Concentrations in plasma, epithelial lining fluid, alveolar macrophages and bronchial mucosa after a single intravenous dose of 1.6 mg/kg of iclaprim (AR-100) in healthy men

Simulation of optimal dose regimens of photoactivated curcumin for antimicrobial resistance pneumonia in COVID-19 patients: A modeling approach

Background

Secondary antimicrobial resistance bacterial (AMR) pneumonia could lead to an increase in mortality in COVID-19 patients, particularly of geriatric patients with underlying diseases. The comedication of current medicines for AMR pneumonia with corticosteroids may lead to suboptimal treatment or toxicities due to drug-drug interactions (DDIs).

Objective

This study aimed to propose new promising dosage regimens of photoactivated curcumin when co-administered with corticosteroids for the treatment of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) pneumonia in COVID-19 patients.

Methods

A whole-body physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) with the simplified lung compartments model was built and verified following standard model verification (absolute average-folding error or AAFEs). The pharmacokinetic properties of photoactivated were assumed to be similar to curcumin due to minor changes in physiochemical properties of compound by photoactivation. The acceptable AAFEs values were within 2-fold. The verified model was used to simulate new regimens for different formulations of photoactivated curcumin.

Results

The AAFEs was 1.12-fold. Original formulation (120 mg once-daily dose) or new intramuscular nano-formulation (100 mg with a release rate of 10/h given every 7 days) is suitable for outpatients with MRSA pneumonia to improve patient adherence. New intravenous formulation (2000 mg twice-daily doses) is for hospitalized patients with both MRSA and VRSA pneumonia.

Conclusion

The PBPK models, in conjunction with MIC and applied physiological changes in COVID-19 patients, is a potential tool to predict optimal dosage regimens of photoactivated curcumin for the treatment of co-infected AMR pneumonia in COVID-19 patients. Each formulation is appropriate for different patient conditions and pathogens.

New Antibiotics for Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) represent one of the most common hospital-acquired infections, carrying a significant morbidity and risk of mortality. Increasing antibiotic resistance among the common bacterial pathogens associated with HAP and VAP, especially Enterobacterales and nonfermenting gram-negative bacteria, has made the choice of empiric treatment of these infections increasingly challenging. Moreover, failure of initial empiric therapy to cover the causative agents associated with HAP and VAP has been associated with worse clinical outcomes. This review provides an overview of antibiotics newly approved or in development for the treatment of HAP and VAP. The approved antibiotics include ceftobiprole, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, and cefiderocol. Their major advantages include their high activity against multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens.

Emerging Treatment Options for Infections by Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Positive Microorganisms

Antimicrobial agents are currently the mainstay of treatment for bacterial infections worldwide. However, due to the increased use of antimicrobials in both human and animal medicine, pathogens have now evolved to possess high levels of multi-drug resistance, leading to the persistence and spread of difficult-to-treat infections. Several current antibacterial agents active against Gram-positive bacteria will be rendered useless in the face of increasing resistance rates. There are several emerging antibiotics under development, some of which have been shown to be more effective with an improved safety profile than current treatment regimens against Gram-positive bacteria. We will extensively discuss these antibiotics under clinical development (phase I-III clinical trials) to combat Gram-positive bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecium and Streptococcus pneumoniae. We will delve into the mechanism of actions, microbiological spectrum, and, where available, the pharmacokinetics, safety profile, and efficacy of these drugs, aiming to provide a comprehensive review to the involved stakeholders.

