2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Executive summary

Risk factors for the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The rate at which atrial fibrillation (AF) patients experience a return of symptoms after catheter ablation is significant, and there are multiple risk factors involved. This research intends to perform a meta-analysis to explore the risk factors connected to the recurrence of AF in patients following catheter ablation.

METHODS

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, WOS, Embase, SinoMed, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases were explored for studies from January 1, 2000 to August 10, 2021, and research meeting the established inclusion requirements was chosen. Two authors separately gathered details regarding the study structure. The strength of the link between various risk factors and AF returning after CA was evaluated using odds ratios. All statistical evaluations were conducted with RevMan5.3 software.

RESULTS

In total, 44 articles and 62,674 patients were included. The OR for AF recurrence in patients with diabetes was 2.04 compared with the reference group (95% CI 1.51-2.76, p < 0.00001); that of lower left ventricular ejection fraction was 1.38 (95% CI 1.25-1.52, p < 0.00001); that of female was 1.34 (95% CI 1.18-1.52, p < 0.00001); that of increased age was 1.03 (95% CI 1.02-1.04, p < 0.00001); that of persistent AF was 1.72 (95% CI 1.58-1.87, p < 0.00001); that of AF duration over 2 years was 1.17 (95% CI 1.08-1.26, p < 0.00001); that of increased left atrial diameter (LAD) was 1.12 (95% CI 1.08-1.17, p < 0.00001); that of larger left atrial volume index (LAVi) was 1.02 (95% CI 1.01-1.03, p < 0.00001); that of higher hs-CRP was 1.19 (95% CI 1.04-1.36, p = 0.04); that of early recurrence (ER) was 3.22 (95% CI 2.74-3.77, p < 0.00001); and that of long ablation duration was 1.00 (95% CI 0.98-1.02, p = 0.72). Heterogeneity and slight publication bias were observed for each factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence indicates that diabetes, low left ventricular ejection fraction, being female, older age, longer duration of atrial fibrillation, elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels, large left atrial dimension, large left atrial volume index, persistent atrial fibrillation, and exercise rehabilitation are factors that increase the chances of getting atrial fibrillation again after catheter ablation. However, the length of the ablation procedure does not relate to the recurrence of AF.

Prognosis and Management of Recurrent Stenosis After Pulmonary Vein Stenting: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein stenting is effective for severe pulmonary vein stenosis, which is limited by restenosis. The assessment and management of in-stent restenosis (ISR) are inadequate, and follow-up outcomes after reintervention remain unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the prognosis and management of pulmonary vein ISR and determine whether the modified stent-in-stent strategy is superior to balloon angioplasty (BA) in treating ISR.

METHODS

The authors conducted a prospective observational study on patients with severe pulmonary vein stenosis post radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients with 174 severely stenosed veins underwent successful stenting. Forty-three veins among 36 patients experienced ISR (24.7%, 43 of 174). Veins developing ISR had smaller diameter stents (7.8 ± 0.8 mm vs 9.2 ± 0.7 mm; P = 0.008). Restenosis veins were assigned to BA group or stent-in-stent group. Success rate was 95.7% for BA and 90.0% for stent-in-stent. Twelve veins experienced recurrent ISR, including 2 in stent-in-stent group (11.1%, 2 of 18) and 10 in BA group (45.5%, 10 of 22). The risk of recurrent stenosis was significantly lower in veins treated with the stent-in-stent method than with BA (HR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.07-0.64; P = 0.02). Patients in the stent-in-stent group had greater exercise endurance and better World Health Organization cardiac functional class compared with BA group (F = 7.2; P < 0.05; and F = 4.4; P < 0.05, respectively) at 6- and 12-month follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our modified stent-in-stent implantation approach is superior to BA for treating pulmonary vein ISR, by reducing recurrent restenosis rate and improving exercise endurance.

Utility of Loneliness Status to Risk Stratification and Prediction of Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation

INTRODUCTION

Socioeconomic determinants are increasingly important factors in the integrated management of atrial fibrillation (AF). The impact of loneliness status on AF recurrence remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study based on patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation from 2017 to 2022. The Chinese version of the De Jong Gierveld scale (DJGLS) for evaluating loneliness degree was used. Multivariate Cox regression was performed to identify the independent risk factors for recurrent AF. A multivariate model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) when adjusting the known risk covariates in several kinds of subgroups.

RESULTS

Nine hundred fifty-five patients with AF and mean age > 65 years finished long-term follow-up. The AF cluster with severe/extreme loneliness tended to live alone according to DJGLS scores. Multivariate Cox regression showed that loneliness status is an independent risk factor for AF recurrence by using a multivariate model with adjustments of some covariates (moderate loneliness: HR 2.02; 95% CI 1.47-2.77, P < 0.001; severe/extreme loneliness: HR 5.28; 95% CI 3.56-7.84, P < 0.001). Survival analysis demonstrated that patients with AF with a more severe degree of loneliness are more likely to have AF recurrence in the long-term follow-up (log-rank test, P < 0.001). Restricted cubic spline (RCS) showed a mainly non-linear relationship between feeling lonely and AF recurrence (P overall < 0.001, P non-linear = 0.195). Receiver-operator characteristic curve (ROC) and time-dependent ROC curve indicated that the diagnostic value of loneliness status in predicting AF recurrence is stable and acceptable.

CONCLUSION

A more severe degree of loneliness was positively associated with increased risk of AF recurrence. Loneliness status showed an acceptable diagnostic value in discriminating AF recurrence as an independent tripartite variable.

Long-Term Outcome Following Concomitant Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation at University Hospital Basel: A Retrospective Study

Background and Objectives: This study aims to examine the success of concomitant surgical ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation after one, three, and five years. Additionally, important predictors for rhythm outcome and rates of permanent pacemaker implantations were analyzed. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we included patients who were referred to the University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland, between 2011 and 2017. Primary outcome was one-year success of surgical ablation. Secondary outcomes include heart rhythm during entire follow-up, three- and five-years success, and need for additional arrhythmia interventions (incl. pacemaker implantation). Results: A total of 120 patients were analyzed and divided into two groups: pulmonary vein isolation (n = 55) and left atrial (n = 65). The median follow-up time was 4.4 years. Sinus rhythm was present in 66%, 64%, and 67% after one, three, and five years, respectively. When adjusted for preoperative type of atrial fibrillation, left atrial lesion set increased the chance of achieving sinus rhythm within 5 years by factor 6.5. The pacemaker-implantation rate was 22%, with significantly more pacemaker implantations in the left atrial group (9% vs. 32%, p = 0.0043). Conclusions: These real-world data demonstrate the high success rate of concomitant surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation. Our study highlights the importance of preoperative discussion in an interdisciplinary heart team to weigh the effectiveness of surgical ablation against the risk of a pacemaker implantation.

