Molecular basis for antagonistic activity of anifrolumab, an anti-interferon-α receptor 1 antibody

Structural basis for the recognition of IFNAR1 by the humanized therapeutic monoclonal antibody QX006N for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus

Interferon (IFN) alpha/beta receptor 1 (IFNAR1) is indispensable for antiviral responses and the immune regulation. Dysregulation of the IFNAR1-mediaetd signaling pathways leads to deleterious autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). QX006N, a humanized therapeutic monoclonal antibody, specifically targets human IFNAR1 and is in the clinical trial phase for treating SLE, but the molecular mechanism underlying the QX006N-mediated recognition of IFNAR1 remains unclear. Here, we report the high neutralization activities of QX006N against IFNAR1-mediated signal transduction. Meanwhile, we determine the structures of the fragment antigen-binding domain (Fab) of QX006N (QX006N-Fab) and QX006N-Fab in complex with the subdomains 1-3 of IFNAR1 (IFNAR1-SD123) at 2.87 Å and 2.68 Å resolutions, respectively. In the structure of the QX006N-Fab/IFNAR1-SD123 complex, QX006N-Fab only recognizes the SD3 subdomain of IFNAR1 by the hydrophobic, hydrogen-bonding and electrostatic interactions. Compared with the structure of the IFN/IFNAR1/IFNAR2 complex, the binding of QX006N-Fab to IFNAR1-SD3 blocks its association with IFN due to steric hindrance, which inhibits the IFN/IFNAR1/IFNAR2 complex formation for signal transduction. The results of this study provide the structural evidence for the specific targeting of IFNAR1 by the therapeutic antibody QX006N and pave the way for the rational design of antibody drugs to combat IFNAR1-related autoimmune diseases.

Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of the Anti-IFNAR1 Monoclonal Antibody QX006N: A First-in-Human Single Ascending Dose Study in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

QX006N is a novel, humanized, IgG4κ monoclonal antibody targeting IFNAR1, developed for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. This study aims to investigate the pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of QX006N when administered intravenously to healthy Chinese individuals.

METHODS

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-ascending-dose, phase I clinical trial was conducted comprising five cohorts (n = 10 per cohort, except n = 5 for the first cohort). Subjects in each cohort were randomly assigned in a 4:1 ratio to receive a single intravenous infusion of QX006N (0.3 mg/kg, 1.0 mg/kg, 3.0 mg/kg, 6.0 mg/kg, or 10.0 mg/kg) or placebo for 30 minutes. Tolerability assessments included adverse events, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiogram, physical examination, and clinical laboratory tests. The serum concentration of QX006N was measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method, and the anti-drug antibodies were detected using the electrochemiluminescence assay method.

RESULTS

QX006N demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability profile throughout the study. All treatment-emergent adverse events were of Grade 1-2 (CTCAE Version 5.0), and no serious adverse events, deaths, or drug discontinuations because of treatment-emergent adverse events were observed. All drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events showed no clear dose-related trends. Following an intravenous infusion of QX006N at doses that ranged from 0.3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg, the half-life increased from 24.7 to 208 hours in a dose-dependent manner, while clearance decreased from 0.0828 to 0.0065 L/h. The maximum concentration exhibited nearly dose-proportional increases, and the area under the curve displayed a more than dose-proportional increment with non-linear pharmacokinetic characteristics. The incidence of anti-drug antibodies was observed to increase over time for doses that ranged from 1.0 mg/kg to 10.0 mg/kg of QX006N, reaching its peak at day 57 (range 62.50-87.50%). Conversely, the incidence of anti-drug antibodies in the QX006N 0.3-mg/kg and placebo cohorts remained low.

CONCLUSIONS

QX006N demonstrated acceptable safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic characteristics in healthy subjects when administered as a single intravenous infusion at doses that ranged from 0.3 mg/kg to 10.0 mg/kg. Based on the pharmacokinetic and safety outcomes, a recommended effective dose of 300 mg is proposed for future phase Ib studies.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study has been registered at http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/ under identifier CTR20212834.

Interferons and systemic lupus erythematosus: Pathogenesis, clinical features, and treatments in interferon-driven disease

Type I interferons (IFNs) have recently received a lot of attention with the elucidation of the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Type I IFNs are associated with many SLE symptoms and play a role in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases that may occur concurrently with SLE, such as Sjögren's syndrome, antiphospholipid syndrome, myositis, scleroderma, and interferonopathy. Type I IFNs could be the link between these diseases. However, direct measurement of type I IFN levels and the IFN gene signature is currently unavailable in clinical practice. This review discusses type I IFN signalling in SLE, investigates the role of type I IFN in the clinical manifestations and symptoms associated with SLE and other IFN-related diseases, and discusses the clinical tests that can be used to diagnose SLE and measure disease activity. In addition, the role of type I IFN-blocking therapies as potential treatments for SLE is discussed.

Mutation of the TGN1412 anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody lower hinge confers specific FcγRIIb binding and retention of super-agonist activity

The agonistic action of several immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) requires both target antigen binding and clustering of this mAb:target complex by the Fcs interacting with Fcγ receptors (FcγRs), in particular FcγRIIb, on neighboring bystander cells. Fc mutations were made in the immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-based TGN1412 anti-CD28 mAb to define the role of FcγR interactions in its "super-agonist" activity. The dual mutation, IgG4-ED269,270 AA, ablated interaction with all human FcγRs and agonistic action was consequentially lost, confirming the FcγR dependence on the action of TGN1412. The IgG4 lower hinge region (F234 L235 G236 G237 ) was modified by L235 E mutation (F234 E235 G236 G237 ), a mutation commonly used to ablate FcγR binding, including in approved therapeutic mAbs. However, rather than ablating all FcγR binding, IgG4-L235 E conferred specific binding to FcγRIIb, the inhibitory Fc receptor. Furthermore, in combination with the core hinge-stabilizing mutation (IgG4-S228 P, L235 E), this mutation increased affinity for FcγRIIb compared with wild-type IgG4. In addition to having FcγRIIb specificity, these engineered TGN1412 antibodies retained their super-agonistic ability, demonstrating that CD28- and FcγRIIb-specific binding are together sufficient for agonistic function. The FcγRIIb-specific nature of IgG4-L235 E has utility for mAb-mediated immune agonism therapies that are dependent on FcγRIIb interaction and of anti-inflammatory mAbs in allergy and autoimmunity that harness FcγRIIb inhibitory signaling.

A Transcriptome Array-Based Approach Links Proteinuria and Distinct Molecular Signatures to Intrarenal Expression of Type I Interferon IFNA5 in Lupus Nephritis

In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the relevance of non-hematopoietic sources of type I interferon in human autoimmunity has recently been recognized. Particularly, type I interferon production precedes autoimmunity in early skin lesions related to SLE. However, the relevance of intrarenal type I interferon expression has not been shown in lupus nephritis. From transcriptome array datasets, median-centered log₂ mRNA expression levels of IFNα (IFNA1, IFNA2, IFNA4, IFNA5, IFNA6, IFNA7, IFNA8, IFNA10, IFNA13, IFNA14, IFNA16, IFNA17, and IFNA21), IFNω (IFNW1), and IFNβ (IFNB1) in lupus nephritis were extracted specifically from microdissected tubulointerstitial (n = 32) and glomerular compartments (n = 32). We found an association between proteinuria and tubulointerstitial expression of type I interferon IFNA5 (p = 0.0142), while all others were not significantly associated. By contrast, no such correlation was observed between proteinuria and any type I interferon expression in the glomerular compartment in lupus nephritis. Interestingly, there was no difference between female and male patients (p = 0.8237) and no association between type I interferon IFNA5 expression and kidney function or lupus nephritis progression. Finally, we identified distinct molecular signatures involved in transcriptional regulation (GLI protein-regulated transcription, IRF7 activation, and HSF1-dependent transactivation) and receptor signaling (BMP signaling and GPCR ligand binding) in association with tubulointerstitial expression of type I interferon IFNA5 in the kidney. In summary, this transcriptome array-based approach links proteinuria to the tubulointerstitial expression of type I interferon IFNA5 in lupus nephritis. Because type I interferon receptor subunit I antagonism has recently been investigated in active SLE, the current study further emphasizes the role of type I interferons in lupus nephritis and might also be of relevance for mechanistic studies.

