Engagement in the Hepatitis C care continuum among people who use drugs

Knowledge of, and attitude towards, the treatment of hepatitis C in people who inject drugs

BACKGROUND

Direct acting antivirals (DAAs) as a curative treatment of hepatitis C have been available for several years and have replaced interferon-containing therapies. However, treatment rates of people who inject drugs (PWID) are declining in Germany, putting the elimination of hepatitis C by 2030 at risk. This study aimed at elucidating the knowledge of, and attitude towards, hepatitis C treatment in a clinical sample of PWID.

METHODS

Participants were recruited between February 2019 and October 2020 at two opioid agonist therapy (OAT) clinics and two in-patient drug detoxification wards. Based on the European Addiction Severity Index (Europ-ASI), a standardized interview focusing on: sociodemographic data, drug history, risky behavior, infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HIV, and previous experience with HCV treatment was carried out. In addition, participants filled in a questionnaire evaluating 13 statements relating to HCV treatment (right/wrong) and 15 statements on their personal 'pros and cons' views to start such a treatment assessed with the means of a 6-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients (average age 45 years, male 78%; 106 (69.3%) currently in opioid maintenance treatment, 47 (30.7%) currently admitted to an inpatient detoxification) with an opioid use disorder were investigated. All of them reported having injected drugs at least once in their lives; 97 participants (63.3%) stated that they had been previously diagnosed with HCV infection. Among them, 27/97 patients (27.8%) reported a previous treatment with interferon; 27/97 (27.8%) with DAAs; and 32/97 (33.0%) reported a currently active hepatitis C. Most patients knew about the availability and efficacy of DAAs. However, DAAs' low rate of side effects, their short treatment duration, and their replacement of interferon, were not correctly evaluated by up to 50.3% of patients. 25-40% of 32 patients with currently active hepatitis C prioritized handling of social and other medical issues, e.g., reduction of heroin use, over treatment of hepatitis C.

CONCLUSIONS

Although current levels of risky behavior have reportedly been reduced by active PWID over the past few years, educational and motivational interventions to increase hepatitis C treatment uptake should address the gaps in patients' knowledge.

Bridging the gap: Addressing disparities in hepatitis C screening, access to care, and treatment outcomes

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a significant public health challenge globally, with substantial morbidity and mortality due to chronic liver disease. Despite the availability of highly effective and well-tolerated direct-acting antiviral therapies, widespread disparities remain in hepatitis C screening, access to treatment, linkage to care, and therapeutic outcomes. This review article synthesizes evidence from various studies to highlight the multifactorial nature of these disparities, which affects ethnic minorities, people with lower socioeconomic status, individuals with substance use disorders, and those within correctional facilities. The review also discusses policy implications and targeted strategies needed to overcome barriers and ensure equitable care for all individuals with HCV. Recommendations for future research to address gaps in knowledge and evaluation of the effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce disparities are provided.

Distrust in the Health Care System and Adherence to Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy among People with Hepatitis C Virus Who Inject Drugs

This study is a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial (October 2013-April 2017) involving 150 People Who Inject Drugs (PWIDs) with hepatitis C virus (HCV) seen in opioid agonist treatment programs in the Bronx, New York, and investigates the impact of distrust in the healthcare system on adherence to Direct-Acting Antivirals (DAAs) HCV treatment therapy among PWIDs. The distrust was scaled on a 9-item instrument and the adherence to DAA medications was measured using electronic blister packs. This study demonstrated a significant inverse relationship between levels of distrust and medication adherence: 71.8 ± 2.2% (se) vs. 77.9 ± 1.8%, p = 0.024 between participants with higher and lower distrust levels. Despite the absence of significant association of distrust with sociodemographic or substance use characteristics, these findings suggest that building trust within the healthcare system is paramount for improving adherence to DAAs among PWIDs. The results call for a healthcare approach that emphasizes trust-building through patient-centered care, sensitivity training, peer support, and health system reform to effectively address the treatment needs of this marginalized population.

Community-Based Point-of-Diagnosis Hepatitis C Treatment for Marginalized Populations: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

Importance

Disparities persist in testing and treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV), leaving socially marginalized populations less likely to benefit from curative treatment. Linkage services are often insufficient to overcome barriers to navigating the medical system and contextual factors.

