Planning and implementing sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in electronic health records

People affected by cancer and their carers from gender and sexually diverse communities: their experiences and the role of smartphone applications

BACKGROUND

People living with cancer, or carers who are from lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex or asexual (LGBTQIA+) communities experience unique information and support needs. Accessible technology-based resources providing tailored support are required to promote wellbeing, however this is a growing area of research requiring further investigation. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of healthcare services among people living with cancer, and their carers, who belong to sexual or gender diverse communities (LGBTQIA+), and identify how smartphone applications (apps) could support people from LGBTQIA + communities.

METHODS

This was a qualitative descriptive study where people living with cancer or carers from LGBTQIA + communities participated in phone interviews. Participants were recruited across Australia via social media advertisements, LGBTQIA + medical practices, and cancer advocacy groups. Participants were asked questions about their experiences, and were provided with screenshots of an existing app and asked to provide feedback on content and inclusiveness. Transcripts were coded and codes grouped together to form similar and concepts. Inductive and deductive analyses were used to create themes.

RESULTS

13 patients (mean age 56 (SD:13)), and three carers (mean age 64 (SD:19)) completed phone interviews. The majority of participants identified their gender as female (patients n = 9, carers 3), and their sexuality as gay or lesbian (patients n = 10, carers n = 3). Four themes were created: (1) navigating disclosure in healthcare, described emotional challenges surrounding disclosure; (2) the power of positive experiences with clinicians, described positive interactions and gaps in care from clinicians; (3) impact of gender and sexuality on informal support, outlined support received from informal network and gaps in support, and; (4) opportunities to increase inclusivity in smartphone apps, generated ideas on how apps can be tailored to meet needs identified.

CONCLUSION

Disclosure of gender or sexuality, and interactions with clinicians had the potential to impact participants' experience of cancer care. Gaps in informal networks pointed at how to better support LGBTQIA + communities, and identified opportunities for inclusion in an app that will be tailored and trialled for this community. Future work should focus on addressing systems-level processes in acknowledging and supporting priority groups affected by cancer.

Decreased Anogenital Gonorrhea and Chlamydia in Transgender and Gender Diverse Primary Care Patients Receiving Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy

BACKGROUND

Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) adults in the U.S. experience health disparities, including in anogenital sexually transmitted infections (STI). Gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) is known to be medically necessary and improve health. Few studies have assessed the effect of GAHT on STI diagnoses.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of GAHT delivered in primary care as an intervention to improve STI outcomes for TGD adults.

DESIGN

LEGACY is a longitudinal, multisite cohort study of adult TGD primary care patients from two federally qualified community health centers in Boston, MA, and New York, NY.

PARTICIPANTS

Electronic health record data for eligible adult TGD patients contributed to the LEGACY research data warehouse (RDW). A total of 6330 LEGACY RDW patients were followed from 2016 to 2019, with 2555 patients providing STI testing data.

MAIN MEASURES

GAHT exposure was being prescribed hormones, and the clinical outcome was anogenital gonorrhea or chlamydia diagnoses. Log-Poisson generalized estimating equations assessed the effect of prescription GAHT on primary outcomes, adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, gender identity, poverty level, health insurance, clinical site, and cohort years.

KEY RESULTS

The median age was 28 years (IQR = 13); the racial breakdown was 20.4% Black, 8.1% Multiracial, 6.9% Asian/Pacific Islander, 1.8% Other; 62.8% White; 21.3% Hispanic/Latinx; 47.0% were assigned female at birth, and 16.0% identified as nonbinary. 86.3% were prescribed hormones. Among those tested, the percentage of patients with a positive anogenital STI diagnosis ranged annually from 10.0 to 12.5% between 2016 and 2019. GAHT prescription was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of anogenital STI diagnosis (aRR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.59-0.96) over follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

GAHT delivered in primary care was associated with less STI morbidity in this TGD cohort over follow-up. Patients may benefit from individualized and tailored clinical care alongside GAHT to optimize STI outcomes.

Understanding social needs screening and demographic data collection in primary care practices serving Maryland Medicare patients

BACKGROUND

Health outcomes are strongly impacted by social determinants of health, including social risk factors and patient demographics, due to structural inequities and discrimination. Primary care is viewed as a potential medical setting to assess and address individual health-related social needs and to collect detailed patient demographics to assess and advance health equity, but limited literature evaluates such processes.

METHODS

We conducted an analysis of cross-sectional survey data collected from n = 507 Maryland Primary Care Program (MDPCP) practices through Care Transformation Requirements (CTR) reporting in 2022. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize practice responses on social needs screening and demographic data collection. A stepwise regression analysis was conducted to determine factors predicting screening of all vs. a targeted subset of beneficiaries for unmet social needs.

RESULTS

Almost all practices (99%) reported conducting some form of social needs screening and demographic data collection. Practices reported variation in what screening tools or demographic questions were employed, frequency of screening, and how information was used. More than 75% of practices reported prioritizing transportation, food insecurity, housing instability, financial resource strain, and social isolation.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the MDPCP program there was widespread implementation of social needs screenings and demographic data collection. However, there was room for additional supports in addressing some challenging social needs and increasing detailed demographics. Further research is needed to understand any adjustments to clinical care in response to identified social needs or application of data for uses such as assessing progress towards health equity and the subsequent impact on clinical care and health outcomes.

Gynecologic Care for Sexual and Gender Minority Patients

Sexual and gender minority (SGM) people, including lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer individuals, are a diverse population with a wide spectrum of gynecologic needs. Institutionalized cisheteronormativity, stigmatization, lack of provider training, and fear of discrimination contribute to health disparities in this patient population. In this article, we review key topics in the gynecologic care of SGM patients and provide strategies to enable gynecologists to provide SGM people with equitable and inclusive full spectrum reproductive health care.

Health inequities in dialysis care: A scoping review

MAIN PROBLEM

We aim to look at potential gaps in current dialysis literature on inequities and explore future research that could contribute to more equitable care.

METHODS

Following guidelines from the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), we conducted a scoping review of health inequities in dialysis. PubMed and Ovid Embase were searched in July 2022 for articles published between 2016 and 2022 that examined at least one of the following NIH defined health inequities: race/ethnicity, sex/gender, LGBTQ+ identity, underserved rural populations, education level, income, and occupation status. Frequencies of each health inequity as well as trends over time of the four most examined inequities were analyzed.

RESULTS

In our sample of 69 included studies, gaps were identified in LGBTQ+ identity and patient education. Inequities pertaining to race/ethnicity, sex/gender, underserved rural populations, and income were sufficiently reported. No trends between inequities investigated over time were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Our scoping review examined current literature on health inequities pertaining to dialysis and found gaps concerning LGBTQ+ and patients with lower levels of education. To help fill these gaps, and possibly alleviate additional burden to these patients, we recommend cultural competency training for providers and dialysis center staff as well as community-based educational programs to improve dialysis patients' health literacy.

