1
|
Pennings G. Should a gamete bank verify the non-medical information provided by a donor? Hum Reprod 2024; 39:632-637. [PMID: 38261363 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Over the years, cases of fraud have been discovered where donors have been lying about their characteristics. The question raised by such cases is what the responsibility of the gamete bank is for the non-medical information provided by the donor. The problem is that extended donor profiles contain a large amount of information about different aspects of the donor's life and that not all this information can be verified or is worth verifying. Two cases are scrutinized in more detail: education and criminal record. The proposed solution is to split the donor information into a verified and a non-verified part with the non-verified part falling under the responsibility of the donor. The question of what information should be included in the verified part of the donor profile is still open.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Pennings
- Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cornthwaite K, Goedeke S, Shepherd D, Rodino I. Student views on recognition and payment options for gamete donation in New Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2023; 63:753-759. [PMID: 37221091 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Demand for donor gametes in New Zealand significantly outweighs the number of willing donors. Payment for donation has been suggested as a viable solution to increase the supply and attract more donors in acknowledging the time, effort and inconvenience associated with donation. AIMS Internationally, university students are a commonly targeted group for paid gamete donation. This study aims to explore the views of university students in New Zealand to gauge their support and concerns relating to a range of options to recognise donors, including payment. METHODS Two hundred and three tertiary students completed a questionnaire exploring their views on various forms of recognition for donation and concerns relating to payment. RESULTS Participants indicated the greatest support for reimbursement for expenses directly related to the donation process. Payment constituting explicit financial advantage was regarded least favourably. Participants held concerns that payment would attract people donating for the 'wrong' reasons and lead to donors concealing relevant histories. Further concerns included payment increasing costs for recipients and causing disparities in access to gametes. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study suggest that within a New Zealand context a culture of gift-giving and altruism are strongly held principles towards reproductive donation, including among the student population. This highlights the need to consider alternative strategies to commercial models to overcome donor shortages which are in line with the cultural and legislative context of New Zealand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey Cornthwaite
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sonja Goedeke
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Daniel Shepherd
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Iolanda Rodino
- Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Takeda Y, Hyslop L, Choudhary M, Robertson F, Pyle A, Wilson I, Santibanez‐Koref M, Turnbull D, Herbert M, Hudson G. Feasibility and impact of haplogroup matching for mitochondrial replacement treatment. EMBO Rep 2023; 24:e54540. [PMID: 37589175 PMCID: PMC10561356 DOI: 10.15252/embr.202154540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Mitochondrial replacement technology (MRT) aims to reduce the risk of serious disease in children born to women who carry pathogenic mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) variants. By transplanting nuclear genomes from eggs of an affected woman to enucleated eggs from an unaffected donor, MRT creates new combinations of nuclear and mtDNA. Based on sets of shared sequence variants, mtDNA is classified into ~30 haplogroups. Haplogroup matching between egg donors and women undergoing MRT has been proposed as a means of reducing mtDNA sequence divergence between them. Here we investigate the potential effect of mtDNA haplogroup matching on clinical delivery of MRT and on mtDNA sequence divergence between donor/recipient pairs. Our findings indicate that haplogroup matching would limit the availability of egg donors such that women belonging to rare haplogroups may have to wait > 4 years for treatment. Moreover, we find that intra-haplogroup sequence variation is frequently within the range observed between randomly matched mtDNA pairs. We conclude that haplogroup matching would restrict the availability of MRT, without necessarily reducing mtDNA sequence divergence between donor/recipient pairs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuko Takeda
- Wellcome Centre for Mitochondrial Research, Biosciences InstituteNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Louise Hyslop
- Newcastle Fertility Centre, Biomedicine West WingCentre for LifeNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Meenakshi Choudhary
- Newcastle Fertility Centre, Biomedicine West WingCentre for LifeNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Fiona Robertson
- Wellcome Centre for Mitochondrial ResearchInstitute of Clinical Translational Research, Newcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Angela Pyle
- Wellcome Centre for Mitochondrial ResearchInstitute of Clinical Translational Research, Newcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Ian Wilson
- Biosciences Institute, Centre for LifeNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | | | - Douglass Turnbull
- Wellcome Centre for Mitochondrial ResearchInstitute of Clinical Translational Research, Newcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Mary Herbert
- Wellcome Centre for Mitochondrial Research, Biosciences InstituteNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
- Newcastle Fertility Centre, Biomedicine West WingCentre for LifeNewcastle upon TyneUK
- Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery InstituteMonash UniversityMelbourneVICAustralia
| | - Gavin Hudson
- Wellcome Centre for Mitochondrial Research, Biosciences InstituteNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tober D, Pavone V, Lafuente-Funes S, Konvalinka N. Eggonomics: Vitrification and bioeconomies of egg donation in the United States and Spain. Med Anthropol Q 2023; 37:248-263. [PMID: 37229598 DOI: 10.1111/maq.12767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Regulations governing assisted reproduction control the degree to which gamete donation is legal and how people providing genetic material are selected and compensated. The United States and Spain are both global leaders in fertility treatment with donor oocytes. Yet both countries take different approaches to how egg donation is regulated. The US model reveals a hierarchically organized form of gendered eugenics. In Spain, the eugenic aspects of donor selection are more subtle. Drawing upon fieldwork in the United States and Spain, this article examines (1) how compensated egg donation operates under two regulatory settings, (2) the implications for egg donors as providers of bioproducts, and (3) how advances in oocyte vitrification enhances the commodity quality of human eggs. By comparing these two reproductive bioeconomies we gain insight into how different cultural, medical, and ethical frameworks intersect with egg donor embodied experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane Tober
- Department of Anthropology and Institute for Social Science Research, University of Alabama, 19 Ten Hoor Hall, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, United States
- Affiliate faculty, Social and Behavioral Sciences University of California, San Francisco
| | - Vincenzo Pavone
- Institute of Public Goods and Policies, Spanish National Research Council, Calle Albesanz, 26-28, Madrid, 28037, Spain
| | - Sara Lafuente-Funes
- Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany, Theodor-W.-Adorno-Platz 6, 60323, Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nancy Konvalinka
- Departamento Antropología Social y Cultural, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Calle Senda del Rey, 7, 28040, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pennings G. When elective egg freezers become egg donors: practical and ethical issues. Reprod Biomed Online 2023; 47:151-156. [PMID: 37198006 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
Many people hope that the unused and unwanted eggs frozen by women for self-use could be applied to reduce the shortage of donor eggs. However, several practical (additional screening and counselling) and ethical (informed consent and reimbursement) issues may dampen this hope. This paper also considers the question of whether elective egg freezers who want to donate their eggs should be reimbursed for the costs they have met for the IVF cycle and storage. It is argued that a partial reimbursement for the collection (hormonal stimulation and retrieval) is morally acceptable because it is limited to proven expenses (and does not violate the altruism rule) and because the recipients should contribute to the costs of a scheme from which they are benefiting. The storage fee should be paid by the egg freezer herself and no reward for effort, time and inconvenience should be given. This compromise benefits both donors and recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Pennings
- Universiteit Gent, Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Gent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nogueira A, Ammar O, Bilir E, Iftene L, Torrero I, Ceschin N, Nogueira-Silva C, Brandão P. University students' opinion on gamete donor identification regimes. J Assist Reprod Genet 2023:10.1007/s10815-023-02832-w. [PMID: 37233867 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02832-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to evaluate the opinion of university students about the identification or nonidentification of gamete donation and the probability of donation according to the different regimes. METHODS This was a cross-sectional observational study based on an online anonymous survey including questions about sociodemographic data, reasons for considering donations, information about the donation process and legislation, and their opinions about the different regimes and how they would influence donations. RESULTS In total, 1393 valid responses were obtained, with a mean age of 24.0 years (SD = 4.8), most of the respondents being female (68.5%), living in a relationship (56.7%), and without children (88.4%). The main reasons for considering donation would be altruism and monetary compensation. Overall, it was found that participants were poorly informed about the donation procedure and legislation. Students revealed preference for nonidentified donation, and they were less likely to donate in an open identity regime. CONCLUSION Most university students consider themselves poorly informed about gamete donation, express a preference for nonidentified gamete donation, and would less likely donate on an open identity basis. Thus, an identified regime may be less attractive to potential donors and lead to a decrease in the availability of gamete donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Nogueira
