Potential Contenders for the Leadership in Robotic Surgery

Comparison of perioperative outcomes of DaVinci robot and Hugo robot radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy of radical prostatectomy with DaVinci robot and Hugo robot.

METHODS

The system searches Embase, PubMed, Cochrane library, and Web of Science 4 database. The search time ranges from database creation to June 2024. Stata17 was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 5 studies were conducted, including 816 patients. The results showed that there was no difference in age, preoperative prostate volume, preoperative PSA level, operation time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, overall complications, urinary incontinence, lymph node yield, and positive margin between DaVinci robot and Hugo robot radical prostatectomy. However, the BMI of DaVinci group was larger than that of Hugo (Effect = 0.47, 95%Cl [0.03, 0.91], P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The BMI of the DaVinci group seems to be larger, and Hugo robotic radical prostatectomy seems to be as effective as DaVinci robotic radical prostatectomy. But more well-designed studies are needed to assess the oncology outcomes and cost-effectiveness of both. In addition to this, the accumulation of surgeon experience and the transfer of robotic skills are worthy of further attention.

Impact of prior robotic surgical expertise on the results of Hugo RAS radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched comparison between Da Vinci-expert and non-Da Vinci-expert surgeons

BACKGROUND

Hugo RAS is a novel robotic platform gaining global adoption. Most reported outcomes come from centers with prior Da Vinci experience, with limited data from robotic-naïve settings or comparisons based on prior robotic expertise.

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of Hugo RAS robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) performed by Da Vinci-experienced (DVE) versus non-Da Vinci-experienced (NDVE) surgeons.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Prospective data from patients undergoing Hugo-RARP (July 2022-November 2024) were analyzed. Patients were grouped based on whether their surgeon had prior Da Vinci experience. None had prior Hugo-RAS experience.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Primary outcomes were positive surgical margin (PSM) and complication rates. Secondary outcomes included operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), continence, and potency. Propensity score matching adjusted for baseline differences.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

After matching, 117 patients per group were analyzed. PSM rates (17% vs. 21%; p = 0.40) and complications (p = 0.63) were similar. DVE surgeons had shorter OT (179 vs. 206 min; p < 0.001) and lower EBL (127 vs. 161 ml; p = 0.008). LOS did not differ (p = 0.84), and 12-month functional and oncological outcomes were comparable. Limitations include the non-randomized, single-center design.

CONCLUSIONS

Hugo RAS enables safe and effective RARP with comparable outcomes regardless of prior robotic experience. Prior Da Vinci experience, however, improves intraoperative efficiency.

Comparison of the Hinotori surgical robot with the da Vinci robotic system in urologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The objective is to investigate the outcomes of the Hinotori Surgical Robotic System (HSRS) for urological surgery and to analyze the variation in perioperative performance between the HSRS and the da Vinci surgical robot. Multiple databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science were comprehensibly retrieved to screen studies that applied HSRS to urologic surgery and compared it with the da Vinci system. The results were combined and analyzed using estimated ratio of ratios (OR) and weighted mean difference (WMD). Eight studies with 740 patients were included. Among the baseline characteristics of patients in both groups, all outcomes showed similarity. In urologic surgery, the HSRS cohort experienced a longer operative time (WMD = 8.85, 95% Cl (1.73, 15.97), p < 0.05) and a relatively longer use of the robotic system (WMD = 10.77, 95% Cl [1.09, 20.44], p < 0.05), as well as a notable increase in console time (WMD = 20.99, 95% Cl 95% Cl [8.24, 33.75], p < 0.05). However, estimated blood loss, length of hospitalization, rate of severe complications, and rate of positive margins did not show statistical differences. In urologic surgery, HSRS has a longer operative time, robot system usage time, and console time, but its perioperative results are similar to the Da Vinci system. HSRS shows good clinical promise, however, further long-term data studies are needed to prove it.

Comparison of the Hinotori surgical robot with the da Vinci robotic system in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

In recent years, the adoption of robot-assisted surgery for prostatectomy has seen a significant increase. Among the various systems available, the da Vinci system has established itself as the standard in this domain. Meanwhile, the Hinotori Surgical Robotic System (HSRS) has garnered attention as a promising emerging technology. This paper seeks to systematically evaluate and conduct a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of HSRS with the da Vinci system in the context of radical prostatectomy (RP). We searched multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, to identify studies that utilized HSRS in the context of RP, specifically those comparing it with the da Vinci system. The meta-analysis incorporated five studies that collectively involved a total of 779 patients. The findings indicated that the HSRS cohort experienced a significantly longer operative time compared to the Da Vinci cohort (WMD = 20.42, 95% Cl (6.25, 34.59), p < 0.05). Moreover, the console time for the HSRS cohort was also significantly extended (WMD = 24.14, 95% Cl (16.74, 31.53), p < 0.05). No substantial differences were evident between the two cohorts regarding estimated blood loss, length of stay, urinary incontinence, occurrence of major complications, and the presence of positive surgical margins. In RP, HSRS is associated with extended operative and console times; however, it is similar to the da Vinci system in terms of tumor efficacy and functional recovery. While HSRS demonstrates encouraging clinical applications, there remains a pressing need for extensive, multicenter, high-quality studies to thoroughly assess its effectiveness.

Outcomes and efficacy of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy using the CMR Versius platform: a prospective study on 118 patients with 1-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes and efficacy of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using the Versius robotic surgical system, aiming to provide comprehensive data on perioperative outcomes, postoperative recovery, and complications.

PATIENT AND METHODS

All cases of RARP using the CMR Versius platform performed at Cairo University Hospital over a two-year period were enrolled in this study. All patients had pathologically confirmed prostate cancer in both localized and locally advanced stages. Data were prospectively collected including preoperative parameters as patients' demographics, serum PSA, and Gleason score after trans-rectal ultrasound guided biopsy. Intraoperative parameters and complications were assessed. Postoperatively, we monitored the oncological and functional outcomes such as continence and sexual functions for at least 12 months. Follow up of PSA was done at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, postoperatively.

RESULTS

One-hundred-and-eighteen patients continued the follow-up till 12 months. The median patient age was 64.26 ± 7.13 years. The median PSA value at diagnosis was 9 (4.16-64) ng/ml and the median prostate size was 50 (20-167) grams. The mean docking time, console time, and the total operative time were 13.17 ± 1.157, 194.75 ± 24.3 and 225.76 ± 25 min, respectively and the median blood loss was 307.46 ± 61.44 ml. The mean hospital stay and the mean catheter time were 2.16 ± 0.867 and 7.26 ± 1.441 days, respectively. Forty-nine patients underwent nerve-sparing RARP (bilateral in 41 patients and unilateral in 8 patients). Post-operative continence and potency showed progressive improvement over time during follow-up. Twelve months postoperatively, 90.7% of patients were totally continent and 49% of those patients who underwent nerve-sparing RARP (24/49) were potent.

CONCLUSION

With a positive safety profile and a successful oncological outcome, the use of the CMR system for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy presents a safe and promising method in the surgical management of prostate cancer.

Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with the Hugo RAS and da Vinci Surgical Robotic Systems: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The introduction of the Hugo RAS system represents a recent innovation in robotic surgery. The potential benefits and limitations of this system and its integration into clinical practice in urology have yet to be fully delineated. Our objective was to assess surgical, early oncological, and functional outcomes in studies comparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) performed with the new Hugo RAS system and the well-established da Vinci surgical system.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases. Eligible studies compared RARP outcomes in adult males between the Hugo RAS and da Vinci systems. The main endpoints were analyzed using a random-effects model, including perioperative outcomes (surgical times, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2 complications), oncological outcomes (positive surgical margins and postoperative prostate-specific antigen), and functional outcomes (continence status and erectile function).

