Headache after attempted epidural block: the role of intrathecal air

Post-dural puncture headache combined with pneumocephalus secondary to vaginal delivery following epidural anesthesia: a case report

BACKGROUND

Pneumocephalus is rare in vaginal deliveries. Pneumocephalus may be asymptomatic or present with signs of increased intracranial pressure. However, parturients who received epidural anesthesia with air in their brains may experience low intracranial pressure headaches after giving birth, causing the diagnosis of pneumocephalus to be delayed. We report a case of a parturient who developed post-dural puncture headache combined with pneumocephalus secondary to vaginal delivery following epidural anesthesia.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 24-year-old G1P0 Chinese woman at 38 weeks gestation was in labor and received epidural anesthesia using the loss of resistance to air technique and had a negative prior medical history. She presented with postural headache, neck stiffness and auditory changes 2 h after vaginal delivery. The head non-contrast computed tomography revealed distributed gas density shadows in the brain, indicating pneumocephalus. Her headache was relieved by bed rest, rehydration, analgesia, and oxygen therapy and completely disappeared after 2 weeks of postpartum bed rest.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report that positional headaches after epidural anesthesia may not indicate low intracranial pressure alone; it may combine with pneumocephalus, particularly when using the loss of resistance to air technique. At this moment, head computed tomography is essential to discover other conditions like pneumocephalus.

Extensive tension pneumocephalus presented in the setting of a challenging etiology

Background

Pneumocephalus (PNC) is a well-described consequence in postoperative settings and skull fractures that is usually self-limiting. It can get complicated into tension PNC on some rare occasions, leading to an intracranial mass effect. PNC was also reported after unintentional dural puncture throughout the epidural anesthesia process. However, tension PNC resulting from epidural anesthesia procedures is an extremely rare outcome that implies urgent intervention to relieve the tension within the brain. Here, we report a case of an extensive tension intraventricular PNC 2 days following an epidural anesthesia procedure for a femur fixation surgery.

Case Description

A 23-year-old male presented to the emergency department with basal skull fractures and a femur fracture due to a motorcycle accident. His skull base fracture was managed conservatively then he underwent a femur fixation procedure under epidural anesthesia. Two days after, he developed a severe headache with a disturbed level of consciousness. Computed tomography of the brain revealed an extensive PNC that involved all the subarachnoid spaces down to the cervical region and compressing the cerebellum, which was not found in the initial imaging. The patient's status improved after the twist-drill burr-hole evacuation of air under the water seal.

Conclusion

Extensive tension PNC can occur after traumatic brain injury, especially after epidural anesthesia. Such cases should gain high focus because they may differ from simple PNC regarding diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up.

Don't Forget Rare Causes of Postpartum Headache! Cases Report and Literature Review

Headache is a common finding in the postpartum period, caused by a spectrum of different conditions. Most headaches in the postpartum period are self-limiting and benign in etiology, but there are some potentially serious causes to be considered. We disclose two cases of postpartum headache, initially considered as post-dural puncture headache (PDPH), that evolved into a harmful condition and showed that an expanded differential diagnosis for headache in the postpartum is mandatory, requiring a high level of attention from health professionals. In fact, a careful examination of the medical history, physical examination, and the recognition for the need for early neuroradiological imaging should increase diagnostic accuracy.

Pneumocephalus following fluoroscopy-guided lumbar epidural injection in elderly patients: two cases report and a review of Korean literatures - Two cases report

Background

Pneumocephalus can originate from accidental dural puncture while performing epidural block using the loss-of-resistance (LOR) technique with an air-filled syringe.

Case

We present two cases of pneumocephalus after lumbar epidural block under fluoroscopy for pain control in elderly patients.

Conclusions

Lumbar epidural block should be performed under fluoroscopic guidance in elderly patients with severe lesions. The physician should be aware of the increased possibility of a dural puncture occurring due to anatomical changes in older patients. The use of saline is recommended for the LOR technique. A contrast injection should be used together with the LOR technique to locate the epidural space. If a dural puncture occur, the patient should be carefully monitored to determine whether pneumocephalus has developed.