- Medical School, University of Minho, Universidade Do Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal
| | - Omar Ammar
- Ar-Razi Private Hospital, 60 Street, Ramadi, Iraq
| | - Enes Bilir
- School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Ignácio Torrero
- University Cardenal Herrera, Carrer Lluís Vives, 1, 46115 Alfara del Patriarca, Valencia, Spain
| | - Nathan Ceschin
- Feliccità Fertility Institute, Rua Conselheiro Dantas, 1154-Prado Velho, Curitiba, Paraná, 80220-191, Brazil
| | - Cristina Nogueira-Silva
- Medical School, University of Minho, Universidade Do Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal
| | - Pedro Brandão
- Ginemed Porto, Avenida da Boavista, 1243, 4100-130, Porto, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Caughey LE, White KM, Lensen S, Peate M. Elective egg freezers' disposition decisions: a qualitative study. Fertil Steril 2023:S0015-0282(23)00151-6. [PMID: 37032273 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the factors that influence elective egg freezers' disposition decisions toward their surplus-frozen oocytes. DESIGN Qualitative. SETTING Not applicable. PATIENT(S) Thirty-one participants: 7 past; 6 current; and 18 future oocyte disposition decision-makers. INTERVENTION(S) Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Qualitative thematic analysis of interview transcripts. RESULTS Six inter-related themes were identified related to the decision-making process which are as follows: decisions are dynamic; triggers for the final decision; achieving motherhood; conceptualization of oocytes; the impacts of egg donation on others; and external factors affecting the final disposition outcome. All women reported a type of trigger event for making a final decision (e.g., completing their family). Women who achieved motherhood were more open to donating their oocytes to others but were concerned about the implications for their child and felt responsibility for potential donor children. Women who did not achieve motherhood were unlikely to donate to others due to the grief of not becoming a mother, often feeling alone, misunderstood, and unsupported. Reclaiming oocytes (e.g., taking them home) and closure ceremonies helped some women process their grief. Donating to research was viewed as an altruistic option as oocytes would not be wasted and did not have the "complication" of a genetically-linked child. There was a general lack of knowledge around disposition options at all stages of the process. CONCLUSION(S) Oocyte disposition decisions are dynamic and complex for women, exacerbated by a general lack of understanding of these options. The final decision is framed by: whether women achieved motherhood, dealing with grief if they did not achieve motherhood, and considering the complexities of donating to others. Additional decision support through counseling, decision aids, and early consideration of disposition when eggs are initially stored may help women make informed decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy E Caughey
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Katherine M White
- School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sarah Lensen
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michelle Peate
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lafuente‐Funes S, Weis C, Hudson N, Provoost V. Egg donation in the age of vitrification: A study of egg providers' perceptions and experiences in the UK, Belgium and Spain. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2023; 45:259-278. [PMID: 36444136 PMCID: PMC10100196 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
IVF treatment involving donated eggs increases yearly. Numerous technical and commercial transformations have reshaped how eggs are retrieved, stored and managed. A key transformation is vitrification; a 'fast freezing' method that allows efficient preservation of eggs, and therefore more flexibility in use, giving rise to new commercial possibilities. There has been limited focus on egg providers' experiences in the context of vitrification and related commercialisation. We report findings from a study in the UK, Spain and Belgium, where we interviewed 75 egg providers. Comparing experiences within different donation 'regimes' allows an exploration of how varying national practices and policies shape information-giving and women's experiences. In the UK, a system of 'informed gift-giving' was described, where egg providers saw their actions as not-for-profit and felt relatively well informed. In Belgium, the system was presented as 'trusted tissue exchange': with less information-giving than in the UK, but clinics were trusted to act responsibly. In Spain, a 'closed-door, market-driven' system was described, whereby egg providers received little information and expressed concerns about generation of excess profit. Our findings extend understandings of how egg donation is managed at the national level and how donation regimes produce specific experiences, expectations and subjectivities amongst tissue providers.
Collapse
|
9
|
Pinto da Silva S, de Freitas C, Severo M, Silva S. Gamete and embryo donation for research: what might shape the willingness to donate among gamete donors and recipients? J Assist Reprod Genet 2022; 39:2077-2087. [PMID: 35986809 PMCID: PMC9475016 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02569-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Research using gametes and embryos donated by reproductive and third-party donors contributed to substantial, albeit contentious achievements. The views of gamete donors and recipients on donation for research and the underpinning role of attitudes towards research have been seldom explored and are yet to be incorporated into ethical, legal, and regulatory landscapes. From a cultural standpoint, this study adapts and explores psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Research Attitudes Questionnaire (RAQ), and analyzes the willingness of gamete donors and recipients to donate gametes and embryos for research and its association with sociodemographic, reproductive characteristics, and attitudes towards research. METHODS Between July 2017 and June 2018, 71 donors and 165 recipients completed a self-administered questionnaire at the Portuguese Public Bank of Gametes. Willingness to donate and attitudes towards research were measured with a 5-point Likert scale. RAQ psychometric characteristics were explored. RESULTS Two RAQ components were identified: "trustworthiness of research" and "critical perspective". Most participants were willing to donate gametes and embryos: donors more willing to donate gametes and male recipients more willing to donate gametes and embryos. Higher RAQ scores, indicating a more positive attitude towards research, were observed on the component "trustworthiness of research" among those willing to donate gametes and embryos and on the component "critical perspective" among those willing to donate embryos. CONCLUSION These findings help foster inclusivity, diversity, and responsiveness of research and call for upstream engagement of male and female gamete donors and recipients, promoting a trustworthy, anticipatory, democratic, and people-centered approach to policies, regulations, and practices in human gamete and embryo research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Pinto da Silva
- EPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas nº135, 4050‑600, Porto, Portugal.
- Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas nº135, 4050-600, Porto, Portugal.
- Departamento de Ciências da Saúde Pública e Forenses e Educação Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Cláudia de Freitas
- EPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas nº135, 4050‑600, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas nº135, 4050-600, Porto, Portugal
- Departamento de Ciências da Saúde Pública e Forenses e Educação Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
- Centre for Research and Studies in Sociology (CIES-IUL), University Institute of Lisbon (ISCTE-IUL), Avenida das Forças Armadas, 1649-026, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Milton Severo
- EPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas nº135, 4050‑600, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas nº135, 4050-600, Porto, Portugal
- Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto, Rua Jorge de Viterbo Ferreira nº 228, 4050-313, Porto, Portugal
| | - Susana Silva
- Department of Sociology, Institute of Social Sciences, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal
- Centre for Research in Anthropology (CRIA), Avenida das Forças Armadas, 1649-026, Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Coveney C, Hudson N, Funes SL, Jacxsens L, Provoost V. From scarcity to sisterhood: The framing of egg donation on fertility clinic websites in the UK, Belgium and Spain. Soc Sci Med 2022; 296:114785. [DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
11
|
Goedeke S, Shepherd D, Rodino IS. Fertility stakeholders' concerns regarding payment for egg and sperm donation in New Zealand and Australia. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE & SOCIETY ONLINE 2022; 14:8-19. [PMID: 34703916 PMCID: PMC8523861 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
New Zealand and Australia are countries which currently prohibit donor payment and require open-identity forms of donation. This study explored the concerns of fertility stakeholders regarding payment which would constitute financial reward for gamete donation, and factors predicting such concerns. A total of 434 participants from across New Zealand and Australia completed an online survey anonymously. Participants included those with infertility and treatment experience, donors, recipients, donor-conceived people and clinic professionals. Results indicated that participants' concerns related to their assumptions about the type of donor motivated by financial reward, and the possibility that, if paid, donors might conceal information relevant to treatment and the donor-conceived person. Furthermore, participants were concerned about increasing recipient costs. Participants with personal experience of infertility held stronger concerns overall. Professionals expressed concerns of clinical relevance, such as the withholding of donor information relevant to treatment outcomes. The lowest levels of concern were expressed in relation to payment devaluing the meaning of human life. Qualitatively, themes highlighted concerns regarding payment enticing the 'wrong' type of donor, increased cost to recipients, and concern about the wellbeing of donor-offspring. Collectively, such concerns must be understood against the New Zealand and Australia open-identity donation context which enables the possibility of contact between donors and offspring. These findings indicate that donor recruitment campaigns need to account for different stakeholder concerns, and consider ways to address donor shortages effectively while remaining compliant with legislative requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Goedeke
