A Randomized Controlled Trial of Local Delivery of a Rho Inhibitor (VX-210) in Patients with Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

Methylprednisolone substituted lipid nanoparticles deliver C3 transferase mRNA for combined treatment of spinal cord injury

Spinal cord injury (SCI), characterized by the disruption of neural pathways and an increase in inflammatory cell infiltration, leads to profound and lasting neurological deficits, with a high risk of resulting in permanent disability. Currently, the therapeutic landscape for SCI is notably sparse, with limited effective treatment options available. Methylprednisolone (MP), a widely used clinical anti-inflammatory agent for SCI, requires administration in high doses that are associated with significant adverse effects. In this study, we introduce an innovative approach by substituting cholesterol with MP to engineer a novel Lipid Nanoparticle (MP-LNP). This strategy aims to enhance the localization and concentration of MP at the injury site, thereby amplifying its therapeutic efficacy while mitigating systemic side effects. Furthermore, we explore the integration of C3 transferase mRNA into MP-LNPs. C3 transferase, a potent inhibitor of the RhoA pathway, has shown promise in facilitating neurological recovery in animal models of SCI and is currently being evaluated in clinical trials. The novel formulation, MP-LNP-C3, is designed for direct administration to the injury site during decompression surgery, offering a targeted therapeutic modality for SCI. Our findings reveal several significant advantages of this approach: Firstly, the incorporation of C3 transferase mRNA into MP-LNPs does not compromise the structural integrity of the nanoparticles, ensuring efficient mRNA expression within the spinal cord. Secondly, the MP-LNP formulation effectively attenuates inflammation and reduces the adverse effects associated with high-dose MP treatment in the acute phase of SCI. Lastly, MP-LNP-C3 demonstrates notable neuroprotective properties and promotes enhanced recovery of motor function in SCI mouse models. Together, these results underscore the potential of this innovative LNP-based therapy as a promising avenue for advancing the treatment of clinical SCI.

Spinal cord injury: pathophysiology, possible treatments and the role of the gut microbiota

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating pathological state causing motor, sensory, and autonomic dysfunction. To date, SCI remains without viable treatment for its patients. After the injury, molecular events centered at the lesion epicenter create a non-permissive environment for cell survival and regeneration. This newly hostile setting is characterized by necrosis, inflammation, demyelination, axotomy, apoptosis, and gliosis, among other events that limit locomotor recovery. This review provides an overview of the pathophysiology of SCI, highlighting the potential role of the gut microbiota in modulating the inflammatory response and influencing neurological recovery following trauma to the spinal cord. Emphasis on the bidirectional communication between the gut and central nervous system, known as the gut-brain axis is given. After trauma, the gut-brain/spinal cord axis promotes the production of pro-inflammatory metabolites that provide a non-permissive environment for cell survival and locomotor recovery. Therefore, any possible pharmacological treatment, including antibiotics and painkillers, must consider their effects on microbiome dysbiosis to promote cell survival, regeneration, and behavioral improvement. Overall, this review provides valuable insights into the pathophysiology of SCI and the evolving understanding of the role of the gut microbiota in SCI, with implications for future research and clinical practice.

ARHGAP29 promotes keratinocyte proliferation and migration in vitro and is dispensable for in vivo wound healing

BACKGROUND

RhoA GTPases play critical roles in actin cytoskeletal remodeling required for controlling a diverse range of cellular functions including cell proliferation, adhesion, migration and changes in cell shape, all required for cutaneous wound healing. RhoA cycles between an active GTP-bound and an inactive GDP-bound form, a process regulated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs). ARHGAP29 is a GAP expressed in skin keratinocytes and is decreased in the absence of interferon regulator factor 6, a critical regulator of cell proliferation, migration, and wound healing. However, the role for ARHGAP29 in keratinocyte biology is unknown.

RESULTS

We generated ARHGAP29 knockdown keratinocyte cell lines and show they displayed increased filamentous actin, phospho-myosin regulatory light chain, cell area and population doubling time. Furthermore, we found that ARHGAP29 knockdown keratinocytes displayed significant delays in scratch wound closure in both single and collective cell migration conditions; these delays were rescued by both adding back ARHGAP29 or adding a ROCK inhibitor to ARHGAP29 knockdown cells. In vivo, however, Arhgap29 heterozygotes or keratinocyte-specific knockouts showed on-time wound healing.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that ARHGAP29 is required for keratinocyte morphology, proliferation and migration in vitro but is dispensable during wound healing in vivo.

