In vivo and in vitro effects of simvastatin on inflammatory markers in pre-dialysis patients

Identification of endophenotypes supporting outcome prediction in hemodialysis patients based on mechanistic markers of statin treatment

Background

Statins are widely used to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis have significantly increased risk of developing CVD. Statin treatment in these patients however did not show a statistically significant benefit in large trials on a patient cohort level.

Methods

We generated gene expression profiles for statins to investigate the impact on cellular programs in human renal proximal tubular cells and mesangial cells in-vitro. We subsequently selected biomarkers from key statin-affected molecular pathways and assessed these biomarkers in plasma samples from the AURORA cohort, a double-blind, randomized, multi-center study of patients on hemodialysis or hemofiltration that have been treated with rosuvastatin. Patient clusters (phenotypes) were created based on the identified biomarkers using Latent Class Model clustering and the associations with outcome for the generated phenotypes were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. The multivariable models were adjusted for clinical and biological covariates based on previously published data in AURORA.

Results

The impact of statin treatment on mesangial cells was larger as compared with tubular cells with a large overlap of differentially expressed genes identified for atorvastatin and rosuvastatin indicating a predominant drug class effect. Affected molecular pathways included TGFB-, TNF-, and MAPK-signaling and focal adhesion among others. Four patient clusters were identified based on the baseline plasma concentrations of the eight biomarkers. Phenotype 1 was characterized by low to medium levels of the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and high levels of interleukin 6 (IL6) or matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2) and it was significantly associated with outcome showing increased risk of developing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) or cardiovascular death. Phenotype 2 had high HGF but low Fas cell surface death receptor (FAS) levels and it was associated with significantly better outcome at 1 year.

Conclusions

In this translational study, we identified patient subgroups based on mechanistic markers of statin therapy that are associated with disease outcome in patients on hemodialysis.

HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for people with chronic kidney disease not requiring dialysis

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease is the most frequent cause of death in people with early stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and the absolute risk of cardiovascular events is similar to people with coronary artery disease. This is an update of a review first published in 2009 and updated in 2014, which included 50 studies (45,285 participants).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of statins compared with placebo, no treatment, standard care or another statin in adults with CKD not requiring dialysis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 4 October 2023. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. An updated search will be undertaken every three months.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared the effects of statins with placebo, no treatment, standard care, or other statins, on death, cardiovascular events, kidney function, toxicity, and lipid levels in adults with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 90 to 15 mL/min/1.73 m2) were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two or more authors independently extracted data and assessed the study risk of bias. Treatment effects were expressed as mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous benefits and harms with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 63 studies (50,725 randomised participants); of these, 53 studies (42,752 participants) compared statins with placebo or no treatment. The median duration of follow-up was 12 months (range 2 to 64.8 months), the median dosage of statin was equivalent to 20 mg/day of simvastatin, and participants had a median eGFR of 55 mL/min/1.73 m2. Ten studies (7973 participants) compared two different statin regimens. We were able to meta-analyse 43 studies (41,273 participants). Most studies had limited reporting and hence exhibited unclear risk of bias in most domains. Compared with placebo or standard of care, statins prevent major cardiovascular events (14 studies, 36,156 participants: RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.79; I2 = 39%; high certainty evidence), death (13 studies, 34,978 participants: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.96; I² = 53%; high certainty evidence), cardiovascular death (8 studies, 19,112 participants: RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.87; I² = 0%; high certainty evidence) and myocardial infarction (10 studies, 9475 participants: RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.73; I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence). There were too few events to determine if statins made a difference in hospitalisation due to heart failure. Statins probably make little or no difference to stroke (7 studies, 9115 participants: RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.08; I² = 39%; moderate certainty evidence) and kidney failure (3 studies, 6704 participants: RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.05; I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence) in people with CKD not requiring dialysis. Potential harms from statins were limited by a lack of systematic reporting. Statins compared to placebo may have little or no effect on elevated liver enzymes (7 studies, 7991 participants: RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.50; I² = 0%; low certainty evidence), withdrawal due to adverse events (13 studies, 4219 participants: RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.60; I² = 37%; low certainty evidence), and cancer (2 studies, 5581 participants: RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.30; I² = 0%; low certainty evidence). However, few studies reported rhabdomyolysis or elevated creatinine kinase; hence, we are unable to determine the effect due to very low certainty evidence. Statins reduce the risk of death, major cardiovascular events, and myocardial infarction in people with CKD who did not have cardiovascular disease at baseline (primary prevention). There was insufficient data to determine the benefits and harms of the type of statin therapy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Statins reduce death and major cardiovascular events by about 20% and probably make no difference to stroke or kidney failure in people with CKD not requiring dialysis. However, due to limited reporting, the effect of statins on elevated creatinine kinase or rhabdomyolysis is unclear. Statins have an important role in the primary prevention of cardiovascular events and death in people who have CKD and do not require dialysis. Editorial note: This is a living systematic review. We will search for new evidence every three months and update the review when we identify relevant new evidence. Please refer to the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for the current status of this review.

Antidyslipidemia Pharmacotherapy in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The benefits and safety of antidyslipidemia pharmacotherapy in patients with chronic kidney disease were not well defined so the latest evidence was summarized by this work.

METHODS

This systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) included searches of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to 28 February 2022, for randomized controlled trials of any antilipidaemic medications administered to adults with chronic kidney disease [CKD: defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤ 60 mL/min/1.73 m² not undergoing transplantation], using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool to assess the certainty of the evidence.

RESULTS

55 trials and 30 works of them were included in our systematic review and NMA, respectively. In comparisons with no antidyslipidemia therapy or placebo, proprotein convertase subtilisin/Kexin type 9 inhibitors plus statin (PS) was the most effective drug regimen for reducing all-cause mortality (OR 0.62, 95% CI [0.40, 0.93]; GRADE: moderate), followed by moderate-high intensity statin (HS, OR 0.76, 95% CI [0.60, 0.93]; I² = 66.9%; GRADE: moderate). PS, HS, low-moderate statin (LS), ezetimibe plus statin (ES), and fibrates (F) significantly decreased the composite cardiovascular events. The subgroup analysis revealed the null effect of statins on death (OR 0.92, 95% CI [0.81, 1.04]) and composite cardiovascular events (OR 0.94, 95% CI [0.82, 1.07]) in dialysis patients.

