1
|
Zhang Q, Qiu Z. Therapeutic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Neurol Sci 2024; 45:1953-1967. [PMID: 38117402 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-023-07235-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in children with cerebral palsy and to compare the differences in efficacy of different treatment parameters. Computer searches of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, China Knowledge Network, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, Vipshop and China Biomedical Literature Database were conducted to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TMS to improve function in children with cerebral palsy. The search period was from the establishment of the database to April 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted data information, and the risk of bias was assessed for the included studies using the Cochrane Systematic Evaluation Manual 5.1.0. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 and Stata software. A total of 18 studies containing 1675 patients with cerebral palsy were included, and r-TMS did not differ significantly from other treatments in improving language function [MD = 2.80, 95% CI (-1.51, 7.11), Z = 1.27, P = 0.20] after treatment. The results of the reticulated meta-analysis showed the best probability ranking of the effect of three different frequencies of r-TMS on motor function scores in children with cerebral palsy: combined LF-rTMS + HF-rTMS (49.8%) > LF-rTMS (45.6%) > HF-rTMS (4.6%) > conventional rehabilitation (0%). Publication bias showed no significant asymmetry in the inverted funnel plot, but the possibility of publication bias could not be excluded. The results of this study showed that r-TMS was not statistically significant in improving language function in children with cerebral palsy compared to conventional treatment. r-TMS was almost unanimously significantly effective in motor function in children with cerebral palsy according to current literature data, and the combined high- and low-frequency transcranial magnetic therapy was better than low-frequency transcranial magnetic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Zhang
- Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, 250355, Shandong, China.
| | - Zhengang Qiu
- Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, 250355, Shandong, China
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University City Hospital, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, 250300, Shandong, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oberman LM, Francis SM, Lisanby SH. The use of noninvasive brain stimulation techniques in autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res 2024; 17:17-26. [PMID: 37873560 PMCID: PMC10841888 DOI: 10.1002/aur.3041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have recently emerged as alternative, nonpharmacological interventions for a variety of psychiatric, neurological, and neurodevelopmental conditions. NIBS is beginning to be applied in both research and clinical settings for the treatment of core and associated symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) including social communication deficits, restricted and repetitive behaviors, irritability, hyperactivity, depression and impairments in executive functioning and sensorimotor integration. Though there is much promise for these targeted device-based interventions, in other disorders (including adult major depressive disorder (MDD) and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) where rTMS is FDA cleared), data on the safety and efficacy of these interventions in individuals with ASD is limited especially in younger children when neurodevelopmental interventions typically begin. Most studies are open-label, small scale, and/or focused on a restricted subgroup of individuals with ASD. There is a need for larger, randomized controlled trials that incorporate neuroimaging in order to develop predictive biomarkers of treatment response and optimize treatment parameters. We contend that until such studies are conducted, we do not have adequate estimates of the safety and efficacy of NIBS interventions in children across the spectrum. Thus, broad off-label use of these techniques in this population is not supported by currently available evidence. Here we discuss the existing data on the use of NIBS to treat symptoms related to ASD and discuss future directions for the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay M Oberman
- Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Sunday M Francis
- Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Sarah H Lisanby
- Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ursumando L, Ponzo V, Monteleone AM, Menghini D, Fucà E, Lazzaro G, Esposito R, Picazio S, Koch G, Zanna V, Vicari S, Costanzo F. The efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation in the treatment of children and adolescents with Anorexia Nervosa: study protocol of a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Eat Disord 2023; 11:127. [PMID: 37533058 PMCID: PMC10394844 DOI: 10.1186/s40337-023-00852-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current psychological and pharmacological treatments for Anorexia Nervosa (AN) provide only moderate effective support, and there is an urgent need for research to improve therapies, especially in developing age. Non-invasive brain stimulation has suggested to have the potential to reducing AN symptomatology, via targeting brain alterations, such as hyperactivity of right prefrontal cortex (PFC). We suppose that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the PFC may be effective in children and adolescents with AN. METHODS We will conduct a randomized, double blind, add-on, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of tDCS treatment on clinical improvement. We will also investigate brain mechanisms and biomarkers changes acting in AN after tDCS treatment. Eighty children or adolescent with AN (age range 10-18 years) will undergo treatment-as-usual including psychiatric, nutritional and psychological support, plus tDCS treatment (active or sham) to PFC (F3 anode/F4 cathode), for six weeks, delivered three times a week. Psychological, neurophysiological and physiological measures will be collected at baseline and at the end of treatment. Participants will be followed-up one, three, six months and one year after the end of treatment. Psychological measures will include parent- and self-report questionnaires on AN symptomatology and other psychopathological symptoms. Neurophysiological measures will include transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with electroencephalography and paired pulse TMS and repetitive TMS to investigate changes in PFC connectivity, reactivity and plasticity after treatment. Physiological measures will include changes in the functioning of the endogenous stress response system, body mass index (BMI) and nutritional state. DISCUSSION We expect that tDCS treatment to improve clinical outcome by reducing the symptoms of AN assessed as changes in Eating Disorder Risk composite score of the Eating Disorder Inventory-3. We also expect that at baseline there will be differences between the right and left hemisphere in some electrophysiological measures and that such differences will be reduced after tDCS treatment. Finally, we expect a reduction of endogenous stress response and an improvement in BMI and nutritional status after tDCS treatment. This project would provide scientific foundation for new treatment perspectives in AN in developmental age, as well as insight into brain mechanisms acting in AN and its recovery. Trial registration The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05674266) and ethical approval for the study was granted by the local research ethics committee (process number 763_OPBG_2014).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciana Ursumando
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Viviana Ponzo
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Deny Menghini
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Elisa Fucà
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Lazzaro
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Romina Esposito
- Experimental Neuropsychophysiology Lab, IRCCS S. Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Picazio
- Experimental Neuropsychophysiology Lab, IRCCS S. Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
- Department of Psychology, University "Sapienza" of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giacomo Koch
- Experimental Neuropsychophysiology Lab, IRCCS S. Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
- Section of Human Phisiology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Valeria Zanna
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Vicari
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
- Department of Life Science and Public Health, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Floriana Costanzo
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza Sant'Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Delatorre RG, Sutter EN, Nemanich ST, Krach LE, Meekins G, Feyma T, Gillick BT. Anodal Contralesional tDCS Enhances CST Excitability Bilaterally in an Adolescent with Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy: A Brief Report. Dev Neurorehabil 2023; 26:216-221. [PMID: 36967533 PMCID: PMC10228174 DOI: 10.1080/17518423.2023.2193626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
Hemiparetic cerebral palsy (HCP), weakness on one side of the body typically caused by perinatal stroke, is characterized by lifelong motor impairments related to alterations in the corticospinal tract (CST). CST reorganization could be a useful biomarker to guide applications of neuromodulatory interventions, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), to improve the effectiveness of rehabilitation therapies. We evaluated an adolescent with HCP and CST reorganization who demonstrated persistent heightened CST excitability in both upper limbs following anodal contralesional tDCS. The results support further investigation of targeted tDCS as an adjuvant therapy to traditional neurorehabilitation for upper limb function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ellen N. Sutter
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Samuel T. Nemanich
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Linda E. Krach
- Department of Neurology, Gillette Children’s Specialty Healthcare, Saint Paul, MN, USA
| | - Gregg Meekins
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Timothy Feyma
- Department of Neurology, Gillette Children’s Specialty Healthcare, Saint Paul, MN, USA
| | - Bernadette T. Gillick
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Carlson HL, Giuffre A, Ciechanski P, Kirton A. Electric field simulations of transcranial direct current stimulation in children with perinatal stroke. Front Hum Neurosci 2023; 17:1075741. [PMID: 36816507 PMCID: PMC9932338 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1075741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Perinatal stroke (PS) is a focal vascular brain injury and the leading cause of hemiparetic cerebral palsy. Motor impairments last a lifetime but treatments are limited. Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) may enhance motor learning in adults but tDCS effects on motor learning are less studied in children. Imaging-based simulations of tDCS-induced electric fields (EF) suggest differences in the developing brain compared to adults but have not been applied to common pediatric disease states. We created estimates of tDCS-induced EF strength using five tDCS montages targeting the motor system in children with PS [arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) or periventricular infarction (PVI)] and typically developing controls (TDC) aged 6-19 years to explore associates between simulation values and underlying anatomy. Methods Simulations were performed using SimNIBS https://simnibs.github.io/simnibs/build/html/index.html using T1, T2, and diffusion-weighted images. After tissue segmentation and tetrahedral mesh generation, tDCS-induced EF was estimated based on the finite element model (FEM). Five 1mA tDCS montages targeting motor function in the paretic (non-dominant) hand were simulated. Estimates of peak EF strength, EF angle, field focality, and mean EF in motor cortex (M1) were extracted for each montage and compared between groups. Results Simulations for eighty-three children were successfully completed (21 AIS, 30 PVI, 32 TDC). Conventional tDCS montages utilizing anodes over lesioned cortex had higher peak EF strength values for the AIS group compared to TDC. These montages showed lower mean EF strength within target M1 regions suggesting that peaks were not necessarily localized to motor network-related targets. EF angle was lower for TDC compared to PS groups for a subset of montages. Montages using anodes over lesioned cortex were more sensitive to variations in underlying anatomy (lesion and tissue volumes) than those using cathodes over non-lesioned cortex. Discussion Individualized patient-centered tDCS EF simulations are prudent for clinical trial planning and may provide insight into the efficacy of tDCS interventions in children with PS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen L. Carlson
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children’s Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada,Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada,Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada,Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada,*Correspondence: Helen L. Carlson,
| | - Adrianna Giuffre
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children’s Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada,Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada,Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada,Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Patrick Ciechanski
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children’s Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada,Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada,Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada,Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Adam Kirton
