Concussion reporting, return to learn, and return to play experiences in a sample of private preparatory high school students

A grounded theory of youth athlete concussion under-reporting decisions

BACKGROUND

Sport-related concussions leave youth vulnerable to significant health, physical, social, and educational disruptions. Many youth athletes under-report concussions, but the scope of the issue for this population is not well understood, nor are the underlying motivations for (under)reporting. It is necessary to examine the relationship between sport-related concussion knowledge and reporting and invite athletes to share their decision-making processes. The purpose of the research was to understand how athletes' attitudes, experiences and beliefs regarding concussions influence their under-reporting decisions and behaviours.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 elite athletes, aged 16-18 years, from individual and team sports. Data were analyzed using constructivist grounded theory and a substantive theoretical model of sport-related concussion under-reporting was developed.

RESULTS

The model demonstrates personal, social, cultural, and biophysical processes that contribute to under-reporting decisions and identifies multiple interconnected processes that contribute to 'high-risk' situations of under-reporting. Youth athletes navigate various barriers and facilitators to under-reporting, including their own desire to play, perceived stigma, concussion sense-making, and social influences. Results suggest that under-reporting by youth athletes implicates a collective, rather than individual, responsibility.

CONCLUSIONS

A theoretical grounded model for youth sport-related concussion under-reporting highlights the complexity of the decision-making process. This study offers a new framework for understanding why youth athletes may hide concussion symptoms. The model offers potential to be used to develop concussion interventions and tools for improved decision-making, and to address issues of risk and responsibility concerning concussion reporting.

The Effect of Social Determinants of Health on Clinical Recovery Following Concussion: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Concussion evaluations include a multifaceted approach; however, individual differences can influence test score interpretations and validity. Social determinants of health (SDoH) differentially affect disease risk and outcomes based upon social and environmental characteristics. Efforts to better define, diagnose, manage, and treat concussion have increased, but minimal efforts have focused on examining SDoH that may affect concussion recovery.

OBJECTIVE

This review examined previous research that examined the effect of SDoH on concussion recovery of athletes.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and SPORTDiscus databases were used to search the terms "concussion" AND "recovery," "youth, adolescent, teen and/or adult," and "social determinants of health" and variations of these terms. The evidence level for each study was evaluated using the 2011 Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine Guide.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Seven thousand nine hundred and twenty-one articles were identified and screened for inclusion. Five studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. Using the Downs and Black Quality Index, the studies included in this review were deemed high quality.

CONCLUSION

Though limited literature exists, there is preliminary evidence to suggest that SDoH (specifically, economic stability, education access and quality, and social and community context) may have an impact on the clinical recovery from concussion. The dimensions evaluated varied between studies and the results were inconsistent. No single factor consistently affected clinical recovery; however, private insurance and race appear to have an association with the speed of recovery. Unfortunately, the potential intersection of these variables and other preinjury factors limits the ability to make clear recommendations. While most of the studies in this review are retrospective in nature, future efforts should focus on training clinicians to prospectively evaluate the effect of SDoH on concussion recovery and injury outcomes. Funding and registration for this systematic review were not obtained nor required.

Concussion Rehabilitation and the Application of Ten Movement Training Principles

