmembrane helical pocket that partially overlaps the TRH binding pocket. This result is consistent with the competitive antagonism of midazolam binding. We suggest that the mechanism of inverse agonism effected by midazolam involves its direct interaction with Trp-279, which contributes to the stabilization of the inactive conformation of TRH-R1.

The heptahelical domain of GABA(B2) is activated directly by CGP7930, a positive allosteric modulator of the GABA(B) receptor

The gamma-aminobutyric acid, type B (GABA(B)) receptor is well recognized as being composed of two subunits, GABA(B1) and GABA(B2). Both subunits share structural homology with other class-III G-protein-coupled receptors. They are composed of two main domains: a heptahelical domain (HD) typical of all G-protein-coupled receptors and a large extracellular domain (ECD). Although GABA(B1) binds GABA, GABA(B2) is required for GABA(B1) to reach the cell surface. However, it is still not demonstrated whether the association of these two subunits is always required for function in the brain. Indeed, GABA(B2) plays a major role in the coupling of the heteromer to G-proteins, such that it is possible that GABA(B2) can transmit a signal in the absence of GABA(B1). Today only ligands interacting with GABA(B1) ECD have been identified. Thus, the compounds acting exclusively on the GABA(B2) subunit will be helpful in analyzing the specific role of this subunit in the brain. Here, we explored the mechanism of action of CGP7930, a compound described as a positive allosteric regulator of the GABA(B) receptor. We showed that it activates the wild type GABA(B) receptor but with a low efficacy. The GABA(B2) HD is necessary for this effect, although one cannot exclude that CGP7930 could also bind to GABA(B1). Of interest, CGP7930 could activate GABA(B2) expressed alone and is the first described agonist of GABA(B2). Finally, we show that CGP7930 retains its agonist activity on a GABA(B2) subunit deleted of its ECD. This demonstrates that the HD of GABA(B2) behaves similar to a rhodopsin-like receptor, because it can reach the cell surface alone, can couple to G-protein, and be activated by agonists. These data open new strategies for studying the mechanism of activation of GABA(B) receptor and examine any possible role of homomeric GABA(B2) receptors.

Heptahelical domain of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 behaves like rhodopsin-like receptors

Although agonists bind directly in the heptahelical domain (HD) of most class-I rhodopsin-like G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), class-III agonists bind in the extracellular domain of their receptors. Indeed, the latter possess a large extracellular domain composed of a cysteine-rich domain and a Venus flytrap module. Both the low sequence homology and the structural organization of class-III GPCRs raised the question of whether or not the HD of these receptors functions the same way as rhodopsin-like GPCRs. Here, we show that the HD of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGlu(5)) displays the same agonist-independent constitutive activity as the wild-type receptor. Moreover, we show that the noncompetitive antagonist MPEP [2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine hydrochloride] and the positive allosteric modulator DFB (3,3'-difluorobenzaldazine) act as inverse agonist and full agonist, respectively, on the mGlu(5) HD in the absence of the extracellular domain. This finding illustrates that, like rhodopsin-like receptors, the HD of mGluRs can constitutively couple to G proteins and be negatively and positively regulated by ligands. These data show that the HD of mGluRs behave like any other class-I GPCRs in terms of G protein coupling and regulation by various types of ligands.

Mutational Analysis and Molecular Modeling of the Binding Pocket of the Metabotropic Glutamate 5 Receptor Negative Modulator 2-Methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine

Metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) 5 is a G-protein-coupled metabotropic glutamate receptor that plays an important role as a modulator of synaptic plasticity, ion channel activity, and excitotoxicity. 2-Methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP) is a highly potent, noncompetitive, selective, and systemically active antagonist of mGlu5 receptors. It binds to a novel allosteric site that resides within the seven-transmembrane domain of mGlu5 receptors. Using site-directed mutagenesis, [3H]MPEP binding, a functional Ca2+ mobilization assay, and rhodopsin-based homology modeling, we identified eight residues (Pro-6543.36, Tyr-6583.40, Leu-7435.47, Thr-7806.44, Trp-7846.48, Phe-7876.51, Tyr-7916.55, and Ala-8097.47) that are crucial for MPEP-binding to rat mGlu5 receptors. Four mutations, Y6583.40V, W7846.48A, F7876.51A, and A8097.47V, caused complete loss of [3H]MPEP binding and also blocked the MPEP-mediated inhibition of quisqualate-induced intracellular Ca2+ mobilization. To visualize these experimental findings, we have constructed a homology model based on the X-ray crystal of bovine rhodopsin and have suggested a possible binding mode of MPEP. We propose that MPEP via its interactions with a network of the aromatic residues including Phe-6583.40 in transmembrane (TM) 3 helix and Trp-7986.48, Phe-7876.51, and Tyr-7916.55 in TM6 helix prevents the movement of TM6 helix relative to TM3 helix, a step that is required for receptor activation, and consequently stabilizes the inactive conformation of mGlu5 receptor. In the TM6 region, we observed a striking similarity between the critical residues involved in MPEP-binding site with those of previously identified as 1-ethyl-2-methyl-6-oxo-4-(1,2,4,5-tetrahydro-benzo[d]azepin-3-yl)-1,6-dihydropyrimidine-5-carbonitrile-binding pocket of mGlu1, pointing to a common mechanism of inhibition shared by both antagonists.

