1
|
Presa J, Findlow J, Zimet GD. Meningococcal Vaccination of Adolescents in the United States: Past Successes and Future Considerations. J Adolesc Health 2024; 74:1068-1077. [PMID: 38430074 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a rare but serious illness, and adolescents and young adults in the United States are at increased risk. Here, we discuss US IMD history and how successful disease prevention through routine vaccination against the most common disease-causing serogroups (A, B, C, W, and Y) can inform future recommendations. Before the introduction of quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate (MenACWY) vaccines, most US cases of IMD were caused by serogroups B, C, and Y. After recommendation by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for routine MenACWY vaccination of 11-12-year-olds in 2005, followed by a 2010 booster recommendation, MenCWY disease incidence declined dramatically, and vaccine coverage remains high. Two serogroup B (MenB) vaccines are licensed in the United States, but uptake is low compared with MenACWY vaccines, likely because Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends MenB vaccination subject to shared clinical decision-making rather than routinely for all adolescents. The proportion of adolescent IMD caused by MenB has now increased. Pentavalent vaccines that protect against serogroups A, B, C, W, and Y may provide an optimal strategy for improving vaccination rates to ultimately reduce MenB incidence while maintaining the historically low rates of IMD caused by serogroups A, C, W, and Y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Presa
- Vaccines Medical Development & Scientific/Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
| | - Jamie Findlow
- Vaccines Medical Development & Scientific/Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Ltd, Surrey, United Kingdom
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
San Francisco Ramos A, Isitt C, Athaide S, Ladhani SN, Andrews NJ, Townsend-Payne K, Holland A, Louth J, Borrow R, Heath PT, Cosgrove CA. Propositive follow-up: Long-term immune responses to the 4CMenB and MenACWY vaccines in people living with HIV. HIV Med 2024; 25:370-380. [PMID: 38013594 DOI: 10.1111/hiv.13586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People living with HIV have an increased risk of meningococcal disease. The Propositive trial evaluated co-administration of two doses of a four-component recombinant protein-based MenB vaccine (4CMenB) and a quadrivalent conjugate polysaccharide MenACWY vaccine (MenACWY-CRM197) given 1 month apart in people with HIV. The follow-up trial assessed the immunogenicity of these vaccines at 1.5 and 2.5 years after primary vaccination. METHODS Participants who completed the parent Propositive trial were invited to the follow-up study. Immunogenicity analysis was performed at 18 and 30 months after primary vaccination. Primary outcome measures were serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) geometric mean titres (GMTs) against three MenB reference strains and the proportion of participants maintaining a protective SBA titre of ≥4 at 18 and 30 months. Secondary outcome measures were SBA GMTs against MenA, C, W, and Y serogroups and the proportion of participants maintaining a protective SBA titre of ≥8 at 18 and 30 months. The trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT042394300). RESULTS A total of 40 participants aged 22-47 years were enrolled. Geometric mean titres waned by 18 and 30 months but remained higher than pre-vaccination for all MenB strains and MenA, C, W, and Y. In total, 75%-85% of participants retained protective SBA titres by 30 months against individual MenB strains, whereas 68.8% of patients retained protective antibody titres against all three MenB strains. Antibodies against MenC waned more rapidly than did those against MenA, W, and Y. The proportion of participants with protective titres against MenC at 30 months was also lower (46.9%) than that with protective titres against MenA (87.5%), W (78.1%), and Y (87.5%). CONCLUSIONS Immune responses against MenB in our cohort of people living with HIV at 2.5 years of follow-up were reassuring, with 68.8% of participants retaining protection against all three reference strains. However, responses against MenC were lower than those against MenA, W, and Y serogroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto San Francisco Ramos
- Centre for Paediatric and Neonatal Infection, Vaccine Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Catherine Isitt
- Centre for Paediatric and Neonatal Infection, Vaccine Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Shehnaz Athaide
- Centre for Paediatric and Neonatal Infection, Vaccine Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Shamez N Ladhani
- Centre for Paediatric and Neonatal Infection, Vaccine Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK
- United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, UK
| | | | - Kelly Townsend-Payne
- UKHSA Vaccine Evaluation Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
| | - Ann Holland
- UKHSA Vaccine Evaluation Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
| | - Jennifer Louth
- UKHSA Vaccine Evaluation Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
| | - Ray Borrow
- UKHSA Vaccine Evaluation Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
