Implementation of early prophylaxis for deep-vein thrombosis in intracerebral hemorrhage patients: an observational study from the Chinese Stroke Center Alliance

BACKGROUND

There is substantial evidence to support the use of several methods for preventing deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) following intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). However, the extent to which these measures are implemented in clinical practice and the factors influencing patients' receipt of preventive measures remain unclear. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the rate of the early implementation of DVT prophylaxis and the factors associated with its success in patients with ICH.

METHODS

This study enrolled 49,950 patients with spontaneous ICH from the Chinese Stroke Center Alliance (CSCA) between August 2015 and July 2019. Early DVT prophylaxis implementation was defined as an intervention occurring within 48 h after admission. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the rate and factors associated with the implementation of early prophylaxis for DVT in patients with ICH.

RESULTS

Among the 49,950 ICH patients, the rate of early DVT prophylaxis implementation was 49.9%, the rate of early mobilization implementation was 29.49%, and that of pharmacological prophylaxis was 2.02%. Factors associated with an increased likelihood of early DVT prophylaxis being administered in the multivariable model included receiving early rehabilitation therapy (odds ratio [OR], 2.531); admission to stroke unit (OR 2.231); admission to intensive care unit (OR 1.975); being located in central (OR 1.879) or eastern regions (OR 1.529); having a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 1.292), ischemic stroke (OR 1.245), coronary heart disease or myocardial infarction (OR 1.2); taking antihypertensive drugs (OR 1.136); and having a higher Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (OR 1.045). Conversely, being male (OR 0.936), being hospitalized in tertiary hospitals (OR 0.778), and having a previous intracranial hemorrhage (OR 0.733) were associated with a lower likelihood of early DVT prophylaxis being administered in patients with ICH.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation rate of early DVT prophylaxis among Chinese patients with ICH was subpar, with pharmacological prophylaxis showing the lowest prevalence. Various controllable factors exerted an impact on the implementation of early DVT prophylaxis in this population.

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Review

BACKGROUND

Patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) are at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). The administration of mechanical and pharmacological VTE prophylaxis after sICH is important but challenging. The safety and efficacy of the optimal anticoagulant dose, timing, and type of VTE chemoprophylaxis in cases of sICH are still unclear, and clinicians are concerned that it may lead to cerebral hematoma expansion, which is associated with poor prognosis. Through this literature review, we aim to summarize the latest guidelines, recommendations, and clinical research progress to support evidence-based treatment strategies.

REVIEW SUMMARY

It has been proven that intermittent pneumatic compression can effectively reduce the risk of VTE and should be used at the time of hospital admission, whereas gradient compression stockings or lack of prophylaxis in sICH cases are not recommended by current guidelines. Studies regarding pharmacological VTE prophylaxis in patients with ICH were reviewed and summarized. Prophylactic anticoagulation for VTE in patients with ICH seems to be safe and was not associated with cerebral hematoma expansion. Meanwhile, the prophylactic efficacy of anticoagulation for pulmonary embolism seems to be more obvious than that of deep vein thrombosis in patients with ICH.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should pay attention to the prevention and management of VTE after sICH. Intermittent pneumatic compression should be applied to patients with sICH on the day of hospital admission. After documentation of bleeding cessation, early initiation of pharmacological VTE prophylaxis (24 h to 48 h from sICH onset) seems to be safe and effective in pulmonary embolism prophylaxis.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Thromboprophylaxis with Heparins Following Intracerebral Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

 The efficacy and safety of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains unclear.

METHODS

 A literature search was performed to collect studies comparing the effect of thromboprophylaxis in patients with ICH. The primary endpoints were deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and hematoma expansion or rebleeding. A meta-analytic approach was employed to estimate the relative risk (RR) by fitting fixed-effects (FE) and random-effects (RE) models.

