Antibiotic Consumption During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic and Emergence of Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Lineages Among Inpatients in a Chilean Hospital: A Time-Series Study and Phylogenomic Analysis

Hypervirulent and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A global public health threat

The evolution of hypervirulent and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae can be categorized into three main patterns: the evolution of KL1/KL2-hvKp strains into CR-hvKp, the evolution of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKp) strains into hv-CRKp, and the acquisition of hybrid plasmids carrying carbapenem resistance and virulence genes by classical K. pneumoniae (cKp). These strains are characterized by multi-drug resistance, high virulence, and high infectivity. Currently, there are no effective methods for treating and surveillance this pathogen. In addition, the continuous horizontal transfer and clonal spread of these bacteria under the pressure of hospital antibiotics have led to the emergence of more drug-resistant strains. This review discusses the evolution and distribution characteristics of hypervirulent and carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, the mechanisms of carbapenem resistance and hypervirulence, risk factors for susceptibility, infection syndromes, treatment regimens, real-time surveillance and preventive control measures. It also outlines the resistance mechanisms of antimicrobial drugs used to treat this pathogen, providing insights for developing new drugs, combination therapies, and a "One Health" approach. Narrowing the scope of surveillance but intensifying implementation efforts is a viable solution. Monitoring of strains can be focused primarily on hospitals and urban wastewater treatment plants.

An increased prevalence of carbapenem-resistant hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae associated with the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

Klebsiella pneumoniae (Kp) is a common community-acquired and nosocomial pathogen. Carbapenem-resistant and hypervirulent (CR-hvKp) variants can emerge rapidly within healthcare facilities and impacted by other infectious agents such as COVID-19 virus.

METHODS

To understand the impact of COVID-19 virus on the prevalence of CR-hvKp, we accessed Kp genomes with corresponding metadata from GenBank. Sequence types (STs), antimicrobial resistance genes, and virulence genes, and those scores and CR-hvKp were identified. We analyzed population diversity and phylogenetic characteristics of five most common STs, measured the prevalence of CR-hvKp, identified CR-hvKp subtypes, and determined associations between carbapenem resistance gene subtypes with STs and plasmid types. These variables were compared pre- and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

FINDINGS

The proportion of CR-hvKp isolates increased within multiple STs in different continents during the COVID-19 pandemic and persistent CR-hvKp subtypes were found in common STs. blaKPC was dominant in CG258, blaKPC-2 was detected in 97 % of the ST11 CR-hvKp, blaNDM subtypes were prominent in ST147 (87.4 %) and ST307 (70.8 %); blaOXA-48 and its subtypes were prevalent in ST15 (80.5 %). The possession of carbapenemase genes was different among subclades from different origins in different periods of time within each ST. IncFIB/IncHI1B hybrid plasmids contained virulence genes and carbapenemase genes and were predominant in ST147 (67.37 %) and ST307 (56.25 %).

INTERPRETATION

The prevalence of CR-hvKp increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, which was evident by an increase in local endemic clones. This process was facilitated by the convergence of plasmids containing carbapenemase genes and virulence genes. These findings have implications for the appropriate use of antimicrobials and infection prevention and control during outbreaks of respiratory viruses and pandemic management.

Prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales with bla IMP-6 predominance in hospitals from 2018 to 2021 in Nara, Japan

Objectives

Despite the global health risk of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), especially carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), Japan reports a significantly low frequency of CRE with a predominance of IMP-type carbapenemases. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of CRE isolated from hospitals in the city of Nara, Japan.

Methods

We obtained 171 CRE isolates from 16 791 Enterobacterales isolated at 23 hospitals in Nara between January 2018 and December 2021. Isolates of CPE were characterized through antimicrobial susceptibility testing, the carbapenem inactivation method, PCR and DNA sequencing. Genotypic diversity of carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae was determined via MLST and PFGE.

