1
|
Zhang D, Chen WJ, Meng XX, Zhao X, Liu RH, Tian HY. Breaking down barriers: rationalisations and motivation to stop among Chinese male smokers under cigarette dependence. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:1812. [PMID: 38972984 PMCID: PMC11229221 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19295-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Smoking rationalisation beliefs are a huge barrier to quitting smoking. What types of rationalisations should be emphasised in smoking cessation interventions? Although past literature has confirmed the negative relationship between those beliefs and motivation to stop smoking, little is known regarding the importance and performance of those beliefs on motivation with varying cigarette dependence. The study aimed to ascertain rationalisations that are highly important for motivation yet perform poorly in different cigarette dependence groups. METHODS The cross-sectional study was conducted from November 19 to December 9, 2023 in Guiyang City, China. Adult male current smokers were enrolled. Partial least squares structural equation modelling was used to test the hypothesis. The multi-group analysis was used to determine the moderating effect of cigarette dependence, and the importance-performance map analysis was utilised to assess the importance and performance of rationalisations. RESULTS A total of 616 adult male current smokers were analysed, and they were divided into the low cigarette dependence group (n = 297) and the high cigarette dependence group (n = 319). Except for risk generalisation beliefs, smoking functional beliefs (H1: -β = 0.131, P < 0.01), social acceptability beliefs (H3: β = -0.258, P < 0.001), safe smoking beliefs (H4: β = -0.078, P < 0.05), self-exempting beliefs (H5: β = -0.244, P < 0.001), and quitting is harmful beliefs (H6: β = -0.148, P < 0.01) all had a significant positive influence on motivation. Cigarette dependence moderated the correlation between rationalisations and motivation. In the high-dependence group, the social acceptability beliefs and smoking functional beliefs were located in the "Concentrate Here" area. In the low-dependence group, the social acceptability beliefs were also situated in there. CONCLUSIONS Social acceptability beliefs and smoking functional beliefs showed great potential and value for improvement among high-dependence smokers, while only social acceptability beliefs had great potential and value for improvement among low-dependence smokers. Addressing these beliefs will be helpful for smoking cessation. The multi-group analysis and the importance-performance map analysis technique have practical implications and can be expanded to other domains of health education and intervention practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Zhang
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Guizhou Medical University, No. 6 Ankang Avenue, Guiyang City, 561113, China
- Guizhou Institute of Health Development, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China
| | - Wen-Jiao Chen
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Guizhou Medical University, No. 6 Ankang Avenue, Guiyang City, 561113, China
- School of Sociology, Guizhou Minzu University, Guiyang, China
| | - Xiao-Xia Meng
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Guizhou Medical University, No. 6 Ankang Avenue, Guiyang City, 561113, China
- Center of Medicine Economics and Management Research, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China
| | - Xiong Zhao
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Guizhou Medical University, No. 6 Ankang Avenue, Guiyang City, 561113, China
- Center of Medicine Economics and Management Research, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China
| | - Run-Hua Liu
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Guizhou Medical University, No. 6 Ankang Avenue, Guiyang City, 561113, China.
- Center of Medicine Economics and Management Research, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
| | - Hai-Yu Tian
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Guizhou Medical University, No. 6 Ankang Avenue, Guiyang City, 561113, China.
- One Health Institute, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grech J, Norman I, Azzopardi C, Grixti M, Sammut R. Assessing the feasibility and acceptability of a diabetes-specific nurse-led multicomponent smoking cessation intervention in diabetes education: study protocol for an open-label pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e083235. [PMID: 38904126 PMCID: PMC11191808 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Smoking cessation is an essential, but often overlooked aspect of diabetes management. Despite the need for tailored smoking cessation support for individuals with diabetes, evidence of effective interventions for this cohort is limited. Additionally, individuals with diabetes do not easily adopt such interventions, resulting in low uptake and abstinence rates. This protocol describes a study that aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a unique smoking cessation intervention, based on the best evidence, theory and the needs of individuals with diabetes, among patients and service providers, the diabetes nurse educators. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is an open-label pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Between 80 and 100 individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who smoke will be recruited from the diabetes outpatients at the main acute public hospital in Malta, starting in August 2023. Participants will be randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to the intervention or control arm for 12 weeks. The experimental intervention will consist of three to four smoking cessation behavioural support sessions based on the 5As (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist and Arrange) algorithm, and a 6-week supply of nicotine replacement therapy. The control intervention will consist of an active referral to the Maltese National Health Service's one-to-one smoking cessation support service, which is based on motivational interviewing. The primary feasibility and acceptability outcomes include the recruitment and participation rates, resources used, problems identified by the nurses, the nurses' perceived challenges and facilitators to implementation and the nurses' and patients' acceptability of the study intervention. Data analyses will be descriptive, with quantitative feasibility and acceptability outcomes reported with 95% confidence intervals. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical clearance was obtained from the Faculty of Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee, University of Malta. The study results will be disseminated through conference presentations and a publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05920096.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Grech
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| | - Ian Norman
- King's College London Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery & Palliative Care, London, London, UK
| | | | - Moira Grixti
- Diabetes Education Unit, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| | - Roberta Sammut
