Robustness and relevance of predictive score in sudden cardiac death for patients with Brugada syndrome

Nonmodifiable Risk Factors Predict Outcomes in Brugada Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification in Brugada syndrome (BrS) is based on the occurrence of dynamic factors, such as unexplained syncope and documentation of spontaneous type 1 pattern. At odds with other channelopathies, the role of nonmodifiable risk factors such as sex or genetics remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to identify nonmodifiable risk factors for the occurrence of life-threatening arrhythmic events (LAEs) and define their clinical utility.

METHODS

Clinical and genetic data from consecutive, unrelated Italian patients with Brugada syndrome screened on the sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 5 (SCN5A) gene and 3 pivotal single-nucleotide variations (formerly single-nucleotide polymorphisms) associated with BrS (rs11708996, rs10428132, and rs9388451) were analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

In 2,182 unrelated patients with BrS (81% males; median age at diagnosis: 41.6 years [Q1-Q3: 33.4-50.3 years]), male sex (HR: 3.6; 95% CI: 1.9-6.9; P = 0.0001), missense SCN5A mutations in BrS-enriched domains (HR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.2-4.3; P = 0.008), nonmissense SCN5A mutations (HR: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.8-5.7; P < 0.001), and polygenic risk score for BrS (HR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.0-1.6; P = 0.041) were all independently associated with a significantly higher risk of a first LAE since birth. Based on these results, we derived the nonmodifiable risk of each patient with BrS, and the division of nonmodifiable risk into tertiles identified 3 distinct risk profiles. In an analysis at follow-up, nonmodifiable risk was independently associated with LAE at follow-up (HR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1-2.7; P = 0.014), alongside classical predictors including: history of LAE before diagnosis (HR: 13.8; 95% CI: 8.1-23.7; P < 0.0001), history of unexplained syncope before diagnosis (HR: 4.1; 95% CI: 2.4-6.8; P < 0.0001), and spontaneous type 1 pattern at diagnosis (HR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.2-3.8; P = 0.010). The model was internally validated, and we derived the equation permitting to calculate the granular 5-year risk of experiencing an LAE at follow-up for each patient with BrS, which may be used to facilitate clinical decision-making.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that male sex, type of SCN5A mutation, and polygenic risk score for BrS define the nonmodifiable risk of each patient with BrS. Nonmodifiable risk is independently associated with LAE, regardless of symptoms or pattern type.

Validation of novel risk prediction models in patients with Brugada syndrome: A multicenter study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification in patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) is challenging, especially in those at intermediate risk. The Predicting Arrhythmic evenT (PAT) score has recently been demonstrated to be excellent for predicting future arrhythmic events in patients without prior ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, validation studies are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the performance of a novel risk stratification model in predicting future VF events in patients with BrS in a Japanese multicenter cohort.

METHODS

The PAT score was calculated for 413 patients with BrS (mean age, 50.9 ± 13.6 years; 395 men) from 59 hospitals in Japan, including 314 patients without prior VF. The incidence of developing VF during the follow-up period was investigated.

RESULTS

During the 106.8-month follow-up period, 54 patients (13.1%) experienced VF events. Of the 314 patients without prior VF at enrollment, 14 (4.5%) experienced VF events. The incidence of VF events during the follow-up period was significantly higher in patients with PAT scores ≥ 10 than in those with scores < 10 (41/173 [23.7%] vs 13/240 [5.4%]; P < .0001) in the total cohort. No difference was observed in the incidence of VF events between patients with PAT scores ≥ 10 and < 10 among the 314 patients without prior VF (6/86 [7.0%] vs 8/228 [3.5%]; P = .22). PAT scores ≥ 10 predicted future VF events with a sensitivity and specificity of 42.9% and 73.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This Japanese multicenter registry demonstrated that the novel risk stratification model could not accurately predict future VF events in patients with BrS but without prior VF.

Zebrafish as a Model System for Brugada Syndrome

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inheritable cardiac arrhythmogenic disease, associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death. It is most common in males around the age of 40 and the prevalence is higher in Asia than in Europe and the United States. The pathophysiology underlying BrS is not completely understood, but several hypotheses have been proposed. So far, the best effective treatment is the implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), but device-related complications are not uncommon. Therefore, there is an urgent need to improve diagnosis and risk stratification and to find new treatment options. To this end, research should further elucidate the genetic basis and pathophysiological mechanisms of BrS. Several experimental models are being used to gain insight into these aspects. The zebrafish (Danio rerio) is a widely used animal model for the study of cardiac arrhythmias, as its cardiac electrophysiology shows interesting similarities to humans. However, zebrafish have only been used in a limited number of studies on BrS, and the potential role of zebrafish in studying the mechanisms of BrS has not been reviewed. Therefore, the present review aims to evaluate zebrafish as an animal model for BrS. We conclude that zebrafish can be considered as a valuable experimental model for BrS research, not only for gene editing technologies, but also for screening potential BrS drugs.