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Nine studies involving 1185 patients (478 Hugo RAS and 707 da Vinci) were included. Significant differences in pooled baseline characteristics included higher body mass index for the da Vinci cohort (p = 0.035) and a higher rate of palpable disease in the Hugo RAS cohort (p = 0.036). Docking time was significantly longer for the Hugo RAS, with a median difference of 6.1 min (95% confidence interval 3.9-8.2; I2 = 68.6%; p < 0.001; three studies). Overall, there were no significant differences in perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes between the two systems.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Despite the preliminary nature of the evidence, this systematic review and meta-analysis show comparable surgical and clinical outcomes for RARP performed with the Hugo RAS system and the da Vinci robotic platform.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We reviewed studies comparing the use of two different surgical robots for removal of the prostate. The results suggest that surgical and clinical outcomes with the new Hugo RAS robot are comparable to those with the established da Vinci robot for this procedure.

Surgical Experience and Functional Outcomes after Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Results from a Multi-Institutional Collaboration

Background: In patients treated with partial nephrectomy, prior evidence showed that peri-operative outcomes, such as complications and ischemia time, improved as a function of the surgical experience of the surgeon, but data on functional outcomes after surgery are still scarce. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of 4011 patients with a single, unilateral cT1a-b renal mass treated with laparoscopic or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. The operations were performed by 119 surgeons at 22 participating institutions between 1997 and 2022. Multivariable models investigated the association between surgical experience (number of prior operations) and acute kidney injury (AKI) and recovery of at least 90% of baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 1 yr after partial nephrectomy. The adjustment for case mix included age, Body Mass Index, preoperative serum creatinine, clinical T stage, PADUA score, warm ischemia time, pathologic tumor size, and year of surgery. Results: A total of 753 (19%) and 3258 (81%) patients underwent laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, respectively. Overall, 37 (31%) and 55 (46%) surgeons contributed only to laparoscopic and robotic learning curves, respectively, whereas 27 (23%) contributed to the learning curves of both approaches. In the laparoscopic group, 8% and 55% of patients developed AKI and recovered at least 90% of their baseline eGFR, respectively. After adjusting for confounders, we did not find evidence of an association between surgical experience and AKI after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (odds ratio [OR]: 0.9992; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9963, 1.0022; p = 0.6). Similar results were found when 1-year renal function was the outcome of interest (OR: 0.9996; 95% CI: 0.9988, 1.0005; p = 0.5). Among patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, AKI occurred in 11% of patients, whereas 54% recovered at least 90% of their baseline eGFR. On multivariable analyses, the relationship between surgical experience and AKI after surgery was not statistically significant (OR: 1.0015; 95% CI: 0.9992, 1.0037; p = 0.2), with similar results when the outcome of interest was renal function one year after surgery (OR: 1.0001; 95% CI: 0.9980, 1.0022; p = 0.9). Virtually the same findings were found on sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: In patients treated with laparoscopic or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, our data suggest that the surgical experience of the operating surgeon might not be a key determinant of functional recovery after surgery. This raises questions about the use of serum markers to assess functional recovery in patients with two kidneys and opens the discussion on what are the key steps of the procedure that allowed surgeons to achieve optimal outcomes since their initial cases.

Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with the Hugo™ RAS System: Initial Experience at a High-Volume Robotic Centre

Background: The Hugo™ Robotic-Assisted Surgery (Hugo™ RAS) system represents a novel advancement in robotic surgical technology. Despite this, there remains a scarcity of data regarding extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (eRARP) using this system. Methods: We conducted a prospective study at Ospedale Regionale "F. Miulli" from June 2023 to January 2024, enrolling consecutive patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing eRARP ± lymph node dissection. All procedures employed a modular four-arm setup performed by two young surgeons with limited prior robotic surgery experience. This study aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of eRARP using the Hugo™ RAS system, reporting comprehensive preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes in the largest reported cohort to date. Results: A total of 50 cases were analyzed, with a mean patient age of 65.76 (±5.57) years. The median operative time was 275 min (Q1-Q3 150-345), and the console time was 240 min (Q1-Q3 150-300). The docking time averaged 10 min (Q1-Q3 6-20). There were no intraoperative complications recorded. Two major complications occurred within the first 90 days. At the 3-month mark, 36 patients (72%) achieved undetectable PSA levels (<0.1 ng/mL). Social continence was achieved by 66% of patients, while 40% maintained erectile function. Conclusions: eRARP utilizing the Hugo™ RAS system demonstrated effectiveness and safety in our study cohort. However, more extensive studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up periods are necessary to thoroughly evaluate long-term outcomes.

Implementation of Robot-assisted Urologic Surgeries Using Hugo RAS System in a High-volume Robotic "Da Vinci Xi" Center: Outcomes and Initial Experience

OBJECTIVE

To describe the trocar disposition, docking angles, surgical times, functional outcomes, and complications experienced during the first 30 surgeries with Hugo RAS platform performed by a high-volume Da Vinci Xi's surgeon.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational, descriptive study was performed between May-December 2023. Safety and feasibility of the procedures were evaluated considering console and docking time (minutes), perioperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification), blood loss (mL), and collision of the arms during the procedures (Yes/No). For radical prostatectomies (RARP) the urinary continence and sexual function were also evaluated.

RESULTS

RARP, simple prostatectomies (RASP), partial nephrectomies (RAPN), and cystectomy (RARC) were performed. Trocar placement, docking, and bed assistant ergonomics were important challenges. Patient positioning, trocar placement, and robotic arm positioning had to be adapted. The median console operative time for RARP and RASP was 78 (60-120) minutes and 79 (58-125) minutes, respectively. The median docking time for both RARP and RASP was 10 (5-20) minutes. Of patients undergoing RARP, 94.5% recovered sexual function and no patient used more than one PAD per day after 90days of the surgery. The median console operative and docking time for RAPN was 82 (80-130) minutes and 12 (7-19) minutes, respectively. Blood loss in all patients was less than 200 mL and all none procedure presented major complications.

CONCLUSION

For a high-volume surgeon with motivated and well-trained multidisciplinary team, the implementation of HUGO RAS system for urological program is safe and smooth. Adaptations were necessary to achieve equivalent surgical technique and results. Docking position and bed assistant ergonomics are the major challenges.

Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy with hinotori, a brand-new surgical robot system produced in Japan; report of initial clinical case series

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC) is increasingly common due to the increased uptake of surgical robot systems. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the perioperative outcomes of the first patient cohort to undergo RASC using a brand-new surgical robot system, the hinotori surgical system (robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy with hinotori surgical system [h-RASC]). This study also aimed to compare the outcomes of this group with those of the group of patients who had undergone RASC with the da Vinci surgical system (d-RASC).

METHODS

This study included 15 patients per group. Operative times, blood loss, complications, overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS; subjective measure), and urodynamic outcomes (objective measure) were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

All cases were completed without serious problems during RASC procedure. Perioperative outcomes were similar between the groups except for longer operation time (min) (h-RASC 266 vs. d-RASC 229; p < .01) and console time (min) (178 vs. 159; p = .02) in the h-RASC group than in the d-RASC. De novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) recurrence were comparable. LUTS improved in the postoperative OABSS total score (preoperative 6 vs. postoperative 3; p < .01) in the h-RASC group. However, OABSS assessment (h-RASC -3 vs. d-RASC -4; p = .38) was similar between the two groups. Urodynamic studies showed similar outcomes in the median Qmax (maximum flow rate) values in both groups.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report focusing on RASC using the hinotori surgical system. RASC using the hinotori surgical system could provide favorable perioperative outcomes as comparable with those of the existing da Vinci system.