Adjunctive Left Atrial Posterior Wall Isolation in Treating Non-Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

The clinical outcomes of adjunctive posterior wall isolation (PWI) beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) remain unclear. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the role of PWI in non-paroxysmal AF by pooled analysis of most updated randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

A literature search in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify RCTs comparing the outcomes of PVI with and without PWI in non-paroxysmal AF patients. The primary outcomes were recurrence rates of all atrial arrhythmias, AF, and atrial tachycardia/flutter (AT/AFL). The secondary outcomes included total procedure time, ablation time, fluoroscopy time and procedure-related complications. Estimated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs with a total of 1,243 non-paroxysmal AF patients were included in our analysis. There were no significant differences in all atrial arrhythmias recurrence (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.66-1.11, p = 0.24, I2 = 49%) and AF recurrence (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.51-1.08, p = 0.12, I2 = 62%) between stand-alone PVI group and PVI plus PWI group. Adjunctive PWI increased the AT/AFL recurrence rate (RR: 1.62 95% CI: 1.08-2.42, p = 0.02, I2 = 0%). In the subgroup analysis, PWI using cryoballoon ablation was associated with a significantly lower recurrence rate of all atrial arrhythmias (p = 0.01) and AF (p = 0.02) recurrence and similar recurrence rate of AT/AFL (p = 0.15). Additional PWI was associated with an increased AT/AFL recurrence (p = 0.03) in patients with left atrial diameter (LAD) <44 mm. Adjunctive PWI needed longer ablation time, fluoroscopy time, and total procedure time. The incidence of procedural adverse events was low and similar between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Adjunctive PWI beyond PVI did not improve the freedom from all atrial arrhythmias and AF with an increased recurrence rate of AT/AFL in non-paroxysmal AF patients. The ablation energy and LAD might affect the clinical outcome of PWI. However, larger more RCTs were needed to verify our findings.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

Contact-force local impedance algorithm to guide effective pulmonary vein isolation in AF patients: 1-year outcome from an international multicenter clinical setting

BACKGROUND

The combination of highly localized impedance (LI) and contact force (CF) may improve tissue characterization and lesion prediction during radiofrequency (RF) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

OBJECTIVE

We report the outcomes of our acute and long-term clinical evaluation of CF-LI-guided PVI in consecutive AF ablation cases from an international multicenter clinical setting.

METHODS

Three hundred twenty-four consecutive patients from 20 European centers undergoing RF catheter ablation with the Stablepoint™ catheter were enrolled in the CHARISMA registry. Of these, 275 had a minimum follow-up of 1 year and were included in the primary analysis.

RESULTS

The mean procedure duration was 115 ± 47 min, and the mean fluoroscopy time was 9.9 ± 6 min. At the end of the procedures, all PVs had been successfully isolated in all study patients. Minor complications were reported in 12 patients (4.4%). At 1 year, 36 (13.1%) patients had had an AF recurrence, and freedom from antiarrhythmic drugs and AF recurrence was achieved in 228 (82.9%) patients. The recurrence rate was higher in patients with persistent AF (21/116, 18.1%) than in those with paroxysmal AF (15/159, 9.4%; p = 0.0459). On multivariate logistic analysis adjusted for baseline confounders, only time > 6 months from first diagnosis of AF to ablation (HR = 2.93, 95%CI 1.03 to 8.36, p = 0.0459) was independently associated with recurrences.

CONCLUSION

An ablation strategy for PVI guided by CF-LI technology proved safe and effective and resulted in a low recurrence rate of AF over 1-year follow-up, irrespective of the underlying AF type.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Catheter Ablation of Arrhythmias with a High-Density Mapping System in Real-World Practice. (CHARISMA). URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ Identifier: NCT03793998.

Evaluating the Prognostic Significance of Cystatin C Level Variations Pre- and Post-Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in the Recurrence of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the correlation between persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence and alterations in cystatin C levels pre- and post-radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA).

METHODS

This study encompassed 114 patients diagnosed with persistent AF. Their serum cystatin C levels were assessed both prior to and 3 months after undergoing an RFCA procedure. The variance in cystatin C levels before and after RFCA is represented as ΔCystatin C. Subsequently, we compared these values between two groups: patients who did not experience a recurrence of AF (n = 79) and those who did experience a recurrence (n = 35).

RESULTS

A significant reduction in cystatin C levels post-RFCA in both groups, with a more pronounced decrease observed in the non-recurrence group. Moreover, the recurrence group exhibited larger left atrial diameter and volume before RFCA compared to the non-recurrence group. Cox regression analysis indicated that smaller reductions in serum cystatin C levels and greater left atrial volumes before RFCA were associated with an increased risk of recurrence, after adjusting for covariates. The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated an elevated probability of clinical recurrence of AF post-RFCA in patients with a cystatin C decline < 0.08 mg/L (AUC 0.64). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that patients with a cystatin C decline > 0.08 mg/L exhibited significantly higher rates of remaining free from recurrence following RFCA across a 24-month follow-up period (Log-rank test p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Alterations in ΔCystatin C levels pre and post-RFCA in the initial phase could independently predict the recurrence of AF.

Delphi consensus on oral anticoagulation management in special clinical situations in the cardiology setting

Background: Management of oral anticoagulation (OAC) can be challenging, such as in complex cases of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).Materials & methods: A Delphi study comprising two rounds was used for gathering expert opinion through an online questionnaire (83 items grouped in 8 dimensions) on OAC management in specific clinical settings.Results: Consensus was reached for 79 items (95%) in round 1. Experts recommended direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for pericardioversion, uninterrupted OAC for catheter ablation, and dual therapy with a DOAC and clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention. They also recommended restarting OAC with a DOAC after an intracranial haemorrhage.Conclusion: The expert-based recommendations obtained may contribute to standardizing and guiding the management of OAC in complex clinical situations in cardiology.

Surveillance of esophageal injury after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation

AIMS

Atrial-esophageal fistula following ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a major concern. There is no standardized approach to minimize the risk and morbidity of this serious complication. The objective of this study was to present the 7-year experience of systematic endoscopic surveillance of esophageal injury after AF catheter ablation.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center registry of systematic endoscopic evaluations after consecutive AF ablation procedures performed from 2016 to 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 677 AF ablation procedures with controlled esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) were analyzed during that period. Most patients were male (71%) with paroxysmal AF (71%). Radiofrequency with electroanatomical mapping was the main ablation approach for 633 patients (93.5%). Esophageal temperature monitoring was performed using a single sensor in 220 patients (34.3%) and a multisensor probe in 296 patients (46%). Most of the patients presented no esophageal lesions (75,7%). Severe lesions (Kansas-city-classification KCC 2B) were found in 46 (6.8%) of them, requiring a new EGD in 7 days. KCC2B lesions were persistent in 3 patients, 2 of whom had ulcers during healing and 1 patient with a deep ulcer of 10 mm who was admitted to the hospital and underwent fasting and parenteral nutrition. The ulcer healed in the second week after the procedure. Both esophageal temperature monitoring strategies were equivalent at preventing thermal lesions. Additionally, a greater left atrium (LA) was associated with a lower incidence of esophageal ulcer (P = 0.028). Most of the lesions spontaneously healed.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of esophageal injury after ablation was 24.3%. Most (72%) were mild lesions that required no therapeutic intervention. A larger left atrium (LA) was correlated with a lower incidence of thermal lesions. Early endoscopy can help diagnose severe esophageal lesions and may provide additional information for the surveillance of esophageal injury after AF ablation.

Safety, efficacy, and quality of life outcomes of pulsed field ablation in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation: results from the PULSED AF trial

BACKGROUND

Pulsed field ablation (PFA), a novel treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), has yet to be evaluated in a Japanese cohort.

METHODS

In this sub-analysis of the PULSED AF trial, 12-month outcomes of paroxysmal AF (PAF) and persistent AF (PsAF) patients treated with PFA in four Japan centers were assessed. After a 90-day blanking period, primary efficacy was determined via freedom from a composite endpoint of acute procedural failure, arrhythmia recurrence, or antiarrhythmic drug escalation over 1 year. Patient improvement was evaluated via two quality of life (QoL) surveys (AFEQT and EQ-5D) at baseline and 12 months.

