1
|
Miyashiro M, Asano T, Ishii Y, Miyazaki C, Shimizu H, Masuda J. Treatment Patterns of Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs and Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Japan: A Claims-Based Cohort Study. Drugs Real World Outcomes 2024; 11:285-297. [PMID: 38598110 PMCID: PMC11176134 DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00423-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reports on treatment patterns of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)/Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical practice are still sparse in Japan, especially in combination with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs). OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate treatment patterns of bDMARD/JAKi in the treatment of RA in real-world clinical practice in Japan. METHOD A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Japanese Medical Data Vision health claims database. The inclusion criteria required a recorded diagnosis of RA, defined by ICD-10 codes, in patients aged 18 years and older on the index date. We analyzed 39,903 RA patients treated with DMARDs from 2008 to 2020. RESULTS Among analyzed subjects, 10,196 patients (25.6%) were prescribed bDMARDs/JAKi in combination with csDMARDs, and 3067 patients (7.7%) were prescribed these drugs without csDMARDs. Among the bDMARDs/JAKi, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) were the most commonly prescribed DMARD overall, and also the most common first-line therapy, accounting for 60.0% or 45.5% of patients prescribed these drugs in combination with or without csDMARDs, respectively. Switching, temporary discontinuation (restarting with the same agents), and discontinuation of bDMARDs/JAKi were observed in 3150 (30.9%), 1379 (13.5%), and 2025 (19.9%) patients with csDMARDs, and in 849 (27.7%), 513 (16.7%), and 833 (27.2%) patients without csDMARDs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Real-world treatment trajectories of bDMARDs/JAKi with and without csDMARDs was analyzed in RA patients in Japan between 2008 and 2020. TNFi were the predominant first-line therapy, and likely to be switched to different classes. Understanding the current treatment patterns, including discontinuation, is important to find an optimal treatment strategy for RA patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiko Miyashiro
- Immunology and Infectious Diseases Department, Medical Affairs Division, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Nishi Kanda 3-5-2, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, 101-0065, Japan
| | - Teita Asano
- Immunology and Infectious Diseases Department, Medical Affairs Division, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Nishi Kanda 3-5-2, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, 101-0065, Japan.
| | - Yutaka Ishii
- Immunology and Infectious Diseases Department, Medical Affairs Division, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Nishi Kanda 3-5-2, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, 101-0065, Japan
| | - Celine Miyazaki
- Value, Evidence and Access Department, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Nishi Kanda 3-5-2, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, 101-0065, Japan
| | - Hirohito Shimizu
- Medical Affairs Division, Medical Excellence Department, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Nishi Kanda 3-5-2, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, 101-0065, Japan
| | - Junya Masuda
- Immunology and Infectious Diseases Department, Medical Affairs Division, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Nishi Kanda 3-5-2, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, 101-0065, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Birkner B, Rech J, Edelmann E, Verheyen F, Schett G, Stargardt T. Patient-individual tapering of DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis patients in a real-world setting. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022; 62:1476-1484. [PMID: 35980267 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Revised: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aim to provide real-world evidence on the effectiveness of patient-individual tapering of DMARDs for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in daily clinical practice using medical records and claims data. METHODS We utilize data obtained through a controlled prospective cohort study in Germany conducted from July 2018 to March 2021. Participants consist of RA patients in sustained remission (>6 months) who were eligible for tapering at enrolment. Patients treated with individual tapering based on shared decision making (n = 200) are compared with patients without any dose-reduction (n = 237). The risk of loss of remission and the risk of flare is assessed with risk-adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimators and Cox-Regressions. We evaluate differences in costs one year before and after baseline based on claims data for the subgroup of patients insured at one major sickness fund in Germany (n = 76). RESULTS The risk of flare (HR 0.88 95%-CI: 0.59-1.30) or loss of remission (HR 1.04 95%-CI: 0.73, 1.49) was not statistically different between the individual tapering group and the continuation group. Minor increases of disease activity and decreases of quality of life were observed 12 months after baseline, again with no statistically significant difference. Drug costs decreased by 1,017€in the individual tapering group while increased by 1,151€in the continuation group (p< 0.01). CONCLUSION Individual tapering of DMARDs does not increase the average risk of experiencing flares or loss of remission. Encouraging rheumatologists and patients to apply tapering in shared decision may be a feasible approach to allow individualisation of treatment in RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Birkner
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics (HCHE), Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Rech
- Department of Internal Medicine 3-Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - Georg Schett
- Department of Internal Medicine 3-Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tom Stargardt
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics (HCHE), Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Arnold S, Jaeger VK, Scherer A, Ciurea A, Walker UA, Kyburz D. Discontinuation of biologic DMARDs in a real-world population of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in remission: outcome and risk factors. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 61:131-138. [PMID: 33848332 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Data from randomized controlled trials have shown the feasibility of discontinuation of bDMARD therapy in patients with RA that have reached remission. Criteria for selecting patients that are likely to remain in remission are still incompletely defined.We aimed to identify predictors of successful discontinuation of bDMARD therapy in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management (SCQM) registry, a real-world cohort of RA patients. METHODS RA patients in DAS28-ESR remission who stopped bDMARD/tsDMARD treatment were included. Loss of remission was defined as a DAS28-ESR > 2.6 or restart of a bDMARD/tsDMARD. Time to loss of remission was the main outcome. Kaplan-Meier methods were applied and cox regression was used for multivariable analyses adjusting for confounding factors. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation. RESULTS 318 patients in a bDMARD/tsDMARD-free remission were followed between 1997 and 2017. 241 patients (76%) lost remission after a median time of 0.9 years (95%CI 0.7-1.0). The time to loss of remission was shorter in women, in patients with a longer disease duration >4yrs and in patients who did not meet CDAI remission criteria at baseline. Remission was longer in patients with csDMARD therapy during b/tsDMARD free remission (HR 0.8, p= 0.05, 95%CI 0.6-1.0). CONCLUSION In a real-world patient population the majority of patients who discontinued b/tsDMARD treatment lost remission within <1 year. Our study confirms that fulfilment of more rigorous remission criteria and csDMARD treatment increases the chance of maintaining b/tsDMARD free remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Arnold
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Veronika K Jaeger
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Institute for Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Germany
| | - Almut Scherer
- Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Adrian Ciurea
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ulrich A Walker
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Diego Kyburz
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Prediction of disease flare by biomarkers after discontinuing biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis achieving stringent remission. Sci Rep 2021; 11:6865. [PMID: 33767314 PMCID: PMC7994312 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86335-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