The Rise of Molecular Image-Guided Robotic Surgery

Following early acceptance by urologists, the use of surgical robotic platforms is rapidly spreading to other surgical fields. This empowerment of surgical perception via robotic advances occurs in parallel to developments in intraoperative molecular imaging. Convergence of these efforts creates a logical incentive to advance the decades-old image-guided robotics paradigm. This yields new radioguided surgery strategies set to optimally exploit the symbiosis between the growing clinical translation of robotics and molecular imaging. These strategies intend to advance surgical precision by increasing dexterity and optimizing surgical decision-making. In this state-of-the-art review, topic-related developments in chemistry (tracer development) and engineering (medical device development) are discussed, and future scientific robotic growth markets for molecular imaging are presented.

New horizons in gynecological surgery: first-year experience with HUGO™ robotic-assisted surgery system at two tertiary referral robotic centers

The HUGO™ robotic-assisted surgery system (RAS, Medtronic, CA) consists of a 3D open console, four independent carts, and an integrated laparoscopic and robotic tower. Approved in 2021, it represents a novel alternative platform for robotic procedures. The aim of our study is to report the first-year experience with this system for gynecological procedures at two tertiary referral robotic centers. We prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed data from patients underwent gynecological robot-assisted surgery with the HUGO™ RAS, at San Paolo University Hospital (Milan, Italy), and Onze Lieve Vrouw (OLV) Hospital (Aalst, Belgium), March 2022-April 2023. Demographic characteristics, intraoperative settings, and perioperative outcomes were investigated. A total of 32 procedures were performed: 20 (62.5%) hysterectomies, 7 (21.9%) adnexal surgeries, and 5 (15.6%) pelvic floor reconstructive surgeries. In 2022 and 2023, 13 (40.6%) and 19 (59.4%) procedures were carried out, respectively. The median docking time was 8 min (IQR 5.8-11.5). The median console and skin-to-skin time was 52.5 min (IQR 33.8-94.2) and 108.5 min (IQR 81.5-157.2), respectively. No intraoperative complications occurred. Two conversions to laparoscopy managed without any additional complications were needed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first global series of gynecological procedures performed with the HUGO™ RAS. Our preliminary findings showed the system's feasibility reporting promising results. The observed upward trend in the total number of procedures during the analyzed period is encouraging. Further studies are needed to assess a standardized method in the gynecological field with the novel platform.

Development and accuracy assessment of a crown lengthening surgery robot for use in the esthetic zone: An in vitro study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Crown lengthening surgery has been widely used to enhance the health and esthetics of anterior teeth, and its accuracy significantly influences surgical outcomes. However, the feasibility and accuracy of a robot system for crown lengthening surgery remains unknown.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to develop a crown lengthening surgery robot and evaluate its accuracy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A robotic crown lengthening surgery system consisting of a robotic arm, a robotic software system, and an optical tracking device was designed. Intraoral scanning and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) were performed on 18 artificial dentition models. The data were imported into the planning software program to synthesize a surgical path for gingivectomy and alveolectomy. Subsequently, a robotic arm equipped with a high-speed handpiece was used to perform these surgical procedures. Postoperatively, the models were rescanned for evaluation, with the accuracy (trueness ±precision) of the surgical outcomes of gingivectomy and alveolectomy being assessed from the trajectories in the highest, lowest, and overall regions. Differences between groups were analyzed by using the independent sample t test and the Levene test (α=.05).

RESULTS

Crown lengthening surgery was feasible in vitro using the robot developed in this study. The overall robot-assisted crown lengthening surgery accuracy (trueness ±precision) of gingivectomy (0.23 ±0.08 mm) was significantly higher than that of alveolectomy (0.33 ±0.11 mm) (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted crown lengthening surgery had acceptable accuracy generally and can be considered a feasible treatment option.

Positive Surgical Margins After Anterior Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Assessing the Learning Curve in a Multi-institutional Collaboration

BACKGROUND

The learning curve for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) remains controversial, with prior studies showing that, in contrast with evidence on open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, biochemical recurrence rates of experienced versus inexperienced surgeons did not differ.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the learning curve for positive surgical margins (PSMs) after RARP.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We analyzed the data of 13 090 patients with prostate cancer undergoing RARP by one of 74 surgeons from ten institutions in Europe and North America between 2003 and 2022.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Multivariable models were used to assess the association between surgeon experience at the time of each patient's operation and PSMs after surgery, with adjustment for preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, grade, stage, and year of surgery. Surgeon experience was coded as the number of robotic radical prostatectomies done by the surgeon before the index patient's operation.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Overall, 2838 (22%) men had PSMs on final pathology. After adjusting for case mix, we found a significant, nonlinear association between surgical experience and probability of PSMs after surgery, with a lower risk of PSMs for greater surgeon experience (p < 0.0001). The probabilities of PSMs for a patient treated by a surgeon with ten, 250, 500, and 2000 prior robotic procedures were 26%, 21%, 18%, and 14%, respectively (absolute risk difference between ten and 2000 procedures: 11%; 95% confidence interval: 9%, 14%). Similar results were found after stratifying patients according to extracapsular extension at final pathology. Results were also unaltered after excluding surgeons who had moved between institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

While we characterized the learning curve for PSMs after RARP, the relative contribution of surgical learning to the achievement of optimal outcomes remains controversial. Future investigations should focus on what experienced surgeons do to avoid positive margins and should explore the relationship between learning, margin rate, and biochemical recurrence. Understanding what margins affect recurrence and whether these margins are trainable or a result of other factors may shed light on where to focus future efforts in surgical education.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In patients receiving robotic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, we characterized the learning curve for positive margins. The risk of surgical margins decreased progressively with increasing experience, and plateaued around the 500th procedure. Understanding what margins affect recurrence and whether these margins are trainable or a result of other factors has implications for surgeons and patients, and it may shed light on where to focus future efforts in surgical education.

Privacy-proof Live Surgery Streaming: Development and Validation of a Low-cost, Real-time Robotic Surgery Anonymization Algorithm

OBJECTIVE

Develop a pioneer surgical anonymization algorithm for reliable and accurate real-time removal of out-of-body images validated across various robotic platforms.

BACKGROUND

The use of surgical video data has become a common practice in enhancing research and training. Video sharing requires complete anonymization, which, in the case of endoscopic surgery, entails the removal of all nonsurgical video frames where the endoscope can record the patient or operating room staff. To date, no openly available algorithmic solution for surgical anonymization offers reliable real-time anonymization for video streaming, which is also robotic-platform and procedure-independent.

METHODS

A data set of 63 surgical videos of 6 procedures performed on four robotic systems was annotated for out-of-body sequences. The resulting 496.828 images were used to develop a deep learning algorithm that automatically detected out-of-body frames. Our solution was subsequently benchmarked against existing anonymization methods. In addition, we offer a postprocessing step to enhance the performance and test a low-cost setup for real-time anonymization during live surgery streaming.

RESULTS

Framewise anonymization yielded a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve score of 99.46% on unseen procedures, increasing to 99.89% after postprocessing. Our Robotic Anonymization Network outperforms previous state-of-the-art algorithms, even on unseen procedural types, despite the fact that alternative solutions are explicitly trained using these procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Our deep learning model, Robotic Anonymization Network, offers reliable, accurate, and safe real-time anonymization during complex and lengthy surgical procedures regardless of the robotic platform. The model can be used in real time for surgical live streaming and is openly available.

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the Hugo™ robot-assisted surgery system: A single-center initial experience in Japan

BACKGROUND

Recently, various novel robotic systems have been put into clinical use. The aim of the present study was to assess the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using the Hugo™ RAS system, one of brand-new robot-assisted surgical platforms.

METHODS

We performed RARP with the Hugo™ RAS system in 13 cases of localized prostate cancer (PCa) between August 2023 and February 2024 at our hospital. The perioperative outcomes of these 13 patients were assessed.