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Frings D, Albery IP, Kimber C, Naughton F, Sideropoulos V, Dawkins L. Change in vaping, smoking and dual-use identities predicts quit success and cigarette usage: A prospective study of people quitting smoking with electronic cigarette support. Br J Health Psychol 2024. [PMID: 38873852 DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Electronic cigarettes (ECs) are an efficacious support for some but not all people wishing to stop using tobacco. While advice and practical support have been identified as increasing quit success, little research has explored the role of changes in smoking and EC-related social identities. METHODS A prospective study following 573 people attempting to quit smoking with EC support. Self-report measures of identification with being a smoker, non-smoker, vaper and dual user (people using ECs and tobacco products) were taken prior to the quit attempt and at a 12-week follow-up. RESULTS Baseline identifications with being a smoker, non-smoker or dual user were not associated with smoking outcomes. Baseline vaper identity baseline was linked to more frequent tobacco abstinence at follow-up and lower levels of cigarette smoking. Levels of social identification at follow-up were consistently linked with outcomes, with vaper identity and non-smoking identities being protective and dual user identity being related to lower abstinence rates but decreased tobacco usage. Changes in identity over time were the most consistent predictor of outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Findings have implications for smoking cessation practice, informing how and when identity-based interventions may be effective and our understanding of how identity transitions occur.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Frings
- Centre for Addictive Behaviours Research, London South Bank University, London, UK
| | - I P Albery
- Centre for Addictive Behaviours Research, London South Bank University, London, UK
| | - C Kimber
- Centre for Addictive Behaviours Research, London South Bank University, London, UK
| | - F Naughton
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - V Sideropoulos
- Department of Psychology & Human Development, IOE, UCL's Faculty of Education and Society, University College London, London, UK
| | - L Dawkins
- Centre for Addictive Behaviours Research, London South Bank University, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Michaux KD, Metcalfe RK, Burns P, Conklin AI, Hoens AM, Smith D, Struik L, Safari A, Sin DD, Sadatsafavi M. IMplementing Predictive Analytics towards efficient COPD Treatments (IMPACT): protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized impact study. Diagn Progn Res 2023; 7:3. [PMID: 36782301 PMCID: PMC9926816 DOI: 10.1186/s41512-023-00140-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Personalized disease management informed by quantitative risk prediction has the potential to improve patient care and outcomes. The integration of risk prediction into clinical workflow should be informed by the experiences and preferences of stakeholders, and the impact of such integration should be evaluated in prospective comparative studies. The objectives of the IMplementing Predictive Analytics towards efficient chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatments (IMPACT) study are to integrate an exacerbation risk prediction tool into routine care and to determine its impact on prescription appropriateness (primary outcome), medication adherence, quality of life, exacerbation rates, and sex and gender disparities in COPD care (secondary outcomes). METHODS IMPACT will be conducted in two phases. Phase 1 will include the systematic and user-centered development of two decision support tools: (1) a decision tool for pulmonologists called the ACCEPT decision intervention (ADI), which combines risk prediction from the previously developed Acute COPD Exacerbation Prediction Tool with treatment algorithms recommended by the Canadian Thoracic Society's COPD pharmacotherapy guidelines, and (2) an information pamphlet for COPD patients (patient tool), tailored to their prescribed medication, clinical needs, and lung function. In phase 2, we will conduct a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial in two outpatient respiratory clinics to evaluate the impact of the decision support tools on quality of care and patient outcomes. Clusters will be practicing pulmonologists (n ≥ 24), who will progressively switch to the intervention over 18 months. At the end of the study, a qualitative process evaluation will be carried out to determine the barriers and enablers of uptake of the tools. DISCUSSION The IMPACT study coincides with a planned harmonization of electronic health record systems across tertiary care centers in British Columbia, Canada. The harmonization of these systems combined with IMPACT's implementation-oriented design and partnership with stakeholders will facilitate integration of the tools into routine care, if the results of the proposed study reveal positive association with improvement in the process and outcomes of clinical care. The process evaluation at the end of the trial will inform subsequent design iterations before largescale implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05309356.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina D Michaux
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Rebecca K Metcalfe
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences (CHÉOS), St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Paloma Burns
- Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, University of British Columbia & St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Annalijn I Conklin
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences (CHÉOS), St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alison M Hoens
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences (CHÉOS), St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Laura Struik
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada
| | - Abdollah Safari
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada
- Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Don D Sin
- Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, University of British Columbia & St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Medicine (Division of Respirology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mohsen Sadatsafavi
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
- Department of Medicine (Division of Respirology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Exploring motivation to quit and risk appraisals of hookah tobacco smoking for self and partner among a member of single and dual smoker couples. J Behav Med 2022:10.1007/s10865-022-00369-4. [DOI: 10.1007/s10865-022-00369-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
6
|
Sawyer K, Burke C, Ng RLY, Freeman TP, Adams S, Taylor G. Effectiveness of Mental Health Warnings on Tobacco Packaging in People With and Without Common Mental Health Conditions: An Online Randomised Experiment. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:869158. [PMID: 35911223 PMCID: PMC9331922 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.869158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Health warning labels on tobacco packaging are a cost-effective means of health risk communication. However, while an extensive range of physical health risks are well-portrayed via current tobacco health warnings in the UK, there are none that currently portray the negative impact of smoking on mental health. Aims (i) develop novel mental health warning labels for tobacco packaging and (ii) test perceptions of these warnings in smokers and non-smokers, with and without mental health problems. Methods Six mental health warning labels were developed with a consultancy focus group. These warning labels were tested in an online randomised experiment, where respondents (N = 687) rated six Mental Health Warning Labels (MHWLs) and six Physical Health Warning Labels (PHWLs) on measures of perceived effectiveness, believability, arousal, valence, acceptability, reactance and novelty of information. Results MHWLs were perceived as low to moderately effective (mean = 4.02, SD = 2.40), but less effective than PHWLs (mean = 5.78, SD = 2.55, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.63). MHWLs were perceived as less believable, arousing, unpleasant, and acceptable than PHWLs. MHWLs evoked more reactance and were rated as more novel. Perceptions of MHWLs did not differ in people with and without mental health problems except for reactance and acceptability, but consistent with the PHWL literature, perceptions of MHWLs differed between non-smokers and smokers. Conclusion MHWLs could be an effective means to communicate novel information about the effects of smoking on mental health. MHWLs are perceived as less effective, believable, arousing, unpleasant, and acceptable than PHWLs, but MHWLs evoke more reactance and are rated as more novel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Sawyer