| | - Paul T Heath
- Centre for Paediatric and Neonatal Infection, Vaccine Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Catherine A Cosgrove
- Centre for Paediatric and Neonatal Infection, Vaccine Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nguyen PNT, Thai PQ, Dien TM, Hai DT, Dai VTT, Luan NH, Mathur G, Badur S, Truyen DM, Le Minh NH. 4CMenB Vaccination to Prevent Meningococcal B Disease in Vietnam: Expert Review and Opinion. Infect Dis Ther 2024; 13:423-437. [PMID: 38430327 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-023-00905-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
An advisory board meeting was held with experts in Vietnam (Hanoi, August 2022), to review the evidence on invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) epidemiology, clinical management, and meningococcal vaccines to reach a consensus on recommendations for meningococcal vaccination in Vietnam. IMD is a severe disease, with the highest burden in infants and children. IMD presents as meningitis and/or meningococcemia and can progress extremely rapidly. Almost 90% of deaths in children occur within the first 24 h, and disabling sequelae (e.g., limb amputations and neurological damage) occur in up to 20% of survivors. IMD patients are often hospitalized late, due to mild and nonspecific early symptoms and misdiagnosis. Difficulties related to diagnosis and antibiotic misuse mean that the number of reported IMD cases in Vietnam is likely to be underestimated. Serogroup B IMD is predominant in many regions of the world, including Vietnam, where 82% of IMD cases were due to serogroup B (surveillance data from 2012 to 2021). Four component meningococcal B vaccine (4CMenB) is used in many countries (and is part of the pediatric National Immunization Program in 13 countries), with infant vaccination starting from two months of age, and a 2 + 1 dosing schedule. Experts recommend 4CMenB vaccination as soon as possible in Vietnam, starting from two months of age, with a 2 + 1 dosing schedule, and at least completing one dose before 6 months of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phung Nguyen The Nguyen
- Pediatrics Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Pham Quang Thai
- Communicable Diseases Control and Prevention Department, National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | | | - Do Thien Hai
- Center for Tropical Diseases, National Pediatric Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Vo Thi Trang Dai
- Respiratory Microbiology Bacteria Laboratory, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, the Pasteur Institute in Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Nguyen Huy Luan
- Immunization Unit of University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital, Pediatrics Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
McMillan M, Mohammed H, Bednarz J, Leong LEX, Lawrence A, Sullivan TR, Maiden MCJ, Marshall HS. Longitudinal study of meningococcal carriage in adolescents and young adults in South Australia 2017-2020. J Infect 2024; 88:149-157. [PMID: 38242365 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This analysis investigated longitudinal changes in meningococcal carriage in adolescents in South Australia over 4 years. METHODS Data from the "B Part of It" study, which included a state-wide cluster randomized controlled trial in secondary-school students (n = 34,489 in 2017 and 2018) and serial cross-sectional studies in school leavers aged 17-25 years (n = 4028 in 2019-2020). Individuals had oropharyngeal swabs collected annually. This study included two unique cohorts: (1) individuals enrolled in 2019, with three consecutive annual swabs taken in 2017, 2018 and 2019; and (2) individuals enrolled in 2020, with swabs taken in 2017, 2018, and 2020. Disease-associated N. meningitidis genogroups were identified using PCR and whole genome sequencing. Univariate analysis identified risk factors for recurrent carriage (≥2). RESULTS Among school leavers, 50 (1.7%, total n = 2980) had carriage detected at successive visits. In participants with meningococcal carriage at successive visits, 38/50 (76.0%) had the same genogroup detected by porA PCR. Of those, 19 had the same MLST type and demonstrated minimal variation, indicating they most likely had sustained carriage of the same isolate (range 226 to 490 days, mean duration 352 [SD 51] days). In the 2019 school leaver cohort, 6.7% acquired carriage in their first year out of school compared to 3.3% in their final school year. Compared to single carriage detection, recurrent carriage was potentially more likely in older adolescents (16 compared to ≤15 years; OR = 1.97 (95%CI 1.0, 3.86); p = 0.048). CONCLUSION Whilst carriage is typically transient, some adolescents/young adults may have persistent carriage and are likely to be an important group in the transmission of meningococci.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark McMillan
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Hassen Mohammed
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jana Bednarz
- School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; SAHMRI Women and Kids Theme, South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Lex E X Leong
- Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, SA Pathology, Adelaide 5000, Australia
| | - Andrew Lawrence
- Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, SA Pathology, Adelaide 5000, Australia