Objective

To determine the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of HCV treatment at the point of HCV infection diagnosis disclosure in a nonclinical community setting.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this single-arm nonrandomized controlled trial conducted between July 1, 2020, and October 31, 2021, street-outreach recruitment targeted people experiencing homelessness and injecting drugs in an urban US community who were eligible for simplified HCV treatment.

Interventions

Study procedures were designed to reflect the community environment and services needed to provide HCV testing, disclosure, and treatment in a nonclinical site. The test-and-treat No One Waits (NOW) model of care provided a 2-week starter pack of 400 mg of sofosbuvir and 100 mg of velpatasvir at time of HCV RNA results disclosure. Participants were transitioned to insurance-provided sofosbuvir-velpatasvir when feasible to complete a 12-week treatment course.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12 or later (SVR12). Acceptability end points were treatment initiation and completion. Safety end points were treatment discontinuation because of a late exclusion criterion and adverse events.

Results

Of the 492 people (median [IQR] age, 48 [37-58] years; 62 [71%] male) who underwent anti-HCV testing, 246 (50%) tested anti-HCV positive, and 111 (23%) tested HCV RNA positive and were eligible for simplified HCV treatment. Eighty-nine of the 111 eligible participants (80%) returned for confirmatory RNA results, and 87 (98%) accepted and initiated HCV treatment. Seventy (80%) were currently injecting drugs, 83 (97%) had an income below the poverty line, and 53 (61%) were currently unsheltered. Most had HCV genotype 1a (45 [52%]) or 3 (20 [23%]). Sixty-nine (79%) completed 12 weeks of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir treatment, 2 stopped treatment because of low adherence, and 16 were lost to follow-up. Of the 66 participants who completed treatment and had a successful blood draw, 61 (92%) had undetectable HCV RNA at treatment completion. Of the 87 treated patients, 58 achieved SVR12, leading to a treatment response of 67% (95% CI, 56%-76%) among the intention-to-treat group and 84% (95% CI, 73%-92%) among the per-protocol group. There were no adverse events, late exclusions, or deaths.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this nonrandomized controlled trial of HCV treatment at the point of diagnosis, the NOW model of care reduced steps between HCV testing and treatment initiation and resulted in high levels of treatment initiation, completion, and cure. The NOW model of care can expand the current HCV test-and-treat toolkit by reaching a broader population of marginalized communities and expediting curative therapy.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03987503.

Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection: An Ongoing Challenge in Screening and Treatment

With the advent of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) in the recent few years, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has become a curable infectious disease. Successful clearance of HCV could lead to improvement of both hepatic and extrahepatic outcomes, such as complications of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, cardiovascular diseases, and incident diabetes. However, challenges persist in reaching the HCV elimination goals of the World Health Organization by 2030. Among these challenges are identifying those already infected or undiagnosed subjects, re-linking to the care of known but untreated HCV-infected subjects, and developing strategies to enhance treatment rates and compliance in specific or high-risk populations. In addition, issues of post-DAA viral clearance, including avoiding or preventing reinfection in high-risk populations and surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma, are important to consolidate the treatment's short- and long-term efficacies. In the current DAA era, treatment is the most effective prevention strategy not only in its excellent efficacy and safety but also in preventing HCV spread. All of the surveillance or measures should center on DAA treatment in clinical practice.

"Treated like a Human Being": perspectives of people who inject drugs attending low-threshold HCV treatment at a syringe service program in New York City

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment can effectively cure HCV among people who inject drugs (PWID). Perspectives of PWID treated in innovative models can reveal program features that address barriers to treatment, and guide implementation of similar models.

METHODS

We interviewed 29 participants in the intervention arm of a randomized trial. The trial enrolled PWID with HCV in New York City from 2017 to 2020 and tested the effectiveness of a low-threshold HCV treatment model at a syringe services program. Participants were purposively sampled and interviewed in English or Spanish. The interview guide focused on prior experiences with HCV testing and treatment, and experiences during the trial. Interviews were inductively coded and analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Before enrollment, participants reported being tested for HCV in settings such as prison, drug treatment, and emergency rooms. Treatment was delayed because of not being seen as urgent by providers. Participants reported low self-efficacy, competing priorities, and systemic barriers to treatment such as insurance, waiting lists, and criminal-legal interactions. Stigma was a major factor. Treatment during the trial was facilitated through respect from staff, which overcame stigma. The flexible care model (allowing walk-ins and missed appointments) helped mitigate logistical barriers. The willingness of the staff to address social determinants of health was highly valued.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the need for low-threshold programs with nonjudgmental behavior from program staff, and flexibility to adapt to participants' needs. Social determinants of health remain a significant barrier, but programs' efforts to address these factors can engender trust and facilitate treatment. Trial registration NCT03214679.

