Seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome

Interaction of antiphospholipid antibodies with endothelial cells in antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease with arteriovenous thrombosis and recurrent miscarriages as the main clinical manifestations. Due to the complexity of its mechanisms and the diversity of its manifestations, its diagnosis and treatment remain challenging issues. Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) not only serve as crucial "biomarkers" in diagnosing APS but also act as the "culprits" of the disease. Endothelial cells (ECs), as one of the core target cells of aPL, bridge the gap between the molecular level of these antibodies and the tissue and organ level of pathological changes. A more in-depth exploration of the relationship between ECs and the pathogenesis of APS holds the potential for significant advancements in the precise diagnosis, classification, and therapy of APS. Many researchers have highlighted the vital involvement of ECs in APS and the underlying mechanisms governing their functionality. Through extensive in vitro and in vivo experiments, they have identified multiple aPL receptors on the EC membrane and various intracellular pathways. This article furnishes a comprehensive overview and summary of these receptors and signaling pathways, offering prospective targets for APS therapy.

Comparative assessment of the diagnostic performances of particle-based multianalyte technology and commercial ELISA for antiphospholipid autoantibody testing

BACKGROUND

Diagnosing Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) relies heavily on laboratory findings, particularly the detection of specific antibodies like lupus anticoagulant (LA), IgG and/or IgM anti-cardiolipin (aCL), and IgG and/or IgM anti-β2 glycoprotein 1 (aB2GP1). Although ELISA is widely used in the US for this purpose, standardization between different assay methodologies remains challenging, leading to significant variability across laboratories. Particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT) offers a streamlined one-step detection for all six antiphospholipid (aPL) autoantibodies, covering aCL and aB2GP1 of IgA, IgG, and IgM isotypes.

METHODS

In this study involving 224 subjects, including 34 clinically diagnosed with APS, alongside 160 non-APS patients and 30 healthy donors, PMAT's performance was evaluated against commercial ELISA in detecting aPL antibodies.

RESULTS

At the manufacturer's suggested cutoff, PMAT exhibited sensitivity comparable to ELISA, albeit with a low to moderate decrease in specificity for certain antibodies. With anti-CL IgM alone, PMAT displayed a 17.7% decrease in sensitivity, accompanied by a corresponding 31.1% increase in specificity compared to ELISA. However, applying a stricter cutoff (88-90% specificity), IgA and IgM antibodies yielded 5.9-17.6% higher sensitivities with PMAT, and IgG antibodies displayed similar sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study cohort, PMAT demonstrated higher or comparable sensitivity to that of commercial ELISA for all six aPL antibodies at a specificity cutoff near 90%. Notably, PMAT demonstrated superior sensitivity and specificity overall in detecting IgA aCL and aB2GP1 antibodies. This study highlights the potential of automated PMAT for detecting aPL antibodies in APS evaluation.

Criteria and non-criteria antiphospholipid autoantibodies screening in patients with late pregnancy morbidity: A cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a cause of pregnancy morbidity. We aim to determine the frequency of criteria and non-criteria anti-phospholipid (aPL) autoantibodies in patients admitted for unexplained fetal death (UFD), pre-eclampsia (PE) and/or fetal growth restriction (FGR).

METHODS

All consecutive patients with UFD, PE and/or FGR followed in the department of Obstetrics, Bichat Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, between January 2019 and December 2021 were screened. Patients with available serum stored from the index pregnancy were included. Patients with previously known APS or twin pregnancy were excluded. Testing for aPL autoantibodies included anti-cardiolipin (aCL), anti-β2GPI (aβ2GPI), anti-phosphatidylethanolamine (aPE), anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) IgG/IgM and anti-annexin V IgG. When available, placenta specimens were analyzed by a pathologist blinded to the aPL status. All clinical characteristics, pregnancy features, and comorbidities were extracted from electronic medical records.

RESULTS

Overall 167 (32 (28.8-35.7) years) patients with UFD (n = 28; 16.8 %), PE (n = 60; 35.9 %) and/or FGR (n = 105; 62.9 %) were screened for aPL autoantibodies. Moderate titers of aPL autoantibodies were detected in 33 (n = 33/167, 19.8 %) patients. aPL autoantibodies were non-criteria aPE IgG/IgM in most cases (n = 28/33, 84.8 %). aPS/PT IgG/IgM were found in 11 (n = 11/33, 33.3 %) cases and aCL or aβ2GP1 IgG/IgM in 4 (n = 4/33, 12.1 %). Multivariable logistic regression showed that aPL autoantibodies were mostly associated with UFD (OR 4.37 [1.72-11.20], p = 0.002), PE ≤ 34th week of gestation (3.22 [0.86-11.90], p = 0.070) and chronic deciduitis (8.03 [0.89-67.2], p = 0.060) DISCUSSION: The frequency of aPL autoantibodies, mostly aPE, is high in patients with late pregnancy morbidity and may qualify obstetrical APS.

Neurovascular Issues in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Arterial Vasculopathy from Small to Large Vessels in a Neuroradiological Perspective

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune prothrombotic condition characterized by venous thromboembolism, arterial thrombosis, and pregnancy morbidity. Among neurological manifestations, arterial thrombosis is only one of the possible associated clinical and neuroradiological features. The aim of this review is to address from a neurovascular point of view the multifaceted range of the arterial side of APS. A modern neurovascular approach was proposed, dividing the CNS involvement on the basis of the size of affected arteries, from large to small arteries, and corresponding clinical and neuroradiological issues. Both large-vessel and small-vessel involvement in APS were detailed, highlighting the limitations of the available literature in the attempt to derive some pathomechanisms. APS is a complex disease, and its neurological involvement appears multifaceted and not yet fully characterized, within and outside the diagnostic criteria. The involvement of intracranial large and small vessels appears poorly characterized, and the overlapping with the previously proposed inflammatory manifestations is consistent.

The impact of antiphospholipid antibodies/antiphospholipid syndrome on systemic lupus erythematosus

aPLs are a major determinant of the increased cardiovascular risk in patients with SLE. They adversely affect clinical manifestations, damage accrual and prognosis. Apart from the antibodies included in the 2006 revised classification criteria for APS, other non-classical aPLs might help in identifying SLE patients at increased risk of thrombotic events. The best studied are IgA anti-β2-glycoprotein I, anti-domain I β2-glycoprotein I and aPS-PT. Major organ involvement includes kidney and neuropsychiatric systems. aPL/APS severely impacts pregnancy outcomes. Due to increased thrombotic risk, these patients require aggressive cardiovascular risk factor control. Primary prophylaxis is based on low-dose aspirin in high-risk patients. Warfarin is the gold-standard drug for secondary prophylaxis.

Extra-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with small vessel brain lesions and clinical manifestations associated with antiphospholipid syndrome

OBJECTIVES

Neurological manifestations compatible with small vessel brain lesions (SVBL), such as migraine, cognitive impairment, seizures, and transverse myelitis, may be related to antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and patients could need APS therapies even though they do not fit into thrombosis or obstetric morbidity. Furthermore, extra-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) provide an increase in sensitivity in patients with clinical manifestations related to APS but negative for IgG/IgM anticardiolipin (aCL), anti-β2 glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI), and lupus anticoagulant, which are the antibodies included in the classification criteria for APS.

METHODS

We determined extra-criteria aPL in 65 SVBL patients with neurological traits and Magnetic Resonance Imaging suggestive of APS but negative for APS classification criteria, 47 of whom were prospectively followed and tested over three years. A group of 95 patients with autoimmune diseases (AD) but without clinical traits of APS was also studied.