To elucidate the disease-flare process in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after discontinuing biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), we first focused on RA-flare prediction after achieving stringent remission criteria. Patients with RA who maintained a simplified disease activity index ≤ 3.3 for ≥ 3 months during November 2014-January 2018 in our medical centre in Tokyo, Japan, were eligible. The primary endpoint was flare (disease activity score 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate ≥ 3.2 with increase from baseline > 0.6) within 2 years after bDMARD discontinuation. Comprehensive clinical assessments, ultrasonographic evaluation of 40 joints, and blood sampling for 12 biomarkers were performed every 2-3 months for 2 years unless patients experienced flare. Flare-positive and flare-negative patients were compared using univariate and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Thirty-six patients (80.6% female, median disease duration, 5.2 years; median treatment period with discontinued bDMARD, 2 years; median remission duration, 18 months) were enrolled. Twenty patients (55.6%) experienced RA flare 43-651 (median, 115) days after the first skipped date of bDMARDs. Two patients who withdrew without disease flare were excluded from the comparison. Clinical and ultrasonographic evaluations did not show significant between-group differences; Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that higher baseline soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNFR1) concentration impacted subsequent disease flare (p = 0.0041); higher baseline interleukin (IL)-2 concentration was exclusively beneficial to patients with lower sTNFR1 (p = 0.0058), resulting in remission maintenance in 83.3% of patients with lower sTNFR1 and higher IL-2. We demonstrated the usefulness of combined biomarker evaluation for predicting sustained remission after bDMARD discontinuation in RA.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ochiai M, Tanaka E, Sato E, Inoue E, Abe M, Saka K, Sugano E, Sugitani N, Higuchi Y, Yamaguchi R, Sugimoto N, Ikari K, Nakajima A, Yamanaka H, Harigai M. Successful discontinuation of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in real-world settings. Mod Rheumatol 2021; 31:790-795. [PMID: 33538611 DOI: 10.1080/14397595.2021.1883252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To analyze the proportion of successful biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) discontinuation and related factors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical settings. METHODS Among 1775 RA patients who started bDMARDs between 2003 and 2012, 43 patients with DAS28-ESR <3.2 at the time of bDMARD discontinuation were extracted. Patients were divided into two groups (bio-free success: BS and bio-free failure: BF groups) based on bDMARD usage and disease activity 1 year after discontinuation. We evaluated the proportion of bio-free success and assessed factors related to bio-free success. RESULTS Twenty-five patients (58.1%: BS group) maintained discontinuation of bDMARDs and DAS28-ESR <3.2 at 1 year after discontinuation. The median DAS28-ESR at bDMARD initiation was lower in the BS group than in the BF group (3.95 vs 5.04; p = .04). The BS group experienced a larger decrease in average glucocorticoid (GC) dose during bDMARD use than the BF group (-3.0 mg/day vs 0 mg/day; p = .01). CONCLUSION bDMARDs were discontinued without flare up of RA in 58.1% of patients with RA in clinical settings. A lower DAS28-ESR at initiation and reduction of GC dose before discontinuation of bDMARD were important factors associated with bio-free success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moeko Ochiai
- Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eiichi Tanaka
- Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eri Sato
- Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.,Keyaki Total Clinic, Chiba, Japan
| | - Eisuke Inoue
- Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.,Research Administration Center, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mai Abe
- Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kumiko Saka
- Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eri Sugano
- Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naohiro Sugitani
- Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoko Higuchi
- Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rei Yamaguchi
- Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Sugimoto
- Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Katsunori Ikari
- Department of Orthopedics, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ayako Nakajima
- Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.,Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Mie University Hospital, Mie, Japan
| | - Hisashi Yamanaka
- Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.,Rheumatology, Sanno Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masayoshi Harigai
- Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Michaud K, Pope J, van de Laar M, Curtis JR, Kannowski C, Mitchell S, Bell J, Workman J, Paik J, Cardoso A, Taylor PC. Systematic Literature Review of Residual Symptoms and an Unmet Need in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 73:1606-1616. [PMID: 32619340 PMCID: PMC8596735 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the nature and burden of residual disease in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients who meet treatment targets. Second, for those who did not meet targets, to evaluate how much is due to patient symptoms. Methods Prospective and retrospective studies were searched in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library in the English language from January 1, 2008 to April 18, 2018; conference abstracts (from January 2016 to April 2018) and reference lists of relevant studies were also screened. Results Of 8,339 records identified, 55 were included in the review; 53 were unique studies, including 10 randomized controlled trials. Of these, 48 reported on patients who achieved low disease activity (LDA) or remission. Studies varied in population, treatment goals, and outcome reporting. The proportions of patients with residual symptoms in these studies varied by the definitions used for LDA or remission and were more often reported in patients with LDA than those in remission. The most commonly reported outcome measures were functional disability (n = 34 studies), tender or swollen joints (n = 18), pain (n = 17), patient global assessment (n = 15), and fatigue (n = 14). However, few studies reported the percentage of patients achieving a specific threshold, which could then be used to easily define the presence of residual symptoms. Conclusion Residual symptoms are present in some patients despite their achieving LDA or remission, highlighting an unmet need, especially with respect to improving pain, fatigue, and function. Standardized reporting in future observational studies would facilitate better understanding of this issue in defined RA populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaleb Michaud
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, and FORWARD, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, Kansas
| | - Janet Pope
- University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jim Paik
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | - Peter C Taylor
- Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schlager L, Loiskandl M, Aletaha D, Radner H. Predictors of successful discontinuation of biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in remission or low disease activity: a systematic literature review. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020; 59:324-334. [PMID: 31325305 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically review possible predictors of successful discontinuation of biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) in RA patients in remission or low disease activity. METHODS MEDLINE database and Cochrane Library were scanned for studies that discontinued b/tsDMARDs in remission/low disease activity and searched for predictors of successful discontinuation. Additionally, EULAR and ACR meeting abstracts were hand searched. RESULTS Thirty-four studies with a total of 5724 patients were included. Predictors of successful b/tsDMARD discontinuation were (number of studies): low disease activity (n = 13), better physical function (n = 6), low or absence of rheumatoid factor (n = 5) or ACPA (n = 3), low levels of CRP (n = 3) or ESR (n = 3), shorter disease duration (n = 3), low signals of disease activity by ultrasound (n = 3). Only one study with high risk of bias was identified on tsDMARD discontinuation. CONCLUSION Several predictors of successful bDMARD discontinuation were identified. Although studies are heterogeneous, these predictors may inform clinical decision making in patients who are considered for a potential bDMARD discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Schlager
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michaela Loiskandl
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Helga Radner