More than 30 years of Brugada syndrome: a critical appraisal of achievements and open issues

Over the last three decades, what is referred to as Brugada syndrome (BrS) has developed from a clinical observation of initially a few cases of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the absence of structural heart disease with ECG signs of "atypical right bundle brunch block" to a predominantly electrocardiographic, and to a lesser extent genetic, diagnosis. Today, BrS is diagnosed in patients without overt structural heart disease and a spontaneous Brugada type 1 ECG pattern regardless of symptoms. The diagnosis of BrS is less clear in those with an only transient or drug-induced type 1 Brugada pattern, but should be considered in the presence of an arrhythmic syncope, family history of BrS, or family history of sudden death. In addition to survived cardiac arrest, syncope is probably the single most decisive risk marker for future arrhythmias. For asymptomatic BrS, risk stratification remains challenging. General recommendations to lower the risk in BrS include avoidance of drugs/agents known to induce and/or increase right precordial ST-segment elevation, including treatment of fever with antipyretic drugs. Several ECG markers that have been associated with an increased risk of SCD have been incorporated into a recently published risk score for BrS. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the status of risk stratification and to illustrate open issues und gaps in evidence in BrS.

Importance of Comprehensive Assessment in Brugada Syndrome. Reply to Kataoka, N.; Imamura, T. How to Diagnose and Risk Stratify Brugada Syndrome. Comment on "Matusik et al. Twelve-Lead ECG, Holter Monitoring Parameters, and Genetic Testing in Brugada Syndrome: Insights from Analysis of Multigenerational Family with a History of Sudden Cardiac Arrest during Physical Activity. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 6581"

We would like to thank Dr. Imamura for their interest in our study and their valuable comments on diagnostics and risk stratification in Brugada syndrome (BrS) [...].

Clinical Management of Brugada Syndrome: Commentary From the Experts

Although there is consensus on the management of patients with Brugada Syndrome with high risk for sudden cardiac arrest, asymptomatic or intermediate-risk patients present clinical management challenges. This document explores the management opinions of experts throughout the world for patients with Brugada Syndrome who do not fit guideline recommendations. Four real-world clinical scenarios were presented with commentary from small expert groups for each case. All authors voted on case-specific questions to evaluate the level of consensus among the entire group in nuanced diagnostic and management decisions relevant to each case. Points of agreement, points of controversy, and gaps in knowledge are highlighted.

When to ablate in Brugada and early repolarization syndromes

INTRODUCTION

Mapping advances have expanded both the feasibility and benefits of ablation as a therapeutic approach, including in the treatment of two heart conditions that contribute to sudden cardiac death in young people: Brugada syndrome (BrS) and early repolarization syndrome (ERS). Although these conditions share a number of similarities, debates persist regarding the underlying pathophysiology and origin of the ventricular arrhythmias associated with them.

AREAS COVERED

By synthesizing available data (PubMed), including current recommendations, pathophysiological insights and case reports, patient registries, our aim is to elucidate and establish the nuanced role of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in therapeutic management.

EXPERT OPINION

RFA is a particularly promising approach in BrS, with a proven long-term benefit. Concerning ERS, RFA seems to be interesting at the price of more complex procedures with more nuanced results.

Human Genetics of Cardiac Arrhythmias

Inherited forms of cardiac arrhythmias mostly are rare diseases (prevalence <1:2000) and considered to be either "primary electrical heart disorders" due to the absence of structural heart abnormalities or "cardiac ion channel disorders" due to the myocellular structures involved. Precise knowledge of the electrocardiographic features of these diseases and their genetic classification will enable early disease recognition and prevention of cardiac events including sudden cardiac death.The genetic background of these diseases is complex and heterogeneous. In addition to the predominant "private character" of a mutation in each family, locus heterogeneity involving many ion channel genes for the same familial arrhythmia syndrome is typical. Founder pathogenic variants or mutational hot spots are uncommon. Moreover, phenotypes may vary and overlap even within the same family and mutation carriers. For the majority of arrhythmias, the clinical phenotype of an ion channel mutation is restricted to cardiac tissue, and therefore, the disease is nonsyndromic.Recent and innovative methods of parallel DNA analysis (so-called next-generation sequencing, NGS) will enhance further mutation and other variant detection as well as arrhythmia gene identification.