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children’s Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada,Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada,Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada,Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada,Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Raess L, Hawe RL, Metzler M, Zewdie E, Condliffe E, Dukelow SP, Kirton A. Robotic Rehabilitation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Children With Bilateral Cerebral Palsy. FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES 2022; 3:843767. [PMID: 36188922 PMCID: PMC9397997 DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2022.843767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Aim To identify challenges of combining robotic upper extremity rehabilitation with tDCS in children with upper extremity bilateral cerebral palsy (CP) by assessing feasibility, tolerability and safety. Methods This was an unblinded, open-label, pilot clinical trial. Participants completed 10 × 1 h sessions of robotic rehabilitation combined with motor cortex anodal tDCS. Feasibility, acceptability and practicality, were assessed including the number of participants completing the protocol, factors limiting participation, time required for sessions, and completion of functional assessments and tolerability scales. To assess safety, standardized clinical and robotic measures of sensorimotor function were performed. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04233710). Results Eight children were recruited (mean age 8y ± 1.8y, range 6–11 years) and 5 completed the intervention. There were no serious adverse events. One child developed focal seizures 6 weeks after the trial that were deemed to be unrelated. Barriers to completion included time and scheduling demands and patient factors, specifically cognitive/behavioral impairments and dyskinesia. No decline in clinical function was appreciated. Conclusions Robotic upper extremity rehabilitation combined with tDCS may be feasible in children with bilateral CP. Careful participant selection, family engagement, and protocol adaptations are recommended to better understand the feasibility and tolerability of future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liliane Raess
- University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Clinical Neurosciences, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Rachel L Hawe
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Megan Metzler
- Clinical Neurosciences, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Ephrem Zewdie
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Condliffe
- Clinical Neurosciences, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Sean P Dukelow
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Adam Kirton
- Clinical Neurosciences, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
He W, Huang Y, He L, Liu L, Zeng P, Qiu H, Wang X, Zhou H, Chen Z, Xu Y, Zhao J, Wang W, Tang H, Xu K. Safety and effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on hand function in preschool children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: A pilot study. Front Behav Neurosci 2022; 16:925122. [PMID: 36160682 PMCID: PMC9500382 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.925122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has shown a promising prospect in improving function and spasticity in school-aged children with cerebral palsy, but little is known in preschool children. The aim of this study was to explore the safety and effects of tDCS on hand function in preschool children (aged 3–6 years) with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (HCP). We designed a crossover, single-blind, sham-controlled study in 30 preschool children with HCP, who were recruited to receive one session of sham and one session of active anodal tDCS (1.5 mA, 20 min) on the primary motor cortex of the affected hemisphere, with a 24-h interval between the two sessions. Questionnaire was completed by each participant and their attendants immediately, 90 min, and 24 h after each session to monitor common adverse events of tDCS, such as skin irritation, skin erythema, burning sensation, headache, dizziness, etc. Box and Block Test, Selective Control of the Upper Extremity Scale, Modified Ashworth Scale, and Melbourne Assessment 2 were conducted at baseline, immediately, and 90 min after each session. No severe adverse event occurred during the study and only a few of them felt transient and slight discomfort. Results also showed that all participants performed better at Box and Block Test of the hemiplegic hand immediately after a single anodal tDCS (P < 0.05) and this improvement lasted at least 90 min and more than 24 h. However, there was no significant improvement in Selective Control of the Upper Extremity Scale of both hands, Box and Block Test of the non-hemiplegic hand, Modified Ashworth Scale, and Melbourne Assessment 2 of the hemiplegic upper limb (P > 0.05). Shortly, this study supported the safety and effects of a single anodal tDCS on improving the manual dexterity of the hemiplegic hand for preschool children with HCP. Further researches with larger samples about the optimal dose and treatment cycle of tDCS for preschool children with HCP are warranted. This study gained the approval of ethics committee of the organization and was registered at chictr.org (ChiCTR2000031141).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjie He
- Department of Rehabilitation, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuan Huang
- Department of Rehabilitation, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lu He
- Department of Rehabilitation, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liru Liu
- Department of Rehabilitation, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Peishan Zeng
- Department of Rehabilitation, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huiying Qiu
- Department of Rehabilitation, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoyue Wang
- Department of Rehabilitation, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hongyu Zhou
- Department of Rehabilitation, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhaofang Chen
- Department of Rehabilitation, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi Xu
- Department of Rehabilitation, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jingyi Zhao
- Department of Rehabilitation, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenda Wang
- Department of Rehabilitation, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hongmei Tang
- Department of Rehabilitation, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- Hongmei Tang
| | - Kaishou Xu
- Department of Rehabilitation, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Kaishou Xu
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis of Motor Learning in Preschoolers and Children over the Last 15 Years. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10081415. [PMID: 36011071 PMCID: PMC9407894 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10081415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Motor learning enables preschoolers and children to acquire fundamental skills that are critical to their development. The current study sought to conduct a bibliometric and visualization analysis to provide a comprehensive overview of motor-learning progress in preschoolers and children over the previous 15 years. The number of studies is constantly growing, with the United States and Australia, as well as other productive institutions and authors, at the leading edge. The dominant disciplines were Neurosciences and Neurology, Psychology, Rehabilitation, and Sport Sciences. The journals Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, Human Movement Science, Physical Therapy, Neuropsychology, Journal of Motor Behavior, and Journal of Experimental Child Psychology have been the most productive and influential in this regard. The most common co-citations for clinical symptoms were for cerebral palsy, developmental coordination disorder, and autism. Research has focused on language impairment (speech disorders, explicit learning, and instructor-control feedback), as well as effective intervention strategies. Advances in brain mechanisms and diagnostic indicators, as well as new intervention and rehabilitation technologies (virtual reality, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and transcranial direct current stimulation), have shifted research frontiers and progress. The cognitive process is critical in intervention, rehabilitation, and new technology implementation and should not be overlooked. Overall, our broad overview identifies three major areas: brain mechanism research, clinical practice (intervention and rehabilitation), and new technology application.
Collapse
|
9
|
Mousavi N, Nitsche MA, Jahan A, Nazari MA, Hassanpour H. Efficacy of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) combined with intensive speech therapy for language production in monozygotic twins with corpus callosum dysgenesis (CCD): A sham-controlled single subject study. Neurocase 2022; 28:218-225. [PMID: 35533270 DOI: 10.1080/13554794.2022.2071626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this single subject study was to investigate whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to both hemispheres combined with speech therapy can improve language learning in a pair of 5-year-old twins with corpus callosum dysgenesis (CCD). The treatment protocol included anodal tDCS with simultaneous speech therapy in one of the participants (T.D.), and sham-tDCS with the same montage, and stimulation regime concomitant with speech therapy for the other twin (A.D.). Our findings show that T.D. improved in language production when treated with speech therapy in combination with tDCS. A.D. showed evidence for a relatively minor behavioral benefit from speech therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Najva Mousavi
- Department of Language and Speech Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul Gelisim University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Michael A Nitsche
- Department of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (Ifado), Dortmund, Germany
| | - Ali Jahan
- Department of Speech Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Ali Nazari
- Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hassan Hassanpour
- Faculty of Psychology and Social Sciences, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gordon AM, Ferre CL, Robert MT, Chin K, Brandao M, Friel KM. HABIT+tDCS: a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating the synergistic efficacy of hand-arm bimanual intensive therapy (HABIT) plus targeted non-invasive brain stimulation to improve upper extremity function in school-age children with unilateral cerebral palsy. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e052409. [PMID: 35190424 PMCID: PMC8860006 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Unilateral spastic cerebral palsy (USCP) is characterised by movement deficits primarily on one body side. The best available upper extremity (UE) therapies are costly and intensive. Thus, there is an urgent need for better, more efficient and thus more accessible therapies. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is non-invasive and may enhance physical rehabilitation approaches. The aim of this study is to determine whether tDCS targeted to the hemisphere with corticospinal tract (CST) connectivity enhances the efficacy of UE training in children with USCP. Our central hypothesis is that hand-arm bimanual intensive therapy (HABIT) combined with a tDCS montage targeting the hemisphere with CST connectivity to the impaired UE muscles will improve UE function more than HABIT plus sham stimulation. We will test this by conducting a randomised clinical trial with clinical and motor cortex physiology outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSES 81 children, aged 6-17 years, will be randomised to receive 2 mA anodal tDCS targeted to the affected UE motor map, 2 mA cathodal tDCS to the contralesional motor cortex or sham tDCS during the first 20 min of each HABIT session (10 hours: 2 hours/day for 5 days). Primary outcomes will be Box and Blocks Test, Assisting Hand Assessment and motor cortex excitability, determined with single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. Secondary outcomes include ABILHAND-Kids, Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, Cooper Stereognosis, Dimension of Mastery Questionnaire and Participation and Environment Measure-Children and Youth. All measures will be collected before, immediately and 6 months after treatment. A group × test session Analysis of Variance will test differences among groups on all measures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been approved by the BRANY Institutional Review Board (#18-10-285-512). We will leverage our subject and family relationships to maximise dissemination and share results with the academic and patient/family advocacy groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03402854.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Gordon
- Department of Biobehavioral Science, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Claudio L Ferre
- Burke Neurological Institute, White Plains, New York, USA
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Maxime T Robert
- Department of Rehabilitation, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Karen Chin
- Department of Biobehavioral Science, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
- Burke Neurological Institute, White Plains, New York, USA
| | - Marina Brandao
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Quinn de Launay K, Cheung ST, Riggs L, Reed N, Beal DS. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on cognitive performance in youth with persistent cognitive symptoms following concussion: a controlled pilot study. Brain Inj 2022; 36:39-51. [PMID: 35157529 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2022.2034179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Explore the feasibility, tolerability, and early efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as a therapeutic intervention for youth with cognitive persistent post-concussion symptoms (PPCS). HYPOTHESIS tDCS improves performance on a dual task working memory (WM) paradigm in youth with cognitive PPCS. PARTICIPANTS Twelve youth experiencing cognitive PPCS. DESIGN A quasi-randomized pilot trial was used to explore the tolerability of, and performance differences on, a dual N-Back WM task paired with active or sham tDCS over 3 sessions. MEASURES Accuracy and reaction time on WM task and self-report of tDCS tolerability. RESULTS Trends toward increases in accuracy from Day 1 to 3 seen in both groups. Active tDCS group performed better than sham on Day 2 in N-Back level N2 (p = .019), and marginally better than the sham group on Day 3 in level N3 (p = .26). Participants reported tDCS as tolerable; compared to the active tDCS group, the sham group reported more "considerable" (p = .078) and "strong" symptoms (p = .097). CONCLUSION tDCS is a promising tool for enhancing WM performance and is a feasible and tolerable adjunct to behavioral interventions in youth with cognitive PPCS. A clinical trial to demonstrate efficacy is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keelia Quinn de Launay