RESULTS

A persistent presence of extra-criteria aPL was detected in 27.7% of patients: 12.77% IgM anti- prothrombin (PT), 6.38% IgG anti-PT, 6.38% IgM anti-phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), 4.26% IgA aβ2GPI, 2.13% IgG anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (PS/PT) and 2.13% IgM anti-PS/PT. There was a tendency towards a higher prevalence of these aPL in SVBL patients than in AD - especially for IgA aβ2GPI - and a lack of IgG aPS/PT positivity in the AD group. We found no SVBL patient positive for IgA aCL, IgG anti-PE, annexin V, or aβ2GPI domain I.

CONCLUSIONS

Extra-criteria aPL can improve sensitivity for APS diagnosis in patients with SVBL, especially IgA aβ2GPI and IgG anti-PS/PT antibodies.

An advanced understanding of the heterogeneous clinical features of "non-criteria" obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: Two case reports and a literature review

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired autoimmune disorder characterized by recurrent venous and/or arterial thrombosis and/or pregnancy complications, in the presence of elevated antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies. APS in pregnant women is referred to as "obstetrical" APS (OAPS). The diagnosis of definite OAPS requires the presence of one or more typical clinical criteria and persistent aPL antibodies at least 12 weeks apart. However, the classification criteria for OAPS have generated wide discussion, with a growing impression that certain patients not fully meeting these criteria might be inappropriately excluded from the classification, which is known as "non-criteria" OAPS. We present here two unique cases of potentially lethal "non-criteria" OAPS, complicating severe preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction (FGR), liver rupture, preterm birth, refractory recurrent miscarriages, or even stillbirth. We further share our diagnostic search and analysis, treatment adjustment, and prognosis for this unusual antenatal event. We will also present a short review of an advanced understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms of this disease, heterogeneous clinical features, and potential significance.

The Role of Autoantibody Testing in Modern Personalized Medicine

Personalized medicine (PM) aims individualized approach to prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Precision Medicine applies the paradigm of PM by defining groups of individuals with akin characteristics. Often the two terms have been used interchangeably. The quest for PM has been advancing for centuries as traditional nosology classification defines groups of clinical conditions with relatively similar prognoses and treatment options. However, any individual is characterized by a unique set of multiple characteristics and therefore the achievement of PM implies the determination of myriad demographic, epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters. The accelerated identification of numerous biological variables associated with diverse health conditions contributes to the fulfillment of one of the pre-requisites for PM. The advent of multiplex analytical platforms contributes to the determination of thousands of biological parameters using minute amounts of serum or other biological matrixes. Finally, big data analysis and machine learning contribute to the processing and integration of the multiplexed data at the individual level, allowing for the personalized definition of susceptibility, diagnosis, prognosis, prevention, and treatment. Autoantibodies are traditional biomarkers for autoimmune diseases and can contribute to PM in many aspects, including identification of individuals at risk, early diagnosis, disease sub-phenotyping, definition of prognosis, and treatment, as well as monitoring disease activity. Herein we address how autoantibodies can promote PM in autoimmune diseases using the examples of systemic lupus erythematosus, antiphospholipid syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren syndrome, systemic sclerosis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cholangitis, and autoimmune neurologic diseases.

Comparison of non-criteria antiphospholipid syndrome with definite antiphospholipid syndrome: A systematic review

Objectives

Patients with laboratory or clinical manifestations suggestive of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) but not fulfilling the classification criteria constitute a clinical challenge. This study aims to compare non-criteria APS (NC-APS) with definite APS in terms of clinical manifestations, therapies, and outcomes.

Methods

A systematic review of observational studies comparing definite and NC-APS was performed searching four electronic databases. Data on clinical manifestations, therapies and clinical outcomes was extracted.

Results

Sixteen studies, assessing a total of 3,798 participants, were included. Seven out of 10 studies found no significant difference in the prevalence of arterial or venous thrombosis between definite and NC-APS, with two studies on seronegative APS also finding no difference in thrombosis recurrence. Seven out of 12 studies found no significant difference in the prevalence of obstetric manifestations between groups, with the remaining exhibiting conflicting results. In 9 studies comparing treatment frequency in obstetric patients, all but one described similar treatment frequency, with the percentage of NC-APS treated during pregnancy ranging from 26% to 100%. In 10 studies comparing pregnancy outcomes of NC-APS versus definite APS, 7 found similar successful pregnancies/live births. Additionally, 5 studies described improvement of live births in both groups with treatment, with three signalling aspirin monotherapy as efficacious as combination therapy in NC-APS.

Conclusion

This review hints at an absence of marked differences in most evaluated parameters between definite and NC-APS, emphasizing the value of a more active follow-up of these patients. The low-quality available evidence highlights the need for well-defined NC-APS populations in future studies.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42020210674.

Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Management of Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review

Antiphospholipid syndrome is an autoimmune disorder characterized by vascular thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity associated with persistent antiphospholipid antibody positivity. Cases fulfilling the Sydney criteria for obstetric morbidity with no previous thrombosis are known as obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS). OAPS is the most identified cause of recurrent pregnancy loss and late-pregnancy morbidity related to placental injury. Cases with incomplete clinical or laboratory data are classified as obstetric morbidity APS (OMAPS) and non-criteria OAPS (NC-OAPS), respectively. Inflammatory and thrombotic mechanisms are involved in the pathophysiology of OAPS. Trophoblasts, endothelium, platelets and innate immune cells are key cellular players. Complement activation plays a crucial pathogenic role. Secondary placental thrombosis appears by clot formation in response to tissue factor activation. New risk assessment tools could improve the prediction of obstetric complication recurrences or thromboses. The standard-of-care treatment consists of low-dose aspirin and prophylactic low molecular weight heparin. In refractory cases, the addition of hydroxychloroquine, low-dose prednisone or IVIG improve pregnancy outcomes. Statins and eculizumab are currently being tested for treating selected OAPS women. Finally, we revisited recent insights and concerns about the pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of OAPS.

Detection of IgA Antiphospholipid Antibodies Does not Improve Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification: A two-Center Study

Background

Thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease; its diagnosis requires meeting both clinical and laboratory criteria. Prevalence rates of immunoglobulin (Ig) A anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and IgA anti-β₂ glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ₂GPI) remain unknown, and the clinical value of these antibodies to APS classification remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to examine both items in the Chinese population.

Methods

Using chemiluminescence immunoassay, antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) were quantified in 12,582 hospital-based general population, 278 thrombotic APS patients, and 233 healthy controls.

Results

In the general population, the positive rates of IgA aCL and IgA aβ₂GPI antibodies were 2.87% and 1.99%, respectively. Furthermore, isolated IgA aPL-positivity rate was 0.72% in patients with APS, which was comparable to those in the general population (0.68%, p = 1) and in healthy controls (0.43%, p = 1). Among the IgA aPL-positive individuals in the general population, isolated IgA-positive individuals had lower serum levels of IgA antibodies (p = 0.007 for IgA aCL and p = 0.059 for IgA aβ₂GPI). Regarding to APS classification, adding IgA aPL into conventional aPL assays may not improve and may even deteriorate the net reclassification index for APS; besides, no association between thrombosis and IgA aPL was observed.

Conclusions

this study assessed the prevalence of various aPL in Chinese population. IgA aPL may not enhance the classification ability of established laboratory criteria for thrombotic APS. Our data do not support the addition of IgA aPL to conventional aPL assays.