| | - Thomas R Sullivan
- School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; SAHMRI Women and Kids Theme, South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | | | - Helen S Marshall
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Milazzo A, McMillan M, Giles L, Page K, Flood L, Marshall H. Geographical distribution of invasive meningococcal disease and carriage: A spatial analysis. Epidemiol Infect 2024; 152:e22. [PMID: 38234190 PMCID: PMC10894902 DOI: 10.1017/s0950268824000116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Little information exists concerning the spatial relationship between invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) cases and Neisseria meningitidis (N. meningitidis) carriage. The aim of this study was to examine whether there is a relationship between IMD and asymptomatic oropharyngeal carriage of meningococci by spatial analysis to identify the distribution and patterns of cases and carriage in South Australia (SA). Carriage data geocoded to participants' residential addresses and meningococcal case notifications using Postal Area (POA) centroids were used to analyse spatial distribution by disease- and non-disease-associated genogroups, as well as overall from 2017 to 2020. The majority of IMD cases were genogroup B with the overall highest incidence of cases reported in infants, young children, and adolescents. We found no clear spatial association between N. meningitidis carriage and IMD cases. However, analyses using carriage and case genogroups showed differences in the spatial distribution between metropolitan and regional areas. Regional areas had a higher rate of IMD cases and carriage prevalence. While no clear relationship between cases and carriage was evident in the spatial analysis, the higher rates of both carriage and disease in regional areas highlight the need to maintain high vaccine coverage outside of the well-resourced metropolitan area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana Milazzo
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Mark McMillan
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, Australia
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Lynne Giles
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Kira Page
- Australian Centre for Housing Research, Hugo Centre for Population and Migration Studies, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Louise Flood
- Communicable Disease Control Branch, Department for Health and Wellbeing, Government of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Helen Marshall
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, Australia
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bloom DE, Bonanni P, Martinón-Torres F, Richmond PC, Safadi MAP, Salisbury DM, Charos A, Schley K, Findlow J, Balmer P. Meningococcal Disease in the Post-COVID-19 Era: A Time to Prepare. Infect Dis Ther 2023; 12:2649-2663. [PMID: 38048020 PMCID: PMC10746601 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-023-00888-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The global invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) landscape changed considerably during the COVID-19 pandemic, as evidenced by decreased incidence rates due to COVID-19 mitigation measures, such as limited social contact, physical distancing, mask wearing, and hand washing. Vaccination rates were also lower during the pandemic relative to pre-pandemic levels. Although policymakers may have shifted their focus away from IMD vaccination programs to COVID-19 vaccination programs, strong arguments support implementation and prioritization of IMD vaccination programs; IMD cases have increased in some countries and IMD rates may even have exceeded pre-pandemic levels. Additional concerns include increased susceptibility due to vaccination coverage gaps, increased incidence of other respiratory pathogens, immunity debt from lockdown restrictions, and increased IMD epidemiologic variability. The full range of benefits of widely available and effective meningococcal vaccines needs to be considered, especially in health technology assessments, where the broad benefits of these vaccines are neither accurately quantified nor captured in implementation policy decisions. Importantly, implementation of meningococcal vaccination programs in the current IMD climate also appeals to broader healthcare principles, including preparedness rather than reactive approaches, generally accepted benefit-risk approaches to vaccination, historical precedent, and the World Health Organization's goal of defeating meningitis by 2030. Countries should therefore act swiftly to bolster existing meningococcal vaccination strategies to provide broad coverage across age groups and serogroups given the recent increases in IMD incidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David E Bloom
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paolo Bonanni
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Federico Martinón-Torres
- Pediatrics Department, Translational Pediatrics and Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago, de Compostela, Spain
- Genetics, Vaccines and Infections Research Group (GENVIP), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Peter C Richmond
- Division of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute and Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Marco A P Safadi