RESULTS

The analysis included 32 patients, 16 PAF and 16 PsAF, with PAF patients averaging 61.1 ± 10.6 years and PsAF patients averaging 62.8 ± 11.5 years of age. Females made up 31% of PAF and 25% of PsAF cohorts. Acute pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 100% of both cohorts. The primary efficacy success rate at 12 months was 75.0% for PAF and 56.3% for PsAF patients. No primary safety events occurred. The mean AFEQT score significantly increased for both PAF (25.9 points, p < 0.0001) and PsAF (13.2 points, p = 0.0002) patients, while the EQ-5D-5L score improved significantly for PAF (0.12 points, p = 0.048) patients but not for PsAF (0.04 points, p = 0.08) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar to outcomes in the global cohort, ablation with the PulseSelect™ PFA catheter was efficient, effective, and safe in a Japanese population, resulting in improved QoL for PAF and PsAF patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04198701.

Influence of time to ablation on outcomes among patients with atrial fibrillation with pre-existing heart failure

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are cardiac disorders that often coexist.

Objective

This study aimed to investigate how time to ablation could influence the outcomes of AF patients with pre-existing HF.

Methods

Using the 2013 to 2022 Optum Clinformatics database, AF patients with pre-existing HF were classified into 2 groups: early ablation (ablation within 6 months of AF diagnosis) and late ablation (ablation in the 6- to 24-month period after AF diagnosis). Outcomes including AF-related hospitalization, electrical cardioversion, repeat ablation, antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) use, and AF recurrence (a composite outcome of the aforementioned events) were assessed in the postblanking 24-month period. Inverse probability of treatment weighted Poisson regression estimated risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome.

Results

Overall, 601 patients were identified (early ablation: 347; late ablation: 254). In 24 months, the weighted data suggested that patients in the early ablation cohort had significantly lower rate of composite outcome (49.32% vs 61.39%, P = .01), repeat ablation (8.56% vs 17.35%, P < .01), and AAD use (35.95% vs 47.92%, P = .01). Early ablation was associated with a 20%, 51%, and 25% lower risk of composite outcome (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.94), repeat ablation (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.31-0.79), and AAD use (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.92), respectively. No significant difference in AF-related hospitalization and electrical cardioversion were observed.

Conclusion

AF patients with pre-existing HF undergoing ablation within 6 months of AF diagnosis have a lower risk of AF recurrence than those undergoing late ablation, which was evidenced by a lower rate of repeat ablation and AAD use.

Colchicine for the treatment of the spectrum of cardiovascular diseases: current evidence and ongoing perspectives

Colchicine is one of the oldest drugs in medicine. Traditionally used to treat and prevent gouty attacks, it has been introduced into cardiovascular medicine for the treatment and prevention of pericarditis, starting from the positive experience in the treatment and prevention of polyserositis in familial mediterranean fever. Colchicine is a lipophilic drug that enters the cells and is eliminated by glycoprotein P. As granulocytes are lacking in this protein, colchicine is able to concentrate in these cells, exerting a substantial anti-inflammatory action, even with low oral doses. As these cells may trigger acute cardiovascular events, colchicine has been shown to be efficacious and safe to prevent acute coronary syndromes and ischemic stroke with an efficacy comparable to more established treatments, such as antiplatelet agents and statins. On this basis, colchicine seems a promising, efficacious, well tolerated, and cheap option for the prevention of several cardiovascular events, and it may become an additional pillar in the pharmacologic treatment of cardiovascular diseases.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

Efficacy and safety of a novel temperature-controlled catheter for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation

BACKGROUND

Maintaining an adequate temperature at the target site is essential for effective ablation. We hypothesized that a tissue temperature-controlled (T-Con) catheter for cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation could improve the procedural ablation parameters.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the T-Con (DiamondTemp™) catheter for CTI ablation compared with non-irrigation (Non-Irri) and irrigation (Irri) catheters.

METHODS

We analyzed 150 patients who underwent prophylactic CTI ablation combined with pulmonary vein isolation. The Non-Irri, Irri, and T-Con catheter groups comprised 50 patients each, and the ablation procedural parameters and complications were compared between these groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in clinical background characteristics among the three groups. The Kruskal-Wallis and post hoc tests demonstrated that the T-Con group showed the lowest total radiofrequency energy delivery time among the three groups (median [25 and 75 percentiles]: 340 [209, 357], 147 [100, 199], and 83 [61, 109] s, respectively in the Non-Irri, Irri, and T-Con groups; T-Con versus Non-Irri, p < .01; T-Con versus Irri, p < .01). The total procedural time and acute reconnection rate in the T-Con group (264 s and 4%, respectively) were lower than those in the Non-Irri group (438 s and 24%) but were similar to those in the Irri group (268 s and 6%). No significant complications were observed in any group.

CONCLUSIONS

The T-Con catheter achieved a short energy delivery time and a low acute reconnection rate, indicating its potential as an alternative catheter for CTI ablation.

Very high-power and short-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation in a Latin American low-volume private center

BACKGROUND

Center volume and operator experience/training are important factors impacting outcomes in AFib CA. Setting for RF delivery (power, duration, and contact force) associated with better outcomes remains to be determined.

METHODS

This is an observational, longitudinal, and retrospective study. All consecutive procedures performed between December 12, 2013, and March 9, 2023, in a low-volume private center in Latin America were analyzed. Procedure characteristics and outcomes were compared between STD and vHPSD.

RESULTS

Two hundred ten procedures were performed on 194 patients. Median annual number of procedures was 19 (7-29). Median age was 62 (52-68), and majority were male (71%). Median procedure duration was 155 (125-195) min, mean fluoroscopy time 32.8 ± 15 min and mean fluoroscopy dose 373.5 ± 208.9 mGray. Median follow-up was 27 months, significantly longer in STD compared with vHPSD group (43 [31-68] vs. 13 [8-19], respectively; P ≤ 0.001). The recurrence rate was 33.2% and major complications 8.6%. Compared with STD, vHPSD resulted in a significantly shorter procedure duration (125 vs. 180 min, P ≤ 0.001), shorter fluoroscopy time (22.7 ± 9.5 vs. 39.2 ± 14.3 min, P ≤ 0.001), and lower fluoroscopy dose (283.8 ± 161.1 vs. 438.3 ± 216.1 mGray, P ≤ 0.001). No long-term recurrence difference was observed when the follow-up periods were comparable. No difference in complication rate was observed (8.5% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.988).

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes in AFib CA in a Latin American low-volume private center can be considered acceptable, with efficacy and safety similar to those reported in the literature. Compared with STD ablation, vHPSD showed higher efficiency with similar efficacy and safety.

In-Hospital Pulmonary Arterial Embolism after Catheter Ablation of Over 45,000 Cardiac Arrhythmias: Individualized Case Analysis of Multicentric Data

OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND

 Data on incidence of in-hospital pulmonary embolisms (PE) after catheter ablation (CA) are scarce. To gain further insights, we sought to provide new findings through case-based analyses of administrative data.

