Impact of drug resistance mutations on virologic response to salvage therapy. Swiss HIV Cohort Study

Optimization of HIV Sequencing Method Using Vela Sentosa Library on Miseq Ilumina Platform

Genotypic testing is often recommended to improve the management of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). To help combat this major pandemic, next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques are widely used to analyse resistance to antiretroviral drugs. In this study, we used a Vela Sentosa kit (Vela Diagnostics, Kendall, Singapore), which is usually used for the Ion Torrent personal genome machine (PGM) platform, to sequence HIV using the Illumina Miseq platform. After RNA extraction and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), minor modifications were applied to the Vela Sentosa kit to adapt it to the Illumina Miseq platform. Analysis of the results showed the same mutations present in the samples using both sequencing platforms. The total number of reads varied from 185,069 to 752,343 and from 642,162 to 2,074,028 in the Ion Torrent PGM platform and the Illumina Miseq platform, respectively. The average depth was 21,955 and 46,856 for Ion Torrent PGM and Illumina Miseq platforms, respectively. The cost of sequencing a run of eight samples was quite similar between the two platforms (about USD 1790 for Illumina Miseq and about USD 1833 for Ion Torrent PGM platform). We have shown for the first time that it is possible to adapt and use the Vela Sentosa kit for the Illumina Miseq platform to obtain high-quality results with a similar cost.

Advances in Molecular Genetics Enabling Studies of Highly Pathogenic RNA Viruses

Experimental work with viruses that are highly pathogenic for humans and animals requires specialized Biosafety Level 3 or 4 facilities. Such pathogens include some spectacular but also rather seldomly studied examples such as Ebola virus (requiring BSL-4), more wide-spread and commonly studied viruses such as HIV, and the most recent example, SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19. A common characteristic of these virus examples is that their genomes consist of single-stranded RNA, which requires the conversion of their genomes into a DNA copy for easy manipulation; this can be performed to study the viral life cycle in detail, develop novel therapies and vaccines, and monitor the disease course over time for chronic virus infections. We summarize the recent advances in such new genetic applications for RNA viruses in Switzerland over the last 25 years, from the early days of the HIV/AIDS epidemic to the most recent developments in research on the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus. We highlight game-changing collaborative efforts between clinical and molecular disciplines in HIV research on the path to optimal clinical disease management. Moreover, we summarize how the modern technical evolution enabled the molecular studies of emerging RNA viruses, confirming that Switzerland is at the forefront of SARS-CoV-2 research and potentially other newly emerging viruses.

Impact of pre-existing drug resistance on risk of virological failure in South Africa

OBJECTIVES

There is conflicting evidence on the impact of pre-existing HIV drug resistance mutations (DRMs) in patients infected with non-B subtype virus.

METHODS

We performed a case-cohort substudy of the AIDS Drug Resistance Surveillance Study, which enrolled South African patients initiating first-line efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir. Pre-ART DRMs were detected by Illumina sequencing of HIV pol and DRMs present at <20% of the viral population were labelled as minority variants (MVs). Weighted Cox proportional hazards models estimated the association between pre-ART DRMs and risk of virological failure (VF), defined as confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≥1000 copies/mL after ≥5 months of ART.

RESULTS

The evaluable population included 178 participants from a randomly selected subcohort (16 with VF, 162 without VF) and 83 additional participants with VF. In the subcohort, 16% of participants harboured ≥1 majority DRM. The presence of any majority DRM was associated with a 3-fold greater risk of VF (P = 0.002), which increased to 9.2-fold (P < 0.001) in those with <2 active drugs. Thirteen percent of participants harboured MV DRMs in the absence of majority DRMs. Presence of MVs alone had no significant impact on the risk of VF. Inclusion of pre-ART MVs with majority DRMs improved the sensitivity but reduced the specificity of predicting VF.

CONCLUSIONS

In a South African cohort, the presence of majority DRMs increased the risk of VF, especially for participants receiving <2 active drugs. The detection of drug-resistant MVs alone did not predict an increased risk of VF, but their inclusion with majority DRMs affected the sensitivity/specificity of predicting VF.

Dual Antiretroviral Therapy-All Quiet Beneath the Surface?

Infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is characterized by progressive depletion of CD4+ lymphocytes cells as a result of chronic immune activation. Next to the decreases in the number of CD4+ cells which leads to opportunistic infections, HIV-related immune activation is associated with several prevalent comorbidities in the HIV-positive population such as cardiovascular and bone disease. Traditionally, combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) consists of three drugs with activity against HIV and is highly effective in diminishing the degree of immune activation. Over the years, questions were raised whether virological suppression could also be achieved with fewer antiretroviral drugs, i.e., dual- or even monotherapy. This is an intriguing question considering the fact that antiretroviral drugs should be used lifelong and their use could also induce cardiovascular and bone disease. Therefore, the equilibrium between drug-induced toxicity and immune activation related comorbidity is delicate. Recently, two large clinical trials evaluating two-drug cART showed non-inferiority with respect to virological outcomes when compared to triple-drug regimens. This led to adoption of dual antiretroviral therapy in current HIV treatment guidelines. However, it is largely unknown whether dual therapy is also able to suppress immune activation to the same degree as triple therapy. This poses a risk for an imbalance in the delicate equilibrium. This mini review gives an overview of the current available evidence concerning immune activation in the setting of cART with less than three antiretroviral drugs.

