Con: Should we abandon the use of the MDRD equation in favour of the CKD-EPI equation?

Estimating glomerular filtration in young people

Background

Creatinine-based equations are the most used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), the re-expressed Lund-Malmö Revised (r-LMR) and the European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equations are the most validated. The EKFC and r-LMR equations have been suggested to have better performances in young adults, but this is debated.

Methods

We collected data (GFR) measured by clearance of an exogenous marker (reference method), serum creatinine, age and sex from 2366 young adults (aged between 18 and 25 years) both from Europe and the USA.

Results

In the European cohorts (n = 1892), the bias (in mL/min/1.73 m²) was systematically better for the EKFC and r-LMR equations compared with the CKD-EPI equation [2.28, 95% confidence interval (1.59; 2.91), -2.50 (-3.85; -1.76), 17.41 (16.49; 18.47), respectively]. The percentage of estimated GFR within 30% of measured GFR (P30) was also better for EKFC and r-LMR equations compared with the CKD-EPI equation [84.4% (82.8; 86.0), 87.2% (85.7; 88.7) and 65.4% (63.3; 67.6), respectively]. In the US cohorts (n = 474), the bias for the EKFC and r-LMR equations was better than for the CKD-EPI equation in the non-Black population [0.97 (-1.69; 3.06), -2.62 (-5.14; -1.43) and 7.74 (5.97; 9.63), respectively], whereas the bias was similar in Black US individuals. P30 results were not different between the three equations in US cohorts. Analyses in sub-populations confirmed these results, except in individuals with high GFR levels (GFR ≥120 mL/min/1.73 m²) for whom the CKD-EPI equation might have a lower bias.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that both the EKFC and r-LMR creatinine-based equations have a better performance than the CKD-EPI equation in a young population. The only exception might be in patients with hyperfiltration.

Diagnostic standard: assessing glomerular filtration rate

Creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is imprecise at individual level, due to non-GFR-related serum creatinine determinants, including atypical muscle mass. Cystatin C has the advantage of being independent of muscle mass, a feature that led to the development of race- and sex-free equations. Yet, cystatin C-based equations do not perform better than creatinine-based equations for estimating GFR unless both variables are included together. The new race-free Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation had slight opposite biases between Black and non-Black subjects in the USA, but has poorer performance than that the previous version in European populations. The European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equation developed in 2021 can be used in both children and adults, is more accurate in young and old adults, and is applicable to non-white European populations, by rescaling the Q factor, i.e. population median creatinine, in a potentially universal way. A sex- and race-free cystatin C-based EKFC, with the same mathematical design, has also be defined. New developments in the field of GFR estimation would be standardization of cystatin C assays, development of creatinine-based eGFR equations that incorporate muscle mass data, implementation of new endogenous biomarkers and the use of artificial intelligence. Standardization of different GFR measurement methods would also be a future challenge, as well as new technologies for measuring GFR. Future research is also needed into discrepancies between cystatin C and creatinine, which is associated with high risk of adverse events: we need to standardize the definition of discrepancy and understand its determinants.

Performance of the European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) creatinine-based equation in United States cohorts

Estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is important in daily practice to assess kidney function and adapting the best clinical care of patients with and without chronic kidney disease. The new creatinine-based European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equation is used to estimate GFR. This equation was developed and validated mainly in European individuals and based on a rescaled creatinine, with the rescaling factor (Q-value) defined as the median normal value of serum creatinine in a given population. The validation was limited in Non-Black Americans and absent in Black Americans. Here, our cross-sectional analysis included 12,854 participants from nine studies encompassing large numbers of both non-Black and Black Americans with measured GFR by clearance of an exogenous marker (reference method), serum creatinine, age, sex, and self-reported race available. Two strategies were considered with population-specific Q-values in Black and non-Black men and women (EKFCPS) or a race-free Q-value (EKFCRF). In the whole population, only the EKFCPS equation showed no statistical median bias (0.14, 95% confidence interval [-0.07; 0.35] mL/min/1.73m2), and the bias for the EKFCRF (0.74, [0.51; 0.94] mL/min/1.73m2) was closer to zero than that for the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI2021) equation (1.22, [0.99; 1.47]) mL/min/1.73m2]. The percentage of estimated GFR within 30% of measured GFR was similar for CKD-EPI2021 (79.2% [78.5%; 79.9%]) and EKFCRF (80.1% [79.4%; 80.7%]), but improved for the EKFCPS equation (81.1% [80.5%; 81.8%]). Thus, our EKFC equations can be used to estimate GFR in the United States incorporating either self-reported race or unknown race at the patient's discretion per hospital registration records.

Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation in Adults: Myths and Promises

BACKGROUND

In daily practice, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is estimated with equations including renal biomarkers. Among these biomarkers, serum creatinine remains the most used. However, there are many limitations with serum creatinine, which we will discuss in the current review. We will also discuss how creatinine-based equations have been developed and what we can expect from them in terms of performance to estimate GFR.

SUMMARY

Different creatinine-based equations have been proposed. We will show the advantages of the recent European Kidney Function Consortium equation. This equation can be used in children and adults. This equation can also be used with some flexibility in different populations.

KEY MESSAGES

GFR is estimated by creatinine-based equations, but the most important for nephrologists is probably to know the limitations of these equations.

Volumetric and functional outcomes at 1-year between percutaneous-ablation and partial-nephrectomy for T1b renal tumors

INTRODUCTION

Indication for percutaneous-ablation (PA) is gradually expanding to renal tumors T1b (4-7cm). Few data exist on the alteration of renal functional volume (RFV) post-PA. Yet, it is a surrogate marker of post partial-nephrectomy (PN) glomerular filtration rate (GFR) impairment. The objective was to compare RFV and GFR at 1-year post-PN or PA, in this T1b population.

METHODS

Patients with unifocal renal tumor≥4cm treated between 2014 and 2019 were included. Tumor, homolateral (RFVh), contralateral RFV, and total volumes were assessed by manual segmentation (3D Slicer) before and at 1 year of treatment, as was GFR. The loss of RFV, contralateral hypertrophy, and preservation of GFR were compared between both groups (PN vs. PA).

RESULTS

144 patients were included (87PN, 57PA). Preoperatively, PA group was older (74 vs. 59 years; P<0.0001), had more impaired GFR (73 vs. 85mL/min; P=0.0026) and smaller tumor volume(31.1 vs. 55.9cm3; P=0.0007) compared to PN group. At 1 year, the PN group had significantly more homolateral RFV loss (-19 vs. -14%; P=0.002), and contralateral compensatory hypertrophy (+4% vs. +1,8%; P=0.02, respectively). Total-RFV loss was similar between both (-21.7 vs. -19cm3; P=0.07). GFR preservation was better in the PN group (95.9 vs. 90.7%; P=0.03). In multivariate analysis, age and tumor size were associated with loss of RFVh.

CONCLUSION

For renal tumors T1b, PN is associated with superior compensatory hypertrophy compared with PA, compensating for the higher RFVh loss, resulting in similar ΔRFV-total between both groups. The superior post-PN GFR preservation suggests that the preserved quantitative RFV factor is insufficient. Therefore, the underlying quality of the parenchyma would play a major role in postoperative GFR.

Glomerular Filtration Rate Measurement and Chemotherapy Dosing

Many chemotherapeutic drugs used to treat malignancies undergo renal clearance. Thus, accurate knowledge of kidney function is critical to ensure proper dosing, maximize efficacy, and minimize toxicity of drugs that often have a narrow therapeutic index. Making this issue more salient is the fact that impaired kidney function, as assessed by glomerular filtration rate (GFR), is encountered commonly in patients with cancer. Recent data and expert guidelines recommend the use of the Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration equation to guide the assessment of kidney function, except when directly measured GFR is clinically necessary. Controversies regarding the measurement of kidney function include the use of race in this equation, indexing to body surface area, and dosing of medications based on stages of chronic kidney disease versus more discrete values of estimated GFR. The development of accurate, real-time GFR measures may hold great promise in allowing for more accurate dosing of these important drugs.