METHODS

 Incidences of PE after CA of supraventricular tachycardias (SVT), atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFlu), and ventricular tachycardias (VT) in three German tertiary centers between 2005 and 2020 were determined and coded by the G-DRG (German Diagnosis Related Groups System) and OPS (German Operation and Procedure Classification) systems. An administrative search was performed with a consecutive case-based analysis.

RESULTS

 Overall, 47,344 ablations were analyzed (10,037 SVT; 28,048 AF; 6,252 AFlu; 3,007 VT). PE occurred in 14 (0.03%) predominantly female (n = 9; 64.3%) patients with a mean age of 55.3 ± 16.9 years, body mass index 26.2 ± 5.1 kg/m2, and left ventricular ejection fraction of 56 ± 13.6%. PE incidences were 0.05% (n = 5) for SVT, 0.02% (n = 5) for AF, and 0.13% (n = 4) for VT ablations. No patient suffered PE after AFlu ablation. Five patients (35.7%) with PE after CA had no prior indication for oral anticoagulation (OAC). Preprocedural international normalized ratio in PE patients was 1.2 ± 0.5. Most patients with PE following CA presented with symptoms the day after the procedure (n = 9) after intraprocedural heparin application of 12,943.2 ± 5,415.5 IU. PE treatment included anticoagulation with either phenprocoumon (n = 5) or non-vitamin K-dependent OAC (n = 9). Two patients with PE died after VT/AF ablation, respectively. The remaining patients were discharged without sequels.

CONCLUSION

 Over a 15-year period, incidence of PE after ablation is low, particularly low in patients with ablation for AF/AFlu. This is most likely due to stricter anticoagulation management in these patients compared with those receiving SVT/VT ablation procedures and could argue for continuation of OAC prior to ablation. Optimizing periprocedural anticoagulation management should be subject of further prospective trials.

Meta-analysis of Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Thermal Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in AF: A Broad Overview Focusing on Efficacy, Safety and Outcomes

The recently established non-thermal, single-shot pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a potential tool for achieving rapid pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) to cause cell death by electroporation, yet data regarding this state-of-the-art technology remain sparse. In this meta-analysis, we included 3,857 patients from 20 studies. There was no significant difference in AF recurrence between the PFA and control groups. Subgroup analysis showed that additional ablation beyond PVI has a similar rate of AF recurrence to PVI alone (10% versus 13%, respectively). PVI durability was achieved in 83% (mean), 95% CI [65-99%] of the PFA group and in 79% (mean), 95% CI [60-98%] of the control group, with no significant difference in the rate of PVI durability between the two groups. The PFA group had considerably reduced procedure duration, but not fluoroscopy time. No statistically significant differences in periprocedural complications were observed. PFA is associated with shorter procedural time than thermal ablation. Cardiac complications were uncommon and mainly reversible in both the PFA and control groups.

Association between personality type and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is known to be associated with a negative emotional state. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are important tools for evaluating the endpoints of AF management. This study aims to examine the correlation between personality types and PROs in patients with AF.

METHODS

All included subjects were newly diagnosed with AF fewer than one month, and their personality types were assessed using the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ). Quality of life (QoL) was measured using the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT) questionnaire. Anxiety and depression were assessed using the General Anxiety Scale (GAD-7) and the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), respectively. We constructed stepwise linear regression analyses for factors related to the QoL and emotional state in patients with AF.

RESULTS

A total of 531 AF patients completed the survey and were categorized into four groups based on their personality types. Of these patients (mean age: 67.12 ± 10.93 years, 50.28% male), 357 (67.23%) had paroxysmal AF, and 16.95% (n = 90) had a sanguine personality. Compared to patients with other personality types, those with a sanguine personality had the highest average AFEQT scores (P < 0.001) and the lowest scores of GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scales (P < 0.05). Furthermore, multiple linear regression analyses suggested that sanguine personality was also independently associated with better QoL and emotional states (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

There is a significant association between the personality types and PROs in AF patients.

Voltage-guided pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Bipolar voltage amplitude is capable of helping determine the ideal lesion size index (LSI) setting during radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF).

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine whether voltage-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is noninferior to conventional LSI-guided PVI in patients with nonvalvular AF.

METHODS

This was a multicenter randomized trial conducted during a period of 12 months. The primary efficacy end points of the study were AF recurrence, atrial flutter, and atrial tachycardia, and the noninferiority margin was set at a hazard ratio of 1.4. The primary safety end point was a composite of procedure-related complications.

RESULTS

A total of 370 patients underwent randomization; 189 and 181 were assigned to the voltage (underwent voltage-guided PVI) and control (underwent conventional LSI-guided PVI) groups, respectively. The primary efficacy end point occurred in 22 patients (12.0%) in the voltage group and 23 patients (12.9%) in the control group (1-year Kaplan-Meier event-free rate estimates, 88.0% and 87.1%, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.25). The primary safety end points were 4.8% in the voltage group and 6.6% in the control group (P = .2791). PVI time was significantly shorter in the voltage group (35.7 ± 14.5 minutes vs 39.7 ± 14.7 minutes; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Voltage-guided PVI was noninferior to conventional LSI-guided PVI with respect to efficacy in the treatment of patients with AF, and its use significantly reduced procedure time. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000042325.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in elderly and very elderly patients: safety, outcomes, and quality of life

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) risk increases with age. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in the older population.

METHODS

All patients undergoing AF ablation (2013-2021) at our institution were enrolled in a prospectively maintained registry. The primary endpoint was AF recurrence. Patients were divided into 3 groups: non-elderly (< 65 years), elderly (65-75 years), and very elderly (> 75 years). Patient surveys at baseline and during follow-up were used to calculate quality of life (QoL) metrics: the AF severity score as well as the AF burden.

RESULTS

A total of 7020 patients were included (42% non-elderly, 42% elderly, and 16% very elderly). Periprocedural major complications were low (< 1.5%) and similar in all groups besides pericardial effusion which was more frequent with older age and similar between the elderly and very elderly. At 3 years, AF recurrence for persistent AF (PersAF) was highest in the very elderly group (48%), followed by the elderly group (42%), and was the lowest in the non-elderly group (36%). In paroxysmal AF (PAF), there was no difference in AF recurrence between the elderly and non-elderly, while the very elderly remained associated with a significantly increased risk. Multivariable Cox analysis confirmed these findings (PersAF; elderly: HR = 1.23, P = 0.003; very elderly: HR = 1.44, P < 0.001) (PAF; elderly: HR = 1.04, P = 0.62; very elderly: HR = 1.30, P = 0.01). Catheter ablation resulted in a significant improvement in quality of life, irrespective of age group.

CONCLUSION

Catheter ablation in elderly and very elderly patients is safe, efficacious, and associated with QoL benefits. Overall, major complications were minimal and did not differ significantly between age groups, with the exception of pericardial effusions which were higher in the elderly and very elderly compared to non-elderly adults. Very elderly patients had a higher rate of AF recurrence when compared with elderly or non-elderly patients. Nevertheless, ablation resulted in a remarkable improvement in QoL and a reduction of AF burden and AF symptoms with a similar magnitude, irrespective of age.

Efficacy of four different left atrial appendage closure techniques during cardiac surgery-A transesophageal echocardiography follow-up study

Objective

Closure of the left atrial appendage (LAA) is a routine part of atrial fibrillation ablation surgery and significantly reduces stroke rates. Different LAA-closure techniques are used in cardiac surgery with variable results reported. We therefore evaluated the efficacy of 4 different LAA-closure techniques in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Methods

In total, 149 patients who underwent concomitant LAA closure during cardiac surgery between 2015 and 2019 were included in this retrospective transesophageal echocardiography study. Four different LAA-closure techniques were evaluated: LAA clipping (n = 62), suture ligation (n = 28), stapler resection (n = 30), and surgical LAA excision (n = 29). Successful LAA closure was defined as absence of LAA perfusion and absence of a stump greater than 10 mm.