- Department of Pediatrics, Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - David M Salisbury
- Programme for Global Health, Royal Institute of International Affairs, Chatham House, London, UK
| | | | | | - Jamie Findlow
- Vaccines, Antivirals and Evidence Generation, Pfizer Ltd, Tadworth, UK
| | - Paul Balmer
- Vaccines, Antivirals and Evidence Generation, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kassianos G, Barasheed O, Abbing-Karahagopian V, Khalaf M, Ozturk S, Banzhoff A, Badur S. Meningococcal B Immunisation in Adults and Potential Broader Immunisation Strategies: A Narrative Review. Infect Dis Ther 2023; 12:2193-2219. [PMID: 37428339 PMCID: PMC10581987 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-023-00836-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Recombinant vaccines against invasive meningococcal disease due to Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B (MenB) have shown substantial impact in reducing MenB disease in targeted populations. 4CMenB targets four key N. meningitidis protein antigens; human factor H binding protein (fHbp), Neisserial heparin binding antigen (NHBA), Neisseria adhesin A (NadA) and the porin A protein (PorA P1.4), with one or more of these expressed by most pathogenic MenB strains, while MenB-FHbp targets two distinct fHbp variants. While many countries recommend MenB immunisation in adults considered at high risk due to underlying medical conditions or immunosuppression, there are no recommendations for routine use in the general adult population. We reviewed the burden of MenB in adults, where, while incidence rates remain low (and far lower than in young children < 5 years of age at greatest risk), a substantial proportion of MenB cases (20% or more) is now observed in the adult population; evident in Europe, Australia, and in the United States. We also reviewed immunogenicity data in adults from clinical studies conducted during MenB vaccine development and subsequent post-licensure studies. A 2-dose schedule of 4CMenB generates hSBA titres ≥ 1:4 towards all four key vaccine target antigens in up to 98-100% of subjects. For MenB-FHbp, a ≥ fourfold rise in hSBA titres against the four primary representative test strains was observed in 70-95% of recipients following a 3-dose schedule. While this suggests potential benefits for MenB immunisation if used in adult populations, data are limited (especially for adults > 50 years) and key aspects relating to duration of protection remain unclear. Although a broader adult MenB immunisation policy could provide greater protection of the adult population, additional data are required to support policy decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Kassianos
- Royal College of General Practitioners, London, UK
- The British Global and Travel Health Association, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lodi L, Barbati F, Amicizia D, Baldo V, Barbui AM, Bondi A, Costantino C, Da Dalt L, Ferrara L, Fortunato F, Guarnieri V, Icardi G, Indolfi G, Martinelli D, Martini M, Moriondo M, Nieddu F, Peroni DG, Prato R, Ricci S, Russo F, Tirelli F, Vitale F, Ladhani SN, Azzari C. Four-Component Recombinant Protein-Based Vaccine Effectiveness Against Serogroup B Meningococcal Disease in Italy. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2329678. [PMID: 37594762 PMCID: PMC10439479 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Population-based data on the 4-component recombinant protein-based (4CMenB) vaccine effectiveness and reduction in incidence rate ratios (IRRs) are continuously needed to assess vaccine performance in the prevention of serogroup B invasive meningococcal disease (IMD). Objective To assess the effectiveness and reduction in IRRs associated with the 4CMenB vaccine in the pediatric population in 6 regions in Italy. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort screening study and case-control study included data from children aged younger than 6 years in 6 highly populated Italian regions from January 1, 2006, to January 1, 2020. Participants included children younger than 6 years diagnosed with serogroup B IMD without predisposing factors. Data were collected from regional surveillance and vaccination registries and were analyzed from September 2021 to January 2022. Exposures Routine 4CMenB vaccination, per regional vaccination programs. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was the effectiveness of the 4CMenB vaccine in the prevention of serogroup B IMD in the population of children aged younger than 6 years in 6 Italian regions. The percentages of vaccine effectiveness (VE) were obtained through the concomitant use of a screening method and a case-control study. Secondary outcomes were the comparison of effectiveness results obtained using the 2 different computational methods, the description of serogroup B IMD incidence rates, and reduction in IRRs before and after 4CMenB introduction, as a proxy for vaccine impact. Results The cohort screening study included a resident population of 587 561 children younger than 6 years in 3 regions with similar surveillance protocols, and the matched-case controls study assessed a resident population of 1 080 620 children younger than 6 years in 6 regions. Analyses found that 4CMenB VE in fully immunized children was 94.9% (95% CI, 83.1%-98.4%) using the screening method and 91.7% (95% CI, 