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cavalli G, Favalli EG. Biologic discontinuation strategies and outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2019; 15:1313-1322. [PMID: 31663390 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2020.1686976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic autoimmune disease, which affects joints as well as extra-articular tissues. In the last decades, increasing targeted therapeutic options dramatically improved RA management by doubling the rate of patients achieving clinical remission. Currently, there is a need for management strategies aimed at limiting treatment-related adverse events and costs in good responders.Areas covered: Data on de-escalation of biologic drugs (especially for anti-TNF agents) are mainly available from post-hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials and from registry-based observational studies. This narrative review illustrates the rationales for dose tapering and expands to provide an overview of the efficacy of the different available strategies for reducing the exposure to biologic drugs in patients achieving a sustained clinical response. Selected studies are discussed as illustrative examples.Expert opinion: Withdrawal of biologic therapy might be attempted in limited patients with very early RA; conversely, established RA is more suitably managed with a progressive decrease of drug regimen, by either dose reduction or injection/infusion spacing. Further studies investigating potential factors predicting post-tapering disease relapse are warranted, in order to better identify the best candidates for a decreased-dose approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Cavalli
- Unit of Immunology, Rheumatology, Allergy and Rare Diseases (UnIRAR), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Meyer MK, Andersen M, Ring T, Andersen GN, Ehlers LH, Rasmussen C, Stensballe A. Personalized rheumatic medicine through dose reduction reduces the cost of biological treatment – a retrospective intervention analysis. Scand J Rheumatol 2019; 48:398-407. [DOI: 10.1080/03009742.2019.1585940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- MK Meyer
- Department of Rheumatology, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark
- Center for Clinical Science, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Center for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark
- The DANBIO Registry and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - M Andersen
- Department of Rheumatology, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark
- Center for Clinical Science, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - T Ring
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Health Economics and Management, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - GN Andersen
- Department of Rheumatology, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark
- Center for Clinical Science, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Center for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark
| | - LH Ehlers
- Department of Health Economics and Management, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - C Rasmussen
- Department of Rheumatology, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark
- Center for Clinical Science, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- The DANBIO Registry and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Health Economics and Management, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - A Stensballe
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ogawa N, Ohashi H, Ota Y, Kobori K, Suzuki M, Tsuboi S, Hayakawa M, Goto Y, Karahashi T, Kimoto O, Miyamoto T, Furukawa S, Shimoyama K, Suzuki D, Maekawa Y. Multicenter, observational clinical study of abatacept in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Immunol Med 2019; 42:29-38. [PMID: 31067155 DOI: 10.1080/25785826.2019.1605036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patient. Patients (20 men, 89 women, aged 61.9 ± 10.4 y) who responded inadequately to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug were treated with abatacept for 24-months. Disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28-CRP) was evaluated. Of 109 patients, 82 (75.2%) were on methotrexate (MTX; mean dosage 9.0 ± 2.7 mg/week); 48 (44.0%) were naive to biologics and 61 (56.0%) had failed biologics. The 1- and 2-year retention rates were 77% and 53%, respectively. At 24-months, the DAS28-CRP remission rates were 54.5% in the biologic-naïve patients, and 28.2% in the biologic-failure patients (p < .01), while the structural remission rates were 83.9% and 73.1%, respectively (p = .461). Abatacept was equally effective in RA patients who were and were not on concomitant MTX. Biologic-naïve was associated with better clinical outcome. Abatacept was effective in patients who showed decreasing anti-CCP antibody titers or serum MMP-3 levels during treatment. Infection was the most frequent adverse effect of abatacept therapy. In conclusion, abatacept is more effective in biologic-naïve than in biologic-failure RA patients with or without concomitant use of MTX. Abatacept is more effective in RA patients with than without decreasing serum MMP-3 or anti-CCP antibody titers during treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noriyoshi Ogawa
- a Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine 3 , Hamamatsu University School of Medicine , Hamamatsu-City , Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ohashi
- b Department of Rheumatology, Omaezaki Municipal Hospital , Omaezaki-City , Japan
| | | | - Kaori Kobori
- d Kobori Orthopedic Clinic , Hamamatsu-City , Japan
| | - Motohiro Suzuki
- e Department of Orthopedic Surgery , Hamamatsu University School of Medicine , Hamamatsu , Japan
| | - Seiji Tsuboi
- f Department of Rheumatology, Shizuoka Kosei Hospital , Shizuoka-City , Japan
| | | | | | - Taro Karahashi
- i Department of Rheumatology, Fujieda Municipal Hospital , Fujieda , Japan
| | | | - Toshiaki Miyamoto
- k Department of Rheumatology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital , Hamamatsu , Japan
| | - Shogo Furukawa
- a Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine 3 , Hamamatsu University School of Medicine , Hamamatsu-City , Japan
| | - Kumiko Shimoyama
- a Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine 3 , Hamamatsu University School of Medicine , Hamamatsu-City , Japan
| | - Daisuke Suzuki
- a Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine 3 , Hamamatsu University School of Medicine , Hamamatsu-City , Japan
| | - Yuichiro Maekawa
- a Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine 3 , Hamamatsu University School of Medicine , Hamamatsu-City , Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Daien C, Hua C, Gaujoux-Viala C, Cantagrel A, Dubremetz M, Dougados M, Fautrel B, Mariette X, Nayral N, Richez C, Saraux A, Thibaud G, Wendling D, Gossec L, Combe B. Update of French society for rheumatology recommendations for managing rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine 2019; 86:135-150. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/06/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
12
|
Yoshida S, Kotani T, Kimura Y, Matsumura Y, Yoshikawa A, Tokai N, Ozaki T, Nagai K, Takeuchi T, Makino S, Arawaka S. Efficacy of abatacept tapering therapy for sustained remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Prospective single-center study. Int J Rheum Dis 2019; 22:81-89. [DOI: 10.1111/1756-185x.13384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2017] [Revised: 07/12/2018] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shuzo Yoshida
- Department of Internal Medicine (IV); Osaka Medical College; Osaka Japan
| | - Takuya Kotani
- Department of Internal Medicine (IV); Osaka Medical College; Osaka Japan
| | - Yuko Kimura
- Department of Internal Medicine (IV); Osaka Medical College; Osaka Japan
| | - Yoko Matsumura
- Department of Internal Medicine (IV); Osaka Medical College; Osaka Japan
| | - Ayaka Yoshikawa
- Department of Internal Medicine (IV); Osaka Medical College; Osaka Japan
| | - Nao Tokai
- Department of Internal Medicine (IV); Osaka Medical College; Osaka Japan
| | - Takuro Ozaki
- Department of Internal Medicine (IV); Osaka Medical College; Osaka Japan
| | - Koji Nagai
- Department of Internal Medicine (IV); Osaka Medical College; Osaka Japan
| | - Toru Takeuchi
- Department of Internal Medicine (IV); Osaka Medical College; Osaka Japan
| | - Shigeki Makino
- Department of Internal Medicine (IV); Osaka Medical College; Osaka Japan
| | - Shigeki Arawaka
- Department of Internal Medicine (IV); Osaka Medical College; Osaka Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fautrel B. Therapeutic strategy for rheumatoid arthritis patients who have achieved remission. Joint Bone Spine 2018; 85:679-685. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
14
|