Outcomes of catheter ablation in high-risk patients with Brugada syndrome refusing an implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation

AIMS

The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) in preventing arrhythmic events among patients with symptomatic Brugada syndrome (BrS) who declined implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 40 patients with symptomatic BrS were included in the study, of which 18 refused ICD implantation and underwent CA, while 22 patients received ICD implantation. The study employed substrate modification (including endocardial and epicardial approaches) and ventricular fibrillation (VF)-triggering pre-mature ventricular contraction (PVC) ablation strategies. The primary outcomes were a composite endpoint consisting of episodes of VF and sudden cardiac death during the follow-up period. The study population had a mean age of 43.8 ± 9.6 years, with 36 (90.0%) of them being male. All patients exhibited the typical Type 1 BrS electrocardiogram pattern, and 16 (40.0%) were carriers of an SCN5A mutation. The Shanghai risk scores were comparable between the CA and the ICD groups (7.05 ± 0.80 vs. 6.71 ± 0.86, P = 0.351). Ventricular fibrillation-triggering PVCs were ablated in 3 patients (16.7%), while VF substrates were ablated in 15 patients (83.3%). Epicardial ablation was performed in 12 patients (66.7%). During a median follow-up of 46.2 (17.5-73.7) months, the primary outcomes occurred more frequently in the ICD group than in the CA group (5.6 vs. 54.5%, Log-rank P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Catheter ablation is an effective alternative therapy for improving arrhythmic outcomes in patients with symptomatic BrS who decline ICD implantation. Our findings support the consideration of CA as an alternative treatment option in this population.

Assessment of Sudden Cardiac Death Risk in Pediatric Primary Electrical Disorders: A Comprehensive Overview

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) in children is a devastating event, often linked to primary electrical diseases (PED) of the heart. PEDs, often referred to as channelopathies, are a group of genetic disorders that disrupt the normal ion channel function in cardiac cells, leading to arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. This paper investigates the unique challenges of risk assessment and stratification for channelopathy-related SCD in pediatric patients-Brugada syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, idiopathic ventricular fibrillation, long QT syndrome, Anderson-Tawil syndrome, short QT syndrome, and early repolarization syndrome. We explore the intricate interplay of genetic, clinical, and electrophysiological factors that contribute to the complex nature of these conditions. Recognizing the significance of early identification and tailored management, this paper underscores the need for a comprehensive risk stratification approach specifically designed for pediatric populations. By integrating genetic testing, family history, and advanced electrophysiological evaluation, clinicians can enhance their ability to identify children at the highest risk for SCD, ultimately paving the way for more effective preventive strategies and improved outcomes in this vulnerable patient group.

Twelve-Lead ECG, Holter Monitoring Parameters, and Genetic Testing in Brugada Syndrome: Insights from Analysis of Multigenerational Family with a History of Sudden Cardiac Arrest during Physical Activity

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an arrhythmogenic disorder increasing the risk of syncopal episodes and sudden cardiac death. BrS usually runs through families with reduced penetrance and variable expression. We analyzed the multigenerational family of a patient who died after sudden cardiac arrest with post-mortem diagnosis of BrS. We analyzed clinical history, comprehensive arrhythmic risk, genetic findings, and additional tests, including electrocardiogram (ECG), detailed 24-hour Holter ECG results, and standard echocardiography findings, and followed up the patients in the ambulatory clinic. We analyzed a pedigree of 33 members of four generations of the family (19 male and 14 female patients). In this family, we identified 7 patients with BrS (median Modified Shanghai Score and Sieira model: 4.5 (4-6) and 1 (0-4) points, respectively), including both parents of the deceased patient, and 8 relatives with negative sodium channel blocker drug challenge test. Genetic testing revealed a novel mutation in sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 5 (SCN5A) c.941A>G, (p.Tyr314Cys) inherited from the father of the proband. Patients with BrS were characterized by longer P-wave duration (120 (102-155) vs. 92.5 (88-110) ms, p = 0.013) and longer PR intervals (211.3 ±26.3 vs. 161.6 ± 18.9 ms, p = 0.001), along with more frequent positive aVR sign, but did not differ in terms of QRS duration or T-wave characteristics in resting ECGs. BrS patients were characterized by lower mean, minimal, and maximal (for all p ≤ 0.01) heart rates obtained from Holter ECG monitoring, while there was no difference in arrhythmias among investigated patients. Moreover, visual diurnal variability of ST segment changes and fragmented QRS complexes were observed in patients with BrS in Holter ECG monitoring. There were no major arrhythmic events during median follow-up of 68.7 months of alive BrS patients. These results suggest ECG features which may be associated with a diagnosis of BrS and indicate a novel SCN5A variant in BrS patients. Twelve-lead Holter ECG monitoring, with modified precordial leads placement, may be useful in BrS diagnostics and risk stratification in personalized medicine.

