Mucosal Healing in Ulcerative Colitis--When Zero is Better

Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasound Detects Early Therapy Response Following Anti-TNF Therapy in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Though colonoscopy plays a crucial role in assessing active ulcerative colitis [aUC], its scope is limited to the mucosal surface. Endoscopic ultrasound [EUS] coupled with contrast-enhancement [dCEUS] can precisely quantify bowel wall thickness and microvascular circulation, potentially enabling the quantitative evaluation of inflammation. We conducted a prospective, longitudinal study to assess therapy response using dCEUS in aUC patients undergoing treatment with adalimumab [ADA] or infliximab [IFX].

METHODS

Thirty ADA- and 15 IFX-treated aUC patients were examined at baseline and at 2, 6, and 14 weeks of therapy and 48 weeks of follow-up. Bowel wall thickness [BWT] was measured by EUS in the rectum. Vascularity was quantified by dCEUS using rise time [RT] and time to peak [TTP]. Therapy response was defined after 14 weeks using the Mayo Score.

RESULTS

Patients with aUC displayed a mean BWT of 3.9 ± 0.9 mm. In case of response to ADA/IFX a significant reduction in BWT was observed after 2 weeks [p = 0.04], whereas non-responders displayed no significant changes. The TTP was notably accelerated at baseline and significantly normalized by week 2 in responders [p = 0.001], while non-responders exhibited no significant alterations [p = 0.9]. At week 2, the endoscopic Mayo score did not exhibit any changes, thus failing to predict treatment responses.

CONCLUSION

dCEUS enables the early detection of therapy response in patients with aUC, which serves as a predictive marker for long-term clinical success. Therefore, dCEUS serves as a diagnostic tool for assessing the probability of future therapy success.

Impact of completely histological remission on reducing flare-ups in moderate-to-severe, biologics-experienced ulcerative colitis patients with endoscopic remission

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Endoscopic remission is presently recognized as the standard therapeutic target in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). However, achieving histological remission is increasingly viewed as a pivotal objective. This study investigates the effects of attaining completely histological remission on the clinical outcomes for UC patients with a high disease burden who have already reached endoscopic remission. This is the inaugural study to concentrate on this specific patient demographic.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study enrolled moderate-to-severe, biologics-experienced UC patients with completely endoscopic remission (Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0) between June 2017 and October 2023 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou. Patients were classified into histological remission (HR) and non-histological remission (non-HR) groups based on the Nancy index (NI). HR was defined as an NI score of 0, with all other patients categorized as non-HR. The definition of flare-ups was based on both clinical and endoscopic evidence. Comparative analyses focused on baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes at follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients (HR group: 23, non-HR group: 19) were included. The average follow-up duration was 17.6 months. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. At the end of follow-up, the HR group showed a significantly lower rate of acute flare-ups (26.1% vs. 68.4%, P = 0.006). Although not statistically significant, the HR group also experienced fewer emergency department visits and hospital admissions.

CONCLUSIONS

For moderate-to-severe, biologics-experienced UC patients in endoscopic remission, achieving completely histological remission is associated with a substantial reduction in flare-ups, suggesting its potential as a valuable therapeutic target.

Deep mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis: how deep is better?

Ulcerative colitis (UC), characterized by its recurrent nature, imposes a significant disease burden and compromises the quality of life. Emerging evidence suggests that achieving clinical remission is not sufficient for long-term remission. In pursuit of a favorable prognosis, mucosal healing (MH) has been defined as the target of therapies in UC. This paradigm shift has given rise to the formulation of diverse endoscopic and histological scoring systems, providing distinct definitions for MH. Endoscopic remission (ER) has been widely employed in clinical practice, but it is susceptible to subjective factors related to endoscopists. And there's growing evidence that histological remission (HR) might be associated with a lower risk of disease flares, but the incorporation of HR as a routine therapeutic endpoint remains a debate. The integration of advanced technology has further enriched the definition of deep MH. Up to now, a universal standardized definition for deep MH in clinical practice is currently lacking. This review will focus on the definition of deep MH, from different dimensions, and analyze strengths and limitations, respectively. Subsequent multiple large-scale trials are needed to validate the concept of deep MH, offering valuable insights into potential benefits for UC patients.

Fecal calprotectin and endoscopic scores: The cornerstones in clinical practice for evaluating mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease

Managing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is becoming increasingly complex and personalized, considering the advent of new advanced therapies with distinct mechanisms of action. Achieving mucosal healing (MH) is a pivotal therapeutic goal in IBD management and can prevent IBD progression and reduce flares, hospitalization, surgery, intestinal damage, and colorectal cancer. Employing proactive disease and therapy assessment is essential to achieve better control of intestinal inflammation, even if subclinical, to alter the natural course of IBD. Periodic monitoring of fecal calprotectin (FC) levels and interval endoscopic evaluations are cornerstones for evaluating response/remission to advanced therapies targeting IBD, assessing MH, and detecting subclinical recurrence. Here, we comment on the article by Ishida et al Moreover, this editorial aimed to review the role of FC and endoscopic scores in predicting MH in patients with IBD. Furthermore, we intend to present some evidence on the role of these markers in future targets, such as histological and transmural healing. Additional prospective multicenter studies with a stricter MH criterion, standardized endoscopic and histopathological analyses, and virtual chromoscopy, potentially including artificial intelligence and other biomarkers, are desired.

Histologic Disease Persists beyond Mucosal Healing and Could Predict Reactivation in Ulcerative Colitis

Mucosal healing (MH) is the main target in ulcerative colitis (UC) treatment. Even if MH lowers the risk of disease reactivation, some patients still relapse. Histologic activity (HA) beyond MH could explain these cases. This study aims to assess how many patients with MH have HA and which lesions are associated with relapse. We retrospectively enrolled UC patients showing MH, expressed as a Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (MES) of 0 and 1 upon colonoscopy. We reviewed the histological reports of biopsies evaluating the presence of typical lesions of UC and assessed the number of clinical relapses after 12 months. Among 100 enrolled patients, 2 showed no histological lesions. According to univariate analysis, patients with a higher number of histological lesions at the baseline had a higher risk of relapse (OR 1.25, p = 0.012), as well as patients with basal plasmacytosis (OR 4.33, p = 0.005), lamina propria eosinophils (OR 2.99, p = 0.047), and surface irregularity (OR 4.70, p = 0.010). However, in the multivariate analysis, only basal plasmacytosis (OR 2.98, p = 0.050) and surface irregularity (OR 4.50, p = 0.024) were confirmed as risk factors for disease reactivation. HA persists in a significant percentage of patients with MH. Despite the presence of MH, patients with basal plasmacytosis and surface irregularity have a higher risk of relapse.

Accuracy of the Pancolonic Modified Mayo Score in predicting the long-term outcomes of ulcerative colitis: a promising scoring system

Background

Different endoscopic scoring systems for assessing ulcerative colitis (UC) severity are available. However, most of them are not correlated with disease extent.

Objectives

Our study aimed to compare the predictive value of the PanMay score versus the endoscopic Mayo (MES), Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS), and Dublin score in predicting long-term outcomes of UC.

Design

This retrospective study enrolled consecutive UC patients who underwent colonoscopy before at least a 3-year follow-up.

Methods

The PanMayo, MES, UCEIS, and Dublin scores and the baseline clinical and demographic characteristics of the participants were assessed. Endpoints were disease flare that required novel biological therapy, colectomy, and hospitalization. Patients were stratified using baseline clinical activity.

Results

Approximately 62.8% of the 250 enrolled patients were in clinical remission. In these patients, the PanMayo, MES, and Dublin scores were positively associated with the risk of clinical flare. The MES score increased with clinical flare. The PanMayo score (>12 points), but not the MES score, was associated with the need for novel biological initiation and biological escalation. Furthermore, the Dublin and UCEIS scores of patients in remission who need novel biological treatment had a similar trend. Colectomy risk was associated with PanMayo and Dublin scores.

Conclusion

The combined endoscopic assessment of disease extent and severity can be more accurate in predicting outcomes among patients with UC. PanMayo score can be utilized in addition to the existing scoring systems, thereby leading to a more accurate examination.

Summary

UC endoscopic scores do not assess extension. Our study aimed to analyze the predictive value of the PanMayo score. Based on 250 patients, results showed that the long-term disease outcomes of UC could be predicted with the PanMayo score more accurately.