Pharmacologic Therapy for Spinal Cord Injury

Neuroprotective strategies aimed at preventing secondary neurologic injury following acute spinal cord injury remain an important area of clinical, translational, and basic science research. Despite recent advancement in the understanding of basic mechanisms of primary and secondary neurologic injury, few pharmacologic agents have shown consistent promise in improving neurologic outcomes following SCI in large randomized clinical trials. The authors review the existing literature and clinical guidelines for pharmacologic therapy investigated for managing acute SCI, including corticosteroids, GM-1 ganglioside (Sygen), Riluzole, opioid antagonists, Cethrin, minocycline, and vasopressors for mean arterial pressure augmentation. Therapies for managing secondary effects of SCI, such as bradycardia, are discussed. Current clinical trials for pharmacotherapy and cellular transplantation following acute SCI are also reviewed. Despite the paucity of current evidence for clinically beneficial post-SCI pharmacotherapy, future research efforts will hopefully elucidate promising therapeutic agents to improve neurologic function.

Next-gen spinal cord injury clinical trials: lessons learned and opportunities for future success

Despite promising basic science discoveries and a surge in clinical trials, the quest for effective treatments that restore neurological function after spinal cord injury lags on. While "failed" in a conventional sense, emerging solutions to longstanding challenges represent promising steps towards a future with effective interventions. In this personal view, we highlight clinical trials implementing new solutions and their impact on the field. Our perspective is that, ultimately, the integration of shared knowledge, adaptive designs, and a deeper understanding of the intricacies of spinal cord injury holds promise of unlocking of major breakthroughs, leading to improved outcomes for people with spinal cord injury.

Bridging the gap: a translational perspective in spinal cord injury

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating and complex condition to treat with no curative options. In the past few decades, rapid advancements in our understanding of SCI pathophysiology as well as the mergence of new treatments has created more optimism. Focusing on clinical translation, this paper provides a comprehensive overview of SCI through its epidemiology, pathophysiology, currently employed management strategies, and emerging therapeutic approaches. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of addressing the heavy quality of life (QoL) challenges faced by SCI patients and their desires, providing a basis to tailor patient-centric forms of care. Furthermore, this paper discusses the frequently encountered barriers in translation from preclinical models to clinical settings. It also seeks to summarize significant completed and ongoing SCI clinical trials focused on neuroprotective and neuroregenerative strategies. While developing a cohesive regenerative treatment strategy remains challenging, even modest improvements in sensory and motor function can offer meaningful benefits and motivation for patients coping with this highly debilitating condition.

Translational Relevance of Secondary Intracellular Signaling Cascades Following Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a life-threatening and life-altering condition that results in debilitating sensorimotor and autonomic impairments. Despite significant advances in the clinical management of traumatic SCI, many patients continue to suffer due to a lack of effective therapies. The initial mechanical injury to the spinal cord results in a series of secondary molecular processes and intracellular signaling cascades in immune, vascular, glial, and neuronal cell populations, which further damage the injured spinal cord. These intracellular cascades present promising translationally relevant targets for therapeutic intervention due to their high ubiquity and conservation across eukaryotic evolution. To date, many therapeutics have shown either direct or indirect involvement of these pathways in improving recovery after SCI. However, the complex, multifaceted, and heterogeneous nature of traumatic SCI requires better elucidation of the underlying secondary intracellular signaling cascades to minimize off-target effects and maximize effectiveness. Recent advances in transcriptional and molecular neuroscience provide a closer characterization of these pathways in the injured spinal cord. This narrative review article aims to survey the MAPK, PI3K-AKT-mTOR, Rho-ROCK, NF-κB, and JAK-STAT signaling cascades, in addition to providing a comprehensive overview of the involvement and therapeutic potential of these secondary intracellular pathways following traumatic SCI.

