Sleep laboratory studies on the single-dose effects of serotonin reuptake inhibitors paroxetine and fluoxetine on human sleep and awakening qualities

Continuous home cage monitoring of activity and sleep in mice during repeated paroxetine treatment and discontinuation

RATIONALE

Non-invasive home cage monitoring is emerging as a valuable tool to assess the effects of experimental interventions on mouse behaviour. A field in which these techniques may prove useful is the study of repeated selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment and discontinuation. SSRI discontinuation syndrome is an under-researched condition that includes the emergence of sleep disturbances following treatment cessation.

OBJECTIVES

We used passive infrared (PIR) monitoring to investigate changes in activity, sleep, and circadian rhythms during repeated treatment with the SSRI paroxetine and its discontinuation in mice.

METHODS

Male mice received paroxetine (10 mg/kg/day, s.c.) for 12 days, then were swapped to saline injections for a 13 day discontinuation period and compared to mice that received saline injections throughout. Mice were continuously tracked using the Continuous Open Mouse Phenotyping of Activity and Sleep Status (COMPASS) system.

RESULTS

Repeated paroxetine treatment reduced activity and increased behaviourally-defined sleep in the dark phase. These effects recovered to saline-control levels within 24 h of paroxetine cessation, yet there was also evidence of a lengthening of sleep bouts in the dark phase for up to a week following discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the first example of how continuous non-invasive home cage monitoring can be used to detect objective behavioural changes in activity and sleep during and after drug treatment in mice. These data suggest that effects of paroxetine administration reversed soon after its discontinuation but identified an emergent change in sleep bout duration, which could be used as a biomarker in future preclinical studies to prevent or minimise SSRI discontinuation symptoms.

Depression and Sleep

Impaired sleep is both a risk factor and a symptom of depression. Objective sleep is assessed using the sleep electroencephalogram (EEG). Characteristic sleep-EEG changes in patients with depression include disinhibition of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, changes of sleep continuity, and impaired non-REM sleep. Most antidepressants suppress REM sleep both in healthy volunteers and depressed patients. Various sleep-EEG variables may be suitable as biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction of therapy response in depression. In family studies of depression, enhanced REM density, a measure for frequency of rapid eye movements, is characteristic for an endophenotype. Cordance is an EEG measure distinctly correlated with regional brain perfusion. Prefrontal theta cordance, derived from REM sleep, appears to be a biomarker of antidepressant treatment response. Some predictive sleep-EEG markers of depression appear to be related to hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical system activity.

Somnambulism Precipitated by Selective Serotonin-Reuptake Inhibitors

Objective:

To report a case of somnambulism (sleepwalking) potentially precipitated by selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in an HIV-positive woman.

Case Summary:

A 34-year-old HIV-positive white woman without a prior history of somnambulism began sleepwalking following treatment for depression with two different SSRIs. The sleepwalking episodes disappeared completely with a reduction of the dosages of the SSRIs and began again when the dosages were increased.

Discussion:

Somnambulism has been associated with psychoactive drugs that affect the physiology of sleep, awareness, arousal, and memory. A biologic plausibility is supported by the fact that SSRIs alter electroencephalogram and sleep patterns and may be prone to precipitating somnambulism in susceptible individuals. Because people who sleepwalk may not be aware of their actions during such episodes, there is a potential for injury if this adverse effect were to occur.

Conclusions:

Given the widespread use of SSRIs, clinicians should be aware of the possibility that somnambulism may occur with this class of drugs.

Use of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Sleep Quality: A Population-Based Study

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Poor sleep is a risk factor for the development and recurrence of depression. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) use is consistently associated with good subjective sleep in clinically depressed patient populations. However, studies in the general population are lacking. Our objective was to investigate the association between SSRIs and subjective sleep in a middle-aged and elderly population in a daily practice setting.

METHODS

We included participants from the prospective Rotterdam Study cohort. Participants had up to two subjective sleep measurements assessed with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index ([PSQI], number of measurements = 14,770). SSRI use was based on pharmacy records. We assessed the association between SSRIs and PSQI score and its sub-components, with nonusers of any antidepressant as reference. Analyses were, among others, adjusted for presence of depressive symptoms and concurrent psycholeptic drug use.

RESULTS

We included 9,267 participants, average baseline age 66.3 y (standard deviation 10.6), and 57.6% women. SSRI use was significantly associated with a 0.78-point lower PSQI score (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.11; -0.44) which reflects better sleep, compared with non-use. The association was more prominent in continuous SSRI users (-0.71 points, 95% CI -1.18; -0.24). Of the sub-components, SSRIs were associated with 0.70-h longer sleep duration (95% CI 0.56; 0.85), higher sleep quality, higher sleep efficiency, and in contrast more daytime dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

SSRI use was associated with better subjective sleep, after adjustment for depressive symptoms and concurrent psycholeptic drug use. This suggests that, in clinical practice in the middle-aged and elderly population, the sleep quality of some persons may benefit from, continued, SSRI use.

