Reactivation of Hepatitis B Virus With Immune-Escape Mutations After Ocrelizumab Treatment for Multiple Sclerosis

Real-world effectiveness, safety and immunogenicity of ocrelizumab in turkish multiple sclerosis patients: a single-center experience for 4-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate postmarketing ocrelizumab safety and effectiveness in a real-world population with multiple sclerosis (MS) and matching these parameters among MS disease types.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center study with MS patients treated with ocrelizumab. Demographic, clinical characteristics and immunological data were analyzed, including annualized relapse rate (ARR), relapse-free rate, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), complete blood count parameters, immunoglobulin (Ig) levels, liver function tests (LFT), hepatitis markers and adverse events in the 4-year follow-up. A total of 96 patients, 22 with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), 54 with secondary progressive MS (SPMS), and 20 with primary progressive MS (PPMS) who were treated with at least two doses of ocrelizumab between January 2018 and September 2023 were included in the study.

RESULTS

Sixty-five (68%) were women and 31 (32%) were men. The mean age was 48.4 ± 11.1 years (20-70 years). Ninety-three patients were evaluated in the first year, 65 in the second year, 39 in the third year and 24 in the fourth year of treatment. 96% of patients were relapse-free rate in the first year, 91% in the second year, 85% in the third year and 75% in the fourth year. Eighty-six percent of patients were progression free in the 1st year of treatment, 71% in the 2nd year, in 64% in the 3rd year, and in 62% in the 4th year. During the follow-up of the cases, EDSS remained stable in 77% of RRMS patients, improved in 14%, and worsened in 9%; while EDSS remained stable in 65% of SPMS patients with attacks, it improved in 9% and worsened in 26%; while EDSS remained stable in 60% of PPMS patients, worsening was observed in 40%. There is a significant decrease in IgM and IgG values during the follow-up of ocrelizumab therapy (p < 0.001, p = 0.014). There is no significant difference in IgA, lymphocyte and neutrophil values (p = 0.713, p = 0.086, p = 0.999). No significant relationship was found between low serum IgM levels and the risk of developing infection (p > 0.05). Liver function tests was found to be within normal limits in 94% of the patients over a 4-year period. No hepatitis B, C or A infection, hepatitis B reactivation, tuberculosis, HIV infection, malignancy or drug related death occurred during 4-years follow-up. The most common side effect during ocrelizumab treatment is urinary tract infection (29%); others were upper respiratory tract infections (13%), numbness/tingling of the face, trunk, or extremities (8%), insomnia (6%), headache (5%), and soft tissue infections (cellulitis and dental abscess, 2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that ocrelizumab reduces the frequency of attacks and prevent the disease progression in RRMS patients, and reducing the disease progression by primarily stabilizing EDSS scores in SPMS with attacks and PPMS. It is thought that the relatively high rates of urinary tract infection detected in this study may be related with advanced stage of the disease. The absence of hepatitis B reactivation, chronic infection or malignancy in the 4-year follow-up of our cases supports the long-term safety of ocrelizumab treatment. Ocrelizumab may be preferred as an effective and reliable treatment of different types of MS due to non-serious side effects.

Genetic variations and gene expression profiles of Rice Black-streaked dwarf virus (RBSDV) in different host plants and insect vectors: insights from RNA-Seq analysis

Rice black-streaked dwarf virus (RBSDV) is an etiological agent of a destructive disease infecting some economically important crops from the Gramineae family in Asia. While RBSDV causes high yield losses, genetic characteristics of replicative viral populations have not been investigated within different host plants and insect vectors. Herein, eleven publicly available RNA-Seq datasets from Chinese RBSDV-infected rice, maize, and viruliferous planthopper (Laodelphax striatellus) were obtained from the NCBI database. The patterns of SNP and RNA expression profiles of expected RBSDV populations were analyzed by CLC Workbench 20 and Geneious Prime software. These analyses discovered 2,646 mutations with codon changes in RBSDV whole transcriptome and forty-seven co-mutated hotspots with high variant frequency within the crucial regions of S5-1, S5-2, S6, S7-1, S7-2, S9, and S10 open reading frames (ORFs) which are responsible for some virulence and host range functions. Moreover, three joint mutations are located on the three-dimensional protein of P9-1. The infected RBSDV-susceptible rice cultivar KTWYJ3 and indigenous planthopper datasets showed more co-mutated hotspot numbers than others. Our analyses showed the expression patterns of viral genomic fragments varied depending on the host type. Unlike planthopper, S5-1, S2, S6, and S9-1 ORFs, respectively had the greatest read numbers in host plants; and S5-2, S9-2, and S7-2 were expressed in the lowest level. These findings underscore virus/host complexes are effective in the genetic variations and gene expression profiles of plant viruses. Our analysis revealed no evidence of recombination events. Interestingly, the negative selection was observed at 12 RBSDV ORFs, except for position 1015 in the P1 protein, where a positive selection was detected. The research highlights the potential of SRA datasets for analysis of the virus cycle and enhances our understanding of RBSDV's genetic diversity and host specificity.

Ocrelizumab-induced organizing pneumonia in multiple sclerosis: case report and literature review

Patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis should be offered disease-modifying therapies as part of their management. Recommended options include integrin antagonist therapy including natalizumab as well as anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies like, ocrelizumab, rituximab, ofatumumab, and ublituximab. These therapies reduce relapse rates and slow brain lesion accumulation. Disease-modifying therapies selection may depend on patient preferences, potential fetal harm, and specific drug risks, requiring continuous monitoring via tracking clinical relapses and new MRI brain lesions. Natalizumab carries a risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, particularly in anti-JCV antibody-positive patients, necessitating regular monitoring. Ocrelizumab, rituximab, and ublituximab are associated with an increased risk of infections (especially respiratory and skin infections), infusion reactions, and hypogammaglobulinemia. Ocrelizumab additionally poses a heightened risk of immune-mediated colitis and breast cancer, and it is contraindicated for patients with active hepatitis B due to the risk of viral reactivation. Ublituximab has been noted to be linked to potential fetal harm. We report the case of a 42-year-old male with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis on ocrelizumab who developed persistent fever and shortness of breath, two weeks after his last ocrelizumab dose. Despite antibiotic treatment for suspected pneumonia, his symptoms persisted. A chest CT scan revealed multifocal ground-glass opacities suggestive of organizing pneumonia, likely secondary to ocrelizumab. The patient's condition improved with high-dose corticosteroids, underscoring the importance of vigilance for extremely rare ocrelizumab-associated pulmonary side effects and the need for prompt, appropriate intervention.

Risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation in people with multiple sclerosis treated with ocrelizumab: an observational study from Turkey

BACKGROUND

The risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation remains unclear in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving ocrelizumab. We aimed to assess HBV seroprevalence and reactivation risk in MS patients on ocrelizumab and to evaluate the effectiveness of antiviral prophylaxis against HBV reactivation.

METHODS

In this single-center, cross-sectional study, 400 people with MS receiving ocrelizumab were screened for HBV at baseline and antiviral prophylaxis was implemented based on serological results. Patients were monitored for HBV reactivation, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 56 (14%) patients who had serology compatible with occult or resolved HBV infection, 49 (85.7%) received antiviral prophylaxis regularly and had no HBV reactivation during the follow-up. Reactivation of HBV occurred in 2 out of 7 (28.6%) patients who did not receive antiviral prophylaxis and in one patient who did not adhere to the prophylaxis regimen. All patients with reactivation had anti-HBs levels below 100 mIU/mL and the median titer was significantly lower than the patients with no HBV reactivation (p = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights a 14% anti-HBc positivity, indicating a potential risk for HBV reactivation in people with MS receiving ocrelizumab. This suggests the importance of vigilant monitoring and the implementation of prophylactic measures. Our recommendation emphasizes antiviral prophylaxis, particularly for patients with low anti-HBs, and a pre-emptive strategy for others.