Molecular determination of agouti-related protein binding to human melanocortin-4 receptor

Agouti-related protein (AGRP) is an endogenous antagonist of the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) that functions in the hypothalamic control of feeding behavior. Our previous studies have suggested that in addition to exoloops 2 and 3, several transmembrane domains of MC4R may be important for AGRP binding. However, the detailed molecular basis of MC4R domains in AGRP binding is presently unclear. The present studies were designed to determine the specific contribution of MC4R exoloops and transmembrane domains to AGRP binding by using chimeric receptor constructs of the human melanocortin-1 receptor (hMC1R), a receptor that is not inhibited by AGRP, and the human MC4R (hMC4R), a receptor that is potently inhibited by AGRP. Our results indicate that substitutions of the second and third extracellular loops of the MC4R with homologous domains of the MC1R dramatically decreased AGRP 87-132 binding affinity, but did not affect AGRP 110-117 binding affinity. In contrast, cassette substitutions of the third or fourth transmembrane domain of the MC4R with the homologous domain of the MC1R resulted in a substantial decrease of AGRP 87-132 binding affinity and loss of AGRP 110-117 binding affinity. These data suggest that the AGRP fragment 110-117 has no binding sites at exoloops of hMC4R and that transmembrane domains of MC4R may play an important role in AGRP 110-117 binding and function, whereas the exoloops do not. The second and third extracellular loops of MC4R are important for AGRP 87-132 N-terminal binding, whereas the third and fourth transmembrane domains of hMC4R are crucial for AGRP 110-117 binding.

Evolution, structure, and activation mechanism of family 3/C G-protein-coupled receptors

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent one of the largest gene families in the animal genome. These receptors can be classified into several groups based on the sequence similarity of their common heptahelical domain. The family 3 (or C) GPCRs are receptors for the main neurotransmitters glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid, for Ca(2+), for sweet and amino acid taste compounds, and for some pheromone molecules, as well as for odorants in fish. Although none of these family 3 receptors have been found in plants, members have been identified in ancient organisms, such as slime molds (Dictyostelium) and sponges. Like any other GPCRs, family 3 receptors possess a transmembrane heptahelical domain responsible for G-protein activation. However, most of these identified receptors also possess a large extracellular domain that is responsible for ligand recognition, is structurally similar to bacterial periplasmic proteins involved in the transport of small molecules, and is called a Venus Flytrap module. The recent resolution of the structure of this binding domain in one of these receptors, the metabotropic glutamate 1 receptor, together with the recent demonstration that these receptors are dimers, revealed a unique mechanism of activation for these GPCRs. Such data open new possibilities in the development of drugs aimed at modulating these receptors, and raise a number of interesting questions on the activation mechanism of the other GPCRs.

Mutational analysis and molecular modeling of the allosteric binding site of a novel, selective, noncompetitive antagonist of the metabotropic glutamate 1 receptor

A model of the rmGlu1 seven-transmembrane domain complexed with a negative allosteric modulator, 1-ethyl-2-methyl-6-oxo-4-(1,2,4,5-tetrahydro-benzo[d]azepin-3-yl)- 1,6-dihydro-pyrimidine-5-carbonitrile (EM-TBPC) was constructed. Although the mGlu receptors belong to the family 3 G-protein-coupled receptors with a low primary sequence similarity to rhodopsin-like receptors, the high resolution crystal structure of rhodopsin was successfully applied as a template in this model and used to select residues for site-directed mutagenesis. Three mutations, F801(6.51)A, Y805(6.55)A, and T815(7.39)M caused complete loss of the [(3)H]EM-TBPC binding and blocked the EM-TBPC-mediated inhibition of glutamate-evoked G-protein-coupled inwardly rectifying K(+) channel current and [Ca(2+)](i) response. The mutation W798(6.48)F increased the binding affinity of antagonist by 10-fold and also resulted in a marked decrease in the IC(50) value (4 versus 128 nm) compared with wild type. The V757(5.47)L mutation led to a dramatic reduction in binding affinity by 13-fold and a large increase in the IC(50) value (1160 versus 128 nm). Two mutations, N7474(5.51)A and N7504(5.54)A, increased the efficacy of the EM-TBPC block of the glutamate-evoked [Ca(2+)](i) response. We observed a striking conservation in the position of critical residues. The residues Val-757(5.47), Trp-798(6.48), Phe-801(6.51), Tyr-805(6.55), and Thr-815(7.39) are critical determinants of the EM-TBPC-binding pocket of the mGlu1 receptor, validating the rhodopsin crystal structure as a template for the family 3 G-protein-coupled receptors. In our model, the aromatic ring of EM-TBPC might interact with the cluster of aromatic residues formed from Trp-798(6.48), Phe-801(6.51), and Tyr-805(6.55), thereby blocking the movement of the TM6 helix, which is crucial for receptor activation.

A single mutation in the 5-HT4 receptor (5-HT4-R D100(3.32)A) generates a Gs-coupled receptor activated exclusively by synthetic ligands (RASSL)

To better understand G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCRs) signaling, cellular and animal physiology, as well as gene therapy, a new tool has recently been proposed. It consists of GPCR mutants that are insensitive to endogenous ligands but sensitive to synthetic ligands. These GPCRs are called receptor activated solely by synthetic ligands (RASSL). Only two examples of such engineered receptors have been described so far: one G(i)-coupled (opioid receptors) and one G(s)-coupled (beta(2)-adrenergic receptors). Here, we describe the first RASSL related to serotonin receptors (D100(3.32)A G(s)-coupled 5-HT(4) receptor or 5-HT(4)-RASSL). 5-HT(4)-RASSL is generated by a single mutation, is totally insensitive to serotonin (5-HT), and still responds to synthetic ligands. These ligands have affinities in the range of nanomolar concentrations for the mutant receptor and exhibit full efficacy. More interestingly, two synthetic ligands behave as antagonists on the wild type but as agonists on the 5-HT(4)-RASSL.