1
|
Rubbert-Roth A, Kato K, Haraoui B, Rischmueller M, Liu Y, Khan N, Camp HS, Xavier RM. Safety and Efficacy of Upadacitinib in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Refractory to Biologic DMARDs: Results Through Week 216 from the SELECT-CHOICE Study. Rheumatol Ther 2024; 11:1197-1215. [PMID: 39031276 PMCID: PMC11422392 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-024-00694-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/22/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The safety and efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg (UPA15) through week 216 was evaluated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from the long-term extension (LTE) of the phase 3 SELECT-CHOICE study. METHODS Patients with RA refractory to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) were randomized to UPA15 or abatacept (ABA) for 24 weeks. During the open-label LTE, patients on ABA switched to UPA15 at week 24, and those on UPA15 continued treatment. The safety and efficacy of continuous UPA15, and ABA to UPA15, are summarized through week 216. RESULTS The LTE was comprised of 91.4% (n = 277/303) of patients that initially received UPA15, and 89.6% (n = 277/309) that initially received ABA. Of patients on UPA15 in the LTE (n = 547), 28.3% (n = 155/547) discontinued the study drug by week 216. Relative to other adverse events of special interest, and largely consistent with previous findings at week 24, higher rates of serious infection, COVID-19, herpes zoster, and elevated creatine phosphokinase were reported, while rates of malignancy excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), NMSC, major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), and venous thromboembolism (VTE) were low. Long-term safety data with UPA through week 216 aligned with previous observations and no new safety risks were identified, including in patients who switched from ABA to UPA15. Proportions of patients achieving 28-joint disease activity score based on C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]) < 2.6/ ≤ 3.2, clinical disease activity index (CDAI) and simple disease activity index (SDAI) low disease activity/remission, ≥ 20%/50%/70% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20/50/70) response criteria, and Boolean remission were maintained or improved with UPA15 through week 216. Improvements in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), patient's assessment of pain, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) were also maintained or improved with UPA15 through week 216. Across all efficacy endpoints, similar results were observed in patients who switched from ABA to UPA15 versus continuous UPA15. Patients with an inadequate response to ≥ 1 prior tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor (UPA15: n = 263/303, 86.8%; ABA to UPA15: n = 273/309, 88.3%) showed similar responses to the total population. CONCLUSIONS The long-term safety profile of UPA was consistent with previous findings and the broader RA clinical program. Compared to the primary analyses at week 24, efficacy responses were maintained or further improved with UPA15 through week 216 in patients with RA. Trial registration, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03086343.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Rubbert-Roth
- Division of Rheumatology, Cantonal Clinic St Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, 9007, St Gallen, Sankt Gallen, Switzerland.
| | | | - Boulos Haraoui
- Institut de Rhumatologie de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Maureen Rischmueller
- The Queen Elizabeth Hospital and Basil Hetzel Institute, Woodville, SA, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Ricardo M Xavier
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mack DP, Greenhawt M, Bukstein DA, Golden DBK, Settipane RA, Davis RS. Decisions With Patients, Not for Patients: Shared Decision-Making in Allergy and Immunology. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2024; 12:2625-2633. [PMID: 38851489 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.05.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2024] [Revised: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024]
Abstract
Shared decision-making (SDM) is an increasingly implemented patient-centered approach to navigating patient preferences regarding diagnostic and treatment options and supported decision-making. This therapeutic approach prioritizes the patient's perspectives, considering current medical evidence to provide a balanced approach to clinical scenarios. In light of numerous recent guideline recommendations that are conditional in nature and are clinical scenarios defined by preference-sensitive care options, there is a tremendous opportunity for SDM and validated decision aids. Despite the expansion of the literature on SDM, formal acceptance among clinicians remains inconsistent. Surprisingly, a significant disparity exists between clinicians' self-reported adherence to SDM principles and patients' perceptions of its implementation during clinical encounters. This discrepancy underscores a fundamental issue in the delivery of health care, where clinicians may overestimate their integration of SDM, while patients' experiences suggest otherwise. This review critically examines the factors contributing to this inconsistency, including barriers within the health care system, clinician attitudes and behaviors, and patient expectations and preferences. By elucidating these factors in the fields of food allergy, asthma, eosinophilic esophagitis, and other allergic diseases, this review aims to provide insights into bridging the gap between clinician perception and patient experience in SDM. Addressing this discordance is crucial for advancing patient-centered care and ensuring that SDM is not merely a theoretical concept but a tangible reality in the.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas P Mack
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | - Matthew Greenhawt
- Section of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital Colorado, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo
| | - Don A Bukstein
- The Inner City Milwaukee Clinic, Allergy, Asthma & Sinus Center, Milwaukee, Wisc
| | - David B K Golden
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md
| | - Russell A Settipane
- Department of Pediatrics, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Ray S Davis
- Division of Allergy Immunology & Pulmonary Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Manswell K, Le V, Henry K, Casey M, Anumolu N, Putman MS. The State of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. J Rheumatol 2024; 51:920-927. [PMID: 38825357 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2023-1073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate the quality and timeliness of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure reporting, which have not been previously studied. METHODS Clinical trials that informed new US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals for the first rheumatological indication between 1995 and 2021 were identified. Data were recorded to determine whether collected PROs were published, met minimum clinically important difference (MCID) or statistical significance (P < 0.05) thresholds, and were consistent with Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)-PRO standards. Hazard ratios and Kaplan-Meier estimate were used to assess the time from FDA approval to PRO publication. RESULTS Thirty-one FDA approvals corresponded with 110 pivotal trials and 262 reported PROs. Of the 90 included studies, 1 (1.1%) met all 5 recommended items, 10 (11.1%) met 4 items, 17 (18.9%) met 3 items, 21 (23.3%) met 2 items, 26 (28.9%) met 1 item, and 15 (16.7%) met none of the reporting standards. Most PROs met MCID thresholds (149/262; 56.9%) and were statistically significant (223/262; 85.1%). Of our subset analysis, one-third of PROs were not published upfront (70/212; 33%) and 1 of 9 (22/212; 10.4%) remained unpublished ≥ 4 years after initial trial reporting. Publication rates were highest for the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (97.4%) and lowest for the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (81.8%). Less than half of these published PROs met MCID and statistical significance thresholds (94/212; 44.3%). CONCLUSION One in 9 PROs remained unpublished for ≥ 4 years after initial trial reporting, and compliance with CONSORT-PRO reporting guidelines was poor. Efforts should be made to ensure PROs are adequately reported and expeditiously published.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenrick Manswell
- K. Manswell, BS, V. Le, BS, K. Henry, BS, M. Casey, BS, N. Anumolu, BS, M.S. Putman MD, MSci, Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Victoria Le
- K. Manswell, BS, V. Le, BS, K. Henry, BS, M. Casey, BS, N. Anumolu, BS, M.S. Putman MD, MSci, Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Kathryn Henry
- K. Manswell, BS, V. Le, BS, K. Henry, BS, M. Casey, BS, N. Anumolu, BS, M.S. Putman MD, MSci, Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Maximilian Casey
- K. Manswell, BS, V. Le, BS, K. Henry, BS, M. Casey, BS, N. Anumolu, BS, M.S. Putman MD, MSci, Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Natalie Anumolu
- K. Manswell, BS, V. Le, BS, K. Henry, BS, M. Casey, BS, N. Anumolu, BS, M.S. Putman MD, MSci, Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Michael S Putman
- K. Manswell, BS, V. Le, BS, K. Henry, BS, M. Casey, BS, N. Anumolu, BS, M.S. Putman MD, MSci, Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ahmed S, Parks-Vernizzi E, Perez B, Arnold B, Boucher A, Hossenbaccus M, Correia H, Bartlett SJ. Translation and linguistic validation of 24 PROMIS item banks into French. Qual Life Res 2024; 33:2119-2127. [PMID: 38865068 PMCID: PMC11286690 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03690-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) was developed to provide reliable, valid, and normed item banks to measure health. The item banks provide standardized scores on a common metric allowing for individualized, brief assessment (computerized adaptive tests), short forms (e.g. heart failure specific), or profile assessments (e.g. PROMIS-29). The objective of this study was to translate and linguistically validate 24 PROMIS adult item banks into French and highlight cultural nuances arising during the translation process. METHODS We used the FACIT translation methodology. Forward translation into French by two native French-speaking translators was followed by reconciliation by a third native French-speaking translator. A native English-speaking translator fluent in French then completed a back translation of the reconciled version from French into English. Three independent reviews by bilingual translators were completed to assess the clarity and consistency of terminology and equivalency across the English source and French translations. Reconciled versions were evaluated in cognitive interviews for conceptual and linguistic equivalence. RESULTS Twenty-four adult item banks were translated: 12 mental health, 10 physical health, and two social health. Interview data revealed that 577 items of the 590 items translated required no revisions. Conceptual and linguistic differences were evident for 11 items that required iterations to improve conceptual equivalence and two items were revised to accurately reflect the English source. CONCLUSION French translations of 24 item banks were created for routine clinical use and research. Initial translation supported conceptual equivalence and comprehensibility. Next steps will include validation of the item banks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Ahmed
- School of Physical and Occupation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, 3655 Sir William-Osler, Montreal, QC, H3G 1Y6, Canada.
- Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Canada.