RESULTS

The median operative and console times were 197 (interquartile range [IQR], 187-228) and 134 min (IQR, 125-157), respectively. The median docking time was 7 min (IQR, 6-10), and the median estimated blood loss was 150 mL (IQR, 80-250). The vesical catheter was removed on postoperative day 6 in all cases. A positive surgical margin was observed in one patient (7.7%), and none experienced major perioperative complications, defined as Clavien-Dindo classification ≥3. The median postoperative length of stay was 8 days (IQR, 8-8.5).

CONCLUSIONS

This was the first study to focus on RARP using the Hugo™ RAS system in Japan. Although further investigations should be conducted to assess the long-term oncological and functional outcomes, the Hugo™ RAS system could provide safe and favorable perioperative outcomes for patients with localized PCa undergoing RARP.

Early experience and future prospects regarding use of newly developed surgical robot system, hinotori, in the field of urologic cancer surgery

In the field of urology, robotic surgery has gained rapid and wide acceptance as a standard surgical approach in the majority of major surgeries over the last decade. To date, the da Vinci surgical system has been the dominant platform in robotic surgery; however, several newly developed robotic systems have recently been introduced in routine clinical practice. Of these, hinotori, the first made-in-Japan robotic system, is characterized by various unique and attractive features different from the existing system, and the use of this system has gradually increased mainly in urologic cancer surgeries, including radical prostatectomy, partial nephrectomy, radical nephrectomy, and radical nephroureterectomy. This review initially describes detailed characteristics of hinotori, then summarizes the early experience with urologic cancer surgeries using hinotori at our institution, and finally discusses the future prospects of robotic surgery using hinotori, considering problems associated with the use of this robotic system.

Initial 12 Cases of Robot-Assisted Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer Using the Hinotori Surgical Robot System: Tips for the Efficient Introduction of a New Surgical Robot

Introduction: The use of robotic platform for gastrectomy for gastric cancer is rapidly increasing. This study aimed to describe the perioperative outcomes of 12 patients who underwent robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer using the hinotori™ surgical robot system (hinotori), a novel robot-assisted surgical platform, and compare the outcomes with the existing system, the da Vinci® Surgical System (DVSS). Methods: This study included 12 consecutive patients with gastric cancer who underwent robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer using the hinotori between March 2023 and September 2023 at our institution. The comprehensive perioperative outcomes of these patients were retrospectively analyzed and compared to 11 patients who underwent robotic gastrectomy using the DVSS during the same period. Results: The median age and body mass index were 71 years (range: 56-86) and 22.7 kg/m2 (range: 16.1-26.7). Distal and total gastrectomy were performed in 8 and 4 patients, respectively. The median console time and operation times were 187 (range: 112-270) and 252 minutes (range: 173-339), respectively. The median blood loss was 3 mL (range: 2-5). No intra- or postoperative complications were observed. There were no significant differences in perioperative outcomes between the hinotori and the DVSS. Conclusions: Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer using the hinotori is a feasible procedure and achieved perioperative outcomes similar to that using the DVSS. Clinical Trial Registration number: 114167-1.

Colorectal procedures with the novel Hugo™ RAS system: training process and case series report from a non-robotic surgical team

BACKGROUND

The landscape of robotic surgery is evolving with the emergence of new platforms. However, reports on their applicability in different surgical fields are still limited and come from teams with robotics experience. This study aims to describe the training process for colorectal surgery with the Hugo™ RAS system of a robotics-inexperienced surgical team and present the initial patient series.

METHODS

The training process is depicted, and data from the first 10 consecutive patients operated on for colorectal conditions with the Hugo™ RAS system by a surgical team with no prior experience in robotic surgery were prospectively recorded and analysed.

RESULTS

The team received intensive training in robotic surgery and specifically in the Hugo™ RAS system previously to the first case. Between May 2023 and December 2023, 10 patients underwent colorectal procedures: 5 right colectomies, 3 sigmoid resections, 1 high rectal resection and 1 ventral mesh rectopexy. The first case was proctored by an expert. Median docking time was 14 min and median total operative time was 185 min. The only technical difficulty during the procedures was occasional clashing of robotic arms. None had to be converted, and no intraoperative or postoperative morbidity was recorded. Hospital stays ranged from 2 to 4 days. A median of 21 lymph nodes were yielded in the operations for malignant conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Common colorectal procedures can be safely performed using the Hugo™ RAS platform. Prior experience in robotic surgery is not a necessary requirement, but following a structured training program is essential.

Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty with HUGO™ Robotic System: Initial Experience and Optimal Surgical Set-Up at a Tertiary Referral Robotic Center

Background: In February 2021 Medtronic® (Minneapolis, MN) launched the HUGO™ Robot-Assisted Surgery (RAS) System in the global market. The aim of the current study is to describe the first case series and the optimal setup of robot-assisted pyeloplasty procedure, performed with HUGO RAS system in a tertiary referral robotic center. Methods: Data from consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted pyeloplasty at Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital (Aalst, Belgium) were recorded. Baseline characteristics, and perioperative and surgical outcomes were collected. Results: Overall, 10 robot-assisted pyeloplasties were performed (October 2022-September 2023). Based on our expertise, the following minor setting changes have been made, relative to the official setup guide: the endoscope port and, subsequently, the left and right-hand ports were positioned more laterally. Additionally, the reserve/4th port was placed more laterally and cranially, and adjusted the arm cart's tilt angle, reducing it from -30° to -15°. The median docking time was 8 (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.2-9.8) minutes, and the median active console time was 89.5 (80.0-95.8) minutes. No conversion to open/laparoscopic surgery or perioperative complications was encountered. A single technical problem was recorded in 1 (10%) procedure. Specifically, one arm was blocked, and the procedure was accomplished with three arms without compromising the procedure success. Conclusions: This study represents the first worldwide series of robot-assisted pyeloplasty performed with the HUGO RAS system and shows promising results. The procedure might be safely performed with this robotic platform achieving optimal perioperative outcomes.

Robotic-Assisted versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: An Analysis of Clinical and Financial Outcomes from a Tertiary Referral Center

Background: The popularity of robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer is increasing, but its superiority over the laparoscopic approach regarding safety, efficacy, and costs has not been well established. Methods: A retrospective single-center study was conducted comparing consecutively performed robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgeries for rectal cancer between 1 January 2016 and 31 September 2021. In total, 125 adult patients with sporadic rectal adenocarcinoma (distal extent ≤ 15 cm from the anal verge) underwent surgery where 66 were operated on robotically and 59 laparoscopically. Results: Severe postoperative complications occurred less frequently with robotic-assisted compared with laparoscopic surgery, as indicated by Clavien-Dindo classification grades 3b-5 (13.6% vs. 30.5%, p = 0.029). Multiple logistic regression analyses after backward selection revealed that robotic-assisted surgery was associated with a lower rate of total (Clavien-Dindo grades 1-5) (OR = 0.355; 95% CI 0.156-0.808; p = 0.014) and severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grades 3b-5) (OR = 0.243; 95% CI 0.088-0.643; p = 0.005). Total inpatient costs (median EUR 17.663 [IQR EUR 10.151] vs. median EUR 14.089 [IQR EUR 12.629]; p = 0.018) and surgery costs (median EUR 10.156 [IQR EUR 3.551] vs. median EUR 7.468 [IQR EUR 4.074]; p < 0.0001) were higher for robotic-assisted surgery, resulting in reduced total inpatient profits (median EUR -3.196 [IQR EUR 9.101] vs. median EUR 232 [IQR EUR 6.304]; p = 0.004). Conclusions: In our study, robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer resulted in less severe and fewer total postoperative complications. Still, it was associated with higher surgery and inpatient costs. With increasing experience, the operative time may be reduced, and the postoperative recovery may be further accelerated, leading to reduced surgery and total inpatient costs.

Comparative analysis of robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: the HUGO™ RAS system versus the DaVinci® Xi system

BACKGROUND

Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy (RASP) has emerged as a promising alternative in the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). However, there is currently a lack of comparative studies evaluating different robotic platforms for performing RASP. Therefore, we aimed to compare perioperative and functional outcomes of RASP performed using the HUGO™ RAS System versus the DaVinci® Xi System.