Novelties in Brugada Syndrome: Complex Genetics, Risk Stratification, and Catheter Ablation

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited arrhythmia syndrome with distinctive electrocardiographic abnormalities in the right precordial leads and predisposes to ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in otherwise healthy patients. Its complex genetic architecture and pathophysiological mechanism are not yet completely understood, and risk stratification remains challenging, particularly in patients at intermediate risk of arrhythmic events. Further understanding of its complex genetic architecture may help improving future risk stratification, and advances in management may contribute to alternatives to implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Here, the authors review the latest insights and developments in BrS.

Risk stratification of sudden cardiac death: a review

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is responsible for several millions of deaths every year and remains a major health problem. To reduce this burden, diagnosing and identification of high-risk individuals and disease-specific risk stratification are essential. Treatment strategies include treatment of the underlying disease with lifestyle advice and drugs and decisions to implant a primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and perform ablation of the ventricles and novel treatment modalities such as left cardiac sympathetic denervation in rare specific primary electric diseases such as long QT syndrome and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. This review summarizes the current knowledge on SCD risk according to underlying heart disease and discusses the future of SCD prevention.

Brugada Syndrome: More than a Monogenic Channelopathy

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited cardiac channelopathy first diagnosed in 1992 but still considered a challenging disease in terms of diagnosis, arrhythmia risk prediction, pathophysiology and management. Despite about 20% of individuals carrying pathogenic variants in the SCN5A gene, the identification of a polygenic origin for BrS and the potential role of common genetic variants provide the basis for applying polygenic risk scores for individual risk prediction. The pathophysiological mechanisms are still unclear, and the initial thinking of this syndrome as a primary electrical disease is evolving towards a partly structural disease. This review focuses on the main scientific advancements in the identification of biomarkers for diagnosis, risk stratification, pathophysiology and therapy of BrS. A comprehensive model that integrates clinical and genetic factors, comorbidities, age and gender, and perhaps environmental influences may provide the opportunity to enhance patients' quality of life and improve the therapeutic approach.

Current gaps in knowledge in inherited arrhythmia syndromes

The 3 most common inherited arrhythmia syndromes-Brugada syndrome, congenital long QT syndrome and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia-were initially described in the previous century. Since then, research has evolved, which has enabled us to identify patients prior to the onset of potentially life-threatening symptoms. However, there are significant gaps in knowledge that complicate clinical management of these patients today. With this review paper, we aim to highlight the most important knowledge gaps in clinical research of these inherited arrhythmia syndromes.

Genetic and Molecular Mechanisms in Brugada Syndrome

Brugada syndrome is a rare hereditary arrhythmia disorder characterized by a distinctive electrocardiogram pattern and an elevated risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in young adults. Despite recent advances, it remains a complex condition, encompassing mechanisms, genetics, diagnosis, arrhythmia risk stratification, and management. The underlying electrophysiological mechanism of Brugada syndrome requires further investigation, with current theories focusing on abnormalities in repolarization, depolarization, and current-load match. The genetic basis of the syndrome is strong, with mutations found in genes encoding subunits of cardiac sodium, potassium, and calcium channels, as well as genes involved in channel trafficking and regulation. While the initial discovery of mutations in the SCN5A gene provided valuable insights, Brugada syndrome is now recognized as a multifactorial disease influenced by several loci and environmental factors, challenging the traditional autosomal dominant inheritance model. This comprehensive review aims to provide a current understanding of Brugada syndrome, focusing on its pathophysiology, genetic mechanisms, and novel models of risk stratification. Advancements in these areas hold the potential to facilitate earlier diagnosis, improve risk assessments, and enable more targeted therapeutic interventions.

Prediction of the Presence of Ventricular Fibrillation From a Brugada Electrocardiogram Using Artificial Intelligence

BACKGROUND

Brugada syndrome is a potential cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and is characterized by a distinct ECG, but not all patients with A Brugada ECG develop SCD. In this study we sought to examine if an artificial intelligence (AI) model can predict a previous or future ventricular fibrillation (VF) episode from a Brugada ECG.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We developed an AI-enabled algorithm using a convolutional neural network. From 157 patients with suspected Brugada syndrome, 2,053 ECGs were obtained, and the dataset was divided into 5 datasets for cross-validation. In the ECG-based evaluation, the precision, recall, and F1score were 0.79±0.09, 0.73±0.09, and 0.75±0.09, respectively. The average area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.81±0.09. On per-patient evaluation, the AUROC was 0.80±0.07. This model predicted the presence of VF with a precision of 0.93±0.02, recall of 0.77±0.14, and F1score of 0.81±0.11. The negative predictive value was 0.94±0.11 while its positive predictive value was 0.44±0.29.

