Comparison of Symptom Burden among Patients Referred to Palliative Care with Hematologic Malignancies versus those with Solid Tumors

Malignant Hematologic Oncology Referrals to an Outpatient Palliative Care Clinic at a Tertiary Cancer Center

CONTEXT

Hematological malignancies represent a heterogeneous group of diseases with variable and often unpredictable illness trajectories. Comparisons between hematological and solid tumor malignancy referrals to an outpatient palliative care clinic have not been explored.

OBJECTIVES

This study compared characteristics, referral trends, and time from first palliative care clinic visit to death between patients with hematological and solid tumor malignancies.

METHODS

A retrospective review of palliative care clinic referrals at a tertiary cancer center from January 1st, 2018 to December 31st, 2022 was conducted. Clinical and demographic data, symptom burden, performance status, and time from first palliative care clinic visit to death were compared.

RESULTS

Of 5230 outpatients, 283 (5.4%) had a hematological malignancy (107 [38%] leukemia, 98 [35%] lymphoma, and 78 [28%] multiple myeloma). Patients with leukemia and lymphoma had similar symptom burden to solid tumor malignancies; patients with multiple myeloma had significantly more pain (P < 0.0001) and constipation (P = 0.005). Patients with hematological malignancies had worse performance status compared with solid tumor malignancies (ECOG ≥3 for 37.9% leukemia, 35.0% lymphoma, and 31.6% multiple myeloma vs. 19.6% solid tumor malignancies, P < 0.0001). At 12-months from first palliative care clinic visit, survival probabilities were 27.6% for leukemia, 42.2% lymphoma, and 69.5% multiple myeloma vs. 39.5% solid tumor malignancies.

CONCLUSION

Patients with hematological malignancies experience at least similar symptom burden to those with solid tumor malignancies referred to a palliative care clinic, and worse performance status, factors that should be considered when designing palliative care clinic interventions for patients with hematological malignancies.

Palliative Care Needs in Adult Patients with Acute Leukemia: A Prospective Observational Study

Background: Acute leukemia (AL) affects patients' well-being and inflicts substantial symptom burden. We evaluated palliative care needs and symptom burden in adult patients with AL from diagnosis through fourth week of induction chemotherapy. Methods: Newly diagnosed adult patients with AL scheduled for curative-intent treatments, prospectively completed Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia questionnaire at diagnosis and postinduction therapy. Subscale scores identified domains with major needs, with lower scores signifying higher needs, while Leu-subscale assessed leukemia-specific symptom burden. Results: One hundred patients were enrolled. Upon diagnosis and four weeks into induction phase, respectively, patients exhibited the lowest scores in physical (17 ± 8.75; 16 ± 11; p < 0.05), functional (16.5 ± 10.75; 11 ± 12.2; p < 0.05), and leukemia-specific (43 ± 16.75; 41.48 ± 11.68; p > 0.05) domains. Predominant symptoms were "getting tired easily" (91%) at diagnosis and "unable to do usual activities" (92.3%) after induction. Conclusion: Patients with AL demonstrated substantial physical, functional, and leukemia-specific symptom needs at diagnosis, which intensified postinduction, highlighting the necessity for palliative care integration from diagnosis.

Integrating Palliative Care and Hematologic Malignancies: Bridging the Gaps for Our Patients and Their Caregivers

Patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs) struggle with immense physical and psychological symptom burden, which negatively affect their quality of life (QOL) throughout the continuum of illness. These patients are often faced with substantial prognostic uncertainty as they navigate their illness course, which further complicates their medical decision making, especially at the end of life (EOL). Consequently, patients with HM often endure intensive medical care at the EOL, including frequent hospitalization and intensive care unit admissions, and they often die in the hospital. Our EOL health care delivery models are not well suited to meet the unique needs of patients with HMs. Although studies have established the role of specialty palliative care for improving QOL and EOL outcomes in patients with solid tumors, numerous disease-, clinician-, and system-based barriers prevail, limiting the integration of palliative care for patients with HMs. Nonetheless, multiple studies have emerged over the past decade identifying the role of palliative care integration in patients with various HMs, resulting in improvements in patient-reported QOL, symptom burden, and psychological distress, as well as EOL care. Importantly, these studies have also identified active components of specialty palliative care interventions, including strategies to promote adaptive coping especially in the face of prognostic uncertainty. Future work can leverage the knowledge gained from specialty palliative care integration to develop and test primary palliative care interventions by training clinicians caring for patients with HMs to incorporate these strategies into their clinical practice.

Health-related quality of life in hemato-oncology patients: role of informativeness and doctor-patient communication

Background

The patient's information about the disease and doctor-patient communication are both constructs whose importance is emphasized in the theory, but much less frequently researched and used in the practice.

Objective

This study aimed to determine whether certain facets of health-related quality of life of hemato-oncology patients in Croatia could be predicted based on patients' sociodemographic data, the disease's determinants, the patients' information about their disease and the quality of doctor-patient communication.

Methods

60 women and 54 men with diagnoses of both leukemia and lymphoma have participated in filling out questionnaires. The survey consisted of a sociodemographic questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30(version 3), EORTC QLQ-INFO25 and the Doctor-Patient Communication Questionnaire.

Results

Patients' sociodemographic data, the disease's determinants, the patients' information about their disease and the quality of doctor-patient communication predicted 26.8 % variance of global health status (F = 2.756, p \< .01), 35.7% variance of physical functioning (F = 4.196, p \< .01), 23.3% variance of role functioning (F = 2.291, p \< .05), 29.9% variance of emotional functioning (F = 3.215, p \< .01) and 27.9% of social functioning (F = 2.881, p \< .01). Predictors that significantly contributed to the change in variance of health-related quality of life were age, duration of diagnosis, the existence of comorbidity, frequency of hospitalization, talking with the psychologist after getting the diagnosis and information.

Conclusion

The study offers valuable insights into an under-researched patient population and a better understanding of their health-related quality of life. The results indicate the importance of information that can be implemented in everyday clinical practice, and pave the way for further research on doctor-patient communication.

Compassionate Communication and Advance Care Planning to improve End-of-life Care in Treatment of Haematological Disease 'ACT': Study Protocol for a Cluster-randomized trial

INTRODUCTION

To support the implementation of advance care planning and serious illness conversations in haematology, a previously developed conversation intervention titled 'Advance Consultations Concerning your Life and Treatment' (ACT) was found feasible. This study aims to investigate the effect of ACT on the quality of end-of-life care in patients with haematological malignancy and their informal caregivers.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The study is a nationwide 2-arm cluster randomised trial randomising 40 physician-nurse clusters across seven haematological departments in Denmark to provide standard care or ACT intervention. A total of 400 patients with haematological malignancies and their informal caregivers will be included. The ACT intervention includes an ACT conversation that centres on discussing the patient's prognosis, worries, hopes and preferences for future treatment. The intervention is supported by clinician training and supervision, preparatory materials for patients and informal caregivers, and system changes including dedicated ACT-conversation timeslots and templates for documentation in medical records.This study includes two primary outcomes: (1) the proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy within the last 30 days of death and (2) patients' and informal caregivers' symptoms of anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder-7) at 3 6, 9, 12 and 18 months follow-up. Mixed effects models accounting for clusters will be used.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Declaration of Helsinki and the European GDPR regulations as practised in Denmark are followed through all aspects of the study. Findings will be made available to the participants, patient organisations, funding bodies, healthcare professionals and researchers at national and international conferences and through publication in peer-reviewed international journals.

REGISTRATION DETAILS

The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05444348). The Regional Ethics Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (record no: 21067634) has decided that approval is not necessary as per Danish legislation. Study approval has been obtained from The Capital Region of Denmark Data Protection Agency (record no: P-2022-93).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05444348.