Arctigenin promotes mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis through facilitating focal adhesion assembly and colonic epithelial cell migration via targeting focal adhesion kinase

Colonic mucosal defect constitutes the major reason of recurrence and deterioration of ulcerative colitis (UC), and mucosal healing has become the therapeutic endpoint of UC. Unfortunately, specific promoter of mucosal healing is still absent. Our previous researches demonstrated that arctigenin could alleviate colitis symptoms in mice, but whether it has a positive impact on colonic mucosal healing remains unclear. This study explores whether and how arctigenin promotes mucosal healing. Orally administered arctigenin was shown to alleviate colitis in mice primarily by enhancing mucosal healing. In vitro, arctigenin was shown to promote the wound healing by accelerating colonic epithelial cell migration but not proliferation. Acceleration of the focal adhesion turnover, especially assembly, is crucial for arctigenin promoting the cell migration. Arctigenin was able to activate focal adhesion kinase (FAK) in colonic epithelial cells through directly binding with Tyr251 site of FAK, as evidenced by surface plasmon resonance assay and site-directed mutagenesis experiment. In the colonic epithelial cells of UC patients and colitis mice, FAK activation was significantly down-regulated compared with the controls. Arctigenin promoted colonic epithelial cell migration and mucosal healing in dextran sulphate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis mice dependent on activating FAK, as confirmed by combined use with FAK inhibitor. In summary, arctigenin can directly promote mucosal healing in colitis mice through facilitating focal adhesion turnover, especially assembly, and consequent migration of epithelial cells via targeting FAK. Arctigenin may be developed as a mucosal healing promoter, and FAK is a potential therapeutic target for UC and other mucosal defect-related diseases.

Defining Comprehensive Disease Control for Use as a Treatment Target for Ulcerative Colitis in Clinical Practice: International Delphi Consensus Recommendations

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Treatment of ulcerative colitis [UC] requires a patient-centric definition of comprehensive disease control that considers improvements in aspects not typically captured by classical landmark trial endpoints. In an international initiative, we reviewed aspects of UC that affect patients and/or indicate mucosal inflammation, to achieve consensus on which aspects to combine in a definition of comprehensive disease control, using a modified Delphi process.

METHODS

The Delphi panel comprised 12 gastroenterologists and one patient advocate. Two gastroenterologists were elected as chairs and did not vote. To inform statements, we asked 18 patients and the panel members about their experiences of remission and reviewed published literature. Panel members voted on statements anonymously in three rounds, with a live discussion before Round 3. Consensus was met if ≥67% of the panel agreed. Statements without consensus in Rounds 1 and 2 were revised or discarded after Round 3.

RESULTS

The panel agreed to measure individual patient benefit using a definition of comprehensive disease control that combines aspects currently measured in trials [rectal bleeding, stool frequency, disease-related quality of life, endoscopy, histological inflammatory activity, inflammatory biomarkers, and corticosteroid use] with additional patient-reported symptoms [bowel urgency, abdominal pain, extraintestinal manifestations, fatigue, and sleep disturbance]. The panel agreed on scoring systems and thresholds for many aspects.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a robust methodology, we defined comprehensive disease control in UC. Next, we will combine the measurement and scoring of these aspects into a multicomponent tool and will adopt comprehensive disease control as a treatment target in clinical practice and trials.

Histological healing as a predictor of sustained clinical remission in paediatric ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to assess the longitudinal impact of endoscopic healing (EH) and histological healing (HH) in a cohort of paediatric patients affected by ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-centre longitudinal study. 86 children with UC who underwent endoscopic re-assessment while in clinical and biochemical remission were included. Partial EH was defined as a Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (MES) of 1 and complete EH was defined as a MES of 0. HH was defined as the absence of active inflammation in all biopsies. The cumulative incidence of clinical relapse was evaluated during follow-up.

RESULTS

At the second endoscopic re-evaluation, 59 (68.6%) patients achieved EH (MES ≤1). Of these patients, 39 (66%) achieved complete EH. 20 of the 39 patients who achieved complete EH attained complete HH. Patients who achieved partial and complete EH showed higher recurrence-free survival rates compared to those who did not (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). Amongst patients with complete EH, those who achieved complete HH had lower recurrence rates when compared to patients who still showed microscopic inflammation (p = 0.049).

CONCLUSION

Achievement of EH and HH is associated with fewer disease relapses, with patients achieving HH showing longer relapse-free survival rates.

Early Intestinal Ultrasound Predicts Clinical and Endoscopic Treatment Response and Demonstrates Drug-Specific Kinetics in Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is an emerging modality in monitoring disease activity in ulcerative colitis (UC). Here, we aimed to identify early IUS predictors of treatment response as evaluated by endoscopy and assessed the kinetics of IUS changes.

METHODS

This prospective, longitudinal study included UC patients with endoscopic disease activity (endoscopic Mayo score [EMS] ≥2) starting anti-inflammatory treatment. Clinical scores, biochemical parameters and IUS were assessed at baseline (W0), at week 2 (W2), at W6(W6), and at the time of second endoscopy (W8-W26). Per colonic segment, endoscopic remission (EMS = 0), improvement (EMS ≤1), response (decrease in EMS ≥1), and clinical remission (Lichtiger score ≤3) were assessed and correlated with common IUS parameters. Additionally, drug-specific responsiveness of bowel wall thickness (BWT) was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients were included and followed, and 33 patients underwent second endoscopy. BWT was lower from W6 onward for patients reaching endoscopic improvement (3.0 ± 1.2 mm vs 4.1 ± 1.3 mm; P = .026), remission (2.5 ± 1.2 mm vs 4.1 ± 1.1 mm; P = .002), and clinical remission (3.01 ± 1.34 mm vs 3.85 ± 1.20 mm; P = .035). Decrease in BWT was more pronounced in endoscopic responders (-40 ± 25% vs -4 ± 28%; P = .001) at W8 to W26. At W6, BWT ≤3.0 mm (odds ratio [OR], 25.13; 95% confidence interval, 2.01-3.14; P = .012) and color Doppler signal (OR, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.88; P = .026) predicted endoscopic remission and improvement, respectively. Submucosal layer thickness at W6 predicted endoscopic remission (OR, 0.09; P = .018) and improvement (OR, 0.14; P = .02). Furthermore, BWT decreased significantly at W2 for infliximab and tofacitinib and at W6 for vedolizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

BWT and color Doppler signal predicted endoscopic targets already after 6 weeks of treatment and response was drug specific. IUS allows close monitoring of treatment in UC and is a surrogate marker of endoscopy.

Histologic Inflammation can Predict Future Clinical Relapse in Ulcerative Colitis Patients in Endoscopic Remission

Background

In ulcerative colitis (UC), endoscopic improvement, defined as a Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES) of 0 or 1, is a target of treatment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the risk of clinical relapse between patients with an MES of 0 or 1 and determine if histologic activity using the Robarts Histopathologic Index (RHI) was predictive of clinical relapse.

Methods

UC patients with an MES score of 0 or 1, no prior colectomy, and at least 1 year of outpatient follow-up after colonoscopy were included. Demographic, clinical characteristics, and clinical relapse were retrospectively collected. Biopsy specimens were read by a gastrointestinal pathologist. Primary outcome was defined as a composite of relapse requiring change in medical therapy, new steroid use, UC-related hospitalization, and/or colectomy.

Results

Four hundred and forty-five UC patients were identified. Ninety-five percent of patients with MES 0 were in histologic remission by the RHI whereas only 35% of patients with MES 1 were in histologic remission. Twenty-six percent of patients experienced a clinical relapse; patients with MES 1 or RHI > 3 were significantly more likely to relapse (P < .01) compared to patients with MES 0 or RHI ≤ 3. When patients were stratified into 4 groups (MES 0, RHI ≤ 3; MES 0, RHI > 3; MES 1, RHI ≤ 3; MES 1, RHI > 3) and adjusted for age and sex, RHI > 3 was predictive of relapse (P = .008).

Conclusions

UC patients with endoscopic improvement have a high rate of clinical relapse over time. Histologic activity is a predictor of clinical relapse.

Long-term follow-up of the red density pilot trial: a basis for long-term prediction of sustained clinical remission in ulcerative colitis?

Red density (RD) technology is an automated operator-independent endoscopic scoring system for disease activity in ulcerative colitis (UC). In this retrospective analysis we aimed to assess the predictive value of the RD sore for sustained clinical remission. All 39 patients from the RD pilot trial were evaluated for clinical outcome in a 5-year period. The highest RD score was considered for Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine the cut-off of the RD for the composite endpoint of treatment failure (defined as mortality, colectomy, hospitalizations, flares and UC therapy changes). Statistical significance was considered P < 0.05. Reassessment of the RD score was possible in 36 patients. The composite endpoint was reached in 17 of 39 patients. ROC analysis for clinical remission showed a RD cut-off of 65, area under the ROC was 0.68, sensitivity of 0.71, and a specificity of 0.63. A RD score of ≥ 65 demonstrated a statistically non-significant increase in composite endpoint (hazard ratio 0.49 (95% confidence interval 0.1871-1.280); P = 0.1453). In conclusion, the RD score may be an independent predictor of clinical remission in patients with UC for the disease course up to 5 years, but results of the ongoing PROCEED-UC trial are to awaited for definite conclusions.