New antiretroviral agent use affects prevalence of HIV drug resistance in clinical care populations

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of HIV drug resistance over time and identify risk factors for multiclass resistance.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical cohort of HIV-infected patients at the University of North Carolina.

METHODS

Among antiretroviral therapy (ART)-experienced patients in care 2000-2016, we estimated annual prevalences of cumulative resistance, defined as at least one major mutation by drug class. Clinical data and multiple imputation were used when genotypic data were missing, and mutations were carried forward in time. We estimated resistance odds ratios comparing characteristics of patients in care in 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 3682 patients contributed 23 169 person-years. Prevalence of at least one major resistance mutation, irrespective of viral suppression, peaked in 2005 with 49% (95% confidence interval 46, 52) and decreased to 38% (35, 40) in 2016. Resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, protease inhibitors, and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors also peaked in 2005-2007 and decreased to 28 (26, 31), 14 (12, 16), and 27% (24, 29) in 2016, respectively. In 2016, prevalence of integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) resistance was 2% (1, 3) and triple-class resistance 10% (9, 12). Over the study period, cumulative resistance was frequent among patients with detectable viremia, but uncommon among patients initiating ART post-2007. Among 1553 patients in care in 2016, ART initiation at an older age, with an INSTI, and with higher CD4 cell counts were associated with resistance to fewer or no classes.

CONCLUSION

Prevalence of resistance to older ART classes has decreased in the last 10 years in this clinical cohort, whereas INSTI resistance has increased but remained very low. Patients with viremia continue to have a high burden of resistance even if they initiated ART recently.

Prediction of Virologic Outcome of Salvage Antiretroviral Treatment by Different Systems for Interpreting Genotypic HIV Drug Resistance

The authors assessed the predictive capacity of 3 rule-based algorithms (Bergamo, Stanford University, Rega Institute) for HIV genotypic interpretation. A total of 1132 postgenotypic regimens in 533 patients were considered. The genotypic sensitivity score (GSS) was strongly associated ( P < .0001) with the virologic outcome (1 log HIV-RNA reduction). The 3 algorithms had a highly significant prediction efficiency. The Bergamo algorithm receiver-operating characteristic curve area under the curve (AUC) for the prediction of ≥1 log HIV-RNA reduction was 0.753 (95% confidence interval, 0.725-0.781), testifying that the prediction was significantly different ( P < .0001) from simple chance. The AUCs obtained by the 2 other systems were similar (0.752 Stanford; 0.741 Rega). The predictive capacity of the algorithms was not influenced by the type of antiviral drugs used. The 3 considered rule-based algorithms for the interpretation of HIV genotypic resistance yield congruent results and may effectively predict the virologic outcome of rescue therapy. Their use may help clinicians in interpreting mutational patterns and in making therapeutic choices.

The physical and psychological effects of HIV infection and its treatment on perinatally HIV-infected children

INTRODUCTION

As highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) transforms human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) into a manageable chronic disease, new challenges are emerging in treating children born with HIV, including a number of risks to their physical and psychological health due to HIV infection and its lifelong treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a literature review to evaluate the evidence on the physical and psychological effects of perinatal HIV (PHIV+) infection and its treatment in the era of HAART, including major chronic comorbidities.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Perinatally infected children face concerning levels of treatment failure and drug resistance, which may hamper their long-term treatment and result in more significant comorbidities. Physical complications from PHIV+ infection and treatment potentially affect all major organ systems. Although treatment with antiretroviral (ARV) therapy has reduced incidence of severe neurocognitive diseases like HIV encephalopathy, perinatally infected children may experience less severe neurocognitive complications related to HIV disease and ARV neurotoxicity. Major metabolic complications include dyslipidaemia and insulin resistance, complications that are associated with both HIV infection and several ARV agents and may significantly affect cardiovascular disease risk with age. Bone abnormalities, particularly amongst children treated with tenofovir, are a concern for perinatally infected children who may be at higher risk for bone fractures and osteoporosis. In many studies, rates of anaemia are significantly higher for HIV-infected children. Renal failure is a significant complication and cause of death amongst perinatally infected children, while new data on sexual and reproductive health suggest that sexually transmitted infections and birth complications may be additional concerns for perinatally infected children in adolescence. Finally, perinatally infected children may face psychological challenges, including higher rates of mental health and behavioural disorders. Existing studies have significant methodological limitations, including small sample sizes, inappropriate control groups and heterogeneous definitions, to name a few.