CONCLUSION

In nondialysis CKD patients, statin-based therapies could significantly and safely reduce all-cause death and major composite cardiovascular events despite the presence of arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease and LDL-c levels. Aggressive medication regimens, PS and HS, appeared to be more effective, especially in patients with established CAD.

Statins Have an Anti-Inflammation in CKD Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Background

Persistent inflammation has been recognized as an important comorbid condition in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is associated with many complications, mortality, and progression of CKD. Previous studies have not drawn a clear conclusion about the anti-inflammatory effects of statins in CKD. This meta-analysis is aimed at assessing the anti-inflammatory effects of statins therapy in patients with CKD.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in these databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, and clinical trials) to identify the randomized controlled trials that assess the anti-inflammatory effects of statins. Subgroup, sensitivity, and trim-and-fill analysis were conducted to determine the robustness of pooled results of the primary outcome.

Results

25 eligible studies with 7921 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The present study showed that statins therapy was associated with a decreased C-reactive protein (CRP) (-2.06 mg/L; 95% CI: -2.85 to -1.27, p < 0.01). Subgroup, sensitivity, and trim-and-fill analysis showed that the pooled results of CPR were stable.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis demonstrates that statins supplementation has anti-inflammatory effects in patients with CKD. Statins exert an anti-inflammatory effect that is clinically important in improving complications, reducing mortality, and slowing progression in CKD. We believe that the benefits of statins to CKD are partly due to their anti-inflammatory effects. However, stains usually are prescribed in the CKD patients with dyslipidemia, whether statins can reduce inflammation in CKD patients with normal serum lipid needed to explore in the future. Therefore, we suggest that randomized clinical trials need to assess the effect of statins in CKD patients with normal serum lipid. Whether statins can be prescribed for aiming to inhibit inflammation in CKD also needed further study. Trial Registration. The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO); registration number: CRD42022310334.

Breakfast skipping and prevalence of heartburn syndrome among Iranian adults

PURPOSE

Limited data are available linking breakfast consumption to Heart Burn Syndrome (HBS). This study was done to investigate to find whether breakfast consumption is associated with HBS. This cross-sectional study was done to investigate the association between breakfast consumption and HBS among Iranian adults.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was performed among 4763 general adults of Isfahan, Iran. Participants' patterns of breakfast eating were assessed by asking two questions from them. How often do you eat breakfast in a week?" Participants were able to respond as: "never or 1 day/wk", "2-4 days/wk", "5-6 days/wk", "every day". HBS was defined as the presence of HBS at sometimes, often or always using a Persian version of validated self-administered modified ROME III questionnaire.

RESULTS

Totally, 4763 patients with HBS completed this cross-sectional study, where about 32.4% of them intake breakfast less than one time per week. After controlling for potential confounders, participants who consumed breakfast every day had a 43% lower risk for having HBS as compared with those who had breakfast ≤ 1 times/wk (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.41-0.80). A significant inverse relationship was found between breakfast consumption and frequent than scare HBS (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.40-0.77) among the whole population, not in patients with HBS. No significant association was observed between breakfast intake and severity of HBS (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.31-1.04).

CONCLUSION

We found an inverse association between frequency of breakfast consumption and odds of HBS as well as the frequency of HBS among the adult population. Prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, cross-sectional descriptive study.

Role of Uremic Toxins in Early Vascular Ageing and Calcification

In patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), the accumulation of uremic toxins, caused by a combination of decreased excretion secondary to reduced kidney function and increased generation secondary to aberrant expression of metabolite genes, interferes with different biological functions of cells and organs, contributing to a state of chronic inflammation and other adverse biologic effects that may cause tissue damage. Several uremic toxins have been implicated in severe vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) changes and other alterations leading to vascular calcification (VC) and early vascular ageing (EVA). The above mentioned are predominant clinical features of patients with CKD, contributing to their exceptionally high cardiovascular mortality. Herein, we present an update on pathophysiological processes and mediators underlying VC and EVA induced by uremic toxins. Moreover, we discuss their clinical impact, and possible therapeutic targets aiming at preventing or ameliorating the harmful effects of uremic toxins on the vasculature.

Effect of statins on cardiovascular complications in chronic kidney disease patients: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The rates of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity are increased in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Mild to moderate CKD is associated with an increase in cardiovascular events. This study aims to investigate the effects of statins on patient mortality and cardiac events.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Studies on statins (atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, simvastatin, and simvastatin + ezetimibe) in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded databases from 1970 to February 2019 were analyzed. Inclusion criteria were randomized control trials and adult patients (>18 years old). Reviews, observational studies, and clinical trials that did not clearly define outcomes or that did not have thrombosis as an outcome were excluded. We performed direct and indirect network meta-analysis using Bayesian models and ranked different statins using generation mixed treatment comparison (GeMTC) and Stata version 13. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) of network meta-analysis approach specified 4 levels of certainty for a given result: high, moderate, low, and very low. The outcomes were cardiac events, cardiac mortality, and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies (45,863 patients) were included. Compared with placebos, pravastatin 40 mg group showed a significantly lower patient mortality (odds ratio 0.66 [95% credible interval, 0.46-0.91]).Atorvastatin 80 mg, fluvastatin 40 mg, lovastatin 20 mg, pravastatin 40 mg, and simvastatin 40 mg showed significant results in reducing cardiac events.In rank probability, pravastatin showed the best effect at all-cause mortality rate. Lovastatin, fluvastatin, and pravastatin showed good effects in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd ranks in cardiac events.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS

Pravastatin 40 mg demonstrated the best effect on all-cause mortality, and was observed to be effective with high ranking in cardiac events. We anticipate that the data of this study will assist physicians in making informed decisions when selecting statins, such as pravastatin, as a treatment option for CKD patients.