Concussion awareness continues to grow in all aspects of healthcare, including the areas of prevention, acute care, and ongoing rehabilitation. Most of the concussion research to date has focussed on the challenges around screening and diagnosing what can be a complex mix of brain impairments that overlay with additional pre-existing comorbidities. While we expect further progress in concussion diagnosis, progress also continues to be made around proactive rehabilitation, with the emergence of interventions that can enhance the recovery process, maximise function and independence with a return to study, work, and play. Traditionally, optimal multimodal assessments of concussion have treated the physical, cognitive, and psychological domains of brain injury separately, which supports diagnosis, and informs appropriate follow-up care. Due to the complex nature of brain injury, multimodal assessments direct care toward professionals from many different disciplines including medicine, physiotherapy, psychology, neuropsychology, ophthalmology, and exercise physiology. In addition, these professionals may work in different fields such as sports, neurorehabilitation, vestibular, musculoskeletal, community, vocational, and general practice clinical settings. Rehabilitation interventions for concussions employed in practice are also likely to use a blend of theoretical principles from motor control, cognitive, and psychological sciences. This scale of diversity can make information dissemination, collaboration, and innovation challenging. The Ten Movement Training Principles (MTPs) have been proposed as a usable and relevant concept to guide and support clinical reasoning in neurorehabilitation. When applied to concussion rehabilitation, these same 10 principles provide a comprehensive overview of key rehabilitation strategies for current and future practice. Future collaborations can use these training principles to support clinical and research innovations including the rapid rise of technologies in this growing field of rehabilitation practice.

Prognostic Utility of Oculomotor Assessments in Determining Return-to-Learn Time in Acutely Concussed College Student-Athletes: A Pilot Study

We sought to discover which oculomotor test (King-Devick [KD], near point of convergence [NPC], and accommodative facility [AF]) would best produce a prognostic model for an RTL time frame. An observational cohort design was used to longitudinally track division I and III student-athletes with concussion at a private university in New York State. Measurements included pre-RTL oculomotor testing (NPC, KD, and AF), along with daily text messages and phone calls. Participants were considered returned-to-learn once they had returned to baseline symptoms and had attended 2 days of classes. Our data promote KD score and class attendance as the best-fit prognostic model, with every second accrued on the KD test equating to 5.29 h of RTL time. Further, attending class throughout recovery, versus not, shortened RTL time by a mean 170.50 h, or 7.1 days. Five variables produced a significant attenuating association with concussion symptoms: time post-injury (p = 0.01); caffeine (p = 0.05); alcohol (p = 0.01); music (p = 0.01); and physical activity (p = 0.01). Three variables produced a significant worsening association with concussion symptoms: screen time (p = 0.05); music (p = 0.01); and class attendance (p = 0.01). The findings present a preliminary evidence-based model to prognosticate RTL time. To our knowledge, this is the second longitudinal study, and the first overall, to present objective data for guiding and prognosticating RTL, respectively. Correspondingly, these data should assist clinicians with objectively steering RTL in-clinic.

Challenges and opportunities in diagnosing and managing mild traumatic brain injury in rural settings

INTRODUCTION

There is some evidence to suggest that Americans living in rural areas are at increased risk for sustaining a traumatic brain injury (TBI) compared to those living in urban areas. In addition, once a TBI has been sustained, rural residents have worse outcomes, including a higher risk of death. Individuals living in rural areas tend to live farther from hospitals and have less access to TBI specialists. Aside from these factors, little is known what challenges healthcare providers practicing in rural areas face in diagnosing and managing TBI in their patients and what can be done to overcome these challenges.

METHODS

Seven focus groups and one individual interview were conducted with a total of 18 healthcare providers who mostly practiced in primary care or emergency department settings in rural areas. Providers were asked about common mechanisms of TBI in patients that they treat, challenges they face in initial and follow-up care, and opportunities for improvement in their practice.

RESULTS

The rural healthcare providers reported that common mechanisms of injury included sports-related injuries for their pediatric and adolescent patients and work-related accidents, motor vehicle crashes, and falls among their adult patients. Most providers felt prepared to diagnose and manage their patients with TBI, but acknowledged a series of challenges they face, including pushback from parents, athletes, and coaches and lack of specialists to whom they could refer. They also noted that patients had their own barriers to overcome for timely and adequate care, including lack of access to transportation, difficulties with cost and insurance, and denial about the seriousness of the injury. Despite these challenges, the focus group participants also outlined benefits to practicing in a rural area and several ways that their practice could improve with support.