24.4%-98.6%) using the case-control method. Overall reduction in IRR was 50%, reaching 70% in regions with early-start vaccination schedules. The case-control method involving 6 highly-populated Italian regions included 26 cases and 52 controls and found an estimated VE of 92.4% (95% CI, 67.6%-97.9%) in children old enough for the first vaccine dose and 95.6% (95% CI, 71.7%-99.1%) in fully immunized children. VE was more than 90% for partially immunized children. Even in regions where the first dose was administered at age 2 months, almost 20% of unvaccinated cases were among infants too young to receive the first 4CMenB dose. Conclusions and Relevance This screening cohort study and matched case-controls study found high effectiveness of 4CMenB vaccination and greater reduction in IRR for early-start vaccination schedules in preventing invasive serogroup B meningococcal disease. The high proportion of children too young to be vaccinated among unvaccinated cases suggests that starting the vaccination even earlier may prevent more cases. Screening and case-control methods provided similar estimates of VE: either method may be used in different study settings, but concomitant use can provide more robust estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Lodi
- Immunology Unit, Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Federica Barbati
- Immunology Unit, Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniela Amicizia
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Baldo
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Barbui
- S.C. Microbiology and Virology Laboratory, City of Health and Science, Turin, Italy
| | - Alessandro Bondi
- S.C. Microbiology and Virology Laboratory, City of Health and Science, Turin, Italy
| | - Claudio Costantino
- Department of Health Promotion Sciences, Maternal and Infant Care, Internal Medicine and Excellence Specialties “G. D’Alessandro,” University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Liviana Da Dalt
- Department of Woman’s and Child’s Health, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Lorenza Ferrara
- Regional Epidemiology Reference Service for the Surveillance, Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases, Local Health Unit of Alessandria, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Francesca Fortunato
- Hygiene Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Foggia Hospital, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Valentina Guarnieri
- Immunology Unit, Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Icardi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Indolfi
- Paediatric and Liver Unit, Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
- Department of Neurofarba, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Domenico Martinelli
- Hygiene Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Foggia Hospital, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Maria Moriondo
- Laboratory of Immunology and Molecular Microbiology, Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Nieddu
- Laboratory of Immunology and Molecular Microbiology, Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
| | - Diego G. Peroni
- Pediatric Clinic, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Rosa Prato
- Hygiene Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Foggia Hospital, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Silvia Ricci
- Immunology Unit, Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesca Russo
- Veneto Regional Directorate of Prevention, Food Safety, Veterinary, Public Health, Venice, Italy
| | - Francesca Tirelli
- Department of Woman’s and Child’s Health, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Francesco Vitale
- Department of Health Promotion Sciences, Maternal and Infant Care, Internal Medicine and Excellence Specialties “G. D’Alessandro,” University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Shamez N. Ladhani
- National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chiara Azzari
- Immunology Unit, Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cinconze E, Rosillon D, Rappuoli R, Vadivelu K, Bekkat-Berkani R, Abbing-Karahagopian V. Challenges in synthesis of real-world vaccine effects on meningococcal serogroup B disease for 4CMenB vaccine post-licensure effectiveness studies: A systematic review. Vaccine 2023; 41:4347-4358. [PMID: 37321895 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Real-world studies on vaccine effects are diverse in terms of objectives, study setting and design, data type and scope, and analysis methods. In this review, we describe and discuss four-component meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB vaccine, Bexsero) real-world studies with the aim of synthesizing their findings with application of standard methods. METHODS We performed a systematic literature review of all real-world studies on 4CMenB vaccine effects on meningococcal serogroup B disease, with no restriction for population age, vaccination schedule and/or type of vaccine effect evaluated (vaccine effectiveness [VE] and vaccine impact [VI] outcomes) published since its licensure in 2013 (from January 2014 until July 2021) in PubMed, Cochrane and the grey literature. We then aimed to synthesize the findings of the identified studies through application of standard synthesis methods. RESULTS According to reported criteria we retrieved five studies