Musculoskeletal health considerations for the transgender athlete

BACKGROUND

In addition to the familiar sports-related injuries and conditions experienced by cisgender athletes, transgender athletes may also face unique challenges to maintaining their musculoskeletal health. Encouraging sports medicine professionals to become familiar with accepted nomenclature and terminology related to transgender athletes will enable open communication on the field, in the athletic training facility, and office.

OBJECTIVE

Understanding contemporary medical and surgical gender-affirming treatments and the unique ways in which the musculoskeletal system might be affected by each - such as impairments in bone health, changes in ligamentous function and the potential increased risk for deep venous thromboembolism - is essential for provision of optimal musculoskeletal care to transgender athletes. Knowledge of the existing participation policies for transgender athletes is also key for enabling sports medicine professionals to effectively counsel athletes about the need for specialized protective equipment. Additionally, this knowledge is important for appropriately managing therapeutic use exemptions in the competitive sports setting.

CONCLUSION

This article provides an overview of the current accepted nomenclature, common gender-affirming medical and surgical treatments, unique musculoskeletal health considerations, and participation policies for transgender athletes.

Transgender People's Experiences Sharing Information With Clinicians: A Focus Group-Based Qualitative Study

PURPOSE

Investigating transgender people's experiences sharing health information in clinical encounters may yield insights for family medicine clinicians.

METHODS

This was a qualitative study using a community-based participatory research approach and interpretive description methodology. Seven qualitative focus groups were conducted with 30 transgender adults living in North America. We used purposive sampling to ensure diversity. The focus groups were transcribed verbatim, and 2 investigators independently reviewed and coded each transcript, then they mutually reviewed the transcripts, reconciled their coding, and summarized the codes into themes. Themes were reviewed with community members, participants, and uninvolved clinically oriented investigators for member checking and peer debriefing.

RESULTS

Four themes were noted: (1) transgender people often perceive clinicians' questions as voyeuristic, stigmatizing, or self-protective; (2) patients describe being pathologized, denied or given substandard care, or harmed when clinicians learned they are transgender; (3) transgender people frequently choose between risking stigma when sharing information and risking ineffective clinical problem solving if clinicians do not have all the information about their medical histories; (4) improving the safety of transgender people is difficult in the context of contemporary medical systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Transgender people often must choose between stigma and potentially suboptimal care. Improvements in medical culture, policies, procedures, and data collection tools are necessary to improve the quality and safety of clinical care for transgender people. Institutional and systems changes may be required to safely and effectively implement sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data collection in clinical settings.

Patient Perceptions of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection in an Outpatient Radiation Oncology Setting

PURPOSE

Sexual and gender minority patients with cancer experience significant health disparities requiring tailored care. Collecting sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data in the electronic medical record (EMR) could allow care to be tailored and is in line with radiation oncology's mission to better serve diverse patients. This article describes a systematic method for collecting SOGI data for all patients starting radiation treatment in a department of radiation oncology (DRO).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

During a 3-month experimental period, DRO staff administered a demographic questionnaire and attitude survey to new adult patients. SOGI demographic data, entered into the EMR by nursing staff, were extracted and analyzed for all patients from the experimental period and from the 3 months prior (control period). Descriptive and categorical data completion rates were compared between the experimental and control periods using independent-samples t tests and Pearson χ2 tests.

RESULTS

A total of 788 patients were included in this analysis: 368 in the control period and 420 in the experimental period. Of the 420 patients enrolled in the experimental period, 267 (63.6%) were offered a survey, of whom 211 (79.0%) completed the survey. There were higher rates of sexual orientation responses entered into the EMR for the experimental group compared with the control group (56.9% vs 27.1%; P <.001), with the highest response rates for patients who completed a survey (82.9%). Ten patients (2.9%) identified as gay or lesbian and 100% identified as cisgender. The majority of patients were not upset by the form, with only 11 patients (5.2%) stating that any specific question caused them distress.

CONCLUSIONS

Collecting SOGI data via a demographic form is feasible in an outpatient DRO. This approach was well received by the majority of patients and could lead to provision of higher-quality, tailored care.

Provider perspectives on clinical decision support to improve HIV prevention in pediatric primary care: a multiple methods study

BACKGROUND

Clinical decision support (CDS) is a promising intervention for improving uptake of HIV testing and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). However, little is known regarding provider perspectives on acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of CDS for HIV prevention in pediatric primary care, a key implementation setting.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional multiple methods study utilizing surveys and in-depth interviews with pediatricians to assess acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of CDS for HIV prevention, as well as to identify contextual barriers and facilitators to CDS. Qualitative analysis utilized work domain analysis and a deductive coding approach grounded in the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research. Quantitative and qualitative data were merged to develop an Implementation Research Logic Model to conceptualize implementation determinants, strategies, mechanisms, and outcomes of potential CDS use.

RESULTS

Participants (n = 26) were primarily white (92%), female (88%), and physicians (73%). Using CDS to improve HIV testing and PrEP delivery was perceived as highly acceptable (median score 5), IQR [4-5]), appropriate (5, IQR [4-5]), and feasible (4, IQR [3.75-4.75]) using a 5-point Likert scale. Providers identified confidentiality and time constraints as two key barriers to HIV prevention care spanning every workflow step. With respect to desired CDS features, providers sought interventions that were integrated into the primary care workflow, standardized to promote universal testing yet adaptable to the level of a patient's HIV risk, and addressed providers' knowledge gaps and bolstered self-efficacy in providing HIV prevention services.

CONCLUSIONS

This multiple methods study indicates that clinical decision support in the pediatric primary care setting may be an acceptable, feasible, and appropriate intervention for improving the reach and equitable delivery of HIV screening and PrEP services. Design considerations for CDS in this setting should include deploying CDS interventions early in the visit workflow and prioritizing standardized but flexible designs.

Disparities in Cancer Screening in Sexual and Gender Minority Populations: A Secondary Analysis of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Data

OBJECTIVES

To describe cancer screening characteristics and better understand individual-, environmental-, and organizational-level barriers of sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations. .

SAMPLE & SETTING

This study was conducted using a combined sample from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) national dataset from 2014 and 2016.

METHODS & VARIABLES

Chi-square tests for independence and logistic regression analysis tests were performed to determine whether relationships existed between SGM status and demographics.

RESULTS

Black respondents or those who reported their race as other, were female, had some college or technical school or more, and had healthcare coverage were less likely to present for cancer screening. SGM respondents who were in good or better health; were unmarried; were aged 18-44 years or 45-55 years; or were Asian, Native American, or Hawaiian, or reported their race as other, had higher odds of screening for cancer.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Disparities in cancer screening among SGM populations are not well documented. These findings will inform structured education and preventative interventions to improve screening participation among SGM populations.