Performance of creatinine-based equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate in White and Black populations in Europe, Brazil and Africa

BACKGROUND

A new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation without the race variable has been recently proposed (CKD-EPIAS). This equation has neither been validated outside USA nor compared with the new European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) and Lund-Malmö Revised (LMREV) equations, developed in European cohorts.

METHODS

Standardized creatinine and measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from the European EKFC cohorts (n = 13 856 including 6031 individuals in the external validation cohort), from France (n = 4429, including 964 Black Europeans), from Brazil (n = 100) and from Africa (n = 508) were used to test the performances of the equations. A matched analysis between White Europeans and Black Africans or Black Europeans was performed.

RESULTS

In White Europeans (n = 9496), both the EKFC and LMREV equations outperformed CKD-EPIAS (bias of -0.6 and -3.2, respectively versus 5.0 mL/min/1.73 m², and accuracy within 30% of 86.9 and 87.4, respectively, versus 80.9%). In Black Europeans and Black Africans, the best performance was observed with the EKFC equation using a specific Q-value (= concentration of serum creatinine in healthy males and females). These results were confirmed in matched analyses, which showed that serum creatinine concentrations were different in White Europeans, Black Europeans and Black Africans for the same measured GFR, age, sex and body mass index. Creatinine differences were more relevant in males.

CONCLUSION

In a European and African cohort, the performances of CKD-EPIAS remain suboptimal. The EKFC equation, using usual or dedicated population-specific Q-values, presents the best performance in the whole age range in the European and African populations included in this study.

The New 2021 CKD-EPI Equation Without Race in a European Cohort of Renal Transplanted Patients

BACKGROUND

Whether the new chronic kidney disease-epidemiology (CKD-EPI) equation without the race variable remains accurate enough for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation in non-US kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is unclear. We sought to compare the predictive performance between this equation and the classical CKD-EPI equation in a French cohort of KTRs. We also evaluated the performance of the European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equation, an estimate that has proved very accurate in nontransplant patients and that does not include race variable.

METHODS

We retrospectively selected 489 KTRs for whom GFR was measured by inulin clearance. Performances of GFR equations were compared according to median bias, imprecision, and accuracy within 30% (P30) and 20% (P20). Differences in P20/P30 were tested using the exact McNemar test.

RESULTS

Although the 4 equations exhibited a similar level of imprecision, the bias of the new CKD-EPI equation was +5.5 (4.0; 6.6) mL/min/1.73 m², much higher than the bias of the classical CKD-EPI, EKFC, and Modified Diet in Renal Diseases (MDRD) equation (2.4 [1.7;3.5], 2.2 [1.1;3.1], and -0.5 [-1.5; 1.0] mL/min/1.73 m², respectively). The new CKD-EPI equation was significantly less accurate with a P30 of 68.3% as compared with 74.2%, 75.3%, and 77.1% for the classical CKD-EPI, EKFC, and MDRD equation, respectively. The EKFC equation outperformed both versions of the CKD-EPI equation in terms of P20.

CONCLUSIONS

The new CKD-EPI equation is suboptimal for the care and follow-up of European transplanted patients. The EKFC equation shows at least a similar performance to the MDRD and the classical CKD-EPI equation. Further validation of the EKFC equation in KTRs from a diverse ethnic background is needed.

Kidney function assessment and endpoint ascertainment in clinical trials

Heterogeneity in the reporting of kidney function, kidney outcomes, and definitions for kidney endpoints in clinical trials makes it challenging to compare results and gauge incremental benefit of interventions across trials. We conducted a systematic review of the ascertainment of baseline kidney variables, reporting of kidney endpoints, and definitions used to characterize these endpoints in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), kidney, and heart failure (HF) trials. Medline, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from January 2014 through January 2021 for large (>1000 participants) T2DM, HF, and kidney disease trials and their secondary analyses. Trial publication and supplementary appendices were searched to abstract relevant data. Thirty-three trials (16 T2DM; 10 HF; 7 kidney diseases) were included. Thirteen trials did not include patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and for trials that did, representation of this cohort ranged from 0.1% to 15%. Reporting of baseline kidney function and albuminuria remained low, especially in HF trials. Variability was observed in the definition of chronic kidney disease, sustained decline in eGFR, end-stage kidney disease, kidney death, and kidney composite endpoint across trials. eGFR slope was reported in less than half trials, with differences observed in statistical models, definition of acute or chronic slope, and follow-up duration across trials. Significant heterogeneity in reporting of kidney function and kidney outcomes in large T2DM, kidney, and HF trials underscores the need for future stakeholders to draft a consensus solution. Detailed profiling of patients at baseline, accrual of more patients with advanced kidney disease, and standardization of definitions in trials may improve the ability to compare the results across trials.

Drugs Dosing in Geriatric Patients Depending on Kidney Function Estimated by MDRD and Cockroft-Gault Formulas

INTRODUCTION

According to the current data, regardless of the method used to estimate GFR, the differences between the obtained results should be insignificant and do not imply therapeutic decisions. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the eGFR results with the estimated creatinine clearance score calculated according to the Cockroft-Gault equation, and to assess the significance of the difference between these two results.

SAMPLE AND METHODS

A study group was constituted of 115 patients, of whom 76 were women and 39 men at the age range of 55-93 years, with a median of 79 years. The study analyzed differences in the assessment of kidney function by comparing the results of eGFR assessed by MDRD method obtained from the laboratory with the calculated values of creatinine clearance using the Cockroft-Gault formula, and examining the correlation between the difference D = eGFR -eClCr and BMI and body surface.

RESULTS

In the entire group of patients (N = 115), the significant statistical difference was found between eGFR and eClCr. In the subgroup of patients (N = 45) with the lower baseline eGFR <60, there was no significant difference between eGFR and eClCr, while in the subgroup of patients with baseline eGFR ≥60 (N = 75), there was a significant difference between eGFR and eClCr. The study showed that based on the estimated GFR using both methods (C-G and MDRD), 29.2% and 32.4% of patients, respectively, were incorrectly assigned to given stage of chronic kidney disease.

CONCLUSION

Proper assessment of kidney function is very important in order to properly drugs dosing, especially to adjust the doses of drugs metabolized by the kidneys in order to avoid or minimize their nephrotoxic effects.

