1
|
Li X, Bai Y, Weng L, Bai Y, Gong W. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among the Chinese elderly: A multi-stakeholder qualitative study. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2024; 20:2315663. [PMID: 38439589 PMCID: PMC10936594 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2315663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
The United Nations reported that the mortality risk of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is five times higher in the elderly than the global average. Although the COVID-19 vaccine effectively prevents infections and reduce mortality among the elderly, vaccine hesitancy among the Chinese elderly poses a significant threat. This study, utilizing the "Confidence, Convenience and Complacency (3 Cs)" vaccine hesitancy model, aimed to explore factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy among the Chinese elderly and assess national countermeasures and potential improvement approaches. Thirteen elderly with vaccine hesitancy and eleven vaccine-related staff participated in semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis revealed three key determinants of vaccine hesitancy among the elderly: perceived low threat of COVID-19, lack of confidence in COVID-19 vaccine, and poor accessibility to vaccination. China has implemented strategies, including advocacy through diverse channels, joint multi-sectoral promotion vaccination, and enhancing ongoing vaccination services. Recommendations from the vaccine-related staff emphasize improving vaccine awareness among the elderly, and prioritizing the vaccination environment and process. The study underscores the importance of targeted vaccination promotion programs addressing hesitation reasons to improve vaccination rates. Furthermore, existing countermeasures can serve as a foundation for enhancing vaccination strategies, including improved publicity, administration, and management approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyu Li
- HER Team and Department of Maternal and Child Health, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yanping Bai
- HER Team and Department of Maternal and Child Health, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Lijun Weng
- HER Team and Department of Maternal and Child Health, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yunshan Bai
- Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Wenjie Gong
- HER Team and Department of Maternal and Child Health, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Suragh TA, Adzrago D, Allicock MA, Yeh PG, Cuccaro P. Exploring the relationship between vaccine hesitancy and mothers' perspectives on COVID-19 vaccines for children ages 5-11 years during the omicron predominant period 2021-2022: a qualitative study. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1355452. [PMID: 39040866 PMCID: PMC11262113 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1355452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The United States Food and Drug Administration authorized COVID-19 vaccines for children ages 5-11 years in October 2021 during the Omicron predominant period. Parental vaccine hesitancy was prevalent during this time, resulting in low childhood COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Most studies exploring factors influencing parental vaccine hesitancy have focused on racial and ethnic minorities and lower socioeconomic populations; however, there is little knowledge of the drive drivers of vaccine hesitancy among White parents with higher education and socioeconomic statuses. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with a sample of 15 White mothers of children ages 5-11 years in Atlanta, GA, between October-December 2021. Thematic analysis was performed using NVivo 12. Results Mothers were college-educated, homeowners, and fully vaccinated against COVID-19. Key findings included decreased pediatrician's recommendations for COVID-19 vaccines, reliance on information from specialized doctors and scientists, distrust in public health authorities, high risk-perception of COVID-19 vaccines, and low risk-perception of COVID-19 disease. Factors related to vaccine acceptance were altruism and practicality. Conclusion This study adds to the sparse literature on reasons for vaccine hesitancy among White mothers of children ages 5-11 years with higher educational and socioeconomic status. Improving vaccine uptake among this group is critical for protecting the health of their children and other vulnerable populations. Tailored vaccine messaging and intervention are warranted to address their unique attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors. An enhanced understanding of the factors influencing subpopulations of parents can help vaccine policymakers and healthcare providers improve efforts to reduce vaccine hesitancy, particularly for new vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany A. Suragh
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX, United States
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim JEC, Kranzler EC, Yu K, Denison B, Dahlen HM, Luchman JN, Ihongbe TO, Marshall MC, Hoffman B, Moffett K, Dupervil D, Margolis KA, Hoffman L. The Association Between the We Can Do This Campaign and Vaccination Beliefs in the United States, January 2021-March 2022. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2024:1-12. [PMID: 38958603 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2024.2373159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
Public health campaigns addressing COVID-19 vaccination beliefs may be effective in changing COVID-19 vaccination behaviors, particularly among people who remain vaccine hesitant. The "We Can Do This" COVID-19 public education campaign (the Campaign) was designed to increase COVID-19 vaccine confidence and uptake. This study aims to evaluate whether Campaign dose was associated with changes in vaccination beliefs related to COVID-19 vaccine concerns and perceived risks, the importance of COVID-19 vaccines, the perceived benefits of COVID-19 vaccination, normative beliefs about COVID-19 vaccination, and perceptions about general vaccine safety and effectiveness. The study linked data from four waves of a nationally representative longitudinal panel of U.S. adults (January 2021-March 2022) with Campaign paid digital media data (April 2021-May 2022). We used mixed-effects linear regressions to examine the association between Campaign paid digital impressions and changes in vaccination beliefs. The results provide evidence that Campaign digital impressions were significantly associated with changes in respondent beliefs regarding COVID-19 vaccine concerns and perceived risks, perceived benefits of COVID-19 vaccination, and perceptions about general vaccine safety and effectiveness. Findings suggest that public education campaigns may influence vaccine confidence and uptake by increasing positive vaccination beliefs and reducing vaccine concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae-Eun C Kim
- Communication Campaign Research & Evaluation, Fors Marsh, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Elissa C Kranzler
- Communication Campaign Research & Evaluation, Fors Marsh, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Kathleen Yu
- Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
| | - Benjamin Denison
- Communication Campaign Research & Evaluation, Fors Marsh, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Heather M Dahlen
- Communication Campaign Research & Evaluation, Fors Marsh, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Joseph N Luchman
- Communication Campaign Research & Evaluation, Fors Marsh, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Timothy O Ihongbe
- Communication Campaign Research & Evaluation, Fors Marsh, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Michael C Marshall
- Communication Campaign Research & Evaluation, Fors Marsh, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Blake Hoffman
- Communication Campaign Research & Evaluation, Fors Marsh, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Kenneth Moffett
- Communication Campaign Research & Evaluation, Fors Marsh, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Daphney Dupervil
- Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
| | - Katherine A Margolis
- Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
| | - Leah Hoffman
- Communication Campaign Research & Evaluation, Fors Marsh, Arlington, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sharif-Nia H, She L, Allen KA, Marôco J, Kaur H, Arslan G, Gorgulu O, Osborne JW, Rahmatpour P, Khoshnavay Fomani F. Parental hesitancy toward children vaccination: a multi-country psychometric and predictive study. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:1348. [PMID: 38762744 PMCID: PMC11102617 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18806-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024] Open
Abstract
AIM Understanding vaccine hesitancy, as a critical concern for public health, cannot occur without the use of validated measures applicable and relevant to the samples they are assessing. The current study aimed to validate the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (VHS) and to investigate the predictors of children's vaccine hesitancy among parents from Australia, China, Iran, and Turkey. To ensure the high quality of the present observational study the STROBE checklist was utilized. DESIGN A cross-sectional study. METHOD In total, 6,073 parent participants completed the web-based survey between 8 August 2021 and 1 October 2021. The content and construct validity of the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale was assessed. Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega were used to assess the scale's internal consistency, composite reliability (C.R.) and maximal reliability (MaxR) were used to assess the construct reliability. Multiple linear regression was used to predict parental vaccine hesitancy from gender, social media activity, and perceived financial well-being. RESULTS The results found that the VHS had a two-factor structure (i.e., lack of confidence and risk) and a total of 9 items. The measure showed metric invariance across four very different countries/cultures, showed evidence of good reliability, and showed evidence of validity. As expected, analyses indicated that parental vaccine hesitancy was higher in people who identify as female, more affluent, and more active on social media. CONCLUSIONS The present research marks one of the first studies to evaluate vaccine hesitancy in multiple countries that demonstrated VHS validity and reliability. Findings from this study have implications for future research examining vaccine hesitancy and vaccine-preventable diseases and community health nurses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamid Sharif-Nia
- Psychosomatic Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
- Department of Nursing, Amol School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
| | - Long She
- Sunway Business School, Sunway University, Sunway City, Malaysia
| | - Kelly-Ann Allen
- School of Educational Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Education, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
- Centre for Wellbeing Science, Faculty of Education, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - João Marôco
- William James Centre for Research ISPA - Instituto Universitário, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Harpaljit Kaur
- Business School, Taylor's University Lakeside Campus, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
| | - Gökmen Arslan
- Department of Psychological Counseling, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey
| | - Ozkan Gorgulu
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Kırşehir, Turkey
| | | | - Pardis Rahmatpour
- School of Nursing, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Khoshnavay Fomani
- Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nguyen KH, Coy KC, Black CL, Scanlon P, Singleton JA. Comparison of adult hesitancy towards COVID-19 vaccines and vaccines in general in the USA. Vaccine 2024; 42:645-652. [PMID: 38143200 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.12.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 12/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adults who are hesitant toward routinely recommended vaccines for adults may also be hesitant toward COVID-19 vaccines. However, the distribution and differences in hesitancy between routinely recommended vaccines and COVID-19 vaccines, and the association of hesitancy regarding routinely recommended vaccines and hesitancy with COVID-19 vaccination status and intent, is unknown. METHODS Using the Research and Development Survey (RANDS) during COVID-19, Round 3, a probability-sampled, nationally representative, web and phone survey fielded from May 17 - June 30, 2021 (n = 5,434), we examined the distribution and difference in prevalence of hesitancy towards COVID-19 and vaccines in general, beliefs associated with vaccine hesitancy, and factors impacting plans to be vaccinated against COVID-19. RESULTS Reported hesitancy towards COVID-19 vaccines (42.2%) was 6-percentage points higher than hesitancy towards vaccines in general (35.7%). Populations who were most hesitant toward COVID-19 vaccines were younger adults, non-Hispanic Black adults, adults with lower education or income, and adults who were associated with a religion. Beliefs in the social benefit and the importance of vaccination, and the belief that COVID-19 vaccines lower risk for infection, were strongly associated with COVID-19 vaccination and intent to be vaccinated. CONCLUSIONS Vaccine hesitancy for both COVID-19 vaccines and vaccines in general is common. Health providers and public health officials should utilize strategies to address vaccine hesitancy, including providing strong clear recommendations for needed vaccines, addressing safety and effectiveness concerns, and utilizing trusted messengers such as religious and community leaders to improve vaccine confidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly H Nguyen
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kelsey C Coy
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Leidos Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Carla L Black
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Paul Scanlon
- National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, MD, USA
| | - James A Singleton
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Keene K, Balasubramanian A, Potter A, Cioffredi LA. Maternal worry of children contracting COVID-19 predicts vaccine uptake in young children in Vermont. Vaccine X 2024; 16:100442. [PMID: 38318233 PMCID: PMC10839441 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Young children, 6 months to 4 years of age, were the last population for whom the COVID-19 vaccines became available and remain the group with the lowest uptake. Scarce information exists on drivers of vaccine uptake in young children. The relationship between parental perceived risk of infection and child COVID-19 vaccination is unknown. Objective Examine the association between perceived risk of infection and early childhood vaccination. Methods In June 2020, perinatal women in Vermont were enrolled in a longitudinal survey study assessing life changes during the pandemic. Surveys included worry of infection, Parents Attitude about Childhood Vaccines (PACV), intention to vaccinate children with the COVID-19 vaccine, and masking behaviors. Once vaccines became available, surveys also included child vaccination status. A demographic-adjusted stepwise logistic regression was conducted to assess the relationship of worry of infection and vaccine hesitancy on child vaccination status. Results 85 women completed baseline and follow up surveys. Participants were highly adherent to adult COVID vaccines with 93 % at least partially vaccinated and only 3 % demonstrated general childhood vaccine hesitancy on the PACV. However, in this highly adherent population, only 61 % of young children are vaccinated. In univariate [OR = 7.35 95 % CI (2.70 to 20.02)] and demographic adjusted [OR = 6.03 95 % CI (1.30 to 27.90)] models, current worry about child infection was associated with higher odds of child vaccination. Previously established predictors, vaccine hesitancy [OR = 0.91 95 % CI (0.84 to 0.99)] and younger maternal age [OR = 1.33 95 % CI (1.07 to 1.65)] were again associated lower odds of child vaccination. Conclusion Among vaccine adherent parents, worry of infection was a strong predictor of vaccine uptake. Continued efforts to articulate the potential morbidity of COVID in young children, along with established methods to address general vaccine hesitancy may aid in COVID vaccine uptake in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen Keene