Key characteristics of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies and clinical implications for multiple sclerosis treatment

The recent success of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapies in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) has highlighted the role of B cells in the pathogenesis of MS. In people with MS, the inflammatory characteristics of B-cell activity are elevated, leading to increased pro-inflammatory cytokine release, diminished anti-inflammatory cytokine production and an accumulation of pathogenic B cells in the cerebrospinal fluid. Rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, ublituximab and BCD-132 are anti-CD20 therapies that are either undergoing clinical development, or have been approved, for the treatment of MS. Despite CD20 being a common target for these therapies, differences have been reported in their mechanistic, pharmacological and clinical characteristics, which may have substantial clinical implications. This narrative review explores key characteristics of these therapies. By using clinical trial data and real-world evidence, we discuss their mechanisms of action, routes of administration, efficacy (in relation to B-cell kinetics), safety, tolerability and convenience of use. Clinicians, alongside patients and their families, should consider the aspects discussed in this review as part of shared decision-making discussions to improve outcomes and health-related quality of life for people living with MS.

Histologic manifestations of ocrelizumab-associated intestinal and hepatic injury in patients with multiple sclerosis

AIMS

Ocrelizumab is a humanized anti-CD20-monoclonal antibody that has recently been approved for the treatment of certain types of multiple sclerosis. Isolated case reports of ocrelizumab-associated colitis have been reported in the literature. We present a case series of ocrelizumab-associated intestinal injury with a focus on histopathologic features and report a case of ocrelizumab-associated hepatitis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective computerized search was conducted from 03/2017 to 08/2022, which identified six patients with suspected or clinically confirmed ocrelizumab-associated intestinal injury and one patient with hepatic injury. Pertinent clinical, endoscopic, and histopathologic findings were reviewed and recorded. Seven patients (six female, one male) were identified with ages ranging from 24 to 68 years. The presenting symptoms included diarrhoea (n = 5), abdominal pain (n = 3), hematochezia (n = 2), and vomiting (n = 1), nausea (n = 1) fever (n = 1), and weight loss (n = 1). Endoscopic findings ranged from normal (n = 1) to patchy colonic inflammation with or without ulceration (n = 4) and decreased mucosal vascular pattern in the rectum (n = 1). Crohn's disease was clinically suspected in two patients and ulcerative colitis in one patient. None of the patients had a prior confirmed diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. Histologic patterns of initial colonic injury included acute colitis/proctitis (n = 5), and chronic active colitis (n = 1). Follow-up ranged from 1 to 3 years and 10 months. All patients were alive at follow-up. Follow-up biopsies were available for four patients and findings included focal acute colitis (n = 1), apoptotic colopathy (n = 1) lymphocytic colitis (n = 1), and normal mucosa (n = 1). Four patients were treated with steroids and ocrelizumab was discontinued in three patients. Two patients were symptomatically managed with subsequent resolution of symptoms. The liver biopsy from the patient with a marked hepatic pattern of liver enzyme elevation showed an acute hepatitis pattern of injury with prominent centrilobular necrosis, which resolved upon discontinuation of the drug and treatment with steroids and azathioprine.

CONCLUSIONS

The histologic manifestations of ocrelizumab-associated intestinal injury are variable and can mimic inflammatory bowel disease. Hepatic injury can rarely manifest as an acute hepatitis pattern of injury with necrosis. Identifying ocrelizumab-associated injury is paramount in determining management, which often includes discontinuation of ocrelizumab therapy, and/or administration of immunosuppressive therapy.

Overview of the immunological mechanisms in hepatitis B virus reactivation: Implications for disease progression and management strategies

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a clinically significant challenge in disease management. This review explores the immunological mechanisms underlying HBV reactivation, emphasizing disease progression and management. It delves into host immune responses and reactivation's delicate balance, spanning innate and adaptive immunity. Viral factors' disruption of this balance, as are interactions between viral antigens, immune cells, cytokine networks, and immune checkpoint pathways, are examined. Notably, the roles of T cells, natural killer cells, and antigen-presenting cells are discussed, highlighting their influence on disease progression. HBV reactivation's impact on disease severity, hepatic flares, liver fibrosis progression, and hepatocellular carcinoma is detailed. Management strategies, including anti-viral and immunomodulatory approaches, are critically analyzed. The role of prophylactic anti-viral therapy during immunosuppressive treatments is explored alongside novel immunotherapeutic interventions to restore immune control and prevent reactivation. In conclusion, this comprehensive review furnishes a holistic view of the immunological mechanisms that propel HBV reactivation. With a dedicated focus on understanding its implications for disease progression and the prospects of efficient management strategies, this article contributes significantly to the knowledge base. The more profound insights into the intricate interactions between viral elements and the immune system will inform evidence-based approaches, ultimately enhancing disease management and elevating patient outcomes. The dynamic landscape of management strategies is critically scrutinized, spanning anti-viral and immunomodulatory approaches. The role of prophylactic anti-viral therapy in preventing reactivation during immunosuppressive treatments and the potential of innovative immunotherapeutic interventions to restore immune control and proactively deter reactivation.

Advances in Multiple Sclerosis Neurotherapeutics, Neuroprotection, and Risk Mitigation Strategies

The treatment of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) has advanced tremendously over the past few decades. More efficacious therapies have been approved, which can significantly reduce the inflammatory process of relapsing MS. Neuroprotection by controlling this pathophysiology is important given our current limitations to control progressive MS and induce neurorepair. Here, the authors discuss the current landscape of neurotherapeutics for relapsing MS focusing on newer disease-modifying treatments and their use. Risk mitigation of these medications can greatly improve their safety and improve their benefit-risk balance. The authors discuss treatment strategies for risk mitigation including treatment discontinuation and de-escalation.

Cladribine tablets in people with relapsing multiple sclerosis: A real-world multicentric study from southeast European MS centers

BACKGROUND

Cladribine is an oral disease-modifying drug authorized by the European Medicine Agency for the treatment of highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS).

OBJECTIVES

To provide real-world evidence of cladribine's effectiveness and safety in people with MS (pwMS).

METHODS

A retrospective observational multi-center, multi-national study of pwMS who were started on cladribine tablets in ten centers from five European countries.

RESULTS

We identified 320 pwMS treated with cladribine tablets. The most common comorbidities were arterial hypertension and depression. Three patients had resolved hepatitis B infection, while eight had positive Quantiferon test prior to cladribine commencement. There were six pwMS who had malignant diseases, but all were non-active. During year 1, 91.6% pwMS did not have EDSS worsening, 86.9% were relapse-free and 72.9% did not have MRI activity. During the second year, 90.2% did not experience EDSS worsening, 86.5% were relapse-free and 75.5% did not have MRI activity. NEDA-3 was present in 58.0% pwMS in year 1 and in 54.2% in year 2. In a multivariable logistic regression model age positively predicted NEDA-3 in year 1. The most common adverse events were infections and skin-related adverse events. Lymphopenia was noted in 54.7% of pwMS at month 2 and in 35.0% at month 6. Two pwMS had a newly discovered malignant disease, one breast cancer, and one melanoma, during the first year of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our real-world data on the effectiveness and safety of cladribine tablets are comparable to the pivotal study and other real-world data with no new safety signals.