- Addiction and Mental Health Group (AIM), Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Chloe Burke
- Addiction and Mental Health Group (AIM), Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Ronnie Long Yee Ng
- Addiction and Mental Health Group (AIM), Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Tom P. Freeman
- Addiction and Mental Health Group (AIM), Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Sally Adams
- Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Gemma Taylor
- Addiction and Mental Health Group (AIM), Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Perski O, Theodoraki M, Cox S, Kock L, Shahab L, Brown J. Associations between smoking to relieve stress, motivation to stop and quit attempts across the social spectrum: A population survey in England. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0268447. [PMID: 35580121 PMCID: PMC9113576 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Smoking prevalence in several high-income countries is steadily declining but remains persistently high in 'lower' socioeconomic position (SEP) groups, contributing to inequities in morbidity and mortality. Smoking to relieve stress is a commonly endorsed motive for continued smoking; however, it remains unclear whether smoking to relieve stress has a negative impact on motivation to stop and future quit attempts and if so, whether associations are moderated by SEP. This was an observational study with cross-sectional and prospective survey data from the nationally representative Smoking Toolkit Study in England. A total of 1,135 adult smokers were surveyed at baseline, with 153 (13.5%) respondents followed up at 12 months. Respondents provided information on demographic, social and smoking characteristics. A series of multivariable logistic regression analyses was conducted. Bayes Factors (BFs) were calculated to explore non-significant associations. Smoking to relieve stress was commonly endorsed by respondents from both 'lower' (43.2% [95% CI = 39.4%, 47.0%]) and 'higher' (40.5% [95% CI = 35.9%, 45.1%]) SEP groups (p = 0.39). Smoking to relieve stress was associated with high motivation to stop at baseline (ORadj = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.03-2.12, p = 0.035) but not significantly with the odds of making a quit attempt at a 12-month follow-up, although the magnitude and direction of the effect was similar to that observed for high motivation to stop (ORadj = 1.49, 95% CI = 0.69-3.20, p = 0.3). Data were insensitive to detect moderation effects of SEP (BF = 0.90 and BF = 1.65, respectively). Smoking to relieve stress is a commonly endorsed motive and is associated with high motivation to stop but not significantly with the odds of making a quit attempt in the next 12 months, although the magnitude and direction of the effect was similar for both outcomes. There was no clear evidence of moderation by SEP, although data were insensitive to distinguish the alternative from the null hypothesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Perski
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Theodoraki
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sharon Cox
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Loren Kock
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lion Shahab
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jamie Brown
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rios LE, Freire MDCM. Religiosity is Associated with Motivation to Start and Stop Smoking Among Adolescent Students in Brazil. JOURNAL OF RELIGION AND HEALTH 2021; 60:4467-4479. [PMID: 33909196 DOI: 10.1007/s10943-021-01269-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to estimate associations between adolescents' religiosity and their motivation to start and stop smoking. A school survey was carried out in Midwestern Brazil. Participants were never-smokers (n = 2073) and smokers (n = 116) aged 13-19 who answered a questionnaire. Religiosity was measured with the Duke Religion Index, and motivation with questions based on the Prime Theory of Motivation. Organizational, non-organizational, and intrinsic religiosity were associated with motivation to start smoking among never-smokers. Intrinsic religiosity was associated with smokers' motivation to quit. Findings indicate the protective role of religiosity in the motivational system that prompts smoking initiation and cessation during adolescence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo Essado Rios
- School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Ave Universitária, s/n, Goiânia, GO, 74605-020, Brazil.
- Federal Institute of Education Science and Technology (IFG), Ave Universitária, s/n, Inhumas, GO, 75402-556, Brazil.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tattan‐Birch H, Brown J, Kock L, Shahab L. Moderators of the association between regular smoking exposure and motivation and attempts to quit: a repeat cross-sectional study. Addiction 2021; 116:2837-2846. [PMID: 33739568 PMCID: PMC8612132 DOI: 10.1111/add.15479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Revised: 02/28/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To estimate the associations between regular exposure to smoking by other people and motivation and attempts to quit among current smokers. To examine whether socio-demographic and other factors moderate these associations. DESIGN A repeat nationally representative cross-sectional survey. Data were collected monthly between November 2014 and February 2019. SETTING England. PARTICIPANTS Current smokers ≥16 years of age from the Smoking Toolkit Study (n = 15 136). MEASUREMENTS Participants were asked whether other people regularly smoke in their presence, how motivated they were to quit and whether they had made a quit attempt in the past year. Moderators assessed were occupation-based social grade, housing tenure, urges to smoke, high-risk alcohol consumption, and disability. Adjusted analyses included moderators, socio-demographic (age/sex/ethnicity/sexual orientation/marital status/children in household) and seasonal (quarter/year) confounders. FINDINGS Current smokers who were regularly exposed to other people smoking in their presence were less likely to be highly motivated to quit (OR = 0.88 [95% CI 0.80-0.97]), but were no less likely to have made a quit attempt in the past year (OR 1.04 [0.97-1.13], Bayes Factor (BF) = 0.05). The inverse relationship between regular smoking exposure and motivation to quit was moderated by urges to smoke, such that exposure was only associated with a reduction in motivation among those without strong urges to smoke (OR 0.83 [0.75-0.93] versus OR 1.04 [0.86-1.26]; P = 0.048). None of the other factors significantly moderated the association with motivation to quit, and none moderated the relationship between regular smoking exposure and quit attempts. All non-significant interactions, except social grade (BF = 1.44) with quit attempts, had Bayes Factors that supported the hypothesis of no moderation (BF range: 0.12-0.21). CONCLUSIONS Among current smokers in England, regular exposure to other smokers appears to be associated with lower motivation to quit in people without strong urges to smoke, yet there appears to be no association with quit attempts in the previous year. Social grade, housing tenure, high-risk alcohol consumption and disability do not moderate these associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry Tattan‐Birch
- Department of Behavioural Science and HealthUniversity College London1‐19 Torrington PlaceLondonUK
| | - Jamie Brown
- Department of Behavioural Science and HealthUniversity College London1‐19 Torrington PlaceLondonUK
| | - Loren Kock
- Department of Behavioural Science and HealthUniversity College London1‐19 Torrington PlaceLondonUK