Pan-sarbecovirus prophylaxis with human anti-ACE2 monoclonal antibodies

Human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that target the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein have been isolated from convalescent individuals and developed into therapeutics for SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, therapeutic mAbs for SARS-CoV-2 have been rendered obsolete by the emergence of mAb-resistant virus variants. Here we report the generation of a set of six human mAbs that bind the human angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (hACE2) receptor, rather than the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. We show that these antibodies block infection by all hACE2 binding sarbecoviruses tested, including SARS-CoV-2 ancestral, Delta and Omicron variants at concentrations of ~7-100 ng ml-1. These antibodies target an hACE2 epitope that binds to the SARS-CoV-2 spike, but they do not inhibit hACE2 enzymatic activity nor do they induce cell-surface depletion of hACE2. They have favourable pharmacology, protect hACE2 knock-in mice against SARS-CoV-2 infection and should present a high genetic barrier to the acquisition of resistance. These antibodies should be useful prophylactic and treatment agents against any current or future SARS-CoV-2 variants and might be useful to treat infection with any hACE2-binding sarbecoviruses that emerge in the future.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Immunogenicity of Anifrolumab

The type I interferon (IFN) signaling pathway is implicated in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Anifrolumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets the type I IFN receptor subunit 1. Anifrolumab is approved in several countries for patients with moderate to severe SLE receiving standard therapy. The approved dosing regimen of anifrolumab is a 300-mg dose administered intravenously every 4 weeks; this was initially based on the results of the Phase 2b MUSE and further confirmed in the Phase 3 TULIP-1 and TULIP-2 trials, in which anifrolumab 300-mg treatment was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in disease activity with an acceptable safety profile. There have been several published analyses of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of anifrolumab, including a population-pharmacokinetic analysis of 5 clinical studies of healthy volunteers and patients with SLE, in which body weight and type I IFN gene expression were significant covariates identified for anifrolumab exposure and clearance. Additionally, the pooled Phase 3 SLE population has been used to evaluate how serum exposure may be related to clinical responses, safety risks, and pharmacodynamic effects of the 21-gene type I IFN gene signature (21-IFNGS). The relevance of 21-IFNGS with regard to clinical efficacy outcomes has also been analyzed. Herein, the clinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of anifrolumab as well as results of population-pharmacokinetics and exposure-response analyses are reviewed.

The efficacy and safety of anifrolumab in Japanese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: TULIP-2 subanalysis

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the efficacy and safety of anifrolumab in the subpopulation of Japanese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in phase 3 TULIP-2 trial.

METHODS

TULIP-2 was a 52-week randomized placebo-controlled trial (N = 362) that evaluated efficacy and safety of anifrolumab 300 mg IV every 4 weeks vs. placebo in patients with moderate to severe SLE who were receiving standard therapy. We performed a post hoc analysis of the primary and key secondary endpoints, and safety, of TULIP-2 in the Japanese subpopulation.

RESULTS

In the Japanese subpopulation (anifrolumab, n = 24; placebo, n = 19), the proportion of patients who achieved a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment response at Week 52 (primary endpoint) was greater in the anifrolumab group vs. placebo [50.0% (12/24) vs. 15.8% (3/19); treatment difference: 34.2%, 95% confidence interval 6.9, 61.5; nominal p = .014]. Improvement in skin activity and flare rates (key secondary endpoints) were favourable for anifrolumab vs. placebo. Consistent with the overall population, anifrolumab had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and safety of anifrolumab 300 mg in Japanese patients with SLE was consistent with the demonstrated clinical profile of anifrolumab for the overall TULIP-2 population.

Anti-G protein antibodies targeting the RSV G protein CX3C chemokine region improve the interferon response

Background

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a poor inducer of antiviral interferon (IFN) responses which result in incomplete immunity and RSV disease. Several RSV proteins alter antiviral responses, including the non-structural proteins (NS1, NS2) and the major viral surface proteins, that is, fusion (F) and attachment (G) proteins. The G protein modifies the host immune response to infection linked in part through a CX3 C chemokine motif. Anti-G protein monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), that is, clones 3D3 and 2D10 that target the G protein CX3C chemokine motif can neutralize RSV and inhibit G protein-CX3CR1 mediated chemotaxis.

Objectives

Determine how monoclonal antibodies against the RSV F and G proteins modify the type I and III IFN responses to RSV infection.

Design

As the G protein CX3 C motif is implicated in IFN antagonism, we evaluated two mAbs that block G protein CX3C-CX3CR1 interaction and compared responses to isotype mAb control using a functional cellular assay and mouse model.

Methods

Mouse lung epithelial cells (MLE-15 cells) and BALB/c mice were infected with RSV Line19 F following prophylactic mAb treatment. Cell supernatant or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were assayed for types I and III IFNs. Cells were interrogated for changes in IFN-related gene expression.

Results

Treatment with an anti-G protein mAb (3D3) resulted in improved IFN responses compared with isotype control following infection with RSV, partially independently of neutralization, and this was linked to upregulated SOCS1 expression.

Conclusions

These findings show that anti-G protein antibodies improve the protective early antiviral response, which has important implications for vaccine and therapeutic design.

Plain Language Summary

RSV is a leading cause of respiratory disease in infants and the elderly. The only Food and Drug Administration-approved prophylactic treatment is limited to an anti-F protein monoclonal antibody (mAb), that is, palivizumab which has modest efficacy against RSV disease. Accumulating evidence suggests that targeting the RSV attachment (G) protein may provide improved protection from RSV disease. It is known that the G protein is an IFN antagonist, and IFN has been shown to be protective against RSV disease. In this study, we compared IFN responses in mouse lung epithelial (MLE-15) cells and in mice infected with RSV Line19 F treated with anti-G protein or anti-F protein mAbs. The levels of type I and III IFNs were determined. Anti-G protein mAbs improved the levels of IFNs compared with isotype-treated controls. These findings support the concept that anti-G protein mAbs mediate improved IFN responses against RSV disease, which may enable improved treatment of RSV infections.

Myeloid cell interferon secretion restricts Zika flavivirus infection of developing and malignant human neural progenitor cells

Zika virus (ZIKV) can infect human developing brain (HDB) progenitors resulting in epidemic microcephaly, whereas analogous cellular tropism offers treatment potential for the adult brain cancer, glioblastoma (GBM). We compared productive ZIKV infection in HDB and GBM primary tissue explants that both contain SOX2+ neural progenitors. Strikingly, although the HDB proved uniformly vulnerable to ZIKV infection, GBM was more refractory, and this correlated with an innate immune expression signature. Indeed, GBM-derived CD11b+ microglia/macrophages were necessary and sufficient to protect progenitors against ZIKV infection in a non-cell autonomous manner. Using SOX2+ GBM cell lines, we found that CD11b+-conditioned medium containing type 1 interferon beta (IFNβ) promoted progenitor resistance to ZIKV, whereas inhibition of JAK1/2 signaling restored productive infection. Additionally, CD11b+ conditioned medium, and IFNβ treatment rendered HDB progenitor lines and explants refractory to ZIKV. These findings provide insight into neuroprotection for HDB progenitors as well as enhanced GBM oncolytic therapies.

