Dose-effect comparisons of the CINOD AZD3582 and naproxen on upper gastrointestinal tract mucosal injury in healthy subjects

A proof-of-concept, Phase 2 clinical trial of the gastrointestinal safety of a hydrogen sulfide-releasing anti-inflammatory drug

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

ATB-346 is a hydrogen sulfide (H2 S)-releasing anti-inflammatory and analgesic drug. Animal studies demonstrated negligible gastrointestinal (GI) damage despite marked inhibition of COX activity and significant analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. In humans, ATB-346 (250 mg once daily) was found to inhibit COX to the same extent as naproxen (550 mg twice daily).

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Two hundred forty-four healthy volunteers completed a 2-week, double-blind study, taking either ATB-346 (250 mg once daily) or naproxen (550 mg twice daily), with upper GI ulceration being examined endoscopically.

KEY RESULTS

Forty-two per cent of the subjects taking naproxen developed at least one ulcer (≥3-mm diameter), while only 3% of the subjects taking ATB-346 developed at least one ulcer. The two drugs produced comparable and substantial (>94%) suppression of COX activity. Subjects in the naproxen group developed more ulcers per subject than ATB-346-treated subjects and a greater incidence of larger ulcers (≥5-mm diameter). The incidence of dyspepsia, abdominal pain, gastro-oesophageal reflux, and nausea was lower with ATB-346 than with naproxen. Subjects treated with ATB-346 had significantly higher plasma levels of H2 S than those treated with naproxen.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

This Phase 2B study provides unequivocal evidence for a marked reduction of GI toxicity of the H2 S-releasing analgesic/anti-inflammatory drug, ATB-346, as compared to the conventional dose of naproxen that produced equivalent suppression of COX.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed section on Hydrogen Sulfide in Biology & Medicine. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v177.4/issuetoc.

Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Therapy: A Journey Toward Safety

The efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) against inflammation, pain, and fever has been supporting their worldwide use in the treatment of painful conditions and chronic inflammatory diseases until today. However, the long-term therapy with NSAIDs was soon associated with high incidences of adverse events in the gastrointestinal tract. Therefore, the search for novel drugs with improved safety has begun with COX-2 selective inhibitors (coxibs) being straightaway developed and commercialized. Nevertheless, the excitement has fast turned to disappointment when diverse coxibs were withdrawn from the market due to cardiovascular toxicity. Such events have once again triggered the emergence of different strategies to overcome NSAIDs toxicity. Here, an integrative review is provided to address the breakthroughs of two main approaches: (i) the association of NSAIDs with protective mediators and (ii) the design of novel compounds to target downstream and/or multiple enzymes of the arachidonic acid cascade. To date, just one phosphatidylcholine-associated NSAID has already been approved for commercialization. Nevertheless, the preclinical and clinical data obtained so far indicate that both strategies may improve the safety of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory therapy.

Efficacy and safety of naproxcinod in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a 13-week prospective, randomized, multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the cyclooxygenase-inhibiting nitric-oxide donator, naproxcinod, compared with naproxen and placebo in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee.

METHOD

918 eligible patients were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with either naproxcinod 375 mg, naproxcinod 750 mg, naproxen 500 mg or placebo, twice daily for 13 weeks. The primary objective was to show superiority of naproxcinod compared to placebo. Main efficacy criteria were assessment of pain and physical function using the Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and patients' overall rating of disease status (Likert scale). The main secondary objectives were to show that naproxcinod was non-inferior to naproxen 500 mg and to evaluate overall safety.

RESULTS

Both doses of naproxcinod were statistically and clinically superior to placebo in relieving signs and symptoms of OA of the knee after 13 weeks of treatment, as demonstrated by all three co-primary endpoints (P< or =0.0003). The evaluation of the other secondary efficacy measures was consistent with the primary endpoint results. Naproxcinod 750 mg was non-inferior to equimolar doses of naproxen 500 mg in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population. 24.5% of patients discontinued prematurely, with a higher incidence in the placebo group (18.6%) than the active groups (4.3-7.1%) discontinuing due to lack of efficacy. Both doses of naproxcinod were well-tolerated, with most adverse events being mild or moderate. Compared to placebo, naproxcinod 750 mg and 375 mg showed a similar blood pressure (BP) profile in contrast to naproxen which increased BP.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrated the clinical efficacy and safety of naproxcinod in the management of the signs and symptoms of OA. Naproxcinod was well-tolerated, with BP effects similar to placebo and different from naproxen. Clinical Trials.gov identifier: NCT00542555.

Overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 in rat oral cancers and prevention of oral carcinogenesis in rats by selective and nonselective COX inhibitors

Oral squamous cell carcinomas induced in rats by 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (NQO) show substantial overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) when compared with adjacent phenotypically normal oral tissues. By contrast, neither 5-lipoxygenase (LOX) nor 12-LOX is overexpressed in rat oral cancers. Two chemoprevention studies were done to test the resulting hypothesis that COX-2 is a useful target for oral cancer chemoprevention in the rat. In both studies, male F344 rats received drinking water exposure to NQO (20 ppm) for 10 weeks, followed by administration of chemopreventive agents from week 10 until study termination at week 26. In the first study, groups of rats were fed basal diet (control), or basal diet supplemented with the selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib (500 or 1,500 mg/kg diet), the nonselective COX inhibitor piroxicam (50 or 150 mg/kg diet), or the 5-LOX inhibitor zileuton (2,000 mg/kg diet). In the second study, rats were fed basal diet (control) or basal diet supplemented with nitric oxide-naproxen (180 or 90 mg/kg diet), a nonselective COX inhibitor that shows reduced gastrointestinal toxicity. When compared with dietary controls, celecoxib decreased oral cancer incidence, cancer invasion score, and cancer-related mortality. Piroxicam decreased cancer-related mortality and cancer invasion score, whereas nitric oxide-naproxen decreased oral cancer incidence and cancer invasion score. By contrast, zileuton showed no chemopreventive activity by any parameter assessed. These data show that both selective and nonselective inhibitors of COX-2 can prevent NQO-induced oral carcinogenesis in rats. The chemopreventive activity of COX inhibitors may be linked to overexpression of their enzymatic target in incipient oral neoplasms.

Chemopreventive efficacy of naproxen and nitric oxide-naproxen in rodent models of colon, urinary bladder, and mammary cancers

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) have been highly effective in preventing colon, urinary bladder, and skin cancer preclinically, and also in clinical trials of colon adenoma formation. However, certain NSAIDs cause gastrointestinal ulceration and may increase cardiovascular events. Naproxen seems to cause the lowest cardiovascular events of the common NSAIDs other than aspirin. Nitric oxide (NO)-naproxen was tested based on the finding that adding a NO group to NSAIDs may help alleviate GI toxicity. In the azoxymethane-induced rat colon aberrant crypt foci (ACF) model, naproxen administered at 200 and 400 ppm in the diet reduced mean ACFs in the colon by about 45% to 60%, respectively. NO-naproxen was likewise administered in the diet at roughly equimolar doses (300 and 600 ppm) and reduced total ACF by 20% to 40%, respectively. In the hydroxybutyl (butyl) nitrosamine rat urinary bladder cancer model, NO-naproxen was given at 183 or 550 ppm in the diet, and naproxen at 128 ppm. The NO-naproxen groups had 77% and 73% decreases, respectively, in the development of large urinary bladder tumors, whereas the 128 ppm naproxen group also showed a strong decrease (69%). If treatments were started 3 months after hydroxybutyl (butyl) nitrosamine, NO-naproxen (550 ppm) and naproxen (400 ppm) were also highly effective (86-94% decreases). In the methylnitrosourea-induced mammary cancer model in rats, NO-naproxen and naproxen showed nonsignificant inhibitions (12% and 24%) at 550 and 400 ppm, respectively. These data show that both naproxen and NO-naproxen are effective agents against urinary bladder and colon, but not mammary, carcinogenesis.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the cyclooxygenase-inhibiting nitric oxide donator naproxcinod in treating osteoarthritis of the hip or knee

OBJECTIVE

Naproxcinod, a cyclooxygenase-inhibiting nitric oxide donator antiinflammatory drug, was evaluated in this phase 2, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study to determine its optimal dose in patients with osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

In total 543 patients with OA of the hip or knee were randomized to receive naproxcinod 750 mg once daily (qd), 750 mg twice daily (bid), 1125 mg bid, rofecoxib 25 mg qd, or placebo for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the within-patient change from baseline to the average of Weeks 4 and 6 in WOMAC pain subscale score. Treatment-group differences were compared using ANCOVA with factors for treatment and country, and baseline pain subscale score as a covariate. Safety endpoints included vital signs and adverse events. Treatment-group differences in mean change from baseline to Week 6 in systolic blood pressure (SBP) were compared using an ANCOVA with treatment and country as fixed factors and baseline SBP as covariate.