- Lethbridge Layton Mackay Rehabilitation Centre, CIUSSS Centre-Ouest-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
- Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation, Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | - Mushirah Hossenbaccus
- Lethbridge Layton Mackay Rehabilitation Centre, CIUSSS Centre-Ouest-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Helena Correia
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Susan J Bartlett
- Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation, Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meng CF, Lee YC, Schieir O, Valois MF, Butler MA, Boire G, Hazlewood G, Hitchon C, Keystone E, Tin D, Thorne C, Bessette L, Pope J, Bartlett SJ, Bykerk VP. Having More Tender Than Swollen Joints Is Associated With Worse Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Early RA. J Clin Rheumatol 2024; 30:193-199. [PMID: 38689390 PMCID: PMC11388901 DOI: 10.1097/rhu.0000000000002091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), high tender-swollen joint differences (TSJDs) have been associated with worse outcomes. A better understanding of the phenotype and impact of high TSJD on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in early RA may lead to earlier personalized treatment targeting domains that are important to patients today. Our objectives were to evaluate the impact of TSJD on updated PROs in patients with early RA over 1 year and to determine differences in associations by joint size. METHODS This longitudinal cohort study followed patients with active, early RA enrolled in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort between 2016 and 2022, who completed clinical assessments and PROMIS-29 measures over 1 year. Twenty-eight joint counts were performed and TSJDs calculated. Adjusted associations between TSJD and PROMIS-29 scores were estimated using separate linear-mixed models. Separate analyses of large versus small-joint TJSDs were performed. RESULTS Patients with early RA (n = 547; 70% female; mean [SD] age, 56 [15] years; mean [SD] symptom duration, 5.3 [2.9] months) were evaluated. A 1-point increase in TSJD was significantly associated with worse PROMIS T-scores in all domains: physical function (adjusted regression coefficient, -0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.39, -0.15), social participation (adjusted regression coefficient, -0.34; 95% CI, -0.50, -0.19), pain interference (adjusted regression coefficient, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35, 0.64), sleep problems (adjusted regression coefficient, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.16, 0.43), fatigue (adjusted regression coefficient, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.18, 0.50), anxiety (adjusted regression coefficient, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08, 0.38), and depression (adjusted regression coefficient, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06, 0.35). Large-joint TSJD was associated with markedly worse PROs compared with small-joint TSJD. CONCLUSIONS Elevated TSJD is associated with worse PROs particularly pain interference, social participation, and fatigue. Patients with more tender than swollen joints, especially large joints, may benefit from earlier, targeted therapeutic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charis F Meng
- From the Hospital for Special Surgery, Division of Rheumatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Yvonne C Lee
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Medicine/Rheumatology, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Orit Schieir
- University of Toronto, Dalla Lana School of Public Health
| | | | - Margaret A Butler
- Hospital for Special Surgery, Division of Rheumatology, New York, NY
| | - Gilles Boire
- Université de Sherbrooke, Medicine, Quebec, Canada
| | - Glen Hazlewood
- University of Calgary, Department of Medicine, Alberta, Canada
| | - Carol Hitchon
- University of Manitoba, Department of Internal Medicine, Winnipeg, Canada
| | | | - Diane Tin
- University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carter Thorne
- Southlake Regional Health Centre, Centre of Arthritis Excellence, TAP Research Group, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Janet Pope
- University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Vivian P Bykerk
- Hospital for Special Surgery and Mount Sinai Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shrestha S, Haq K, Malhotra D, Patel DM. Care of Adults with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease. J Clin Med 2024; 13:4378. [PMID: 39124645 PMCID: PMC11313041 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13154378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2024] [Revised: 07/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) impacts over 10% of the global population. Adults with CKD face significant morbidity and mortality. As kidney disease progresses, the risk of adverse outcomes increases. Here, we present an overview of strategies to care for adults with advanced CKD (stage 4-5 CKD, not receiving kidney replacement therapy). We aim to guide clinicians through several aspects of CKD care, ranging from recommended laboratory assessments to interdisciplinary support for patients as they plan for kidney replacement therapy (dialysis, transplantation, or conservative management). We incorporate considerations of health equity and person-centered care, empowering clinicians to deliver high-quality care to people with CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Dipal M. Patel
- Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA (D.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bryan ED, Renfro CP, Anguiano RH, Kumor L, DeClercq J, Choi L, Zuckerman AD. Evaluating patient-reported adherence and outcomes in specialty disease states: A dual-site initiative. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2024; 30:710-718. [PMID: 38950163 PMCID: PMC11217860 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.7.710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are often used by clinicians to evaluate patient response to specialty medications used to treat multiple sclerosis (MS) and rheumatologic conditions. Identifying associations among PROs and patient characteristics could inform patient-centered treatment monitoring. OBJECTIVE To examine the association among patient characteristics and PROs, including patient-reported adherence (defined as no missed doses), medication tolerance, patient perceived effectiveness, and health care resource utilization (HCRU; defined as emergency department visits or hospitalizations), for patients prescribed specialty medications in 2 health system specialty pharmacies. METHODS A dual-center, retrospective review of monthly medication assessments completed by Vanderbilt Specialty Pharmacy and University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System specialty pharmacy was conducted. Patients were included if they received at least 3 fills of a specialty medication from rheumatology or MS clinics from October 2019 to March 2022, excluding patients with more than a 30-day supply. Primary outcomes were the PROs of patient-reported adherence, medication tolerability, perceived effectiveness, and HCRU. For each of the 2 primary outcomes (adherence and tolerability), a mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to test for associations with age, sex, race, clinic, site, and the other PROs. RESULTS A total of 61,926 assessments were completed from 3,677 patients (Site 1 = 3,346; 91.0% and Site 2 = 331; 9.0%). Patients were predominantly White (75.6%) and female (71.7%) with a median age of 50 years (IQR = 37-61). Assessments most frequently originated from rheumatology (76.0%). Nonadherence was reported 4.0% of the time, with the most common explanations being forgetfulness (33.1%) and medication being held because of a procedure or illness (29.5%). Most responses indicated perceived effectiveness as good/excellent (93.9%), with 98.5% of responses indicating no issues with tolerability. Patients who reported tolerability issues were 2.5 times more likely to report a missed dose (95% CI = 1.87-3.23, P < 0.001). An effectiveness rating of fair was associated with a 61% increase in the odds of a missed dose compared with a rating of good/excellent (95% CI = 1.33-1.94). CONCLUSIONS Patients filling rheumatology or MS specialty medications within health system specialty pharmacies reported high rates of medication effectiveness and adherence and low rates of issues with tolerability and HCRU. Patients who report tolerability issues or lower perceived effectiveness may benefit from additional monitoring to prevent nonadherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Danielle Bryan
- Vanderbilt Specialty Pharmacy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Chelsea P. Renfro
- Vanderbilt Specialty Pharmacy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | - Lisa Kumor
- Specialty Pharmacy Services at University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago
| | - Josh DeClercq
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Leena Choi
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Autumn D. Zuckerman
- Vanderbilt Specialty Pharmacy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fernández-Ávila DG, Patiño-Hernández D, Moreno-Luna S, Brance L, Arbeláez Á, Vilar AC, Lozada C, Ríos C, Toro C, Ramírez C, Pons-Estel G, Ugarte-Gil M, Narváez M, Albanese M, Roa O, Ruiz O, Burgos P, Xavier R, Fuentes Y, Soriano E. Development of a novel clinimetric tool: PAtient Reported Disease Activity Index in Rheumatoid Arthritis (PARDAI-RA) by PANLAR, for the assessment of patients living with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2024; 43:1277-1285. [PMID: 38355831 PMCID: PMC10944809 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-024-06868-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical experience has shown that a single measure is not sufficient to assess disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Various clinimetric tools are necessary to address the many clinical situations that can arise. METHODS In order to develop a comprehensive measurement tool, the Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology searched for the most frequent measures of disease activity applied in RA by means of a semi-systematic review of the available literature. RESULTS We found that the most frequently reported measures of disease activity were the 28-joint Disease Activity Score, C-reactive protein, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, followed by patient-reported measures of pain and stiffness and many other composite indices and patient-reported outcome measures. The most frequent physician-reported sign of disease was the swollen joint count, and the most frequently self-reported feature was the increase in disease activity or flares. CONCLUSION In this article, we present a new clinimetric tool developed based on expert consensus and on data retrieved from our search. Disease activity can be better assessed by combining various data sources, such as clinical, laboratory, and self-reported outcomes. These variables were included in our novel clinimetric tool. Key Points • The goal of treatment of RA is to achieve the best possible control of inflammation, or even remission; therefore, disease management should include systematic and regular evaluation of inflammation and health status. • Clinimetric tools evaluate a series of variables (e.g., symptoms, functional capacity, disease severity, quality of life, disease progression) and can reveal substantial prognostic and therapeutic differences between patients. • Our clinimetric tool, which is based on a combination of data (e.g., clinical variables, laboratory results, PROMs), can play a relevant role in patient assessment and care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel G Fernández-Ávila
- Rheumatology Division, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia.
| | | | | | - Lorena Brance
- Rheumatology Division, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | | | | | - Carlos Lozada
- Rheumatology Division, University of Miami, Coral Gables, USA
| | - Carlos Ríos
- Universidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo, Guayaquil, Ecuador
| | - Carlos Toro
- Centro de Referencia en Osteoporosis y Reumatología, Cali, Colombia
| | | | - Guillermo Pons-Estel
- Centro Regional de Enfermedades Autoinmunes y Reumáticas (GO-CREAR), Rosario, Argentina
| | | | | | | | - Orlando Roa
- Rheumatology Division Keralty, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Oscar Ruiz
- Rheumatology Division Keralty, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Paula Burgos
- Clinic Immunology and Rheumatology Department, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Ricardo Xavier
- Rheumatology Service Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | | - Enrique Soriano
- Rheumatology Division, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Edgerton C, Frick A, Helfgott S, Huston KK, Singh JA, Zueger P, Anyanwu SI, Patel P, Soloman N. Real-World Treatment and Care Patterns in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Initiating First-Line Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy in the United States. ACR Open Rheumatol 2024; 6:179-188. [PMID: 38221639 PMCID: PMC11016569 DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Treatment guidelines for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) recommend targeting low disease activity or remission and switching therapies for patients not reaching those targets. We evaluated real-world use of disease activity measures, treatment discontinuation, and switching patterns among patients with RA initiating a first-line tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi). METHODS Data from adult patients with RA initiating a first-line TNFi were collected from the American Rheumatology Network (January 2014-August 2021). The proportion of patients with recorded disease activity scores (Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI] or Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 [RAPID3]) at TNFi initiation was assessed. Among patients with moderate or severe RA at TNFi initiation, reasons for discontinuation and subsequent advanced therapy were evaluated. RESULTS Among TNFi initiators (n = 15,182), 44.8% recorded a CDAI/RAPID3 score at treatment initiation; of those who did not, 47.0% had recorded a tender and/or swollen joint count or pain score. Among patients with moderate or severe RA (n = 1,651), 52% discontinued their initial TNFi during follow-up, of which 15%, 46%, 28%, and 12% initiated the same TNFi, another TNFi, a non-TNFi biologic, or a Janus kinase inhibitor, respectively. The proportion of patients restarting the same TNFi or initiating another TNFi varied according to TNFi discontinuation reason. CONCLUSION In clinical practice, over half of patients with RA initiating a first-line TNFi did not have baseline disease activity assessments. Many patients cycled through TNFi despite citing lack of efficacy as the most common reason for discontinuation. Consistent, objective monitoring of treatment response and timely switch to effective therapy is needed in patients with RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin Edgerton
- Articularis Healthcare Group and American Rheumatology NetworkCharlestonSouth Carolina
| | | | | | | | - Jasvinder A. Singh
- University of Alabama at Birmingham and Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center
| | | | | | | | - Nehad Soloman
- Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology AssociatesPhoenixArizona
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zagt AC, Bos N, Bakker M, de Boer D, Friele RD, de Jong JD. A scoping review into the explanations for differences in the degrees of shared decision making experienced by patients. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 118:108030. [PMID: 37897867 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In order to improve the degree of shared decision making (SDM) experienced by patients, it is necessary to gain insight into the explanations for the differences in these degrees. METHODS A scoping review of the literature on the explanations for differences in the degree of SDM experienced by patients was conducted. We assessed 21,329 references. Ultimately, 308 studies were included. The explanations were divided into micro, meso, and macro levels. RESULTS The explanations are mainly related to the micro level. They include explanations related to the patient and healthcare professionals, the relationship between the patient and the physician, and the involvement of the patient's relatives. On the macro level, explanations are related to restrictions within the healthcare system such as time constraints, and adequate information about treatment options. On the meso level, explanations are related to the continuity of care and the involvement of other healthcare professionals. CONCLUSIONS SDM is not an isolated process between the physician and patient. Explanations are connected to the macro, meso, and micro levels. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS This scoping review suggests that there could be more focus on explanations related to the macro and meso levels, and on how explanations at different levels are interrelated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne C Zagt
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Nanne Bos
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Max Bakker
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Dolf de Boer
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Roland D Friele
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands; Tranzo Scientifc Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Judith D de Jong
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands; CAPHRI, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hernández-Cruz B, Kiltz U, Avouac J, Treuer T, Haladyj E, Gerwien J, Gupta CD, Conti F. Systematic Literature Review of Real-World Evidence on Baricitinib for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther 2023; 10:1417-1457. [PMID: 37715917 PMCID: PMC10654279 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-023-00591-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Baricitinib, an orally available small-molecule inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK)1 and JAK2, is indicated to treat active moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). OBJECTIVE This systematic review described the real-world clinical characteristics of baricitinib-treated patients with RA, prescription patterns, effectiveness, drug persistence, patient-reported outcomes (PROs; physical function, pain, health-related quality of life [HRQoL]), patient global assessment (PGA), and safety of baricitinib. METHODS A PRISMA systematic review of real-world studies was conducted to identify relevant literature published between January 2016 and September 2022 using MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, and evidence-based medicine review databases. Websites or online repositories of the American College of Rheumatology and the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology were searched manually to include relevant abstracts from conferences held between January 2016 and November 2022. RESULTS A total of 11,472 records were identified by searching online databases. Seventy studies were included in the study, of which 40 were abstracts. Most patients were older (51-71 years), female, and with mean RA duration of 4-19 years. Baricitinib was mostly used after the failure of one or more bDMARDs, and 4 mg dosing was prevalent in patients with RA (range 22-100%). Clinical effectiveness of baricitinib was reported in real-world settings regardless of prior biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use and concomitant conventional synthetic DMARD use. Achievement of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission was reported in 8.7-60% of patients at week 12 and CDAI low disease activity (LDA) in 20.2-81.6% at week 24. The proportion of patients attaining Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission was reported in 12% at week 4 to 45.4% at 24 weeks. Drug persistence was high, similar, or equal to anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs. No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSION Baricitinib demonstrated effectiveness in the real-world setting with a consistent safety profile observed in clinical studies. Better persistence rates for baricitinib compared to bDMARDs with improvement in PROs were reported, although baricitinib-treated patients had RA with poor prognostic characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Uta Kiltz
- Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Claudiusstraße 45, 44649, Herne, Germany
| | - Jérôme Avouac
- AP-HP Centre, Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Service de Rhumatologie, 27 Rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Tamas Treuer
- Eli Lilly and Company, 893 S. Delaware Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46225, USA.