Takeuchi T, Genovese MC, Haraoui B, Li Z, Xie L, Klar R, Pinto-Correia A, Otawa S, Lopez-Romero P, de la Torre I, Macias W, Rooney TP, Smolen JS. Dose reduction of baricitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis achieving sustained disease control: results of a prospective study. Ann Rheum Dis 2018; 78:171-178. [PMID: 30194275 PMCID: PMC6352419 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2018] [Revised: 07/25/2018] [Accepted: 08/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Objectives This study investigated the effects of dose step-down in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who achieved sustained disease control with baricitinib 4 mg once a day. Methods Patients who completed a baricitinib phase 3 study could enter a long-term extension (LTE). In the LTE, patients who received baricitinib 4 mg for ≥15 months and maintained CDAI low disease activity (LDA) or remission (REM) were blindly randomised to continue 4 mg or taper to 2 mg. Patients could rescue (to 4 mg) if needed. Efficacy and safety were assessed through 48 weeks. Results Patients in both groups maintained LDA (80% 4 mg; 67% 2 mg) or REM (40% 4 mg; 33% 2 mg) over 48 weeks. However, dose reduction resulted in small, statistically significant increases in disease activity at 12, 24 and 48 weeks. Dose reduction also produced earlier and more frequent relapse (loss of step-down criteria) over 48 weeks compared with 4 mg maintenance (23% 4 mg vs 37% 2 mg, p=0.001). Rescue rates were 10% for baricitinib 4 mg and 18% for baricitinib 2 mg. Dose reduction was associated with a numerically lower rate of non-serious infections (30.6 for baricitinib 4 mg vs 24.9 for 2 mg). Rates of serious adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation were similar across groups. Conclusions In a large randomised, blinded phase 3 study, maintenance of RA control following induction of sustained LDA/REM with baricitinib 4 mg was greater with continued 4 mg than after taper to 2 mg. Nonetheless, most patients tapered to 2 mg could maintain LDA/REM or recapture with return to 4 mg if needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mark C Genovese
- Rheumatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Boulos Haraoui
- Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Zhanguo Li
- Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Li Xie
- Eli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | | | - Susan Otawa
- Eli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Josef S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kaneko Y, Kato M, Tanaka Y, Inoo M, Kobayashi-Haraoka H, Amano K, Miyata M, Murakawa Y, Yasuoka H, Hirata S, Tanaka E, Miyasaka N, Yamanaka H, Yamamoto K, Takeuchi T. Tocilizumab discontinuation after attaining remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were treated with tocilizumab alone or in combination with methotrexate: results from a prospective randomised controlled study (the second year of the SURPRISE study). Ann Rheum Dis 2018; 77:1268-1275. [PMID: 29853455 PMCID: PMC6104678 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2018] [Revised: 05/08/2018] [Accepted: 05/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the sustained remission and low disease activity after discontinuation of tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were treated with tocilizumab alone or in combination with methotrexate. Methods The SURPRISE study was a 2-year, open-label randomised controlled study. Among patients who had been randomised to additional tocilizumab (ADD-ON) or switch to tocilizumab (SWITCH) in the first year, those who achieved remission based on the disease activity score for 28 joints (DAS28-ESR<2.6) discontinued tocilizumab at week 52 and were observed for the following 52 weeks. The endpoint of the second year included tocilizumab-free remission and low disease-activity rates, functional outcome, radiological outcomes assessed with the modified total Sharp score (mTSS) and safety. The efficacy of reinstituted tocilizumab/methotrexate was also evaluated. Results A total of 105 patients who achieved remission at week 52 discontinued tocilizumab; 51 in ADD-ON continued methotrexate and 54 in SWITCH received no disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Sustained DAS28 low disease-activity rates were significantly higher in ADD-ON than in SWITCH (55%vs27%, p=0.005). Sustained remission rates at week 104 were 24% for ADD-ON and 14% for SWITCH (p=0.29). Radiological progression was comparable between both groups (mTSS; 0.37vs0.64, p=0.36). The restart of tocilizumab induced remission in all except two patients after 36 weeks, irrespective of concomitant methotrexate. Conclusion Sustained low disease activity after tocilizumab discontinuation could be maintained with continued methotrexate in more than half of the patients. Retreatment with tocilizumab led to remission in more than 90% of patients. Trial registration number NCT01120366; Results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuko Kaneko
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaru Kato
- Department of Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yoshiya Tanaka
- The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | | | | | - Koichi Amano
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Japan
| | - Masayuki Miyata
- Department of Internal Medicine, Fukushima Red Cross Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Yohko Murakawa
- Department of Rheumatology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Japan
| | - Hidekara Yasuoka
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shintaro Hirata
- The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.,Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Eiichi Tanaka
- Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Miyasaka
- Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hisashi Yamanaka
- Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Yamamoto
- Department of Allergy and Rheumatology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bechman K, Sin FE, Ibrahim F, Norton S, Matcham F, Scott DL, Cope A, Galloway J. Mental health, fatigue and function are associated with increased risk of disease flare following TNF inhibitor tapering in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an exploratory analysis of data from the Optimizing TNF Tapering in RA (OPTTIRA) trial. RMD Open 2018; 4:e000676. [PMID: 29862047 PMCID: PMC5976130 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2018] [Revised: 04/13/2018] [Accepted: 04/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Tapering of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy appears feasible, safe and effective in selected patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Depression is highly prevalent in RA and may impact on flare incidence through various mechanisms. This study aims to investigate if psychological states predict flare in patients' dose tapering their anti-TNF therapy. Methods This study is a post-hoc analysis of the Optimizing TNF Tapering in RA trial, a multicentre, randomised, open-label study investigating anti-TNF tapering in RA patients with sustained low disease activity. Patient-reported outcomes (Health Assessment Questionnaire, EuroQol 5-dimension scale, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy fatigue scale (FACIT-F), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36)) were collected at baseline. The primary outcome was flare, defined as an increase in 28-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS28) ≥0.6 and ≥1 swollen joint. Discrete-time survival models were used to identify patient-reported outcomes that predict flare. Results Ninety-seven patients were randomised to taper their anti-TNF dose by either 33% or 66%. Forty-one patients flared. Higher baseline DAS28 score was associated with flare (adjusted HR 1.96 (95% CI 1.18 to 3.24), p=0.01). Disability (SF-36 physical component score), fatigue (FACIT-F) and mental health (SF-36 mental health subscale (MH)) predicted flare in unadjusted models. In multivariate analyses, only SF-36 MH remained a statistically significant predictor of flare (adjusted HR per 10 units 0.74 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.93), p=0.01). Conclusions Baseline DAS28 and mental health status are independently associated with flare in patients who taper their anti-TNF therapy. Fatigue and function also associate with flare but the effect disappears when adjusting for confounders. Given these findings, mental health and functional status should be considered in anti-TNF tapering decisions in order to optimise the likelihood of success. Trial registration numbers EudraCT Number: 2010-020738-24; ISRCTN: 28955701; Post-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Bechman
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Fang En Sin
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Fowzia Ibrahim
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sam Norton
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Faith Matcham
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, KCL, London, UK
| | - David Lloyd Scott
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Andrew Cope
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - James Galloway