A catastrophic seronegative anti-phospholipid syndrome: case and literature review

Background

Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) is a multisystemic autoimmune disease characterized by arterial and venous thrombosis and / or obstetric morbidity in the presence of at least one circulating anti-phospholipid antibody. The spectrum of vascular events varies from deep venous thrombosis to catastrophic APS, a rare form characterized by acute multiorgan thrombosis and high mortality.

Case report

We present the case of a 32-week pregnant woman arriving in the hospital emergency room with bilateral acute lower limb ischemia. In the obstetric evaluation, fetal death was declared. Computerized Tomography angiography showed pulmonary embolism of both pulmonary arteries, areas of splenic and right renal infarction and multiple arterial and venous thrombosis. The patient underwent urgent caesarean section and axillary-bifemoral bypass. No events registered. In the postoperative period, in an intensive care unit, treatment with rituximab and plasmapheresis were added to anticoagulant therapy. The laboratorial investigation was negative for thrombophilia and autoimmune diseases.

Conclusion

Catastrophic APS develops quickly, with multiorgan involvement and high mortality rate. The presented case poses a multidisciplinary challenge, with the surgical approach of extra-anatomical revascularization being less invasive and guaranteeing immediate perfusion of the lower limbs. Although the serological tests were negative for anti-phospholipid antibodies, this case hardly fits into another diagnosis. Therefore, it was treated as a catastrophic APS, having shown a favorable evolution.

Breast implant illness: scientific evidence of its existence

INTRODUCTION

More than one million breast augmentation procedures using silicone breast implants (SBI) have been performed worldwide. Adverse events of SBI include local complications such as pain, swelling, redness, infections, capsular contracture, implant rupture and gel-bleed. Furthermore, patients experience systemic symptoms such as chronic fatigue, arthralgias, myalgias, pyrexia, sicca, and cognitive dysfunction. These symptoms received different names such as autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) due to silicone incompatibility syndrome and breast implant illness (BII). Because of chronic immune activation, BII/ASIA, allergies, autoimmune diseases, immune deficiencies and finally lymphomas may develop in SBI patients.

AREAS COVERED

Causality for SBI-related BII/ASIA is reviewed. To address the role of silicone implants in promoting causality, we utilized the Bradford-Hill criteria, with results highlighted in this article.

EXPERT OPINION

We conclude that there is a causal association between SBIs and BII/ASIA. Using data derived from patients with BII/ASIA and from other medically implanted devices, there appears to be clear pathogenic relationship between SBI and BII/ASIA. Breast implants cause characteristic systemic reactions in certain women, leading to symptoms of sufficient severity to warrant device removal. The morbidity suffered is variable. SBI removal resolves the symptoms in most women and removal is the most effective treatment.

Effectiveness and safety of the direct oral anticoagulants in non-triple positive antiphospholipid syndrome without prior arterial thromboembolism

Thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (TAPS) is an autoimmune disorder that manifests with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and/or arterial thromboembolism (ATE) in the presence of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs). Recent trials have failed to demonstrate non-inferiority of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to vitamin K antagonists as anticoagulation in TAPS, but there is a subgroup of non-triple positive patients without prior ATE in who only limited data exists. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of DOACs in non-triple positive TAPS without prior ATE. We conducted a retrospective review of all non-triple positive TAPS patients without prior ATE who were anticoagulated with a DOAC at two tertiary care hospitals from January 2010 to July 2020. We assessed outcomes of VTE, ATE, major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB). 50 patients were included in the analysis, encompassing 157.2 years of patient follow-up. There were no recurrent VTE, but one patient had a possible arterial thrombosis (0.64 events per 100 patient-years [95% confidence interval (CI 0.16-35.49)] as a transient ischemic attack (TIA) which occurred on reduced dose DOAC. There were no major bleeding events, but two patients had CRNMB (1.27 events per 100 patient-years [95% CI 1.5-46.0]), both as menorrhagia. DOACs were effective and safe as anticoagulation in non-triple positive TAPS patients without prior ATE with a low rate of recurrent thrombosis and bleeding. Larger, prospective controlled studies are required to confirm these findings prior to routine use of DOACs in this subgroup.

Obstetrical outcome and treatments in seronegative primary APS: data from European retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To compare characteristics, pregnancies and treatments during pregnancies of seronegative and seropositive antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), to analyse factors associated with obstetrical outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Inclusion criteria were: (1) thrombotic and/or obstetrical APS (Sydney criteria); (2) absence of conventional antiphospholipid antibodies (APL); (3) at least one persistent non-conventional APL among IgA anticardiolipin antibodies, IgA anti-B2GPI, anti-vimentin G/M, anti-annexin V G/M, anti-phosphatidylethanolamine G/M and anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin G/M antibodies. The exclusion criteria were: (1) systemic lupus erythematosus ( SLE) or SLE-like disease; and (2) other connective tissue disease.

RESULTS

A total of 187 women (mean 33±5 years) with seronegative APS were included from 14 centres in Austria, Spain, Italy, Slovenia and France and compared with 285 patients with seropositive APS. Seronegative APS has more obstetrical rather than thrombotic phenotypes, with only 6% of venous thrombosis in comparison to seropositive APS. Cumulative incidence of adverse obstetrical events was similar in seronegative and seropositive APS patients, although higher rates of intrauterine deaths (15% vs 5%; p=0.03), of preeclampsia (7% vs 16%, p=0.048) and lower live birth term (36±3 vs 38±3 weeks of gestation; p=0.04) were noted in seropositive APS. The cumulative incidence of adverse obstetrical events was significantly improved in treated versus untreated seronegative APS (log rank<0.05), whereas there was no difference between patients who received aspirin or aspirin-low-molecular weighted heparin combination.

CONCLUSION

Several non-criteria APL can be detected in patients with clinical APS features without any conventional APL, with various rates. The detection of non-criteria APL and thus the diagnosis of seronegative APS could discuss the therapeutic management similar to seropositive APS, but well-designed controlled studies are necessary.

Autoantibody Discovery, Assay Development and Adoption: Death Valley, the Sea of Survival and Beyond

Dating to the discovery of the Lupus Erythematosus (LE) cell in 1948, there has been a dramatic growth in the discovery of unique autoantibodies and their cognate targets, all of which has led to the availability and use of autoantibody testing for a broad spectrum of autoimmune diseases. Most studies of the sensitivity, specificity, commutability, and harmonization of autoantibody testing have focused on widely available, commercially developed and agency-certified autoantibody kits. However, this is only a small part of the spectrum of autoantibody tests that are provided through laboratories world-wide. This manuscript will review the wider spectrum of testing by exploring the innovation pathway that begins with autoantibody discovery followed by assessment of clinical relevance, accuracy, validation, and then consideration of regulatory requirements as an approved diagnostic test. Some tests are offered as "Research Use Only (RUO)", some as "Laboratory Developed Tests (LDT)", some enter Health Technology Assessment (HTA) pathways, while others are relegated to a "death valley" of autoantibody discovery and become "orphan" autoantibodies. Those that achieve regulatory approval are further threatened by the business world's "Darwinian Sea of Survival". As one example of the trappings of autoantibody progression or failure, it is reported that more than 200 different autoantibodies have been described in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a small handful (~10%) of these have achieved regulatory approval and are widely available as commercial diagnostic kits, while a few others may be available as RUO or LDT assays. However, the vast majority (90%) are orphaned and languish in an autoantibody 'death valley'. This review proposes that it is important to keep an inventory of these "orphan autoantibodies" in 'death valley' because, with the increasing availability of multi-analyte arrays and artificial intelligence (MAAI), some can be rescued to achieve a useful role in clinical diagnostic especially in light of patient stratification and precision medicine.

