Lipoprotein(a) is associated with large artery atherosclerosis stroke aetiology and stroke recurrence among patients below the age of 60 years: results from the BIOSIGNAL study

Association of Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 and Lipoprotein(a) With the Risk of Recurrence Stroke in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

OBJECTIVE

It is still a major global challenge to reduce the high morbidity and mortality of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and improve the prognosis of patients. This study aims to investigate the prognostic value of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) combined with lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) for long-term stroke recurrence in patients with AIS.

METHODS

This study included 580 patients with AIS. Assessment of Lp-PLA2 and Lp(a) levels was conducted upon patient admission. Continuous monitoring over the long term categorized stroke recurrence as an endpoint. Patients were categorized based on these identified thresholds to compare the risk of stroke recurrence: high Lp-PLA2 and high Lp(a), high Lp-PLA2 and low Lp(a), low Lp-PLA2 and high Lp(a), and low Lp-PLA2 combined with low Lp(a).

RESULTS

Among the 580 participants, 101 individuals (17.41%) experienced stroke recurrence within the 2-year follow-up. The majority were male (61.39%), with a median age of 62 years (interquartile range: 55-69.5). Factors independently associated with heightened the risk of recurrence stroke comprised age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.025; p = 0.021), diabetes mellitus (HR, 1.751; p = 0.007), Lp-PLA2 (HR, 1.004; p < 0.001), and Lp(a) (HR, 1.002; p < 0.001). Noteworthy is that the combination of Lp-PLA2 and Lp(a) displayed superior predictive efficacy for long-term stroke recurrence risk in AIS patients compared to individual factors.

CONCLUSION

This investigation underscores the potential advantage of leveraging the combined impact of Lp-PLA2 in conjunction with Lp(a) as a more precise and cost-effective predictive tool for the risk of recurrence stroke in patients with AIS.

Biomarker-enhanced cardiovascular risk prediction in patients with cancer: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Continuously improving cancer-specific survival puts a growing proportion of cancer patients at risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), but tailored tools for cardiovascular risk prediction remain unavailable.

OBJECTIVES

To assess a broad panel of cardiovascular biomarkers and risk factors for the prediction of MACE and cardiovascular death in cancer patients.

METHODS

In total, 2192 patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent cancer were followed prospectively for the occurrence of 2-year MACE and 5-year cardiovascular death. Univariable and multivariable risk models were fit to assess independent associations of cardiovascular risk factors and biomarkers with adverse outcomes, and a risk score was developed.

RESULTS

Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and selected cancer types were linked to higher MACE risk. While levels of Lp(a), CRP, and GDF-15 did not associate with MACE, levels of ICAM-1, P-/E-/L-selectins, and NT-proBNP were independently linked to 2-year MACE risk. A clinical risk score was derived, assigning +1 point for male sex, smoking, and age of ≥60 years and +2 points for atherosclerotic disease, yielding a bootstrapped C-statistic of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.71-0.81) for the prediction of 2-year MACE. Implementation of biomarker data conferred improved performance (0.83, 95% CI: 0.78-0.88), with a simplified model showing similar performance (0.80, 95% CI: 0.74-0.86). The biomarker-enhanced and simplified prediction models achieved a C-statistic of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71-0.93) and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.64-0.83) for the prediction of 5-year cardiovascular death.

CONCLUSION

Biomarker-enhanced risk prediction strategies allow the identification of cancer patients at high risk of MACE and cardiovascular death. While external validation studies are ongoing, this first-of-its-kind risk score may provide the basis for personalized cardiovascular risk assessment across cancer entities.

Treat the patient, not the disease: The embolic stroke of undetermined source as an opportunity to optimize cardiovascular prevention in a holistic approach

For any physician treating a patient with a medical condition of unclear etiology, the differential diagnosis aims to identify the actual most probable cause among various potential etiologies, in order to tailor treatment options. In patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), this can be challenging due to the frequent presence of multiple potential embolic sources, raising difficulties to identify the most likely cause. Additionally, despite targeted preventive measures for the presumed embolic source, patients may remain at risk for stroke and cardiovascular events due to other unrecognized or underestimated pathologies. The multi-level complexity and multimorbidity typically associated with ESUS, represents a challenge that requires broad knowledge of the cardiovascular pathophysiology, deep expertise of the available diagnostic and therapeutic options, and interdisciplinary approach. At the same time, it is an ideal opportunity to assess thoroughly the overall cardiovascular status of the patient, which in turn can allow us to optimize therapeutic and preventive strategies in a holistic approach, and prevent future strokes, cardiovascular events and disability through different parallel pathways. In this context, rather than narrowing our perspective on identifying the specific embolic source presumed to be the most likely cause of ESUS, it is crucial to shift our focus from the disease to the patient, and evaluate the overall cardiovascular profile by assessing the risk of all cardiovascular comorbidities present, no matter if causally associated with ESUS or not. In order to bring across these points and more, this article is centred around a clinical case that serves as a starting point to illustrate the holistic approach to the management of patients with ESUS. After all, this is the beauty, the magic and the art of Internal Medicine: to treat the patient, not the disease, the system or the organ.

The association between lipoprotein(a) levels and ischemic stroke in children: A case-control study

BACKGROUND

Pediatric arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) is a rare disorder, associated with severe morbidity. In adults, elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), a cholesterol-like particle, is associated with ischemic stroke. However, data on Lp(a) and pediatric AIS are scarce. Therefore, we evaluated the association between Lp(a) levels and pediatric AIS.

METHODS

We included children who suffered an AIS (≤18 years) and were treated in a tertiary center in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Two groups of children with AIS were identified: (i) neonates and (ii) children older than 29 days. A case-control study was performed, with the latter group as cases and children without AIS as control group. Cases and controls were matched for age of Lp(a) testing and sex. Multivariable logistic regression models were used.

RESULTS

Thirteen neonates and 23 children were included. Mean (SD) age of AIS was 0.6 (2.0) days and 9.2 (6.3) years, respectively. Children with AIS were matched to 62 controls. Lp(a) levels of greater than 50 mg/dL were more prevalent in children with AIS compared to controls (21.7% vs. 3.2%, p = .02). A significant association was found between Lp(a) and AIS (odds ratio [OR] adjusted for age at Lp(a) testing, body mass index [BMI], measurement assay: 1.36 per 10 mg/dL increase of Lp(a), 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.82, p = .041).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, Lp(a) levels were positively associated with the risk of AIS in children, suggesting that high Lp(a) might be an independent risk factor for AIS. This underlines the importance of Lp(a) measurement in children with AIS.

Lipoprotein(a) and ischemic stroke: current insights and knowledge gaps

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], a particle similar to low-density lipoprotein, has been consistently identified as a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Emerging data from epidemiological observation and genetic studies have demonstrated that elevated levels of Lp(a), primarily influenced by genetic variation, are associated with an increased risk of ischemic strokes (IS). This association may be attributed to the proatherogenic, proinflammatory, and prothrombotic properties of Lp(a). Although therapeutic interventions specifically aimed at reducing Lp(a) levels are still under development, understanding the relationship of Lp(a) and IS could aid in the management of IS. This review aims to present the clinical evidence, pathophysiological mechanisms, and potential implications linking Lp(a) to IS, with the goal of raising awareness of Lp(a) in real-world clinical practice for IS prevention and treatment.