A Comparative Sentiment Analysis of Greek Clinical Conversations Using BERT, RoBERTa, GPT-2, and XLNet

In addressing the critical role of emotional context in patient-clinician conversations, this study conducted a comprehensive sentiment analysis using BERT, RoBERTa, GPT-2, and XLNet. Our dataset includes 185 h of Greek conversations focused on hematologic malignancies. The methodology involved data collection, data annotation, model training, and performance evaluation using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and specificity. BERT outperformed the other methods across all sentiment categories, demonstrating its effectiveness in capturing the emotional context in clinical interactions. RoBERTa showed a strong performance, particularly in identifying neutral sentiments. GPT-2 showed promising results in neutral sentiments but exhibited a lower precision and recall for negatives. XLNet showed a moderate performance, with variations across categories. Overall, our findings highlight the complexities of sentiment analysis in clinical contexts, especially in underrepresented languages like Greek. These insights highlight the potential of advanced deep-learning models in enhancing communication and patient care in healthcare settings. The integration of sentiment analysis in healthcare could provide insights into the emotional states of patients, resulting in more effective and empathetic patient support. Our study aims to address the gap and limitations of sentiment analysis in a Greek clinical context, an area where resources are scarce and its application remains underexplored.

Palliative care for patients with hematologic malignancies in Germany: a nationwide survey on everyday practice and influencing factors from the perspective of treating physicians

Integrating palliative care into the treatment of patients with advanced hematological malignancies (HM) remains challenging. To explore treating physicians' perspectives on current palliative care practice and to evaluate factors influencing integration, we conducted a nationwide online survey. Based on literature and expert review, the survey addressed the importance of palliative care, communication about life-threatening conditions, challenges in establishing goals of care, and factors influencing the integration of palliative care. 207 physicians treating patients with HM in Germany participated. We used standard descriptive statistics to analyze quantitative data and a content structuring approach. Most physicians considered palliative care in HM to be very important (60.6%) and discussed life-threatening conditions with more than half of their patients (52%), especially when goals of care were changed (87.0%) or when patients raised the topic (84.0%). Disease-related factors, different professional perspectives on prognosis, and patient hopes were the main barriers to changing goals of care, but collaboration with colleagues and multidisciplinary teams provided important support. Time constraints were identified as the main barrier to integrating palliative care. The majority worked well with palliative care teams. Referral processes and conditions were perceived as minor barriers. The study highlights the need to address barriers to integrating palliative care into the management of patients with advanced HM. Future research should aim at optimizing palliative care for patients with HM.

Effects of tertiary palliative care on the pattern of end-of-life care in patients with hematologic malignancies in Korea

INTRODUCTION

Patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs) often face challenges in accessing palliative care (PC) and receiving quality end-of-life (EOL) care. We examined factors associated with referrals to tertiary PC and the effects of tertiary PC on EOL care in patients with HMs.

METHOD

We included patients with HMs who were admitted to a university-affiliated hospital and died during hospitalization between January 2018 and December 2021. We investigated the receipt of PC consultations, patient characteristics, and EOL care indicators.

RESULTS

Overall, 487 patients were included in the analysis, with 156 (32%) undergoing PC consultation. Sex, residence, disease status, and admission purpose were factors associated with the likelihood of PC consultation, and there has been an increasing trend in the frequency of consultations in recent cases. A higher proportion of patients who received PC completed advance statements and life-sustaining treatment documents. Patients who received PC had lower rates of aggressive EOL care, including chemotherapy and intensive care unit admission, than those who did not receive PC. Notably, PC reduced the number of blood transfusions.

CONCLUSION

Tertiary PC aims to reduce aggressive EOL care through patient-centered goal-of-care discussions. Therefore, there is an imperative need for concerted efforts toward seamless integration of PC.

Influence of Income, Education, and Medicaid Expansion on Palliative Care in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Using the National Cancer Database

Palliative care is integral to symptom management, and we examined its relationship with income, education, and Medicaid expansion in acute myeloid leukemia. This was a retrospective cross-sectional study using the National Cancer Database that included patients with acute myeloid and monocytic leukemias > 18 years of age treated at Commission on Cancer facilities from 2004 to 2016. Univariate and multivariate models were adjusted for demographic variables and facility characteristics. There were 124,988 patients, but only 106,495 had palliative care data, and of this 4111 (3%) received palliative care. The most educated had the highest odds of receiving palliative care (odds ratio, OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08-1.41; P = 0.002), but the highest income bracket (≥ $63,333) had the lowest odds (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.93; P = 0.003). Residence in states with Medicaid expansion (January 2014 onward) had greater palliative care utilization. Palliative care use was associated with higher education but underutilized with higher incomes. Increased access with Medicaid expansion suggests the importance of public insurance.

"A strong reason why I enjoy coming to work": Clinician acceptability of a palliative and supportive care intervention (PACT) for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia and their care partners

INTRODUCTION

Studies about clinician acceptability of integrative palliative care interventions in the inpatient and outpatient cancer settings are limited. In this study, we examined clinician acceptability of a NIH-funded interdisciplinary PAlliative and Supportive Care inTervention (PACT) for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and their care partners that transcends both inpatient and outpatient settings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data was collected using semi-structured interviews with clinicians who were directly involved in PACT. The domains of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability were used to guide the qualitative analysis.

RESULTS

The clinicians consisted of occupational therapists (37%), physical therapists (25%), registered nurses (25%), and a clinical rehabilitation manager (13%). Five themes were identified in the thematic analysis: (1) Emotions and affect towards the intervention, (2) Intervention coherence and self-efficacy, (3) Barriers, burden, and opportunity costs of delivering the intervention, (4) Usefulness and effectiveness of the intervention, and (5) Recommendations to improve intervention delivery.

DISCUSSION

All clinicians found the PACT intervention highly acceptable and expressed the positive impact of the intervention on job fulfillment and satisfaction. Our findings provide evidence to inform the delivery and implementation of future large scale integrative palliative care intervention trials.

Quality outcomes for end-of-life care among people with haematological malignancies at a New Zealand cancer centre

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the end-of-life (EOL) experience and specialist palliative care use patterns of patients with haematological malignancies (HMs) in New Zealand.

AIMS

This retrospective analysis sought to examine the quality of EOL care received by people with HMs under the care of Auckland District Health Board Cancer Centre's haematology service and compare it to international data where available.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive adult patients with HMs who died on or before 31 December 2019 were identified. We collected information on EOL care quality indicators, including anticancer treatment use and acute healthcare utilisation in the last 30 days of life, place of death and rate and timing of specialist palliative care input.

RESULTS

During the final 14 and 30 days of life, 15% and 27% of the patients received anticancer therapy respectively. Within 30 days of death, 22% had multiple hospitalisations and 25% had an intensive care unit admission. Death occurred in an acute setting for 42% of the patients. Prior contact with hospital and/or community (hospice) specialist palliative care service was noted in 80% of the patients, and 67% had a history of hospice enrolment. Among them, 15% and 28% started their enrolment in their last 3 and 7 days of life respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings highlight the intensity of acute healthcare utilisation at the EOL and high rates of death in the acute setting in this population. The rate of specialist palliative care access was relatively high when compared with international experiences, with relatively fewer late referrals.