CONCLUSIONS

Success in treating perinatally HIV-infected children and better understanding of the physical and psychological implications of lifelong HIV infection require that we address a new set of challenges for children. A better understanding of these challenges will guide care providers, researchers and policymakers towards more effective HIV care management for perinatally infected children and their transition to adulthood.

Recent advances in the treatment of HIV/AIDS

In industrialized countries, highly active antiretroviral therapy has resulted in significant reductions in morbidity and mortality in patients with HIV/AIDS. At the same time, the management of the HIV-infected individual has become exceedingly complex due to the increasing number of antiretroviral medications and resistance to them. New medications are needed that are effective against the drug-resistant virus. The key advances in the management of HIV/AIDS as seen through the eyes of a front-line HIV physician who has been actively involved in patient care, clinical drug trials and as an educator for the past 15 years will be discussed.

Hepatitis C virus drug resistance: implications for clinical management

The addition of hepatitis C virus NS3 protease inhibitors to interferon-based regimens has dramatically improved response rates. Despite these improvements treatment is now more complex, associated with increased side effects, and has the potential to select resistant variants in those who are not cured. This article discusses the virologic underpinnings for the development of hepatitis C virus-resistant variants (with a focus on telaprevir and boceprevir) and their impact on therapeutic success. Interim guidance on the use of resistance testing and management is provided based on the limited data. Finally, resistance considerations for other classes of inhibitors and the rapidly approaching interferon-free therapeutics regimens are offered.

Investigation of Super Learner Methodology on HIV-1 Small Sample: Application on Jaguar Trial Data

Background. Many statistical models have been tested to predict phenotypic or virological response from genotypic data. A statistical framework called Super Learner has been introduced either to compare different methods/learners (discrete Super Learner) or to combine them in a Super Learner prediction method. Methods. The Jaguar trial is used to apply the Super Learner framework. The Jaguar study is an "add-on" trial comparing the efficacy of adding didanosine to an on-going failing regimen. Our aim was also to investigate the impact on the use of different cross-validation strategies and different loss functions. Four different repartitions between training set and validations set were tested through two loss functions. Six statistical methods were compared. We assess performance by evaluating R(2) values and accuracy by calculating the rates of patients being correctly classified. Results. Our results indicated that the more recent Super Learner methodology of building a new predictor based on a weighted combination of different methods/learners provided good performance. A simple linear model provided similar results to those of this new predictor. Slight discrepancy arises between the two loss functions investigated, and slight difference arises also between results based on cross-validated risks and results from full dataset. The Super Learner methodology and linear model provided around 80% of patients correctly classified. The difference between the lower and higher rates is around 10 percent. The number of mutations retained in different learners also varys from one to 41. Conclusions. The more recent Super Learner methodology combining the prediction of many learners provided good performance on our small dataset.

Comparison of HIV-1 genotypic resistance test interpretation systems in predicting virological outcomes over time

BACKGROUND

Several decision support systems have been developed to interpret HIV-1 drug resistance genotyping results. This study compares the ability of the most commonly used systems (ANRS, Rega, and Stanford's HIVdb) to predict virological outcome at 12, 24, and 48 weeks.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Included were 3763 treatment-change episodes (TCEs) for which a HIV-1 genotype was available at the time of changing treatment with at least one follow-up viral load measurement. Genotypic susceptibility scores for the active regimens were calculated using scores defined by each interpretation system. Using logistic regression, we determined the association between the genotypic susceptibility score and proportion of TCEs having an undetectable viral load (<50 copies/ml) at 12 (8-16) weeks (2152 TCEs), 24 (16-32) weeks (2570 TCEs), and 48 (44-52) weeks (1083 TCEs). The Area under the ROC curve was calculated using a 10-fold cross-validation to compare the different interpretation systems regarding the sensitivity and specificity for predicting undetectable viral load. The mean genotypic susceptibility score of the systems was slightly smaller for HIVdb, with 1.92+/-1.17, compared to Rega and ANRS, with 2.22+/-1.09 and 2.23+/-1.05, respectively. However, similar odds ratio's were found for the association between each-unit increase in genotypic susceptibility score and undetectable viral load at week 12; 1.6 [95% confidence interval 1.5-1.7] for HIVdb, 1.7 [1.5-1.8] for ANRS, and 1.7 [1.9-1.6] for Rega. Odds ratio's increased over time, but remained comparable (odds ratio's ranging between 1.9-2.1 at 24 weeks and 1.9-2.2 at 48 weeks). The Area under the curve of the ROC did not differ between the systems at all time points; p = 0.60 at week 12, p = 0.71 at week 24, and p = 0.97 at week 48.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

Three commonly used HIV drug resistance interpretation systems ANRS, Rega and HIVdb predict virological response at 12, 24, and 48 weeks, after change of treatment to the same extent.

Primary drug resistance in antiretroviral-naïve injection drug users

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the prevalence of primary HIV drug resistance in a population of 128 injection drug users (48 female) prior to initiating antiretroviral therapy.

