The new melanoma markers: MART-1 and Melan-A (the NIH experience)

Expression of Melan-A in cutaneous granular cell tumours: a diagnostic pitfall

Morphological overlap exists between cutaneous granular cell tumours (GCT) and malignant melanoma, with the melanocyte-specific markers HMB45 and Melan-A commonly used to support the diagnosis of melanoma. We recently encountered several cases of GCT in our practice showing strong expression of Melan-A. The aim of this study was to establish the prevalence of positive immunohistochemical staining for Melan-A and HMB45 in a series of unequivocal GCTs. We also aimed to assess the prevalence of staining for PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma), a marker expressed in >80% of primary melanomas as well as many non-melanocytic tumours. A total of 20 cutaneous/subcutaneous GCTs were evaluated using Melan-A, HMB45 and PRAME immunohistochemistry. Staining for Melan-A and HMB45 was scored using a semiquantitative scale from 0 (absent) to 3+ (staining present in >50% of tumour cells). PRAME expression was recorded as either positive (>75% of cell nuclei staining) or negative. Melan-A expression was observed in four GCTs (20%), with strong and diffuse (3+) staining seen in two cases (10%), both from anogenital areas. Weak patchy nuclear PRAME expression was seen in every case, interpreted to be negative. HMB45 was also negative in all cases (100%). Our study demonstrates that Melan-A expression can be strong and diffuse in a subset of otherwise unequivocal cutaneous GCTs, which may cause diagnostic confusion with malignant melanoma. HMB45 and PRAME did not stain any of the GCTs in our series.

An Algorithmic Immunohistochemical Approach to Define Tumor Type and Assign Site of Origin

Immunohistochemistry represents an indispensable complement to an epidemiology and morphology-driven approach to tumor diagnosis and site of origin assignment. This review reflects the state of my current practice, based on 15-years' experience in Pathology and a deep-dive into the literature, always striving to be better equipped to answer the age old questions, "What is it, and where is it from?" The tables and figures in this manuscript are the ones I "pull up on the computer" when I am teaching at the microscope and turn to myself when I am (frequently) stuck. This field is so exciting because I firmly believe that, through the application of next-generation immunohistochemistry, we can provide better answers than ever before. Specific topics covered in this review include (1) broad tumor classification and associated screening markers; (2) the role of cancer epidemiology in determining pretest probability; (3) broad-spectrum epithelial markers; (4) noncanonical expression of broad tumor class screening markers; (5) a morphologic pattern-based approach to poorly to undifferentiated malignant neoplasms; (6) a morphologic and immunohistochemical approach to define 4 main carcinoma types; (7) CK7/CK20 coordinate expression; (8) added value of semiquantitative immunohistochemical stain assessment; algorithmic immunohistochemical approaches to (9) "garden variety" adenocarcinomas presenting in the liver, (10) large polygonal cell adenocarcinomas, (11) the distinction of primary surface ovarian epithelial tumors with mucinous features from metastasis, (12) tumors presenting at alternative anatomic sites, (13) squamous cell carcinoma versus urothelial carcinoma, and neuroendocrine neoplasms, including (14) the distinction of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma from well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, site of origin assignment in (15) well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor and (16) poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, and (17) the distinction of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor G3 from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma; it concludes with (18) a discussion of diagnostic considerations in the broad-spectrum keratin/CD45/S-100-"triple-negative" neoplasm.

MELANOMA IN GOLDEN AND KING WILDEBEESTS ( CONNOCHAETES TAURINUS)

Pigmentation of the skin is a crucial component in the pathogenesis of melanocytic neoplasms and other skin-related tumors, as melanin is known to function in both the absorbance of ultraviolet radiation and as an antioxidant. Very limited information exists regarding the incidence and metastatic potential of neoplastic conditions of the skin in game animals, especially wildebeests, relative to domestic animals. Four cases of cutaneous melanoma in color-variant golden and king wildebeests ( Connochaetes taurinus) (from 2014 to 2015) in South Africa were investigated. Melanoma in these captive animals was characterized using histopathology, transmission electron microscopy, and an immunohistochemistry panel, which consisted of monoclonal antibodies against three melanocytic markers: Melan A, PNL2, and S100. Overall, 2/4 cases (50%) of the melanocytic neoplasms stained strongly positive for all the melanocytic markers, while 4/4 cases (100%) stained positively for at least one of the markers. Cutaneous melanocytic neoplasia has not been reported in wildebeests; the current study suggests that selection of wildebeests for coat color potentially predisposes to this condition.

Value of melanocytic-associated immunohistochemical markers in the diagnosis of malignant melanoma: a review and update

Since the identification of S100 protein as an immunohistochemical marker that could be useful in the diagnosis of melanoma in the early 1980s, a large number of other melanocytic-associated markers that could potentially be used to assist in the differential diagnosis of these tumors have also been investigated. A great variation exists, however, among these markers, not only in their expression in some subtypes of melanoma, particularly desmoplastic melanoma, but also in their specificity because some of them can also be expressed in nonmelanocytic neoplasms, including various types of soft tissue tumors and carcinomas. This article reviews the information that is currently available on the practical value of some of the markers that have more often been recommended for assisting in the diagnosis of melanomas, including those that have only recently become available.

Marginal and joint distributions of S100, HMB-45, and Melan-A across a large series of cutaneous melanomas

CONTEXT

The distribution of the standard melanoma antibodies S100, HMB-45, and Melan-A has been extensively studied. Yet, the overlap in their expression is less well characterized.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the joint distributions of the classic melanoma markers and to determine if classification according to joint antigen expression has prognostic relevance.