| | - Ewa Haladyj
- Eli Lilly and Company, 893 S. Delaware Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46225, USA
| | - Jens Gerwien
- Eli Lilly and Company, 893 S. Delaware Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46225, USA
| | | | - Fabrizio Conti
- AOU Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wang T, Ho MH, Tong MCF, Chow JCH, Voss JG, Lin CC. Effects of Patient-Reported Outcome Tracking and Health Information Provision via Remote Patient Monitoring Software on Patient Outcomes in Oncology Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Semin Oncol Nurs 2023; 39:151473. [PMID: 37516624 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The authors sought to 1) review the literature on the remote care model that uses remote patient monitoring software (RPMS) as key mechanisms in oncology care for symptom tracking and health information provision and (2) compare the remote care model to standard care in terms of health-related quality of life, symptom burden, health management self-efficacy, anxiety, and depression. DATA SOURCES The search was conducted on March 23, 2022, in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases. RESULTS The primary strategies for applying digital technology in remote care models are patient-reported outcomes (PRO) tracking and health information delivery. Common PRO measurements applied in the RPMS include quality of life, symptom burden, self-efficacy, anxiety, and depression. Nine randomized controlled trials testing seven RPMS interventions were examined. Compared to standard care, remote patient monitoring via RPMS was related to greater quality of life and lower physical symptom burden during cancer therapy. The RPMS incorporated into routine clinical care with nurses providing remote monitoring performed better on PRO than that not integrated. CONCLUSION The RPMS-based remote care model improves patient outcomes during cancer treatment, and it is not inferior to standard care until the RPMS function is more integrated with existing clinical care. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Nurses are well-positioned to engage patients in self-care skills via RPMS and can play a vital role in integrating such a model of remote patient care into routine care practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tongyao Wang
- Research Assistant Professor, School of Nursing, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Mu-Hsing Ho
- Assistant Professor, School of Nursing, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Michael C F Tong
- Professor and Head, Graduate Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery; Director, Institute of Human Communicative Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - James Chung-Hang Chow
- Associate Consultant, Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Joachim G Voss
- Professor, Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Chia-Chin Lin
- Head and Professor, School of Nursing, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Charity Foundation Professor in Nursing, Hong Kong.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Islam ST, Descallar J, Martens D, Hassett G, Gibson KA. Screening for Anxiety in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis Using the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire. J Rheumatol 2023; 50:1273-1278. [PMID: 37399467 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2022-1261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) in screening for anxiety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), compared to the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) as the reference standard. METHODS Patients with a physician diagnosis of RA or PsA were invited to complete the MDHAQ and HADS at their routine rheumatology clinic visit. Sensitivity, specificity, percent agreement, and [Formula: see text] statistics were used to evaluate agreement between 2 MDHAQ items for anxiety and HADS subscale for Anxiety (HADS-A) score of ≥ 8. The first item is a question asked on a 4-point scale (0-3.3), and the second is a yes or no (blank) question asked within a 60-item review of symptoms (ROS) checklist. RESULTS The study included 183 participants, of whom 126 (68.9%) had RA and 57 (31.1%) had PsA. The mean age was 57.3 years and 66.7% were female. Positive screening for anxiety according to a HADS-A score of ≥ 8 was seen in 39.3% of patients. Compared to those with a HADS-A score of ≥ 8, patients with an MDHAQ score of ≥ 2.2 or a positive on ROS had a sensitivity of 69.9%, specificity of 73.6% and substantial agreement (agreement 80.9%, [Formula: see text] 0.59). CONCLUSION The MDHAQ provides information similar to the HADS in screening for anxiety in patients with RA and PsA. The use of this single questionnaire, which can also be used to monitor clinical status and to screen for fibromyalgia and depression without requiring multiple questionnaires, may prove a valuable tool in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadia Tasnim Islam
- S.T. Islam, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool;
| | - Joseph Descallar
- J. Descallar, MBiostat, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, and South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Liverpool
| | - David Martens
- D. Martens, MBBS, Department of Rheumatology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, and South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Liverpool
| | - Geraldine Hassett
- G. Hassett, PhD, K.A. Gibson, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, and South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Liverpool, Australia
| | - Kathryn Alleyne Gibson
- G. Hassett, PhD, K.A. Gibson, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, and South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Liverpool, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
van Slingerland K, de Jong PHP, Dolhain RJEM, Pasma A. The effect of a goal-setting strategy with integrated feedback on goal attainment in inflammatory arthritis patients: a mixed method study. Rheumatol Int 2023; 43:1897-1904. [PMID: 37481593 PMCID: PMC10435644 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-023-05394-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
Patients with Inflammatory Arthritis (IA) often experience difficulties in daily life as a result of their disease. Unfortunately, outpatient consultations in daily practice tend to focus on medical topics, thereby ignoring the impact of the disease on patients' daily lives. Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) can be used to understand this impact, but they are not enough for offering person-centered care. Because the patient's true values and goals can only be ascertained during a proper conversation, which should include both medical as well as patient goals. Therefore, the aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of a goal management strategy with integrated feedback on goal attainment and Health-Related Quality of Life(HRQoL) in IA patients. IA patients with an active disease were given the opportunity to set and follow-up goals. In addition to goal setting, patients were asked to complete online questionnaires on various PROs, including HRQoL. Ninety-two IA patients participated in the study. The mean age was 51 years and most of them had rheumatoid arthritis. A total of 302 patient goals were set, of which 32% were achieved. In the entire population, HRQoL did not change over time, but patients who did not meet their goals tended to report a lower HRQoL. Incorporating a feedback mechanism in a goal-setting strategy has a positive effect on goal attainment. Yet no effect was seen on HRQoL, but this may due to the fact that general HRQoL measurement are not sensitive or specific enough to detect changes that are accompanied with goal setting and attainment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - P H P de Jong
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R J E M Dolhain
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Pasma
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Quality and Patient Care, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Teuwen MMH, Knaapen IRE, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Schoones JW, van den Ende CHM, van Weely SFE, Gademan MGJ. The use of PROMIS measures in clinical studies in patients with inflammatory arthritis: a systematic review. Qual Life Res 2023; 32:2731-2749. [PMID: 37103773 PMCID: PMC10474175 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03422-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although the use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures is widely advocated, little is known on their use in patients with inflammatory arthritis. We systematically describe the use and outcomes of PROMIS measures in clinical studies involving people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Through a systematic search of nine electronic databases, clinical studies including patients with RA or axSpA and reporting the use of PROMIS measure were selected. Study characteristics, details of PROMIS measures and their outcomes, if available, were extracted. RESULTS In total, 29 studies described in 40 articles met the inclusion criteria, of which 25 studies included RA patients, three studies included axSpA patients and one study included both RA and axSpA patients. The use of two general PROMIS measures (PROMIS Global Health, PROMIS-29) and 13 different domain-specific PROMIS measures was reported, of which the PROMIS Pain Interference (n = 17), Physical Function (n = 14), Fatigue (n = 13), and Depression (n = 12) measures were most frequently used. Twenty-one studies reported their results in terms of T-scores. Most T-scores were worse than the general population mean, indicating impairments of health status. Eight studies did not report actual data but rather measurement properties of the PROMIS measures. CONCLUSION There was considerable variety regarding the different PROMIS measures used, with the PROMIS Pain interference, Physical function, Fatigue, and Depression measures being the most frequently used. In order to facilitate the comparisons across studies, more standardization of the selection of PROMIS measures is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M M H Teuwen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, P.O.Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - I R E Knaapen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, P.O.Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - T P M Vliet Vlieland
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, P.O.Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J W Schoones
- Directorate of Research Policy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C H M van den Ende
- Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - S F E van Weely
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, P.O.Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M G J Gademan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, P.O.Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Moons P, Norekvål TM, Arbelo E, Borregaard B, Casadei B, Cosyns B, Cowie MR, Fitzsimons D, Fraser AG, Jaarsma T, Kirchhof P, Mauri J, Mindham R, Sanders J, Schiele F, Torbica A, Zwisler AD. Placing patient-reported outcomes at the centre of cardiovascular clinical practice: implications for quality of care and management. Eur Heart J 2023; 44:3405-3422. [PMID: 37606064 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide important insights into patients' own perspectives about their health and medical condition, and there is evidence that their use can lead to improvements in the quality of care and to better-informed clinical decisions. Their application in cardiovascular populations has grown over the past decades. This statement describes what PROs are, and it provides an inventory of disease-specific and domain-specific PROs that have been developed for cardiovascular populations. International standards and quality indices have been published, which can guide the selection of PROs for clinical practice and in clinical trials and research; patients as well as experts in psychometrics should be involved in choosing which are most appropriate. Collaborations are needed to define criteria for using PROs to guide regulatory decisions, and the utility of PROs for comparing and monitoring the quality of care and for allocating resources should be evaluated. New sources for recording PROs include wearable digital health devices, medical registries, and electronic health record. Advice is given for the optimal use of PROs in shared clinical decision-making in cardiovascular medicine, and concerning future directions for their wider application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Moons
- KU Leuven Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 PB7001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Arvid Wallgrens backe 1, 413 46 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, Klipfontein Rd, Rondebosch, 7700 Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Tone M Norekvål
- Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Haukelandsveien 22, 5009 Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Jonas Lies veg, 875021 Bergen, Norway
| | - Elena Arbelo
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, C/Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigació August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS). Rosselló 149-153, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Av. Monforte de Lemos, 3-5. Pabellón 11. Planta 0, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Britt Borregaard
- Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 19, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Barbara Casadei
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, RDM, University of Oxford; Headley Way, Headington Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Headley Way, Headington Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Bernard Cosyns
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Brussels, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Jette, Belgium
| | - Martin R Cowie
- Royal Brompton Hospital & School of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Lifesciences, King's College London, Sydney St, London SW3 6NP, UK
| | - Donna Fitzsimons
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Queens University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast | BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland
| | - Alan G Fraser
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XW, UK
| | - Tiny Jaarsma
- Department of Medicine, Health and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Campus Norrköping, 601 74 Norrköping, Sweden
- Nursing Science, Julius Center, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paulus Kirchhof
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Martinistrasse 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Josepa Mauri
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Carretera de Canyet, s/n, 08916 Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Richard Mindham
- European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Patient Forum, 2035 route des colles, CS 80179 Biot, 06903 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
| | - Julie Sanders
- St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK
- William Harvey Research Institute, Charterhouse Square, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Francois Schiele
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Besancon, 3 Bd Alexandre Fleming, 25030 Besançon, France
| | - Aleksandra Torbica
- Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), Bocconi University, Via Sarfatti, 10 20136 Milan, Italy
| | - Ann Dorthe Zwisler
- Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- REHPA, The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, Odense University Hospital, Vestergade 17, 5800 Nyborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Greene GJ, Beaumont JL, Bacalao EJ, Muftic A, Kaiser K, Eisenstein AR, Mandelin AM, Cella D, Ruderman EM. Integrating PROMIS Measures in a Treat-to-Target Approach to Standardize Patient-Centered Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Rheumatol 2023; 50:1002-1008. [PMID: 37127317 PMCID: PMC11210325 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2022-1176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of a patient-centered rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treat-to-target (T2T) disease management approach on patient outcomes and patient satisfaction with care. METHODS In this longitudinal, observational pilot study, rheumatologists implemented a modified T2T approach that integrated Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures for depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, and social function into RA care. Study participants selected 1 PROMIS domain to target treatment and completed quarterly follow-up assessments. Participants were classified as improved if their Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) changed by > 5 points. Change in PROMIS t scores was examined for the group with improved CDAI, and then compared to those with unchanged or worsened CDAI. Satisfaction with care was assessed using multiple measures, including the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Treatment Satisfaction-Patient Satisfaction Scale. RESULTS The analytical sample (n = 119, median age 57 years, 90.8% female) was split between those with CDAI > 10 (n = 63) and CDAI ≤ 10 (n = 53). At 1 year, there was improvement in CDAI by > 5 points in 66% and 13% of individuals with baseline CDAI > 10 and baseline CDAI ≤ 10, respectively. Across all participants, improvement in CDAI by > 5 points correlated with improvements in the 5 PROMIS domains. Satisfaction with RA treatment also increased. CONCLUSION The integration of PROMIS measures into the T2T approach for RA care was associated with improvements in disease activity, and improvement in disease activity was associated with improvements in PROMIS measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George J Greene