Management practices for postdural puncture headache in obstetrics: a prospective, international, cohort study

BACKGROUND

Accidental dural puncture is an uncommon complication of epidural analgesia and can cause postdural puncture headache (PDPH). We aimed to describe management practices and outcomes after PDPH treated by epidural blood patch (EBP) or no EBP.

METHODS

Following ethics committee approval, patients who developed PDPH after accidental dural puncture were recruited from participating countries and divided into two groups, those receiving EBP or no EBP. Data registered included patient and procedure characteristics, headache symptoms and intensity, management practices, and complications. Follow-up was at 3 months.

RESULTS

A total of 1001 patients from 24 countries were included, of which 647 (64.6%) received an EBP and 354 (35.4%) did not receive an EBP (no-EBP). Higher initial headache intensity was associated with greater use of EBP, odds ratio 1.29 (95% confidence interval 1.19-1.41) per pain intensity unit increase. Headache intensity declined sharply at 4 h after EBP and 127 (19.3%) patients received a second EBP. On average, no or mild headache (numeric rating score≤3) was observed 7 days after diagnosis. Intracranial bleeding was diagnosed in three patients (0.46%), and backache, headache, and analgesic use were more common at 3 months in the EBP group.

CONCLUSIONS

Management practices vary between countries, but EBP was more often used in patients with greater initial headache intensity. EBP reduced headache intensity quickly, but about 20% of patients needed a second EBP. After 7 days, most patients had no or mild headache. Backache, headache, and analgesic use were more common at 3 months in patients receiving an EBP.

Pneumocephalus and Chemical Meningitis after Inadvertent Dural Puncture during Lumbar Epidural Injection

Inadvertent dural puncture (IDP) is one of the complications of lumbar epidural steroid injections (ESIs). We report a case in which pneumocephalus and chemical meningitis developed at the same time after an IDP during a lumbar interlaminar ESI. A 60-year-old woman presented to the emergency room with thunderclap headache and febrile sensation 3 hours after receiving a lumbar interlaminar ESI. Brain computed tomography (CT) scan showed multiple small foci of air within the subarachnoid space and ventricle. After the admission, the patient was afebrile and reported mild improvement of headache with analgesics. However, 2 days after the admission, headache worsened and fever recurred. Follow-up brain CT scan revealed resolution of the pneumocephalus. A diagnostic lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination revealed the findings suggestive of aseptic (chemical) meningitis rather than bacterial meningitis. With symptomatic treatment, headache improved and there was no fever after 48 hours. No bacteria, Mycobacterium, or fungi grew in the CSF for 7 days. This case shows an IDP during a lumbar ESI can cause pneumocephalus and chemical meningitis at the same time and efforts should be made to reduce the risk of IDP during lumbar ESIs.

Symptomatic Pneumocephalus as a Complication of Lumbar Epidural Anaesthesia

Introduction

Lumbar epidural anaesthesia is a commonly used technique for analgesia during labour. One of the rare complications of this technique is pneumocephalus.

Case description

We report the case of a 35-year-old female admitted to the Emergency Department with severe headache associated with fast head movements. Five days previously she had a eutocic delivery and lumbar epidural anaesthesia was performed. A brain computed tomography (CT) scan showed pneumocephalus and she was admitted to the hospital ward. A brain CT scan on the fourth day of hospitalization showed resolution of ventricular pneumocephalus.

Discussion

The most frequently occurring symptom with pneumocephalus is headache associated with fast brain motion resulting from air injection and meningeal irritation. When there is clinical suspicion of pneumocephalus, a brain CT scan should be performed for the diagnosis.

LEARNING POINTS

Pneumocephalus is the presence of air in the intracranial cavity and its development after spinal or epidural anaesthesia is extremely infrequent.Headache that occurs in the setting of lumbar epidural anaesthesia should not be labelled as post-dural puncture headache.The suspicion of pneumocephalus, based on the characteristics of the headache, should be maintained to obtain an emergent brain CT scan.

Postdural Puncture Headache: An Evidence-Based Approach

Headache after dural puncture is a common complication accompanying neuraxial anesthesia. The proposed cause is loss of cerebrospinal fluid through the puncture into the epidural space. Although obstetric patients are at risk for the development of this headache because of female gender and young age, there is a difference in the obstetric population. Women who deliver by cesarean delivery have a lower incidence of headache after dural puncture compared with those who deliver vaginally. Treatment of postdural puncture headache is an epidural blood patch. Departments should develop protocols for management of accidental dural puncture, including appropriate follow-up and indications for further management.