The Implication of Dropping Race from the MDRD Equation to Estimate GFR in an African American-Only Cohort

The widely used Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula adapts a 1.212 multiplier for individuals who are identified as African Americans (AAs) or Blacks, which leads to a higher GFR estimation. As it stands, AAs have a lower prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) but higher incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) compared with Whites. Many hypotheses have been postulated to explain this paradox, but the imprecision of the GFR estimation with race-adaptation could be contributory. We performed a single-center, longitudinal, retrospective study on a cohort of outpatient AA patients using the MDRD and MDRD_{race removed} and CKD-EPI and CKD-EPI_{race removed} and their progression to CKD G5 (eGFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m²). 327 patients were analyzed. Median follow-up was 88.1 months (interquartile range, 34.4–129.1). When race was removed from MDRD, 39.9% of patients in CKD G1/2 were reclassified to CKD G3a, 72.6% of patients in CKD G3a would be reclassified to CKD G3b, and 54.1% and 36.4% of patients would be reclassified from CKD 3b to CKD G4 and CKD G4 to CKD G5, respectively (p < 0.0001). Comparing the CKD-EPI formula against the MDRD in our cohort, we found that 8.2%, 18.8%, and 11.4% of patients were reclassified from CKD G1/2 to CKD G3a, CKD G3a to G3b, and CKD G3b to CKD G4 respectively. Overall median time to progression to CKD G5 was 137.4 (131.9–142.8) months in patients who were not reclassified and 133.6 (127.6–139.6) months for patients who were reclassified by MDRD_{race removed}(p < 0.288). Concerns of inequitable access to healthcare have elicited calls to review race-corrected eGFR equations. A substantial number of individuals would have their CKD stage reclassified should have the MDRD_{race removed} equation be adopted en masse on an AA-only population. The discrepancy is highest at the 45–59 and >60 ml/min/1.72 min² ranges. This will have tremendous impact on our center's approach to pharmacological dosing, referral system, best practices, and outcome surveillance. Comprehensive review of the current “race-corrected” eGFR will require a multifaceted approach and adjunctive use of noncreatinine-based approach.

The « race » correction in estimating glomerular filtration rate: an European point of view

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is currently a heated debate ongoing whether or not to use the race coefficient for black people in the Modification of Diet in Renal Diseases and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology-equation. The use of the race coefficient is thought by several American authors as a source of discrimination.

RECENT FINDINGS

It has recently been shown that the race coefficient is inaccurate in European and African black people. Therefore, it seems that the race correction is more a correction for black Americans, rather than for black in general. This 'correction' at the glomerular filtration rate (GFR)-level has been criticized, as it is misleading, and should be abandoned, as it has not been shown that GFR is different between black and white people. However, as differences in creatinine generation between black and white people might exist, a correction or adjustment, different for black and white people, at the creatinine level might be required, very similar to the different scaling of creatinine for males and females.

SUMMARY

The current debate on the race coefficient is particularly difficult because of the absence of good scientific data in black subjects and there lies the real discrimination in our opinion. We therefore call for future dedicated studies, both in Europe and USA.

Association Between Renal Dysfunction and Low HDL Cholesterol Among the Elderly in China

Objective: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) have a high morbidity and mortality among the elderly. Low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), a traditional risk marker for CVD, are common in CKD patients. Little is known about the association of low HDL-C with renal dysfunction in the community dwelling population. Methods: This was a population-based cross-sectional study included 4,753 participants enrolled in a prospective study, the Shanghai Elderly Cardiovascular Health (SHECH) study. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), calculated by the Chinese Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (C-MDRD equation), was used to assess renal dysfunction. Associations between renal dysfunction and low HDL-C were evaluated using multiple logistic regression models and restricted cubic splines. Results: Of 4,649 individuals who met inclusion criteria, 620 (13.34%) had low HDL-C at <40 mg/dl. In the fully adjusted model, lower eGFR of <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.21-3.43) and marginal eGFR of 60 to 90 ml/min/1.73 m2 (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01-1.58) were significantly associated with low HDL-C, compared with normal eGFR of ≥90 ml/min/1.73 m2. Moreover, consistent findings were obtained in subsidiary analyses using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. Fully adjusted cubic spline models indicated a significant dose-response relationship between eGFR and low HDL-C (P for non-linearity, 0.356). Conclusion: In this general elderly population, renal dysfunction was independently and significantly associated with low HDL-C, and the prevalence of low HDL-C increased with decreasing eGFR, such that even slight changes in renal function may be associated with altered lipid levels.

20-year longitudinal follow-up of measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplant patients

BACKGROUND

The slopes of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations are used in the longitudinal follow-up of transplant patients. A 30% reduction in eGFR over 2 years is often used to predict the subsequent risk of mortality or end-stage renal disease. Whether, at the individual level, such changes in eGFR correspond to changes in measured GFR (mGFR) is actually unknown.

METHODS

The performance of serum creatinine-based eGFR equations was compared with mGFR during the longitudinal follow-up of 20 years in a monocentric study of 417 transplanted patients.

RESULTS

The accuracy within 30% for the eGFR equations varied between 70 and 75%. All eGFR equations showed a similar pattern, very like the mGFR time profiles. Individual changes (slopes) of mGFR or eGFR were predictive of graft loss in the next months or years, following the decline in GFR, with no evidence for a difference. However, although the tendency is the same as for mGFR, the percentage of transplant patients with a >30% GFR decrease in the last period before graft loss is significantly lower for eGFR than for mGFR, with discordant results from mGFR in ~25% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

All eGFR equations showed similar trends as mGFR, but eGFR predictions may not be very useful at the individual patient level.

A Review of Specific Biomarkers of Chronic Renal Injury and Their Potential Application in Nonclinical Safety Assessment Studies

A host of novel renal biomarkers have been developed over the past few decades which have enhanced monitoring of renal disease and drug-induced kidney injury in both preclinical studies and in humans. Since chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute kidney injury (AKI) share similar underlying mechanisms and the tubulointerstitial compartment has a functional role in the progression of CKD, urinary biomarkers of AKI may provide predictive information in chronic renal disease. Numerous studies have explored whether the recent AKI biomarkers could improve upon the standard clinical biomarkers, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and urinary albumin to creatinine ratio, for predicting outcomes in CKD patients. This review is an introduction to alternative assays that can be utilized in chronic (>3 months duration) nonclinical safety studies to provide information on renal dysfunction and to demonstrate specific situations where these assays could be utilized in nonclinical drug development. Novel biomarkers such as symmetrical dimethyl arginine, dickkopf homolog 3, and cystatin C predict chronic renal injury in animals, act as surrogates for GFR, and may predict changes in GFR in patients over time, ultimately providing a bridge from preclinical to clinical renal monitoring.

Drug dosing in cancer patients with decreased kidney function: A practical approach

Correct drug dosing of anticancer agents is essential to obtain optimal outcomes. Overdosing will result in increased toxicity, treatment interruption and possible cessation of anticancer treatment. Underdosing may result in suboptimal anti-cancer effects and may increase the risk of cancer-related mortality. As it is practical nor feasible to perform therapeutic drug monitoring for all anti-cancer drugs, kidney function is used to guide drug dosing for those drugs whose primary mode of excretion is through the kidney. However, it is not well-established what method should be utilized to measure or estimate kidney function and the choice of method does influence treatment decisions regarding eligibility for anti-cancer drugs and their dose. In this review, we will provide an overview regarding the importance of drug dosing, the preferred method to determine kidney function and a practical approach to drug dosing of anticancer drugs.

Elevated Serum Uric Acid is Associated with Rapid Decline in Kidney Function: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study

Purpose

The long-term impact of changes in serum uric acid (SUA) concentration on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) among the general population remains unclear. We investigated the longitudinal associations between changes in SUA and eGFR over 10 years in 1222 participants with baseline eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m².

Methods

This was a 10-year retrospective cohort study conducted from 2007 to 2017. Rapid eGFR decline (defined as the highest quartile of change in eGFR between 2007 and 2017) and new-onset kidney disease (defined as an eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m² at a 10-year follow-up) were examined using multiple logistic regression analysis, adjusted for sex, age, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, SUA, fasting plasma glucose, serum total cholesterol, and triglyceride at baseline.

Results

SUA was inversely correlated with eGFR, and the slopes of the SUA-eGFR regression lines were consistently steeper in females than males. A significant inverse correlation was also observed between 10-year changes in SUA and eGFR in both sexes. Multivariate analysis showed that every 1 mg/dL increase in SUA from baseline was associated with higher risk of rapid eGFR decline and new-onset kidney disease (OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.14–1.33 and OR 1.40; 95% CI 1.26–1.49, respectively). Furthermore, the subjects in the highest SUA quartile (>6.0 mg/dL) had a 2.45 times higher risk of rapid eGFR decline (95% CI 1.51–3.42) compared to those in the lowest SUA quartile (<3.9 mg/dL).