The joint association of lipoprotein(a) and lipoprotein-associated phopholipase A2 with the risk of stroke recurrence

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Currently little is known about the joint association of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) with stroke recurrence.

METHODS

In this prospective multicenter cohort study, 10,675 consecutive acute ischemic stroke (IS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients with Lp(a) and Lp-PLA2 were enrolled. The association of stroke recurrence within 1 year with Lp(a) and Lp-PLA2 was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier curves. The interaction between Lp(a) and Lp-PLA2 with stroke recurrence was evaluated by multiplicative and additive scales.

RESULTS

A significant joint association of Lp(a) and Lp-PLA2 with the risk of stroke recurrence was observed. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the combination of elevated Lp(a) (≥ 50 mg/dL) and Lp-PLA2 (≥175.1 ng/mL) was independently associated with the risk of stroke recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-1.76). Both significant multiplicative [(exp(β3): 1.63, 95% CI: 1.17-2.29, P = 0.004] and additive interaction (RERI: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.20-0.90, P = 0.002; AP: 0.39, 95% CI, 0.24-0.53) were observed between Lp(a) and Lp-PLA2.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that Lp(a) and Lp-PLA2 have a joint association with the risk of stroke recurrence in IS/TIA patients. Patients with concomitant presence of elevated Lp(a) and Lp-PLA2 have greater risk of stroke recurrence.

Impaired endogenous fibrinolysis status: a potential prognostic predictor in ischemic stroke

Stroke confers a severe global healthcare burden, hence exploring risk factors for stroke occurrence and prognosis is important for stroke prevention and post-stroke management strategies. Endogenous fibrinolysis is a spontaneous physiological protective mechanism that dissolves thrombus to maintain vascular patency. Recently, impaired endogenous fibrinolysis has been considered as a potential novel cardiovascular risk factor, but its link with ischaemic stroke in the past has been underappreciated. In this review, we summarize the latest mechanisms of endogenous fibrinolysis, review the current evidence and data on endogenous fibrinolysis in ischemic stroke. It includes the structure of thrombus in ischemic stroke patients, the effect of fibrin structure on the endogenous fibrinolytic efficiency, and the association between intravenous thrombolytic therapy and endogenous fibrinolysis in ischemic stroke. It also includes the single factors (tissue plasminogen activator, urokinase plasminogen activator, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor, complement component 3, complement component 5, alpha-2-antiplasmin, plasmin-alpha-2-antiplasmin complex, and lipoprotein[a]), and the global assessments of endogenous fibrinolysis status (thromboelastography, rotational thromboelastometry, and global thrombosis test), and their potential as predictors to identify occurrence or unfavorable functional outcomes of ischemic stroke. All of these assessments present advantages and limitations, and we suggest that the global thrombosis test may be more appropriate for detecting impaired endogenous fibrinolysis status in ischemic stroke patients.

Associations between brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and hypertensive retinopathy in treated hypertensive adults: Results from the China Stroke Primary Prevention Trial (CSPPT)

Although the association between persistent hypertension and the compromise of both micro- and macro-circulatory functions is well recognized, a significant gap in quantitative investigations exploring the interplay between microvascular and macrovascular injuries still exists. In this study, the authors looked into the relationship between brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) and hypertensive retinopathy in treated hypertensive adults. The authors conducted a cross-sectional study of treated hypertensive patients with the last follow-up data from the China Stoke Primary Prevention Trial (CSPPT) in 2013. With the use of PWV/ABI instruments, baPWV was automatically measured. The Keith-Wagener-Barker classification was used to determine the diagnosis of hypertensive retinopathy. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the connection between baPWV and hypertensive retinopathy were determined using multivariable logistic regression models. The OR curves were created using a multivariable-adjusted restricted cubic spline model to investigate any potential non-linear dose-response relationships between baPWV and hypertensive retinopathy. A total of 8514 (75.5%) of 11,279 participants were diagnosed with hypertensive retinopathy. The prevalence of hypertensive retinopathy increased from the bottom quartile of baPWV to the top quartile: quartile 1: 70.7%, quartile 2: 76.1%, quartile 3: 76.7%, quartile 4: 78.4%. After adjusting for potential confounders, baPWV was positively associated with hypertensive retinopathy (OR = 1.05, 95% CI, 1.03-1.07, p < .001). Compared to those in the lowest baPWV quartile, those in the highest baPWV quartile had an odds ratio for hypertensive retinopathy of 1.61 (OR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.37-1.89, p < .001). Two-piece-wise logistic regression model demonstrated a nonlinear relationship between baPWV and hypertensive retinopathy with an inflection point of 17.1 m/s above which the effect was saturated .

Synergetic impact of lipoprotein(a) and fibrinogen on stroke in coronary artery disease patients

BACKGROUND

Emerging data suggested that lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Previous studies indicated fibrinogen (Fib) had synergetic effect on Lp(a)-induced events. However, combined impact of Fib and Lp(a) on ischemic stroke has not been elucidated.

METHODS

In this prospective study, we consecutively enrolled 8263 patients with stable coronary artery diseases (CAD) from 2011 to 2017. Patients were categorized into three groups according to tertiles of Lp(a) levels [Lp(a)-low, Lp(a)-medium, and Lp(a)-high] and further divided into nine groups by Lp(a) and Fib levels. All subjects were followed up for the occurrence of ischemic stroke.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 37.7 months, 157 (1.9%) ischemic strokes occurred. Stroke incidence increased by Lp(a) (1.1 vs. 2.1 vs. 2.5%, Cochran-Armitage p < .001) and Fib (1.1 vs. 2.0 vs. 2.6%, Cochran-Armitage p < .001) categories. When further classified into nine groups by Lp(a) and Fib levels, the incidence of ischemic stroke in group 9 [Lp(a)-high and Fib-high] was significantly higher than that in group 1 [Lp(a)-low and Fib-low] (3.1 vs. 6%, p < .001). The group 9 was associated with a highest risk for ischemic stroke (adjusted HR 4.907, 95% CI: 2.154-11.18, p < .001), compared with individuals in the Lp(a)-high (adjusted HR 2.290, 95% CI: 1.483-3.537, p < .001) or Fib-high (adjusted HR 1.184, 95% CI: 1.399-3.410, p = .001). Furthermore, combining Lp(a) with Fib increased C-statistics by .045 (p = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Current study first demonstrated that elevated Lp(a) combining with Fib evaluation enhanced the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with CAD beyond Lp(a) or Fib alone.

Discordance between LDL-C and apolipoprotein B is associated with large-artery-atherosclerosis ischemic stroke in patients ⩽70 years of age

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Low density lipoprotein (LDL-C) and other atherogenic lipoproteins are coated by apolipoprotein B100 (apoB). The correlation between LDL-C and apoB is usually thight, but in some cases LDL-C underestimates apoB levels and residual cardiovascular risk. We aimed to assess if a discordance of LDL-C-levels with apoB levels is associated with LAA stroke.