Epidural Steroid Injection Complicated by Intrathecal Entry, Pneumocephalus, and Chemical Meningitis

BACKGROUND

Epidural steroid injections are frequently used to treat back and extremity pain. The procedure is generally safe, with a low rate of adverse events, including intrathecal entry, pneumocephalus, and chemical meningitis.

CASE REPORT

We report a case of a 45-year-old woman who presented to the emergency department (ED) with headache, nausea, vomiting, and photophobia after a lumbar epidural steroid injection. She was afebrile and had an elevated white blood cell count. A non-contrast computed tomography scan of the head revealed pneumocephalus within the subarachnoid space and lateral ventricles. The patient was admitted to the ED observation unit for pain control and subsequently developed a marked leukocytosis and worsening meningismus. A lumbar puncture was performed yielding cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) consistent with meningitis (1,000 total nucleated cells, 89% neutrophils, 85 mg/dL total protein, and no red blood cells). Gram stain revealed no bacteria. The patient was admitted on empiric vancomycin and ceftriaxone. Antibiotics were discontinued at 48 h when CSF cultures remained negative and the patient was clinically asymptomatic. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Emergency physicians should consider intrathecal entry and pneumocephalus in patients who present with a headache after an epidural intervention. The management of pneumocephalus includes supportive therapies, appropriate positioning, and supplemental oxygen. These symptoms can be accompanied by fever, leukocytosis, and markedly inflammatory CSF findings consistent with bacterial or chemical meningitis. Empiric treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics should be initiated until CSF culture results are available.

Pneumocephalus after lumbar epidural steroid injection: a case report and review of the literature

Pneumocephalus may occur after inadvertent injection of air into the subarachnoid space while performing epidural anesthesia using a loss-of-resistance technique with air in the syringe. We report a case of pneumocephalus after an interlaminar epidural steroid injection using the loss-of-resistance to air technique. In this report, we examine the etiology, the expected course of symptoms, and resolution, as well as treatment, of pneumocephalus following a systematic literature review.

Case Report: Pneumocephalus after labor epidural anesthesia

Lumbar epidural anesthesia is commonly used for labor analgesia. The 'loss-of- resistance' to air technique (LORA) is generally employed for recognition of the epidural space. One of the rare complications of this technique is pneumocephalus (PC). Here we describe the case of a parturient who developed a frontal headache when locating the epidural space using LORA. On the second day after epidural injection, the patient exhibited occipital headaches with gradual worsening. Computed tomography scans of the brain indicated PC. Following symptomatic treatment, our patient was discharged on the 13th day. We concluded that the amount of air used to identify the epidural space in LORA should be minimized, LORA should not be used after dural puncture and the use of saline avoids PC complications.

Air versus saline in the loss of resistance technique for identification of the epidural space

BACKGROUND

The success of epidural anaesthesia depends on correct identification of the epidural space. For several decades, the decision of whether to use air or physiological saline during the loss of resistance technique for identification of the epidural space has been governed by the personal experience of the anaesthesiologist. Epidural block remains one of the main regional anaesthesia techniques. It is used for surgical anaesthesia, obstetrical analgesia, postoperative analgesia and treatment of chronic pain and as a complement to general anaesthesia. The sensation felt by the anaesthesiologist from the syringe plunger with loss of resistance is different when air is compared with saline (fluid). Frequently fluid allows a rapid change from resistance to non-resistance and increased movement of the plunger. However, the ideal technique for identification of the epidural space remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