Management of patients with antiphospholipid antibodies: what to do in laboratory scenarios that do not fit the guidelines

Introduction: Some patients with positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) have not been included in randomized clinical trials or observational registries and, therefore, information on their risk of obstetric or thrombotic recurrence and optimal treatment is scarce.Areas covered: In the present review, the existing evidence regarding the management of two laboratory scenarios not covered by the guidelines is presented: (1) patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) clinical manifestations and aPL positivity not fulfilling APS laboratory criteria, and (2) the possibility of discontinuing anticoagulation in APS patients whose aPL become persistently negative.Expert opinion: Growing evidence suggests a role for low titers and 'non-criteria' aPL, especially in obstetric APS. Treatment is not formally recommended but might be considered according to the individual's risk profile. Regarding the question of whether or not to discontinue anticoagulants after the 'spontaneous' disappearance of aPL, there is no definite answer. Retrospective studies seem to suggest that withdrawal of anticoagulation could be safe in certain patients with APS, especially in those with a first provoked venous thrombosis and whose aPL became persistently negative during follow-up. Still, before the withdrawal can be recommended in routine clinical practice, multicenter and prospective studies are required to validate this hypothesis.

B cells in primary antiphospholipid syndrome: Review and remaining challenges

It is now widely accepted that antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) have direct pathogenic effects and that B cells, notably through aPL production, play a key role in the development of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Recent findings strengthened the implication of B cells with the description of specific B cell phenotype abnormalities and inborn errors of immunity involving B cell signaling in APS patients. In addition, it has been shown in preclinical models that cross-reactivity between APS autoantigens and mimotopes expressed by human gut commensals can lead to B cell tolerance breakdown and are sufficient for APS development. However, B cell targeting therapies are surprisingly not as effective as expected in APS compared to other autoimmune diseases. Elucidation of the B cell tolerance breakdown mechanisms in APS patients may help to develop and guide the use of novel therapeutic agents that target B cells or specific immune pathway.

Avidity of anti-phospholipid antibodies in relation to their levels

Introduction

The heterogeneity of anti-phospholipid antibodies can be manifested not only in different antigenic specificities, but also in their avidities. The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between anti-cardiolipin antibody (aCL) IgG avidities and levels within the range of their titres, from very low to high ones.

Material and methods

We analyzed 78 serum samples from 60 patients by ELISA with chaotropic agents, using urea concentration of 6 and 8 mol/l and single diluted serum samples. The changes of aCL levels and avidities were explored during a long-term follow-up in 14 patients.

Results

The avidities of aCLs did not differ in the groups of patients classified according to aCL levels. The higher avidity antibodies predominated in our patients and the fluctuation of avidities in the longitudinal follow-up did not show significant differences. No relationship between aCL levels and their avidities was found.

Conclusions

aCL avidities seem to have no relationship with aCL levels and high-avidity aCLs; the potentially deleterious effects might be present also in patients with low and extremely low aCL levels. Avidity of aCLs belongs to stable characteristics with insignificant changes in time.

Validation of the Particle-Based Multi-Analyte Technology for Detection of Anti-PhosphatidylSerine/Prothrombin Antibodies

Among “extra-criteria” antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies, are considered a part of risk assessment strategies when investigating patients suspected of having antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). aPL detection is currently performed by solid-phase assays to identify anti-cardiolipin (aCL), anti-β2glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) and aPS/PT antibodies, but new techniques are emerging. Among these, particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT), which allows the full automation and simultaneous digital detection of autoantibodies and proteins, including IgG, IgA and IgM isotypes of aCL, aβ2GPI and aPS/PT. The aim of this study was to investigate the agreement of aPS/PT testing between enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the PMAT platform. A total of 94 patients were enrolled in the study, including 71 patients with confirmed APS and 23 “aPL carriers”. aPS/PT IgG showed a moderate binomial agreement between ELISA and PMAT (k = 0.57, 95% CI 0.45–0.75), and aPS/PT IgM showed a moderate agreement (k = 0.60, 95% CI 0.45–0.75). Moreover, when considering the continuous agreement, both aPS/PT IgG and IgM showed a statistically significant correlation between ELISA and PMAT (Spearman’s correlation = 0.69, p < 0.001 and 0.72, p < 0.001, respectively). This study demonstrates that PMAT technology is a reliable method for aPS/PT IgG and IgM testing when compared to the available commercial ELISA kit.

Molecular Mechanisms of "Antiphospholipid Antibodies" and Their Paradoxical Role in the Pathogenesis of "Seronegative APS"

Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by arterial and/or venous thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity, associated with circulating antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). In some cases, patients with a clinical profile indicative of APS (thrombosis, recurrent miscarriages or fetal loss), who are persistently negative for conventional laboratory diagnostic criteria, are classified as "seronegative" APS patients (SN-APS). Several findings suggest that aPL, which target phospholipids and/or phospholipid binding proteins, mainly β-glycoprotein I (β-GPI), may contribute to thrombotic diathesis by interfering with hemostasis. Despite the strong association between aPL and thrombosis, the exact pathogenic mechanisms underlying thrombotic events and pregnancy morbidity in APS have not yet been fully elucidated and multiple mechanisms may be involved. Furthermore, in many SN-APS patients, it is possible to demonstrate the presence of unconventional aPL ("non-criteria" aPL) or to detect aPL with alternative laboratory methods. These findings allowed the scientists to study the pathogenic mechanism of SN-APS. This review is focused on the evidence showing that these antibodies may play a functional role in the signal transduction pathway(s) leading to thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity in SN-APS. A better comprehension of the molecular mechanisms triggered by aPL may drive development of potential therapeutic strategies in APS patients.

The prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies in women with late pregnancy complications and low-risk for chromosomal abnormalities

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are known to increase the risk of obstetrical complications. However, aPL significance and prevalence in women with late-onset pregnancy complications (LO-PC) need further clarification.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the prevalence of aPL in a cohort of women who experienced LO-PC and to compare it with a cohort of uneventful pregnancies.

METHODS

One hundred pregnant women who experienced LO-PC, had a low risk for chromosomal abnormalities, and absence of fetal abnormalities were recruited from August 2018 to August 2019. One hundred women with uneventful pregnancy were included as controls. aPL testing was performed on serum samples derived from prenatal screening test and included both criteria and "extra criteria" aPL.

RESULTS

Patients with LO-PC had significantly higher aPL prevalence when compared with controls (31/100 [31%] vs 10/100 [10%]; P < .001). More in detail, up to 26% of women with LO-PC were positive for one aPL, with an overall prevalence significantly higher than controls (26% vs 9%; P < .05). Among single aPL positivity, patients had significantly higher rate of positivity and titers of anticardiolipin IgG (10% vs 2%; mean ± standard deviation 11 ± 13 vs 4 ± 9.6 chemoluminescent unit; P < .05) and phosphatidylserine-prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) IgM (15% vs 6%; mean ± standard deviation 10.2 ± 21.7 vs 3.7 ± 13.7 U; P < .05). Testing for aPS/PT (IgM/IgG) alone allowed the identification of 17 patients negative for criteria aPL. aPL-positive patients had a significantly higher risk of preterm birth (34-36 + 6 weeks; 10% vs 8%; P < .012).