RESULTS

 A total of 28 studies representing 3,697 hospitalized patients with ICH were included. Thromboprophylaxis was initiated within 4 days following hospital presentation and continued for 10 to 14 days in most of studies. Compared with control, thromboprophylaxis was associated with a reduced risk of DVT (47/1,399 [3.4%] vs. 202/1,377 [14.7%]; FE: RR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.18-0.32; RE: RR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.19-0.39) as well as PE (9/953 [0.9%] vs. 37/864 [4.3%]; FE: RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.19-0.57; RE: RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.21-0.66). Thromboprophylaxis was not associated with increased risk of hematoma expansion or rebleeding (32/1,319 [2.4%] vs. 37/1,301 [2.8%]; FE: RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.48-1.18; RE: RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.49-1.30) or mortality (117/925 [12.6%] vs. 139/904 [15.4%]; FE: RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.65-1.03; RE: RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.66-1.04).

CONCLUSION

 Thromboprophylaxis was effective in preventing DVT and PE without increasing the risk of hematoma expansion or bleeding among ICH patients. Future studies should explore the long-term effects of thromboprophylaxis in this population, particularly on the functional outcomes.

Call to Action for Cardiovascular Disease in Women: Epidemiology, Awareness, Access, and Delivery of Equitable Health Care: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association

Addressing the pervasive gaps in knowledge and care delivery to reduce sex-based disparities and achieve equity is fundamental to the American Heart Association's commitment to advancing cardiovascular health for all by 2024. This presidential advisory serves as a call to action for the American Heart Association and other stakeholders around the globe to identify and remove barriers to health care access and quality for women. A concise and current summary of existing data across the areas of risk and prevention, access and delivery of equitable care, and awareness and education provides a framework to consider knowledge gaps and research needs critical toward achieving significant progress for the health and well-being of all women.

Anticoagulation for Thromboprophylaxis in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Less Room for Scepticism

No abstract.

Patients with venous thromboembolism after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a review

Background

Patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) have a higher risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and in-hospital VTE is independently associated with poor outcomes for this patient population.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search about patients with VTE after spontaneous ICH was conducted using databases MEDLINE and PubMed. We searched for the following terms and other related terms (in US and UK spelling) to identify relevant studies: intracerebral hemorrhage, ICH, intraparenchymal hemorrhage, IPH, venous thromboembolism, VTE, deep vein thrombosis, DVT, pulmonary embolism, and PE. The search was restricted to human subjects and limited to articles published in English. Abstracts were screened and data from potentially relevant articles was analyzed.

Results

The prophylaxis and treatment of VTE are of vital importance for patients with spontaneous ICH. Prophylaxis measures can be mainly categorized into mechanical prophylaxis and chemoprophylaxis. Treatment strategies include anticoagulation, vena cava filter, systemic thrombolytic therapy, catheter-based thrombus removal, and surgical embolectomy. We briefly summarized the state of knowledge regarding the prophylaxis measures and treatment strategies of VTE after spontaneous ICH in this review, especially on chemoprophylaxis and anticoagulation therapy. Early mechanical prophylaxis, especially with intermittent pneumatic compression, is recommended by recent guidelines for patients with spontaneous ICH. While decision-making on chemoprophylaxis and anticoagulation therapy evokes debate among clinicians, because of the concern that anticoagulants may increase the risk of recurrent ICH and hematoma expansion. Uncertainty still exists regarding optimal anticoagulants, the timing of initiation, and dosage.

Conclusion

Based on current evidence, we deem that initiating chemoprophylaxis with UFH/LMWH within 24–48 h of ICH onset could be safe; anticoagulation therapy should depend on individual clinical condition; the role of NOACs in this patient population could be promising.

A Nomogram for Predicting Venous Thromboembolism in Critically Ill Patients with Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a nomogram for predicting the risk of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage.

METHODS

Patients ≥18 years old with primary intracerebral hemorrhage were screened within 24 hours of onset from January 2019 to April 2021. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to screen out independent predictors that were significantly associated with venous thromboembolism. A nomogram was constructed based on the results of a multivariate regression analysis. Discrimination and calibration were used to evaluate performance of the nomogram. A decision curve analysis was used to assess its clinical utility.