DESIGN

S100, HMB-45, and Melan-A were assayed by immunofluorescence-based immunohistochemistry on a large tissue microarray of 212 cutaneous melanoma primary tumors and 341 metastases. Positive expression for each antigen required display of immunoreactivity for at least 25% of melanoma cells. Marginal and joint distributions were determined across all markers. Bivariate associations with established clinicopathologic covariates and melanoma-specific survival analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Of 322 assayable melanomas, 295 (91.6%), 203 (63.0%), and 236 (73.3%) stained with S100, HMB-45, and Melan-A, respectively. Twenty-seven melanomas, representing a diverse set of histopathologic profiles, were S100 negative. Coexpression of all 3 antibodies was observed in 160 melanomas (49.7%). Intensity of endogenous melanin pigment did not confound immunolabeling. Among primary tumors, associations with clinicopathologic parameters revealed a significant relationship only between HMB-45 and microsatellitosis (P = .02). No significant differences among clinicopathologic criteria were observed across the HMB-45/Melan-A joint distribution categories. Neither marginal HMB-45 (P = .56) nor Melan-A (P = .81), or their joint distributions (P = .88), was associated with melanoma-specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive characterization of the marginal and joint distributions for S100, HMB-45, and Melan-A across a large series of cutaneous melanomas revealed diversity of expression across this group of antigens. However, these immunohistochemically defined subclasses of melanomas do not significantly differ according to clinicopathologic correlates or outcome.

Melan A (A103) is not a marker of mesothelioma

Although a large number of immunohistochemical markers have been proven to be valuable in the differential diagnosis between epithelioid mesotheliomas and metastatic carcinomas involving the serosal membrane, no single antibody has been found that is absolutely sensitive and/or specific in making this distinction. A recent study reported melan A positivity in all 12 of the epithelioid mesotheliomas stained with a melan A antibody (clone A103). To fully determine the practical value of this antibody for assisting in the differential diagnosis of mesotheliomas, we investigated the expression of melan A (A103) in 40 mesotheliomas (27 epithelioid, 6 sarcomatoid, and 7 biphasic), 10 lung adenocarcinomas, and 10 serous carcinomas of the ovary. None of the mesotheliomas, lung adenocarcinomas, or serous carcinomas of the ovary were melan A (A103) positive. Similar staining results were observed in the 20 mesotheliomas immunostained in another institution using the same antibody clone from a different commercial source. On the basis of these results, it is concluded that in contrast to the initial report, melan A (A103) is not expressed in mesotheliomas and therefore, immunostaining with this antibody has no utility in the diagnosis of mesothelioma. The possible cause of the discrepancies between the results obtained in the present investigation and those of the initial study is discussed.

Tissue microarray analysis of ezrin, KBA.62, CD166, nestin, and p-Akt in melanoma versus banal and atypical nevi, and nonmelanocytic lesions

Multiple melanocytic markers are useful for differentiating between melanoma and nonmelanocytic lesions but generally do not distinguish melanoma from nevi and atypical melanocytic lesions. We sought to determine if several immunohistochemical markers recently described in the literature, including ezrin, KBA.62, p-Akt, CD166, and nestin, may be helpful in distinguishing these lesions. One hundred ten tissue microarray samples were scored for nestin and CD166 and 220 samples for ezrin, KBA.62, and p-Akt. We found that putative stem cell markers nestin and CD166 were both expressed in most melanomas (86% and 65% of samples, respectively), including desmoplastic melanoma, but were also expressed at similar levels in nevi (79% and 74%, respectively). In addition, these markers were not specific for melanocytic lesions. Ezrin was also expressed in both nevi and melanoma (81% each), including desmoplastic melanoma (75%), and in neural tumors. KBA.62 stained more cases of nevi versus melanoma (93% and 65%, respectively) and was positive in 53% of desmoplastic melanoma. However, it was also positive in several nonmelanocytic tumors. P-Akt expression was generally weak but was increased in nevi (75%) versus melanoma (43%), and was lost in desmoplastic melanomas (5%). Overall, only KBA.62 and p-Akt expression differed between melanoma and nevi, and none of these markers were completely specific for melanocytic tumors versus nonmelanocytic lesions.

MART-1 is a reliable melanocytic marker in lichen planus-like keratosis: a study on 70 cases

Recent studies have proposed that MART-1 may falsely stain clusters of intraepidermal nonmelanocytic cells in lichenoid dermatitides. This may become an issue especially in isolated lesions of lichen planus-like keratosis (LPLK), a condition also known as benign lichenoid keratosis, and one that is often mistaken clinically for a malignant cutaneous neoplasm. LPLKs are known to exhibit basal epidermal pseudonests, mimicking a regressing melanocytic lesion histologically, and often may prompt the pathologist to obtain a MART-1 stain. If MART-1 is falsely positive, it may seal an incorrect diagnosis. To determine whether or not pseudonests in LPLK decorated with MART-1, we reviewed 70 cases from our institution, stained them with MART-1 (Thermo Fisher-Lab Vision, Ab3 clone, 1:400 dilution, heat-induced epitope retrieval with 0.02M citrate buffer at pH 6.0), and evaluated them for the presence or absence of staining within pseudonests. Four cases demonstrated an occasional MART-1-positive junctional nest. In these cases, microphthalmia transcription factor was also positive, confirming a true melanocytic origin. None of the other cases showed a MART-1 pattern that would have been suspicious for a melanocytic lesion. We propose that this discrepancy between our study and prior ones may be explained by differences in staining protocols or by a very low incidence of non-specific staining. Our study suggests that MART-1 is a useful marker in differentiating melanocytic nests from pseudonests in LPLK.