- Vermont Children’s Hospital, Pediatrics, Burlington, VT, United States
| | | | - Alexandra Potter
- Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
- University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, Burlington, VT, United States
| | - Leigh-Anne Cioffredi
- Vermont Children’s Hospital, Pediatrics, Burlington, VT, United States
- Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Walker KK, Clare A, Kumar A, Gaviria-Agudelo C. A scoping review of the use of parent-adolescent dyads in HPV vaccination research. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 118:108007. [PMID: 37847989 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Parental vaccine hesitancy is a significant contributor to low adolescent HPV vaccination. Shared HPV vaccination decision-making among adolescents and parents is an important determinant of vaccination uptake. We performed a scoping review to identify studies that used parent-adolescent dyads in HPV vaccination research. METHODS We searched peer-reviewed articles in PubMed, Embase, and PsychInfo from 2012 to 2023. Randomized or observational studies with parent-adolescent dyads related to HPV vaccination were eligible for inclusion. Articles were coded for the main themes related to use of parent-adolescent dyads in HPV vaccination research. RESULTS Fifteen articles met the inclusion criteria and were categorized into two main themes: qualitative decision-making and quantitative vaccination intentions. Dyad members reported substantially different roles, barriers, and facilitators of HPV vaccine decisions and intentions. Dyad members disagreed on who made the final decision. Provider recommendation style and content were important to parental confidence in the vaccine decision. CONCLUSION The recent evidence for parent-adolescent HPV vaccination dyad research is sparse but indicates that factors that account for dyad vaccination decisions and intentions often differ between dyad members. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Studies in this review support ongoing research with parent-adolescent dyads to target HPV vaccine interventions at individual dyad members to increase HPV vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly K Walker
- Zimmerman School of Advertising and Mass Communications, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
| | - Alyssa Clare
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
| | - Ambuj Kumar
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
| | - Claudia Gaviria-Agudelo
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rajeh MT, Farsi DJ, Farsi NJ, Mosli HH, Mosli MH. Are parents' willing to vaccinate their children against COVID-19? A qualitative study based on the Health Belief Model. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2177068. [PMID: 36755490 PMCID: PMC10054307 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2177068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, several countries have started implementing voluntary or involuntary mass vaccination programs. Although vaccine acceptance is high among adults, uncertainty about whether to vaccinate children against COVID-19 remains a controversial theme. To date, few qualitative studies have explored parents' views on this topic. A qualitative descriptive study design was used to collect data and individual in-depth interviews were conducted with 50 parents in the Makkah region of Saudi Arabia. The Health Belief Model (HBM) was used as a guide in developing the interview guide. Each question was related to a construct of the HBM. The data were then analyzed using thematic content analysis and interpreted using NVivo software. Two major themes emerged: motivation to vaccinate children, which was influenced by perceived benefits, perceived severity, perceived suitability, collective responsibilities, confidence, and cues to action; and barriers to vaccination in children, which included complacency, rapid vaccine development, and uncertainty about the long-term side effects of the vaccine. The findings of this study revealed that the public is not sufficiently informed about the efficacy or side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine, increasing the awareness of which will help parents make informed decisions regarding vaccinating their children and potentially increase vaccine acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona T Rajeh
- Department of Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Deema J Farsi
- Pediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nada J Farsi
- Department of Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hala H Mosli
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed H Mosli
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Liang Y, Sun Y. Awareness of and attitude toward COVID-19 vaccination among individuals with COPD and the strategies to overcome vaccine hesitation: A mini review. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2286686. [PMID: 38059434 PMCID: PMC10732662 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2286686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines have a protective effect on individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), preventing them from developing severe illnesses and reducing the risk of hospitalization and mortality. However, the coverage rate of COVID-19 vaccination among this population is not satisfactory, which is associated with their lack of awareness of and negative attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination, that is, vaccine hesitancy. We reviewed recent literatures on the vaccination status of COPD patients and vaccine hesitancy, described the factors related to vaccine hesitancy among COPD patients, and proposed strategies to improve the vaccine coverage, such as providing accurate and consistent vaccine information to the public, patient health education program, improving self-management capabilities, easy access to vaccination service, etc., which can hopefully help to improve patients' ability to cope with SARS-CoV-2 infection and reduce the COVID-19 related mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Liang
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Research Center for Chronic Airway Diseases, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yongchang Sun
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Research Center for Chronic Airway Diseases, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Collier AF, Schaefer KR, Uddin A, Noonan C, Dillard DA, Son-Stone L, Manson SM, Buchwald D, MacLehose R. COVID-19 vaccination in urban American Indian and Alaska Native children: Parental characteristics, beliefs and attitudes associated with vaccine acceptance. Vaccine X 2023; 15:100406. [PMID: 38058791 PMCID: PMC10696120 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Little is known about vaccination rates for American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) parents and their children, or parental decisions in this regard. Improving vaccination rates is a serious concern due to the disproportionate incidence and morbidity of COVID-19 in AI/AN people. Purpose Our goal was to describe urban AI/AN parental attributes associated with COVID-19 vaccination of their children. Methods Survey participants (n = 572) were ≥18 years of age, had children ≥5 years of age, AI/AN, and seen at one of six urban health organizations serving primarily AI/AN people within the prior year. They were asked about gender, age, education, marital status, perceived stress, trauma history, whether they had received the COVID-19 vaccine, tested positive for COVID-19 in the past, and if their child was vaccinated. They were also asked about 16 vaccine hesitancy reasons. Results Parental vaccination rate was 82%, with 59% of their children vaccinated. Parents who vaccinated their children were older, had higher education, lower stress and trauma, and were more likely to be vaccinated compared to parents who did not vaccinate their children. Forty-two percent of parents indicated they would likely vaccinate their unvaccinated child in the future. Sixteen vaccine hesitancy reasons revealed four factors: distrust, inconvenience, lack of concern about the pandemic, and AI/AN concerns. Parents who had no plans to vaccinate their children had the highest vaccine distrust and lack of concern about the pandemic. Parents with greater vaccine distrust and AI/AN specific concern reported significantly greater trauma history and higher levels of education. Conclusion Even though vaccination rates for AI/AN parents and children are high, the consequences of COVID-19 for AI/AN people are more severe than for other US populations. Providers should use trauma-informed, trust-building and culturally competent communication when discussing choices about vaccination with AI/AN parents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Azhar Uddin
- Institute for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Elson S Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, United States
| | - Carolyn Noonan
- Institute for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Elson S Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, United States
| | | | - Linda Son-Stone
- First Nations Community Healthsource, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| | - Spero M. Manson
- Centers for American Indian and Alaska Native Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, United States
| | - Dedra Buchwald
- Institute for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Elson S Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, United States
| | - Richard MacLehose
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, School of Public Health, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kretchner M, Lifshin U, Mikulincer M. Parental motivated helplessness in vaccinating children against COVID-19: Its association with fear, effectiveness and willingness to vaccinate. J Health Psychol 2023; 28:1345-1358. [PMID: 37183794 PMCID: PMC10189525 DOI: 10.1177/13591053231170055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
According to the motivated helplessness hypothesis, parental feelings of helplessness regarding vaccinating children against COVID-19 may serve a protective function against vaccine fear and hesitancy. Two correlational studies conducted among Israelis (Study 1) and an international sample (Study 2), examined whether self-reported perceived helplessness in vaccinating children may be related to lower vaccine-fear, and higher perceived vaccine-effectiveness, trust in authorities' recommendations and willingness to vaccinate. Results indicated parents who felt they had no other choice but to vaccinate their children, exhibited less vaccine-fear, higher vaccine-effectiveness and greater intentions to vaccinate. Additionally, the relationships between vaccine-helplessness, vaccine-effectiveness and willingness to vaccinate were partially mediated by vaccine-fear. In Study 2, vaccine-helplessness was found related to higher trust in authorities' recommendations, which was partially mediated by vaccine-fear. The implications of these findings for research on the psychological function of helplessness in the parental decision-making process of vaccinating children during a pandemic are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mabelle Kretchner
- Reichman University, Israel
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem,
Israel
- Bar Ilan University, Israel
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Feghaly E, Hanna V, Mohamad NK, Assaf MA, Sebastian J, El Khatib S, Karam R, Zeitoun A, Berry A, Samaha H, Shouman M, Obeid S, Hallit S, Malaeb D. Trust in pharmaceuticals and vaccine hesitancy: exploring factors influencing COVID-19 immunization among Lebanese children aged 1 to 11 years. BMC Pediatr 2023; 23:570. [PMID: 37974145 PMCID: PMC10652549 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-023-04394-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic is a serious threat to everyone's health. Numerous studies have demonstrated that vaccines are very effective in preventing COVID-19-related severe illness, hospitalization, and death. Children's vaccination exerts its protecting effect by preventing the spread of the virus. The purpose of this study was to analyze the rate of COVID-19 immunization among Lebanese children aged 1 to 11 years and assess parental factors that affect immunization rates. METHODS An online cross-sectional study was conducted between January and March 2023. The online survey was distributed across all social media channels, including the Ministry of Public Health website. RESULTS A total of 390 parents filled the survey (mean age = 37.48 ± 8.39 years; 50.5% mothers; 70% with a university level of education). Mothers compared to fathers, having a history of bad reaction to a vaccine vs. not, and higher vaccine hesitancy were significantly associated with less willingness to administer the vaccine to the child. Trusting pharmaceutical companies was significantly associated with more willingness to administer the vaccine to the child. CONCLUSION The results of this study show that the factors associated with parents' decisions to vaccinate their children may vary. Our findings conclude that vaccine acceptance is being highly associated with parental concerns, trust, and information regarding the vaccine safety and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Feghaly
- School of Pharmacy, Lebanese International University, Bekaa, Lebanon
| | - Venise Hanna
- School of Pharmacy, Lebanese International University, Bekaa, Lebanon
| | | | - Mohamad Ali Assaf
- School of Pharmacy, Lebanese International University, Bekaa, Lebanon
| | - Juny Sebastian
- College of Pharmacy, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
| | - Sami El Khatib
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Lebanese International University, Bekaa, Lebanon
- Center for Applied Mathematics and Bioinformatics (CAMB), Gulf University for Science and Technology, Mubarak Al-Abdullah, Kuwait
| | - Rita Karam
- Quality Assurance of Pharmaceutical Products Department, National Pharmacovigilance Program, Lebanese Ministry of Public Health, Beirut, Lebanon
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon
- Pharmacology Department, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Abeer Zeitoun
- Quality Assurance of Pharmaceutical Products Department, National Pharmacovigilance Program, Lebanese Ministry of Public Health, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Atika Berry
- Preventive Medicine Department, Ministry of Public Health, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Hajar Samaha
- Preventive Medicine Department, Ministry of Public Health, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Marwa Shouman
- Preventive Medicine Department, Ministry of Public Health, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Sahar Obeid
- Social and Education Sciences Department, School of Arts and Sciences, Lebanese American University, Jbeil, Lebanon.
| | - Souheil Hallit
- School of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, P.O. Box 446, Jounieh, Lebanon.