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand
| | - Daniel Shepherd
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand
| | - Iolanda S. Rodino
- Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kirkman-Brown J, Calhaz-Jorge C, Dancet EAF, Lundin K, Martins M, Tilleman K, Thorn P, Vermeulen N, Frith L. OUP accepted manuscript. Hum Reprod Open 2022; 2022:hoac001. [PMID: 35178481 PMCID: PMC8847071 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoac001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What information and support should be offered to donors, intended parents and donor-conceived people, in general and in consideration of the availability of direct-to-consumer genetic testing and matching services? SUMMARY ANSWER For donors, intended parents and donor-conceived offspring, recommendations are made that cover information needs and informed consent, psychosocial implications and disclosure. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Trends indicate that the use of donor-assisted conception is growing and guidance is needed to help these recipients/intended parents, the donors and offspring, navigate the rapidly changing environment in which donor-assisted conception takes place. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A working group (WG) collaborated on writing recommendations based, where available, on evidence collected from a literature search and expert opinion. Draft recommendations were published for stakeholder review and adapted where relevant based on the comments received. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Papers retrieved from PUBMED were included from 1 January 2014 up to 31 August 2020, focusing on studies published since direct-to-consumer genetic testing has become more widespread and accessible. The current paper is limited to reproductive donation performed in medically assisted reproduction (MAR) centres (and gamete banks): donation outside the medical context was not considered. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In total, 32 recommendations were made for information provision and support to donors, 32 for intended parents and 27 for donor-conceived offspring requesting information/support. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The available evidence in the area of reproductive donation is limited and diverse with regards to the context and types of donation. General conclusions and recommendations are largely based on expert opinion and may need to be adapted in light of future research. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS These recommendations provide guidance to MAR centres and gamete banks on good practice in information provision and support but should also be considered by regulatory bodies and policymakers at a national and international level to guide regulatory and legislative efforts towards the protection of donors and donor-conceived offspring. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The development of this good practice paper was funded by European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), covering expenses associated with the WG meetings, the literature searches and dissemination. The WG members did not receive any payment. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. DISCLAIMER This document represents the views of ESHRE, which are the result of consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders and where relevant based on the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation. The recommendations should be used for informational and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care, or be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care nor exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. They do not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, nor variations based on locality and facility type. †ESHRE pages content is not externally peer reviewed. The manuscript has been approved by the Executive Committee of ESHRE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jackson Kirkman-Brown
- Centre for Human Reproductive Science, University of Birmingham, IMSR, Birmingham, UK
- Correspondence address. University of Birmingham, IMSR, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. E-mail: ;
| | | | - Eline A F Dancet
- KU Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kersti Lundin
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mariana Martins
- University of Porto, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Porto, Portugal
| | - Kelly Tilleman
- Department for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Petra Thorn
- Private Practice, Couple and Family Therapy, Infertility Counseling, Mörfelden, Germany
| | - Nathalie Vermeulen
- European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Central Office, Strombeek-Bever, Belgium
| | - Lucy Frith
- Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Khosravi S, Kazemi A, Ahmadi SM. Emotions towards potential genetic offspring among oocyte donors: a cross-sectional study. Reprod Health 2021; 18:255. [PMID: 34930363 PMCID: PMC8691081 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01311-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The presence of maternal emotions towards the offspring resulting from assisted reproductive techniques (ART) has been previously reported in oocyte donors. However, there is limited information about the presence of these emotions in oocyte donors during the ART process and before pregnancy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the emotions of oocyte donor women towards the potential genetic offspring and to compare them with women treated with ART by using own oocytes. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 women who were divided into two groups of oocyte donors and those treated with ART and using autologous oocyte. At the time of oocyte retrieval. Using a validated questionnaire, the emotions toward potential offspring (EPO) resulting from ART and its three dimensions (including imagination, sense of ownership, and importance of treatment outcome) were measured and compared in two groups. Results Comparison of the EPO in the two groups showed that the emotions in all three dimensions were lower in oocyte donors than the other group (p < 0.001). Moreover, in oocyte donors, the mean score of the scale of the importance of treatment outcome dimension was higher than the other two scales (p < 0.001). Conclusion The results of the study showed that there is a significant emotion toward the potential offspring in oocyte donors. The presence of these emotions thus should be considered in formulating the ethical charter of ART by using oocyte donation. There is limited information about the presence of maternal emotions in egg donor women during the assisted reproductive techniques (ART) process and before pregnancy. The aim of this study was to evaluate these emotions of women towards the potential genetic offspring and to compare them with women treated with ART by using own oocytes. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 women who were divided into two groups of egg donor and those treated with ART and using autologous oocyte. At the time of oocyte retrieval and using a validated questionnaire, the emotions toward potential offspring (EPO) resulting from ART and its three dimensions (including imagination, sense of ownership, and importance of treatment outcome) were measured and compared in two groups. Out of 100 women. Comparison of the EPO in the two groups showed that the emotions in all three dimensions were lower in egg donors than the other group. Moreover, in egg donors, the mean score of the scale of the importance of treatment outcome dimension was higher than the other two scales. The results of the study showed that there is a significant emotion toward the potential offspring in oocyte donors. The presence of these emotions thus should be considered in formulating the ethical charter of ART by using oocyte donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahar Khosravi
- Reproductive Health Department, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Ashraf Kazemi
- Reproductive Health Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Hezarjerib AV, Isfahan, Iran.
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pennings G. Balancing embryo donation and double gamete donation. Hum Reprod 2021; 37:389-392. [PMID: 34878137 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Huele and colleagues started a debate on the comparison between embryo donation and double donation. Although I largely agree with their final conclusion, I believe that the perspective of the recipients needs to be added to get a more complete picture. The present contribution focuses on that perspective and advances other arguments to balance the two methods. The main argument in favour of double donation is the difference in perceived meaning for the recipients compared to surplus embryos. The main arguments in favour of embryo donation are the fair distribution of scarce resources (i.e. donor gametes) and the principle of non-maleficence through the avoidance of unnecessary oocyte donation cycles. The balance would be to put both treatments on an equal footing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Pennings
- Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP, Perruzza D, Terzuoli G, Azzena S, Crippa A, Dworakowska A, Tabanelli C, Magli MC. Oocyte donation: not all oocyte cryobanks are the same. Reprod Biomed Online 2021; 44:271-279. [PMID: 35031239 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION Is the efficacy of imported vitrified oocyte donation affected by the cryobank of origin? DESIGN Longitudinal cohort study, including 249 completed oocyte warming cycles from 200 recipients (January 2016-July 2020). No severe male factor was included. Vitrified oocytes were provided by three Spanish cryobanks. Primary outcome was cumulative live birth delivery rate (CLBR) per completed oocyte warming cycle. RESULTS After warming 1535 oocytes, 1244 survived (81.0%) and 945 fertilized (76.0%); embryo utilization rate was 65.3%. The overall CLBR per completed cycle was 47.0% but was lower in cryobank 1 (31.2%) versus cryobank 2 (56.0%, P = 0.0010) and cryobank 3 (50.8%, P = 0.0241). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified survival of four or more oocytes as the strongest predictor for delivery (P = 0.0282). Only 202 out of 249 oocyte warming cycles had four or more survived oocytes in a proportion that was significantly lower in cryobank 1 versus cryobank 2 (70.1% versus 89.0%, P = 0.0020); comparison with cryobank 3 (81.0%) was not significant. In the 202 oocyte warming cycles, CLBR in cryobank 1 (37.0%) was lower versus cryobank 2 (58.8%, P = 0.0115) and cryobank 3 (60.8%, P = 0.0019), suggesting a reduced viability in oocytes from cryobank 1 that survived warming. CONCLUSIONS Differences were found in the efficacy of imported vitrified oocytes in relation to the cryobank of origin. Each centre needs to evaluate the results internally when starting a collaboration with an oocyte cryobank to establish the necessary measures to maximize treatment efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Gianaroli
- SISMER, Reproductive Medicine Unit, Via Mazzini 12, Bologna 40138, Italy.