Advancements in neuroregenerative and neuroprotective therapies for traumatic spinal cord injury

Traumatic spinal cord injuries (SCIs) continue to be a major healthcare concern, with a rising prevalence worldwide. In response to this growing medical challenge, considerable scientific attention has been devoted to developing neuroprotective and neuroregenerative strategies aimed at improving the prognosis and quality of life for individuals with SCIs. This comprehensive review aims to provide an up-to-date and thorough overview of the latest neuroregenerative and neuroprotective therapies currently under investigation. These strategies encompass a multifaceted approach that include neuropharmacological interventions, cell-based therapies, and other promising strategies such as biomaterial scaffolds and neuro-modulation therapies. In addition, the review discusses the importance of acute clinical management, including the role of hemodynamic management as well as timing and technical aspects of surgery as key factors mitigating the secondary injury following SCI. In conclusion, this review underscores the ongoing scientific efforts to enhance patient outcomes and quality of life, focusing on upcoming strategies for the management of traumatic SCI. Each section provides a working knowledge of the fundamental preclinical and patient trials relevant to clinicians while underscoring the pathophysiologic rationale for the therapies.

An updated systematic review of neuroprotective agents in the treatment of spinal cord injury

This systematic review aims to summarize the findings from all clinical randomized trials assessing the efficacy of potential neuroprotective agents in influencing the outcomes of acute spinal cord injuries (SCI). Following the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted comprehensive searches in four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) up to September 5th, 2023. Our analysis included a total of 30 studies. We examined the effects of 15 substances/drugs: methylprednisolone, tirilazad mesylate, erythropoietin, nimodipine, naloxone, Sygen, Rho protein antagonist, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, autologous macrophages, autologous bone marrow cells, vitamin D, progesterone, riluzole, minocycline, and blood alcohol concentration. Notable improvements in neurological outcomes were observed with progesterone plus vitamin D and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. In contrast, results for methylprednisolone, erythropoietin, Sygen, Rho Protein, and Riluzole were inconclusive, primarily due to insufficient sample size or outdated evidence. No significant differences were found in the remaining evaluated drugs. Progesterone plus vitamin D, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, methylprednisolone, Sygen, Rho Protein, and Riluzole may enhance neurological outcomes in acute SCI cases. It is worth noting that different endpoints or additional subgroup analyses may potentially alter the conclusions of individual trials. Therefore, certain SCI grades may benefit more from these treatments than others, while the overall results may remain inconclusive.

Neuromodulation to guide circuit reorganization with regenerative therapies in upper extremity rehabilitation following cervical spinal cord injury

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a profoundly debilitating condition with no effective treatment to date. The complex response of the central nervous system (CNS) to injury and its limited regeneration capacity pose bold challenges for restoring function. Cervical SCIs are the most prevalent and regaining hand function is a top priority for individuals living with cervical SCI. A promising avenue for addressing this challenge arises from the emerging field of regenerative rehabilitation, which combines regenerative biology with physical medicine approaches. The hypothesis for optimizing gains in upper extremity function centers on the integration of targeted neurorehabilitation with novel cell- and stem cell-based therapies. However, the precise roles and synergistic effects of these components remain poorly understood, given the intricate nature of SCI and the diversity of regenerative approaches. This perspective article sheds light on the current state of regenerative rehabilitation for cervical SCI. Notably, preclinical research has yet to fully incorporate rehabilitation protocols that mimic current clinical practices, which often rely on neuromodulation strategies to activate spared circuits below the injury level. Therefore, it becomes imperative to comprehensively investigate the combined effects of neuromodulation and regenerative medicine strategies in animal models before translating these therapies to individuals with SCI. In cases of severe upper extremity paralysis, the advent of neuromodulation strategies, such as corticospinal tract (CST) and spinal cord stimulation, holds promise as the next frontier in enhancing the effectiveness of cell- and stem cell-based therapies. Future preclinical studies should explore this convergence of neuromodulation and regenerative approaches to unlock new possibilities for upper extremity treatment after SCI.

Traumatic Human Spinal Cord Injury: Are Single Treatments Enough to Solve the Problem?