• To evaluate the efficacy and safety of both air and saline in the loss of resistance technique for identification of the epidural space.• To evaluate complications related to the air or saline injected.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2013, Issue 9), MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information Database (LILACS) (from inception to September 2013). We applied no language restrictions. The date of the most recent search was 7 September 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized controlled trials (quasi-RCTs) on air and saline in the loss of resistance technique for identification of the epidural space.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included in the review seven studies with a total of 852 participants. The methodological quality of the included studies was generally ranked as showing low risk of bias in most domains, with the exception of one study, which did not mask participants. We were able to include data from 838 participants in the meta-analysis. We found no statistically significant differences between participants receiving air and those given saline in any of the outcomes evaluated: inability to locate the epidural space (three trials, 619 participants) (risk ratio (RR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33 to 2.31, low-quality evidence); accidental intravascular catheter placement (two trials, 223 participants) (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.45, low-quality evidence); accidental subarachnoid catheter placement (four trials, 682 participants) (RR 2.95, 95% CI 0.12 to 71.90, low-quality evidence); combined spinal epidural failure (two trials, 400 participants) (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.18, low-quality evidence); unblocked segments (five studies, 423 participants) (RR 1.66, 95% CI 0.72 to 3.85); and pain measured by VAS (two studies, 395 participants) (mean difference (MD) -0.09, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.18). With regard to adverse effects, we found no statistically significant differences between participants receiving air and those given saline in the occurrence of paraesthesias (three trials, 572 participants) (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.15); difficulty in advancing the catheter (two trials, 227 participants) (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.32 to 2.56); catheter replacement (two trials, 501 participants) (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.83); and postdural puncture headache (one trial, 110 participants) (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.12 to 5.71).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Low-quality evidence shows that results do not differ between air and saline in terms of the loss of resistance technique for identification of the epidural space and reduction of complications. Applicability might be compromised, as most of the results described in this review were obtained from parturient patients. This review underlines the need to conduct well-designed trials in this field. 

High quality labour analgesia using small gauge epidural needles and catheters

PURPOSE

Inadvertent epidural needle punctures represent the leading cause of severe postdural puncture headache (PDPH) in parturients. Use of small gauge (G) epidural needles for continuous analgesia has received little attention despite possible important reductions in PDPH. We report the first study to examine the feasibility of using small G Tuohy needles and 23 G catheters for labour analgesia.

METHODS

Healthy parturients <or= 6 cm dilated were recruited. Epidural analgesia was established using a 19 G Tuohy epidural needle, a 23 G single port 40 cm catheter and bupivacaine 0.08% with fentanyl 2 microg x mL(-1) (15-20 mL). Breakthrough pain was treated by protocol. There was no formal in-training period for anesthesiologists. The primary outcome was the combined failure rate for initiation (failed needle/catheter placement or failed block <or= 30 min of drug administration). Secondary out-comes included late block failure (> 30 min), recognized dural puncture, PDPH, patient assessment of analgesia within 24 hr of delivery, complications and anesthesiologist satisfaction.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven parturients were recruited. Successful blocks were initiated and maintained in 24/27 who rated overall analgesia from good to excellent (19/24 very good to excellent). Three block failures occurred at the initiation phase only (two unilateral, one absent). There was no evidence of catheter kinking after placement. One patient developed PDPH after unrecognized dural puncture which was self-treated with acetaminophen for four days, followed by complete symptom resolution.

CONCLUSION

It is feasible to provide high quality labour analgesia using small G epidural needles and catheters. The effect of small G epidural needles on PDPH warrants future study.

[Post-dural puncture headache]

Headache following dural puncture is a typical complication of neuraxial analgesia and can impair the ability to perform activities of daily living up to incapacitation. The use of thin, atraumatic needles and special puncture techniques (e.g. reinsertion of the stylet) can prevent the majority of post-dural puncture headaches (PDPH). One of the most effective measures to prevent headache after accidental dural puncture is the intrathecal or epidural administration of morphine. When the diagnosis of PDPH is confirmed after excluding relevant differential diagnoses, some of which are potentially life-threatening, caffeine, theophylline and non-opioid analgesics are effective agents to reduce the severity of the symptoms. Traditional measures, such as strict bed rest and hyperhydration can no longer be recommended. If invasive treatment of the headache is warranted an epidural blood patch is still the method of choice with a high rate of success.