Barriers and enablers to testing for hepatitis C virus infection in people who inject drugs - a scoping review of the qualitative evidence

BACKGROUND

Injection drug use is the primary mode of transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the developed world and guidelines recommend screening individuals with current or history of injection drug use for HCV; however, the majority of those living with HCV in Canada are not aware of their positive status. This low level of HCV status awareness suggests that screening is not effective with current testing strategies. The aim of this review is to determine what barriers and enablers people who inject drugs (PWID) experience surrounding testing for HCV to help inform the development of an engaging testing strategy.

METHODS

Comprehensive literature searches were conducted using Medline, Embase and CINAHL in February 2021. Included studies investigated the barriers and enablers to testing for HCV in PWID and the experiences of PWID in testing for HCV. Studies were included if they were qualitative or mixed-methods design, involved people with current injection drug use or those with a history of injecting drugs, and were written in the English language. Studies were compared and common themes were coded and analyzed.

RESULTS

The literature search resulted in 1554 citations and ultimately nine studies were included. Common barriers included self-perception of low risk for HCV, fear of diagnosis, stigma associated with IV drug use and HCV, antipathy in relation to mainstream health care services, limited knowledge about HCV, lack of rapport with provider, lack of motivation or competing priority of drug use, and limited awareness of new treatment options. Common enablers to testing included increasing awareness of HCV testing and treatment and providing positive narratives around HCV care, positive rapport with provider, accessible testing options and individualized care.

CONCLUSION

While there has been some qualitative research on barriers and enablers to testing for HCV in PWID more research is needed to focus on this research question as a primary objective in order to provide more understanding from the participant's perspective.

A qualitative investigation of the barriers and facilitators to Hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening among individuals experiencing homelessness in Houston, Texas

BACKGROUND

Individuals experiencing homelessness may be at a higher risk for hepatitis C infection because many are vulnerable to risk factors related to HCV. Screening is the very first step in the HCV care continuum, but it remains unclear how to improve HCV screening among this hard-to-reach population. Thus, the present study investigated the barriers and facilitators to HCV screening from the perspective of individuals experiencing homelessness within a non-residential social service setting.

METHODS

Individuals experiencing homelessness (aged 18+) were approached while they were seeking services at two community-based organizations in Houston, Texas, during August 2020. Participants (N = 31) completed an interviewer-administered demographic survey and a semi-structured interview about their experiences with healthcare, homelessness, and HCV screening. Following transcript coding and content analysis, a thematic analysis was conducted to identify HCV screening barriers and facilitators discussed by participants.

RESULTS

Participants were predominantly male (n = 25, 80.6%), and almost 40% of participants had no form of medical insurance. Participants identified the following as barriers to HCV screening: mistrust of the healthcare system and professionals and lack of knowledge of HCV prevention, harm reduction, and complications. Participants identified the following as facilitators to HCV screening: providing incentives and increasing access and convenience to HCV screening.

CONCLUSION

Community-based HCV screening programs may wish to account for the lived experiences of individuals experiencing homelessness in order to minimize barriers to screening. Client-centered strategies that reduce wait times and incentivize participation should be considered to eliminate barriers and increase convenience for this high-risk population.

ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL NEEDS WITH UNCONTROLLED VIREMIA IN PEOPLE WITH HIV

Using a tool integrated into the electronic health record, we determined prevalence of 10 social needs among 377 people with HIV (PWH) and 27,833 patients without HIV receiving care in the Montefiore Health System. PWH (median age 53) were 55% women, 41% Black, 44% Hispanic. 33% of PWH reported at least one social need vs. 18% among patients without HIV, with healthcare transportation and housing needs significantly higher among PWH in adjusted analyses. PWH reporting transportation needs were 27% less likely to be virologically suppressed (< 200 copies/mL, adjusted prevalence ratio 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.96) compared with PWH without transportation needs.