| | - Lion Shahab
- Department of Behavioural Science and HealthUniversity College London1‐19 Torrington PlaceLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kastaun S, Leve V, Hildebrandt J, Funke C, Klosterhalfen S, Lubisch D, Reddemann O, McRobbie H, Raupach T, West R, Wilm S, Viechtbauer W, Kotz D. Training general practitioners in the ABC versus 5As method of delivering stop-smoking advice: a pragmatic, two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial. ERJ Open Res 2021; 7:00621-2020. [PMID: 34322552 PMCID: PMC8311138 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00621-2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
This study assessed the effectiveness of a 3.5-h training session for general practitioners (GPs) in providing brief stop-smoking advice and compared two methods of giving advice - ABC versus 5As - on the rates of delivery of such advice and of recommendations of evidence-based smoking cessation treatment during routine consultations. A pragmatic, two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial was carried out including a pre-/post-design for the analyses of the primary outcome in 52 GP practices in Germany. Practices were randomised (1:1) to receive a 3.5-h training session (ABC or 5As). In total, 1937 tobacco-smoking patients, who consulted trained GPs in these practices in the 6 weeks prior to or following the training, were included. The primary outcome was patient-reported rates of GP-delivered stop-smoking advice prior to and following the training, irrespective of the training method. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported receipt of recommendation/prescription of behavioural therapy, pharmacotherapy or combination therapy for smoking cessation, and the effectiveness of ABC versus 5As regarding all outcomes. GP-delivered stop-smoking advice increased from 13.1% (n=136 out of 1039) to 33.1% (n=297 out of 898) following the training (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.25, 95% CI 2.34-4.51). Recommendation/prescription rates of evidence-based treatments were low (<2%) pre-training, but had all increased after training (e.g. behavioural support: aOR 7.15, 95% CI 4.02-12.74). Delivery of stop-smoking advice increased non-significantly (p=0.08) stronger in the ABC versus 5As group (aOR 1.71, 95% CI 0.94-3.12). A single training session in stop-smoking advice was associated with a three-fold increase in rates of advice giving and a seven-fold increase in offer of support. The ABC method may lead to higher rates of GP-delivered advice during routine consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Kastaun
- Institute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Verena Leve
- Institute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jaqueline Hildebrandt
- Institute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Christian Funke
- Institute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Stephanie Klosterhalfen
- Institute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Diana Lubisch
- Institute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Olaf Reddemann
- Institute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Hayden McRobbie
- University of New South Wales, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Randwick, Australia
- Lakes District Health Board, Rotorua, New Zealand
| | - Tobias Raupach
- Dept of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- Behavioral Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - Robert West
- Behavioral Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stefan Wilm
- Institute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Viechtbauer
- Dept of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Kotz
- Institute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Behavioral Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
- Dept of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Eisenberg MJ, Hébert-Losier A, Windle SB, Greenspoon T, Brandys T, Fülöp T, Nguyen T, Elkouri S, Montigny M, Wilderman I, Bertrand OF, Bostwick JA, Abrahamson J, Lacasse Y, Pakhale S, Cabaussel J, Filion KB. Effect of e-Cigarettes Plus Counseling vs Counseling Alone on Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2020; 324:1844-1854. [PMID: 33170240 PMCID: PMC7656286 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.18889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) for smoking cessation remain controversial. OBJECTIVE To evaluate e-cigarettes with individual counseling for smoking cessation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A randomized clinical trial enrolled adults motivated to quit smoking from November 2016 to September 2019 at 17 Canadian sites (801 individuals screened; 274 ineligible and 151 declined). Manufacturing delays resulted in early termination (376/486 participants, 77% of target). Outcomes through 24 weeks (March 2020) are reported. INTERVENTIONS Randomization to nicotine e-cigarettes (n = 128), nonnicotine e-cigarettes (n = 127), or no e-cigarettes (n = 121) for 12 weeks. All groups received individual counseling. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was point prevalence abstinence (7-day recall, biochemically validated using expired carbon monoxide) at 12 weeks, changed from 52 weeks following early termination. Participants missing data were assumed to be smoking. The 7 secondary end points, examined at multiple follow-ups, were point prevalence abstinence at other follow-ups, continuous abstinence, daily cigarette consumption change, serious adverse events, adverse events, dropouts due to adverse effects, and treatment adherence. RESULTS Among 376 randomized participants (mean age, 52 years; 178 women [47%]), 299 (80%) and 278 (74%) self-reported smoking status at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively. Point prevalence abstinence was significantly greater for nicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling vs counseling alone at 12 weeks (21.9% vs 9.1%; risk difference [RD], 12.8 [95% CI, 4.0 to 21.6]) but not 24 weeks (17.2% vs 9.9%; RD, 7.3 [95% CI, -1.2 to 15.7]). Point prevalence abstinence for nonnicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling was not significantly different from counseling alone at 12 weeks (17.3% vs 9.1%; RD, 8.2 [95% CI, -0.1 to 16.6]), but was significantly greater at 24 weeks (20.5% vs 9.9%; RD, 10.6 [95% CI, 1.8 to 19.4]). Adverse events were common (nicotine e-cigarette with counseling: 120 [94%]; nonnicotine e-cigarette with counseling: 118 [93%]; counseling only: 88 [73%]), with the most common being cough (64%) and dry mouth (53%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among adults motivated to quit smoking, nicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling vs counseling alone significantly increased point prevalence abstinence at 12 weeks. However, the difference was no longer significant at 24 weeks, and trial interpretation is limited by early termination and inconsistent findings for nicotine and nonnicotine e-cigarettes, suggesting further research is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02417467.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark J. Eisenberg
- Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Division of Cardiology, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Sarah B. Windle
- Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Todd Greenspoon
- Hamilton Community Health Centre, Family Health Organization, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Tamàs Fülöp
- Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Thang Nguyen
- St Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Stéphane Elkouri
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Martine Montigny
- Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Laval, Hôpital Cité-de-la-Santé, Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Igor Wilderman
- Wilderman Medical Clinic/Canadian Centre for Clinical Trials, Thornhill, Ontario, Canada
| | - Olivier F. Bertrand