Sleep disturbance as detected by actigraphy in pre-pubertal juvenile monkeys receiving therapeutic doses of fluoxetine

Sleep disturbance is a reported side effect of antidepressant drugs in children. Using a nonhuman primate model of childhood selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy, sleep was studied quantitatively with actigraphy. Two 48-h sessions were recorded in the home cage environment of juvenile male rhesus monkeys at two and three years of age, after one and two years of treatment with a therapeutic dose of the SSRI fluoxetine, and compared to vehicle treated controls. A third session was conducted one year after discontinuation of treatment at four years of age. During treatment, the fluoxetine group demonstrated sleep fragmentation as indexed by a greater number of rest-activity transitions compared to controls. In addition fluoxetine led to more inactivity during the day as indexed by longer duration of rest periods and the reduced activity during these periods. The fluoxetine effect on sleep fragmentation, but not on daytime rest, was modified by the monkey's genotype for polymorphisms of monoamine oxidase A (MAOA), an enzyme that metabolizes serotonin. After treatment, the fluoxetine effect on nighttime rest-activity transitions persisted, but daytime activity was not affected. The demonstration in this nonhuman primate model of sleep disturbance in connection with fluoxetine treatment and specific genetic polymorphisms, and in the absence of diagnosed psychopathology, can help inform use of this drug in children.

Increased frontal sleep slow wave activity in adolescents with major depression

Sleep slow wave activity (SWA), the major electrophysiological characteristic of deep sleep, mirrors both cortical restructuring and functioning. The incidence of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) substantially rises during the vulnerable developmental phase of adolescence, where essential cortical restructuring is taking place. The goal of this study was to assess characteristics of SWA topography in adolescents with MDD, in order to assess abnormalities in both cortical restructuring and functioning on a local level. All night high-density EEG was recorded in 15 patients meeting DSM-5 criteria for MDD and 15 sex- and age-matched healthy controls. The actual symptom severity was assessed using the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R). Topographical power maps were calculated based on the average SWA of the first non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep episode. Depressed adolescents exhibited significantly more SWA in a cluster of frontal electrodes compared to controls. SWA over frontal brain regions correlated positively with the CDRS-R subscore "morbid thoughts". Self-reported sleep latency was significantly higher in depressed adolescents compared to controls whereas sleep architecture did not differ between the groups. Higher frontal SWA in depressed adolescents may represent a promising biomarker tracing cortical regions of intense use and/or restructuring.

No change in [¹¹C]CUMI-101 binding to 5-HT(1A) receptors after intravenous citalopram in human

The main objective of this study was to determine the sensitivity of [¹¹C]CUMI-101 to citalopram challenge aiming at increasing extracellular 5-HT. CUMI-101 has agonistic properties in human embryonic kidney 293 cells transfected with human recombinant 5-HT(1A) receptors (Hendry et al. [2011] Nucl Med Biol 38:273-277; Kumar et al. [2006] J Med Chem 49:125-134) and has previously been demonstrated to be sensitive to bolus citalopram in monkeys (Milak et al. [2011] J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 31:243-249). We studied six healthy individuals. Two PET-scans were performed on the same day in each individual before and after constant infusion of citalopram (0.15 mg/kg). The imaging data were analyzed using two tissue compartment kinetic modeling with metabolite corrected arterial input and Simplified Reference Tissue Modeling using cerebellum as a reference region. There was no significant difference in regional distribution volume or non-displaceable binding potential values before and after citalopram infusion. The mean receptor occupancy was 0.03 (range -0.14 to 0.17). Our data imply that [¹¹C]CUMI-101 binding is not sensitive to citalopram infusion in humans.

Wake and sleep EEG provide biomarkers in depression

Both wake and sleep electroencephalogram (EEG) provide biomarkers of depression and antidepressive therapy, respectively. For a long time it is known that EEG activity is altered by drugs. Quantitative EEG analysis helps to delineate effects of antidepressants on brain activity. Cordance is an EEG measure with a superior correlation with regional brain perfusion. Prefrontal quantitative EEG cordance appears to be a predictor of the response to antidepressants. Sleep EEG shows characteristic changes in depression as impaired sleep continuity, desinhibition of REM sleep and changes of nonREM sleep. Elevated REM density (a measure for frequency of rapid eye movements) characterizes an endophenotype in family studies of depression. REM-sleep changes including a more distinct REM rebound after sleep deprivation are found in animal models of depression. Most antidepressants suppress REM sleep in depressed patients, normal controls and laboratory animals. REM suppression appears to be a distinct, but not an absolute requirement for antidepressive effects of a compound. Sleep-EEG variables like REM latency or certain clusters of variables were shown to predict the response to the treatment with a certain antidepressant or even the course of the disorder for several years. Some of these predictive sleep-EEG markers of the longterm course of depression appear to be closely related to hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical system activity.

Computer-assisted method for quantifying sleep eye movements that reflects medication effects

A significant amount of data is not attended to clinically in routine sleep studies. Measures of sleep physiology not obvious to the human eye may provide important clues to disease states, and responses to therapy. For example, it has been noted that eye movements change significantly in patients exposed to antidepressant medications. This paper describes how eye movements were different in depressed patients who used antidepressant medications, compared to those who did not. Groups 1 and 2 included five patients each who used citalopram and venlafaxine respectively compared to five patients not taking any antidepressants. Autoregressive (AR) coefficients of eye movements recorded during sleep have been derived. These coefficients represent the shape of the sleep eye movements of all three groups and were classified using discriminant analysis. In this paper, an improved methodology has been used for this classification. This method includes eye movement detection with improved eye movement detection software and evaluation of AR coefficients with fixed segments. The AIC method has been used for determination of an appropriate model order of 27. AR coefficients are then derived on the basis of this optimized value and are then classified with a linear discriminant function. The overall average of the regular method accuracies were 76.4%, and 78.7% for groups 1 and 2 respectively. The overall average of the leave-one-out method accuracies were 75.5% and 77.5% for Groups 1 and 2. The results demonstrate that eye movements can be quantified and characterized with this approach. This methodology will allow the development of new metrics that may assist in disease classification, and response to treatment in a variety of neuropsychiatric conditions.