CONCLUSIONS

We report a high prevalence of aPL in our cohort. Testing for both criteria and "extra criteria" aPL in women with previous LO-PC could improve the diagnostic accuracy identifying women at higher risk for recurrent pregnancy complications.

"Non-criteria" antiphospholipid syndrome: A nomenclature proposal

The classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) generate discussion, with a growing impression that certain patients not fulfilling these criteria might be inadequately excluded from the classification. Nonetheless, these "non-criteria" patients are heterogeneously defined across different publications. We reviewed the "non-criteria" APS subgroups depicted in the literature and attempted to organize these subsets in a nomenclature proposal that could be used for research purposes. We established four potential patient profiles, grouped under the broad term "non-criteria APS": (A) "Seronegative APS": patients fulfilling clinical criteria, plus "non-criteria" manifestations, with persistently negative antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL); (B) "Clinical non-criteria APS": patients with "non-criteria" manifestations, plus aPL positivity fulfilling the classification criteria; (C) "Incomplete laboratory APS": patients fulfilling clinical criteria, plus positive aPL, but not fulfilling the classification criteria (low titer aPL); and (D) "Laboratory non-criteria APS": patients fulfilling clinical criteria, with negative or low titer criteria aPL, plus positive "non-criteria" aPL. This categorization could allow for a more homogeneous research approach to APS, enabling more sustained and universal conclusions.

Non-Criteria Antiphospholipid Antibodies: Risk Factors for Endothelial Dysfunction in Women with Pre-Eclampsia

The association between unconventional antiphospholipid antibodies and pre-eclampsia in patients without thrombotic manifestations and its relationship with endothelial dysfunction after delivery has been studied poorly. We included 157 pregnant women, 122 of them having developed pre-eclampsia (56 non-severe and 66 severe). The determination of classical and unconventional, as well as pulse wave velocity and ankle-brachial index were performed at three months after delivery. The prevalence of unconventional antiphospholipid antibodies was 22.9% and 54.9% in patients included in control and pre-eclampsia groups, respectively (p = 0.001). The most frequent antiphospholipid antibody was IgM anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin in both cohorts. The presence of IgM anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin showed an association with the development of pre-eclampsia (OR = 5.4; CI 95% (2.0-14.9), p = 0.001) with an AUC of 0.744 (p < 0.001). Likewise, IgM anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin exhibited a positive linear correlation with pulse wave velocity values (rho = 0.830; p < 0.001) and an association with the presence of pulse wave velocity altered values (OR = 1.33; CI95% (1.10-1.59), p = 0.002). With regard to ankle braquial index values, the presence of IgM anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin displayed a weak negative correlation (rho = -0.466; p < 0.001) and an association with altered ankle braquial index values (OR = 1.08; CI 95% (1.04-1.13), p < 0.001). In patients who developed preeclampsia, the presence of IgM anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin could be associated with endothelial dysfunction, causing alteration of cardiovascular parameters.

Evaluation of novel assays for the detection of autoantibodies in antiphospholipid syndrome

Patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) present with clinical features of recurrent thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity and persistently test positive for the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). At least one clinical (vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity) and one lab-based (positive test result for lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies and/or anti-β2-glycoprotein 1 antibodies) criterion have to be met for a patient to be classified as having APS. Nevertheless, the clinical variety of APS encompasses additional signs and symptoms, potentially affecting any organ, that cannot be explained exclusively by a prothrombotic state. Those manifestations, also known as extra-criteria manifestations, include haematologic (thrombocytopenia and haemolytic anaemia), neurologic (chorea, myelitis and migraine) manifestations as well as the presence of livedo reticularis, nephropathy and valvular heart disease. The growing body of evidence describing the clinical aspect of the syndrome has been paralleled over the years by emerging research interest focusing on the development of novel biomarkers that might improve the diagnostic accuracy for APS when compared to the current aPL tests. This review will focus on the clinical utility of extra-criteria aPL specificities. Besides, the promising role of a new technology using particle based multi-analyte testing that supports aPL panel algorithm testing will be discussed. Diagnostic approaches to difficult cases, including real-world case studies investigating the diagnostic added value of extra criteria aPL, particularly anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin, will also be examined.

[Seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome: Myth or reality?]

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by thrombosis and/or obstetrical manifestations and the persistent presence, at least 12 weeks apart, of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) such as lupus anticoagulant (LA) and/or anticardiolipin antibodies (ACL) and/or anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI). The finding of patients with clinical profile highly suggestive of APS but who are negative for conventional biological criteria has led to the concept of seronegative APS. In the last few years, new antigen targets and methodological approaches have been employed to more clearly identify this syndrome in patients with thrombosis or obstetrical complications without conventional aPL. Although seronegative APS is still controversial, there is increasing recognition of the existence of this subgroup. However, clinical relevance of non conventional aPL need to be confirmed by efforts toward standardizing new biological tools and longitudinal studies involving large cohort of patients.

"Non-criteria" antiphospholipid antibodies add value to antiphospholipid syndrome diagnoses in a large Chinese cohort

BACKGROUND

Despite expansion in the 2006 Sydney antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria to include IgG/IgM anti-β2-glycoprotein (aβ2GPI) antibodies in addition to IgG/IgM anti-cardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and lupus anticoagulant (LAC), some individuals with clinical features of APS remain seronegative (seronegative APS or SNAPS) and are at risk of recurrent thrombosis and pregnancy morbidities. Our aim was to assess the value of "non-criteria" aPL antibodies to detect these SNAPS patients.

METHODS

One hundred ninety-two APS patients, 90 SNAPS patients, 193 autoimmune disease controls, and 120 healthy controls were evaluated. Ten antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) were tested using commercial kits, including 5 non-criteria aPLs: anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) IgG/IgM, aCL IgA, aβ2GPI IgA, and anti-β2GPI Domain 1 (aβ2GPI-D1) IgG.

RESULTS

Up to 60.9% of the SNAPS and 93.5% of APS patients were detected by at least one non-criteria aPL. aPS/PT IgG had the highest Youden index in classifying APS and SNAPS from controls. aPS/PT IgG and aβ2GPI Domain 1 IgG seem to be the most significant risk factors for thrombotic events and pregnancy morbidity, respectively. aPS/PT IgG/IgM and aβ2GPI-D1 IgG were detected in some SNAPS patients, while IgA isotypes of aCL/aβ2GPI tended to appear together with other biomarkers. The combined analysis showed enhanced diagnostic performance with the inclusion of non-criteria aPLs.

CONCLUSIONS

Recognition of SNAPS patients is critical for clinical management and prevention of potential thrombotic and obstetric adverse events. The non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies help to identify a considerable portion (60.9%) of these patients who otherwise may remain untreated and at clinical risk.

Intralipid Immunotherapy for Repeated IVF Failure

The intravenous fat emulsion, intralipid, has been hypothesised to be an effective and safe treatment for repeated in vitro fertilisation (IVF), implantation failure and pregnancy loss. This exploratory, retrospective cohort study determined pregnancy outcomes and documented adverse events associated with intralipid use. Ninety-three women were identified as having received intralipid for a history of repeated unsuccessful IVF cycles and pre-viable pregnancy loss in two Australian IVF units that independently recruited between October 2014 and July 2016. Pregnancy outcomes and adverse events were recorded in fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles in which the infusion was administered. The 93 women who received intralipid had a clinical pregnancy rate of 40.0%, compared with 35.0% in 651 age-matched controls undergoing IVF, which was not significantly different. The intralipid group had a livebirth rate of 35.7%. Apart from flushing, which was experienced by one individual, there were no adverse events associated with intralipid use. As a prelude to definitive evidence of benefit, we did not identify a safety concern or reduced pregnancy rates in intralipid users compared to controls. Indeed, these outcomes were better than expected in a poor prognosis group. This data supports an argument for large, randomised controlled trials to determine the benefit of intralipid in the treatment of recurrent implantation failure or miscarriage.