CONCLUSIONS

This proof-of-concept study showed that an AI-enabled algorithm can predict the presence of VF with a substantial performance. It implies that the AI model may detect a subtle ECG change that is undetectable by humans.

Brugada Syndrome: 30 Years of Scientific Ventures

Thirty years ago, a distinctly new clinical-electrocardiographic syndrome was described, today known as Brugada Syndrome (BrS). Typical treatment for this type of syndrome is electrocardiography with ST-segment elevation in the direct precordial derivations. The clinical presentation of the disease is highly variable: the patients can remain completely asymptomatic, but they can also develop episodes of syncope, atrial fibrillation (AF), sinus node dysfunction (SNF), conduction disorders, asystole, and ventricular fibrillation (VF). This disease is caused by mutations in the genes responsible for the potential action of cardiac cells. The most commonly involved gene is SCN5A, which controls the structure and function of the heart's sodium channel. The description of this new syndrome has shown highly positive implications in all fields of medicine.

Brugada Syndrome: From Molecular Mechanisms and Genetics to Risk Stratification

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a rare hereditary arrhythmia disorder, with a distinctive ECG pattern, correlated with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young adults. BrS is a complex entity in terms of mechanisms, genetics, diagnosis, arrhythmia risk stratification, and management. The main electrophysiological mechanism of BrS requires further research, with prevailing theories centered on aberrant repolarization, depolarization, and current-load match. Computational modelling, pre-clinical, and clinical research show that BrS molecular anomalies result in excitation wavelength (k) modifications, which eventually increase the risk of arrhythmia. Although a mutation in the SCN5A (Sodium Voltage-Gated Channel Alpha Subunit 5) gene was first reported almost two decades ago, BrS is still currently regarded as a Mendelian condition inherited in an autosomal dominant manner with incomplete penetrance, despite the recent developments in the field of genetics and the latest hypothesis of additional inheritance pathways proposing a more complex mode of inheritance. In spite of the extensive use of the next-generation sequencing (NGS) technique with high coverage, genetics remains unexplained in a number of clinically confirmed cases. Except for the SCN5A which encodes the cardiac sodium channel NaV1.5, susceptibility genes remain mostly unidentified. The predominance of cardiac transcription factor loci suggests that transcriptional regulation is essential to the Brugada syndrome's pathogenesis. It appears that BrS is a multifactorial disease, which is influenced by several loci, each of which is affected by the environment. The primary challenge in individuals with a BrS type 1 ECG is to identify those who are at risk for sudden death, researchers propose the use of a multiparametric clinical and instrumental strategy for risk stratification. The aim of this review is to summarize the latest findings addressing the genetic architecture of BrS and to provide novel perspectives into its molecular underpinnings and novel models of risk stratification.

Concealed Substrates in Brugada Syndrome: Isolated Channelopathy or Associated Cardiomyopathy?

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited autosomal dominant genetic disorder responsible for sudden cardiac death from malignant ventricular arrhythmia. The term "channelopathy" is nowadays used to classify BrS as a purely electrical disease, mainly occurring secondarily to loss-of-function mutations in the α subunit of the cardiac sodium channel protein Nav1.5. In this setting, arrhythmic manifestations of the disease have been reported in the absence of any apparent structural heart disease or cardiomyopathy. Over the last few years, however, a consistent amount of evidence has grown in support of myocardial structural and functional abnormalities in patients with BrS. In detail, abnormal ventricular dimensions, either systolic or diastolic dysfunctions, regional wall motion abnormalities, myocardial fibrosis, and active inflammatory foci have been frequently described, pointing to alternative mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis which challenge the definition of channelopathy. The present review aims to depict the status of the art of concealed arrhythmogenic substrates in BrS, often resulting from an advanced and multimodal diagnostic workup, to foster future preclinical and clinical research in support of the cardiomyopathic nature of the disease.

Comparing the performance of published risk scores in Brugada syndrome: a multi-center cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The management of Brugada Syndrome (BrS) patients at intermediate risk of arrhythmic events remains controversial. The present study evaluated the predictive performance of different risk scores in an Asian BrS population and its intermediate risk subgroup.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients diagnosed with BrS from January 1^st, 1997 to June 20^th, 2020 from Hong Kong. The primary outcome is sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Two novel risk risk scores and seven machine learning-based models (random survival forest, Ada boost classifier, Gaussian naïve Bayes, light gradient boosting machine, random forest classifier, gradient boosting classifier and decision tree classifier) were developed. The area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) [95% confidence intervals] was compared between the different models.

