Anti-interleukin-12 and anti-interleukin-23 agents in Crohn's disease

Safety of tildrakizumab: a disproportionality analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database from 2018-2023

Background: Tildrakizumab, the IL-23 inhibitor, is used to treat plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Many studies have reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with Tildrakizumab. Objective: The aim of this study was to describe ADRs associated with Tildrakizumab monotherapy by mining data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: The signals of Tildrakizumab-associated ADRs were quantified using disproportionality analyses such as the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multiitem gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms. Results: A total of 10,530,937 reports of ADRs were collected from the FAERS database, of which 1,177 reports were identified with tildrakizumab as the "primary suspect (PS)". Tildrakizumab-induced ADRs occurred against 27 system organ classes (SOCs). A total of 32 significant disproportionality Preferred Terms (PTs) conformed to the algorithms. Unexpected significant ADRs such as coronavirus infection, herpes simplex, diverticulitis, atrial fibrillation and aortic valve incompetence were also possible. The median time to onset of Tildrakizumab-associated ADRs was 194 days (interquartile range [IQR] 84-329 days), with the majority occurring, within the first 1 and 3 months after initiation of Tildrakizumab. Conclusion: This study identified a potential signal for new ADRs with Tildrakizumab, which might provide important support for clinical monitoring and risk prediction.

Management Strategies for Pediatric Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Spotlight on Biologics

Although psoriasis onset has been reported at any ages, in up to one-third of cases, it begins during childhood, with an estimated prevalence of about 2% in pediatric population. The management of moderate-to-severe forms of childhood psoriasis may represent a challenge for dermatologists, especially for parents' concerns about the need of systemic treatments. However, a prompt safe and effective treatment is mandatory in these patients, due to the significative impact that psoriasis may have on their quality of life, with well-known consequences on psychological health of both patients and caregivers. Due to the relatively frequent parents' refusal of systemic treatments, probably due to the fear of eventual adverse events, difficulties of oral or injective route, the management of moderate-to-severe forms still represents a challenge. Herein, we report a narrative review, aiming to resume the systemic treatments for pediatric psoriasis, focusing on the use of biologics and small molecules in the pediatric ages. The most widely used therapeutic strategies today for the pediatric population with moderate-severe psoriasis are traditional systemic therapies, while more innovative drugs such as biologics and small molecules now represent a somewhat unexplored but certainly promising field for unresponsive patients.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Association between Preoperative Ustekinumab and Surgical Complications in Crohn's Disease Patients

INTRODUCTION

The impact of ustekinumab (UST) therapy on surgical complications in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis is to explore the link between these two.

METHODS

Databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Springer Link) were searched until April 2022. Studies of CD patients who received UST and no UST prior to surgery (including no biological therapy, anti-tumor necrosis factor-α [anti-TNF-α] agent, and vedolizumab [VDZ]) were included. Primary outcomes included overall complications, infectious complications, and noninfectious complications.

RESULTS

Nine studies totaling 3,225 CD patients were enrolled; 332 patients received UST treatment. There was no evidence of difference in the overall complications (odds ratio [OR] = 0.84, p = 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.57-1.23], I2 = 40%) between CD patients who had UST treatment preoperatively and those who had no UST treatment. There was no evidence of a difference in infectious complications (OR = 1.15, p = 0.35, 95% CI = [0.86-1.53], I2 = 2%). Additionally, there was no significant evidence of difference between these groups in terms of noninfectious complications and death. Specifically, there was no evidence of difference in overall complications, infection complications (including wound complications, sepsis, abscess, and anastomotic leakage), and noninfection complications (ileus, readmission, and return to operation), compared with no biological therapy and anti-TNF-α agents. At the same time, no significant evidence of difference was discovered in the comparison of preoperative UST and VDZ therapy in terms of overall complications, infectious complications (sepsis and abscess), and noninfectious complications (intestinal obstruction, readmission, and recovery surgery).

CONCLUSION

In general, compared with other biological agents, preoperative use of UST in the treatment of CD patients is usually safe and does not increase surgical complications.