Human endogenous retrovirus K triggers an antigen-specific immune response in breast cancer patients

Recent evidence indicates that human cancer cells reactivate the expression of latent human endogenous retroviral (HERV) proteins. However, the extent to which cancer patients mount de novo immune responses against expressed HERV elements is unclear. In this study, we determined the extent of HERV-K env expression in human breast cancer (BC) and whether both humoral and cell-mediated immunity against HERV-K can be found in BC patients. We found HERV-K env protein expression in 88% of BC (n = 119) but not in normal breast (n = 76) tissues. ELISA screening assays detected significant titers of anti-HERV-K env IgG in a large proportion of BC patients. T-cell responses against HERV-K were also detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from BC patients stimulated with autologous dendritic cells pulsed with HERV-K env SU antigens. These responses included induction of T-cell proliferation (P = 0.0043), IFN-gamma production measured by enzyme-linked immunospot (P < 0.0001), and multiplex cytokine secretion (P = 0.0033). Multiplex cytokine analysis found a T-helper 1 cytokine response, including interleukin (IL)-2 (P = 0.0109), IL-6 (P = 0.0396), IL-8 (P = 0.0169), and IP-10 (P = 0.0045) secretion during in vitro stimulation of BC PBMC with HERV-K antigen. We also found HERV-K-specific CTLs that were capable of lysing target cells expressing HERV-K env protein in BC patients but not in normal female controls without cancer. These findings suggest that retroviral gene products are capable of acting as tumor-associated antigens activating both T-cell and B-cell responses in BC patients.

Immunohistochemical characteristics of melanoma

Melanoma has a wide spectrum of histologic features which mimic epithelial, hematologic, mesenchymal, and neural tumors. Immunohistochemistry has been the primary tool to distinguish melanomas from these other tumors; it has also been studied for use as an adjunct to distinguish benign and malignant melanocytic tumors and to elucidate prognosis. Furthermore, there has been extensive effort to find a suitable marker to differentiate spindle cell and desmoplastic melanoma from other tumors. We have reviewed the literature investigating melanocytic differentiation markers, proliferation markers, immunomodulatory markers, signaling molecules, and nerve growth factors and receptors. Despite the proliferation of immunohistochemical markers, S-100 remains the most sensitive marker for melanocytic lesions, while markers such as HMB-45, MART-1/Melan-A, tyrosinase, and MITF demonstrate relatively good specificity but not as good sensitivity as S-100. No marker has proven useful in distinguishing spindle cell and desmoplastic melanomas from other tumors. Ki67 remains the most useful adjunct in distinguishing benign from malignant melanocytic tumors. None of the markers reviewed has been shown conclusively to have prognostic value for melanocytic neoplasms.

RT in situ PCR detection of MART-1 and TRP-2 mRNA in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues of melanoma and nevi

Melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1 (MART-1) and tyrosinase-related protein-2 (TRP-2) are two useful markers for immunohistochemical detection of melanocytic tumors. However, these markers may be passively acquired (phagocytosed) rather than actively synthesized. Reverse transcriptase in situ polymerase chain reaction (RT in situ PCR) can amplify even small amounts of specific mRNA in cells and therefore confirm the cellular source of a marker. We developed a one-step RT in situ PCR procedure in which Thermus thermophilus DNA polymerase synthesizes and amplifies cDNA from mRNA in a single reaction mixture. To examine its practicability and feasibility with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue, we compared the results of one-step RT in situ PCR with those of immunohistochemistry (IHC). MART-1 mRNA was identified in the cytoplasm of lesional cells from 23/26 primary melanomas (92%), 9/9 metastatic melanomas (100%) and 5/6 nevi (83%). MART-1 epitope was detected by IHC in 23/24 primary melanomas (96%), 9/9 metastatic melanomas (100%) and 5/6 nevi (83%). TRP-2 mRNA was identified in the cytoplasm of lesional cells from 17/26 primary melanomas (65%), 6/9 metastatic melanomas (67%) and 4/6 nevi (67%). TRP-2 epitope was detected by IHC in 20/24 primary melanomas (83%), 9/9 metastatic melanomas (100%) and 4/6 nevi (67%). Both techniques detected MART-1 and TRP-2 in FFPE melanoma cell lines. Neither marker was detected in squamous cell carcinomas or basal cell carcinomas by RT in situ PCR or IHC. We conclude that the RT in situ PCR technique can be successfully applied to FFPE tissue to determine the cellular sources of gene expression observed by conventional PCR approaches.

Immunostaining for MART-1 in the interpretation of problematic intra-epidermal pigmented lesions

The histopathologic distinction between pigmented actinic keratosis (PAK) and atypical junctional melanocytic proliferations (AJMP) is a common problem, and it is one with meaningful clinical significance. Previous publications have suggested that Melanocyte Antigen Related to T-cells-1 (MART-1)--a melanocytic marker related to host immune response--was not useful in making this interpretative separation. To revisit that assertion, the authors selected 68 specimens that concerned the diagnosis of PAK vs. AJMP. The degree of morphologic difficulty attached to each case was rated semiquantitatively using a three-tiered scale, and interpretative problems were caused by cytologic similarity between atypical keratinocytes and aberrant melanocytes, obscuring lichenoid inflammation, subepidermal fibrosis, and an absence of clearly defined cell nests at the dermoepidermal junction. Each biopsy sample was immunostained for MART-1 (using antibody clone A103) with azure-B counterstaining; the principal criterion for a diagnosis of AJMP was that of confluent cellular positivity over at least 1 high-power (x400) microscopic field, in conjunction with nested cell growth. The specimens were then re-examined diagnostically. Immunostaining definitely improved interpretative certitude in 65 examples (96% effectiveness); the final diagnosis was that of PAK for 21 lesions and AJMP for 47. Three specimens--all of which represented AJMP--did not benefit by MART-1 staining. It is concluded that MART-1 immunostaining with azure-B counterstaining is a useful adjunct in the interpretation of problematic intra-epidermal pigmented lesions.