METHODS

We included patients with an acute ischemic stroke from two prospective studies enrolled at the University Hospital Bern, Basel and Zurich, Switzerland. LDL-C and apoB were measured within 24 h of symptom onset. By linear regression, for each LDL-C, we computed the expected apoB level assuming a perfect correlation. Higher-than-expected apoB was defined as apoB level being in the upper residual tertile.

RESULTS

Overall, we included 1783 patients, of which 260 had a LAA stroke (15%). In the overall cohort, higher-than-expected apoB values were not associated with LAA. However, a significant interaction with age was present. Among the 738 patients ⩽70 years of age, a higher-than-expected apoB was more frequent in patients with LAA- versus non LAA-stroke (48% vs 36%, p = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, a higher-than-expected apoB was associated with LAA stroke (aOR = aOR 2.48, 95%CI 1.14-5.38). Among those aged ⩽70 years and with LAA, 11.7% had higher than guideline-recommended apoB despite LDL-C ⩽ 1.8 mmol/L (<70 mg/dl), compared to 5.9% among patients with other stroke etiologies (p = 0.04). A triglyceride cut-off of ⩾0.95 mmol/L had, in external validation, a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 52% for apoB ⩾ 0.65 g/L among patients with LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients aged ⩽70 years, a higher-than-expected apoB was independently associated with LAA stroke. Measuring apoB may help identify younger stroke patients potentially benefiting from intensified lipid-lowering therapy.

Association between lipoprotein(a) and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims

High lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level has been demonstrated as an important risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) amongst the older populations, whereas its effects in the younger population remain unclear. This study evaluated the associations between Lp(a) and the risk of premature ASCVD.

Method and results

PubMed and Embase were searched for related studies until 12 November 2023. Fifty-one studies including 100 540 participants were included. Mean age of patients ranged from 35.3 to 62.3 years. The proportion of male participants ranged from 0% to 100%. The mean follow-up was provided in five studies ranging from 1 year to 40 years. The definition of elevated Lp(a) varied among studies, such as >30 mg/dL, >50 mg/dL, the top tertiles, the top quartiles, the top quintiles, and so on. Higher Lp(a) was significantly associated with the composite ASCVD [odds ratio (OR): 2.15, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.53-3.02, P < 0.001], especially for coronary artery disease (OR: 2.44, 95% CI: 2.06-2.90, P < 0.001) and peripheral arterial disease (OR: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.56-4.21, P < 0.001). This association remained significant in familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) (OR: 3.11, 95% CI: 1.63-5.96, P < 0.001) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients (OR: 2.23; 95% CI: 1.54-3.23, P < 0.001).Significant results were observed in South Asians (OR: 3.71, 95% CI: 2.31-5.96, P < 0.001), Caucasians (OR: 3.17, 95% CI: 2.22-4.52, P < 0.001), and patients with baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) level ≥ 2.6 mmol/L.

Conclusion

Elevated Lp(a) predicts the risk of the composite or individual ASCVD in young, regardless of study design, gender, population characteristics (community or hospitalized), different premature definitions, and various Lp(a) measurement approaches. This association was important in South Asians, Caucasians, FH patients, T2DM patients, and patients with baseline LDL-c level ≥ 2.6 mmol/L.

Lipoprotein(a) as a blood marker for large artery atherosclerosis stroke etiology: validation in a prospective cohort from a swiss stroke center

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] serum levels are highly genetically determined and promote atherogenesis. High Lp(a) levels are associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity. Serum Lp(a) levels have recently been associated with large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) stroke. We aimed to externally validate this association in an independent cohort.

METHODS

This study stems from the prospective multicentre CoRisk study (CoPeptin for Risk Stratification in Acute Stroke patients [NCT00878813]), conducted at the University Hospital Bern, Switzerland, between 2009 and 2011, in which Lp(a) plasma levels were measured within the first 24 hours after stroke onset. We assessed the association of Lp(a) with LAA stroke using multivariable logistic regression and performed interaction analyses to identify potential effect modifiers.

RESULTS

Of 743 patients with ischaemic stroke, 105 (14%) had LAA stroke aetiology. Lp(a) levels were higher for LAA stroke than non-LAA stroke patients (23.0 nmol/l vs 16.3 nmol/l, p = 0.01). Multivariable regression revealed an independent association of log10and#xA0;Lp(a) with LAA stroke aetiology (aOR 1.47 [95% CI 1.03and#x2013;2.09], p = 0.03). The interaction analyses showed that Lp(a) was not associated with LAA stroke aetiology among patients with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

In a well-characterised cohort of patients with ischaemic stroke, we validated the association of higher Lp(a) levels with LAA stroke aetiology, independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. These findings may inform randomised clinical trials investigating the effect of Lp(a) lowering agents on cardiovascular outcomes. The CoRisk (CoPeptin for Risk Stratification in Acute Patients) study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00878813.

Enhancing the evaluation of acute ischemic stroke risk in individuals with non-valvular atrial fibrillation by including laboratory indicators

To investigate the clinical significance of the CHA2DS2-VASc-60 score, lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], red blood cell distribution width (RDW), and their combined effect in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who experience acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of hospitalized patients with NVAF at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University between April 1, 2020, and April 1, 2023. Based on the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), the patients were divided into two groups: the AIS group (150 cases of NVAF patients with comorbid AIS) and the non-AIS group (163 cases of NVAF patients without AIS). We performed CHA2DS2-VASc-60 scoring for all patients and collected their laboratory indicators and echocardiographic indicators during hospitalization. The study comprised 313 individuals with NVAF in total. There is a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) in the comparison of CHA2DS2-VASc-60 score (5.68 ± 1.12 vs. 3.67 ± 1.47), Lp(a) [23.98 (13.28, 42.22) vs. 14.32 (7.96, 21.91)] and RDW (13.67 ± 1.25 vs. 12.94 ± 0.76) between NVAF patients with and without concomitant AIS. The results of the Spearman correlation analysis demonstrate a positive association between Lp(a) and RDW levels and both the CHA2DS2-VASc score and the CHA2DS2-VASc-60 score in patients with NVAF. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that CHA2DS2-VASc-60 score [OR = 6.549, 95% CI: 4.110-10.433, P < 0.05], Lp(a) [OR = 1.023, 95% CI: 1.005-1.041, P < 0.05], and RDW [OR = 1.644, 95% CI: 1.071-2.525, P < 0.05] were independent risk factors for AIS in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves showed that the area under the curve of CHA2DS2-VASc-60 score, Lp(a), RDW, and CHA2DS2-VASc-60 score combined with Lp(a) and RDW predicted that NVAF patients with AIS were 0.881 [95% CI: 0.804-0.906], 0.685 [95% CI: 0.626-0.744], 0.695 [95% CI: 0.637-0.754], and 0.906 [95% CI: 0.845-0.921], respectively. The CHA2DS2-VASc-60 score, Lp(a), and RDW were significantly increased in NVAF patients with AIS, which were independent risk factors for NVAF patients with AIS. The combination of the three has a high predictive capacity for NVAF patients with AIS.