RESULTS

This study enrolled 369 patients. The nomogram included 3 predictors from the regression analysis: D-dimer, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, and Glasgow Coma Scale score on admission. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.794, indicating good discrimination of the nomogram. The nomogram demonstrated calibration curves with slight deviation from the ideal predictions. Decision curve analysis showed that the prediction nomogram was clinically useful.

CONCLUSIONS

This nomogram comprising D-dimer, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and Glasgow Coma Scale score on admission can accurately predict the risk of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.

[Venous thromboembolic complications in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of various heparin therapy regimens for venous thromboembolic complications in patients with acute cerebral circulatory disorders of the hemorrhagic type.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a prospective single-center study, treatment results of 62 patients with hypertensive brain hematoma were analyzed. All patients were divided into two comparable groups: the group of «very early» prophylactic heparin therapy or the first 48 hours from the moment of the disease (n=35) and the group of «early» prophylactic heparin therapy, or later than 48 hours from the moment of the intracerebral hematoma development (n=27). The end points of the study were: venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism (fatal and non-fatal), recurrent intracerebral hemorrhage, other clinically significant hemorrhagic complications, and intrahospital mortality.

RESULTS

In the group of «very early» and «early» prophylactic heparin therapy, the results were as follows: venous thrombosis 22.9% vs. 29.6% (p=0.36), total rate of PE 2.9% vs. 11.1% (p=0.03), nonfatal PE 0% vs. 7.4% (p=0.007), fatal PE 2.9% vs. 3.7% (p=0.76), recurrent intracerebral hemorrhage and other hemorrhagic complications 0% in both groups, intrahospital mortality was 54.3% versus 48.1% (p=0.54).

CONCLUSION

The earliest administration of direct anticoagulants in prophylactic doses in patients with hemorrhagic stroke leads to the decrease in the frequency of venous thrombosis and thromboembolic complications, without being accompanied by the development of repeated intracranial and other hemorrhagic events.

Venous Thromboembolism in ICU Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Risk Factors and the Prognosis After Anticoagulation Therapy

Purpose

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients in intensive care unit (ICU), but anticoagulation therapy of ICH patients with VTE remains controversial. We aim to explore the risk factors and prognosis of anticoagulation therapy in ICH patients with VTE.

Patients and Methods

Medical records of ICH patients were collected from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III version 1.4) database. The risk factors and prognosis of anticoagulation therapy in ICH patients with VTE were assessed by multivariable logistic regression analysis and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, respectively.

Results

A total of 848 ICH patients were included in our study, of whom 69 ICH patients with VTE were screened, including 58 patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT), 12 patients with pulmonary embolism (PE), and 1 patient with DVT and PE. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, malignancy (odds ratio (OR): 4.262, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.263–8.027, P=0.000), pulmonary circulation disease (OR: 28.717, 95% CI: 9.566–86.208, P=0.000), coagulopathy (OR: 2.453, 95% CI: 1.098–5.483, P=0.029), age > 60 years old (OR: 2.138, 95% CI: 1.087–4.207, P=0.028) and hospitalization time > 16 days (OR: 2.548, 95% CI: 1.381–4.701, P=0.003) were independent risk factors for VTE in ICH patients. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and log-rank test found that, compared to non-anticoagulation group, anticoagulation group had higher cumulative survival rates during hospitalization, 28-day, 3-month, 1-year, and 4-year after admission, respectively.

Conclusion

Malignancy, pulmonary circulation disease, coagulopathy, age >60 years old and hospitalization time >16 days were independent risk factors for VTE in ICH patients, and anticoagulation therapy for VTE in ICH patients may be safe and effective. These findings need to be verified by more high-quality and well-designed randomized controlled trials.

