Detection of atrial high-rate events by continuous home monitoring: clinical significance in the heart failure-cardiac resynchronization therapy population

Atrial High-Rate Episodes and Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation: State of the Art and Clinical Questions with Complex Solutions

Atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) and subclinical atrial fibrillation (AF) are frequently registered in asymptomatic patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs). While an increased risk of thromboembolic events (e.g., stroke) and benefits from anticoagulation have been widely assessed in the setting of clinical AF, concerns persist about optimal clinical management of subclinical AF/AHREs. As a matter of fact, an optimal threshold of subclinical episodes' duration to predict stroke risk is still lacking and recently published randomized clinical trials assessing the impact of anticoagulation on thromboembolic events in this specific setting have shown contrasting results. The aim of this review is to summarize current evidence regarding classification and clinical impact of subclinical AF/AHREs and to discuss the latest evidence regarding the potential benefit of anticoagulation in this setting, highlighting which clinical questions are still unanswered.

Long-Term Changes in Atrial Arrhythmia Burden After Renal Denervation Combined With Pulmonary Vein Isolation: SYMPLICITY-AF

BACKGROUND

The autonomic nervous system plays an important role in atrial fibrillation (AF) and hypertension. Renal denervation (RDN) lowers blood pressure (BP), but its role in AF is poorly understood.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether RDN reduces AF recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

METHODS

This study randomized patients from 8 centers (United States, Germany) with drug-refractory AF for treatment with PVI+RDN vs PVI alone. A multielectrode radiofrequency Spyral catheter system was used for RDN. Insertable cardiac monitors were used for continuous rhythm monitoring. The primary efficacy endpoint was ≥2 minutes of AF recurrence or repeat ablation during all follow-up. The secondary endpoints included atrial arrhythmia (AA) burden, discontinuation of class I/III antiarrhythmic drugs, and BP changes from baseline.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients with AF (52 paroxysmal, 18 persistent) and uncontrolled hypertension were randomized (RDN+PVI, n = 34; PVI, n = 36). At 3.5 years, 26.2% and 21.4% of patients in RDN+PVI and PVI groups, respectively, were free from the primary efficacy endpoint (log rank P = 0.73). Patients with mean ≥1 h/d AA had less daily AA burden after RDN+PVI vs PVI (4.1 hours vs 9.2 hours; P = 0.016). More patients discontinued class I/III antiarrhythmic drugs after RDN+PVI vs PVI (45% vs 14%; P = 0.040). At 1 year, systolic BP changed by -17.8 ± 12.8 mm Hg and -13.7 ± 18.8 mm Hg after RDN+PVI and PVI, respectively (P = 0.43). The composite safety endpoint was not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AF and uncontrolled BP, RDN+PVI did not prevent AF recurrence more than PVI alone. However, RDN+PVI may reduce AF burden and antiarrhythmic drug usage, but this needs further prospective validation.

[Characterization of atrial fibrillation burden using wearables]

The characterization of atrial fibrillation (AF) according to current guidelines categorically refers to the differentiation between paroxysmal, persistent, and permanent AF. A more precise characterization of AF, including the evaluation of AF burden, is playing an increasingly significant role in both scientific research and clinical practice. Digital devices, especially those with the capability of passive (semi-)continuous recording, can contribute to a more accurate quantification of AF burden. Particularly in patients with an already established diagnosis of AF, the evaluation of AF burden can be used to monitor the success of antiarrhythmic therapy including antiarrhythmic drugs or pulmonary vein isolation. However, important questions remain unanswered: In addition to a uniform, evidence-based definition of AF burden, clinically relevant cut-offs for AF burden and resulting therapeutic consequences (e.g., subclinical AF) need to be elaborated. Furthermore, the establishment and evaluation of care structures for assessing and integrating AF burden in clinical care, especially by incorporating data from wearable medical devices, should take place.

Management of atrial arrhythmias identified by cardiac devices

Implantable cardiac devices have shown that atrial fibrillation (AF) is more frequent than previously assumed, with subclinical, asymptomatic, self-limiting manifestations called atrial high-rate events (AHREs) or subclinical AF. The clinical significance and correct therapeutic management of these episodes of subclinical AF is less well defined than in the case of clinically manifest AF. Two important randomized studies on the topic have recently been published, NOAH-AFNET 6 and ARTESIA, which, however, have not definitively clarified the topic. In patients with AHRE or subclinical AF, the average thrombo-embolic risk is lower than that in patients with clinically manifest AF and is ∼1%. For this reason, in these patients, the possibility that the benefit of anticoagulant therapy is overshadowed by the risk of bleeding is very high. Therefore, while waiting for new tools that allow a better stratification of low-risk patients, we must rely on individual clinical evaluation and overcome the qualitative dichotomy (AHRE yes vs. AHRE no), preferring instead an approach that is as quantitative as possible and takes into account the number of episodes, their duration, and the patient's CHADSVASC score, before deciding, in each individual case, whether or not to use anticoagulant therapy.

Association of Device-Detected Atrial High-Rate Episodes With Long-term Cardiovascular and All-Cause Mortality: A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Device-detected atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) were associated with an increased thromboembolic risk. Although limited data regarding the long-term prognosis of patients with AHRE were controversial, this study aimed to identify the association of device-detected AHRE with mortality.

METHODS

This observational study included patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) placement and no history of atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFL), or atrial tachycardia (AT). During follow-up, patients with at least 1 day of AHRE duration ≥ 15 minutes were identified. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular mortality, and the secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up period of 4.2 years, AHREs were detected in 124 of 343 (36.2%) patients. Of these, 44 deaths (35.5%) occurred in 124 patients with AHREs, which was significantly higher than those without AHREs (43 of 219; 19.6%; P = 0.001). The multivariate analysis revealed that patients with AHRE had a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular (hazard ratio [HR], 2.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-4.67; P = 0.010), and all-cause mortality (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.49-3.59; P < 0.001). Further analysis indicated that this association remained significant in patients with higher burden (≥ 6 hours) but not in patients with lower burden (≥ 15 minutes to 6 hours). Notably, even after excluding the patients diagnosed with clinical AF during follow-up, the remaining patients with AHREs still exhibited a higher risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality compared with patients without AHREs.

CONCLUSIONS

AHREs were prevalent in ICD or CRT-D recipients with no history of clinical AF, AFL, or AT and were associated with more than twice the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

No. ChiCTR-ONRC-13003695.

Is there a temporal relationship between atrial fibrillation and stroke? A review

Importance

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an established risk factor for ischaemic stroke. The introduction of continuous cardiac rhythm monitoring devices has enabled detection of brief and asymptomatic episodes of AF.

Observations

The search yielded 727 studies, 11 of which met the inclusion criteria. Four studies suggested a strong temporal association between episodes of AF and stroke, while seven indicated a weak relationship. The conflicting nature of the studies may be attributed to inconsistencies in ischaemic stroke verification (n=5/11), event rate and power (n=6/11) and lack of controlling for anticoagulation (n=10/11), mitigating the relationship between AF episodes and stroke.