Tofacitinib as a maintenance therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis stratified by OCTAVE Sustain baseline Mayo endoscopic subscore

BACKGROUND

Tofacitinib is an oral small molecule Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. We evaluated tofacitinib efficacy and safety in the 52-week maintenance study, OCTAVE Sustain, by baseline Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) following 8-week induction.

METHODS

The proportion of patients achieving efficacy endpoints at Week 24 or 52 of OCTAVE Sustain was evaluated by baseline MES following 8-week induction. Using logistic regression, the difference in treatment effect (tofacitinib vs. placebo) between baseline MES (0 vs. 1) for each endpoint was assessed. Adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

At Week 52 of OCTAVE Sustain, a numerically higher proportion of tofacitinib-treated patients achieved remission with OCTAVE Sustain baseline MES of 0 versus 1 (61.9% vs. 36.5% for tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily [BID] and 75.0% vs. 54.2% for tofacitinib 10 mg BID). Similar trends were observed for endoscopic remission and endoscopic improvement. Logistic regression analyses showed a larger treatment effect at Week 52 in patients with baseline MES of 0 versus 1 for clinical response (p = 0.0306) in the tofacitinib 5 mg BID group (other endpoints all p > 0.05); differences were not significant for any endpoint in the 10 mg BID group (all p > 0.05). Infection adverse events were less frequent among patients with baseline MES 0 versus 1.

CONCLUSIONS

MES may be important in predicting long-term efficacy outcomes for tofacitinib maintenance treatment. Aiming for endoscopic remission during induction with tofacitinib 10 mg BID may allow successful maintenance with tofacitinib 5 mg BID. Safety was consistent with the known tofacitinib safety profile. Trial registration NCT01458574.

Histologic Activity and Steroid Use History Are Risk Factors of Clinical Relapse in Ulcerative Colitis With Mayo Endoscopic Subscore of 0 or 1

BACKGROUND

The treatment goal of ulcerative colitis (UC) has changed from the control of symptoms to mucosal healing, previously evaluated mainly by endoscopy. Recently, the importance of histologic activity has emerged. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the risk of clinical relapse according to histologic activity in UC with a Mayo endoscopic subsccore (MES) of 0 or 1.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort after our center's biopsy guideline for UC was instituted, 492 UC patients with an MES of 0 or 1 were enrolled and analyzed. The primary outcome was the development of a clinical relapse including changes in medication, hospitalization, colectomy, and the development of colorectal cancer during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

During the median 549 days of follow-up, 92 (18.7%) patients had a clinical relapse. All the patients changed their medication, including 4 hospitalized patients. Histologic activity defined by a Geboes score of ≧3.1 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.732; P = .035) and steroid use history (HR, 1.762; P = .008) were independent factors associated with clinical relapse. When stratified, the 1- and 2-year incidence rates of clinical relapse were 4.1% and 10.6%, respectively, for patients with histologic improvement and no steroid use history, whereas the rates were 23.9% and 39.4% for patients with histologic activity and steroid use history.

CONCLUSIONS

In UC with an MES of 0 or 1, histologic activity and steroid use history can be used to stratify the risk of clinical relapse.

Disease clearance in ulcerative colitis: Setting the therapeutic goals for future in the treatment of ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis, one of the phenotypic patterns of inflammatory bowel disease, should be considered a progressive disease with an increased risk of complications if intestinal inflammation is not adequately controlled. The advent of new lines of treatment for this condition has changed and expanded the therapeutic goals to modify its natural history and evolution. The concept of "disease clearance" in ulcerative colitis aims to achieve clinical and biological remission as well as mucosal healing (endoscopic, histological, and in future molecular) in these patients. This review provides the available data on each of the goals of disease clearance in ulcerative colitis to be considered for application in clinical practice in the coming years.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio may predict clinical relapse in ulcerative colitis patients with mucosal healing

Endoscopic mucosal healing (MH) is an important treatment goal for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) reflects systemic inflammation and has been reported to be a useful predictive marker for UC. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of the NLR for predicting clinical relapse in UC patients with MH. We retrospectively enrolled patients with UC who underwent colonoscopy at the Osaka City University Hospital between January 2010 and December 2010, whose Mayo Endoscopic Subscore was 0 or 1. The correlation between the incidence of relapse and demographic factors, including the NLR, was analyzed. We included 129 patients in the present study. The median NLR at the time of endoscopy was 1.98, and differences in the high NLR group and the low NLR group were compared. During a median follow-up period of 46.4 months, 58 patients (45.0%) experienced relapse. The cumulative relapse-free rate was significantly higher in the low NLR group than in the high NLR group (P = 0.03, log-rank test). Multivariate analysis identified high NLR as an independent prognostic factor for clinical relapse (hazard ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.98; P = 0.04). NLR is a novel and useful predictor of clinical relapse in UC patients with MH, and it can potentially be a strong indicator to determine the appropriate treatment strategy and decision-making in clinical practice.

Histologic healing and factors associated with complete remission following conventional treatment in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic and histological activity scores in ulcerative colitis (UC) are associated with clinical outcomes and have become important targets of clinical trials. However, these endpoints have been scarcely investigated in patients receiving only conventional treatment.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the deep and complete remission rates after 3 months of conventional treatment in patients with newly diagnosed UC with moderate to severe endoscopic activity. We also aimed to investigate whether selected clinical and biochemical variables at baseline were associated with complete remission status after 3 months.

DESIGN

This was a prospective cohort study.

METHODS

Newly diagnosed patients with active UC commencing 5-aminosalicylate, corticosteroid, and/or azathioprine treatment were consecutively included. Clinical, biochemical, endoscopic, and histological data were collected at baseline and after 3 months. Rates of clinical remission (Partial Mayo Score ⩽ 2), mucosal healing (Mayo Endoscopic Score ⩽ 1), and histologic healing (Nancy Index ⩽ 1) were determined. Deep remission was assessed as clinical remission plus mucosal healing and complete remission as deep remission plus histologic healing. Predictors of complete remission were identified by logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 180 patients were included in the study. Deep remission and complete remission occurred in 62.8% and 42.2% of patients, respectively. Thus, of patients in deep remission one-third had persistent histologic activity. Histologic activity in mucosally healed patients was associated with higher symptom scores and faecal calprotectin levels. Of baseline variables, less endoscopic distribution and disease activity showed strongest association with achieving complete remission, and limited distribution in combination with moderate activity gave highest odds for complete remission (odds ratio: 4.1, 95% confidence interval: 7.69-2.18).

CONCLUSION

In patients with mucosal healing, persistent histologic activity was a common finding and was associated with increased disease activity. Pancolitis and severe inflammatory activity at baseline were associated with lower complete remission rates.

Intestinal Ultrasound Is Accurate to Determine Endoscopic Response and Remission in Patients With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is noninvasive, cost-effective, and accurate to determine disease activity in ulcerative colitis (UC). In this study, we prospectively evaluated IUS for treatment response in a longitudinal cohort by using endoscopy and histology as gold standards.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with moderate to severe UC (endoscopic Mayo score [EMS] ≥2) starting tofacitinib treatment were included. Patients were evaluated at baseline and after 8 weeks of tofacitinib induction by means of clinical, biochemical, endoscopic (EMS and UC endoscopic index for severity), histologic (Robarts Histopathologic Index) and IUS assessments. Readers of IUS, endoscopy, and histology were blinded for all other outcomes. The primary outcome was difference in bowel wall thickness (BWT) for endoscopic improvement vs no endoscopic improvement. Endoscopic remission was defined as EMS = 0, improvement as EMS ≤1, and response as a decrease of EMS ≥1.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were included, with 27 patients completing follow-up. BWT correlated with EMS (ρ = 0.68, P < .0001), UC endoscopic index for severity (ρ = 0.73, P < .0001) and Robarts Histopathologic Index (ρ = 0.49, P = .002) at both time points. BWT in the sigmoid was lower in patients with endoscopic remission (1.4 mm vs 4.0 mm, P = .016), endoscopic improvement (1.8 mm vs 4.5 mm, P < .0001) and decrease in BWT was more pronounced in patients with endoscopic response (-58.1% vs -13.4%, P = .018). The most accurate cutoff values for BWT were 2.8 mm (area under the curve [AUC] 0.87) for endoscopic remission, 3.9 mm (AUC 0.92) for improvement, and decrease of 32% (AUC 0.87) for response. The submucosa was the most responsive wall layer.

CONCLUSION

IUS, importantly BWT as the single most important parameter, is highly accurate to detect treatment response when evaluated against endoscopic outcomes.