Frequency & factors associated with elevated lipoprotein-a among Ghanaian stroke survivors

BACKGROUND

Indigenous Africans are genetically predisposed to elevated lipoprotein-a (Lp(a)), a veritable risk factor for ischemic stroke. Recent studies have demonstrated the promising efficacy of therapeutic interventions for addressing elevated Lp(a) among patients at high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events. It is important to assess the burden of elevated Lp(a) among stroke survivors of African ancestry aimed at addressing potential unmet therapeutic gaps for optimal secondary prevention.

PURPOSE

To assess the frequency of elevated lipoprotein-a among Ghanaian stroke survivors and factors associated with it.

METHODS

A prospective study conducted at the Neurology clinic of the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital among ischemic stroke survivors aged ≥18 years. Serum lipoprotein-a concentrations were measured using ELISA kits. A multivariate regression analysis was fitted to identify factors independently associated with elevated lipoprotein-a concentration > 30 mg/dl.

RESULTS

Among 116 stroke survivors, 35 (30.2%) had elevated Lp(a). The adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) of factors associated with elevated Lp(a) were female sex 3.09 (1.05-9.12), p = 0.04, diabetes mellitus 3.52 (1.32-9.40), p = 0.01, urban dwelling 4.64 (1.61-13.39), p = 0.005 and total cholesterol 1.85 (1.28-2.67), p = 0.001. Whereas the LDL cholesterol significantly decreased from baseline to month 12 among a subset of participants, the Lp(a) levels significantly increased from a baseline value of 29.38 ± 15.32 mg/dl to 40.97 ± 29.72 mg/dl, p = 0.032.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 1 in 3 Ghanaian ischemic stroke survivors harbor an elevated Lp(a) associated with female sex, urban residence, diabetes mellitus and raised cholesterol. This burden highlights an unmet therapeutic gap in secondary risk reduction in this resource-limited setting.

Fibrinogen-to-Albumin Ratio and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Artery Atherosclerosis Stroke

BACKGROUND

A high fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR), a novel inflammatory marker, is considered to be a prognostic marker in vascular diseases. However, the association of FAR with large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) stroke is still unknown. This study was conducted to evaluate the association between FAR levels and clinical outcomes in patients with acute LAA stroke.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 809 patients within 72 hours of LAA stroke were included and followed up to 1 year. FAR was calculated as fibrinogen (g/L)/albumin (g/L). The associations of FAR with clinical outcomes were assessed by multivariate Cox regression or logistic regression analysis. Clinical outcomes included stroke recurrence, all-cause death, poor functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 3-6), and dependence (modified Rankin Scale score 3-5). Among the 809 patients with acute LAA stroke, the median FAR was 0.075 (interquartile range, 0.064-0.087). At 1 year, 103 (12.7%) patients had stroke recurrence, 105 (13.0%) had poor functional outcome, 76 (9.8%) had dependence, and 29 (3.6%) had died. After adjusting for all confounding risk factors, a high FAR level was associated with stroke recurrence (hazard ratio, 2.57 [95% CI, 1.32-5.02]), poor functional outcome (odds ratio, 3.30 [95% CI, 1.57-6.94]), and dependence (odds ratio, 3.49 [95% CI, 1.49-8.19]).

CONCLUSIONS

A high FAR level was associated with an increased risk of stroke recurrence, poor functional outcome, and dependence in patients with acute LAA stroke.

Burden of elevated lipoprotein(a) among patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Evidence from a systematic literature review and feasibility assessment of meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level is an independent genetic risk factor that increases the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) by 2-4 fold. We aimed to report the burden of clinically relevant elevated Lp(a) in secondary prevention ASCVD population as the evaluation of such evidence is lacking.

METHODS

A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted using Embase®, MEDLINE®, and MEDLINE® In-Process databases to identify studies reporting burden of elevated Lp(a) levels from January 1, 2010, to March 28, 2022. Full-text, English-language studies including ≥500 participants with ≥1 Lp(a) assessment were included.

RESULTS

Sixty-one studies reported clinical burden of elevated Lp(a). Of these, 25 observational studies and one clinical trial reported clinical burden of clinically relevant elevated Lp(a) levels. Major clinical outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE; n = 20), myocardial infarction (MI; n = 11), revascularization (n = 10), stroke (n = 10), cardiovascular (CV) mortality (n = 9), and all-cause mortality (n = 10). Elevated Lp(a) levels significantly increased the risk of MACE (n = 15) and revascularization (n = 8), while they demonstrated a trend for positive association with remaining CV outcomes. Meta-analysis was not feasible for included studies due to heterogeneity in Lp(a) thresholds, outcome definitions, and patient characteristics. Three studies reported humanistic burden. Patients with elevated Lp(a) levels had higher odds of manifesting cognitive impairment (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval; CI]: 1.62 [1.11-2.37]) and disability related to stroke (OR [95% CI]:1.46 [1.23-1.72)]) (n = 2). Elevated Lp(a) levels negatively correlated with health-related quality of life (R = -0.166, p = 0.014) (n = 1). A single study reported no association between elevated Lp(a) levels and economic burden.

CONCLUSIONS

This SLR demonstrated a significant association of elevated Lp(a) levels with major CV outcomes and increased humanistic burden in secondary prevention ASCVD population. These results reinforce the need to quantify and manage Lp(a) for CV risk reduction and to perform further studies to characterize the economic burden.

Lipoprotein(a): A Residual Cardiovascular Risk Factor in Statin-Treated Stroke Survivors: Insights From the SPARCL Trial

Background

In the SPARCL (Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol levels) trial, atorvastatin (80 mg/d) was compared to placebo in patients with recent stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and no known coronary artery disease.

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the contribution of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] to subsequent cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events in stroke/TIA survivors.

Methods

Lp(a) levels and apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] isoform size were determined by liquid-chromatography mass spectrometry in samples collected at baseline from 2,814 SPARCL participants (1,418 randomized to atorvastatin and 1,396 to placebo). Within each treatment arm, patients in the highest quartile (≥84.0 nmol/L) were compared with those in the lowest quartiles of Lp(a) concentrations. Patients in the lowest quartile (≤25.9 Kringle IV domains) of apo(a) isoform sizes were compared with those in the highest quartiles. Multivariable-adjusted HRs were calculated using Cox proportional regression models.

Results

There was no significant association between Lp(a) concentrations or apo(a) isoform sizes and the risk of recurrent stroke, the primary outcome of SPARCL, or cerebrovascular events in patients randomized to atorvastatin or placebo. In contrast, in patients randomized to atorvastatin, elevated Lp(a) concentrations and short apo(a) isoforms were positively and independently associated with an increased risk of coronary events (HR: 1.607 [95% CI: 1.007-2.563] and HR: 2.052 [95% CI: 1.303-3.232]). No such association was found in patients randomized to placebo (HR: 1.025 [95% CI: 0.675-1.555] and HR: 1.097 [95% CI: 0.735-1.637]).

Conclusions

Lp(a) contributes to the residual coronary artery disease risk of statin-treated stroke/TIA survivors, paving the way for use of therapies targeting Lp(a) in this population with stroke. (Lipitor In The Prevention Of Stroke, For Patients Who Have Had A Previous Stroke [SPARCL]; NCT00147602).