Recommendations for improved standardization of immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) continues to suffer from variable consistency, poor reproducibility, quality assurance disparities, and the lack of standardization resulting in poor concordance, validation, and verification. This document lists the recommendations made by the Ad-Hoc Committee on Immunohistochemistry Standardization to address these deficiencies. Contributing factors were established to be underfixation and irregular fixation, use of nonformalin fixatives and ancillary fixation procedures divested from a deep and full understanding of the IHC assay parameters, minimal or absent IHC assay optimization and validation procedures, and lack of a standard system of interpretation and reporting. Definitions and detailed guidelines pertaining to these areas are provided.

Concordant loss of melanoma differentiation antigens in synchronous and asynchronous melanoma metastases: implications for immunotherapy

Because of its known heterogeneity, the analysis of antigen expression is crucial prior to the initiation of antigen-specific immunotherapy for melanoma. The melanoma differentiation antigens gp100, MART-1 and tyrosinase are involved in a common pathway of melanin synthesis. Peptides derived from these melanoma differentiation antigens are used in the immunotherapy of melanoma and antibodies recognizing these antigens are commonly applied to detect melanocytic lesions. One hundred and ninety-one paraffin-embedded melanoma metastases from 28 patients with 2-19 lesions (mean, 6.8) developing synchronously (n = 67) or asynchronously (n = 124) were analysed by immunohistochemistry for the expression of the melanoma differentiation antigens, as well as cancer/testis antigens of the melanoma antigen-A (MAGE-A) family (monoclonal antibodies 77B and 57B), anti-S100 and SM5-1. The overall reactivities were 81.6% (gp100), 79.5% (MART-1), 59.6% (tyrosinase), 59.1% (77B), 60.7% (57B), 93.2% (S100) and 91.6% (SM5-1). Twenty-seven lesions (14.1%) were positive for all tumour-associated antigens, 75 lesions (39.2%) were negative for one antigen and 87 lesions (45.5%) were negative for several tumour-associated antigens. Co-ordinated loss was found for lesions negative for gp100 and MART-1 (9.4%, P < 0.0005), gp100 and tyrosinase (11.0%, P = 0.009), MART-1 and tyrosinase (15.2%, P < 0.0005) and gp100, MART-1 and tyrosinase (8.9%, P < 0.0005), which is up to six times higher than the expected calculated loss. This co-ordinated loss of melanoma differentiation antigens in melanoma did not include cancer testis antigens and S100 or SM5-1. On average, the melanoma differentiation antigens stained 50-65% of cells within a lesion, and 10-39% of synchronous clusters were heterogeneous for melanoma differentiation antigen expression. In conclusion, broader polypeptide vaccines should be used for melanoma immunotherapy.

Pathologic Reporting and Special Diagnostic Techniques for Melanoma

Pathologists play a central role in the management of cutaneous melanoma in determining that a tumor is a melanoma, whether or not it is primary or metastatic, and whether or not the margins of excision are tumor free and in evaluating prognostic indicators from examination of the primary tumor and, where appropriate, lymph nodes, including the sentinel nodes.

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Novel Monoclonal Antibody PNL2 and Comparison With Other Melanocyte Differentiation Markers

PNL2 is a novel monoclonal antibody, which has recently been introduced as an immunohistochemical reagent to stain melanocyte and tumors derived thereof. In the present study, we analyzed the immunoreactivity of this mAb in various normal tissues, melanocytic nevi, primary and metastatic melanoma, nonmelanocytic tumors, including histologic mimickers of melanoma as well as angiomyolipoma, and multiple cell lines derived from different tumors types. We used several tissue microarray panels as well as selected conventional sections from tissue blocks. For metastatic melanoma, immunoreactivity for PNL2 was compared with A103 (Melan-A/MART-1), T311 (tyrosinase), HMB45 (gp100), and D5 (MITF). Positive staining with PNL2 was found in normal melanocytes and neutrophils, but no other normal cell type. Among melanocytic lesions, both benign nevi as well as primary malignant melanomas, especially epithelioid variants thereof, were commonly immunopositive. Only 1 of 13 desmoplastic melanomas reacted with PNL2. PNL2 showed high sensitivity for metastatic melanoma (87%). In comparison, 82% of metastatic melanomas were positive for A103, 76% for HMB45, 92% for T311, and 84% for D5. The combined use of all five reagents minimized the number of immunonegative cases. None of the selected nonmelanocytic tumors (carcinomas or soft tissue neoplasms) was positive for PNL2 in this series except for angiomyolipomas and chronic myeloid leukemias and 1 single case of a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor with heterologous differentiation (malignant Triton tumor). Despite its reactivity with neutrophils, PNL2 appears to be a valuable supplementary reagent for the diagnosis of melanocytic tumors.