Results

The mean patients age was 68.7 ± 9.4 years; 61.7% were male. No complications related to LAA closure were observed. Mean follow-up was 36.5 ± 8 months. Transesophageal echocardiography follow-up showed the following LAA closure success rates: LAA clip 98.4%, surgical excision 93.1%, stapler resection 76.6%, and suture ligation 39.2%. Suture ligation resulted in a high rate of recanalization (50%) and residual stumps (10.8%), whereas stapler resection resulted in a high rate of residual stumps (23.4%). Overall, 4 patients (2.7%) had a stroke during follow-up. In detail, 2 of 27 (7.4%) patients with unsuccessful LAA closure had a stroke, whereas 2 of the 122 (1.6%) patients with successful LAA closure had a stroke.

Conclusions

In our study, LAA clipping and surgical LAA excision proved to be both successful LAA-closure methods. External LAA ligation and stapler resection resulted in low rates of successful LAA closure and should be avoided.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

Adjunctive left atrial posterior wall isolation for atrial fibrillation: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Posterior left atrial wall isolation (PWI) plus traditional pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has been proposed as a promising intervention to decrease atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of adding PWI to the traditional PVI in patients with AF.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved by systematically searching PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and Cochrane through June 14, 2023. We used Stata version 17 to pool dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) and continuous data using mean difference (MD), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023446227).

RESULTS

We included 11 RCTs with a total number of 1534 patients. Combined ablation with PWI + PVI was not associated with any significant difference over PVI only regarding the recurrence of clinical AF (RR: 0.86 with 95% CI [0.70-1.06]), all atrial arrhythmia (RR: 0.93 with 95% CI [0.82-1.07]), nonatrial fibrillation arrhythmia (RR: 1.22 with 95% CI [0.97-1.53]), early AF (RR: 0.89 with 95% CI [0.62-1.27]), and antiarrhythmic drugs at discharge (RR: 0.83 with 95% CI [0.67-1.04]). However, it was associated with increased total ablation duration (minutes) (MD: 12.58 with 95% CI [6.80-18.37]) and total procedure duration (minutes) (MD: 16.77 with 95% CI [9.63-23.91]), without any significant difference regarding adverse events (RR: 1.05 with 95% CI [0.63-1.74]).

CONCLUSION

While the pooled data from PWI + PVI using point-by-point radiofrequency did not suggest a benefit in the recurrence of various atrial arrhythmias compared to PVI alone, PWI+PVI using direct posterior wall ablation, especially with cryoballoon, demonstrated a significant reduction in recurrence of AF/atrial arrhythmias. Also, PWI + PVI significantly increased the ablation and total procedure durations.

Efficacy and safety of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Catheter ablation (CA) effectively treats atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), improving clinical outcomes. However, its benefits for AF patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are still unclear.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus for studies investigating outcomes of CA in AF patients with HFpEF. Efficacy indicators included freedom from AF and antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) free AF elimination. Safety indicators comprised total complications, HF admission, all-cause admission, and all-cause mortality. Sixteen studies with 20,796 patients included in our research.

Results

The comprehensive analysis demonstrated that, when comparing CA with medical therapy in HFpEF, no significant differences were observed in terms of HF admissions, all-cause admissions, and all-cause mortality [(OR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.12-1.51, P = 0.19), (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.48-1.27, P = 0.31), and (OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.83-1.44, P = 0.51)], while freedom from AF was significantly higher in CA (OR: 5.88; 95% CI: 2.99-11.54, P < 0.00001). Compared with HFrEF, CA in HFpEF showed similar rates of freedom from AF, AAD-free AF elimination, total complications, and all-cause admission were similar [(OR:0.91; 95% CI: 0.71,1.17, P =0.47), (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.50-1.86, P = 0.93), (OR: 1.27; 95% CI: 0.47-3.41, P = 0.64), (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.72, 1.73; P = 0.63)]. However, CA in HFpEF was associated with lower rates of HF admission and all-cause mortality [(OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.60; P = 0.0002), (OR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.85; P = 0.02)]. Compared with patients without HF, CA in HFpEF patients exhibited lower rates of AAD-free AF elimination (OR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.30, 0.75; P = 0.001). However, their rates of freedom from AF and total complications were similar [(OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.48, 1.02; P = 0.06), (OR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.19, 1.90; P = 0.38)].

Conclusion

This meta-analysis conducted provided a comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of CA in patients with AF and HFpEF. The results suggest that CA may represent a valuable treatment strategy for patients with AF and HFpEF.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails, identifier (CRD42024514169).

Real world risk of discontinuing oral anticoagulation after successful catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Background

Many patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) discontinued oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy after successful catheter ablation. We aimed to determine the real-world risks and consequences of discontinuing OAC use after catheter ablation for AF.

Methods

Patients who underwent successful catheter ablation for AF from January 2004 to December 2020 were divided into continued long-term OAC (On-OAC, n = 1062) and discontinued (Off-OAC, n = 1055) groups. The long-term outcomes including thromboembolic events, major bleeding, all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), were compared between the two groups.

Results

The CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.44 ± 1.12. After a mean follow-up of 37.09 months, thromboembolism risk was higher and major bleeding risk was lower in the Off-OAC than in the On-OAC group (Both log-rank P < 0.001). CHA2DS2-VASc score-stratified subgroup analysis showed similar cumulative event rates between the two groups in men and women with scores of 2 and 3 (intermediate risk for stroke), respectively, (P > 0.05), except for a higher major bleeding rate in the On-OAC group (P = 0.002). Patients at high risk for stroke (men and women with scores ≥3 and ≥ 4) had better non-thromboembolic and non-MACE results (Both log-rank P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Men with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2 and women with a score of 3 had a relatively low incidence of stroke events after successful catheter ablation for AF and may be safe for anticoagulation cessation. Greater benefits from long-term OAC were observed in men with CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥3 and women with score ≥4.

Body Fat Distribution and Left Atrial Reverse Remodeling After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Background

Emerging evidence suggests a pathophysiological link between obesity and atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the contribution of body fat distribution to left atrial (LA) remodeling and its reversibility remain unclear in nonobese AF patients.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of body fat distribution with LA size and reverse remodeling (LARR).

Methods

In total, 116 nonobese patients with AF (88 men, age 63 ± 11 years) who underwent first catheter ablation (CA) were included. Body fat distribution was assessed with bioelectrical impedance, and body fat percentage (BF%) and central fat percentage (CF%) were calculated. Patients were categorized by body size metrics (body mass index [BMI] and waist-to-hip [W/H] ratio) and fat parameters (BF% and CF%). Echocardiography was performed before and 6 months after CA. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between the 4 metrics (ie, BMI, W/H ratio, BF%, and CF%) and a lack of LARR (<15% reduction or increase in the LA volume index).

Results

Body size metrics and adiposity measures were not independently associated with baseline LA size. Six months after CA, the higher W/H ratio and CF% groups exhibited persistent LA enlargement compared to their counterparts (both P < 0.01). In the multivariable analysis, W/H ratio and CF% were associated with a lack of LARR (adjusted ORs of 3.86 and 2.81 per 0.10 and 10% increase, respectively, both P < 0.01). The combined assessment of CF% with W/H ratio provided complementary risk stratification for persistent LA enlargement.