- G.J. Greene, PhD, A. Muftic, BSW, K. Kaiser, PhD, A.R. Eisenstein, PhD, D. Cella, PhD, Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois;
| | - Jennifer L Beaumont
- J.L. Beaumont, MS, Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, and Clinical Outcomes Solutions, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Emily J Bacalao
- E.J. Bacalao, BS, A.M. Mandelin, MD, PhD, E.M. Ruderman, MD, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Azra Muftic
- G.J. Greene, PhD, A. Muftic, BSW, K. Kaiser, PhD, A.R. Eisenstein, PhD, D. Cella, PhD, Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Karen Kaiser
- G.J. Greene, PhD, A. Muftic, BSW, K. Kaiser, PhD, A.R. Eisenstein, PhD, D. Cella, PhD, Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Amy R Eisenstein
- G.J. Greene, PhD, A. Muftic, BSW, K. Kaiser, PhD, A.R. Eisenstein, PhD, D. Cella, PhD, Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Arthur M Mandelin
- E.J. Bacalao, BS, A.M. Mandelin, MD, PhD, E.M. Ruderman, MD, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - David Cella
- G.J. Greene, PhD, A. Muftic, BSW, K. Kaiser, PhD, A.R. Eisenstein, PhD, D. Cella, PhD, Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Eric M Ruderman
- E.J. Bacalao, BS, A.M. Mandelin, MD, PhD, E.M. Ruderman, MD, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kasturi S, Ahearn EL, Batterman A, Horton R, Kleinman J, Rose-Smith J, LeClair AM, Mandl LA. Measuring What Matters: A Qualitative Study of the Relevance and Clinical Utility of PROMIS Surveys in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J Rheumatol 2023; 51:jrheum.2023-0184. [PMID: 37399463 PMCID: PMC10757986 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2023-0184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the relevance and clinical utility of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) surveys in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS Adults with SLE receiving routine outpatient care at a tertiary care academic medical center participated in a qualitative study. Patients completed PROMIS computerized adaptive tests (CATs) in 12 selected domains and rated the relevance of each domain to their experience with SLE. Focus groups and interviews were conducted to elucidate the relevance of the PROMIS surveys, identify additional domains of importance, and explore the utility of the surveys in clinical care. Focus group and interview transcripts were coded, and a thematic analysis was performed using an iterative inductive process. RESULTS Twenty-eight women and 4 men participated in 4 focus groups and 4 interviews, respectively. Participants endorsed the relevance and comprehensiveness of the selected PROMIS domains in capturing the effect of SLE on their lives. They ranked fatigue, pain interference, sleep disturbance, physical function, and applied cognition abilities as the most salient health-related quality of life (HRQOL) domains. They suggested that the disease-agnostic PROMIS questions holistically captured their lived experience of SLE and its common comorbidities. Participants were enthusiastic about using PROMIS surveys in clinical care and described potential benefits in enabling disease monitoring and management, facilitating communication, and empowering patients. CONCLUSION PROMIS includes the HRQOL domains that are of most importance to individuals with SLE. Patients suggest that these universal tools can holistically capture the impact of SLE and enhance routine clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanthini Kasturi
- S. Kasturi, MD, MS, Division of Rheumatology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Emily L Ahearn
- E.L. Ahearn, BS, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Adena Batterman
- A. Batterman, MSW, LCSW, Department of Social Work, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Roberta Horton
- R. Horton, LCSW, ACSW, Department of Social Work, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Juliette Kleinman
- J. Kleinman, LCSW, ACSW, Department of Social Work, Montefiore Health System, Bronx, New York
| | - Jillian Rose-Smith
- J. Rose-Smith, PhD, MPH, LCSW, Department of Social Work, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Amy M LeClair
- A.M. LeClair, PhD, Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lisa A Mandl
- L.A. Mandl, MD, MPH, Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Predmore Z, Chen EK, Concannon TW, Schrandt S, Bartlett SJ, Bingham CO, Xie RZ, Chapman RH, Frank L. Treatment goals for rheumatoid arthritis: patient engagement and goal collection. J Comp Eff Res 2023; 12:e220097. [PMID: 36976963 PMCID: PMC10402807 DOI: 10.57264/cer-2022-0097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: We developed the Patient-Engaged Health Technology Assessment strategy for survey-based goal collection from patients to yield patient-important outcomes suitable for use in multi-criteria decision analysis. Methods: Rheumatoid arthritis patients were recruited from online patient networks for proof-of-concept testing of goal collection and prioritization using a survey. A Project Steering Committee and Expert Panel rated the feasibility of scaling to larger samples. Results: Survey respondents (n = 47) completed the goal collection exercise. Finding effective treatments was rated by respondents as the most important goal, and reducing stiffness was rated as the least important. Feedback from our steering committee and expert panel support the approach's feasibility for goal identification and ranking. Conclusion: Goals relevant for treatment evaluation can be identified and rated for importance by patients to permit wide input from patients with lived experience of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lori Frank
- RAND Corporation, Arlington, VA, USA
- The New York Academy of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bingham CO, Black S, Shiff NJ, Xu S, Langholff W, Curtis JR. Response to Treatment with Intravenous Golimumab or Infliximab in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: PROMIS Results from the Real-World Observational Phase 4 AWARE Study. Rheumatol Ther 2023; 10:659-678. [PMID: 36820983 PMCID: PMC10140242 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-023-00533-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To assess changes in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) outcomes related to social, mental, and physical well-being after approximately 1 year of intravenous (IV) golimumab or infliximab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using real-world evidence from AWARE. METHODS AWARE was a prospective, noninterventional, multicenter, observational, U.S.-based phase 4 study of 1270 RA patients who initiated treatment with IV golimumab or infliximab. PROMIS-29 and PROMIS short form (SF) Fatigue 7a and Pain Interference 6b questionnaires were administered at baseline and infusions 2, 5, and 8 (approximately weeks 4, 28, and 52 for IV golimumab and weeks 2, 22, and 46 for infliximab). Mean changes from baseline in all PROMIS-29 domains and respective SFs and response rates for achieving ≥ 3, ≥ 5, or ≥ 10-point improvements were determined. RESULTS Among all patients, baseline mean ± SD PROMIS T-scores were consistent between treatment groups and indicated worse physical function (38.2 ± 6.8 IV golimumab, 38.0 ± 6.9 infliximab), more pain interference (63.0 ± 7.6 IV golimumab, 63.9 ± 7.8 infliximab), and greater fatigue (58.4 ± 9.9 IV golimumab, 59.4 ± 10.0 infliximab) in these patients vs the general U.S. population (T-score = 50). Through the 8th infusion of either treatment, IV golimumab- and infliximab-treated patients achieved meaningful improvements (≥ 3-point improvement in T-scores) in all PROMIS-29 domains and respective SFs, and the proportions of patients with ≥ 3, ≥ 5, or ≥ 10-point improvements in T-scores increased from infusion 2 through infusion 8. CONCLUSIONS RA patients treated with IV golimumab or infliximab achieved comparable improvements across social, mental, and physical well-being PROMIS measures. Additionally, PROMIS detected meaningful clinical changes in patient-reported outcomes in both treatment groups. CLINICALTRIALS GOV REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02728934.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clifton O Bingham
- Johns Hopkins Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University, 5200 Eastern Ave, MFL Center Tower, Room 434A, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
| | - Shawn Black
- Department of Immunology, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA
| | - Natalie J Shiff
- Department of Immunology, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA.,Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Stephen Xu
- Department of Biostatistics, Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA
| | - Wayne Langholff
- Department of Biostatistics, Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Curtis
- Department of Medicine, Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hermans K, Boonen A, Vonkeman HE, van Tubergen A. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of combined asynchronous telemonitoring and patient-initiated care for spondyloarthritis: protocol for a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial (TeleSpA Study). BMJ Open 2023; 13:e067445. [PMID: 36806136 PMCID: PMC9944312 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION During the COVID-19 pandemic, an accelerated uptake of remote monitoring strategies, replacing traditional face-to-face care, has been observed. However, data on the effects of remote care interventions for patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases remain scarce and interpretation is hampered by study heterogeneity and research quality concerns. High-quality evidence is required to guide future implementation in clinical practice, with health economic analyses identified as an important knowledge gap. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing telemonitoring with conventional care for patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) are currently lacking. METHODS AND ANALYSIS TeleSpA is a pragmatic, multicentre RCT investigating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of combined asynchronous telemonitoring and patient-initiated follow-up for patients with SpA, compared with conventional care. Two-hundred patients will be recruited at two hospitals and randomised (1:1) to the study intervention or standard care. The primary endpoint is a reduction in the number of follow-up visits by ≥25% in the intervention compared with standard care group, during a 1-year period. Secondary endpoints are (a) non-inferiority of the study intervention with regard to health outcomes, quality of care and patient-reported experience with care; and (b) cost-effectiveness of the intervention, evaluated through a prospective trial-based cost-utility analysis. In addition, experiences with the study intervention will be assessed among patients and healthcare providers, and factors associated with primary and secondary endpoints will be identified. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Academic Hospital Maastricht/Maastricht University (NL71041.068.19/METC 19-059). Results will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04673825.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasper Hermans
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid van Tubergen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tymms K, O'Sullivan C, Smith T, Littlejohn G, Freeman T, Hoffman D, Segelov D, Griffiths H, Ciciriello S, Youssef P, Mathers D, Deakin CT. A novel electronic patient-reported outcome delivery system to implement health-related quality of life measures in routine clinical care: An analysis of 5 years of experience. Front Digit Health 2023; 4:1074931. [PMID: 36698650 PMCID: PMC9869675 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.1074931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To develop a simple and secure technological solution to incorporate electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) into routine clinical care. Methods A novel ePRO questionnaire delivery system was developed by Software for Specialists (S4S) in partnership with OPAL Rheumatology Australia. Validated questionnaires were sent from the electronic medical record (EMR) (Audit4) of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), lupus or giant cell arteritis (GCA) and delivered to the patient's email address or completed in the clinic waiting room using a smart device (in-practice). Completed questionnaires were encrypted and returned to the patient's Audit4. Deidentified clinical data was extracted and aggregated across all sites. Data collected between April 2016-Dec 2020 were analysed descriptively. Results Between April 2016 to Dec 2020, 221,352 Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F), Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) and/or HealthCare Resource Utilization (HCRU) questionnaires were sent from 39 of 42 contributing clinics (93%). 85% of questionnaires were delivered via email and 15% in-practice. Overall, 85% of patients completed at least one questionnaire, and of all questionnaires sent, 73% were completed. Females were more likely to engage with the questionnaires than males (87% vs. 81%), and older patients were slightly more likely to complete all questionnaires delivered. Conclusions The novel Audit4 ePRO delivery system is an effective tool for incorporating PROs into routine clinical care. The data generated provides a unique opportunity to understand the full burden of disease for patients in the real-world setting and the impact of interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Geoffrey Littlejohn
- OPAL Rheumatology, Sydney, NSW, Australia,Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Tim Freeman
- Software4Specialists Pty Ltd, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David Hoffman
- Software4Specialists Pty Ltd, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Dana Segelov
- Software4Specialists Pty Ltd, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Hedley Griffiths
- OPAL Rheumatology, Sydney, NSW, Australia,Barwon Rheumatology Service, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Sabina Ciciriello
- OPAL Rheumatology, Sydney, NSW, Australia,Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter Youssef
- OPAL Rheumatology, Sydney, NSW, Australia,University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia,Royal Prince Alfred, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - David Mathers
- OPAL Rheumatology, Sydney, NSW, Australia,Georgetown Arthritis, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bailey GA, Matthews C, Szewczyk-krolikowski K, Moore P, Komarzynski S, Davies EH, Peall KJ. Use of remote monitoring and integrated platform for the evaluation of sleep quality in adult-onset idiopathic cervical dystonia. J Neurol 2023; 270:1759-1769. [PMID: 36414751 PMCID: PMC9971061 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11490-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Up to 70% of individuals diagnosed with adult-onset idiopathic focal cervical dystonia (AOIFCD) report difficulties with sleep. Larger cohort studies using wrist-worn accelerometer devices have emerged as an alternative to smaller polysomnography studies, in order to evaluate sleep architecture. METHODS To measure activity during the sleep/wake cycle, individuals wore a consumer-grade wrist device (Garmin vivosmart 4) continuously over 7 days on their non-dominant wrist, while completing a daily sleep diary and standardised sleep and non-motor questionnaires via a dedicated app. Sleep measures were derived from the captured raw triaxial acceleration and heart rate values using previously published validated algorithms. RESULTS Data were collected from 50 individuals diagnosed with AOIFCD and 47 age- and sex-matched controls. Those with AOIFCD self-reported significantly higher levels of excessive daytime sleepiness (p = 0.04) and impaired sleep quality (p = 0.03), while accelerometer measurements found the AOIFCD cohort to have significantly longer total sleep times (p = 0.004) and time spent in NREM sleep (p = 0.009), compared to controls. Overall, there was limited agreement between wearable-derived sleep parameters, and self-reported sleep diary and visual analogue scale records. DISCUSSION This study shows the potential feasibility of using consumer-grade wearable devices in estimating sleep measures at scale in dystonia cohorts. Those diagnosed with AOIFCD were observed to have altered sleep architecture, notably longer total sleep time and NREM sleep, compared to controls. These findings suggest that previously reported disruptions to brainstem circuitry and serotonin neurotransmission may contribute to both motor and sleep pathophysiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace A. Bailey
- grid.5600.30000 0001 0807 5670Neuroscience and Mental Health Research Institute, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Hadyn Ellis Building, Maindy Road, Cardiff, CF24 4HQ UK
| | | | | | - Peter Moore
- grid.416928.00000 0004 0496 3293The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | - Kathryn J. Peall