Results

The prevalence of CRE between 2018 and 2021 was 1.02%, gradually decreasing from 1.13% to 0.74%. Ninety-nine isolates were identified as CPE, representing six species. Ninety-seven CPE isolates harboured bla IMP-6, while the remaining two carried either bla IMP-1 or bla IMP-19. Genotype analysis identified ST131 as the dominant genotype for E. coli, but none for K. pneumoniae. PFGE results suggested clonal spread of CPE in Hospital A, where CRE was isolated in high numbers (n = 44).

Conclusions

In this study, CRE prevalence was marginally higher than previously reported in Japan, but still low in frequency. A predominance of Enterobacterales harbouring bla IMP-6 was confirmed in Nara. The spread of CPE at Hospital A suggested the possibility of a nosocomial outbreak due to bla IMP-6 transmission via plasmids or clonal spread. Continued monitoring is crucial for effective management of CRE prevalence in the region.

Ceftazidime/avibactam resistance is associated with PER-3-producing ST309 lineage in Chilean clinical isolates of non-carbapenemase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Introduction

Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) is indicated against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, particularly those that are carbapenem resistant. CZA resistance in P. aeruginosa producing PER, a class A extended-spectrum β-lactamase, has been well documented in vitro. However, data regarding clinical isolates are scarce. Our aim was to analyze the contribution of PER to CZA resistance in non-carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa clinical isolates that were ceftazidime and/or carbapenem non-susceptible.

Methods

Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined through agar dilution and broth microdilution, while bla PER gene was screened through PCR. All PER-positive isolates and five PER-negative isolates were analyzed through Whole Genome Sequencing. The mutational resistome associated to CZA resistance was determined through sequence analysis of genes coding for PBPs 1b, 3 and 4, MexAB-OprM regulators MexZ, MexR, NalC and NalD, AmpC regulators AmpD and AmpR, and OprD porin. Loss of bla PER-3 gene was induced in a PER-positive isolate by successive passages at 43°C without antibiotics.

Results

Twenty-six of 287 isolates studied (9.1%) were CZA-resistant. Thirteen of 26 CZA-resistant isolates (50%) carried bla PER. One isolate carried bla PER but was CZA-susceptible. PER-producing isolates had significantly higher MICs for CZA, amikacin, gentamicin, ceftazidime, meropenem and ciprofloxacin than non-PER-producing isolates. All PER-producing isolates were ST309 and their bla PER-3 gene was associated to ISCR1, an insertion sequence known to mobilize adjacent DNA. PER-negative isolates were classified as ST41, ST235 (two isolates), ST395 and ST253. PER-negative isolates carried genes for narrow-spectrum β-lactamases and the mutational resistome showed that all isolates had one major alteration in at least one of the genes analyzed. Loss of bla PER-3 gene restored susceptibility to CZA, ceftolozane/tazobactam and other β-lactamsin the in vitro evolved isolate.

Discussion

PER-3-producing ST309 P. aeruginosa is a successful multidrug-resistant clone with blaPER-3 gene implicated in resistance to CZA and other β-lactams.

Costs-effectiveness and cost components of pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions affecting antibiotic resistance outcomes in hospital patients: a systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

Limited information on costs and the cost-effectiveness of hospital interventions to reduce antibiotic resistance (ABR) hinder efficient resource allocation.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review for studies evaluating the costs and cost-effectiveness of pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions aimed at reducing, monitoring and controlling ABR in patients. Articles published until 12 December 2023 were explored using EconLit, EMBASE and PubMed. We focused on critical or high-priority bacteria, as defined by the WHO, and intervention costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we extracted unit costs, ICERs and essential study information including country, intervention, bacteria-drug combination, discount rates, type of model and outcomes. Costs were reported in 2022 US dollars ($), adopting the healthcare system perspective. Country willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds from Woods et al 2016 guided cost-effectiveness assessments. We assessed the studies reporting checklist using Drummond's method.

RESULTS

Among 20 958 articles, 59 (32 pharmaceutical and 27 non-pharmaceutical interventions) met the inclusion criteria. Non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as hygiene measures, had unit costs as low as $1 per patient, contrasting with generally higher pharmaceutical intervention costs. Several studies found that linezolid-based treatments for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were cost-effective compared with vancomycin (ICER up to $21 488 per treatment success, all 16 studies' ICERs

CONCLUSION

Robust information on ABR interventions is critical for efficient resource allocation. We highlight cost-effective strategies for mitigating ABR in hospitals, emphasising substantial knowledge gaps, especially in low-income and middle-income countries. Our study serves as a resource for guiding future cost-effectiveness study design and analyses.PROSPERO registration number CRD42020341827 and CRD42022340064.