Prevention of post-dural puncture headache in parturients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Post-dural puncture headaches (PDPHs) present an important clinical problem. We assessed methods to decrease accidental dural punctures (ADPs) and interventions to reduce PDPH following ADP. Multiple electronic databases were searched for randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of parturients having labour epidurals, in which the studied intervention could plausibly affect ADP or PDPH, and the incidence of at least one of these was recorded. Forty RCTs (n = 11,536 epidural insertions) were included, studying combined spinal-epidurals (CSEs), loss of resistance medium, prophylactic epidural blood patches, needle bevel orientation, ultrasound-guided insertion, epidural morphine, Special Sprotte needles, acoustic-guided insertion, administration of cosyntropin, and continuous spinal analgesia. The RCTs for CSE, loss of resistance medium, and prophylactic epidural blood patches were meta-analysed. Five methods reduced PDPH: prophylactic epidural blood patch {four trials, median quality score = 2, risk difference = -0.48 [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.88 to -0.086]}, lateral positioning of the epidural needle bevel upon insertion (one trial, quality score = 1), Special Sprotte needles [one trial, quality score = 5, risk difference = -0.44 (95% CI: -0.67 to -0.21)], epidural morphine [one trial, quality score = 4, risk difference = -0.36 (95% CI -0.59 to -0.13)], and cosyntropin [one trial, quality score = 5, risk difference = -0.36 (95% CI -0.55 to -0.16)]. Several methods potentially reduce PDPH. Special Sprotte needles, epidural morphine, and cosyntropin are thus far each supported by a single, albeit good quality trial. Prophylactic blood patches are supported by three trials, but these had flawed methodology. Mostly, trials were of limited quality, and further well-conducted, large studies are needed.

Minimising the risk of accidental dural puncture with epidural analgesia for labour: a retrospective review of risk factors

BACKGROUND

Accidental dural puncture has a quoted incidence of between 0.19% and 3.6% of obstetric epidurals and is associated with significant morbidity. We set out to determine possible factors associated with an increased risk of accidental dural puncture.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 18385 epidurals, performed over a 15-year period. Factors analysed were: time of day of insertion, loss-of-resistance technique, maternal position, cervical dilatation, grade of anaesthetist and depth to the epidural space.

RESULTS

Using univariate analyses we found no association between the risk of accidental dural puncture and the following variables: time of day of insertion (P=0.71), loss-of-resistance technique (P=0.22), maternal position for insertion (P=0.83), degree of cervical dilatation (P=0.41) and grade of anaesthetist performing the epidural (P=0.34). Conversely, we found that the risk of accidental dural puncture increased with increasing depth to the epidural space. This was confirmed using a logistic regression analysis, from which it was estimated that, for every 1-cm increase in depth, the risk of accidental dural puncture increased by approximately 19% (P=0.019; 95% CI for OR: 1.029-1.38).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the risk of accidental dural puncture increases with increasing depth to the epidural space. We suggest further study is required to correlate this risk with increasing body mass index.

The use of intraoperative suprasellar pneumocisternogram for resection of large pituitary tumors

Adequate removal of large pituitary tumors with significant suprasellar extension remains a challenge through the trans-sphenoidal corridor because of this route's limited working window. The application of intracisternal air and intraoperative fluoroscopy is explored as a form of intraoperative imaging to maximize tumor resection and to confirm adequate suprasellar tumor decompression. The authors confirmed adequate decompression of suprasellar space using this technique of fluoroscopy with the present intrathecal air for 10 of 12 patients with giant, non-functioning pituitary tumors. Intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid fistulae prevented the use of intrathecal air in the remaining two patients.

Pneumocephalus following thoracic surgery: the implication of the epidural anesthesia is still exceptional

Epidural analgesia is the gold standard for the management of pain after thoracopulmonary surgery. However, it is not without side-effects and complications. We report the case of a 52-year-old man who underwent left lower lobectomy for a carcinoid tumor. He received multimodal anesthesia combining epidural thoracic anesthesia and balanced intravenous general anesthesia. He presented with pneumocephalus on the 10th postoperative day. Etiological assessment consisted of isotopic cisternography and cerebromedullar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), revealing a breach in the fourth left spinal dural nerve sheath. Although it was initially suspected, the thoracic epidural was eventually excluded as the cause. Management consisted of prompt surgical repair.

Modern neuraxial labor analgesia: options for initiation, maintenance and drug selection

In the present review we outline the state-of-the-art of neuraxial analgesia. As neuraxial analgesia remains the gold standar of analgesia during labor, we review the most recent literature on this topic. The neuraxial analgesia techniques, types of administration, drugs, adjuvants, and adverse effects are investigated from the references. Most authors would agree that central neuraxial analgesia is the best form to manage labor pain. When neuraxial analgesia is administered to the parturient in labor, different management choices must be made by the anesthetist: how will we initiate analgesia, how will analgesia be maintained, which local anesthetic will we use for neuraxial analgesia and which adjuvant drugs will we combine? The present manuscript tries to review the literature to answer these questions.