Efficacy of Accelerated Vaccination against Hbv to Achieve Antibody formation in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Receiving Anti-Cd20 Therapy

Aim

Ocrelizumab is a monoclonal antibody that has been approved for use in both relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). Since ocrelizumab acts on B cells, it also affects humoral immunity, thus reducing the vaccine response. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the relationship between the antibody response following rapid vaccination against hepatitis B virus (HBV) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients receiving ocrelizumab treatment, and the time of vaccination.

Materials and Methods

A total of 220 MS patients were included in this retrospective analysis. The patients' baseline HBV serostatuses (HbsAg, Anti-HbsAb, Anti-HbcAb), previous drug history for MS, whether they were vaccinated against HBV in the past, vaccination status before or after ocrelizumab treatment, and protective antibody titers according to vaccination times, occult HBV incidence and initiation of antiviral treatment were evaluated.

Results

Forty-nine percent of MS patients using ocrelizumab were not vaccinated against HBV. The patients were divided into three groups according to their vaccination status as: individuals vaccinated in the past (7.3%, n = 16), vaccinated before treatment (4.5%, n = 10), and vaccinated after treatment (22.3%, n = 49). The antibody titers of the patients in the 6th month after ocrelizumab treatment were measured as 78 mIU/ml, 193 mIU/ml, and 0, respectively. The number of patients with occult HBV infection was 38.

Conclusion

In patients with a suspected diagnosis of MS, HBV serostatus should be evaluated at the beginning and if necessary, patients should be vaccinated in the early period. Vaccinating patients at least 1 month before initiating multiple sclerosis treatment is more effective in terms of protective antibody formation.

Latin American consensus recommendations on the risk of infections in people with multiple sclerosis treated with disease modifying drugs

INTRODUCTION

The emergence of several therapeutic options in multiple sclerosis (MS), which significantly modify the immune system functioning, has led to the need for the consideration of additional factors, such as risk of infections, in the decision-making process. The aim of these consensus recommendations was to discuss and perform a practical guide to Latin American neurologists on the risk of infections at diagnosis, follow-up and prior to initiation of DMDs.

METHODS

A panel of Latin American neurologists, experts in demyelinating diseases and dedicated to management and care of MS patients, gathered during 2021 and 2022 to make consensus recommendations on the risk of infections in PwMS treated with DMDs in Latin America. The RAND/UCLA methodology was developed to synthesize the scientific evidence and expert opinions on health care topics and was used for reaching a formal agreement.

RESULTS

Recommendations were established based on relevant published evidence and expert opinion, focusing on: 1- baseline infection disease and vaccination status; 2- opportunistic infections; 3- progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; 4- genitourinary system infections; 5- respiratory tract infections; 6- digestive system infections, 7-others local infections and 8- COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

The recommendations of this consensus seek to optimize the care, management and treatment of PwMS in Latin America. The standardized evidence-based care of pwMS infections will allow better outcomes.

Evaluation of BAFF, APRIL and CD40L in Ocrelizumab-Treated pwMS and Infectious Risk

BACKGROUND

The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody ocrelizumab has been widely employed in the treatment of people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). However, its B-cell-depleting effect may induce a higher risk of infectious events and alterations in the secretion of B-cell-activating factors, such as BAFF, APRIL and CD40L.

METHODS

The aim of this study was to investigate plasma BAFF, APRIL and CD40L levels and their relationship with infectious risk in ocrelizumab-treated pwMS at baseline (T0), at 6 months (T6) and at 12 months (T12) after starting the treatment. As a control group, healthy donors (HD) were enrolled too.

RESULTS

A total of 38 pwMS and 26 HD were enrolled. At baseline, pwMS showed higher plasma BAFF (p < 0.0001), APRIL (p = 0.0223) and CD40L (p < 0.0001) levels compared to HD. Compared to T0, plasma BAFF levels were significantly increased at both T6 and T12 (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Whereas plasma APRIL and CD40L levels were decreased at T12 (p = 0.0003 and p < 0.0001, respectively). When stratifying pwMS according to the development of an infectious event during the 12-month follow-up period in two groups-with (14) and without an infectious event (24)-higher plasma BAFF levels were observed at all time-points; significantly, in the group with an infectious event compared to the group without an infectious event (T0: p < 0.0001, T6: p = 0.0056 and T12: p = 0.0400). Conclusions: BAFF may have a role as a marker of immune dysfunction and of infectious risk.

Hepatotoxicity of Drugs Used in Multiple Sclerosis, Diagnostic Challenge, and the Role of HLA Genotype Susceptibility

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating disease of the central nervous system and the association with other autoimmune diseases is well-documented. There are many therapeutic options for the treatment of MS. Most of the available drugs cause drug-induced liver injury (DILI) to variable extents with heterogeneous clinical and biological manifestations, including liver injury with or without signs of hypersensitivity and autoimmunity. The diagnosis of DILI may be particularly difficult because MS is frequently associated with idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis. Recent advances suggest that MS and immune-mediated DILI could be promoted by genetic factors, including HLA genotype. In addition, some of these drugs may promote hepatitis B virus reactivation. This review explores the potential hepatotoxicity of drugs used to treat MS and the criteria to distinguish DILI from idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis associated with MS. The role of susceptible genes both promoting MS and causing the hepatotoxicity of the drug used for MS treatment is also discussed.

OCRELIZUMAB THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ANTI-HBC ANTIBODIES - A PRELIMINARY STUDY

OBJECTIVE

Aim: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory neurodegenerative disease resulting in cognitive impairment, physical disabilities, and neurological symptoms. Ocrelizumab is an effective drug used in MS treatment. However, it causes a risk of hepatitis B reactivation in anti-HBc positive patients. We describe the impact of entecavir and tenofovir on HBV reactivation during treatment with ocrelizumab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and methods: Our study included eight patients (aged 18-70 years) with positive anti-HBc antibodies who were diagnosed with MS based on the 2017 McDonald criteria. The subjects were treated with ocrelizumab and were given anti-HBV prophylaxis with nucleoside analogs. The mean time from the beginning of therapy with nucleoside analogs to the initiation of ocrelizumab treatment was 27.5 days. Patients were administered ocrelizumab and none of them was diagnosed with HBV reactivation.

RESULTS

Results: None of the laboratory parameters worsened. No severe adverse effects were observed. These results suggest that entecavir and tenofovir are effective in HBV reactivation prophylaxis. Additionally, positive anti-HBc antibodies do not rule out treatment with ocrelizumab.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: In patients with positive anti-HBc antibodies, nucleoside analogs, such as entecavir or tenofovir, should be administered before ocrelizumab administration to reduce the risk of viral reactivation. Further studies on simultaneous treatment with ocrelizumab and nucleoside analogs are required to confirm our findings.

Multiple sclerosis-disease modifying therapies affect humoral and T-cell response to mRNA COVID-19 vaccine

Background

The mRNA vaccines help protect from COVID-19 severity, however multiple sclerosis (MS) disease modifying therapies (DMTs) might affect the development of humoral and T-cell specific response to vaccination.

Methods

The aim of the study was to evaluate humoral and specific T-cell response, as well as B-cell activation and survival factors, in people with MS (pwMS) under DMTs before (T0) and after two months (T1) from the third dose of vaccine, comparing the obtained findings to healthy donors (HD). All possible combinations of intracellular IFNγ, IL2 and TNFα T-cell production were evaluated, and T-cells were labelled "responding T-cells", those cells that produced at least one of the three cytokines of interest, and "triple positive T-cells", those cells that produced simultaneously all the three cytokines.