RESULTS

This study included 548 consecutive BrS patients (7% female, age at diagnosis: 50±16 years, follow-up: 84±55 months). For the whole cohort, the score developed by Sieira et al. showed the best performance (AUC: 0.806 [0.747-0.865]). A novel risk score was developed using the Sieira score and additional variables significant on univariable Cox regression (AUC: 0.855 [0.808-0.901]). A simpler score based on non-invasive results only showed a statistically comparable AUC (0.784 [0.724-0.845]), improved using random survival forests (AUC: 0.942 [0.913-0.964]). For the intermediate risk subgroup (N=274), a gradient boosting classifier model showed the best performance (AUC: 0.814 [0.791-0.832]).

CONCLUSION

A simple risk score based on clinical and electrocardiographic variables showed a good performance for predicting VT/VF, improved using machine learning. Abstract: The management of Brugada Syndrome (BrS) patients at intermediate risk of arrhythmic events remains controversial. This study evaluated the predictive performance of published risk scores in a cohort of BrS patients from Hong Kong (N=548) and its intermediate risk subgroup (N=274). A novel risk score developed by modifying the best performing existing score (by. Sieira et al.) showed an area under the curve of 0.855 and 0.760 for the whole BrS cohort and the intermediate risk subgroup, respectively. The performance of the different scores was significantly improved machine learning-based methods, such as random survival forests and gradient boosting classifier.

Implantable defibrillators in primary prevention of genetic arrhythmias. A shocking choice?

Many previously unexplained life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac deaths (SCDs) in young individuals are now recognized to be genetic in nature and are ascribed to a growing number of distinct inherited arrhythmogenic diseases. These include hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT), and short QT syndrome. Because of their lower frequency compared to coronary disease, risk factors for SCD are not very precise in patients with inherited arrhythmogenic diseases. As randomized studies are generally non-feasible and may even be ethically unjustifiable, especially in the presence of effective therapies, the risk assessment of malignant arrhythmic events such as SCD, cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation (VF), appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) interventions, or ICD therapy on fast VT/VF to guide ICD implantation is based on observational data and expert consensus. In this document, we review risk factors for SCD and indications for ICD implantation and additional therapies. What emerges is that, allowing for some important differences between cardiomyopathies and channelopathies, there is a growing and disquieting trend to create, and then use, semi-automated systems (risk scores, risk calculators, and, to some extent, even guidelines) which then dictate therapeutic choices. Their common denominator is a tendency to favour ICD implantation, sometime with reason, sometime without it. This contrasts with the time-honoured approach of selecting, among the available therapies, the best option (ICDs included) based on the clinical judgement for the specific patient and after having assessed the protection provided by optimal medical treatment.

Predictors of late arrhythmic events after generator replacement in Brugada syndrome treated with prophylactic ICD

Introduction

Predictors of late life-threatening arrhythmic events in Brugada syndrome (BrS) patients who received a prophylactic ICD implantation remain to be evaluated. The aim of the present long-term multicenter study was to assess the incidence and clinical-electrocardiographic predictors of late life-threatening arrhythmic events in BrS patients with a prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and undergoing generator replacement (GR).

Methods

The study population included 105 patients (75% males; mean age 45 ± 14years) who received a prophylactic ICD and had no arrhythmic event up to first GR.

Results

The median period from first ICD implantation to last follow-up was 155 (128-181) months and from first ICD Implantation to the GR was 84 (61-102) months. During a median follow-up of 57 (38-102) months after GR, 10 patients (9%) received successful appropriate ICD intervention (1.6%/year). ICD interventions included shock on ventricular fibrillation (n = 8 patients), shock on ventricular tachycardia (n = 1 patient), and antitachycardia pacing on ventricular tachycardia (n = 1 patient). At survival analysis, history of atrial fibrillation (log-rank test; P = 0.02), conduction disturbances (log-rank test; P < 0.01), S wave in lead I (log-rank test; P = 0.01) and first-degree atrioventricular block (log-rank test; P = 0.04) were significantly associated with the occurrence of late appropriate ICD intervention. At Cox-regression multivariate analysis, S-wave in lead I was the only independent predictor of late appropriate ICD intervention (HR: 9.17; 95%CI: 1.15-73.07; P = 0.03).

Conclusions

The present study indicates that BrS patient receiving a prophylactic ICD may experience late appropriate intervention after GR in a clinically relevant proportion of cases. S-wave in lead I at the time of first clinical evaluation was the only independent predictor of persistent risk of life-threatening arrhythmic events. These findings support the need for GR at the end of service regardless of previous appropriate intervention, mostly in BrS patients with conduction abnormalities.