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, M4G 1R8, Toronto, Canada
| | - Stephanie T Cheung
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, M4G 1R8, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lily Riggs
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, M4G 1R8, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nick Reed
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, M4G 1R8, Toronto, Canada
| | - Deryk S Beal
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, M4G 1R8, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tang L, Wu Y, Ma J, Lu Y, Wang L, Shan C. Application of tDCS in children with cerebral palsy: A mini review. Front Pediatr 2022; 10:966650. [PMID: 36204667 PMCID: PMC9530366 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.966650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Cerebral palsy (CP) refers to a group of diseases characterized by persistent central dyskinesia, postural development disorder and activity limitation syndromes caused by nonprogressive brain injury in the developing fetus or infant, which is often accompanied by sensory, cognitive and attention disorders. The routine rehabilitation methods for children with CP mainly include physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy and other methods. In recent years, noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS), as a relatively new intervention method, has been widely used because of its potential to regulate cortical excitability and plasticity. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an NIBS technique that is easier and more convenient to perform. It does not require patients to remain stationary for a long time or have a significant impact on treatment results due to children's frequent activities. Compared with other NIBS techniques, tDCS has greater flexibility and no strict restrictions on patients' activities; it also helps the therapist conduct occupational therapy or speech therapy while a child receives tDCS, which markedly reduces the treatment time and avoids burnout due to a long treatment duration. Thus, tDCS is a better and more convenient intervention for CP children and warrants further exploration. Accordingly, this article reviews tDCS application in children with CP and discusses tDCS application prospects for such children to promote its expansion in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Tang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuwei Wu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiayin Ma
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Lu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seventh People's Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ling Wang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chunlei Shan
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Engineering Research Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine Intelligent Rehabilitation, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.,School of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Salazar Fajardo JC, Kim R, Gao C, Hong J, Yang J, Wang D, Yoon B. The Effects of tDCS with NDT on the Improvement of Motor Development in Cerebral Palsy. J Mot Behav 2021; 54:480-489. [PMID: 34913842 DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2021.2016572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
We investigated the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) with neurodevelopmental treatment (NDT) on the improvement of motor development and reduction of spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Twenty-four children with CP were allocated to two groups: the tDCS + NDT group and the only NDT group, done 3 times per week for 5 weeks. The Gross Motor Function Measurement (GMFM-88) and Box and Block Test (BBT) were used to assess changes in motor development, and the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) was used to evaluate changes in spasticity. All measurements were carried out at 3 time points: baseline, post-intervention, and 1 month follow-up. We found improvements in the GMFM-88 total scores and in each individual GMFM-88 dimension scores, favoring the tDCS + NDT group over the only NDT group. The BBT scores improved only in the tDCS + NDT group. In addition, the MAS scores reduced in the hemibody with significant motor impairment only in the tDCS + NDT group. The present findings suggest that tDCS combined with NDT can be considered a promising intervention for children with CP, as it can enhance motor development and reduce spasticity in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jhosedyn Carolaym Salazar Fajardo
- Major of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | - RockHyun Kim
- Major of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Gao
- Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.,BK21FOUR R&E Center for Learning Health Systems, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | - JiYeon Hong
- Purme Foundation, NEXON Children's Rehabilitation Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - JinKyu Yang
- Purme Foundation, NEXON Children's Rehabilitation Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - BumChul Yoon
- Major of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.,BK21FOUR R&E Center for Learning Health Systems, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Xu J, Wu Z, Nürnberger A, Sabel BA. Reorganization of Brain Functional Connectivity Network and Vision Restoration Following Combined tACS-tDCS Treatment After Occipital Stroke. Front Neurol 2021; 12:729703. [PMID: 34777199 PMCID: PMC8580405 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.729703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is already known to improve visual field functions in patients with optic nerve damage and partially restores the organization of brain functional connectivity networks (FCNs). However, because little is known if NIBS is effective also following brain damage, we now studied the correlation between visual field recovery and FCN reorganization in patients with stroke of the central visual pathway. Method: In a controlled, exploratory trial, 24 patients with hemianopia were randomly assigned to one of three brain stimulation groups: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)/transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) (ACDC); sham tDCS/tACS (AC); sham tDCS/sham tACS (Sham), which were compared to age-matched controls (n = 24). Resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG) was collected at baseline, after 10 days stimulation and at 2 months follow-up. EEG recordings were analyzed for FCN measures using graph theory parameters, and FCN small worldness of the network and long pairwise coherence parameter alterations were then correlated with visual field performance. Result: ACDC enhanced alpha-band FCN strength in the superior occipital lobe of the lesioned hemisphere at follow-up. A negative correlation (r = −0.80) was found between the intact visual field size and characteristic path length (CPL) after ACDC with a trend of decreased alpha-band centrality of the intact middle occipital cortex. ACDC also significantly decreased delta band coherence between the lesion and the intact occipital lobe, and coherence was enhanced between occipital and temporal lobe of the intact hemisphere in the low beta band. Responders showed significantly higher strength in the low alpha band at follow-up in the intact lingual and calcarine cortex and in the superior occipital region of the lesioned hemisphere. Conclusion: While ACDC decreases delta band coherence between intact and damaged occipital brain areas indicating inhibition of low-frequency neural oscillations, ACDC increases FCN connectivity between the occipital and temporal lobe in the intact hemisphere. When taken together with the lower global clustering coefficient in responders, these findings suggest that FCN reorganization (here induced by NIBS) is adaptive in stroke. It leads to greater efficiency of neural processing, where the FCN requires fewer connections for visual processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiahua Xu
- Institute of Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Otto-V.-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.,Faculty of Computer Science, Otto-V.-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Zheng Wu
- Institute of Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Otto-V.-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.,Faculty of Computer Science, Otto-V.-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Nürnberger
- Faculty of Computer Science, Otto-V.-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Bernhard A Sabel
- Institute of Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Otto-V.-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Giuffre A, Zewdie E, Wrightson JG, Cole L, Carlson HL, Kuo HC, Babwani A, Kirton A. Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhanced Motor Learning on Robotic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Motor Maps in Children. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:747840. [PMID: 34690726 PMCID: PMC8526891 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.747840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Conventional transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) may improve motor learning in children. Mechanisms are not understood. Neuronavigated robotic transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can produce individualised maps of primary motor cortex (M1) topography. We aimed to determine the effects of tDCS- and HD-tDCS-enhanced motor learning on motor maps. Methods: Typically developing children aged 12-18 years were randomised to right M1 anodal tDCS, HD-tDCS, or Sham during training of their left-hand on the Purdue Pegboard Task (PPT) over 5 days. Bilateral motor mapping was performed at baseline (pre), day 5 (post), and 6-weeks retention time (RT). Primary muscle was the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) with secondary muscles of abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and adductor digiti minimi (ADM). Primary mapping outcomes were volume (mm2/mV) and area (mm2). Secondary outcomes were centre of gravity (COG, mm) and hotspot magnitude (mV). Linear mixed-effects modelling was employed to investigate effects of time and stimulation type (tDCS, HD-tDCS, Sham) on motor map characteristics. Results: Twenty-four right-handed participants (median age 15.5 years, 52% female) completed the study with no serious adverse events or dropouts. Quality maps could not be obtained in two participants. No effect of time or group were observed on map area or volume. LFDI COG (mm) differed in the medial-lateral plane (x-axis) between tDCS and Sham (p = 0.038) from pre-to-post mapping sessions. Shifts in map COG were also observed for secondary left-hand muscles. Map metrics did not correlate with behavioural changes. Conclusion: Robotic TMS mapping can safely assess motor cortex neurophysiology in children undergoing motor learning and neuromodulation interventions. Large effects on map area and volume were not observed while changes in COG may occur. Larger controlled studies are required to understand the role of motor maps in interventional neuroplasticity in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrianna Giuffre
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Ephrem Zewdie
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - James G Wrightson
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Lauran Cole
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Helen L Carlson
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Hsing-Ching Kuo
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States
| | - Ali Babwani
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Adam Kirton
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Framorando D, Cai T, Wang Y, Pegna AJ. Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on effort during a working-memory task. Sci Rep 2021; 11:16399. [PMID: 34385478 PMCID: PMC8361175 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95639-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has shown that stimulation of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) facilitates task performance in working-memory tasks. However, little is known about its potential effects on effort. This study examined whether tDCS affects effort during a working-memory task. Participants received anodal, cathodal and sham stimulation over DLPFC across three sessions before carrying out a 2-back task. During the task, effort-related cardiovascular measures were recorded-especially the Initial Systolic Time Interval (ISTI). Results showed that anodal stimulation produced a shorter ISTI, indicating a greater effort compared to cathodal and sham conditions, where effort was lower. These findings demonstrate that anodal stimulation helps participants to maintain engagement in a highly demanding task (by increasing task mastery), without which they would otherwise disengage. This study is the first to show that tDCS impacts the extent of effort engaged by individuals during a difficult task.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Framorando
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Brisbane, QLD-4068, Australia.
| | - Tianlan Cai
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Brisbane, QLD-4068, Australia
| | - Yi Wang
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Brisbane, QLD-4068, Australia
| | - Alan J Pegna
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Brisbane, QLD-4068, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study. J Autism Dev Disord 2021; 52:3202-3213. [PMID: 34318430 PMCID: PMC9213272 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-021-05202-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Evidence-based therapeutic options for children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) are scarce. This work explored the effects of cerebellar anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS) on three 48 h-apart motor sequence learning and upper limb coordination sessions in children with DCD. The results revealed that, as compared to a Sham intervention (n = 10), cerebellar atDCS (n = 10) did not meaningfully improve execution speed but tended to reduce the number of execution errors during motor sequence learning. However, cerebellar atDCS did neither meaningfully influence offline learning nor upper limb coordination, suggesting that atDCS’ effects are circumscribed to its application duration. These results suggest that cerebellar atDCS could have beneficial effects as a complementary therapeutic tool for children with DCD.