METHODS

Genotypic and phenotypic profiles were obtained retrospectively for the period June 1996 to February 2007. Genotypic drug resistance was defined as the presence of a major mutation (IAS-USA table, 2007 revision), adding revertants at reverse transcriptase (RT) codon 215. Phenotypic drug resistance was defined as the fold change associated with >or=80% loss of the wild type virologic response due to viral resistance based on virtual phenotype analysis.

RESULTS

Genotypic drug resistance was uncommon, and was only identified in six (4.7%) cases, all in the RT gene (L100I, K103N, Y181C, M184V, Y188L, and T215D). There were no cases of multi-class or protease inhibitor (PI) resistance. However, polymorphisms in the protease and RT genes were extremely common. Phenotypic drug resistance was also identified in six (4.7%) patients, four in the RT gene (in patients with mutations K103N, Y181C, M184V and Y188L) and two the protease gene (in two patients with minor PI mutations). In addition, 25 (19.5%) of the patients had reduced susceptibility to PIs, defined as resistance>20% but <80% of the wild type virologic response, with no primary PI mutations detected in all these patients.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of primary HIV drug resistance was low in this population of injection drug users.

Impact of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase inhibitor drug resistance mutation interactions on phenotypic susceptibility

The role specific reverse transcriptase (RT) drug resistance mutations play in influencing phenotypic susceptibility to RT inhibitors in virus strains with complex resistance interaction patterns was assessed using recombinant viruses that consisted of RT-PCR-amplified pol fragments derived from plasma HIV-1 RNA from two treatment-experienced patients. Specific modifications of key RT amino acids were performed by site-directed mutagenesis. A panel of viruses with defined genotypic resistance mutations was assessed for phenotypic drug resistance. Introduction of M184V into several different clones expressing various RT resistance mutations uniformly decreased susceptibility to abacavir, lamivudine, and didanosine, and increased susceptibility to zidovudine, stavudine, and tenofovir; replication capacity was decreased. The L74V mutation had similar but slightly different effects, contributing to decreased susceptibility to abacavir, lamivudine, and didanosine and increased susceptibility to zidovudine and tenofovir, but in contrast to M184V, L74V contributed to decreased susceptibility to stavudine. In virus strains with the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) mutations K101E and G190S, the L74V mutation increased replication capacity, consistent with published observations, but replication capacity was decreased in strains without NNRTI resistance mutations. K101E and G190S together tend to decrease susceptibility to all nucleoside RT inhibitors, but the K103N mutation had little effect on nucleoside RT inhibitor susceptibility. Mutational interactions can have a substantial impact on drug resistance phenotype and replication capacity, and this has been exploited in clinical practice with the development of fixed-dose combination pills. However, we are the first to report these mutational interactions using molecularly cloned recombinant strains derived from viruses that occur naturally in HIV-infected individuals.

Raltegravir with optimized background therapy for resistant HIV-1 infection

BACKGROUND

Raltegravir (MK-0518) is an inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) integrase active against HIV-1 susceptible or resistant to older antiretroviral drugs.

METHODS

We conducted two identical trials in different geographic regions to evaluate the safety and efficacy of raltegravir, as compared with placebo, in combination with optimized background therapy, in patients infected with HIV-1 that has triple-class drug resistance in whom antiretroviral therapy had failed. Patients were randomly assigned to raltegravir or placebo in a 2:1 ratio.

RESULTS

In the combined studies, 699 of 703 randomized patients (462 and 237 in the raltegravir and placebo groups, respectively) received the study drug. Seventeen of the 699 patients (2.4%) discontinued the study before week 16. Discontinuation was related to the study treatment in 13 of these 17 patients: 7 of the 462 raltegravir recipients (1.5%) and 6 of the 237 placebo recipients (2.5%). The results of the two studies were consistent. At week 16, counting noncompletion as treatment failure, 355 of 458 raltegravir recipients (77.5%) had HIV-1 RNA levels below 400 copies per milliliter, as compared with 99 of 236 placebo recipients (41.9%, P<0.001). Suppression of HIV-1 RNA to a level below 50 copies per milliliter was achieved at week 16 in 61.8% of the raltegravir recipients, as compared with 34.7% of placebo recipients, and at week 48 in 62.1% as compared with 32.9% (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Without adjustment for the length of follow-up, cancers were detected in 3.5% of raltegravir recipients and in 1.7% of placebo recipients. The overall frequencies of drug-related adverse events were similar in the raltegravir and placebo groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In HIV-infected patients with limited treatment options, raltegravir plus optimized background therapy provided better viral suppression than optimized background therapy alone for at least 48 weeks. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00293267 and NCT00293254.)

Early changes in T-cell activation predict antiretroviral success in salvage therapy of HIV infection

OBJECTIVE

Because effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) reduces immune activation, we hypothesize that early changes in immune activation are associated with subsequent virologic response to therapy.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

SETTING

Institutional HIV clinic.