Conclusions and relevance

The temporal relationship between AF and stroke still remains unclear due to varying study methodology, lack of control for anticoagulation and inconsistent stroke subtyping. Our review identifies limitations to the current literature and makes recommendations for future studies assessing the temporal relationship between AF episodes and cardioembolic stroke.

Use of Anticoagulation for Thromboembolic Prophylaxis in Patients With Atrial High-Rate Episodes on Device Monitoring: A Narrative Review

Ischemic stroke and systemic thromboembolism are primary drivers of significant morbidity and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Although stroke is commonly the first index presentation of clinically silent AF, the growing use of continuous rhythm monitoring through cardiac implanted electronic devices has enabled earlier and increased detection of AF in patients who are otherwise asymptomatic before stroke development. Atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) are atrial tachyarrhythmias frequently detected by cardiac implanted electronic devices; these events represent subclinical AF and other atrial tachyarrhythmias that can lead to stroke development and AF. Although the presence of AHREs increases the risk of developing both clinical AF and stroke compared with absence of AHREs, there has been a significant clinical variability in anticoagulation initiation in these subjects. In this narrative review, we explore the current evidence and published research surrounding the association between AHREs and stroke development in addition to the utility of anticoagulation in this population for thromboembolic prophylaxis.

Role of atrial high-rate episodes in stratifying thromboembolic risk: a multiple cut-off diagnostic meta-analysis

Aims

Despite the high prevalence rate of atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) detected using cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), clinical guidelines and consensus documents have disagreed on a universal AHRE definition and a temporal cut-off related to subsequent thromboembolic events. This diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis aims to derive the optimal temporal threshold of clinically significant AHREs from the available literature.

Methods

The PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were screened for studies on CIED patients reporting the incidence of thromboembolic events related to at least one AHRE temporal cut-off. A total of 23 studies were included: 19 considering the longest single AHRE and four the AHRE burden, respectively. A random-effect diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis with multiple cut-offs was performed. Two analyses were performed according to the AHRE temporal cut-off subtype (longest episode vs. cumulative burden).

Results

The analysis on the longest single AHRE indicated 0.07 min as the optimal duration to differentiate AHRE associated or not with thromboembolic events [sensitivity 65.4% (95% CI 48.8%-79.0%), specificity 52.7% (95% CI 46.0%-59.4%), and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-SROC): 0.62]. The analysis on AHRE burden indicated 1.4 min as the optimal cut-off [sensitivity 58.2% (95% CI 25.6%-85.0%), specificity 57.5% (95% CI 42.0%-71.7%), and AUC-SROC 0.60]. A sensitivity analysis excluding patients with a history of atrial fibrillation and including high-quality studies only yielded similar results.

Conclusion

The presence of AHRE, rather than a specific duration, relates to an increased, albeit low, thromboembolic risk in CIED patients. Any AHRE should constitute an additional element in patient-specific thromboembolic risk assessment.

[Tactics of anticoagulant therapy in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices and subclinical atrial fibrillation: A review]

Screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) has attracted considerable attention recently. Of special interest are patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) that allow for recording episodes of atrial arrhythmias of various durations, including asymptomatic ones, in which case they are referred to as subclinical atrial fibrillation (SCAF). The available data suggest that the risk of thromboembolic events varies between patients with SCAF and clinically overt AF. As of today, the question regarding anticoagulant therapy in patients with SCAF remains unresolved. The article presents an overview of previous and ongoing studies on this issue, as well as current guidelines on anticoagulant use in patients with SCAF and CIEDs.

Atrial high-rate episode burden and stroke risks for patients with device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Atrial high-rate episode (AHRE) and stroke are related; however, the magnitude of the correlations between different AHRE burdens and stroke remains unknown. We analysed studies that evaluated this relationship.

METHODS

We searched for observational controlled studies that reported the associations of different AHRE burdens with stroke in populations with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). The primary endpoint was stroke or thrombosis during follow-up. We performed subgroup analyses according to the classification criteria and research design of the included studies.

RESULTS

Of the 5985 studies identified, 9 met the eligibility criteria and included 42,958 patients. Patients with low and high AHRE burdens had a 1.2-fold risk of stroke (no heterogeneity) and a 2.52-fold risk of stroke (moderate heterogeneity), respectively. After excluding studies analysing the atrial fibrillation history, no significant difference in progressive stroke risk was observed for patients with a low AHRE burden (without significant heterogeneity). An increased likelihood of stroke was observed for patients with a high AHRE burden (decreased heterogeneity). Four of the nine studies classified high and low AHRE burdens using the longest AHRE time. Five studies classified high and low AHRE burdens based on the median of the total AHRE time as the cutoff value. Low and high AHRE burdens were more closely related to stroke when classified by the total AHRE duration than when classified by the single longest AHRE duration.

CONCLUSIONS

For populations with CIEDs without an atrial fibrillation history, a high AHRE burden was significantly associated with stroke.

Atrial fibrillation and stroke

INTRODUCTION

Stroke is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity globally. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia. It is set to reach epidemic proportions. AF is associated with a five-fold increase in risk of stroke. Strokes caused by AF more often are fatal or result in severe disability. Even though the incidence of stroke has been significantly reduced by oral anticoagulation, AF is thought to account for a significant proportion of cryptogenic strokes where no etiology is identified.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the literature related to AF and stroke, pathophysiological insights, diagnosis of AF in stroke patients, and its management (Graphical Abstract).

EXPERT OPINION

The pathophysiology of thrombogenesis that links AF and stroke is not well understood and is an area of active research to identify new therapeutic targets to prevent AF and stroke. As the nature of AF and stroke is multifaceted, an integrated care approach to managing AF and stroke is increasingly essential.

Prevalence of asymptomatic atrial fibrillation among multimorbid elderly patients: diagnostic implications

Advancing age of the global population is one of the main reasons for the uprising trend in atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence worldwide leading to a proper "AF epidemic". Strictly related to the increasing prevalence of AF in the elderly is the relevant burden of cardiac end extra-cardiac comorbidities that these patients show. Patients with AF are frequently asymptomatic (i.e., asymptomatic or silent AF) and thus the arrhythmia is generally underdiagnosed. Detainment of proper treatment in elderly and comorbid patients may potentially result in significant morbidity and mortality. Therefore, in recent years, several screening strategies (systematic vs opportunistic screening) for asymptomatic AF have been developed and early diagnosis of AF is an important treatment goal that can improve prognosis. This review will focus on the prevalence of asymptomatic AF in the elderly, frequently associated comorbidities, screening strategies, and implications for a correct AF diagnosis.

Atrial fibrillation burden and the risk of stroke: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The increased stroke risk associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) burden exceeding 5 min is a matter of debate. In addition, the potential linear or nonlinear relationship between AF burden and stroke risk has been largely unexplored.