presenting estimates on 4CMenB vaccine effectiveness and impact. These studies showed great diversity in population, vaccination schedule and analysis methods mainly due to diversity in vaccine strategies and recommendations in the study settings. Directed by this diversity, no quantitative pooling methods to synthesize findings could be applied; instead we descriptively assessed study methods. We report VE estimates ranging from 59% to 94% and VI estimates ranging from 31% to 75%, representing diverse age groups, vaccination schedules and analysis methods. CONCLUSION Both vaccine outcomes showed real-life effectiveness of 4CMenB vaccine despite differences in study methodologies and vaccination strategies. Based on appraisal of study methods, we highlighted the need for an adapted tool which facilitates synthesis of heterogenic real-world vaccine studies when quantitative pooling methods are not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Rino Rappuoli
- GSK, Siena, Italy; Fondazione Biotecnopolo di Siena, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang B, Giles L, Andraweera P, McMillan M, Almond S, Beazley R, Mitchell J, AHoure M, Denehy E, Flood L, Marshall H. 4CMenB sustained vaccine effectiveness against invasive meningococcal B disease and gonorrhoea at three years post program implementation. J Infect 2023:S0163-4453(23)00300-6. [PMID: 37268223 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2023.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate persistence of vaccine effectiveness (VE) and vaccine impact (VI) on invasive meningococcal B (MenB) disease and gonorrhoea at three years after implementation of a state funded 4CMenB program for infants, children, adolescents and young people in South Australia. METHODS VI was assessed using a Poisson or negative binomial regression model, and VE was estimated using screening and case-control methods. Chlamydia controls were used to estimate VE in the primary analysis to control potential confounding effects such as high-risk sexual behaviour associated with sexually transmitted infections. RESULTS During the three-year program, reductions of 63.1% (95%CI 29.0% to 80.9%) and 78.5% (95%CI 33.0% to 93.1%) in incidence of MenB disease were observed in infants and adolescents, respectively. There were no cases in infants who had received three doses of 4CMenB. Two-dose VE against MenB disease was 90.7% (95%CI 6.9% to 99.1%) for the childhood program and 83.5% (95%CI 0 to 98.2%) for the adolescent program. Two-dose VE against gonorrhoea in adolescents was 33.2% (95%CI 15.9% to 47.0%). Lower VE estimates were demonstrated after 36 months post-vaccination (23.2% (95%CI 0 to 47.5%) >36 months post-vaccination compared to 34.9% (95%CI 15.0% to 50.1%) within 6-36 months). Higher VE estimates were found after excluding patients with repeat gonorrhoea infections (37.3%, 95%CI 19.8% to 51.0%). For gonorrhoea cases co-infected with chlamydia VE was maintained (44.7% (95%CI 17.1% to 63.1%). CONCLUSION The third-year evaluation results show persistent vaccine effectiveness of 4CMenB against MenB disease in infants and adolescents. As this is the first ongoing program for adolescents, moderate vaccine protection against gonorrhoea with waning effectiveness three years post-vaccination was demonstrated in adolescents and young adults. The additional protection of 4CMenB vaccine against gonorrhoea, likely through cross-protection should be considered in cost-effectiveness analyses. A booster dose may need to be further evaluated and considered in adolescents due to waning protection against gonorrhoea demonstrated after 36 months post-vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bing Wang
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Lynne Giles
- School of Public Health and Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Prabha Andraweera
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mark McMillan
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sara Almond
- Communicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Rebecca Beazley
- Communicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Janine Mitchell
- Communicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Michele AHoure
- Communicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Emma Denehy
- Communicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Louise Flood
- Communicable Disease Control Branch, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Helen Marshall
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kanda P, Ioannidis S, Sim W, Weston B, Koaik M. Primary Meningococcal Conjunctivitis in an Adult Patient. IDCases 2023; 32:e01749. [PMID: 37063785 PMCID: PMC10090984 DOI: 10.1016/j.idcr.2023.e01749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary meningococcal conjunctivitis from Neisseria meningitidis is a rare cause for acute, purulent conjunctivitis most commonly presenting in children. Here we present a case of primary meningococcal conjunctivitis in an adult patient with mild signs/symptoms mimicking non-gonococcal bacterial conjunctivitis. The patient was immediately treated with topical and systemic antibiotics. Here we highlight that an early diagnosis of a mild case can be missed thus, clinicians need to keep a high index of suspension as prompt recognition is important to initiate appropriate systemic antimicrobial therapy to prevent systemic disease.