Endoscopic mucosal healing and histologic remission in ulcerative colitis: a systematic literature review of clinical, quality-of-life and economic outcomes

OBJECTIVE

This systematic literature review (SLR) assessed the effects of endoscopic mucosal healing and histologic remission on clinical, quality-of-life (QoL), and economic outcomes in adults with ulcerative colitis (UC) in the real-world setting.

METHODS

Literature searches of Embase and MEDLINE (6 July 2020) and conference proceedings (2017-2020) were performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Eligible studies included adults with UC with documented endoscopic mucosal healing or histologic remission. Clinical, QoL, and economic outcomes were extracted and narratively synthesized.

RESULTS

Of 1603 studies screened, 25 met eligibility criteria and collectively included 2813 patients (mean age: 34-60 years). The most commonly reported indices were Mayo endoscopic score (MES) for endoscopic mucosal healing (n = 22, 88%) and Geboes score (n = 5, 20%) for histologic outcomes. The most frequently reported clinical outcome was relapse-free survival (n = 15, 60%). Less commonly reported outcomes were avoidance of colectomy (n = 5, 20%), hospitalization (n = 4, 16%), clinical remission (n = 4, 16%), and steroid-free clinical remission (n = 3, 12%). Most studies reported relapse-free survival rates up to 50% over 6-48 months of follow-up in endoscopic mucosal healing cohorts. Studies reporting results by MES demonstrated higher relapse-free survival rates among patients with MES 0 than with MES 1 (32%-100% vs 26%-86%, respectively). Similarly, patients with histologic remission had better relapse-free survival rates over 12-24 months of follow-up compared with those without histologic remission (72%-91% vs 40%-63%, respectively). Rates of clinical remission, steroid-free remission, hospitalization, and colectomy avoidance were also better among patients with endoscopic mucosal healing and histologic remission. Two studies examining QoL reported endoscopic mucosal healing was associated with improved QoL. No study reported economic outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This SLR demonstrated consistent evidence of improved clinical outcomes among UC patients with endoscopic mucosal healing and histologic remission.

(Re)Appraising Remission in Ulcerative Colitis

As the therapeutic targets in ulcerative colitis (UC) shift from control of symptoms to mucosal healing and prevention of disease complications like disability, colectomy, and cancer, the definition of remission has evolved. The current definition of clinical remission is variable and is determined by the clinical context in which it is being used. This results in skepticism and uncertainty about the true meaning of the term "clinical remission." In this review, the authors reexamine the definition of clinical remission and propose a novel approach to define remission in UC.

External validation of the Paddington International Virtual Electronic ChromoendoScopy ScOre as a good endoscopic score to define mucosal healing and predict long-term clinical outcomes in ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVES

To define endoscopic and histological remission in ulcerative colitis (UC) accurately, several scoring systems have been established. A novel virtual electronic chromoendoscopy score, the Paddington International Virtual ChromoendoScopy ScOre (PICaSSO), was developed, validated, and reproduced to assess inflammation grade and predict patient prognosis. We externally verified and validated the clinical value of PICaSSO in UC patients.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 63 UC patients. The Mayo endoscopic score (MES), UC Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS), and PICaSSO were adopted for endoscopic evaluation. All biopsy samples were scored using the Robarts histological index (RHI), Nancy histological index (NHI), and "Extent, Chronicity, Activity, Plus additional findings" (ECAP) score. Patients with an endoscopic MES of 0-1 at baseline were followed up during a median time of 23.5 months.

RESULTS

PICaSSO was strongly correlated with other endoscopic and histological scoring systems. PICaSSO ≤3 had advantages in assessing histological remission (HR), with the highest accuracy of 88.9% for ECAP-HR. Relapse-free survival rates were significantly different between patients with MES 0 and MES 1 and patients with PICaSSO ≤3 and >3 (P = 0.010 and 0.018, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

PICaSSO was externally validated with strong correlations with other endoscopic and histological scoring systems in UC, and PICaSSO-ER might potentially predict a better long-term clinical outcome in UC patients.

Beyond complete endoscopic healing: Goblet appearance using an endocytoscope to predict future sustained clinical remission in ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVES

Complete endoscopic healing, defined as Mayo endoscopic score (MES) = 0, is an optimal target in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). However, some patients with MES = 0 show clinical relapse within 12 months. Histologic goblet mucin depletion has emerged as a predictor of clinical relapse in patients with MES = 0. We observed goblet depletion in vivo using an endocytoscope, and analyzed the association between goblet appearance and future prognosis in UC patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, all enrolled UC patients had MES = 0 and confirmed clinical remission between October 2016 and March 2020. We classified the patients into two groups according to the goblet appearance status: preserved-goblet and depleted-goblet groups. We followed the patients until March 2021 and evaluated the difference in cumulative clinical relapse rates between the two groups.

RESULTS

We identified 125 patients with MES = 0 as the study subjects. Five patients were subsequently excluded. Thus, we analyzed the data for 120 patients, of whom 39 were classified as the preserved-goblet group and 81 as the depleted-goblet group. The patients were followed-up for a median of 549 days. During follow-up, the depleted-goblet group had a significantly higher cumulative clinical relapse rate than the preserved-goblet group (19% [15/81] vs. 5% [2/39], respectively; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Observing goblet appearance in vivo allowed us to better predict the future prognosis of UC patients with MES = 0. This approach may assist clinicians with onsite decision-making regarding treatment interventions without a biopsy.

Influence of Genetics, Immunity and the Microbiome on the Prognosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD Prognosis Study): the protocol for a Copenhagen IBD Inception Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, are chronic, inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. We have initiated a Danish population-based inception cohort study aiming to investigate the underlying mechanisms for the heterogeneous course of IBD, including need for, and response to, treatment.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

IBD Prognosis Study is a prospective, population-based inception cohort study of unselected, newly diagnosed adult, adolescent and paediatric patients with IBD within the uptake area of Hvidovre University Hospital and Herlev University Hospital, Denmark, which covers approximately 1 050 000 inhabitants (~20% of the Danish population). The diagnosis of IBD will be according to the Porto diagnostic criteria in paediatric and adolescent patients or the Copenhagen diagnostic criteria in adult patients. All patients will be followed prospectively with regular clinical examinations including ileocolonoscopies, MRI of the small intestine, validated patient-reported measures and objective examinations with intestinal ultrasound. In addition, intestinal biopsies from ileocolonoscopies, stool, rectal swabs, saliva samples, swabs of the oral cavity and blood samples will be collected systematically for the analysis of biomarkers, microbiome and genetic profiles. Environmental factors and quality of life will be assessed using questionnaires and, when available, automatic registration of purchase data. The occurrence and course of extraintestinal manifestations will be evaluated by rheumatologists, dermatologists and dentists, and assessed by MR cholangiopancreatography, MR of the spine and sacroiliac joints, ultrasonography of peripheral joints and entheses, clinical oral examination, as well as panoramic radiograph of the jaws. Fibroscans and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans will be performed to monitor occurrence and course of chronic liver diseases, osteopenia and osteoporosis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by Ethics Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (approval number: H-20065831). Study results will be disseminated through publication in international scientific journals and presentation at (inter)national conferences.

Advances of Heat Shock Family in Ulcerative Colitis

Ulcerative Colitis (UC) is a non-specific and chronic inflammatory disease of colonic mucosa whose exact etiology and mechanisms remain unclear. The incidence rate of UC is increasing year by year worldwide. What followed is that the medical costs are also rising rapidly. Therefore, it is urgent to understand the pathogenesis and find promising therapeutic targets for UC. Intestinal mucosal homeostasis is essential for normal bowel function, and its imbalance may be an important pathogenesis of UC. Endogenous homeostatic regulators play roles in repairing intestinal mucosa injury after stress. Heat shock family proteins are essential endogenous homeostasis factors. They can inhibit inflammation, regulate intestinal epithelial cells’ survival and death, and promote mucosal healing. Thus, they play important roles in sustaining intestinal mucosal homeostasis and protecting against UC progression. However, the heat shock family may promote UC carcinogenesis. Here, we summarize the advances in the research of the functions of the heat shock family in UC. And this review is an attempt to light on the etiopathogenesis of UC, highlighting the endogenous protective mechanisms, hoping to provide a novel therapeutic target for UC treatment.