Collapse
|
18
|
Perinatal stroke: mapping and modulating developmental plasticity. Nat Rev Neurol 2021; 17:415-432. [PMID: 34127850 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-021-00503-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Most cases of hemiparetic cerebral palsy are caused by perinatal stroke, resulting in lifelong disability for millions of people. However, our understanding of how the motor system develops following such early unilateral brain injury is increasing. Tools such as neuroimaging and brain stimulation are generating informed maps of the unique motor networks that emerge following perinatal stroke. As a focal injury of defined timing in an otherwise healthy brain, perinatal stroke represents an ideal human model of developmental plasticity. Here, we provide an introduction to perinatal stroke epidemiology and outcomes, before reviewing models of developmental plasticity after perinatal stroke. We then examine existing therapeutic approaches, including constraint, bimanual and other occupational therapies, and their potential synergy with non-invasive neurostimulation. We end by discussing the promise of exciting new therapies, including novel neurostimulation, brain-computer interfaces and robotics, all focused on improving outcomes after perinatal stroke.
Collapse
|
19
|
Buchanan DM, Bogdanowicz T, Khanna N, Lockman-Dufour G, Robaey P, D’Angiulli A. Systematic Review on the Safety and Tolerability of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Children and Adolescents. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11020212. [PMID: 33578648 PMCID: PMC7916366 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11020212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a safe, tolerable, and acceptable technique in adults. However, there is limited evidence for its safety in youth. Although limited, there are a handful of important empirical articles that have evaluated safety and tolerability outcomes in youth. However, a synthesis of pediatric safety studies is not currently available. Objective: To synthesize objective evidence regarding the safety and tolerability of pediatric tDCS based on the current state of the literature. Methods: Our search and report used PRISMA guidelines. Our method systematically examined investigations purposefully designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and acceptability of tDCS in healthy and atypical youth that were submitted to three databases, from the beginning of the database to November 2019. Safety considerations were evaluated by studies utilizing neuroimaging, physiological changes, performance on tasks, and by analyzing reported and objective side effects; tolerability via rate of adverse events; and acceptability via rate of dropouts. Results: We report on 203 sham sessions, 864 active sessions up to 2 mA, and 303 active hours of stimulation in 156 children. A total of 4.4% of the active sessions were in neurotypical controls, with the other 95.6% in clinical subjects. Conclusion: In spite of the fact that the current evidence is sporadic and scarce, the presently reviewed literature provides support for the safety, tolerability, and acceptability, of tDCS in youth for 1–20 sessions of 20 min up to 2 mA. Future pediatric tDCS research is encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derrick Matthew Buchanan
- Department of Neuroscience, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; (T.B.); (N.K.); (G.L.-D.); (P.R.); (A.D.)
- Neuroscience of Imagination Cognition Emotion Research Lab, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
- Neuropsychiatric Lab, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada
- Correspondence:
| | - Thomas Bogdanowicz
- Department of Neuroscience, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; (T.B.); (N.K.); (G.L.-D.); (P.R.); (A.D.)
- Neuroscience of Imagination Cognition Emotion Research Lab, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
| | - Neha Khanna
- Department of Neuroscience, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; (T.B.); (N.K.); (G.L.-D.); (P.R.); (A.D.)
- Neuroscience of Imagination Cognition Emotion Research Lab, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
| | - Guillaume Lockman-Dufour
- Department of Neuroscience, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; (T.B.); (N.K.); (G.L.-D.); (P.R.); (A.D.)
- Neuroscience of Imagination Cognition Emotion Research Lab, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
| | - Philippe Robaey
- Department of Neuroscience, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; (T.B.); (N.K.); (G.L.-D.); (P.R.); (A.D.)
- Neuropsychiatric Lab, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
| | - Amedeo D’Angiulli
- Department of Neuroscience, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; (T.B.); (N.K.); (G.L.-D.); (P.R.); (A.D.)
- Neuroscience of Imagination Cognition Emotion Research Lab, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Grohs MN, Craig BT, Kirton A, Dewey D. Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Function in Children 8-12 Years With Developmental Coordination Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Hum Neurosci 2020; 14:608131. [PMID: 33362497 PMCID: PMC7759610 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.608131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives: Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) is a neurodevelopmental motor disorder occurring in 5-6% of school-aged children. It is suggested that children with DCD show deficits in motor learning. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) enhances motor learning in adults and children but is unstudied in DCD. We aimed to investigate if tDCS, paired with motor skill training, facilitates motor learning in a pediatric sample with DCD. Methods: Twenty-eight children with diagnosed DCD (22 males, mean age: 10.62 ± 1.44 years) were randomized and placed into a treatment or sham group. Anodal tDCS was applied (1 mA, 20 min) in conjunction with fine manual training over 5 consecutive days. Children's motor functioning was assessed with the Purdue Pegboard Test and Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test at baseline, post-intervention and 6 weeks following intervention. Group differences in rates of motor learning and skill transfer/retention were examined using linear mixed modeling and repeated measures ANOVAs, respectively. Results: There were no serious adverse events or drop-outs and procedures were well-tolerated. Independent of group, all participants demonstrated improved motor scores over the 5 training days [F(69.280), p < 0.001, 95% CI (0.152, 0.376)], with no skill decay observed at retention. There was no interaction between intervention group and day [F(2.998), p = 0.086, 95% CI (−0.020, 0.297)]. Conclusion: Children with DCD demonstrate motor learning with long-term retention of acquired skill. Motor cortex tDCS did not enhance motor learning as seen in other populations. Before conclusions of tDCS efficacy can be drawn, additional carefully designed trials with reproducible results are required. Clinical Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03453983
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melody N Grohs
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Brandon T Craig
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada.,Hotchkiss Brain Institute (HBI), University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Adam Kirton
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada.,Hotchkiss Brain Institute (HBI), University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Deborah Dewey
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada.,Hotchkiss Brain Institute (HBI), University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Li F, Ball S, Zhang X, Smith A. Focal stimulation of the temporoparietal junction improves rationality in prosocial decision-making. Sci Rep 2020; 10:20275. [PMID: 33219290 PMCID: PMC7680130 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76956-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
We tested the hypothesis that modulation of neurocomputational inputs to value-based decision-making affects the rationality of economic choices. The brain's right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) has been functionally associated with both social behavior and with domain-general information processing and attention. To identify the causal function of rTPJ in prosocial decisions, we administered focal high definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) while participants allocated money between themselves and a charity in a modified dictator game. Anodal stimulation led to improved rationality as well as increased charitable giving and egalitarianism, resulting in more consistent and efficient choices and increased sensitivity to the price of giving. These results are consistent with the theory that anodal stimulation of the rTPJ increases the precision of value computations in social decision-making. Our results demonstrate that theories of rTPJ function should account for the multifaceted role of the rTPJ in the representation of social inputs into value-based decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flora Li
- Economics Experimental Lab, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing, China
| | - Sheryl Ball
- Department of Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.,School of Neuroscience, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Xiaomeng Zhang
- Economics Experimental Lab, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing, China
| | - Alec Smith
- Department of Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA. .,School of Neuroscience, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Saldanha JS, Zortea M, Torres ILDS, Fregni F, Caumo W. Age as a Mediator of tDCS Effects on Pain: An Integrative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Hum Neurosci 2020; 14:568306. [PMID: 33192397 PMCID: PMC7654216 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.568306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulatory technique with the potential to decrease pain scores and to improve chronic pain treatment. Although age is an essential factor that might impact the tDCS effect, most studies are solely conducted in adults. Therefore, the age limitation presents a critical research gap in this field and can be shown by only a handful of studies that have included other age groups. To examine the evidence upon the tDCS effect on pain scores on children, adolescents, or elderly, and indirectly, to infer the age-dependent impact on tDCS effects, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic review searching the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, and Science Direct using the following search terms adapted according to MeSh or Entree: [(“Adolescent” OR “Children” OR “Elderly”) AND (“tDCS”) AND (“Pain” OR “Pain threshold”) AND (“dorsolateral prefrontal cortex” OR “Motor cortex)] up to April 20th, 2020. We retrieved 228 articles, 13 were included in the systematic review, and five studies with elderly subjects that had their outcomes assessed by pain score or pain threshold were included in the meta-analysis. Results: For the analysis of pain score, 96 individuals received active stimulation, and we found a favorable effect for active tDCS to reduce pain score compared to sham (P = 0.002). The standardized difference was −0.76 (CI 95% = −1.24 to −0.28). For the pain threshold, the analysis showed no significant difference between active and sham tDCS. We reviewed two studies with adolescents: one study using anodal tDCS over the prefrontal cortex reported a reduction in pain scores. However, the second study reported an increase in pain sensitivity for the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) stimulation. Conclusion: Our findings suggest tDCS may reduce pain levels in the elderly group. Nevertheless, the small number of studies included in this review—and the considerable heterogeneity for clinical conditions and protocols of stimulation present—limits the support of tDCS use for pain treatment in elderly people. Larger studies on the tDCS effect on pain are needed to be conducted in elderly and adolescents, also evaluating different montages and electrical current intensity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Júlia Schirmer Saldanha
- Graduate Program in Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Laboratory of Pain and Neuromodulation, Clinical Research Center, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Maxciel Zortea
- Graduate Program in Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Laboratory of Pain and Neuromodulation, Clinical Research Center, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Iraci Lucena da Silva Torres
- Pharmacology of Pain and Neuromodulation: Pre-Clinical Investigations Research Group, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande Do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Felipe Fregni
- Laboratory of Neuromodulation and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Physics and Rehabilitation Department, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Wolnei Caumo
- Graduate Program in Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Laboratory of Pain and Neuromodulation, Clinical Research Center, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Pain and Palliative Care Service, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wilcox G, Galilee A, Stamp J, Makarenko E, MacMaster FP. The Importance of Research on Integrating Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (TDCS) with Evidence-Based Reading Interventions. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NEUROPSYCHOLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40817-020-00090-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
24
|