Biological drugs for systemic lupus erythematosus or active lupus nephritis and rates of infectious complications. Evidence from large clinical trials

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystemic autoimmune disease that frequently affects the kidneys, known as lupus nephritis (LN). Such patients are treated with antimalarials, corticosteroids or immunosuppressive drugs, and more recently, target-specific biological drugs. Although efficacy of these therapies improved SLE-related outcomes, SLE remains associated with higher rates of infections. Here, we performed a comprehensive systemic review of infectious complications in clinical trials covering drug interventions for SLE or specifically for active LN. Our search in 15 online registries yielded a total of 1477 studies of which 14 matched our prespecified criteria. These covered the biological drugs anifrolumab, belimumab, and rituximab that were tested in patients with non-renal SLE and active LN.The available safety data from the SLE trials indicated that infectious complications such as herpes zoster, upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, bronchitis, and urinary tract infection in patients receiving placebo were quite prevalent especially in the EXPLORER (rituximab) trial. Infections occurred mostly during the first year of LN therapy. Serious adverse events and infectious complications occurred more frequently in placebo-treated patients with active LN, especially in the BLISS-LN (belimumab) and LUNAR (rituximab) trials. Anifrolumab and rituximab increased the number of clinically relevant episodes of herpes zoster compared to belimumab in patients with active LN. Anifrolumab displayed a similar trend for influenza infections, which is consistent with the specific mechanisms-of-action of anifrolumab; highlighting drug-specific effects on infectious complications. In addition, standard-of-care therapy, e.g., MMF and immunosuppressants, as well as a longer SLE duration may also affect the incidence of serious adverse events and certain infectious complications in SLE patients with active LN.Infectious complications are common in SLE but even more common in patients with active LN, especially herpes zoster is strongly associated with active LN and anifrolumab therapy (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.18 to 6.66, p = 0.018). Immunotherapy seems to impose unspecific and specific risks for infections. The latter may imply specific precautions such as preemptive vaccination and individual risk-benefit assessments.

Sustained glucocorticoid tapering in the phase 3 trials of anifrolumab: a post-hoc analysis of the TULIP-1 and TULIP-2 trials

OBJECTIVES

Glucocorticoid sparing is a key priority for SLE management. We evaluated the effects of sustained glucocorticoid tapering in patients with SLE.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of the randomized, placebo-controlled, 52-week phase 3 TULIP-1 and TULIP-2 trials of anifrolumab (300 mg intravenously once every four weeks for 48 weeks) plus standard therapy in patients with moderate to severe SLE. In a cohort of patients receiving glucocorticoids (prednisone or equivalent) 10 mg or more per day at baseline, we assessed changes in glucocorticoid dosage, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and safety. Outcome measures were compared between sustained glucocorticoid taper responders (7.5 mg or less per day by Week 40 sustained through Week 52) and non-responders, regardless of treatment group, and between patients receiving anifrolumab or placebo.

RESULTS

Among the 726 patients in the TULIP trials, 375 patients received glucocorticoids 10 mg or more per day at baseline, and of these, 155 (41%) patients were sustained glucocorticoid taper responders. Compared with non-responders (n = 220), sustained glucocorticoid taper responders reduced their mean cumulative glucocorticoid dose by 32%, improved PRO scores, reduced blood pressure, and experienced fewer serious adverse events. Sustained glucocorticoid tapering was achieved by 51% (96/190) of patients receiving anifrolumab versus 32% (59/185) receiving placebo. Compared with placebo, more anifrolumab-treated patients achieved both sustained glucocorticoid taper and reduced overall disease activity (38% [72/190] vs 23% [33/185]).

CONCLUSION

Sustained glucocorticoid tapering is associated with clinical benefits. Anifrolumab treatment has potential to reduce disease activity and glucocorticoid exposure, a key goal of SLE management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02446912 and NCT02446899.

Neuropsychiatric lupus erythematosus: Focusing on autoantibodies

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) frequently suffer from nervous system complications, termed neuropsychiatric lupus erythematosus (NPLE). NPLE accounts for the poor prognosis of SLE. Correct attribution of NP events to SLE is the primary principle in managing NPLE. The vascular injuries and neuroinflammation are the fundamental neuropathologic changes in NPLE. Specific autoantibody-mediated central nerve system (CNS) damages distinguish NPLE from other CNS disorders. Though the central antibodies in NPLE are generally thought to be raised from the periphery immune system, they may be produced in the meninges and choroid plexus. On this basis, abnormal activation of microglia and disease-associated microglia (DAM) should be the common mechanisms of NPLE and other CNS disturbances. Improved understanding of both characteristic and sharing features of NPLE might yield further options for managing this disease.

Anifrolumab for Treatment of Refractory Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a spectrum of skin changes related to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a family of autoimmunity manifesting characteristic multisystem inflammation and damage. Treatment of CLE continues to evolve, especially for patients with moderate to severe disease. Type 1 interferon (IFN-1) play a significant role in CLE. IFN-1 binds to interferon α receptor 1 (IFNAR1) resulting in a cascade of immunological events that contribute to CLE pathogenesis. Anifrolumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively binds IFNAR1, prevents the formation of the IFN-1/IFNAR1 complex and subsequent gene transcription. Multiple phase 2 and 3 randomized trials have resulted in federal drug administration approval for anifrolumab in the treatment of moderate to severe SLE. We present a case series of patients whose refractory cutaneous lupus significantly improved with anifrolumab.

Indirect treatment comparison of anifrolumab efficacy versus belimumab in adults with systemic lupus erythematosus

Aim: Assess the comparative efficacy of anifrolumab 300 mg versus belimumab 10 mg/kg in adults with moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) receiving standard therapy. Patients and methods: Population-adjusted simulated treatment comparisons (primary analyses) and matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (supporting analyses) were conducted using individual patient data from TULIP-1/TULIP-2 and summary-level data from BLISS-52/BLISS-76. Results: Compared with belimumab-treated patients, anifrolumab-treated patients were more than twice as likely to achieve a reduction of four or more points in SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 score (simulated treatment comparison odds ratio: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.16-5.25) and SLE Responder Index-4 response (odds ratio: 2.61; 95% CI: 1.22-5.58) at 52 weeks. Conclusion: Patients with moderate-to-severe SLE are more likely to achieve an improvement in disease activity with anifrolumab than with belimumab.

Relationship of anifrolumab pharmacokinetics with efficacy and safety in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the relationship of anifrolumab pharmacokinetics with efficacy and safety in patients with moderate to severe SLE despite standard therapy, using pooled data from two phase 3 trials.

METHODS

TULIP-1 and TULIP-2 were randomized, placebo-controlled, 52-week trials of intravenous anifrolumab (every 4 weeks for 48 weeks). For the exposure-response analysis, BILAG-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) or SLE Responder Index [SRI(4)] response rates at week 52 in each quartile/tertile of average anifrolumab serum concentration (Cave) were compared for anifrolumab and placebo in all-comers, patients who completed treatment, and IFN gene signature (IFNGS)-high patients who completed treatment, using average marginal effect logistic regression. Relationships between exposure and key safety events were assessed graphically.

RESULTS

Of patients in TULIP-1/TULIP-2 who received anifrolumab (150 mg, n = 91; 300 mg, n = 356) or placebo (n = 366), 574 completed treatment, of whom 470 were IFNGS high. In the exposure-efficacy analyses, BICLA and SRI(4) treatment differences favouring anifrolumab 300 mg vs placebo were observed across Cave subgroups and all analysis populations. Logistic regression identified Cave as a significant covariate for predicted BICLA response, as higher anifrolumab Cave predicted greater efficacy. There was no evidence of exposure-driven incidence of key safety events through week 52 in patients receiving anifrolumab 150 or 300 mg.

CONCLUSION

While higher Cave predicted greater efficacy, consistent positive benefit favouring anifrolumab 300 mg vs placebo was observed in BICLA and SRI(4) responses across Cave subgroups in the TULIP trials. There was no evidence of exposure-driven safety events.

CLINICALTRIAL.GOV NUMBERS

NCT02446912, NCT02446899.