Trimethoprim and other nonclassical antifolates an excellent template for searching modifications of dihydrofolate reductase enzyme inhibitors

The development of new mechanisms of resistance among pathogens, the occurrence and transmission of genes responsible for antibiotic insensitivity, as well as cancer diseases have been a serious clinical problem around the world for over 50 years. Therefore, intense searching of new leading structures and active substances, which may be used as new drugs, especially against strain resistant to all available therapeutics, is very important. Dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) has attracted a lot of attention as a molecular target for bacterial resistance over several decades, resulting in a number of useful agents. Trimethoprim (TMP), (2,4-diamino-5-(3′,4′,5′-trimethoxybenzyl)pyrimidine) is the well-known dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor and one of the standard antibiotics used in urinary tract infections (UTIs). This review highlights advances in design, synthesis, and biological evaluations in structural modifications of TMP as DHFR inhibitors. In addition, this report presents the differences in the active site of human and pathogen DHFR. Moreover, an excellent review of DHFR inhibition and their relevance to antimicrobial and parasitic chemotherapy was presented.

Evaluation of in vitro activity of iclaprim in combination with other antimicrobials against pulmonary pathogens: a pilot study

In this pilot study, the in vitro antimicrobial activity of iclaprim, a diaminopyrimidine, tested in combination with other antimicrobials against recent and common Gram-positive and Gram-negative respiratory pathogens, was examined by the checkerboard method. The range of minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for iclaprim against all bacteria tested in the study was 0.03 to >128 µg ml⁻¹. Iclaprim exhibited synergy with sulfamethoxazole against 11 of the 16 bacterial strains tested, with mean fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) values of 0.2–0.5. Synergy with sulfamethoxazole was demonstrated against all Gram-positive bacteria and selected Gram-negative bacteria. Neither synergy nor antagonism was observed for combinations of iclaprim with ampicillin, meropenem, tetracycline, levofloxacin, aztreonam, piperacillin/tazobactam, colistin, cefepime or gentamicin against any of the bacterial strains tested. The significant reduction in the MIC values observed with the combination of iclaprim and sulfamethoxazole demonstrates that this regimen could be effective against common Gram-positive and selected Gram-negative respiratory bacteria.

Iclaprim, a dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor antibiotic in Phase III of clinical development: a review of its pharmacology, microbiology and clinical efficacy and safety

Iclaprim is under clinical development for treating acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and nosocomial pneumonia most often due to Gram-positive bacteria, including infections due to drug-resistant bacteria. In two recent Phase III studies of patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, intravenous iclaprim 80 mg every 12 h was noninferior to dose-adjusted vancomycin. Additional studies are planned for patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Iclaprim represents an alternative for the treatment of severe skin and pulmonary infections due to Gram-positive bacteria.

An Updated Review of Iclaprim: A Potent and Rapidly Bactericidal Antibiotic for the Treatment of Skin and Skin Structure Infections and Nosocomial Pneumonia Caused by Gram-Positive Including Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria

New antibiotics are needed because of the increased morbidity and mortality associated with multidrug-resistant bacteria. Iclaprim, a bacterial dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor, not currently approved, is being studied for the treatment of skin infections and nosocomial pneumonia caused by Gram-positve bacteria, including multidrug-resistant bacteria. Iclaprim showed noninferiority at -10% to linezolid in 1 of 2 phase 3 studies for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections with a weight-based dose (0.8 mg/kg) but did not show noninferiority at -10% to linezolid in a second phase 3 study. More recently, iclaprim has shown noninferiority at -10% to vancomycin in 2 phase 3 studies for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections with an optimized fixed dose (80 mg). A phase 3 study for the treatment of hospital-acquired bacterial and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia is upcoming. If, as anticipated, iclaprim becomes available for the treatment of skin and skin structure infections, it will serve as an alternative to current antibiotics for treatment of severe infections. This article will provide an update to the chemistry, preclinical, pharmacology, microbiology, clinical and regulatory status of iclaprim.