Health Inequities in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Literature: A Scoping Review

Although life saving, health inequities exist regarding access and patient outcomes in Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), especially among marginalized groups. This scoping review's goal is to outline existing literature and highlight gaps for future research. Researchers followed guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. We conducted a search to identify articles published between 2016 and 2022 regarding CABG and inequity groups, defined by the National Institutes of Health. Fifty-seven articles were included in our final sample. Race/Ethnicity was examined in 39 incidences, Sex or Gender 29 times, Income 17 instances, Geography 10 instances, and Education Level 3 instances. Occupation Status 2 instances, and LGBTQ+ 0 times. Important disparities exist regarding CABG access and outcomes, especially involving members of the LGBTQ+, Native American, and Black communities. Further research is needed to address health disparities and their root causes for focused action and improved health of minoritized groups.

Examining participant representation by sex, race, ethnicity and age in United States blood donation and blood transfusion clinical trials

Significant inequities based on sex, race, ethnicity, and age exist among participants in clinical trials dedicated to investigating medical disease states. While general demographic data regarding blood donors and blood transfusion recipients have been studied extensively, the demographics of participants involved in blood donation and blood transfusion clinical trials are unknown. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of United States (U.S.) -based interventional blood donation and blood transfusion clinical trials registered with Clinicaltrials.gov to ascertain the composition of participants' sex, race, ethnicity, and age, as well as diagnostic conditions and geographic trial locations.Eligible trials were undertaken between July 2003 and August 2020. Thirty-eight of the one hundred and fifty-two blood donation and blood transfusion clinical trials met inclusion criteria (seven blood donation and thirty-one blood transfusion trials). While the participant dataset from trial reports were incomplete, 100 % of blood donation trials reported sex and age, 71.4 % reported race, and 42.3 % reported ethnicity. 96.8 % of blood transfusion trials reported sex, 51.6 % reported race, 38.7 % reported ethnicity, and 100 % reported age. Among 2720 participants enrolled in the seven blood donation trials, females were underrepresented (28.5 %) compared to U.S. Census data. Conversely, female (50.8 %) and male participants (49.2 %) were equally represented in blood transfusion trials (9255 participants). White participants were overrepresented in blood donation trials (73.4 %), while Hispanic or Latinos were underrepresented in both blood donation (7.7 %) and blood transfusion (8.2 %) trials compared to 2019 U.S.Census data. Only 8.3 % of blood transfusion clinical trials open to adults reported including older adults (i.e., ≥ 65yo). Despite mandatory reporting requirements and an already established framework, researchers frequently failed to report complete demographics of blood donation and blood transfusion clinical trial participants. Furthermore, various demographic groups were underrepresented in blood donation and/or blood transfusion clinical trials, including females, Hispanic or Latino individuals, and older adults. These findings demonstrate the need for implementation of strategies to ensure equitable representation of individuals in blood donation and transfusion clinical trials.

Updates in Transgender Breast Imaging

Transgender patients are seen in breast imaging centers for routine screening mammography and diagnostic imaging of the symptomatic breast. This comprehensive review of transgender breast imaging aims to update the radiologist on appropriate terminology, breast cancer risk in different patient populations, screening guidelines, and diagnostic scenarios. The chapter concludes with practical tips on how to optimize the patient experience.

Reducing Adult Transgender Barriers to Care in the Emergency Department: Strategies to Improve Policies and Practices

The Research to Practice column is intended to improve the research critique skills of the advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) and the emergency department (ED) registered nurse (RN) and to assist with translating research into practice. In this column, we review a recent qualitative research study by M. Allison, S. Marshall, G. Stewart, M. Joiner, C. Nash, and M. Stewart (2021) titled "Experiences of Transgender and Gender Nonbinary Patients in the Emergency Department and Recommendations for Health Care Policy, Education, and Practice" with discussion of how their findings can be applied to inform providers how to deliver appropriate care of transgender patients within the ED.

Facilitators and barriers to providing affirming care for transgender patients in primary care practices in Arkansas

PURPOSE

This study assessed factors affecting the provision of affirming-care best practices (ACBPs) for transgender individuals by primary care providers (PCPs) in a rural, southern state METHODS: We conducted a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study in 2020, including a statewide survey (phase 1) and interviews (phase 2). Surveyed PCPs (phase 1) included Medical Doctors/Doctors of Osteopathy (MDs/DOs), nurse practitioners, and 1 physician assistant. Interview participants (phase 2) included providers and staff in 6 practices throughout the state. We used an exploratory approach to data collection and performed content analysis to classify interview data into categories representing overarching themes RESULTS: Among surveyed PCPs who reported they had provided care to transgender patients (n = 35), the most common reason for providing gender-affirming medical services was "because of my ethical obligation to treat patients equally" (n = 27, 77%). The most common reason for not providing such services was because the PCPs "have not been trained/don't feel competent to provide these services" (n = 12, 34%). Interviews revealed the following themes: (1) willingness to provide "culturally competent care"; (2) continuum of accepting to affirming attitudes toward transgender individuals; (3) basic understanding of stigma and an awareness of its impact; (4) changes needed to provide "culturally competent care"; and (5) preferred clinical support strategies.

CONCLUSION

Training and education to provide ACBPs are warranted and would meet the needs of patients and providers. Facilitating telemedicine visits for transgender patients with gender-affirming care experts was a favorable implementation strategy for clinical support and is recommended to address access to affirming care.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Clinical Trials

Minority groups are vastly underrepresented in clinical trial participants and leadership. Because these studies provide innovative and revolutionary treatment options to patients with cancer and have the potential to extend survival, it is imperative that public and private stakeholders, as well as hospital and clinical trial leadership, prioritize equity and inclusion of diverse populations in clinical trial development and recruitment strategies. Achieving equity in clinical trials could be an important step in reducing the overall cancer burden and mortality disparities in vulnerable populations.

Sexual and gender minority cultural humility training for oncology settings: An example of iterative adaptation and implementation

Background

Multiple national organizations recommend that cancer care providers and oncology practices be responsive to the needs of sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients. Oncology practices have attempted to incorporate this recommendation through SGM-focused cultural humility training interventions. It is unclear how best to adapt and implement such training across practices. This manuscript outlines one process for adapting a widely-used SGM training from The Fenway Institute to the context of oncology settings using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced (FRAME) model.

Methods

We conducted training sessions in two oncology care settings: a breast oncology center and a radiation oncology department. Subsequently, we conducted in-depth interviews with the three trainers involved in adapting The Fenway Institute's training to these two practices. Two independent investigators coded the interviews using components of the FRAME model as an analytic guide.