Conclusions

Central adiposity was associated with a lack of LARR after CA, highlighting the importance of assessing body fat distribution even in nonobese patients.

Left atrial low-voltage areas, but not volume, predict the recurrence of atrial fibrillation in repeat ablation procedures

INTRODUCTION

Left atrial (LA) low voltage areas (LVA) are a controversial target in atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. However, LVA and LA volume are good predictors of arrhythmia recurrence in ablation-naïve patients. Their predictive value in progressively diseased pre-ablated atria is uncertain.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial tachycardia (AT), who were scheduled for repeat LA ablation, were enrolled in the prospective Bernau ablation registry between 2016 and 2020. All patients received a complete LA ultrahigh-density map before ablation. Maps were analyzed for LA size, LVA percentage and distribution. The predictive value of demographic, anatomic, and mapping variables on AF recurrence was analyzed.

RESULTS

160 patients (50.6% male, 1.3 pre-ablations, 60% persistent AF) with complete LA voltage maps were included. Mean follow-up time was 16 ± 11 months. Mean recorded electrograms (EGMs) per map were 9754 ± 5808, mean LA volume was 176.1 ± 35.9 ml and mean rate of LVAs <0.5 mV was 30.6% ± 23.1%. During follow-up recurrence rate of AF or AT >30 s was 55.6%. Patients with recurrence had a significant higher percentage of LVAs (40.0% vs. 18.8%, p < .001) but no relevant difference in LA volume (172 vs. 178 mL, p = .299). ROC curves revealed LVA as a good predictor for recurrence (AUC = 0.79, p < .001) and a cut-off of 22% LVAs with highest sensitivity (73.0%) and specificity (71.8%). Based on this cut off, event free survival was significantly higher in the Low LVA group (p < .01).

CONCLUSION

Total LVA percentage has a good predictive power on arrhythmia recurrence in a cohort of advanced scarred left atria in repeat procedures independent of the applied ablation strategy. Left atrial volume seems to have minor impact on the rhythm outcome in our study cohort.

Prevention of esophageal lesions during atrial fibrillation catheter ablation using esophageal temperature monitoring: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The use of esophageal temperature monitoring (ETM) for the prevention of esophageal injury during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is often advocated. However, evidence supporting its use is scarce and controversial. We therefore aimed to review the evidence assessing the efficacy of ETM for the prevention of esophageal injury.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review of the available literature from inception to December 31, 2022. All studies comparing the use of ETM, versus no ETM, during radiofrequency (RF) AF ablation and which reported the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDELs) were included.

RESULTS

Eleven studies with a total of 1112 patients undergoing RF AF ablation were identified. Of those patients, 627 were assigned to ETM (56%). The overall incidence of EDELs was 9.8%. The use of ETM during AF ablation was associated with a non significant increase in the incidence of EDELs (12.3% with ETM, vs. 6.6 % without ETM, odds ratio, 1.44, 95%CI, 0.49, 4.22, p = .51, I2 = 72%). The use of ETM was associated with a significant increase in the energy delivered specifically on the posterior wall compared to patients without ETM (mean power difference: 5.13 Watts, 95% CI, 1.52, 8.74, p = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ETM does not reduce the incidence of EDELs during RF AF ablation. The higher energy delivered on the posterior wall is likely attributable to a false sense of safety that may explain the lack of benefit of ETM. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to provide conclusive results.

SEA 2024 Standards for Global Control of Vascular Risk

One of the objectives of the Spanish Society of Arteriosclerosis is to contribute to the knowledge, prevention and treatment of vascular diseases, which are the leading cause of death in Spain and entail a high degree of disability and health expenditure. Atherosclerosis is a multifactorial disease and its prevention requires a global approach that takes into account the associated risk factors. This document summarises the current evidence and includes recommendations for patients with established vascular disease or at high vascular risk: it reviews the symptoms and signs to evaluate, the laboratory and imaging procedures to request routinely or in special situations, and includes the estimation of vascular risk, diagnostic criteria for entities that are vascular risk factors, and general and specific recommendations for their treatment. Finally, it presents aspects that are not usually referenced in the literature, such as the organisation of a vascular risk consultation.

Quality indicators in atrial fibrillation ablation (RIQAFA). A national registry from the Portuguese Association of Arrhythmology, Pacing and Electrophysiology (APAPE)

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia, with significant burden for patients. Catheter ablation is safe and superior for symptom improvement. The purpose of this work was to assess how clinical practice compares with current scientific evidence and quality indicators for AF ablation.

METHODS

The Portuguese Association of Arrhythmology, Pacing and Electrophysiology conducted a prospective registry among Portuguese centers to assess clinical practice regarding management of patients referred for ablation and the methodology used in the procedures and related outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 337 patients were referred for ablation, 102 (37.91%) female, age 65 (56-70.8) years. The median CHADS2-VaSC2 thromboembolic risk score was 2 (1-3), and 308 (92.49%) were on anticoagulants. AF was mainly paroxysmal (224, 66.97%) and symptomatic (mEHRA score 3; 2-3). Before ablation most patients (273, 81.49%) underwent cardiac computed tomography and only 24 (7.36%) procedures were performed with uninterrupted anticoagulation. For ablation, Carto® (194; 59.15%) and Ensite® (55; 16.77%) were mainly used, and the preferential strategy was pulmonary vein isolation (316; 94.61%). Acute complications occurred in five (1.49%) patients, while most had symptom improvement at one month (200; 86.21%), sustained at one year. There were 40 (12.6%) relapses within 30 days and 19 (26.39%) at one year.

CONCLUSIONS

In a population of patients with AF referred for ablation in Portuguese centers, patient management is provided according to the best scientific evidence and there is a high standard of practice with respect to the quality of AF ablation practice.

Analyses of lncRNA and mRNA profiles in recurrent atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia worldwide. Catheter ablation has become a crucial treatment for AF. However, there is a possibility of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation. Our study sought to elucidate the role of lncRNA‒mRNA regulatory networks in late AF recurrence after catheter ablation.

METHODS

We conducted RNA sequencing to profile the transcriptomes of 5 samples from the presence of recurrence after AF ablation (P-RAF) and 5 samples from the absence of recurrence after AF ablation (A-RAF). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and long noncoding RNAs (DE-lncRNAs) were analyzed using the DESeq2 R package. The functional correlations of the DEGs were assessed through Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses. A protein‒protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed using STRING and Cytoscape. We also established a lncRNA‒mRNA regulatory network between DE-lncRNAs and DEGs using BEDTools v2.1.2 software and the Pearson correlation coefficient method. To validate the high-throughput sequencing results of the hub genes, we conducted quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‒PCR) experiments.

RESULTS

A total of 28,528 mRNAs and 42,333 lncRNAs were detected. A total of 96 DEGs and 203 DE-lncRNAs were identified between the two groups. GO analysis revealed that the DEGs were enriched in the biological processes (BPs) of "regulation of immune response" and "regulation of immune system process", the cellular components (CCs) of "extracellular matrix" and "cell‒cell junction", and the molecular functions (MFs) of "signaling adaptor activity" and "protein-macromolecule adaptor activity". According to the KEGG analysis, the DEGs were associated with the "PI3K-Akt signaling pathway" and "MAPK signaling pathway." Nine hub genes (MMP9, IGF2, FGFR1, HSPG2, GZMB, PEG10, GNLY, COL6A1, and KCNE3) were identified through the PPI network. lncRNA-TMEM51-AS1-201 was identified as a core regulator in the lncRNA‒mRNA regulatory network, suggesting its potential impact on the recurrence of AF after catheter ablation through the regulation of COL6A1, FGFR1, HSPG2, and IGF2.