Appendiceal Orifice Inflammation Is Associated with Lower Rate of Complete Endoscopic Remission in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

Appendiceal orifice inflammation (AOI) is commonly considered a skip lesion in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the clinical significance of AOI in UC patients remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical feature and long-term outcomes of AOI by comparing UC patients with and without AOI. This study was conducted as a retrospective design of patients who were newly diagnosed or referred within 3 months after diagnosis at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2020. All patients underwent index and follow-up colonoscopies. The long-term outcomes involved achieving complete endoscopic remission (ER), use of biologics, hospitalization, and proximal disease extension. Complete ER was defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore 0. In total, 318 UC patients were included, of which 140 had AOI. The baseline characteristics were not significantly different between AOI and non-AOI groups. The cumulative risk of complete ER was a significant difference between AOI and non-AOI groups (p = 0.041). The other cumulative risks of disease outcomes were not significantly different between AOI and non-AOI groups (use of biologics, p = 0.542; hospitalization, p = 0.795; proximal disease extension, p = 0.403). The multivariate Cox regression analysis also revealed that AOI was the significant factor of complete ER (hazard ratio, 0.656; 95% confidence interval, 0.462-0.932; p = 0.019) in UC patients. AOI shows a significant association with lower rate of complete ER in UC patients. Therefore, a meticulous treatment strategy may be recommended to achieve complete ER in UC patients with AOI.

Monitoring of intestinal inflammation and prediction of recurrence in ulcerative colitis

Background and objectives: Ulcerative colitis is a chronic recurrent intestinal inflammatory disease, and its recurrence is difficult to predict. In this review, we summarized the objective indicators that can be used to evaluate intestinal inflammation, the purpose is to better predict the clinical recurrence of UC, formulate individualized treatment plan during remission of UC, and improve the level of diagnosis and treatment of UC.Methods: Based on the search results in the PUBMED database, we explored the accuracy and value of these methods in predicting the clinical recurrence of UC from the following three aspects: endoscopic and histological scores, serum biomarkers and fecal biomarkers.Results: Colonoscopy with biopsy is the gold standard for assessing intestinal inflammation, but it is invasive, inconvenient and expensive. At present, there is no highly sensitive and specific endoscopic or histological score to predict the clinical recurrence of UC. Compared with serum biomarkers, fecal biomarkers have higher sensitivity and specificity because they are in direct contact with the intestine and are closer to the site of intestinal inflammation. Fecal calprotectin is currently the most studied and meaningful fecal biomarker. Lactoferrin and S100A12, as novel biomarkers, have no better performance than FC in predicting the recurrence of UC.Conclusions: FC is currently the most promising predictive marker, but it lacks an accurate cut-off value. Combining patient symptoms, incorporating multiple indicators to construct a UC recurrence prediction model, and formulating individualized treatment plans for high recurrence risk patients will be the focus of UC remission management.

Advanced endoscopy for the management of inflammatory digestive diseases: Review of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society core session

A series of workshops entitled "Advanced endoscopy in the management of inflammatory digestive disease" was held at the 97^th to 100^th biannual meeting of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. During these core sessions, research findings concerning various endoscopic practices in the field of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) were presented, and meaningful discussions were shared on the evolving role and future challenges of endoscopy in IBD. This article reviews these core sessions and discusses current topics on the role of endoscopy, focusing on the diagnosis, disease monitoring, mucosal healing assessments, cancer surveillance, and therapeutic interventions in IBD.

Gelsolin as a Potential Biomarker for Endoscopic Activity and Mucosal Healing in Ulcerative Colitis

The therapeutic goal in ulcerative colitis is mucosal healing, which requires improved non-invasive biomarkers to evaluate disease activity. Gelsolin is associated with several autoimmune diseases, and here, we aimed to analyze its usefulness as a serological biomarker for clinical and endoscopic activities in ulcerative colitis. Patients with ulcerative colitis (n = 138) who had undergone blood tests and colonoscopy were included. Serum gelsolin was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and correlation between the gelsolin level and clinical and endoscopic activities was examined. The serum gelsolin level in patients with ulcerative colitis was significantly lower than that in healthy subjects, and it decreased in proportion to increasing Mayo score and Mayo endoscopic subscore. The area under the curve for correlation between clinical and endoscopic remission and serum gelsolin level was higher than that for C-reactive protein. Furthermore, in C-reactive protein-negative patients, the serum gelsolin level was lower in the active phase than in remission. Our findings indicate that the serum gelsolin level correlates with clinical and endoscopic activities in ulcerative colitis, has a higher sensitivity and specificity than C-reactive protein, and can detect mucosal healing, suggesting that gelsolin can be used as a biomarker for ulcerative colitis.

Systematic review and meta-analysis: the advantage of endoscopic Mayo score 0 over 1 in patients with ulcerative colitis

Background

Mucosal healing (MH) evaluated by endoscopy is a novel target of therapy in UC as it is associated with improved long-term outcomes. It is defined based on the Mayo endoscopic score (MES), but it is still to define whether a value of MES 0 or 1 should be the target. The purpose of this paper is to present the results of a systematic review with meta-analysis which compares long-term outcomes of patients in steroid-free clinical remission with MES 0 with those with MES 1.

Methods

A systematic electronic search of the literature was performed using Medline, Scopus, and CENTRAL through December 2020 (PROSPERO n:CRD42020179333). The studies concerned UC patients, in steroid-free clinical remission, with MES of 0 or 1, and with at least 12-months of follow-up.

Results

Out of 4611 citations, 15 eligible studies were identified. Increases in clinical relapse among patients with MES 1 were observed in all the studies included in this review, suggesting that MES of 1 have a higher risk of relapse than a score of 0. MES 0 patients displayed a lower risk of clinical relapse (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.26–0.43; I² 13%) irrespective of the follow-up time (12-months or longer). On the other hand, no differences were found comparing MES 0 versus MES 1 about the risk of hospitalization or colectomy.

Conclusions

MES 0 is associated with a lower rate of clinical relapse than is MES 1. For this reason, MES 0, rather than MES 0–1, should be considered the therapeutic target for patients with UC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02157-5.

Long noncoding RNA Gm31629 protects against mucosal damage in experimental colitis via YB-1/E2F pathway

Mucosal healing is a key treatment goal for inflammatory bowel disease, and adequate epithelial regeneration is required for an intact gut epithelium. However, the underlying mechanism is unclear. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been reported to be involved in the development of inflammatory bowel disease. Here, we report that a lncRNA named Gm31629, decreases in intestinal epithelial cells in response to inflammatory stimulation. Gm31629 deficiency leads to exacerbated intestinal inflammation and delayed epithelial regeneration in dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) -induced colitis model. Mechanistically, Gm31629 promotes E2F pathways and cell proliferation by stabilizing Y-box protein 1 (YB-1), thus facilitating epithelial regeneration. Genetic overexpression of Gm31629 protects against DSS-induced colitis in vivo. Theaflavin 3-gallate, a natural compound mimicking Gm31629, alleviates DSS-induced epithelial inflammation and mucosal damage. These results demonstrate an essential role of lncRNA Gm31629 in linking intestinal inflammation and epithelial cell proliferation, providing a potential therapeutic approach to inflammatory bowel disease.

Composite outcomes in observational studies of ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative colitis (UC) has been the focus of numerous observational studies over the years and a common strategy employed in their design is the use of composite and aggregate outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to identify composite and aggregate outcomes of observational studies in UC and to evaluate how the number and type of variables included and the length of follow-up affect the frequency of patients that achieve these outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was carried out using MEDLINE [via PubMed], Scopus, and Web of Science online databases. Observational studies that included UC patients and reported composite or aggregate outcomes were identified. A set of variables considered to be representative of progressive or disabling UC was defined, the proportion of patients attaining the outcomes was determined and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed by dividing the identified studies into subgroups according to different criteria of interest.

RESULTS

A total of 10,264 records were identified in the systematic search, of which 33 were retained for qualitative analysis and 20 were included in the meta-analysis. The mean frequency for composite outcomes was 0.363 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.323-0.403]. The frequency of composite outcome for the subgroup of studies that included the variable "Biologics" was significantly higher than for those in which this variable was not reported [0.410; 95% CI 0.364-0.457 versus 0.298; 95% CI 0.232-0.364; p = 0.006]. Composite outcomes were also more frequent as the follow-up duration increased.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of composite outcomes in observational studies of UC is dependent on the specific identity of the variables being reported. Moreover, longer follow-up periods are associated with higher frequencies of composite outcomes. The evidence provided here is useful for the design of future observational studies of UC that aim to maximize the frequency of patients that achieve composite outcomes.

Residual Short-Segment Distal Inflammation Has No Significant Impact on the Major Relapse of Extensive Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Mucosal healing is a treatment target for patients with ulcerative colitis. However, the relevance of proactive treatment for residual inflammation limited to the distal colon is unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with ulcerative colitis who had extensive colitis in clinical remission and underwent colonoscopy were retrospectively enrolled and followed up for 2 years. Patients with complete endoscopic remission (CER; Mayo endoscopic subscore [MES] of 0) and those with short-segment distal inflammation (SS; active inflammation only in the sigmoid colon and/or rectum with a proximal MES of 0) were compared for the incidence of minor (only symptomatic) and major (need for induction treatments or hospitalization) relapses.