- Research Department, Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross, Jal Eddib, Lebanon.
- Applied Science Research Center, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan.
| | - Diana Malaeb
- College of Pharmacy, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tang J, Wang T, Cottrell J, Jia F. Navigating Uncertainty: Experiences of Older Adults in Wuhan during the 76-Day COVID-19 Lockdown. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2970. [PMID: 37998461 PMCID: PMC10671022 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11222970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect the world. Wuhan, the epicenter of the outbreak, underwent a 76-day lockdown. Research has indicated that the lockdown negatively impacted the quality of life of older individuals, but little is known about their specific experiences during the confinement period. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 elderly residents of Wuhan, aged 65 to 85, who experienced mandatory isolation throughout the pandemic. The interviews centered around three stages of experiences: the Early Lockdown stage (the first week of lockdown after the government implemented the lockdown policy in January 2020), Infection During Lockdown stage (from February to April 2020 when participants were affected by the lockdown), and the Post-Lockdown stage (after April 2020 when the government lifted the lockdown policy). We found that older adults experienced different core themes during each lockdown stage. In the Early Lockdown stage, they felt nervousness and fear while searching for information. During the Lockdown and Infection Stage, they relied on reciprocal support and adjusted to new lifestyles. In the Post-Lockdown stage, they expressed cautions, trust, and gratitude. The finding highlights the evolving emotions and coping strategies of older adults throughout the lockdown phases. This study has yielded valuable insights into the adaptations of behavior and the importance of social interactions, specifically emphasizing the significance of healthcare among the elderly population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianing Tang
- School of Foreign Languages and Literature, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China;
| | - Tangsheng Wang
- School of Marxism, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China;
| | - Jessica Cottrell
- Department of Biology, Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ 07079, USA;
| | - Fanli Jia
- Department of Psychology, Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ 07079, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Baghani M, Fathalizade F, Loghman AH, Samieefar N, Ghobadinezhad F, Rashedi R, Baghsheikhi H, Sodeifian F, Rahimzadegan M, Akhlaghdoust M. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy worldwide and its associated factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. SCIENCE IN ONE HEALTH 2023; 2:100048. [PMID: 39077035 PMCID: PMC11262288 DOI: 10.1016/j.soh.2023.100048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
Introduction The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has taken a toll on humans, and the development of effective vaccines has been a promising tool to end the pandemic. However, for a vaccination program to be successful, a considerable proportion of the community must be vaccinated. Hence, public acceptance of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines has become the key to controlling the pandemic. Recent studies have shown vaccine hesitancy increasing over time. This systematic review aims to evaluate the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy rate and related factors in different communities. Method A comprehensive search was performed in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, and Web of Science from January 1, 2019 to January 31, 2022. All relevant descriptive and observational studies (cross-sectional and longitudinal) on vaccine hesitancy and acceptance were included in this systematic review. In the meta-analysis, odds ratio (OR) was used to assess the effects of population characteristics on vaccine hesitancy, and event rate (acceptance rate) was the effect measure for overall acceptance. Publication bias was assessed using the funnel plot, Egger's test, and trim-and-fill methods. Result A total of 135 out of 6,417 studies were included after screening. A meta-analysis of 114 studies, including 849,911 participants, showed an overall acceptance rate of 63.1%. In addition, men, married individuals, educated people, those with a history of flu vaccination, those with higher income levels, those with comorbidities, and people living in urban areas were less hesitant. Conclusion Increasing public awareness of the importance of COVID-19 vaccines in overcoming the pandemic is crucial. Being men, living in an urban region, being married or educated, having a history of influenza vaccination, having a higher level of income status, and having a history of comorbidities are associated with higher COVID-19 vaccine acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matin Baghani
- Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Cognitive and Neuroscience Research Center (CNRC), Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farzan Fathalizade
- Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Cognitive and Neuroscience Research Center (CNRC), Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amir Hossein Loghman
- USERN Office, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Network of Interdisciplinarity in Neonates and Infants (NINI), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
| | - Noosha Samieefar
- USERN Office, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Network of Interdisciplinarity in Neonates and Infants (NINI), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
| | - Farbod Ghobadinezhad
- Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
- USERN Office, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
- Network of Interdisciplinarity in Neonates and Infants (NINI), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
| | - Ronak Rashedi
- USERN Office, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Network of Interdisciplinarity in Neonates and Infants (NINI), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
| | - Hediyeh Baghsheikhi
- USERN Office, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Network of Interdisciplinarity in Neonates and Infants (NINI), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Sodeifian
- USERN Office, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- USERN Office, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Milad Rahimzadegan
- Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- USERN Office, Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Meisam Akhlaghdoust
- Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- USERN Office, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- USERN Office, Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Network of Interdisciplinarity in Neonates and Infants (NINI), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Obasanya M, Igenoza O, Gupta S, McElroy K, Brannon GE, Brown K. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Maternal and Child COVID-19 Vaccination Intent Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women in the USA (April-June 2020): an Application of Health Belief Model. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2023; 10:2540-2551. [PMID: 36352345 PMCID: PMC9645740 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-022-01434-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
This study investigated racial/ethnic differences in pregnant and postpartum women's intentions to receive the COVID-19 vaccination (maternal COVID-19 vaccination intent) and intentions to vaccinate their children against COVID-19 (child COVID-19 vaccination intent) during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic (April-June 2020). This study also assessed Health Belief Model constructs to examine their influence on maternal and child COVID-19 vaccination intent by race/ethnicity. This study includes 489 US pregnant and postpartum women (18-49 years) recruited via Prolific Academic to complete a 55-item cross-sectional online survey. Crude and adjusted logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the associations between race/ethnicity, maternal COVID-19 vaccination intent, and child COVID-19 vaccination intent. Among pregnant women, the odds of maternal COVID-19 vaccination intent (aOR = 2.20, 95% CI: .862, 5.61) and child COVID-19 vaccination intent (aOR = .194, 95% CI: .066, .565) among NH Black women were statistically significantly lower than that of NH White women after adjustment for demographic, health, and health belief model variables. Among postpartum women, although some racial differences in maternal or child COVID-19 vaccination intent were observed, these differences were not statistically significant in unadjusted and adjusted models. The findings have implications for future research and interventions which should adopt a racial health equity lens and identify strategies grounded in institutional trustworthiness and systems perspectives to address racial/ethnic disparities in COVID-19 vaccination intent among pregnant and postpartum women during novel pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mercy Obasanya
- Department of Kinesiology, College of Nursing and Health Innovation, University of Texas at Arlington, 500 W. Nedderman Drive, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA
| | | | | | - Kristin McElroy
- Maternal and Child Health Epidemiologist, Division of Epidemiology and Health Information, Tarrant County Public Health, 1101 S. Main Street, Fort Worth, TX, 76104, USA
| | - Grace E Brannon
- Department of Communication, College of Liberal Arts, University of Texas at Arlington, 700 W. Greek Row Drive, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA
| | - Kyrah Brown
- Department of Kinesiology, College of Nursing and Health Innovation, University of Texas at Arlington, 500 W. Nedderman Drive, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fok CL, Fifita M, Tanjasiri SP. Decision-Making Regarding Elective Child and Adolescent Vaccinations Among Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Parents in Orange County. Health Promot Pract 2023:15248399231193707. [PMID: 37772336 DOI: 10.1177/15248399231193707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders (NHPIs) in aggregate experience greater health burdens than non-Hispanic Whites, such as a higher incidence of cervical cancer and COVID-19. Given the importance of vaccinations in preventing and reducing the severity of diseases, such as the flu, cervical cancer, and COVID-19, the receipt of vaccines during childhood and adolescence is crucial. Therefore, this qualitative study aimed to explore the factors associated with NHPI parents' decisions regarding vaccinating their children with these elective vaccinations-that is, vaccinations not required for child care, preschool, or K-12 admissions in California but highly recommended. A total of 15 NHPI parents were recruited through a community-based organization. Semi-structured interviews explored parents' reasons for accepting or denying each vaccine for their child(ren). Results demonstrated variable acceptance of each vaccine, though consistent themes included protection and concerns over side effects. This study also found two general types of parents-those who treat vaccines the same and those with varying opinions about each vaccine. Results from this study demonstrate the family- and community-oriented nature of NHPI communities, suggesting that future interventions target not only parents but also their families and communities to cultivate vaccine acceptance through social networks. Furthermore, addressing all three vaccines during well-child visits may benefit parents who view each vaccine as separate entities with individual pros and cons. Such interventions could contribute toward reducing the burdens of particularly chronic health disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Melenaite Fifita
- University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
- Pacific Islander Health Partnership, Santa Ana, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Carlson SJ, Attwell K, Roberts L, Hughes C, Blyth CC. West Australian parents' views on vaccinating their children against COVID-19: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:1764. [PMID: 37697268 PMCID: PMC10494404 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16645-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Australian children and adolescents were among the last local cohorts offered COVID-19 vaccines. Despite promising initial uptake, coverage subsequently plateaued, requiring further efforts to improve access and build parents' recognition of the importance of COVID-19 vaccination. We sought to understand West Australian (WA) parents' willingness to vaccinate their children to inform strategies for improving uptake at the time in which they were becoming eligible. METHODS We undertook in-depth qualitative interviews with 30 parents of children aged 5-17 years from June - December 2021. During this period, children aged 12-15 years became eligible for vaccination; children aged 5-11 years became eligible shortly thereafter. Data were thematically analysed in NVivo. RESULTS Most parents intended on vaccinating their children once eligible. Parents sought to protect their children, to protect the community, to resume travel, and to get back to "normal". They reflected that vaccination against key infectious threats is a routine activity in childhood. Some were concerned about the vaccine, particularly mRNA vaccines, being new technology or impacting fertility. "Wait-awhiles" wanted to see what other parents would do or were delaying until they felt that there was a higher risk of COVID-19 in WA. Most parents of younger children wanted their child to be vaccinated at the general practice clinic due to familiarity and convenience. Parents were particularly eager for clear and consistent messaging about vaccination of children and adolescents, including safety, importance, scientific evidence, and personal stories. CONCLUSION For future pandemic vaccinations pertaining to children, governments and health officials need to address parents' concerns and meet their preferences for the delivery of the vaccine program to children and adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha J Carlson
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA, Australia
- School of Social Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Katie Attwell
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA, Australia
- School of Social Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Leah Roberts
- School of Social Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | | | - Christopher C Blyth
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA, Australia.
- School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.