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) results in partial or complete motor deficits, such as paraplegia, tetraplegia, and sphincter control, as well as sensory disturbances and autonomic dysregulation such as arterial hypotension, lack of sweating, and alterations in skin lability. All this has a strong psychological impact on the affected person and his/her family, as well as costs to healthcare institutions with an economic burden in the short, medium, and long terms. Despite at least forty years of experimental animal studies and several clinical trials with different therapeutic strategies, effective therapy is not universally accepted. Most of the published works on acute and chronic injury use a single treatment, such as medication, trophic factor, transplant of a cell type, and so on, to block some secondary injury mechanisms or promote some mechanisms of structural/functional restoration. However, despite significant results in experimental models, the outcome is a moderate improvement in muscle strength, sensation, or eventually in sphincter control, which has been considered non-significant in human clinical trials. Here we present a brief compilation of successful individual treatments that have been applied to secondary mechanisms of action. These studies show limited neuroprotective or neurorestorative approaches in animal models and clinical trials. Thus, the few benefits achieved so far represent a rationale to further explore other strategies that seek better structural and functional restoration of the injured spinal cord.

Axonal growth inhibitors and their receptors in spinal cord injury: from biology to clinical translation

Axonal growth inhibitors are released during traumatic injuries to the adult mammalian central nervous system, including after spinal cord injury. These molecules accumulate at the injury site and form a highly inhibitory environment for axonal regeneration. Among these inhibitory molecules, myelin-associated inhibitors, including neurite outgrowth inhibitor A, oligodendrocyte myelin glycoprotein, myelin-associated glycoprotein, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans and repulsive guidance molecule A are of particular importance. Due to their inhibitory nature, they represent exciting molecular targets to study axonal inhibition and regeneration after central injuries. These molecules are mainly produced by neurons, oligodendrocytes, and astrocytes within the scar and in its immediate vicinity. They exert their effects by binding to specific receptors, localized in the membranes of neurons. Receptors for these inhibitory cues include Nogo receptor 1, leucine-rich repeat, and Ig domain containing 1 and p75 neurotrophin receptor/tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 19 (that form a receptor complex that binds all myelin-associated inhibitors), and also paired immunoglobulin-like receptor B. Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans and repulsive guidance molecule A bind to Nogo receptor 1, Nogo receptor 3, receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase σ and leucocyte common antigen related phosphatase, and neogenin, respectively. Once activated, these receptors initiate downstream signaling pathways, the most common amongst them being the RhoA/ROCK signaling pathway. These signaling cascades result in actin depolymerization, neurite outgrowth inhibition, and failure to regenerate after spinal cord injury. Currently, there are no approved pharmacological treatments to overcome spinal cord injuries other than physical rehabilitation and management of the array of symptoms brought on by spinal cord injuries. However, several novel therapies aiming to modulate these inhibitory proteins and/or their receptors are under investigation in ongoing clinical trials. Investigation has also been demonstrating that combinatorial therapies of growth inhibitors with other therapies, such as growth factors or stem-cell therapies, produce stronger results and their potential application in the clinics opens new venues in spinal cord injury treatment.

Development of neural repair therapy for chronic spinal cord trauma: soluble Nogo receptor decoy from discovery to clinical trial

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

After traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), neurological deficits persist due to the disconnection of surviving neurons. While repair of connectivity may restore function, no medical therapy exists today.This review traces the development of the neural repair-based therapeutic AXER-204 from animal studies to the recent clinical trial for chronic cervical SCI.

RECENT FINDINGS

Molecular studies reveal a Nogo-66 Receptor 1 (NgR1, RTN4R) pathway inhibiting axon regeneration, sprouting, and plasticity in the adult mammalian central nervous system (CNS). Rodent and nonhuman primate studies demonstrate that the soluble receptor decoy NgR(310)ecto-Fc or AXER-204 promotes neural repair and functional recovery in transection and contusion SCI. Recently, this biological agent completed a first-in-human and randomized clinical trial for chronic cervical SCI. The intervention was safe and well tolerated. Across all participants, upper extremity strength did not improve with treatment. However, posthoc and biomarker analyses suggest that AXER-204 may benefit treatment-naïve patients with incomplete SCI in the chronic stage.

SUMMARY

NgR1 signaling restricts neurological recovery in animal studies of CNS injury. The recent clinical trial of AXER-204 provides encouraging signals supporting future focused trials of this neural repair therapeutic. Further, AXER-204 studies provide a roadmap for the development of additional and synergistic therapies for chronic SCI.

A critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on pharmacological treatments for spinal cord injury

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Spinal cord injury brings devastating consequences and huge economic burden. Different authoritative organizations have developed different guidelines for pharmacological treatments of spinal cord injury, but there is a lack of a critical appraisal of them.