Benzodiazepine-induced reduction in activity mirrors decrements in cognitive and psychomotor performance

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether actigraphy is sensitive to benzodiazepine-induced changes in cognitive and psychomotor performance and sleep.

METHODS

Healthy young volunteers (n = 23; 11 males), were randomised to a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Actigraphy was used to record motor activity continuously. Following dosing at 18.00 h with 2.5 mg lorazepam (LZP), psychomotor and cognitive assessments were made at hourly intervals post-dose for 4 h and after sleep at 14.5 h post-dose.

RESULTS

Activity levels were significantly reduced after LZP for 5 h post-dose (p = 0.0104), during sleep (5-13 h) (p < 0.02) and the following morning, 13-14.5 h post-dose (p < 0.02). At the same time cognitive and psychomotor performance was also significantly impaired (p < 0.05). LZP also significantly increased actigraphic sleep efficiency and sleep per cent (p < 0.02).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that activity levels were significantly reduced following dosing with a benzodiazepine and these changes coincided with impairment of cognitive and psychomotor performance. Actigraphy, therefore, appears to be able to reflect the psychopharmacological effects of a benzodiazepine in changes in daytime function and nocturnal behaviour, which, without waking the subject, is beyond the power of conventional psychometrics.

Duloxetine increases stage 3 sleep and suppresses rapid eye movement (REM) sleep in patients with major depression

Sleep studies in patients with major depression receiving the new selective norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) duloxetine are lacking. Therefore, polysomnography in 10 patients with major depression (7 males, 39.9+/-7.6 years, HAMD-21 score: 23.6+/-5.6) was recorded twice, before and after 7-14 days of treatment with duloxetine. Stage 3 sleep significantly (P<0.01) increased from 21.0+/-10.7 to 37.4+/-20.1 min. Rapid eye movement (REM) latency significantly (P<0.005) increased from 58.5+/-31.1 to 193.6+/-72.6 min. REM sleep significantly (P<0.005) decreased from 94.8+/-34.5 to 51.5+/-42.5 min. These results partly differ from those in healthy subjects receiving duloxetine.

Human taste thresholds are modulated by serotonin and noradrenaline

Circumstances in which serotonin (5-HT) and noradrenaline (NA) are altered, such as in anxiety or depression, are associated with taste disturbances, indicating the importance of these transmitters in the determination of taste thresholds in health and disease. In this study, we show for the first time that human taste thresholds are plastic and are lowered by modulation of systemic monoamines. Measurement of taste function in healthy humans before and after a 5-HT reuptake inhibitor, NA reuptake inhibitor, or placebo showed that enhancing 5-HT significantly reduced the sucrose taste threshold by 27% and the quinine taste threshold by 53%. In contrast, enhancing NA significantly reduced bitter taste threshold by 39% and sour threshold by 22%. In addition, the anxiety level was positively correlated with bitter and salt taste thresholds. We show that 5-HT and NA participate in setting taste thresholds, that human taste in normal healthy subjects is plastic, and that modulation of these neurotransmitters has distinct effects on different taste modalities. We present a model to explain these findings. In addition, we show that the general anxiety level is directly related to taste perception, suggesting that altered taste and appetite seen in affective disorders may reflect an actual change in the gustatory system.

Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and sleep disturbances in community-dwelling older women

OBJECTIVES

To determine the association between use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and objective measures of sleep disturbances in older community-dwelling women, including women without evidence of depression.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Four U.S. clinical centers.

PARTICIPANTS

Two thousand eight hundred fifty-three women aged 71 and older (2,630 nonusers of antidepressants and 223 taking SSRIs alone, not in combination with other antidepressants).

MEASUREMENTS

Medication use, assessed using an interviewer-administered questionnaire with verification of use from medication containers and computerized dictionary used to categorize type of medication; evidence of depression assessed using self-report or a score of 6 or higher on the Geriatric Depression Scale; and sleep parameters measured using a wrist actigraph, with data collected for an average of four consecutive 24-hour periods.

RESULTS

Of the overall cohort of 2,853 women and of 2,337 women without evidence of depression, sleep disturbances were more common in women taking SSRIs than in those not taking antidepressants. After excluding women with evidence of depression and adjusting for multiple potential confounders, women taking SSRIs were more likely to have a sleep duration of 5 hours or less (multivariate odds ratio (MOR)=2.15, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.04-4.47), sleep efficiency less than 70% (MOR=2.37, 95% CI=1.32-4.25), sleep latency of 1 hour or more (MOR=3.99, 95% CI=2.29-6.96) and eight or more long wake episodes (MOR=1.75, 95% CI=0.99-3.10).

CONCLUSION

SSRI use by older women, including those without evidence of depression, is associated with a greater likelihood of sleep disturbances, including poorer sleep efficiency, longer sleep latency, and sleep fragmentation, manifested by multiple long wake episodes. These results add to the uncertainty regarding risks and benefits of SSRI use in aged populations.