Brugada Syndrome as a Major Cause of Sudden Cardiac Death in Asians

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is one of the main inherited arrhythmia syndromes causing ventricular fibrillation (VF) and sudden cardiac death in young to middle-aged men, especially in Asians. The diagnosis of BrS is based on spontaneous or drug-provoked type 1 Brugada electrocardiogram. The current reliable therapy for BrS patients with VF history is the implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. As for BrS patients without VF history, how asymptomatic BrS patients should effectively be treated is still uncertain because risk stratification of the BrS is still inadequate. Various parameters and combinations of several parameters have been reported for risk stratification of BrS. The SCN5A gene is believed to be the only gene that is responsible for BrS, and it has been reported to be useful for risk stratification. This review focuses on risk stratification of BrS patients, and focuses specifically on BrS patients of Asian descent.

Performance of Multiparametric Models in Patients With Brugada Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Multiparametric models have shown better risk stratification in Brugada syndrome. Recently, these models have been validated in different populations.

Aims

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the predictive performance of three validated multiparametric models (Delise model, Sieria model, and Shanghai score).

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Ovid for studies validating the risk multiparametric model. A Sieria score &gt; 2 and Shanghai score ≥ 4 were considered to indicate higher risk. Performance estimates were summarized using a random-effects model.

Results

Seven studies were included, with sample sizes of 111–1,613. The follow-up duration was 3.3–10.18 years. The Sieria model had a pooled area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of 0.71 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67–0.75], 57% (95% CI: 35–76), and 71% (95% CI: 62–79), respectively. The Shanghai score had an AUC of 0.63–0.71, 68.97–90.67% sensitivity, and 43.53–63.43% specificity. The AUC of the Delise model was 0.77–0.87; however, the optimal cut-off was not identified.

Conclusions

The three models exhibited moderate discriminatory ability for Brugada syndrome. The Sieria model has poor sensitivity and moderate specificity, whereas the Shanghai score has poor specificity and moderate sensitivity.

Pathogenesis and Management of Brugada Syndrome: Recent Advances and Protocol for Umbrella Reviews of Meta-Analyses in Major Arrhythmic Events Risk Stratification

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a primary electrical disease associated with life-threatening arrhythmias. It is estimated to cause at least 20% of sudden cardiac deaths (SCDs) in patients with normal cardiac anatomy. In this review paper, we discuss recent advances in complex BrS pathogenesis, diagnostics, and current standard approaches to major arrhythmic events (MAEs) risk stratification. Additionally, we describe a protocol for umbrella reviews to systematically investigate clinical, electrocardiographic, electrophysiological study, programmed ventricular stimulation, and genetic factors associated with BrS, and the risk of MAEs. Our evaluation will include MAEs such as sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, appropriate implantable cardioverter–defibrillator therapy, sudden cardiac arrest, and SCDs from previous meta-analytical studies. The protocol was written following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. We plan to extensively search PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for meta-analyses concerning risk-stratification in BrS. Data will be synthesized integratively with transparency and accuracy. Heterogeneity patterns across studies will be reported. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology, A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2), and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) are planned to be applied for design and execution of our evidence-based research. To the best of our knowledge, these will be the first umbrella reviews to critically evaluate the current state of knowledge in BrS risk stratification for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, and will potentially contribute towards evidence-based guidance to enhance clinical decisions.

Brugada Syndrome

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an "inherited" condition characterized by predisposition to syncope and cardiac arrest, predominantly during sleep. The prevalence is ∼1:2,000, and is more commonly diagnosed in young to middle-aged males, although patient sex does not appear to impact prognosis. Despite the perception of BrS being an inherited arrhythmia syndrome, most cases are not associated with a single causative gene variant. Electrocardiogram (ECG) findings support variable extent of depolarization and repolarization changes, with coved ST-segment elevation ≥2 mm and a negative T-wave in the right precordial leads. These ECG changes are often intermittent, and may be provoked by fever or sodium channel blocker challenge. Growing evidence from cardiac imaging, epicardial ablation, and pathology studies suggests the presence of an epicardial arrhythmic substrate within the right ventricular outflow tract. Risk stratification aims to identify those who are at increased risk of sudden cardiac death, with well-established factors being the presence of spontaneous ECG changes and a history of cardiac arrest or cardiogenic syncope. Current management involves conservative measures in asymptomatic patients, including fever management and drug avoidance. Symptomatic patients typically undergo implantable cardioverter defibrillator insertion, with quinidine and epicardial ablation used for patients with recurrent arrhythmia. This review summarizes our current understanding of BrS and provides clinicians with a practical approach to diagnosis and management.