Melan A (A103) is expressed in adrenocortical neoplasms but not in renal cell and hepatocellular carcinomas

Most adrenocortical neoplasms, renal cell carcinomas, and hepatocellular carcinomas are diagnosed by a combination of clinical and morphologic features. However, occasionally this histologic differential diagnosis requires additional ancillary tests, such as immunohistochemistry. The authors investigated the potential value of A103 in the differential diagnosis of these tumors. Thirty-two adrenocortical neoplasms, 86 renal cell carcinomas, and 57 hepatocellular carcinomas were evaluated by immunohistochemistry using a monoclonal antibody A103 and a standard ABC method. The adrenocortical neoplasms were 21 adenomas and 11 carcinomas. Thirty-one of the 32 adrenocortical neoplasms showed strong and diffuse granular cytoplasmic staining for Melan A. No nuclear reaction was observed. There were no differences in staining patterns between adrenocortical adenomas and carcinomas. With the exception of one clear cell renal cell carcinoma, all non-adrenocortical neoplasms were negative. The authors conclude that A103 is a useful addition to the immunohistochemical panel in the differential diagnosis of adrenocortical neoplasms from both renal cell and hepatocellular carcinomas. This marker, however, does not separate benign from malignant adrenocortical neoplasms.

Melanoma patient staging: histopathological versus molecular evaluation of the sentinel node

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy provide a minimally invasive means of directly determining the status of the regional lymph nodes in all patients who have a primary melanoma >1 mm thick but no clinical evidence of nodal involvement. Since the histological status of the sentinel node (SN) has been shown to be the most important prognostic factor in primary melanoma patients, the World Health Organization has recently recommended that sentinel lymphadenectomy should become the new standard of care for primary melanoma patients. This paper reviews the literature with regards to developments in and the current status of SN evaluation. Developments in the histopathological versus molecular detection of melanoma nodal metastases are reviewed, with specific emphasis on the strengths, limitations and clinical significance of these techniques. Molecular evaluation of the SN offers several advantages over standard histopathological analysis. These include an improved sensitivity, the cost-effective use of multiple markers for the improvement of detection rate and prognosis, as well as being less labour-intensive and costly. Moreover, molecular analysis has the potential to allow estimation of tumour burden. We review the potential causes of technical false-negative and false-positive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results and how these could be eliminated by a systematic approach consisting of (i) careful and systematic assay design, which would include efficient tissue homogenization, choice of reagents and molecular markers, primer design and the use of one-stage versus two-stage PCR; (ii) careful optimization of the RT-PCR parameters (in particular the PCR cycle number) through the use of appropriate control tissues; and (iii) aiming for high assay reproducibility and lastly by applying the necessary positive and negative controls with each batch of samples. We also review the significant improvement in patient prognosis and management that has been made possible by the development of sentinel lymphadenectomy and histopathological evaluation of the SN, and compare the clinical (predictive) value of histopathological analysis with that of RT-PCR. Although RT-PCR is able to detect additional, clinically significant SN metastases that are missed by routine histopathology, its current limitation is that it overestimates the number of patients who have clinically significant melanoma metastases. Therefore, we suggest and discuss appropriate steps that need to be taken in order to minimize these false-positives and make this molecular tool more acceptable for routine clinical use.

HMB-45, S-100, NK1/C3, and MART-1 in metastatic melanoma

The diagnosis of melanoma metastatic to lymph node remains a difficult problem given its histological diversity. We examined the staining patterns of S-100, NK1/C3, HMB-45, and MART-1 (DC10) in melanoma metastases to lymph nodes. Immunohistochemical stains were performed on tissue sections of 126 formalin-fixed lymph nodes from 126 patients with an established diagnosis of metastatic melanoma. A total of 98% of cases (123 of 126) stained positive for S-100, 93% (117 of 125) stained positive for NK1/C3, 82% (103 of 126) stained positive for MART-1, and 76% (95 of 125) stained positive for HMB-45. The distribution and intensity of staining varied among these markers. A diffuse staining pattern, defined as >50% of tumor cells stained, was observed in 83% of MART-1-positive cases but in only 56% of S-100-positive cases, 48% of NK1/C3-positive cases, and 34% of HMB-45-positive cases. A maximally intense signal was almost always observed for MART-1 (83% of positive cases) but was rarely observed for NK1/C3 (20%). S-100 and HMB-45 showed maximally intense staining in 50% and 54% of cases, respectively. S-100 and NK1/C3 stained both histiocytes and melanocytes, whereas MART-1 and HMB-45 stained only melanocytes. Seventy-eight cases (63%) stained positive for all 4 markers, 17 cases (14%) stained for all markers except HMB-45, 13 cases (10%) stained for all markers except MART-1, 6 cases (5%) stained only with S-100 and NK1/C3, 4 cases (3%) stained only with S-100 and HMB-45, and 2 cases stained for all markers except S-100. One case each stained for the following: only S-100, only S-100 and HMB-45, and all markers except NK1/C3. One case exhibited absence of staining for any of these markers. We demonstrate that lymph node metastases of melanoma are heterogeneous with regard to tumor marker expression. S-100 and NK1/C3 were the most sensitive stains for detecting metastatic melanoma; however, they both also stain other nontumor cells in lymph nodes. MART-1 did not stain histiocytes and exhibited a more frequently intense and diffuse staining pattern than NK1/C3. HMB-45 was less sensitive and demonstrated less diffuse staining than MART-1.