| | | | - Davide Perruzza
- SISMER, Reproductive Medicine Unit, Via Mazzini 12, Bologna 40138, Italy
| | - Gaia Terzuoli
- SISMER, Reproductive Medicine Unit, Via Mazzini 12, Bologna 40138, Italy
| | - Silvia Azzena
- SISMER, Reproductive Medicine Unit, Via Mazzini 12, Bologna 40138, Italy
| | - Andor Crippa
- SISMER, Reproductive Medicine Unit, Via Mazzini 12, Bologna 40138, Italy
| | - Aneta Dworakowska
- SISMER, Reproductive Medicine Unit, Via Mazzini 12, Bologna 40138, Italy
| | - Carla Tabanelli
- SISMER, Reproductive Medicine Unit, Via Mazzini 12, Bologna 40138, Italy
| | - M Cristina Magli
- SISMER, Reproductive Medicine Unit, Via Mazzini 12, Bologna 40138, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bracewell-Milnes T, Holland JC, Jones BP, Saso S, Almeida P, Maclaran K, Norman-Taylor J, Nikolaou D, Shah NM, Johnson M, Thum MY. Exploring the knowledge and attitudes of women of reproductive age from the general public towards egg donation and egg sharing: a UK-based study. Hum Reprod 2021; 36:2189-2201. [PMID: 34227667 PMCID: PMC8648294 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What are the knowledge and views of UK-based women towards egg donation (ED) and egg sharing (ES)? SUMMARY ANSWER Lacking knowledge of the practices of ED and ES could be an influential factor in donor egg shortages, rather than negative perceptions or lack of donor anonymity and financial incentives. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The increasing age of women trying to conceive has led to donor egg shortages, with ED and ES failing to meet demand. Indeed, in recent years in the UK, ES numbers have fallen. This results in long waiting lists, forcing patients abroad for fertility treatment to take up cross border reproductive care. Previous research suggests a lack of knowledge of ED among members of the general public; however, no study has yet assessed knowledge or views of ES in the general public. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Six hundred and thirty-five UK-based women over 18 years were voluntarily recruited from social media community groups by convenience sampling. The recruitment period was from February to April 2020. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Participants completed a previously validated questionnaire regarding female fertility, ED and ES, including knowledge, perceptions and approval of the practices and relevant legislation. This included ranking key benefits and issues regarding egg sharing. The questionnaire was completed using the online Qualtrics survey software. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Regarding knowledge of ED and ES, 56.3% and 79.8%, respectively had little or no prior knowledge. Upon explanation, most approved of ED (85.8%) and ES (70.4%). A greater proportion of respondents would donate to a family member/friend (49.75%) than to an anonymous recipient (35.80%). Overall, ES was viewed less favourably than ED, with ethical and practical concerns highlighted. Women aged 18-30 years were significantly more likely to approve of egg donation practice compared to those aged >30 years (P < 0.0001). Those against ES found fears of financial coercion or negative psychological wellbeing the most concerning. About 35.8% and 49.7% would personally consider anonymous and known ED, respectively, whilst 56.7% would consider ES. Those answering in favour of egg sharing were significantly more likely to give higher benefit ratings compared to those against the practice (P < 0.001). Most agreed (55.8%) with and were not deterred to donate (60.1%) by the 'Disclosure of Donor Identity' legislation. Only 31.6% agreed with the compensatory cap; however, 52.7% would not be more motivated to donate by an increased cap. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION There were several limitations of the study, including the use of convenience sampling and the voluntary nature of participation opening the study up to sampling and participation bias. Finally, closed questions were predominantly used to allow the generation of quantitative data and statistical analysis. However, this approach prevented opinion justification and qualitative analysis, limiting the depth of conclusions drawn. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS To our knowledge, this is the first study to survey the general public's knowledge and views of ED/ES using a previously validated questionnaire. The conclusion that lack of knowledge could be contributing to the current donor shortfall in the UK demonstrates that campaigns to inform women of the practices are necessary to alleviate donor oocyte shortages. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funds were used for this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Bracewell-Milnes
- Assisted Conception Unit, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.,Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - James C Holland
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Benjamin P Jones
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Paula Almeida
- Assisted Conception Unit, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - Kate Maclaran
- Assisted Conception Unit, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | - Nishel M Shah
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Mark Johnson
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK.,The Lister Hospital, The Lister Fertility Clinic, London, UK
| | - Meen-Yau Thum
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK.,The Lister Hospital, The Lister Fertility Clinic, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
De Proost M, Hudson N, Provoost V. 'Nothing will stop me from giving the gift of life': a qualitative analysis of egg donor forum posts. CULTURE, HEALTH & SEXUALITY 2021; 23:690-704. [PMID: 32212987 DOI: 10.1080/13691058.2020.1722242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Online spaces are increasingly important for our collective consciousness and provide an opportunity to document changing ideas, subjectivities and experiences surrounding new reproductive technologies. This paper reports on the first study of egg donation and online discussion boards in UK-based forums. Using thematic analysis, we investigated how donors use online forums and explored how they present themselves as possible donors in online spaces. Three major themes were identified: 'using online forums to exchange knowledge and experiences', 'egg donation as a gift' and 'having a drive to donate'. Findings from the study reveal how donors enter online spaces looking for advice, presenting themselves as available and weaving themselves into an online community. There exist multiple ways in which donors construct and narrate their own participation in the process of egg donation. Presenting a donor identity in these online forums is not a straightforward matter of helping by giving but also involves a specific drive. While more research is needed on the range of possible motivations, this study gives a better understanding of the available online information and the co-construction of donor identities on discussions boards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michiel De Proost
- Gender, Diversity and Intersectionality Research Centre (RHEA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nicky Hudson
- Centre for Reproduction Research, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cavoretto PI, Farina A, Miglio R, Zamagni G, Girardelli S, Vanni VS, Morano D, Spinillo S, Sartor F, Candiani M. Prospective longitudinal cohort study of uterine arteries Doppler in singleton pregnancies obtained by IVF/ICSI with oocyte donation or natural conception. Hum Reprod 2021; 35:2428-2438. [PMID: 33099621 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2020] [Revised: 07/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Do uterine arteries Doppler studies show different pulsatility index (UtA-PI) measurements in IVF/ICSI pregnancies with oocyte donation (OD) as compared to natural conceptions? SUMMARY ANSWER In IVF/ICSI pregnancies with OD, UtA-PI is reduced by an average of about 40% as compared to pregnancies with natural conception. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY OD pregnancies present worse pregnancy outcomes as compared to natural conception, particularly for increased incidence of pre-eclampsia (PE). Recent evidence shows that IVF/ICSI pregnancies with frozen blastocyst transfer also present higher prevalence of PE and 15% lower UtA-PI as compared to pregnancies after fresh blastocyst transfers. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Prospective, longitudinal matched cohort study performed in the Fetal Medicine and Obstetric Departments of San Raffaele Hospital in Milan, between 2013 and 2018. The analysis is based on 584 Doppler observations collected from 296 women with different method of conception (OD n = 122; natural conception n = 174). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS IVF/ICSI viable singleton pregnancies with OD and natural conception control pregnancies matched for BMI and smoking, performing repeated UtA-PI measurements at 11-34 weeks. Miscarriages, abnormalities, twins, significant maternal diseases and other types of ARTs were excluded. Log mean left-right UtA-PI was used for analysis with linear mixed model (LMM) and correction for significant confounders. Pregnancy outcome was also analyzed. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Participants after OD were older and more frequently nulliparous (mean age: OD 43.4, 95% CI from 42.3 to 44.6; natural conception 35.1, 95% CI from 34.5 to 35.7; P-value < 0.001; nulliparous: OD 96.6%; natural conception 56.2%; P-value < 0.001). Mean pulsatility index was lower in OD (UtA-PI: natural conception 1.22; 95% CI from 1.11 to 1.28; OD 1.04; 95% CI from 0.96 to 1.12; P-value < 0.001). A significant effect of parity, gestational age (GA) modeled with a cubic polynomial and BMI was described in the LMM. The mean Log UtA-PI was on average 37% lower in OD as compared to natural conception pregnancies at LMM (P-value < 0.001). We also found a significant interaction between longitudinal UtA-PI Doppler and GA. Therefore, at 11 weeks' gestation the Log UtA-PI was 42% lower and, at 34 weeks, the differences reduced to 32%. GA at delivery and birth weight were statistically lower in OD group; however, birthweight centile was not statistically different. Preeclampsia was 11-fold more common in the OD group (0.6% and 6.6%, P-value = 0.003). No other significant difference in pregnancy outcome was shown in the study groups (gestational diabetes mellitus, small or large for GA). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION It was not possible to properly match for maternal age and to blind the assessment given the major differences between cohorts; however, we did not find significant within-groups effects related to maternal age. Future research is needed to reassess outcomes and correct them for maternal characteristics (e.g. cardiovascular function). WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This finding reproduces our previous discovery of lower UtA-PI in frozen as compared to fresh blastocyst transfer. The vast majority of OD is obtained by the use of cryopreservation. We speculate that increased uterine perfusion may be the physiological response to compensate dysfunctions both in the mother and in the placenta. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This is a non-funded study. The authors do not declare competing interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P I Cavoretto
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - A Farina
- Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC) Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - R Miglio
- Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - G Zamagni
- Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - S Girardelli
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - V S Vanni
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - D Morano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sant'Anna University Hospital, Cona, Ferrara, Italy
| | - S Spinillo
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - F Sartor
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - M Candiani
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pennings G. Expanded carrier screening should not be mandatory for gamete donors. Hum Reprod 2021; 35:1256-1261. [PMID: 32369167 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Revised: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
More and more centers are imposing expanded carrier screening (ECS) on their gamete donors. In some clinics and gamete banks, gamete donors are not given this right, contrary to the freedom to decline genetic screening in the general population. The possible social and psychological burdens that are recognized for infertility patients and the general population are downplayed for gamete donors. The procedure of imposing ECS on gamete donors shows that the interests of the recipients are valued higher than those of the donors. The general ethical argument defended here is the principle of proportionality: the burdens imposed on donors have to be balanced against the potential benefits for the offspring and the recipients. The risk reduction of ECS is below 1% and is too small to outweigh the potential dangers and disadvantages for donors. The conclusion is that clinics may ask, but not compel, donors to submit to ECS provided that they offer appropriate genetic and psychological counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Pennings
- Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Financial compensation of oocyte donors: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2021; 116:319-325. [PMID: 33910756 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.03.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Financial compensation of women donating oocytes for reproductive or research purposes is justified on ethical grounds and should acknowledge the time, inconvenience, and discomfort associated with screening, ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval, and postretrieval recovery and not vary according to the planned use of the oocytes or the number or quality of oocytes retrieved. This document replaces the document of the same name published in 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
-
- American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
|
22
|
Miner SA. "I would want to pay her": Challenging altruistic egg exchanges in Canada through moral patchworks. Soc Sci Med 2021; 272:113733. [PMID: 33556813 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Studies surrounding egg donation often occur within existing legal marketplaces showing how language of altruism and gift is employed to uphold gendered standards of femininity and morality. This article examines how women negotiate those gendered and moral standards under the Canadian Assisted Human Reproduction Act (AHRA), which prohibited the market exchange of eggs through the criminalization of paid egg donation. Through 71 in-depth semi-structured interviews with health care professionals (n = 51) and egg donation recipients (n = 20), I argue that participants in these exchanges use a patchwork of moral framings to question the ethicality of the act and the gendered links between altruism, morality and femininity. These market participants employ moral patchworks consisting of subverting, circumventing and rejecting the legally defined ethical practice of donation. By explicitly discussing payment and gifts as moral egg donation exchanges, recipients and fertility professionals suggest that egg donors' reproductive labor should be monetarily recognized. This article considers the ethical implications of these moral patchworks for understanding how gender is reproduced and undone in market exchanges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Skye A Miner
- Department of Sociology, McGill University, Room 712, Leacock Building, 855 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, QC, H3A 2T7, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hogan RG, Hammarberg K, Wang AY, Sullivan EA. ‘Battery hens’ or ‘nuggets of gold’: a qualitative study on the barriers and enablers for altruistic egg donation. HUM FERTIL 2021; 25:688-696. [DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2021.1873430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rosemarie G. Hogan
- Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- School of Nursing, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Karin Hammarberg
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Victorian Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alex Y. Wang
- Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Elizabeth A. Sullivan
- Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Pennings G. Mild stimulation should be mandatory for oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 2020; 35:2403-2407. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Revised: 08/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The increasing commercialization of oocyte donation is a source of concern. This evolution is expressed in the fact that oocyte donors’ interests are not a priority. For decades now, people mention that oocyte donation holds serious health risks for donors, as if this is an unavoidable given. However, most of the harm is caused by high hormonal stimulation. The risk/benefit balance of high stimulation compared to the risk/benefit balance of mild stimulation does not justify causing greater harm to donors, especially given the fact that donors submit to the procedure without any medical benefit for themselves and to help others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Pennings
- Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kretz M, Ohl J, Letur H, Guivarch A, Catteau-Jonard S, De Mouzon J. [Comparative survey of French oocyte donor's profile and motivations between nulliparous and multiparous donors, 2017-2018]. GYNECOLOGIE, OBSTETRIQUE, FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE 2020; 48:736-745. [PMID: 32289498 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Since the authorization of French nulliparous women to donate oocytes, who are the new donors? What are the similar and differential points with the initial donors who have already procreated? METHODS Retrospective multicenter cohort study using a questionnaire. RESULTS The return rate is 90.7% with 248 donor files from 5 French assisted reproductive technology (ART) centers, included between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018. The average age is 31,0 years. More than two thirds of women have a higher educational level than the license. Donation is spontaneous or relational in 69% and 25% of cases, respectively. Among nulliparous donors, 37% don't know the possibility of self-preservation but after information, 80% wish to benefit from it versus 32% of multiparous women if they were given the opportunity. CONCLUSIONS This study by the Study Group for Egg Donation (GEDO) highlights the particularities of French oocytes donors. The 2015 decree allowed to diversify the origin of the donation, which remains mainly altruistic but the possibility of self-preservation for nulliparous donors also seems to motivate women. This link between donation and self-preservation poses an ethical problem that needs to be approached and resolved in the next Bioethics Law framing Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Kretz
- Service de Gynécologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, avenue Molière, 67000 Strasbourg.