Results

Training team members described the mechanisms by which FRAME adaption occurred both proactively and reactively; the importance of involving SGM-identified trainers of diverse backgrounds as well as champions from within oncology practices in which trainings were conducted; the importance of adapting both the context and content of training to be relevant to oncology audiences; and the ways in which fidelity to the core principles of improving health care for SGM patients was maintained throughout the process.

Discussion

SGM cultural humility training for oncology providers and staff must undergo iterative adaptation to address the political and social context of specific practice environments and advocate for broader institutional culture change to achieve responsiveness to SGM health needs.

A Novel Medical Student Elective Course in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex, Asexual, and Sexually and Gender Diverse Health: Training Tomorrow's Physician-Leaders

Purpose: Inadequate medical training in lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and sexually and gender diverse (LGBTQIA+) health care contributes to health disparities. This article reports on a novel 4-week elective course at Harvard Medical School that prepares students to become physician-leaders in LGBTQIA+ health care. Methods: The course engages students in multidisciplinary clinical placements, self-directed learning, and mentored scholarly projects, all specifically relevant to LGBTQIA+ health. The authors qualitatively reviewed student experiences, and quantitatively analyzed course evaluations. Results: Between 2016 and 2022, 30 students completed the course, and 12 scholarly projects resulted in a published peer-reviewed article authored by the student. Students who completed evaluations rated the course as excellent and reported increased interest and core knowledge in LGBTQIA+ health care. Conclusion: This novel program has demonstrated feasibility and may serve as a model for establishing other advanced medical student clinical and scholarly electives on LGBTQIA+ health care.

Instituting Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Training and Documentation to Increase Inclusivity at a Pediatric Health System

In this mixed-methods quality improvement project, we implemented and evaluated sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) form rollout in the electronic medical record. Families in our gender diversity program completed a baseline survey in 2017 (55/328 responded) and follow-up in 2020 (180/721 responded) to evaluate the frequency of affirmed name and pronoun use in the hospital. Survey feedback informed system-wide inclusivity efforts and training. SOGI was implemented in 2020 after 1,662 providers completed an online training and 11,090 team members completed gender and sexual orientation inclusivity training. We recommend similar trainings for health systems utilizing SOGI.

Achieving Health Equity for LGBTQ+ Adolescents

The lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) adolescent population experiences health disparities due to barriers to care, including lack of access to culturally competent health care providers. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to increase access to culturally competent care through continuing education, a physical makeover of clinic space, and a social marketing campaign. The impact of the project on the number of LGBTQ+ adolescent patients at the clinic and the rate of documentation of sexual orientation and gender identity data was evaluated via a chart audit. Changes in nurses' and health care providers' knowledge as a result of the continuing education were evaluated with a pretest and a posttest. The number of LGBTQ+ patients and provider knowledge increased following the continuing education. Sexual orientation and gender identity data were documented during 87.5% of visits. The participants' knowledge increased by 4.7% following the continuing education. Further, five physical changes to the clinic were completed and a social marketing campaign was launched. This quality improvement project demonstrates that continuing education can be an effective way to increase cultural competence for the care of LGBTQ+ individuals. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2022;53(8):348-354.].

Sexual and/or gender minority parental structures among California births from 2016 to 2020

BACKGROUND

Sexual and/or gender minority people account for roughly 7.1% of the US population, and an estimated one-third are parents. Little is known about sexual and/or gender minority people who become pregnant, despite this population having documented healthcare disparities that may affect pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to describe parental structures among birth parents and the prepregnancy characteristics of parents giving birth in likely sexual and/or gender minority parental structures from California birth certificates.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a population-based study using birth certificate data from all live births in California from 2016 through 2020 (n=2,257,974). The state amended its birth certificate in 2016 to enable the recording of more diverse parental roles. Now, parents on birth certificates are classified as "parent giving birth" and "parent not giving birth" and people in either role can identify as "mother," "father," or "parent." We examined all potential combinations of parenting roles, and grouped parental structures of "mother-mother" and those designating a "father" as the "parent giving birth" into likely sexual and/or gender minority groups. We assessed the distribution of prepregnancy characteristics across parental structure groups ("mother-father," "sexual and/or gender minority," "mother only," "unclassified," and "missing both parental roles").

RESULTS

Sexual and/or gender minority parents accounted for 6802 (0.3%) of live births in California over the 5-year study period. The most common sexual and/or gender minority parental structures were "mother-mother" (n=4310; 63% of the group) and "father-father" (n=1486; 22% of the group). Compared with "parents giving birth" in the "mother-father" structure (n=2,055,038; 91%), a higher proportion of "parents giving birth" in the "sexual and/or gender minority" group were aged ≥35 years, White, college-educated, and had commercial health insurance. In addition, a higher proportion had a high prepregnancy body mass index. Although likely underreported overall, the proportion of those who used assisted reproductive technology was much higher in the "sexual and/or gender minority" group (1.4%) than in the "mother-father" group (0.05%). Cigarette smoking in the 3 months before pregnancy was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Changes to the California birth certificate have revealed a multiplicity of parental structures. Our findings suggest that sexual and/or gender minority parents differ from other parental structures and from the general sexual and/or gender minority population and warrant further research.

Pediatric sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in the electronic health record

The systematic documentation of sexual orientation and gender identity data in electronic health records can improve patient-centered care and help to identify and address health disparities affecting sexual and gender minority populations. Although there are existing guidelines for sexual orientation and gender identity data among adult patients, there are not yet standard recommendations for pediatric patients. In this article, we discuss methods that pediatric primary care organizations can use to collect and document sexual orientation and gender identity information with children and adolescents in electronic health records. These recommendations take into consideration children's developmental stages, the role of caregivers, and the need to protect the privacy of this information. We also focus on the current limitations of electronic health records in capturing the nuances of sexual and gender minority identities and make suggestions for addressing these limitations.

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Reporting Among U.S. Health Centers

INTRODUCTION

Sexual orientation and gender identity data collection is necessary to address health inequities. This study examines sexual orientation and gender identity data reporting among community health centers.

METHODS

Using the 2016-2019 Uniform Data System for 1,381 community health centers, trends in reporting of sexual orientation and gender identity data were examined. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations between community health center characteristics and whether sexual orientation and gender identity data were available for ≥75% of a community health center's patients in 2019. Data were analyzed in 2021.