CONCLUSION

Rural healthcare providers may be comfortable diagnosing, treating, and managing their patients who present with a suspected TBI, but they also face many challenges in their practice. In this study it was continually noted that there was lack of resources and a lack of awareness, or recognition of the seriousness of TBI, among the providers' patient populations. Education about common symptoms and the need for evaluation after an injury is needed. The use of telemedicine, an increasingly common technology, may help close some gaps in access to services. People living in rural areas may be at increased risk for TBI. Healthcare providers who work in these areas face many challenges but have found ways to successfully manage the treatment of this injury in their patients.

Gaps in concussion management across school-aged children

OBJECTIVE

Examine how demographic and injury factors impact identification and management of concussion in students.

METHODS

Prospective observational cohort. Pre-K - 12th grade students within a large, urban school district reported to school with concussion during 2015-2019. Participants were grouped into Elementary/Middle School (E/MS) and High School (HS) and compared by sex, concussion history, injury setting and mechanism, time to medical evaluation and clearance, absences, and recommended accommodations.

RESULTS

154 E/MS and 230 HS students reported to school with physician-diagnosed concussion. E/MS students experienced fewer concussions at school and from sports than HS. More E/MS males than females sustained concussions, while this difference was reversed for HS. Time-to-evaluation was longer for E/MS, specifically female E/MS students and those injured outside of school. E/MS males were cleared more quickly than females. In contrast, no differences were found between sexes for HS by injury setting, mechanism of injury, or management factors.

CONCLUSION

Differences observed in E/MS students by demographic and injury factors are not observed in HS students. Younger students, particularly females or those not injured in school or sports, may be at risk for delayed identification and prolonged time to clearance. Future research should further characterize concussion management in E/MS children.

Concussion Recovery in Children and Adolescents: A Qualitative Study of Parents' Experiences

BACKGROUND

Although parents play an instrumental role in youth concussion management, few studies have qualitatively explored youth concussion recovery from the parents' perspective. This study explored parents' experiences with and perceptions of their child's recovery from concussion, particularly with regards to the return-to-school process.

METHODS

We conducted 11 face-to-face semi-structured interviews with the parents of concussed youth aged 11 to 17 years between October 2018 and April 2019. We used the methods of open coding, axial coding, and selective coding to analyze the data.

RESULTS

We identified 7 themes during data analysis, which we divided into 2 categories: at home (prior to school re-entry) and at school (during the school reintegration process). The at-home category included 4 themes: (1) physical and cognitive rest; (2) child-led decision-making; (3) the role of parent-child communication in recovery; and (4) feelings about returning to school following concussion. The at-school category included 3 themes: (1) availability and utilization of academic accommodations; (2) return-to-school policies and procedures; and (3) support from school officials and teachers.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents' experiences of their child's return-to-school post-concussion underscore the need for evidence-based guidelines for cognitive rest post-concussion and a collaborative, team-based approach to concussion management.

The role of AT-SLP collaborations in return to academics following mTBI: A scoping review

Return-to-academics (RTA) for student-athletes with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is crucial, but relatively understudied compared to return-to-play (RTP). The transient and unpredictable nature of symptoms surrounding mTBI often results in underreporting of neurocognitive symptoms, leading to a greater susceptibility for repeated TBIs, as well as posing impediments to the process of RTA. Athletic Trainers (ATs) and Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs) are in a unique position to help student-athletes achieve a safe, timely, and effective RTA following mTBI. They typically work in middle/high schools and collegiate-level academic settings and often serve as members of concussion management teams. Compared to other allied health professions, ATs and SLPs are relatively new professions with evolving scopes of practice. Despite established guidelines and recommendations for their scope of practice in treating student-athletes with mTBI, there is a lacuna in research regarding their individual and collaborative roles in achieving RTA. The current scoping review was conducted with the main goal of exploring published literature pertaining to the roles of ATs and SLPs in achieving RTA for student-athletes with mTBI. Current implications, recommendations for integrating pre-service interprofessional education (IPE) experiences, and future directions for AT-SLP collaborations are discussed.