Nonlinear Population Pharmacokinetics of Anifrolumab in Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

We characterized the population pharmacokinetics of anifrolumab, a type I interferon receptor–blocking antibody. Pharmacokinetic data were analyzed from the anifrolumab (intravenous [IV], every 4 weeks) arms from 5 clinical trials in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (n = 664) and healthy volunteers (n = 6). Population pharmacokinetic modeling was performed using a 2‐compartment model with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination pathways. The impact of covariates (demographics, interferon gene signature [IFNGS, high/low], disease characteristics, renal/hepatic function, SLE medications, and antidrug antibodies) on pharmacokinetics was evaluated. Time‐varying clearance (CL) was characterized using an empirical sigmoidal time‐dependent function. Anifrolumab exposure increased more than dose‐proportionally from 100 to 1000 mg IV every 4 weeks. Based on population pharmacokinetics modeling, the baseline median linear CL was 0.193 L/day in IFNGS‐high patients and 0.153 L/day in IFNGS‐low/healthy volunteers. After a year, median anifrolumab linear CL decreased by 8.4% from baseline. Body weight and IFNGS were significant pharmacokinetic covariates, whereas age, sex, race, disease activity, SLE medications, and presence of antidrug antibodies had no significant effect on anifrolumab pharmacokinetics. Anifrolumab at a concentration of 300 mg IV every 4 weeks was predicted to be below the lower limit of quantitation in 95% of patients ≈10 weeks after a single dose and ≈16 weeks after stopping dosing at steady state. To conclude, anifrolumab exhibited nonlinear pharmacokinetics and time‐varying linear CL; doses ≥300 mg IV every 4 weeks provided sustained anifrolumab concentrations. This study provides further evidence to support the use of anifrolumab 300 mg IV every 4 weeks in patients with moderate to severe SLE.

The Relationship between Anifrolumab Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy in Patients With Moderate to Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

This study aimed to elucidate the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and pharmacodynamic/efficacy relationships of anifrolumab, a type I interferon receptor antibody, in patients with moderate to severe systemic lupus erythematosus. Data were pooled from the randomized, 52‐week, placebo‐controlled TULIP‐1 and TULIP‐2 trials of intravenous anifrolumab (150 mg/300 mg, every 4 weeks for 48 weeks). Pharmacodynamic neutralization was measured with a 21‐gene type I interferon gene signature (21‐IFNGS) in patients with high IFNGS. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship was analyzed graphically and modeled with a nonlinear mixed‐effects model. British Isles Lupus Assessment Group–based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) response rates were compared across 21‐IFNGS neutralization quartiles. Overall, 819 patients received ≥1 dose of anifrolumab or placebo, of whom 676 were IFNGS high. Over 52 weeks, higher average anifrolumab serum concentrations were associated with increased median 21‐IFNGS neutralization, which was rapid and sustained with anifrolumab 300 mg (>80%, weeks 12‐52), lower and delayed with anifrolumab 150 mg (>50%, week 52), and minimal with placebo. The proportion of patients with week 24 anifrolumab trough concentration exceeding the IC₈₀ (3.88 μg/mL) was greater with anifrolumab 300 mg vs anifrolumab 150 mg (≈83% vs ≈27%), owing to the higher estimated median trough concentration (15.6 vs 0.2 μg/mL). BICLA response rates increased with 21‐IFNGS neutralization; more patients had a BICLA response in the highest vs lowest neutralization quartiles at week 52 (58.1% vs 37.6%). In conclusion, anifrolumab 300 mg every 4 weeks rapidly, substantially, and sustainably neutralized the 21‐IFNGS and was associated with clinical efficacy, supporting this dosing regimen in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Anifrolumab efficacy and safety by type I interferon gene signature and clinical subgroups in patients with SLE: post hoc analysis of pooled data from two phase III trials

Objectives

To characterise the efficacy and safety of anifrolumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) according to interferon gene signature (IFNGS), demographic and clinical subgroups.

Methods

We performed post hoc analyses of pooled data from the 52-week phase III TULIP-1/TULIP-2 placebo-controlled trials of intravenous anifrolumab in moderate-to-severe SLE. Outcomes were assessed in predefined subgroups: IFNGS (high/low), age, sex, body mass index, race, geographic region, age of onset, glucocorticoid use, disease activity and serological markers.

Results

In pooled data, patients received anifrolumab 300 mg (360/726) or placebo (366/726); 82.6% were IFNGS-high. IFNGS-high patients had greater baseline disease activity and were more likely to have abnormal serological markers versus IFNGS-low patients. In the total population, a greater proportion of patients treated with anifrolumab versus placebo achieved British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) response at week 52 (difference 16.6%; nominal p<0.001). BICLA response treatment differences with anifrolumab versus placebo were comparable to the total population across most predefined subgroups, including subgroups for baseline glucocorticoid dosage (<10/≥10 mg/day prednisone/equivalent) and for clinical disease activity (SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 score <10/≥10). Subgroups with larger treatment differences included IFNGS-high patients (18.2%), patients with abnormal baseline serological markers (23.1%) and Asian patients (29.2%). The safety profile of anifrolumab was similar across subgroups.

Conclusions

Overall, this study supports the consistent efficacy and safety of anifrolumab across a range of patients with moderate-to-severe SLE. In a few subgroups, small sample sizes limited conclusions from being drawn regarding the treatment benefit with anifrolumab.

Trial registration number

NCT02446912, NCT02446899.

Type I Interferons in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Journey from Bench to Bedside

Dysregulation of type I interferons (IFNs) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) since the late 1970s. The majority of SLE patients demonstrate evidence of type I IFN pathway activation; however, studies attempting to address the relationship between type I IFN signature and SLE disease activity have yielded conflicting results. In addition to type I IFNs, type II and III IFNs may overlap and also contribute to the IFN signature. Different genetic backgrounds lead to overproduction of type I IFNs in SLE and contribute to the breakdown of peripheral tolerance by activation of antigen-presenting myeloid dendritic cells, thus triggering the expansion and differentiation of autoreactive lymphocytes. The consequence of the continuous stimulation of the immune system is manifested in different organ systems typical of SLE (e.g., mucocutaneous and cardiovascular involvement). After the discovery of the type I IFN signature, a number of different strategies have been developed to downregulate the IFN system in SLE patients, finally leading to the successful trial of anifrolumab, the second biologic to be approved for the treatment of SLE in 10 years. In this review, we will discuss the bench to bedside translation of the type I IFN pathway and put forward some issues that remain unresolved when selecting SLE patients for treatment with biologics targeting type I IFNs.

Systemic Sclerosis: From Pathophysiology to Novel Therapeutic Approaches

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a systemic, immune-mediated chronic disorder characterized by small vessel alterations and progressive fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. The combination of a predisposing genetic background and triggering factors that causes a persistent activation of immune system at microvascular and tissue level is thought to be the pathogenetic driver of SSc. Endothelial alterations with subsequent myofibroblast activation, excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, and unrestrained tissue fibrosis are the pathogenetic steps responsible for the clinical manifestations of this disease, which can be highly heterogeneous according to the different entity of each pathogenic step in individual subjects. Although substantial progress has been made in the management of SSc in recent years, disease-modifying therapies are still lacking. Several molecular pathways involved in SSc pathogenesis are currently under evaluation as possible therapeutic targets in clinical trials. These include drugs targeting fibrotic and metabolic pathways (e.g., TGF-β, autotaxin/LPA, melanocortin, and mTOR), as well as molecules and cells involved in the persistent activation of the immune system (e.g., IL4/IL13, IL23, JAK/STAT, B cells, and plasma cells). In this review, we provide an overview of the most promising therapeutic targets that could improve the future clinical management of SSc.

[Pharmacological actions of anifrolumab (Saphnelo®) and clinical trial results as a treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus]

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease which causes damaging inflammation in multiple organs via the accumulation of immune complexes. SLE pathogenesis is associated with type I interferons (IFNs), which are central and reflective of disease activity in SLE. Even before clinical development of disease, genetic and environmental contributions to IFN production lead to abnormal innate and adaptive immune activation. Through the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription signaling pathway, IFN play a central role in the immunopathogenicity of SLE. Thus, IFN-blocking therapy may be used to regulate inflammation in individuals with SLE. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved anifrolumab (Saphnelo^®), which is a human IgG1κ monoclonal antibody that binds to subunit 1 of the type I interferon receptor with high specificity and affinity, was also approved for the treatment of adult patients with moderate to severe SLE who are receiving standard therapy by Pharmaceuticals and Medical Device Agency (PMDA), in Japan in September 2021; anifrolumab is administered as an intravenous infusion, 300 mg over a 30-minute period, every 4 weeks. In this article, we reviewed the actions of type I IFN and anifrolumab as a treatment for SLE.