RESULTS

In 2016-2019, the percentage of community health centers with sexual orientation and gender identity data for ≥75% of patients increased from 14.9% to 53.0%. In 2019, community health centers were more likely to have this data for ≥75% of patients if they were in nonmetro counties (OR=1.48, 95% CI=1.04, 2.10 versus metro), were in the South (OR=2.27, 95% CI=1.57, 3.31) or West (OR=1.91, 95% CI=1.27, 2.88 versus the Northeast), and had more patients aged between 18 and 39 years (OR=1.04, 95% CI=1.02, 1.07), between 40 and 64 years (OR=1.04, 95% CI=1.02, 1.06 vs <18 years), or veterans (OR=1.10, 95% CI=1.01, 1.20). This was less likely among community health centers serving 10,000-20,000 patients (OR=0.70, 95% CI=0.52, 0.95) and >20,000 patients (OR=0.44, 95% CI=0.32, 0.61 vs <10,000) and community health centers with more patients of American Indian/Alaskan Native (OR=0.98, 95% CI=0.97, 0.99) or unknown race (OR=0.92, 95% CI=0.86, 0.97 versus White).

CONCLUSIONS

Collection of sexual orientation and gender identity data by community health centers has increased substantially since 2016, although gaps remain.

Effects of Including Gender Pronoun Questions in Surveys

This research examines whether the mere presence of asking about gender pronouns (e.g., she/her, he/him, they/them, and ze/zir) in a survey enhances participants’ attitudes and satisfaction of answering the questions. A large sample (N = 1,511) of heterosexual, cisgender, and LGBTQIA+ participants across the United States (US) were surveyed an online “personality test” (as a deception), with the real purpose of examining whether asking a pronoun question enhanced their perceptions of the survey. Three demographic groups were included: (i) heterosexual–cisgender (n = 503), (ii) gay–cisgender (n = 509), and (iii) genderqueer (trans, non-conforming, other, n = 499). Half of each group were randomly given either a survey that included a gender pronoun question (test) or not (control), and then all rated their perceptions of the survey questions. For participants who identified as heterosexual or gay, no major differences were found between survey conditions. However, participants who identified as genderqueer experienced significant increases of satisfaction, comfort level, and perceived relevance of the questions when given a survey that asked their gender pronouns versus the survey that did not. These findings have implications for any surveys that ask about personal demographics, and suggest that any form of written communication should include clarity about gender pronouns.

Concordance of Data About Sex From Electronic Health Records and the National Death Index: Implications for Transgender Populations

BACKGROUND

Transgender individuals have greater health risks than cisgender individuals, which may bode for greater mortality. However, research is limited by lack of gender identity information at the time of death. Novel opportunities to combine administrative data with National Death Index (NDI) data may facilitate mortality research about transgender populations, but binary measures of sex and gender may pose problems for analyses. This study explored differences in sex recorded in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) electronic health record (EHR) and NDI data between transgender and cisgender decedents.

METHODS

We used VHA EHR data from fiscal years 2000-2016 to identify deaths among a sample of transgender and cisgender patients. We cross-tabulated sex recorded in the NDI with EHR-based sex from VHA EHR data. We extracted data in 2018 and conducted analyses in 2020.

RESULTS

Death occurred for 1109 transgender patients and 7757 cisgender patients. For cisgender decedents, EHR-based sex and NDI-based sex were 100% concordant. For transgender decedents, 46 (4%) were discordant between data sources. Of transgender decedents with female EHR-based sex (n = 259), 17% were indicated as male in NDI data; of those with male EHR-based sex (n = 850), 0.2% were indicated as female in NDI data.

CONCLUSIONS

Data linkage between EHR and the NDI can facilitate transgender mortality research, but examining mortality specific to various transgender identities remains difficult. Improved documentation of sex and gender is needed within US mortality surveillance.

Comparing Electronic Health Record Domains' Utility to Identify Transgender Patients

Purpose

Earlier literature has reported on the utility of diagnostic codes and demographic information for identifying transgender patients. We aim to assess which method identifies the most transgender patients utilizing readily available tools from within the electronic health record (EHR).

Methods

A de-identified patient database from a single EHR that allows for searching any discrete data point in the EHR was used to query International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnostic codes and demographic data specific to transgender patients from January 2011 to April 2019.

Results

Demographic data and ICD-10 codes yielded 1494 individual EHRs with transgender-specific data domains. ICD-10 diagnostic codes alone identified 942 (63.05%) unique EHRs. Demographics alone identified 218 (14.59%) unique EHRs. A total of 334 (22.36%) unique EHRs had both ICD-10 and demographic identifiers. Of those identified by transgender-specific demographic data (552), 294 (53.26%) were trans masculine, 215 (38.95%) were trans feminine, and 43 (7.79%) were nonbinary. Of the 552 demographic-identified transgender patients, 141 (25.86%) were identified by a two-part gender identity demographic question.

Conclusions

ICD-10 diagnostic codes, not demographic data, identified the most transgender patient records, but neither diagnostic codes alone nor demographic data captured the full population. Only 26.36% of the charts identified as transgender patients had both ICD-10 codes and demographic data. We recommend that when identifying transgender populations through EHR domains, a combination of diagnostic codes and demographic data be used. Furthermore, research is needed to optimize disclosure and collection of demographic information for gender minority populations.

Identification and Reporting of Gender Identity in HIV Surveillance Data in the Deep South

Introduction

Although studies have identified high prevalence of HIV among individuals who are transgender, HIV surveillance data regarding gender identity is incomplete, resulting in uncertainty regarding the gender identity, including transgender and other diverse gender identities, of individuals diagnosed with HIV. This information is critical to planning strategies for HIV prevention and care.

Methods

From August 2018 to March 2019, interviews were conducted with HIV surveillance leadership (including Surveillance Directors, Epidemiologists, and HIV/STI Prevention Staff) at offices of epidemiology from eight US Deep South states regarding their practices related to gender identity documentation in HIV surveillance data and the barriers encountered in these documentation processes as well as their recommendations for improving gender identity data collection.

Results

Interview findings indicated significant barriers to collection of accurate gender identity information in HIV surveillance data including lack of standardized data systems for collecting gender identity; difficulty obtaining gender identity information from HIV testing sites, laboratories, and medical databases; and need for enhanced cultural sensitivity and gender identity knowledge at all levels of the data collection process. Recommendations from the state HIV surveillance staff, leaders, and epidemiologists are included in the findings.

Conclusions and Policy Implications

Effective, well-coordinated strategies are needed to improve gender identity information in HIV surveillance reporting. Recommendations include standardizing and enhancing data collection strategies, providing cultural sensitivity training at all levels of HIV testing/reporting, and developing formal guidance and providing technical assistance that targets and educates laboratories and medical organizations to implement systems of data collection that routinely and safely capture gender identity data.