- grid.5600.30000 0001 0807 5670Neuroscience and Mental Health Research Institute, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Hadyn Ellis Building, Maindy Road, Cardiff, CF24 4HQ UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Taylor PC, Fautrel B, Piette Y, Romero-Yuste S, Broen J, Welcker M, Howell O, Rottier E, Zignani M, Van Beneden K, Caporali R, Alten R. Treat-to-target in rheumatoid arthritis: a real-world study of the application and impact of treat-to-target within the wider context of patient management, patient centricity and advanced therapy use in Europe. RMD Open 2022; 8:rmdopen-2022-002658. [PMID: 36549856 PMCID: PMC9791437 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While treat-to-target (T2T) is endorsed for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), data on the degree of implementation in clinical practice are limited. This study investigated the use of T2T for RA in a real-world setting across Europe. METHODS The Adelphi RA Disease-Specific Programme was a point-in-time survey of rheumatologists and their consulting patients with RA conducted between January and October 2020 in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK. Rheumatologists completed an attitudinal survey, and a record form for their next 10-12 consulting patients, who were invited to voluntarily complete a patient-reported questionnaire. Data collected included clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and attitudes towards T2T. RESULTS Overall, 316 rheumatologists provided data for 3120 patients, of whom 1108 completed the questionnaire. While 86.1% of rheumatologists estimated using T2T principles in clinical practice, only 66.6% of patients were reported by their physician to be managed using a T2T approach. Achieving disease remission was the most commonly reported treatment goal identified by rheumatologists (79.7%), followed by symptom control (47.8%) and reducing impact on quality of life (44.5%). 40.8% of rheumatologists and their patients were in agreement that a treatment goal had been set. When there was agreement on treatment goals, we observed better patient satisfaction, engagement and treatment success. CONCLUSIONS Despite recommendations, the T2T approach in RA appears to be suboptimally implemented in clinical practice. This highlights the importance of patient-centricity in the decision-making process to define meaningful targets and select appropriate treatments to improve disease outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter C. Taylor
- Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Bruno Fautrel
- Institut Pierre Louis d'epidemiologie, Sorbonne University, INSERM UMR-S 1136, Paris, France,Service de Rhumatologie, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Yves Piette
- Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent and AZ Sint-Jan Brugge - Oostende AV, Bruges, Belgium
| | - Susana Romero-Yuste
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Complex of Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain
| | - Jasper Broen
- Regional Rheumatology Center, Maxima Medical Centre, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Oliver Howell
- Autoimmune Franchise, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK
| | - Elke Rottier
- Autoimmune Franchise, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK
| | - Monia Zignani
- Evidence Generation, Galapagos NV, Mechelen, Belgium
| | | | - Roberto Caporali
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy,Division of Clinical Rheumatology, ASST Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy
| | - Rieke Alten
- Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Scholsspark Klinik, Teaching Hospital Charite University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kasturi S, Price LL, LeClair A, Patel N, Shetty S, Sheira D, Weber S, Curtis D, Nowell WB, Salmon J, Terrin N, McAlindon TE, Mandl LA. Clinical integration of patient-reported outcome measures to enhance the care of patients with SLE: a multi-centre prospective cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022; 61:4763-4774. [PMID: 35357445 PMCID: PMC9707322 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility and impact of integrating electronic patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into the routine outpatient care of patients with SLE. METHODS We conducted a prospective cohort study, utilizing a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design, of SLE outpatients receiving rheumatology care at two academic medical centres. Participants completed electronic PROMs at enrolment and then prior to their next two routine rheumatology visits. PROM score reports were shared with patients and rheumatologists before visits. Patients and rheumatologists completed post-visit surveys evaluating the utility of PROMs in the clinical encounters. Focus groups of patients and interviews with treating rheumatologists were conducted to further explore their experience utilizing PROMs. RESULTS A total of 105 SLE patients and 17 rheumatologists participated in the study. Patients completed PROMs in 159 of 184 encounters (86%), with 93% of surveys completed remotely. Patients reported that PROMs were 'quite a bit' or 'very' useful (55% of encounters) and beneficial to communication (55% of encounters). In contrast, physicians found PROMs useful (20%) and beneficial to communication (17%) less frequently. There was no significant change in visit length, health-related quality of life or disease activity after implementation of PROMs; however, patient satisfaction improved slightly. Qualitative analyses revealed that patients felt PROMs provided utility primarily by facilitating communication, particularly when physicians discussed the surveys. CONCLUSION The remote capture and integration of electronic PROMs into clinical care was feasible in a diverse cohort of SLE outpatients. PROMs were useful to patients and enhanced their clinical experience primarily by facilitating communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanthini Kasturi
- Division of Rheumatology/Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center
| | - Lori Lyn Price
- Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies
| | - Amy LeClair
- Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Neena Patel
- Division of Rheumatology/Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center
| | - Shreya Shetty
- Division of Rheumatology/Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center
| | - Dina Sheira
- Division of Rheumatology/Department of Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
| | - Serena Weber
- Division of Rheumatology/Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center
| | | | | | - Jane Salmon
- Division of Rheumatology/Department of Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
- Division of Rheumatology/Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Norma Terrin
- Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University
| | | | - Lisa A Mandl
- Division of Rheumatology/Department of Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
- Division of Rheumatology/Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Patients' and clinicians' perspectives on the clinical utility of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Foot Disease Activity Index. Rheumatol Int 2022; 42:1807-1817. [PMID: 35622086 PMCID: PMC9136191 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-022-05147-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Although patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are recommended in clinical practice, their application in routine care is limited. The Rheumatoid Arthritis Foot Disease Activity Index (RADAI-F5) is a validated PROM for assessing foot disease in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To explore patient and clinician opinions and perceptions of the clinical utility of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Foot Disease Activity Index (RADAI-F5), eight RA patients and eight clinicians routinely involved in the management of RA patients participated in one semi-structured remote video-based interview. They provided their perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to clinical implementation of the RADAI-F5. Three global themes were identified; 'Feet are a priority' as the impact of RA on the feet negatively impacted upon patient quality of life. The second theme was 'Need for a clinically feasible foot PROM' as participants recognised the current lack of a clinically feasible tool to determine RA foot disease. The third global theme of 'Implementation' was drawn together to form two subordinate themes: 'Facilitators to RADAI-F5 implementation' as the tool can promote communication, guide management, help screen foot symptoms, monitor foot disease status and treatments, and promote patient education and; 'Barriers to RADAI-F5 implementation' as there were associated practical difficulties, including lack of appointment time, administrative burdens, IT barriers and preference for further RADAI-F5 validation using imaging. The RADAI-F5 has significant potential as a clinical tool to aid foot disease management. However, implementation challenges must be overcome before broad adoption in rheumatology clinics.
Collapse
|
27
|
Cho SK, Kim H, Song YJ, Nam E, Jones B, Ndosi M, Sung YK. Validation of the Korean Leeds satisfaction questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis with Rasch models. Int J Rheum Dis 2022; 25:1270-1278. [PMID: 35945672 DOI: 10.1111/1756-185x.14419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We conducted the cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Leeds Satisfaction Questionnaire (LSQ) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Korea. METHODS The adaptation of the LSQ from English into Korean was based on guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation for self-report measures. Patients with RA were recruited from an outpatient clinic of a university hospital in South Korea. Validation of the Korean-LSQ with Rasch models was carried out using WINSTEPS. Model fit was determined by Infit and Outfit statistics (≥0.50 and ≤1.50), including the separation index (≥2.00) and reliability index (≥0.80). RESULTS The data set comprised 125 patients (82.4% female), with median (interquartile range) age 49.0 (37-57) years, and disease duration of 2.5 (1.2-3.8) years. The total and subscale scores of the Korean-LSQ demonstrated excellent or good test-retest reliability (0.88 for total, 0.71-0.82 for subscales), and items in the scale also revealed a high internal consistency (α = 0.93). The six subscales of the Korean-LSQ were found to have a good fit to the Rasch model and good reliability (Person separation index = 2.63 and reliability index = 0.87; item separation index = 37.03 and reliability index >0.99). In addition, the unidimensionality of the scale was confirmed by the principal component analysis based on the Rasch residuals. CONCLUSION Fit to the Rasch model confirmed that the construct validity, reliability, and unidimensionality of the LSQ were preserved following the adaptation into Korean. The Korean-LSQ is a valid and reliable tool for measuring satisfaction with care in Korean patients with RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo-Kyung Cho
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases and Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyoungyoung Kim
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases and Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeo-Jin Song
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases and Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eunwoo Nam
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases and Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Bethan Jones
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Mwidimi Ndosi
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Yoon-Kyoung Sung
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases and Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mollard E, Pedro S, Schumacher R, Michaud K. Smartphone-based behavioral monitoring and patient-reported outcomes in adults with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:566. [PMID: 35690753 PMCID: PMC9188241 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05520-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) are associated with depression, fatigue, and disturbed sleep - symptoms that often impact behavior and activity. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) are a way of collecting information on the patient symptom experience directly from the individual. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare user smartphone sensor and activity data in adults with RMDs and assess associations with PROs. METHODS We invited adults with RMDs enrolled in the FORWARD Databank to participate by installing a custom app on their smartphone and answering PROs (pain, global, HAQ-II) questions daily and weekly over 3 years. Passive data collected included mobility distance, unique calls and text messages, call durations, and number of missed calls. Confounders included sociodemographic, clinical, passive phone behavior, and seasonal factors. Kappa statistics between PRO and flares were computed to measure agreement. The agreement between daily and weekly VAS pain was estimated using the intraclass (ICC) correlation of a two-way random effect model. The relationship between the weekly PRO outcomes and the passive phone data was analyzed with a linear mixed-effect model (LMM), including a random intercept for participant and slope for time in the study with an unstructured covariate structure. RESULTS Of the 446 participants, the mean (SD) age was 54 (12) years, most (65.5%) had rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the vast majority (91%) were female, and the US Northeast has the least representation (12%). Longer reaction times, interaction diversity, and higher mobility were associated with worse PROs while longer text messages were associated with better PROs. Participants in this study showed good levels of adherence which holds promise for future interventions using passive behavior measures in self-management and clinical follow-up. CONCLUSION This is the first study to examine passive smartphone behavior with PROs in RMDs and we found significant associations between these behaviors and important health outcomes of pain and function. As smartphone usage continues to change, future studies should validate and expand on our findings with a goal of finding changes in patient symptoms passively through mobile device monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sofia Pedro
- FORWARD, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, KS, USA
| | | | - Kaleb Michaud
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA. .,FORWARD, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, KS, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Morrison T, Foster E, Dougherty J, Barton J. Shared Decision Making in Rheumatology: A Scoping Review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2022; 56:152041. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2022.152041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
30
|
Brodke DJ, Zhang C, Shaw JD, Cizik AM, Saltzman CL, Brodke DS. How Do PROMIS Scores Correspond to Common Physical Abilities? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022; 480:996-1007. [PMID: 34855330 PMCID: PMC9007194 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Patient-Report Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is increasingly used as a general-purpose tool for measuring orthopaedic surgery outcomes. This set of questionnaires is efficient, precise, and correlates well with specialty-specific measures, but impactful implementation of patient-specific data, especially at the point of care, remains a challenge. Although clinicians may have substantial experience with established patient-reported outcome measures in their fields, PROMIS is relatively new, and the real-life meaning of PROMIS numerical summary scores may be unknown to many orthopaedic surgeons. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES We aimed to (1) identify a small subset of important items in the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) item bank that are answered by many patients with orthopaedic conditions and (2) graphically display characteristic responses to these items across the physical function spectrum in order to translate PROMIS numerical scores into physical ability levels using clinically relevant, familiar terms. METHODS In a cross-sectional study, 97,852 PROMIS PF assessments completed by 37,517 patients with orthopaedic conditions presenting to a tertiary-care academic institution were pooled and descriptively analyzed. Between 2017 and 2020, we evaluated 75,354 patients for outpatient orthopaedic care. Of these, 67% (50,578) were eligible for inclusion because they completed a PROMIS version 2.0 physical function assessment; 17% (12,720) were excluded because they lacked information in the database on individual item responses, and another < 1% (341) were excluded because the assessment standard error was greater than 0.32, leaving 50% of the patients (37,517) for analysis. The PROMIS PF is scored on a 0-point to 100-point scale, with a population mean of 50 and SD of 10. Anchor-based minimum clinically important differences have been found to be 8 to 10 points in a foot and ankle population, 7 to 8 points in a spine population, and approximately 4 points in a hand surgery population. The most efficient and precise means of administering the PROMIS PF is as a computerized adaptive test (CAT), whereby an algorithm intelligently tailors each follow-up question based on responses to previous questions, requiring only a few targeted questions to generate an accurate result. In this study, the mean PROMIS PF score was 41 ± 9. The questions most frequently used by the PROMIS CAT software were identified (defined in this study as any question administered to > 0.1% of the cohort). To understand the ability levels of patients based on their individual scores, patients were grouped into score categories: < 18, 20 ± 2, 25 ± 2, 30 ± 2, 35 ± 2, 40 ± 2, 45 ± 2, 50 ± 2, 55 ± 2, 60 ± 2, and > 62. For each score category, the relative frequency of each possible response (ranging from "cannot do" to "without any difficulty") was determined for each question. The distribution of responses given by each score group for each question was graphically displayed to generate an intuitive map linking PROMIS scores to patient ability levels (with ability levels represented by how patients responded to the PROMIS items). RESULTS Twenty-eight items from the 165-question item bank were used frequently (that is, administered to more than 0.1% of the cohort) by the PROMIS CAT software. The top four items constituted 63% of all items. These top four items asked about the patient's ability to perform 2 hours of physical labor, yard work, household chores, and walking more than 1 mile. Graphical displays of responses to the top 28 and top four items revealed how PROMIS scores correspond to patient ability levels. Patients with a score of 40 most frequently responded that they experienced "some difficulty" with physical labor, yard work, household chores, and walking more than 1 mile, compared with "little" or "no" difficulty for patients with a score of 50 and "cannot do" for patients with a score of 30. CONCLUSION We provided a visual key linking PROMIS numerical scores to physical ability levels using clinically relevant, familiar terms. Future studies might investigate whether using similar graphical displays as a patient education tool enhances patient-provider communication and improves the patient experience. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The visual explanation of PROMIS scores provided by this study may help new users of the PROMIS understand the instrument, feel empowered to incorporate it into their practices, and use it as a tool for counseling patients about their scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dane J. Brodke