| | - J Ohl
- Service d'Assistance Médicale à la Procréation (CMCO), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, rue Louis Pasteur, 67300 Schiltigheim.
| | - H Letur
- Service d'Assistance Médicale à la Procréation - Préservation de la Fertilité, Polyclinique de Navarre, boulevard Haute rive, 64000 Pau.
| | - A Guivarch
- Clinique La Sagesse, 3, place Saint Guenole, 35000 Rennes.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hudson N, Culley L, Herbrand C, Pavone V, Pennings G, Provoost V, Coveney C, Funes SL. Reframing egg donation in Europe: new regulatory challenges for a shifting landscape. HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
27
|
Cordier C, Ducrocq B, Fry J, Catteau-Jonard S. Views of French oocyte donors at least 3 years after donation. Reprod Biomed Online 2020; 40:819-826. [PMID: 32295744 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2019] [Revised: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION The study aimed to evaluate the percentage of oocyte donors who regretted their donation at least 3 years later. DESIGN Between December 2018 and January 2019, this single-centre study sought to contact by telephone all women who had donated oocytes during the 6-year period from 2010 to 2015 at the Lille Centre for the study and storage of eggs and spermatozoa (CECOS). RESULTS Among 118 women, 72 responded to the questionnaire by telephone and were included in the study. The response rate was 61%. No woman regretted having donated an oocyte, and 89% said that they would do it again in the same situation. The survey distinguished two types of donors: 'relational' (58%) and 'altruistic' (42%); some of their responses differed. Ninety per cent of the women had talked about the donation to family and friends. Among them, 74% felt supported by their family and friends, and 72% by their partner. The donation was something that 76% of the women sometimes thought about; 83% felt that this donation was something useful that they had accomplished. Finally, most donors felt that oocyte donation should remain unremunerated and anonymous. CONCLUSIONS None of the donors we interviewed regretted their donation. In France, the current principles governing this donation appear satisfactory to oocyte donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Cordier
- Université de Lille, CHU Lille, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Lille, France.
| | | | - Julie Fry
- Cellules d'Urgence Médico-Psychologiques SAMU 62, CECOS de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Sophie Catteau-Jonard
- Université de Lille, CHU Lille, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Lille, France; Université de Lille, CHU Lille, INSERM U1172, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cormery E, Frapsauce C, Malmanche H. [Preliminary study on the experience of egg donors at the CHRU in Tours: Key features for future research]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 48:366-373. [PMID: 32035169 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.01.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This exploratory survey aims to identify the obstacles to egg donation (ED), based on the donors' experience. Despite 30 years of practice and awareness-raising campaigns, ED in France suffers from a shortage of female donors due to a lack of knowledge of this donation (Agence de la biomédecine, 2017). METHOD Qualitative study by semi-directive interviews conducted between January and August 2018 at the CHRU in Tours with 15 egg donors in the postoperative period. RESULTS The donation generated a sense of pride and personal accomplishment among the donors, in contrast to the lack of recognition of their actions by professionals and their entourage. Physical commitment does not seem to be a barrier to donation. The organisational and logistical constraints were identified as one of the main obstacles, while 70% of the interviewees stressed the benevolence of the practitioners. Finally, the donation opened up questions for them on female fertility, maternity and the role of gender norms in gamete donation. CONCLUSION The survey reveals the technical dimension of ED imposed by the biomedical system deplored by donors, and highlights the need to recognize their actions. Physical engagement is not a major obstacle, unlike organizational and relational aspects. This study opens up an important field of investigation, which should be explored in particular in the perspective of a French bioethical reform of ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Cormery
- Maternité Olympe de Gouges, CHRU Bretonneau, 2, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France.
| | - C Frapsauce
- Service de médecine et biologie de la reproduction - CECOS, CHRU Bretonneau, 2, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France; Université de Tours, 60, rue du Plat D'Étain, 37020 Tours cedex 1, France
| | - H Malmanche
- École des hautes études en sciences sociales, centre d'études sociologiques et politiques Raymond-Aron (UMR 8036), 105, boulevard Raspail, 75006 Paris, France; Maternité des Bluets, Hôpital Pierre-Rouquès, 4, rue Lasson, 75012 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Goedeke S, Shepherd D, Rodino IS. Support for recognition and payment options for egg and sperm donation in New Zealand and Australia. Hum Reprod 2020; 35:117-129. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Revised: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION
To what extent do infertility clinic patients, fertility industry professionals and members of the public support different forms of payment and recognition for egg and sperm donation?