Changes of sleep architecture, spectral composition of sleep EEG, the nocturnal secretion of cortisol, ACTH, GH, prolactin, melatonin, ghrelin, and leptin, and the DEX-CRH test in depressed patients during treatment with mirtazapine

The noradrenergic and specific serotoninergic antidepressant mirtazapine improves sleep, modulates hormone secretion including blunting of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) activity, and may prompt increased appetite and weight gain. The simultaneous investigation of sleep electroencephalogram (EEG) and hormone secretion during antidepressive treatment helps to further elucidate these effects. We examined sleep EEG (for later conventional and quantitative analyses) and the nocturnal concentrations of cortisol, adrenocorticotropin (ACTH), growth hormone (GH), prolactin, melatonin and the key factors of energy balance, ghrelin, and leptin before and after 28 days of treatment of depressed patients (seven women, three men, mean age 39.9+/-4.2 years) with mirtazapine. In addition, a sleep EEG was recorded at day 2 and the dexamethasone-corticotropin-releasing hormone (DEX-CRH) test was performed to assess HPA activity at days -3 and 26. Psychometry and mirtazapine plasma concentrations were measured weekly. Already at day 2, sleep continuity was improved. This effect persisted at day 28, when slow-wave sleep, low-delta, theta and alpha activity, leptin and (0300-0700) melatonin increased, and cortisol and ghrelin decreased. ACTH and prolactin remained unchanged. The first two specimens of GH collected after the start of quantitative EEG analysis were reduced at day 28. The DEX-CRH test showed, at day 26, a blunting of the overshoot of ACTH and cortisol found at day -3. The Hamilton Depression score decreased from 32.1+/-7.3 to 15.5+/-6.7 between days -1 and 28. A weight gain of approximately 3 kg was observed. This unique profile of changes is compatible with the action of mirtazapine at 5-HT-2 receptors, at presynaptic adrenergic alpha 2 receptors, at the HPA system, and on ghrelin and leptin.

Biomarkers for the effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in healthy subjects

AIMS

Studies of novel centrally acting drugs in healthy volunteers are traditionally concerned with kinetics and tolerability, but useful information may also be obtained from biomarkers of clinical endpoints. This paper provides a systematic overview of CNS-tests used with SSRIs in healthy subjects. A useful biomarker should meet the following requirements: a consistent response across studies and drugs; a clear response of the biomarker to a therapeutic dose; a dose-response relationship; a plausible relationship between biomarker, pharmacology and pathogenesis.

METHODS

These criteria were applied to all individual tests found in studies of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), performed in healthy subjects since 1966, identified with a systematic MedLine search. Separate databases were created to evaluate the effects of single or multiple dose SSRI-studies, and for amitriptyline whenever the original report included this antidepressant as a positive control. Doses of the antidepressant were divided into high- and low-dose ranges, relative to a medium range of therapeutic doses. For each test, the drug effects were scored as statistically significant impairment/decrease (-), improvement/increase (+) or no change (=) relative to placebo.

RESULTS

56 single dose studies and 22 multiple dose studies were identified, investigating the effects of 13 different SSRIs on 171 variants of neuropsychological tests, which could be clustered into seven neuropsychological domains. Low single doses of SSRIs generally stimulated tests of attention and memory. High doses tended to impair visual/auditory and visuomotor systems and subjective performance, while showing an acceleration in motor function. The most pronounced effects were observed using tests that measure flicker discrimination (improvement at low doses: 75%, medium doses: 40%, high doses: 43% of studies); REM sleep (inconsistent decrease after medium doses, decrease in 83% of studies after high doses); and EEG recordings, predominantly in alpha (decrease in 60% and 43% of studies after low and medium doses, respectively) and in theta activity (increase in 43% and 33% of studies after medium and high doses, respectively). Amitriptyline generally impaired central nervous system (CNS) functions, which increased with doses. Multiple doses caused less pronounced effects on the reported tests. The most responsive tests to amitriptyline appeared to be EEG alpha and theta, and REM sleep duration.

CONCLUSIONS

SSRIs in healthy subjects appear to cause slight stimulating effects after low doses, which tend to diminish with dose. The most consistent effects were observed with flicker discrimination tests, EEG (alpha and beta bands), REM sleep duration, and subjective effects at higher doses. These effects are small compared with amitriptyline and other CNS-active drugs. Multiple dosing with SSRIs caused even fewer measurable differences from placebo, probably due to adaptive processes. SSRI-effects are best detected with a test battery that is sensitive to general CNS-stimulation, but such tests only comprise a very small portion of the close to 200 different methods that were found in current review.