Hollis A, Zewdie E, Nettel-Aguirre A, Hilderley A, Kuo HC, Carlson HL, Kirton A. Transcranial Static Magnetic Field Stimulation of the Motor Cortex in Children. Front Neurosci 2020; 14:464. [PMID: 32508570 PMCID: PMC7248312 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-invasive neuromodulation is an emerging therapy for children with early brain injury but is difficult to apply to preschoolers when windows of developmental plasticity are optimal. Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS) decreases primary motor cortex (M1) excitability in adults but effects on the developing brain are unstudied. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS We aimed to determine the effects of tSMS on cortical excitability and motor learning in healthy children. We hypothesized that tSMS over right M1 would reduce cortical excitability and inhibit contralateral motor learning. METHODS This randomized, sham-controlled, double-blinded, three-arm, cross-over trial enrolled 24 healthy children aged 10-18 years. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) assessed cortical excitability via motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and paired pulse measures. Motor learning was assessed via the Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT). A tSMS magnet (677 Newtons) or sham was held over left or right M1 for 30 min while participants trained the non-dominant hand. A linear mixed effect model was used to examine intervention effects. RESULTS All 72 tSMS sessions were well tolerated without serious adverse effects. Neither cortical excitability as measured by MEPs nor paired-pulse intracortical neurophysiology was altered by tSMS. Possible behavioral effects included contralateral tSMS inhibiting early motor learning (p < 0.01) and ipsilateral tSMS facilitating later stages of motor learning (p < 0.01) in the trained non-dominant hand. CONCLUSION tSMS is feasible in pediatric populations. Unlike adults, tSMS did not produce measurable changes in MEP amplitude. Possible effects of M1 tSMS on motor learning require further study. Our findings support further exploration of tSMS neuromodulation in young children with cerebral palsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asha Hollis
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Ephrem Zewdie
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Alberto Nettel-Aguirre
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Alicia Hilderley
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Hsing-Ching Kuo
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Helen L. Carlson
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Adam Kirton
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ciechanski P, Carlson HL, Herrero M, Lane C, MacMaster FP, Kirton A. A Case of Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation for Childhood Stroke Hemiparesis: A Brief Report. Dev Neurorehabil 2020; 23:133-136. [PMID: 31424312 DOI: 10.1080/17518423.2019.1655678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Survivors of childhood stroke incur lifelong physical disability. Treatment options are limited, however, models of motor reorganization after stroke are revealing cortical targets for neuromodulation. Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) enhances motor learning and may improve motor recovery in adult stroke, but remains uninvestigated in childhood-onset stroke. Here we documented the feasibility and safety of tDCS in an adolescent with chronic stroke-induced hemiparesis.Materials and methods: Over 10 days, the participant underwent occupational therapy paired with contralesional, primary motor cortex-targeting, cathodal tDCS. Clinical motor outcomes, and safety and tolerability measures were completed.Results: tDCS was well-tolerated with no adverse events. Motor outcomes did not regress post-intervention, with clinically significant changes still evident at 6 months.Conclusions: Application of controlled trials of non-invasive neuromodulation are safe and tolerability in childhood-onset stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - H L Carlson
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - M Herrero
- Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - C Lane
- Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - F P MacMaster
- Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research & Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - A Kirton
- University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nwaroh C, Giuffre A, Cole L, Bell T, Carlson HL, MacMaster FP, Kirton A, Harris AD. Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on GABA and Glx in Children: A pilot study. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0222620. [PMID: 31910218 PMCID: PMC6946135 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation that safely modulates brain excitability and has therapeutic potential for many conditions. Several studies have shown that anodal tDCS of the primary motor cortex (M1) facilitates motor learning and plasticity, but there is little information about the underlying mechanisms. Using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), it has been shown that tDCS can affect local levels of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and Glx (a measure of glutamate and glutamine combined) in adults, both of which are known to be associated with skill acquisition and plasticity; however this has yet to be studied in children and adolescents. This study examined GABA and Glx in response to conventional anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) and high definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) targeting the M1 in a pediatric population. Twenty-four typically developing, right-handed children ages 12-18 years participated in five consecutive days of tDCS intervention (sham, a-tDCS or HD-tDCS) targeting the right M1 while training in a fine motor task (Purdue Pegboard Task) with their left hand. Glx and GABA were measured before and after the protocol (at day 5 and 6 weeks) using a PRESS and GABA-edited MEGA-PRESS MRS sequence in the sensorimotor cortices. Glx measured in the left sensorimotor cortex was higher in the HD-tDCS group compared to a-tDCS and sham at 6 weeks (p = 0.001). No changes in GABA were observed in either sensorimotor cortex at any time. These results suggest that neither a-tDCS or HD-tDCS locally affect GABA and Glx in the developing brain and therefore it may demonstrate different responses in adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chidera Nwaroh
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary AB, Canada
- Alberta Children’s Hospital (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Child and Adolescent Imaging Research (CAIR) Program, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Adrianna Giuffre
- Alberta Children’s Hospital (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Lauran Cole
- Alberta Children’s Hospital (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Tiffany Bell
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary AB, Canada
- Alberta Children’s Hospital (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Child and Adolescent Imaging Research (CAIR) Program, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Helen L. Carlson
- Alberta Children’s Hospital (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Frank P. MacMaster
- Alberta Children’s Hospital (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Child and Adolescent Imaging Research (CAIR) Program, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- The Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Addictions and Mental Health Strategic Clinical Network, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Adam Kirton
- Alberta Children’s Hospital (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Ashley D. Harris
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary AB, Canada
- Alberta Children’s Hospital (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Child and Adolescent Imaging Research (CAIR) Program, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Application of anodal tDCS at primary motor cortex immediately after practice of a motor sequence does not improve offline gain. Exp Brain Res 2019; 238:29-37. [PMID: 31758203 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05697-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/17/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Tecchio et al. (J Neurophysiology 104: 1134-1140, 2010) reported that the application of anodal tDCS at primary motor cortex (M1) immediately after practice of a procedural motor skill enhanced consolidation, which in turn improved offline gain. Tecchio et al. noted, however, that this study did not account for known after-effects associated with this form of non-invasive stimulation. The present study was designed to explicitly reevaluate Tecchio et al.'s claim. As in the original study, individuals experienced either anodal or sham stimulation at M1 after practice of a serial reaction time task (SRTT) followed by test trials 15-min later. Two additional novel conditions experienced the test trials after 120-min rather than 15-min thus allowing potential stimulation after-effects to dissipate. The expectation was that if anodal stimulation influences post-practice consolidation leading to offline gain, this effect would be present not only at 15-min but also after 120-min. In agreement with the working hypothesis, findings revealed offline gain at both 15-min and the longer 2-h time period. Unexpectedly, we found no interaction between real and sham conditions. The lack of difference between Real and Sham effects weakens confidence in the potential of post-practice tDCS for consolidation enhancement, while it is more consistent with other claims that decoupling practice and anodal tDCS stimulation in time can reduce the effectiveness of exogenous stimulation for procedural skill gain.
Collapse
|
28
|
Carlson HL, Sugden C, Brooks BL, Kirton A. Functional connectivity of language networks after perinatal stroke. Neuroimage Clin 2019; 23:101861. [PMID: 31141787 PMCID: PMC6536856 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2018] [Revised: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 05/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Successful language acquisition during development is imperative for lifelong function. Complex language networks develop throughout childhood. Perinatal stroke may cause significant language disabilities but function can also be remarkably normal. Studying such very early brain injury populations may inform developmental plasticity models of language networks. We examined functional connectivity (FC) of language networks in children with arterial and venous perinatal stroke and typically developing controls (TDC) in a population-based, controlled, cohort study. Resting state functional MRI was performed at 3 T (TR/TE = 2000/30 ms, 150 volumes, 3.6mm3 voxels). Seed-based analyses used bilateral inferior frontal and superior temporal gyri. A subset of stroke participants completed clinical language testing. Sixty-six children participated (median age: 12.85±3.8y, range 6-19; arterial N = 17; venous N = 15; TDC N = 34]. Children with left hemisphere strokes had comparable FC in their right hemispheres compared to TDC. Inter- and intra-hemispheric connectivity strengths were similar between TDC and PVI but lower for AIS. Reduced FC was associated with poorer language comprehension. Language networks can be estimated using resting-state fMRI in children with perinatal stroke. Altered connectivity may occur in both hemispheres, is more pronounced with arterial lesions, and is associated with clinical function. Our results have implications for therapeutic language interventions after early stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen L Carlson
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| | - Cole Sugden
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Brian L Brooks
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Neuropsychology Service, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada; Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Adam Kirton
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Pilot Study of Motor Effect. Neural Plast 2019; 2019:2184398. [PMID: 30733800 PMCID: PMC6348802 DOI: 10.1155/2019/2184398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2018] [Revised: 10/26/2018] [Accepted: 11/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is an emerging tool to improve upper limb motor functions after stroke acquired in adulthood; however, there is a paucity of reports on its efficacy for upper limb motor rehabilitation in congenital or early-acquired stroke. In this pilot study we have explored, for the first time, the immediate effects, and their short-term persistence, of a single application of anodal tDCS on chronic upper limb motor disorders in children and young individuals with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy (UCP). To this aim, in a crossover sham-controlled study, eight subjects aged 10-28 years with UCP underwent two sessions of active and sham tDCS. Anodal tDCS (1.5 mA, 20 min) was delivered over the primary motor cortex (M1) of the ipsilesional hemisphere. Results showed, only following the active stimulation, an immediate improvement in unimanual gross motor dexterity of hemiplegic, but not of nonhemiplegic, hand in Box and Block test (BBT). Such improvement remained stable for at least 90 minutes. Performance of both hands in Hand Grip Strength test was not modified by anodal tDCS. Improvement in BBT was unrelated to participants' age or lesion size, as revealed by MRI data analysis. No serious adverse effects occurred after tDCS; some mild and transient side effects (e.g., headache, tingling, and itchiness) were reported in a limited number of cases. This study provides an innovative contribution to scientific literature on the efficacy and safety of anodal tDCS in UCP. This trial is registered with NCT03137940.