SUMMARY ANSWER
While participants expressed support for reimbursement of expenses for both egg and sperm donation, payment constituting explicit financial advantage was regarded less favourably although potentially necessary to address donor gamete shortages.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
In both New Zealand and Australia, commercial inducement for the supply of gametes is prohibited. This prohibition has been argued to contribute to limited availability of donor gametes with the effect of increasing waiting lists and/or the pursuit of potentially unregulated cross-border reproductive care by domestic patients requiring donor gametes.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
The study was a mixed methods study drawing on data from a questionnaire completed by 434 participants from across New Zealand and Australia between November 2018 and March 2019.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
Stakeholders involved in donor-assisted conception (past and present infertility patients, gamete recipients and donors), fertility industry professionals and members of the public were recruited following online advertisement of the study. All participants spoke English and primarily identified as Caucasian. Participants anonymously completed an online questionnaire gauging their support for a range of recognition and payment options. Dependent samples t-tests were used to probe for differences in support of recognition and payment options in relation to egg and sperm donation. Linear regression models were used to determine factors predicting support for the different options for both egg and sperm donation. Thematic analysis was used to identify main themes in free text question responses.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
Broadly, there was agreement that donors be reimbursed for medical expenses, travel time, unpaid time away from work relating to treatments and out-of-pocket expenses directly related to the gamete donation process, with greater support suggested for egg versus sperm donors. Items gauging support for non-material recognition and tokens of thanks for donations were not significantly different between egg and sperm donation programmes (P > 0.05) nor rated as highly as reimbursement alternatives. Lowest ratings of support were indicated for the outright payment or reward of donors for the supply of their gametes, options that would leave donors in better financial positions. Qualitatively, themes valuing gamete donation as ideally relating to gifting were identified, although counterbalanced in opinion by concepts of fairness in reimbursing gamete donors for their costs. Where payment over and above the reimbursement of costs was supported, this was related to pragmatic considerations of limited supply of donor gametes.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION
This study used a cross-sectional design and consequently causal inferences cannot be made. Additionally, participants particularly professional fertility staff, were required to self-report on politically sensitive and legal issues with the potential for social desirability response bias. Snowball sampling may have led to participation of like-minded individuals, thus limiting generalizations of findings.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
In a climate of global commercialization of reproductive medicine, limited donor gamete availability and rising incidences of cross-border reproductive care, the findings of this study can be used as a basis for further discussion between regulators and professional industry stakeholders with respect to shaping ethical policy and practice relating to donor conception.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)
No external funds were sought for this work. None of the authors have any competing interests to declare.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Goedeke
- Department of Psychology, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Daniel Shepherd
- Department of Psychology, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Thaldar D. Egg donors' motivations, experiences, and opinions: A survey of egg donors in South Africa. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0226603. [PMID: 31940367 PMCID: PMC6961873 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2018] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study was to gain information from egg donors in South Africa (SA) which could be pertinent to policy development on egg donation. The study was conducted on egg donors in the database of a Cape Town-based egg donation agency who donated within a year preceding the study. 150 egg donors from the population of 226 participated in an online survey. The main results are: 95% of respondents experienced egg donation as being positive. However, 7% of respondents report not giving proper informed consent, and a similar percentage of respondents also report not knowing whether any medical risks actually materialised as sequelae to their donations. This is a cause for concern and should be investigated further. Regarding donor anonymity, which is currently the legal position in SA, 79% of respondents indicated that they would still have donated had they been legally required to release their identities. Accordingly, possible legal reform away from the current system of donor anonymity seems unlikely to significantly impact the supply of donated eggs. Regarding motivation, respondents report being primarily motivated by wanting to help infertile women. However, respondents believe that a fair and realistic amount of compensation would be about 60% higher than what is currently paid as the national standard fixed amount. This fixed-amount compensation system should be further investigated in terms of its legality, impact on donor profile, and its current amount.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donrich Thaldar
- School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Flatscher-Thöni M, Böttcher B, Geser W, Lampe A, Werner-Felmayer G, Voithofer C, Schusterschitz C. Worlds apart or two sides of the same coin? Attitudes, meanings, and motives of potential oocyte and sperm donors in Austria. J Assist Reprod Genet 2020; 37:287-296. [PMID: 31916077 PMCID: PMC7056682 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01683-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Gamete donors and recipients of such donations have been explored by previous studies, which mostly focus on post-donation scenarios. Our study analyses the general willingness to donate oocytes or sperm and focuses on differences between potential female and male donors in attitudes, meanings, and motives in a pre-donation setting. Methods An electronic survey (n = 555 students) was used in this anonymous observational study. To enable comparisons between men and women regarding their attitudes, meanings, and motives and their willingness to donate gametes, we designed two separate questionnaires. Results The sample was divided into three groups based on the willingness to donate: potential donors (n = 133; women: 48.1%, men: 51.9%); doubtful donors (n = 207; women: 75.8%, men: 24.2%); and non-donors (n = 215; women: 68.3%, men: 31.7%). The group of potential male donors (39.2%) was significantly larger than the group of potential female donors (16.9%). Significant differences regarding altruism, the meaning of one’s self-worth, and passing on the own genes were found between doubtful and potential donors. Potential donors attached less value to altruism but more value to the enhancement of one’s self-worth and passing on one’s genes than doubtful donors. The motive of passing on one’s genes and altruistic motives were more important to men than to women. Conclusion This study helps to create a better understanding of potential donors in the existing donation framework and supports the evaluation of the given regimes in the context of designing an improved framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Flatscher-Thöni
- Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, 6060, Hall in Tyrol, Austria
| | - B Böttcher
- Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - W Geser
- Institute of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - A Lampe
- University Clinic of Medical Psychology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - G Werner-Felmayer
- Division of Biological Chemistry, Biocentre, Medical University of Innsbruck, bioethics network education, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - C Voithofer
- Department of Civil Law, University of Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - C Schusterschitz
- Department of Psychology and Medical Sciences, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, 6060, Hall in Tyrol, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kool E, van der Graaf R, Bos A, Fauser B, Bredenoord A. What constitutes a reasonable compensation for non-commercial oocyte donors: an analogy with living organ donation and medical research participation. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2019; 45:736-741. [PMID: 31375547 PMCID: PMC6860404 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Revised: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
There is a growing consensus that the offer of a reasonable compensation for oocyte donation for reproductive treatment is acceptable if it does not compromise voluntary and altruistically motivated donation. However, how to translate this 'reasonable compensation' in practice remains unclear as compensation rates offered to oocyte donors between different European Union countries vary significantly. Clinics involved in oocyte donation, as well as those in other medical contexts, might be encouraged in calculating a more consistent and transparent compensation for donors if the elements that constitute a reasonable compensation are explicated. In doing so, lessons can be learnt from living organ donation and medical research participation. Practices in which the elements of a reasonable compensation for the individuals involved have already been more defined in the literature. By means of analogical reasoning, we will outline the different components of a reasonable compensation and subsequently apply these to the context of oocyte donation. We will argue that oocyte donors should first of all be reasonably reimbursed direct expenses related to the donation, without standard remuneration of lost wages. Second, donating oocytes requests a serious time investment, therefore donors are entitled to suitable compensation for their time spent and efforts made. Finally, we will explain that a reasonable compensation consisting of these two components allows for altruism to remain the key value of oocyte donation for reproductive treatment. However, if we acknowledge that donors' motives are more complex and often include reasons from self-interest, the reasonable compensation may be complemented with modest (non)monetary benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emy Kool
- Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rieke van der Graaf
- Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Annelies Bos
- Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bartholomeus Fauser
- Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Annelien Bredenoord
- Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Alon I, Guimón J, Urbanos-Garrido R. Regulatory responses to assisted reproductive technology: a comparative analysis of Spain and Israel. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019; 36:1665-1681. [PMID: 31346936 PMCID: PMC6708013 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01525-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The market of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) is rapidly evolving, raising growing ethical and social dilemmas. This paper compares the regulatory responses to technological and market developments in Israel and Spain, both intensive users of ART. We identify strengths and deficiencies in the regulation of ART in these two countries. METHODS We developed a conceptual framework to classify the factors affecting regulations and priority setting, and applied it using a Delphi survey combined with in-depth interviews. We selected two panels of experts from various fields, trying to simulate the bioethics committees of Israel and Spain. RESULTS ART is often wrongfully perceived as a solution to age-related infertility. Both panels embraced alternative solutions. The impact of private commercial interest on regulations is resulting in excessive practices such as the repeat of ineffective cycles and the push of sometimes unnecessary treatment add-ons. Our findings show experts dissatisfaction with the regulations of donor-eggs concerning reimbursement and registries in both countries. CONCLUSIONS The adequacy of ART to solve age-related infertility should be confronted with alternative approaches, with emphasis on the distribution of accurate information. The magnitude of ART markets, particularly the use of donor-eggs, should raise the need for additional societal debate and the reform of regulations. The impact factors analysis leads us to question the current regulatory framework, which could be improved by nominating a non-governmental statutory central regulatory agency in Israel and by reforming the Spanish agency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ido Alon
- Department of Development Economics, Research Group on Economics and Management of Innovation, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Guimón
- Department of Development Economics, Research Group on Economics and Management of Innovation, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rosa Urbanos-Garrido
- Department of Applied Economics, Public Economics and Political Economy, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Degli Esposti S, Pavone V. Oocyte provision as a (quasi) social market: Insights from Spain. Soc Sci Med 2019; 234:112381. [PMID: 31252241 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2018] [Revised: 06/15/2019] [Accepted: 06/20/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
The provision of oocytes plays an important role in human fertility treatments. Spain alone performs half of oocyte provision cycles in the European Union whilst all other European countries face an oocyte shortage. How do Spanish fertility clinics manage to match the increasing domestic and foreign demand for female oocytes? Adopting a weak performativity approach and drawing insights from interviews carried out with 20 fertility clinic representatives, this study suggests that Spanish clinics are successful thanks to an egg provision system designed as a (quasi) social market. In the absence of traditional market mechanisms based on price fluctuations, the combination of fixed monetary compensation for providers and altruistic framing of oocyte provision as an act of donation, are used to mobilize relatively high numbers of women. Fertility clinics optimize this supply through a set of supplementary strategies to ensure oocyte supply always meets oocyte demand. Though successful, this market design reinforces gender stereotypes and relies on manipulative notions of altruism. A clear but unacknowledged appropriation of women's bodies and reproductive labour are also operated, which reinforces and reproduces racial and social stratifications. Therefore, we ask whether alternative mechanisms to promote female solidarity across different generations, to raise awareness of the risks of advanced maternal age, and to explore alternative market designs should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Degli Esposti
- Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), C\ Albasanz 26-28, 28037 Madrid, Spain; Centre for Business in Society (CBiS), Coventry University, Jaguar Building, Coventry CV1 5DL, UK.