The Pathogenesis, Molecular Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Potential of the Interferon Pathway in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Other Autoimmune Diseases

Therapeutic success in treating patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is limited by the multivariate disease etiology, multi-organ presentation, systemic involvement, and complex immunopathogenesis. Agents targeting B-cell differentiation and survival are not efficacious for all patients, indicating a need to target other inflammatory mediators. One such target is the type I interferon pathway. Type I interferons upregulate interferon gene signatures and mediate critical antiviral responses. Dysregulated type I interferon signaling is detectable in many patients with SLE and other autoimmune diseases, and the extent of this dysregulation is associated with disease severity, making type I interferons therapeutically tangible targets. The recent approval of the type I interferon-blocking antibody, anifrolumab, by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with SLE demonstrates the value of targeting this pathway. Nevertheless, the interferon pathway has pleiotropic biology, with multiple cellular targets and signaling components that are incompletely understood. Deconvoluting the complexity of the type I interferon pathway and its intersection with lupus disease pathology will be valuable for further development of targeted SLE therapeutics. This review summarizes the immune mediators of the interferon pathway, its association with disease pathogenesis, and therapeutic modalities targeting the dysregulated interferon pathway.

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF): A multifaceted cytokine regulated by genetic and physiological strategies

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is a proinflammatory cytokine encoded within a functionally polymorphic genetic locus. MIF was initially recognized as a cytokine generated by activated T cells, but in recent days it has been identified as a multipotent key cytokine secreted by many other cell types involved in immune response and physiological processes. MIF is a highly conserved 12.5 kDa secretory protein that is involved in numerous biological processes. The expression and secretion profile of MIF suggests that MIF to be ubiquitously and constitutively expressed in almost all mammalian cells and is vital for numerous physiological processes. MIF is a critical upstream mediator of host innate and adaptive immunity and survival pathways resulting in the clearance of pathogens thus playing a protective role during infectious diseases. On the other hand, MIF being an immune modulator accelerates detrimental inflammation, promotes cancer metastasis and progression, thus worsening disease conditions. Several reports demonstrated that genetic and physiological factors, including MIF gene polymorphisms, posttranslational regulations, and receptor binding control the functional activities of MIF. Taking into consideration the multi-faceted role of MIF both in physiology and pathology, we thought it is timely to review and summarize the expressional and functional regulation of MIF, its functional mechanisms associated with its beneficial and pathological roles, and MIF-targeting therapies. Thus, our review will provide an overview on how MIF is regulated, its response, and the potency of the therapies that target MIF.

Anifrolumab: First Approval

Anifrolumab (anifrolumab-fnia; Saphnelo^™) is a monoclonal antibody antagonist of the type 1 interferon receptor (IFNAR). It is being developed by AstraZeneca (under license from Medarex, now Bristol-Myers Squibb) for the treatment of autoimmune disorders, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis, the underlying pathogenesis of which involves type 1 interferon. In July 2021, intravenous anifrolumab was approved in the USA for the treatment of adult patients with moderate to severe SLE who are receiving standard therapy. Anifrolumab (intravenous or subcutaneous) continues to be assessed in clinical studies in SLE in various countries, and the intravenous formulation is under regulatory review in the EU and Japan. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of anifrolumab leading to this first approval for the treatment of moderate to severe SLE.

Anifrolumab reduces flare rates in patients with moderate to severe systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) management objectives include preventing disease flares while minimizing glucocorticoid exposure. Pooled data from the phase 3 TULIP-1 and TULIP-2 trials in patients with moderate to severe SLE were analyzed to determine anifrolumab's effect on flares, including those arising with glucocorticoid taper.

METHODS

TULIP-1 and TULIP-2 were randomized, placebo-controlled, 52-week trials of intravenous anifrolumab (300 mg every 4 weeks for 48 weeks). For patients receiving baseline glucocorticoid ≥10 mg/day, attempted taper to ≤7.5 mg/day prednisone or equivalent from Weeks 8-40 was required and defined as sustained reduction when maintained through Week 52. Flares were defined as ≥1 new BILAG-2004 A or ≥2 new BILAG-2004 B scores versus the previous visit. Flare assessments were compared for patients receiving anifrolumab versus placebo.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo (n = 366), anifrolumab (n = 360) was associated with lower annualized flare rates (rate ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-0.95), prolonged time to first flare (hazard ratio 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.89), and fewer patients with ≥1 flare (difference -9.3%, 95% CI -16.3 to -2.3), as well as flares in organ domains commonly active at baseline (musculoskeletal, mucocutaneous). Fewer BILAG-based Composite Lupus Assessment responders had ≥1 flare with anifrolumab (21.1%, 36/171) versus placebo (30.4%, 34/112). Of patients who achieved sustained glucocorticoid reductions from ≥10 mg/day at baseline, more remained flare free with anifrolumab (40.0%, 76/190) versus placebo (17.3%, 32/185).

CONCLUSIONS

Analyses of pooled TULIP-1 and TULIP-2 data support that anifrolumab reduces flares while permitting glucocorticoid taper in patients with SLE.ClinicalTrials.gov identifiersTULIP-1 NCT02446912 (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02446912);TULIP-2 NCT02446899 (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02446899).

Microchip-based structure determination of low-molecular weight proteins using cryo-electron microscopy

Interest in cryo-Electron Microscopy (EM) imaging has skyrocketed in recent years due to its pristine views of macromolecules and materials. As advances in instrumentation and computing algorithms spurred this progress, there is renewed focus to address specimen-related challenges. Here we contribute a microchip-based toolkit to perform complementary structural and biochemical analysis on low-molecular weight proteins. As a model system, we used the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) protein (48 kDa) due to its stability and important role in therapeutic development. Cryo-EM structures of the N protein monomer revealed a flexible N-terminal "top hat" motif and a helical-rich C-terminal domain. To complement our structural findings, we engineered microchip-based immunoprecipitation assays that led to the discovery of the first antibody binding site on the N protein. The data also facilitated molecular modeling of a variety of pandemic and common cold-related coronavirus proteins. Such insights may guide future pandemic-preparedness protocols through immuno-engineering strategies to mitigate viral outbreaks.

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Anifrolumab in Adults With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results of a Phase II Open-Label Extension Study

Objective

To investigate long‐term safety and tolerability of anifrolumab, a human monoclonal antibody to the type I interferon (IFN) receptor subunit 1, in patients with moderate‐to‐severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods

This 3‐year, multinational, open‐label extension study included adult patients who completed treatment (48 weeks of anifrolumab or placebo; 12‐week follow‐up) in the MUSE phase IIb randomized controlled trial (RCT). Patients initially received 1,000 mg of anifrolumab intravenously every 4 weeks, which was reduced to 300 mg every 4 weeks based on the benefit/risk profile established in the MUSE trial. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed monthly. Exploratory end points included the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI‐2K), Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI), pharmacodynamics, and health‐related quality of life (HRQoL).

Results

Of the 246 patients who completed the RCT, 218 (88.6%) enrolled in the open‐label extension study, of which 139 (63.8%) completed 3 years of treatment. Approximately 69.7% of patients reported ≥1 AE during the first year of open‐label extension treatment. Frequency and patterns of serious AEs and AEs of special interest over 3 years were consistent with those reported for 1 year of treatment in the RCT. Few patients (6.9%) discontinued treatment due to AEs. No new safety signals were identified. Improvement in the SLEDAI‐2K was sustained over 3 years. SDI and Short Form 36 health survey scores remained stable. Neutralization of type I IFN gene signatures was maintained in the IFN‐high population, and C3, C4, and anti–double‐stranded DNA showed trends toward sustained improvement.

Conclusion

Long‐term anifrolumab treatment demonstrates an acceptable safety profile with sustained improvement in SLE disease activity, HRQoL, and serologic measures.