Management of dyslipidaemia in patients with chronic kidney disease: a position paper endorsed by the Italian Society of Nephrology

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) represents a major public health issue worldwide and entails a high burden of cardiovascular events and mortality. Dyslipidaemia is common in patients with CKD and it is characterized by a highly atherogenic profile with relatively low levels of HDL-cholesterol and high levels of triglyceride and oxidized LDL-cholesterol. Overall, current literature indicates that lowering LDL-cholesterol is beneficial for preventing major atherosclerotic events in patients with CKD and in kidney transplant recipients while the evidence is less clear in patients on dialysis. Lipid lowering treatment is recommended in all patients with stage 3 CKD or worse, independently of baseline LDL-cholesterol levels. Statin and ezetimibe are the cornerstones in the management of dyslipidaemia in patients with CKD, however alternative and emerging lipid-lowering therapies may acquire a central role in near future. This position paper endorsed by the Italian Society of Nephrology aims at providing useful information on the topic of dyslipidaemia in CKD and at assisting decision making in the management of these patients.

Effect of atorvastatin on iron metabolism regulation in patients with chronic kidney disease - a randomized double blind crossover study

INTRODUCTION

To determine the effect of 6-month administration of atorvastatin on hepcidin and hemojuvelin levels, inflammatory parameters and iron metabolism in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3 and 4.

METHODS

Thirty six statin- and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive patients with CKD stages 3 and 4 and LDL cholesterol ≥100 mg/dl received atorvastatin or placebo for two 6-month periods in a double blind, randomized crossover study. Hepcidin, hemojuvelin, hsCRP, IL-6, hemoglobin, red blood cell distribution width, iron, total iron binding capacity (TIBC), and unsaturated iron binding capacity (UIBC) were measured before and after each treatment period.

RESULTS

Hepcidin decreased (from 102 [307] to 63 [170] pg/ml (p > .001)) in the course of statin therapy but remained unchanged after placebo administration (173 [256] to 153 [204] pg/ml, respectively). Hemojuvelin did not change after either part of the study. Both IL-6 and hsCRP decreased following statin therapy (from 8.7 [12.0] to 8.1 [13.9] pg/ml; p = .04 and from 4.7 [4.0] to 4.0 [3.6] mg/l; p = .4, respectively), but did not change after placebo administration. Blood hemoglobin increased slightly but significantly after 6-month statin therapy (from 11.6 ± 1.6 to 11.9 ± 1.5 g/dl, p = .002), and was unchanged after placebo treatment. TIBC and UIBC increased significantly after 6-month statin therapy, and serum iron also tended to increase. The change of eGFR during the study did not differ between the two treatment periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Statin may have a small but potentially beneficial effect on serum hepcidin, which may lead to improvement of anemia control in CKD patients.

Statins dose-dependently exert a significant chemopreventive effect on colon cancer in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A population-based cohort study

Purpose

We evaluated the chemopreventive effect of statins on colon cancer in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and identified the statin exerting the strongest chemopreventive effect.

Methods

Using the National Health Insurance Research Database, we identified patients who received a COPD diagnosis in Taiwan between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2012, and included them in the study cohort. Each patient was followed to assess the colon cancer risk and protective factors. A propensity score was derived using a logistic regression model to estimate the effect of statins by accounting for covariates predicted during the intervention (statins). To examine the dose–response relationship, we categorized statin doses into four groups in each cohort [<28, 28–90, 91–365, and >365 cumulative defined daily dose].

Results

Compared with the statin nonusers, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for colon cancer decreased in the statin users (aHR = 0.52, 95% confidence interval = 0.44, 0.62). Hydrophilic statins exerted a stronger preventive effect against colon cancer. Regarding the statin type, lovastatin, pravastatin, and fluvastatin nonsignificantly reduced the colon cancer risk in the patients with COPD. Compared with the statin nonusers, the aHRs for colon cancer decreased in the individual statin users (rosuvastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin: aHRs = 0.28, 0.64, and 0.65, respectively). In the sensitivity analysis, statins dose-dependently reduced the colon cancer risk.

Conclusions

Statins dose-dependently exert significant chemopreventive effects on colon cancer in patients with COPD, with rosuvastatin exerting the largest chemopreventive effect.

Anti-inflammatory effects of Simvastatin in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage in an intensive care unit

Intracerebral hemorrhage is one of the most common types of cerebrovascular disease in humans and often causes paralysis, a vegetative state and even death. Patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage are frequently monitored in intensive care units (ICUs). Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage is associated with a higher rate of mortality and morbidity than other intracephalic diseases. The expression levels of inflammatory factors have important roles in inflammatory responses indicative of changes in a patient's condition and are therefore important in the monitoring and treatment of affected patients at the ICU as well as the development of therapeutic strategies for acute cerebral hemorrhage. The present study investigated the anti-inflammatory effects of Simvastatin in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage at an ICU, and inflammatory factors and cellular changes were systematically analyzed. The plasma concentrations of inflammatory factors, including interleukin (IL)-4, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10, were evaluated by ELISAs. The plasma concentrations of inflammatory cellular changes were detected by using flow cytometry. The results demonstrated that after Simvastatin treatment of patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage at the ICU, the plasma concentrations of IL-4, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 were downregulated compared with those in placebo-treated controls. In addition, Simvastatin treatment at the ICU decreased lymphocytes, granulocytes and mononuclear cells in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage. The levels of inflammatory factors were associated with brain edema in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage treated at the ICU. In addition, the amount of bleeding was reduced in parallel with the inflammatory cell plasma concentration of lymphocytes, granulocytes and mononuclear cells. Importantly, Simvastatin treatment produced beneficial outcomes by improving brain edema and reducing the amount of bleeding. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated the efficacy of Simvastatin in treating acute intracerebral hemorrhage and evidenced the association between inflammatory responses and the progress of affected patients at the ICU, thereby providing insight for applying effective therapies for patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage.