Conclusion

Elevated baseline SUA is an independent risk factor for rapid eGFR decline and new-onset kidney disease in the general population.

Renal changes and estimation of glomerular filtration rate using different equations in morbidly obese Egyptian patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Obesity is a worldwide pandemic with multiple consequences including kidney affection. This study aimed to assess the effects of obesity on renal functions and to detect the most reliable formula of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in morbidly obese patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, observational study was conducted on 82 morbidly obese patients. Anthropometric measurements were done for all patients and body adiposity (BAI) and visceral adiposity (VAI) indices were calculated after assessment of abdominal fat tissue analysis by computerized tomography (CT). Serum creatinine was incorporated into six different formulae of eGFR, then eGFR was compared with the 24-h measured creatinine clearance (CL_cr) values.

RESULTS

The mean body mass index was 55.8 ± 9.5 kg/m². Proteinuria and glomerular hyperfiltration (CL_cr > 130 ml/min/1.73 m²) were detected in 68.3% and 91.5% of the patients, respectively. Cockcroft-Gault formula using total (CCG-TBW-eGFR) and adjusted body water (CCG-AjBW-eGFR) had the nearest values to measured CL_Cr. These two formulae had a moderate reliability and the lowest percentage of error (30% and 23%, respectively). Visceral and total abdominal fat tissue surface area and volume assessed by CT were directly correlated to the 24-h urinary protein excretion (r = 0.32, 0.24, 0.37 and 0.34, respectively; p = 0.02, 0.03, 0.004 and 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Glomerular hyperfiltration and proteinuria are highly prevalent in morbidly obese patients. There is no ideal formula for GFR estimation in morbidly obese patients, however, TBW and AjBW incorporated into the Cockcroft-Gault can be helpful in those patients.

Glomerular filtration rate: when to measure and in which patients?

Of the glomerular, tubular and endocrine functions of the kidney, nephrologists have mostly focused their attention on the glomerular functions-albuminuria and glomerular filtration rate (GFR)-to grade the severity of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although both albuminuria and GFR are associated with renal and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, the utility of measured GFR (mGFR) has been questioned. GFR when measured adequately is the most precise measure of glomerular function and can be useful to individualize therapy among patients with CKD. In situations where estimated GFR is known to provide imprecise estimates of glomerular function, for example, sarcopenia and advanced cirrhosis, the measurement of GFR may be especially important. We discuss several clinical situations where mGFR can potentially influence the quality of life or complications of therapy because of interventions based on imperfect knowledge of GFR. We reason that although large databases may not detect the benefits of mGFR at the population level, precision medicine requires that therapy be individualized based on the best estimate of GFR that can be obtained particularly when the risk of harm is increased. The recent standardization of mGFRs is a step in the right direction and may help in treating the individual patient with CKD with a lower risk of complications and a better quality of life. We call for research in these subgroups of patients where it is clinically felt that mGFR is useful for clinical decision-making.

How to determine kidney function in cancer patients?

A precise and efficient method for estimating kidney function in cancer patients is important to determine their eligibility for clinical trials and surgery and to allow for appropriate dose adjustment of anti-cancer drugs, especially toxic drugs with a narrow therapeutic index. Since direct measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is cumbersome, several formulae have been developed to estimate kidney function. Most of these are based on serum creatinine concentration. Though the CKD-EPI formula is recognised as being the most accurate, there is an ongoing debate on which is the optimal formula for cancer patients. In this review, we provide an overview of different GFR estimating equations for kidney function and the advantages and disadvantages of each method and compare their performance in cancer patients. We discuss the importance of body surface area-indexing and propose a framework for evaluating kidney function in cancer patients.

Temporal variation of renal function in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A retrospective UK clinical practice research datalink cohort study

AIM

To characterize the longitudinal variability of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), including variation between categories and individuals.

METHODS

People with T2DM and sufficient recorded serum creatinine measurements were identified from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (T2DM diagnosis from 1 January 2009 to 1 January 2011 with 5 years follow-up); eGFR was calculated using the CKD-EPI equation.

RESULTS

In total, 7766 individuals were included; 32.8%, 50.2%, 12.4%, 4.0% and 0.6% were in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) categories G1, G2, G3a, G3b and G4, respectively. Overall, eGFR decreased by 0.44 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year; eGFR increased by 0.80 mL/min/1.73 m2 between index and year 1, then decreased by 0.75 mL/min/1.73 m2 annually up to year 5. Category G1 showed a steady decline in eGFR over time; G2, G3a and G3b showed an increase between index and year 1, followed by a decline. Category G4 showed a mean eGFR increase of 1.85 mL/min/1.73 m2 annually. People in categories G3-G4 moved across a greater number of GFR categories than those in G1 and G2. Individual patients' eGFR showed a wide range of values (change from baseline at year 5 varied from -80 to +59 mL/min/1.73 m2 ).

CONCLUSION

Overall, eGFR declined over time, although there was considerable variation between GFR categories and individuals. This highlights the difficulty in prescribing many glucose-lowering therapies, which require dose adjustment for renal function. The study also emphasizes the importance of regular monitoring of renal impairment in people with T2DM.

Novel glomerular filtration markers

Chronic kidney disease is currently assessed by estimated glomerular filtration rate, a mathematical construct based on creatinine or creatinine and cystatin concentration. Creatinine-based equations have improved with standardization efforts and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD) and CKD-Epidemiology Collaboration Study (CKD-EPI). Because the measurement of creatinine is subject to interference from non-GFR determinants, alternative markers have long been sought. These have included cystatin C and low molecular weight proteins like β2-microglobulin and beta trace protein. Tubular disease often occurs before glomerular filtration is impaired and investigators have investigated the excretion of other low molecular weight proteins such as Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL) and Kidney Injury Molecule-1 and N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase. While preliminary, there is some evidence linking these analytes with GFR, disease stage and mortality. Although asymmetrical dimethyl arginine, an inhibitor of nitric oxide, has been shown to be associated with progression of renal disease, symmetric dimethyl arginine may be a better marker. Recent work has also explored the potential of microRNA (miRNA) analysis and metabolomics studies to further elucidate this complex pathophysiologic disease process. Investigators hope to improve our ability to detect CKD by the use of test panels, i.e., various marker combinations thereof. Unfortunately, most of these markers lack standardization unlike traditional measures that rely on creatinine and cystatin C measurement.

Estimated glomerular filtration ratio is a better index than creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault) for predicting the prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the general Japanese population

Direct oral anti-coagulants (DOACs) have been used in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), and renal function evaluation using the CCr (Cockcroft-Gault) is recommended as a criterion for the reduction of DOAC. In contrast, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is usually used as an index of renal function in daily practice. We determined the age- and gender-specific prevalence rates of AF and whether CCr or eGFR was associated with the prevalence of AF. Data from the periodic health examinations of 108,951 subjects were collected. Risk factors for AF were determined based on medical history, physical examinations and blood samples, and AF was diagnosed based on electrocardiography. The prevalence rate of AF was 0.92% (998/108,951). It was four times higher in men than in women and increased with age. Cardiac disease (odds ratio (OR) = 27.07, confidence interval (CI) 23.39-31.37, p = 0.0001), male gender (OR = 3.65, CI 3.11-4.30), age > 65 years (OR = 2.52, CI 2.14-2.96), hyperlipidemia (OR = 2.51, CI 1.97-3.20), BMI > 25 kg/m² (OR = 1.37, CI 1.19-1.58) and hypertension (OR = 1.14, CI 1.11-1.16) were independently associated with a high risk of AF in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. The odds ratio of having AF was significantly higher in patients with eGFR ≤ 59 (OR = 2.10, CI 1.21-3.86) than in those with eGFR ≥ 90 but was not associated with CCr after adjustments for age, gender, diabetes mellitus and smoking. The significance of this difference disappeared after additional adjustment for hypertension. Cardiac disease, gender, age, hyperlipidemia, obesity, hypertension and renal dysfunction were strong risk factors for AF. The evaluation of renal dysfunction as a morbidity risk factor for AF suggests that eGFR should be used.