The predictive value of platelet to lymphocyte ratio and D-dimer to fibrinogen ratio combined with WELLS score on lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in young patients with cerebral hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

To study the predictive effect on YCH patients complicated with LEDVT by PLR and DFR combined with WELLS score.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 109 patients with YCH were selected as the research subjects. Patients with combined LEDVT were in the thrombosis group (33 cases), and without LEDVT in the non-thrombosis group (76 cases). Wells score was used to evaluate the vascular of the lower extremities. The PLR and DFR were calculated. The diagnostic value of PLR and DFR combined with the Wells score was evaluated by the AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and other indicators in the ROC.

RESULTS

The values of PLR, DFR, and Wells score in the thrombus group were 149.20 ± 52.17, 118.46 ± 8.37, and 2.67 ± 0.48, and that of the non-thrombotic group were 95.27 ± 29.48, 75.28 ± 10.16, and 0.72 ± 0.34, respectively. The differences were statistically significant. ROC results showed good diagnosis power of PLR (sensitivity 86.35%, specificity 75.18%, AUC 0.702.), DFR (sensitivity 88.57%, specificity 79.21%, AUC 0.786.), and the Wells score (sensitivity 90.17%, specificity 81.06%, AUC 0.889.). The combined application of the Wells score, PLR, and DFR for the occurrence of LEDVT had a sensitivity of 97.65%, a specificity of 92.43%, a missed diagnosis rate of 2.35%, and a misdiagnosis rate of 7.57%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.951, which was higher than using these variables independently.

CONCLUSIONS

PLR and DFR combined with Wells score have high specificity for predicting LEDVT in YCH patients with low missed diagnosis and low misdiagnosis rates. They are worthy of popularization and application.

Anticoagulant management by low-dose of low molecular weight heparin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation following hemorrhagic transformation and complicated with venous thrombosis: Five case reports and literature review

For patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) following hemorrhagic infarction (HI)/hemorrhage transformation (HT) and complicated with venous thrombosis, the management of anticoagulation is controversial. Our study intends to explore the safety and effectiveness of using low-dose of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to treat NVAF patients with HI (or HT) and complicated with venous thrombosis.Between January 2018 and January 2019, NVAF related acute ischemic stroke patients with HT/HI, hospitalized in the department of neurology or rehabilitation in our hospital, are enrolled retrospectively. Among them, those who were found to have venous thrombosis and undergo anticoagulation (LMWH) during the treatment were extracted. We investigate the efficacy and safety in those patients who have been treated with anticoagulant of LMWH.Five cases accepted LMWH within 3 weeks attributed to the appearance of venous thrombosis, and all of them did not display new symptomatic bleeding or recurrent stroke. However, based on the results of a head computed tomography scan, there were 2 cases of slightly increased intracranial hemorrhage, and then we reduced the dose of anticoagulant. In addition, color ultrasound showed that venous thrombosis disappeared or became stable.Patients with NVAF following HI/HT have a higher risk of thromboembolism. Early acceptance of low-dose LMWH as an anticoagulant is relatively safe and may gain benefit. However, in the process of anticoagulant therapy, we should follow-up head computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging frequently, as well as D-dimer values, limb vascular ultrasound. Besides, the changes of symptoms and signs should be focused to judge the symptomatic bleeding or recurrent stroke. Furthermore, it is better to adjust anticoagulant drug dosage according to specific conditions.

Ultra-Early Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage (sICH)

OBJECTIVE

To determine if ultra-early (<24 h) venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis was associated with hematoma growth in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).