[Endocrine tumors of the testis]

The most characteristic endocrine tumours of the testis are germ cell tumours and sex cord/gonadal stromal tumours. They include the primary carcinoid, the relation of which to teratomas is still unclear. In general, gonadal stromal tumours are rare, however, endocrine activity occurs in at least 10%-20%. Among gonadal stromal tumours, only Leydig cell tumours and Sertoli cell tumours are of practical importance. Endocrine disorders are mostly related to Leydig cell tumours (gynaecomastia, pubertas praecox). Although less frequent than the other gonadal stromal tumours, they can, in principle, occur. The large cell calcifying Sertoli cell tumour occurs in association with other complex disorders (i.e. Peutz-Jeghers syndrome). Valuable markers are: inhibin, calretinin, cytokeratin, melan-A, CD-99, Ki-67, androgen receptor and p53. As the conventional morphology and immunohistological markers frequently overlap, unclear cases should be referred to specialised centres.

MLANA/MART1 and SILV/PMEL17/GP100 are transcriptionally regulated by MITF in melanocytes and melanoma

The clinically important melanoma diagnostic antibodies HMB-45, melan-A, and MITF (D5) recognize gene products of the melanocyte-lineage genes SILV/PMEL17/GP100, MLANA/MART1, and MITF, respectively. MITF encodes a transcription factor that is essential for normal melanocyte development and appears to regulate expression of several pigmentation genes. In this report, the possibility was examined that MITF might additionally regulate expression of the SILV and MLANA genes. Both genes contain conserved MITF consensus DNA sequences that were bound by MITF in vitro and in vivo, based on electrophoretic mobility shift assay and chromatin-immunoprecipitation. In addition, MITF regulated their promoter/enhancer regions in reporter assays, and up- or down-regulation of MITF produced corresponding modulation of endogenous SILV and MLANA in melanoma cells. Expression patterns were compared with these factors in a series of melanoma cell lines whose mutational status of the proto-oncogene BRAF was also known. SILV and MLANA expression correlated with MITF, while no clear correlation was seen relative to BRAF mutation. Finally, mRNA expression array analysis of primary human melanomas demonstrated a tight correlation in their expression levels in clinical tumor specimens. Collectively, this study links three important melanoma antigens into a common transcriptional pathway regulated by MITF.

Metastatic balloon cell melanoma in a dog

BACKGROUND

Balloon cell melanoma is a rare variant of amelanotic melanoma that is difficult to differentiate from sebaceous cell carcinoma, liposarcoma, and other clear cell neoplasms without immunohistochemistry or ultrastructural evidence of melanin or melanosomes.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this report was to describe the clinical, cytologic, histologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural findings in a dog with metastatic balloon cell melanoma.

METHODS

A 6-year-old female Golden Retriever was evaluated for a white, flocculent infiltrate in the anterior chamber of the left eye and an enlarged left prescapular lymph node. Cytologic evaluation of the eye and lymph node were performed following aqueocentesis and fine-needle aspiration, respectively. The affected lymph node was examined histologically and stained for cytokeratin, vimentin, S-100, and Melan A. Following euthanasia a necropsy was performed and samples of the affected lymph node were examined by electron microscopy.

RESULTS

Cytologic examination of the lymph node and aqueocentesis sample revealed round neoplastic cells that had abundant clear vacuolated cytoplasm. A tentative diagnosis of metastatic sebaceous cell carcinoma or clear cell neoplasm was made. Histologically, the affected lymph node had similar polygonal clear cells arranged in sheets and packets divided by delicate fibrovascular stroma. Immunohistochemical staining of the cells was negative for cytokeratin but positive for vimentin, weakly positive for S-100, and strongly positive for Melan A. At necropsy, metastatic lesions were identified in the diaphragm, heart, lung, kidneys, left eye, prescapular and sublumbar lymph nodes, and multiple skin sites. Ultrastructural examination of neoplastic lymph nodes revealed many membrane-bound vacuoles, myelin-like figures, and rare melanosomes.

CONCLUSION

Immunohistochemical staining and ultrastructural features of the neoplastic cells supported a diagnosis of metastatic balloon cell melanoma.

PNL2, a new monoclonal antibody directed against a fixative-resistant melanocyte antigen

We report the production of a new monoclonal antibody, PNL2, directed against a fixative resistant melanocyte antigen. The analysis of PNL2 immunostaining on a broad range of normal or malignant human tissues and on various melanocytic lesions revealed its high specificity. PNL2 gave a strong cytoplasmic staining of skin and oral mucosae melanocytes, and staining of granulocytes when used at high concentration. PNL2 stained all intra-epidermal nevi irrespective of their histologic type, but common intradermal nevi and the dermal component of compound nevi were largely non-reactive as only scattered nevus cells in the papillary dermis were labeled. PNL2 labeled more than 70% of the neoplastic cells in all primary melanomas irrespective of their histologic type. However, PNL2 did not label desmoplastic melanomas. All metastatic melanomas were also stained but the percentage of labeled cells was occasionally lower than the primary tumor. PNL2, as anti-Melan A and HMB-45 antibodies, stained most of the clear cell sarcoma cells, and a few cells in angiomyolipomas and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. None of the other non-melanocytic lesions tested were labeled. Proteomic approaches showed that the immunoaffinity purified PNL2-binding complexes isolated from melanoma cell lines comprise at least TAP1, Clathrin 17 and prealbumin proteins, but not the gp100 recognized by HMB-45. In conclusion, this new monoclonal antibody, PNL2, is directed against a new fixative resistant melanocyte associated antigen. This antigen is chemically resistant and thus allows immunostaining after melanin bleaching or decalcification. We also demonstrate that it is different from Melan A and from gp100, even if PNL2 and HMB-45 staining patterns are sometimes similar.