The Scope of Practice of an Embedded Pediatric Palliative Oncology Clinic

CONTEXT

Pediatric palliative care (PPC) improves end-of-life (EOL) outcomes for children with cancer. Though PPC visits are the 'intervention' in studies focused on EOL care, the content of PPC visits within pediatric oncology is poorly understood.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to understand the scope of PPC practice during visits for children with cancer and their families.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients 0-27 years with cancer seen in PPC clinic within an academic pediatric oncology center between 2017 and 2022. During each PPC visit, documenting providers chose the domains discussed or managed (goals of care, symptom management, and care coordination with respective subdomains). Data was abstracted from the electronic health record, PPC clinic database, and Cancer Registry. The differences in frequency and addressed domains were analyzed by demographics, visit type, diagnosis group, and proximity to EOL.

RESULTS

Across 351 patients, 1919 outpatient PPC visits occurred. Median domains were higher in visits <90 days vs. 91+ days from EOL (12.0 vs. 10.0; p < 0.0001); pain and hospice collaboration were particularly discussed closer to EOL. Psychological symptoms like anxiety (30.7% vs. 21.1%; p < 0.001) were addressed more in follow-ups than initial visits. Compared to brain tumor or leukemia/lymphoma visits, solid tumor visits addressed more symptom management subdomains, especially pain (79.9%; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The scope of PPC practice is broad and varied. Each visit encompasses many subdomains, the most common being care coordination with oncology teams and helping patients/families cope with the disease. More domains were addressed in solid tumor visits and near EOL.

Bleeding Risk of Acupuncture for Patients with Hematological Malignancies Accompanying Thrombocytopenia: A Retrospective Chart Review

Introduction: In recent years, it has been reported that acupuncture is useful for alleviating the symptoms of patients with hematological malignancies, but the safety of acupuncture for such patients has not been established. This study evaluated the risk of bleeding from acupuncture in patients with hematological malignancies accompanying thrombocytopenia. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective investigation of the medical records of patients with hematological malignancies who received acupuncture during hospitalization at the hematology department of a single medical center in Japan. The bleeding risk at the acupuncture site was evaluated in the following four groups according to the platelet count measured on the day of acupuncture treatment: (1) <20 × 103/μL, (2) 20-49 × 103/μL, (3) 50-99 × 103/μL, and (4) 100 × 103/μL or more. Occurrence of grade 2 or higher bleeding according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, within 24 h from the acupuncture session or before the next session was defined as an event, and the risk of occurrence of bleeding was examined in each group. Results: Of 2423 acupuncture sessions conducted on 51 patients with hematological malignancies, 815 were included in the analysis. Ninety sessions were performed in the <20 × 103/μL platelet count group, 161 in the 20-49 × 103/μL group, 133 in the 50-99 × 103/μL group, and 431 in the 100 × 103/μL or more group. No bleeding event according to the authors' definition occurred in any of these groups. Conclusions: This study is the largest to date to assess the bleeding risk of acupuncture in patients with hematological malignancies accompanying thrombocytopenia. The authors considered that acupuncture could be safely performed without causing serious bleeding for patients with hematological malignancies accompanying thrombocytopenia.

Innovations for the integration of palliative care for hematologic malignancies

Specialist palliative care provides additional support to facilitate living well with a serious illness, like cancer, even while pursuing disease-directed therapy. For patients with hematologic malignancies, integrated specialist palliative care improves symptom burden, mood, and quality of life, with benefits even extending to caregivers. Despite this, patients with hematologic malignancies continue to have significant unmet palliative care needs and typically access palliative care late in their disease trajectories, if at all. In this paper, we will define specialist palliative care and review its benefits for patients with hematologic malignancies. We will discuss the unmet palliative care needs of this patient population and the barriers to integrating palliative care and oncologic care. Finally, we will explore innovations and areas of future research to enhance and optimize palliative care integration into usual cancer care treatment for patients with hematologic malignancies. We will explore the importance of ongoing clinical trials that are examining the correct "dose" of palliative care; the use of technology and telehealth; and the use of novel treatments for this patient population. Together, we will consider innovative avenues to provide palliative care to patients with hematologic malignancies and their caregivers.

Factors associated with palliative care symptoms in cancer patients in Palestine

Palliative care is critical to redundancy in cancer patients seeking to improve their quality of life. Evaluation should be incorporated into clinical practice routines at all stages of cancer. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) was used to rate the intensity of ten symptom evaluations designed and validated for cancer patients in various languages and cultures. Therefore, the study aims to assess the symptoms reported using ESAS scores to identify patients who would benefit from palliative care that can improve the integration of palliative care into standard cancer care at An-Najah National University Hospital (NNUH). A cross-sectional study was selected for 271 cancer patients using a convenience sampling method at NNUH. Demographic, clinical, and lifestyle characteristics are described. Furthermore, patients' moderate to severe symptoms (score > 4) were obtained using ESAS-R. The survey consisted of 271 patients, with a response rate of 95%. The average age of the patients was 47 ± 17.7 years, ranging from 18 to 84 years. The male-to-female ratio was approximately 1:1, 59.4% of the patients were outpatients, and 153 (56.5%) had hematologic malignancies. Fatigue (62.7%) and drowsiness (61.6%) were the most common moderate to severe symptoms in ESAS. Furthermore, pain (54.6%), nausea (40.2%), lack of appetite (55.0%), shortness of breath (28.5%), depression (40.6%), anxiety (47.2%) and poor well-being (56.5%) were reported. In conclusion, fatigue and drowsiness were the most reported symptoms according to the ESAS scale among cancer patients, while moderate to severe symptoms were reported in cancer patients using the ESAS. The ESAS is a functional tool for assessing cancer patients' symptoms and establishing palliative care services.

Knowledge, feelings, and willingness to use palliative care in cancer patients with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors: a prospective, cross-sectional study in a comprehensive cancer center in Germany

PURPOSE

Patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) receive palliative care (PC) less often and later than patients with solid tumors (ST). Patients' lack of knowledge about PC and negative feelings about PC are barriers to their willingness to use PC. Is there a difference between patients with HM and ST in their knowledge and willingness to use PC?

METHODS

Two hundred ten patients (85 HM, 125 ST) from an oncology day clinic at a university hospital participated in this cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey.

RESULTS

Patients with HM and ST had high knowledge and mainly positive feelings about PC. More than half of the patients answered that they would feel reassured by the use of PC, and one-third would feel anxious or hopeless. The majority of patients (58.3%) were willing to use PC. There are no significant differences between patients with HM and ST. In multiple regression analysis, perceived chance of cure and feelings of reassurance and anxiety are associated with willingness to use PC, but not with the HM/ST disease group. More than half (53.9%) of the participants would like the treating physician to choose the timing of a discussion about PC.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows a high level of knowledge and relatively positive feelings of patients about PC, with no differences between patients with HM or ST. They expect their treating physician to initiate communication about PC. Communication should include the patient's feelings about PC and their chances of a cure.

Advancing Palliative Care Integration in Hematology: Building Upon Existing Evidence

OPINION STATEMENT

Patients with hematologic malignancies and their families are among the most distressed of all those with cancer. Despite high palliative care-related needs, the integration of palliative care in hematology is underdeveloped. The evidence is clear that the way forward includes standard-of-care PC integration into routine hematologic malignancy care to improve patient and caregiver outcomes. As the PC needs for patients with blood cancer vary significantly by disease, a disease-specific PC integration strategy is needed, allowing for serious illness care interventions to be individualized to the specific needs of each patient and situation.

Differences in palliative opportunities across diagnosis groups in children with cancer

BACKGROUND

Childhood cancer causes significant physical and emotional stress. Patients and families benefit from palliative care (PC) to reduce symptom burden, improve quality of life, and enhance family-centered care. We evaluated palliative opportunities across leukemia/lymphoma (LL), solid tumors (ST), and central nervous system (CNS) tumor groups.