Antidepressants and sleep: a qualitative review of the literature

Most antidepressants change sleep; in particular, they alter the physiological patterns of sleep stages recorded overnight with EEG and other physiological measures. These effects are greatest and most consistent on rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, and tend to be in the opposite direction to the sleep abnormalities found in major depression, but are usually of greater degree. Reductions in the amount of REM sleep and increases in REM sleep onset latency are seen after taking antidepressants, both in healthy volunteers and in depressed patients. Antidepressants that increase serotonin function by blocking reuptake or by inhibiting metabolism have the greatest effect on REM sleep. The decrease in amount of REM sleep appears to be greatest early in treatment, and gradually diminishes during long-term treatment, except after monoamine oxidase inhibitors when REM sleep is often absent for many months. Sleep initiation and maintenance are also affected by antidepressants, but the effects are much less consistent between drugs. Some antidepressants such as clomipramine and the selective serotonin receptor inhibitors (SSRIs), particularly fluoxetine, are sleep-disturbing early in treatment and some others such as amitriptyline and the newer serotonin 5-HT2-receptor antagonists are sleep promoting. However, these effects are fairly short-lived and there are very few significant differences between drugs after a few weeks of treatment. In general, the objectively measured sleep of depressed patients improves during 3-4 weeks of effective antidepressant treatment with most agents, as does their subjective impression of their sleep. Sleep improvement earlier in treatment may be an important clinical goal in some patients, perhaps when insomnia is particularly distressing, or to ensure compliance. In these patients, the choice of a safely used and effective antidepressant which improves sleep in short term is indicated. Patients with other sleep disorders such as restless legs syndrome and REM sleep behaviour disorder should be identified before choosing a treatment, as some antidepressants worsen these conditions. Conversely, there is evidence that some antidepressants may be useful in the treatment of sleep disorders such as night terrors.

Sleep laboratory study on single and repeated dose effects of paroxetine, alprazolam and their combination in healthy young volunteers

AIMS

To evaluate the potential interaction of 20 mg paroxetine and 1 mg alprazolam (early morning once-daily administration) on polysomnographic (PSG) sleep and subjective sleep and awakening quality, both after a single intake and after reaching a steady-state concentration.

METHODS

Twenty-two (11 for the PSG) healthy young volunteers of both sexes with no history of sleep disturbances (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index <5) participated in a double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, repeated-dose, 4-period, cross-over study. All volunteers received all 4 treatment sequences: paroxetine-alprazolam placebo (PAP); paroxetine placebo-alprazolam (PPA); paroxetine-alprazolam (PA), and paroxetine placebo-alprazolam placebo (PLA), in a randomized order. Each treatment was administered over 15 consecutive days, with a treatment-free interval of 7 days prior to the subsequent study period. In each experimental period, one PSG sleep study was performed on the 1st night (single-dose effects) and another study was performed on the 15th night (repeated-dose effects). Additionally, two other PSG studies were assessed: an adaptation recording, and a control night recording. All-night PSG recordings were obtained following standard procedures. Each 30-second period was scored according to the criteria of Rechtschaffen and Kales by means of an automatic sleep analysis system: Somnolyzer 24x7. A self-rating scale for sleep and awakening quality and early morning behavior was completed no later than 15 min after awakening over the 15 days of each experimental intervention. General lineal models (treatment/time) were applied separately to each variable.

RESULTS

(1) No significant effects were observed in any sleep variables when control nights were compared with the 1st night with PLA. (2) Sleep continuity: After PAP a clear awakening effect was seen both in the first and second evaluations, mainly in wake time, movement time, number of awakenings and stage-1 duration. After PPA an evident hypnotic effect was observed on night 1. This effect was mainly observed in maintenance variables and slightly in sleep initiation variables; it had decreased by night 15. After PA an intermediate behavior in the variables related to sleep continuity was seen, highlighting the absence of the tolerance phenomenon observed when PPA was administered alone. (3) Sleep architecture: The most important effects in REM sleep were observed after PAP; an increase in REM latency and decreases in REM sleep. PAP also induced decreases in the number of non-REM and REM periods and increases in the average duration of non-REM periods and sleep cycles. PA presented a similar pattern to PAP, and PPA similar to PLA. In relation to non-REM sleep, PA showed more stage-2 and less slow-wave sleep (SWS). (4) Subjective perception: No significant differences were observed between treatments while they were being taken, but impairments in subjective sleep quality, awaking quality, latency and efficiency were seen, mainly after PA but also after PPA discontinuations.

CONCLUSION

The combination of PAP and PPA presented an intermediate pattern in relation to sleep continuity, with less awaking effect than PAP alone and less hypnotic effect than PPA alone, and without developing tolerance. The PAP and PPA combination also showed a similar effect to PAP on REM sleep and was the treatment with the longest stage 2 and shortest SWS. No subjective sleep and awakening effects were seen during drug intake but subjective withdrawal reports were seen after abrupt interruption. The high agreement rate for the epoch-by-epoch comparison between automatic and human scoring confirms the validity of the Somnolyzer 24x7 and thus facilitates sleep studies in neuropsychopharmacological research.

Comparative effects of duloxetine and desipramine on sleep EEG in healthy subjects

RATIONALE

Antidepressants are known to modify human sleep patterns.

OBJECTIVES

Duloxetine is a new antidepressant with a mechanism of action involving reuptake inhibition of both serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE). In this study, the effects of two dosing regimens of duloxetine on sleep electroencephalography (EEG) were investigated at steady-state plasma concentrations in young, healthy, male subjects.

METHODS

Placebo (n=12), desipramine (50 mg BID; n=12) and two regimens of duloxetine (80 mg QD, n=6; or 60 mg BID, n=6) were compared in a randomized, double-blind, three-period crossover study, each treatment being administered from day 1 to day 7. Sleep polygraphic recordings took place at baseline (day -1) and day 6 of each period. The Leeds sleep evaluation questionnaire (LSEQ) was also administered on the morning of day 7.