RESULTS

A total of 91 patients with CER and 54 patients with SS were identified and 63 relapses (47 minor and 16 major) were analyzed. Univariate analysis showed that minor relapses were significantly more frequent in the SS group than in the CER group (hazard ratio [HR], 2.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-3.97), but major relapses were not more frequent in the SS group than in the CER group (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 0.65-4.83). Multivariable analysis showed that SS was the only risk factor significantly associated with minor relapse (HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.31-4.36). When the SS group was stratified by MES of 1 vs 2/3, minor relapses were significantly more frequent in the subgroup with MES of 2/3 than in the CER group, whereas the incidence of major relapse remained similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Residual short-segment distal inflammation is not a risk factor for major relapses as long as endoscopic remission is achieved in the proximal colon. Therefore, reactive but not proactive treatment may be appropriate for such lesions.

A review on the current status and definitions of activity indices in inflammatory bowel disease: how to use indices for precise evaluation

Many clinical trials have been conducted for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), so various clinical indices (CIs) and endoscopic indices (EIs) have also been evaluated. However, recently, with the progress of IBD management, review of established indices from previous studies, and establishment of new indices, the landscape of the use of indices in clinical trials have changed. We investigated the number and frequency of the indices adapted in recent clinical trials for ulcerative colitis (CI and EI) and Crohn's disease (CI, EI, index related to magnetic resonance imaging, index for evaluating patient-reported outcomes, and health-related quality of life). Based on the results, we selected representative indices and further reviewed their content and characteristics. Moreover, various definitions, including clinical and endoscopic response or remission, have been described by means of representative indices in clinical trials.

Induction of mucosal healing by intensive granulocyte/monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) without use of corticosteroids in patients with ulcerative colitis: long-term remission maintenance after induction by GMA and efficacy of GMA re-treatment upon relapse

This study examined the long-term maintenance rate after inducing remission by intensive granulocyte/monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) without use of corticosteroids (CS) and GMA re-treatment efficacy in the same patients upon relapse with ulcerative colitis. Patients who achieved clinical remission and mucosal healing (MH) by first-time intensive GMA (first GMA) without CS were enrolled. The cumulative non-relapse survival rate up to week 156 was calculated. Patients with relapse during the maintenance period underwent second-time intensive GMA (second GMA) without CS. Clinical remission and MH rates following second GMA were compared to those following first GMA in the same patients. Of the 84 patients enrolled, 78 were followed until week 156 and 34 demonstrated relapse. The cumulative non-relapse survival rate by week 156 was 56.4%. Clinical remission and MH rates after second GMA did not differ from those after first GMA in the same patients (week 6: clinical remission, 100% vs 88.4%, p = 0.134; MH, 100% vs 84.8%, p = 0.074). In conclusion, MH induction by intensive GMA without use of CS in ulcerative colitis patients contributes to subsequent long-term clinical remission maintenance. GMA re-treatment efficacy was comparable to that of first GMA in the same patients who had relapse.

Histological inflammatory activity can predict endoscopic relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis who have achieved mucosal healing

BACKGROUND AIMS

Current therapeutic goals in ulcerative colitis (UC) include clinical and endoscopic remission, named mucosal healing (MH). Despite MH, a proportion of patients suffer a clinical relapse, which has been related to histological inflammation. We aimed to identify which histopathological features or histopathological index cut-off was associated with endoscopic relapse (ER) in UC patients with MH.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of UC patients who underwent surveillance colonoscopy showing complete MH (endoscopic Mayo subscore=0) with random biopsies, and at least one more endoscopy along the follow-up. After a consensus meeting, expert pathologist performed histological assessment according to Simplified Geboes Score (SGS), Nancy Index (NI) and Robarts Histopathological Index (RHI). Other histopathological features were also evaluated. Patients were followed until ER or last endoscopy performed showing persistence of MH.

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients (150 colonoscopies) were included. After mean follow-up of 31.2 months (SD 21.7), 33 patients (34.7%) suffered ER. Neutrophils in lamina propria (OR 2.6; P = 0.037), within the epithelium (OR 2.6; P = 0.03), SGS ≥3.1 (OR 2.6; P = 0.037), NI ≥2 (OR 2.6; P = 0.03) and RHI ≥5 (OR 2.6; P = 0.037) were associated with ER in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, eosinophils in the lamina propria (HR 2.5; P = 0.01) and clinical remission<12 months (HR 3.2; P = 0.002) were associated with ER.

CONCLUSIONS

Histopathological findings in UC patients who have achieved endoscopic MH may predict ER. Standardized histopathology reports according to the presence of neutrophils, eosinophils or to defined cut-off of validated histopathologic indexes may represent a useful tool to predict ER and should be considered at therapeutic and surveillance decision process.

Treatment Targets in Ulcerative Colitis: Is It Time for All In, including Histology?

The main therapeutic goal of ulcerative colitis (UC) is to induce and maintain remission to prevent long-term disease progression. Treat-to-target strategies, first introduced by the STRIDE consensus and updated in 2021, have shifted focus from symptomatic control toward more stringent objective endpoints. Today, patient monitoring should be based on a combination of biomarkers and clinical scores, while patient-reported outcomes could be used as short-term targets in monitoring disease activity and therapeutic response. In addition, endoscopic healing was the preferred long-term goal in UC. A Mayo endoscopic score (MES) ≤ 1 can be recommended as a minimum target. However, recent evidence suggests that more stringent endoscopic goals (MES of 0) are associated with superior outcomes. Recently, emerging data support that histological remission (HR) is a superior prognostic factor to endoscopic healing in predicting long-term remission. Despite not yet being recommended as a target, HR may become an important potential therapeutic goal in UC. However, it remains questionable if histological healing should be used as a routine assessment in addition to clinical, biomarker, and endoscopic targets in all patients. Therefore, in this review, our aim was to discuss the current evidence for the different treatment targets and their value in everyday clinical practice.

The efficacy of linked color imaging for the endoscopic diagnosis of mucosal healing in quiescent ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (MES) and the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) are used to assess endoscopic mucosal healing in patients suffering from ulcerative colitis. Although mucosal healing is defined by MES 0, relapse of ulcerative colitis is often observed. Over a 48-month period, this study investigated the efficacy of linked color imaging (LCI) in predicting the long-term prognosis of ulcerative colitis patients diagnosed with MES 0.

METHODS

Overall, 26 patients in ulcerative colitis remission, diagnosed with MES 0, were enrolled. Using a LASEREO endoscopic system (Fujifilm Co., Tokyo, Japan), endoscopic colonic images were assessed with linked color imaging and the colitis endoscopic index of severity. Endoscopic LCI images were separated into three subgroups (A, no redness; B, redness with visible vessels; and C, redness without visible vessels). The Geboes score was used to evaluate histology; active mucosa was defined as GS > 2B.1.

RESULTS

Linked color imaging classification subdivided colonic mucosa, which had been diagnosed with MES 0, into two classes. The LCI-A group did not relapse, and the non-relapse rate was significantly higher (P = 0.018) than that in the LCI-B group. No difference in relapse rates was observed between patients with a colitis endoscopic index of severity of 0 and 1 (P = 0.655). There was no statistical difference between the composition of LCI-A group and the relapse rate between active and inactive mucosa diagnosed by Geboes score.

CONCLUSIONS

This methodology can be used to evaluate mucosal healing and predict long-term outcomes in ulcerative colitis patients.

Role of Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) versus Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (MES) in Predicting Patients' Response to Biological Therapy and the Need for Colectomy

BACKGROUND

The main goal in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) is to achieve mucosal healing. Despite being unvalidated, the most widely used scoring system is the Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES). However, the recently established and validated Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) represents an interesting alternative method in assessing endoscopic disease activity.

OBJECTIVE

Due to a lack of reliable prognostic factors, the aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the UCEIS and the MES, in predicting response to biological therapy and the need for colectomy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, uncontrolled, single-center study on UC patients with endoscopically active disease even with concomitant conventional and/or biological therapy, who had already started or had been changed a biological treatment.

RESULTS

Sixty-one UC patients were enrolled. At baseline, 71% were naive to biological therapies and 41% had an extensive colitis. At control time (median time of 11.5 months), MES and UCEIS scores significantly decreased from those at baseline (from 2.6 to 1.8 and 5 to 3.2, respectively, p < 0.001). UCEIS, but not MES, was found to be significantly associated with unresponsiveness to therapy (p = 0.040). Moreover, when UCEIS was ≥7, all patients underwent colectomy after a median time of 5 months (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

UCEIS may be superior to MES because of its accuracy and predictive role. Therefore, UCEIS should be considered for use in daily clinical practice.