- Institut de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ), Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | | | | | - Yves Lacasse
- Institut de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ), Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Smita Pakhale
- The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute/The Bridge Engagement Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Kristian B. Filion
- Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tattan-Birch H, Jackson SE, Ide C, Bauld L, Shahab L. Evaluation of the Impact of a Regional Educational Advertising Campaign on Harm Perceptions of E-Cigarettes, Prevalence of E-Cigarette Use, and Quit Attempts Among Smokers. Nicotine Tob Res 2020; 22:1148-1154. [PMID: 31837223 PMCID: PMC7291809 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntz236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We evaluated how effective an advertising campaign that was piloted by Cancer Research UK in January/February 2018 was at promoting quit attempts by increasing awareness of the relative harms of e-cigarettes compared with smoking. METHODS Adults (≥16 years, n = 2217) living in Greater Manchester (campaign region), Yorkshire & Humber and the North East of England (control regions) completed cross-sectional surveys immediately before and after the campaign period. Surveys measured socio-demographics, perceptions and use of e-cigarettes, and motivation and attempts to quit smoking. We tested interactions between time (pre, post) and region (campaign, control). RESULTS 36.7% (95% CI 33.0%-40.6%) of those in the intervention region recognized the campaign. In the general population, interactions were nonsignificant for all outcomes except for perception of e-cigarettes as effective cessation aids, with smaller increases from pre- to post-campaign in the campaign (49.9% to 54.0%) compared with the control region (40.5% to 55.0%; odds ratio [OR] = 0.66, 95% CI .45-0.98). Among smokers, motivation to quit increased in the intervention region (44.0% to 48.0%) but decreased in the control region (40.5% to 21.5%; OR = 2.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-7.16), with no other significant differences between regions over time. Bayes factors confirmed that nonsignificant results were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS Compared with the control region, the campaign was associated with an increase in smokers' motivation to quit but a smaller increase in adults' perception of e-cigarettes as an effective cessation aid. There was insufficient evidence to determine whether the campaign affected other outcomes. IMPLICATIONS Past extended mass media tobacco control campaigns have been shown to change public attitudes towards smoking, improve motivation to quit smoking, and reduce smoking prevalence. Much less is known about shorter, targeted campaigns. Here we show that using mass media to communicate accurate information about the relative harms of e-cigarettes compared with smoking may be an effective strategy in increasing smokers' motivation to quit. Moreover, even when only run for a month, such campaigns can reach a large proportion of the targeted population. Further research is needed to evaluate effects on quit attempts and success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry Tattan-Birch
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah E Jackson
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Linda Bauld
- Cancer Research UK, London, UK
- Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lion Shahab
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Caponnetto P, Polosa R, Robson D, Bauld L. Tobacco smoking, related harm and motivation to quit smoking in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Health Psychol Res 2020; 8:9042. [PMID: 32510003 PMCID: PMC7267811 DOI: 10.4081/hpr.2020.9042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
This narrative review focuses on the topic of tobacco smoking amongst people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. We searched PubMed, PsycInfo and Scopus databases for schizophrenia spectrum disorders and smoking and included articles about the epidemiology of tobacco smoking in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, examining the relationship between smoking and mental health. This narrative review describes that a higher prevalence, frequency and impact of both high nicotine dependence and its harmful effects in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders compared with those in the general population. Despite several existent theories, the reasons for high smoking rates, the high dependence on nicotine and severity of nicotine withdrawal symptoms are not fully understood. The main aim of this paper is to inform mental health personnel and particularly clinical and health psychologists about the impact and role of tobacco smoking for smokers with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Linda Bauld
- Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- UK Centre for Tobacco & Alcohol Studies, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hébert-Losier A, Filion KB, Windle SB, Eisenberg MJ. A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of E-Cigarette Use for Smoking Cessation in the General Population: E3 Trial Design. CJC Open 2020; 2:168-175. [PMID: 32462131 PMCID: PMC7242503 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2020.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Smoking cessation improves morbidity and mortality among smokers who achieve long-term abstinence. Many smokers are using electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) to attempt to quit, despite a lack of data concerning their efficacy and safety for smoking cessation. METHODS The Evaluating the Efficacy of E-Cigarette use for Smoking Cessation (E3) trial is a multicentre randomized controlled trial (NCT02417467) with a treatment period of 12 weeks and follow-up of 52 weeks. A total of 376 participants motivated to quit smoking were enrolled at 17 Canadian centres (November 2016 to September 2019). Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to 1 of 3 treatment arms: nicotine e-cigarettes, non-nicotine e-cigarettes, or no e-cigarettes. All groups received individual counselling. Treatment allocation was double-blind for the e-cigarette groups. The trial includes follow-ups by telephone at weeks 1, 2, 8, and 18, and clinic visits at weeks 4, 12, 24, and 52. The primary endpoint is to compare nicotine e-cigarettes to counselling alone in terms of biochemically validated point-prevalence smoking abstinence at 12 weeks; the primary endpoint was changed from 52 weeks after early termination (77% of targeted enrollment) due to a prolonged delay in e-cigarette manufacturing. The secondary objectives are to examine the efficacy of nicotine and non-nicotine e-cigarettes in terms of point-prevalence and continuous smoking abstinence, and reduction in daily cigarette consumption at all follow-ups through week 52, and to describe the occurrence of adverse events. CONCLUSION The E3 trial will provide regulators, health care professionals, and smokers with important information about the efficacy and safety of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andréa Hébert-Losier
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Kristian B. Filion
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Departments of Medicine and of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Sarah B. Windle
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Mark J. Eisenberg