- Department of Microbiology, PathWestLaboratory Medicine, Perth, WA, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Beatty SD, Macke JB, Griffin KM, Villwock JA. Parental Vaccine Hesitancy in a COVID-19 World: A Qualitative Study of Midwestern Parents' Decisions Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination for Their Children. Kans J Med 2023; 16:194-199. [PMID: 37791020 PMCID: PMC10544882 DOI: 10.17161/kjm.vol16.20049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction With the launch of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) vaccines, a new cohort of people exists who do not consider themselves to be completely vaccine-hesitant, but are specifically COVID-19 vaccine hesitant (CVH). There is a need to learn from CVH parents, to ensure their concerns are addressed, and allow them to comfortably vaccinate their children against the COVID-19 virus. Methods Surveys were used to identify CVH parents. Using semistructured interviews, we assessed the attitudes of CVH parents toward COVID-19 vaccination in children. An inductive coding method was used to analyze transcripts and develop themes. Results Fourteen parents were interviewed. Seven (50%) had received the COVID-19 vaccine even though they had doubts. Six reported that education about mRNA vaccine production was helpful in deciding to get vaccinated. Parents were reluctant regarding pediatric vaccination due to lack of long-term studies and concerns about adverse impact on childhood development. Personal physicians were the most trusted source of information and direct conversations with them were the most influential, as opposed to public health leaders like the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health. Conclusions Our findings suggested that physicians are among the most trusted sources of information regarding the COVID-19 vaccine for CVH parents. Rather than use broad public health messaging and advertising to increase rates of vaccination, further investigation into training health professionals on how to counsel CVH patients effectively may be a higher impact area of opportunity to improve vaccine response rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon D Beatty
- University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS
| | - Jamison B Macke
- University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, KS
| | | | - Jennifer A Villwock
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cox E, Sanchez M, Taylor K, Baxter C, Crary I, Every E, Futa B, Adams Waldorf KM. A Mother's Dilemma: The 5-P Model for Vaccine Decision-Making in Pregnancy. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1248. [PMID: 37515063 PMCID: PMC10383354 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11071248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Pregnant women are a highly vaccine-resistant population and face unique circumstances that complicate vaccine decision-making. Pregnant women are also at increased risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes to many vaccine-preventable diseases. Several models have been proposed to describe factors informing vaccine hesitancy and acceptance. However, none of these existing models are applicable to the complex decision-making involved with vaccine acceptance during pregnancy. We propose a model for vaccine decision-making in pregnancy that incorporates the following key factors: (1) perceived information sufficiency regarding vaccination risks during pregnancy, (2) harm avoidance to protect the fetus, (3) relationship with a healthcare provider, (4) perceived benefits of vaccination, and (5) perceived disease susceptibility and severity during pregnancy. In addition to these factors, the availability of research on vaccine safety during pregnancy, social determinants of health, structural barriers to vaccine access, prior vaccine acceptance, and trust in the healthcare system play roles in decision-making. As a final step, the pregnant individual must balance the risks and benefits of vaccination for themselves and their fetus, which adds greater complexity to the decision. Our model represents a first step in synthesizing factors informing vaccine decision-making by pregnant women, who represent a highly vaccine-resistant population and who are also at high risk for adverse outcomes for many infectious diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Cox
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Magali Sanchez
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Katherine Taylor
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Carly Baxter
- School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Isabelle Crary
- School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Emma Every
- School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Brianne Futa
- School of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| | - Kristina M Adams Waldorf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kollath-Cattano C, Hatteberg SJ, Petillo S, Giancaterini M. Correlates of and barriers to COVID-19 vaccine initiation and intention among US college students. JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH : J OF ACH 2023:1-9. [PMID: 37437183 DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2023.2222843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine correlates of and barriers to COVID-19 vaccine initiation and intention among college students. PARTICIPANTS 1,171 students attending a public university in the South. METHODS Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the correlates of vaccine intention and initiation. Reasons for pursuing or foregoing vaccination were analyzed qualitatively using an inductive approach. RESULTS Among respondents, 44% had initiated vaccination, 38% intended to be vaccinated, and 18% were unsure about/unwilling to be vaccinated. Vaccine initiation and intention were both associated with 2019-2020 seasonal flu vaccination and political ideology, with conservative-leaning students having lower odds of vaccine initiation and of intention relative to liberal-leaning students. The most common reasons for vaccine initiation/intention and for vaccine hesitancy differed in frequency by political ideology. CONCLUSION The most effective vaccine promotion strategies may be those tailored to different social groups, virus-related beliefs/perceptions, and the specific concerns of vaccine hesitant students.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christy Kollath-Cattano
- Department of Health and Human Performance, College of Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Sarah J Hatteberg
- Department of Sociology and Anthropology, College of Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Samantha Petillo
- Department of Health and Human Performance, College of Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Morgan Giancaterini
- Department of Health and Human Performance, College of Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zaildo T, Santino TA, Chaves G, da Silva BAK, Alchieri JC, Patino CM, Leite S, Luz KG, Guerra RO, da Penha THS, da Silva GR, Jácome AC, Monteiro KS, de Mendonça KMPP. Barriers to and facilitators of populational adherence to prevention and control measures of COVID-19 and other respiratory infectious diseases: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Eur Respir Rev 2023; 32:220238. [PMID: 37343960 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0238-2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS To summarise the evidence on barriers to and facilitators of population adherence to prevention and control measures for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other respiratory infectious diseases. METHODS A qualitative synthesis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis and the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care: Qualitative Evidence Synthesis. We performed an electronic search on MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO from their inception to March 2023. RESULTS We included 71 studies regarding COVID-19, pneumonia, tuberculosis, influenza, pertussis and H1N1, representing 5966 participants. The measures reported were vaccinations, physical distancing, stay-at-home policy, quarantine, self-isolation, facemasks, hand hygiene, contact investigation, lockdown, infection prevention and control guidelines, and treatment. Tuberculosis-related measures were access to care, diagnosis and treatment completion. Analysis of the included studies yielded 37 barriers and 23 facilitators. CONCLUSIONS This review suggests that financial and social support, assertive communication, trust in political authorities and greater regulation of social media enhance adherence to prevention and control measures for COVID-19 and infectious respiratory diseases. Designing and implementing effective educational public health interventions targeting the findings of barriers and facilitators highlighted in this review are key to reducing the impact of infectious respiratory diseases at the population level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tácito Zaildo
- Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate Program in Physical Therapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil
| | - Thayla Amorim Santino
- Department of Physical Therapy, State University of Paraiba, Campina Grande, PB, Brazil
| | | | | | - João Carlos Alchieri
- Department of Psychology, Graduate Program in Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil
| | - Cecilia M Patino
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sarah Leite
- Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate Program in Physical Therapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil
| | - Kleber Giovanni Luz
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil
| | - Ricardo Oliveira Guerra
- Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate Program in Physical Therapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil
| | - Tito Hugo Soares da Penha
- Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate Program in Physical Therapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil
| | - Gabriel Rodrigues da Silva
- Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate Program in Physical Therapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil
| | - Ada Cristina Jácome
- Public Health Department of the State of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil
| | - Karolinne Souza Monteiro
- Faculty of Health Sciences of Trairi, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cox E, Sanchez M, Baxter C, Crary I, Every E, Munson J, Stapley S, Stonehill A, Taylor K, Widmann W, Karasz H, Waldorf KMA. COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among English-Speaking Pregnant Women Living in Rural Western United States. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1108. [PMID: 37376496 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11061108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
This mixed-method study investigated vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women living in rural western United States and their response to social media ads promoting COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Thirty pregnant or recently pregnant participants who live in rural zip codes in Washington, Oregon, California, and Idaho were interviewed between November 2022 and March 2023. Interviews were transcribed and coded, while the ad ratings were analyzed using linear mixed models. The study identified five main themes related to vaccine uptake, including perceived risk of COVID, sources of health information, vaccine hesitancy, and relationships with care providers. Participants rated ads most highly that used peer-based messengers and negative outcome-based content. Ads with faith-based and elder messengers were rated significantly lower than peer messengers (p = 0.04 and 0.001, respectively). An activation message was also rated significantly less favorably than negative outcome-based content (p = 0.001). Participants preferred evidence-based information and the ability to conduct their own research on vaccine safety and efficacy rather than being told to get vaccinated. Primary concerns of vaccine-hesitant respondents included the short amount of time the vaccine had been available and perceived lack of research on its safety during pregnancy. Our findings suggests that tailored messaging using peer-based messengers and negative outcome-based content can positively impact vaccine uptake among pregnant women living in rural areas of the Western United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Cox
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Magali Sanchez
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Carly Baxter
- School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Isabelle Crary
- School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Emma Every
- School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Jeff Munson
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98102, USA
| | - Simone Stapley
- Department of Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Alex Stonehill
- Department of Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Katherine Taylor
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Willamina Widmann
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Hilary Karasz
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Kristina M Adams Waldorf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kohler RE, Wagner RB, Careaga K, Vega J, Btoush R, Greene K, Kantor L. Parents' Intentions, Concerns and Information Needs about COVID-19 Vaccination in New Jersey: A Qualitative Analysis. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1096. [PMID: 37376485 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11061096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2019, the World Health Organization identified vaccine hesitancy as a top ten global health threat, which has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite local and nationwide public health efforts, adolescent COVID-19 vaccination uptake in the US remains low. This study explored parents' perceptions of the COVID-19 vaccine and factors influencing hesitancy to inform future outreach and education campaigns. METHODS We conducted two rounds of individual interviews via Zoom in May-September 2021 and January-February 2022, with parents of adolescents from the Greater Newark Area of New Jersey, a densely populated area with historically marginalized groups that had low COVID-19 vaccination uptake. Data collection and analysis was guided by the Increasing Vaccination Model and WHO Vaccine Hesitancy Matrix. Interview transcripts were double-coded and thematically analyzed in NVivo. RESULTS We interviewed 22 parents (17 in English, 5 in Spanish). Nearly half (45%) were Black and 41% were Hispanic. Over half (54%) were born outside of the US. Most of the parents described that their adolescents had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. All but one parent had received the COVID-19 vaccine. Despite strong vaccination acceptance for themselves, parents remained hesitant about vaccinating their adolescents. They were mostly concerned about the safety and potential side effects due to the novelty of the vaccine. Parents sought information about the vaccines online, through healthcare providers and authorities, and at community spaces. Interpersonal communication exposed parents to misinformation, though some personal connections to severe COVID-19 illness motivated vaccination. Historical mistreatment by the healthcare system and politicization of the vaccine contributed to parents' mixed feelings about the trustworthiness of those involved with developing, promoting, and distributing COVID-19 vaccines. CONCLUSIONS We identified multilevel influences on COVID-19 vaccine-specific hesitancy among a racially/ethnically diverse sample of parents with adolescents that can inform future vaccination interventions. To increase vaccine confidence, future COVID booster campaigns and other vaccination efforts should disseminate information through trusted healthcare providers in clinical and also utilize community settings by addressing specific safety concerns and promoting vaccine effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Racquel E Kohler
- Center for Cancer Heath Equity, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
- School of Public Health, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Rachel B Wagner
- Center for Cancer Heath Equity, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
- School of Public Health, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Katherine Careaga
- Center for Cancer Heath Equity, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Jacqueline Vega
- Center for Cancer Heath Equity, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
- School of Public Health, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Rula Btoush
- School of Nursing, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Kathryn Greene
- Center for Cancer Heath Equity, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
- School of Communication & Information, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Leslie Kantor
- School of Public Health, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ryan GW, Goulding M, Borg A, Minkah P, Beeler A, Rosal MC, Lemon SC. Development and Beta-Testing of the CONFIDENCE Intervention to Increase Pediatric COVID-19 Vaccination. J Pediatr Health Care 2023; 37:244-252. [PMID: 36470798 PMCID: PMC9671697 DOI: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Innovative strategies are needed to improve pediatric COVID-19 vaccination rates. We describe the process for developing a clinic-based intervention, CONFIDENCE, to improve pediatric COVID-19 vaccine uptake and present results of our beta-test for feasibility and acceptability. METHOD CONFIDENCE included communication training with providers, a poster campaign, and parent-facing educational materials. We assessed feasibility and acceptability through interviews and measured preliminary vaccine intention outcomes with a pre-post parent survey. Interviews were analyzed using rapid qualitative methods. We generated descriptive statistics for variables on the parent survey and used Fisher's exact test to assess pre-post differences. RESULTS Participating providers (n = 4) reported high levels of feasibility and acceptability. We observed positive trends in parents' (n = 69) reports of discussing vaccination with their provider and the parental decision to accept COVID-19 vaccination. DISCUSSION Our next steps will be to use more rigorous methods to establish the efficacy and effectiveness of the CONFIDENCE intervention.