METHODS

Forty consecutive cases of RASP performed between May 2021 and March 2023 with the HUGO™ RAS and the DaVinci® Xi at OLV Hospital (Aalst, Belgium) were included in this retrospective study. All surgeries were performed by three experienced surgeons using the same approach. Baseline characteristics, peri-operative and functional outcomes were collected and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The population was equally divided between the two groups with 20 patients in each group. There were no significant differences in preoperative patient characteristics between the two groups, except for the presence of bladder stones prior to the surgery (p = 0.03). No significant differences in total operative time and console time between the two groups were reported (p = 0.3). No cases required conversion to open surgery or additional port placement. During one case performed with the HUGO™ RAS, a malfunctioning monopolar curved shear had to be replaced. However, there was no statistically significant differences in terms of technical robotic problems between the groups (p = 0.3). There was no significant difference between the two groups in perioperative and functional outcomes (all p ≥ 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not observe any statistically significant difference in perioperative and functional outcomes in case of RASP performed with the HUGO™ RAS System and with the DaVinci® Xi System. These findings provide compelling support for considering the HUGO™ RAS as a promising tool for robot-assisted procedures, thereby expanding the utilization of robotics for benign conditions.

Robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy using the novel surgical robot platform, hinotori: Initial experience with two cases

Introduction

A newly developed surgical robot system, hinotori, with various unique advantages has been in clinical use in Japan; however, there have not been any studies of robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy using hinotori.

Case presentation

We describe two male patients aged 67 and 76 years old with right renal cell carcinoma and a level II and I inferior vena cava tumor thrombus, respectively, undergoing robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy using hinotori. Both operations were successfully completed with a purely robotic procedure without any major perioperative complications, resulting in the following findings: time using robotic system, 158 and 156 min; total operative time, 228 and 214 min; estimated blood loss, 535 and 200 mL, respectively.

Conclusion

Based on our first experience, robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy using hinotori may be an effective treatment for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus ≤level II.

Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with the Dexter Robotic System: Initial Experience and Insights into On-demand Robotics

We report the world's first case series of ten robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) procedures performed with the Dexter robotic system (Distalmotion SA, Épalinges, Switzerland). The Dexter system is an open robotic platform that integrates into the existing operating room (OR) equipment. The optional sterile environment for the surgeon console provides flexibility for transition between a robot-assisted surgical procedure and a traditional laparoscopic setup, allowing surgeons to selectively use their preferred laparoscopic devices for specific surgical maneuvers on-demand. Ten patients underwent RARP ± lymph node dissection at Saintes Hospital (Saintes, France). Positioning and docking of the system were quickly mastered by the OR team. All procedures were successfully completed, without any intraprocedural complication, conversion to open surgery, or major technical failure. The median operative time was 230 min (interquartile range [IQR] 226-235), and the median length of stay was 3 d (IQR 3-4). This case series demonstrates the safety and feasibility of RARP with the Dexter system and provides the first insights into what an on-demand robotics platform could offer to hospitals willing to start or expand their robotic surgery program.

Partial nephrectomy series using Versius robotic surgical system: technique and outcomes of an initial experience

Partial nephrectomy (PN) represents a procedure where the use of a robot has further enabled successful completion of this complex surgery. The results of this procedure using Versius Robotic Surgical System (VRSS) still need to be evaluated. Our working group described the technique and reported the initial results of a series of PN using VRSS. We presented our setting, surgical technique and outcomes for PN, using VRSS. Between 2022 and 2023, 15 patients underwent PN performed by two surgeons in two different centers. Fifteen patients underwent PN. The median lesion size identified on preoperative imaging was 4 (IQR 2.3-5) cm. Median PADUA score was 8 (IQR 7-9). Two procedures were converted to radical nephrectomy for enhanced oncological disease control. Of the 13 nephrectomies that were completed as partial, 7 were performed clampless and 6 with warm ischemia clamping. Median clamping time was 10 (IQR 9-11) minutes. No procedure was converted to open. Median blood loss was 200 (IQR 100-250) mL. Median total operative time was 105 (IQR 100-110) minutes. Median console time was 75 (IQR 66-80) minutes. Median set-up time was 13 (IQR 12-14) minutes. No intraoperative complications were reported. The median hospitalization time was 4 (IQR 3.5-4) days. None of the patients were transfused and none of the patients required readmission. In a pathology report, one patient had a positive surgical margin. Our initial experience suggests that performing PN using VRSS is feasible with good short-term outcomes.

Navigating Now and Next: Recent Advances and Future Horizons in Robotic Radical Prostatectomy

Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become the leading approach for radical prostatectomy driven by innovations aimed at improving functional and oncological outcomes. The initial advancement in this field was transperitoneal multiport robotics, which has since undergone numerous technical modifications. These enhancements include the development of extraperitoneal, transperineal, and transvesical approaches to radical prostatectomy, greatly facilitated by the advent of the Single Port (SP) robot. This review offers a comprehensive analysis of these evolving techniques and their impact on RARP. Additionally, we explore the transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) in digitizing robotic prostatectomy. AI advancements, particularly in automated surgical video analysis using computer vision technology, are unprecedented in their scope. These developments hold the potential to revolutionize surgeon feedback and assessment and transform surgical documentation, and they could lay the groundwork for real-time AI decision support during surgical procedures in the future. Furthermore, we discuss future robotic platforms and their potential to further enhance the field of RARP. Overall, the field of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer has been an incubator of innovation over the last two decades. This review focuses on some recent developments in robotic prostatectomy, provides an overview of the next frontier in AI innovation during prostate cancer surgery, and highlights novel robotic platforms that may play an increasing role in prostate cancer surgery in the future.

Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed with Different Robotic Platforms: First Comparative Evidence Between Da Vinci and HUGO Robot-assisted Surgery Robots

BACKGROUND

In the field of robotic surgery, there is a lack of comparative evidence on surgical and functional outcomes of different robotic platforms.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcomes of patients receiving robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) at a high-volume robotic center with daVinci and HUGO robot-assisted surgery (RAS) surgical systems.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We analyzed the data of 542 patients undergoing RARP ± extended pelvic lymph node dissection at OLV hospital (Aalst, Belgium) between 2021 and 2023. All procedures were performed by six surgeons using daVinci or HUGO RAS robots; the use of one platform rather than the other did not follow any specific preference and/or indication.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Multivariable analyses investigated the association between robotic system (daVinci vs HUGO RAS) and surgical outcomes after adjustment for patient- and tumor-related factors. Urinary continence recovery was defined as the use of no/one safety pad.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 378 (70%) and 164 (30%) patients underwent RARP with daVinci and HUGO RAS surgical systems, respectively. Despite a higher rate of palpable disease in the HUGO RAS group (34% vs 25%), baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups (all p > 0.05). After adjusting for confounders, we did not find evidence of a difference between the groups with respect to operative time (estimate: 16.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -6.35, 39.78; p = 0.12), estimated blood loss (estimate: 3.12; 95% CI: -67.03, 73.27; p = 0.9), and postoperative Clavien-Dindo ≥2 complications (odds ratio [OR]: 1.66; 95% CI: 0.34, 8.15; p = 0.5). On final pathology, 55 (15%) and 20 (12%) men in, respectively, the daVinci and the HUGO RAS group had positive surgical margins (PSMs; p = 0.5). On multivariable analyses, we did not find evidence of an association between a robotic system and PSMs (OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.56, 2.07; p = 0.8). Similarly, the odds of recovering continence did not differ between daVinci and HUGO RAS cases after both 1 mo (OR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.38; p = 0.4) and 3 mo (OR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.49, 2.79; p = 0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients receiving RARP with daVinci or HUGO RAS surgical platforms, we did not find differences in surgical and functional outcomes between the robots. This may be a result of a standardized surgical technique that allowed surgeons to transfer their skills between robotic systems. Awaiting future investigations with longer follow-up, these results have important implications for patients, surgeons, and health care policymakers.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We compared surgical and functional outcomes of patients receiving robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with daVinci versus HUGO robot-assisted surgery (RAS) robots. The two platforms were able to achieve similar outcomes, suggesting that the introduction of HUGO RAS is safe and allows for optimal outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

Transitioning from Da Vinci Si to Xi: assessing surgical outcomes at a high-volume robotic center

PURPOSE

In the emerging field of robotics, only few studies investigated the transition between different robotic platforms in terms of surgical outcomes. We aimed at assessing surgical outcomes of patients receiving robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) at a high-volume robotic center during the transition from Si to Xi Da Vinci surgical systems.