Alginate-based drug carrier systems to target inflammatory bowel disease: A review

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an inflammatory disorder that affects the gastrointestinal tract. IBD has become an increasingly common condition in both developed and developing nations over the last few decades, owing to a variety of factors like a rising population and diets packed with processed and junk foods. While the root pathophysiology of IBD is unknown, treatments are focused on medications aimed to mitigate symptoms. Alginate (AG), a marine-derived polysaccharide, is extensively studied for its biocompatibility, pH sensitivity, and crosslinking nature. This polymer is thoroughly researched in drug delivery systems for IBD treatment, as it is naturally available, non-toxic, cost effective, and can be easily and safely cross-linked with other polymers to form an interconnected network, which helps in controlling the release of drugs over an extended period. There are various types of drug delivery systems developed from AG to deliver therapeutic agents; among them, nanotechnology-based systems and hydrogels are popular due to their ability to facilitate targeted drug delivery, reduce dosage, and increase the therapeutic efficiency. AG-based carrier systems are not only used for the sustained release of drug, but also used in the delivery of siRNA, interleukins, and stem cells for site directed drug delivery and tissue regenerating ability respectively. This review is focussed on pathogenesis and currently studied medications for IBD, AG-based drug delivery systems and their properties for the alleviation of IBD. Moreover, future challenges are also be discoursed to improve the research of AG in the field of biopharmaceuticals and drug delivery.

Treatment persistence among bio-naïve patients with Crohn's disease initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab

OBJECTIVES

To compare persistence and describe dose titration among bio-naïve patients with Crohn's disease (CD) initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab.

METHODS

Bio-naïve adults with CD who initiated ustekinumab or adalimumab (index date) from 23 September 2016 (ustekinumab US approval for CD) to 1 August 2019 were selected from IQVIA PharMetrics Plus. Cohorts were balanced on baseline characteristics measured over 12 months pre-index using inverse probability of treatment weights. Persistence was defined as no gaps (ustekinumab: >120 days; adalimumab: >60 days) between days of supply. Dose escalation was defined as ≥2 consecutive sub-cutaneous claims 100% above the US label daily dose in the maintenance phase; de-escalation was a return to the daily dose for ≥2 consecutive claims. Outcomes were described using weighted Kaplan-Meier models; persistence outcomes were compared using Cox's proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

At 12 months post-index, patients in the ustekinumab (n = 948) versus adalimumab (n = 4143) cohort had a significantly higher rate of persistence on index biologic (hazard ratio [HR] 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.29-1.74). A total of 830 (87.6%) patients in the ustekinumab cohort and 3713 (89.6%) in the adalimumab cohort began the maintenance phase; within 12 months, 11.2% and 16.9%, underwent a dose escalation, and 26.6% and 6.3%, respectively, subsequently de-escalated to the per US label daily exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Bio-naïve patients with CD initiated on ustekinumab were more persistent than patients initiated on adalimumab; moreover, these patients had numerically lower dose escalation and higher de-escalation rates than patients initiated on adalimumab. Findings support the use of ustekinumab as a first-line treatment for bio-naïve patients with CD.

Baricitinib for the treatment of intestinal Behçet's disease: A pilot study

OBJECTIVES

The pilot study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in treating refractory intestinal Behçet's disease (BD).

METHODS

We consecutively enrolled patients with refractory intestinal BD from October 2020 to September 2022. They were treated with baricitinib 2-4 mg daily, with background glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants. Efficacy assessment included the global gastrointestinal symptom scores, the endoscopy scores, the Disease activity index for intestinal Behçet's disease (DAIBD), and the inflammatory parameters. Side effects were recorded.

RESULTS

The thirteen patients (six males and seven females) had a median follow-up of eleven months, 76.92% (10/13) patients achieved complete remission of global gastrointestinal symptom scores, and 66.7% (6/9) had mucosal healing on endoscopy. The DAIBD scores decreased significantly, as well as the C-reactive protein level. Baricitinib showed a glucocorticoid-sparing effect, and the safety profile is favorable.

CONCLUSION

Baricitinib might be a potential choice in treating refractory intestinal BD.