Collapse
|
25
|
Goldman RD, Hart RJ, Bone JN, Seiler M, Olson PG, Keitel K, Manzano S, Gualco G, Krupik D, Schroter S, Weigert RM, Chung S, Thompson GC, Muhammad N, Shah P, Gaucher NO, Hou M, Griffiths J, Lunoe MM, Evers M, Pharisa Rochat C, Nelson CE, Gal M, Baumer-Mouradian SH. Willingness to vaccinate children against COVID-19 declined during the pandemic. Vaccine 2023; 41:2495-2502. [PMID: 36889992 PMCID: PMC9977620 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To document the level of vaccine hesitancy in caregivers' of children younger than 12 years of age over the course of the pandemic in Pediatric Emergency Departments (ED). Study design Ongoing multicenter, cross-sectional survey of caregivers presenting to 19 pediatric EDs in the USA, Canada, Israel, and Switzerland during first months of the pandemic (phase1), when vaccines were approved for adults (phase2) and most recently when vaccines were approved for children (phase3). RESULTS Willingness to vaccinate rate declined over the study period (59.7%, 56.1% and 52.1% in the three phases). Caregivers who are fully vaccinated, who have higher education, and those worried their child had COVID-19 upon arrival to the ED, were more likely to plan to vaccinate in all three phases. Mothers were less likely to vaccinate early in the pandemic, but this hesitancy attenuated in later phases. Older caregivers were more willing to vaccinate, and caregivers of older children were less likely to vaccinate their children in phase 3. During the last phase, willingness to vaccinate was lowest in those who had a primary care provider but did not rely on their advice for medical decisions (34%). Those with no primary care provider and those who do and rely on their medical advice, had similar rates of willingness to vaccinate (55.1% and 52.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is widespread and growing over time, and public health measures should further try to leverage identified factors associated with hesitancy in order to enhance vaccination rates among children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R D Goldman
- The Pediatric Research in Emergency Therapeutics (PRETx) Program, Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, and BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - R J Hart
- Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - J N Bone
- Research Informatics, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - M Seiler
- Emergency Department, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - P G Olson
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency and Transport Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - K Keitel
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - S Manzano
- Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Geneva Children's Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - G Gualco
- Pediatric Emergency Department, Pediatric Institute of Italian part of Switzerland, Ticino, Switzerland
| | - D Krupik
- Pediatric Emergency Unit, Ziv Medical Center, and Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| | - S Schroter
- Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California and Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - R M Weigert
- Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Children's Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - S Chung
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - G C Thompson
- Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - N Muhammad
- Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Advocate Children's Hospital, Oak Lawn, IL, USA
| | - P Shah
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - N O Gaucher
- Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine, 3175 Ch Cote Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, Canada
| | - M Hou
- The Pediatric Research in Emergency Therapeutics (PRETx) Program, Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, and BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - J Griffiths
- The Pediatric Research in Emergency Therapeutics (PRETx) Program, Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, and BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - M M Lunoe
- Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - M Evers
- Division of Pediatric Pediatric Emergency Medicine, UH Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - C Pharisa Rochat
- Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Fribourg Hospital HFR, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - C E Nelson
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - M Gal
- Pediatric Emergency Department, Kaplan Medical Centre, Rehovot, Israel
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Cousin L, Roberts S, Brownstein NC, Whiting J, Kasting ML, Head KJ, Vadaparampil ST, Giuliano AR, Gwede CK, Meade CD, Christy SM. Factors associated with parental COVID-19 vaccine attitudes and intentions among a national sample of United States adults ages 18-45. J Pediatr Nurs 2023; 69:108-115. [PMID: 36716520 PMCID: PMC9852321 DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2023.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 11/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study explored factors associated with parents' attitudes and intentions to seek information about the COVID-19 vaccine for their children (ages 0-18) and intentions to vaccinate their age-eligible children. DESIGN AND METHODS As part of an anonymous online cross-sectional survey, parents' vaccine attitudes, COVID-19 vaccine intentions for their children, health literacy, health numeracy, and sociodemographic variables were assessed. Multivariable ordered logistic regression models identified factors associated with parents' COVID-19 vaccine intentions for their children. RESULTS Parents/guardians (n = 963) were mostly White (82.3%), insured (88.0%), and college graduates (57.3%). Men reported higher intentions than women to seek information about the COVID-19 vaccine for their children (p = 0.003) and higher intentions to vaccinate their children (p = 0.049). Parental characteristics associated with increased intentions to have their children vaccinated included higher educational attainment (p < 0.001), more positive general vaccine attitudes (p < 0.001), preference for health information in a language other than English (p = 0.006), higher income (p = 0.048), having health insurance (p = 0.05), health literacy (p = 0.024), and health numeracy (p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS Multiple sociodemographic characteristics including male gender, higher health literacy and numeracy, and language preference are noteworthy factors associated with parental COVID-19 vaccine intentions that could inform the planning and implementation of educational interventions. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Nurses are important sources of trusted information and play an important role in parent/family health education and in understanding myriad factors that may improve attitudes and enhance readiness toward vaccine uptake. Our findings emphasize the potential value of examining tailored/targeted COVID-19 vaccine education according to key influencing factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lakeshia Cousin
- College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
| | - Stephanie Roberts
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Naomi C Brownstein
- Dept. of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Junmin Whiting
- Dept. of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Monica L Kasting
- Dept. of Public Health, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States of America; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Katharine J Head
- Dept. of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Susan T Vadaparampil
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States of America; Dept. of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States of America; Center for Immunization and Infection Research in Cancer, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Anna R Giuliano
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States of America; Center for Immunization and Infection Research in Cancer, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States of America; Dept. of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Clement K Gwede
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States of America; Dept. of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States of America; Dept. of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Cathy D Meade
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States of America; Dept. of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States of America; Dept. of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Shannon M Christy
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States of America; Dept. of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States of America; Center for Immunization and Infection Research in Cancer, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States of America; Dept. of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wigle J, Hodwitz K, Juando-Prats C, Allan K, Li X, Howard L, Fallon B, Birken CS, Maguire JL, Parsons JA. Parents' perspectives on SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations for children: a qualitative analysis. CMAJ 2023; 195:E259-E266. [PMID: 36810223 PMCID: PMC9943572 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.221401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uptake of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for children aged 5-11 years has been lower than anticipated in Canada. Although research has explored parental intentions toward SARS-CoV-2 vaccination for children, parental decisions regarding vaccinations have not been studied in-depth. We sought to explore reasons why parents chose to vaccinate or not vaccinate their children against SARS-CoV-2 to better understand their decisions. METHODS We conducted a qualitative study involving in-depth individual interviews with a purposive sample of parents in the Greater Toronto Area, Ontario, Canada. We conducted interviews via telephone or video call from February to April 2022 and analyzed the data using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS We interviewed 20 parents. We found that parental attitudes toward SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations for their children represented a complex continuum of concern. We identified 4 cross-cutting themes: the newness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and the evidence supporting their use; the perceived politicization of guidance for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination; the social pressure surrounding SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations; and the weighing of individual versus collective benefits of vaccination. Parents found making a decision about vaccinating their child challenging and expressed difficulty sourcing and evaluating evidence, determining the trustworthiness of guidance, and balancing their own conceptions of health care decisions with societal expectations and political messaging. INTERPRETATION Parents' experiences making decisions regarding SARS-CoV-2 vaccination for their children were complex, even for those who were supportive of SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations. These findings provide some explanation for the current patterns of uptake of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among children in Canada; health care providers and public health authorities can consider these insights when planning future vaccine rollouts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jannah Wigle
- Applied Health Research Centre (Wigle, Hodwitz, Juando-Prats, Maguire, Parsons), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Juando-Prats, Howard), University of Toronto; Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work (Allan, Fallon), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Li, Birken), The Hospital for Sick Children; Departments of Pediatrics (Birken, Maguire) and of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Parsons), Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Kathryn Hodwitz
- Applied Health Research Centre (Wigle, Hodwitz, Juando-Prats, Maguire, Parsons), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Juando-Prats, Howard), University of Toronto; Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work (Allan, Fallon), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Li, Birken), The Hospital for Sick Children; Departments of Pediatrics (Birken, Maguire) and of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Parsons), Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Clara Juando-Prats
- Applied Health Research Centre (Wigle, Hodwitz, Juando-Prats, Maguire, Parsons), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Juando-Prats, Howard), University of Toronto; Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work (Allan, Fallon), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Li, Birken), The Hospital for Sick Children; Departments of Pediatrics (Birken, Maguire) and of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Parsons), Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Kate Allan
- Applied Health Research Centre (Wigle, Hodwitz, Juando-Prats, Maguire, Parsons), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Juando-Prats, Howard), University of Toronto; Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work (Allan, Fallon), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Li, Birken), The Hospital for Sick Children; Departments of Pediatrics (Birken, Maguire) and of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Parsons), Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Xuedi Li
- Applied Health Research Centre (Wigle, Hodwitz, Juando-Prats, Maguire, Parsons), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Juando-Prats, Howard), University of Toronto; Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work (Allan, Fallon), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Li, Birken), The Hospital for Sick Children; Departments of Pediatrics (Birken, Maguire) and of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Parsons), Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Lisa Howard
- Applied Health Research Centre (Wigle, Hodwitz, Juando-Prats, Maguire, Parsons), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Juando-Prats, Howard), University of Toronto; Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work (Allan, Fallon), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Li, Birken), The Hospital for Sick Children; Departments of Pediatrics (Birken, Maguire) and of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Parsons), Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Barbara Fallon
- Applied Health Research Centre (Wigle, Hodwitz, Juando-Prats, Maguire, Parsons), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Juando-Prats, Howard), University of Toronto; Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work (Allan, Fallon), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Li, Birken), The Hospital for Sick Children; Departments of Pediatrics (Birken, Maguire) and of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Parsons), Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Catherine S Birken
- Applied Health Research Centre (Wigle, Hodwitz, Juando-Prats, Maguire, Parsons), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Juando-Prats, Howard), University of Toronto; Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work (Allan, Fallon), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Li, Birken), The Hospital for Sick Children; Departments of Pediatrics (Birken, Maguire) and of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Parsons), Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Jonathon L Maguire
- Applied Health Research Centre (Wigle, Hodwitz, Juando-Prats, Maguire, Parsons), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Juando-Prats, Howard), University of Toronto; Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work (Allan, Fallon), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Li, Birken), The Hospital for Sick Children; Departments of Pediatrics (Birken, Maguire) and of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Parsons), Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
| | - Janet A Parsons
- Applied Health Research Centre (Wigle, Hodwitz, Juando-Prats, Maguire, Parsons), St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Juando-Prats, Howard), University of Toronto; Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work (Allan, Fallon), University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences (Li, Birken), The Hospital for Sick Children; Departments of Pediatrics (Birken, Maguire) and of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Parsons), Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Spees LP, Biddell CB, Angove RSM, Gallagher KD, Anderson E, Christenbury A, Rocque G, Wheeler SB. Barriers to COVID-19 vaccine uptake among resource-limited adults diagnosed with chronic illness. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1046515. [PMID: 36844843 PMCID: PMC9948023 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1046515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the use of interventions (e.g., monetary incentives, educational campaigns, on-site workplace vaccination) to increase COVID-19 vaccination, differences in uptake persist by poverty level, insurance status, geography, race, and ethnicity, suggesting that these interventions may not be adequately addressing the barriers faced by these populations. Among a sample of resource-limited individuals with chronic illnesses, we (1) described the prevalence of different types of barriers to the COVID-19 vaccination and (2) identified associations between patients' sociodemographic characteristics and barriers to vaccination. Methods We surveyed a national sample of patients with chronic illness and demonstrated healthcare affordability and/or access challenges about barriers to COVID-19 vaccination in July 2021. We categorized participant responses into cost, transportation, informational, and attitudinal barrier domains and assessed the prevalence of each domain, both overall and by self-reported vaccination status. Using logistic regression models, we examined unadjusted and adjusted associations between respondent characteristics (sociodemographic, geographic, and healthcare access) and self-reported barriers to vaccination. Results Of 1,342 respondents in the analytic sample, 20% (264/1,342) reported informational barriers and 9% (126/1,342) reported attitudinal barriers to COVID-19 vaccination. Transportation and cost barriers were reported much less commonly, by only 1.1% (15/1,342) and 0.7% (10/1,342) of the sample, respectively. Controlling for all other characteristics, respondents with either a specialist as their usual source of care or no usual source of care had an 8.4 (95% CI: 1.7-15.1) and 18.1 (95% CI: 4.3-32.0) percentage point higher predicted probability, respectively, of reporting informational barriers to care. Compared to females, males had an 8.4% point (95% CI: 5.5-11.4) lower predicted probability of reporting attitudinal barriers. Only attitudinal barriers were associated with COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Conclusion Among a sample of adults with chronic illnesses who had received financial assistance and case management services from a national non-profit, informational and attitudinal barriers were more commonly reported than logistical or structural access barriers (i.e., transportation and cost barriers). Interventions should target attitudinal barriers among patients with chronic illness, who may have particular concerns about the interaction of the vaccine with ongoing medical care. Additionally, interventions targeting informational barriers are particularly needed among individuals without a usual source of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa P. Spees
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Caitlin B. Biddell
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | | | | | - Eric Anderson
- Patient Advocate Foundation, Hampton, VA, United States
| | | | - Gabrielle Rocque
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Stephanie B. Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Indiana Parental Perceptions of the Acceptability of General and HPV-Specific State Vaccine Requirements. J Community Health 2023; 48:528-538. [PMID: 36745356 PMCID: PMC9900532 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-023-01198-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
State vaccine requirements are a tool for improving child and adolescent vaccination immunization coverage, but to be effective, parental buy-in is needed. The objective of this study was to assess the demographic, healthcare characteristics, and health beliefs associated with parental acceptance of general and HPV-specific state vaccine requirements. Indiana parents (N = 601) with children ages 11-17 years old completed a survey during March 2020.Results showed that 47.2% and 43.1% of parents believed there should always be general and HPV-specific state vaccine requirements, respectively. In multivariable analysis, higher odds of parental support for general state vaccine requirements were associated with being unsure whether HPV-associated cancer is a problem in the participant's county and having higher perceived benefits of HPV vaccines. Lower odds were associated with private insurance, having less than a bachelor's degree, and having less confidence in vaccines. In comparison, parents had higher odds of agreeing with HPV-specific state vaccine requirements if they reported higher interpersonal altruism and higher perceived benefits of HPV vaccines; they had lower odds if they were non-Hispanic White. Findings indicate that while similar percentages of parents agreed with general and HPV-specific state vaccine requirements, there were different characteristics associated with acceptance of each. Results can inform the development of tailored interventions for improving parental support for general and HPV-specific state vaccine requirements.