Does seronegative obstetric APS exist? "pro" and "cons"

Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) is the commonest treatable cause of recurrent miscarriage and pharmacological treatment of pregnant patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) should aim at preventing obstetric complications and maternal thrombotic events. Conventional treatment for patients with an established diagnosis of obstetric APS (OAPS), generally resulting in over 70-80% successful pregnancies. Since seropositive (SP)-APS and seronegative (SN)-APS patients had shown similar clinical profiles, patients with SN- OAPS, as well as SP-OAPS, should receive combined treatment in order to improve the pregnancy prognosis; indeed, current standard of care increased good pregnancy outcome in SN-APS, with similar effect to confirmed APS. The above data suggest that there are patients with the clinical manifestations of OAPS but persistently negative to conventional aPL that need to be identified to ensure adequate therapy and therefore a better prognosis. The clinical utility of non-criteria aPL in the diagnosis of SN-APS is still a matter of debate. In the last decade more and more studies have reported the presence of patients suffering from SN-APS in which non-conventional ("non-criteria") aPL might be present or antibodies may be detected using methodological approaches different from the traditional assays. To improve test standardization large prospective, multicenter, and multinational studies are needed. Therefore, when assessing a patient with clinical manifestations consistent with OAPS but aPL negative using the conventional available assays, the clinician should consider the possibility that the patient is affected with SN-APS.

Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of a novel line immunoassay for the detection of criteria and non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies in comparison to established ELISAs

Background

Persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) constitute the serological hallmark of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Recently, various new assay technologies for the detection of aPL better suited to multiplex reaction environments than ELISAs emerged. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of such a novel line immunoassay (LIA) for the simultaneous detection of 10 different aPL.

Methods

Fifty-three APS patients and 34 healthy controls were investigated for criteria (antibodies against cardiolipin [aCL], β2-glycoprotein I [aβ2-GPI]) and non-criteria aPL (antibodies against phosphatidic acid [aPA], phosphatidyl-choline [aPC], -ethanolamine [aPE], -glycerol [aPG], -inositol [aPI], -serine [aPS], annexin V [aAnnV], prothrombin [aPT]) IgG and IgM by LIA. Criteria aPL were additionally determined with the established Alegria (ALE), AcuStar (ACU), UniCap (UNI), and AESKULISA (AES) systems and non-criteria aPL with the AES system. Diagnostic performance was evaluated with a gold standard for criteria aPL derived from the results of the four established assays via latent class analysis and with the clinical diagnosis as gold standard for non-criteria aPL.

Results

Assay performance of the LIA for criteria aPL was comparable to that of ALE, ACU, UNI, and AES. For non-criteria aPL, sensitivities of the LIA for aPA-, aPI-, aPS-IgG and aPA-IgM were significantly higher and for aPC-, aPE-, aAnnV-IgG and aPC- and aPE-IgM significantly lower than AES. Specificities did not differ significantly.

Conclusions

The LIA constitutes a valuable diagnostic tool for aPL profiling. It offers increased sensitivity for the detection of aPL against anionic phospholipids. In contrast, ELISAs exhibit strengths for the sensitive detection of aPL against neutral phospholipids.

Right ventricular thrombus in a case of neonatal lupus: case report

Neonatal thrombosis is considered a rare manifestation with unclear aetiology. We reported a neonatal lupus of a Sjogren’s syndrome mother with recurrent miscarriage secondary to antiphospholipid syndrome; seronegative to anticardiolipin antibodies, lupus anticoagulant and B2GP1. She was serologically positive to antiphosphatidylethanolamine and antiprothrombin antibodies, anti-SSA/Ro and anti-SSB/La. The neonate developed neonatal lupus complicated with right ventricular thrombus assumed to be induced by maternal transmission of antiphosphatidylethanolamine and antiprothrombin antibodies, treated successfully with tissue plasminogen activator and warfarin.

[Which place of antiphosphatidylethanolamine antibodies research in seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome suspicion?]

PURPOSE

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a clinico-biological syndrome, which associates vascular injury and persisting antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Patients with clinical symptoms of APS but without aPL are defined as "seronegative APS" (SNAPS). The aim of this study was to evaluate antiphosphatidylethanolamine antibody (aPE) investigation in patients with SNAPS suspicion.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in patients with SNAPS suspicion. A homemade enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to search for aPE. The results of this homemade method were compared with those from a global screening ELISA.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-eight patients with SNAPS suspicion were included. Among them, 58.3% had a thrombotic event. The homemade ELISA found positive persisting aPE in 23 patients (10%): 15 with a thrombotic event, 6 with obstetrical morbidity and 2 with a combined event. The global screening ELISA was positive in only 11 of these 23 patients (47.8%).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest the implication of aPE in SNAPS.

Prevalence and Significance of Non-conventional Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Patients With Clinical APS Criteria

Background: The biological diagnostics of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) takes into account the persistent positivity for anticardiolipin and/or anti-β2GP1 antibodies and/or presence of lupus anticoagulant (LA). However, some non-conventional antiphospholipid antibodies have emerged that could help in the diagnosis of APS.

Objectives: To study the potential usefulness of non-conventional antiphospholipid antibodies in clinical practice.

Methods: Eighty-seven patients, aged from 15 to 92 years were included and classified in following groups: 41 patients positive for the conventional antibodies with clinical criterion of APS (31 with primary APS and 10 secondary), 17 seronegative APS (SNAPS) patients (i.e., persistent negativity for the conventional antibodies with a strong clinical suspicion of APS), 11 asymptomatic antiphospholipid antibodies carriers (i.e., persistent positivity for the conventional antibodies without clinical evidence of APS), and 18 patients presenting with a first thrombotic or obstetrical event. IgG and IgM were detected to the following antigens: phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (PS/PT) by ELISA, and phosphatidic acid, phosphatidyl-ethanolamine, phosphatidyl-glycerol, phosphatidyl-inositol, phosphatidylserine, annexin V, prothrombin by immunodot. Anti-β2GP1 IgA, and anti-β2GP1 domain 1 IgG were detected by chemiluminescence.

Results: Positivity for the non-conventional antibodies was correlated with APS severity; patients with catastrophic APS (CAPS) being positive for 10.7 (Median, Range: 5–14) non-conventional antibodies. 9/17 seronegative patients were positive for at least one of non-conventional antibodies. A study of non-supervised hierarchical clustering of all markers revealed that anti-PS/PT antibodies showed high correlation with the presence of LA. All patients with APS triple positivity (highest risk profile) exhibited also persistent positivity for anti-PS/PT antibodies.

Conclusions: Our data obtained from a prospective cohort constituted mainly by patients with primary APS, suggest that non-conventional APS antibodies may be useful for patients classified as SNAPS. They demonstrate the potential value of aPS/PT antibodies as a strong marker of APS. We propose that anti-PS/PT antibodies could be a surrogate APS biological marker of LA to classify in high-risk profile patients treated by direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), in whom LA detection cannot be achieved.