Performance of glomerular filtration rate estimation equations in Congolese healthy adults: The inopportunity of the ethnic correction

Context and objective

In the estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), ethnicity is an important determinant. However, all existing equations have been built solely from Caucasian and Afro-American populations and they are potentially inaccurate for estimating GFR in African populations. We therefore evaluated the performance of different estimated GFR (eGFR) equations in predicting measured GFR (mGFR).

Methods

In a cross-sectional study, 93 healthy adults were randomly selected in the general population of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo, between June 2015 and April 2016. We compared mGFR by plasma clearance of iohexol with eGFR obtained with the Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation with and without ethnic factor, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) serum creatinine (SCr)-based equation, with and without ethnic factor, the cystatin C-based CKD-EPI equation (CKD-EPI SCys) and with the combined equation (CKD-EPI SCrCys) with and without ethnic factor. The performance of the equations was studied by calculating bias, precision and accuracy within 30% (P30) of mGFR.

Results

There were 48 women and 45 men. Their mean age was 45.0±15.7 years and the average body surface area was 1.68±0.16m². Mean mGFR was 92.0±17.2 mL/min/1.73m² (range of 57 to 141 mL/min/1.73m²). Mean eGFRs with the different equations were 105.5±30.1 and 87.2±24.8 mL/min/1.73m² for MDRD with and without ethnic factor, respectively; 108.8±24.1 and 94.3x20.9 mL/min/1.73m² for CKD-EPI SCr with and without ethnic factor, respectively, 93.5±18.6 mL/min/1.73m² for CKD-EPI SCys; 93.5±18.0 and 101±19.6 mL/min/ 1.73m² for CKD-EPI SCrCys with and without ethnic factor, respectively. All equations slightly overestimated mGFR except MDRD without ethnic factor which underestimated by -3.8±23.0 mL/min /1.73m². Both CKD-EPI SCr and MDRD with ethnic factors highly overestimated mGFR with a bias of 17.9±19.2 and 14.5±27.1 mL/min/1.73m², respectively. There was a trend for better P30 for MDRD and CKD-EPI SCr without than with the ethnic factor [86.0% versus 79.6% for MDRD (p = 0.21) and 81.7% versus 73.1% for the CKD-EPI SCr equations (p = 0.057)]. CKD-EPI SCrCys and CKD-EPI SCys were more effective than creatinine-based equations.

Conclusion

In the Congolese healthy population, MDRD and CKD-EPI equations without ethnic factors had better performance than the same equations with ethnic factor. The equations using Cys C (alone or combined with SCr) performed better than the creatinine-based equations.

Estimation of the glomerular filtration rate in older individuals with serum creatinine-based equations: A systematic comparison between CKD-EPI and BIS1

AIM

CKD-EPIcr (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine) and BIS1 (Berlin Initiative Study) are two serum creatinine-based formulae for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). However, their comparative accuracy in older people has not been well established. Our aim was to conduct a systematic comparative study of the accuracy of estimation of GFR in older people with these two formulae.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search in Pubmed, EMBASE and Central databases on the validity of the CKD-EPIcr and BIS1 formulae in people aged 60 or more years. The search ranged from 2009 and 2012 for CKD-EPIcr and BIS1, respectively, until May 2017. The validity criterion for comparing the formulae was to have a P30 accuracy level equal to or greater than 80%.

RESULTS

Of 1295 identified studies, 16 met our inclusion criteria. Out of 16 studies reporting the accuracy of the CKD-EPIcr formula, only 5 (31.3%) had P30 scores ≥80% (mean P30 was 77.1 ± 7.711 range 55.5-91.7), and out of 9 studies on accuracy using the BIS1 formula, 6 (66.7%) were ≥80% (mean P30 was 83.88 ± 9.37, range 67.0-95.8).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that for the estimation of the GFR in older people, BIS1 formula may be more accurate than CKD-EPIcr.

Estimating glomerular filtration rate for the full age spectrum from serum creatinine and cystatin C

Background

We recently published and validated the new serum creatinine (Scr)-based full-age-spectrum equation (FAS crea ) for estimating the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) for healthy and kidney-diseased subjects of all ages. The equation was based on the concept of normalized Scr and shows equivalent to superior prediction performance to the currently recommended equations for children, adolescents, adults and older adults.

Methods

Based on an evaluation of the serum cystatin C (ScysC) distribution, we defined normalization constants for ScysC ( Q cysC  =   0.82 mg/L for ages <70 years and Q cysC  =   0.95 mg/L for ages ≥70 years). By replacing Scr/ Q crea in the FAS crea equation with ScysC/ Q cysC , or with the average of both normalized biomarkers, we obtained new ScysC-based (FAS cysC ) and combined Scr-/ScysC-based FAS equations (FAS combi ). To validate the new FAS cysC and FAS combi we collected data on measured GFR, Scr, ScysC, age, gender, height and weight from 11 different cohorts including n  = 6132 unique white subjects (368 children, aged ≤18 years, 4295 adults and 1469 older adults, aged ≥70 years).

Results

In children and adolescents, the new FAS cysC equation showed significantly better performance [percentage of patients within 30% of mGFR (P30) = 86.1%] than the Caucasian Asian Paediatric Adult Cohort equation (P30 = 76.6%; P < 0.0001), or the ScysC-based Schwartz equation (P30 = 68.8%; P < 0.0001) and the FAS combi equation outperformed all equations with P30 = 92.1% (P < 0.0001). In adults, the FAS cysC equation (P30 = 82.6%) performed equally as well as the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI cysC ) (P30 = 80.4%) and the FAS combi equation (P30 = 89.9%) was also equal to the combined CKD-EPI equation (P30 = 88.2%). In older adults, FAS cysC was superior (P30 = 88.2%) to CKD-EPI cysC (P30 = 84.4%; P < 0.0001) and the FAS combi equation (P30 = 91.2%) showed significantly higher performance than the combined CKD-EPI equation (P30 = 85.6%) (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The FAS equation is not only applicable to all ages, but also for all recommended renal biomarkers and their combinations.

Systematic Review and Metaanalysis Comparing the Bias and Accuracy of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Equations in Community-Based Populations

BACKGROUND

The majority of patients with chronic kidney disease are diagnosed and monitored in primary care. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a key marker of renal function, but direct measurement is invasive; in routine practice, equations are used for estimated GFR (eGFR) from serum creatinine. We systematically assessed bias and accuracy of commonly used eGFR equations in populations relevant to primary care.

CONTENT

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing measured GFR (mGFR) with eGFR in adult populations comparable to primary care and reporting both the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations based on standardized creatinine measurements. We pooled data on mean bias (difference between eGFR and mGFR) and on mean accuracy (proportion of eGFR within 30% of mGFR) using a random-effects inverse-variance weighted metaanalysis. We included 48 studies of 26875 patients that reported data on bias and/or accuracy. Metaanalysis of within-study comparisons in which both formulae were tested on the same patient cohorts using isotope dilution-mass spectrometry-traceable creatinine showed a lower mean bias in eGFR using CKD-EPI of 2.2 mL/min/1.73 m² (95% CI, 1.1-3.2; 30 studies; I² = 74.4%) and a higher mean accuracy of CKD-EPI of 2.7% (1.6-3.8; 47 studies; I² = 55.5%). Metaregression showed that in both equations bias and accuracy favored the CKD-EPI equation at higher mGFR values.