RESULTS

Both regimens of duloxetine produced a significant increase in the onset latency of REM sleep as well as a significant mean decrease in total REM sleep duration. Desipramine exhibited comparable effects. When compared to placebo, sleep continuity was significantly reduced with desipramine and duloxetine 60 mg BID whereas a significant improvement was observed with duloxetine 80 mg QD. On the LSEQ, duloxetine 80 mg QD produced a significant improvement in the "getting to sleep" subscale compared to placebo, whereas desipramine demonstrated a significant reduction (worsening) in the "quality of sleep" score versus placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

The two dose regimens of duloxetine (80 mg QD and 60 mg BID) produced a REM sleep pattern comparable to that of most antidepressant medications. Duloxetine 80 mg QD appeared to exhibit less impact upon sleep quality than duloxetine 60 mg BID in healthy subjects.

Effects of long-term administration of nicotine and fluoxetine on sleep in depressed patients

BACKGROUND

The long-term effects of transdermal nicotine and fluoxetine on sleep and major depression were investigated.

METHODS

Two independent groups of 12 nonsmoking patients with major depression (Hamilton Rating >/=18) served as subjects. The first group received transdermal nicotine (17.5 mg) while the second group received an oral dose of 20 mg/day of fluoxetine, 5 days weekly for 6 months, 3 days weekly at month 7 and 1 day/week at month 8. From the 9(th) to the 14(th) month, once a week a patch without nicotine and an oral placebo substituted nicotine and fluoxetine. Polysomnographic recordings were conducted and depressive symptoms evaluated at baseline and on a monthly basis during medication and during withdrawal.

RESULTS

Nicotine diminished wakefulness and stage 1 and increased REM sleep latency and slow wave sleep throughout the study. A small decrease of REM sleep duration was observed upon nicotine withdrawal. Fluoxetine increased wakefulness, stage 1 duration and REM latency and decreased the sleep efficiency index. Both nicotine and fluoxetine improved mood according to HRS-D scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Nicotine and fluoxetine showed equivalent antidepressant efficacy; however, important differences in sleep parameters were observed between nicotine and fluoxetine, both during their administration and following withdrawal.

Paroxetine controlled release

A controlled-release (CR) formulation of the SSRI paroxetine has been developed. This CR formulation delays the release of paroxetine until the tablet has passed through the stomach; the drug is then released over 4-5 hours. In well designed placebo-controlled trials in patients with major depressive disorder (including a study in the elderly), social anxiety disorder or premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD), paroxetine CR was consistently superior to placebo with regards to primary endpoints (i.e. mean Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression total score [major depressive disorder], Liebowitz social anxiety scale total score and Clinical Global Impressions-Global Improvement score [social anxiety disorder] and Visual Analogue Scale-Mood score [PMDD]). The duration of treatment was 12 weeks or, in PMDD, over three menstrual cycles (intermittent or continuous administration). Paroxetine CR also demonstrated efficacy in three well designed studies in patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia. Paroxetine CR was generally well tolerated in clinical trials, with an adverse-event profile typical of SSRIs, although recipients of paroxetine CR experienced significantly less nausea than recipients of immediate-release paroxetine in the first week of treatment.

REM sleep effects as a biomarker for the effects of antidepressants in healthy volunteers

The potential use of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep effects as a biomarker for the therapeutic effects of antidepressants in healthy volunteers is reviewed. A literature search was performed to select studies investigating the effects of antidepressants on REM sleep. To assess the specificity of REM sleep effects as a biomarker, the effects of other central nervous system drugs on REM sleep were also investigated. A significant REM sleep reduction was shown for 16 of 21 investigated antidepressants after single-dose (mean reduction 34.1%) and for 11/13 drugs after multiple-dose administration (mean reduction 29.2%). The median increase in REM latency was approximatety 60% after single- or multiple-dose administration. REM sleep effects were linearly normalized to therapeutic doses, by dividing the REM sleep effect by the investigated dose and multiplying by the therapeutic dose. Normalized REM sleep effects were highly variable (range -27.0% to 81.8% for REM sleep; range -17.0% to 266.3% for REM latency) and demonstrated no relationship with relevant pharmacological properties of the investigated drugs. No quantifiable dose-response relationship could be constructed after single and multiple dose administration. REM sleep effects were not specific for antidepressants. Benzodiazepines, for example, caused an average dose normalized REM sleep reduction of 8.7% and a median 8.6% increase of REM latency. This review demonstrates that although REM sleep effects occur with most of the antidepressants, it is by itself of limited value as a biomarker for antidepressant action. The specificity for antidepressants is limited, and it does not show a quantitative dose-response relationship to antidepressant agents. This is at least partly due to the complex relationships between drug pharmacokinetics and the variable time course of REM and other sleep stages throughout the night. Models that take these complex relationships into account may provide more comprehensive and quantifiable results.

Focus on paroxetine

This review of paroxetine is based on Medline and PsycLit searches and a manual search of the available research literature. It aims to cover the pharmacology of this frequently prescribed SSRI antidepressant in terms of its indications, efficacy and adverse effects. Overall, paroxetine is a well-tolerated and safe first-line SSRI antidepressant with anxiolytic qualities. It has been found useful in depression, anxiety and other conditions such as obsessive compulsive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. The antidepressant has some advantages over earlier tricyclic medication in terms of a lack of cardiovascular side-effects and relative safety in overdose. Cessation of use, however, is associated with withdrawal or discontinuation symptoms and patients should be counselled as to how these might be avoided. A 3- or 4-week graded withdrawal regimen, perhaps with concomitant fluoxetine to cover serotonergic discontinuation symptoms, may be advisable.