PROCEDURE

A priori, nine palliative opportunities were defined: disease progression/relapse, hematopoietic stem cell transplant, phase 1 trial enrollment, admission for severe symptoms, social concerns or end-of-life (EOL) care, intensive care admission, do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status, and hospice enrollment. A single-center retrospective review was completed on 0-18-year olds with cancer who died from January 1, 2012 to November 30, 2017. Demographic, disease, and treatment data were collected. Descriptive statistics were performed. Opportunities were evaluated from diagnosis to death and across disease groups.

RESULTS

Included patients (n = 296) had LL (n = 87), ST (n = 114), or CNS tumors (n = 95). Palliative opportunities were more frequent in patients with ST (median 8) and CNS tumors (median 7) versus LL (median 5, p = .0005). While patients with ST had more progression/relapse opportunities (p < .0001), patients with CNS tumors had more EOL opportunities (p < .0001), earlier PC consultation, DNR status, and hospice enrollment. Palliative opportunities increased toward the EOL in all diseases (p < .0001). PC was consulted in 108 (36%) patients: LL (48%), ST (30%), and CNS (34%, p = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

All children with cancer incur many events warranting PC support. Patients with ST and CNS tumors had more palliative opportunities than LL, yet received less subspecialty PC. Understanding palliative opportunities within each disease group can guide PC utilization to ease patient and family stress.

Early integration of palliative care for patients with haematological malignancies

Early palliative care (EPC) significantly improves quality of life, symptoms, and satisfaction with care for patients with advanced cancer. International organizations have recognized and promoted the role of palliative care as a distinct specialty, advocating its involvement throughout the cancer trajectory. Although patients with haematologic malignancies (HMs) have a comparable symptom burden to patients with solid tumours, they face multiple barriers to EPC integration. In this review, we discuss these barriers, present updated evidence from clinical trials of EPC in HMs and propose models to support EPC integration into care for patients with HMs.

Palliative care for patients with hematologic malignancies: are we meeting patients' needs early enough?

INTRODUCTION

Palliative care for patients with cancer, and more recently for patients with hematologic malignancies, has increasingly been shown to be beneficial, with mounting evidence pointing to its vast benefits both to patients and caregivers. Despite this, there is a significant gap in integration of palliative care into usual cancer care for patients with hematologic malignancies.

AREAS COVERED

In this paper, we will define palliative care and discuss its benefits broadly for patients with hematologic malignancies. We will then discuss the late access to palliative care, the unmet needs in this patient population, and some of the barriers to access to palliative care.

EXPERT OPINION

With all this information and the clear benefit for early integrated palliative care for patients with hematologic malignancies, there is a need for novel models of palliative care and cancer care integration. Given the various needs of patients with different hematologic malignancies, we propose how palliative care can meet the unique needs of patients with hematologic malignancy by disease subtype.

Timing of referral to outpatient palliative care for patients with haematologic malignancies

Outpatient palliative-care facilitates timely supportive-care access; however, there is a paucity of studies on the timing of referral in the outpatient setting for patients with haematologic malignancy. We examined the trend in timing of outpatient palliative-care referrals over a 10-year period in patients with haematologic malignancies at our comprehensive cancer centre. We included consecutive patients with a diagnosis of haematologic malignancy who were seen at our outpatient palliative-care clinic between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019. We collected data on patient characteristics, symptom burden and supportive-care interventions at outpatient palliative-care consultation. The primary outcome was time from outpatient palliative-care consultation to death or last follow-up. In all, 384 patients were referred by leukaemia (n = 143), lymphoma (n = 213), and stem cell transplant (n = 28) services. The median time from outpatient palliative-care referral to death was 3.4 years (IQR 2.4-5.3) with a significant increase in both the number of referrals per year (p = 0.047) and the timing of referral between 2010 and 2019 (p = 0.001). Patients with haematologic malignancies were referred in a timely fashion to our outpatient palliative-care clinic, with earlier and greater numbers of referrals over time.

Early integration of palliative care in hematology: an urgency for patients, a challenge for physicians

Introduction

Objective and method

Results and conclusion

Intensive end-of-life care in acute leukemia from a French national hospital database study (2017–2018)

Background

A better understanding of how the care of acute leukemia patients is managed in the last days of life would help clinicians and health policy makers improve the quality of end-of-life care. This study aimed: (i) to describe the intensity of end-of-life care among patients with acute leukemia who died in the hospital (2017–2018) and (ii) to identify the factors associated with the intensity of end-of-life care.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of decedents based on data from the French national hospital database. The population included patients with acute leukemia who died during a hospital stay between 2017 and 2018, in a palliative care situation (code palliative care Z515 and-or being in a inpatient palliative care support bed during the 3 months preceding death). Intensity end-of-life care was assessed using two endpoints: High intensive end-of-life (HI-EOL: intensive care unit admission, emergency department admission, acute care hospitalization, intravenous chemotherapy) care and most invasive end-of-life (MI-EOL: orotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, artificial feeding, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, gastrostomy, or hemodialysis) care.

Results

A total of 3658 patients were included. In the last 30 days of life, 63 and 13% of the patients received HI-EOL care and MI-EOL care, respectively. Being younger, having comorbidities, being care managed in a specialized hospital, and a lower time in a palliative care structure were the main factors associated with HI-EOL.

Conclusions

A large majority of French young adults and adults with acute leukemia who died at the hospital experienced high intensity end-of-life care. Identification of factors associated with high-intensity end-of-life care, such as the access to palliative care and specialized cancer center care management, may help to improve end-of-life care quality.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-022-00937-0.

Risk factors for delirium in adult patients receiving specialist palliative care: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Delirium is common and distressing for patients receiving palliative care. Interventions targetting modifiable risk factors in other settings have been shown to prevent delirium. Research on delirium risk factors in palliative care can inform context-specific risk-reduction interventions.

AIM

To investigate risk factors for the development of delirium in adult patients receiving specialist palliative care.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42019157168).

DATA SOURCES

CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, MEDLINE and PsycINFO (1980-2021) were searched for studies reporting the association of risk factors with delirium incidence/prevalence for patients receiving specialist palliative care. Study risk of bias and certainty of evidence for each risk factor were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 28 included studies, 16 conducted only univariate analysis, 12 conducted multivariate analysis. The evidence for delirium risk factors was limited with low to very low certainty.

POTENTIALLY MODIFIABLE RISK FACTORS

Opioids and lower performance status were positively associated with delirium, with some evidence also for dehydration, hypoxaemia, sleep disturbance, liver dysfunction and infection. Mixed, or very limited, evidence was found for some factors targetted in multicomponent prevention interventions: sensory impairments, mobility, catheter use, polypharmacy (single study), pain, constipation, nutrition (mixed evidence).

NON-MODIFIABLE RISK FACTORS

Older age, male sex, primary brain cancer or brain metastases and lung cancer were positively associated with delirium.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings may usefully inform interventions to reduce delirium risk but more high quality prospective cohort studies are required to enable greater certainty about associations of different risk factors with delirium during specialist palliative care.

Current management of cancer pain in Italy: Expert opinion paper

Introduction

Chronic pain and breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) have a high prevalence in all cancer types and cancer stages, combined with a significant physical, psychological, and economic burden. Despite efforts to improve appropriate management of cancer pain, a poor assessment and guilty undertreatment are still reported in many countries. The purpose of this expert opinion paper is to contribute to reduce and clarify these issues with a multidisciplinary perspective in order to share virtuous paths of care.

Methods

Common questions about cancer pain assessment and treatment were submitted to a multidisciplinary pool of Italian clinicians and the results were subsequently discussed and compared with the findings of the published literature.