SUMMARY

Both equations underestimated mGFR, but CKD-EPI gave more accurate estimates of GFR.

Serum protease activity in chronic kidney disease patients: The GANI_MED renal cohort

Serum or plasma proteases have been associated with various diseases including cancer, inflammation, or reno-cardiovascular diseases. We aimed to investigate whether the enzymatic activities of serum proteases are associated with the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with different stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Our study population comprised 268 participants of the "Greifswald Approach to Individualized Medicine" (GANI_MED) cohort. Enzymatic activity of aminopeptidase A, aminopeptidase B, alanyl (membrane) aminopeptidase, insulin-regulated aminopeptidase, puromycin-sensitive aminopeptidase, leucine aminopeptidase 3, prolyl-endopeptidase (PEP), dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4), angiotensin I-converting enzyme, and angiotensin I-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) proteases was measured in serum. Linear regression of the respective protease was performed on kidney function adjusted for age and sex. Kidney function was modeled either by the continuous Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD)-based eGFR or dichotomized by eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m² or <45 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively. Results with a false discovery rate below 0.05 were deemed statistically significant. Among the 10 proteases investigated, only the activities of ACE2 and DPP4 were correlated with eGFR. Patients with lowest eGFR exhibited highest DPP4 and ACE2 activities. DPP4 and PEP were correlated with age, but all other serum protease activities showed no associations with age or sex. Our data indicate that ACE2 and DPP4 enzymatic activity are associated with the eGFR in patients with CKD. This finding distinguishes ACE2 and DPP4 from other serum peptidases analyzed and clearly indicates that further analyses are warranted to identify the precise role of these serum ectopeptidases in the pathogenesis of CKD and to fully elucidate underlying molecular mechanisms. Impact statement • Renal and cardiac diseases are very common and often occur concomitantly, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. Understanding of molecular mechanisms linking both diseases is limited, available fragmentary data point to a role of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and, in particular, Ras-related peptidases. • Here, a comprehensive analysis of serum peptidase activities in patients with different stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is presented, with special emphasis given to RAS peptidases • The serum activities of the peptidases angiotensin I-converting enzyme 2 and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 were identified as closely associated with kidney function, specifically with the estimated glomerular filtration rate. The findings are discussed in the context of available data suggesting protective roles for both enzymes in reno-cardiac diseases. • The data add to our understanding of pathomechanisms underlying development and progression of CKD and indicate that both enzymes might represent potential pharmacological targets for the preservation of renal function.

Iohexol plasma clearance for measuring glomerular filtration rate in clinical practice and research: a review. Part 1: How to measure glomerular filtration rate with iohexol?

While there is general agreement on the necessity to measure glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in many clinical situations, there is less agreement on the best method to achieve this purpose. As the gold standard method for GFR determination, urinary (or renal) clearance of inulin, fades into the background due to inconvenience and high cost, a diversity of filtration markers and protocols compete to replace it. In this review, we suggest that iohexol, a non-ionic contrast agent, is most suited to replace inulin as the marker of choice for GFR determination. Iohexol comes very close to fulfilling all requirements for an ideal GFR marker in terms of low extra-renal excretion, low protein binding and in being neither secreted nor reabsorbed by the kidney. In addition, iohexol is virtually non-toxic and carries a low cost. As iohexol is stable in plasma, administration and sample analysis can be separated in both space and time, allowing access to GFR determination across different settings. An external proficiency programme operated by Equalis AB, Sweden, exists for iohexol, facilitating interlaboratory comparison of results. Plasma clearance measurement is the protocol of choice as it combines a reliable GFR determination with convenience for the patient. Single-sample protocols dominate, but multiple-sample protocols may be more accurate in specific situations. In low GFRs one or more late samples should be included to improve accuracy. In patients with large oedema or ascites, urinary clearance protocols should be employed. In conclusion, plasma clearance of iohexol may well be the best candidate for a common GFR determination method.

Creatinine-based equations for the adjustment of drug dosage in an obese population

AIM

For drug dosing adaptation, the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines recommend using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, after 'de-indexation' by body surface area (BSA). In pharmacology, the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation is still recommended to adapt drug dosage. In the context of obesity, adjusted ideal body weight (AIBW) is sometimes preferred to actual body weight (ABW) for the CG equation. The aim of the present study was to compare the performance of the different GFR-estimating equations, non-indexed or de-indexed by BSA for the purpose of drug-dosage adaptation in obese patients.

METHODS

We analysed data from patients with a body mass index (BMI) higher than 30 kg m(-2) who underwent a GFR measurement. eGFR was calculated using the CKD-EPI and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations, de-indexed by BSA, and the CG equation, using either ABW, AIBW or lean body weight (LBW) for the weight variable and compared with measured GFR, expressed in ml min(-1).

RESULTS

In our population of obese patients, use of the AIBW instead of the ABW in the CG equation, markedly improved the overall accuracy of this equation [57% for CGABW and 79% for CGAIBW (P < 0.05)]. For high BMI (over 40 kg m(-2)), the accuracy of the CG equations is no different when using LBW than when using AIBW. The MDRD and CKD-EPI equations de-indexed by the BSA also performed well, with an overall higher accuracy for the MDRD de-indexed equation [(80% and 76%, respectively (P < 0.05)].

CONCLUSIONS

The de-indexed MDRD equation appeared to be the most suitable for estimating the non-indexed GFR for the purpose of drug dosage adaptation in obese patients.

The Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation does not improve the underestimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) in people with diabetes and preserved renal function

BACKGROUND

Our hypothesis was that both the Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations would underestimate directly measured GFR (mGFR) to a similar extent in people with diabetes and preserved renal function.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, bias (eGFR - mGFR) was compared for the CKD-EPI and MDRD equations, after stratification for mGFR levels. We also examined the ability of the CKD-EPI compared with the MDRD equation to correctly classify subjects to various CKD stages. In a longitudinal study of subjects with an early decline in GFR i.e., initial mGFR > 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and rate of decline in GFR (ΔmGFR) > 3.3 ml/min/1.73 m(2) per year, ΔmGFR (based on initial and final values) was compared with ΔeGFR by the CKD-EPI and MDRD equations over a mean of 9 years.

RESULTS

In the cross-sectional study, mGFR for the whole group was 80 ± 2.2 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (n = 199, 75 % type 2 diabetes). For subjects with mGFR >90 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (mGFR: 112 ± 2.0, n = 76), both equations significantly underestimated mGFR to a similar extent: bias for CKD-EPI: -12 ± 1.4 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (p < 0.001) and for MDRD: -11 ± 2.1 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (p < 0.001). Using the CKD-EPI compared with the MDRD equation did not improve the number of subjects that were correctly classified to a CKD-stage. No biochemical or clinical patient characteristics were identified to account for the under estimation of mGFR values in the normal to high range by the CKD-EPI equation. In the longitudinal study (n = 30, 66 % type 1 diabetes), initial and final mGFR values were 102.8 ± 6 and 54.6 ± 6.0 ml/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. Mean ΔGFR (ml/min/1.73 m(2) per year) was 6.0 by mGFR compared with only 3.0 by MDRD and 3.2 by CKD-EPI (both p < 0.05 vs mGFR) CONCLUSIONS: Both the CKD-EPI and MDRD equations underestimate reference GFR values > 90 ml/min/1.73 m(2) as well as an early decline in GFR to a similar extent in people with diabetes. There is scope to improve methods for estimating an early decline in GFR.

The Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation does not improve the underestimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) in people with diabetes and preserved renal function

Background

Our hypothesis was that both the Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations would underestimate directly measured GFR (mGFR) to a similar extent in people with diabetes and preserved renal function.

Methods

In a cross-sectional study, bias (eGFR – mGFR) was compared for the CKD-EPI and MDRD equations, after stratification for mGFR levels. We also examined the ability of the CKD-EPI compared with the MDRD equation to correctly classify subjects to various CKD stages. In a longitudinal study of subjects with an early decline in GFR i.e., initial mGFR >60 ml/min/1.73 m² and rate of decline in GFR (ΔmGFR) > 3.3 ml/min/1.73 m² per year, ΔmGFR (based on initial and final values) was compared with ΔeGFR by the CKD-EPI and MDRD equations over a mean of 9 years.

Results

In the cross-sectional study, mGFR for the whole group was 80 ± 2.2 ml/min/1.73 m² (n = 199, 75 % type 2 diabetes). For subjects with mGFR >90 ml/min/1.73 m² (mGFR: 112 ± 2.0, n = 76), both equations significantly underestimated mGFR to a similar extent: bias for CKD-EPI: -12 ± 1.4 ml/min/1.73 m² (p < 0.001) and for MDRD: -11 ± 2.1 ml/min/1.73 m² (p < 0.001). Using the CKD-EPI compared with the MDRD equation did not improve the number of subjects that were correctly classified to a CKD-stage. No biochemical or clinical patient characteristics were identified to account for the under estimation of mGFR values in the normal to high range by the CKD-EPI equation. In the longitudinal study (n = 30, 66 % type 1 diabetes), initial and final mGFR values were 102.8 ± 6 and 54.6 ± 6.0 ml/min/1.73 m², respectively. Mean ΔGFR (ml/min/1.73 m² per year) was 6.0 by mGFR compared with only 3.0 by MDRD and 3.2 by CKD-EPI (both p < 0.05 vs mGFR)

Conclusions

Both the CKD-EPI and MDRD equations underestimate reference GFR values >90 ml/min/1.73 m² as well as an early decline in GFR to a similar extent in people with diabetes. There is scope to improve methods for estimating an early decline in GFR.

[Dosing adjustment and renal function: Which equation(s)?]

While the CKD-EPI (for Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology) equation is now implemented worldwide, utilization of the Cockcroft formula is still advocated by some physicians for drug dosage adjustment. Justifications for this recommendation are that the Cockcroft formula was preferentially used to determine dose adjustments according to renal function during the development of many drugs, better predicts drugs-related adverse events and decreases the risk of drug overexposure in the elderly. In this opinion paper, we discuss the weaknesses of the rationale supporting the Cockcroft formula and endorse the French HAS (Haute Autorité de santé) recommendation regarding the preferential use of the CKD-EPI equation. When glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is estimated in order to adjust drug dosage, the CKD-EPI value should be re-expressed for the individual body surface area (BSA). Given the difficulty to accurately estimate GFR in the elderly and in individuals with extra-normal BSA, we recommend to prescribe in priority monitorable drugs in those populations or to determine their "true" GFR using a direct measurement method.

Individualizing pharmacotherapy in patients with renal impairment: the validity of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula in specific patient populations with a glomerular filtration rate below 60 ml/min. A systematic review

Background

The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula is widely used in clinical practice to assess the correct drug dose. This formula is based on serum creatinine levels which might be influenced by chronic diseases itself or the effects of the chronic diseases. We conducted a systematic review to determine the validity of the MDRD formula in specific patient populations with renal impairment: elderly, hospitalized and obese patients, patients with cardiovascular disease, cancer, chronic respiratory diseases, diabetes mellitus, liver cirrhosis and human immunodeficiency virus.

Methods and Findings

We searched for articles in Pubmed published from January 1999 through January 2014. Selection criteria were (1) patients with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 ml/min (/1.73m²), (2) MDRD formula compared with a gold standard and (3) statistical analysis focused on bias, precision and/or accuracy. Data extraction was done by the first author and checked by a second author. A bias of 20% or less, a precision of 30% or less and an accuracy expressed as P₃₀% of 80% or higher were indicators of the validity of the MDRD formula. In total we included 27 studies. The number of patients included ranged from 8 to 1831. The gold standard and measurement method used varied across the studies. For none of the specific patient populations the studies provided sufficient evidence of validity of the MDRD formula regarding the three parameters. For patients with diabetes mellitus and liver cirrhosis, hospitalized patients and elderly with moderate to severe renal impairment we concluded that the MDRD formula is not valid. Limitations of the review are the lack of considering the method of measuring serum creatinine levels and the type of gold standard used.

Conclusion

In several specific patient populations with renal impairment the use of the MDRD formula is not valid or has uncertain validity.

Modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) study and CKD epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations for Taiwanese adults

Background

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study or the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations may not be accurate for Asians; thus, we developed modified eGFR equations for Taiwanese adults.

Methods

This cross-sectional study compared the Taiwanese eGFR equations, the MDRD study, and the CKD-EPI equations with inulin clearance (C_in). A total of 695 adults including 259 healthy volunteers and 436 CKD patients were recruited. Participants from the Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital were used as the development set (N = 556) to develop the Taiwanese eGFR equations, whereas participants from the National Taiwan University Hospital were used as the validation set (N = 139) for external validation.

Results

The Taiwanese eGFR equations were developed by using the extended Bland-Altman plot in the development set. The Taiwanese MDRD equation was 1.309×MDRD^0.912, Taiwanese CKD-EPI was 1.262×CKD-EPI^0.914 and Taiwanese four-level CKD-EPI was 1.205×four-level CKD-EPI^0.914. In the validation set, the Taiwanese equations had the lowest bias, the Taiwanese equations and the Japanese CKD-EPI equation had the lowest RMSE, whereas the Taiwanese and the Japanese equations had the best precision and the highest P₃₀ among all equations. However, the Taiwanese MDRD equation had higher concordance correlation than did the Taiwanese CKD-EPI, the Taiwanese four-level CKD-EPI and the Japanese equations. Moreover, only the Taiwanese equations had no proportional bias among all of the equations. Finally, the Taiwanese MDRD equation had the best diagnostic performance in terms of ordinal logistic regression among all of the equations.

Conclusion

The Taiwanese MDRD equation is better than the MDRD, CKD-EPI, Japanese, Asian, Thai, Taiwanese CKD-EPI, and Taiwanese four-level CKD-EPI equations for Taiwanese adults.

Does the type of creatinine assay affect creatinine clearance determination?

BACKGROUND

A creatinine clearance (CrCl) is still often requested to estimate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in clinical practice. However, the diversity of serum and urine creatinine (Scr, Ucr) assays leads to different CrCl-results which are here compared with each other and with the CKD-EPI eGFR-formula.

METHODS

We collected information on urine volume, Ucr and Scr using Roche's enzymatic (E), compensated Jaffe (CJ) and Jaffe (J) assay for 589 patients. To allow comparison with the CKD-EPI prediction results, CrCl was normalized for body surface area.

RESULTS

Differences between CrCl-E and CrCl-CJ are rather small as opposed to the large differences with CrCl-J. However, two compensating errors in the CrCl-J calculation result in a closer agreement with CKD-EPI eGFR, than between CrCl-CJ or CrCl-E and CKD-EPI eGFR. The explained variance R(2) in all three cases is smaller than 0.66, demonstrating the very large scatter of the data around the regression line.