Results

The cross-sectional evaluation showed no significant differences in anti-S antibody titers between pwMS and HD at both time-points. In pwMS, lower percentages of responding T-cells at T0 (CD4: p=0.0165; CD8: p=0.0022) and triple positive T-cells at both time-points compared to HD were observed (at T0, CD4: p=0.0007 and CD8: p=0.0703; at T1, CD4: p=0.0422 and CD8: p=0.0535). At T0, pwMS showed higher plasma levels of APRIL, BAFF and CD40L compared to HD (p<0.0001, p<0.0001 and p<0.0001, respectively) and at T1, plasma levels of BAFF were still higher in pwMS compared to HD (p=0.0022).According to DMTs, at both T0 and T1, lower anti-S antibody titers in the depleting/sequestering-out compared to the enriching-in pwMS subgroup were found (p=0.0410 and p=0.0047, respectively) as well as lower percentages of responding CD4+ T-cells (CD4: p=0.0394 and p=0.0004, respectively). Moreover, the depleting/sequestering-out subgroup showed higher percentages of IFNγ-IL2-TNFα+ T-cells at both time-points, compared to the enriching-in subgroup in which a more heterogeneous cytokine profile was observed (at T0 CD4: p=0.0187; at T0 and T1 CD8: p =0.0007 and p =0.0077, respectively).

Conclusion

In pwMS, humoral and T-cell response to vaccination seems to be influenced by the different DMTs. pwMS under depleting/sequestering-out treatment can mount cellular responses even in the presence of a low positive humoral response, although the cellular response seems qualitatively inferior compared to HD. An understanding of T-cell quality dynamic is needed to determine the best vaccination strategy and in general the capability of immune response in pwMS under different DMT.

Reducing infection risk in multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: a Brazilian reference center's approach

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are the most common autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). They present chronic relapsing courses that demand treatment with disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) to prevent inflammatory activity. Disease-modifying drugs lead to immunomodulation or immunosuppression through diverse mechanisms (e.g., shifting lymphocyte and cytokine profile, suppressing specific lymphocyte subpopulations). Thus, patients are more prone to infectious complications and associated worsening of disease.

OBJECTIVE

To present feasible strategies for mitigating the infection risk of MS and NMOSD treated patients.

METHODS

Targeted literature review concerning the management of infection risk with an emphasis on vaccination, therapy-specific measures, and particularities of the Brazilian endemic infectious diseases' scenario.

CONCLUSION

We propose a vaccination schedule, infectious screening routine, and prophylactic measures based on the current scientific evidence. Awareness of emergent tropical diseases is necessary due to evidence of demyelinating events and possible parainfectious cases of MS and NMOSD.

Hepatitis B virus infection reactivation in patients under immunosuppressive therapies: Pathogenesis, screening, prevention and treatment

With a 5.3% of the global population involved, hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a major public health challenge requiring an urgent response. After a possible acute phase, the natural history of HBV infection can progress in chronicity. Patients with overt or occult HBV infection can undergo HBV reactivation (HBVr) in course of immunosuppressive treatments that, apart from oncological and hem-atological diseases, are also used in rheumatologic, gastrointestinal, neurological and dermatological settings, as well as to treat severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. The risk of HBV reactivation is related to the immune status of the patient and the baseline HBV infection condition. The aim of the present paper is to investigate the risk of HBVr in those not oncological settings in order to suggest strategies for preventing and treating this occurrence. The main studies about HBVr for patients with occult hepatitis B infection and chronic HBV infection affected by non-oncologic diseases eligible for immunosuppressive treatment have been analyzed. The occurrence of this challenging event can be reduced screening the population eligible for immunosuppressant to assess the best strategies according to any virological status. Further prospective studies are needed to increase data on the risk of HBVr related to newer immunomodulant agents employed in non-oncological setting.

OCRELİZUMAB KULLANAN MULTİPL SKLEROZ HASTALARINDA HEPATİT B VİRÜSÜ SEROLOJİK DURUMU

IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS USING OCRELIZUMAB SEROLOGICAL STATUS OF HEPATITIS B VIRUS Abstract Objective B-cell depleting treatments are associated with potential risks of viral infections. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the most common chronic viral infection and it is estimated that 30% of the world population has serological evidence of current or past infection Material end methods Our study is a single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of MS patients receiving ocrelizumab. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), drug history before ocrelizumab for MS; Mean ocrelizumab intake times, smoking status, hepatitis C virus, HIV serological status, HBV serological status, HBV treatment status were recorded. Results The study included 64 MS patients treated with ocrelizumab. The mean age was 41.6±9.8 years (min-max: 21-62 years). 75% of the cases were female (n:48), 25% were male (n:16). HIV and hepatitis C virus serological tests were negative in all cases. HBsAg was found to be positive in 1.6% (n:1) and Anti-HBcIgG in 12.5% (n:8). The number of patients who were started on hepatitis B treatment was 12.5% (n:8), and tenofovir disoproxil was started in 2 patients (25%), entecavir in 5 patients (62.5%), and tenofovir alafenamide in 1 patient (12.5). The mean duration of taking ocrelizumab for the patients was 28.5±13.1 months (min-max: 6-46 months). Conclusion In conclusion, all patients should be screened for HBV before starting ocrelizumab therapy. Both HBsAg and Anti-HBcIg G tests should be used. The isolated presence of Anti-HBcIg G may cause HBV reactivation. Therefore, Anti-HBcIg G should be screened before immunosuppressive therapy.

Vaccination of multiple sclerosis patients during the COVID-19 era: Novel insights into vaccine safety and immunogenicity

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an incurable autoimmune disease known to cause widespread demyelinating lesions in the central nervous system (CNS) and a host of debilitating symptoms in patients. The development of MS is believed to be driven by the breakdown of the blood brain barrier, subsequent infiltration by CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, and widespread CNS inflammation and demyelination. Disease modifying therapies (DMTs) profoundly disrupt these processes and therefore compose an essential component of disease management. However, the effects of these therapeutic agents on vaccine safety and immunogenicity in individuals with MS are not yet fully understood. As such, the primary objective of this review article was to summarize the findings of recently conducted studies on vaccine safety and immunogenicity in MS patients treated with DMTs, particularly in the context of the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Discussed in this review are vaccinations against influenza, yellow fever, human papillomavirus, measles, mumps, rubella, Streptococcus pneumoniae, hepatitis B, and COVID-19. This article additionally reviews our current understanding of COVID-19 severity and incidence in this patient population, the risks and benefits of vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and vaccination guidelines set forth by MS societies and organizations.

Multiple sclerosis and the risk of infection: Association of British Neurologists consensus guideline

Infection in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) is of major concern, particularly for those receiving disease-modifying therapies. This article explores the risk of infection in people with MS and provides guidance-developed by Delphi consensus by specialists involved in their management-on how to screen for, prevent and manage infection in this population.

Challenges and insights in immunization in patients with demyelinating diseases: a bench-to-bedside and evidence-based review

BACKGROUND

Infections are among the main causes of death in patients with demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system (CNSDD). Vaccines are effective methods in reducing hospitalization and death from infectious diseases, but they are challenging in patients with CNSDD because of autoimmunity and immunosuppression.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the pathophysiological rationale and main evidence for vaccine recommendations in patients with CNSDD.