Structural integrity with functional plasticity: what type I IFN receptor polymorphisms reveal

The type I IFNs activate an array of signaling pathways, which are initiated after IFNs bind their cognate receptors, IFNα/β receptor (IFNAR)1 and IFNAR2. These signals contribute to many aspects of human health including defense against pathogens, cancer immunosurveillance, and regulation of inflammation. How these cytokines interact with their receptors influences the quality of these signals. As such, the integrity of receptor structure is pivotal to maintaining human health and the response to immune stimuli. This review brings together genome wide association studies and clinical reports describing the association of nonsynonymous IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 polymorphisms with clinical disease, including altered susceptibility to viral and bacterial pathogens, autoimmune diseases, cancer, and adverse reactions to live-attenuated vaccines. We describe the amino acid substitutions or truncations induced by these polymorphisms and, using the knowledge of IFNAR conformational changes, IFNAR-IFN interfaces and overall structure-function relationship of the signaling complexes, we hypothesize the effect of these polymorphisms on receptor structure. That these predicted changes to IFNAR structure are associated with clinical manifestations of human disease, highlights the importance of IFNAR structural integrity to maintaining functional quality of these receptor-mediated responses. Type I IFNs are pivotal to innate immune responses and ultimately, to human health. Understanding the consequences of altered structure on the actions of these clinically significant cell receptors provides important information on the roles of IFNARs in health and disease.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of subcutaneous anifrolumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, active skin disease, and high type I interferon gene signature: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

300 mg of intravenous anifrolumab every 4 weeks added to standard-of-care treatment for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) reduced disease activity and glucocorticoid requirement in a previous phase 3 trial. Because patients might find subcutaneous administration more convenient than intravenous delivery, we aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of subcutaneous anifrolumab in patients with SLE, active skin disease, and a high type I interferon gene signature.

METHODS

This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study was done at 12 hospitals and outpatient clinics in Hungary, South Korea, Poland, and the USA. Eligible patients were aged 18-70 years, and had SLE with high type I interferon gene signature and an activity score on the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) of at least 10. Enrolled participants were randomly assigned (3:1:3:1) by use of a voice-web response system to receive either 150 mg of subcutaneous anifrolumab or corresponding placebo, or 300 mg of subcutaneous anifrolumab or corresponding placebo in addition to stable standard-of-care treatment. The study was double-blinded with respect to intervention but not dose, until 12 weeks. Doses of oral glucocorticoids were tapered after week 12. The primary pharmacokinetic endpoint was the serum concentration of anifrolumab based on the maximum concentration after the first dose and the minimum (trough) concentration before subsequent doses and was measured in all patients who received anifrolumab and had at least one quantifiable serum pharmacokinetics observation following the first dose. The primary pharmacodynamic endpoint was neutralisation of the type I interferon pharmacodynamic signature at week 12 and was assessed in all patients with a high type I interferon pharmacodynamics signature at baseline based on a 21-gene test. Safety was evaluated in the full analysis set, which included all patients who received at least one dose of anifrolumab. This trial is completed and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02962960.

FINDINGS

Between March 14, 2017, and Oct 26, 2017, 36 patients were randomly assigned to receive 150 mg of anifrolumab (n=14), 300 mg of anifrolumab (n=13), or placebo (n=9). Two patients in the anifrolumab 150 mg group were excluded from the pharmacodynamic analysis set (n=34). Ten (71%) of 14 patients in the anifrolumab 150 mg group, ten (77%) of 13 patients in the anifrolumab 300 mg group, and nine (100%) of the nine patients in the placebo group completed 52 weeks of treatment. At week 12, pre-dose mean trough serum concentrations of anifrolumab were more than dose proportional between the anifrolumab 150 mg group (19·82 μg/mL [SD 15·01]) and the anifrolumab 300 mg group (60·28 μg/mL [43·66]), and the pharmacokinetics were non-linear. At week 12, the median percentage neutralisation of the type I interferon gene signature was higher with 150 mg (88·0% [median absolute deviation 7·4]) and 300 mg (90·7% [3·3]) of anifrolumab than with placebo (18·5% [8·1]), and more patients in the anifrolumab 150 mg group and the anifrolumab 300 mg group than in the placebo group had neutralisation of 75% or more (eight [67%] of 12 vs ten [77%] of 13 vs one [11%] of nine). At least one adverse event was reported by 23 (85%) of 27 patients in the anifrolumab groups and by seven (78%) of nine patients in the placebo group; most adverse events were of mild-to-moderate severity. Serious adverse events were reported in six (22%) of 27 patients in the anifrolumab groups (four patients in the 150 mg group and two in the 300 mg group). No serious adverse events were reported in the placebo group. Herpes zoster infection was reported by three (11%) of 27 patients in the anifrolumab groups and by one (11%) of nine patients in the placebo group. There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Anifrolumab, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks to patients with SLE and moderate-to-severe skin manifestations, had non-linear pharmacokinetics that were more than dose proportional, and neutralised the type I interferon gene signature in a dose-dependent manner. The safety profile was consistent with previous studies of intravenous anifrolumab, supporting the continued development of anifrolumab as a subcutaneously administered therapy for patients with SLE.

FUNDING

AstraZeneca.

Safety profile of anifrolumab in patients with active SLE: an integrated analysis of phase II and III trials

OBJECTIVE

In phase II and III trials, anifrolumab, a human monoclonal antibody that binds type I interferon receptor subunit 1, has shown efficacy in adults with moderate to severe SLE. We evaluated the safety and tolerability of anifrolumab using data pooled from these trials to more precisely estimate the rate and severity of adverse events (AEs).

METHODS

Data were pooled from patients receiving monthly intravenous anifrolumab 300 mg or placebo in MUSE, TULIP-1 and TULIP-2. Key safety endpoints included percentages and exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) of patients who experienced AEs, serious AEs (SAEs), AEs leading to discontinuation and AEs of special interest.

RESULTS

During treatment, 86.9% of patients receiving anifrolumab 300 mg (n=459) experienced AEs (≥1) versus 79.4% receiving placebo (n=466), and 4.1% versus 5.2% experienced an AE leading to discontinuation of investigational product. SAEs (≥1) were experienced by 11.8% and 16.7% of patients receiving anifrolumab and placebo, respectively (EAIR risk difference (95% CI) -7.2 (-12.5 to -1.9)), including lupus exacerbations classified as SAEs (1.5% and 3%, respectively). Infections occurred in 69.7% and 55.4% of patients receiving anifrolumab and placebo, respectively; difference in reported rates was driven by herpes zoster (HZ) and mild and moderate respiratory (excluding pneumonia) infections. The risk of HZ was increased with anifrolumab versus placebo (6.1% vs 1.3%, respectively; EAIR risk difference (95% CI) 5.4 (2.8 to 8.4)); most HZ events were mild or moderate, cutaneous and resolved without treatment discontinuation. Serious infections occurred in 4.8% and 5.6% of patients receiving anifrolumab and placebo, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pooled analysis of 925 patients with moderate to severe SLE, monthly intravenous anifrolumab 300 mg was generally well tolerated over 52 weeks with an acceptable safety profile. Anifrolumab was associated with an increased incidence of HZ and respiratory tract infections and lower reported rate of SLE worsening as SAEs.

A monoclonal antibody recognizing a new epitope on CD81 inhibits T-cell migration without inducing cytokine production

CD81 is involved in leukocyte migration and cytokine induction. Previous work found that anti-CD81 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) showed therapeutic potential for several immune diseases via inhibiting leukocyte migration. Although the suppression of cell migration is a promising approach for treating immune diseases, some anti-CD81 mAbs can induce cytokine production, which may exacerbate disease. To obtain new anti-human CD81 mAbs that inhibited migration in the absence of cytokine production enhancement activity, we screened a human single chain variable fragment by phage library. One of the new anti-CD81 mAbs isolated, DSP-8250, had equivalent inhibitory cell migration activity with the established anti-CD81 mAb 5A6, but it lacked cytokine induction activity. These mAbs recognized different epitopes on CD81. mAb 5A6, which had inhibitory activity on T-cell migration and increased cytokine production, bound to three residues, Ser179, Asn180 and Phe186 of CD81. In contrast, DSP-8250, which had inhibitory activity on T-cell migration but no cytokine enhancement activity, bound to four residues, His151, Ala164, Ser168 and Asn172 of CD81 as a unique epitope. These results indicate that the set of His151, Ala164, Ser168 and Asn172 forms a novel epitope that might make the application of anti-CD81 mAb therapeutically useful.