METHODS

We analyzed data of 1884 patients undergoing RARP (n = 1437, 76%) and RAPN (n = 447, 24%) at OLV hospital (Aalst, Belgium) between 2011 and 2021. For both procedures, we assessed operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, and positive surgical margins. For RARP, we investigated length of catheterization and PSA persistence after surgery, whereas warm ischemia time, clampless surgery, and acute kidney injury (AKI) were assessed for RAPN. Multivariable analyses (MVA) investigated the association between robotic platform (Si vs. Xi) and surgical outcomes after adjustment for patient- and tumor-related factors.

RESULTS

A total of 975 (68%) and 462 (32%) patients underwent RARP performed with the Si vs. Xi surgical system, respectively. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups. On MVA, we did not find evidence of a difference between the groups with respect to operative time (estimate: 1.07) or estimated blood loss (estimate: 32.39; both p > 0.05). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) length of stay was 6 (3, 6) and 4 (3, 5) days in the Si vs. Xi group, respectively (p < 0.0001). On MVA, men treated with the Xi vs. Si robot had lower odds of PSM (Odds ratio [OR]: 0.58; p = 0.014). A total of 184 (41%) and 263 (59%) patients received RAPN with the Si and Xi robotic system, respectively. Baseline characteristics, including demographics, functional data, and tumor-related features did not differ between the groups. On MVA, operative time was longer in the Xi vs. Si group (estimate: 30.54; p = 0.006). Patients treated with the Xi vs. Si system had higher probability of undergoing a clampless procedure (OR: 2.56; p = 0.001), whereas the risk of AKI did not differ between the groups (OR: 1.25; p = 0.4). On MVA, patients operated with the Xi robot had shorter length of stay as compared to the Si group (estimate: - 0.86; p = 0.003), whereas we did not find evidence of an association between robotic system and PSM (OR: 1.55; p = 0.3).

CONCLUSION

We found that the Xi robot allowed for improvements in peri-operative outcomes as compared to the Si platform, with lower rate of positive margins for RARP and higher rate of off-clamp procedures for RAPN. Hospital stay was also shorter for patients operated with the Xi vs. Si robot, especially after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Awaiting future investigations-in particular, cost analyses-these results have important implications for patients, surgeons, and healthcare policymakers.

Robot-assisted radical nephrectomy using novel surgical robot platform, hinotori: Report of initial series of 13 cases

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the present study were to describe the perioperative findings of the first series of patients undergoing robot-assisted radical nephrectomy (RARN) with a newly launched platform, the hinotori surgical robot system, and compare the findings with a similar set receiving RARN with the existing system, da Vinci.

METHODS

This study included 34 patients, consisting of 13 and 21 undergoing RARN using the hinotori and da Vinci robotic systems, respectively. As a rule, RARN was performed via an intraperitoneal approach employing 3 robotic arms, irrespective of the robotic systems.

RESULTS

In the hinotori group, the median age, body mass index and tumor diameter were 65 years, 23.3 kg/m2 and 50 mm, respectively. All surgical procedures with hinotori could be completed by a purely robotic approach. In the hinotori group, the median operative time, time using the robotic system, estimated blood loss and length of hospital stay were 157, 83 min, 11 mL and 6 days, respectively, and major perioperative complications did not occur. In this group, 3, 1 and 9 patients were pathologically diagnosed with pT1a, pT1b and pT3a tumors, respectively. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were noted between the hinotori and da Vinci groups, and there were also no significant differences in perioperative findings between them.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a case series with a small sample size, this is the first report evaluating RARN using the hinotori surgical robot system, which could be safely conducted and achieved perioperative outcomes similar to that using the da Vinci system.

Special Issue: "Latest Advances on Urinary Incontinence"

Urinary incontinence (UI) has a great impact on patients' quality of life [...].

A comparative analysis of the HUGOTM robot-assisted surgery system and the Da Vinci® Xi surgical system for robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse treatment

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare the outcomes of Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC) performed using the novel HUGOTM Robot-Assisted Surgery (RAS) System with the Da Vinci® Xi surgical system.

METHODS

Data from 38 women undergoing RASC for a ≥ 2-grade pelvic organ prolapse were collected (2021-2023).

RESULTS

Overall, 23 (60.5%) and 15 (39.5%) procedures were performed using the DaVinci® Xi and the HUGOTM RAS system, respectively. The median total operative time was 123 (IQR:106.5-140.5) minutes for the DaVinci® Xi versus 120 (IQR:120-146) minutes for the HUGOTM RAS cases (p = 0.5). No conversion to open/laparoscopic surgery, perioperative complications, or system failures occurred. No differences were recorded according to day of catheter removal and length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the first worldwide comparison of RASC executed using the HUGOTM RAS versus the Da Vinci® Xi System. Our data suggest that RASC might be performed with both robotic platforms with similar perioperative outcomes.

Extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the Hugo™ RAS system: initial experience of a tertiary center with a high background in extraperitoneal laparoscopy surgery

PURPOSE

The Hugo™ RAS system is a novel robotic platform with innovative features. However, there are currently no available data on extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) performed using this system. The objective of this study is to describe the surgical setup and assess the safety and feasibility of the extraperitoneal approach in robotic radical prostatectomy with the Hugo™ RAS system.

METHODS

Sixteen consecutive patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer underwent extraperitoneal RARP ± lymph node dissection at our institution, between March and May 2023. All RARP procedures were performed extraperitoneal with a modular four-arm configuration. The focus was to describe the operative room setup, trocar placement, tilt and docking angles and evaluate the safety and feasibility of this approach with this robotic platform. Secondary outcomes recorded included, total operative time, console time, estimated bleeding, intra- and postoperative complications, and length of stay after surgery. A descriptive analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

We report on the first sixteen cases of extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy performed with the new Hugo™ RAS system. All procedures were completed, without the need for conversion or placement of additional ports. No intraoperative complications or major technical failures that would prevent the completion of surgery were recorded. The median operative time was 211 min (IQR 180-277), and the median console time was 152 min (IQR 119-196). The mean docking time was 4.6 min (IQR 4.1-5.2). The median estimated blood loss and the median time to remove the vesical catheter were 200 mL (IQR 150-400) and 8 days (IQR 7-8), respectively. The median length of stay was 2 days (IQR 2-2). Only one minor complication was registered in the first 30 days.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence of the safety and feasibility of the extraperitoneal approach in RARP with the Hugo™ RAS system. The description of the surgical setup in terms of trocar placement, arm-cart disposition, tilt and docking angles offers valuable information for surgeons interested in adopting this surgical approach with the Hugo™ RAS platform.