METHODS

Specialists with different backgrounds on the subject: a neurologist specialized in demyelinating diseases, an infectious diseases specialist and an immunologist, presented a critical narrative review of vaccination literature in patients with CNSDD, highlighting which vaccines should or should not be administered and the best time for it.

RESULTS

Patients with DDSNC are at increased risk of vaccine-preventable viral and bacterial infections. Vaccines can prevent herpes zoster, hepatitis B reactivation, HPV-associated warts and tumors, viral and bacterial pneumonia, and meningitis. Live attenuated virus vaccines should not be used when the patient is on immunosuppression. Vaccines should be avoided during relapses. The greatest vaccine efficacy is given before treatment or at the end of medication.

CONCLUSION

Patients with DDSNC need differentiated immunization in relation to additional vaccines, contraindicated vaccines and timing of vaccination.

Immune Reconstitution Following Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Sclerosis: A Review on Behalf of the EBMT Autoimmune Diseases Working Party

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a central nervous system (CNS) disorder, which is mediated by an abnormal immune response coordinated by T and B cells resulting in areas of inflammation, demyelination, and axonal loss. Disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) are available to dampen the inflammatory aggression but are ineffective in many patients. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been used as treatment in patients with a highly active disease, achieving a long-term clinical remission in most. The rationale of the intervention is to eradicate inflammatory autoreactive cells with lympho-ablative regimens and restore immune tolerance. Immunological studies have demonstrated that autologous HSCT induces a renewal of TCR repertoires, resurgence of immune regulatory cells, and depletion of proinflammatory T cell subsets, suggesting a "resetting" of immunological memory. Although our understanding of the clinical and immunological effects of autologous HSCT has progressed, further work is required to characterize the mechanisms that underlie treatment efficacy. Considering that memory B cells are disease-promoting and stem-like T cells are multipotent progenitors involved in self-regeneration of central and effector memory cells, investigating the reconstitution of B cell compartment and stem and effector subsets of immunological memory following autologous HSCT could elucidate those mechanisms. Since all subjects need to be optimally protected from vaccine-preventable diseases (including COVID-19), there is a need to ensure that vaccination in subjects undergoing HSCT is effective and safe. Additionally, the study of vaccination in HSCT-treated subjects as a means of evaluating immune responses could further distinguish broad immunosuppression from immune resetting.

Management of hepatitis B virus prophylaxis in patients treated with disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis: a multicentric Italian retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) often receive disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) that can expose them to reactivation of potential occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (pOBI). We aimed to evaluate the MS Centers behavior regarding HBV screening and prophylaxis in a large cohort of MS patients receiving anti-CD20 or cladribine.

METHODS

Retrospective, multicentric study recruiting Italian MS patients treated with rituximab, ocrelizumab and cladribine.

RESULTS

We included 931 MS patients from 15 centers. All but 38 patients performed a complete HBV screening. Patients' age > 50 years was significantly associated with no history of vaccination and HBsAb titres < 100 mIU at baseline (p < 0.001). No significant correlation was found between post-vaccination HBsAb titres and type of treatment (p = 0.5), pre-or post-therapy vaccination (p = 0.2) and number of previous DMTs (p = 0.2). Among pOBI patients (n = 53), 21 received antiviral prophylaxis, while only 13 had HBV DNA monitoring and 19 patients neither monitored HBV DNA nor received prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline HBV screening in patients receiving anti-CD20 and cladribine is a consolidated practice. Nonetheless, HBV vaccination coverage is still lacking in such population and age is a significant factor associated with low HBV protection. Rituximab, ocrelizumab and cladribine did not impair HBV vaccine response. Almost 35% of pOBI patients fail to receive HBVr prevention. Management of HBV prophylaxis could be improved in MS patients and further prospective studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic strategies in such patients.

A Detailed Overview of Immune Escape, Antibody Escape, Partial Vaccine Escape of SARS-CoV-2 and Their Emerging Variants With Escape Mutations

The infective SARS-CoV-2 is more prone to immune escape. Presently, the significant variants of SARS-CoV-2 are emerging in due course of time with substantial mutations, having the immune escape property. Simultaneously, the vaccination drive against this virus is in progress worldwide. However, vaccine evasion has been noted by some of the newly emerging variants. Our review provides an overview of the emerging variants' immune escape and vaccine escape ability. We have illustrated a broad view related to viral evolution, variants, and immune escape ability. Subsequently, different immune escape approaches of SARS-CoV-2 have been discussed. Different innate immune escape strategies adopted by the SARS-CoV-2 has been discussed like, IFN-I production dysregulation, cytokines related immune escape, immune escape associated with dendritic cell function and macrophages, natural killer cells and neutrophils related immune escape, PRRs associated immune evasion, and NLRP3 inflammasome associated immune evasion. Simultaneously we have discussed the significant mutations related to emerging variants and immune escape, such as mutations in the RBD region (N439K, L452R, E484K, N501Y, K444R) and other parts (D614G, P681R) of the S-glycoprotein. Mutations in other locations such as NSP1, NSP3, NSP6, ORF3, and ORF8 have also been discussed. Finally, we have illustrated the emerging variants' partial vaccine (BioNTech/Pfizer mRNA/Oxford-AstraZeneca/BBIBP-CorV/ZF2001/Moderna mRNA/Johnson & Johnson vaccine) escape ability. This review will help gain in-depth knowledge related to immune escape, antibody escape, and partial vaccine escape ability of the virus and assist in controlling the current pandemic and prepare for the next.

Infectious risk in multiple sclerosis patients treated with disease-modifying therapies: A three-year observational cohort study

Background

The disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) largely used in multiple sclerosis (MS) may result in higher infectious risk.

Objective

We aimed to investigate the infectious risk in DMT-treated MS patients.

Methods

MS patients were evaluated for infectious risk before starting, switching or during DMT.

Results

In this three-year observational cohort study 174 MS patients were enrolled. Among them, 18 patients were anti-HBc + and 19 patients were QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT)  +  . No patients with anti-HBc + showed a detectable HBV-DNA and all started DMT. Among QTB + patients, 17 latent TB infections (LTBIs) and 2 active TB infections (TBIs) were identified. After one month of LTBI prophylaxis or TB treatment, respectively, all patients started DMTs.Overall, 149 started DMTs. During DMTs, one ocrelizumab-treated patient with anti-HBc + developed HBV reactivation and six patients (3 on natalizumab, 2 on ocrelizumab and 1 on IFN-β) showed reactivation of HSV-1, with detectable plasma DNA. Finally, 1 cladribine-treated patient experienced VZV reactivation. All the reactivations of latent infections have been successfully treated.

Conclusion

Screening of infectious diseases in DMT candidate MS patients helps to mitigate the infectious risk. During DMTs, a regular assessment of infectious risk allows to avoid discontinuing MS therapy and guarantees a higher degree of safety.

Risk and Prevention of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation during Immunosuppression for Non-Oncological Diseases

Reactivation of overt or occult HBV infection (HBVr) is a well-known, potentially life-threatening event which can occur during the course of immunosuppressive treatments. Although it has been described mainly in subjects receiving therapy for oncological or hematological diseases, the increasing use of immunosuppressant agents in non-oncological patients observed in recent years has raised concerns about the risk of reactivation in several other settings. However, few data can be found in the literature on the occurrence of HBVr in these populations, and few clear recommendations on its management have been defined. The present paper was written to provide an overview of the risk of HBV reactivation in non-neoplastic patients treated with immunosuppressive drugs, particularly for rheumatological, gastrointestinal, dermatological and neurological diseases, and for COVID-19 patients receiving immunomodulating agents; and to discuss the potential strategies for prevention and treatment of HBVr in these settings.