Presence of Immune Complexes of IgG/IgM Bound to B2-glycoprotein I Is Associated With Non-criteria Clinical Manifestations in Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Background: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired autoimmune disorder defined by the presence of both clinical (thromboembolic events or pregnancy morbidity) and laboratory (antiphospholipid antibodies, aPL) manifestations. Despite their importance, several clinical manifestations strongly associated with APS such as livedo reticularis (LR), thrombocytopenia, sicca-ophthalmic(sicca), heart, or neurological manifestations are not included in the APS clinical classification criteria. Circulating immune complexes (CIC) formed by Beta-2-glycoprotein I (B2GPI) and aPL (B2-CIC) have been described and their presence has been related with thrombotic events.

Methods: Cross-sectional and observational cohort study in APS patients with thrombotic symptomatology.

Setting and Participants: Fifty-seven patients from the University Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa (Belgrade, Serbia) who met the APS classification criteria (35 with primary APS and 22 with APS associated to systemic lupus erythematosus). This study aimed to determine the prevalence of B2-CIC in APS patients and to evaluate their association with clinical manifestations of APS not included in the classification criteria.

Results: B2-CIC prevalence in APS patients was 19.3%. The presence of thrombocytopenia (OR:5.7), livedo reticularis (OR:5.6), sicca (OR:12.6), and leukopenia (OR:5.6) was significantly higher in patients with B2-CIC than in the rest of APS patients. C3 and C4 complement factor levels were significantly lower in B2-CIC positive patients, which suggests a greater consumption of complement. Patients with quadruple aPL positivity (triple aPL-positivity plus the presence of B2-CIC) showed a higher prevalence of thrombocytopenia, leucopenia and LR than those with single/double aPL-positivity. No significant differences were found in the frequencies observed in patients with triple-only vs. single/double aPL-positivity. There were no significant differences between patients with primary APS and lupus-associated APS regarding the prevalence of B2-CIC and outcomes.

Conclusions: Presence of B2-CIC is strongly associated with several non-criteria clinical manifestations related to APS and to higher complement consumption. More studies are required to better understand the clinical significance of B2-CIC.

Zonal cortical scarring and tubular thyroidization in kidney biopsies of patients with SLE-histologic indicator for antiphospholipid antibodies

Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) is an acquired prothrombotic autoimmune disease caused by the presence of antibodies against anionic phospholipids or plasma proteins bound to phospholipids on cell membranes. It can be a primary disease or secondary to other autoimmune diseases, most commonly systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Laboratory testing for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) may be only transiently positive, so APS could be missed until a catastrophic thrombotic episode or pregnancy morbidity occurs. In the kidneys, this manifests as thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), and patients present with hypertensive urgency and acute kidney injury. However, APS may not always have a catastrophic presentation but instead a more smoldering course. Kidney biopsy may not show obvious active TMA lesions but rather only chronic injury in the form of zonal cortical scarring and tubular thyroidization. Still, it may warrant anticoagulation therapy. So it is important to recognize this pattern of injury in the biopsy. Herein, we retrospectively study the correlation between presence of this histologic feature in kidney biopsies of SLE patients and positive aPL testing results (anticardiolipin antibodies and/or lupus anticoagulant). Kidney biopsies of SLE patients from 2004 to 2015 ( n = 186) were screened for presence or absence of zonal cortical scarring. Their electronic medical records were reviewed for aPL results. Our study showed low sensitivity (33%) but higher positive predictive value (62%), specificity (89%) and negative predictive value (71%). This histologic finding is therefore not a sensitive screening tool, but if present, greatly increases the likelihood of underlying aPL. We want to emphasize that recognition of this histologic feature in the biopsies of SLE patients is important so as not to miss the opportunity to treat with anticoagulation therapy and possibly slow down the chronic renal damage.

A Monocentric Cohort of Obstetric Seronegative Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome

The present study was conducted to diagnose obstetric anti-phospholipid syndrome (OAPS) in patients with clinical signs suggestive of anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS), but persistently negative for conventional anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL). Sera from 61 obstetrical seronegative APS (SN-APS) patients were analyzed for anti-cardiolipin antibodies (aCL) using thin-layer chromatography (TLC)-immunostaining, for anti-cardiolipin/vimentin antibodies (aCL/Vim), anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies, IgA anti-β₂glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ₂GPI), and IgA aCL antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Taken together, our findings show that in 50 out of 61 SN-APS (81.9%) at least one aPL/cofactor antibody was detected using the assays under test. Results revealed that 76% of SN-APS patients resulted positive for aCL by TLC-immunostaining, 54% for aCL/Vim, 12% for aPS/PT, 4% for IgA aβ₂GPI, and 2% for IgA aCL. Thirty-five out of 61 patients were followed up and the tests were repeated on two occasions, at least 12 weeks apart. Twenty-six out of 35 SN-APS (74.3%) were positive at least one non-conventional test; only 2 patients (5.7%) did not confirm the positivity to the second test. These findings suggest that non-conventional tests, mainly aCL/Vim and aCL detected by TLC-immunostaining, seem to be the most sensitive approaches for finding out aPL in patients with obstetric SN-APS. The use of these tests can be useful for accurate and timely diagnosis of patients with obstetrical APS who are negative for conventional laboratory criteria markers.

An extraordinary case of recurrent stroke, disseminated thrombosis and endocarditis

A 43-year-old woman with no known cardiovascular risk factors was admitted with a second episode of ischaemic stroke. She was not a known case of connective tissue disease like systemic lupus erythematosus or antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). During the current episode, she was found to have markedly deranged coagulation parameters and laboratory evidence of microangiopathic haemolysis, but no evidence of sepsis or active bleeding. Further investigation revealed multiple organ infarcts. A diagnosis of probable catastrophic APS was made and she improved dramatically with a combination of plasmapheresis, corticosteroids and therapeutic anticoagulation. Serological markers of APS were negative. Her hospital course was complicated by Libman Sacks endocarditis with significant aortic regurgitation that improved markedly with anticoagulation obviating the need for high-risk cardiac surgery. At discharge, she was stable and well and was advised long-term anticoagulation and rheumatology follow-up.

Antiphosphatidylethanolamine Antibodies and Deep Vein Thrombosis in Lupus Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Backgroud. Which factors determine venous thrombotic events in some antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients and arterial thrombosis or conditions related to pregnancy in others has not been established yet. Purpose. The aim of this study was to search the antiphospholipid antibodies (APLAs) correlates in regard to deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and APS. Methods. Twenty-nine patients fulfilling the criteria of both SLE and APS were included. Complete anamnesis and clinical examination was performed on inclusion. Also, for all patients, disease activity was assessed by the SLEDAI score. An extended APLAs profile, ten Abs, was searched. Results. The titers of IgG anticardiolipin (aCL), IgG anti-β2 glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI), IgG antiphosphatidylethanolamine (aPE), and also of IgG antiprothrombin (aPT) were significant higher in patients with DVT history. After analysis by ROC curve and univariate logistic regression, the strongest association was found for IgG aPE. Also, in multivariate analysis, SLEDAI score correlated with the DVT antecedents. Conclusions. IgG aPE might be involved in DVT pathogenic pathways in patients with SLE and APS as their titers remain significantly higher in patients with previous DVT. Lupus patients with DVT events represent a subgroup of patients with more severe underlying pathology.