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Chong Zhang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jeremy D. Shaw
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amy M. Cizik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Charles L. Saltzman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Darrel S. Brodke
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Carfora L, Foley CM, Hagi-Diakou P, Lesty PJ, Sandstrom ML, Ramsey I, Kumar S. Patients' experiences and perspectives of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical care: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0267030. [PMID: 35446885 PMCID: PMC9022863 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) or patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used by clinicians in everyday clinical practice to assess patients' perceptions of their own health and the healthcare they receive. By providing insight into how illness and interventions impact on patients' lives, they can help to bridge the gap between clinicians' expectations and what matters most to the patient. Given increasing focus on patient-centred care, the objective of this meta-synthesis was to summarise the qualitative evidence regarding patients' perspectives and experiences of the use of PROMs in clinical care. METHODS A systematic search of the following databases was undertaken in August 2020: Medline, EMBASE, EMCARE, PsychINFO, Scopus and the Cochrane Library. This review was conducted and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research (CASP). A meta-ethnographic approach was used for data extraction and meta-synthesis of findings (PROSPERO registration: CRD42020202506). RESULTS Fourteen studies from a range of countries with differing qualitative research methodologies were identified. Three themes were identified, namely 'patient preferences regarding PROMs', 'patient perceived benefits' and 'barriers to patient engagement with PROMs'. The perspectives of patients suggested they preferred PROMs that were simple and relevant to their conditions and found benefits in the way they facilitated self-reflection and effective communication with their clinicians. Patients, however, questioned the relevance of some individual questions and purpose. CONCLUSION PROMs can be a useful tool in the clinical setting by enabling individualisation and patient centred care. This meta-synthesis provides insights into what patients find beneficial as well as barriers to their engagement, highlighting the importance of educating patients about PROMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam Carfora
- UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ciara M. Foley
- UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Phillip Hagi-Diakou
- UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Phillip J. Lesty
- UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Marianne L. Sandstrom
- UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Imogen Ramsey
- Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Saravana Kumar
- UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Fujiwara T, Kondo M, Yamada H, Haraguchi A, Fujimura K, Sakuraba K, Kamura S, Fukushi JI, Miyahara H, Inoue Y, Tsuru T, Shuto T, Yoshizawa S, Suematsu E, Miyamura T, Ayano M, Mitoma H, Arinobu Y, Niiro H, Ohishi M, Hirata A, Tokunaga S, Takada A, Hara D, Tsushima H, Akasaki Y, Ikemura S, Sueishi T, Toya M, Sakuragi T, Tsutsui T, Kai K, Arisumi S, Nakashima Y. Factors affecting patient satisfaction related to cost and treatment effectiveness in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the multicenter observational cohort study, FRANK Registry. Arthritis Res Ther 2022; 24:53. [PMID: 35193646 PMCID: PMC8862466 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-022-02746-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To further improve rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment, it is necessary to understand each RA patient’s satisfaction and to identify the factors affecting their satisfaction. Despite the rise in medical costs for RA, little is known about the factors that influence patient satisfaction with the cost of treatment in RA patients. Methods This is a multicenter observational study of Japanese RA patients from the FRANK Registry with data analyzed from March 2017 to August 2020. We collected data on demographic characteristics, clinical data, quality of life which was evaluated using the EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire (EQ5D), and patient satisfaction. The four categories of patient satisfaction were evaluated individually (i.e., cost, treatment efficacy, activities of daily living [ADL], and global treatment satisfaction). We analyzed the factors that affected each patient’s satisfaction, such as age, sex, EQ5D, disease duration, disease activity, and treatment. Results This study included 2235 RA outpatients (406 males, 1829 females). In RA patients, “very satisfied” and “satisfied” were given for nearly half of each satisfaction aspect (cost 49%; efficacy 72%; ADL 58%; global treatment 66%) at the time of the initial registration. To investigate the factors influencing each satisfaction, multivariate analysis has revealed that the use of b/tsDMARDs increased satisfaction of treatment effect (odds ratio [OR] 0.66) and ADL (OR 0.78) but decreased cost satisfaction (OR 2.21). Age (50–64 years; OR 0.91; 65–74 years, 0.55: ≥ 75 years, 0.35), female (OR 0.81), and history of musculoskeletal surgery (OR 0.60) all increased cost satisfaction. Patients with lower disease activity and higher EQ5D scores had higher levels of satisfaction in all areas. Conclusions In this study, patient satisfaction in terms of cost, treatment effect, ADL, and overall treatment was generally higher, but some patients were dissatisfied. The cost of satisfaction increased with age and a history of musculoskeletal surgery, while it decreased with a lower EQ5D score and the use of b/tsDMARDs. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-022-02746-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshifumi Fujiwara
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
| | - Masakazu Kondo
- Kondo Clinic of Rheumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Hisakata Yamada
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.,Kondo Clinic of Rheumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Akihisa Haraguchi
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Fujimura
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Koji Sakuraba
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Satoshi Kamura
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Jun-Ichi Fukushi
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Hisaaki Miyahara
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yasushi Inoue
- Department of Rheumatology, Fukuoka Red Cross Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | | | - Toshihide Shuto
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Chiyoda Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Seiji Yoshizawa
- Department of Rheumatology, Hamanomachi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Eiichi Suematsu
- Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tomoya Miyamura
- Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Masahiro Ayano
- Department of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Hiroki Mitoma
- Department of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yojiro Arinobu
- Department of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Niiro
- Department of Medical Education, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Masanobu Ohishi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chihaya Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Akie Hirata
- Medical Information Center, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Shoji Tokunaga
- Medical Information Center, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Atsushi Takada
- Medical Information Center, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Daisuke Hara
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Tsushima
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Yukio Akasaki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Satoshi Ikemura
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Takuya Sueishi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Masakazu Toya
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Takahide Sakuragi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Tomoko Tsutsui
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Kai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Shinkichi Arisumi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Yasuharu Nakashima
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Tanaka Y, Yamaguchi A, Miyamoto T, Tanimura K, Iwai H, Kaneko Y, Takeuchi T, Amano K, Iwamoto N, Kawakami A, Murakami M, Nishimoto N, Atsumi T, Sumida T, Ohmura K, Mimori T, Yamanaka H, Fujio K, Fujino Y, Saito K, Nakano K, Hirata S, Nakayamada S. OUP accepted manuscript. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022; 61:4273-4285. [PMID: 35136990 PMCID: PMC9629352 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To compare the outcome of various treatment de-escalation regimens in patients with RA who achieved sustained remission. Methods At period 1, 436 RA patients who were treated with MTX and bDMARDs and had maintained DAS28(ESR) at <2.6 were divided into five groups based on shared patient/physician decision-making; continuation, dose reduction and discontinuation of MTX or bDMARDs. At end of year 1, patients who achieved DAS28(ESR) <3.2 were allowed to enrol in period 2 for treatment using the de-escalation regimens for another year. The primary and secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with DAS28(ESR) <2.6 at year 1 and 2, respectively. Results Based on shared decision-making, 81.4% elected de-escalation of treatment and 48.4% selected de-escalation of MTX. At end of period 1, similar proportions of patients maintained DAS28(ESR) <2.6 (continuation, 85.2%; MTX dose reduction, 79.0%; MTX-discontinuation, 80.0%; bDMARD dose reduction, 73.9%), although the rate was significantly different between the continuation and bDMARD-discontinuation. At end of period 2, similar proportions of patients of the MTX groups maintained DAS28(ESR) <2.6 (continuation or de-escalation), but the rates were significantly lower in the bDMARD-discontinuation group. However, half of the latter group satisfactorily discontinued bDMARDs. Adverse events were numerically lower in MTX and bDMARD-de-escalation groups during period 1 and 2, compared with the continuation group. Conclusions After achieving sustained remission by combination treatment of MTX/bDMARDs, disease control was achieved comparably by continuation, dose reduction or discontinuation of MTX and dose reduction of bDMARDs at end of year 1. Subsequent de-escalation of MTX had no impacts on disease control but decreased adverse events in year 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiya Tanaka
- Correspondence to: Yoshiya Tanaka, The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahata-nishi, Kitakyushu 807-8555, Japan. E-mail:
| | - Ayako Yamaguchi
- The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine
- Department of Laboratory and Transfusion Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu
| | - Toshiaki Miyamoto
- Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, Hamamatsu
| | - Kazuhide Tanimura
- Department of Rheumatology, Hokkaido Medical Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Sapporo
| | - Hideyuki Iwai
- Department of Medicine and Rheumatology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
| | - Yuko Kaneko
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo
| | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo
| | - Koichi Amano
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama
| | - Naoki Iwamoto
- Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Division of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki
| | - Atsushi Kawakami
- Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Division of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki
| | - Miho Murakami
- Department of Molecular Regulation for Intractable Diseases, Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo Medical University, Osaka
| | - Norihiro Nishimoto
- Department of Molecular Regulation for Intractable Diseases, Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo Medical University, Osaka
| | - Tatsuya Atsumi
- Department of Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido
| | - Takayuki Sumida
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba
| | - Koichiro Ohmura
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University
| | - Tsuneyo Mimori
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University
- Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto
| | | | - Keishi Fujio
- Department of Allergy and Rheumatology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo
| | - Yoshihisa Fujino
- Department of Environmental Epidemiology, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health
| | - Kazuyoshi Saito
- The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine
- Tobata General Hospital, Kitakyushu
| | - Kazuhisa Nakano
- The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine
| | - Shintaro Hirata
- The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Roberts JC, Recht M, Gonzales SE, Stanley J, Denne M, Caicedo J, Rockwood K. Incorporating the patient voice and patient engagement in GOAL-Hēm: Advancing patient-centric hemophilia care. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2022; 6:e12655. [PMID: 35155975 PMCID: PMC8822263 DOI: 10.1002/rth2.12655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Goal Attainment Scaling for Hemophilia (GOAL-Hēm) is a novel, hemophilia-specific, validated patient engagement tool and patient-reported outcome instrument. OBJECTIVE We evaluated the degree to which the language of GOAL-Hēm was patient-centric and the content valuable and relevant for people with hemophilia (PWH) and/or their caregivers. PATIENTS/METHODS Patients and caregivers participated in one of three investigations: an online survey, one-on-one patient interviews, or a focus group. The survey and interviews assessed the clarity and relevance of the GOAL-Hēm menu items. Interviews were semistructured, audio recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Feedback from interviews was coded as "clear," "unclear," "remove," or "add." The focus group explored participants' experience of GOAL-Hēm and elicited recommendations for implementation. Quotations from focus group and interview transcripts were indexed and charted to emergent themes for analysis. RESULTS Participants comprised 19 adults with hemophilia and 19 caregivers of children with hemophilia (survey, n = 20; interview, n = 12; focus group, n = 6). After their feedback, 32% (15/48) of goals were retained unchanged. Further feedback resulted in the removal of 45% (286/635) of the goal descriptors, and 30% (193/635) of the retained descriptors were modified. Three new (total = 38) goals and 42 descriptors (total = 368) were added to the menu. Thematic analysis indicated that participants were enthusiastic about patient-centric language, empowered through the goal-setting process, and recognized GOAL-Hēm could measure clinically meaningful change. CONCLUSION By listening closely to patients and caregivers, we refined GOAL-Hēm to better capture the experiences of PWH, enhance content validity, and augment implementation strategies. Incorporating the patient voice is integral to developing patient-centered outcome measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael Recht