Product review on MAbs (alemtuzumab and ocrelizumab) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis

Traditionally, the management of active relapsing remitting MS was based on the, so-called, maintenance therapy, which is characterized by continuous treatment with particular disease modifying therapy (DMT), and a return of disease activity when the drug is discontinued. Another approach is characterized by a short treatment course of a DMT, which is hypothesized to act as an immune reconstitution therapy (IRT), with the potential to protect against relapses for years after a short course of treatment. Introduction of monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of MS has revolutionized MS treatment in the last decade. However, given the increasingly complex landscape of DMTs approved for MS, people with MS and neurologists are constantly faced with the question which DMT is the most appropriate for the given patient, a question we still do not have an answer to. In this product review, we will discuss the first DMT that acts as IRT, an anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab and an anti CD20 monoclonal antibody, ocrelizumab that has the potential to act as an IRT, but is administered continuously. Special emphasis will be given on safety in the context of COVID-19 pandemics and vaccination strategies.

The Disease-Modifying Therapies of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis and Liver Injury: A Narrative Review

In this narrative review, we analyze pre-registration and post-marketing data concerning hepatotoxicity of all disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) available for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, including beta interferon, glatiramer acetate, fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, cladribine, natalizumab, alemtuzumab, and ocrelizumab. We review the proposed causal mechanisms described in the literature and we also address issues like use of DMTs in patients with viral hepatitis or liver cirrhosis. Most data emerged in the post-marketing phase by reports to national pharmacovigilance agencies and published case reports or case series. Serious liver adverse events are rare, but exact incidence is largely unknown, as are predictive factors. Unfortunately, none of the DMTs currently available for the treatment of multiple sclerosis is free of potential hepatic toxic effects. Cases of acute liver failure have been reported for beta-interferon, fingolimod, natalizumab, alemtuzumab, and ocrelizumab by different mechanisms (idiosyncratic reaction, autoimmune hepatitis, or viral reactivation). Patients with multiple sclerosis should be informed about possible hepatic side effects of their treatment. Most cases of liver injury are idiosyncratic and unpredictable. The specific monitoring schedule for each DMT has been reviewed and the clinician should be ready to recognize clinical symptoms suggestive for liver injury. Not all DMTs are indicated in cirrhotic patients. For some DMTs, screening for hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus is required before starting treatment and a monitoring or antiviral prophylaxis schedule has been established. Beta interferon, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, and alemtuzumab are relatively contraindicated in autoimmune hepatitis due to the risk of disease exacerbation.

Ocrelizumab for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacology

The success of selective B-cells depleting therapies, as the anti-CD20 antibodies, in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) has confirmed that B-cells are critical in the immune pathogenesis of the disease. Ocrelizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively targets CD20+ B-cells, profoundly suppresses acute inflammatory disease activity, representing a highly effective therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). It is also the first proven therapy able to slow disability progression in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS), particularly in patients with signs of acute radiological activity before being enrolled. Effectiveness has widely been demonstrated in randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and recently confirmed in open-label extension trials. Here, we review the role of B-cells in MS, the mechanism of action of ocrelizumab, its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and the clinical data supporting its use, as well as safety data. We focus on issues related to the maintenance of immunocompetence, essential to ensure an immune response to either a primary infection or a vaccination. Lastly, we discuss about the possible role of ocrelizumab as an exit strategy from natalizumab-treated patients at risk of developing multifocal progressive leukoencephalopathy. In view of using ocrelizumab chronically, collecting long-term safety data and finding strategies to minimize adverse events will be extremely relevant.

Infections and multiple sclerosis: Recommendations from the French Multiple Sclerosis Society

INTRODUCTION

Viral, bacterial, or fungal infections are suspected of triggering multiple sclerosis (MS) and promoting relapses of the disease and are likely to be promoted by immune-active treatments. This raises questions about the infectious workup and preventive treatment of these infections prior to their initiation.

OBJECTIVES

To establish recommendations on infections and MS. Provide information to patients and healthcare professionals on the minimal infectious workup to be performed in an MS patient at diagnosis and prior to initiation of immuno-active therapy in MS.

METHODS

The recommendation attempts to answer four main questions about infections and MS. The French Group for Recommendations in Multiple Sclerosis (France4MS) did a systematic review of articles from PubMed and universities databases (from January 1975 to June 2020), using the RAND/UCLA formalized consensus method. The RAND/UCLA method has been developed to synthesize the scientific literature and expert opinions on health care topics and was used for reaching a formal agreement. Twenty-three experts contributed to the detailed review and a group of 63 multidisciplinary health professionals validated the final version of 36 recommendations.

RESULTS

It is recommended that MS patients undergo a minimal infectious workup, check their vaccination status at diagnosis, and repeat it during follow-up and before starting immunotherapy. Screening and preventive treatment of viral (group Herpes virus, HPV, JCV, HCV, HBV), bacterial (mycobacteria) and fungal (Cryptococcus) infections is recommended prior to the initiation of certain immuno-active MS therapies.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

At diagnosis of MS and prior to the choice of therapeutic strategy, it is recommended to update the vaccination schedule of MS patients in reference to the HCSP vaccination schedule and the SFSEP recommendations. Before starting immunosuppressive treatment, it is recommended to inform patients of the risks of infections and to look for a constitutive or acquired immune deficiency. Health professionals and patients should be informed of the updated recommendations on infections and MS.

Effects of disease-modifying therapy on peripheral leukocytes in patients with multiple sclerosis

Modern disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) have variable modes of action and selectively suppress or modulate the immune system. In this review, we summarize the predicted and intended as well as unwanted adverse effects on leukocytes in peripheral blood as a result of treatment with DMTs for MS. We link changes in laboratory tests to the possible therapeutic risks that include secondary autoimmunity, infections, and impaired response to vaccinations. Profound knowledge of the intended effects on leukocyte counts, in particular lymphocytes, explained by the mode of action, and adverse effects which may require additional laboratory and clinical vigilance or even drug discontinuation, is needed when prescribing DMTs to treat patients with MS.

Infection Mitigation Strategies for Multiple Sclerosis Patients on Oral and Monoclonal Disease-Modifying Therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The newer, higher-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS)-orals and monoclonals-have more profound immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive properties than the older, injectable therapies and require risk mitigation strategies to reduce the risk of serious infections. This review will provide a systematic framework for infectious risk mitigation strategies relevant to these therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

We classify risk mitigation strategies according to the following framework: (1) screening and patient selection, (2) vaccinations, (3) antibiotic prophylaxis, (4) laboratory and MRI monitoring, (5) adjusting dose and frequency of DMT, and (6) behavioral modifications to limit the risk of infection. We systematically apply this framework to the infections for which risk mitigations are available: hepatitis B, herpetic infections, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, and tuberculosis. We also discuss up-to-date recommendations regarding COVID-19 vaccinations for patients on DMTs. We offer a practical, comprehensive, DMT-specific framework of derisking strategies designed to minimize the risk of infections associated with the newer MS therapies.

Current Immunological and Clinical Perspective on Vaccinations in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: Are They Safe after All?