Robotic docking time with the Hugo™ RAS system in gynecologic surgery: a procedure independent learning curve using the cumulative summation analysis (CUSUM)

Robot-assisted surgery has been proven to offer improvements in term of surgical learning curve and feasibility of minimally invasive surgery, but has often been criticized for its longer operative times compared to conventional laparoscopy. Additional times can be split into time required for system set-up, robotic arms docking and calibration of robotic instruments; secondly, surgeon's learning curve. One of the newest systems recently launched on the market is the Hugo™ RAS (MEDTRONIC Inc, United States). As some of the earliest adopters of the Hugo™ RAS system technology, we present our data on robotic docking learning curve for the first 192 gynecologic robotic cases performed at our institution. Our data indicates that robotic set-up and docking with the new Hugo™ RAS robotic surgical system can be performed time-effectively and that the specific robotic docking learning curve is comparable to preexisting data for other platforms. This preliminary insights into this recently released system may be worthwhile for other centers which may soon adopt this new technology and may need some relevant information on topics such as OR times. Further studies are necessary to assess the different features of the Hugo™ RAS considering other technical and surgical aspects, to fully become familiar with this novel technology.

Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy using hinotori versus da Vinci surgical robot system: a propensity score-matched analysis

The purpose of this study was to evaluate perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) using hinotori, a recently developed robot-assisted surgical platform, by comparing them with those using da Vinci. This study included 303 and 40 consecutive patients who underwent RAPN using da Vinci and hinotori, respectively. To adjust potential baseline parameters between da Vinci and hinotori groups, 1:2 propensity score-matching was performed, and perioperative outcomes in these two groups were comprehensively evaluated. Propensity score-matched analysis generated two groups, consisting of 74 and 37 patients undergoing RAPN using da Vinci and hinotori, respectively, and no significant differences in major baseline parameters were noted between the two groups. RAPN could be completed without conversion to nephrectomy or open surgery in all patients. There were no significant differences in major perioperative outcomes between da Vinci and hinotori groups, including the operative time, time using the robotic system and warm ischemia time. No patient in either group was diagnosed with a positive surgical margin or experienced perioperative complications, corresponding to Clavien-Dindo 3 ≤ . There were no significant differences in the achievements of trifecta and margin, ischemia and complications outcomes between the two groups, and changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate 1 and 28 days after RAPN were also similar between them. In conclusion, these findings showed that the hinotori platform could facilitate similar perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing RAPN in comparison with the existing robotic system, da Vinci.

Initial Experience of Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy with Hugo Robot-Assisted Surgery System: Step-by-Step Description of Two Different Techniques

Introduction: There are only a few clinical data on nononcologic procedures performed with the new Hugo™ robot-assisted surgery (RAS) system. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) is a minimally invasive treatment option for benign prostatic hyperplasia, and it demonstrated equal early functional and better perioperative outcomes as compared with open simple prostatectomy. In this article, we reported the first large series of RASP performed with Hugo RAS system. Methods: This Supplementary Video S1 is a step-by-step description of two different techniques for RASP. We analyzed the data of 20 consecutive patients who underwent RASP at OLV Hospital (Belgium) between February 2022 and March 2023. Patients baseline characteristics, perioperative and pathologic, and 1-month postoperative outcomes were reported, using the median (interquartile range [IQR]) and frequencies, as appropriate. Results: Median age (IQR) and preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) were 72 (67-76) years, and 7.7 (5.0-13.4) ng/mL, respectively. A total of 11 patients experienced an episode of preoperative acute urinary retention, and 8 men had an indwelling bladder catheter at the time of the surgery. No intraoperative complication occurred, and there was no need for conversion to open surgery. Median operative and console time were 165 (121-180) and 125 (101-148) minutes. On the first postoperative day the urethral catheter was removed in 80% of the patients. Median length of stay was 3 (3-4) days. Three patients had minor postoperative complications. On final pathology report, median prostate volume was 120 (101-154) g. On postoperative uroflowmetry, median Qmax and postvoid residual were 16 (13-26) mL/s and 15 (0-34) mL, respectively. Conclusions: This series represents the first report of surgical outcomes of RASP executed with Hugo RAS system. Awaiting study with longer follow-up, our study suggests that Hugo RAS has multiple applications, and it can ensure optimal outcomes in nononcologic procedures.

Robotics in Microsurgery and Supermicrosurgery

Microsurgery has changed the ability to perform highly precise and technical surgeries through the utilization of high-powered microscopes and specialized instruments to manipulate and repair anatomical structures as small as a few millimeters. Since the first human trials of robotic-assisted microsurgery in 2006, the expansion of microsurgery to supermicrosurgery (luminal diameter less than 1 mm) has enabled successful repair of previously inaccessible structures. Surgical robotic systems can offer two distinct operative advantages: (1) minimal access surgery-by entering body cavities through ports, flap harvest can be redesigned to affect a minimally invasive approach for flaps such as the rectus abdominis muscle, the latissimus flap, and the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap; and (2) precision-by eliminating physiologic tremor, improving ergonomics, increasing accessibility to difficult spaces, and providing motion scaling, precision is significantly enhanced. Robotic-assisted microsurgery is a promising application of robotics for the plastic surgeon and has played an important role in flap harvest, head and neck reconstruction, nerve reconstruction, gender-affirming surgery, and lymphatic reconstruction-all the while minimizing surgical morbidity. This article aims to review the history, technology, and application of microsurgery and supermicrosurgery in plastic surgery.

Impact of hands-on practice with HugoRAS and Versius System simulators on the attractiveness of robotic surgery among medical and nurse undergraduate students

The scenario of robotic surgery is rapidly evolving with the introduction of new robotic systems. A structured learning program in robotic surgery during academic education is often lacking, especially for undergraduates; as a result, many students may be unaware of indications to robotic surgery and technological progress. The aim of the study is to evaluate the knowledge and interest toward robotic surgery of medical and nurse students, and to analyze how the attractiveness may change after a hand-on training course with new simulators of Hugo RAS and Versius System. We performed a cross-sectional study involving medical and nurse students recruited on a voluntary basis at ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan; participants were invited to join a hands-on practice simulation with the Hugo RAS and/or Versius Trainer Simulator. Before the hand-on exercise, students were asked to fulfill an online anonymous questionnaire addressing knowledge and interest toward robotic surgery. After a 2-h hands-on exercises at the Hugo RAS and/or at the Versius Trainer simulator (preceded by a brief lecture on robotic surgery and new systems), participants were asked to complete a second-round questionnaire to evaluate changes in attractiveness toward robotic surgery. Data were recorded in a database; after a descriptive analysis of the variables, median values were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test, frequencies with the Fisher's exact test and in the case of paired observations (before and after the simulation), the Mc Nemar test was used. Forty-one undergraduates agreed to participate. Twenty-three nursing students and 18 medical students were recruited. Some of them had a basic knowledge in robotic surgery and were able to figure out some surgical indications, given the presence of a robotic program already settled up at the institution. Before the hands-on course, 44.0% nurse students and 36.6% of medical students were interested in surgical disciplines and robotic surgery. After the simulation, all students (100%) reported a high level of interest in robotic surgery and some of them required for a dedicated internship (p < 0.001). The students provided also feedback on the perceived ease-of-use of the robotic simulators (on a scale 0-10); overall, the median score was 8, IQR [7-8], with no differences between nursing and medical students (p = 0.482). In conclusion, the study demonstrates a great interest toward robotic surgery as a part of medical and nurse education. A hands-on simulation further improved the interest of undergraduates from both backgrounds. The technological progress with the availability of new surgical systems will be the future challenge of training programs and should be considered at all levels of education.