Spondyloarthropathy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: From Pathophysiology to Pharmacological Targets

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) represents one of the most frequent extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Evidence of shared genetic and molecular pathways underlying both diseases is emerging, which has led to rational approaches when treating patients with concomitant diseases. Clinical efficacy of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists has been ascertained over the years, and they currently represent the cornerstone of treatment in patients with IBD and SpA, but the therapeutic armamentarium in these cases has been recently expanded. Evidence for vedolizumab is controversial, as it was associated both with improvement and development of arthralgias, while ustekinumab, the first anti-interleukin 12/23 (IL-12/23) approved for IBD, has demonstrated good efficacy, especially in peripheral arthritis, and more IL-23 inhibitors are being developed in IBD. Tofacitinib was the first Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor to be approved in IBD, and as it demonstrated efficacy in treating ankylosing spondylitis, it may represent a good choice in axial arthritis, while more selective JAK inhibitors are yet to be approved. Unexpectedly, the first anti-IL17 that was studied in IBD (secukinumab) has shown not to be effective in treating IBD, and the role of anti-IL17 drugs in these diseases needs further investigation. Therefore, as availability of biologics and small molecules is increasing, their positioning in clinical practice is becoming more and more challenging, and multidisciplinary management needs to be implemented in both research and clinical settings in order to enhance early recognition of SpA in IBD patients, optimize treatment and ultimately improve the patients' quality of life.

[Biologics in inflammatory bowel diseases]

BACKGROUND

In addition to conventional anti-inflammatory treatment for chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), there has been an evolution of new treatment options over the past 20 years. Already approved biologics provide multiple treatment alternatives but also make the treatment algorithms more complex. This development results in a substantial improvement in patient care. The ambitious treatment targets are associated with a higher quality of life and the reduction of long-term disability and morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to give an overview of how biologics can currently be implemented in IBD. In particular, the current clinical management is presented and an outlook on future treatment options with biologics for IBD is provided.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A search was carried out in PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov and the current German and European guidelines and expert recommendations were evaluated.

RESULTS

Since the late 1990s there have been a continuously increasing number of treatment options for IBD. All substances have proven safety and efficacy in large randomized clinical studies and enable increasingly more individualized treatment for patients with IBD. Biologics are currently the standard treatment of choice for moderate to severe inflammatory activity as well as for steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent courses of disease after failure of conventional treatment.

CONCLUSION

The diversity of IBD treatment offers increasing treatment options and thus improved patient care; however, as the number of new substances increases treatment becomes more complex. This article summarizes the current and future treatment options for IBD and their integration into current treatment algorithms.

Serological Response to BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccines in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Biologic Therapies

Introduction: The immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on biologic therapies is not well studied. The goal of this study was to measure the serological response to BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines in patients with IBD receiving different biologic therapies. Methods: We performed a multi-center prospective study between 1 August 2021 and 15 September 2021. We measured the seropositivity of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (SARS-CoV-2 IgG) and neutralizing antibody concentrations in patients with IBD receiving biologic therapies 4-10 weeks after their second dose or 3-6 weeks after their first dose of BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines. Results: A total of 126 patients were enrolled (mean age, 31 years; 60% male; 71% Crohn's disease, 29% ulcerative colitis). Of these, 92 patients were vaccinated with the BNT162b2 vaccine (73%) and 34 patients with the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (27%). In patients being treated with infliximab and adalimumab, the proportion of patients who achieved positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels after receiving two doses of the vaccine were 44 out of 59 patients (74.5%) and 13 out of 16 patients (81.2%), respectively. In contrast, of those receiving ustekinumab and vedolizumab, the proportion of patients who achieved positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels after receiving two doses of the vaccine were 100% and 92.8%, respectively. In patients receiving infliximab and adalimumab, the proportion of patients who had positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody levels after two-dose vaccination was 40 out of 59 patients (67.7%) and 14 out 16 patients (87.5%), respectively. On the other hand, the proportion of patients who had positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody levels were 12 out of 13 patients (92.3%) and 13 out of 14 patients (92.8%) in patients receiving ustekinumab and vedolizumab, respectively. Conclusions: The majority of patients with IBD who were on infliximab, adalimumab, and vedolizumab seroconverted after two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. All patients on ustekinumab seroconverted after two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are both likely to be effective after two doses in patients with IBD on biologics. Larger follow-up studies are needed to evaluate if decay of antibodies occurs over time.