Collapse
|
30
|
Valero-Martínez C, Martínez-Rivera C, Zhen-Duan J, Fukuda M, Alegría M. Attitudes toward COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake: A Qualitative Study of Mostly Immigrant Racial/Ethnic Minority Older Adults. Geriatrics (Basel) 2023; 8:17. [PMID: 36826359 PMCID: PMC9956127 DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics8010017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Few qualitative studies address diverse older adults' perceptions of COVID-19 vaccination in the United States, including non-English speakers and immigrant populations. This study aims to understand the attitudes of diverse, primarily immigrant older adults in the U.S. toward the COVID-19 vaccine and its influences on their vaccination decision-making. (2) Methods: The research team conducted semi-structured interviews (N = 100) in 2021 focused on understanding ethnically/racially diverse older adults' perceptions of the COVID-19 vaccine. Interviews were recorded, coded, and analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. (3) Results: Thematic analyses identified three themes. (1) Older adults showed mixed attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine associated with information consumed and trust in healthcare systems; (2) health concerns and underlying medical conditions were the most influential factors of vaccine uptake; and (3) systemic barriers and trusted figures impacted vaccination decision-making of older adults. (4) Conclusions: Accessible information in diverse languages tailored to the community's fears is needed to combat vaccine mistrust. Vaccine rollout programs need to tackle the fear of vaccine side effects. Attitudes of religious leaders, family members, and physicians considerably influenced vaccine uptake, suggesting their role as trusted members for vaccine messaging for older, primarily immigrant adults. Systemic barriers, namely lack of transportation and inaccessible vaccination sites, contributed to vaccine deterrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Valero-Martínez
- Disparities Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Río Piedras Campus, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR 00925, USA
| | - Christopher Martínez-Rivera
- Disparities Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- School of Medicine, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce, PR 00716, USA
| | - Jenny Zhen-Duan
- Disparities Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Marie Fukuda
- Disparities Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Margarita Alegría
- Disparities Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Savitsky B, Shvartsur R, Kagan I. Israeli parents` views on coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccinations for children: A cross-sectional study. J Pediatr Nurs 2023; 68:79-86. [PMID: 36270927 PMCID: PMC9579057 DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2022.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parents play the decisive role in children's vaccination. Our study aimed as assessing attitudes of parents toward the COVID-19 vaccine for children aged 5-18 and to define sources of influence on these attitudes, the barriers and reasons for hesitation. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, 138 Israeli parents of 5-18 aged children completed a self-administered structured questionnaire. FINDINGS More than a quarter of parents reported that they did not intend to vaccinate their children. Independent of other demographic characteristics, parents who do not vaccinate their children accordingly to the routine vaccinations have five-fold significant odds not to vaccinate with COVID-19 vaccine (OR = 4.8, 95% CI: 1.8-12.7). Greater social influence was significantly and negatively associated with intentions not to vaccinate a child. Among parents who do not intend to vaccinate their children, the most frequent reasons were fear of possible side effects (92%), vaccine novelty (92%) and lack of belief in its effectiveness (69%). DISCUSSION This study found that vaccination in the past as part of routine government immunization programs predict a tendency to vaccinate children during the pandemic. Among the factors associated with the intention not to vaccinate, concerns and uncertainty about the necessity of the vaccine, its side effects and reliability have been emphasized. APPLICATION TO PRACTICE Cultural-religious adjustments should be applied when implementing interventions aiming to promote vaccination in routines and emergencies. Social influence is important in adopting a positive attitude toward vaccines. Public health professionals should incorporate those parents who have vaccinated their children and have a positive attitude toward vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bella Savitsky
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Ashkelon Academic College, Ashkelon, Yitshak Ben Zvi 12, Israel.
| | - Rachel Shvartsur
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Ashkelon Academic College, Ashkelon, Yitshak Ben Zvi 12, Israel
| | - Ilya Kagan
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Ashkelon Academic College, Ashkelon, Yitshak Ben Zvi 12, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Tilahun BD, Adane T, Fentanew M, Alene TD, Abebe GK, Ngusie HS. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in the second wave of the pandemic among university students in Ethiopia: application of the health belief model. Ther Adv Infect Dis 2023; 10:20499361231213226. [PMID: 38107553 PMCID: PMC10722942 DOI: 10.1177/20499361231213226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The first case of COVID-19 virus was reported in Africa on 14 February 2020. The pandemic became more aggressive in the continent during the second wave than the first wave. Promoting vaccination behavior is an unparalleled measure to curb the spread of the pandemic. Regarding this, the health belief model (HBM) is the major model for understanding health behaviors. This study aimed to examine predictors of intended COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in the second wave of the pandemic among university students in Ethiopia using HBM. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among 423 randomly selected medical and health science students at the University of Gondar from 21 August to 15 September 2020. Analysis of data was performed using STATA 14.0. Linear regression analysis was applied and a p value of less than 0.05 was used to declare statistical significance. Results Among the total participants, 293 [72.2% (95.0%: CI: 67.2-76.8)] of them scored above the mean of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. HBM explained nearly 46.3% (adjusted R2 = 0.463) variance in intention to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Year of study (β = 0.288; 95% CI: 0.144-0.056), using social media (β = 0.58; 95% CI: 1.546-2.804), existing chronic disease (β = 0.12; 95% CI: 0.042-0.433), perceived overall health condition (β = 0.117; 95% CI: 0.307-0.091), perceived susceptibility (β = 0.58; 95% CI: 1.546-2.804), perceived benefit (β = 0.338; 95% CI: 1.578-2.863), and cues to action (β = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.388-0.99) were significantly associated with intended COVID-19 vaccine acceptance at p value < 0.5. Conclusion Approximately, three-quarters of the participants were above the mean score of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, which is higher compared to previous reports in resource-limited settings. Interventions in this study setting chould include placing emphasis on the risks of acquiring COVID-19, enhancing perceived benefits of COVID-19 vaccination and improving cues to action by advocating COVID-19 vaccination. Our findings also implied that social media health campaigns are significant factor in COVID-19 vaccination behavioral change in this study setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Befkad Derese Tilahun
- Department of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, P.O. Box: 400, Woldia, Amhara 400, Ethiopia
| | - Tiruneh Adane
- Department of Hematology and Immunohematology, School of Biomedical Laboratory Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Molla Fentanew
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Tilahun Dessie Alene
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
| | - Gebremeskel Kibret Abebe
- Department of Emergency and Critical Nursing, School of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia
| | - Habtamu Setegn Ngusie
- Department of Health Informatics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Herry AM, Greaves D, Smith P, Toledo NA, Wildman A, Wildman T, Browne R, Chen M, Jones M, Aymat S. Facilitators of and barriers to COVID-19 vaccination in Grenada: a qualitative study. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2023; 47:e44. [PMID: 36945250 PMCID: PMC10022831 DOI: 10.26633/rpsp.2023.44] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To identify the factors contributing to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy in Grenada. Methods A phenomenological study was conducted using semi-structured interviews at vaccination and pop-up testing clinics during a spike in COVID-19 cases on the island. Interview questions were developed using the health belief model related to perceived threat of COVID-19, perceived benefits of and barriers to COVID-19 vaccination, and cues to action. Data were analyzed using a deductive approach to identify themes, categories, and subcategories. Results Twenty-five interviews were transcribed and coded. In all, 68% of participants were unvaccinated, 12% were partially vaccinated, and 20% were fully vaccinated. Data analysis revealed two main themes: facilitators and barriers. Factors more likely to encourage vaccination (facilitators) included trust in medical advice and vaccine efficacy, social responsibility, and vaccine mandates for travel, employment, and social activities. Factors hindering vaccination (barriers) included: perceived low threat of COVID-19; preference for natural remedies; concerns about contraindications because of underlying health conditions; fear; mistrust of vaccines and related messaging; vaccine accessibility; and the many different information sources. Conclusions Overcoming vaccine hesitancy is key to combating the detrimental effects of COVID-19 in Grenada. Public health interventions and policies that address barriers and capitalize on facilitators can increase vaccine uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlette M. Herry
- St George’s UniversitySt GeorgeGrenadaSt George’s University, St George, Grenada.