- The Hemophilia Center at Oregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandOregonUSA
- American Thrombosis and Hemostasis NetworkRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | | | | | | | | | - Kenneth Rockwood
- Ardea OutcomesHalifaxNova ScotiaCanada
- Department of MedicineDalhousie UniversityHalifaxNova ScotiaCanada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Marinello D, Di Cianni F, Del Bianco A, Mattioli I, Sota J, Cantarini L, Emmi G, Leccese P, Lopalco G, Mosca M, Padula A, Piga M, Salvarani C, Taruscio D, Talarico R. Empowering Patients in the Therapeutic Decision-Making Process: A Glance Into Behçet's Syndrome. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:769870. [PMID: 34966756 PMCID: PMC8710680 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.769870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Behçet's syndrome (BS) represents a challenging condition, characterized by a variable spectrum of disease profile and associated with a significant limitation of the daily activities as well as a potential negative impact on relationships and psychological status. Considering also the complexity of the therapeutic management of BS, that often includes biological off-label treatments, the participation in the therapeutic decision-making process of the BS patients is essential to ensure the integration of the care process into the life of the patient. For this reason, the empowerment of BS patients represents a crucial need and the present work is aimed at fully exploring all the potential variables implicated in the BS patient empowerment, also highlighting major points to consider and concrete actions to be planned in the immediate future in order to implement a pragmatic facilitation of the patients' empowerment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Marinello
- Rheumatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Federica Di Cianni
- Rheumatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Irene Mattioli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy
| | - Jurgen Sota
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Luca Cantarini
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Giacomo Emmi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy
| | - Pietro Leccese
- Rheumatology Department of Lucania, Rheumatology Institute of Lucania, San Carlo Hospital of Potenza and Madonna delle Grazie Hospital of Matera, Potenza and Matera, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lopalco
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Emergence Medicine and Transplantation (DETO), University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Marta Mosca
- Rheumatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Angela Padula
- Rheumatology Department of Lucania, Rheumatology Institute of Lucania, San Carlo Hospital of Potenza and Madonna delle Grazie Hospital of Matera, Potenza and Matera, Italy
| | - Matteo Piga
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, AOU University Clinic and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Carlo Salvarani
- Rheumatology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia and Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Domenica Taruscio
- National Centre for Rare Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Rosaria Talarico
- Rheumatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Richesson RL, Marsolo KS, Douthit BJ, Staman K, Ho PM, Dailey D, Boyd AD, McTigue KM, Ezenwa MO, Schlaeger JM, Patil CL, Faurot KR, Tuzzio L, Larson EB, O'Brien EC, Zigler CK, Lakin JR, Pressman AR, Braciszewski JM, Grudzen C, Fiol GD. Enhancing the use of EHR systems for pragmatic embedded research: lessons from the NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28:2626-2640. [PMID: 34597383 PMCID: PMC8633608 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We identified challenges and solutions to using electronic health record (EHR) systems for the design and conduct of pragmatic research. MATERIALS AND METHODS Since 2012, the Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory has served as the resource coordinating center for 21 pragmatic clinical trial demonstration projects. The EHR Core working group invited these demonstration projects to complete a written semistructured survey and used an inductive approach to review responses and identify EHR-related challenges and suggested EHR enhancements. RESULTS We received survey responses from 20 projects and identified 21 challenges that fell into 6 broad themes: (1) inadequate collection of patient-reported outcome data, (2) lack of structured data collection, (3) data standardization, (4) resources to support customization of EHRs, (5) difficulties aggregating data across sites, and (6) accessing EHR data. DISCUSSION Based on these findings, we formulated 6 prerequisites for PCTs that would enable the conduct of pragmatic research: (1) integrate the collection of patient-centered data into EHR systems, (2) facilitate structured research data collection by leveraging standard EHR functions, usable interfaces, and standard workflows, (3) support the creation of high-quality research data by using standards, (4) ensure adequate IT staff to support embedded research, (5) create aggregate, multidata type resources for multisite trials, and (6) create re-usable and automated queries. CONCLUSION We are hopeful our collection of specific EHR challenges and research needs will drive health system leaders, policymakers, and EHR designers to support these suggestions to improve our national capacity for generating real-world evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel L Richesson
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Keith S Marsolo
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Brian J Douthit
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,US Department of Veterans Affairs, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Karen Staman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - P Michael Ho
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Dana Dailey
- Center for Health Sciences, St. Ambrose University, Davenport, Iowa and Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Andrew D Boyd
- Department of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kathleen M McTigue
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Miriam O Ezenwa
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, University of Florida, College of Nursing, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Judith M Schlaeger
- Department of Human Development Nursing Science, University of Illinois Chicago, College of Nursing, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Crystal L Patil
- Department of Human Development Nursing Science, University of Illinois Chicago, College of Nursing, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Keturah R Faurot
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Leah Tuzzio
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Eric B Larson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Emily C O'Brien
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christina K Zigler
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Joshua R Lakin
- Palliative Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alice R Pressman
- Center for Health Systems Research, Sutter Health Center for Health Systems Research, Walnut Creek, California, USA
| | - Jordan M Braciszewski
- Center for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Corita Grudzen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Guilherme Del Fiol
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Schäfer M, Albrecht K, Kekow J, Rockwitz K, Liebhaber A, Zink A, Strangfeld A. Factors associated with treatment satisfaction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: data from the biological register RABBIT. RMD Open 2021; 6:rmdopen-2020-001290. [PMID: 33051270 PMCID: PMC7722277 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2020] [Revised: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess satisfaction with the effectiveness and tolerability of treatments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods Patients from the RABBIT register, starting a biological (b) or targeted synthetic (ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD), or a conventional synthetic (cs)DMARD treatment after ≥1 csDMARD failure, were included. Treatment satisfaction was measured after 1 year of treatment in four categories and binarised for analysis. Logistic regression models were performed to calculate ORs for factors associated with treatment satisfaction. Results Data of 10 646 patients (74% women, mean 58 years) were analysed. At baseline, 55% of the patients were satisfied with the efficacy and 68% with the tolerability of their previously given treatments. After 1 year, 85% of the patients were satisfied with treatment effectiveness and 90% with tolerability. Baseline satisfaction (OR 2.98, 95% CI 2.58 to 3.44), seropositivity (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.57), reduction of DAS28 (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.46) and pain (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.31), and the improvement of physical capacity (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.29) were positively associated with treatment satisfaction at follow-up while glucocorticoids (GCs) >5 mg/day, depression, fibromyalgia, obesity, prior bDMARDs and therapy changes were negatively associated. The impact of GC on satisfaction was dose-dependent, becoming strongest for GC >15 mg (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.34). A 5 mg/day reduction within 12 months was positively associated with satisfaction regarding efficacy (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.27) and tolerability (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.21). Conclusion Most patients were satisfied with their treatment’s effectiveness and tolerability after 1 year of treatment. Tapering GCs was positively associated with the improvement of patients’ satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Schäfer
- Epidemiology and Health Care Research, German Rheumatism Research Center (DRFZ Berlin), Berlin, Germany
| | - Katinka Albrecht
- Epidemiology and Health Care Research, German Rheumatism Research Center (DRFZ Berlin), Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörn Kekow
- Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Clinic of Rheumatology and Orthopaedics, Vogelsang-Gommern, Germany
| | | | | | - Angela Zink
- Epidemiology and Health Care Research, German Rheumatism Research Center (DRFZ Berlin), Berlin, Germany
| | - Anja Strangfeld
- Epidemiology and Health Care Research, German Rheumatism Research Center (DRFZ Berlin), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ye Y, Ge J. Clinical application of comfort nursing in elderly patients with advanced lung cancer. Am J Transl Res 2021; 13:9750-9756. [PMID: 34540105 PMCID: PMC8430082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the clinical effect of comfort nursing in elderly patients with advanced lung cancer (ALC). METHODS Eighty-six elderly patients with ALC treated in our hospital were selected as clinical subjects for this prospective study. The patients were randomly divided into the control group (n=43, received routine nursing) and the observation group (n=43, received additional comfort nursing based on routine nursing) according to a digital table method. The scores of pressure ulcer scale (Braden), Morse fall scale (MFS), numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain, activity of daily living (ADL) scale, incidence of complications and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. RESULTS The scores of Braden and ADL scale of the two groups were significantly improved (all P<0.05) under different nursing methods. The improvement of patients in the observation group was better than that in the control group after nursing, and the difference was statistically significant (all P<0.01). Compared with those before nursing, the scores of MFS and NRS in the two groups were decreased, and the improvements in the observation group were more obvious (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the control group (83.72%) was significantly higher (P<0.05) than that in the observation group (65.12%). The nursing satisfaction of patients in the control group (76.74%) was significant lower (P<0.05) than that in the observation group (93.02%). CONCLUSION Comfort nursing has a positive clinical effect in elderly patients with ALC. It can improve the patients' quality of life and reduce the incidence of pain and complications, which has high patient satisfaction and obvious clinical effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeqiu Ye
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversitySuzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Juxiang Ge
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversitySuzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
- Respiratory Endoscopic Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversitySuzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Thackeray A, Hanmer J, Yu L, McCracken P, Marcus R. Linking AM-PAC Mobility and Daily Activity to the PROMIS Physical Function Metric. Phys Ther 2021; 101:6158914. [PMID: 33693902 PMCID: PMC8340629 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to link Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) Mobility and Daily Activity scales to the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) allowing for a common metric across scales. METHODS Cross-sectional study of patients 18 years and older presenting to 1 of 8 outpatient rehabilitation clinics in southwestern Pennsylvania. Patients completed one survey with questions from the AM-PAC Daily Activity and Mobility short forms, and the PROMIS PF item bank. Using item response theory, 2 rounds of fixed-parameter calibration were performed. In the first, the AM-PAC Daily Activity and Mobility items were calibrated with 27 fixed item parameters from the PROMIS PF. Second, the AM-PAC Daily Activity items were calibrated with 11 PROMIS Upper Extremity fixed item parameters. This process uses the construct of physical function and equates AM-PAC items on the same underlying measurement scale for the PROMIS PF. RESULTS Both scales measured a wide range of functioning and demonstrated good calibration. Data were appropriate for a fixed-parameter item response theory-based crosswalk. AM-PAC Daily Activity and Mobility raw scores were mapped onto the PROMIS PF metric. AM-PAC Daily Activity scores were also mapped onto the PROMIS PF Upper Extremity metric. CONCLUSION Question items from the AM-PAC Daily Activity, AM-PAC Mobility, and PROMIS PF similarly measure the construct of physical function. This consistency allows for a crosswalk of AM-PAC scores onto the PROMIS PF metric. IMPACT Crosswalk tables developed in this study allow for converting scores from the AM-PAC Daily Activity and Mobility scales to the PROMIS PF metric. This will facilitate monitoring of longitudinal change in function over time and across settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Thackeray
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA,Address all correspondence to Dr Thackeray at:
| | - Janel Hanmer
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lan Yu
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Polly McCracken
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robin Marcus
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kasturi S, Wong JB, Mandl LA, McAlindon TE, LeClair A. "Unspoken Questions": A Qualitative Study of Rheumatologists' Perspectives on the Clinical Implementation of Patient-reported Outcome Measures. J Rheumatol 2020; 47:1822-1830. [PMID: 32611667 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.200232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify rheumatologists' views on perceived barriers and facilitators to the clinical implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM). METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted with academically affiliated clinical rheumatologists. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Deidentified transcripts were independently coded and analyzed for themes. RESULTS Fifteen attending rheumatologists, 8 women (53%) and 7 men (47%) with a mean of 17.3 years in practice (range 5-43) at 2 urban academic medical centers, participated in interviews. Rheumatologists identified several barriers to integrating PROM in clinical care, highlighting physician buy-in and culture change as significant challenges beyond logistical considerations. They further underscored the lack of effective interventions and resources for addressing the domains of most interest to patients. Physicians also recognized significant benefits of PROM in clinical care, including contributing to the clinical impression by providing the patient perspective, and promoting agenda setting by uncovering "unspoken questions." They additionally noted that PROM could support treatment planning, build patient-physician relationships, and facilitate patient engagement. Participants suggested that technology, physician education, and team-based care could facilitate the effective implementation of PROM. CONCLUSION Rheumatologists identified multiple mechanisms through which PROM could augment clinical care, but also noted several obstacles to implementation, questioning the added value of PROM and the limited availability of interventions to improve patient-centered outcomes. Programs seeking to successfully integrate PROM to enhance patient-centered care and meet quality benchmarks should prioritize physician buy-in and training, and provide resources to address the outcomes that are measured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanthini Kasturi