CONCLUSIONS

The recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation may be associated with immune responses and fibrosis, with the extracellular matrix playing a crucial role. TMEM51-AS1-201 has been identified as a potential key target for AF recurrence after catheter ablation.

Impact of diabetes mellitus and poor glycemic control on the prevalence of left atrial low-voltage areas and rhythm outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation ablation

INTRODUCTION

Left atrial low-voltage areas (LVAs) are known to be correlated with atrial scarring and atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after ablation. However, the association between LVAs and glycemic status before ablation has not been fully clarified. The purpose of this study was to investigate associations among the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM), glycemic control, and the prevalence of LVAs in patients with AF ablation.

METHODS

In total, 912 (age, 68 ± 10 years; female, 299 [33%]; persistent AF, 513 [56%]) consecutive patients who underwent initial AF ablation were included. A preprocedure glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥7% was set as the cutoff for poor glycemic control in patients with DM. LVAs were defined as areas with a bipolar voltage of <0.5 mV covering ≥5 cm2 of left atrium.

RESULTS

LVAs existed in 208 (23%) patients, and 168 (18%) patients had DM. LVAs were found more frequently in patients with DM and poor glycemic control. On multivariate analysis, DM with HbA1c ≥7% was an independent predictor of LVAs (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval: 1.6-6.7; p = .001). In patients with LVAs, freedom from AF recurrence during the 24-month study period was significantly lower in patients who had DM with HbA1c ≥7% than in those without DM (37.9% vs. 54.7%, p = .02).

CONCLUSION

In patients with AF ablation, LVAs were found more frequently in patients with DM and poor glycemic control. DM with HbA1c ≥7% was an independent predictor of LVAs.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Review of Current Literature and Views

Atrial fibrillation is a common supraventricular tachyarrhythmia with uncoordinated atrial activation and ineffective atrial contraction. This leads to an increased risk of atrial thrombi, most commonly in the left atrial appendage, and increased risks of embolic strokes and/or peripheral thromboembolism. It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. To meet the concerns of thrombi and stroke, anticoagulation has been the mainstay for prevention and treatment thereof. Historically, anticoagulation involved the use of aspirin or vitamin K antagonists, mainly warfarin. Since early 2010s, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban have been introduced and approved for anticoagulation of atrial fibrillation. DOACs demonstrated a dramatic reduction in the rate of intracranial hemorrhage as compared to warfarin, and offer the advantages of absolution of monitoring therefore avoid the risk of hemorrhages in the context of narrow therapeutic window and under-treatment characteristic of warfarin, particularly in high-risk patients. One major concern and disadvantage for DOACs was lack of reversal agents, which have largely been ameliorated by the approval of Idarucizumab for dabigatran and Andexanet alfa for both apixaban and rivaroxaban, with Ciraparantag as a universal reversal agent for all DOACs undergoing Fast-Track Review from FDA. In this article, we will be providing a broad review of anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation with a focus on risk stratification schemes and anticoagulation agents (warfarin, aspirin, DOACs) including special clinical considerations.

Feasibility of double-blinded, placebo-controlled interventional study for assessing catheter ablation efficacy in persistent atrial fibrillation: Insights from the ORBITA AF feasibility study

BACKGROUND

To date, there are no randomized, double-blinded clinical trials comparing catheter ablation to DC cardioversion (DCCV) with medical therapy in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF). Conducting a large-scale trial to address this question presents considerable challenges, including recruitment, blinding, and implementation. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a definitive placebo-controlled trial.

METHODS

This prospective trial was carried out at Barts Heart Centre, United Kingdom, employing a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled design. Twenty patients with PersAF (duration <2 years) were recruited, representing 10% of the proposed larger trial as determined by a power calculation. The patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either PVI ± DCCV (PVI group) or DCCV + Placebo (DCCV group). The primary endpoint of this feasibility study was to evaluate patient blinding. Patients remained unaware of their treatment allocation until end of study.

RESULTS

During the study, 35% of patients experienced recurrence of PersAF prior to completion of 12 months follow-up. Blinding was successfully maintained amongst both patients and medical staff. The DCCV group had a trend to higher recurrence and repeat procedure rate compared to the PVI group (recurrence of PersAF 60% vs 30%; p = .07 and repeat procedure 70% vs 40%; p = .4). The quality of life experienced by individuals in the PVI group showed improvement, as evidenced by enhanced scores on the AF specific questionnaire (AF PROMS) (3 [±4] vs 21 [±8]) and SF-12 mental-component raw score (51.4 [±7] vs 43.24 [±15]) in patients who maintained sinus rhythm at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

This feasibility study establishes the potential for conducting a blinded, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of PVI versus DCCV in patients with PersAF.

Association of Atrial Fibrillation Progression With Left Atrial Functional Reserve and Its Reversibility

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) progression is closely related to heart failure occurrence, and catheter ablation carries a beneficial effect for heart failure prevention. Recently, particular attention has been given to left atrial (LA) function and functional reserve in the pathogenesis linking AF and heart failure, although its significance and reversibility is not well studied.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively investigated 164 patients with AF with normal left ventricular systolic function and free from heart failure who underwent first catheter ablation and pre-/postprocedural echocardiography. Conventional and speckle-tracking echocardiography were performed at rest and during passive leg lifting to assess LA size, LA reservoir strain (LARS), and functional reserve calculated as passive leg lifting-LARS - rest-LARS. Patients were categorized into 3 AF subtypes: paroxysmal AF (N=95), persistent AF (PeAF; N=50), and long-standing persistent AF (LS-PeAF; N=19). The PeAF and LS-PeAF groups had larger LA size and reduced LARS compared with the paroxysmal AF group (all P<0.05). LA functional reserve was significantly impaired in the LS-PeAF group (P=0.003). In multivariable analysis, LS-PeAF and advanced age were significantly associated with impaired LA functional reserve. Among 149 patients with sinus rhythm 1 to 2 days after catheter ablation, LARS was significantly improved in both PeAF and LS-PeAF groups but was still lower than that in the paroxysmal AF group. Sinus rhythm restoration also led to amelioration of LA functional reserve in patients with LS-PeAF.

CONCLUSIONS

AF progression was related to impaired LARS and LA functional reserve, and restoration of sinus rhythm might contribute to early LA reverse remodeling.

Fecal calprotectin: A novel predictor of ulcerated esophageal injury after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation

BACKGROUND

Atrial esophageal fistula (AEF) is a lethal complication that can occur post atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Esophageal injury (EI) is likely to be the initial lesion leading to AEF. Endoscopic examination is the gold standard for a diagnosis of EI but extensive endoscopic screening is invasive and costly. This study was conducted to determine whether fecal calprotectin (Fcal), a marker of inflammation throughout the intestinal tract, may be associated with the existence of esophageal injury.

METHODS

This diagnostic study was conducted in a cohort of 166 patients with symptomatic AF undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation from May 2020 to June 2021. Fcal tests were performed 1-7 days after ablation. All patients underwent endoscopic ultrasonography 1 or 2 days after ablation.