- Arlette M. Herry,
| | - Damian Greaves
- St George’s UniversitySt GeorgeGrenadaSt George’s University, St George, Grenada.
| | - Pauline Smith
- St George’s UniversitySt GeorgeGrenadaSt George’s University, St George, Grenada.
| | - Nilo A. Toledo
- St George’s UniversitySt GeorgeGrenadaSt George’s University, St George, Grenada.
| | - Ariel Wildman
- St George’s UniversitySt GeorgeGrenadaSt George’s University, St George, Grenada.
| | - Trent Wildman
- St George’s UniversitySt GeorgeGrenadaSt George’s University, St George, Grenada.
| | - Rosheem Browne
- McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonTexasUnited States of AmericaMcGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Texas, United States of America.
| | - Madison Chen
- St George’s UniversitySt GeorgeGrenadaSt George’s University, St George, Grenada.
| | - Matthew Jones
- St George’s UniversitySt GeorgeGrenadaSt George’s University, St George, Grenada.
| | - Sebastian Aymat
- St George’s UniversitySt GeorgeGrenadaSt George’s University, St George, Grenada.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Al Ghafri T, Badahdah A, Al Awaidy S, Khamis F, Anwar H, Al Barwani N, Al Tamimi S, Hanashi AA, Al Yaaquba AG, Qatan R, Al Mukhaini A, Al Harrasi A, Al Balushi A, Al Aamri S, Al Rabaani M, Al Musalhi A, Al Bulushi A. Mothers' Intention to Vaccinate Their Children Aged 5-11 Against COVID-19: A Cross-sectional Survey. Oman Med J 2023; 38:e462. [PMID: 36873794 PMCID: PMC9975923 DOI: 10.5001/omj.2023.47] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives COVID-19 vaccines lower the risk of infection hospitalization, and death. Despite the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines, some caregivers are hesitant to vaccinate their children against COVID-19. In this study, we explored the factors that influence Omani mothers' intentions to vaccinate their 5-11 year-old children. Methods Of the 954 mothers approached, 700 (73.4%) participated in a cross-sectional face-to-face interviewer-administered questionnaire in Muscat, Oman, between 20 February and 13 March 2022. Data on age, income, level of education, trust in doctors, vaccine hesitancy, and intention to vaccinate their children were collected. Logistic regression was used to assess determinants of mothers' intention to vaccinate their children. Results Most mothers had 1-2 children (n = 525, 75.0%), had a college degree or higher education (73.0%), and were employed (70.8%). More than half (n = 392, 56.0%) reported that they were likely or very likely to get their children vaccinated. The intention to get children vaccinated was associated with older age (odds ratio (OR) = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.08; p =0.003), trust in their doctor (OR = 2.12, 95%, CI: 1.71-2.62; p < 0.001), and low vaccine hesitancy (OR = 25.91, 95% CI: 16.92-39.64; p < 0.001). Conclusions Understanding the factors that influence caregivers' intentions to vaccinate their children against COVID-19 is important for the development of evidence-based vaccine campaigns. To increase and sustain high vaccination rates for COVID-19 vaccination in children, it is critical to address the factors that cause caregiver hesitation about vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thamra Al Ghafri
- Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman
| | - Abdallah Badahdah
- School of Psychology, Sociology and Rural Studies, South Dakota State University, Brookings, USA
| | | | - Faryal Khamis
- Adult Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman
| | - Huda Anwar
- Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman
| | - Nada Al Barwani
- Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman
| | - Saif Al Tamimi
- Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman
| | - Ahmed Al Hanashi
- Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman
| | | | - Reem Qatan
- Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman
| | - Ameena Al Mukhaini
- Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman
| | - Abeer Al Harrasi
- Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman
| | - Anbren Al Balushi
- Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman
| | - Salma Al Aamri
- Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman
| | - Muna Al Rabaani
- Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman
| | - Asma Al Musalhi
- Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Wang LJ, Kou KC, Tang KS, Lee Y, Chen YC, Lo MH, Lee IK, Chuah SK, Lee CT, Kung CT, Wang CC, Chien SJ. Parental Attitudes, Intentions, Decisions, and Psychological Wellbeing Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination: Preschool, School-Age, and Adolescent Caregivers. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10122114. [PMID: 36560524 PMCID: PMC9782239 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10122114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The vaccination of all children may be one of the most important public health measures for preventing a wider spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in the community. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the attitude, intention, decision making, and psychological well-being among the caregivers of children who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in Taiwan. The caregivers of children (98 preschool children, 191 school-age children, and 154 adolescents) who received COVID-19 vaccination were invited to fill in the following questionnaires: Adopting Self-Protective Behavior Scale, Drivers of COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance Scale, Impact of Event Scale, Chinese Health Questionnaire, and Parental Bonding Instrument. Compared to the caregivers of adolescents, the caregivers of preschool children exhibited more protective behaviors toward the COVID-19 pandemic. The caregivers of preschool children also displayed a higher emotional impact than those of adolescents and took a greater interest in the family's opinion about vaccination. Finally, we found that COVID-19 ideological invasion and protective parenting style were significantly related to the prevalence of mental illness among caregivers. The results of this study can be used as an important reference for vaccination health care and policy formulation for adolescents with regard to COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang-Jen Wang
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
| | - Kuang-Che Kou
- Division of Pediatric Infection, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Shu Tang
- Division of Pediatric Emergency, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
| | - Yu Lee
- Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chun Chen
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
| | - Mao-Hung Lo
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
| | - Ing-Kit Lee
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
| | - Seng-Kee Chuah
- Division of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Te Lee
- Department of Nephrology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Te Kung
- Department of Emergency, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chi Wang
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
- Correspondence: (C.-C.W.); (S.-J.C.); Tel.: +886-975056193 (S.-J.C.); Fax: +886-7-7338009 (S.-J.C.)
| | - Shao-Ju Chien
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
- Correspondence: (C.-C.W.); (S.-J.C.); Tel.: +886-975056193 (S.-J.C.); Fax: +886-7-7338009 (S.-J.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Parimi K, Gilkeson K, Creamer BA. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: Considerations for reluctance and improving vaccine uptake. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2062972. [PMID: 35436173 PMCID: PMC9897654 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2062972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19) pandemic during the fall of 2019 led to the rapid development of vaccines aimed at curbing viral infection, spread, and its potential eradication. A recent trend is an overall increase in vaccine hesitancy, leading to the World Health Organization citing this as a problem which needs to be addressed. With the development and approval of vaccines for COVID-19, this trend has quickened, leading to potential negative ramifications in the ability controlling COVID-19 spread. Here we describe reported examples in overall vaccine hesitancy prior to the emergence of COVID-19, as well as summarizing recent reports on vaccine hesitancy related to COVID-19 vaccines. Gaining a better understanding of the reasons individuals have, as well as potential methods for decreasing hesitancy in the future, will hopefully lead to a greater percentage of vaccinated individuals and aid in ending the current pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaushal Parimi
- Thomas Jefferson Independent Day School, Joplin, MO, USA
| | - Kyle Gilkeson
- Department of Basic Sciences, College of Medicine, Kansas City University, Joplin, MO, USA
| | - Bradley A. Creamer
- Department of Basic Sciences, College of Medicine, Kansas City University, Joplin, MO, USA,CONTACT Bradley A. Creamer Department of Basic Sciences, Kansas City University, 2901 St. Johns Blvd, Joplin, MO64804, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Tostrud L, Thelen J, Palatnik A. Models of determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in non-pregnant and pregnant population: Review of current literature". Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2138047. [PMID: 36345571 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2138047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Vaccination has proven to be the most effective tool in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. While pregnant individuals are considered to be a high-risk population and are more likely to experience adverse effects from COVID-19, vaccination rates among pregnant individuals are significantly lower than in the general population. The Health Belief Model (HBM), Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), 3C model, 5C model, and 5A model have been used to assess vaccination hesitancy behaviors. In this paper, we review the use of each of these models to address vaccine hesitancy, with a focus on the pregnant population and the COVID-19 vaccine. The HBM, TPB, 3C model, and 5C model have demonstrated great versatility in their ability to evaluate, explain, and modify vaccine hesitancy and behavior. Up to date, the HBM and 3C models appear to be the most effective models to study and address vaccination hesitancy within the pregnant persons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Tostrud
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Julia Thelen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Anna Palatnik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Maftei A, Petroi CE. "I'm luckier than everybody else!": Optimistic bias, COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, vaccination status, and the link with the time spent online, anticipated regret, and the perceived threat. Front Public Health 2022; 10:1019298. [PMID: 36457316 PMCID: PMC9706105 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1019298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The catastrophic wave in the fall of 2021 drove Romania to the top of the list of dangerous COVID-19 infections, with the highest mortality rate in Europe. At the same time, Romania had one of the lowest vaccination rates. In this context, the present research aimed to explore the link between vaccination intention/status, optimistic bias, COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, the time spent online, and vaccination (anticipated) regret. Our convenience sample was formed by 408 adults aged 18-63 years (M = 22.11, SD = 6.18, 69.9 % females), who were distributed into four groups: (1) non-vaccinated who definitely refused COVID-19 vaccination, (2) non-vaccinated who considered COVID-19 vaccination, (3) non-vaccinated who reported their absolute willingness to COVID-19 vaccination, and (4) people who were COVID-19 vaccinated. We conducted our analyses separately, depending on these groups (i.e., vaccination intentions/status). Data were collected using an online questionnaire between November 10, 2021, and January 03, 2022. In our cross-sectional approach, following correlation and ANOVA analyses, among the observed patterns were (1) the significant negative relation between optimism bias and the perceived COVID-19 threat; (2) the positive link between anticipated regret, post-vaccination regret, age, and conspiracy beliefs. We discuss our findings considering their contribution to health policies and practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Maftei
- Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iaşi, Romania
| | - Cosmina Elena Petroi
- Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iaşi, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Moradi-Lakeh M, Goharinezhad S, Hoveidamanesh S, Amirkafi A, Zahraei SM, Eshrati B. Vaccine hesitancy from the parent perspectives: protocol for a qualitative study in Iran. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e064424. [PMID: 36153015 PMCID: PMC9511549 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION WHO declared vaccine hesitancy as a global public health threat in 2019. Since even a slight reduction in vaccine coverage rates can lead to a decrease in herd immunity, it is imperative to explore the underlying factors affecting vaccine hesitancy. This qualitative study protocol aims to explore determinant factors that influence vaccine hesitancy in Iran from the parent's perspective. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Descriptive-Interpretive Qualitative research will be conducted to gain an insight into vaccine hesitancy in the west of Tehran province in Iran. Participants in the study will be recruited from vaccine-hesitant parents of children under 5 years' old who will be recognised as being hesitant to extract from the national health information system. The semistructured interviews and in-depth questions will be performed both face-to-face in an open space such as a park near their homes and via video call because of the COVID-19 pandemic and social distancing. Interviews will be conducted by a trained qualitative person. Transcribed data will be analysed through thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval was obtained from the research ethics committee at the Iran University of Medical Sciences (Approval ID #IR.IUMS.REC.1399.273). The results of the study are expected to be presented by the end of 2022 year. A variety of dissemination methods will be employed to communicate research findings, including presentations at conferences and peer-reviewed publications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maziar Moradi-Lakeh
- Preventive Medicine and Public Health Research Center, Psychsocial Health Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Salime Goharinezhad
- Preventive Medicine and Public Health Research Center, Psychsocial Health Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Healthcare Services Management, School of Health Management & Information Sciences, Health Management and Economics Research Center, Health Management, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Ali Amirkafi
- Preventive Medicine and Public Health Research Center, Psychsocial Health Research Institute, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Mohsen Zahraei
- Center for Communicable Disease Control, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran
| | - Babak Eshrati
- Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Preventive Medicine and Public Health Research Center, Psychosocial Health Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hicks A, Lloyd A. Agency and liminality during the COVID-19 pandemic: Why information literacy cannot fix vaccine hesitancy. J Inf Sci 2022. [PMCID: PMC9483135 DOI: 10.1177/01655515221124003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
This article employs a sociological and dialogical information perspective to
identify what shape information literacy practice takes for people who are
hesitant about the COVID-19 vaccine. An information perspective places
information and people’s relations with information at the centre of the
inquiry. The study carried out 14 semi-structured interviews with UK adults who
had not yet received or taken up their invitation to have the COVID-19 vaccine.
Outcomes of this study suggest that information literacy practices related to
vaccine hesitancy emerged through the liminal space and in relation to agentic
performance, which was catalysed through engagement with experiential, corporeal
and social information. This study has implications for the teaching of
information literacy, in particular, the idea that being informed is an
affirmative action that will automatically empower learners to make appropriate
choices.