Ovarian steroid cell tumors: an immunohistochemical study including a comparison of calretinin with inhibin

Ovarian steroid cell tumors, not otherwise specified (SCTs, NOS) are uncommon sex cord-stromal tumors that may be difficult to distinguish from other oxyphilic or clear-cell neoplasms. Immunohistochemical staining for inhibin, although generally useful in the diagnosis of SCTs, NOS, is not positive in every case and not all laboratories have this marker available. Recently, it has been reported that calretinin is expressed by sex cord-stromal tumors. We studied six SCTs, NOS for both calretinin and inhibin expression to evaluate the sensitivity of calretinin in comparison to inhibin. We also tested for CD99, Melan-A (A103), and S-100, other markers reported to be positive in these tumors. HMB-45 and MART-1 (Ab3) completed our panel of markers. All six tumors were positive for both calretinin and inhibin. Calretinin positivity was present in 60% to >90% of tumor cells, whereas inhibin reactivity ranged from <5% to >90% of tumor cells. Membranous staining for CD99 was present in one tumor. S-100-positive cells were seen in two tumors, whereas four tumors were immunoreactive for HMB-45. All six tumors were positive for Melan-A (A103), but in general the staining was less diffuse than with calretinin. All of the tumors were essentially negative for MART-1 (Ab3). The consistent diffuse staining of the tumors in this study for calretinin, in comparison to inhibin and Melan-A (A103), suggests that it is a sensitive marker for SCTs, NOS. MART-1 (Ab3) immunostaining may be useful for cases in which melanoma is considered in the differential diagnosis.

Immunohistochemical markers of melanocytic lesions: a review of their diagnostic usefulness

We critically reviewed recent literature reports of 25 melanocytic immunohistochemical markers. This review organizes and summarizes the many new studies of old and novel melanocytic markers and identifies the most promising diagnostic immunohistochemical markers that can be used to distinguish melanocytic from nonmelanocytic lesions and benign melanocytic from malignant melanocytic lesions.

Melanoma markers in angiomyolipoma of the liver and kidney: a comparative study

CONTEXT

Melanoma markers, especially the new microphthalmia transcription factor (mitf), have not been previously compared in hepatic and renal angiomyolipomas.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate expression of the novel melanocytic markers mitf and tyrosinase in angiomyolipomas, and to compare these markers with the established markers HMB-45 and melan-A in both hepatic and renal tumors.

DESIGN

Clinical, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical features of 15 hepatic angiomyolipomas were compared with those of 10 renal angiomyolipomas.

RESULTS

No significant differences between patients with hepatic angiomyolipomas and renal angiomyolipomas were found with respect to age, gender, race, and tumor size. Hepatic angiomyolipomas exhibited a predominance of the epithelioid smooth muscle cell component, in contrast to their renal counterparts, which were predominantly spindled. The smooth muscle cells expressed HMB-45 in 100% of cases in both groups, melan-A in 14 of 15 hepatic angiomyolipomas and 8 of 9 renal angiomyolipomas, mitf in 5 of 12 hepatic angiomyolipomas versus 6 of 10 renal angiomyolipomas, and tyrosinase in 3 of 12 and 2 of 10 hepatic angiomyolipomas and renal angiomyolipomas, respectively. The extent and intensity of immunostaining with HMB-45 and melan-A were dependent on whether spindled or epithelioid cells predominated; the epithelioid cells showed stronger and more widespread reactivity than the spindled cells.

CONCLUSION

We believe that the best immunohistochemical marker for confirming the diagnosis of angiomyolipoma is HMB-45, followed by melan-A. Routine use of mitf and/or tyrosinase is not indicated.

Microphthalmia transcription factor: a sensitive and specific marker for malignant melanoma in cytologic specimens

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of melanoma can be difficult because of shared cytomorphology with other malignant neoplasms. The most commonly used melanocytic markers, anti-S-100 protein and HMB-45 antigen, have limited specificity and sensitivity, respectively. Microphthalmia transcription factor (Mitf) is a nuclear transcription factor critical for the development and survival of melanocytes and has been shown as a sensitive and specific marker for melanoma in histologic specimens.

METHODS

To evaluate the efficacy of Mitf as a marker for melanoma in cytologic preparations, 81 cell blocks from 44 patients with melanoma and 37 patients with nonmelanoma malignancies (29 patients with carcinoma, 4 patients with mesotheliomas, 2 patients with lymphoma, and 2 patients with islet cell tumors) were stained with monoclonal antibodies against Mitf (clone D5), S-100 protein, and HMB-45 antigen. The staining was evaluated blindly by three independent observers. The presence of nuclear staining for Mitf and cytoplasmic staining for S-100 protein or HMB-45 antigen in > 10% of tumor cells was considered positive staining for each antigen.

RESULTS

Forty-four melanomas (100%), including all 3 spindle-cell melanomas, were positive for Mitf. All nonmelanoma neoplasms were negative with only one exception: One mammary carcinoma showed rare (< 10%), weak nuclear staining with Mitf. The sensitivity and specificity of Mitf as a marker for melanoma were both 100%, whereas the sensitivity of HMB-45 antigen was 90.4%, and the specificity of S-100 protein was 70.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Mitf is a sensitive and specific marker for malignant melanoma, including the spindle-cell variant, in cytologic specimens and may be superior to the current standard melanocytic markers, S-100 protein and HMB-45 antigen.