AIM

To determine the association between AF burden > 5 min and the increased risk of stroke and explore the potential dose-response relationship between these two factors.

METHODS

Sixteen studies from six databases with 53141 subjects (mean age 65 years) were included. Fifteen studies were observational studies, and one was a randomized controlled trial study. The potential nonlinear dose-response association was characterized using a restricted cubic splines regression model. AF burden for each 1 h and 2 h was associated with an increased risk of stroke. Trial sequential analysis with a random-effect model was used to evaluate the robustness of the evidence from the included 16 studies.

RESULTS

AF burden > 5 min was associated with an increased risk of clinical AF [adjusted risk ratio (RR) = 4.18, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.26-7.74]. However, no association was found with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted RR = 1.55, 95%CI: 0.87-2.75). Patients with AF burden > 5 min had an increased risk of stroke (adjusted RR = 2.49, 95%CI: 1.79-3.47). Moreover, a dose-response analysis showed that the increased stroke risk was paralleled by an increase in AF burden at a rate of 2.0% per hour (P_nonlinear = 0.656, RR = 1.02, 95%CI: 1.01-1.03). Trial sequential analysis provided robust evidence of the association between AF burden > 5 min and an increased risk of stroke.

CONCLUSION

AF burden was a significant risk factor for clinical AF and future stroke. A significant linear association was documented between increased AF burden and risk of future stroke.

What to do with device-detected atrial high-rate episodes: Summary of the evidences

Cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIEDs), that perform atrial sensing via an atrial electrode, commonly detect self-terminating atrial arrhythmias. Nomenclature of these arrhythmias is defined as atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) and subclinical atrial fibrillation (SCAF). We have provided a comprehensive summation of the trials regarding the incidence and adverse outcomes of AHREs. The reported incidence of AHRE varies considerably (approximately 10% to %70) between studies depending on the definition of AHRE, duration of follow-up and the clinical profile of the population. There is increasing evidence related with the association between AHREs' and stroke and/or systemic embolism. However, risk of stroke and/or systemic embolism seems to be less than the risk associated with clinical AF. There is still lack of sufficient evidence related with oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with AHRE to reduce thromboembolic risk. Although, the strongest association of OAC treatment with reduction in stroke has been reported to be observed among patients with device detected SCAF episodes of >24 hours; it is still questionable whether AHRE is a direct cause of thromboembolic event or just a marker of increased risk. Results of ongoing randomized clinical trials (NOAH-AFNET 6 and ARTESIA) will provide robust evidence on effect of OAC therapy on AHREs. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Atrial High-Rate Episode Duration Thresholds and Thromboembolic Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Available evidence supports an association between atrial high‐rate episode (AHRE) burden and thromboembolic risk, but the necessary extent and duration of AHREs to increase the thromboembolic risk remain to be defined. The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to identify the thromboembolic risk associated with various AHRE thresholds.

Methods and Results

We searched PubMed and Scopus until January 9, 2020, for literature reporting AHRE duration and thromboembolic risk in patients with implantable electronic devices. The outcome assessed was stroke or systemic embolism. Risk estimates were reported as hazard ratio (HR) or relative risk alongside 95% CIs. We used the Paule‐Mandel estimator, and heterogeneity was calculated with I² index. Among 27 studies including 61 919 patients, 23 studies reported rates according to the duration of the longest AHRE and 4 studies reported rates according to the cumulative day‐level AHRE duration. In patients with cardiac implantable devices, AHREs lasting ≥30 seconds significantly increased the risk of stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 4.41; 95% CI, 2.32–8.39; I², 5.5%), which remained consistent for the thresholds of 5 minutes and 6 and 24 hours. Patients with previous stroke or transient ischemic attack and AHREs lasting ≥2 minutes had a marginally increased risk of recurrent stroke or transient ischemic attack. The risk of stroke or systemic embolism was higher in patients with cumulative AHRE ≥24 hours compared with those of shorter duration or no AHRE (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.04–1.52; I², 0%).

Conclusions

This systematic review and meta‐analysis suggests that single AHRE episodes ≥30 seconds and cumulative AHRE duration ≥24 hours are associated with increased risk of stroke or systemic embolism.

Device-detected atrial high rate episodes and the risk of stroke/thrombo-embolism and atrial fibrillation incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Atrial High Rate Episodes (AHRE) are asymptomatic atrial tachy-arrhythmias detected through continuous monitoring with a cardiac implantable electronic device. The risks of stroke/Thromboembolic (TE) events and incident clinical Atrial Fibrillation (AF) associated with AHRE varies markedly.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the relationship between AHRE and TE events, and between AHRE and incident clinical AF.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA recommendations. PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to 18/02/2021 for studies reporting TE events and incident clinical AF in patients with AHRE, as compared with patients without.

RESULTS

Ten out of 8081 records fulfilled the inclusion criteria, for a total of 37 266 patients. Seven out of ten studies excluded patients with prior history of clinical AF (4961 patients), embracing the most recent definition of AHRE. The risk ratio (RR) for TE events in AHRE patients was 2.13 (95% CI: 1.53-2.95, I²: 0%). The incidence of clinical AF was reported in four studies excluding patients with a history of clinical AF (3574 patients). The RR for incident clinical AF was 3.34 (95%CI: 1.89-5.90, I²: 73%).

CONCLUSIONS

AHRE are significantly associated with systemic thromboembolism and incident clinical AF. Further studies are needed to improve patients' risk stratification and management.

Association Between Changes in Physical Activity and New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation After ICD/CRT-D Implantation

Background: Changes in physical activity (PA) after implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) implantation were unknown. The association of PA changes with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF), cardiac death and all-cause mortality was unclear in patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death.

Methods: Patients receiving ICD/CRT-D implantation from SUMMIT registry were retrospectively analyzed. Changes in PA were considered from baseline status to 1 year after implantation. New-onset AF was defined as the first atrial high-rate episode ≥1% of the daily AF burden detected after implantation.

Results: Over a mean follow-up of 50.3 months, 124 new-onset AF events (36.2%), 61 cardiac deaths (17.8%), and 87 all-cause deaths (25.4%) were observed in 343 patients with ICD/CRT-D implantation. PA at 1 year after implantation was increased compared with PA at baseline (11.97 ± 5.83% vs. 10.82 ± 5.43%, P = 0.008), and PA at 1 year was improved in 210 patients (61.2%). Per 1% decrease in PA was associated with 12.4, 18.3, and 14.3% higher risks of new-onset AF, cardiac death and all-cause mortality, regardless of different baseline characteristics. Patients with decreased PA had 2-fold risks of new-onset AF (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.972, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.352–2.877, P < 0.001) as high as those with unchanged/increased PA. Decreased PA was an independent risk factor for cardiac death (HR = 3.358, 95% CI: 1.880–5.996, P < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR = 2.803, 95% CI:1.732–4.535, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: PA decrease after ICD/CRT-D implantation is associated with a higher incidence of new-onset AF, resulting in worsened outcomes in cardiac death and all-cause mortality.