RESULTS

All active treatments showed statistically significant reductions in WOMAC pain score compared to placebo (p<or=0.02). Naproxcinod was well tolerated. The 750 mg bid dose appeared to have the best balance of benefit versus safety. All 3 naproxcinod doses showed a reduction in SBP, while an increase was shown for rofecoxib. The changes for the naproxcinod groups were statistically significantly better compared to rofecoxib (p<or=0.02).

CONCLUSION

This dose-finding study identified naproxcinod 750 mg bid as the upper dose for further therapeutic confirmatory clinical trials. Naproxcinod at all doses decreased mean SBP compared to an increase with rofecoxib.

Role of coxibs in the strategies for gastrointestinal protection in patients requiring chronic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory therapy

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most commonly prescribed drugs due to their high efficacy in the treatment of pain, fever, inflammation and rheumatic disorders. However, their use is associated with the occurrence of adverse effects at the level of digestive tract, ranging from dyspeptic symptoms, gastrointestinal erosions and peptic ulcers to more serious complications, such as overt bleeding or perforation. To overcome problems related to NSAID-induced digestive toxicity, different therapeutic strategies can presently be considered, including the co-administration of drugs endowed with protective activity on the upper gastrointestinal tract, such as the proton pump inhibitors, or the prescription of coxibs, which have been clinically developed as anti-inflammatory/analgesic drugs characterized by reduced damaging activity on gastrointestinal mucosa. The availability of different treatment options, to reduce the risk of NSAID-induced adverse digestive effects, has fostered intensive preclinical and clinical research aimed at addressing a number of unresolved issues and to establish rational criteria for an appropriate use of coxibs in the medical practice. Particular attention is being paid to the management of patients with high degrees of digestive risk, resulting by concomitant treatment with low-dose aspirin for anti-thrombotic prophylaxis or ongoing symptomatic gastroduodenal ulcers. The present review discusses the most relevant lines of evidence concerning the position of coxibs in the therapeutic strategies for gastrointestinal protection in patients who require NSAID therapy and hold different levels of risk of developing adverse effects at the level of digestive tract.

Prostaglandins, NSAIDs, and gastric mucosal protection: why doesn't the stomach digest itself?

Except in rare cases, the stomach can withstand exposure to highly concentrated hydrochloric acid, refluxed bile salts, alcohol, and foodstuffs with a wide range of temperatures and osmolarity. This is attributed to a number of physiological responses by the mucosal lining to potentially harmful luminal agents, and to an ability to rapidly repair damage when it does occur. Since the discovery in 1971 that prostaglandin synthesis could be blocked by aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), there has been great interest in the contribution of prostaglandins to gastric mucosal defense. Prostaglandins modulate virtually every aspect of mucosal defense, and the importance of this contribution is evident by the increased susceptibility of the stomach to injury following ingestion of an NSAID. With chronic ingestion of these drugs, the development of ulcers in the stomach is a significant clinical concern. Research over the past two decades has helped to identify some of the key events triggered by NSAIDs that contribute to ulcer formation and/or impair ulcer healing. Recent research has also highlighted the fact that the protective functions of prostaglandins in the stomach can be carried out by other mediators, in particular the gaseous mediators nitric oxide and hydrogen sulfide. Better understanding of the mechanisms through which the stomach is able to resist injury in the presence of luminal irritants is helping to drive the development of safer anti-inflammatory drugs, and therapies to accelerate and improve the quality of ulcer healing.

Gastroduodenal mucosal defense

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The duodenum absorbs nearly all secreted gastric acid. Carbonic anhydrases facilitate transmucosal acid movement. The upper gastrointestinal tract must resist a variety of injuries, including those caused by ingested noxious substances, acid, ischemia/reperfusion, and infections such as Helicobacter pylori. The results are similar, however, regardless of insult: inflammation, ulceration, or metaplasia/dysplasia. In the past year, there have been prominent findings suggesting that oxidative stress and the formation of reactive oxygen species may play a pivotal role in all forms of injury, and that antioxidants may be the key to injury prevention and healing.

RECENT FINDINGS

Oxidative injury may be a common mechanism by which the upper gastrointestinal mucosa responds to noxious insults. Endogenous antioxidants, such as ghrelin, L-carnitine, and annexin-1 attenuate the oxidative-stress response. Similarly, exogenous antioxidants have also been shown to decrease inflammation, upregulate free radical scavengers, and prevent the formation of reactive oxygen species.

SUMMARY

Many studies published in the past year have linked oxidative stress to a variety of upper gastrointestinal insults. Exogenous and endogenous antioxidant compounds prevent the oxidative stress response. The future holds great promise for the development of pharmaceuticals with antioxidant properties that are safe, efficacious, and inexpensive.