Vaccines work by stimulating the immune system, and their immunogenicity is key in achieving protection against specific pathogens. Questions have been raised whether in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients they could induce disease exacerbation and whether vaccines could possibly act as a trigger in the onset of MS in susceptible populations. So far, no correlation has been found between the vaccinations against influenza, hepatitis B, tetanus, human papillomavirus, measles, mumps, rubella, varicella zoster, tuberculosis, yellow fever, or typhoid fever and the risk of MS. Further research is needed for the potential protective implications of the tetanus and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin vaccines in MS patients. Nowadays with the emerging coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and recent vaccinations approval and arrival, the risk-benefit in MS patients with regards to safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination in those treated with immunosuppressive therapies is of paramount importance. In this manuscript, we demonstrate how different vaccine types could be related to the immunopathogenesis of MS and discuss the risks and benefits of different vaccinations in MS patients.

Assessing and mitigating risk of infection in patients with multiple sclerosis on disease modifying treatment

Introduction: The important development that the multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment field has experienced in the last years comes along with the need of dealing with new adverse events such as the increase risk of infections. In the shared therapeutic decision-making process, the MS expert neurologist should also balance the risks of specific infections under each particular treatment and be familiar with new mitigation strategies.Areas covered: In this review, the authors provide an up-to-date review of the infection risk associated with MS treatments with a specific focus on risk mitigating strategies. The search was conducted using Pubmed® database (2000 - present) to identify publications that reported infection rates and infection complications for each treatment (interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, cladribine, natalizumab, alemtuzumab, rituximab, and ocrelizumab).Expert opinion: Since the emergence of the first natalizumab-related PML case, the arrival of new MS therapies has come hand in hand with new infectious complications. MS-specialist neurologist has to face new challenges regarding the management of immunosuppression-related infectious complications. The implementation of patient-centered management focus on preventive and mitigating strategies with a multidisciplinary approach should be seen in the future as a marker of excellence of MS management.

Prevention and management of adverse effects of disease modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the currently known side effects of the approved therapies of multiple sclerosis and to suggest monitoring procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

The progress in the treatment of multiple sclerosis with new very effective therapies is accompanied by a number of side effects. Some of these have already been described in the approval studies, but some only after approval in a real world situation. The reason for this is the short duration of the clinical studies, the very heterogeneous patient profile in the real world setting with a number of comorbidities, pretherapies, and wider age range. The side effects may occur during application of therapies or afterwards during the course of the treatment. The side effects may range from mild infections, mild laboratory abnormalities, secondary autoimmune diseases to life-threatening side effects such as progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

SUMMARY

It has to be pointed out that these side effects are not to be considered as final and neurologists should be vigilant against new unknown side effects. The doctor should be aware of these undesirable effects, should weigh the benefits of the therapies against the risks, but at the same time she/he should keep in mind that multiple sclerosis can be a very disabling disease if not treated properly.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Anti-CD20 B Cells Depleting Drugs in Multiple Sclerosis

Rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab and ublituximab are disease modifying therapies (DMT) currently used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) or are in advanced stages of clinical trials. These monoclonal antibodies deplete B cells by targeting the cell surface protein CD20. This review highlights the similarities and major differences between the four agents. We summarize data from various clinical trials of each of these therapeutics and discuss their efficacy and safety. Additional considerations regarding the route of administration and cost are presented. Among the four therapeutics, only ocrelizumab is approved for primary progressive (PP) MS. Infusion/injection related reactions (IRRs) are the most common adverse events associated with all four therapeutics. In phase III trials of ocrelizumab and ofatumumab, the incidence of IRRs was lower with ofatumumab. Ofatumumab is unique among the four therapeutics due to its availability as a subcutaneous injection (SQ). Although SQ administration may be appealing for some patients it may raise concerns regarding medication compliance among physicians. Phase II trials studying ublituximab for the treatment of RMS yielded promising results. Phase III trials are currently comparing the efficacy of ublituximab to teriflunomide.

Safety of Newer Disease Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis

In the past decade, the therapeutic arsenal for multiple sclerosis has expanded greatly. Newer more potent disease modifying therapies (DMTs) with varying mechanisms of actions are increasingly used early in the disease course. These newer DMTs include oral therapies (teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod, and cladribine) and infusion therapies (natalizumab, alemtuzumab, and ocrelizumab), and are associated with better control of disease activity and long-term outcomes in patients with MS compared to older injectable therapies (interferon beta and glatiramer acetate). However, they are associated with safety concerns and subsequent monitoring requirements. Adverse events are initially observed in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials, and further long-term data are collected in phase 3 extension studies, case series, and post-marketing reports, which highlight the need to periodically re-evaluate and adjust monitoring strategies to optimize treatment safety in an individualized approach.

Targeting B cells to modify MS, NMOSD, and MOGAD: Part 2

Ocrelizumab, rituximab, ofatumumab, ublituximab, inebilizumab, and evobrutinib are immunotherapies that target various B cell–related proteins. Most of these treatments have proven efficacy in relapsing and progressive forms of MS and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disease (NMOSD) or are in advanced stages of clinical development. Currently, ocrelizumab and inebilizumab are licensed for treatment of MS and NMOSD, respectively. This part of the review focuses on monoclonal antibody B cell–depleting strategies in NMOSD and the emerging related myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) immunoglobulin G–associated disease (MOGAD). Case series and phase 2/3 studies in these inflammatory disorders are assessed. The safety profile of long-term B-cell depletion in MS, NMOSD, and MOGAD will be highlighted. Finally implications of the current coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the management of patients with these disorders and the use of B cell–depleting agents will be discussed.

The Pharmacogenetics of Rituximab: Potential Implications for Anti-CD20 Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis

There are a broad range of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) available in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), but limited biomarkers exist to personalise DMT choice. All DMTs, including monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab and ocrelizumab, are effective in preventing relapses and preserving neurological function in MS. However, each agent harbours its own risk of therapeutic failure or adverse events. Pharmacogenetics, the study of the effects of genetic variation on therapeutic response or adverse events, could improve the precision of DMT selection. Pharmacogenetic studies of rituximab in MS patients are lacking, but pharmacogenetic markers in other rituximab-treated autoimmune conditions have been identified. This review will outline the wider implications of pharmacogenetics and the mechanisms of anti-CD20 agents in MS. We explore the non-MS rituximab literature to characterise pharmacogenetic variants that could be of prognostic relevance in those receiving rituximab, ocrelizumab or other monoclonal antibodies for MS.

The risk of infection in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with disease-modifying therapies: A Delphi consensus statement

The risk of infection associated with immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) has been increasingly addressed in recent scientific literature. A modified Delphi consensus process was conducted to develop clinically relevant, evidence-based recommendations to assist physicians with decision-making in relation to the risks of a wide range of infections associated with different DMDs in patients with MS. The current consensus statements, developed by a panel of experts (neurologists, infectious disease specialists, a gynaecologist and a neuroradiologist), address the risk of iatrogenic infections (opportunistic infections, including herpes and cryptococcal infections, candidiasis and listeria; progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; human papillomavirus and urinary tract infections; respiratory tract infections and tuberculosis; hepatitis and gastrointestinal infections) in patients with MS treated with different DMDs, as well as prevention strategies and surveillance strategies for the early identification of infections. In the discussion, more recent data emerged in the literature were taken into consideration. Recommended risk reduction and management strategies for infections include screening at diagnosis and before starting a new DMD, prophylaxis where appropriate, monitoring and early diagnosis.

Safety profile of ocrelizumab for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

We systematically reviewed adverse events (AEs) for ocrelizumab for multiple sclerosis (MS).