Atrial fibrillation burden: an update-the need for a CHA2DS2-VASc-AFBurden score

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an established independent risk factor for stroke. Current guidelines regard AF as binary; either present or absent, with the decision for anti-coagulation driven by clinical variables alone. However, there are increasing data to support a biological gradient of AF burden and stroke risk, both in clinical and non-clinical AF phenotypes. As such, this raises the concept of combining AF burden assessment with a clinical risk score to refine and individualize the assessment of stroke risk in AF-the CHA2DS2VASc-AFBurden score. We review the published data supporting a biological gradient to try and construct a putative schema of risk attributable to AF burden.

Impact of the Pattern of Atrial Fibrillation on Stroke Risk and Mortality

Thromboembolism is the most serious complication of AF, and oral anticoagulation is the mainstay therapy. Current guidelines place all AF types together in terms of anticoagulation with the major determinants being associated comorbidities translated into risk marker. Among patients in large clinical trials, those with non-paroxysmal AF appear to be at higher risk of stroke than those with paroxysmal AF. Higher complexity of the AF pattern is also associated with higher risk of mortality. Moreover, continuous monitoring of AF through cardiac implantable devices provided us with the concept of 'AF burden'. Usually, the larger the AF burden, the higher the risk of stroke; however, the relationship is not well characterised with respect to the threshold value above which the risk increases. The picture is more complex than it appears: AF and underlying disorders must act synergically respecting the magnitude of its own characteristics, which are the amount of time a patient stays in AF and the severity of associated comorbidities.

Recommendations on the utilization of telemedicine in cardiology

The enormous progress made in recent years in the field of information and communication technology and also in sensor and computer technology has affected numerous fields of medicine and is capable of inducing even radical changes in diagnostic and therapeutic processes. This is particularly true for cardiology, where, for example, telemetric monitoring of cardiac and circulatory functions has been in use for many years. Nevertheless, broad application of newer telemedical processes has not yet been achieved to the extent one would expect from the encouraging results of numerous clinical studies in this field and the state of the art of the underlying technology. In the present paper, the Working Group on Rhythmology of the Austrian Cardiological Society aims to provoke a critical discussion of the digital change in cardiology and to make recommendations for the implementation of those telemedical processes that have been shown to exert positive effects on a wide variety of medical and economic parameters. The greatest benefit of telecardiological applications is certainly to be found in the long-term care of patients with chronic cardiovascular diseases. Accordingly, follow-up care of patients with cardiological rhythm implants, management of chronic heart failure and secondary prevention following an acute cardiac event during rehabilitation are currently the most important fields of application. Telemedicine is intended to enable high-quality and cost-efficient care for an increasing number of patients, whose care poses one of the greatest challenges to our healthcare system. Not least of all, telemedicine should make a decisive contribution to improving the quality of life of this segment of the population by favorably influencing mortality, morbidity and hospitalization as well as the patient's contribution to treatment.

What do we do about atrial high rate episodes?

Atrial high rate episodes (AHREs) are defined as asymptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmias detected by cardiac implantable electronic devices with atrial sensing, providing automated continuous monitoring and tracings storage, occurring in subjects with no previous clinical atrial fibrillation (AF) and with no AF detected at conventional electrocardiogram recordings. AHREs are associated with an increased thrombo-embolic risk, which is not negligible, although lower than that of clinical AF. The thrombo-embolic risk increases with increasing burden of AHREs, and moreover, AHREs burden shows a dynamic pattern, with tendency to progression along with time, with potential transition to clinical AF. The clinical management of AHREs, in particular with regard to prophylactic treatment with oral anticoagulants (OACs), remains uncertain and heterogeneous. At present, in patients with confirmed AHREs, as a result of device tracing analysis, an integrated, individual and clinically-guided assessment should be applied, taking into account the patients' risk of stroke (to be reassessed regularly) and the AHREs burden. The use of OACs, preferentially non-vitamin K antagonists OACs, may be justified in selected patients, such as those with longer AHREs durations (in the range of several hours or ≥24 h), with no doubts on AF diagnosis after device tracing analysis and with an estimated high/very high individual risk of stroke, accounting for the anticipated net clinical benefit, and informed patient's preferences. Two randomized clinical trials on this topic are currently ongoing and are likely to better define the role of anticoagulant therapy in patients with AHREs.

High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein is a Predictor of Subsequent Atrial High-Rate Episodes in Patients with Pacemakers and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with morbidity and mortality. Modern pacemakers can detect atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) as a surrogate for AF. It remains controversial whether inflammation is a cause or a consequence of AF. This study investigated whether the inflammatory biomarker high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) can predict subsequent AHREs. This study gathered prospective data from patients with pacemakers and a left ventricle EF ≥ 50% between 2015 and 2019. The hs-CRP and other cardiac biomarkers at baseline and device-detected AHREs, defined as atrial rate ≥ 180 bpm and duration ≥ 6 min, were determined. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the independent predictors for AHREs. A total of 171 consecutive patients were included. During the median follow-up of 614 days, 66 patients (39%) developed subsequent AHREs. In the univariate Cox regression analysis, sick sinus syndrome (p = 0.005), prior AF (p < 0.001), mitral A velocity (p = 0.008), and hs-CRP (p = 0.013) showed significant association with the increased risk of AHREs. In the multivariate Cox regression model, hs-CRP (HR = 1.121, 95% confidence interval = 1.015-1.238, p = 0.024) retained its significance. Our results suggest that elevated hs-CRP could predict subsequent AHREs and that inflammation could play a role in AF pathogenesis in patients with preserved EF.

Pacemaker detected prolonged atrial high rate episodes - Incidence, predictors and implications; a retrospective observational study

Introduction

Atrial tachyarrhythmias especially atrial fibrillation are the most commonly encountered arrhythmias in clinical practice. Most atrial tachyarrhythmia episodes are subclinical. Cardiac implantable electronic devices with atrial sensing function enable detection of atrial tachyarrhythmias through means of atrial high rate event algorithms. Prolonged atrial high rate episodes(AHRE) above a defined rate and duration threshold represent episodes of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, and longer atrial tachycardias that correlate strongly with risk for thromboembolic events.

Objective

1. To examine the occurrence of prolonged AHRE in dual-chamber pacemaker recipients over the study period. 2. To examine the factors which influence the occurrence of prolonged AHRE in these patients.

Methods

In this study, we analyzed data of 398 patients without valvular heart disease or history of atrial fibrillation who underwent dual chamber permanent pacemaker implantation at our center from January 2013 to June 2018. Patient demographics, cardiovascular comorbidities, medications, echocardiographic parameters such as ejection fraction and left atrial(LA) dimension were obtained. Also, we collected pacing characteristics such as paced QRS duration(QRSd), ventricular pacing site and cumulative percentage ventricular paced beats.