Acute activation of bronchopulmonary vagal nociceptors by type I interferons

KEY POINTS

Type I interferon receptors are expressed by the majority of vagal C-fibre neurons innervating the respiratory tract Interferon alpha and beta acutely and directly activate vagal C-fibers in the airways. The interferon-induced activation of C-fibers occurs secondary to stimulation of type 1 interferon receptors Type 1 interferons may contribute to the symptoms as well as the spread of respiratory viral infections by causing coughing and other defensive reflexes associated with vagal C-fibre activation ABSTRACT: We evaluated the ability of type I interferons to acutely activate airway vagal afferent nerve terminals in mouse lungs. Using single cell RT-PCR of lung-specific vagal neurons we found that IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 were expressed in 70% of the TRPV1-positive neurons (a marker for vagal C-fibre neurons) and 44% of TRPV1-negative neurons. We employed an ex vivo vagal innervated mouse trachea-lung preparation to evaluate the effect of interferons in directly activating airway nerves. Utilizing 2-photon microscopy of the nodose ganglion neurons from Pirt-Cre;R26-GCaMP6s mice we found that applying IFNα or IFNβ to the lungs acutely activated the majority of vagal afferent nerve terminals. When the type 1 interferon receptor, IFNAR1, was blocked with a blocking antibody the response to IFNβ was largely inhibited. The type 2 interferon, IFNγ, also activated airway nerves and this was not inhibited by the IFNAR1 blocking antibody. The Janus kinase inhibitor GLPG0634 (1 μm) virtually abolished the nerve activation caused by IFNβ. Consistent with the activation of vagal afferent C-fibers, infusing IFNβ into the mouse trachea led to defensive breathing reflexes including apneas and gasping. These reflexes were prevented by pretreatment with an IFN type-1 receptor blocking antibody. Finally, using whole cell patch-clamp electrophysiology of lung-specific neurons we found that IFNβ (1000 U ml^-1 ) directly depolarized the membrane potential of isolated nodose neurons, in some cases beyond to action potential threshold. This acute non-genomic activation of vagal sensory nerve terminals by interferons may contribute to the incessant coughing that is a hallmark of respiratory viral infections.

Anifrolumab, a monoclonal antibody to the type I interferon receptor subunit 1, for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: an overview from clinical trials

Chronic activation of the type I interferon (IFN) pathway plays a critical role in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) pathogenesis. Anifrolumab is a human monoclonal antibody to the type I IFN receptor subunit 1, which blocks the action of type I IFNs. Two phase 3 studies (TULIP-1 and TULIP-2) and a phase 2b study (MUSE) provide substantial evidence for the efficacy and safety of anifrolumab for moderately to severely active SLE. In all three studies, monthly intravenous anifrolumab 300 mg was associated with treatment differences >16% compared with placebo at Week 52 in British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment response rates. The combined data across a range of other clinically significant endpoints (e.g. oral corticosteroid reduction, improved skin disease, flare reduction) further support the efficacy of anifrolumab for SLE treatment. The safety profile of anifrolumab was generally similar across all studies; serious adverse events occurred in 8-16% and 16-19% of patients receiving anifrolumab and placebo, respectively. Herpes zoster incidence was greater with anifrolumab (≤7%) vs placebo (≤2%). Evidence from these clinical trials suggests that in patients with active SLE, anifrolumab is superior to placebo in achieving composite endpoints of disease activity response and oral corticosteroid reduction.

The potential similarities of COVID-19 and autoimmune disease pathogenesis and therapeutic options: new insights approach

Abstract

Cytokine pathways and their signaling disorders can be the cause of onset and pathogenesis of many diseases such as autoimmune diseases and COVID-19 infection. Autoimmune patients may be at higher risk of developing infection due to the impaired immune responses, the use of immunosuppressive drugs, and damage to various organs. Increased secretion of inflammatory cytokines and intolerance of the patient’s immune system to COVID-19 infection are the leading causes of hospitalization of these patients. The content used in this paper has been taken from English language articles (2005–2020) retrieved from the PubMed database and Google Scholar search engine using “COVID-19,” “Autoimmune disease,” “Therapeutic,” “Pathogenesis,” and “Pathway” keywords. The emergence of COVID-19 and its association with autoimmune disorders is a major challenge in the management of these diseases. The results showed that the use of corticosteroids in the treatment of autoimmune diseases can make diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 more challenging by preventing the fever. Due to the common pathogenesis of COVID-19 and autoimmune diseases, the use of autoimmune drugs as a possible treatment option could help control the virus.

Key Points

• Inflammatory cytokines play an essential role in the pathogenesis of COVID-19

• ACE2 dysfunctions are related to the with COVID-19 and autoimmune diseases

• The use autoimmune diseases drugs can be useful in treating COVID-19

Type I interferon antagonists in clinical development for lupus

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a severe chronic and incurable autoimmune disease. Treatment includes glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants which typically result in partial responses, and hence there is a great need for new therapies. The type I interferon (IFN) pathway is activated in more than 50% of SLE patients, and it is strongly implicated as a pathogenic factor in SLE.

AREAS COVERED

We searched the literature using 'SLE and interferon antagonists' as search terms. This identified a number of therapeutics that have entered clinical development targeting type I IFN in SLE. These include monoclonal antibodies against type I IFN cytokines and a kinoid vaccination strategy to induce anti-IFN antibodies.

EXPERT OPINION

Type I IFN antagonists have had some success, but many molecules have not progressed to phase III. These varied results are likely attributed to the multiple concurrent cytokine abnormalities present in SLE, the imprecise nature of the IFN signature as a readout for type I IFN and difficulties with clinical trials such as background medication use and diffuse composite disease activity measures. Despite these challenges, it seems likely that a type I IFN antagonist will come to clinical utility for SLE given the large unmet need and the recent phase III success with anifrolumab.

Characterization of Type-I IFN subtype autoantibodies and activity in SLE serum and urine

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Type-I interferons contribute to pathogenesis in systemic lupus erythematosus, including nephritis. Interferons consist of a family of 16 proteins yet are often characterized in patients without knowledge of the specific interferon subtypes involved. Different interferons may function in the kidneys, and other organs, relative to what is often measured in patient blood. Moreover, antibodies to interferons may potentially modulate systemic or organ-specific interferon activity. The aim of this study was to characterize global interferon activity levels and identify autoantibodies to the 12 interferon α subtypes in patient serum and urine.

METHODS

Interferon activity levels in serum and urine were measured using an interferon bioassay. Anti-interferon and anti-cytokine autoantibodies were measured by ELISA. Serum and urine samples were also characterized for their ability to neutralize the biological activity of exogenously added interferons.

RESULTS

Serum interferon activity was increased in 62% of systemic lupus erythematosus patient samples, relative to healthy donor controls, whereas binding interferon α autoantibodies to at least one interferon α subtype were found in 68% of the samples evaluated. High Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index scores were significantly (p = 0.001) associated with patient samples containing interferon α autoantibodies to three or more interferon α subtypes in their serum. Interferon α autoantibodies that potently block interferon activity were rare (∼5% of samples), but collectively bound to all 12 interferon α subtypes. Urine interferon activity and interferon α autoantibody profiles did not correlate with their serum counterparts, suggesting immune responses in systemic lupus erythematosus kidneys can be distinct from those measured in serum. Analysis of autoantibodies to 15 additional cytokines in serum identified higher frequencies of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin 17A autoantibodies, suggesting these signaling pathways may potentially contribute, with interferons, to systemic lupus erythematosus pathogenesis.

CONCLUSIONS

The measurement of autoantibodies to multiple interferon subtypes in serum and urine may provide an alternative method for following interferon-mediated systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity. The results suggest autoantibodies might be used for patient monitoring and/or identifying additional cytokine signaling pathways that are functioning in different systemic lupus erythematosus patients.

Anifrolumab in systemic lupus erythematosus: current knowledge and future considerations

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that is potentially life-threatening and can affect any organ. The complex pathogenesis and heterogeneity of the disease, among other factors, present significant challenges in developing new therapies. Knowledge gained over many years has implicated type I interferon (IFN) in the pathogenesis of SLE and anti-IFN therapies hold promise as a much-needed future treatment for SLE. Anifrolumab, a human monoclonal antibody against the type I IFN receptor, has recently been evaluated in two Phase III clinical trials for the treatment of moderate-to-severe SLE. Here, we review the clinical efficacy and safety of anifrolumab and discuss the potential challenges in determining the optimal SLE patient subgroup for treatment.