Depression, sleep physiology, and antidepressant drugs

This review summarizes current findings regarding effects of antidepressant compounds on sleep architecture and interprets their clinical relevance. Effects of the major classes of antidepressant drugs on sleep properties are presented, with the antidepressant compounds organized into categories based primarily on their putative mechanism of action. The majority of antidepressant compounds, across several different categories, exhibit robust suppression of REM sleep. Others, such as bupropion and nefazodone, lack REM suppressant effects. Such findings support the idea that critical neurochemical mechanisms involved in the regulation of discrete sleep stages can be elucidated by means of polysomnographic investigations utilizing pharmacologically targeted agents. Clinicians have appreciated the importance of antidepressant drug effects on sleep when considering therapeutic options for patients. While such decisions in the past were based on empirical observations, an increasing amount of information regarding specific effects of different antidepressant drugs on sleep continuity and sleep architecture is available. Thus, clinicians may choose to consider profiles of sleep effects for different antidepressant drugs in the initial selection of an antidepressant compound.

Fetal behavioural state changes following maternal fluoxetine infusion in sheep

Clinical depression is diagnosed in 5-15% of women during pregnancy, increasing the risk of negative outcomes. Fluoxetine (FX), a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, is prescribed during pregnancy. In adults, FX alters sleep patterns with single doses decreasing total sleep time and rapid eye movement sleep. The effects of FX on sleep in the fetus are unknown. However, 5-hydroxytryptophan, the precursor of serotonin, has been reported to prolong high-voltage (HV) electrocortical (ECoG) activity and increase the incidence of fetal breathing movements (FBM) in the sheep fetus. We hypothesize that FX exposure will decrease the incidence of LV ECoG in the fetus. Twenty-one pregnant sheep were surgically prepared for chronic study of blood gases, ECoG activity, eye movements and FBM. After 3 days of recovery, ewes received a 70-mg bolus i.v. infusion of FX or sterile water followed by continuous infusion at a rate of 0.036 mg/min for 8 days. The incidence of low-voltage (LV) ECoG decreased from 54+/-4% on the preinfusion day to 45+/-5% on infusion day 1 in the FX group and remained decreased throughout the infusion period. In addition, the incidence of both eye movements and FBM was decreased on infusion day 1 compared to preinfusion day in the FX group. HV ECoG increased from 39+/-3% on preinfusion day to 68+/-14% on FX infusion day 1 and remained elevated throughout the infusion period. These data show that maternal FX administration alters fetal behavioural state.

Conventional and spectral power analysis of all-night sleep EEG after subchronic treatment with paroxetine in healthy male volunteers

Paroxetine is a selective and potent serotonin reuptake inhibitor with reported antidepressant properties. Since changes in the regular sleeping pattern were described as side effects under treatment with paroxetine, the impact of the drug on the sleep architecture is of major interest. The present study addressed the question of subchronic effects of paroxetine medication (30 mg/day) in eight healthy male volunteers in a double blind, placebo-controlled crossover-design. Conventional sleep EEG parameters and additionally computed spectral power analysis based on FFT of 20-s time epochs in the delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma frequency range for different sleep stages after 4 weeks of treatment were investigated. Subchronic paroxetine administration in healthy subjects led to a prolonged REM latency and a decrease in the number of REM phases, whereas sleep efficiency, total sleep time, sleep onset latency, number of awakenings, and awake during sleep period time were not altered by paroxetine medication. Moreover, we could not detect any alterations of the spectral power values in certain frequency bands during NREM or REM sleep following subchronic paroxetine medication.

Paroxetine. An update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in depression and a review of its use in other disorders

Paroxetine is a potent and selective inhibitor of the neuronal reuptake of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT), which was previously reviewed as an antidepressant in Drugs in 1991. Since then, more comparative trials with other antidepressants have become available, and its use in the elderly and as long term maintenance therapy has been investigated. Paroxetine has also been studied in several other disorders with a presumed serotonergic component, primarily obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and panic disorder. In short term clinical trials in patients with depression, paroxetine produced clinical improvements that were significantly greater than those with placebo and similar to those achieved with other agents including tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), maprotiline, nefazodone and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and sertraline. Long term data suggest that paroxetine is effective in preventing relapse or recurrence of depression in patients treated for up to 1 year. In the elderly, the overall efficacy of paroxetine was at least as good as that of comparator agents. In short term clinical trials involving patients with OCD or panic disorder, paroxetine was significantly more effective than placebo and of similar efficacy to clomipramine. Limited long term data show that paroxetine is effective in maintaining a therapeutic response over periods of 1 year (OCD) and up to 6 months (panic disorder). Preliminary data suggest that paroxetine has potential in the treatment of social phobia, premenstrual dysphoric disorder and chronic headache. Like the other SSRIs, paroxetine is better tolerated than the TCAs, causing few anticholinergic adverse effects. The most commonly reported adverse event associated with paroxetine treatment is nausea, although this is generally mild and subsides with continued use. Fewer withdrawals from treatment due to adverse effects occurred with paroxetine treatment than with TCAs. The adverse events profile of paroxetine appears to be broadly similar to that of other SSRIs, although data from comparative trials are limited. Serious adverse effects associated with paroxetine are very rare. In conclusion, paroxetine is effective and well tolerated, and suitable as first-line therapy for depression. It also appears to be a useful alternative to other available agents for the treatment of patients with OCD or panic disorder.