Results

Prolonged AHRE occurred in 59 patients(14.8%). Baseline LA dimension was greater in patients with prolonged AHRE(median 35 mm, IQR 33-37 vs median 35 mm, IQR 34-38, P = 0.004) compared to those without. Paced QRSd was significantly longer in patients with prolonged AHRE (median of 147 ms, IQR 139-160 ms vs 140 ms, IQR 132-150 ms; P < 0.001). On multivariable logistic regression, paced QRSd(OR 1.04, 95%CI 1.02-1.06; P = 0.001) and baseline LA dimension(OR 1.14, 95%CI 1.03-1.27; P = 0.01) significantly co-predicted AHRE. On Kaplan Meier analysis, patients with paced QRSd≥142 ms had more likelihood of developing prolonged AHRE during follow up (HR 2.46, CI 1.40-4.3, P = 0.001). After adjusting for baseline values, patients with paced QRSd≥142 ms had significant decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (adjusted mean difference -1.27%; P = 0.02) and significant LA dilation (adjusted mean difference 0.62 mm; P = 0.05).

Conclusion

In our study, paced QRSd and LA dimension were the strongest predictors for prolonged AHRE. The incidence of AHRE may be reduced by achieving the narrowest possible paced QRSd during device implantation.

The Link Between CHA2DS2-VASc Score and Thromboembolic Risk in Patients Without Known Atrial Fibrillation: Are We Missing a Silent Culprit?

Stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. The majority of strokes are ischemic and a subset of these are due to atrial fibrillation (AF). Other etiologies include a variety of cardiovascular disorders. The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score is a validated stroke prediction tool for patients with non-valvular AF. However, it has also been shown to predict increased risk for stroke or thromboembolism in the absence of AF. Given how common subclinical AF (SCAF) is when looked for in patients with elevated CHA₂DS₂-VaSc scores who are not known to have AF, (especially when implanted monitors are used), the stroke/thromboembolism risk that has been associated with CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores absent known AF may be an overestimate of the true risk due to the likely presence of SCAF in some of the subjects included. This has not yet been adequately addressed in the literature. Finally, the risk of a left atrial thromboembolic event is a consequence of the altered atrial anatomy and physiology (atrial cardiomyopathy) that may result from comorbid disorders and AF itself, or, additively from both - whether or not the AF has been already recognized clinically.

Galectin-3 levels and the prediction of atrial high-rate episodes in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy

Galectin-3 is an inflammation biomarker associated with atrial remodeling which plays a role in the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). Atrial high-rate episode (AHRE) is related to development of clinically documented AF and stroke. The present study aimed to determine the relationship between the presence of AHRE and the coronary sinus (CS) serum sampling of galectin-3 levels in the long-term follow-up of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients. A total of 108 consecutive CRT patients were included prospectively in the study. AHREs were defined as atrial tachyarrhythmia episodes lasting at least 6 min with atrial rate >190 beats/min detected by cardiac implantable electronic device. CS blood samples were drawn from the CS guiding catheter to perform galectin-3 measurements. Galectin-3 levels were measured via ELISA. During a mean follow-up 12.6±4.9 months, AHRE was observed in 31 (28.7%) patients and not observed in 77 (72.3%) patients. CS galectin-3 levels were significantly higher in patients with AHRE than those without AHRE (18.09±2.62 vs 13.17±3.17, respectively, p<0.001). Moreover, CS galectin-3 levels showed significant positive correlation with percent of time spent in total AHRE (r=0.436, p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that left atrium (LA) volume and CS galectin-3 levels were significant and independent predictors for AHRE (OR=1.127, 95% CI: 1.045 to 1.216; p=0.002, OR=1.799, 95% CI: 1.388 to 2.330; p<0.001, respectively). In this study, we determined that high CS galectin-3 levels were a predictor for the development of AHRE in CRT patients.

Atrial High-Rate Episodes and Their Association with Cerebral Ischemic Events in Chagasic Patients

Fundamento

Episódios de alta frequência atrial (EAFAs) estão associados a um risco elevado de eventos isquêmicos cerebrais, porém não existem estudos relacionados com a presença de EAFAs e eventos isquêmicos cerebrais em pacientes chagásicos.

Objetivo

Investigar a associação entre a presença de EAFAs ≥ 6 minutos e eventos isquêmicos cerebrais em pacientes chagásicos.

Métodos

Estudo de coorte com pacientes chagásicos, portadores de dispositivos cardíacos eletrônicos implantáveis (DCEIs), acompanhados no ambulatório de arritmias de um hospital universitário, na cidade de Salvador/BA, entre maio de 2016 e junho de 2017. Pacientes com diagnóstico de flutter atrial/fibrilação atrial, com DCEI unicameral e em uso de anticoagulação oral foram excluídos. Foram considerados EAFAs com frequência atrial ≥ 190 batimentos por minuto e duração ≥ 6 minutos (min), e os eventos isquêmicos cerebrais foram identificados por meio de tomografia computadorizada (TC) de crânio.

Resultados

Os 67 participantes da pesquisa (67,2% do sexo feminino, com idade média de 63,6 ± 9,2 anos) foram acompanhados por 98 ± 28,8 dias e 11,9% dos pacientes apresentaram EAFAs ≥ 6 minutos. A TC de crânio evidenciou eventos isquêmicos cerebrais silenciosos em 16,4% dos pacientes, sendo que, destes, 63,6% haviam apresentado os EAFAs ≥ 6 minutos na análise dos DCEIs. A idade avançada (OR 1,12 [IC 95% 1,03-1,21; p=0,009) e a presença de EAFAs ≥ 6 minutos (OR 96,2 [IC 95% 9,4-987,4; p<0,001]) foram preditores independentes para eventos isquêmicos.

Conclusão

EAFAs detectados por DCEIs estavam associados à presença de eventos isquêmicos cerebrais silenciosos em pacientes chagásicos. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)

Prevalence and prognostic significance of device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

Cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIEDs) can detect short durations of previously unrecognised atrial fibrillation (AF). The prognostic significance of device-detected subclinical AF, in the context of contemporary heart failure (HF) therapy, is unclear.

METHODS

Amongst patients enrolled in the Remote Monitoring in HF with implanted devices (REM-HF) trial, three categories were defined based on total AF duration in the first year of follow-up: no AF, subclinical AF (≥6 min to ≤24 h), and AF >24 h. All-cause mortality, stroke, and cardiovascular hospitalisation were assessed.

RESULTS

1561 patients (94.6%) had rhythm data: 71 (4.6%) had subclinical AF (median of 4 episodes, total duration 3.1 h) and 279 (17.9%) had AF >24 h. During 2.8 ± 0.8 years' follow-up, 39 (2.5%) patients had a stroke. Stroke rate was highest amongst patients with subclinical AF (2.0 per 100-person years) versus no AF or AF >24 h (0.8 and 1.0 per 100-person years, respectively). In the overall cohort, AF >24 h was not an independent predictor of stroke. However, amongst patients with no history of AF (n = 932), new-onset subclinical AF conferred a three-fold higher stroke risk (adjusted HR 3.35, 95%CI 1.15-9.77, p = 0.027). AF >24 h was associated with more frequent emergency cardiovascular hospitalisation (adjusted HR 1.46, 95%CI 1.19-1.79, p < 0.0005). Neither AF classification was associated with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HF and a CIED, subclinical AF was infrequent but, as a new finding, was associated with an increased risk of stroke. Anticoagulation remains an important consideration in this population, particularly when the clinical profile indicates a high stroke risk.