Outcomes of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with the Hugo RAS Surgical System: Initial Experience at a High-volume Robotic Center

Clinical data on robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) performed with the new Hugo robot-assisted surgery (RAS) system are scarce. We described surgical outcomes of 112 consecutive patients who underwent RARP ± extended pelvic lymph-node dissection (ePLND) at OLV Hospital (Aalst, Belgium) between February and November 2022. The median age was 65 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 60-70) and median preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 7.9 ng/ml (5.8-10.7). Thirty-eight patients (34%) had International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥3 tumor on prostate biopsy. On preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, 26 (23%) patients had a suspicion of extraprostatic disease. The median operative time was 180 min (IQR 145-200) and 27 men (24%) underwent ePLND. On final pathology, 34 patients (31%) had extraprostatic disease and ten (9%) had positive surgical margins. The median number of nodes removed was 15 (IQR 9-19). Among men with data available on the first PSA after surgery, 88% (60/68) had undetectable PSA (<0.1 ng/ml). The probability of urinary continence (UC) recovery was 36% (95% confidence interval [CI] 28-47%) at 1 mo and 81% (95% CI 72-89%) at 3 mo. The median time to UC recovery was 36 d (95% CI 34-44). This is the first report of data on UC recovery and surgical pathology for patients undergoing RARP for prostate cancer performed with the Hugo RAS robotic system. Future investigations with longer follow-up are awaited. PATIENT SUMMARY: We describe surgical outcomes of patients undergoing robot-assisted surgical removal of the prostate for cancer performed with the Hugo RAS robotic system at our institution. In our experience this platform provided adequate results in terms of surgical results and early recovery of urinary continence. Studies with longer follow-up are awaited.

Initial experience of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with Hugo™ RAS system: implications for surgical setting

PURPOSE

Hugo™ RAS system is one of the most promising new robotic platforms introduced in the field of urology. To date, no data have been provided on robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) performed with Hugo™ RAS system. The aim of the study is to describe the setting and report the performance of the first series of RAPN performed with Hugo™ RAS system.

METHODS

Ten consecutive patients who underwent RAPN at our Institution between February and December 2022 were prospectively enrolled. All RAPN were performed transperitoneally with a modular four-arm configuration. The main outcome was to describe the operative room setting, trocar placement and the performance of this novel robotic platform. Pre, intra and post-operative, variables were recorded. A descriptive analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Seven patients underwent RAPN for right-side and three for left-side masses. Median tumor size and PADUA score were 3 (2.2-3.7) cm and 9 (8-9), respectively. Median docking and console time were 9.5 (9-14) and 138 (124-162) minutes, respectively. Median warm ischemia time was 13 (10-14) minutes, and one case was performed clamp-less. Median estimated blood loss was 90 (75-100) mL. One major complication (Clavien-Dindo 3a) occurred. No case of positive surgical margin was recorded.

CONCLUSION

This is the first series to prove the feasibility of Hugo™ RAS system in the setting of RAPN. These preliminary results may help new adopters of this surgical platform to identify critical steps of robotic surgery with this platform and explore solutions before in-vivo surgery.

Initial experience of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy using hinotori surgical robot system: Single institutional prospective assessment of perioperative outcomes in 30 cases

INTRODUCTION

Innovation of robotic surgery is still actively growing, and various novel robotic systems are in the process of development. The objective of this study was to assess the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) using the hinotori surgical robot system, a recently developed robot-assisted surgical platform, for patients with small renal tumors.

METHODS

This study prospectively included a total of 30 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with small renal tumors and subsequently underwent RAPN using hinotori between April and November 2022. Major perioperative outcomes in these 30 patients were comprehensively analyzed.

RESULTS

The median tumor size and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score in the 30 patients were 28 mm and 8, respectively. Of these 30, 25 and 5 received RAPN by intra- and retro-peritoneal approaches, respectively. RAPN could be completed in all 30 patients without conversion to nephrectomy or open surgery. The median operative time, time using hinotori and warm ischemia time were 179, 106 and 13 minutes, respectively. No patient was diagnosed with a positive surgical margin or experienced major perioperative complications, corresponding to Clavien-Dindo 3≤. Achievements of trifecta and margin, ischemia and complications (MIC) outcomes in this series were 100 and 96.7%, respectively, and median changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate 1 day and 1 month after RAPN were -20.9 and -11.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study focusing on RAPN using hinotori, which showed favorable perioperative outcomes, considering the findings of trifecta and MIC. Although it will be necessary to investigate the long-term effects of RAPN using hinotori on oncological and functional outcomes, the present findings strongly suggest that the hinotori surgical robot system could be safely applied to RAPN for patients with small renal tumors.

Robot-assisted sutureless partial nephrectomy for the treatment of fifteen bilateral renal masses in a patient with Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome: a case report from a high-volume robotic center

Renal cell carcinoma is among major causes of death in patients with Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome, and it usually presents with multiple and bilateral lesions that may require multiple renal surgeries. This, in turn, may compromise renal function, resulting in end-stage renal disease. To minimize renal function impairment in these patients, great importance is given to the preservation of functional parenchyma with the use of nephron-sparing techniques. Furthermore, new techniques such as off-clamp surgery, selective suturing or sutureless techniques may improve long-term functional outcomes. We described the case of a 27-year-old male patient with a family history of VHL disease affected by multiple, bilateral renal masses. He received bilateral, metachronous robot-assisted partial nephrectomies (RAPN) for a total of 15 renal lesions. No intra- or post-operative complications occurred, and the patient was discharged on the second postoperative day after both procedures. Serum creatinine after the second RAPN was 0.99 mg/dl (baseline value was 1.11 mg/dl). In patients with VHL syndrome and multiple renal lesions, robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, especially with the use of clampless and sutureless techniques, helps minimizing renal function impairment and should be performed when anatomically and technically feasible.

Robotic-Assisted versus Laparoscopic Proctectomy with Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis: An Analysis of Clinical and Financial Outcomes from a Tertiary Referral Center

Background: Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery is gaining popularity, but limited data are available on the safety, efficacy, and cost of robotic-assisted restorative proctectomy with the construction of an ileal pouch and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted comparing consecutively performed robotic-assisted and laparoscopic proctectomy with IPAA between 1 January 2016 and 31 September 2021. In total, 67 adult patients with medically refractory UC without proven dysplasia or carcinoma underwent surgery: 29 operated robotically and 38 laparoscopically. Results: There were no differences between both groups regarding postoperative complications within 30 days according to Clavien-Dindo classification’ grades 1−5 (51.7% vs. 42.1%, p = 0.468) and severe grades 3b−5 (17.2% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.485). Robotic-assisted surgery was associated with an increased urinary tract infection rate (n = 7, 24.1% vs. n = 1, 2.6%; p = 0.010) and longer operative time (346 ± 65 min vs. 281 ± 66 min; p < 0.0001). Surgery costs were higher when operated robotically (median EUR 10.377 [IQR EUR 4.727] vs. median EUR 6.689 [IQR EUR 3.170]; p < 0.0001), resulting in reduced total inpatient profits (median EUR 110 [IQR EUR 4.971] vs. median EUR 2.853 [IQR EUR 5.386]; p = 0.001). Conclusion: Robotic-assisted proctectomy with IPAA can be performed with comparable short-term clinical outcomes to laparoscopy but is associated with a longer duration of surgery and higher surgery costs. As experience increases, some advantages may become evident regarding operative time, postoperative recovery, and length of stay. The robotic procedure might then become cost-efficient.

Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with the Novel Hugo Robotic System: Initial Experience and Optimal Surgical Set-up at a Tertiary Referral Robotic Center

We describe the first five robot-assisted radical prostatectomies (RARPs) performed with the new Hugo RAS system (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in Europe. The five patients underwent RARP ± lymph node dissection at OLV Hospital (Aalst, Belgium). All procedures were completed, with no need for conversion or for placement of additional ports. No intraoperative complication or technical failure of the system was recorded. The median operative time was 170 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 140-180) and the median console time was 120 min (IQR: 110-150). Median length of stay was 3 d (IQR: 2-4). System start-up and docking of the robotic arms were straightforward and rapid processes for a properly trained surgical team. Awaiting future investigations in larger series, this study proves the safety and feasibility of RARP with the Hugo RAS system and provides relevant data that may be of help to early adopters of this surgical platform.