Clinical Risk Assessment in the Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Current Landscape and Emerging Biomarkers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Laboratory criteria for the classification of antiphospholipid syndrome include the detection of a lupus anticoagulant and/or anticardiolipin and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies. However, the majority of patients who test positive in these assays do not have thrombosis. Current risk-stratification tools are largely limited to the antiphospholipid antibody profile and traditional thrombotic risk factors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Novel biomarkers that correlate with disease activity and potentially provide insight into future clinical events include domain 1 specific anti-β₂GPI antibodies, antibodies to other phospholipids or phospholipid/protein antigens (such as anti-PS/PT), and functional/biological assays such as thrombin generation, complement activation, levels of circulating microparticles, and annexin A5 resistance. Clinical risk scores may also have value in predicting clinical events. Biomarkers that predict thrombosis risk in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies have been long sought, and several biomarkers have been proposed. Ultimately, integration of biomarkers with established assays and clinical characteristics may offer the best chance of identifying patients at highest risk of APS-related complications.

Diagnosis and management of non-criteria obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome

Accurate diagnosis of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a prerequisite for optimal clinical management. The international consensus (revised Sapporo) criteria for obstetric APS do not include low positive anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti β2 glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) antibodies (> 99th centile) and/or certain clinical criteria such as two unexplained miscarriages, three non-consecutive miscarriages, late preeclampsia, placental abruption, late premature birth, or two or more unexplained in vitro fertilisation failures. In this review we examine the available evidence to address the question of whether patients who exhibit non-criteria clinical and/or laboratory manifestations should be included within the spectrum of obstetric APS. Prospective and retrospective cohort studies of women with pregnancy morbidity, particularly recurrent pregnancy loss, suggest that elimination of aCL and/or IgM aβ2GPI, or low positive positive aCL or aβ2GPI from APS laboratory diagnostic criteria may result in missing the diagnosis in a sizeable number of women who could be regarded to have obstetric APS. Such prospective and retrospective studies also suggest that women with non-criteria obstetric APS may benefit from standard treatment for obstetric APS with low-molecular-weight heparin plus low-dose aspirin, with good pregnancy outcomes. Thus, non-criteria manifestations of obstetric APS may be clinically relevant, and merit investigation of therapeutic approaches. Women with obstetric APS appear to be at a higher risk than other women of pre-eclampsia, placenta- mediated complications and neonatal mortality, and also at increased long-term risk of thrombotic events. The applicability of these observations to outcomes in women with non-criteria obstetric APS remains to be determined.

Diagnosing antiphospholipid syndrome: 'extra-criteria' manifestations and technical advances

First described in the early 1980s, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a unique form of acquired autoimmune thrombophilia in which patients present with clinical features of recurrent thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity and persistently test positive for the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). At least one clinical (vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity) and one lab-based (positive test result for lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies and/or anti-β2-glycoprotein 1 antibodies) criterion have to be met for a patient to be classified as having APS. However, the clinical spectrum of APS encompasses additional manifestations that can affect many organs and cannot be explained exclusively by patients being in a prothrombotic state; clinical manifestations not listed in the classification criteria (known as extra-criteria manifestations) include neurologic manifestations (chorea, myelitis and migraine), haematologic manifestations (thrombocytopenia and haemolytic anaemia), livedo reticularis, nephropathy and valvular heart disease. Increasingly, research interest has focused on the development of novel assays that might be more specific for APS than the current aPL tests. This Review focuses on the current classification criteria for APS, presenting the role of extra-criteria manifestations and lab-based tests. Diagnostic approaches to difficult cases, including so-called seronegative APS, are also discussed.

Diagnosis and management of the antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by thrombosis and/or pregnancy complications in the presence of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA). Laboratory diagnosis of APLA depends upon the detection of a lupus anticoagulant, which prolongs phospholipid-dependent anticoagulation tests, and/or anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2-glycoprotein-1 (β2GPI) antibodies. APLA are primarily directed toward phospholipid binding proteins. Pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying thrombosis and pregnancy loss in APS include APLA induced cellular activation, inhibition of natural anticoagulant and fibrinolytic systems, and complement activation, among others. There is a high rate of recurrent thrombosis in APS, especially in triple positive patients (patients with lupus anticoagulant, aCL and anti-β2GPI antibodies), and indefinite anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist is the standard of care for thrombotic APS. There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend the routine use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in thrombotic APS. Aspirin with low molecular weight or unfractionated heparin may reduce the incidence of pregnancy loss in obstetric APS. Recent insights into the pathogenesis of APS have led to the identification of new potential therapeutic interventions, including anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory therapies. Additional research is needed to better understand the effects of APLA on activation of signaling pathways in vascular cells, to identify more predictive biomarkers that define patients at greatest risk for a first or recurrent APLA-related clinical event, and to determine the safety and efficacy of DOACs and novel anti-inflammatory and immune-modulatory therapies for refractory APS.

Microangiopathic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome due to anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex IgM antibody

Herein we describe a case of microangiopathic antiphospholipid syndrome (MAPS) due to anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex (aPS/PT) IgM antibody successfully treated with rituximab. A significant correlation was observed between the clinical course and the aPS/PT IgM antibody titer, which can rise earlier before the appearance of clinical symptoms. Rituximab can be safely and effectively used for MAPS. Although detection of only aPS/PT IgM antibody is rare, aPS/PT IgM antibody might be associated with the pathogenesis of MAPS and might be a useful marker of disease activity.

The outcome of ELISA for antiphosphatidylethanolamine antibodies is dependent on the composition of phosphatidylethanolamine

OBJECTIVE

The presence of circulating autoantibodies against phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) has been shown to be positively associated with symptoms of antiphospholipid syndromes (APS). However, the current ELISA-based tests for antiphosphatidylethanolamine (aPE) antibodies remain inconsistent and controversial. The term PE refers to a collection of phospholipids that have phosphorylethanolamine head group as a common structural feature, but can vary in fatty acids with diverse physicochemical properties. The present study was to investigate, using synthetic positionally symmetrical PE species as a model system, the impact of PE structural variations on aPE ELISA.

METHODS

Single and combinations of synthetic PE species, including 16:0 (fatty acid length:degree of unsaturation), 18:0, 18:1, 20:4 and 22:6, were screened with ELISA using serum samples from aPE patients and compared with chicken egg PE. There were a total of 37 aPE patient serum samples, including 11 cofactor-independent IgM, 14 ABP-independent IgG and 12 ABP-dependent aPE serum samples (3 IgM, 8 IgG and 1 IgA). The ELISA conditions were investigated for different isotypes and cofactor dependence. Based on the initial screening, adjustments in phospholipid compositions were made for achieving optimal OD readings. Finally, we isolated total IgG from aPE sera to validate different antigenic preferences.

RESULTS

The antigenic preference was different among immunoglobulin isotypes and between cofactor-dependent versus cofactor-independent aPE antibodies. More specifically, 18:1 PE was a preferred antigen for cofactor-dependent aPE, whereas 20:4 PE was the preferred antigen for cofactor-independent IgG aPE. In contrast, cofactor-independent IgM aPE appeared to have a general preference for a more complex PE combination with longer fatty acids and a higher degree of unsaturation.

CONCLUSION

The present data indicated that the outcome of aPE ELISA was dependent on the composition and physicochemical properties of PE antigens. The discovery that aPE antibodies may have different antigenic preferences could shed light on the nature of their binding interactions.

The Laboratory Diagnosis of the Antiphospholipid Syndrome

The Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) is classified based on the presence of both clinical and laboratory criteria. Both sets of criteria are subject to much review and intense research as it is becoming increasingly clear that no single test is specific for defining this autoimmune disorder. A number of leading international bodies have released guidelines in an attempt to improve the laboratory testing and reporting. The current review is an appraisal of some of the literature pertaining to the laboratory testing.