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bouman CAM, Tweehuysen L, Haverkort D, van den Ende CH, van der Maas A, den Broeder AA. Abatacept and tocilizumab tapering in rheumatoid arthritis patients: results of SONATA-a retrospective, exploratory cohort study. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2018; 2:rky008. [PMID: 31431957 PMCID: PMC6649917 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rky008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2018] [Revised: 03/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives As data on disease-activity-guided dose optimization of abatacept and tocilizumab are scarce, we explored the feasibility, effectiveness and safety of dose optimization of these biological DMARDs in RA patients in daily practice. Methods RA patients who had been treated with abatacept or tocilizumab for ≥6 months, with DAS28 <3.2, were included. Four groups were identified: abatacept dose reduction (DR) and usual care (UC), and tocilizumab DR and UC. Successful DR and discontinuation entailed being on a lower dose than at baseline or having discontinued abatacept or tocilizumab, while maintaining disease activity score with ESR using 28 joint count (DAS28) <3.2. Proportions of patients with successful DR or discontinuation at 12 months were described. Maintenance of DR was investigated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Between-group differences in mean DAS28 and Health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) change (Δ) over 6 and 12 months were estimated. Results One hundred and nineteen patients were included. DR was attempted in 13 of 28 (46%; 95% CI: 28, 66%) abatacept and 64 of 91 (70%; 95% CI: 60, 79%) tocilizumab patients. At 12 months, 3 of 11 (27%; 95% CI: 6, 61%) abatacept and 20 of 48 (42%; 95% CI: 28, 57%) tocilizumab patients were successfully tapered. One of 11 (9%; 95% CI: 0, 41%) abatacept and 5 of 48 (10%; 95% CI: 3, 23%) tocilizumab patients were successfully discontinued. Mean ΔDAS28 and ΔHAQ-DI at months 6 and 12 were not significantly different between DR and UC. For tocilizumab, DAS28 was significantly higher in the DR compared with the UC group at 6 months. Adverse events were comparable between groups. Conclusion Abatacept and tocilizumab DR appears to be feasible and safe in clinical practice. No benefits in terms of fewer adverse events in the DR group were observed. Furthermore, DR was suboptimal, because all patients were eligible for DR, but in a substantial number of patients no DR was attempted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantal A M Bouman
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lieke Tweehuysen
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cornelia H van den Ende
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Aatke van der Maas
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Henaux S, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Cantagrel A, Barnetche T, Fautrel B, Filippi N, Lukas C, Raffeiner B, Rossini M, Degboé Y, Constantin A. Risk of losing remission, low disease activity or radiographic progression in case of bDMARD discontinuation or tapering in rheumatoid arthritis: systematic analysis of the literature and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 77:515-522. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2017] [Revised: 11/16/2017] [Accepted: 11/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
ObjectivesTo assess the risk of losing remission, low disease activity (LDA) or radiographic progression in the case of (1) discontinuing or (2) tapering doses of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) compared with continuation of the initial treatment regimen in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with remission or LDA.Materials and methodsA systematic literature analysis was carried out through May 2017 on the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and international congress databases, selecting controlled trials comparing bDMARDs discontinuation/tapering versus continuation in RA patients with remission or LDA. The meta-analysis assessed the risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI of losing remission or LDA and the risk of radiographic progression after (1) discontinuing and (2) tapering doses of bDMARDs versus continuing the initial treatment.ResultsThe meta-analysis comparing bDMARDs discontinuation versus continuation performed on nine trials showed an increased risk of losing remission (RR (95% CI)=1.97(1.43 to 2.73), P<0.0001) or LDA (RR (95% CI)=2.24(1.52 to 3.30), P<0.0001) and an increased risk of radiographic progression (RR (95% CI)=1.09(1.02 to 1.17), P=0.01) in case of bDMARD discontinuation. The meta-analysis comparing bDMARDs tapering versus continuation performed on 11 trials showed an increased risk of losing remission (RR (95% CI)=1.23(1.06 to 1.42), P=0.006) but no increased risk of losing LDA (RR (95% CI)=1.02 (0.85 to 1.23), P=0.81) nor any increased risk of radiographic progression (RR (95% CI)=1.09(0.94 to 1.26), P=0.26) in case of bDMARD tapering.ConclusionDiscontinuation of bDMARDs leads to an increased risk of losing remission or LDA and radiographic progression, while tapering doses of bDMARDs does not increase the risk of relapse (LDA) or radiographic progression, even though there is an increased risk of losing remission.
Collapse
|
19
|
Edwards CJ, Fautrel B, Schulze-Koops H, Huizinga TWJ, Kruger K. Dosing down with biologic therapies: a systematic review and clinicians' perspective. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2017; 56:1847-1856. [PMID: 28339632 PMCID: PMC5850865 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2016] [Revised: 11/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The effectiveness of biologic therapies now means that remission or low disease activity are realistic targets for treatment. However, after achieving remission/low disease activity, the next steps remain unclear. The aim of this publication was to conduct a broad systematic literature review to evaluate dosing down of biologics. After screening papers and abstracts for relevance and application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, a structured extraction process was used to collect information on the included studies. Fifty-two papers were included in the analysis across rheumatic disease. In patients who discontinue therapy, remission is not typically sustained, with reported rates of relapse and flare across early RA (48-54%), established RA (2-84%), axial spondyloarthritis (11-53%) and PsA (44.9%). In many cases, an acceptable disease activity can be regained upon retreatment. More research is needed to understand the long-term impacts of these strategies on efficacy, safety and cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Edwards
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, NIHR Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Bruno Fautrel
- Pierre et Marie Curie University - Paris 6, Sorbonne Universités, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, Paris, GRC-08 (EEMOIS)
| | | | - Tom W J Huizinga
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine IV, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Klaus Kruger
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, C1-41, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tweehuysen L, van den Ende CH, Beeren FMM, Been EMJ, van den Hoogen FHJ, den Broeder AA. Little Evidence for Usefulness of Biomarkers for Predicting Successful Dose Reduction or Discontinuation of a Biologic Agent in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review. Arthritis Rheumatol 2017; 69:301-308. [PMID: 27696778 PMCID: PMC5299504 DOI: 10.1002/art.39946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2016] [Accepted: 09/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically review studies addressing prediction of successful dose reduction or discontinuation of a biologic agent in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies that examined the predictive value of biomarkers for successful dose reduction or discontinuation of a biologic agent in RA. Two reviewers independently selected studies, and extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. A biomarker was classified as a "potential predictor" if the univariate association was either strong (odds ratio or hazard ratio >2.0 or <0.5) or statistically significant. For biomarkers that were studied multiple times, qualitative best-evidence synthesis was performed separately for the prediction of successful dose reduction and discontinuation. Biomarkers that were defined in ≥75% of the studies as potential predictors were regarded as "predictor" for the purposes of our study. RESULTS Of 3,029 nonduplicate articles initially searched, 16 articles regarding 15 cohorts were included in the present study. Overall, 17 biomarkers were studied multiple times for the prediction of successful dose reduction, and 33 for the prediction of successful discontinuation of a biologic agent. Three predictors were identified: higher adalimumab trough level for successful dose reduction and lower Sharp/van der Heijde erosion score and shorter symptom duration at the start of a biologic agent for successful discontinuation. CONCLUSION The predictive value of a wide variety of biomarkers for successful dose reduction or discontinuation of biologic treatment in RA has been investigated. We identified only 3 biomarkers as predictors, in just 2 studies. The strength of the evidence is limited by the low quality of the included studies and the likelihood of reporting bias and multiple testing.