Frequent questions and responses on the 2022 lipoprotein(a) consensus statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society

In 2022, the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) published a new consensus statement on lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], summarizing current knowledge about its causal association with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic stenosis. One of the novelties of this statement is a new risk calculator showing how Lp(a) influences lifetime risk for ASCVD and that global risk may be underestimated substantially in individuals with high or very high Lp(a) concentration. The statement also provides practical advice on how knowledge about Lp(a) concentration can be used to modulate risk factor management, given that specific and highly effective mRNA-targeted Lp(a)-lowering therapies are still in clinical development. This advice counters the attitude: "Why should I measure Lp(a) if I can't lower it?". Subsequent to publication, questions have arisen relating to how the recommendations of this statement impact everyday clinical practice and ASCVD management. This review addresses 30 of the most frequently asked questions about Lp(a) epidemiology, its contribution to cardiovascular risk, Lp(a) measurement, risk factor management and existing therapeutic options.

Serum S-100B adds incremental value for the prediction of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and brain edema after acute ischemic stroke

Background:

Early identification of patients developing symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and symptomatic brain edema after acute ischemic stroke is essential for clinical decision-making. Astroglial protein S-100B is a marker of blood-brain barrier disruption, which plays an important role in the formation of intracranial hemorrhage and brain edema. In this study, we assessed the prognostic value of serum S-100B for the development of these complications.

Methods:

Serum S-100B levels were measured within 24 h from symptom onset in 1749 consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients from the prospective, observational, multicenter BIOSIGNAL cohort study (mean age 72.0 years, 58.3% male). To determine symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage or symptomatic brain edema, follow-up neuroimaging was performed in all patients receiving reperfusion therapy or experiencing clinical worsening with an NIHSS increase of ⩾4.

Results:

Forty six patients (2.6%) developed symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 90 patients (5.2%) developed symptomatic brain edema. After adjustment for established risk factors, log10S-100B levels remained independently associated with both symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR 3.41, 95% CI 1.7–6.9, p = 0.001) and symptomatic brain edema (OR 4.08, 95% CI 2.3–7.1, p < 0.001) in multivariable logistic regression models. Adding S-100B to the clinical prediction model increased the AUC from 0.72 to 0.75 ( p = 0.001) for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and from 0.78 to 0.81 ( p < 0.0001) for symptomatic brain edema.

Conclusions:

Serum S-100B levels measured within 24 h after symptom onset are independently associated with the development of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and symptomatic brain edema in acute ischemic stroke patients. Thus, S-100B may be useful for early risk-stratification regarding stroke complications.

Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Lipoprotein(a): A Gordian Knot in Cardiovascular Prevention

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is the most frequent genetic disorder resulting in increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels from childhood, leading to premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) if left untreated. FH diagnosis is based on clinical criteria and/or genetic testing and its prevalence is estimated as being up to 1:300,000−400,000 for the homozygous and ~1:200−300 for the heterozygous form. Apart from its late diagnosis, FH is also undertreated, despite the available lipid-lowering therapies. In addition, elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) (>50 mg/dL; 120 nmol/L), mostly genetically determined, has been identified as an important cardiovascular risk factor with prevalence rate of ~20% in the general population. Novel Lp(a)-lowering therapies have been recently developed and their cardiovascular efficacy is currently investigated. Although a considerable proportion of FH patients is also diagnosed with high Lp(a) levels, there is a debate whether these two entities are associated. Nevertheless, Lp(a), particularly among patients with FH, has been established as a significant cardiovascular risk factor. In this narrative review, we present up-to-date evidence on the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of both FH and elevated Lp(a) with a special focus on their association and joint effect on ASCVD risk.

Lipoprotein(a) and residual vascular risk in statin-treated patients with first acute ischemic stroke: A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Statins either barely affect or increase lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels. This study aimed to explore the factors correlated to the change of Lp(a) levels as well as the relationship between Lp(a) and the recurrent vascular events in statin-treated patients with first acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

METHODS

Patients who were admitted to the hospital with first AIS from October 2018 to September 2020 were eligible for inclusion. Correlation between the change of Lp(a) levels and potential influencing factors was assessed by linear regression analysis. Cox proportional regression models were used to estimate the association between Lp(a) and recurrent vascular events including AIS, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization.

RESULTS

In total, 303 patients, 69.6% males with mean age 64.26 ± 11.38 years, completed the follow-up. During the follow-up period, Lp(a) levels increased in 50.5% of statin-treated patients and the mean percent change of Lp(a) levels were 14.48% (95% CI 6.35-22.61%). Creatinine (β = 0.152, 95% CI 0.125-0.791, P = 0.007) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (β = 0.160, 95% CI 0.175-0.949, P = 0.005) were positively associated with the percent change of Lp(a) levels. During a median follow-up of 26 months, 66 (21.8%) patients had a recurrent vascular event. The median time period between AIS onset and vascular events recurrence was 9.5 months (IQR 2.0-16.3 months). The on-statin Lp(a) level ≥70 mg/dL (HR 2.539, 95% CI 1.076-5.990, P = 0.033) and the change of Lp(a) levels (HR 1.003, 95% CI 1.000-1.005, P = 0.033) were associated with the recurrent vascular events in statin-treated patients with first AIS. Furthermore, the on-statin Lp(a) levels ≥70 mg/dL (HR 3.612, 95% CI 1.018-12.815, P = 0.047) increased the risk of recurrent vascular events in patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels < 1.8 mmol/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Lp(a) levels increased in half of statin-treated patients with first AIS. Creatinine and AST were positively associated with the percent change of Lp(a) levels. Lp(a) is a determinant of residual vascular risk and the change of Lp(a) is positively associated with the risk of recurrent vascular events in these patients.

Genetic proxies for PCSK9 inhibition associate with lipoprotein(a): Effects on coronary artery disease and ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Post hoc analyses of clinical trials show that PCSK9 inhibitors might lower lipoprotein(a), but whether this effect contributes to reductions in cardiovascular risk remains unknown. We aimed to assess whether genetically proxied PCSK9 inhibition influences lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), and whether any such effect could mediate its effects on coronary artery disease (CAD) and ischemic stroke (IS).

METHODS

To explore associations between the genetic proxies for PCSK9 inhibitors and Lp(a) levels, we used UK Biobank data (310,020 individuals). We identified 10 variants in the PCSK9 gene associated with lower PCSK9 and LDL-C levels as proxies for PCSK9 inhibition. We explored the effects of genetically proxied PCSK9 inhibition on Lp(a) levels, as well as on odds of CAD (60,801 cases, 184,305 controls) and IS (60,341 cases, 454,450 controls) in two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses. In mediation analyses, we assessed the effects of genetically proxied PCSK9 inhibition on CAD and IS mediated through reductions in Lp(a) levels.