Overcoming technical and cultural challenges to delivering equitable care for LGBTQ+ individuals in a rural, underserved area

The lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or questioning (LGBTQ+) community is vulnerable to health-care disparities. Many health-care organizations are working to collect sexual orientation and gender identity in their electronic health records (EHRs), with the goal of providing more inclusive care to their LGBTQ+ patients. There are significant human and technical barriers to making these efforts successful. Based on our 5-year experience at Geisinger (an integrated health system located in a rural, generally conservative area), this case report provides insights to overcome challenges in 4 critical areas: (1) enabling the EHR to collect and use information to support the health-care needs of LGBTQ+ patients, (2) building a culture of awareness and caring, empowering members of the health-care team to break down barriers of misunderstanding and mistrust, (3) developing services to support the needs of LGBTQ+ patients, and (4) partnering with local communities to become a trusted health-care provider.

Cultivating LGBTQ+ Competent Cancer Research: Recommendations from LGBTQ+ Cancer Survivors, Care Partners, and Community Advocates

OBJECTIVE

Sexual and gender minority (SGM) or LGBTQ+ communities were designated as a National Institutes of Health (NIH) disparity population in 2016, yet research exploring SGM cancer disparities is still limited. Thus, we sought the insight of LGBTQ+ cancer survivors, care partners, and community advocates to learn their recommendations for cultivating competent and inclusive cancer research for LGBTQ+ individuals.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a focus group with LGBTQ+ survivors and care partners of LGBTQ+ survivors who were 18 years or older (N = 8) and interviews with community advocates who are leaders in LGBTQ+ cancer (N = 8). The focus group and interviews were recorded, transcribed, and qualitatively analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis.

CONCLUSION

Qualitative analysis elicited an overarching theme of cultivating competent research for LGBTQ+ individuals, including three subthemes: (i) Cisheteronormativity: An inhospitable ecosystem for LGBTQ+ patients, survivors, and care partners, (ii) Study design: Shifting from invasive 'othering' to a sustainable community-driven climate, and (iii) Recruitment and data collection: Ways to cultivate ecosystem health. Cultivating inclusive, competent research with SGM populations is crucial for addressing health disparities and improving cancer survivors' and care partners' health.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Recommendations from LGBTQ+ survivors, care partners, and community advocates ranged from small alterations to systemic changes, highlighting the multifaceted yet feasible process of cultivating LGBTQ+ competent cancer research. The process of cultivating competent research for LGBTQ+ populations will take substantial investment from researchers, providers, and health systems.

Transgender and nonbinary individuals and ICT-driven information practices in response to transexclusionary healthcare systems: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

This qualitative research examines how transgender and gender nonbinary (T/GNB) persons from South Carolina navigate informational barriers within healthcare systems. This navigation can be described through the lens of information practices, or how T/GNB participants create, seek, use, and share information to achieve desired healthcare outcomes. Special focus is given to the roles of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in shaping these practices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The research utilizes participant data from semistructured interviews and focus groups conducted with 26 T/GNB individuals focusing on their health information practices. Data analysis utilized emic/etic coding and the constant comparative method to identify themes describing transexclusionary information barriers and respondent ICT-led information practices.

RESULTS

Findings note healthcare systems producing cisnormativity by design resulting in T/GNB individuals viewing healthcare spaces as exclusionary. Exclusionary barriers included over reliance on medical, expert authority ignoring T/GNB embodiment, and a lack of contextual perspective to identities. In response, T/GNB seek, create, use, and share information via ICTs to challenge exclusionary practices.

DISCUSSION

T/GNB ICT use addresses systemic barriers within healthcare systems suggesting a need to reframe healthcare systems through the lens of design justice, one that values T/GNB agency in understanding and producing health knowledge.

CONCLUSION

While many healthcare providers are not intentionally being transexclusionary, the design of healthcare information systems rely on cisnormative values, thus excluding many T/GNB from accessing healthcare in comfortable and safe ways. Shifting toward the values and practices of T/GNB as informed by ICT use will afford healthcare providers ways to undo barriers to care.

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection at US Health Centers: Impact of City-Level Structural Stigma in 2018

Objectives. To examine the relationship between city-level structural stigma pertaining to sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) and completeness of patient SOGI data collection at US federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). Methods. We used the Human Rights Campaign's Municipal Equality Index to quantify city-level structural stigma against sexual and gender minority people in 506 US cities across 49 states. We ascertained the completeness of SOGI data collection at FQHCs from the 2018 Uniform Data System, which describes FQHC patient demographics and service utilization. We included FQHCs in cities captured by the structural stigma index in multinomial generalized linear mixed models to examine the relationship between city-level structural stigma and SOGI data completeness. Results. FQHCs in cities with more protective sexual orientation nondiscrimination policies reported more complete patient sexual orientation data (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2, 2.1). This association was also found for gender identity nondiscrimination policies and gender identity data collection (AOR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.3, 2.2). Conclusions. Municipal sexual and gender minority nondiscrimination laws are associated with social and municipal environments that facilitate patient SOGI data collection.(Am J Public Health. 2021;111(11):2059-2063. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306414).

Addressing bias in big data and AI for health care: A call for open science

Artificial intelligence (AI) has an astonishing potential in assisting clinical decision making and revolutionizing the field of health care. A major open challenge that AI will need to address before its integration in the clinical routine is that of algorithmic bias. Most AI algorithms need big datasets to learn from, but several groups of the human population have a long history of being absent or misrepresented in existing biomedical datasets. If the training data is misrepresentative of the population variability, AI is prone to reinforcing bias, which can lead to fatal outcomes, misdiagnoses, and lack of generalization. Here, we describe the challenges in rendering AI algorithms fairer, and we propose concrete steps for addressing bias using tools from the field of open science.

Gender harmony: improved standards to support affirmative care of gender-marginalized people through inclusive gender and sex representation

Objective

Accurate representation of clinical sex and gender identity in interoperable clinical systems is a major challenge for organizations intent on improving outcomes for sex- and gender-marginalized people. Improved data collection has been hindered by the historical approach that presumed a single, often binary, datum was sufficient. We describe the Health Level Seven International (HL7) Gender Harmony logical model that proposes an improved approach.

Materials and Methods

The proposed solution was developed via an American National Standards Institute (ANSI)-certified collaborative balloted process. As an HL7 Informative Document, it is an HL7 International-balloted consensus on the subject of representing sex and representing gender in clinical systems based on work of the gender harmony project led by the HL7 Vocabulary Work Group.

Results

The Gender Harmony Model is a logical model that provides a standardized approach that is both backwards-compatible and an improvement to the meaningful capture of gender identity, recorded sex or recorded gender, a sex for clinical use, the name to use, and pronouns that are affirmative and inclusive of gender-marginalized people.

Conclusion

Most clinical systems and current standards in health care do not meaningfully address, nor do they consistently represent, sex and gender diversity, which has impeded interoperability and led to suboptimal health care. The Gender Harmony Project was formed to create more inclusive health information exchange standards to enable a safer, higher-quality, and embracing healthcare experience. The Gender Harmony Model provides the informative guidance for standards developers to implement a more thorough technical design that improves the narrow binary design used in many legacy clinical systems.