PURPOSE

To systematically review and appraise guidelines regarding their recommendations for pharmacological treatments for spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science from January 2000 to January 2022 as well as guideline-specific databases (eg, Congress of Neurological Surgeons) and Google Scholar. We included the most updated guideline containing evidence-based recommendations or consensus-based recommendations developed by specific authoritative organizations if multiple versions were available. We appraised guidelines through the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation, 2nd edition instrument consisting of six domains (eg, applicability). With supporting evidence, recommendations were classified as: for, against, neither for nor against. We utilized an evidence assessment system to categorize the quality of supporting evidence as poor, fair, or good.

RESULTS

Eight guidelines developed from 2008 to 2020 were included, but all of them scored lowest in the domain of applicability among all six domains. Twelve pharmacological agents (eg, methylprednisolone) were studied. For methylprednisolone, three guidelines (3/8=37.5%) recommended for (one evidence-based and two consensus-based), three (3/8=37.5%) recommended against (all evidence-based), and two (2/8=25%) recommended neither for nor against. For monosialotetrahexosylganglioside (GM-1), one guideline (1/4=25%) recommended for (consensus-based), one (1/4=25%) recommended against (evidence-based), and two (2/4=50%) recommended neither for nor against. For other agents (eg, minocycline), most guidelines (3/5=60%) recommended neither for nor against, one (1/5=20%) recommended against naloxone (evidence-based) and nimodipine (evidence-based), and one (1/5=20%) recommended for neural growth factor (consensus-based). The quality of most of the supporting evidence was poor, and the rest was fair.

CONCLUSIONS

There were inconsistencies among recommendations for methylprednisolone and GM-1. Evidence-based recommendations tended to recommend against, whereas consensus-based recommendations tended to recommend for.

ARHGAP29 is required for keratinocyte proliferation and migration

BACKGROUND

RhoA GTPase plays critical roles in actin cytoskeletal remodeling required for controlling a diverse range of cellular functions including cell proliferation, cell adhesions, migration and changes in cell shape. RhoA cycles between an active GTP-bound and an inactive GDP-bound form, a process that is regulated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs). ARHGAP29 is a GAP expressed in keratinocytes of the skin and is decreased in the absence of Interferon Regulator Factor 6, a critical regulator of cell proliferation and migration. However, the role for ARHGAP29 in keratinocyte biology is unknown.

RESULTS

Novel ARHGAP29 knockdown keratinocyte cell lines were generated using both CRISPR/Cas9 and shRNA technologies. Knockdown cells exhibited significant reduction of ARHGAP29 protein (50-80%) and displayed increased filamentous actin (stress fibers), phospho-myosin light chain (contractility), cell area and population doubling time. Furthermore, we found that ARHGAP29 knockdown keratinocytes displayed significant delays in scratch wound closure in both single cell and collective cell migration conditions. Particularly, our results show a reduction in path lengths, speed, directionality and persistence in keratinocytes with reduced ARHGAP29. The delay in scratch closure was rescued by both adding back ARHGAP29 or adding a ROCK inhibitor to ARHGAP29 knockdown cells.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that ARHGAP29 is required for keratinocyte morphology, proliferation and migration mediated through the RhoA pathway.

Immune response following traumatic spinal cord injury: Pathophysiology and therapies

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating condition that is often associated with significant loss of function and/or permanent disability. The pathophysiology of SCI is complex and occurs in two phases. First, the mechanical damage from the trauma causes immediate acute cell dysfunction and cell death. Then, secondary mechanisms of injury further propagate the cell dysfunction and cell death over the course of days, weeks, or even months. Among the secondary injury mechanisms, inflammation has been shown to be a key determinant of the secondary injury severity and significantly worsens cell death and functional outcomes. Thus, in addition to surgical management of SCI, selectively targeting the immune response following SCI could substantially decrease the progression of secondary injury and improve patient outcomes. In order to develop such therapies, a detailed molecular understanding of the timing of the immune response following SCI is necessary. Recently, several studies have mapped the cytokine/chemokine and cell proliferation patterns following SCI. In this review, we examine the immune response underlying the pathophysiology of SCI and assess both current and future therapies including pharmaceutical therapies, stem cell therapy, and the exciting potential of extracellular vesicle therapy.