Postdural puncture headache

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Postdural puncture headache remains the most frequent complication of neuraxial anesthesia. It can occur following uncomplicated spinal anesthesia as well as unintended dural puncture during epidural anesthesia.

RECENT FINDINGS

The incidence following accidental dural puncture is not as high as previously thought--approximately 50%. There are not many maneuvers that prevent postdural puncture headache. The most promising is an intrathecal catheter as it avoids further dural puncture and seals the hole during the time it is in place, decreasing cerebrospinal fluid loss. Several means to treat a postdural puncture headache exist. Medications that increase cerebral vascular resistance are the ones advocated. Methergine (methylergonovine maleate) has been advocated for postdural puncture headache following spinal anesthesia; it has not been studied for accidental dural puncture with a large bore needle. Epidural blood patch remains the treatment of choice.

SUMMARY

An epidural blood patch should not be performed until 24 h after dural puncture to increase its success; however, it should not be delayed beyond that period in the symptomatic patient, as this delay increases the amount of time the patient suffers.

Acute Onset Headache Complicating Labor Epidural Caused by Intrapartum Pneumocephalus

BACKGROUND

Epidural placement for obstetric anesthesia is a common procedure. Pneumocephalus, the introduction of air into the cranial cavity after epidural placement, is a rare complication encountered when air is used for identification of the epidural space.

CASE

A 42-year-old primipara undergoing epidural placement reported sudden onset of severe headache with associated neurologic symptoms and nuchal rigidity. Emergent CT scan revealed pneumocephalus. With conservative management, her symptoms resolved with interval resumption of the air collection evidenced on interval CT.

CONCLUSION

Acute onset headache after epidural placement can present with impressive neurologic signs and symptoms. Prompt identification of the cause of this pathology is of vital importance to delineate pneumocephalus from potentially treatable or life-threatening disorders.

Pneumocephalus with headache complicating labour epidural analgesia: should we still be using air?

Pneumocephalus is a rare complication of epidural block which typically occurs when the loss of resistance to air technique is used to identify the epidural space. We present a case of pneumocephalus with headache in a parturient following apparently uncomplicated labour epidural analgesia.

Expectant management of postdural puncture headache increases hospital length of stay and emergency room visits

PURPOSE

This retrospective cohort study examined hospital length of stay (LOS) and emergency room (ER) visits in parturients diagnosed with postdural puncture headache (PDPH) following recognized dural puncture (DP). All cases were managed expectantly. Outcomes were compared with matched controls with uneventful labour epidurals.

METHODS

After Ethics Committee approval, the hospital perinatal database was used to identify healthy parturients with recognized DP during labour epidural placement from 1996-2001. Women developing PDPH after expectant management were matched with women with uneventful epidurals and no evidence of PDPH, as well as by parity, delivery mode and admission date. All women delivered term singletons. The primary outcome was LOS (hours) from delivery to discharge. Secondary outcomes included: number (#) nights in hospital, #ER visits for PDPH, epidural blood patch (EBP) timing (pre vs post discharge), EBP location (ward vs ER) and blood volumes used.

RESULTS

26 cases and 26 controls were identified. Precise discharge times were found for 23 cases and 23 controls. In cases, the LOS was increased by a mean of 17 +/- 23.8 (SD) hours; [95% conficence interval (CI) = 8, 26; P = 0.0012] and # nights in hospital was increased by a mean of 0.62 +/- 0.94 nights (95% CI, 0.26, 0.98, P = 0.0027). Nineteen cases (73% 19/26) received at least one EBP. Sixteen cases received at least one EBP prior to discharge with 38% (6/16) returning to ER for re-assessment/repeat EBP. Forty-four percent (4/9) of cases without an EBP prior to discharge returned to ER for further assessment/EBP.

CONCLUSION

PDPH leads to a significant increase in hospital LOS and ER visits. Studies of preventive therapy are warranted.