SUBJECTS

Thirty-four adult HIV patients with virologic failure on their current antiretroviral regimen.

INTERVENTION

Change to salvage regimen selected by patient's physician.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Measures of immune activation at baseline and at 2, 4, 8, and 24 weeks after enrollment. Data were analyzed by proportional hazards (PH) models.

RESULTS

PH models showed that reductions between baseline and week 2 in expression of CD38 (P = 0.02) or CD95 (P = 0.02) on CD4 T cells were associated with increased likelihood of achieving virologic suppression. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients who had reductions within the first 2 weeks of therapy in CD4 T-cell expression of CD38 (P = 0.003) or CD95 (P = 0.08) were more likely to achieve viral suppression than those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced CD4 T-cell expression of CD38 and CD95 occurring within 2 weeks of salvage therapy is associated with subsequent viral suppression. Monitoring CD38 and CD95 may allow earlier assessment of the response to ART.

Genotypic susceptibility scores and HIV type 1 RNA responses in treatment-experienced subjects with HIV type 1 infection

This study compared the role of genotypic susceptibility scores (GSS) as a predictor of virologic response in a group (n = 234) of HIV-infected, protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced subjects. Two scoring methods [discrete genotypic susceptibility score (dGSS) and continuous genotypic susceptibility score (cGSS)] were developed. Each drug in the subject's regimen was given a binary susceptibility score using Stanford inferred drug resistance scores to calculate the dGSS. In contrast to the dGSS, the cGSS model was designed to reflect partial susceptibility to a drug. Both GSS were independent predictors of week 16 virologic response. We also compared the GSS to a phenotypic susceptibility score (PSS) model on a subset of subjects that had both GSS and PSS performed, and found that both models were predictive of virologic response. Genotypic analyses at enrollment showed that subjects who were virologic nonresponders at week 16 revealed enrichment of several mutated codons associated with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) (codons 67, 69, 70, 118, 215, and 219) or PI resistance (codons 10, 24, 71, 73, and 88) compared to subjects who were virologic responders. Regression analyses revealed that protease mutations at codons 24 and 90 were most predictive of poor virologic response, whereas mutations at 82 were associated with enhanced virologic response. Certain NNRTI-associated mutations, such as K103N, were rapidly selected in the absence of NRTIs. These data indicate that GSS may be a useful tool in selecting drug regimens in HIV-1-infected subjects to maximize virologic response and improve treatment outcomes.

Evaluation of genotype resistance testing for salvage antiretroviral therapy at AIDS care centers from Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil

The availability of HIV-1 genotype resistance testing (GRT) to clinicians has been insufficiently studied outside randomized clinical trials. The present study evaluated the outcome of salvage antiretroviral therapy (ART) recommended by an expert physician based on GRT in a non-clinical trial setting in Ribeirão Preto, Brazil. A prospective, open, nonrandomized study evaluating easy access to GRT at six Brazilian AIDS Clinics was carried out. This cooperative study analyzed the efficacy of treatment recommended to patients whose salvage ART was guided by GRT with that of treatment with ART based only on previous ART history. A total of 112 patients with ART failure were included in the study, and 77 of them were submitted to GRT. The median CD4 cell count and viral load for these 77 patients at baseline were (mean +/- SD) 252.1 +/- 157.4 cells/microL and 4.60 +/- 0.5 log10 HIV RNA copies/mL, respectively. The access time, i.e., the time elapsed between ordering the GRT and receiving the result was, on average, 71.9 +/- 37.3 days. The study results demonstrated that access to GRT followed by expert recommendations did not improve the time to persistent treatment failure when compared to conventional salvage ART. Access to GRT in this Brazilian community health care setting did not improve the long-term virologic outcomes of HIV-infected patients experiencing treatment failure. This result is probably related to the long time required to implement ART guided by GRT.

Combined therapy for tuberculosis and HIV-1: the challenge for drug discovery

Combining drug therapies for dual infection by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and HIV-1 is made complex by high pill burdens, shared drug toxicities, drug-drug and drug-disease interactions, immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, co-morbid diseases and drug resistance in both bacillus and virus. Recently, novel anti-tubercular and anti-retroviral drugs have bolstered the tuberculosis-HIV drug pipelines and may help ameliorate these difficulties. This review article discusses the reasons for current problems of therapy for dual infection. It also identifies promising agents, which may significantly improve co-therapy and thus diminish the great morbidity and mortality of these two pandemics.