Collapse
|
21
|
Asai S, Fujibayashi T, Oguchi T, Hanabayashi M, Hayashi M, Matsubara H, Ito T, Yabe Y, Watanabe T, Hirano Y, Kanayama Y, Kaneko A, Kato T, Takagi H, Takahashi N, Funahashi K, Takemoto T, Asai N, Watanabe T, Ishiguro N, Kojima T. Predictors of biologic discontinuation due to insufficient response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who achieved clinical remission with biologic treatment: A multicenter observational cohort study. Mod Rheumatol 2017; 28:221-226. [DOI: 10.1080/14397595.2017.1332558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shuji Asai
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | | | - Takeshi Oguchi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Anjo Kosei Hospital, Anjo, Aichi, Japan
| | - Masahiro Hanabayashi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ichinomiya Municipal Hospital, Ichinomiya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Hayashi
- Department of Rheumatology, Nagano Red Cross Hospital, Nagano, Japan
| | | | | | - Yuichiro Yabe
- Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Shinjuku Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Watanabe
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kariya-Toyota General Hospital, Kariya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yuji Hirano
- Department of Rheumatology, Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, Toyohashi, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yasuhide Kanayama
- Department of Rheumatology, Toyota Kosei Hospital, Toyota, Aichi, Japan
| | - Atsushi Kaneko
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Rheumatology, Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | | | - Hideki Takagi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya Central Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Nobunori Takahashi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Koji Funahashi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Toki Takemoto
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Asai
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Tatsuo Watanabe
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Naoki Ishiguro
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Toshihisa Kojima
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mallick A, Fautrel B, Sagez F, Sordet C, Javier RM, Petit H, Chatelus E, Rahal N, Gottenberg JE, Sibilia J. Stratégies d’arrêt ou de réduction des biomédicaments dans la polyarthrite rhumatoïde en rémission. Rev Med Interne 2017; 38:256-263. [DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2016.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2016] [Accepted: 12/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
23
|
bDMARD Dose Reduction in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Narrative Review with Systematic Literature Search. Rheumatol Ther 2017; 4:1-24. [PMID: 28255897 PMCID: PMC5443724 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-017-0055-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Although bDMARDs are effective in the treatment of RA, they are associated with dose-dependent side effects, patient burden, and high costs. Recently, many studies have investigated the possibility of discontinuing or tapering bDMARDs when patients have reached their treatment goal. The aim of this review is to provide a narrative overview of the existing evidence on bDMARD dose reduction and to provide answers to specific dose-reduction-related questions that are of interest to clinicians. Methods We systematically searched for relevant studies in four scientific databases. Furthermore, we screened the references of reviews and relevant studies. Results Our searches resulted in 45 original studies of bDMARD dose reduction in RA patients (15 RCTs and 30 observational studies). Current evidence shows that bDMARD dose reduction can be considered in all RA patients who achieve stable (e.g., ≥6 months) low disease activity or remission. The best strategies seem to be disease-activity-guided dose optimization and fixed dose reduction, since direct bDMARD discontinuation (without restarting) results in a high flare rate, worse physical functioning, and more joint damage. When tapering the bDMARD treatment of a patient, disease activity should be monitored closely, and if a flare occurs, the dose should be increased to the lowest effective dose. Current evidence shows that restarting bDMARD treatment is effective and safe. Unfortunately, no clear predictors of successful dose reduction have been identified so far. Conclusion The current evidence and rising healthcare costs urge that dose reduction should be considered for eligible patients. However, the decision to start dose reduction should be made in shared decision-making. Future research should focus not only on a better understanding of the effects of dose reduction on clinical outcomes but also on the perspectives of patients and physicians as well as the implementation of this new treatment principle. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40744-017-0055-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
24
|
Yasuda S, Ohmura K, Kanazawa H, Kurita T, Kon Y, Ishii T, Fujieda Y, Jodo S, Tanimura K, Minami M, Izumiyama T, Matsumoto T, Amasaki Y, Suzuki Y, Kasahara H, Yamauchi N, Kato M, Kamishima T, Tsutsumi A, Takemori H, Koike T, Atsumi T. Maintenance treatment using abatacept with dose reduction after achievement of low disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (MATADOR) – A prospective, multicenter, single arm pilot clinical trial. Mod Rheumatol 2017; 27:930-937. [DOI: 10.1080/14397595.2017.1286714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shinsuke Yasuda
- Division of Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kazumasa Ohmura
- Division of Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kanazawa
- Department of Rheumatology, Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital, Aomori, Japan
| | - Takashi Kurita
- Division of Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yujiro Kon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Takikawa Municipal Hospital, Takikawa, Japan
| | - Tomonori Ishii
- Department of Hematology and Rheumatology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Fujieda
- Division of Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Tomakomai City Hospital, Tomakomai, Japan
| | - Satoshi Jodo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Tomakomai City Hospital, Tomakomai, Japan
| | | | - Michio Minami
- Department of Rheumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokkaido Orthopaedic Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | | | - Takumi Matsumoto
- Division of Rheumatology, Kin-ikyo Chuo Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | - Masaru Kato
- Division of Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | | | - Akito Tsutsumi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Takikawa Municipal Hospital, Takikawa, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Takemori
- Department of Rheumatology, Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital, Aomori, Japan
| | | | - Tatsuya Atsumi
- Division of Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
|
26
|
Lenert A, Lenert P. Tapering biologics in rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic approach for clinical practice. Clin Rheumatol 2016; 36:1-8. [PMID: 27896522 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-016-3490-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2016] [Accepted: 11/20/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Optimal rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapy in daily clinical practice is based on the treat-to-target strategy. Quicker escalation of therapy and earlier introduction of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs have led to improved outcomes in RA. However, chronic immunosuppressive therapy is associated with adverse events and higher costs. In addition, our patients frequently express a desire for lower dosing and drug holidays. Current clinical practice guidelines from the American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism suggest that rheumatologists consider tapering treatment after achieving remission. However, the optimal approach for tapering therapy in RA, specifically de-escalation of biologics, remains unknown. This clinical review discusses biologic tapering strategies in RA. We draw our recommendations for everyday clinical practice from the most recent observational, pragmatic, and controlled clinical trials on de-escalation of biologics in RA. For each biologic, we highlight clinically relevant outcomes, such as flare rates, recapture of the disease control with retreatment, radiographic progression, side effects, and functional impact. We discuss the use of musculoskeletal ultrasound to select patients for successful tapering. In conclusion, we provide the reader with a practical guide for tapering biologics in the rheumatology clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksander Lenert
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, Kentucky Clinic J507, 740 South Limestone St, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA.