Real world practice indirect comparison between guselkumab and risankizumab: Results from an Italian retrospective study

IL‐23‐inhibitors, such as guselkumab and risankizumab, represent the newest class of biologics approved for psoriasis. Phase III trials have shown their efficacy and safety. However, real life data are still scant. to indirectly compare the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of guselkumab and risankizumab in real world practice. An Italian single‐center retrospective cohort study enrolling moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis patients from September 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020 was performed to indirectly compare guselkumab and risankizumab efficacy and safety. Sixty eight patients were included (36 received guselkumab and 32 risankizumab). The groups were comparable for all analyzed characteristics, except for mean psoriasis duration (p < 0.01) which was higher for guselkumab. In guselkumab group, mean PASI reduced from 16.1 ± 6.4 (baseline) 2.1 ± 0.9 (week‐28) (p < 0.001) up to 0.9 ± 0.8 (week‐44) (p < 0.001). In risankizumab group mean PASI decreased from 13.5 ± 4.9 (baseline) 1.9 ± 0.8 (p < 0.001), (week‐28) (p < 0.001) up to 0.9 ± 0.4 (week‐40) (p < 0.001). No significant difference in mean PASI and BSA were observed between the treatments. No cases of serious AEs, injection site reaction, candida, malignancy, cardiovascular events were reported in both groups. Guselkumab and risankizumab showed favorable efficacy and safety profile, being comparable in terms of PASI90 and PASI100 responses as well as in AEs frequency and discontinuation rates.

Lack of Association between Serum Interleukin-23 and Interleukin-27 Levels and Disease Activity in Patients with Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease characterized by the production of multiple autoantibodies, resulting in tissue and organ damage. Recent studies have revealed that interleukin-23 (IL-23) and interleukin-27 (IL-27) may be therapeutically relevant in selected SLE manifestations. This study aimed to identify associations between serum IL-27 and IL-23 levels and disease activity in Polish patients with different manifestations of SLE: neuropsychiatric lupus (NPSLE), and lupus nephritis (LN). Associations between interleukin levels and oligo-specific antibodies against double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), dose of glucocorticoids, and type of treatment were also analyzed. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to assess anti-dsDNA antibodies and analyze the serum concentration of IL-27 and IL-23 from 72 patients aged 19-74 years with confirmed active SLE. Disease activity was measured using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI 2-K). No significant correlations between interleukin levels and SLEDAI score, anti-dsDNA, corticosteroid dose, or type of treatment were noted. Patients with NPSLE and LN presented the highest median scores of SLEDAI.

A Review of the Efficacy and Safety for Biologic Agents Targeting IL-23 in Treating Psoriasis With the Focus on Tildrakizumab

Psoriasis is a chronic and debilitating inflammatory immune-mediated skin disorder. Several cytokines including interleukin (IL)-23 were demonstrated to play a central role in the pathogenesis of this disease. Treatment options for psoriasis range from topical to systemic modalities, depending on the extent, anatomical locations involved and functional impairment level. Targeting cytokines or their cognate receptors that are involved in disease pathogenesis such as IL-12/23 (i.e., targeting the IL-12p40 subunit shared by these cytokines), IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-17RA, and TNF-α using biologic agents emerged in recent years as a highly effective therapeutic option for patients with moderate-to-severe disease. This review provides an overview of the important role of IL-23 signaling in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. We describe in detail the available IL-23 inhibitors for chronic plaque psoriasis. The efficacy, pharmacokinetic properties, and the safety profile of one of the most recent IL-23 biologic agents (tildrakizumab) are evaluated and reviewed in depth.