Molecular approaches for spinal cord injury treatment

Injuries to the spinal cord result in permanent disabilities that limit daily life activities. The main reasons for these poor outcomes are the limited regenerative capacity of central neurons and the inhibitory milieu that is established upon traumatic injuries. Despite decades of research, there is still no efficient treatment for spinal cord injury. Many strategies are tested in preclinical studies that focus on ameliorating the functional outcomes after spinal cord injury. Among these, molecular compounds are currently being used for neurological recovery, with promising results. These molecules target the axon collapsed growth cone, the inhibitory microenvironment, the survival of neurons and glial cells, and the re-establishment of lost connections. In this review we focused on molecules that are being used, either in preclinical or clinical studies, to treat spinal cord injuries, such as drugs, growth and neurotrophic factors, enzymes, and purines. The mechanisms of action of these molecules are discussed, considering traumatic spinal cord injury in rodents and humans.

Efficacy of miRNA-modified mesenchymal stem cell extracellular vesicles in spinal cord injury: A systematic review of the literature and network meta-analysis

Background

Although some previous studies have indicated that extracellular vesicles (EVs) secreted from miRNA-modified mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may be more effective as compared with control EVs in the treatment of rats with spinal cord injuries (SCI), the efficacy of this treatment modality remains controversial.

Objectives

The current study comprehensively evaluated the efficacy of different administered doses of EVs, including miRNA-overexpressing MSCs-derived EVs, among SCI rats. The efficacy of EVs' treatment was evaluated in different SCI models to provide evidence for preclinical trials.

Methods

We extensively searched the following databases to identify relevant studies: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (from inception to July 20, 2022). Two trained investigators independently screened literature, extracted the data, and evaluated literature quality.

Results

Thirteen studies were included in this network meta-analysis. The results demonstrated that miRNA-overexpressing MSCs-derived EVs (100 and 200 μg of total protein of EVs) significantly improved hind limb motor function in rats at early stages of SCI (i.e., at 3 days after injury) as compared with EVs (100 and 200 μg of total protein of EVs, respectively). However, in the middle and late stages (14 and 28 days), there were no statistically significant differences between EVs with 200 μg dosages and miRNA-loaded EVs with 100 μg dosages. In the late stages (28 days), there were no statistically significant differences between EVs with 100 μg dosages and miRNA-loaded EVs with 200 μg dosages. We found that miRNA-overexpressing MSCs-derived EVs significantly improved motor function among early-stage SCI rats in a compression and contusion model (3 days) as compared with MSCs-derived EVs and miRNA-overexpressing MSCs-derived EVs likewise significantly improved motor function among SCI rats in a contusion model at middle and late stages (14 and 28 days).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that miRNA-overexpressing MSCs-derived EVs (200 μg of total protein of EVs) may be the best choice for the effective treatment of SCI, and miRNA-overexpressing MSCs-derived EVs may likewise be the best choice for treating contusions. However, there are some risks of bias in our included studies, and the mechanisms underlying the efficacy of EVs remain unclear.

Systematic review registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=282051, identifier: CRD42021282051.

Novel Antagonist of the Type 2 Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptor (LPA2), UCM-14216, Ameliorates Spinal Cord Injury in Mice

Spinal cord injuries (SCIs) irreversibly disrupt spinal connectivity, leading to permanent neurological disabilities. Current medical treatments for reducing the secondary damage that follows the initial injury are limited to surgical decompression and anti-inflammatory drugs, so there is a pressing need for new therapeutic strategies. Inhibition of the type 2 lysophosphatidic acid receptor (LPA₂) has recently emerged as a new potential pharmacological approach to decrease SCI-associated damage. Toward validating this receptor as a target in SCI, we have developed a new series of LPA₂ antagonists, among which compound 54 (UCM-14216) stands out as a potent and selective LPA₂ receptor antagonist (E_max = 90%, IC₅₀ = 1.9 μM, K_D = 1.3 nM; inactive at LPA_1,3–6 receptors). This compound shows efficacy in an in vivo mouse model of SCI in an LPA₂-dependent manner, confirming the potential of LPA₂ inhibition for providing a new alternative for treating SCI.