The impact of pretreatment with simvastatin on kidney tissue of rats with acute sepsis

It has been reported that changes in cytokine levels affect mitochondrial functions, levels of hypoxia-inducible factor α (HIF-1α), and tissue damage during sepsis. We aimed to investigate the effects of simvastatin pretreatment on mitochondrial enzyme activities, and on levels of ghrelin, HIF-1α, and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) in kidney tissue during sepsis. Rats were separated into four groups, namely, control, lipopolysaccharides (LPS) (20 mg/kg), simvastatin (20 mg/kg), and simvastatin + LPS. We measured the levels of mitochondrial enzyme activities and TBARS in the kidney using spectrophotometry. The histological structure of the kidney sections was examined after staining with hematoxylin and eosin. Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), IL-10, HIF-1α, and ghrelin immunoreactivity were examined using proper antibodies. In tissue, TNF-α (p < 0.01) and HIF-1α (p < 0.05) levels were increased in the simvastatin + LPS and LPS groups. TBARS levels were higher in the LPS group than in the other groups (p < 0.01), but they were similar in the simvastatin + LPS and control groups (p > 0.05). Ghrelin immunoreactivity was lower in the LPS group (p < 0.05) and higher in the simvastatin + LPS group than in the LPS group (p < 0.01). We observed tubular damage in the sections of the LPS group. There were no differences in mitochondrial enzyme activities between the groups (p > 0.05). We observed that pretreatment of simvastatin caused favorable changes on ghrelin and TBARS levels in rats with sepsis.

Anti-inflammatory effect of simvastatin in hemodialysis patients

Background

Patients in the final stages of renal failure have accelerated inflammation conditions. Inflammation causes progressive kidney damage, faster progression of atherogenesis, chronic malnutrition and increased anemia, resulting in lower life expectancy of patients under dialysis. Statins have pleiotropic effects, because the drug has effects more than just decreasing lipids such as antioxidant effects, changes in endothelial dysfunction, stabilizing the plaque and immune system regulator.

Objectives

The aim of the study was to evaluate anti-inflammatory effect of simvastatin (one of the statins) in patients under hemodialysis.

Patients and Methods

In this clinical trial study, 40 patients under hemodialysis were studied for 12 weeks. Patients were divided into treatment (25 cases) and control groups (15 cases). The treatment group received a daily dosage of 20 mg of simvastatin, while the control group received no medication. The serum amounts of hs-CRP, IL6, Hb and WBC count were measured and compared at baseline and after 12 weeks. In addition, probable hepatic and muscular complications were studied in patients.

Results

At baseline, each of treatment and control groups had similar characteristics. During the study, the average level of CRP decreased in the treatment group (P = 0.04), while it was increased in the control group. The amount of serum IL-6 dropped in the treatment group (P = 0.01); however, it was increased in the control group. In both groups, the level of Hb increased significantly at the end of study in the treatment group (P = 0.007) and the control group (P = 0.016). The average WBC count decreased significantly in the treatment group and the control group (P = 0.003). There was no significant change in hepatic and muscular enzymes in the two groups.

Conclusions

End stage renal disease (ESRD) have accelerated inflammatory conditions. Simvastatin clearly lowers the serum levels of CRP and IL-6, and the white blood cell count in dialysis patients. Administering Simvastatin to dialysis patients is safe.

HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for people with chronic kidney disease not requiring dialysis

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most frequent cause of death in people with early stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD), for whom the absolute risk of cardiovascular events is similar to people who have existing coronary artery disease. This is an update of a review published in 2009, and includes evidence from 27 new studies (25,068 participants) in addition to the 26 studies (20,324 participants) assessed previously; and excludes three previously included studies (107 participants). This updated review includes 50 studies (45,285 participants); of these 38 (37,274 participants) were meta-analysed.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits (such as reductions in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, major cardiovascular events, MI and stroke; and slow progression of CKD to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD)) and harms (muscle and liver dysfunction, withdrawal, and cancer) of statins compared with placebo, no treatment, standard care or another statin in adults with CKD who were not on dialysis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register to 5 June 2012 through contact with the Trials' Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared the effects of statins with placebo, no treatment, standard care, or other statins, on mortality, cardiovascular events, kidney function, toxicity, and lipid levels in adults with CKD not on dialysis were the focus of our literature searches.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two or more authors independently extracted data and assessed study risk of bias. Treatment effects were expressed as mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes (lipids, creatinine clearance and proteinuria) and risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes (major cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), fatal or non-fatal stroke, ESKD, elevated liver enzymes, rhabdomyolysis, cancer and withdrawal rates) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 50 studies (45,285 participants): 47 studies (39,820 participants) compared statins with placebo or no treatment and three studies (5547 participants) compared two different statin regimens in adults with CKD who were not yet on dialysis. We were able to meta-analyse 38 studies (37,274 participants).The risk of bias in the included studies was high. Seven studies comparing statins with placebo or no treatment had lower risk of bias overall; and were conducted according to published protocols, outcomes were adjudicated by a committee, specified outcomes were reported, and analyses were conducted using intention-to-treat methods. In placebo or no treatment controlled studies, adverse events were reported in 32 studies (68%) and systematically evaluated in 16 studies (34%).Compared with placebo, statin therapy consistently prevented major cardiovascular events (13 studies, 36,033 participants; RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.79), all-cause mortality (10 studies, 28,276 participants; RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.91), cardiovascular death (7 studies, 19,059 participants; RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.87) and MI (8 studies, 9018 participants; RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.72). Statins had uncertain effects on stroke (5 studies, 8658 participants; RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.12).Potential harms from statin therapy were limited by lack of systematic reporting and were uncertain in analyses that had few events: elevated creatine kinase (7 studies, 4514 participants; RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.20 to 3.48), liver function abnormalities (7 studies, RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.50), withdrawal due to adverse events (13 studies, 4219 participants; RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.60), and cancer (2 studies, 5581 participants; RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.82 to 130).Statins had uncertain effects on progression of CKD. Data for relative effects of intensive cholesterol lowering in people with early stages of kidney disease were sparse. Statins clearly reduced risks of death, major cardiovascular events, and MI in people with CKD who did not have CVD at baseline (primary prevention).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Statins consistently lower death and major cardiovascular events by 20% in people with CKD not requiring dialysis. Statin-related effects on stroke and kidney function were found to be uncertain and adverse effects of treatment are incompletely understood. Statins have an important role in primary prevention of cardiovascular events and mortality in people who have CKD.