Collapse
|
12
|
Martín Martín S, Morató Agustí ML, Javierre Miranda AP, Sánchez Hernández C, Schwarz Chavarri G, Aldaz Herce P, García Iglesias C, Gómez Marco JJ, Gutiérrez Pérez MI. [Infectious Disease Prevention Group: Update on vaccines, 2022]. Aten Primaria 2022; 54 Suppl 1:102462. [PMID: 36435581 PMCID: PMC9682159 DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2022.102462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The update of the preventive activities for this year 2022 in the field of infectious diseases is of special relevance due to the importance that prevention has gained and more specifically, vaccination as a tool to control the pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus declared on March 11, 2020. The pandemic has focused much of the prevention efforts on its containment, but the importance of maintaining high vaccination coverage of the rest of the recommended vaccines to maintain good control of vaccine-preventable diseases and avoid complications in particularly vulnerable patients should not be forgotten. In this year's review we present a practical document with the aim of providing tools to primary care professionals who work with adults, to make the indication of each vaccine whether it is systematically recommended or if it is because the patient belongs to some risk group due to their condition or underlying pathology. In this way, throughout the document, we will comment on the most innovative aspects of systematic vaccination (flu, pneumococcus, meningococcal vaccines and vaccines against the human papillomavirus [HPV]), the new vaccines (pandemic vaccines against COVID-19, vaccines against herpes zoster of subunits, vaccines against monkeypox) and the recommended vaccines according to risk condition (pregnancy and lactation, travelers, patients with immunosuppression or underlying pathology).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana Martín Martín
- Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud de Balmaseda, OSI Ezkerraldea Enkarterri Cruces, Balmaseda, Vizcaya, España.
| | - M Luisa Morató Agustí
- Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Consultor Senior del Grupo de Prevención en las Enfermedades Infecciosas PAPPS-semFyC
| | | | - Coro Sánchez Hernández
- Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud Virgen Peregrina, SERGAS, Pontevedra, España
| | - Germán Schwarz Chavarri
- Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud San Blas. Conselleria de Sanitat, Generalitat Valenciana, Alicante, España
| | - Pablo Aldaz Herce
- Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud San Juan, SNS, Pamplona, España
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang B, Giles L, Andraweera P, McMillan M, Almond S, Beazley R, Mitchell J, Lally N, Ahoure M, Denehy E, Koehler A, Flood L, Marshall H. Effectiveness and impact of the 4CMenB vaccine against invasive serogroup B meningococcal disease and gonorrhoea in an infant, child, and adolescent programme: an observational cohort and case-control study. THE LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2022; 22:1011-1020. [DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(21)00754-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
14
|
Sohn WY, Tahrat H, Novy P, Bekkat-Berkani R. Real-world implementation of 4-component meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB): implications for clinical practices. Expert Rev Vaccines 2022; 21:325-335. [DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2022.2021881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
15
|
McMillan M, Marshall HS, Richmond P. 4CMenB vaccine and its role in preventing transmission and inducing herd immunity. Expert Rev Vaccines 2021; 21:103-114. [PMID: 34747302 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2022.2003708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION : Vaccination is the most effective method of protecting people from invasive meningococcal disease (IMD). Of all the capsular groups, B is the most common cause of invasive meningococcal disease in many parts of the world. Despite this, adolescent meningococcal B vaccine programs have not been implemented globally, partly due to the lack of evidence for herd immunity afforded by meningococcal B vaccines. AREAS COVERED This review aims to synthesise the available evidence on recombinant 4CMenB vaccines' ability to reduce pharyngeal carriage and therefore provide indirect (herd) immunity against IMD. EXPERT OPINION There is some evidence that the 4CMenB vaccine may induce cross-protection against non-B carriage of meningococci. However, the overall body of evidence does not support a clinically significant reduction in carriage of disease-associated or group B meningococci following 4CMenB vaccination. No additional cost-benefit from herd immunity effects should be included when modelling the cost-effectiveness of 4CMenB vaccine programs against group B IMD. 4CMenB immunisation programs should focus on direct (individual) protection for groups at greatest risk of meningococcal disease. Future meningococcal B and combination vaccines being developed should consider the impact of the vaccine on carriage as part of their clinical evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark McMillan
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Helen S Marshall
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Peter Richmond