Efficacy evaluation of iclaprim in a neutropenic rat lung infection model with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus entrapped in alginate microspheres

The objective of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of iclaprim in a neutropenic rat lung infection model with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) entrapped in alginate beads. An inoculum of 5.25 × 10⁵ colony-forming units (CFU)/mL of S. aureus strain AH1252 was administered intratracheally to rats with prepared alginate bacteria suspensions. Beginning 2 h post-infection, rats received: (1) iclaprim 80 mg/kg (n = 16); (2) iclaprim 60 mg/kg (n = 16), or (3) vancomycin 50 mg/kg (n = 24), for 3 days via subcutaneous (SC) injection every 12 h. Twelve hours after the last treatment, rats were euthanized and lungs collected for CFU determination. Iclaprim administered at 80 mg/kg or 60 mg/kg or vancomycin 50 mg/kg SC twice a day for 3 days resulted in a 6.05 log₁₀ CFU reduction (iclaprim 80 mg/kg compared with control, p < 0.0001), 5.11 log₁₀ CFU reduction (iclaprim 60 mg/kg compared with control, p < 0.0001), and 3.42 log₁₀ CFU reduction, respectively, from the controls (p < 0.0001). Iclaprim 80 mg/kg and 60 mg/kg resulted in 2.59 and 1.69 log₁₀ CFU reductions, respectively, from vancomycin-treated animals (80 mg/kg iclaprim vs. vancomycin, p = 0.0005; 60 mg/kg iclaprim vs. vancomycin, p = 0.07). Animals receiving iclaprim, vancomycin, and controls demonstrated 100%, 91.7%, and 48.3% survival, respectively. In this neutropenic rat S. aureus lung infection model, rats receiving iclaprim demonstrated a greater CFU reduction than the controls or those receiving vancomycin.

The effect of pulmonary surfactant on the in vitro activity of Iclaprim against common respiratory bacterial pathogens

The in vitro antimicrobial activity of iclaprim, a novel diaminopyrimidine, against common respiratory bacteria remained unchanged in the presence of pulmonary surfactant (Survanta®) at concentrations that greatly antagonized the antimicrobial activity of daptomycin. These results indicate that iclaprim could be a potential treatment for pneumonia caused by susceptible and multidrug resistant bacteria.

A Phase II Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Iclaprim Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Nosocomial Pneumonia Suspected or Confirmed to be Due to Gram-positive Pathogens

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this Phase II study was to compare the clinical cure rates of 2 iclaprim dosages versus vancomycin in the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia suspected or confirmed to be caused by gram-positive pathogens.

METHODS

This study was a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial. A total of 70 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive iclaprim 0.8 mg/kg IV q12h (iclaprim q12h; n = 23), iclaprim 1.2 mg/kg IV q8h (iclaprim q8h; n = 24), or vancomycin 1 g IV q12h (vancomycin; n = 23) for 7 to 14 days. The primary end point was clinical cure in the intention-to-treat population at test of cure (TOC; 7 [1] days' posttreatment) visit.

FINDINGS

The baseline and demographic characteristics of patients treated with either iclaprim or vancomycin were comparable. Cure rates in the intention-to-treat population were 73.9% (17 of 23), 62.5% (15 of 24), and 52.2% (12 of 23) at the TOC visit in the iclaprim q12h, iclaprim q8h, and vancomycin groups, respectively (iclaprim q12h vs vancomycin, P = 0.13; iclaprim q8h vs vancomycin, P = 0.47). The death rates within 28 days of the start of treatment were 8.7% (2 of 23), 12.5% (3 of 24), and 21.7% (5 of 23) for the iclaprim q12h, iclaprim q8h, and vancomycin groups (no statistically significant differences). The adverse event profile of both iclaprim dosing regimens was similar to that of vancomycin.

IMPLICATIONS

Iclaprim had clinical cure rates and a safety profile comparable with vancomycin among patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Iclaprim could be an important new therapeutic option for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia, and a pivotal clinical trial is warranted to evaluate its safety and efficacy in this indication.

Emerging drugs for nosocomial pneumonia

INTRODUCTION

Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is one of the leading nosocomial infections worldwide and is associated with an elevated morbidity and mortality and increased hospital costs. Nevertheless, prompt and adequate antimicrobial treatment is mandatory following VAP development, especially in the face of multidrug resistant pathogens.