| | - Vincenzo Pavone
- Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), C\ Albasanz 26-28, 28037 Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hogan RG, Wang AY, Li Z, Hammarberg K, Johnson L, Mol BW, Sullivan EA. Oocyte donor age has a significant impact on oocyte recipients' cumulative live-birth rate: a population-based cohort study. Fertil Steril 2019; 112:724-730. [PMID: 31248619 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Revised: 04/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the impact of the donor's and recipient's age on the cumulative live-birth rate (CLBR) in oocyte donation cycles. DESIGN A population-based retrospective cohort study. SETTING Not applicable. PATIENT(S) All women using donated oocytes (n = 1,490) in Victoria, Australia, between 2009 and 2015. INTERVENTION(S) None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) The association between the donor's and recipient's age and CLBR modeled by multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression with the covariates of male partner's age, recipient parity, and cause of infertility adjusted for, and donor age grouped as <30, 30-34, 35-37, 38-40, and ≥41 years, and recipient age as <35, 35-37, 38-40, 41-42, 43-44, and ≥45 years. RESULT(S) The mean age of the oocyte donors was 33.7 years (range: 21 to 45 years) with 49% aged 35 years and over. The mean age of the oocyte recipients was 41.4 years (range: 19 to 53 years) with 25.4% aged ≥45 years. There was a statistically significant relationship between the donor's age and the CLBR. The CLBR for recipients with donors aged <30 years and 30-34 years was 44.7% and 43.3%, respectively. This decreased to 33.6% in donors aged 35-37 years, 22.6% in donors aged 38-40 years, and 5.1% in donors aged ≥41 years. Compared with recipients with donors aged <30 years, the recipients with donors aged 38-40 years had 40% less chance of achieving a live birth (adjusted hazard ratio 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.86) and recipients with donors aged ≥41 years had 86% less chance of achieving a live birth (adjusted hazard ratio 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04-0.44). The multivariate analysis showed no statistically significant effect of the recipient's age on CLBR. CONCLUSION(S) We have demonstrated that the age of the oocyte donor is critical to the CLBR and is independent of the recipient woman's age. Recipients using oocytes from donors aged ≥35 years had a statistically significantly lower CLBR when compared with recipients using oocytes from donors aged <35 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosemarie G Hogan
- Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Alex Y Wang
- Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Zhuoyang Li
- Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karin Hammarberg
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Victorian Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Louise Johnson
- Victorian Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ben W Mol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash Medical Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elizabeth A Sullivan
- Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
McSweeney B, Allegretti JR, Fischer M, Xu H, Goodman KJ, Monaghan T, McLeod C, Mullish BH, Petrof EO, Phelps EL, Chis R, Edmison A, Juby A, Ennis-Davis R, Roach B, Wong K, Kao D. In search of stool donors: a multicenter study of prior knowledge, perceptions, motivators, and deterrents among potential donors for fecal microbiota transplantation. Gut Microbes 2019; 11:51-62. [PMID: 31122134 PMCID: PMC6973337 DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2019.1611153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a highly effective therapy for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. Stool donors are essential, but difficult to recruit and retain. We aimed to identify factors influencing willingness to donate stool. This multi-center study with a 32-item questionnaire targeted young adults and health care workers via social media and university email lists in Edmonton and Kingston, Canada; London and Nottingham, England; and Indianapolis and Boston, USA. Items included baseline demographics and FMT knowledge and perception. Investigated motivators and deterrents included economic compensation, screening process, time commitment, and stool donation logistics. Logistic regression and linear regression models estimated associations of study variables with self-assessed willingness to donate stool. 802 respondents completed our questionnaire: 387 (48.3%) age 21-30 years, 573 (71.4%) female, 323 (40%) health care workers. Country of residence, age and occupation were not associated with willingness to donate stool. Factors increasing willingness to donate were: already a blood donor (OR 1.64), male, altruism, economic benefit, knowledge of how FMT can help patients (OR 1.32), and positive attitudes towards FMT (OR 1.39). Factors decreasing willingness to donate were: stool collection unpleasant (OR 0.92), screening process invasive (OR 0.92), higher stool donation frequency, negative social perception of stool, and logistics of collection/transporting feces. We conclude that 1) blood donors and males are more willing to consider stool donation; 2) altruism, economic compensation, and positive feedback are motivators; and 3) screening process, high donation frequency, logistics of collection/transporting feces, lack of public awareness, and negative social perception are deterrents. Considering these variables could maximize donor recruitment and retention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Breanna McSweeney
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jessica R. Allegretti
- Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Monika Fischer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Huiping Xu
- Department of Biostatistics, The Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health and School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Karen J. Goodman
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Tanya Monaghan
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Carmen McLeod
- Nottingham Synthetic Biology Research Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Benjamin H. Mullish
- Division of Integrative Systems Medicine and Digestive Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Elaine O. Petrof
- Department of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emmalee L. Phelps
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Roxana Chis
- Department of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Abby Edmison
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Angela Juby
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ralph Ennis-Davis
- Department of Medicine, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Brandi Roach
- Zeidler Ledcor Center, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Karen Wong
- Zeidler Ledcor Center, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Dina Kao
- Zeidler Ledcor Center, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada,CONTACT Dina Kao Zeidler Ledcor Center, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Platts S, Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Jones B, Parikh R, Thum MY. Investigating attitudes towards oocyte donation amongst potential donors and the general population: a systematic review. HUM FERTIL 2019; 24:169-181. [DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2019.1602736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Platts
- Imperial College Healthcare Trust, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Timothy Bracewell-Milnes
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Benjamin Jones
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gonzalo J, Perul M, Corral M, Caballero M, Conti C, García D, Vassena R, Rodríguez A. A follow-up study of the long-term satisfaction, reproductive experiences, and self-reported health status of oocyte donors in Spain. EUR J CONTRACEP REPR 2019; 24:227-232. [DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2019.1588960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
39
|
Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Berger AS, Fagerberg A, Olofsson JI, Scherman-Pukk C, Lindqvist PG, Nasiell J. Increased incidence of obstetric and perinatal complications in pregnancies achieved using donor oocytes and single embryo transfer in young and healthy women. A prospective hospital-based matched cohort study. Gynecol Endocrinol 2019; 35:314-319. [PMID: 30626251 DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2018.1528577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
In this single-center matched-cohort study, women who underwent IVF/ICSI with donor oocytes between 2007 and 2014 (n = 259) were compared to women undergoing autologous cycles during the same time period (n = 515). The matching (1:2) took into consideration the women's age, type of treatment (IVF/ICSI), and year of embryo transfer. All women were healthy and below 40 years of age at the time of IVF/ICSI, and the treatments were performed using a strict policy of single embryo transfer. Multiple logistic regression analysis, adjusted for body mass index (BMI), smoking, and parity, showed a four times increased risk of gestational hypertensive disorders (adjusted odds ratio, AOR 4.25; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.61-6.92) and pre-eclampsia (AOR 3.99; 95% CI 2.27-7.00) in pregnancies achieved with donor oocytes. There was also a higher rate of cesarean section in women who gave birth after oocyte donation (AOR 1.69; 95% CI 1.22-2.35) and a higher risk of postpartum hemorrhage >1000 mL (AOR 1.59; 95% CI, 1.11-2.27). After further adjustment for preeclampsia in the logistic regression analysis, no additional increased perinatal risks were found. The incidence of preterm delivery, low weight at birth, need of neonatal intensive care, Apgar scores, and incidence of perinatal death were also similar between the groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenny A Rodriguez-Wallberg
- a Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Reproduction , Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm , Sweden
- b Department of Oncology-Pathology , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden
| | - Ann-Sofie Berger
- a Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Reproduction , Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm , Sweden
| | - Antonia Fagerberg
- a Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Reproduction , Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm , Sweden
| | - Jan I Olofsson
- c Department of Women's and Children's Health , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden
| | - Christina Scherman-Pukk
- a Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Reproduction , Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm , Sweden
| | - Pelle G Lindqvist
- d Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Södersjukhuset , Stockholm , Sweden
- e Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden
| | - Josefine Nasiell
- e Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden
- f Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm , Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Borgstrøm MB, Nygaard SS, Danielsen AK, Kesmodel US. Exploring motivations, attitudes and experiences of oocyte donors: A qualitative study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019; 98:1055-1062. [DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2018] [Accepted: 02/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Buhl Borgstrøm
- The Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Herlev Gentofte HospitalUniversity of Copenhagen Herlev Denmark
| | - Siv S. Nygaard
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Herlev Gentofte HospitalUniversity of Copenhagen Herlev Denmark
| | - Anne K. Danielsen
- Department of Gastroenterology Herlev Gentofte HospitalUniversity of Copenhagen Herlev Denmark