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Departments of Medicine and of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Division of Cardiology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Perski O, Lumsden J, Garnett C, Blandford A, West R, Michie S. Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Digital Behavior Change Intervention Engagement Scale in Users of an App for Reducing Alcohol Consumption: Evaluation Study. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e16197. [PMID: 31746771 PMCID: PMC6893571 DOI: 10.2196/16197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Revised: 10/30/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The level and type of engagement with digital behavior change interventions (DBCIs) are likely to influence their effectiveness, but validated self-report measures of engagement are lacking. The DBCI Engagement Scale was designed to assess behavioral (ie, amount, depth of use) and experiential (ie, attention, interest, enjoyment) dimensions of engagement. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the DBCI Engagement Scale in users of a smartphone app for reducing alcohol consumption. METHODS Participants (N=147) were UK-based, adult, excessive drinkers recruited via an online research platform. Participants downloaded the Drink Less app and completed the scale immediately after their first login in exchange for a financial reward. Criterion variables included the objectively recorded amount of use, depth of use, and subsequent login. Five types of validity (ie, construct, criterion, predictive, incremental, divergent) were examined in exploratory factor, correlational, and regression analyses. The Cronbach alpha was calculated to assess the scale's internal reliability. Covariates included motivation to reduce alcohol consumption. RESULTS Responses on the DBCI Engagement Scale could be characterized in terms of two largely independent subscales related to experience and behavior. The experiential and behavioral subscales showed high (α=.78) and moderate (α=.45) internal reliability, respectively. Total scale scores predicted future behavioral engagement (ie, subsequent login) with and without adjusting for users' motivation to reduce alcohol consumption (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj]=1.14; 95% CI 1.03-1.27; P=.01), which was driven by the experiential (ORadj=1.19; 95% CI 1.05-1.34; P=.006) but not the behavioral subscale. CONCLUSIONS The DBCI Engagement Scale assesses behavioral and experiential aspects of engagement. The behavioral subscale may not be a valid indicator of behavioral engagement. The experiential subscale can predict subsequent behavioral engagement with an app for reducing alcohol consumption. Further refinements and validation of the scale in larger samples and across different DBCIs are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Perski
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jim Lumsden
- UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Garnett
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ann Blandford
- UCL Interaction Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert West
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Susan Michie
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Herbeć A, Zatoński M, Zatoński WA, Janik-Koncewicz K, Mons U, Fong GT, Quah ACK, Driezen P, Demjén T, Tountas Y, Trofor AC, Fernández E, McNeill A, Willemsen M, Vardavas CI, Przewoźniak K. Dependence, plans to quit, quitting self-efficacy and past cessation behaviours among menthol and other flavoured cigarette users in Europe: The EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys. Tob Induc Dis 2019; 16:A19. [PMID: 34671234 PMCID: PMC8525627 DOI: 10.18332/tid/111356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Revised: 07/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study characterises smoking and cessation-related behaviours among menthol and other flavoured cigarette users in Europe prior to the implementation of the European Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) ban on the sale of flavoured cigarettes. METHODS An analysis of cross-sectional data from the 2016 EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys was conducted among a sample of 10760 adult smokers from eight European Union Member States. Respondents were classified as menthol, other flavoured, unflavoured, or no usual flavour cigarette users and compared on smoking and cessation behaviours and characteristics. Data were analysed in SPSS Complex Samples Package using bivariate and multivariate regression analyses adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, dependence, and country. RESULTS In bivariate analyses, cigarette flavour was significantly associated with all outcomes (p<0.001). After adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, these associations attenuated but remained significant and in the same direction for dependence, self-efficacy, plans to quit, past quit attempts, and ever e-cigarette use. In fully adjusted models, compared to smokers of non-flavoured cigarettes, menthol smokers were less likely to smoke daily (AOR=0.47, 95% CI: 0.32-0.71), smoke within 30 min of waking (0.52,0.43-0.64), consider themselves addicted (0.74,0.59-0.94), and more likely to have ever used e-cigarettes (1.26,1.00-1.57); other flavoured cigarette smokers were less likely to smoke daily (0.33,0.15-0.77), and have higher self-efficacy (1.82,1.20-2.77); no usual flavour smokers were less likely to smoke daily (0.34,0.22-0.51), smoke within 30 min of waking (0.66,0.55-0.80), consider themselves addicted (0.65,0.52-0.78), have ever made a quit attempt (0.69,0.58-0.84), have ever used e-cigarettes (0.66,0.54-0.82), and had higher self-efficacy (1.46,1.19-1.80). CONCLUSIONS Smokers of different cigarette flavours in Europe differ on smoking and cessation characteristics. The lower dependence of menthol cigarette smokers could lead to greater success rates if quit attempts are made, however cross-country differences in smoking behaviours and quitting intentions could lead to the TPD ban on cigarette flavours having differential impact if not accompanied by additional measures, such as smoking cessation support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra Herbeć
- Health Promotion Foundation (HPF), Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,Centre for Behaviour Change, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Mateusz Zatoński
- Health Promotion Foundation (HPF), Warsaw, Poland.,European Observatory of Health Inequalities, President Stanisław Wojciechowski State University of Applied Sciences, Kalisz, Poland.,Tobacco Control Research Group, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Witold A Zatoński
- European Observatory of Health Inequalities, President Stanisław Wojciechowski State University of Applied Sciences, Kalisz, Poland.,Health Promotion Foundation (HPF), Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Ute Mons
- Cancer Prevention Unit and WHO Collaborating Centre for Tobacco Control, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Geoffrey T Fong
- Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo (UW), Waterloo, Canada.,School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo (UW), Waterloo, Canada.,Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anne C K Quah
- Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo (UW), Waterloo, Canada
| | - Pete Driezen
- Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo (UW), Waterloo, Canada
| | - Tibor Demjén
- Smoking or Health Hungarian Foundation (SHHF), Budapest, Hungary
| | - Yannis Tountas
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (UoA), Athens, Greece
| | - Antigona C Trofor
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy 'Grigore T. Popa' Iasi, Iasi, Romania.,Aer Pur Romania, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Esteve Fernández
- Tobacco Control Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), and Tobacco Control Research Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Catalonia, Spain.,School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Ann McNeill
- UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, London, United Kingdom.,National Addiction Centre, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marc Willemsen
- Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Constantine I Vardavas
- European Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention (ENSP), Brussels, Belgium.,University of Crete (UoC), Heraklion, Greece