Collapse

Key Words

• Control strategies
• Infections, diseases, disorders, injuries
• Prevention strategies
• Public Health
• Systematic review

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
• Checklist
• Drug Resistance, Microbial
• Hospitals
• Pharmaceutical Preparations

Collapse

Grants

• FONDECYT
• Asociación Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ANID)
• Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo ANID/FONDAP CIGIDEN
• National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Kasim Allel Disease Control Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
María José Hernández-Leal Department of Community, Maternity and Paediatric Nursing, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain Millennium Nucleus on Sociomedicine, Santiago, Chile
Nichola R Naylor Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK HCAI, Fungal, AMR, AMU & Sepsis Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
Eduardo A Undurraga Escuela de Gobierno, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile CIFAR Azrieli Global Scholars program, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Gerard Joseph Abou Jaoude Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
Priyanka Bhandari Disease Control Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
Ellen Flanagan Disease Control Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
Koen B Pouwels Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK The National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Laith Yakob Disease Control Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Collapse

Challenges and success stories of the implementation of infection control and antimicrobial stewardship strategies: proceedings of the 5th Global Ministerial Summit on Patient Safety, 2023

The 5th edition of the Global Ministerial Summit on Patient Safety was held in Montreux, Switzerland, in February 2023, delayed by three years due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The overarching theme of the summit was "Less Harm, Better Care - from Resolution to Implementation", focusing on the challenges of implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) strategies as well as antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) around the world. IPC strategies and ASP are of increasing importance due to the substantial burden of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance threatening patient safety. Here, we summarize countries' and regional experiences and activities related to the implementation of IPC strategies and ASP shared at the meeting. Full implementation of effective programs remains a major challenge in all settings due to limited support by political and healthcare leaders, and human and financial constraints. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic challenged already well-established programs. By enforcing sustained implementation by dedicated, cross-disciplinary healthcare personnel with a broad skill set, a reduction in healthcare-associated infections and multidrug-resistant pathogens can be achieved, leading ultimately to improved patient safety.

Clinical Characteristics of and Risk Factors for Subsequent Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) Bacteraemia in Rectal CPE Carriers

BACKGROUND

Due to high mortality and limited treatment options, the rise in carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) has become a major concern. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and characteristics of subsequent CPE bacteraemia in rectal CPE carriers and investigate the risk factors for CPE bacteraemia compared with non-carbapenemase-producing (non-CP) Enterobacterales bacteraemia.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on adult patients who were confirmed to have CPE colonisation by stool surveillance culture at a tertiary hospital from January 2018 to February 2022. All episodes of Enterobacterales bacteraemia up to 6 months after CPE colonisation were identified.

RESULTS

Of 1174 patients identified as rectal CPE carriers, 69 (5.8%; 95% CI 4.6-7.3%) experienced subsequent CPE bacteraemia during the 6 months after the diagnosis of CPE colonisation. Colonisation by a Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) producer (or CP-K. pneumoniae), colonisation by multiple CPE species, chronic kidney disease and haematological malignancy were independently associated with CPE bacteraemia in CPE carriers. When CPE carriers developed Enterobacterales bacteraemia, the causative agent was more frequently non-CP Enterobacterales than CPE (63.6% vs. 36.4%). Among these patients, colonisation with a KPC producer, CPE colonisation at multiple sites, shorter duration from colonisation to bacteraemia (< 30 days) and recent intraabdominal surgery were independent risk factors for CPE bacteraemia rather than non-CP Enterobacterales bacteraemia.

CONCLUSIONS

In CPE carriers, non-CP Enterobacterales were more often responsible for bacteraemia than CPE. Empirical antibiotic therapy for CPE should be considered when sepsis is suspected in a CPE carrier with risk factors for CPE bacteraemia.