Targeting cancer prevention and screening interventions to LGBTQ communities: A scoping review

Although some people within LGBTQ communities are at risk of developing some cancers at higher rates than non-LGBTQ people, there is limited evidence of the outcomes of targeted cancer prevention and screening interventions for these communities. This scoping review examined key findings regarding the feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of evaluated intervention studies conducted in high income settings and published in peer reviewed literature (2014-2020) by combining evidence of both cancer risk-reducing behavioural interventions and screening and preventative practice interventions. While there is limited evidence of stronger outcomes from targeted interventions with cohorts of gender and sexuality diverse communities, compared with the use of mainstream or untailored interventions, there is stronger evidence that targeted interventions are more acceptable to these communities and may be more feasible in some contexts. Thus, there is benefit in understanding what targeting entails in these interventions, and to understand what influences acceptability, to inform the design and delivery of such interventions.

Understanding community member and health care professional perspectives on gender-affirming care-A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people experience significant barriers to accessing affirming health services. There is a paucity of literature examining how both community members and health care professionals (HCPs) understand potential causes and solutions for these barriers, particularly in non-urban settings.

OBJECTIVE

We present the first systematic examination of perspectives from community members and HCPs regarding barriers to and solutions for promoting access to gender-affirming health care.

DESIGN

Study activities were conducted through the Plan and Act for Transgender Health (PATH) Project, a health needs assessment of TGD people. Community members in the catchment area were recruited to participate in focus group discussions about access to gender-affirming health care and optimal health service delivery models in March-October 2019. HCPs were recruited to participate in focus group discussions or in-depth interviews about experiences working with TGD clients. Data were analyzed using an inductive grounded theory approach.

SETTING

25 rural counties in Massachusetts, New York, Connecticut, Vermont, and New Hampshire.

PARTICIPANTS

Study participants included 61 adult TGD community members and 23 HCPs working in the catchment area.

RESULTS

Both community members and HCPs spoke of the need for connectedness and linkages among disparate health system components for gender-affirming health care. Participants expressed this priority through calls for systems-level improvements within existing services (e.g., expanded data collection, expanded mental health services, inclusive and affirming health care environments, and TGD staff). They also expressed the need for expanded TGD community outreach and engagement (e.g., incorporation of a patient feedback process, TGD health navigators, and resource mapping).

LIMITATIONS

Findings specifically reflect the perspectives of community members and HCPs in the rural New England area. Furthermore, the study sample was predominantly White non-Hispanic.

CONCLUSION

Interventions to achieve accessible gender-affirming health care must address the diverse perspectives and needs of both community members and HCPs.

The sector is ready, and the community needs Australian alcohol and other drug treatment services to ask about sexuality and gender identity

Sexuality and gender diverse Australians are a priority population in federal and state-based alcohol and other drug (AOD) strategies. Research evidence shows higher prevalence of AOD use by lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) people, riskier use and a higher proportion have accessed AOD treatment. Despite these disparities, Australian AOD treatment services do not routinely collect data on sexuality or gender identity. As a result, the treatment needs, experiences and outcomes of LGBTQ people remain largely invisible. The Australian Bureau of Statistics' recently released standardised indicators for the recording of sex, gender, variations of sex characteristics and sexual orientation presents an opportunity for the AOD sector to implement inclusive data collection as a foundational step towards achieving policy priorities for LGBTQ people. This commentary includes an implementation case study from the New South Wales non-government AOD treatment sector, where sexuality and gender identity indicators have been collected since 2016.

Achieving Equity in Asian American Healthcare: Critical Issues and Solutions

Equity is a fundamental goal of the US health care system. Asians comprise 6% of the US population, and 60% of the world's population. Less than 1% of National Institutes of Health funding is directed toward Asian health. Asian health outcomes are often worse than non-Hispanic Whites (NHWS) in America. Increasing federal and foundation resources and funding toward Asian health research could illuminate these risks and develop precision interventions to reduce known health disparities. When disaggregated by race/ethnicity, Asian health risks are even more apparent. Here, we discuss critical health outcome differences between the six major Asian American subgroups (Asian Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese) comprising 80% of the US Asian population, highlighting demographic, pharmacologic, disease prevalence, and mortality outcomes. We then outline seven critical issues contributing to Asian American health disparities, including aggregated Asian health data, undersampling, invalid extrapolations, underrepresentation in clinical trials, lack of funding and awareness of disparities, and the model minority myth. Building on the successes of national public health initiatives, we propose nine leverage points to improve Asian American health including the following: obtaining disaggregated Asian health data, improved Asian health research (oversampling Asians, improving clinical trial participation, and increasing research funding), stakeholder collaboration (national and with Asian nations), community engagement, providing culturally precise health care, and expansion of the Asian American research ecosystem. Achieving health equity takes deliberate practice and does not occur by accident. By addressing critical issues that perpetuate Asian health disparities, we grow closer to understanding how to effectively improve Asian health and build a nationally unified mindset toward action that emphasizes equitable care for all.

Optimizing gender-affirming medical care through anatomical inventories, clinical decision support, and population health management in electronic health record systems

Recent advances in electronic health records and health information technology are providing new opportunities to improve the quality of care for transgender and gender diverse people, a population that experiences significant health disparities. This article recommends changes to electronic health record systems that have the potential to optimize gender-affirming care. Specifically, we discuss the importance of creating an anatomical inventory form that captures organ diversity, and of developing clinical decision support tools and population health management systems that consider each patient's gender identity, sex assigned at birth, and anatomy.

Frequency of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Documentation After Electronic Medical Record Modification

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Documentation of sexual orientation (SO) and gender identity (GI) is crucial to identify lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth and perform meaningful research to improve health disparities in this community. As a result, some electronic medical records (EMRs) have incorporated SO and GI into part of the provider's workflow for documentation. We aimed to evaluate the effect this modification has had on the frequency of SO and GI documentation. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: This was a retrospective chart review of patient encounters from an outpatient pediatric and adolescent gynecology clinical practice. The rate of documentation of SO and GI were compared between encounters that took place before the implementation of the EMR modification and those that took place after. Additionally, we examined rates of GI and SO documentation according to visit type and patient race.

RESULTS

A statistically significant increase in the frequency of SO and GI documentation after the EMR modification was detected. The documentation rate of SO increased from 10/73 (13.7%) to 32/73 (45.1%) (P < .01) and GI documentation rate went from 1.4% to 46.5% (P < .01) after the EMR changes were implemented. SO or GI was most commonly documented in social history (90%). There were no differences in documentation on the basis of race or type of encounter.

CONCLUSION

Including a specific tab for SO and GI in the EMR significantly increased the frequency of SO and GI documentation. Despite this increase, frequency of documentation remained at less than 50%, emphasizing the need for further improvement.