RESULTS

The levels of Fcal were significantly different between the EI and non-EI groups (404.9 µg/g (IQR 129.6-723.6) vs. 40.4 µg/g (IQR 15.0-246.2), p < .001). Analysis of ROC curves revealed that a Fcal level of 125 µg/g might be the optimal cut-off value for a diagnosis of EI, giving a 78.8% sensitivity and a 65.4% specificity. The negative predictive value of Fcal was 100% for ulcerated EI.

CONCLUSIONS

The level of Fcal is associated with EI post AF catheter ablation. 125 µg/g might be the optimal cut-off value for a diagnosis of EI. Negative Fcal could predict the absence of ulcerated EI, which could be considered a precursor to AEF.

Prevention of venous thromboembolism in right heart-sided electrophysiological procedures: results of an European Heart Rhythm Association survey

Limited data are available regarding venous thromboembolism (VTE), specifically deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), following right-sided ablations and electrophysiological (EP) studies. Compared to left-sided procedures, no guidelines on antithrombotic management strategies for the prevention of DVT and PE are available. The main purpose of the present European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey is to report the current management of right-sided EP procedures, focusing on anticoagulation and prevention of VTE. An online survey was conducted using the EHRA infrastructure. A total of 244 participants answered a 19-items questionnaire on the periprocedural management of EP studies and right-sided catheter ablations. The right femoral vein is the most common access for EP studies and right-sided procedures. An ultrasound-guided approach is employed by more than 2/3 of respondents. Intravenous heparin is not commonly given by the majority of participants. About 1/3 of participants (34%) routinely prescribe VTE prophylaxis during (mostly aspirin and low molecular weight heparin) and 1/4 of respondents (25%) commonly prescribe VTE prophylaxis after discharge (mostly aspirin). Of note, respectively 13% and 9% of participants observed at least one DVT and one PE related to right-sided ablation or EP study within the last year in their center. The present survey shows that only a minority of operators routinely gives intraprocedural intravenous heparin and prescribes VTE prophylaxis after right-sided EP procedures. Compared to left-sided procedures like atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, there are no consistent systematic antithrombotic management strategies.

Surgical ablation of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: 1-year outcomes from the CArdioSurgEry Atrial Fibrillation (CASE-AF) registry

OBJECTIVES

The CArdioSurgEry Atrial Fibrillation (CASE-AF) registry is a prospective, multicentre study for collecting and analysing real-world data of surgical atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes of surgery for long-standing persistent AF at 1 year.

METHODS

In total, 17 centres consecutively include all eligible patients with continuous AF lasting for ≥1 year. Exclusion criteria are missing informed consent or age <18 years. For patient-reported outcomes measures, the European Heart Rhythm Association score was used. No presence of AF (based on ECG findings including Holter ECG and/or implanted devices), no re-ablation, no further cardioversion and no rehospitalization due to AF after a 3-month blanking period defined no AF recurrence at 1 year.

RESULTS

From January 2017 to January 2020, a total of 1115 patients were enrolled in CASE-AF. Of them, 202 patients (mean age 69.7 ± 7.8 years, 27.2% female) underwent surgical ablation of long-standing persistent AF (study cohort), mostly accompanied by left atrial appendage closure (n = 180 [89%], resection n = 75 [42%]) and predominantly performed as concomitant (n = 174 [86%]) and left atrial only procedure (n = 144 [71%]). Early mortality (30 days) was 2.0% and morbidity was low. At follow-up (median 14.4 months, interquartile range, 12.7-17.6 months, 100% complete), 106 patients (56%) had no AF recurrence and 93% of them were asymptomatic. AF recurrence was accompanied by AF-related rehospitalization (n = 12, P = 0.003), direct current shock cardioversion (n = 23, P < 0.001), AF ablation (n = 7, P = 0.003) and stroke (n = 3, P = 0.059). Multivariable analysis identified cryoablation, predominantly performed endocardially including additional left atrial (74%) and biatrial (42%) lesions, as a significant factor for freedom from AF recurrence (odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.07-6.79, P = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

According to CASE-AF, surgical ablation of long-standing persistent AF is most effective when concomitantly performed using endocardial cryoablation. Ongoing follow-up allows further elucidation of efficacious treatment strategies.

Pulmonary vein isolation by visually guided laser balloon ablation: single-center 5-year follow-up results

BACKGROUND

Visually guided laser balloon (VGLB) ablation is a balloon-based treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) that uses a titratable laser energy source to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), allowing for real-time visualization of target tissue and ablation lesions through an endoscopic camera. Few long-term data on this technique are currently available. This report presents acute efficacy, procedural data, complication rates, and long-term AF-free survival up to 5 years post-ablation.

METHODS

In this single-center, retrospective, observational report, 152 patients (72.4% male, mean age 60.6 ± 9.7 years, 62.5% paroxysmal AF, 598 pulmonary veins in total) treated with the first-generation VGLB system between 2014 and 2016 were included for analysis. AF ablation consisted of PVI only.

RESULTS

Acute PVI was achieved in 98.2% of veins, with first-pass isolation in 92.5%. Procedure duration of 129 min [IQR 113-150], fluoroscopy time of 15 min [IQR 11-20], and dose area product of 5016 mGy·cm2 [IQR 3603-8711] were recorded. During a median follow-up of 51 months [IQR 45-57], 74.3% of patients remained free of AF (78.8% for paroxysmal and 65.3% for persistent AF, p = 0.108). Freedom of AF at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years follow-up was 88.2%, 82.2%, 78.9%, and 74.8%, respectively. PV reconnections were identified in only 46.9% of redo procedures. The median number of PV reconnections during redo procedures was 0 [IQR 0-2]. Anti-arrhythmic drug use was significantly reduced after ablation (p < 0.001). The most commonly reported complications were minor vascular complications (4.6%) and transient phrenic nerve paralysis (3.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

First-generation VGLB ablation demonstrated high acute isolation rates, reasonable procedure times and low complication rates. Long-term freedom from AF was 78.8% for paroxysmal AF and 65.3% for persistent AF, performing PVI only.

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) may be a viable option for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and a contraindication for oral anticoagulation. No evidence evaluating the safety of this procedure in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) exists. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether CIED function is affected by LAAO and to explore LAAO procedural characteristics and complications in patients with a CIED.

METHODS

This single-center cohort study included consecutive patients scheduled for percutaneous LAAO. Patients with a CIED prior to LAAO were selected and compared to the patients without CIED, concerning procedural characteristics and peri-procedural complications. In the group of patients with CIEDs, essential pacemaker integrity parameters were compared before and after the procedure to detect possible micro and macro lead displacements.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients with CIED were scheduled for LAAO (age 73.7 ± 5.4 years, 65% males, CHA2DS2-VASc 4.3 ± 1.5, and HAS-BLED 3.3 ± 1.0). The 245 patients without CIED were younger, and HAS-BLED-score was slightly lower (69.4 ± 8.2 years, p < 0.001; 2.8 ± 1.0, p = 0.022). Patients without CIED more frequently underwent LAAO combined with catheter ablation (p = 0.002). All other procedural characteristics were comparable between both groups. No visible lead displacement was observed on chest X-ray after LAAO. Additionally, no differences in impedance, threshold, or intracardiac sensing in various CIED lead locations were found prior versus post LAAO.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the feasibility and safety of LAAO in patients with a CIED.