| | - Ulrik S. Kesmodel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Herlev Gentofte HospitalUniversity of Copenhagen Herlev Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Silva SPD, Freitas CD, Baía I, Samorinha C, Machado H, Silva S. Doação de gametas: questões sociais e éticas (não) respondidas em Portugal. CAD SAUDE PUBLICA 2019; 35:e00122918. [DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00122918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2018] [Accepted: 10/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Resumo: Conhecer a discussão em torno dos desafios sociais e éticos da doação de gametas é fundamental para a boa governança das técnicas de reprodução assistida. Neste artigo, analisam-se os tópicos que orientaram o debate nas organizações de ética portuguesas, discutindo as suas conexões com os temas abordados internacionalmente. Para tal, em março de 2018, pesquisamos sistematicamente os websites do Conselho Nacional de Procriação Medicamente Assistida e do Conselho Nacional de Ética para as Ciências da Vida. Procedemos à análise de conteúdo temática de 25 documentos. Os resultados indicam que o debate se centrou na acessibilidade, no anonimato e na compensação de doadores e, em menor extensão, nas responsabilidades profissionais. Observaram-se posicionamentos heterogêneos e tensões entre múltiplos direitos e princípios éticos associados a receptores, a pessoas nascidas com recurso à doação de gametas e a doadores. Esses têm em comum três alegações: a escassez de evidência científica; as experiências de outros países; e regulamentações oriundas de entidades internacionais. Na literatura abordam-se tópicos adicionais, nomeadamente: uma via dupla que conjugue anonimato/identificação de doadores; implementação de sistemas de registo reprodutivo para receptores e doadores; limites do rastreio genético a doadores; doação por familiares/conhecidos; e o papel dos doadores na decisão quanto ao destino de embriões criopreservados e na escolha das características dos receptores dos seus gametas. Há espaço para expandir o debate e promover a pesquisa em torno das implicações sociais e éticas da doação de gametas, considerando a participação de todos os cidadãos.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cláudia De Freitas
- Universidade do Porto, Portugal; Universidade do Porto, Portugal; ISCT-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Inês Baía
- Universidade do Porto, Portugal; Universidade do Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | - Susana Silva
- Universidade do Porto, Portugal; Universidade do Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
The current status of oocyte banks: domestic and international perspectives. Fertil Steril 2018; 110:1203-1208. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2018] [Revised: 07/03/2018] [Accepted: 07/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
43
|
de Melo-Martín I, Rubin LR, Cholst IN. "I want us to be a normal family": Toward an understanding of the functions of anonymity among U.S. oocyte donors and recipients. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2018; 9:235-251. [PMID: 30398412 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1528308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anonymity remains the more common practice in gamete donations, but legislation prohibiting anonymity with a goal of protecting donor-conceived children's right to know their genetic origins is becoming more common. However, given the dearth of research investigating the function of anonymity for donors and recipients, it is unclear whether these policies will accomplish their goals. The aim of this study was to explore experiences with anonymity among oocyte donors and recipients who participated in an anonymous donor oocyte program and to understand the ways in which anonymity functions for them. METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted with 50 women: 28 oocyte donors and 22 recipients who were recruited from an academic center for reproductive medicine in the United States. RESULTS Donors and recipients view anonymity both as a mechanism to protect the interests of all parties (recipients, donors, and donor-conceived children) and as a point of conflict. Specifically, three key areas were identified where both donors and recipients saw anonymity as having an important role: relieving anxieties about family structures and obligations; protecting their interests and those of donor-conceived children (while acknowledging where interests conflict); and managing the future. CONCLUSION As gamete donation increasingly moves away from the practice of anonymity, examining why anonymity matters to stakeholders will be helpful in devising strategies to successfully implement identity-release options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lisa R Rubin
- b Department of Psychology , New School for Social Research
| | - Ina N Cholst
- c The Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine , Weill Cornell Medical College
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Nahman M. Migrant extractability: Centring the voices of egg providers in cross-border reproduction. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE & SOCIETY ONLINE 2018; 7:82-90. [PMID: 30766926 PMCID: PMC6360401 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2017] [Revised: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
This paper explores reproductive justice from the perspective of those at the beginning of the value chain of reproduction. This vantage point of egg providers can help lend important insights into the wider processes of family-making across borders today. It centres on ethnographic research conducted on contemporary cross-border egg provision performed by female migrant workers in Spain. Through this intersectional perspective, we stand to gain deeper insights into cross-border reproduction more widely. Egg provision can be a way for migrant women to gain temporary financial benefit. In a system that does not provide equal access for migrants to work and care, female migrants make themselves extractable commodities. As such, they are both a commodity and a worker at the same time. The example of female migrant workers providing eggs can be used to reflect more generally on egg provision, and on cross-border reproduction and reproductive justice models as used in queer cross-border family-building. Taken within the broader framework of reproductive justice, and with the struggles of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender cross-border reproduction in mind, the paper begins by asking how three intersecting inequalities due to (1) migration/citizenship, (2) joblessness/contract working and (3) race facilitate the industry of cross-border reproduction? In what ways do female migrant workers mobilize their reproductive potential, including time, whiteness, other racial/phenotypic similarity to commissioning parents, and unstable work lives in cross-border egg donation? The paper ends with an argument for focusing analytical and political attention on the needs of those providing eggs; the most prized material resources for cross-border reproduction.
Collapse
|
45
|
Tulay P, Atılan O. Oocyte donors’ awareness on donation procedure and risks: A call for developing guidelines for health tourism in oocyte donation programmes. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2018; 20:236-242. [PMID: 30299264 PMCID: PMC6883756 DOI: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2018.2018.0110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective In the recent years, oocyte donation programmes have widely spread worldwide becoming the drive of health tourism. In some countries, donation programmes are tightly regulated, whereas in others, the guidelines or regulations are not well defined. To evaluate donors’ awareness of the donation programmes and the ethical consequences in enrolling these programmes. Material and Methods A detailed questionnaire-based survey was conducted to evaluate the donors’ main drive to get involved in the donation programme and the donor’s knowledge and awareness of risk factors. Results The majority of the donors (70%) were undergoing donation programmes for financial gains through compensation. The donors were especially not aware of the long-term medical risks and the possibility of identity exposure through genetic screening. Conclusion The main duty of health professionals is to counsel donors about the basic procedures and any possible problems they may face during the donation programmes. Reimbursement of oocyte donors is a slippery slope in oocyte donation programmes. High compensation may make women think that donation is a profession without considering possible risks. Furthermore, with the wider use of direct-to-consumer genetic testing, and genetic anonymity may be at risk, thus the donors have to be counselled properly. Therefore, in this era of health tourism, it is crucial to set up well-defined counselling bodies in all oocyte donation centres and enable donors to make an informed choice in becoming oocyte donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pınar Tulay
- Department of Medical Genetics, Near East University Faculty of Medicine, Nicosia, Cyprus,Near East University, Research Centre of Experimental Health Sciences, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Okan Atılan
- Department of Medical Biology and Genetics, Near East University Institute of Health Sciences, Nicosia, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Salama M, Isachenko V, Isachenko E, Rahimi G, Mallmann P, Westphal LM, Inhorn MC, Patrizio P. Cross border reproductive care (CBRC): a growing global phenomenon with multidimensional implications (a systematic and critical review). J Assist Reprod Genet 2018; 35:1277-1288. [PMID: 29808382 PMCID: PMC6063838 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1181-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2018] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Many people travel abroad to access fertility treatments. This growing phenomenon is known as cross border reproductive care (CBRC) or fertility tourism. Due to its complex nature and implications worldwide, CBRC has become an emerging dilemma deserving more attention on the global healthcare agenda. METHODS According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review of the literature was performed for all relevant full-text articles published in PubMed in English during the past 18 years to explore CBRC phenomenon in the new millennium. RESULTS Little is known about the accurate magnitude and scope of CBRC around the globe. In this systematic and critical review, we identify three major dimensions of CBRC: legal, economic, and ethical. We analyze each of these dimensions from clinical and practical perspectives. CONCLUSION CBRC is a growing reality worldwide with potential benefits and risks. Therefore, it is very crucial to regulate the global market of CBRC on legal, economic, and ethical bases in order to increase harmonization and reduce any forms of exploitation. Establishment of accurate international statistics and a global registry will help diminish the current information gap surrounding the CBRC phenomenon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud Salama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 34, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt.
| | - Vladimir Isachenko
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 34, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Evgenia Isachenko
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 34, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Gohar Rahimi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 34, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Mallmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 34, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lynn M Westphal
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Marcia C Inhorn
- Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Pasquale Patrizio
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
|
48
|
Shavit T, Hasson J, al Ma’mari N, Son WY, Badeghiesh A, Samer T, Klement-Hershko A, Wiser A, Tulandi T. Oocyte Donation From Donor Older Than 35 Years. Is It Worth Trying? Reprod Sci 2018; 26:503-509. [DOI: 10.1177/1933719118776791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tal Shavit
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Joseph Hasson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Na’ama al Ma’mari
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Weon-Yong Son
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ahmad Badeghiesh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Tannus Samer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Amir Wiser
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Togas Tulandi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kool EM, Bos AME, van der Graaf R, Fauser BCJM, Bredenoord AL. Ethics of oocyte banking for third-party assisted reproduction: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2018; 24:615-635. [DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmy016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 04/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- E M Kool
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A M E Bos
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - B C J M Fauser
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A L Bredenoord
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Shepherd L, Kardzhieva D, Bussey L, Lovell B. The role of emotions in predicting sperm and egg donation. JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 2018. [DOI: 10.1111/jasp.12504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lee Shepherd
- Department of Psychology; Northumbria University
| | | | | | - Brian Lovell
- Department of Psychology; Northumbria University
| |
Collapse
|