Erythropoietin; a review on current knowledge and new concepts

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a worldwide health problem. However, despite to new routes of dialysis, mortality and morbidity is high. One of the most common symptom of CKD is anemia, especially is more obvious in stages 3 and 4. In this review, we compared the effects of erythropoietin and anemia correction on kidney function (GFR) by investigating in various studies. Despite extensive studies in this category, still we do not sure about the effects of erythropoietin and anemia correction on the glomerular filtration rate.

A meta-analysis of the role of statins on renal outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease. Is the duration of therapy important?

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of statin treatment in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate whether statins modulate renal function in patients with CKD.

METHODS

Data from Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of randomized controlled trials for years 1966-December 2012 were searched for appropriate studies.

RESULTS

Twenty trials with 6452 CKD subjects randomized to receive either statin or placebo were included. Statin therapy significantly influenced high sensitivity C-reactive protein levels in patients on or off dialysis [-0.28 mg/dl, 95%CI: -0.93 to -0.37; p<0.05 and -0.46 mg/dl, 95%CI: -0.87 to -0.05; p=0.03], respectively], urinary protein (-0.77 g/24 h, 95%CI: -1.24 to -0.29, p<0.02; this effect persisted for treatment ≤12 months), and serum creatinine but only for long-term therapy (3 years) (-0.65 mg/dl, 95%CI: -1.00 to -0.30; p=0.0003). The summary for standardized effect size of mean differences of glomerular filtration rate was 0.29 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (95%CI: 0.01 to 0.58; p=0.04), and depended on treatment duration - a significant increase was observed for between 1 and 3 years of statin therapy (0.50 ml/min/1.73 m(2), 95%CI: 0.40 to 0.60; p<0.0001), with no significant increase for both ≤1 and >3 years of the therapy.

CONCLUSION

Statins might exert significant renoprotective effects in CKD patients; however, benefit may depend on the duration of treatment. This is an issue that warrants more definitive investigation. More studies are necessary in dialysis patients to credibly evaluate the renal effects of statin therapy.

Effects of statins on lipid profile in chronic kidney disease patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

The available data on statin effects in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients are still conflicting. We investigated the impact of short- and long-term statin therapy on lipid profiles in CKD patients requiring or not requiring dialysis.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Data from Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from 1966 to May 2012 were searched for studies that investigated this effect. We included all randomized controlled clinical trials that investigated the impact of statin therapy on lipids and lipoproteins.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 16 trials with 3594 subjects. In CKD patients, statin therapy significantly reduced total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (p < 0.003 for all comparisons), and the effect insignificantly intensified with duration of statin therapy (56.3 vs 66.8, 22.5 vs 24.1, and 53 vs 56.1 mg/dl, respectively). Comparing statin therapy for ≤ 3 and >3 months in CKD patients on dialysis, the magnitude of TC and LDL-C decreased (26.3 vs 25.9, and 42.2 vs 29.8 mg/dl, respectively, p > 0.05 for both), while TG increased modestly (4.5 vs 13.4 mg/dl). Short-term statin therapy increased high density lipoprotein cholesterol by a mean 0.7 mg/dl (p = 0.04), and long-term therapy was associated with a mean reduction of 2.4 mg/dL.

CONCLUSIONS

Statin therapy significantly modifies the lipid profile in CKD patients not on dialysis therapy (with the trend to be more effective with longer therapy), and have less beneficial effect in patients on dialysis with the trend to be less effective with longer duration of therapy.

Benefits and harms of statin therapy for persons with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Statins have uncertain benefits in persons with chronic kidney disease (CKD) because individual trials may have insufficient power to determine whether treatment effects differ with severity of CKD.

PURPOSE

To summarize the benefits and harms of statin therapy for adults with CKD and examine whether effects of statins vary by stage of kidney disease.

DATA SOURCES

Cochrane and EMBASE databases (inception to February 2012).

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized trials comparing the effects of statins with placebo, no treatment, or another statin on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Eighty trials comprising 51099 participants compared statin with placebo or no treatment. Treatment effects varied with stage of CKD. Moderate- to high-quality evidence indicated that statins reduced all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR], 0.81 [95% CI, 0.74 to 0.88]), cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.78 [CI, 0.68 to 0.89]), and cardiovascular events (RR, 0.76 [CI, 0.73 to 0.80]) in persons not receiving dialysis. Moderate- to high-quality evidence indicated that statins had little or no effect on all-cause mortality (RR, 0.96 [CI, 0.88 to 1.04]), cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.94 [CI, 0.82 to 1.07]), or cardiovascular events (RR, 0.95 [CI, 0.87 to 1.03]) in persons receiving dialysis. Effects of statins in kidney transplant recipients were uncertain. Statins had little or no effect on cancer, myalgia, liver function, or withdrawal from treatment, although adverse events were evaluated systematically in fewer than half of the trials.

LIMITATION

There was a reliance on post hoc subgroup data for earlier stages of CKD.

CONCLUSION

Statins decrease mortality and cardiovascular events in persons with early stages of CKD, have little or no effect in persons receiving dialysis, and have uncertain effects in kidney transplant recipients.

Fenofibrate plus simvastatin (fixed-dose combination) for the treatment of dyslipidaemia

INTRODUCTION

Statin use results in a significant reduction of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. However, patients still have residual CVD risk, even if they are receiving optimal statin treatment.

AREAS COVERED

This review, based on a Pubmed/Scopus search, discusses the available evidence regarding the use of a fixed-dose fenofibrate plus simvastatin combination. This combination is useful for patients with mixed dyslipidaemia because it improves the overall lipoprotein profile. Although in clinical trials the rate of adverse events was not significantly greater than monotherapy, patients who receive combination treatment should be monitored carefully. Furthermore, in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Study, this combination did not result in a significant reduction of CVD events compared with simvastatin monotherapy. However, a possible benefit in this trial was observed in the subgroup of patients with high triglyceride and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.