Expression of gp100, MART-1, tyrosinase, and S100 in paraffin-embedded primary melanomas and locoregional, lymph node, and visceral metastases: implications for diagnosis and immunotherapy. A study conducted by the EORTC Melanoma Cooperative Group

With the recent availability of novel antibodies against melanoma antigens tyrosinase and MART-1, it is important to validate their usefulness in pathology practice and in screening patients for immunotherapy treatment. In the present study conducted by the Melanoma Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC-MCG), immunohistochemical staining for gp100 (antibodies NKI-beteb and HMB-45), MART-1 (A103), tyrosinase (T311), and S100 (S100) was compared on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumour lesions from 80 patients with 130 malignant melanoma lesions, comprising 44 primary tumours, 18 locoregional metastases, 41 lymph node metastases, and 27 visceral metastases from the lung, liver, and brain. A score between 0 and 5 was allocated to each immunohistochemically stained section. These scores were evaluated in a statistical analysis. S100 was by far the most sensitive marker in all four types of lesions tested. Apart from a significantly better performance for T311 in primary melanomas compared with HMB-45, no significant differences were observed between the four remaining antigens tested. Three settings were next investigated to determine whether the expression of melanoma antigens decreases with tumour progression. First, within the primary melanomas, only NKI-beteb and A103 staining showed a nearly significant negative correlation with Clark's level of invasion and a similar tendency was observed for these antibodies with Breslow thickness. Second, when comparing primary melanoma-metastasis pairs from the same patient, lymph node metastases showed less staining with NKI-beteb, HMB-45, A103, and T311, at a level near significance. This difference was not significant when comparing the primary tumour with visceral metastases, probably due to the lower numbers of pairs. Third, regarding tumour progression from primary melanoma to locoregional, to lymph node, to visceral metastasis, a significant decrease with progression was found only for T311. The apparently stable expression of most of the melanoma antigens, and the small contribution of decreased expression in melanoma tumour progression, supports the rationale for immunotherapy based on the melanoma immunogens gp100, MART-1, and tyrosinase.

A tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte from a melanoma metastasis with decreased expression of melanoma differentiation antigens recognizes MAGE-12

Twenty separate tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) bulk cultures and a tumor cell line were originated simultaneously from a fine needle aspiration biopsy of a metastasis in a patient with melanoma (F001) previously immunized with the HLA-A*0201-associated gp100:209-217(210 M) peptide. None of the TIL recognized gp100. However, 12 recognized autologous (F001-MEL) and allogeneic melanoma cells expressing the HLA haplotype A*0201, B*0702, Cw*0702. Further characterization of F001-MEL demonstrated loss of gp100/PMel17, severely decreased expression of other melanoma differentiation Ags and retained expression of tumor-specific Ags. Transfection of HLA class I alleles into B*0702/Cw*0702-negative melanoma cell lines identified HLA-Cw*0702 as the restriction element for F001-TIL. A cDNA library from F001-MEL was used to transfect IFN-alpha-stimulated 293 human embryonal kidney (293-HEK) cells expressing HLA-Cw*0702. A 100-gene pool was identified that induced recognition of 293-HEK cells by F001-TIL. Subsequent cloning of the pool identified a cDNA sequence homologous, except for one amino acid (aa 187 D-->A), to MAGE-12. Among 25 peptide sequences from MAGE-12 with the HLA-Cw*0702 binding motif, MAGE-12:170-178 (VRIGHLYIL) induced IFN-gamma release by F001-TIL when pulsed on F001-EBV-B cells at concentrations as low as 10 pg/ml. Peptide sequences from MAGE-1, 2, 3, 4a, and 6 aligned to MAGE-12:170-178 were not recognized by F001-TIL. In summary a TIL recognizing a MAGE protein was developed from an HLA-A*0201 expressing tumor with strongly reduced expression of melanoma differentiation Ags. Persisting tumor-specific Ag expression maintained tumor immune competence suggesting that tumor-specific Ags/melanoma differentiation Ags may complement each other in the context of melanoma Ag-specific vaccination.

Immunoblot analysis of CD34 expression in histologically diverse neoplasms

CD34 is a heavily glycosylated transmembrane protein of approximately 110 kd whose function is essentially uncharacterized. First identified in a myeloid leukemia cell line, immunohistological reactivity with anti-CD34 antibodies is also encountered in a histologically diverse subset of nonhematolymphoid neoplasms including angiosarcoma, solitary fibrous tumors, epithelioid sarcomas, spindle cell lipomas, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, and myofibroblastomas. Immunohistological reactivity for CD34 in hematopoietic stem cells and endothelial cells has been shown to correspond to the expression of the CD34 protein. With the exception of gastrointestinal stromal tumors, CD34 protein expression has not been investigated in other CD34 immunohistologically reactive nonhematolymphoid neoplasms. We undertook this study to examine whether the observed reactivity for anti-CD34 antibodies in apparently unrelated tumors is due to the expression of the same protein or whether shared epitopes elaborated by other proteins could account for this reactivity. Immunoblot analyses with anti-CD34 antibodies of six different CD34 immunohistologically reactive lesions show the same approximately 110-kd molecular weight protein. In addition, two cases of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans show double bands at approximately 110 kd. Laser-capture microdissection of CD34 immunohistologically reactive epithelioid sarcoma and nonreactive epidermal cells illustrates that this reactivity is specific to tumor cells. These results show that the observed immunohistological reactivity with anti-CD34 antibodies is due to the expression of the CD34 protein and not to shared epitopes on unrelated proteins.