AREAS COVERED

We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Toxicology Data Network-TOXLINE (inception to 8-July-2020), clinical trial registries, and product monographs for any clinical trials, observational studies or case reports examining AEs to ocrelizumab. Studies with/without a comparator drug or placebo were eligible.

EXPERT OPINION

Seventy-eight records were included (4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 4 open-label trials, 29 observational studies, and 27 case reports). AEs affected 2756/4498 (61.3%) of ocrelizumab-exposed patients. The most common AEs were infections (n=1342, 39.2% of ocrelizumab-exposed patients) and infusion-related reactions (n=1391, 26.2%). Compared to beta-interferon, infections were more likely in ocrelizumab-exposed patients (Risk Ratio (RR)=1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI):1.01-1.19), including: herpes-related (RR=1.75; 95%CI:1.11-2.76), respiratory tract-related (RR=1.42; 95%CI:1.10-1.84 and RR=1.61; 95%CI:1.10-2.35), nasopharyngitis (RR=1.47; 95%CI:1.13-1.90), and rhinitis (RR=4.00; 95%CI:1.13-14.14). Infusion-related reactions (RR range: 1.57-4.42) were more common for ocrelizumab versus placebo or beta-interferon. From pooled analyses (three RCTs), the risk of 'any' serious AE did not differ significantly between the ocrelizumab and comparator groups. However, insufficient data were available to assess longer-term AEs, e.g., malignancy.

Neurological immunotherapy in the era of COVID-19 - looking for consensus in the literature

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is concerning for patients with neuroimmunological diseases who are receiving immunotherapy. Uncertainty remains about whether immunotherapies increase the risk of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or increase the risk of severe disease and death upon infection. National and international societies have developed guidelines and statements, but consensus does not exist in several areas. In this Review, we attempt to clarify where consensus exists and where uncertainty remains to inform management approaches based on the first principles of neuroimmunology. We identified key questions that have been addressed in the literature and collated the recommendations to generate a consensus calculation in a Delphi-like approach to summarize the information. We summarize the international recommendations, discuss them in light of the first available data from patients with COVID-19 receiving immunotherapy and provide an overview of management approaches in the COVID-19 era. We stress the principles of medicine in general and neuroimmunology in particular because, although the risk of viral infection has become more relevant, most of the considerations apply to the general management of neurological immunotherapy. We also give special consideration to immunosuppressive treatment and cell-depleting therapies that might increase susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection but reduce the risk of severe COVID-19.

In this Review, the authors synthesize recommendations on the management of neuroimmunological disease in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. They consider these recommendations alongside the first available data from patients, and provide an overview of management approaches in the COVID-19 era.

The risk that the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses for people who are receiving immunotherapy for neuroimmunological disease remains unclear.

Guidelines and statements have been published by societies and individuals, but the level of consensus differs for different aspects; we use a Delphi-like process to clarify where consensus exists.

Without evidence, management of neuroimmunological diseases in the context of COVID-19 requires application of the first principles of immunotherapy, taking into account disease-related, patient-related, physician-related, environment-related and COVID-19-related factors.

In general, corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin and/or plasma exchange for the treatment of acute neuroimmunological deteriorations can be administered with low risk in the COVID-19 pandemic.

In general, ongoing immunotherapy should not be stopped because of the COVID-19 pandemic; treatment initiation and optimization are also recommended.

For some aspects of immunotherapy in the context of COVID-19, consensus in the literature is low, and collection of data in patient registries is important for resolving these uncertainties.

[Ocrelizumab for treatment of multiple sclerosis]

Ocrelizumab ist ein monoklonaler Antikörper, der sich gegen das Differenzierungsantigen CD20 richtet und zu einer effektiven längerfristigen Depletion von Lymphozyten, insbesondere von B‑Zellen, führt. Unlängst publizierte Phase-3-Studien belegen, dass Ocrelizumab sowohl bei der Behandlung der schubförmigen als auch der primär progressiven Multiplen Sklerose (MS) wirksam ist. Darauf basierend wurde Ocrelizumab als erstes Medikament zur Behandlung der primär chronisch-progredienten MS zugelassen. Um diesen Durchbruch besser in den Kontext des heutigen MS-Therapiekanons einordnen zu können, lohnt sowohl ein Blick zurück auf die Entwicklung der antikörpervermittelten CD20-Depletion als auch auf die der Zulassung zugrunde liegenden Studien sowie deren Extensionsphasen. Diese Übersichtsarbeit diskutiert die verfügbaren Daten zur Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit der langfristigen B‑Zell-Depletion bei MS-Patienten und erörtert den aktuellen Kenntnisstand zur Rolle von B‑Lymphozyten in der Immunpathogenese der MS.

Treatment Optimization in Multiple Sclerosis: Canadian MS Working Group Recommendations

The Canadian Multiple Sclerosis Working Group has updated its treatment optimization recommendations (TORs) on the optimal use of disease-modifying therapies for patients with all forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Recommendations provide guidance on initiating effective treatment early in the course of disease, monitoring response to therapy, and modifying or switching therapies to optimize disease control. The current TORs also address the treatment of pediatric MS, progressive MS and the identification and treatment of aggressive forms of the disease. Newer therapies offer improved efficacy, but also have potential safety concerns that must be adequately balanced, notably when treatment sequencing is considered. There are added discussions regarding the management of pregnancy, the future potential of biomarkers and consideration as to when it may be prudent to stop therapy. These TORs are meant to be used and interpreted by all neurologists with a special interest in the management of MS.

Current therapeutic landscape in multiple sclerosis: an evolving treatment paradigm

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To critically assess the current landscape of disease-modifying agents for multiple sclerosis (MS). Treatment algorithms will be discussed and studies for new agents in late development or recently approved are analyzed in terms of their impact on current treatment strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

A real-world study from Wales suggests that early initiation of highly effective therapy may provide more benefit that an escalation approach in relapsing MS. A study from the MSBase dataset found evidence that early treatment with highly effective therapies decreased the risk of developing secondary progressive MS. Ocrelizumab is highly efficacious in relapsing MS and in a group of patients with primary progressive MS. Another CD20 directed mAb, ofatumumab, is in phase 3. A large study examining extended interval dosing of natalizumab in an attempt to decrease the risk of developing progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy is underway. Cladribine and alemtuzumab may work by immune reconstitution. Siponimod was recently approved by United States Federal Drug Administration for relapsing MS and active secondary progressive MS. Other S1P receptor modulators are being studied in phase 3 trials for relapsing MS. Cladribine received FDA approval as treatment for relapsing and active secondary progressive MS. Autologous hematopoetic stem-cell transplantation may be an option for treatment-refractory MS.

SUMMARY

Development of disease-modifying agents in MS continues to be successful. Treatment algorithms need to take new developments into account.

Prevention Strategies to Minimize the Infection Risk Associated with Biologic and Targeted Immunomodulators

The introduction of biologic and targeted immunomodulators is a significant breakthrough in the therapeutic area of various fields of medicine. The occurrence of serious infections, a complication of secondary immunosuppression associated with these agents, leads to increased morbidity and mortality. Implementing preventive strategies could minimize infection-related complications and improve therapeutic outcomes. The purpose of this review is to focus on current evident approaches regarding screening, monitoring, preventing (immunization and chemoprophylaxis), and management of infections in patients who are candidates for about 70 biologic and targeted immunomodulators. Recommendations are based on relevant guidelines, especially the ESCMID Study Group for Infections in Compromised Hosts (ESGICH) Consensus Document series published in 2018.