Collapse
|
30
|
Nemanich ST, Rich TL, Chen CY, Menk J, Rudser K, Chen M, Meekins G, Gillick BT. Influence of Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Motor Training on Corticospinal Excitability in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy. Front Hum Neurosci 2019; 13:137. [PMID: 31105541 PMCID: PMC6492624 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Combined non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) and rehabilitation interventions have the potential to improve function in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP), however their effects on developing brain function are not well understood. In a proof-of-principle study, we used single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to measure changes in corticospinal excitability and relationships to motor performance following a randomized controlled trial consisting of 10 days of combined constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the contralesional motor cortex. Twenty children and young adults (mean age = 12 years, 9 months, range = 7 years, 7 months, 21 years, 7 months) with UCP participated. TMS testing was performed before, after, and 6 months after the intervention to measure motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and cortical silent period (CSP) duration. The association between neurophysiologic and motor outcomes and differences in excitability between hemispheres were examined. Contralesional MEP amplitude decreased as hypothesized in five of five participants receiving active tDCS immediately after and 6 months after the intervention, however no statistically significant differences between intervention groups were noted for MEP amplitude [mean difference = −323.9 μV, 95% CI = (−989, 341), p = 0.34] or CSP duration [mean difference = 3.9 ms, 95% CI = (−7.7, 15.5), p = 0.51]. Changes in corticospinal excitability were not statistically associated with improvements in hand function after the intervention. Across all participants, MEP amplitudes measured in the more-affected hand from both contralesional (mean difference = −474.5 μV) and ipsilesional hemispheres (−624.5 μV) were smaller compared to the less-affected hand. Assessing neurophysiologic changes after tDCS in children with UCP provides an understanding of long-term effects on brain excitability to help determine its potential as a therapeutic intervention. Additional investigation into the neurophysiologic effects of tDCS in larger samples of children with UCP are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel T Nemanich
- Divisions of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Tonya L Rich
- Divisions of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Chao-Ying Chen
- Divisions of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Jeremiah Menk
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Biostatistics, Design, and Analysis Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Kyle Rudser
- School of Public Health, Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Mo Chen
- Non-invasive Neuromodulation Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Gregg Meekins
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Bernadette T Gillick
- Divisions of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ke Y, Wang N, Du J, Kong L, Liu S, Xu M, An X, Ming D. The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Working Memory Training in Healthy Young Adults. Front Hum Neurosci 2019; 13:19. [PMID: 30774590 PMCID: PMC6367257 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 01/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Working memory (WM) is a fundamental cognitive ability to support complex thought, but it is limited in capacity. WM training has shown the potential benefit for those in need of a higher WM ability. Many studies have shown the potential of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to transiently enhance WM performance by delivering a low current to the brain cortex of interest, via electrodes on the scalp. tDCS has also been revealed as a promising intervention to augment WM training in a few studies. However, those few tDCS-paired WM training studies, focused more on the effect of tDCS on WM enhancement and its transferability after training and paid less attention to the variation of cognitive performance during the training procedure. The current study attempted to explore the effect of tDCS on the variation of performance, during WM training, in healthy young adults. All the participants received WM training with the load-adaptive verbal N-back task, for 5 days. During the training procedure, active/sham anodal high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) was used to stimulate the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). To examine the training effect, pre- and post-tests were performed, respectively, 1 day before and after the training sessions. At the beginning of each training session, stable-load WM tasks were performed, to examine the performance variation during training. Compared to the sham stimulation, higher learning rates of performance metrics during the training procedure were found when WM training was combined with active anodal HD-tDCS. The performance improvements (post–pre) of the active group, were also found to be higher than those of the sham group and were transferred to a similar untrained WM task. Further analysis revealed a negative relationship between the training improvements and the baseline performance. These findings show the potential that tDCS may be leveraged as an intervention to facilitate WM training, for those in need of a higher WM ability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yufeng Ke
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Ningci Wang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Precision Instruments and Optoelectronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Jiale Du
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Precision Instruments and Optoelectronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Linghan Kong
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Precision Instruments and Optoelectronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Shuang Liu
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Minpeng Xu
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Precision Instruments and Optoelectronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Xingwei An
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Dong Ming
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Precision Instruments and Optoelectronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
The Therapeutic Potential of Non-invasive Neurostimulation for Motor Skill Learning in Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders. CURRENT DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40474-019-0155-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
33
|
Sensorimotor Robotic Measures of tDCS- and HD-tDCS-Enhanced Motor Learning in Children. Neural Plast 2018; 2018:5317405. [PMID: 30662456 PMCID: PMC6312578 DOI: 10.1155/2018/5317405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2018] [Accepted: 10/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) enhances motor learning in adults. We have demonstrated that anodal tDCS and high-definition (HD) tDCS of the motor cortex can enhance motor skill acquisition in children, but behavioral mechanisms remain unknown. Robotics can objectively quantify complex sensorimotor functions to better understand mechanisms of motor learning. We aimed to characterize changes in sensorimotor function induced by tDCS and HD-tDCS paired motor learning in children within an interventional trial. Healthy, right-handed children (12–18 y) were randomized to anodal tDCS, HD-tDCS, or sham targeting the right primary motor cortex during left-hand Purdue pegboard test (PPT) training over five consecutive days. A KINARM robotic protocol quantifying proprioception, kinesthesia, visually guided reaching, and an object hit task was completed at baseline, posttraining, and six weeks later. Effects of the treatment group and training on changes in sensorimotor parameters were explored. Twenty-four children (median 15.5 years, 52% female) completed all measures. Compared to sham, both tDCS and HD-tDCS demonstrated enhanced motor learning with medium effect sizes. At baseline, multiple KINARM measures correlated with PPT performance. Following training, visually guided reaching in all groups was faster and required less corrective movements in the trained arm (H(2) = 9.250, p = 0.010). Aspects of kinesthesia including initial direction error improved across groups with sustained effects at follow-up (H(2) = 9.000, p = 0.011). No changes with training or stimulation were observed for position sense. For the object hit task, the HD-tDCS group moved more quickly with the right hand compared to sham at posttraining (χ2(2) = 6.255, p = 0.044). Robotics can quantify complex sensorimotor function within neuromodulator motor learning trials in children. Correlations with PPT performance suggest that KINARM metrics can assess motor learning effects. Understanding how tDCS and HD-tDCS enhance motor learning may be improved with robotic outcomes though specific mechanisms remain to be defined. Exploring mechanisms of neuromodulation may advance therapeutic approaches in children with cerebral palsy and other disabilities.
Collapse
|
34
|
Cole L, Giuffre A, Ciechanski P, Carlson HL, Zewdie E, Kuo HC, Kirton A. Effects of High-Definition and Conventional Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation on Motor Learning in Children. Front Neurosci 2018; 12:787. [PMID: 30429768 PMCID: PMC6220373 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2018] [Accepted: 10/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can improve motor learning in children. High-definition approaches (HD-tDCS) have not been examined in children. Objectives/Hypothesis: We hypothesized that primary motor cortex HD-tDCS would enhance motor learning but be inferior to tDCS in children. Methods: Twenty-four children were recruited for a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blinded interventional trial (NCT03193580, clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03193580) to receive (1) right hemisphere (contralateral) primary motor cortex (M1) 1 mA anodal conventional 1 × 1 tDCS (tDCS), (2) right M1 1 mA anodal 4 × 1 HD-tDCS (HD-tDCS), or (3) sham. Over five consecutive days, participants trained their left hand using the Purdue Pegboard Test (PPTL). The Jebsen-Taylor Test, Serial Reaction Time Task, and right hand and bimanual PPT were also tested at baseline, post-training, and 6-week retention time (RT). Results: Both the tDCS and HD-tDCS groups demonstrated enhanced motor learning compared to sham with effects maintained at 6 weeks. Effect sizes were moderate-to-large for tDCS and HD-tDCS groups at the end of day 4 (Cohen's d tDCS = 0.960, HD-tDCS = 0.766) and day 5 (tDCS = 0.655, HD-tDCS = 0.851). Enhanced motor learning effects were also seen in the untrained hand. HD-tDCS was well tolerated and safe with no adverse effects. Conclusion: HD-tDCS and tDCS can enhance motor learning in children. Further exploration is indicated to advance rehabilitation therapies for children with motor disabilities such as cerebral palsy. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT03193580.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauran Cole
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Adrianna Giuffre
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Helen L. Carlson
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Ephrem Zewdie
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Hsing-Ching Kuo
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Adam Kirton
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kuo HC, Zewdie E, Ciechanski P, Damji O, Kirton A. Intervention-Induced Motor Cortex Plasticity in Hemiparetic Children With Perinatal Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2018; 32:941-952. [DOI: 10.1177/1545968318801546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Hsing-Ching Kuo
- Alberta Children’s Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada
- University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ephrem Zewdie
- Alberta Children’s Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada
- University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Patrick Ciechanski
- Alberta Children’s Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Omar Damji
- Alberta Children’s Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Adam Kirton
- Alberta Children’s Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada
- University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Pixa NH, Berger A, Steinberg F, Doppelmayr M. Parietal, but Not Motor Cortex, HD-atDCS Deteriorates Learning Transfer of a Complex Bimanual Coordination Task. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s41465-018-0088-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
37
|
Ciechanski P, Carlson HL, Yu SS, Kirton A. Modeling Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation-Induced Electric Fields in Children and Adults. Front Hum Neurosci 2018; 12:268. [PMID: 30018543 PMCID: PMC6037769 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2018] [Accepted: 06/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation that induces electric fields in neuronal tissue, modulating cortical excitability. Therapeutic applications of tDCS are rapidly expanding, and are being investigated in pediatrics for various clinical conditions. Anatomical variations are among a host of factors that influence the effects of tDCS, and pronounced anatomical differences between children and adults suggest that induced electric fields may be substantially different across development. The aim of this study was to determine the strength and distribution of tDCS-induced electric fields across development. Typically developing children, adolescents, and adults were recruited. Individualized finite-element method modeling of primary motor cortex (M1) targeting tDCS was performed. In the largest pediatric sample to date, we found significantly higher peak and mean M1 electric field strength, and more expansive electric field spread for children compared to adults. Electric fields were often comparable between adolescents and adults. Our results suggest that these differences may be associated with age-related differences in skull and extra-axial space thickness, as well as developmental changes occurring in gray and white matter. Individualized current modeling may be a valuable tool for personalizing effective doses of tDCS in future pediatric clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Ciechanski
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Helen L Carlson
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Sabrina S Yu
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Adam Kirton