Ajmaline-Induced Abnormalities in Brugada Syndrome: Evaluation With ECG Imaging

Background The rate of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in Brugada syndrome (BrS) is ≈1%/y. Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging is a noninvasive mapping system that has a role in assessing BrS depolarization and repolarization abnormalities. This study aimed to analyze electrocardiographic imaging parameters during ajmaline test (AJT). Methods and Results All consecutive epicardial maps of the right ventricle outflow tract (RVOT-EPI) in BrS with CardioInsight were retrospectively analyzed. (1) RVOT-EPI activation time (RVOT-AT); (2) RVOT-EPI recovery time, and (3) RVOT-EPI activation-recovery interval (RVOT-ARI) were calculated. ∆RVOT-AT, ∆RVOT-EPI recovery time, and ∆RVOT-ARI were defined as the difference in parameters before and after AJT. SCD-BrS patients were defined as individuals presenting a history of aborted SCD. Thirty-nine patients with BrS were retrospectively analyzed and 12 patients (30.8%) were SCD-BrS. After AJT, an increase in both RVOT-AT [105.9 milliseconds versus 65.8 milliseconds, P<0.001] and RVOT-EPI recovery time [403.4 milliseconds versus 365.7 milliseconds, P<0.001] was observed. No changes occurred in RVOT-ARI [297.5 milliseconds versus 299.9 milliseconds, P=0.7]. Before AJT no differences were observed between SCD-BrS and non SCD-BrS in RVOT-AT, RVOT-EPI recovery time, and RVOT-ARI (P=0.9, P=0.91, P=0.86, respectively). Following AJT, SCD-BrS patients showed higher RVOT-AT, higher ∆RVOT-AT, lower RVOT-ARI, and lower ∆RVOT-ARI (P<0.001, P<0.001, P=0.007, P=0.002, respectively). At the univariate logistic regression, predictors of SCD-BrS were the following: RVOT-AT after AJT (specificity: 0.74, sensitivity 1.00, area under the curve 0.92); ∆RVOT-AT (specificity: 0.74, sensitivity 0.92, area under the curve 0.86); RVOT-ARI after AJT (specificity 0.96, sensitivity 0.58, area under the curve 0.79), and ∆RVOT-ARI (specificity 0.85, sensitivity 0.67, area under the curve 0.76). Conclusions Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging can be useful in evaluating the results of AJT in BrS.

Brugada syndrome: update and future perspectives

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited cardiac disorder, characterised by a typical ECG pattern and an increased risk of arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). BrS is a challenging entity, in regard to diagnosis as well as arrhythmia risk prediction and management. Nowadays, asymptomatic patients represent the majority of newly diagnosed patients with BrS, and its incidence is expected to rise due to (genetic) family screening. Progress in our understanding of the genetic and molecular pathophysiology is limited by the absence of a true gold standard, with consensus on its clinical definition changing over time. Nevertheless, novel insights continue to arise from detailed and in-depth studies, including the complex genetic and molecular basis. This includes the increasingly recognised relevance of an underlying structural substrate. Risk stratification in patients with BrS remains challenging, particularly in those who are asymptomatic, but recent studies have demonstrated the potential usefulness of risk scores to identify patients at high risk of arrhythmia and SCD. Development and validation of a model that incorporates clinical and genetic factors, comorbidities, age and gender, and environmental aspects may facilitate improved prediction of disease expressivity and arrhythmia/SCD risk, and potentially guide patient management and therapy. This review provides an update of the diagnosis, pathophysiology and management of BrS, and discusses its future perspectives.

Validation of multiparametric approaches for the prediction of sudden cardiac death in patients with Brugada syndrome and electrophysiological study

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Multiparametric scores have been designed for better risk stratification in Brugada syndrome (BrS). We aimed to validate 3 multiparametric approaches (the Delise score, Sieira score and the Shanghai BrS Score) in a cohort with Brugada syndrome and electrophysiological study (EPS).

METHODS

We included patients diagnosed with BrS and previous EPS between 1998 and 2019 in 23 hospitals. C-statistic analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression models were used.

RESULTS

A total of 831 patients were included (mean age, 42.8±13.1; 623 [75%] men; 386 [46.5%] had a type 1 electrocardiogram (ECG) pattern, 677 [81.5%] were asymptomatic, and 319 [38.4%] had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator). During a follow-up of 10.2±4.7 years, 47 (5.7%) experienced a cardiovascular event. In the global cohort, a type 1 ECG and syncope were predictive of arrhythmic events. All risk scores were significantly associated with events. The discriminatory abilities of the 3 scores were modest (particularly when these scores were evaluated in asymptomatic patients). Evaluation of the Delise and Sieira scores with different numbers of extra stimuli (1 or 2 vs 3) did not substantially improve the event prediction c-index.

CONCLUSIONS

In BrS, classic risk factors such as ECG pattern and previous syncope predict arrhythmic events. The predictive capabilities of the EPS are affected by the number of extra stimuli required to induce ventricular arrhythmias. Scores combining clinical risk factors with EPS help to identify the populations at highest risk, although their predictive abilities remain modest in the general BrS population and in asymptomatic patients.