AREAS COVERED

We searched Pubmed and ClinicalTrials.gov site reports in English language of phase III clinical trials, between 2000-2016 referring to the antibiotic treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. We provide a summary of latest approved drugs for HAP and emerging drugs with potential indication nosocomial pneumonia.

EXPERT OPINION

There are several promising compounds on their way, as tedizolid-a new oxazolidone, iclaprim-a novel drug, related to trimethoprim, plazomicin-a new aminoglycoside and two combinations of ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam against MDR bacteria, especially against MRSA and Gram-negative ESBL bacteria.

Interpretation of Epithelial Lining Fluid Concentrations of Antibiotics against Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Although antibiotics whose epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations are reported high tend to be preferred in treatment of pneumonia, measurement of ELF concentrations of antibiotics could be misled by contamination from lysis of ELF cells and technical errors of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). In this review, ELF concentrations of anti-methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) antibiotics were interpreted considering above confounding factors. An equation used to explain antibiotic diffusion into CSF (cerebrospinal fluid) was adopted: ELF/free serum concentration ratio = 0.96 + 0.091 × ln (partition coefficient / molecular weight(1/2)). Seven anti-MRSA antibiotics with reported ELF concentrations were fitted to this equation to see if their ELF concentrations were explainable by the penetration capacity only. Then, outliers were modeled under the assumption of varying contamination from lysed ELF cells (test range 0-10% of ELF volume). ELF concentrations of oritavancin, telavancin, tigecycline, and vancomycin were well described by the diffusion equation, with or without additional impact from cell lysis. For modestly high ELF/free serum concentration ratio of linezolid, technical errors of BAL should be excluded. Although teicoplanin and iclaprim showed high ELF/free serum ratios also, their protein binding levels need to be cleared for proper interpretation. At the moment, it appears very premature to use ELF concentrations of anti-MRSA antibiotics as a relevant guide for treatment of lung infections by MRSA.

Recent advances in antibacterial drugs

The incidence of antimicrobial resistance is on continued rise with a threat to return to the “pre-antibiotic” era. This has led to emergence of such bacterial infections which are essentially untreatable by the current armamentarium of available treatment options. Various efforts have been made to develop the newer antimicrobials with novel modes of action which can act against these multi-drug resistant strains. This review aims to focus on these newly available and investigational antibacterials approved after year 2000, their mechanism of actions/resistance, and spectrum of activity and their phases of clinical trials. Newer unexploited targets and strategies for the next generation of antimicrobial drugs for combating the drug resistance and emerging pathogens in the 21^st century have also been reviewed in the present article.

Penetration of anti-infective agents into pulmonary epithelial lining fluid: focus on antibacterial agents

The exposure-response relationship of anti-infective agents at the site of infection is currently being re-examined. Epithelial lining fluid (ELF) has been suggested as the site (compartment) of antimicrobial activity against lung infections caused by extracellular pathogens. There have been an extensive number of studies conducted during the past 20 years to determine drug penetration into ELF and to compare plasma and ELF concentrations of anti-infective agents. The majority of these studies estimated ELF drug concentrations by the method of urea dilution and involved either healthy adult subjects or patients undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopy. Antibacterial agents such as macrolides, ketolides, newer fluoroquinolones and oxazolidinones have ELF to plasma concentration ratios of >1. In comparison, β-lactams, aminoglycosides and glycopeptides have ELF to plasma concentration ratios of ≤1. Potential explanations (e.g. drug transporters, overestimation of the ELF volume, lysis of cells) for why these differences in ELF penetration occur among antibacterial classes need further investigation. The relationship between ELF concentrations and clinical outcomes has been under-studied. In vitro pharmacodynamic models, using simulated ELF and plasma concentrations, have been used to examine the eradication rates of resistant and susceptible pathogens and to explain why selected anti-infective agents (e.g. those with ELF to plasma concentration ratios of >1) are less likely to be associated with clinical treatment failures. Population pharmacokinetic modelling and Monte Carlo simulations have recently been used and permit ELF and plasma concentrations to be evaluated with regard to achievement of target attainment rates. These mathematical modelling techniques have also allowed further examination of drug doses and differences in the time courses of ELF and plasma concentrations as potential explanations for clinical and microbiological effects seen in clinical trials. Further studies are warranted in patients with lower respiratory tract infections to confirm and explore the relationships between ELF concentrations, clinical and microbiological outcomes, and pharmacodynamic parameters.