Collapse
|
41
|
Alghamdi S. The Attitude of Parents Toward Their Children Receiving the COVID-19 Vaccine. CHILDREN 2022; 9:children9091308. [PMID: 36138617 PMCID: PMC9497995 DOI: 10.3390/children9091308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Parental attitudes towards childhood vaccination programs are important for successful delivery. Children were affected by COVID-19; however, parental attitudes towards childhood COVID-19 vaccination have not been fully assessed. The purpose is to assess parental hesitancy and attitudes about their children receiving a COVID-19 vaccination. This was a cross-sectional study using an electronically distributed questionnaire including a convenience sample of 123 Saudi Arabian parents of school-aged children between five and eleven years old. Most of the participants were mothers (77.2%) aged 31–40 years old (61%). The mean score of the questionnaire about parents’ attitudes towards the COVID-19 vaccine was M = 18.95, SD = 5.52. Only 39% of the parents were hesitant to have their children receive the seasonal influenza vaccine compared to 74% who were hesitant to have their children receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Most of the children (80%) did not receive the COVID-19 vaccine because of parental concerns about the vaccine’s side effects (49.5 %). Parents whose children received the COVID-19 vaccine (Median = 24, IQR = 9) had higher attitude scores than those whose children did not receive the vaccine (Median = 17, IQR = 6). The findings shed light on parental attitudes towards their children receiving a COVID-19 vaccination. Healthcare providers can build upon this study to improve parental attitudes towards childhood vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salmah Alghamdi
- Maternity and Child Health Department, Faculty of Nursing, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Khan B, Khan A, Khan R. Measuring the Intention in Favour and Against Getting Vaccinated from COVID-19 Using the Health Belief Model: Cross-Sectional Study of Pakistan. ILLNESS, CRISIS & LOSS 2022. [PMCID: PMC9372756 DOI: 10.1177/10541373221118149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Vaccination is without a doubt one of the most efficient ways to stop the
COVID-19 pandemic from spreading. The goal of this study was to look into the
acceptance and resistance to COVID-19 vaccination and its associated components
using the Health Belief Model, which is a framework for changing health
behaviours (HBM). The current study is quantitative; hence data was collected
from attendants of patients admitted to hospitals in Pakistan's top-tier cities
using a survey-based self-administered questionnaire. Nonprobability convenient
sampling was utilised to approach the respondents. The model was tested in two
stages using partial least squares (variance-based structural equation
modelling). The measurement model's reliability and validity imply that the data
is reliable and valid. Except for the impact of benefits on accepting behaviour,
all of the study postulated relationships are supported by the results. The
study agenda adds to our understanding of health care, immunisation, consumer
behaviour, and behavioural research. It adds to the body of knowledge in the
fields of immunisation and behavioural research by examining people's behaviours
and changes during the worldwide mass vaccination period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ruqia Khan
- COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Campaign: Risk Perception, Emotional States, and Vaccine Hesitancy in a Sample of Adolescents' Vaccinated Parents in Southern Italy. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10060958. [PMID: 35746568 PMCID: PMC9227385 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10060958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The international strategic plan for COVID-19 vaccines remains the practical option for the protection of health. However, vaccine hesitancy remains an obstacle to full population vaccination, with rapid developments in COVID-19 vaccines and concerns about efficacy acting as influencing factors. AIM The present study investigated the perception of vaccine hesitancy among parents of adolescents in order to explore the reasons and related emotional states. METHODS In January-March 2022, an online questionnaire was administered to a sample of parents who brought their children to the vaccine center of a local health unit, ASL Salerno (Campania, Italy). RESULTS The participants were 1105 parents (F = 64.6%; mean age = 47.37 years, SD = 7.52) of adolescents (F = 47.6%; mean age = 14.83 years, SD = 1.72). All parents had received the COVID-19 vaccine. Regarding the vaccination schedule, 46.8% believed that children receive more vaccinations than they should; 25.1% believed that it is better to develop immunity rather than get vaccinated; 41.2% believed that their child could have side effects; 29.6% were very concerned that vaccines were unsafe, while 35.3% believed vaccines do not prevent disease; 21.5% were very reluctant about pediatric vaccines; and 23.8% did not trust the information received. CONCLUSIONS In order to increase vaccination and reduce the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy, it is essential to support the value of vaccination among all parents and make information more accessible and usable through competent pediatricians.
Collapse
|
44
|
Aimagambetova G, Babi A, Issa T, Issanov A. What Factors Are Associated with Attitudes towards HPV Vaccination among Kazakhstani Women? Exploratory Analysis of Cross-Sectional Survey Data. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10050824. [PMID: 35632580 PMCID: PMC9146459 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10050824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. The high prevalence of HPV infection among Kazakhstani women and the absence of an HPV vaccination program are directly reflected in increasing rates of cervical cancer incidence and mortality. Kazakhstan made its first attempt at introducing the HPV vaccine in 2013, but was unsuccessful due to complications and low public acceptance. The attitudes of Kazakhstani women towards the vaccine were never measured. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the attitudes of women towards the HPV vaccine and determine factors associated with positive, negative, or neutral attitudes. Methods. A 29-item survey consisting of 21 demographic and contextual questions and 8 Likert-scale questions was distributed among women attending gynecological offices in four major cities of Kazakhstan from December 2021 until February 2022. Attitudes of women were measured based on their answers to the eight Likert-scale questions. Ordinal logistic regression was built to find associations between demographic characteristics and attitudes of women. Results. Two hundred thirty-three women were included in the final analysis. A total of 54% of women had positive attitudes towards the vaccine. The majority of women did not trust or had a neutral attitude towards the government, pharmaceutical industry, and traditional and alternative media. However, the trust of women was high in medical workers and scientific researchers. Women's age, education, number of children, effect of the 2013 HPV program, and trust in alternative medicine were included in the ordinal logistic model. Women with a low level of education, a high number of children, who believe in alternative medicine, and who were affected by the failed 2013 vaccination program were less likely to have a positive attitude towards the vaccine. Conclusions. Contrary attitudes towards HPV vaccination exist among Kazakhstani women, with approximately half having positive and almost half having negative or neutral attitudes towards the vaccine. An informational campaign that takes into consideration women's levels of trust in different agencies, as well as targets those who are the most uninformed, might help in a successful relaunch of the HPV vaccination program. However, more studies that cover a higher number of women are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gulzhanat Aimagambetova
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan; (A.B.); (T.I.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Aisha Babi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan; (A.B.); (T.I.)
| | - Torgyn Issa
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan; (A.B.); (T.I.)
| | - Alpamys Issanov
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan;
- School of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T1Z8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Sookaromdee P, Wiwanitkit V. Comment on "Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among parents". Postgrad Med 2022; 134:471. [PMID: 35509201 DOI: 10.1080/00325481.2022.2074699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
46
|
Anderson MR, Hardy EJ, Battle CL. COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy during the Perinatal Period: Understanding Psychological and Cultural Factors to Improve Care and Address Racial/Ethnic Health Inequities. Womens Health Issues 2022; 32:317-321. [PMID: 35606247 PMCID: PMC9005361 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2022.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Micheline R Anderson
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Women and Infants' Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, Rhode Island.
| | - Erica J Hardy
- Women and Infants' Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, Rhode Island; Departments of Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Division of Infectious Diseases, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Cynthia L Battle
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Women and Infants' Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, Rhode Island; Butler Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Schuster L, Gurrieri L, Dootson P. Emotions of burden, intensive mothering and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. CRITICAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/09581596.2022.2061917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Schuster
- Qut Business School, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Lauren Gurrieri
- School of Economics, Finance and Marketing, Rmit University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Paula Dootson
- Qut Business School, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Looking ahead: Caregivers' COVID-19 vaccination intention for children 5 years old and younger using the health belief model. Vaccine 2022; 40:1404-1412. [PMID: 35131135 PMCID: PMC8806122 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.01.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is a significant public health issue. While vaccines are not yet available for children, clinical trials are underway, and children will likely be an important factor in the U.S. reaching herd immunity. However, little research has been conducted to examine parents’ intention to vaccinate their young children for COVID-19. Method An online survey with a national U.S. sample of 682 primary caregivers of children under age six assessed variables associated with intention to accept the COVID-19 vaccine for their children from November 13, 2020, to December 8, 2020. Results Caregivers whose child received a recent influenza vaccine, as well as those with previous experience COVID-19, were more likely to express COVID-19 vaccination intention for their young child. Identifying as female was associated with lower COVID-19 vaccination intention, while identifying as Hispanic or Latino was associated with higher intention. Health Belief Model variables of perceived severity of COVID-19 for their child, as well as vaccine confidence, were positive predictors of COVID-19 vaccine intention and mediated the relationship between prior behavior, demographic variables, and intention. Conclusions The findings highlight the importance of early, proactive COVID-19 vaccination education efforts directed at caregivers, including those with young children. Vaccines for young children will likely become a necessary part of ending the pandemic’s impact in school settings. Operationally, COVID-19 vaccination may also become a part of childhood vaccination schedules. Understanding the beliefs and intentions of caregivers of young children before vaccinations are recommended for children will enable public health officials and medical practitioners to prepare in advance.
Collapse
|
49
|
Ledda C, Costantino C, Liberti G, Rapisarda V. The Italian Version of the Adult Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (aVHS) for the Working-Age Population: Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10020224. [PMID: 35214682 PMCID: PMC8874655 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10020224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The adult Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (aVHS) is valid and reliable for evaluating attitudes toward vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Italian version of the aVHS. After cross-cultural adaptation of the aVHS, internal consistency (IC), intra-class correlation (ICC), and content validity (S-CVI) were evaluated through a survey on 160 workers. Results of the ICC were analyzed on questionnaires administered twice at a distance of two months and revealed a satisfactory reproducibility (0.87). The IC of the aVHS was assessed by the Cronbach alpha coefficient test, with a result of 0.94, demonstrating an excellent IC reliability. The S-CVI calculated for the total scale was 0.97. The aVHS is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating vaccine hesitancy toward adult vaccinations. We suggest the use of this scale in upcoming surveys on opinions and perceptions of adult vaccinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Ledda
- Occupational Medicine, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, 95100 Catania, Italy;
- Correspondence:
| | - Claudio Costantino
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties “G. D’Alessandro”, University of Palermo, 90100 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Liberti
- Commissioner Office in Acta for the COVID-19 Emergency, Provincial Health Authority of Catania, 95100 Catania, Italy;
| | - Venerando Rapisarda
- Occupational Medicine, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, 95100 Catania, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Parents' Decisions to Vaccinate Children against COVID-19: A Scoping Review. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:vaccines9121476. [PMID: 34960221 PMCID: PMC8705627 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9121476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Since 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in sickness, hospitalizations, and deaths of the old and young and impacted global social and economy activities. Vaccination is one of the most important and efficient ways to protect against the COVID-19 virus. In a review of the literature on parents’ decisions to vaccinate their children, we found that widespread vaccination was hampered by vaccine hesitancy, especially for children who play an important role in the coronavirus transmission in both family and school. To analyze parent vaccination decision-making for children, our review of the literature on parent attitudes to vaccinating children, identified the objective and subjective influencing factors in their vaccination decision. We found that the median rate of parents vaccinating their children against COVID-19 was 59.3% (IQR 48.60~73.90%). The factors influencing parents’ attitudes towards child vaccination were heterogeneous, reflecting country-specific factors, but also displaying some similar trends across countries, such as the education level of parents. The leading reason in the child vaccination decision was to protect children, family and others; and the fear of side effects and safety was the most important reason in not vaccinating children. Our study informs government and health officials about appropriate vaccination policies and measures to improve the vaccination rate of children and makes specific recommendations on enhancing child vaccinate rates.
Collapse
|