Strategies for the optimal sequencing of antiretroviral drugs toward overcoming and preventing drug resistance

Drug regimens now offer more potent, less toxic and more durable choices in the treatment of HIV disease than ever before. This has led to a need to consider the convenient, sequential use of active antiretroviral combinations. Ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (PIs) can now be potentially sequenced in a manner that uses the least cross-resistance-prone PI at the start of therapy while leaving the most cross-resistance-prone drug for later, if the latter retains activity against commonly observed drug-resistant forms. Similarly, such new drugs as tenofovir, abacavir and emtricitabine, which make up current nucleoside backbone options, can be potentially sequenced, since each of them selects for an individual pattern of resistance mutations that are generally distinct from those selected by previously popular thymidine analogs such as zidovudine and stavudine.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Tipranavir Boosted With Ritonavir in HIV-1-Infected Patients Failing Multiple Protease Inhibitor Regimens

BACKGROUND

BI 1182.2, an open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase 2 study, evaluated efficacy and tolerability of the protease inhibitor (PI) tipranavir (TPV; 500 mg twice daily or 1000 mg twice daily) administered with ritonavir (100 mg twice daily) in combination with 1 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and 1 nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor in multiple PI-experienced HIV-1-infected patients.

METHODS

Forty-one patients were evaluated in 2 arms: low-dose (19 patients) or high-dose (22 patients) ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r). Primary endpoints were change from baseline in HIV-1 RNA concentrations at weeks 16, 24, 48, and 80 and percentage of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels lower than the limit of quantitation. Safety was evaluated by adverse events (AEs), grade 3/4 abnormalities, and serious AEs.

RESULTS

Of all patients, 59% were still receiving TPV/r (14 in low-dose arm and 10 in high-dose arm) at week 80. Patients in both arms had a median >2.0-log10 reduction in plasma viral load. Intent-to-treat analysis demonstrated that a similar proportion of patients in the high-dose and low-dose groups achieved plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <50 copies/mL at week 80 (43% vs. 32%; P = 0.527). The most frequently observed AEs were diarrhea, headache, and nausea.

CONCLUSION

TPV/r combined with other active antiretroviral agents can provide a durable treatment response for highly treatment-experienced patients.

Reversal periods and patterns from drug-resistant to wild-type HIV type 1 after cessation of anti-HIV therapy

Anti-HIV drug-resistant virus reverts to wild type following discontinuation of antiretroviral therapy (ART). This study aimed to determine the reversal period. ART was discontinued in 16 patients harboring drug-resistant viruses. Resistant mutations of reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease (PR) genes of plasma- and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)-derived viruses were examined by direct sequencing monthly until the disappearance of mutants (median follow-up period: 8.9 months). Only wild-type virus was detected in 50% of patients at 6.3 months (quartiles, 3.2-20.7 months) and at 9.2 months (quartiles, 5.7-13.8 months) in plasma- and PBMC-derived viruses, respectively, after ART interruption. Among the 133 resistance-associated mutations identified at ART interruption, half the RT and PR mutations shifted to wild type in 3.2 months in plasma, 6.7 months of RT, and 5.7 months of PR in PBMC, respectively. In plasma- and PBMC-derived viruses, the PR mutations reverted earlier than the RT mutations. These results could be relevant as to when to perform drug-resistance testing.

Anti-retroviral drug resistance-associated mutations among non-subtype B HIV-1-infected Kenyan children with treatment failure

Recently increased availability of anti-retroviral therapy (ART) has mitigated HIV-1/AIDS prognoses especially in resource poor settings. The emergence of ART resistance-associated mutations from non-suppressive ART has been implicated as a major cause of ART failure. Reverse transcriptase inhibitor (RTI)-resistance mutations among 12 non-subtype B HIV-1-infected children with treatment failure were evaluated by genotypically analyzing HIV-1 strains isolated from plasma obtained between 2001 and 2004. A region of pol-RT gene was amplified and at least five clones per sample were analyzed. Phylogenetic analysis revealed HIV-1 subtype A1 (n = 7), subtype C (n = 1), subtype D (n = 3), and CRF02_AG (n = 1). Before treatment, 4 of 12 (33.3%) children had primary RTI-resistance mutations, K103N (n = 3, ages 5-7 years) and Y181C (n = 1, age 1 year). In one child, K103N was found as a minor population (1/5 clones) before treatment and became major (7/7 clones) 8 months after RTI treatment. In 7 of 12 children, M184V appeared with one thymidine-analogue-associated mutation (TAM) as the first mutation, while the remaining 5 children had only TAMs appearing either individually (n = 2), or as TAMs 1 (M41L, L210W, and T215Y) and 2 (D67N, K70R, and K219Q/E/R) appearing together (n = 3). These results suggest that "vertically transmitted" primary RTI-resistance mutations, K103N and Y181C, can persist over the years even in the absence of drug pressure and impact RTI treatment negatively, and that appearing patterns of RTI-resistance mutations among non-subtype B HIV-1-infected children could possibly be different from those reported in subtype B-infected children.

Natural polymorphisms in the protease gene modulate the replicative capacity of non-B HIV-1 variants in the absence of drug pressure

BACKGROUND

Genetic variation in the HIV-1 pol gene, which encodes the main targets for anti-HIV drugs, may favors different susceptibility and resistance pathways to antiretroviral agents. Several amino acid substitutions occur frequently in some non-B viruses at positions associated with drug resistance in clade B viruses. The clinical relevance of those polymorphisms is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of two natural protease (PR) polymorphisms, K20I and M36I, which are frequently found in non-B subtypes, on the virus replicative capacity in the presence and absence of protease inhibitors (PI).