Targeting Mitochondrial Damage as a Therapeutic for Ileal Crohn's Disease

Paneth cell defects in Crohn's disease (CD) patients (called the Type I phenotype) are associated with worse clinical outcomes. Recent studies have implicated mitochondrial dysfunction in Paneth cells as a mediator of ileitis in mice. We hypothesized that CD Paneth cells exhibit impaired mitochondrial health and that mitochondrial-targeted therapeutics may provide a novel strategy for ileal CD. Terminal ileal mucosal biopsies from adult CD and non-IBD patients were characterized for Paneth cell phenotyping and mitochondrial damage. To demonstrate the response of mitochondrial-targeted therapeutics in CD, biopsies were treated with vehicle or Mito-Tempo, a mitochondrial-targeted antioxidant, and RNA transcriptome was analyzed. During active CD inflammation, the epithelium exhibited mitochondrial damage evident in Paneth cells, goblet cells, and enterocytes. Independent of inflammation, Paneth cells in Type I CD patients exhibited mitochondrial damage. Mito-Tempo normalized the expression of interleukin (IL)-17/IL-23, lipid metabolism, and apoptotic gene signatures in CD patients to non-IBD levels. When stratified by Paneth cell phenotype, the global tissue response to Mito-Tempo in Type I patients was associated with innate immune, lipid metabolism, and G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) gene signatures. Targeting impaired mitochondria as an underlying contributor to inflammation provides a novel treatment approach for CD.

Head-to-head comparison of biological drugs for inflammatory bowel disease: from randomized controlled trials to real-world experience

During past years, the increasing knowledge of molecular mechanisms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have led to the development of several targeted biological therapies. This great expansion of available medical options has prompted the need for comparative data between drugs. For years, given that most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were performed only versus placebo, this demand has clashed with the absence of head-to-head trials comparing two or more treatments. The quality of evidence coming from real-world experience was low overall, so it was extremely difficult to clarify the correct positioning of the biologicals inside the therapeutic algorithms for IBD. Fortunately, times are changing: head-to-head comparative RCTs have been conducted or are ongoing, and the methodological quality of real-world studies is gradually increasing, mainly thanks to a higher rate of application of statistical methods capable of reducing the selection bias, such as the propensity score. In this evolving scenario, the increasing number of comparative RCTs is providing high-quality data for a correct drug positioning in IBD. In parallel, real-world observational studies are supporting the data coming from RCTs, and covering those comparisons not performed in the RCT setting. We believe that there is moderate evidence already available to support clinicians in the correct choice between different biologicals, and data will certainly be more robust in the near future.

Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Oat Beta-Glucans in a Crohn's Disease Model: Time- and Molar Mass-Dependent Effects

BACKGROUND

The incidence of Crohn's disease (CD) is increasing worldwide, and it has currently become a serious public health issue in society. The treatment of CD continues throughout a patient's lifetime, and therefore, it is necessary to develop new, effective treatment methods, including dietotherapy. The present study aimed to determine the effects of consumption of oat beta-glucans with different molar mass on colon inflammation (colitis) in the early stages of 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced CD in an animal model.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley rats (control and TNBS-induced CD) were divided into three dietary groups and fed for 3 days (reflecting acute inflammation) or 7 days (reflecting remission) with a feed containing 1% low (βGl) or high (βGh) molar mass oat beta-glucan or a feed without this polysaccharide. The level of colon inflammatory markers and the expression of cytokines and their receptor genes were measured by ELISA and RT-PCR methods, respectively.

RESULTS

Acute inflammation or remission (3 or 7 days after TNBS administration, respectively) stages of experimentally induced CD were characterized by an increase in the level of inflammatory markers (IL-1, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, TNF-α, CRP, MPO, COX, and PGE2) and the disruption of some cytokine signaling pathways as well as macro- and microscopic changes of colon tissue. The consumption of oat beta-glucans reduced the level of inflammatory markers and recovered the signaling pathways and histological changes, with stronger effects of βGl after 7 days of colitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Dietary oat beta-glucans can reduce colitis at the molecular and organ level and accelerate CD remission.

Microglia-Derived Interleukin 23: A Crucial Cytokine in Alzheimer's Disease?

Neuronal cell death, amyloid β plaque formation and development of neurofibrillary tangles are among the characteristics of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In addition to neurodegeneration, inflammatory processes such as activation of microglia and astrocytes are crucial in the pathogenesis and progression of AD. Cytokines are essential immune mediators of the immune response in AD. Recent data suggest a role of interleukin 23 (IL-23) and its p40 subunit in the pathogenesis of AD and corresponding animal models, in particular concerning microglia activation and amyloid β plaque formation. Moreover, in animal models, the injection of anti-p40 antibodies resulted in reduced amyloid β plaque formation and improved cognitive performance. Here, we discuss the pathomechanism of IL-23 mediated inflammation and its role in AD.