EXPERT OPINION

The fixed-dose fenofibrate plus simvastatin combination treatment produces additive results and is safe when patients are properly monitored. Existing evidence appears to support the addition of fenofibrate to simvastatin treatment for the reduction of residual CVD risk in patients with atherogenic dyslipidaemia. However, this combination did not lead to better clinical outcomes in the absence of dyslipidaemia.

Effects of simvastatin on cytokines secretion from mononuclear cells from critically ill patients with acute kidney injury

PURPOSE

To assess the in vitro effects of simvastatin on IL-10 and TNF-α secretion from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of critically ill patients with and without acute kidney injury (AKI).

METHODS

PBMC were collected from 63 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and from 20 healthy controls. Patients were divided in 3 subgroups: with AKI, with sepsis and without AKI and with AKI and sepsis. After isolation by ficoll-gradient centrifugation cells were incubated in vitro with LPS 1 ng/mL, simvastatin (10(-8)M) and with LPS plus simvastatin for 24h. TNF-α and IL-10 concentrations on cells surnatant were determined by ELISA.

RESULTS

Cells isolated from critically ill patients showed a decreased spontaneous production of TNF-α and IL-10 compared to healthy controls (6.7 (0.2-12) vs 103 (64-257) pg/mL and (20 (13-58) vs 315 (105-510) pg/mL, respectively, p<0.05). Under LPS-stimulus, IL-10 production remains lower in patients compared to healthy control (451 (176-850) vs 1150 (874-1521) pg/mL, p<0.05) but TNF-α production was higher (641 (609-841) vs 406 (201-841) pg/mL, p<0.05). The simultaneous incubation with LPS and simvastatin caused decreased IL-10 production in cells from patients compared to control (337 (135-626) vs 540 (345-871) pg/mL, p<0.05) and increased TNF-α release (711 (619-832) vs 324 (155-355) pg/mL, p<0.05). Comparison between subgroups showed that the results observed in TNF-α and IL-10 production by PBMC from critically ill patients was independent of AKI occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The PBMC treatment with simvastatin resulted in attenuation on pro-inflammatory cytokine spontaneous production that was no longer observed when these cells were submitted to a second inflammatory stimulus. Our study shows an imbalance between pro and anti-inflammatory cytokine production in PBMC from critically ill patients regardless the presence of AKI.

Statins and vitamin D: a friendly association in pre-dialysis patients

The increased mortality rate observed in patients with chronic kidney disease is related to the high prevalence of cardiovascular disease in this population. Recently, it has been shown that interventional therapy with statins and/or vitamin D could improve the outcomes of these patients. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for mortality in a group of patients with chronic kidney disease (stages 4 and 5--pre-dialysis) and verify whether vitamin D and statins could change the outcome. We included 95 patients (mean age--69.4) with stages 4 and 5 (pre-dialysis) of our "low-clearance" outpatient clinic, with an average eGFR of 16.9 ml/min and a mean follow-up of 24.1 months. Several biological, nutritional, laboratory and inflammatory parameters were analysed at baseline. Our population was divided into three groups: G-I, patients not medicated with either vitamin D or statins; G-II, patients medicated with either vitamin D or statins; and G-III, patients medicated with vitamin D and statins. We found (ANOVA) that the serum levels of pre-albumin (P = 0.018) and PTH (P = 0.03) were lower in G-I. Concerning the inflammatory parameters, G-I showed higher levels of hsCRP (P = 0.014) and a trend to higher IL-6 levels (P = 0.077). We found the actuarial survival at 30 months (Kaplan-Meier), to be 56.4% in G-I, 82.3% in G-II and 100% in G-III (log rank = 13.08 P = 0.0014). Using the Cox proportional hazards model, we found that the existence of coronary artery disease (P = 0.0001) and the absence of medication with vitamin D and/or statins (P = 0.005) independently influenced the mortality of our patients. In conclusion, we found, in our study, that patients under vitamin D and statins (with a synergistic effect) were less inflamed and showed a lower mortality rate.

Short-term effect of simvastatin treatment on inflammatory parameters in peritoneal dialysis patients

OBJECTIVE

Increased serum pro-inflammatory cytokine levels are associated with an increased mortality rate in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Statins decrease cardiovascular mortality and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in hemodialysis patients. As the anti-inflammatory effect of statins has not previously been studied in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients with a non-inflammatory status, we wanted to investigate the anti-inflammatory effect of simvastatin in these patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-eight PD patients were randomly allocated to either simvastatin treatment (n=25) or placebo (n=23). Patients in the active-treatment group received simvastatin 20 mg/day for 1 month. At baseline and after 1 month of treatment, blood samples were drawn and high-sensitivity CRP, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and plasma lipid profiles were determined. These parameters were compared between the groups at baseline and at the end of the study period.

RESULTS

Twenty-five subjects in the treatment group and 20 in the placebo group completed the study. Three patients in the placebo group were excluded from the study due to the occurrence of bacterial peritonitis during the study period. Clinical characteristics and baseline parameters were similar in both groups. Serum total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and triglyceride and serum TNF-alpha levels decreased significantly compared to baseline in the treatment group; there were no corresponding differences in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Simvastatin decreased the serum TNF-alpha level in PD patients with a non-inflammatory status. A decrease in the TNF-alpha level could be one of the possible mechanisms of the anti-atherogeneic effect of simvastatin. We suggest that different treatment strategies aimed at decreasing serum cytokine levels could be evaluated to decrease cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the dialysis population.

Oxidative stress and inflammation, a link between chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular disease

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) show a high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This seems to be consequence of the cardiovascular risk factor clustering in CKD patients. Non traditional risk factors such as oxidative stress and inflammation are also far more prevalent in this population than in normal subjects. Renal disease is associated with a graded increase in oxidative stress markers even in early CKD. This could be consequence of an increase in reactive oxygen species as well as a decrease in antioxidant defence. This oxidative stress can accelerate renal injury progression. Inflammatory markers such as C reactive protein and cytokines increase with renal function deterioration suggesting that CKD is a low-grade inflammatory process. In fact, inflammation facilitates renal function deterioration. Several factors can be involved in triggering the inflammatory process including oxidative stress. Statin administration is accompanied by risk reduction in all major vascular events in patients with CKD that are considered high-risk patients. These beneficial effects seem to be consequence of not only their hypolipidemic effect but especially their pleitropic actions that involve modulation of oxidative stress and inflammation.