- S. Kasturi, MD, MS, T.E. McAlindon, MD, MPH, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy & Immunology/Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts;
| | - John B Wong
- J.B. Wong, MD, Division of Clinical Decision Making, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lisa A Mandl
- L.A. Mandl, MD, MPH, Division of Rheumatology/Department of Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Timothy E McAlindon
- S. Kasturi, MD, MS, T.E. McAlindon, MD, MPH, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy & Immunology/Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Amy LeClair
- A.LeClair, PhD, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Honomichl R, Katzan I, Thompson N, Abelson A, Deal C, Rose S, Lapin B. The influence of collecting patient-reported outcome measures on visit satisfaction in rheumatology clinics. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2020; 4:rkaa046. [PMID: 33173849 PMCID: PMC7607157 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkaa046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can direct patient-centred care and increase patient satisfaction with the visit. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between the collection of PROMs and visit satisfaction, as measured by the Clinician and Group Practice Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CG-CAHPS) survey. Methods An electronic platform for collection of patient-reported information was implemented in rheumatology clinics between August and September 2016. Adult patients were included in the study if they completed CG-CAHPS after an ambulatory visit. The pre-implementation cohort consisted of patients seen between January and June 2016; the post-implementation cohort consisted of patients seen between January and June 2017. The CG-CAHPS scores were compared between cohorts. Mixed effect models were constructed to identify predictors of visit satisfaction. Results Characteristics were similar between the 2117 pre- and 2380 post-implementation patients. Visit satisfaction was high in both cohorts but did not differ [odds ratio = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.79, 1.19)]. Predictors of improved satisfaction included being an established patient, being male, older age and reporting higher quality of life. However, sensitivity analyses in the post-implementation cohort suggested that implementing PROMs might convey benefits for new patients, in particular. Conclusion Collection of PROMs had no effect on visit satisfaction in rheumatology clinics, although there might be benefits for new patients. These largely null findings might be attributable to high satisfaction levels in our cohorts or to lack of provider review of PROM data with patients. Further research is indicated to determine the impact of provider communication of PROM results to patients on different domains of visit satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Irene Katzan
- Neurological Institute Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation
| | | | - Abby Abelson
- Center for Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease Orthopedic
| | - Chad Deal
- Department of Rheumatic and Immunologic Diseases
| | - Susannah Rose
- Office of Patient Experience, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Patient-reported experience with patient-reported outcome measures in adult patients seen in rheumatology clinics. Qual Life Res 2020; 30:1073-1082. [PMID: 33170400 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02692-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly utilized in the evaluation of patients with rheumatic diseases. The aim of our study was to assess the patient experience with completing PROMs within rheumatology clinics, and identify patient characteristics associated with a more positive experience. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of adult patients seen in rheumatology clinics between 1/1/2017 and 6/30/2017. Patients were included in the study if they completed at least one patient-reported experience question following completion of PROMs. Patient characteristics associated with more positive experiences were identified through multivariable proportional odds models. RESULTS 12,597 adult patients (mean age 59 ± 15; 76% female; 84% white) completed PROMs, as well as questions on their experience completing PROMs. Patients agreed/strongly agreed that PROM questions were easy to understand (97%), useful (84%), helped their physician understand their health (78%), improved communication with their provider (78%) and improved control over their own care (70%). Predictors of better experience with PROMs included being younger, non-white, having lower income, and being a new patient. Worse self-reported health also predicted better experience with PROMs. CONCLUSION Our study found a positive patient experience with PROMs, which is a crucial component of their successful implementation and utilization. Findings from this study suggest PROMs may be particularly beneficial in new patients, minorities, those with lower income, and worse self-reported quality of life. Collecting PROMs could provide opportunities to improve patient-provider communication and enhance control over care for rheumatology patients who could most benefit.
Collapse
|
43
|
Pascual-Ramos V, Contreras-Yáñez I, Ortiz-Haro AB, Albert CM, Obrador GT, Agazzi E. Concordance among patients and physicians about their ideal of autonomy impacts the patient-doctor relationship: A cross-sectional study of Mexican patients with rheumatic diseases. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0240897. [PMID: 33119715 PMCID: PMC7595407 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In patient-doctor interaction both parties play a role. Primary objective was to determine if the concordance among rheumatologists and their patients of their ideal of autonomy was associated with a better patient-doctor relationship. Secondary objective was to describe factors associated to a patient paternalistic ideal of autonomy (PPIA). MATERIALS AND METHODS This cross-sectional study had 3 steps. Step-1 consisted in translation/cultural local adaption of Ideal Patient Autonomy Scale (IPAS), a 14-items Dutch questionnaire. Step-2 consisted of IPAS validity and reliability in 201 outpatients. Step-3 consisted of the application of IPAS and the patient-doctor relationship questionnaire (PDRQ) to 601 outpatients with a medical encounter, and of IPAS to the 21 attending rheumatologists. Each patient-physician encounter was classified into with/without concordance in the ideal of autonomy and PRDQ scores were compared (Man Whitney U test). Regression analysis was used for associations. RESULTS Step-1 followed ISPOR task force recommendations. Patients from Step-2 and Step-3 were representative outpatients with rheumatic diseases. IPAS structure underwent a modification; the 14 items were redistributed into four subscales, further combined into PPIA vs. patient-centered autonomy ideal. IPAS was valid and reliable. There were 497 patients with a preferred ideal of autonomy, primarily (84.9%) PPIA. There were 363 patient-doctor encounters with concordance in the autonomy ideal and their PDRQ-9 scores were higher. Religious beliefs and higher PDRQ-9 item 8 score ("I feel pleased with my doctor´s treatment") were associated to a PPIA. CONCLUSIONS Concordance of autonomy ideal among patients and their rheumatologists positively impacts on the patient-doctor relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia Pascual-Ramos
- Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico, Mexico
| | - Irazú Contreras-Yáñez
- Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico, Mexico
| | - Ana Belén Ortiz-Haro
- Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico, Mexico
| | | | - Gregorio Tomás Obrador
- Universidad Panamericana, Interdisciplinary Center of Bioethics and School of Medicine, Mexico, Mexico
| | - Evandro Agazzi
- Universidad Panamericana Interdisciplinary Center of Bioethics, Mexico, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Décary S, Toupin-April K, Légaré F, Barton JL. Five Golden Rings to Measure Patient-Centered Care in Rheumatology. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 72 Suppl 10:686-702. [PMID: 33091246 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Décary
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Karine Toupin-April
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jennifer L Barton
- Oregon Health & Science University and US Department of Veteran Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Speerin R, Needs C, Chua J, Woodhouse LJ, Nordin M, McGlasson R, Briggs AM. Implementing models of care for musculoskeletal conditions in health systems to support value-based care. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2020; 34:101548. [PMID: 32723576 PMCID: PMC7382572 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2020.101548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Models of Care (MoCs), and their local Models of Service Delivery, for people with musculoskeletal conditions are becoming an acceptable way of supporting effective implementation of value-based care. MoCs can support the quadruple aim of value-based care through providing people with musculoskeletal disease improved access to health services, better health outcomes and satisfactory experience of their healthcare; ensure the health professionals involved are experiencing satisfaction in delivering such care and health system resources are better utilised. Implementation of MoCs is relevant at the levels of clinical practice (micro), service delivery organisations (meso) and health system (macro) levels. The development, implementation and evaluation of MoCs has evolved over the last decade to more purposively engage people with lived experience of their condition, to operationalise the Chronic Care Model and to employ innovative solutions. This paper explores how MoCs have evolved and are supporting the delivery of value-based care in health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn Speerin
- The Sydney University, Level 7, Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Road, ST LEONARDS, NSW, 2065, Australia.
| | - Christopher Needs
- Department of Rheumatology, Level 4, QEII Building, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, 59 Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
| | - Jason Chua
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
| | - Linda J Woodhouse
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
| | - Margareta Nordin
- Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Environmental Medicine, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center (OIOC), New York University, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Rhona McGlasson
- Bone & Joint Canada, P.O. Box 1036, Toronto, ON, M5K 1P2, Canada.
| | - Andrew M Briggs
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kosse LJ, Weits G, Vonkeman HE, Spuls PI, Van Den Bemt BJF, Tas SW, Hoentjen F, Nurmohamed MT, Van Doorn MBA, Van Puijenbroek EP, Jessurun NT. Immune-mediated inflammatory disease patients' preferences in adverse drug reaction information regarding biologics. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2020; 19:1049-1054. [PMID: 32524887 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2020.1781090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly used in studies and medical practice to obtain information on patients' perspectives toward their treatment or disease. However, most study outcomes are primarily directed at healthcare professionals. It was aimed to obtain insight in which type of information immune-mediated inflammatory disease (IMID) patients prefer to receive after participating in the Dutch Biologic Monitor (DBM), a PRO-based prospective cohort event monitoring system focused on adverse drug reactions (ADRs). METHODS A survey was conducted among DBM participants that wanted information about the results. Patients' preferences were identified using twelve statements and rated with five-point Likert-type scales. Subgroup analyses and differences between statements were performed using Mann-Whitney U Tests. RESULTS The survey was completed by 591 patients (response rate 67.6%). Most respondents had inflammatory rheumatic diseases (76.8%) and used adalimumab (37.2%) or etanercept (33.2%). Respondents preferred results per IMID over aggregated results (p = <0.001). Information on whether patients with similar IMIDs experience ADRs (average 4.5), which biologics are most likely to cause ADRs (4.4) and whether ADRs disappear (4.4) were most interesting. CONCLUSION DBM participants prefer to receive disease-specific information on ADRs that is tailored to their own biologic and IMID, including the outcome of ADRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leanne J Kosse
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb , 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Gerda Weits
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb , 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente and University of Twente , Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Phyllis I Spuls
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health and Epidemiology, Immunity and Infections , The Netherlands
| | - Bart J F Van Den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek , Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sander W Tas
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Infection & Immunity Institute and Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center (ARC) , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mike T Nurmohamed
- Department Rheumatology, Reade & Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center (ARC) , The Netherlands
| | - Martijn B A Van Doorn
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam , Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eugène P Van Puijenbroek
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb , 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.,Department of PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology & Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen , Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Naomi T Jessurun
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb , 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Jacobson RP, Kang D, Houck J. Can Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) measures accurately enhance understanding of acceptable symptoms and functioning in primary care? J Patient Rep Outcomes 2020; 4:39. [PMID: 32436001 PMCID: PMC7239962 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-020-00206-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Value-based healthcare models will require prioritization of the patient's voice in their own care toward better outcomes. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) gives patients a voice and leads providers to actionable treatments across a broad range of diagnoses. However, better interpretation of PROMIS measures is needed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of PROMIS Physical Function (PF), Self-Efficacy for Managing Symptoms (SE), Pain Interference (PI), Fatigue, and Depression measures to discriminate patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) in primary care, determining if that accuracy is stable over time and/or retained when PROMIS score thresholds are set at either ½ or 1 SD worse than the reference population mean. METHODS Primary care patients completed the five PROMIS measures and answered the PASS yes/no question at intake (n = 360), 3-14 days follow-up (n = 230), and 45-60 days follow-up (n = 227). Thresholds (optimal, ½ SD, and 1 SD worse than reference values) for PROMIS T-scores associated with PASS were determined through receiver-operator curve analysis. Accuracy was calculated at the three time points for each threshold value. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine combinations of PROMIS measures that best predicted PASS. RESULTS PROMIS PF, SE, PI, and Fatigue optimal score thresholds (maximizing sensitivity and specificity) yielded area under the curve values of 0.77-0.85, with accuracies ranging from 71.7% to 79.1%. Accuracy increased minimally (1.9% to 5.5%) from intake to follow-ups. Thresholds of 1 SD worse than the mean for PROMIS PF and PI measures and ½ SD worse for SE and Fatigue overall retained accuracy versus optimal (+ 1.3% to - 3.6%). Regression models retained SE, PI, and Fatigue as independent predictors of PASS, and minimally increased accuracy to 83.1?%. CONCLUSIONS This study establishes actionable PROMIS score thresholds that are stable over time and anchored to patient self-reported health status, increasing interpretability of PF, SE, PI, and Fatigue scores. The findings support the use of these PROMIS measures in primary care toward improving provider-patient communication, prioritizing patient concerns, and optimizing clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan P Jacobson
- George Fox University, 414 N. Meridian St., Newberg, Oregon, USA.
| | - Daniel Kang
- George Fox University, 414 N. Meridian St., Newberg, Oregon, USA
| | - Jeff Houck
- George Fox University, 414 N. Meridian St., Newberg, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|