Treatments of inflammatory bowel disease toward personalized medicine

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by intestinal inflammation and epithelial injury. For the treatment of IBD, 5-aminosalicylic acids, corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and biologic agents targeting tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, α4β7-integrin, and interleukin (IL)-12/23 have been widely used. Especially, anti-TNF-α antibodies are the first biologic agents that presently remain at the forefront. However, 10-30% of patients resist biologic agents, including anti-TNF-α agents (primary non-responder; PNR), and 20-50% of primary responders develop treatment resistance within one year (secondary loss of response; SLR). Nonetheless, the etiologies of PNR and SLR are not clearly understood, and predictors of response to biologic agents are also not defined yet. Numerous studies are being performed to discover prediction markers of the response to biologic agents, and this review will introduce currently available therapeutic options for IBD, biologics under investigation, and recent studies exploring various predictive factors related to PNR and SLR.

Use of IL-23 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: A Comprehensive Review

Psoriasis is a common inflammatory skin disease with multiple comorbidities, including psoriatic arthritis and coronary artery disease, that can severely impact an individual’s quality of life and daily functioning. In recent years, enhanced understanding of the pathogenesis of psoriasis, especially the role of T helper 17 cells, has resulted in the development of new classes of biologic drugs targeting modulators along its disease pathway. Among these, inhibitors of interleukin-23 (e.g., ustekinumab, guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab) have emerged as safe and effective options for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis; ustekinumab and guselkumab have additionally been approved to treat psoriatic arthritis. Selective interleukin-23 inhibitors require less frequent dosing than interleukin-17 inhibitors and may possess a more favorable risk profile without an increased risk of candidiasis or inflammatory bowel disease. Overall, these highly effective medications are contributing to a rising standard for psoriasis outcomes through resolution of skin lesions and joint manifestations and improvement of patient quality of life.

Microbiota and Drug Response in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

A mutualistic relationship between the composition, function and activity of the gut microbiota (GM) and the host exists, and the alteration of GM, sometimes referred as dysbiosis, is involved in various immune-mediated diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Accumulating evidence suggests that the GM is able to influence the efficacy of the pharmacological therapy of IBD and to predict whether individuals will respond to treatment. Additionally, the drugs used to treat IBD can modualate the microbial composition. The review aims to investigate the impact of the GM on the pharmacological therapy of IBD and vice versa. The GM resulted in an increase or decrease in therapeutic responses to treatment, but also to biotransform drugs to toxic metabolites. In particular, the baseline GM composition can help to predict if patients will respond to the IBD treatment with biologic drugs. On the other hand, drugs can affect the GM by incrementing or reducing its diversity and richness. Therefore, the relationship between the GM and drugs used in the treatment of IBD can be either beneficial or disadvantageous.

A propensity score weighted comparison of vedolizumab and adalimumab in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

There are no head-to-head randomized controlled trials between biologics in Crohn's disease (CD). We aimed to perform a multicenter, real-life comparison of the effectiveness of vedolizumab (VDZ) and adalimumab (ADA) in CD.

METHODS

Data of consecutive patients with CD treated with VDZ and ADA from January 2016 to April 2019 were extracted from the cohort of the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. The effectiveness was evaluated at 12, 52 weeks, and as failure-free survival at the end of follow up. Propensity score analysis was performed using the inverse probability of treatment weighting method.

RESULTS

Five hundred eighty-five treatments (VDZ: n = 277; ADA: n = 308) were included (median follow-up: 56.0 weeks). After 12 weeks, a clinical response was achieved in 64.3% patients treated with VDZ and in 83.1% patients treated with ADA (odds ratio [OR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-1.10, P = 0.107), while at 52 weeks, a clinical response was observed in 54.0% patients treated with VDZ and in 69.1% patients treated with ADA (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.45-1.31, P = 0.336). Cox survival analysis weighted for propensity score showed no significant difference in the probability of failure-free survival between the two drugs (hazard ratio = 1.20, 95% CI 0.83-1.74, P = 0.340). Post-treatment endoscopic response and mucosal healing rates were similar between the two groups (endoscopic response: 35.3% for VDZ and 25.5% for ADA, P = 0.15; mucosal healing: 31.8% for VDZ and 33.8% for ADA, P = 0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

In the first study comparing VDZ and ADA in CD via propensity score analysis, the drugs showed comparable effectiveness and a similar safety profile.

Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in psoriasis patients who failed ustekinumab and/or anti-interleukin-17 treatment: A real-life 52-week retrospective study

Recent major research advancements have significantly expanded our understanding of psoriasis pathophysiology, resulting in the development of highly effective, targeted therapies. Guselkumab is the first interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitor approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe-psoriasis, providing a new therapeutical option for psoriasis. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab in psoriatic patients who previously failed anti-IL-12/23 and/or anti-IL-17 treatment. A 52-week single-center retrospective study was performed enrolling moderate-to-severe patients attending our Psoriasis Care Center from October 2018 to May 2020. Study population included 13 patients; 46.1% have been previously treated with ustekinumab, while 69.2% have previously failed an anti-IL-17 treatment (38.5% secukinumab, 30.8% ixekizumab, and 38.5% both). At baseline, mean Psoriasis Area and Severity Index was 13.2 ± 6.8, reducing up to 0.5 ± 0.7 at week 52 (P < .001). Body surface area reduced from 22.3 ± 10.5 (baseline) to 0.8 ± 1.1 at week 52 (P < .001). No statistically significant differences have been found between patients previously treated with anti-IL-12/23 compared to anti-IL-17 or both. Only one patient discontinued guselkumab at week 36 due to secondary inefficacy. This is a single institution study with a relatively small sample size. Our real-life data confirm trial results, showing guselkumab as a safe and effective option in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis even in those who previously failed ustekinumab and/or anti-IL-17 treatment.

Effectiveness of Ustekinumab on Crohn's Disease Associated Spondyloarthropathy: Real-World Data from the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (SN-IBD)

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of Ustekinumab (UST) on Crohn's disease (CD)-associated spondyloarthropathy (SpA) is currently unknown.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

All consecutive CD patients with active SpA at the initiation of the treatment with UST were extracted from the cohort of the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (SN-IBD). The primary outcome was the articular response at 8 and 24 weeks, defined as the disappearance of objective signs of arthritis (swelling and/or articular stiffness) and resolution of pain.

RESULTS

Thirty CD patients with active SpA at the initiation of the treatment with UST were assessed. At 24 weeks, 13 patients (43.3%) had an articular response, including 10/18 patients (55.5%) with peripheral SpA and 3/9 patients (33.3%) with axial and peripheral SpA. No patient with axial SpA experienced an articular response. The drop of mean as Harvey-Bradshaw Index values from baseline to week 24 was higher in patients with articular response compared with non-responders (3.8 ± 2.4 vs. 1.3 ± 2.8, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Our real-world, multicentre experience showed that UST was able to obtain a response on articular symptoms in nearly half of the patients with CD and active SpA after 24 weeks of treatment.

Protective Effects of ALDH1A Enzyme Inhibition on Helicobacter-Induced Colitis in Smad3-/- Mice are Associated with Altered α4ß7 Integrin Expression on Activated T Cells

Many inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients require surgical intervention due to limited pharmacological treatment options. Antibodies targeting α4ß7, a gut-homing integrin, are one of the most promising IBD treatments. As retinoic acid (RA) regulates expression of gut-homing proteins including α4ß7 integrin, we tested if ALDH1A enzymes in the RA synthesis pathway could be targeted for IBD treatment using a potent inhibitor, WIN 18,446. Age- and sex-matched Smad3^-/- mice were fed a diet with and without WIN 18,446 for 3 weeks before triggering inflammation with Helicobacter bilis infection. Colitis was evaluated by histopathology one week following the IBD trigger, and T cell subsets were evaluated before and after the IBD trigger. WIN 18,446 treatment significantly reduced IBD severity in Smad3^-/- mice and reduced expression of α4ß7 integrin on multiple activated CD4⁺ T cell subsets. This change was associated with increased ratios of induced regulatory T cells to Th17 cells during the inflammatory response in the draining lymph nodes. These studies indicate that RA reduction via ALDH1A enzyme inhibition is a potential new target for IBD treatment. Further studies are needed to examine its effects on other types of immune cells, to evaluate the efficacy window for this target, and to determine its efficacy in other animal models of IBD.