| | - Krzysztof Przewoźniak
- Maria Skłodowska-Curie Institute - Oncology Center, Warsaw, Poland.,Health Promotion Foundation (HPF), Warsaw, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kastaun S, Leve V, Hildebrandt J, Funke C, Becker S, Lubisch D, Viechtbauer W, Reddemann O, Hempel L, McRobbie H, Raupach T, West R, Kotz D. Effectiveness of training general practitioners to improve the implementation of brief stop-smoking advice in German primary care: study protocol of a pragmatic, 2-arm cluster randomised controlled trial (the ABCII trial). BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2019; 20:107. [PMID: 31351460 PMCID: PMC6660716 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-019-0986-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2018] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Background The German clinical guideline on tobacco addiction recommends that general practitioners (GPs) provide brief stop-smoking advice to their patients according to the “5A” or the much briefer “ABC” method, but its implementation is insufficient. A lack of training is one barrier for GPs to provide such advice. Moreover, the respective effectiveness of a 5A or ABC training regarding subsequent delivery of stop-smoking advice has not been investigated. We developed a training for GPs according to both methods, and conducted a pilot study with process evaluation to optimize the trainings according to the needs of GPs. This study aims at evaluating the effectiveness of both trainings. Methods A pragmatic 2-arm cluster randomised controlled trial with a pre-post data collection will be conducted in 48 GP practices in North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany). GPs will be randomised to receive a 3.5-h-training in delivering either 5A or ABC, including peer coaching and intensive role plays with professional actors. The patient-reported primary outcome (receipt of GP advice to quit: yes/no) and secondary outcomes (recommendation rates of smoking cessation treatments, group comparison (5A versus ABC): receipt of GP advice to quit) will be collected in smoking patients routinely consulting their GP within 4 weeks prior, and 4 weeks following the training. Additional secondary outcomes will be collected at 4, 12 and 26 weeks following the consultation: use of cessation treatments during the last quit attempt (if so) since the GP consultation, and point-prevalence abstinence rates. The primary data analysis will be conducted using a mixed-effects logistic regression model with random effects for the cluster variable. Discussion If the training increases the rates of delivery of stop-smoking advice, it would offer a low-threshold strategy for the guideline implementation in German primary care. Should one method prove superior, a more specific guideline recommendation can be proposed. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00012786); registered on 22th August 2017, prior to the first patient in. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-019-0986-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Kastaun
- Institute of General Practice, Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Verena Leve
- Institute of General Practice, Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jaqueline Hildebrandt
- Institute of General Practice, Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Christian Funke
- Institute of General Practice, Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Stephanie Becker
- Institute of General Practice, Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Diana Lubisch
- Institute of General Practice, Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Viechtbauer
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Olaf Reddemann
- Institute of General Practice, Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Linn Hempel
- Clinical Institute of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Hayden McRobbie
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.,The Dragon Institute for Innovation, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Tobias Raupach
- Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.,Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - Robert West
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Kotz
- Institute of General Practice, Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany.,Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hummel K, Candel MJJM, Nagelhout GE, Brown J, van den Putte B, Kotz D, Willemsen MC, Fong GT, West R, de Vries H. Construct and Predictive Validity of Three Measures of Intention to Quit Smoking: Findings From the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands Survey. Nicotine Tob Res 2018; 20:1101-1108. [PMID: 28472427 PMCID: PMC6093485 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntx092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2016] [Accepted: 04/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The aim of the study was to compare the construct validity and the predictive validity of three instruments to measure intention to quit smoking: a Stages of Change measure, the Motivation To Stop Scale (MTSS), and a Likert scale. We used the Theory of Planned Behavior as theoretical framework. Methods We used data from the International Tobacco Control Netherlands Survey. We included smokers who participated in three consecutive survey waves (n = 980). We measured attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control in 2012, intention to quit with three instruments in 2013, and having made a quit attempt in the last year in 2014. We conducted Structural Equation Modeling with three models for the instruments of intention separately and with one model that included the three instruments simultaneously. Results All three instruments of intention were significantly and positively related to attitude and perceived behavioral control but none was related to subjective norm. All three instruments were significantly and positively related to making a quit attempt. The relation of the Likert scale with making a quit attempt (β = 0.38) was somewhat stronger than that of the Stages of Change measure (β = 0.35) and the MTSS (β = 0.22). When entering the three instruments together into one model, only the Likert scale was significantly related to making a quit attempt. Conclusions All three instruments showed reasonable construct validity and comparable predictive validity. Under the studied conditions, the Likert scale performed slightly better than the Stages of Change measure and the MTSS. Implications An assessment of the Stages of Change, the Motivation To Stop Scale, and a Likert scale showed comparable predictive and construct validity as measures for intention to quit smoking. All three instruments can be used in future research; however, under the studied theoretical framework, that is, the Theory of Planned Behavior, the Likert scale performed slightly better than the other two instruments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Hummel
- Department of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Math J J M Candel
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Gera E Nagelhout
- Department of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jamie Brown
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bas van den Putte
- Department of Communication, University of Amsterdam (ASCoR), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute for Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Kotz
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Institute of General Practice, Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marc C Willemsen
- Department of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Dutch Alliance for a Smokefree Society, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Geoffrey T Fong
- Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Robert West
- Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hein de Vries