RESULTS

Genetically proxied PCSK9 inhibition (1-SD decrement in PCSK9 concentration; corresponding to 20.6 mg/dl decrement in LDL-C levels) was associated with a 4% decrease in log-Lp(a) levels (beta: -0.038, 95%CI: -0.053 to -0.023). We estimated a 0.8% reduction in the odds for CAD (OR: 0.992, 95%CI: 0.989-0.995) and a 0.5% reduction in the odds for atherosclerotic IS (OR: 0.995, 95%CI: 0.992-0.998) due to reductions in Lp(a) levels through genetically proxied PCSK9 inhibition, corresponding to 3.8% and 3.2% of the total effects, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic proxies for PCSK9 inhibition are associated with lower Lp(a) levels. However, Lp(a) lowering explains only a small proportion of the total effects of genetic proxies for PCSK9 inhibitors on risk of CAD and IS.

The relationship between lipoprotein(a) and risk of cardiovascular disease: a Mendelian randomization analysis

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is one of the residual risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the setting of optimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). The association between Lp(a) and CVD is still in the exploratory phase, with few studies indicating a causal connection between Lp(a) and various CVD.

METHODS

Lp(a) (n = 377,590) was a genome-wide association study (GWAS) based on European populations from Neale Lab. Large GWAS datasets for CVD, including aortic aneurysm(AA) (n = 209,366), atrial fibrillation(AF) (n = 1,030,836), coronary heart disease(CHD) (n = 361,194), secondary hypertension(HBP) (n = 164,147), heart failure(HF) (n = 208,178), ischemic stroke (IS) (n = 218,792), large artery atherosclerosis stroke(ISL) (n = 150, 765), small vessel stroke(ISS) (n = 198,048), lacunar stroke(LIS) (n = 225,419), and pulmonary embolism(PE) (n = 218,413) were also based on European populations. We performed separate univariate two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis for Lp(a) and CVD as described above. We evaluated this connection mainly using the random-effects inverse variance weighted technique(IVW1) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for the odds ratio (OR). This was supplemented by MR-Egger, weighted median, maximum likelihood, penalized weighted median, and fixed-effects inverse variance weighted methods. MR-PRESSO offers another means of statistical detection.

RESULTS

Our two-sample MR, which was predominately based on IVW1, revealed a causal relationship between Lp(a) and AA (OR = 1.005, 95%CI: 1.001-1.010, P = 0.009), CHD (OR = 1.003, 95%CI 1.001-1.004, P = 0.010), and ISL (OR = 1.003, 9 5%CI 1.002-1.004, P = 9.50E-11), in addition, there is no causal association with AF, HBP, HF, IS, ISS, LIS, or PE. Similar conclusions were reached by the MR-PRESSO method.

CONCLUSION

This MR study suggested a causal relationship between Lp(a) and CHD, AA, and ISL, but not associated with AF, HF, IS, LIS, ISS, HBP, or PE. Our work further verifies the association between Lp(a) and various CVD, resulting in improved Lp(a) management and a reduction in the prevalence of CVD.

Lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and aortic stenosis: a European Atherosclerosis Society consensus statement

This 2022 European Atherosclerosis Society lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] consensus statement updates evidence for the role of Lp(a) in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic valve stenosis, provides clinical guidance for testing and treating elevated Lp(a) levels, and considers its inclusion in global risk estimation. Epidemiologic and genetic studies involving hundreds of thousands of individuals strongly support a causal and continuous association between Lp(a) concentration and cardiovascular outcomes in different ethnicities; elevated Lp(a) is a risk factor even at very low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. High Lp(a) is associated with both microcalcification and macrocalcification of the aortic valve. Current findings do not support Lp(a) as a risk factor for venous thrombotic events and impaired fibrinolysis. Very low Lp(a) levels may associate with increased risk of diabetes mellitus meriting further study. Lp(a) has pro-inflammatory and pro-atherosclerotic properties, which may partly relate to the oxidized phospholipids carried by Lp(a). This panel recommends testing Lp(a) concentration at least once in adults; cascade testing has potential value in familial hypercholesterolaemia, or with family or personal history of (very) high Lp(a) or premature ASCVD. Without specific Lp(a)-lowering therapies, early intensive risk factor management is recommended, targeted according to global cardiovascular risk and Lp(a) level. Lipoprotein apheresis is an option for very high Lp(a) with progressive cardiovascular disease despite optimal management of risk factors. In conclusion, this statement reinforces evidence for Lp(a) as a causal risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes. Trials of specific Lp(a)-lowering treatments are critical to confirm clinical benefit for cardiovascular disease and aortic valve stenosis.

Association between lipoprotein(a) and thromboembolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a recognized risk factor for ischemic stroke (IS); however, its role in thromboembolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) remains controversial. We aimed to assess the association of Lp(a) and IS and systemic embolism (SEE) in NVAF patients.

METHODS

In total, 16,357 patients with NVAF were recruited from the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2021, and were divided into groups based on Lp(a) quartiles. Logistic regression models analyzed the association between Lp(a), IS, and SEE. The restriction cubic spline was used to assess the potential nonlinear relationship between Lp(a), IS, and SEE. We conducted subgroup analyses and estimated the multiplicative interaction between the stratified variables and Lp(a) to investigate whether the association between Lp(a) and IS and SEE was affected by age, sex, anticoagulants, and CHA₂DS₂-VASc score.

RESULTS

We identified 1319 IS and 133 SEE events. After correcting for CHA₂DS₂-VASc score and other potential confounders, each 1-standard deviation (SD) increase in log-Lp(a) was related to a 23% increased risk of IS (odds ratios [OR], 1.23; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.07-1.41). NVAF patients in the highest Lp(a) quartile were 1.23-fold more likely to have IS than those in the lowest quartile (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.04-1.45). A positive linear relationship between Lp(a) and IS risk was observed (P for nonlinear = 0.341). In the fully adjusted model, subjects had a 1.78-fold increased risk of SEE for each 1-SD increase in log-Lp(a) (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.78-4.36). Subjects in the highest Lp(a) quartile had a 2.38-fold elevated risk of SEE (OR, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.85-6.19) compared with the lowest quartile. Furthermore, Lp(a) had a nonlinear relationship with the risk of SEE (P for nonlinear = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated Lp(a) concentration was significantly associated with IS and SEE, suggesting that Lp(a) may be an emerging biomarker that can help clinicians identify patients at high risk of thromboembolism in this population.

Lipoprotein(a) and cardiovascular and valvular diseases: A genetic epidemiological perspective

Rates of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in the Western world have spectacularly decreased over the past 50 years. However, a substantial proportion of high-risk patients still develop heart attacks, strokes and valvular heart diseases despite benefiting from state-of-the-art treatments including lipid-lowering therapies. Over the past 10-15 years, it has become increasingly clear that Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is a critical component of this so-called residual risk. Genetic association studies revealed that Lp(a) is robustly, independently and causally associated with a broad range of cardiovascular and valvular heart diseases. Up to 1 billion people around the globe may have an Lp(a) level that places them in a high-risk category. Lp(a) is strongly associated with calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS), coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and to a lesser extent with ischemic stroke (IS) and heart failure (HF). Because of this strong association with cardiovascular and valvular heart diseases, Lp(a) even emerged as one of the most important genetic determinants of human lifespan and healthspan. Here, we review the evidence from the largest and most informative genetic association studies and prospective studies that have investigated the association between Lp(a) and human lifespan, healthspan, CVD, CAVS and non-cardiovascular diseases. We present Lp(a) threshold values that may be clinically relevant and identify other cardiovascular risk factors that may modulate the absolute risk of CVD in individuals with high Lp(a) levels. Finally, we identify key clinical and research questions that require further investigation to eventually and optimally reduce CVD risk in patients with high Lp(a) levels.