Pathophysiology, Classification and Comorbidities after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

The spinal cord is a conduit within the central nervous system (CNS) that provides ongoing communication between the brain and the rest of the body, conveying complex sensory and motor information necessary for safety, movement, reflexes, and optimization of autonomic function. After a spinal cord injury (SCI), supraspinal influences on the spinal segmental control system and autonomic nervous system (ANS) are disrupted, leading to spastic paralysis, pain and dysesthesia, sympathetic blunting and parasympathetic dominance resulting in cardiac dysrhythmias, systemic hypotension, bronchoconstriction, copious respiratory secretions and uncontrolled bowel, bladder, and sexual dysfunction. This article outlines the pathophysiology of traumatic SCI, current and emerging methods of classification, and its influence on sensory/motor function, and introduces the probable comorbidities associated with SCI that will be discussed in more detail in the accompanying manuscripts of this special issue.

Delayed administration of elezanumab, a human anti-RGMa neutralizing monoclonal antibody, promotes recovery following cervical spinal cord injury

Spinal cord injury (SCI) elicits a cascade of degenerative events including cell death, axonal degeneration, and the upregulation of inhibitory molecules which limit repair. Repulsive guidance molecule A (RGMa) is an axon growth inhibitor which is also involved in neuronal cell death and differentiation. SCI causes upregulation of RGMa in the injured rodent, non-human primate, and human spinal cord. Recently, we showed that delayed administration of elezanumab, a high affinity human RGMa-specific monoclonal antibody, promoted neuroprotective and regenerative effects following thoracic SCI. Since most human traumatic SCI is at the cervical level, and level-dependent anatomical and molecular differences may influence pathophysiological responses to injury and treatment, we examined the efficacy of elezanumab and its therapeutic time window of administration in a clinically relevant rat model of cervical impact-compression SCI. Pharmacokinetic analysis of plasma and spinal cord tissue lysate showed comparable levels of RGMa antibodies with delayed administration following cervical SCI. At 12w after SCI, elezanumab promoted long term benefits including perilesional sparing of motoneurons and increased neuroplasticity of key descending pathways involved in locomotion and fine motor function. Elezanumab also promoted growth of corticospinal axons into spinal cord gray matter and enhanced serotonergic innervation of the ventral horn to form synaptic connections caudal to the cervical lesion. Significant recovery in grip and trunk/core strength, locomotion and gait, and spontaneous voiding ability was found in rats treated with elezanumab either immediately post-injury or at 3 h post-SCI, and improvements in specific gait parameters were found when elezanumab was delayed to 24 h post-injury. We also developed a new locomotor score, the Cervical Locomotor Score, a simple and sensitive measure of trunk/core and limb strength and stability during dynamic locomotion.

Spinal cord injury - assessing tolerability and use of combined rehabilitation and NeuroAiD (SATURN) study - primary results of an exploratory study

OBJECTIVE

MLC601/MLC901 has demonstrated neuroprotective and neuroregenerative properties that enhance neurological recovery in stroke and traumatic brain injury. We aimed to evaluate its safety and potential efficacy in patients with severe spinal cord injury.

METHODS

Patients with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) A and B were included in an open-label cohort study. Each received a course of MLC601/MLC901 for 6 months in addition to standard care and rehabilitation. Key endpoints were safety, AIS grade and motor scores at month 6 (M6).

RESULTS

Among 30 patients included (mean age 42.2 ± 17.6 years, 24 men), 20 patients had AIS A while 10 patients had AIS B at baseline. Ten patients experienced 14 adverse events including one serious adverse event and six deaths, none were considered treatment-related. AIS improved in 25% of AIS A and 50% of AIS B. Improvement in ASIA motor score was seen most with cervical injury (median change from baseline 26.5, IQR: 6-55). These findings appear to be better than reported rates of spontaneous recovery for SCI AIS A and B.

CONCLUSION

MLC601/MLC901 is safe and may have a role in the treatment of patients with SCI. A controlled trial is justified.

To grow and to stay, both controlled by RhoA: Opposing cellular effects on axon regeneration

In this issue of Neuron, Stern et al. (2021) demonstrate that cell-type-specific ablation of RhoA differentially affects axon regeneration outcomes in spinal cord injury models. Their findings highlight the importance of considering cell-type-specific strategies to promote axon regeneration.