Progression of kidney disease in moderately hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive patients randomized to pravastatin versus usual care: a report from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)

BACKGROUND

Dyslipidemia is common in patients with chronic kidney disease. The role of statin therapy in the progression of kidney disease is unclear.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective randomized clinical trial, post hoc analyses.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

10,060 participants in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (lipid-lowering component) stratified by baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): less than 60, 60 to 89, and 90 or greater mL/min/1.73 m(2). Mean follow-up was 4.8 years.

INTERVENTION

Randomized; pravastatin, 40 mg/d, or usual care.

OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS

Total, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; end-stage renal disease (ESRD), eGFR.

RESULTS

Through year 6, total cholesterol levels decreased in the pravastatin (-20.7%) and usual-care groups (-11.2%). No significant differences were seen between groups for rates of ESRD (1.36 v 1.45/100 patient-years; P = 0.9), composite end points of ESRD and 50% or 25% decrease in eGFR, or rate of change in eGFR. Findings were consistent across eGFR strata. In patients with eGFR of 90 mL/min/1.73 m(2) or greater, the pravastatin arm tended to have a higher eGFR.

LIMITATIONS

Proteinuria data unavailable, post hoc analyses, unconfirmed validity of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation in normal eGFR range, statin drop-in rate in usual-care group with small cholesterol differential between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In hypertensive patients with moderate dyslipidemia and decreased eGFR, pravastatin was not superior to usual care in preventing clinical renal outcomes. This was consistent across the strata of baseline eGFR. However, benefit from statin therapy may depend on the degree of the cholesterol level decrease achieved.

Multiorgan-protective actions of blockers of the renin-angiotensin system, statins and erythropoietin: common pleiotropic effects in reno-, cardio- and neuroprotection

Renal diseases induce nephroprotective measures that may affect the heart, brain and other organs. In addition, many cardiovascular and neurological diseases are accompanied by renal lesions. For these reasons, multiorgan-protective measures, including cardio-, reno- and neuro-protective measures, are necessary to treat these diseases. The drugs used in nephrology are often pleiotropic. Although they usually address a single organ or tissue, many of them have complex actions that may provide multiorgan-protection. The present paper aims to review 3 classes of drugs that are commonly prescribed in nephrological practice: statins, RAS blockers (such as ACEIs and ARBs) and erythropoietin (EPO). This paper highlights the renoprotective actions, as well as those that are protective of the heart, brain and other organs, of these drugs at the cellular and molecular level. Their protective actions are attributable to their main effects and pleiotropic effects. The protective pleiotropic actions of these drugs may be exerted on multiple organs, making them multiorgan-protective. Another objective is to analyse the shared multiorgan-protective pleiotropic effects of RAS blockers (ACEIs and ARBs), statins and erythropoietin. This will allow for the practical association of the main renoprotective drugs with multiorgan protection.

Cytokine dysregulation in chronic kidney disease: how can we treat it?

As the kidney is the major site for elimination of many cytokines, the delicate equilibrium of pro-inflammatory cytokines and their inhibitors is clearly dysregulated in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. The consequences of the altered immune response in uremia lead to a state of persistent inflammation which is highly prevalent among CKD patients and is linked to complications such as the development of protein-energy wasting and atherosclerotic vascular disease. The present review aims at reviewing this complex orchestration of uremic cytokines beyond the well-studied interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Finally, we update our current understanding on anti-inflammatory treatment strategies in CKD patients, including nutritional and lifestyle measurements, pharmacological intervention and specific anticytokine strategies targeting the dialytic procedure.

Effects of lipid-lowering therapy with rosuvastatin on atherosclerotic burden in patients with chronic kidney disease

OBJECTIVE

Although previous studies suggest that treatment of dyslipidemia with statins reduces mortality and morbidity that are associated with cardiovascular disease, only a few studies have examined the efficacy of statins on atherosclerotic status in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 12-month, prospective, randomized study was designed to assess the efficacy of rosuvastatin in reducing circulating atherosclerotic parameters and renal function in patients with CKD. Thirty-eight patients with CKD and LDL cholesterol levels > or =100 mg/dL were randomly assigned to receive 2.5 mg/dL rosuvastatin (group A, n=22) or nonrosuavastatin therapy (group B, n=16). Lipid profile, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and intima-media thickness (IMT) were measured before and 12 months after rosuvastatin was added to the treatment.

RESULTS

Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, remnant-like particle-cholesterol and triglycerides were significantly reduced only in patients who received rosuvastatin. These parameters remained unchanged in patients who were not treated with rosuvastatin. eGFR was significantly increased from 50.7+/-18.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) to 53.3+/-20.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and a significant reduction of U-P was detected in group A patients (0.17+/-0.29 vs. 0.13+/-0.3 g/day; p<0.01). In addition to the hypolipidemic effect, rosuvastatin treatment significantly reduced hs-CRP (p=0.0054). Moreover, maximal IMT at the baseline (1.89+/-0.98 mm) decreased significantly to 1.75+/-0.87 mm at 12 months (p=0.0231).

CONCLUSION

Rosuvastatin treatment, in addition to its beneficial effect on cholesterol levels, reduced maximal IMT and modified the inflammatory state of these patients.