Conclusion

Despite a dedicated law in Italy and effective treatments available, a low percentage of specialists assess pain and BTcP, defining the intensity with validated tools. Moreover, in accordance with the findings of the literature in many countries, the undertreatment of cancer pain is still prevalent. A multidisciplinary approach, more training programs for clinicians, personalised therapy drug formulations, and virtuous care pathways will be essential to improve cancer pain management.

Perceptions of Hematology Among Palliative Care Physicians: Results of a Nationwide Survey

CONTEXT

Palliative care integration for patients with hematologic diseases has lagged behind solid-organ malignancies. Previous work has characterized hematologist perspectives, but less is known about palliative care physician views of this phenomenon.

OBJECTIVES

To examine palliative care physician attitudes and beliefs regarding hematologic diseases, patient care, and collaboration.

METHODS

A 44-item survey containing Likert and free-response items was mailed to 1000 AAHPM physician members. Sections explored respondent comfort with specific diagnoses, palliative care integration, relationships with hematologists, and hematology-specific patient care. Logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to compare parallel Likert responses. Free responses were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The response rate was 55.5%. Respondents reported comfort managing symptoms in leukemia (84.0%), lymphoma (92.1%), multiple myeloma (92.9%), and following hematopoietic stem cell transplant (51.6%). Fewer expressed comfort with understanding disease trajectory (64.9%, 75.7%, 78.5%, and 35.4%) and discussing prognosis (71.0%, 82.6%, 81.6%, and 40.6%). 97.6% of respondents disagreed that palliative care and hematology are incompatible. 50.6% felt that palliative care physicians' limited hematology-specific knowledge hinders collaboration. 89.4% felt that relapse should trigger referral. 80.0% felt that hospice referrals occurred late. In exploring perceptions of hematology-palliative care relationships, three themes were identified: misperceptions of palliative care, desire for integration, and lacking a shared model of understanding.

CONCLUSION

These data inform efforts to integrate palliative care into hematologic care at large, echoing previous studies of hematologist perspectives. Palliative care physicians express enthusiasm for caring for these patients, desire for improved understanding of palliative care, and ongoing opportunities to improve hematology-specific knowledge and skills.

Prospective observational study of palliative care in hematological malignancies: Report of one year of practice

INTRODUCTION

Palliative care is an approach that improves the quality of life of patients with advanced disease.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the process of palliative care in patients with hematologic malignancies.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, we included patients with hematologic malignancies who received palliative care over a 12 month period from June 1, 2019, to May 31, 2020 at the day care hospital of the hematology department in University Hospital of Sfax, Tunisia. Blood transfusion was used to relieve symptoms of anemia and bleeding.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were included. The median age was 68 years. Forty-three percent of patients were diagnosed with acute leukemia and 41.8% with myelodysplastic syndrome. Red cell and platelet transfusions were indicated in 94.5% and 36.3% of cases respectively. Patients reported improvement after blood transfusion in 50% of cases. Twenty-five transfusion reactions (45%) were noted. Fever was noted in 33 patients (60%), with documented sites of infection in 84.8% of them. Pulmonary infection was frequently noted (50%). Antimicrobial treatment was prescribed in all febrile cases. Pain was reported in 22 patients and in 77.5% of these cases, it was nociceptive. Patients who received analgesics showed clinical improvement in pain in 81% of cases. Anorexia with malnutrition was reported in 23% of cases which was treated with enteral nutrition in 75% of cases. Sleep disturbance (20 patients), anxiety (7 patients), and depression (4 patients) were mentioned respectively.

CONCLUSION

Palliative care in hematology should be a multidisciplinary care approach with a global management of the various physical, psychological and sociological complications.

Utility of Palliative Prognostic Index in Predicting Survival Outcomes in Patients With Hematological Malignancies in the Acute Ward Setting

BACKGROUND

The palliative prognostic index (PPI) predicts the life expectancy of patients with terminally ill cancer in hospice settings. This study aimed to evaluate PPI as a prognostic tool for predicting the life expectancy of patients with hematological malignancies admitted to the acute ward.

METHODS

A total of 308 patients with hematological malignancies admitted to the hematological ward at a medical center between January 2016 and December 2017 were consecutively enrolled. PPI was scored within 24 h of admission. All patients were categorized into 3 groups by PPI for comparing survival and in-hospital mortality rates.

RESULTS

The median survival times were 38.4, 3.6, and 1.1 months for patients with good, intermediate, and poor prognostic group, respectively. The hazard ratio was 2.31 (95% CI 1.59-3.35, p < 0.001) when comparing the intermediate and good prognosis groups, and 3.90 (95% CI 2.52-6.03, p < 0.001) when comparing the poor and good prognosis groups. Forty-five (14.6%) patients died at discharge; in-hospital mortality rates among the good, intermediate, and poor prognostic groups were 9.0%, 23.4%, and 46.4%, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio for in-hospital mortality was 1.96 (95% CI, 0.80-4.82, p = 0.14) and 5.25 (95% CI, 2.01-13.7, p < 0.001) for patients in the intermediate and poor prognostic groups compared to those in the good prognostic group.

CONCLUSION

PPI is an accurate prognostic tool for predicting survival times and in-hospital mortality rates in patients with hematological malignancies in an acute ward setting. PPI could assist clinicians in discussing end-of-life issues and in referring patients with hematological malignancies to palliative care.

What is known about palliative care in adult patients with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT)?

Patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) are given a real chance of cure, but at the same time are confronted with a considerable risk of mortality and of severe long-term impediments. This narrative, non-systematic literature review aims to describe the supportive and palliative care needs of allo-SCT recipients, including long-term survivors or those relapsing or dying after transplantation. It also evaluates the feasibility and effectivity of integrating palliative care early in transplant procedures. In this appraisal of available literature, the main findings relate to symptoms like fatigue and psychological distress, which appear to be very common in the whole allo-SCT trajectory and might even persist many years post-transplantation. Chronic GvHD has a major negative impact on quality of life. Overall, there is a paucity of research on further issues in the context of allo-SCT, like the distress related to the frequently unpredictable post-transplant trajectory and prognosis, as well as the end-of-life phase. First randomized controlled results support the effectiveness of early integration of specialized palliative care expertise into transplant algorithms. Barriers to this implementation are discussed.

Evaluating palliative opportunities in pediatric patients with leukemia and lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Despite favorable prognoses, pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies experience significant challenges that may lead to diminished quality of life or family stress. They are less likely to receive subspecialty palliative care (PC) consultation and often undergo intensive end-of-life (EOL) care. We examined "palliative opportunities," or events when the integration of PC would have the greatest impact, present during a patient's hematologic malignancy course and relevant associations.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review was conducted on patients aged 0-18 years with a hematologic malignancy who died between 1/1/12 and 11/30/17. Demographic, disease, and treatment data were collected. A priori, nine palliative opportunity categories were defined. Descriptive statistics were performed. Palliative opportunities were evaluated over temporal quartiles from diagnosis to death. Timing and rationale of pediatric PC consultation were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 92) had a median of 5.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 6.0) palliative opportunities, incurring 522 total opportunities, increasing toward the EOL. Number and type of opportunities did not differ by demographics. PC consultation was most common in patients with lymphoid leukemia (50.9%, 28/55) and myeloid leukemia (48.5%, 16/33) versus lymphoma (0%, 0/4, p = 0.14). Forty-four of ninety-two patients (47.8%) received PC consultation a median of 1.8 months (IQR 4.1) prior to death. Receipt of PC was associated with transplant status (p = 0.0018) and a higher number of prior palliative opportunities (p = 0.0005); 70.3% (367/522) of palliative opportunities occurred without PC.

CONCLUSION

Patients with hematologic malignancies experience many opportunities warranting PC support. Identifying opportunities for ideal timing of PC involvement may benefit patients with hematologic cancers and their caregivers.