Atrial high-rate episodes: prevalence, stroke risk, implications for management, and clinical gaps in evidence

Self-terminating atrial arrhythmias are commonly detected on continuous rhythm monitoring, e.g. by pacemakers or defibrillators. It is unclear whether the presence of these arrhythmias has therapeutic consequences. We sought to summarize evidence on the prevalence of atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) and their impact on risk of stroke. We performed a comprehensive, tabulated review of published literature on the prevalence of AHRE. In patients with AHRE, but without atrial fibrillation (AF), we reviewed the stroke risk and the potential risk/benefit of oral anticoagulation. Atrial high-rate episodes are found in 10-30% of AF-free patients. Presence of AHRE slightly increases stroke risk (0.8% to 1%/year) compared with patients without AHRE. Atrial high-rate episode of longer duration (e.g. those >24 h) could be associated with a higher stroke risk. Oral anticoagulation has the potential to reduce stroke risk in patients with AHRE but is associated with a rate of major bleeding of 2%/year. Oral anticoagulation is not effective in patients with heart failure or survivors of a stroke without AF. It remains unclear whether anticoagulation is effective and safe in patients with AHRE. Atrial high-rate episodes are common and confer a slight increase in stroke risk. There is true equipoise on the best way to reduce stroke risk in patients with AHRE. Two ongoing trials (NOAH-AFNET 6 and ARTESiA) will provide much-needed information on the effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulation using non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with AHRE.

Association of Burden of Atrial Fibrillation With Risk of Ischemic Stroke in Adults With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: The KP-RHYTHM Study

Importance

Atrial fibrillation is a potent risk factor for stroke, but whether the burden of atrial fibrillation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation independently influences the risk of thromboembolism remains controversial.

Objective

To determine if the burden of atrial fibrillation characterized using noninvasive, continuous ambulatory monitoring is associated with the risk of ischemic stroke or arterial thromboembolism in adults with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study conducted from October 2011 and October 2016 at 2 large integrated health care delivery systems used an extended continuous cardiac monitoring system to identify adults who were found to have paroxysmal atrial fibrillation on 14-day continuous ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring.

Exposures

The burden of atrial fibrillation was defined as the percentage of analyzable wear time in atrial fibrillation or flutter during the up to 14-day monitoring period.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Ischemic stroke and other arterial thromboembolic events occurring while patients were not taking anticoagulation were identified through November 2016 using electronic medical records and were validated by manual review. We evaluated the association of the burden of atrial fibrillation with thromboembolism while not taking anticoagulation after adjusting for the Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) or CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk scores.

Results

Among 1965 adults with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, the mean (SD) age was 69 (11.8) years, 880 (45%) were women, 496 (25%) were persons of color, the median ATRIA stroke risk score was 4 (interquartile range [IQR], 2-7), and the median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3 (IQR, 1-4). The median burden of atrial fibrillation was 4.4% (IQR ,1.1%-17.23%). Patients with a higher burden of atrial fibrillation were less likely to be women or of Hispanic ethnicity, but had more prior cardioversion attempts compared with those who had a lower burden. After adjusting for either ATRIA or CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk scores, the highest tertile of atrial fibrillation burden (≥11.4%) was associated with a more than 3-fold higher adjusted rate of thromboembolism while not taking anticoagulants (adjusted hazard ratios, 3.13 [95% CI, 1.50-6.56] and 3.16 [95% CI, 1.51-6.62], respectively) compared with the combined lower 2 tertiles of atrial fibrillation burden. Results were consistent across demographic and clinical subgroups.

Conclusions and Relevance

A greater burden of atrial fibrillation is associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke independent of known stroke risk factors in adults with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Stroke: Past, Present and Future

Subclinical atrial fibrillation (SCAF) describes asymptomatic episodes of atrial fibrillation (AF) that are detected by cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). The increased utilization of CIEDs renders our understanding of SCAF important to clinical practice. Furthermore, 20% of AF present initially as a stroke event and prolonged cardiac monitoring of stroke patients is likely to uncover a significant prevalence of SCAF. New evidence has shown that implanting cardiac monitors into patients with no history of atrial fibrillation but with risk factors for stroke will yield an incidence of SCAF approaching 30–40% at around three years. Atrial high rate episodes lasting longer than five minutes are likely to represent SCAF. SCAF has been associated with an increased risk of stroke that is particularly significant when episodes of SCAF are greater than 23 h in duration. Longer episodes of SCAF are incrementally more likely to progress to episodes of SCAF >23 h as time progresses. While only around 30–40% of SCAF events are temporally related to stroke events, the presence of SCAF likely represents an important risk marker for stroke. Ongoing trials of anticoagulation in patients with SCAF durations less than 24 h will inform clinical practice and are highly anticipated. Further studies are needed to clarify the association between SCAF and clinical outcomes as well as the factors that modify this association.

Atrial Dyssynchrony: A New Predictor for Atrial High-Rate Episodes in Patients with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Background: Heart failure may induce atrial dyssynchrony. We aim to investigate whether preimplantation left atrial (LA) dyssynchrony could predict newly detected atrial high-rate episodes (AHRE) after receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who received CRT-D for standard indications and without a history of atrial fibrillation. The standard deviation of the time-to-peak strain in each LA segment during ventricular systole (SDs) and late diastole (SDa) were calculated to quantify LA dyssynchrony using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography before device implantation. Patients were divided into the AHRE group and the AHRE-free group, depending on the presence of AHRE during device interrogation. Results: Thirty-one patients (28%) had newly detected AHRE during a mean follow-up of 21 ± 9 months. Patients in the AHRE group had higher SDs (8.2 ± 2.6% vs. 6.3 ± 2.3%, p < 0.001) and SDa (5.4 ± 1.8% vs. 4.1 ± 1.4%, p < 0.001) values before implantation than patients in the AHRE-free group. In the multivariate logistic analysis, both SDs (OR 1.325, 95% CI: 1.074–1.636, p =0.009) and SDa (OR: 1.499, 95% CI: 1.071–2.098, p= 0.018) were independent predictors of newly detected AHRE. At a cutoff value of 7.4% for SDs and 5.3% for SDa, the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients with higher SDs and SDa had significantly increased risks of newly detected AHRE after receiving CRT-D. Conclusions: Dyssynchronous LA lengthening and contraction could assist in the prediction of newly detected AHRE in patients with CRT-D.