The effect of LPA Thr3888Pro on lipoprotein(a) and coronary artery disease is modified by the LPA KIV-2 variant 4925G>A

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

High lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations are associated with increased coronary artery disease (CAD) risk. Lp(a) is regulated mainly genetically by the LPA gene but involved genetic variants have not been fully elucidated. Improved understanding of the entanglements of genetic Lp(a) regulation may enhance genetic prediction of Lp(a) and CAD risk. We investigated an interaction between the well-known LPA missense SNP rs41272110 (known as Thr3888Pro) and the frequent LPA splicing mutation KIV-2 4925G>A.

METHODS

Effects on Lp(a) concentrations were investigated by multiple quantile regression in the German Chronic Kidney Disease (GCKD) study, KORA-F3 and KORA-F4 (n_total = 10,405) as well as in the UK Biobank (UKB) 200k exome dataset (n = 173,878). The impact of the interaction on CAD risk was assessed by survival analysis in UKB.

RESULTS

We observed a significant SNP-SNP interaction in all studies (p = 1.26e-05 to 3.03e-04). In quantile regression analysis, rs41272110 as a predictor shows no impact on Lp(a) (β = -0.06 [-0.79; 0.68], p = 0.879), but in a joint model including both SNPs as predictors, rs41272110 is associated with markedly higher Lp(a) (β = +9.40 mg/dL [6.45; 12.34], p = 4.07e-10). Similarly, rs41272110 shows no effect on CAD in UKB (HR = 1.01 [0.97; 1.04], p = 0.731), while rs41272110 carriers not carrying 4925G>A show an increased CAD risk (HR = 1.10 [1.04; 1.16], p = 6.9e-04). This group corresponds to 4% of the population. Adjustment for apolipoprotein(a) isoforms further modified the effect estimates markedly.

CONCLUSIONS

This work emphasizes the complexity of the genetic regulation of Lp(a) and the importance to account for genetic subgroups in Lp(a) association studies and when interpreting genetic cardiovascular risk profiles.

Associations of ATP-Sensitive Potassium Channel’s Gene Polymorphisms With Type 2 Diabetes and Related Cardiovascular Phenotypes

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is characterized by increased levels of blood glucose but is increasingly recognized as a heterogeneous disease, especially its multiple discrete cardiovascular phenotypes. Genetic variations play key roles in the heterogeneity of diabetic cardiovascular phenotypes. This study investigates possible associations of ATP-sensitive potassium channel (KATP) variants with cardiovascular phenotypes among the Chinese patients with T2D. Six hundred thirty-six patients with T2D and 634 non-diabetic individuals were analyzed in the study. Nine KATP variants were determined by MassARRAY. The KATP rs2285676 (AA + GA, OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.13–1.81, P = 0.003), rs1799858 (CC, OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.12–1.78, P = 0.004), and rs141294036 (CC, OR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.15–1.83, P = 0.002) are associated with increased T2D risk. A follow-up of at least 45.8-months (median) indicates further association between the 3 variants and risks of diabetic-related cardiovascular conditions. The associations are categorized as follows: new-onset/recurrent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (rs2285676/AA + GA, HR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.10–1.70, P = 0.005; rs141294036/TT + CT, HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.28–1.99, P < 0.001), new-onset stroke (rs1799858/CC, HR = 2.58, 95% CI: 1.22–5.43, P = 0.013; rs141294036/CC, HR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.16–4.55, P = 0.017), new-onset of heart failure (HF) (rs1799858/TT + CT, HR = 2.78, 95% CI: 2.07–3.74, P < 0.001; rs141294036/TT + CT, HR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.07–1.96, P = 0.015), and new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) (rs1799858/TT + CT, HR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.25–3.37, P = 0.004; rs141294036/CC, HR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.40–3.82, P = 0.001). In particular, the CC genotype of rs1799858 (OR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.11–5.10, P = 0.025) and rs141294036 (OR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.04–3.66, P = 0.037) are only associated with the risk of ischemic stroke while its counterpart genotype (TT + CT) is associated with the risks of HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (rs1799858, OR = 3.46, 95% CI: 2.31–5.18, P < 0.001) and HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) (rs141294036, OR = 2.74, 95% CI: 1.05–7.15, P = 0.039). Furthermore, the 3 variants are associated with increased risks of abnormal serum levels of triglyceride (TIRG) (≥ 1.70 mmol/L), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (≥ 1.40 mmol/L), apolipoprotein B (ApoB) (≥ 80 mg/dL), apolipoprotein A-I (ApoA-I) level (< 120 mg/dL), lipoprotein(a) Lp(a) (≥ 300 mg/dL) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (HsCRP) (≥ 3.0 mg/L) but exhibited heterogeneity (all P < 0.05). The KATP rs2285676, rs1799858, and rs141294036 are associated with increased risks of T2D and its related cardiovascular phenotypes (ACS, stroke, HF, and AF), but show heterogeneity. The 3 KATP variants may be promising markers for diabetic cardiovascular events favoring “genotype-phenotype” oriented prevention and treatment strategies.

Elevated lipoprotein(a) and genetic polymorphisms in the LPA gene may predict cardiovascular events

Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD), but there are few studies on the prediction of future cardiovascular events by Lp(a) and its LPA single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The aim of this study was to investigate whether elevated Lp(a) and its SNPs can predict cardiovascular events. We evaluated whether Lp(a) and LPA SNPs rs6415084 and rs12194138 were associated with the incidence rate and severity of CHD. All participants were followed up for 5 years. Elevated Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for the risk and severity of CHD (CHD group vs. control group: OR = 1.793, 95% CI: 1.053–2.882, p = 0.043; multiple-vessel disease group vs. single-vessel disease group: OR = 1.941, 95% CI: 1.113–3.242, p = 0.027; high GS group vs. low GS group: OR = 2.641, 95% CI: 1.102–7.436, p = 0.040). Both LPA SNPs were risk factors for CHD, and were positively associated with the severity of CHD (LPA SNPs rs6415084: CHD group vs. control group: OR = 1.577, 95% CI: 1.105–1.989, p = 0.004; multiple-vessel disease group vs. single-vessel disease group: OR = 1.613, 95% CI: 1.076–2.641, p = 0.030; high GS group vs. low GS group: OR = 1.580, 95% CI: 1.088–2.429, p = 0.024; LPA SNPs rs12194138: CHD group vs. control group: OR = 1.475, 95% CI: 1.040–3.002, p = 0.035; multiple-vessel disease group vs. single-vessel disease group: OR = 2.274, 95% CI: 1.060–5.148, p = 0.038; high GS group vs. low GS group: OR = 2.067, 95% CI: 1.101–4.647, p = 0.021). After 5 years of follow-up, elevated Lp(a) and LPA SNPs rs6415084 and rs12194138 can independently predict cardiovascular events. The increase of serum Lp(a) and LPA SNPs rs6415084 and rs12194138 are associated with increased prevalence and severity of CHD, and can independently predict cardiovascular events.