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Departments of Pediatrics and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gillick B, Rich T, Nemanich S, Chen CY, Menk J, Mueller B, Chen M, Ward M, Meekins G, Feyma T, Krach L, Rudser K. Transcranial direct current stimulation and constraint-induced therapy in cerebral palsy: A randomized, blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2018; 22:358-368. [PMID: 29456128 PMCID: PMC5899638 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2017] [Revised: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 02/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
We investigated the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) in children and young adults with unilateral cerebral palsy. Twenty participants were randomized to receive active or sham tDCS. The intervention consisted of 10 consecutive weekday sessions of tDCS applied to the non-lesioned hemisphere (20 min) concurrently with CIMT (120 min). Participants, caregivers, and interventionists were blinded to group assignment. The primary safety outcome investigated adverse events. The primary behavioral outcome was the Assisting Hand Assessment. All 20 participants (mean age = 12.7 yrs, range = 7.4-21.6 years) were evaluated for the primary outcomes. No serious adverse events occurred, and the most commonly reported minor adverse events were headache and itchiness. Both groups demonstrated a significant improvement in hand function after the intervention, although no significant effect of tDCS was observed (between-group difference = -2.18, 95% CI = [-6.48, 2.12], p = 0.30). Although hand function improved overall, no significant differences between intervention groups were found. Children with preserved corticospinal tract circuitry from the lesioned hemisphere, compared to those without, showed greater improvement in hand function (mean difference = 3.04, 95% CI = [-0.64, 6.72], p = 0.099). Our study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of serial sessions of tDCS, and presents preliminary evidence for the effect of CST circuitry on outcomes following tDCS/CIMT. Future work in children with unilateral cerebral palsy should focus on the optimal dosing and consider individual brain circuitry when describing response to combined interventions. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.govNCT 02250092.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernadette Gillick
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 388, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
| | - Tonya Rich
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 388, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Samuel Nemanich
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 388, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Chao-Ying Chen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 388, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Jeremiah Menk
- School of Public Health, Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 303, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Bryon Mueller
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, 2450 Riverside Ave. S, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA
| | - Mo Chen
- Institute for Engineering and Medicine, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE, MMC 609, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Marcie Ward
- Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare, 200 East University Ave., St. Paul, MN, 55101, USA
| | - Gregg Meekins
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 295, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Tim Feyma
- Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare, 200 East University Ave., St. Paul, MN, 55101, USA
| | - Linda Krach
- Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute, 800 East 28th St., Minneapolis, MN, 55407, USA
| | - Kyle Rudser
- School of Public Health, Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 303, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Pixa NH, Pollok B. Effects of tDCS on Bimanual Motor Skills: A Brief Review. Front Behav Neurosci 2018; 12:63. [PMID: 29670514 PMCID: PMC5893856 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Accepted: 03/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that allows the modulation of cortical excitability as well as neuroplastic reorganization using a weak constant current applied through the skull on the cerebral cortex. TDCS has been found to improve motor performance in general and motor learning in particular. However, these effects have been reported almost exclusively for unimanual motor tasks such as serial reaction time tasks, adaptation tasks, or visuo-motor tracking. Despite the importance of bimanual actions in most activities of daily living, only few studies have investigated the effects of tDCS on bimanual motor skills. The objectives of this review article are: (i) to provide a concise overview of the few existing studies in this area; and (ii) to discuss the effects of tDCS on bimanual motor skills in healthy volunteers and patients suffering from neurological diseases. Despite considerable variations in stimulation protocols, the bimanual tasks employed, and study designs, the data suggest that tDCS has the potential to enhance bimanual motor skills. The findings imply that the effects of tDCS vary with task demands, such as complexity and the level of expertise of the participating volunteers. Nevertheless, optimized stimulation protocols tailored to bimanual tasks and individual performance considering the underlying neural substrates of task execution are required in order to probe the effectiveness of tDCS in greater detail, thus creating an opportunity to support motor recovery in neuro-rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nils H Pixa
- Department of Sport Psychology, Institute of Sports Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Bettina Pollok
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ciechanski P, Cheng A, Damji O, Lopushinsky S, Hecker K, Jadavji Z, Kirton A. Effects of transcranial direct-current stimulation on laparoscopic surgical skill acquisition. BJS Open 2018; 2:70-78. [PMID: 29951631 PMCID: PMC5989997 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.43] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2017] [Accepted: 12/13/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Changes in medical education may limit opportunities for trainees to gain proficiency in surgical skills. Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) can augment motor skill learning and may enhance surgical procedural skill acquisition. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of tDCS on simulation-based laparoscopic surgical skill acquisition. Methods In this double-blind, sham-controlled randomized trial, participants were randomized to receive 20 min of anodal tDCS or sham stimulation over the dominant primary motor cortex, concurrent with Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery simulation-based training. Primary outcomes of laparoscopic pattern-cutting and peg transfer tasks were scored at baseline, during repeated performance over 1 h, and again at 6 weeks. Intent-to-treat analysis examined the effects of treatment group on skill acquisition and retention. Results Of 40 participants, those receiving tDCS achieved higher mean(s.d.) final pattern-cutting scores than participants in the sham group (207·6(30·0) versus 186·0(32·7) respectively; P = 0·022). Scores were unchanged at 6 weeks. Effects on peg transfer scores were not significantly different (210·2(23·5) in the tDCS group versus 201·7(18·1) in the sham group; P = 0·111); the proportion achieving predetermined proficiency levels was higher for tDCS than for sham stimulation. Procedures were well tolerated with no serious adverse events and no decreases in motor measures. Conclusion The addition of tDCS to laparoscopic surgical training may enhance skill acquisition. Trials of additional skills and translation to non-simulated performance are required to determine the potential value in medical education and impact on patient outcomes. Registration number: NCT02756052 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Ciechanski
- Department of Neuroscience University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
| | - A Cheng
- Department of Pediatrics University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
| | - O Damji
- Department of Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
| | - S Lopushinsky
- Department of Surgery University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
| | - K Hecker
- Department of Veterinary Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.,Department of Community Health Sciences University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
| | - Z Jadavji
- Department of Neuroscience University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
| | - A Kirton
- Department of Pediatrics University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Gillick BT, Gordon AM, Feyma T, Krach LE, Carmel J, Rich TL, Bleyenheuft Y, Friel K. Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Protocol and Risk Mitigation Guide. Front Pediatr 2018; 6:56. [PMID: 29616203 PMCID: PMC5864860 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2018.00056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2017] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-invasive brain stimulation has been increasingly investigated, mainly in adults, with the aims of influencing motor recovery after stroke. However, a consensus on safety and optimal study design has not been established in pediatrics. The low incidence of reported major adverse events in adults with and without clinical conditions has expedited the exploration of NIBS in children with paralleled purposes to influence motor skill development after neurological injury. Considering developmental variability in children, with or without a neurologic diagnosis, adult dosing and protocols may not be appropriate. The purpose of this paper is to present recommendations and tools for the prevention and mitigation of adverse events (AEs) during NIBS in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP). Our recommendations provide a framework for pediatric NIBS study design. The key components of this report on NIBS AEs are (a) a summary of related literature to provide the background evidence and (b) tools for anticipating and managing AEs from four international pediatric laboratories. These recommendations provide a preliminary guide for the assessment of safety and risk mitigation of NIBS in children with UCP. Consistent reporting of safety, feasibility, and tolerability will refine NIBS practice guidelines contributing to future clinical translations of NIBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernadette T Gillick
- Physical Therapy Division, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Andrew M Gordon
- Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Tim Feyma
- Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare, Pediatric Neurology, St. Paul, MN, United States
| | - Linda E Krach
- Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Jason Carmel
- Weill-Cornell Medical College, Blythedale Children's Hospital, Burke Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY, United States
| | - Tonya L Rich
- Rehabilitation Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Yannick Bleyenheuft
- Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), Universite catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kathleen Friel
- Weill-Cornell Medical College, Blythedale Children's Hospital, Burke Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Antal A, Alekseichuk I, Bikson M, Brockmöller J, Brunoni AR, Chen R, Cohen LG, Dowthwaite G, Ellrich J, Flöel A, Fregni F, George MS, Hamilton R, Haueisen J, Herrmann CS, Hummel FC, Lefaucheur JP, Liebetanz D, Loo CK, McCaig CD, Miniussi C, Miranda PC, Moliadze V, Nitsche MA, Nowak R, Padberg F, Pascual-Leone A, Poppendieck W, Priori A, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell J, Rueger MA, Ruffini G, Schellhorn K, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Wexler A, Ziemann U, Hallett M, Paulus W. Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol 2017; 128:1774-1809. [PMID: 28709880 PMCID: PMC5985830 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 646] [Impact Index Per Article: 92.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2017] [Revised: 05/29/2017] [Accepted: 06/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Low intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) in humans, encompassing transcranial direct current (tDCS), transcutaneous spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS), transcranial alternating current (tACS), and transcranial random noise (tRNS) stimulation or their combinations, appears to be safe. No serious adverse events (SAEs) have been reported so far in over 18,000 sessions administered to healthy subjects, neurological and psychiatric patients, as summarized here. Moderate adverse events (AEs), as defined by the necessity to intervene, are rare, and include skin burns with tDCS due to suboptimal electrode-skin contact. Very rarely mania or hypomania was induced in patients with depression (11 documented cases), yet a causal relationship is difficult to prove because of the low incidence rate and limited numbers of subjects in controlled trials. Mild AEs (MAEs) include headache and fatigue following stimulation as well as prickling and burning sensations occurring during tDCS at peak-to-baseline intensities of 1-2mA and during tACS at higher peak-to-peak intensities above 2mA. The prevalence of published AEs is different in studies specifically assessing AEs vs. those not assessing them, being higher in the former. AEs are frequently reported by individuals receiving placebo stimulation. The profile of AEs in terms of frequency, magnitude and type is comparable in healthy and clinical populations, and this is also the case for more vulnerable populations, such as children, elderly persons, or pregnant women. Combined interventions (e.g., co-application of drugs, electrophysiological measurements, neuroimaging) were not associated with further safety issues. Safety is established for low-intensity 'conventional' TES defined as <4mA, up to 60min duration per day. Animal studies and modeling evidence indicate that brain injury could occur at predicted current densities in the brain of 6.3-13A/m2 that are over an order of magnitude above those produced by tDCS in humans. Using AC stimulation fewer AEs were reported compared to DC. In specific paradigms with amplitudes of up to 10mA, frequencies in the kHz range appear to be safe. In this paper we provide structured interviews and recommend their use in future controlled studies, in particular when trying to extend the parameters applied. We also discuss recent regulatory issues, reporting practices and ethical issues. These recommendations achieved consensus in a meeting, which took place in Göttingen, Germany, on September 6-7, 2016 and were refined thereafter by email correspondence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Antal
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany.