| | - Petar Lenert
- Division of Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Iowa, C428-2GH, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Krüger K, Edelmann E. [Treatment reduction in well-controlled rheumatoid arthritis. State of knowledge]. Z Rheumatol 2016; 74:414-20. [PMID: 26085073 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-014-1534-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Nowadays, the excellent treatment options available for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) result in ambitious therapeutic goals, such as remission, which can actually be achieved for many RA patients. In a state of sustained remission many patients request reduction in drug treatment and this as well as economic reasons makes treatment reduction or even drug-free remission a reasonable target. Increasingly successful reduction of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment has been shown in studies for approximately 30-60 % of patients in sustained remission, at least for some period of time. Because flare retreatment is successful in nearly all cases, the risk of treatment de-escalation can be minimized, so long as patients are continuously monitored after reduction or termination of drug treatment. No study has yet shown an elevated risk for unfavorable long-term outcome in cases of controlled treatment reduction. Current treatment recommendations are that glucocorticoids should first be withdrawn followed by reduction and termination of biologics and in cases of sustained remission finally, conventional DMARDs, such as methotrexate should be reduced and possibly terminated to achieve the defined target of drug-free remission. Factors facilitating success of tapering antirheumatic drugs are low disease activity at initiation, negative serological tests and short disease duration after starting DMARD treatment. A joint decision between rheumatologists and patients as well as continuous remission for at least 6 months are prerequisites for drug reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Krüger
- Rheumatologisches Praxiszentrum St. Bonifatius, St. Bonifatius Str. 5, 81541, München, Deutschland,
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chan CKY, Holroyd CR, Mason A, Zarroug J, Edwards CJ. Are there dangers in biologic dose reduction strategies? Autoimmun Rev 2016; 15:742-6. [PMID: 26970488 DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2016.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2016] [Accepted: 03/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Biologic dose reduction strategies, for patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases, have been assessed in multiple studies to assess outcomes compared to ongoing maintenance dosing. Whilst cessation in established disease usually leads to disease flare, dose tapering approaches for those achieving low disease activity often appear to be successful in the short term. However, tapering can be associated with a higher risk of losing disease control and rates of recapture of disease control using the original biologic dose vary between studies. Over relatively short periods of follow-up, a number of studies have shown no statistical difference in radiographic progression in patients tapering or discontinuing biologics. However, a Cochrane review found that radiographic and functional outcomes may be worse after TNF inhibitor discontinuation, and over long-term disease follow-up flares have been associated with radiographic progression and worse patient reported outcomes. To date, no studies of biological therapy dose reduction have specifically investigated the risk of increased immunogenicity or the effects on cardiovascular risk and other co-morbidities, although these remain important potential risks. In addition, whether there are greater dangers in certain dose reduction approaches such as a reduction in dose at the same frequency or a spacing of doses is not established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alice Mason
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Jalaa Zarroug
- MSK Research Unit, NIHR Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, University of Southampton, UK
| | - Christopher J Edwards
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; MSK Research Unit, NIHR Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, University of Southampton, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Burmester GR, Bykerk V, Dougados M, Emery P, Kvien TK, Navarro-Compán MV, Oliver S, Schoels M, Scholte-Voshaar M, Stamm T, Stoffer M, Takeuchi T, Aletaha D, Andreu JL, Aringer M, Bergman M, Betteridge N, Bijlsma H, Burkhardt H, Cardiel M, Combe B, Durez P, Fonseca JE, Gibofsky A, Gomez-Reino JJ, Graninger W, Hannonen P, Haraoui B, Kouloumas M, Landewe R, Martin-Mola E, Nash P, Ostergaard M, Östör A, Richards P, Sokka-Isler T, Thorne C, Tzioufas AG, van Vollenhoven R, de Wit M, van der Heijde D. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: 2014 update of the recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 75:3-15. [PMID: 25969430 PMCID: PMC4717393 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 958] [Impact Index Per Article: 119.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2015] [Revised: 04/10/2015] [Accepted: 04/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reaching the therapeutic target of remission or low-disease activity has improved outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) significantly. The treat-to-target recommendations, formulated in 2010, have provided a basis for implementation of a strategic approach towards this therapeutic goal in routine clinical practice, but these recommendations need to be re-evaluated for appropriateness and practicability in the light of new insights. OBJECTIVE To update the 2010 treat-to-target recommendations based on systematic literature reviews (SLR) and expert opinion. METHODS A task force of rheumatologists, patients and a nurse specialist assessed the SLR results and evaluated the individual items of the 2010 recommendations accordingly, reformulating many of the items. These were subsequently discussed, amended and voted upon by >40 experts, including 5 patients, from various regions of the world. Levels of evidence, strengths of recommendations and levels of agreement were derived. RESULTS The update resulted in 4 overarching principles and 10 recommendations. The previous recommendations were partly adapted and their order changed as deemed appropriate in terms of importance in the view of the experts. The SLR had now provided also data for the effectiveness of targeting low-disease activity or remission in established rather than only early disease. The role of comorbidities, including their potential to preclude treatment intensification, was highlighted more strongly than before. The treatment aim was again defined as remission with low-disease activity being an alternative goal especially in patients with long-standing disease. Regular follow-up (every 1-3 months during active disease) with according therapeutic adaptations to reach the desired state was recommended. Follow-up examinations ought to employ composite measures of disease activity that include joint counts. Additional items provide further details for particular aspects of the disease, especially comorbidity and shared decision-making with the patient. Levels of evidence had increased for many items compared with the 2010 recommendations, and levels of agreement were very high for most of the individual recommendations (≥9/10). CONCLUSIONS The 4 overarching principles and 10 recommendations are based on stronger evidence than before and are supposed to inform patients, rheumatologists and other stakeholders about strategies to reach optimal outcomes of RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josef S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 2nd Department of Medicine, Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ferdinand C Breedveld
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Gerd R Burmester
- Department of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology Free University and Humboldt University, Charité-University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vivian Bykerk
- Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, USA
| | - Maxime Dougados
- Department of Rheumatology B, Cochin Hospital, René Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Paul Emery
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital,Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Tore K Kvien
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Monika Schoels
- 2nd Department of Medicine, Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marieke Scholte-Voshaar
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tanja Stamm
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michaela Stoffer
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jose Louis Andreu
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Majadahonda, Spain
| | - Martin Aringer
- Department of Medicine III, University Medical Center TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Martin Bergman
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Neil Betteridge
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hans Bijlsma
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, and VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harald Burkhardt
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe University Frankfurt, German
| | - Mario Cardiel
- Centro de Investigación Clínica de Morelia, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico
| | - Bernard Combe
- Service d'Immuno-Rhumatologie, Montpellier University, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Patrick Durez
- Pôle de Recherche en Rhumatologie, Institut de Recherche Experimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain and Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Joao Eurico Fonseca
- Rheumatology Research Unit, Instituto de de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- Rheumatology Department, Lisbon Academic Medical Centre, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Alan Gibofsky
- Weill Medical College, Cornell University Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA
| | - Juan J Gomez-Reino
- Rheumatology Unit, Santiago University Clinical Hospital, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | | | - Pekka Hannonen
- Department of Medicine, Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | | | - Marios Kouloumas
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Robert Landewe
- Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, and Atrium Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Peter Nash
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mikkel Ostergaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet and Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Andrew Östör
- Rheumatology Clinical Research Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Pam Richards
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Carter Thorne
- Division of Rheumatology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newarket, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Martinus de Wit
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Desirée van der Heijde
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Yoshida K, Radner H, Mjaavatten MD, Greenberg JD, Kavanaugh A, Kishimoto M, Matsui K, Okada M, Reed G, Saeki Y, Tohma S, Kremer J, Solomon DH. Incidence and Predictors of Biological Antirheumatic Drug Discontinuation Attempts among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Remission: A CORRONA and NinJa Collaborative Cohort Study. J Rheumatol 2015; 42:2238-46. [DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.150240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/11/2015] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Objective.We conducted a longitudinal observational study of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) to describe the proportions of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in remission who discontinued these agents, and to assess the potential predictors of the decision to discontinue.Methods.We used data from the US COnsortium of Rheumatology Researchers Of North America (CORRONA) and the Japanese National Database of Rheumatic Diseases by iR-net in Japan (NinJa) registries, and ran parallel analyses. Patients treated with bDMARD who experienced remission (defined by the Clinical Disease Activity Index ≤ 2.8) were included. The outcome of interest was the occurrence of bDMARD discontinuation while in remission. The predictors of discontinuation were assessed in the Cox regression models. Frailty models were also used to examine the effects of individual physicians in the discontinuation decision.Results.The numbers of eligible patients who were initially in remission were 6263 in the CORRONA and 744 in the NinJa. Among these patients, 10.0% of patients in CORRONA and 11.8% of patients in NinJa discontinued bDMARD while in remission over 5 years, whereas many of the remaining patients lost remission before discontinuing bDMARD. Shorter disease duration was associated with higher rates of discontinuation in both cohorts. In CORRONA, methotrexate use and lower disease activity were also associated with discontinuation. In frailty models, physician random effects were significant in both cohorts.Conclusion.Among patients who initially experienced remission while receiving bDMARD, around 10% remained in remission and then discontinued bDMARD in both registries. Several factors were associated with more frequent discontinuation while in remission. Physician preference likely is also an important correlate of bDMARD discontinuation, indicating the need for standardization of practice.