Early Versus Late New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Differences in Clinical Characteristics and Predictors

New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) during acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has significant consequences but is often misdiagnosed. The aim of the study was to evaluate predictors of NOAF throughout different phases of AMI. Patients with AMI admitted to a tertiary medical center were analyzed. Exclusion criteria were preexisting AF, AMI onset ≥24 hours prior to admission, in-hospital death, significant valvular disease, and in-hospital coronary artery bypass graft. Study population were AMI without-NOAF, early-AF (AF terminated within 24 hours of admission), and late-AF (beyond the first 24 hours). Overall 5946 patients were included, age: 64.8 ±14.8 years; 30% women. The incidence of NOAF was 4.6%: 1.6% early-AF, and 3% late-AF. Patients with NOAF comprised greater rate of women, cardiovascular risk-factors burden, severe left ventricular-dysfunction, pulmonary hypertension, valvular disorders, and left atrial enlargement compared with patients without-NOAF. Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and inferior-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were significantly more prevalent among early-AF group, while anterior-STEMI, in late-AF. The final multivariate models showed c-statistics of 0.73 and 0.76 for the prediction of new-onset early-AF and late-AF, respectively. In conclusion, there are different clinical predictors of early- versus late-NOAF. The study points out “high risk” AMI population for more meticulous heart rate monitoring for NOAF.

Thromboembolism in the Absence of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with thrombus formation in the left atrial appendage and systemic embolic events including ischemic stroke. Cardiogenic thromboembolism can also occur in the absence of clinical AF as a result of various pathological conditions affecting the endocardium. The inconsistent temporal relation between AF and ischemic events has stimulated exploration for factors other than clinical AF that contribute to thromboembolism. These include subclinical AF, a thrombogenic atrial cardiomyopathy, and left atrial appendage dysfunction and embolism from other sources. In conclusion, thromboembolism during normal sinus rhythm is likely multifactorial, involving intertwined pathologic processes. Patients at risk, if accurately identified, could theoretically benefit from anticoagulation.

Incidence of Previously Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation Using Insertable Cardiac Monitors in a High-Risk Population: The REVEAL AF Study

Importance

In approximately 20% of atrial fibrillation (AF)-related ischemic strokes, stroke is the first clinical manifestation of AF. Strategies are needed to identify and therapeutically address previously undetected AF.

Objective

To quantify the incidence of AF in patients at high risk for but without previously known AF using an insertable cardiac monitor.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective, single-arm, multicenter study was conducted from November 2012 to January 2017. Visits took place at 57 centers in the United States and Europe. Patients with a CHADS2 score of 3 or greater (or 2 with at least 1 additional risk factor) were enrolled. Approximately 90% had nonspecific symptoms potentially compatible with AF, such as fatigue, dyspnea, and/or palpitations.

Exposures

Patients underwent monitoring with an insertable cardiac monitor for 18 to 30 months.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was adjudicated AF lasting 6 or more minutes and was assessed at 18 months. Other analyses included detection rates at points from 30 days to 30 months and among CHADS2 score subgroups. Median time from insertion to detection and the percentage of patients subsequently prescribed oral anticoagulation therapy was also determined.

Results

A total of 446 patients were enrolled; 233 (52.2%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 71.5 (9.9) years. A total of 385 patients (86.3%) received an insertable cardiac monitor, met the primary analysis cohort definition, and were observed for a mean (SD) period of 22.5 (7.7) months. The detection rate of AF lasting 6 or more minutes at 18 months was 29.3%. Detection rates at 30 days and 6, 12, 24, and 30 months were 6.2%, 20.4%, 27.1%, 33.6%, and 40.0%, respectively. At 18 months, AF incidence was similar among patients with CHADS2 scores of 2 (24.7%; 95% CI, 17.3-31.4), 3 (32.7%; 95% CI, 23.8-40.7), and 4 or greater (31.7%; 95% CI, 22.0-40.3) (P = .23). Median (interquartile) time from device insertion to first AF episode detection was 123 (41-330) days. Of patients meeting the primary end point, 13 (10.2%) had 1 or more episodes lasting 24 hours or longer, and oral anticoagulation therapy was prescribed for 72 patients (56.3%).

Conclusions and Relevance

The incidence of previously undiagnosed AF may be substantial in patients with risk factors for AF and stroke. Atrial fibrillation would have gone undetected in most patients had monitoring been limited to 30 days. Further trials regarding the value of detecting subclinical AF and of prophylactic therapies are warranted.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01727297.

Atrial high rate episodes in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: implications for clinical outcomes

Background

Atrial high rate episodes (AHREs) detected by cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are associated with an increased risk of stroke. However, the impact of AHRE on improving stroke risk stratification scheme remains uncertain.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of AHRE on prognosis in relation with cardiovascular events and risk stratification.

Methods

A total of 856 consecutive patients who had dual-chamber CIEDs implanted were retrospectively analyzed. To detect AHREs, they were monitored for 6 months after CIEDs’ implantation and were followed for a mean of 4.0 years for clinical outcomes such as thromboembolism or death.

Results

Overall, 125 (14.6%) of patients developed AHREs within the first 6 months (median age 72.0 years, 39.3% female). Patients with AHREs had a high rate of thromboembolism (2.6%/year) and mortality (3.0%/year). On multivariate analysis, AHRE was significantly associated with increased risk of thromboembolism [hazard ratio (HR) 3.40; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38–8.37, P = 0.01] and death (HR 3.47; 95% CI 1.51–7.95; P < 0.01). The predictive abilities of the CHADS₂ and CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores were modest, with no significant improvements by adding AHRE to those scores. However, the integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification improvement showed that the addition of AHRE to the CHADS₂ and CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores statistically improved their predictive ability for the composite outcome.

Conclusions

AHRE was an independent factor associated with increased risk of clinical outcomes. The addition of AHRE to the clinical risk scores significantly improved discrimination for thromboembolism or death.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00392-019-01432-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

[Telemonitoring of implanted cardiac devices : Clinical necessity or senseless luxury?]

In addition to the telemedical follow-up at a fixed point in time, there is the possibility of a close-meshed telemetric monitoring in modern devices. By transferring device and patient-specific data, errors in the integrity of the device or electrodes and cardiac arrhythmias can be detected early, in various studies significantly reducing the number of outpatient or inpatient visits and the rate of inadequate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies. Measurement of various surrogate parameters allows better clinical assessment of heart failure patients, yet no improvement in outcome with therapy guided by telemetric data has been demonstrated. Retrospective analyzes, a prospective randomized study, and various meta-analyzes identified a reduction in all-cause mortality through the use of remote monitoring. This effect is mainly due to monitoring as closely as possible, timely examination of the findings, accordingly early interventions and specification of clear therapeutic regimens in certain clinical scenarios. Such comprehensive patient care requires the creation of telemonitoring centers with appropriate structural and personal equipment, whereby the creation of such structures has not yet been remunerated in the German healthcare system. In this paper, an overview of remote monitoring and identify possibilities and limitations of device-based telemedical monitoring is provided.

Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation, Embolic Risk, and Anticoagulant Treatment

Professor Leonida Gherasim, MD, PhD, is a member of the Romanian Academy. We invited him to write the editorial review for this issue. The subject - how to treat the silent atrial fibrillation (that fibrillation discovered only by devices) and take the decision to anti coagulate or not - is a very important clinical judgement. Professor Gherasim was the editor of several editions of the Romanian Handbook of Internal Medicine - the Romanian equivalent of Harrison's, or Cecil and Loeb's Handbooks. He remains one of the most outstanding professors of internal medicine in Romania. In 2019, professor Leonida Gherasim will be 90 years old. Prof. Mircea Cinteza Chief Editor, MAEDICA J Clin Med.

Clinical Influence and Predictors of Pacing-Induced Mechanical Asynchrony in Patients with Normal Cardiac Function with Ventricular Lead Placed in Non-Apical Position

Right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing often causes left ventricular (LV) mechanical asynchrony, which is enhanced by impaired cardiac contraction and intrinsic conduction abnormality. However, data on patients with normal cardiac function and under RV non-apical (non-RVA) pacing are limited.We retrospectively investigated 97 consecutive patients with normal ejection fraction who received pacemaker implantation for atrioventricular block with the ventricular lead placed in a non-RVA position. We defined mechanical asynchrony as discoordinate contraction between opposing regions of the LV wall evaluated by echocardiography. Asynchrony was detected in 9 (9%) patients at baseline and in 38 (39%) under non-RVA pacing (P < 0.001). Asynchrony at baseline was significantly associated with complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB) [odds ratio (OR) = 20.8, P < 0.001]. Asynchrony under non-RVA pacing was significantly associated with left anterior fascicular block (LAFB) (OR = 7.14, P < 0.001) and CLBBB (OR = 13.3, P = 0.002) at baseline. New occurrence of asynchrony was significantly associated with LAFB at baseline (OR = 5.88, P = 0.001). During a median follow-up period of 4.8 years, the incidence of device-detected atrial fibrillation (AF) was more frequent in patients who developed asynchrony than in those who did not (53.3% versus 27.5%, hazard ratio = 2.17, 95% confidence interval = 1.02-4.61, P = 0.03).In patients with normal cardiac function, LAFB at baseline was significantly associated with new occurrence of mechanical asynchrony under non-RVA pacing. Abnormal contraction had a significant influence on the incidence of device-detected AF.

Silent ischemic brain lesions detected by multi-slice computed tomography are associated with subclinical atrial fibrillation in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy

INTRODUCTION

There is insufficient research on the relationship between subclinical atrial fibrillation (SCAF) and silent ischemic brain lesions (IBLs).

AIM

To investigate the relationship between SCAF and silent IBLs in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Of 720 CRT implanted patients in our department between 2012 and 2018, 121 patients who underwent elective cranial multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) during their follow-up were included in our study. Atrial high-rate episodes (AHRE) were detected by the CRT device. Subclinical atrial fibrillation was defined as asymptomatic AHRE longer than 6 min and shorter than 24 h. A cranial MSCT scan was performed using a 128-section scanner with contiguous 2-5 mm axial images. Patients were divided into two groups - with and without silent IBL.

RESULTS

Silent IBLs were detected in 21 (17.4%) of 121 patients with CRT. Ischemic brain lesion presence was found to be associated with age, CHA2DS2-VASc score, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), hypertension and SCAF in univariate analysis (p < 0.05). In multivariate regression analysis, presence of SCAF and LVEF were found to be independent parameters predicting the risk of silent IBLs. According to this analysis, the presence of SCAF and every 1% decrease in LVEF were found to increase the risk of silent IBL by 3.5 times and 14.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Subclinical atrial fibrillation is independently associated with silent IBL presence. Patients with CRT should be closely monitored for SCAF. Patients diagnosed with SCAF should be evaluated for IBL development and treated with the appropriate oral anticoagulant.

Long-term monitoring to detect atrial fibrillation with the indwelling implantable cardiac monitors

An increasing number of detection tools are available and several detection strategies have been described to pursue the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation to prevent ischemic stroke. Monitoring tools include standard electrocardiography, snapshot single-lead recordings with professional or personal devices (e.g. smartphone-based), Holter monitor, external devices with long-term recording capabilities, and cardiac implantable electronic devices, including pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators and insertable cardiac monitors. Insertable cardiac monitors have shown high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of atrial fibrillation, allow up to three years of continuous monitoring, do not require cooperation of the patient, are well tolerated, have a short device-related time delay between detection of atrial fibrillation and notification to the physician, provide information on atrial fibrillation burden and are minimally invasive. On the other hand, insertable cardiac monitors require a considerable use of resources to process the recordings and have a significant initial cost. Studies conducted with insertable cardiac monitors on patients with prior stroke and on patients with risk factors for stroke but no prior cerebrovascular events or atrial fibrillation have consistently shown a measurable incidence of atrial fibrillation at follow-up. However, the effectiveness of oral anticoagulations in reducing the incidence of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation lasting less than 24 h, though reasonable, is currently unproven. The future of atrial fibrillation detection tools and atrial fibrillation detection strategies will be influenced by ongoing studies exploring whether oral anticoagulations reduce the incidence of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation burden lower than 24 h.

Rationale and Design of the Evaluation of Oral Anticoagulation for Reduction of Thrombo-embolism in Chinese Patients with Device-Detected Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation (ART-CAF) Trial: an Open-Label Registry-Based Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

Subclinical atrial fibrillation (AF) was found in a large number of pacemaker patients. It is not certain whether there is a similar risk/benefit ratio for oral anticoagulation in patients with subclinical AF compared to patients with similar risk profiles and clinically diagnosed AF. Given the weakness of clinical evidence for oral anticoagulation in patients with device-detected subclinical AF, specific recommendations in most guidelines for this population are scarce and rarely similar.

METHODS

ART-CAF trial was primarily designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulant agent use in patients with device-detected subclinical AF at the approved dosage to prevent stroke and systemic arterial embolism. It is an open-label, registry-based, prospective, multicenter, cohort study, recruiting patients with subclinical AF first detected by a pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, or insertable cardiac monitor after device implantation for more than 3 months. The primary outcome is a composite of ischemic stroke and systemic arterial embolism. The primary safety outcome is the occurrence of clinically overt major bleeding. Approximately 750 patients will be needed to be enrolled to the two treatment groups in a 1:1 ratio until 66 primary efficacy outcomes are observed. The anticipated follow-up period is approximately 70 months from the enrollment of the first patient.

CONCLUSIONS

ART-CAF evaluates the feasibility of selecting high-risk patients suitable for anticoagulation by AF burden combined with CHA2DS2-VASc score after pacemaker implantation and aims to select patients who could benefit from anticoagulation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx ChiCTR1800016221.