Pharmacology of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in children and adolescents

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology of a new class of medications, the potent selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), what is known about their metabolism in children and adolescents, and the practical clinical implications of such.

METHOD

Articles were retrieved through index Medicus searches for articles published during the past 10 years on the SSRIs and on pediatric pharmacology.

RESULTS

More than 300 articles were reviewed. Pharmacological data, derived from relevant adult literature, were summarized and extrapolated to children and from the limited pediatric literature. The SSRIs represent a new class of antidepressants with distinct advantages in their side effect profile and their broad therapeutic index over that seen with the tricyclic antidepressants. Their advantage of few anticholinergic side effects and limited cardiovascular toxicities are particularly relevant for the pediatric population. The SSRIs are metabolized via the hepatic cytochrome isoenzyme P450 system, and potential drug-drug interactions are reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

The SSRIs appear to offer advantages over the tricyclic antidepressants. Unfortunately, pharmacokinetic data are lacking, and systematic studies of safety and efficacy in the pediatric age group are limited. Preliminary reports are encouraging, but further study is required.

Sleep patterns in depression and anxiety: theory and pharmacological effects

Sleep is invariably disrupted in patients who have depression and in patients with anxiety disorders. Depression and anxiety frequently coexist and are associated with disturbances in various neurotransmitters. The authors explore the relationship between sleep and the two disorders as well as the effects of antidepressants and anxiolytics on sleep architecture. The effects on sleep of various neurotransmitter systems implicated in depression and anxiety are outlined. Lastly, various theoretical models are proposed to account for the above mentioned phenomena and further directions for research are suggested.

[Sleep and biological rhythms in depression. Changes caused by antidepressants]

Sleep in depression is characterized by an increase in the number and duration of awakenings, sleep instability, and SWS decrease. REM sleep occurs earlier. REMs density during the 1st REM period is higher than in normal controls matched in age. Accordingly, sleep in depression is similar to sleep in normal aging. Endogenous depression cannot be distinguished from other types of depression by means of polygraphic criteria. Sleep recordings at the beginning of tricyclic compound treatment could be predictive of clinical response to treatment. Sleep modifications induced by antidepressive drugs are reviewed. Sleep recordings enabled us to formulate several physiopathological hypotheses of depression mechanisms: cholinergic-aminergic hypothesis, phase advance, deficiency of process S. Other hypotheses are reviewed: flattening of a hypothetical circadian rhythm of arousal, depressogenic property of sleep in itself (or only of SWS) or timing delay for the start of sleep. A significant phase advance of biological rhythms (temperature, cortisol) is rarely found. A reduction in the amplitude of rhythms (temperature, TSH, melatonine) is more frequent.

A study comparing paroxetine placebo and imipramine in depressed patients

These data provide evidence for the antidepressant efficacy of paroxetine. Paroxetine- and imipramine-treated patients were significantly different from placebo-treated patients, but little different to each other, on all depressive outcome measures. However, paroxetine appeared to have a possibly greater and earlier beneficial effect on anxiety symptoms associated with depression, when compared with imipramine. Both active therapies were effective in treating patients with severe depression. Side effects for paroxetine were typical of other serotonin (5-HT) uptake inhibitors but different from those of imipramine. In particular, anticholinergic and cardiovascular symptoms were reduced, and premature withdrawal less likely.

Canine cataplexy is preferentially controlled by adrenergic mechanisms: evidence using monoamine selective uptake inhibitors and release enhancers

Narcolepsy is currently treated with anti-depressants to control REM-related symptoms such as cataplexy and with amphetamine-like stimulants for the management of sleepiness. Both stimulant and antidepressant drugs presynaptically enhance monoaminergic transmission but both classes of compounds lack pharmacological specificity. In order to determine which monoamine is selectively involved in the therapeutic effect of these compounds, we examined the effects of selective monoamine uptake inhibitors and release enhancers on cataplexy using a canine model of the human disorder. A total of 14 compounds acting on the adrenergic (desipramine, nisoxetine, nortriptyline, tomoxetine, viloxazine), serotoninergic (fenfluramine, fluoxetine, indalpine, paroxetine, zimelidine) and dopaminergic (amfonelic acid, amineptine, bupropion, GBR 12909) systems were tested. Some additional compounds interesting clinically but with less pharmacological selectivity, i.e., cocaine, dextroamphetamine, methylphenidate, nomifensine and pemoline, were also included in the study. All compounds affecting noradrenergic transmission completely suppressed canine cataplexy at low doses in all dogs tested, whereas compounds which predominantly modified serotoninergic and dopaminergic transmission were either inactive or partially active at high doses. Our results demonstrate the preferential involvement of adrenergic systems in the control of cataplexy and, presumably, REM sleep atonia. Our findings also demonstrate that canine narcolepsy is a useful tool in assessing the pharmacological specificity of antidepressant drugs.

Sleep and dreaming: induction and mediation of REM sleep by cholinergic mechanisms

The most important recent work on the neurobiology of sleep has focused on the precise cellular and biochemical mechanisms of rapid eye movement sleep mediation. Direct and indirect evidence implicates acetylcholine-containing neurons in the peribrachial pons as critical in the triggering and maintenance of rapid eye movement sleep. Other new studies provide support for the hypothesis that the cholinergic generator system is gated during waking by serotonergic and noradrenergic influences. A growing consensus regarding the basic neurobiology has stimulated new thinking about the brain basis of consciousness during waking and dreaming.