Effects of atorvastatin on inflammatory and fibrinolytic parameters in patients with chronic kidney disease

Although substantial evidence suggests that treatment of dyslipidemia with statins reduces mortality and morbidity that are associated with cardiovascular disease, only a few studies have examined the efficacy of statins on inflammatory and fibrinolytic status in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). A 6-mo, prospective, randomized study was designed to assess the efficacy of atorvastatin in reducing circulating inflammatory and fibrinolytic parameters in patients with CKD. Sixty-six patients with CKD (stages 2, 3, and 4) and LDL cholesterol levels > or =100 mg/dl were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive 20 mg/d atorvastatin (n = 44) or nonatorvastatin therapy (n = 22). Lipid profile, renal function, fibrinolytic balance (tissue plasminogen activator [t-PA] and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1), and inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein [CRP], IL-1 beta, IL-6, and TNF-alpha) were measured before and 6 mo after atorvastatin was added to the treatment. Twenty-five age-matched individuals with normal renal function (estimated GFR >90 ml/min) were used as healthy control subjects. Patients with CKD had higher CRP, IL-1 beta, TNF-alpha, and IL-6 levels than age-matched population with normal renal function. t-PA concentration was higher in patients with CKD (P = 0.000). Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 values were comparable in all patients. Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were significantly reduced only in patients who received atorvastatin. In addition to the hypolipidemic effect, atorvastatin treatment significantly reduced inflammatory parameters: CRP (median 4.1 to 2.9; P = 0.015), TNF-alpha (6.0 +/- 2.7 to 4.7 +/- 2.4; P = 0.046), and IL-1 beta levels (1.9 +/- 0.7 to 1.2 +/- 0.7; P = 0.001). These parameters remained unchanged in patients who were not treated with atorvastatin. Fibrinolytic parameters were not modified by atorvastatin treatment. Patients with CKD showed higher levels of inflammatory parameters and t-PA levels than age-matched healthy control subjects. Atorvastatin treatment, in addition to its beneficial effect on cholesterol levels, improved the inflammatory state of these patients without modifying fibrinolytic balance.

Simvastatin and fluvastatin reduce interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulated production by isolated human monocytes from chronic kidney disease patients

BACKGROUND

Statins reduce lipid levels, inflammation and cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease; CKD patients show increased risk of cardiovascular and increased plasma levels of IL-6 and IL-8.

AIM

To evaluate the in vitro effect of simvastatin (S) or fluvastatin (F) on the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulated secretion of IL-6 and IL-8 from monocytes of chronic kidney disease patients (CKD) in K-DOQI stages 3-5.

METHODS AND SUBJECTS

Monocytes enriched peripheral blood (PBMC) from 28 CKD (15 in K-DOQI stages 3-4, Group I, and 13 in K-DOQI stage 5 on hemodialysis, Group II) and 10 healthy subjects (HS), were isolated by Ficoll-gradient centrifugation. Cells were incubated with LPS 100 ng/ml or with LPS plus increasing doses of statins (from 10(-6) to 10(-8) M ) for 24 h. Surnatant IL-6 and IL-8 concentrations were determined by EIA.

RESULTS

Basally the mean concentration of IL-6 and IL-8 was higher in patients than in HS and in Group II than in Group I (IL6: HS 285 +/- 77 pg/ml, Group I 365 +/- 178 pg/ml, Group II 520 +/- 139 pg/ml- IL8 HS 180 +/- 75 pg/ml, Group I 1722 +/- 582 pg/ml, Group II 4400 +/- 1935 pg/ml). After addition of LPS the mean concentration of IL-6 and IL-8 increased in all groups (IL6: HS 1740 +/- 178 pg/ml, Group I 3754 +/- 672 pg/ml, Group II 4800 +/- 967 pg/ml; IL8: HS 450+/-132 pg/ml, Group I 9700+/-2837 pg/ml, Group II 11608 +/- 2316 pg/ml). After the addition of LPS plus increasing doses of S or F from 10(-10) to 10(-6) M, a significantly lower cytokine concentration compared to the data after LPS alone was observed (IL6: HS 45%, Group I 75%, Group II 50%; IL8: HS 100%, Group I 65%, Group II 35%).

CONCLUSIONS

These data confirm that cytokine release is increased in CKD patients and that is highest in the most severe patients. Furthermore they suggest that fluvastatin or simvastatin can be used in order to reduce the high cardiovascular risk.

The dyslipidemia of chronic renal disease: effects of statin therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Dyslipidemia is a prevalent condition in patients with chronic renal disease, but is often left untreated. Statin treatment constitutes an effective way to improve lipid abnormalities. This review summarizes present studies on dyslipidemia and its treatment in patients with chronic renal disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

The specific dyslipidemia in renal disease is associated with the presence of proteinuria and decreased creatinine clearance, and may even adversely affect the progression of chronic renal disease. Statin therapy may have renoprotective effects due to a combination of lipid lowering and pleiotropic effects. Statins exert several anti-inflammatory properties and lead to a decrease of proteinuria. Post-hoc analyses of large-scale lipid lowering trials have shown that the reduction of cardiovascular risk was equivalent to the reduction achieved in patients without chronic renal failure. We feel, however, that if intervention with statins is postponed until patients reach end-stage renal disease, statins have limited benefit.

SUMMARY

Present studies suggest that patients with renal disease should be screened early for dyslipidemia and that statins have to be considered as the lipid lowering therapy of choice. These drugs reduce cardiovascular risk. Further studies are needed to firmly establish whether statins preserve renal function.

Cardiovascular Biomarkers in CKD: Pathophysiology and Implications for Clinical Management of Cardiac Disease

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with all forms of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The underlying pathological state is caused by a complex interplay of traditional and nontraditional risk factors that results in atherosclerosis, arteriosclerosis, and altered cardiac morphological characteristics. This multifactorial disease introduces new challenges in predicting and treating patients with CVD sufficiently early in the course of CKD to positively alter patient outcome. Asymptomatic individuals with progressive CVD are a group of patients that deserve focused attention because early detection and intervention may provide the best opportunity for improved outcome. However, identifying CVD in asymptomatic patients with CKD or end-stage renal disease remains a significant hurdle in the management of these patients. Recently, a number of cardiovascular biomarkers were identified as predictors of patient outcome in individuals with CVD and, with additional research, may be used to guide the early diagnosis of and therapy for CVD in patients with CKD. This review examines the pathophysiological characteristics and potential clinical role of these novel cardiovascular biomarkers in risk stratification, risk monitoring, and selection of preventive therapies for patients with CKD.