Racial Disparities in End-of-Life Care Between Black and White Adults With Metastatic Cancer

CONTEXT

The comfort of patients with cancer near the end of life (EOL) is often undermined by unnecessary and burdensome treatments. There is a need for more research examining racial disparities in EOL care, especially in regions with a history of racial discrimination.

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether black adults received more burdensome EOL care than white adults in a population-based data set of cancer decedents in Louisiana, a state with a history of slavery and long-standing racial disparities.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of EOL care from the Research Action for Health Network (REACHnet), a regional Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute-funded database. The sample consisted of 875 white and 415 black patients with metastatic cancer who died in Louisiana from 2011 to 2017. We used logistic regression to examine whether race was associated with five indicators of burdensome care in the last 30 days of life: chemotherapy use, inpatient hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, emergency department (ED) admission, and mechanical ventilation.

RESULTS

Most patients (85.0%) received at least one indicator of burdensome care: hospitalization (76.5%), intensive care unit admission (44.1%), chemotherapy (29.1%), mechanical ventilation (23.0%), and ED admission (18.3%). Odds ratios (ORs) indicated that black individuals were more likely than white individuals to be hospitalized (OR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.21-2.28; P = 0.002) or admitted to the ED (OR = 1.57; 95% CI = 1.16-2.13; P = 0.004) during their last month of life.

CONCLUSION

Findings have implications for informing health care decision making near the EOL for patients, families, and clinicians, especially in regions with a history of racial discrimination and disparities.

Frequency and Characteristics of First-Time Palliative Care Referrals During the Last Day of Life

CONTEXT

Palliative care referrals (PCRs) improve symptom management, provide psychosocial and spiritual support, clarify goals of care, and facilitate discharge planning. However, very late PCR can result in increased clinician distress and prevent patients and families from benefiting from the full spectrum of interdisciplinary care.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the frequency and predictors of PCR within 24 hours of death.

METHODS

Consecutive first-time inpatient PCR from September 1, 2013 to August 31, 2017 was identified to determine the frequency and predictors of referrals within 24 hours of death. We compared the clinical characteristics with a random sample of patients discharged alive or died more than 24 hours after first-time PCR as a control, stratified by year of consult in a 1:1 ratio.

RESULTS

Of 7322 first-time PCRs, 154 (2%) died within 24 hours of referral. These patients were older (P = 0.003) and had higher scores for depression (P = 0.0009), drowsiness (P = 0.02), and shortness of breath (P = 0.008) compared with a random sample of 153 patients discharged alive or died more than 24 hours after first-time PCR. Patients who received a PCR within 24 hours of death were more likely than the control group to have Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 4 (95% vs. 25%, P < 0.0001), delirium (89% vs. 17%, P < 0.0001), do-not-resuscitate code status (81% vs. 18%, P < 0.0001), and hematologic malignancies (39% vs. 16%, P < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, depression (odds ratio [OR] 1.4; P = 0.005), do-not-resuscitate code status (OR 9.1; P = 0.003), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 4 (OR 9.8; P = 0.003) were independently associated with first-time PCR within 24 hours of death.

CONCLUSION

Although only a small proportion of first-time PCR occurred in the last 24 hours of life, the patients had a significant amount of distress, indicating a missed opportunity for timely palliative care intervention. These sentinel events call for specific guidelines to better support patients, families, and clinicians during this difficult time. Further research is needed to understand how to minimize very late PCR.

Haematological cancer versus solid tumour end-of-life care: a longitudinal data analysis

OBJECTIVE

To explore differences in end-of-life healthcare utilisation and medication costs between patients with haematological malignancies and patients with solid tumours.

METHODS

Data on deceased patients with cancer were selected from the sample cohort data of health insurance claims from 2008 to 2015 in South Korea. They were categorised into two groups: patients with haematological malignancies and patients with solid tumours. Longitudinal data comprised the patient-month unit and aggregated healthcare utilisation and medication cost for 1 year before death. Healthcare utilisation included emergency room visits, hospitalisation and blood transfusions. Medication costs were subdivided into anticancer drugs, antibiotics, opioids, sedatives and blood preparation. Generalised linear mixed models were used to evaluate differences between the two groups and time trends.

RESULTS

Of the 8719 deceased patients with cancer, 349 died from haematological malignancies. Compared with solid tumours, patients with haematological malignancies were more likely to visit the emergency room (OR=1.36, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.69) and receive blood transfusions (OR=5.44, 95% CI 4.29 to 6.90). The length of hospitalisation of patients was significantly different (difference=2.49 days, 95% CI 1.75 to 3.22). Medication costs, except for anticancer treatment, increased as death approached. The costs of antibiotics and blood preparations were higher in patients with haematological malignancies than in those with solid tumours: 3.24 (95% CI 2.14 to 4.90) and 4.10 (95% CI 2.77 to 6.09) times higher, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with haematological malignancies are at a higher risk for aggressive care and economic burden at the end of life compared with those with solid tumours. Detailed attention is required when developing care plans for end-of-life care of haematological patients.

Primary Palliative Care for Patients with Advanced Hematologic Malignancies: A Pilot Trial of the SHARE Intervention

Objective: Develop and pilot-test a nurse-led primary palliative care intervention for patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. Background: Nurse-led primary palliative care interventions may improve outpatient palliative care provision for patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. Methods: This two-phase, single-arm pilot study involved patients with recurrent or resistant hematologic malignancies, their caregivers, and oncology clinicians at two US-based urban, university-affiliated oncology clinics. Measurements included feasibility (enrollment rates, intervention fidelity, and outcome assessment rates) and acceptability (patient, caregiver, and clinician surveys). Results: In Phase 1 we developed and implemented an oncology nurse-led primary palliative care intervention for patients with recurrent or resistant hematologic malignancies and their caregivers. In Phase 2, we tested feasibility and acceptability. Twenty-six patient participants enrolled. Consent-to-approach rate was 78% and enrolled-to-consent rate was 84%. All enrolled participants received the intervention per protocol. Sixty-nine percent of patients and 100% of caregivers reported that the intervention helped them better understand the patient's illness and cope. Seventy-five percent of oncologists reported that the intervention improved their patients' quality of care, and 25% reported that it helped them take better care of patients. Conclusions: Although our pilot of oncology nurse-led primary palliative care for patients with advanced hematologic malignancies met some of its secondary feasibility endpoints, it did not meet its primary feasibility endpoint (enrollment) and acceptability was mixed. Protecting nursing staff time, increasing patient and clinician involvement in intervention development, and identifying patients with highest supportive needs may improve feasibility and acceptability of future primary palliative care in hematologic malignancy trials.

Defining palliative opportunities in pediatric patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Pediatric patients with sarcomas experience significant morbidity and compromised quality of life throughout their course. These times could be viewed as opportunities for increased subspecialty palliative care (PC). Systematically defining opportunities for additional PC support has not occurred in pediatric oncology. The frequency, timing, and associated factors for palliative opportunities in pediatric patients with sarcomas are unknown.

METHODS

A priori, nine palliative opportunities were defined (disease progression or relapse, admission for symptoms, social concerns or end-of-life, intensive care or bone marrow transplant admission, phase 1 trial or hospice enrollment, do-not-resuscitate status). A single-center retrospective review was conducted on patients aged 0-18 years with bone/soft tissue sarcomas who died from January 1, 2012 to November 30, 2017. Demographic, disease, and treatment data were collected. Descriptive statistics were performed. Opportunities were evaluated over quartiles from diagnosis to death.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 60) had a mean of nine (SD = 4) palliative opportunities with the majority occurring in the last quartile of the disease course. Number and type of opportunities did not differ by demographics or diagnosis. Eighteen patients (30%) received PC consultation a median of 2.2 months (interquartile range [IQR] 11.5) prior to death. Consultation was unrelated to diagnosis or total opportunities.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with sarcomas incur repeated events warranting subspecialty PC, which increase toward the end-of-life. Increased PC utilization may help decrease suffering and bolster family coping during these episodes. Additional work should further refine if opportunities differ across cancers, and how to incorporate this framework into clinical oncology care to prevent missed opportunities for PC.

Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies

Hematologic malignancies are a heterogeneous group of diseases with unique illness trajectories, treatment paradigms, and potential for curability, which affect patients' palliative and end-of-life care needs. Patients with hematologic malignancies endure immense physical and psychological symptoms because of both their illness and often intensive treatments that result in significant toxicities and adverse effects. Compared with patients with solid tumors, those with hematologic malignancies also experience high rates of hospitalizations, intensive care unit admissions, and in-hospital deaths and low rates of referral to hospice as well as shorter hospice length of stay. In addition, patients with hematologic malignancies harbor substantial misperceptions about treatment risks and benefits and frequently overestimate their prognosis. Even survivors of hematologic malignancies struggle with late effects, post-treatment complications, and post-traumatic stress symptoms that can significantly diminish their quality of life. Despite these substantial unmet needs, specialty palliative care services are infrequently consulted for the care of patients with hematologic malignancies. Several illness-specific, cultural, and system-based barriers to palliative care integration and optimal end-of-life care exist in this population. However, recent evidence has demonstrated the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of integrating palliative care to improve the quality of life and care of patients with hematologic malignancies and their caregivers. More research is needed to develop and test population-specific palliative and supportive care interventions to ensure generalizability and to define a sustainable clinical delivery model. Future work also should focus on identifying moderators and mediators of the effect of integrated palliative care models on patient-reported outcomes and on developing less resource-intensive integrated care models to address the diverse needs of this population.

Psychological Interventions for Patients With Advanced Disease: Implications for Oncology and Palliative Care

A growing body of research demonstrates the feasibility and efficacy of psychological interventions for adult patients with advanced cancer. Findings from quantitative studies of psychotherapeutic interventions with primary psychological outcomes for such patients are reviewed here and recommendations for best practice are made. We consider these interventions according to three broad phases in which they are most commonly applied: soon after diagnosis of advanced cancer, when living with the disease, and at or near the end of life. Cumulative evidence from well-designed studies demonstrates the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for patients with advanced disease to relieve and prevent depression, anxiety, and distress related to dying and death, as well as to enhance the sense of meaning and preparation for end of life. Individual and couple-based interventions have been proven to be most feasible, and the development and use of tailored and validated measures has enhanced the rigor of research and clinical care. Palliative care nurses and physicians can be trained to deliver many such interventions, but a core of psychosocial clinicians, including social workers, psychologists, and psychiatrists, is usually required to train other health professionals in their delivery and to ensure their quality. Few of the interventions for which there is evidence of effectiveness have been routinely incorporated into oncology or palliative care. Advocacy on the basis of this evidence is required to build psychosocial resources in cancer treatment settings and to ensure that psychological care receives the same priority as other aspects of palliative care in oncology.

Integration of Palliative Care into Acute Myeloid Leukemia Care

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of the past, present, and future of the integration of palliative care services for patients with hematologic malignancies, such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

DATA SOURCES

Published literature as indexed in Medline, relevant guideline documents, textbooks, and clinical experience.

CONCLUSION

Patients with acute leukemias have substantial palliative care needs that often go unmet with standard oncology care. Evidence shows that the early integration of specialist palliative care into standard oncology care improves patient-centered outcomes among those with advanced solid tumors. Emerging evidence supports similar benefits among hospitalized patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing stem cell transplantation, and additional trials are underway to further test palliative care interventions in patients with AML.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

By better understanding the palliative care needs of patients with AML and the evidence of integration with standard oncologic care, patients with leukemias may be more likely to receive early integrated palliative care.

Palliative Care for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies in a Low-Middle Income Country: Prevalence of Symptoms and the Need for Improving Quality of Attention at the End of Life

BACKGROUND

Palliative care (PC) for patients with malignant hematological diseases is scarcely documented, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to document PC provided to patients with hematologic malignancies.

METHODS

Bidirectional study conducted from July 2016 to June 2019 at the hematology and palliative care departments at a reference center in Northeast Mexico for low-income open population uninsured patients. Clinical records and electronic files of patients with malignant hematological diseases of both sexes and all ages attending an academic hematology center were reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS version 22 program. Acute and chronic leukemias, multiple myeloma, Hodgkin lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and others were included.

RESULTS

Five-hundred ten patients were studied, of which 148 (29%) died. Eighty-one (15.88%) patients including 31 (20.9%) who died received PC. Median age at palliative diagnosis was 42 (2-91) years. The most common symptom was pain (69.7%). The most frequent reason for palliative referral was treatment-refractory disease (39%). During the last week of life, 19 (95%) of 20 patients had blood sampling; 17 (85%) received antibiotics; 16 (80%) had a urinalysis performed; 16 (80%) received analgesia, including paracetamol (11, 35.5%) and buprenorphine (7, 22.6%); 10 (50%) received blood products; 9 (45%) were intubated; and central venous catheters were inserted in 5 (25%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative care was provided to a minority of patients with hematologic malignancies and considerable improvement is required in its timely use and extension.

The incidence and prevalence of delirium across palliative care settings: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Delirium is a common and distressing neurocognitive condition that frequently affects patients in palliative care settings and is often underdiagnosed.

AIM

Expanding on a 2013 review, this systematic review examines the incidence and prevalence of delirium across all palliative care settings.

DESIGN

This systematic review and meta-analyses were prospectively registered with PROSPERO and included a risk of bias assessment.

DATA SOURCES

Five electronic databases were examined for primary research studies published between 1980 and 2018. Studies on adult, non-intensive care and non-postoperative populations, either receiving or eligible to receive palliative care, underwent dual reviewer screening and data extraction. Studies using standardized delirium diagnostic criteria or valid assessment tools were included.

RESULTS

Following initial screening of 2596 records, and full-text screening of 153 papers, 42 studies were included. Patient populations diagnosed with predominantly cancer (n = 34) and mixed diagnoses (n = 8) were represented. Delirium point prevalence estimates were 4%-12% in the community, 9%-57% across hospital palliative care consultative services, and 6%-74% in inpatient palliative care units. The prevalence of delirium prior to death across all palliative care settings (n = 8) was 42%-88%. Pooled point prevalence on admission to inpatient palliative care units was 35% (confidence interval = 0.29-0.40, n = 14). Only one study had an overall low risk of bias. Varying delirium screening and diagnostic practices were used.

CONCLUSION

Delirium is prevalent across all palliative care settings, with one-third of patients delirious at the time of admission to inpatient palliative care. Study heterogeneity limits meta-analyses and highlights the future need for rigorous studies.

Anticancer Therapy at the End of Life: Lessons From a Community Cancer Institute

INTRODUCTION

Studies have shown aggressive cancer care at the end of life is associated with decreased quality of life, decreased median survival, and increased cost of care. This study describes the patients most likely to receive systemic anticancer therapy at the end of life in a community cancer institute.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 201 patients who received systemic anticancer therapy in our institution and died between July 2016 and April 2017. Data collected included primary malignancy, hospice enrollment, healthcare utilization, Oncology Care Model (OCM) enrollment, and clinical assessments at last office visit prior to a treatment decision before death. We defined our outcome variable as the receipt of anticancer treatment in the last 14 days of a patient's life. We evaluated 20 clinical exposure variables with respect to the outcome classes. Risk ratios along with their associated confidence intervals and P values were calculated. Significance was determined using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure to account for multiple testing.