A rapid review of gender, sex, and sexual orientation documentation in electronic health records

Objective

The lack of precise and inclusive gender, sex, and sexual orientation (GSSO) data in electronic health records (EHRs) is perpetuating inequities of sexual and gender minorities (SGM). We conducted a rapid review on how GSSO documentation in EHRs should be modernized to improve the health of SGM.

Materials and Methods

We searched MEDLINE from 2015 to 2020 with terms for gender, sex, sexual orientation, and electronic health/medical records. Only literature reviews, primary studies, and commentaries from peer-reviewed journals in English were included. Two researchers screened citations and reviewed articles with help from a third to reach consensus. Covidence, Excel, and Atlas-TI were used to track articles, extract data, and synthesize findings, respectively.

Results

Thirty-five articles were included. The 5 themes to modernize GSSO documentation in EHRs were (1) creating an inclusive, culturally competent environment with precise terminology and standardized data collection; (2) refining guidelines for identifying and matching SGM patients with their care needs; (3) improving patient-provider relationships by addressing patient rights and provider competencies; (4) recognizing techno-socio-organizational aspects when implementing GSSO in EHRs; and (5) addressing invisibility of SGM by expanding GSSO research.

Conclusions

The literature on GSSO documentation in EHRs is expanding. While this trend is encouraging, there are still knowledge gaps and practical challenges to enabling meaningful changes, such as organizational commitments to ensure affirming environments, and coordinated efforts to address technical, organizational, and social aspects of modernizing GSSO documentation. The adoption of an inclusive EHR to meet SGM needs is a journey that will evolve over time.

Longitudinal Cohort Study of Gender Affirmation and HIV-Related Health in Transgender and Gender Diverse Adults: The LEGACY Project Protocol

Background

Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) adults in the United States experience health disparities, especially in HIV infection. Medical gender affirmation (eg, hormone therapy and gender-affirming surgeries) is known to be medically necessary and to improve some health conditions. To our knowledge, however, no studies have assessed the effects of gender-affirming medical care on HIV-related outcomes.

Objective

This study aims to evaluate the effects of medical gender affirmation on HIV-related outcomes among TGD primary care patients. Secondary objectives include characterizing mental health, quality of life, and unmet medical gender affirmation needs.

Methods

LEGACY is a longitudinal, multisite, clinic-based cohort of adult TGD primary care patients from two federally qualified community health centers in the United States: Fenway Health in Boston, and Callen-Lorde Community Health Center in New York. Eligible adult TGD patients contribute electronic health record data to the LEGACY research data warehouse (RDW). Patients are also offered the option to participate in patient-reported surveys for 1 year of follow-up (baseline, 6-month, and 12-month assessments) with optional HIV and sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing. Biobehavioral data from the RDW, surveys, and biospecimen collection are linked. HIV-related clinical outcomes include pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake (patients without HIV), viral suppression (patients with HIV), and anogenital STI diagnoses (all patients). Medical gender affirmation includes hormones, surgeries, and nonhormonal and nonsurgical interventions (eg, voice therapy).

Results

The contract began in April 2018. The cohort design was informed by focus groups with TGD patients (n=28) conducted between August-October 2018 and in collaboration with a community advisory board, scientific advisory board, and site-specific research support coalitions. Prospective cohort enrollment began in February 2019, with enrollment expected to continue through August 2020. As of April 2020, 7821 patients are enrolled in the LEGACY RDW and 1756 have completed a baseline survey. Participants have a median age of 29 years (IQR 11; range 18-82). More than one-third (39.7%) are racial or ethnic minorities (1070/7821, 13.68% Black; 475/7821, 6.07% multiracial; 439/7821, 5.61% Asian or Pacific Islander; 1120/7821, 14.32% other or missing) and 14.73% (1152/7821) are Hispanic or Latinx. By gender identity, participants identify as 33.79% (2643/7821) male, 37.07% (2900/7821) female, 21.74% (1700/7821) nonbinary, and 7.39% (578/7821) are unsure or have missing data. Approximately half (52.0%) of the cohort was assigned female sex at birth, and 5.4% (421/7821) are living with HIV infection.

Conclusions

LEGACY is an unprecedented opportunity to evaluate the impact of medical gender affirmation on HIV-related health. The study uses a comprehensive research methodology linking TGD patient biobehavioral longitudinal data from multiple sources. Patient-centeredness and scientific rigor are assured through the ongoing engagement of TGD communities, clinicians, scientists, and site clinical staff undergirded by epidemiological methodology. Findings will inform evidence-based clinical care for TGD patients, including optimal interventions to improve HIV-related outcomes.

International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/24198

Bringing Cultural Competency to the EHR: Lessons Learned Providing Respectful, Quality Care to the LGBTQ Community

The lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer (LGBTQ) community is vulnerable to healthcare disparities. Many healthcare organizations are contemplating efforts to collect sexual orientation and gender identity in the electronic health record (EHR), with a goal of providing more respectful, inclusive, high-quality care to their LGBTQ patients. There are significant human and technical barriers that must be overcome to make these efforts successful. Based on our four-year experience at Geisinger (an integrated health system located in a rural, generally conservative area), we provide insights to overcome challenges in two critical areas: 1) enabling the EHR to collect and use information to support the healthcare needs of LGBTQ patients, and 2) building a culture of awareness and caring, empowering members of the healthcare team to break down barriers of misunderstanding and mistrust.

Count me in: using a patient portal to minimize implicit bias in clinical research recruitment

OBJECTIVE

Determine whether women and men differ in volunteering to join a Research Recruitment Registry when invited to participate via an electronic patient portal without human bias.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Under-representation of women and other demographic groups in clinical research studies could be due either to invitation bias (explicit or implicit) during screening and recruitment or by lower rates of deciding to participate when offered. By making an invitation to participate in a Research Recruitment Registry available to all patients accessing our patient portal, regardless of demographics, we sought to remove implicit bias in offering participation and thus independently assess agreement rates.

RESULTS

Women were represented in the Research Recruitment Registry slightly more than their proportion of all portal users (n = 194 775). Controlling for age, race, ethnicity, portal use, chronic disease burden, and other questionnaire use, women were statistically more likely to agree to join the Registry than men (odds ratio 1.17, 95% CI, 1.12-1.21). In contrast, Black males, Hispanics (of both sexes), and particularly Asians (both sexes) had low participation-to-population ratios; this under-representation persisted in the multivariable regression model.

DISCUSSION

This supports the view that historical under-representation of women in clinical studies is likely due, at least in part, to implicit bias in offering participation. Distinguishing the mechanism for under-representation could help in designing strategies to improve study representation, leading to more effective evidence-based recommendations.

CONCLUSION

Patient portals offer an attractive option for minimizing bias and encouraging broader, more representative participation in clinical research.