Risk of Relapse in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis With Persistent Endoscopic Healing: A Durable Treatment Endpoint

BACKGROUND

Deep remission in patients with UC has relied on initial achievement of biochemical, endoscopic, and/or histological remission. We evaluated persistent symptomatic remission and endoscopic healing (EH: Mayo endoscopy score [MES] 0 or 1) on consecutive endoscopic examinations as a durable treatment endpoint.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study, we estimated and compared cumulative risk of clinical relapse in patients with persistent EH, with and without persistent histological remission and depth of EH, among adults with active UC treated-to-target of symptomatic remission and EH who achieved and maintained symptomatic remission and EH over two serial endoscopic assessments. We also explored risk of relapse in patients with persistent EH whose therapy was de-escalated.

RESULTS

Of 270 patients who initially achieved EH with treatment-to-target, 89 maintained symptomatic remission and EH on follow-up endoscopy [interval between EH1 and EH2, 16 months]. On follow-up after EH2 [median, 19 months], 1-year cumulative risk of relapse in patients with persistent EH was 11.5%, and with persistent histological remission was 9.5%. Seventeen patients with persistent EH, who underwent de-escalation of therapy, did not have an increased risk of relapse as compared with patients who continued index therapy [5.3% vs 14%, p = 0.16].

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with active UC treated-to-target of clinical remission, who achieve and maintain symptomatic remission and EH over consecutive endoscopies, have a low risk of relapse, particularly in a subset of patients who simultaneously achieve histological remission. Persistent EH should be examined as a treatment endpoint suggestive of deep remission.

An International Multicenter Real-Life Prospective Study of Electronic Chromoendoscopy Score PICaSSO in Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Endoscopic and histologic remission are important goals in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We investigated the correlation of the recently developed Paddington International Virtual ChromoendoScopy ScOre (PICaSSO) and other established endoscopic scores against multiple histological indices and prospectively assessed outcomes.

METHODS

In this prospective multicenter international study, inflammatory activity was assessed with high-definition and virtual chromoendoscopy in the rectum and sigmoid using the Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES), UC Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS), and PICaSSO. Targeted biopsies were taken for assessment using Robarts Histological Index (RHI), Nancy Histological index (NHI), ECAP (Extent, Chronicity, Activity, Plus score), Geboes, and Villanacci. Follow-up data were obtained at 6 and 12 months after colonoscopy.

RESULTS

A total of 307 patients were recruited. There was strong correlation between PICaSSO and histology scores, significantly superior to correlation coefficients of MES and UCEIS with histology scores. A PICaSSO score of ≤3 detected histologic remission by RHI (≤3 + absence of neutrophils) with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-0.94) and NHI (≤1) AUROC 0.82 (95% CI 0.77-0.87). The interobserver agreement for PICaSSO was 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.92). At 6- and 12-months follow-up, PICaSSO score ≤3 predicted better outcomes than PICaSSO >3 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.19 [0.11-0.33] and 0.22 [0.13-0.34], respectively),} as well as PICaSSO 4-8 (HR 0.25 [0.12-0.53] and 0.22 (0.12-0.39), respectively) and similar to histologic remission.

CONCLUSION

In this first real-life multicenter study, the PICaSSO score correlated strongly with multiple histological indices. Furthermore, PICaSSO score predicted specified clinical outcomes at 6 and 12 months, similar to histology. Thus, PICaSSO can be a useful endoscopic tool in the therapeutic management of UC.

First United Arab Emirates consensus on diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel diseases: A 2020 Delphi consensus

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are the main entities of inflammatory bowel disease characterized by chronic remittent inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. The incidence and prevalence are on the rise worldwide, and the heterogeneity between patients and within individuals over time is striking. The progressive advance in our understanding of the etiopathogenesis coupled with an unprecedented increase in therapeutic options have changed the management towards evidence-based interventions by clinicians with patients. This guideline was stimulated and supported by the Emirates Gastroenterology and Hepatology Society following a systematic review and a Delphi consensus process that provided evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance is provided regarding diagnosis, evaluation of disease severity, appropriate and timely use of different investigations, choice of appropriate therapy for induction and remission phase according to disease severity, and management of main complications.

Treat-to-Target in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: What Does the Evidence Say?

The traditional management of inflammatory bowel disease, based on treatment intensification guided by clinical activity alone, has been revised in the last 10 years and a treat-to-target approach has been proposed and is currently under evaluation as a disease-modifying strategy. Treat-to-target focuses on objective and scheduled measures to monitor intestinal damage, with consequent therapeutic adjustments in case of failure to achieve pre-defined targets. Identification of targets has been set out by the Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE) committee in 2015. Mucosal healing is universally accepted as the main target both in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, given its proven association with better long-term outcomes than clinical remission alone. Equally important is to ensure patients' clinical remission and improve patient-reported outcomes. Transmural healing (for Crohn's disease) and histological remission (for ulcerative colitis), listed as adjunctive targets, are likely to become primary targets in the near future. The ultimate goal of this approach is to modify the natural history of inflammatory bowel diseases by trying to block bowel damage progression, with interventions in the pre-clinical stage. In this review, we will discuss the current recommended therapeutic targets, as well as those that are considered adjunctive targets, with a focus on the limited pediatric literature available. Prospective long-term trials are warranted in order to identify the most appropriate target for the pediatric population and its specific issues. Identification of reliable predictors of disease course, outcome, and response to treatment will help to individually adapt each step of this monitoring algorithm and consequent therapeutic decision.

Incremental Benefit of Achieving Endoscopic and Histologic Remission in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Clinical remission, defined by a composite of patient reported outcomes and Mayo endoscopy subscore (MES) 0 or 1 is a recommended treatment target in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). We estimated whether incorporating more rigorous remission definitions, of endoscopic remission (MES 0) and histologic remission, affects risk of relapse.

METHODS

Through a systematic review, we identified cohort studies in adults with UC in clinical remission that reported a minimum 12-month risk of clinical relapse, based on MES (0 vs 1) and/or histologic disease activity, in patients with endoscopic remission. Using random effects meta-analysis, we calculated relative and absolute risk of clinical relapse in patients with UC achieving different treatment targets.

RESULTS

In a meta-analysis of 17 studies that included 2608 patients with UC in clinical remission, compared to patients achieving MES 1, patients achieving MES 0 had a 52% lower risk of clinical relapse (relative risk, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.37-0.62). The median 12-month risk of clinical relapse in patients with MES 1 was 28.7%; the estimated annual risk of clinical relapse in patients with MES 0 was 13.7% (95% CI, 10.6-17.9). In a meta-analysis of 10 studies in patients in endoscopic remission (MES 0), patients who achieved histologic remission had a 63% lower risk of clinical relapse vs patients with persistent histologic activity (relative risk, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.24-0.56). Estimated annual risk of clinical relapse in who achieved achieving histologic remission was 5.0% (95% CI, 3.3-7.7).

CONCLUSIONS

In a systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with UC in clinical remission, we observed that patients achieving more rigorous treatment endpoints (endoscopic and histologic remission) have a substantially lower risk of clinical relapse compared with patients achieving clinical remission.

Predictors and outcomes of histological remission in ulcerative colitis treated to endoscopic healing

BACKGROUND

Clinical remission is the recommended treatment target in ulcerative colitis. The predictors and outcomes of achieving histologic remission within a treat-to-target paradigm are not well established.

AIM

To evaluate the predictors and outcomes of achieving histologic remission in patients with ulcerative colitis treated-to-target of endoscopic healing (modified Mayo endoscopy score 0 or 1).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in adults with active ulcerative colitis (modified Mayo endoscopy score 2 or 3), whose treatment was iteratively optimised to achieve endoscopic healing. We identified predictors of achieving histologic remission, and outcomes (risk of symptomatic relapse, and ulcerative colitis-related hospitalisation and/or surgery) of achieving histologic remission vs persistent histologic activity, using Cox proportional hazard analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 411 patients with clinically active ulcerative colitis, 270 achieved endoscopic healing. Of the 270 patients, 55% simultaneously achieved histologic remission. Depth of endoscopic healing at final endoscopic assessment was the only independent determinant of histologic remission (modified Mayo endoscopy score 0 vs 1: odds ratio, 0.31 [95% confidence intervals, 0.18-0.52]). Over 28 months, achieving histologic remission was associated with a lower risk of clinical relapse (1-year cumulative risk: 18.7% vs 29.5%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.56 [0.37-0.85]), and lower risk of hospitalisation (hazard ratio, 0.44 [0.20-0.94]). The incremental benefit of achieving histologic remission was observed only in patients achieving Mayo endoscopy score 1, but not Mayo endoscopy score 0.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with active ulcerative colitis treated-to-target of endoscopic healing, 55% simultaneously achieved histologic remission. Histologic remission, particularly in patients achieving modified Mayo endoscopy score 1, was associated with favourable outcomes. Treating to a target of histologic remission over endoscopic healing requires prospective evaluation.