BACKGROUND

Patients with ICH have a high risk of VTE. Pharmacological prophylaxis such as unfractionated heparin (UFH) have been demonstrated to reduce VTE. However, published datasets exclude patients with recent ICH out of concern for hematoma enlargement. American Heart/Stroke Association guidelines recommend UFH 1-4 days after hematoma stabilization while the European Stroke Organization has no recommendations on when to begin UFH. Our institutional practice is to obtain stability CT scans at 6 to 24 h and to begin UFH following documented clinical and radiologic stability. We examined the impact of this practice on hematoma expansion.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive ICH patients treated at a single tertiary academic referral center in the US. Demographic and clinical characteristics were abstracted. ICH volume was measured via 3D volumetrics for a CT head done on admission, follow-up stability, and prior to discharge. The primary outcome was analyzed as ≥3 mL hematoma enlargement. Secondary outcomes include hematoma expansion of ≥6mL and ≥ 33%, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 163 ICH patients were analyzed. There were 58 (35.6%) patients in the ultra-early UFH group and UFH was initiated on average at 13.8 h from initial scan. There were 105 (64.6%) patients in the standard group who initiated UFH at an average of 46.6 h. The primary outcome of hematoma enlargement ≥3 mL was observed in 2/58(3.4%) patients with ultra-early initiation of UFH and in 7/105(6.7%) in the standard group (p=0.49). Secondary outcomes were not significant including hematoma expansion in the ultra-early group ≥ 6 mL 3/58 (5.2%) and ≥33% 7/58 (12.1%) (p=0.91, 0.61, respectively) as well as mortality or LOS.

CONCLUSION

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis started ultra-early (≤24 h) after ICH was not associated with hematoma expansion.

PREvention of VENous Thromboembolism in Hemorrhagic Stroke Patients - PREVENTIHS Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial and a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

In this randomized trial, currently utilized standard treatments were compared with enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).

METHODS

Enoxaparin (0.4 mg daily for 10 days) was started after 72 h from the onset of ICH. The primary outcome was symptomatic or asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis as assessed by ultrasound at the end of study treatment. The safety of enoxaparin was also assessed. We included the results of this study in a meta-analysis of all relevant studies comparing anticoagulants with standard treatments or placebo.

RESULTS

PREVENTIHS was prematurely stopped after the randomization of 73 patients, due to the low recruitment rate. The prevalence of any VTE at 10 days was 15.8% in the enoxaparin group and 20.0% in the control group (RR 0.79 [95% CI 0.29-2.12]); 2.6% of enoxaparin and 8.6% of standard therapy patients had severe bleedings (RR 0.31 [95% CI 0.03-2.82]). When these results were meta-analyzed with the results of the selected studies (4,609 patients; 194 from randomized trials), anticoagulants were associated with a nonsignificant reduction in any VTE (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.43-1.51), in pulmonary embolism (OR 0.53; 95% CI, 0.17-1.60), and in mortality (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.64-1.12) without increase in hematoma enlargement (OR 0.97; 95% CI, 0.31-3.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute ICH, the use of anticoagulants to prevent VTE was safe but the overall level of evidence was low due to the low number of patients included in randomized clinical trials.

Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage, 7th Edition Update 2020

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage is a particularly devastating type of stroke with greater morbidity and mortality compared with ischemic stroke and can account for half or more of all deaths from stroke. The seventh update of the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations includes a new stand-alone module on intracerebral hemorrhage, with a focus on elements of care that are unique or affect persons disproportionately relative to ischemic stroke. Prior to this edition, intracerebral hemorrhage was included in the Acute Stroke Management module and was limited to its management during the first 12 h. With the growing evidence on intracerebral hemorrhage, a separate module focused on this topic across the care continuum was added. In addition to topics related to initial clinical management, neuroimaging, blood pressure management, and surgical management, new sections have been introduced addressing topics surrounding inpatient complications such as venous thromboembolism, seizure management, and increased intracranial pressure, rehabilitation as well as issues related to secondary management including lifestyle management, maintaining a normal blood pressure and antithrombotic therapy, are addressed. The Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations (CSBPR) are intended to provide up-to-date evidence-based guidelines for the prevention and management of stroke and to promote optimal recovery and reintegration for people who have experienced stroke, including patients, families, and informal caregivers.

Venous thromboembolism prevention in intracerebral hemorrhage: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

To summarize and compare the effectiveness of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis to pneumatic compression devices (PCD) for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage.

METHODS

MEDLINE, PUBMED, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were systematically searched to identify randomized and non-randomized studies that compared each intervention directly to each other or against a common control (hydration, anti-platelet agents, stockings) in adults with acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Two investigators independently screened the studies, extracted data, and appraised risk of bias. Studies with a high risk of bias were excluded from our final analysis. The primary outcome was the occurrence of venous thromboembolism (proximal deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) in the first 30 days.