New era of therapy for endocrine autoimmune disorders

The new era of immune and reconstitution therapy of autoimmune disorders is ongoing. However, endocrine autoimmune diseases comprise a group of elaborating pathologies where the development of new treatment strategies remains slow. Substitution of the missing hormones is still standard practice, taking care of the devastating symptoms but not the cause of disease. As our knowledge of the genetic contribution to the aetiology of endocrine disorders increases and early diagnostic tools are available, it is now possible to identify persons at risk before they acquire full-blown disease. This review summarizes current knowledge and treatment of endocrine autoimmune disorders, focusing on type 1 diabetes, Addison's disease, autoimmune thyroid diseases and primary ovarian insufficiency. We explore which new therapies might be used in the different stages of the disease, focus on legalized therapy and elaborate on the ongoing clinical studies for these diseases and the research front, before hypothesizing on the way ahead.

JAK Inhibition as a Therapeutic Strategy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background:

Inflammatory bowel disease, including both Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, are two chronic and progressive disorders affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Research on the molecular mechanisms of both diseases has led to the introduction of targeted therapies which are able to selectively block the key inflammatory mediators.

Methods:

Here, we discuss the current evidence about the mechanism of action with an up to date review of the efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease.

Results:

Multiple small molecule drugs have been evaluated for their use in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Janus kinase inhibitors represent the most important family of these drugs, as their particular mechanism of action enables a simultaneous and effective blockade of multiple cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of the disease.

Conclusion:

Janus kinase inhibitors represent a promising therapeutic strategy, especially in ulcerative colitis. More data are still necessary regarding its efficacy and safety in clinical practice.

Effectiveness and safety of Ustekinumab for the treatment of Crohn's disease in real-life experiences: a meta-analysis of observational studies

Background: The aim of this meta-analysis was to estimate the effectiveness and safety of Ustekinumab in Crohn's disease (CD) reported by observational studies.Research design and methods: PubMed/Medline and Embase were systematically searched through September 2019. Only real-life observational studies were included.Results: Thirteen studies comprising 1450 patients met the inclusion criteria. Ustekinumab was administered subcutaneously at induction among 7 studies, while in 6 studies the intravenous formulation was used. At induction (8-16 weeks), the pooled estimate rates of clinical response and remission were 56% (95% CI: 43-68%; range: 16-94%; I² = 94%) and 34% (95% CI: 25-45%; range: 15-58%; I² = 90%), respectively. The rate of clinical response was higher among studies which employed the subcutaneous compared with the intravenous induction (68% vs. 38%, p = 0.01). At maintenance, the pooled estimate rates of clinical response, clinical remission, endoscopic response, and endoscopic remission were 62% (95% CI: 50-73%; range: 42-89%; I² = 89%), 40% (95% CI: 28-54%; range: 26-73%; I² = 90%), 56% (95% CI: 37-73%; range: 20-77%; I² = 87%), and 19% (95% CI: 11-30%; range: 7-31%; I² = 67%), respectively.Conclusions: Ustekinumab is an effective treatment in patients with CD with a reassuring safety profile. The subcutaneous induction seems to be superior to the intravenous one.

Janus kinase inhibitors in immuno-inflammatory rheumatic diseases: new opportunities and prospects

Despite the great success in the diagnosis and treatment of immuno-inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IIRD), which led to a significant improvement in the prognosis in many patients, the fundamental medical problems of this pathology – the restoration of quality of life and reduction of mortality to the population level – are far from solution. This served as a powerful impetus to the study of new approaches to pharmacotherapy of IIRD, one of which is associated with the use of low-molecular synthetic drugs that inhibit intracellular "signal" molecules-Janus kinase (JAK), the socalled Jakinibs. The current achievements and trends concerning the use of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of IIRD are considered.