STUDY DESIGN

Infectious HIV-1 clones carrying K20I, M36I or K20I/M36I were designed. Their replication kinetics were analyzed by viral competition in the absence of PI. Susceptibility to six different PI was phenotypically assessed in clones and in recombinant viruses carrying non-B proteases from 16 drug-naive individuals.

RESULTS

In the absence of drug, the M36I clone replicated more rapidly than wt (wild type) or the double mutant K20I/M36I. Natural polymorphisms 20I and/or 36I improved the virus replicative capacity under drug pressure, reducing the susceptibility to saquinavir and indinavir, with IC(50) values 2-3.5-fold higher than wt. All but one drug-naive individual carrying non-B viruses were fully susceptibility to all tested PI, suggesting that additional substitutions within the PR might compensate the reduced PI susceptibility caused by K20I and/or M36I.

CONCLUSION

Natural PR polymorphisms in non-B HIV-1 variants can influence in vitro the virus replication capacity in the presence and/or absence or certain PI. Hypothetically, the improved viral replication of mutant 36I might favor a more rapid spreading of non-B subtypes of HIV-1.

A randomised trial comparing genotypic and virtual phenotypic interpretation of HIV drug resistance: the CREST study

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different HIV drug resistance test reports (genotype and virtual phenotype) in patients who were changing their antiretroviral therapy (ART).

Design:

Randomised, open-label trial with 48-week followup.

Setting:

The study was conducted in a network of primary healthcare sites in Australia and New Zealand.

Participants:

Patients failing current ART with plasma HIV RNA > 2000 copies/mL who wished to change their current ART were eligible. Subjects were required to be > 18 years of age, previously treated with ART, have no intercurrent illnesses requiring active therapy, and to have provided written informed consent.

Interventions:

Eligible subjects were randomly assigned to receive a genotype (group A) or genotype plus virtual phenotype (group B) prior to selection of their new antiretroviral regimen.

Outcome Measures:

Patient groups were compared for patterns of ART selection and surrogate outcomes (plasma viral load and CD4 counts) on an intention-to-treat basis over a 48-week period.

Results:

Three hundred and twenty seven patients completing > one month of followup were included in these analyses. Resistance tests were the primary means by which ART regimens were selected (group A: 64%, group B: 62%; p = 0.32). At 48 weeks, there were no significant differences between the groups for mean change from baseline plasma HIV RNA (group A: 0.68 log copies/mL, group B: 0.58 log copies/mL; p = 0.23) and mean change from baseline CD4+ cell count (group A: 37 cells/mm³, group B: 50 cells/mm³; p = 0.28).

Conclusions:

In the absence of clear demonstrated benefits arising from the use of the virtual phenotype interpretation, this study suggests resistance testing using genotyping linked to a reliable interpretive algorithm is adequate for the management of HIV infection.

Background: Antiretroviral drugs are used to treat patients with HIV infection, with good evidence that they improve prognosis. However, mutations develop in the HIV genome that allow it to evade successful treatment—known as drug resistance—and such mutations are known against every class of antiretroviral drug. Resistance can cause treatment failure and limit the treatment options available. Different types of tests are often used to detect resistance and to work out whether patients should switch to a different drug regimen. Currently, the different types of tests include genotype testing (direct sequencing of genes from virus samples infecting a patient); phenotype testing (a test that assesses the sensitivity of a patient's HIV sample to different drugs), and virtual phenotype testing (a way of interpreting genotype data that estimates the likely viral response to different drugs). The researchers of this study did a trial to find out whether providing an additional virtual phenotype report would be beneficial to patients, as compared with a genotype report alone. The main outcome was HIV viral load after 12 months of treatment, but the researchers also looked at differences in drug regimens prescribed, number of treatment changes in the study, and changes in CD4+ (the type of white blood cell infected by HIV) counts.

What this trial shows: The researchers found that the main endpoint of the trial (HIV viral load after 12 months) was no different in patients whose clinicians had received a virtual phenotype report as well as a genotype report, compared with those who had received a genotype report alone. In addition, the average number of drugs prescribed was no different between patients in the two different arms of the trial, and there was no difference in number of drug regimen changes, and no change in immune response (measured using CD4+ cell levels). However, more drugs predicted to be sensitive were prescribed by clinicians who got both a genotype and virtual phenotype report, as compared with clinicians who received only the genotype report.