Precision medicine in secondary prevention of ischemic stroke: how may blood-based biomarkers help in clinical routine? An expert opinion

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

One in eight patients unfortunately suffers a new stroke within 5 years of their first stroke, even today. Research in precision medicine could lead to a more individualized treatment allocation, possibly achieving lower recurrence rates of ischemic stroke. In this narrative review, we aim to discuss potential clinical implementation of several promising candidate blood biomarkers.

RECENT FINDINGS

We discuss specifically some promising blood-based biomarkers, which may improve the identification of underlying causes as well as risk stratification of patients according to their specific cerebrovascular risk factor pattern.

SUMMARY

Multimodal profiling of ischemic stroke patients by means of blood biomarkers, in addition to established clinical and neuroradiological data, may allow in the future a refinement of decision algorithms for treatment allocation in secondary ischemic stroke prevention.

Impact of Lipoprotein(a) Levels on Perioperative Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery

Altered lipid metabolism has been shown to be of major importance in a range of metabolic diseases, with particular importance in cardiovascular disease (CVD). As a key metabolic product, altered lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels may be associated with adverse clinical outcomes in high-risk cardiovascular patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We aimed to investigate the impact of the important metabolite Lp(a) on complications and clinical outcomes in high-risk patients. A prospective observational cohort study was performed. Data were derived from the Bern Perioperative Biobank (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04767685), and included 192 adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. Blood samples were collected at 24 h preoperatively, before induction of general anaesthesia, upon weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and the first morning after surgery. Clinical endpoints included stroke, myocardial infarction, and mortality within 30 days after surgery or within 1 year. Patients were grouped according to their preoperative Lp(a) levels: <30 mg/dL (n = 121; 63%) or >30 mg/dL (n = 71, 37%). The groups with increased vs. normal Lp(a) levels were comparable with regard to preoperative demographics and comorbidities. Median age was 67 years (interquartile range (IQR) 60.0, 73.0), with median body mass index (BMI) of 23.1 kg/m² (23.7, 30.4), and the majority of patients being males (75.5%). Over the observational interval, Lp(a) levels decreased in all types of cardiac surgery after CPB (mean decline of approximately -5 mg/dL). While Lp(a) levels decreased in all patients following CPB, this observation was considerably pronounced in patients undergoing deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) (decrease to preoperative Lp(a) levels by -35% (95% CI -68, -1.7), p = 0.039). Increased Lp(a) levels were neither associated with increased rates of perioperative stroke or major adverse events in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, nor with overall mortality in the perioperative period, or at one year after surgery. Other than for cohorts in neurology and cardiology, elevated Lp(a) might not be a risk factor for perioperative events in cardiac surgery.

Lipoprotein (a) and Cardiovascular Disease: A Missing Link for Premature Atherosclerotic Heart Disease and/or Residual Risk

ABSTRACT

Lipoprotein(a) or lipoprotein "little a" is an under-recognized causal risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD), including coronary atherosclerosis, aortic valvular stenosis, ischemic stroke, heart failure and peripheral arterial disease. Elevated plasma Lp(a) (≥50 mg/dL or ≥100 nmol/L) is commonly encountered in almost 1 in 5 individuals and confers a higher CV risk compared to those with normal Lp(a) levels, although such normal levels have not been generally agreed upon. Elevated Lp(a) is considered a cause of premature and accelerated atherosclerotic CVD. Thus, in patients with a positive family or personal history of premature coronary artery disease (CAD), Lp(a) should be measured. However, elevated Lp(a) may confer increased risk for incident CAD even in the absence of a family history of CAD, and even in those who have guideline-lowered LDL-cholesterol (<70 mg/dl) and continue to have a persisting CV residual risk. Thus, measurement of Lp(a) will have a significant clinical impact on the assessment of atherosclerotic CVD risk, and will assume a more important role in managing patients with CVD with the advent and clinical application of specific Lp(a)-lowering therapies. Conventional therapeutic approaches like lifestyle modification and statin therapy remain ineffective at lowering Lp(a). Newer treatment modalities, such as gene silencing via RNA interference with use of antisense oligonucleotide(s) or small interfering RNA molecules targeting Lp(a) seem very promising. These issues are herein reviewed, accumulated data are scrutinized, meta-analyses and current guidelines are tabulated and Lp(a)-related CVDs and newer therapeutic modalities are pictorially illustrated.

Lipoprotein(a): Knowns, unknowns and uncertainties

Over the last 10 years, there have been advances on several aspects of lipoprotein(a) which are reviewed in the present article. Since the standard immunoassays for measuring lipoprotein(a) are not fully apo(a) isoform-insensitive, the application of an LC-MS/MS method for assaying molar concentrations of lipoprotein(a) has been advocated. Genome wide association, epidemiological, and clinical studies have established high lipoprotein(a) as a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). However, the relative importance of molar concentration, apo(a) isoform size or variants within the LPA gene is still controversial. Lipoprotein(a)-raising single nucleotide polymorphisms has not been shown to add on value in predicting ASCVD beyond lipoprotein(a) concentrations. Although hyperlipoproteinemia(a) represents an important confounder in the diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), it enhances the risk of ASCVD in these patients. Thus, identification of new cases of hyperlipoproteinemia(a) during cascade testing can increase the identification of high-risk individuals. However, it remains unclear whether FH itself increases lipoprotein(a). The ASCVD risk associated with lipoprotein(a) seems to follow a linear gradient across the distribution, regardless of racial subgroups and other risk factors. The inverse association with the risk of developing type 2 diabetes needs consideration as effective lipoprotein(a) lowering therapies are progressing towards the market. Considering that Mendelian randomization analyses have identified the degree of lipoprotein(a)-lowering that is required to achieve ASCVD benefit, the findings of the ongoing outcome trial with pelacarsen will clarify whether dramatically lowering lipoprotein(a) levels can reduce the risk of ASCVD.

Lipids and Lipoproteins in Health and Disease: Focus on Targeting Atherosclerosis

Despite advances in pharmacotherapy, intervention devices and techniques, residual cardiovascular risks still cause a large burden on public health. Whilst most guidelines encourage achieving target levels of specific lipids and lipoproteins to reduce these risks, increasing evidence has shown that molecular modification of these lipoproteins also has a critical impact on their atherogenicity. Modification of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) by oxidation, glycation, peroxidation, apolipoprotein C-III adhesion, and the small dense subtype largely augment its atherogenicity. Post-translational modification by oxidation, carbamylation, glycation, and imbalance of molecular components can reduce the capacity of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) for reverse cholesterol transport. Elevated levels of triglycerides (TGs), apolipoprotein C-III and lipoprotein(a), and a decreased level of apolipoprotein A-I are closely associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Pharmacotherapies aimed at reducing TGs, lipoprotein(a), and apolipoprotein C-III, and enhancing apolipoprotein A-1 are undergoing trials, and promising preliminary results have been reported. In this review, we aim to update the evidence on modifications of major lipid and lipoprotein components, including LDL, HDL, TG, apolipoprotein, and lipoprotein(a). We also discuss examples of translating findings from basic research to potential therapeutic targets for drug development.