Collapse
|
31
|
Fautrel B, Den Broeder AA. De-intensifying treatment in established rheumatoid arthritis (RA): Why, how, when and in whom can DMARDs be tapered? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2015; 29:550-65. [PMID: 26697766 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2015.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
As more patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) achieve remission or low disease activity, strategies such as tapering and withdrawal of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are being investigated. In several trials, DMARD discontinuation was associated with a higher risk of relapse, ranging from 56% to 87% at 1 year. Tapering, either by dose reduction or by injection spacing, may limit the risk of relapse. Half-dose etanercept (ETN) versus full-dose continuation was not associated with an increased relapse risk at 1 year in two trials. Progressive antitumor necrosis factor injection spacing was shown to be equivalent to full regimen continuation in terms of persistent flare and disease activity at 18 months in one trial, but not in another one. Reintroduction of a DMARD at previous dose/regimen was usually associated with remission re-induction. The risk of relevant structural damage progression was not increased. Safety improvement has not yet been demonstrated. The annual cost reduction when tapering biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) was 3500-6000 €/patient. Research questions to be addressed include defining flare that requires reinitiation of treatment, such that patients facilitate the maintenance of remission during tapering by timely communication with their rheumatology team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Fautrel
- Pierre et Marie Curie University - Paris 6, Sorbonne Universités, GRC-08 (EEMOIS), Paris, France; APHP, Rheumatology Department, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, F-75013, Paris, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kuijper TM, Lamers-Karnebeek FB, Jacobs JW, Hazes JM, Luime JJ. Flare Rate in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Low Disease Activity or Remission When Tapering or Stopping Synthetic or Biologic DMARD: A Systematic Review. J Rheumatol 2015; 42:2012-22. [DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.141520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/13/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Objective.To evaluate the risk of having a disease flare in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with low disease activity (LDA) or in remission when deescalating (tapering or stopping) disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy.Methods.A search in medical databases including publications from January 1950 to February 2015 was performed. Included were trials and observational studies in adults with RA who were in LDA or remission, evaluating ≥ 20 patients tapering or stopping DMARD. Flare rates had to have been reported. A metaanalysis was performed on studies deescalating tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers.Results.Four studies evaluated synthetic DMARD. Flare rates ranged from 8% at 24 weeks to 63% at 4 months after deescalation. Fifteen studies reported on TNF blockers. Estimated flare rates by metaanalysis on studies tapering or stopping TNF blockers were 0.26 (95% CI 0.17–0.39) and 0.49 (95% CI 0.27–0.73) for good-quality and moderate-quality studies, respectively. Flare rates in 3 studies stopping tocilizumab were 41% after 6 months, 55% at 1 year, and 87% at 1 year. Flare rates in 3 studies deescalating abatacept were 34% at 1 year, 41% at 1 year, and 72% at 6 months. Five studies evaluating radiographic progression in patients deescalating treatment all found limited to no progression.Conclusion.Results suggest that more than one-third of patients with RA with LDA or in remission may taper or stop DMARD treatment without experiencing a disease flare within the first year. Dose reduction of TNF blockers results in lower flare rates than stopping and may be noninferior to continuing full dose. Radiological progression after treatment deescalation remains low, but may increase slightly.
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
Abatacept is the only T cell co-stimulation modulator approved thus far for the treatment of moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is licensed for use in patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) and/or anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy. The upstream mechanism of action of abatacept leads to downstream effects in a variety of cell types associated with the production of autoantibodies and pro-inflammatory cytokines implicated in RA. Accumulating data also suggest effects on other cells involved in the pathogenesis of RA, including regulatory T cells and osteoclasts. Clinical trials have demonstrated that abatacept is an effective and well-tolerated treatment in RA. More recently, evidence from the Assessing Very Early Rheumatoid arthritis Treatment (AVERT) trial showed that complete drug-free remission following treatment with abatacept may be a possibility in some patients with early RA, indicating that the disease course could be altered by early intervention. Equivalent efficacy and onset of action of abatacept and anti-TNF therapy have also been demonstrated in patients with an inadequate response to MTX in the Abatacept versus adaliMumab comParison in bioLogic-naïvE rheumatoid arthritis subjects with background methotrexate (AMPLE) trial. Together, these findings support the use of abatacept in early and established RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Schiff
- Department of Rheumatology, University of Colorado, 5400 South Monaco Street, Greenwood Village, Denver, CO 80111 USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tanaka Y, Hirata S. Intensive intervention can lead to a treatment holiday from biological DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Drugs 2014; 74:2129-39. [PMID: 25389048 PMCID: PMC4245498 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-014-0323-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by inflammation and joint destruction that causes significant morbidity and mortality. However, the combined use of methotrexate (MTX), a synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (sDMARD) and biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) has revolutionized treatment of RA and clinical remission or low disease activity (LDA) are now realistic targets, achieved by a large proportion of RA patients. We are now in a position to evaluate if it is possible to maintain remission or LDA while at the same time reducing the burden of treatment on the patient and healthcare system. Data are emerging from large, well-conducted studies designed to answer this question, shedding light on which patient populations and treatment algorithms can survive treatment discontinuation or tapering with low risk of disease flare. For early RA, approximately half of early RA patients could discontinue TNF-targeted bDMARDs without clinical flare and functional impairment after obtaining clinical remission by bDMARDs with MTX. In contrast, for established RA, fewer patients sustained remission or LDA after the discontinuation of bDMARDs and "deep remission" at the discontinuation was a key factor to maintain the treatment holiday of bDMARDs. Thus, this article provides a brief outline on withdrawing or tapering bDMARDs once patients have achieved remission or LDA in RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiya Tanaka
- The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Kitakyushu, 807-8555, Japan,
| | | |
Collapse
|