RhoA drives actin compaction to restrict axon regeneration and astrocyte reactivity after CNS injury

An inhibitory extracellular milieu and neuron-intrinsic processes prevent axons from regenerating in the adult central nervous system (CNS). Here we show how the two aspects are interwoven. Genetic loss-of-function experiments determine that the small GTPase RhoA relays extracellular inhibitory signals to the cytoskeleton by adapting mechanisms set in place during neuronal polarization. In response to extracellular inhibitors, neuronal RhoA restricts axon regeneration by activating myosin II to compact actin and, thereby, restrain microtubule protrusion. However, astrocytic RhoA restricts injury-induced astrogliosis through myosin II independent of microtubules by activating Yes-activated protein (YAP) signaling. Cell-type-specific deletion in spinal-cord-injured mice shows that neuronal RhoA activation prevents axon regeneration, whereas astrocytic RhoA is beneficial for regenerating axons. These data demonstrate how extracellular inhibitors regulate axon regeneration, shed light on the capacity of reactive astrocytes to be growth inhibitory after CNS injury, and reveal cell-specific RhoA targeting as a promising therapeutic avenue.

A review of emerging neuroprotective and neuroregenerative therapies in traumatic spinal cord injury

Traumatic spinal cord injuries (SCIs) have far-reaching physical, social, and financial consequences. While medical advancements have improved supportive therapeutic measures for SCI patients, no effective neuroregenerative therapeutic options exist to date. Instead, the paradigm of SCI therapy is inevitably directed towards damage control rather than the restoration of a state of functional independence. Facing a continuous increase in the prevalence of spinal cord injured patients, neuroprotective and neuroregenerative strategies have earned tremendous scientific interest. This review intends to provide a robust summary of the most promising neuroprotective and neuroregenerative therapies currently under investigation. While we highlight encouraging neuroprotective strategies as well, the focus of this review lies on neuroregenerative therapies, including neuropharmacological and cell-based approaches. We finally point to the exciting investigational areas of biomaterial scaffolds and neuromodulation therapies.

Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury With Deranged Lipid Profile

Introduction Spinal cord injury (SCI) can lead to severe disability and neurogenic shock, arrhythmias, autonomic dysfunction, pressure ulcers, etc., of the autonomic nervous system. Therefore, in these patients, cardiovascular problems should be investigated frequently. This study was conducted to evaluate the electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities in patients with spinal cord injury having inappropriate lipid profiles and their relationship with each other. Materials and methods This cross-sectional study was held in the Internal Medicine Department of Mayo Hospital, Lahore, for a one-year duration from May 2020 to May 2021. It included 58 patients with spinal cord injury, 35 of whom had paraplegia, and 23 had tetraplegia. Fasting blood samples were taken for lipid profile analysis. Twelve-lead ECGs three times a day for one month were taken and analyzed in the context of previously available ECGs. Results Out of 58, the lipid profiles were found abnormal in 47 patients, 18 of whom had a normal ECG. The lipid profile was normal in 12, of which only one patient had ECG abnormalities. Cholesterol levels were found normal in 39 patients and deranged in 19 patients; low-density lipoproteins in nine patients, triglycerides in 18 patients, and high-density lipoprotein values in one patient were abnormal. Conclusions Sinus bradycardia was the most common ECG abnormality found in SCI patients with deranged lipid profiles. Further studies are needed in the future to validate the findings of this study.

Pharmacological management of secondary spinal cord injury

Introduction: Secondary spinal cord injury (SCI) sets on immediately after trauma and, despite prompt treatment, may become chronic. SCI is a complex condition and presents numerous challenges to patients and physicians alike, also considering the lack of an approved pharmacological therapy.Areas covered: This review describes the pathophysiological mechanisms leading to secondary SCI to highlight possible targets for pharmacological therapy. Furthermore, an extensive search of the literature on different databases (PubMed, Google scholar, Embase, and Scopus) and of the current clinical trials (clinicaltrials.gov) was performed to investigate the current outlook for the pharmacological management of SCI. Only drugs with performed or ongoing clinical trials were considered.Expert opinion: Pharmacological therapy aims to improve motor and sensory function in patients. Overall, drugs are divided into neuroprotective compounds, which aim to limit the damage induced by the pro-inflammatory and pro-apoptotic milieu of SCI, and neuroregenerative drugs, which induce neuronal and axonal regrowth. While many compounds have been trialed with promising results, none has yet completed a stage III trial and has been approved for the pharmacological management of SCI.