CONCLUSIONS

CrCl determination is very assay-dependent. Although many clinical labs have switched to ID-GC/MS-standardized assays (E and CJ) for the determination of Scr and Ucr to improve analytical accuracy, the increased deviation of the normalized CrCl from the CKD-EPI prediction illustrates that the use of CrCl remains questionable for clinical practice. When a CrCl is requested, we would even recommend clinical labs who work with compensated Jaffe assays not to compensate the Scr-J value.

Calibration and precision of serum creatinine and plasma cystatin C measurement: impact on the estimation of glomerular filtration rate

Serum creatinine (SCr) is the main variable for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Due to inter-assay differences, the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) varies according to the assay used, and calibration standardization is necessary. For SCr, isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) is the gold standard. Systematic differences are observed between Jaffe and enzymatic methods. Manufacturers subtract 0.30 mg/dl from Jaffe results to match enzymatic results ('compensated Jaffe method'). The analytical performance of enzymatic methods is superior to that of Jaffe methods. In the original Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation, SCr was measured by a Jaffe Beckman assay, which was later recalibrated. A limitation of this equation was an underestimation of GFR in the high range. The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) consortium proposed an equation using calibrated and IDMS traceable SCr. The gain in performance was due to improving the bias whereas the precision was comparable. The CKD-EPI equation performs better at high GFR levels (GFR >60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)). Analytical limitations have led to the recommendation to give a grade (>60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) rather than an absolute value with the MDRD equation. By using both enzymatic and calibrated methods, this cutoff-grade could be increased to 90 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (with MDRD) and 120 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (with CKD-EPI). The superiority of the CKD-EPI equation over MDRD is analytical, but the precision gain is limited. IDMS traceable enzymatic methods have been used in the development of the Lund-Malmö (in CKD populations) and Berlin Initiative Study equations (in the elderly). The analytical errors for cystatin C are grossly comparable to issues found with SCr. Standardization is available since 2011. A reference method for cystatin C is still lacking. Equations based on standardized cystatin C or cystatin C and creatinine have been proposed. The better performance of these equations (especially the combined CKD-EPI equation) has been demonstrated.

Evaluation of renal function in patients with cirrhosis: Where are we now?

In the clinical context of the patients with liver cirrhosis, accurate evaluation of the renal function is potentially crucial. Indeed, it can lead to early diagnosis of both acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease and to reliable characterization of the renal status of the patient before performing a liver transplantation. Despite some limitations, the assay of serum creatinine (SCr) is universally used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) because of its wide availability, its simplicity and because it is inexpensive. Nevertheless, several reports show that the value of this assay to estimate GFR is strongly challenged in cirrhotic patients, especially in patients with liver failure and/or severely impaired renal function. This has led to seek new alternatives to estimate more reliably the GFR in these patients. Although the reference methods, based on the utilization of exogenous markers, allow measuring GFR and thereby constitute the “gold standard” to evaluate renal function, they are not feasible in routine clinical practice. Several studies have shown that a cystatin C (CysC) based formula perform better than the SCr-based estimates in cirrhotic patients and the estimation of GFR by these formulas could therefore lead to optimize the management of the patients. A new estimate based on CysC has been recently developed using a large number of patients and the first results regarding the evaluation of its performance are promising, making this new formula the best candidate for a reference estimate of the renal function in cirrhotic patients.

Chronic NSAID use and long-term decline of renal function in a prospective rheumatoid arthritis cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may cause kidney damage. This study assessed the impact of prolonged NSAID exposure on renal function in a large rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patient cohort.

METHODS

Renal function was prospectively followed between 1996 and 2007 in 4101 RA patients with multilevel mixed models for longitudinal data over a mean period of 3.2 years. Among the 2739 'NSAID users' were 1290 patients treated with cyclooxygenase type 2 selective NSAIDs, while 1362 subjects were 'NSAID naive'. Primary outcome was the estimated glomerular filtration rate according to the Cockroft-Gault formula (eGFRCG), and secondary the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula equations and serum creatinine concentrations. In sensitivity analyses, NSAID dosing effects were compared for patients with NSAID registration in ≤/>50%, ≤/>80% or ≤/>90% of assessments.

FINDINGS

In patients with baseline eGFRCG >30 mL/min, eGFRCG evolved without significant differences over time between 'NSAID users' (mean change in eGFRCG -0.87 mL/min/year, 95% CI -1.15 to -0.59) and 'NSAID naive' (-0.67 mL/min/year, 95% CI -1.26 to -0.09, p=0.63). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for significant confounders age, sex, body mass index, arterial hypertension, heart disease and for other insignificant factors, NSAIDs were an independent predictor for accelerated renal function decline only in patients with advanced baseline renal impairment (eGFRCG <30 mL/min). Analyses with secondary outcomes and sensitivity analyses confirmed these results.

CONCLUSIONS

NSAIDs had no negative impact on renal function estimates but in patients with advanced renal impairment.

Enzymatic creatinine assays allow estimation of glomerular filtration rate in stages 1 and 2 chronic kidney disease using CKD-EPI equation

The National Kidney Disease Education Program group demonstrated that MDRD equation is sensitive to creatinine measurement error, particularly at higher glomerular filtration rates. Thus, MDRD-based eGFR above 60 mL/min/1.73 m² should not be reported numerically. However, little is known about the impact of analytical error on CKD-EPI-based estimates. This study aimed at assessing the impact of analytical characteristics (bias and imprecision) of 12 enzymatic and 4 compensated Jaffe previously characterized creatinine assays on MDRD and CKD-EPI eGFR. In a simulation study, the impact of analytical error was assessed on a hospital population of 24084 patients. Ability using each assay to correctly classify patients according to chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages was evaluated. For eGFR between 60 and 90 mL/min/1.73 m², both equations were sensitive to analytical error. Compensated Jaffe assays displayed high bias in this range and led to poorer sensitivity/specificity for classification according to CKD stages than enzymatic assays. As compared to MDRD equation, CKD-EPI equation decreases impact of analytical error in creatinine measurement above 90 mL/min/1.73 m². Compensated Jaffe creatinine assays lead to important errors in eGFR and should be avoided. Accurate enzymatic assays allow estimation of eGFR until 90 mL/min/1.73 m² with MDRD and 120 mL/min/1.73 m² with CKD-EPI equation.

Modification of Diet in Renal Disease versus Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate in obese patients

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a recognized risk factor for both the development and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Accurate estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is thus important in these patients. We tested the performances of two creatinine-based GFR estimates, the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations, in an obese population.

METHODS

Patients with body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m(2) were included. The reference method for measured GFR (mGFR) was (51)Cr-EDTA (single-injection method, two blood samples at 120 and 240 min). Both indexed and non-indexed results were considered. Serum creatinine was measured using the IDMS-traceable compensated Jaffe method. Mean bias (eGFR-mGFR), precision (SD around the bias) and accuracy within 30% (percentage of estimations within 30% of mGFR) were calculated for both equations.

RESULTS

The population included 366 patients (185 women) from two different areas. Mean age was 55 ± 14 years, and mean BMI was 36 ± 7 kg/m(2). Mean mGFR was 56 ± 26 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (71 ± 35 mL/min without indexation). In the total population, mean bias was +1.9 ± 14.3 and +4.6 ± 14.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P < 0.05), and accuracy 30% was 80 and 76% for the MDRD and CKD-EPI equations (P < 0.05), respectively. In patients with mGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), mean bias was +4.6 ± 18.4 and +9.3 ± 17.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P < 0.05), and accuracy 30% was 81 and 79% (NS) for the MDRD and CKD-EPI equations, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The CKD-EPI equation did not outperform the MDRD study equation in this population of obese patients.