[The hinge region of therapeutic antibodies: major importance of a short sequence]

The hinge region is a short sequence of the heavy chains (H) of antibodies linking the Fab (Fragment antigen binding) region to the Fc (Fragment crystallisable) region. The functional properties of the four IgG subclasses partly result from the sequence differences of their hinge regions as some amino acids of the lower hinge region are located within or in the close vicinity of the C1q and FcγR binding sites on the IgG H chains. In addition, the hinge is susceptible to proteolytic cleavage by many proteases present in tumor and/or inflammatory microenvironment capable of affecting functional responses. Thus, an optimal format of the hinge region remains a major challenge for the development of new therapeutic antibodies.

Differential Responsiveness of Monocyte and Macrophage Subsets to Interferon

OBJECTIVE

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients exhibit a gene expression program (interferon [IFN] signature) that is attributed to overproduction of type I IFNs by plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Type I IFNs have been thought to play a role in the pathogenesis of SLE. This study was undertaken to examine an unexpected influence of monocyte/macrophages on the IFN signature.

METHODS

Proinflammatory (classic) and antiinflammatory (nonclassic) monocyte/macrophages were sorted from mice and analyzed by RNA sequencing and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Type I IFN-α/β/ω receptor (IFNAR-1) expression was determined by qPCR and flow cytometry. Macrophages were stimulated in vitro with IFNα, and pSTAT1was measured.

RESULTS

Transcriptional profiling of peritoneal macrophages from mice with pristane-induced SLE unexpectedly indicated a strong IFN signature in classic, but not nonclassic, monocyte/macrophages exposed to the same type I IFN concentrations. Ifnar1 messenger RNA and IFNAR surface staining were higher in classic monocyte/macrophages versus nonclassic monocyte/macrophages (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.05, respectively, by Student's t-test). Nonclassic monocyte/macrophages were also relatively insensitive to IFNα-driven STAT1 phosphorylation. Humans exhibited a similar pattern: higher IFNAR expression (P < 0.0001 by Student's t-test) and IFNα-stimulated gene expression (P < 0.01 by paired Wilcoxon's rank sum test) in classic monocyte/macrophages and lower levels in nonclassic monocyte/macrophages.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that the relative abundance of different monocyte/macrophage subsets helps determine the magnitude of the IFN signature. Responsiveness to IFNα signaling reflects differences in IFNAR expression in classic (high IFNAR) compared to nonclassic (low IFNAR) monocyte/macrophages. Thus, the IFN signature depends on both type I IFN production and the responsiveness of monocyte/macrophages to IFNAR signaling.

B cells targeting therapy in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease which affects the majority of organs and systems. Traditional therapies do not lead to complete remission of disease but only relieve symptoms and inflammation. B cells are the most important effector cell types in the pathogenesis of SLE. Therefore, therapies targeting B cells and their related cytokines are a very important milestone for SLE treatment. Several biologics that modulate B cells, either depleting B cells or blocking B cell functions, have been developed and evaluated in clinical trials. Belimumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that specifically binds B cells activating factor (BAFF), was the first of these agents approved for SLE treatment. In this review, we explore the currently available evidence in B cell targeted therapies in SLE including agents that target B cell surface antigens (CD19, CD20, CD22), B cell survival factors (BAFF and a proliferation-inducing ligand, APRIL), cytokines (interleukin-1 and type 1 interferons) and co-stimulatory molecules (CD40 ligand). We highlighted the mechanisms of action and the individual characteristics of these biologics, and present an update on the clinical trials that have evaluated their efficacy and safety. Finally, we describe some of the emerging and promising therapies for SLE treatment.

Stimulator of interferon genes (STING) activation exacerbates experimental colitis in mice

Detection of cytoplasmic DNA by the host’s innate immune system is essential for microbial and endogenous pathogen recognition. In mammalian cells, an important sensor is the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) protein, which upon activation by bacterially-derived cyclic dinucleotides (cDNs) or cytosolic dsDNA (dsDNA), triggers type I interferons and pro-inflammatory cytokine production. Given the abundance of bacterially-derived cDNs in the gut, we determined whether STING deletion, or stimulation, acts to modulate the severity of intestinal inflammation in the dextran sodium sulphate (DSS) model of colitis. DSS was administered to Tmem173^gt (STING-mutant) mice and to wild-type mice co-treated with DSS and a STING agonist. Colitis severity was markedly reduced in the DSS-treated Tmem173^gt mice and greatly exacerbated in wild-type mice co-treated with the STING agonist. STING expression levels were also assessed in colonic tissues, murine bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs), and human THP-1 cells. M1 and M2 polarized THP-1 and murine BMDMs were also stimulated with STING agonists and ligands to assess their responses. STING expression was increased in both murine and human M1 polarized macrophages and a STING agonist repolarized M2 macrophages towards an M1-like subtype. Our results suggest that STING is involved in the host’s response to acutely-induced colitis.

IMMUNOINFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASES ASSOCIATED WITH TYPE I INTERFERON: NEW EVIDENCE

Immunoinflammatory rheumatic diseases (IIRDs) are a large group of pathological conditions with impaired immunological tolerance to autogenous tissues, leading to inflammation and irreversible organ damage. The review discusses current ideas on the role of type I interferons in the immunopathogenesis of IIRDs, primarily systemic lupus erythematosus, and new possibilities for personalized therapy.

Biologics in the Treatment of Lupus Erythematosus: A Critical Literature Review

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease affecting multiple organ systems that runs an unpredictable course and may present with a wide variety of clinical manifestations. Advances in treatment over the last decades, such as use of corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressive drugs, have improved life expectancy of SLE sufferers. Unfortunately, in many cases effective management of SLE is still related to severe drug-induced toxicity and contributes to organ function deterioration and infective complications, particularly among patients with refractory disease and/or lupus nephritis. Consequently, there is an unmet need for drugs with a better efficacy and safety profile. A range of different biologic agents have been proposed and subjected to clinical trials, particularly dedicated to this subset of patients whose disease is inadequately controlled by conventional treatment regimes. Unfortunately, most of these trials have given unsatisfactory results, with belimumab being the only targeted therapy approved for the treatment of SLE so far. Despite these pitfalls, several novel biologic agents targeting B cells, T cells, or cytokines are constantly being evaluated in clinical trials. It seems that they may enhance the therapeutic efficacy when combined with standard therapies. These efforts raise the hope that novel drugs for patients with refractory SLE may be available in the near future. This article reviews the current biological therapies being tested in the treatment of SLE.

Expression of a constitutively active human STING mutant in hematopoietic cells produces an Ifnar1-dependent vasculopathy in mice

Transgenic expression of a mutant hSTING cDNA under the control of the Vav1 gene promoter leads to a vasculopathy similar to that of the interferonopathy, STING-associated vasculopathy of infancy.

STING-associated vasculopathy with onset in infancy (SAVI) is an autoinflammatory disorder characterized by blood vessel occlusions, acral necrosis, myositis, rashes, and pulmonary inflammation that are the result of activating mutations in the STimulator of Interferon Genes (STING). We generated a transgenic line that recapitulates many of the phenotypic aspects of SAVI by targeting the expression of the human STING-N154S–mutant protein to the murine hematopoietic compartment. hSTING-N154S mice demonstrated failure to gain weight, lymphopenia, progressive paw swelling accompanied by inflammatory infiltrates, severe myositis, and ear and tail necrosis. However, no significant lung inflammation was observed. X-ray microscopy imaging revealed vasculopathy characterized by arteriole occlusions and venous thromboses. Type I interferons and proinflammatory mediators were elevated in hSTING-N154S sera. Importantly, the phenotype was prevented in hSTING-N154S mice lacking the type I interferon receptor gene (Ifnar1). This model, based on a mutant human STING protein, may shed light on the pathophysiological mechanisms operative in SAVI.