RESULTS

8,739 articles were screened; four articles, all randomized control trials, met eligibility criteria. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to calculate risk estimates using both fixed and random effects analyses. 607 patients were included in the network analysis. PCD were associated with a significant decrease in venous thromboembolism compared to control (OR: 0.43, 95% Credible Limits [CrI]: 0.23-0.80). We did not find evidence of statistically significant differences between pharmacological thromboprophylaxis and control (OR: 0.93, 95% CrI: 0.19-4.37) or between PCD and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (OR: 0.47, 95% CrI: 0.09-2.54).

CONCLUSION

PCDs are superior to control interventions, but meaningful comparisons with pharmacotherapy are not possible due to a lack of data. This requires further exploration via large pragmatic clinical trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42018090960.

Protocolized use of Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypassing Activity (FEIBA) for the reversal of warfarin induced coagulopathy

INTRODUCTION

Coagulopathy due to warfarin in patients with major bleeding was traditionally reversed with fresh frozen plasma and intravenous (IV) vitamin K, but prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) are increasingly used in the treatment of these patients. Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypassing Activity (FEIBA) is an activated four-factor PCC most commonly used in patients with hemophilia. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FEIBA and IV vitamin K for the reversal of warfarin-associated coagulopathy in patients with major bleeding, by measuring the percentage of patients who achieved target INR ≤ 1.5 and the incidence of thrombotic adverse events (TAE).

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, we enrolled patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with warfarin associated coagulopathy (INR > 1.5) and major bleeding. Patients received FEIBA using an INR based dosing strategy and IV vitamin K.

RESULTS

In 43 patients, median initial INR was 4.0 (2.7, 7.3 interquartile range (IQR)). Median time to result the second INR was 45 min (38, 55 IQR) and the median INR was 1.4 (1.3, 1.6 IQR). Out of the 43 patients, 93% achieved the target INR of ≤1.5. In-hospital mortality was 40% (17 patients). There were 11 TAEs in 6 patients (14%); 4 events in 2 patients (5%) were attributed to FEIBA.

CONCLUSION

A protocolized use of FEIBA and IV vitamin K resulted in the efficacious reversal of warfarin-induced coagulopathy in patients with major bleeding. TAEs occurred in 14% of patients and were attributed to FEIBA in 5% of patients.

Comparing pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis to intermittent pneumatic compression in acute intracerebral haemorrhage: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Patients with an intracerebral haemorrhage are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism. Pharmacotherapy and pneumatic compression devices are capable of preventing venous thromboembolism, however both interventions have limitations. There are no head-to-head comparisons between these two interventions. To address this knowledge gap, we plan to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to examine the comparative effectiveness of pharmacological prophylaxis and mechanical compression devices in the context of intracerebral haemorrhage.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

MEDLINE, PUBMED, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Internet Stroke Trials Registry will be searched with assistance from an experienced information specialist. Eligible studies will include those that have enrolled adults presenting with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage and compared one or more of the respective interventions against each other and/or a control. Primary outcomes to be assessed are occurrence of new venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism) and haematoma expansion, defined as a significant enlargement of baseline haemorrhage or new haemorrhage occurrence. Both randomised and non-randomised comparative studies will be included. Data on participant characteristics, study design, intervention details and outcomes will be extracted. Study quality will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the Robins-I tool. Bayesian network meta-analyses will be performed to compare interventions based on all available direct and indirect evidence. If the transitivity assumption for network meta-analysis cannot be met, we will perform a qualitative assessment.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Formal ethics is not required as primary data will not be collected. The findings of this study will be disseminated through conference presentations, and peer-reviewed publications. In an area of clinical practice where equipoise exists, the findings of this study may assist in determining which treatment intervention is most effective in venous thromboembolism prevention.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018090960.