The treatment approach to inflammatory bowel disease in 2020

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Multiple new medications with novel mechanisms of action are now available to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Identifying the appropriate patients in whom to use these therapies is critical in maximizing benefit and reducing unnecessary risks. Once the appropriate therapy is selected, using a treat-to-target algorithm including symptomatic, biochemical, and endoscopic monitoring can improve clinical outcomes. If symptoms recur, these same principles, coupled with therapeutic drug monitoring, should be considered to confirm inflammation and determine next therapeutic steps.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple network meta-analyses can assist clinicians in determining the ideal biologic or small molecule therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe IBD. Once selected, several clinical trials have demonstrated that follow-up in 3 to 4 months, coupled with fecal calprotectin or C-reactive protein monitoring, can improve clinical remission and mucosal healing rates. Structural assessment should be performed via colonoscopy, enterography, or capsule endoscopy, dependent on disease location, at 9--12 months to confirm healing.

SUMMARY

Appropriate disease stratification, coupled with biologic or small molecule medication selection and treat-to-target follow-up, can greatly assist clinicians who are managing patients with IBD in achieving the greatest potential benefits of medical therapy.

A review of endoscopic scoring systems and their importance in a treat-to-target approach in inflammatory bowel disease (with videos)

Endoscopic assessment is currently the criterion standard for the diagnosis and assessment of mucosal disease activity, prognosis and monitoring for dysplasia, and assessment of response to therapy. Wider appreciation of the potential disconnect between symptoms and objective measures of disease activity and evidence that uncontrolled inflammation may lead to progressive intestinal injury and irreversible bowel damage with adverse events has led to the concept of treating to target. Treating to target is defined as treating patients with high risk for disease progression early to prevent or limit intestinal injury or disability. Endoscopic remission (mucosal healing) has emerged as a key goal of therapy. Although there are no currently validated definitions of endoscopic mucosal remission, the use of endoscopic scoring systems add uniformity and objectivity and aid standardization with reporting of mucosal appearance, augmenting clinical decision making. A plethora of scoring systems exist to define activity, response, and remission in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. In this review, we discuss the most commonly used endoscopic scoring systems and proposed definitions of response and remission, and how they can be integrated into a treat-to-target approach to optimize patient outcomes.

Mucosal gene transcription of ulcerative colitis in endoscopic remission

Aim/Objective: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease. In UC, a wide range of criteria are used for disease remission, with few studies investigating the differences between disease remission and normal control groups. This paper compares known inflammatory and healing mediators in the mucosa of UC in clinical remission and normal controls, in order to better describe the remission state.Method: Mucosal biopsies from 72 study participants (48 UC and 24 normal controls) were included from the Advanced Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (ASIB Study), Arctic University of Norway, Norway. Clinical remission was defined as Mayo clinical score ≤ 2, with endoscopic subscores of ≤ 1. Targeted gene transcription analyses were performed using hydrolysis probes and SYBR-green.Results: Among the mucosal transcripts examined, 10 genes were regulated in remission versus normal controls, 8 upregulated pro-inflammatory transcripts (IL1B, IL33, TNF, TRAF1, CLDN2, STAT1, STAT3 and IL13Ra2) and 2 downregulated (pro-inflammatory TBX21 and anti-inflammatory TGFB1). In total, 14 transcripts were regulated between the investigated groups. Several master transcription factors for T-cell development were upregulated in patients with Mayo endoscopic score of 1 in comparison to 0.Conclusions: The mucosa of UC in clinical and endoscopic remission differs from normal mucosa, suggesting a remaining dysregulation of inflammatory and wound healing mechanisms.

Fecal calprotectin is more accurate than fecal immunochemical test for predicting mucosal healing in quiescent ulcerative colitis: a prospective multicenter study

Objective: Non-invasive stool tests, including the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and fecal calprotectin (FC), are reliable biomarkers for mucosal healing (MH) in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, which fecal test is superior for predicting MH in inactive UC patients requires evaluation. We aimed to compare the accuracy of FIT and FC results for predicting MH in quiescent UC patients.Methods: This prospective, multicenter study was conducted at three tertiary hospitals. UC patients in clinical remission for at least three months underwent colonoscopy and MH was evaluated using the Mayo endoscopic sub-score (MES). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and cutoff value with the best accuracy for predicting MH were assessed.Results: Among 127 patients, 65 (51.2%) showed MH (MES = 0). The area under the curve (AUC) for predicting MH (MES = 0) was significantly higher for FC than for FIT (AUC 0.858 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.784-0.913) vs. 0.707 (95% CI 0.620-0.784), p < .001); there was no difference when MH included MES = 1 (MES ≤ 1) (AUC 0.820 (95% CI 0.742-0.883) vs. 0.813 (95% CI 0.734-0.877), p = .891). When the cutoff value was 70 μg/g for FC and 10 ng/mL for FIT, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 89.2, 71, 76.3, and 86.3, respectively, for FC and 92.3, 50, 65.9, and 86.1, respectively, for FIT.Conclusion: FC is more accurate than FIT for predicting MH in quiescent UC patients. The superiority of FC might be related to the distinctive performance of FC in differentiating inflammatory levels, particularly in low-grade mucosal activity.

Prevalence of endoscopic improvement and remission according to patient-reported outcomes in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Treatment targets for ulcerative colitis are evolving towards achievement of endoscopic improvement and remission in addition to symptom resolution. It remains to be accurately quantified what proportion of patients with symptom resolution have residual endoscopic activity that might warrant treatment modification.

AIM

To quantify the prevalence of endoscopic improvement and remission amongst ulcerative colitis patients with various permutations of patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

Individual participant data from active intervention and placebo arms of clinical trials of infliximab, golimumab, vedolizumab and tofacitinib were pooled to estimate the prevalence of endoscopic improvement (Mayo endoscopic sub-score [MES] 0 or 1) and remission (MES 0) scores with various permutations of the rectal bleeding sub-score (RBS) and stool frequency sub-score (SFS) of the Mayo score, following induction (6-8 weeks) and maintenance (30-54 weeks) therapy. Subgroup analyses were performed by year of publication and centrally read endoscopy scoring.

RESULTS

Data from 2586 trial participants were analysed. Using locally scored endoscopy, the prevalence of endoscopic improvement and remission was highest among participants with a RBS 0 + SFS 0 post-induction (MES 0/1:81%, [95% CI 78-84]; MES 0:29% [26-33]) and during maintenance (MES 0/1:91% [87-93]; MES 0:57% [52-62]). Prevalence estimates were lower for more recently performed trials (P < .01). In comparison to locally scored endoscopy, when using central endoscopy scoring, the prevalence of endoscopic improvement and remission was lower post-induction (MES 0/1 57% [50-64], P < .001; MES 0 15% [11-21], P = .09) and during maintenance (MES 0/1 74% [67-81], P = .001; MES 0 31% [24-38], P = .001) for participants achieving a RBS 0 + SFS 0.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 8 of 10 patients with normalisation of rectal bleeding and stool frequency have improvement in endoscopic disease activity, whereas approximately only half of these patients have endoscopic remission.

A novel endoscopic imaging system for quantitative evaluation of colonic mucosal inflammation in patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis

Background and study aims  Mucosal healing (MH) is associated with clinical outcome in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. In most clinical trials, a Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) of 0 or 1 is defined as MH. However, several recent studies have reported that clinical outcome is different between UC patients with MES 0 and those with MES 1. In addition, the MES is subjective and may differ among endoscopists. Therefore, a repeatable and objective scoring system is required to distinguish MES 0 from MES 1, even in clinically quiescent UC. Here, we assessed the usefulness of new image-enhancing endoscopic technology, the i-scan TE-c, to quantitatively evaluate colonic inflammation in patients with quiescent UC. Methods  We retrospectively reviewed the data from 52 UC patients in clinical remission who had undergone routine colonoscopy with standard white light. The white-light images were reassessed using the new system, and the degree of colonic mucosal inflammation was quantified according to the MAGIC (Mucosal Analysis of Inflammatory Gravity by i-scan TE-c Image) score. We used the i-scan TE-c system to investigate the association among the MAGIC score, MES, and histologic activity (Geboes score). Results  The MAGIC score was significantly higher in the MES 1 group than in the MES 0 group ( P  = 0.0034). The MAGIC score significantly correlated with the Geboes score ( P  = 0.015). Conclusions  Our novel image-enhancing endoscopic system was useful for objective and quantitative evaluation of MH in patients with quiescent UC. Further clinical studies using this imaging system are required to confirm its clinical benefit for the management of UC patients.