- Department of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Perski O, Herd N, Brown J, West R. Does consistent motivation to stop smoking improve the explanation of recent quit attempts beyond current motivation? A cross-sectional study. Addict Behav 2018; 81:12-16. [PMID: 29421344 PMCID: PMC5862554 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.01.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2017] [Revised: 01/29/2018] [Accepted: 01/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIMS In seeking to provide more accurate models of population quit attempt rates, this study assessed whether a single self-report measure of consistent motivation to stop smoking adds useful explanatory power over and above an established measure of current motivation to stop. METHOD Data from 16,657 current smokers in England were collected between October 2012 and June 2017 using cross-sectional household surveys. Smokers were asked whether they had made a serious quit attempt in the past year and they answered two questions on motivation to stop (current motivation and consistent motivation to stop smoking). Having made at least one quit attempt in the past year was regressed in logistic models onto current motivation to stop and consistent motivation to stop individually and then together, with both models adjusting for sociodemographic variables and a measure of nicotine dependence. RESULTS The addition of consistent motivation to stop smoking added substantially to the fit of the model over and above the established measure of current motivation to quit (χ2(1, N = 16,657) = 901.7, p < 0.001) with an adjusted odds ratio of 4.1 (95% CI = 3.7-4.5, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Consistent motivation to stop smoking substantially improves the modelling of recent smoking cessation attempts over and above current motivation to stop. The consistency of smokers' motivation to quit may be a useful explanatory and target variable in future intervention studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Perski
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
| | - Natalie Herd
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Jamie Brown
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK; Cancer Research UK, Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Robert West
- Cancer Research UK, Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
de Vocht F, Brown J, Beard E, West R, Michie S, Campbell R, Hickman M. Motivation to reduce alcohol consumption and subsequent attempts at reduction and changes in consumption in increasing and higher-risk drinkers in England: a prospective population survey. Addiction 2018; 113:817-827. [PMID: 29368391 PMCID: PMC5947299 DOI: 10.1111/add.14132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2017] [Revised: 09/18/2017] [Accepted: 12/01/2017] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To assess how far motivation to reduce alcohol consumption in increasing and higher-risk drinkers in England predicts self-reported attempts to reduce alcohol consumption and changes in alcohol intake during the following 6 months. METHODS This study used self-reported data from 2928 higher-risk drinkers in the Alcohol Toolkit Study (ATS): a series of monthly cross-sectional household surveys of adults aged 16+ years of age in England. Alcohol consumption was measured in an initial survey and in a 6-month telephone follow-up interview using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)-C questionnaire. Motivation was measured in the initial survey using the Motivation to Reduce Alcohol Consumption (MRAC) scale. Attempts to reduce alcohol consumption during the past 6 months were recorded at follow-up. Data were analysed using repeated-measures difference-in-differences and logistic regression models. RESULTS Participants with higher initial motivation to reduce alcohol consumption were more likely to report that they had made an attempt to reduce consumption at follow-up [adjusted odds ratio (ORadj ) = 2.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.75-3.29]. There was an overall reduction in alcohol consumption between initial survey and follow-up (ORadj = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.65-0.79), but there was insufficient evidence of an additional effect of motivation to reduce consumption on subsequent changes in alcohol consumption, with the difference-in-differences effect instead suggesting an average increase (ORadj = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.00-1.88). CONCLUSIONS Increasing and higher-risk drinkers in England who report greater motivation to reduce their consumption are more likely to report making an attempt to reduce during the next 6 months, but this may not be associated with a reduction in alcohol consumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank de Vocht
- NIHR School for Public Health Research (SPHR)Newcastle upon TyneUK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - Jamie Brown
- NIHR School for Public Health Research (SPHR)Newcastle upon TyneUK
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health PsychologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Behavioural Science and HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Emma Beard
- NIHR School for Public Health Research (SPHR)Newcastle upon TyneUK
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health PsychologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Behavioural Science and HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Robert West
- Department of Behavioural Science and HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Susan Michie
- NIHR School for Public Health Research (SPHR)Newcastle upon TyneUK
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health PsychologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Rona Campbell
- NIHR School for Public Health Research (SPHR)Newcastle upon TyneUK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - Matthew Hickman
- NIHR School for Public Health Research (SPHR)Newcastle upon TyneUK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Simonavicius E, McNeill A, Arnott D, Brose LS. What factors are associated with current smokers using or stopping e-cigarette use? Drug Alcohol Depend 2017; 173:139-143. [PMID: 28246049 PMCID: PMC5380653 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2016] [Revised: 01/06/2017] [Accepted: 01/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While some smokers use e-cigarettes and stop smoking, a substantial proportion try e-cigarettes and later discontinue or use them concurrently with smoking (current dual users). The aim was to assess factors associated with ongoing e-cigarette use and discontinuation among smokers. METHODS Secondary analysis of data of 1489 currently smoking adults, 18 and above, from a GB population-based online survey conducted in March 2016. A multivariable logistic regression assessed motivation to stop smoking among never e-cigarette users, past triers ( RESULTS Current dual users were more motivated to stop smoking than past users (AOR=1.95, 95% CI: 1.10-3.46); never users' or past triers' motivation did not differ from past users'. Dual users were less dependent on cigarettes (AOR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.35-0.86) and more likely to use e-cigarettes as an aid to reduce smoking (AOR=2.40, 95% CI: 1.59-3.64) and to deal with smoking restrictions (AOR=2.03, 95% CI: 1.22-3.38) than past users. Smokers mostly discontinued e-cigarettes because they did not feel like smoking, did not help with cravings, or respondents had just wanted to try them. CONCLUSION Among smokers, ongoing use of e-cigarettes is associated with reasons for reducing smoking and dealing with smoking restrictions, heightened motivation to stop smoking, and lower dependence on smoking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erikas Simonavicius
- Department of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Ann McNeill
- Department of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Leonie S Brose
- Department of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|