New antimicrobial agents for use in the intensive care unit

Timely provision of adequate antimicrobial coverage in an initial anti-infective treatment regimen results in optimal outcomes for bacterial and fungal infections. However, selection of appropriate antimicrobial regimens for treatment of infections in the intensive care unit (ICU) can be challenging due to expansion of resistance, which typically requires use of multidrug anti-infective regimens to provide adequate coverage of important pathogens commonly seen in the ICU setting. Indeed, a recent additional call to action by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) has enforced the impact that antimicrobial-resistant pathogens can have on patient care. The term ESKAPE has been coined by this IDSA group to refer to Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumanii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species, the etiologic causes of the majority of hospital-acquired infections in the United States that are able to effectively "escape" our antibiotic arsenal and that also mandate discovery of new antimicrobial agents. This article reviews select antibacterial agents and an antifungal agent in late stages of clinical development that appear to have potential for treatment of infections in the ICU.

Iclaprim, a Novel Diaminopyrimidine for the Treatment of Resistant Gram-Positive Infections

Objective

To review the pharmacology, microbiology, in vitro susceptibility, pharmacokinetics, clinical trial data, safety, and tolerability of iclaprim, a novel dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) inhibitor.

Data Sources

A MEDLINE search was conducted from 1966 through December 2008. Additional sources included abstracts from meetings of the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy and the Infectious Diseases Society of America from 2001 to 2008 and information available from the manufacturer's Web site.

Study Selection And Data Extraction

In vitro and clinical studies, in addition to Phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials, were included.

Data Synthesis

Iclaprim, a novel diaminopyrimidine and DHFR antagonist, has a mechanism of action similar to that of trimethoprim. It has in vitro activity mainly against gram-positive organisms, including resistant Staphylococcus aureus. In Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials, oral and intravenous administration of iclaprim was effective and well tolerated for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI). Trials are currently ongoing for the treatment of ventilator-associated and healthcare-associated pneumonia.

Conclusions

Iclaprim is a promising antimicrobial agent for the treatment of gram-positive organisms, including resistant S. aureus and trimethoprim-, macrolide-, fluoroquinolone-, and glycopeptide-resistant strains. Additionally, in vitro activity similar to that of trimethoprim has been observed against gram-negative and atypical organisms.

Iclaprim: a novel dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor for skin and soft tissue infections

Antibiotic resistance is an ever-increasing concern in the treatment of severe skin and skin-structure infections, pneumonia, bacteremia and other serious infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant S. aureus, group A Streptococcus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. In this review, we summarize the current status of both US FDA-approved and investigational agents aimed at this group of pathogens. We also describe, in detail, the chemistry, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic properties and spectrum of microbiological activity of iclaprim, a novel dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor recently awarded fast-track approval status by the FDA. Finally, we review the clinical efficacy of iclaprim compared with linezolid for skin and skin-structure infections as demonstrated in Phase III randomized, controlled trials, and comment on its potential role in the treatment of other severe infections with drug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens.

In vitro activity of Iclaprim against respiratory and bacteremic isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae

Iclaprim, a novel dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor, inhibited 90% of the clinical isolates (MIC(90)) of Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 785) collected by a national surveillance program at a concentration of 1 microg/ml. The MIC(90) for iclaprim was 7 doubling dilutions lower for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-susceptible isolates (n = 670; MIC(90), 0.06 microg/ml) than for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-resistant isolates (n = 115; MIC(90), >or=8 microg/ml). The potential clinical utility of iclaprim to treat patients with pneumococcal infections may depend upon the current prevalence of resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in this pathogen.