- Division of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Department of General Paediatrics and Immunology, Perth Children's Hospital.,Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kid's Institute, Perth, Western Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Martinón-Torres F, Taha MK, Knuf M, Abbing-Karahagopian V, Pellegrini M, Bekkat-Berkani R, Abitbol V. Evolving strategies for meningococcal vaccination in Europe: Overview and key determinants for current and future considerations. Pathog Glob Health 2021; 116:85-98. [PMID: 34569453 PMCID: PMC8933022 DOI: 10.1080/20477724.2021.1972663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a life-threatening, unpredictable condition. Vaccines are available against 5 of the 6 meningococcal serogroups (Men) accounting for nearly all IMD cases worldwide; conjugate monovalent MenC, quadrivalent MenACWY, and protein-based MenB vaccines are commonly used. We provide a comprehensive overview of the evolution of meningococcal vaccination strategies employed in national immunization programmes (NIPs) and their impact on IMD incidence in Europe. A more in-depth description is given for several countries: the United Kingdom (UK), the Netherlands, Greece, Italy, and Ireland. We searched European health authorities' websites and PubMed. Various vaccines and immunization schedules are used in 21 NIPs. Most countries implement MenC vaccination in infants, MenACWY in adolescents, and a growing number, MenB in infants. Only Malta has introduced MenACWY vaccination in infants, and several countries reimburse immunization of toddlers. The UK, Italy, Ireland, Malta, Andorra, and San Marino recommend MenB vaccination in infants and MenACWY vaccination in adolescents, targeting the most prevalent serogroups in the most impacted age groups. Main factors determining new vaccination strategies are fluctuating IMD epidemiology, ease of vaccine implementation, ability to induce herd protection, favorable benefit-risk balance, and acceptable cost-effectiveness. Since 1999, when the UK introduced MenC vaccination, the reduction in IMD incidence has been gradually enhanced as other countries adopted routine meningococcal vaccinations. Meningococcal vaccination strategies in each country are continually adapted to regional epidemiology and national healthcare priorities. Future strategies may include broader coverage vaccines when available (e.g., MenABCWY, MenACWY), depending on prevailing epidemiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Martinón-Torres
- Genetics, Vaccines and Pediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group (GENVIP, Instituto De Investigación Sanitaria De Santiago and Universidad De Santiago De Compostela (Usc), Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain
| | - Muhamed-Kheir Taha
- Institut Pasteur, Invasive Bacterial Infections Unit, National Reference Centre for Meningococci and Haemophilus Influenza, Paris, France
| | - Markus Knuf
- Klinik Für Kinder- Und Jugendmedizin, Worms, Germany and Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University Medicine, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Starostzik C. Es tut sich viel bei Impfstoffen für Kinder. PÄDIATRIE 2021. [PMCID: PMC8206907 DOI: 10.1007/s15014-021-3757-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
18
|
Martinón-Torres F, Banzhoff A, Azzari C, De Wals P, Marlow R, Marshall H, Pizza M, Rappuoli R, Bekkat-Berkani R. Recent advances in meningococcal B disease prevention: real-world evidence from 4CMenB vaccination. J Infect 2021; 83:17-26. [PMID: 33933528 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.04.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES 4CMenB is a broadly protective vaccine against invasive meningococcal capsular group B disease (MenB IMD). Licensed worldwide based on immunogenicity and safety data, effectiveness and impact data are now available. We comprehensively reviewed all available real-world evidence gathered from use of 4CMenB since licensure. RESULTS Data from 7 countries provide evidence of effectiveness and impact across different healthcare settings and age-groups, including national/regional immunization programs, observational studies and outbreak control. At least 2 4CMenB doses reduced MenB IMD by 50%-100% in 2-month to 20-year-olds depending on length of follow-up. Estimates of vaccine effectiveness in fully vaccinated cohorts ranged from 59%-100%. The safety profile of 4CMenB administered in real-world settings was consistent with pre-licensure clinical trial data. CONCLUSION MenB IMD is an uncommon but life-threatening disease with unpredictable epidemiology. The substantial body of data demonstrating 4CMenB effectiveness and impact supports its use in IMD prevention. The results reinforce the importance of direct protection of the highest risk groups; infants/young children and adolescents. Direct protection via routine infant immunization with catch-up in young children and routine adolescent vaccination could be the preferred option for MenB disease control. A Video Abstract linked to this article is available on Figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14546790.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Martinón-Torres
- Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela and University of Santiago, A Choupana, s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | | | - Chiara Azzari
- University of Florence, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Florence, Italy
| | - Philippe De Wals
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Laval University, Division of Biological Risks and Occupational Health, Quebec National Public Health Institute (Direction des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut national de santé publique du Québec), and Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Robin Marlow
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8* 2PS, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Marshall
- VIRTU, Women's and Children's Health Network & Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|