| | - I Alekseichuk
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - M Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, USA
| | - J Brockmöller
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Germany
| | - A R Brunoni
- Service of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation, Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Laboratory of Neurosciences (LIM-27) and Interdisciplinary Center for Applied Neuromodulation University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - R Chen
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto and Krembil Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - L G Cohen
- Human Cortical Physiology and Neurorehabilitation Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke NIH, Bethesda, USA
| | | | - J Ellrich
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark; Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; EBS Technologies GmbH, Europarc Dreilinden, Germany
| | - A Flöel
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Greifswald, Germany
| | - F Fregni
- Spaulding Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M S George
- Brain Stimulation Division, Medical University of South Carolina, and Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - R Hamilton
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - J Haueisen
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Germany
| | - C S Herrmann
- Experimental Psychology Lab, Department of Psychology, European Medical School, Carl von Ossietzky Universität, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - F C Hummel
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Centre of Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland; Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL Valais), Sion, Switzerland
| | - J P Lefaucheur
- Department of Physiology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, and EA 4391, Nerve Excitability and Therapeutic Team (ENT), Faculty of Medicine, Paris Est Créteil University, Créteil, France
| | - D Liebetanz
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - C K Loo
- School of Psychiatry & Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - C D McCaig
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
| | - C Miniussi
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy; Cognitive Neuroscience Section, IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - P C Miranda
- Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - V Moliadze
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
| | - M A Nitsche
- Department of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - R Nowak
- Neuroelectrics, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F Padberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Munich Center for Brain Stimulation, Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich, Germany
| | - A Pascual-Leone
- Division of Cognitive Neurology, Harvard Medical Center and Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA
| | - W Poppendieck
- Department of Information Technology, Mannheim University of Applied Sciences, Mannheim, Germany
| | - A Priori
- Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutich, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan Italy; Deparment of Clinical Neurology, University Hospital Asst Santi Paolo E Carlo, Milan, Italy
| | - S Rossi
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Human Physiology Section and Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology Section, Brain Investigation & Neuromodulation Lab, University of Siena, Italy
| | - P M Rossini
- Area of Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, University Clinic A. Gemelli, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - M A Rueger
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - H R Siebner
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark; Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Y Ugawa
- Department of Neurology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan; Fukushima Global Medical Science Center, Advanced Clinical Research Center, Fukushima Medical University, Japan
| | - A Wexler
- Department of Science, Technology & Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - U Ziemann
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - M Hallett
- Human Motor Control Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - W Paulus
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ciechanski P, Zewdie E, Kirton A. Developmental profile of motor cortex transcallosal inhibition in children and adolescents. J Neurophysiol 2017; 118:140-148. [PMID: 28381485 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00076.2017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2017] [Revised: 03/27/2017] [Accepted: 03/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcallosal fibers facilitate interhemispheric networks involved in motor tasks. Despite their clinical relevance, interhemispheric motor control systems have not been completely defined in the developing brain. The objective of this study was to examine the developmental profile of transcallosal inhibition in healthy children and adolescents. Nineteen typically developing right-handed participants were recruited. Two transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) paradigms assessed transcallosal inhibition: ipsilateral silent periods (iSP) and paired-pulse interhemispheric inhibition (IHI). TMS was applied to the motor hotspot of the first dorsal interosseous muscle. Resting motor threshold (RMT), iSP latency, duration and suppression strength, and paired-pulse IHI were measured from both hemispheres. The Purdue Pegboard Test assessed unimanual motor function. Hemispheric differences were evident for RMT and iSP latency and suppression strength, where the left hemisphere had a lower RMT, prolonged latency, and greater suppression strength. iSP duration showed hemispheric symmetry. RMT and iSP latency decreased with age, whereas iSP suppression strength increased. Girls showed shorter iSP latency. Children typically displayed IHI, although hemispheric differences were observed. iSP suppression strength was uniquely associated with IHI within individuals. iSP duration correlated with motor performance. TMS can characterize transcallosal inhibition in normal children and adolescents with effects of age, directionality, sex, and motor performance. Establishing this developmental profile of interhemispheric interactions may advance understanding and therapeutic strategies for pediatric motor disorders such as cerebral palsy.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Here we demonstrate that transcranial magnetic stimulation can characterize transcallosal inhibition in normal children and adolescents with effects of age, directionality, handedness, and motor performance. Interestingly, we also demonstrated sex effects, possibly related to the differing developmental profiles of boys and girls. Establishing this developmental profile of interhemispheric interactions may advance understanding and therapeutic strategies for pediatric motor disorders such as cerebral palsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Ciechanski
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; and
| | - Ephrem Zewdie
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; and
| | - Adam Kirton
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; and .,Departments of Pediatrics and Clinical Neurosciences, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Buch ER, Santarnecchi E, Antal A, Born J, Celnik PA, Classen J, Gerloff C, Hallett M, Hummel FC, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Paulus WJ, Reis J, Robertson EM, Rothwell JC, Sandrini M, Schambra HM, Wassermann EM, Ziemann U, Cohen LG. Effects of tDCS on motor learning and memory formation: A consensus and critical position paper. Clin Neurophysiol 2017; 128:589-603. [PMID: 28231477 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 215] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2016] [Revised: 01/05/2017] [Accepted: 01/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Motor skills are required for activities of daily living. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied in association with motor skill learning has been investigated as a tool for enhancing training effects in health and disease. Here, we review the published literature investigating whether tDCS can facilitate the acquisition, retention or adaptation of motor skills. Work in multiple laboratories is underway to develop a mechanistic understanding of tDCS effects on different forms of learning and to optimize stimulation protocols. Efforts are required to improve reproducibility and standardization. Overall, reproducibility remains to be fully tested, effect sizes with present techniques vary over a wide range, and the basis of observed inter-individual variability in tDCS effects is incompletely understood. It is recommended that future studies explicitly state in the Methods the exploratory (hypothesis-generating) or hypothesis-driven (confirmatory) nature of the experimental designs. General research practices could be improved with prospective pre-registration of hypothesis-based investigations, more emphasis on the detailed description of methods (including all pertinent details to enable future modeling of induced current and experimental replication), and use of post-publication open data repositories. A checklist is proposed for reporting tDCS investigations in a way that can improve efforts to assess reproducibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan R Buch
- Human Cortical Physiology and Neurorehabilitation Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Emiliano Santarnecchi
- Berenson-Allen Center for Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation, Division of Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea Antal
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Jan Born
- Institute for Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Pablo A Celnik
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joseph Classen
- Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christian Gerloff
- Brain Imaging and NeuroStimulation (BINS) Laboratory, Department of Neurology University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Martinistr, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mark Hallett
- Human Motor Control Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Friedhelm C Hummel
- Brain Imaging and NeuroStimulation (BINS) Laboratory, Department of Neurology University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Martinistr, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael A Nitsche
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Leibniz Research Center for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany
| | - Alvaro Pascual-Leone
- Berenson-Allen Center for Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation, Division of Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Walter J Paulus
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Janine Reis
- Department of Neurology, Albert Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Edwin M Robertson
- Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Marco Sandrini
- Department of Psychology, University of Roehampton, London, UK
| | - Heidi M Schambra
- Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric M Wassermann
- Behavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ulf Ziemann
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Leonardo G Cohen
- Human Cortical Physiology and Neurorehabilitation Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kirton A, Ciechanski P, Zewdie E, Andersen J, Nettel-Aguirre A, Carlson H, Carsolio L, Herrero M, Quigley J, Mineyko A, Hodge J, Hill M. Transcranial direct current stimulation for children with perinatal stroke and hemiparesis. Neurology 2016; 88:259-267. [DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000003518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2016] [Accepted: 10/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective:To determine whether the addition of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to intensive therapy increases motor function in children with perinatal stroke and hemiparetic cerebral palsy.Methods:This was a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Participants were recruited from a population-based cohort with MRI-classified unilateral perinatal stroke, age of 6 to 18 years, and disabling hemiparesis. All completed a goal-directed, peer-supported, 2-week after-school motor learning camp (32 hours of therapy). Participants were randomized 1:1 to 1 mA cathodal tDCS over the contralesional primary motor cortex (M1) for the initial 20 minutes of daily therapy or sham. Primary subjective (Canadian Occupational Performance Measure [COPM]), objective (Assisting Hand Assessment [AHA]), safety, and secondary outcomes were measured at 1 week and 2 months after intervention. Analysis was by intention to treat.Results:Twenty-four participants were randomized (median age 11.8 ± 2.7 years, range 6.7–17.8). COPM performance and satisfaction scores doubled at 1 week with sustained gains at 2 months (p < 0.001). COPM scores increased more with tDCS compared to sham control (p = 0.004). AHA scores demonstrated only mild increases at both time points with no tDCS effects. Procedures were safe and well tolerated with no decrease in either arm function or serious adverse events.Conclusion:tDCS trials appear feasible and safe in hemiparetic children. Lack of change in objective motor function may reflect underdosing of therapy. Marked gains in subjective function with tDCS warrant further study.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT02170285.Classification of evidence:This study provides Class II evidence that for children with perinatal stroke and hemiparetic cerebral palsy, the addition of tDCS to moderate-dose motor learning therapy does not significantly improve motor function as measured by the AHA.
Collapse
|