RESULTS

Of the 201 patients who died of cancer, 36 (17%) received anticancer therapy within the last 14 days of life. Several risk factors were significantly positively associated with receiving anticancer therapy at the end of life including hospitalization within 30 days of end of life, number of hospitalizations per patient (≥2), death in hospital, enrollment in OCM, and a diagnosis of hematologic malignancy.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate those enrolled in the OCM and those with hematologic malignancies have a higher risk of receiving anticancer therapy in the last 14 days of life. These observations highlight the need for better identifying the needs of high-risk patients and providing good quality care throughout the disease trajectory to better align end-of-life care with patients' wishes.

A Scoping Review to Map Empirical Evidence Regarding Key Domains and Questions in the Clinical Pathway of Delirium in Palliative Care

CONTEXT

Based on the clinical care pathway of delirium in palliative care (PC), a published analytic framework (AF) formulated research questions in key domains and recommended a scoping review to identify evidence gaps.

OBJECTIVES

To produce a literature map for key domains of the published AF: screening, prognosis and diagnosis, management, and the health-related outcomes.

METHODS

A standard scoping review framework was used by an interdisciplinary study team of nurse- and physician-delirium researchers, an information specialist, and review methodologists to conduct the review. Knowledge user engagement provided context in refining 19 AF questions. A peer-reviewed search strategy identified citations in Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, and CINAHL databases between 1980 and 2018. Two reviewers independently screened records for inclusion using explicit study eligibility criteria for the population, design, delirium diagnosis, and investigational intent.

RESULTS

Of 104 studies reporting empirical data and meeting eligibility criteria, most were conducted in patients with cancer (73.1%) and in inpatient PC units (52%). The most frequent study design was a one or more group, nonrandomized trial or cohort (67.3%). Evidence gaps were identified: delirium risk prediction; comparative effectiveness and harms of prevention, variability in delirium management across PC settings, advanced directive and substitute decision-maker input, and transition of care location; and estimating delirium reversibility. Future rigorous primary studies are required to address these gaps and preliminary concerns regarding the quality of extant literature.

CONCLUSION

Substantial evidence gaps exist, providing opportunities for future research regarding the assessment, prognosis, and management of delirium in PC settings.

Use and timing of referral to specialized palliative care services for people with cancer: A mortality follow-back study among treating physicians in Belgium

Background

Referral to specialized palliative care services (SPCS) occurs often late in the illness trajectory but may differ across cancer types. We examined differences between cancer types in the use and timing of referral to specialized palliative care services (SPCS) and in the reasons for non-referral.

Methods

We conducted a population-based mortality follow-back survey among physicians who certified a representative sample of deaths in Flanders, Belgium. We focused only on sampled death cases of cancer (n = 2392). The questionnaire asked about the use of the existing types of SPCS and the timing of referral to these services.

Results

Response rate was 58% (1394/2392). Patients who died from breast, respiratory, head and neck, genitourinary or gastrointestinal cancer had higher chances of using SPCS compared to hematologic cancer patients. The most prevalent reason for non-referral was that regular care sufficiently addressed palliative and supportive care needs (51%). This differed significantly between cancer types ranging from 77,8% for breast cancer and 42.1% for hematologic cancer. A second prevalent reason for not using SPCS was that it was not meaningful (enough) (23.9%), particularly for hematologic malignancies (35,1%) and only in 5.3% for breast cancer.

Conclusion

Differences in referral across different types of cancer were found. Referral is more often delayed or not initiated for patients with hematologic cancer, possibly due to differences in illness trajectory. An influencing reason is that physicians perceive palliative care as not meaningful or not meaningful enough for these patients which may be linked to the uncertainty in the disease trajectory of hematologic malignancies.

Changes in the Care Setting of First Consults to Palliative and Supportive Care Over a Seven-Year Period

CONTEXT

Optimal benefits from palliative care (PC) are achieved when first consults (PC1) occur early, in the outpatient setting. Late PC1, like those in the intensive care unit (ICU), limit these benefits.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of PC1 over time in the outpatient, ICU, and inpatient non-ICU settings. We also examined patients' baseline characteristics and the timing of PC access (from PC1 to death) by the setting of PC1.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated consecutive cancer patients' records at our cancer center to ascertain the annual number of PC1 and its distribution across settings (2011-2017). ICU PC1 (n = 309) and a random sample of an equal number of outpatient and inpatient non-ICU PC1 were reviewed to retrieve patients' characteristics and death date.

RESULTS

PC1 total annual number increased by 58% from 2011 (n = 2286) to 2017 (n = 3615). We found a significant decrease in the proportion of ICU PC1 (from 2.3% in 2011 to 1% in 2017, P < 0.001). There were no significant changes in the proportion of PC1 at outpatient versus inpatient settings (P = 0.2). Hematologic cancer patients were more likely to have an ICU PC1 (P < 0.001). Median survival (months) was 7.7 (6.3-9.7), 3.4 (2.4-4.5), and 0.1 (0.1-0.1) for outpatient, inpatient, and ICU, respectively (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

PC1 total annual number has increased, and the proportion of PC1 at ICU, a very late clinical setting, is decreasing. Further efforts are needed to integrate PC in hematologic cancer care.

What is Symptom Burden: A Qualitative exploration of Patient Definitions

Current definitions of “symptom burden” are largely derived from clinicians, and there are many variations in the way the term is used, defined, and operationalized. The aim of this study was to explore patient perceptions of symptom burden in the context of advanced and incurable disease. A group of 58 cancer patients followed by a palliative care team answered a single open-ended question: “Please define ‘symptom burden.”’ Three authors independently coded and analyzed patient responses using a grounded theory approach. They identified six themes, the most frequently coded of which were: “can't do usual activities,” “psychological suffering,” and “specific severe symptoms.” Our findings indicate that the concept of symptom burden is complex and extends beyond numerical symptom-scoring systems. In addition to inquiring about specific symptoms, it may be important to directly ask patients about their overall burden or experience of symptoms.

Pain in patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed acute leukemia

PURPOSE

Acute leukemia (AL) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. We assessed the prevalence and correlates of pain in patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed AL.

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed AL admitted to a comprehensive cancer center completed the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS), which assesses prevalence, severity, and distress associated with pain and other symptoms. Factors associated with severe pain were assessed using logistic regression. Two raters completed chart reviews in duplicate for patients with severe pain (MSAS severity ≥ 3/4) to determine the site of pain.

RESULTS

Three hundred eighteen patients were recruited from January 2008 to October 2013: 245 (77.0%) had acute myeloid or acute promyelocytic leukemia (AML/APL) and 73 (23.0%) had acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); 289 (90.9%) were newly diagnosed and 29 (9.1%) had relapsed disease. Pain was reported in 156/318 (49.2%), of whom 55/156 (35.3%) reported severe pain (≥ 3/4). Pain was associated with all psychological symptoms (all p < 0.005) and some physical symptoms. Severe pain was associated with younger age (p = 0.02), worse performance status (p = 0.04), ALL diagnosis (p = 0.04), and time from onset of chemotherapy (p = 0.03), with pain peaking at 4 weeks after chemotherapy initiation. The most common sites of severe pain were oropharynx (22; 40%), head (12; 21.8%), and abdomen (11; 20%). Only 3 patients (0.9%) were referred to the symptom control/palliative care team during the month prior to or following assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain is frequent, distressing, and predictable in patients undergoing induction chemotherapy for AL. Further research is needed to assess the efficacy of early supportive care in this population.