Strengths and limitations: The size of the trial (338 patients recruited) was large enough to properly test the hypothesis that providing a virtual phenotype report as well as a genotype report would result in lower HIV viral loads. Randomization of patients to either intervention ensured that the comparison groups were well-balanced, and the researchers also tested whether selection bias had affected the results (i.e., testing for the possibility that clinicians could predict which intervention participants would receive, and change recruitment into the trial as a result). They found no evidence for selection bias occurring within the trial. However, interpreting the results is difficult because the trial did not directly compare the two different testing platforms, but rather looked at whether providing a virtual phenotype report as well as a genotype report was better than providing a genotype report alone. The investigators also acknowledge that since the trial was conducted, the cutoffs for interpreting genotype information as resistant have been lowered. The findings may therefore not translate precisely to the current situation.

Contribution to the evidence: Other cohort studies and clinical trials have shown that patients offered resistance testing respond better to antiretroviral therapy compared with those who were not, but the clinical effectiveness of different resistance testing methods is not known. This study provides additional data on the respective benefits of genotype testing versus genotype plus provision of virtual phenotype. Another trial comparing genotype versus virtual phenotype has also found that the different interpretation methods perform similarly.

Three-Year Clinical Outcomes of Resistance Genotyping and Expert Advice: Extended follow-up of the Argenta Trial

Objective

To investigate the influence of genotypic resistance-guided HIV-treatment decisions on long-term clinical and virological outcomes in patients failing anti-retroviral therapy by a prospective 30-month observation following a 6-month randomized study (Argenta trial).

Methods

Patients ( n=174) with virological failure on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) were initially randomized (1:1) to receive empirical therapy or guidance by genotypic resistance results. After month 6, all patients with HIV RNA >1,000 copies/ml received genotypic resistance tests and expert advice. Predictors of virological and clinical outcomes were analysed by logistic regression and Cox's regression models.

Results

There was a gradual increase in the proportion of patients with HIV RNA <400 copies/ml with 29.3% at 36 months (intent-to-treat) without differences between initial randomization arms. Independent predictors of 36-month virological response were the use of a salvage therapy with less daily doses and a more pronounced 3-month viral load drop. At 36 months, 84% survived without new AIDS events/death. Independent predictors of new AIDS events/death were previous AIDS events, higher baseline viral load, less pronounced 3-month viral load drop and, in a separate model, baseline protease substitutions K20M/R and I84V

Conclusions

The virological benefit of genotype-guided treatment decisions was continuously appreciable over time. Short-term virological response and viral cross-resistance were independent predictors of long-term outcomes.

Genotyping of B and non-B subtypes of human immunodeficiency virus type 1

Current HIV-1 genotyping assays were developed using subtype B viruses prevalent in Western countries. It is not clear whether these assays are appropriate for use among African patients, who are likely to be infected with non-B subtypes. We evaluated the Bayer TRUGENE HIV-1 genotyping (TG) assay using prospectively collected samples from HIV-1-infected individuals who acquired infection in either sub-Saharan Africa or the West (Europe, North America, and Australia). Plasma samples from 208 individuals with an HIV-1 viral load of >1,000 copies/ml were tested using version 1 primers supplied with the TG assay. If these failed, an alternative primer set version 1.5 was used. Of the 208 individuals, the likely origin of infection was Africa (n = 104), Western (n = 87) and "Others" (i.e., all other geographic locations or origin not certain; n = 17). Among the three groups, the version 1 primers were successful in 85 (82%), 77 (89%), and 13 (76%) individuals, respectively (P = 0.1). Of the remaining 32 samples, 30 were successfully amplified by using the version 1.5 primers. HIV-1 subtypes deduced from the reverse transcriptase sequences correlated with the likely origin of infection: Africa (28A, 3B, 33C, 13D, 6G, 4J, 2K, 5CRF01_AE, and 10CRF02_AG), Western (86B and 1K), and Others (1A and 16B). The success of the version 1 primers correlated with viral load (P < 0.014) and not with HIV-1 subtypes. A protocol based on version 1 primers, followed by 1.5 primers, was successful in sequencing 99% of the samples in this cohort.

Selection and characterization of HIV-1 showing reduced susceptibility to the non-peptidic protease inhibitor tipranavir

Tipranavir is a novel, non-peptidic protease inhibitor, which possesses broad antiviral activity against multiple protease inhibitor-resistant HIV-1. Resistance to this inhibitor however has not yet been well described. HIV was passaged for 9 months in culture in the presence of tipranavir to select HIV with a drug-resistant phenotype. Characterization of the selected variants revealed that the first mutations to be selected were L33F and I84V in the viral protease, mutations which together conferred less than two-fold resistance to tipranavir. At the end of the selection experiments, viruses harbouring 10 mutations in the protease (L10F, I13V, V32I, L33F, M36I, K45I, I54V, A71V, V82L, I84V) as well as a mutation in the CA/SP1 gag cleavage site were selected and showed 87-fold decreased susceptibility to tipranavir. In vitro, tipranavir-resistant viruses had a reduced replicative capacity which could not be improved by the introduction of the CA/SP1 cleavage site mutation. Tipranavir resistant viruses showed cross-resistance to other currently approved protease inhibitors with the exception of saquinavir. These results demonstrate that the tipranavir resistance phenotype is associated with complex genotypic changes in the protease. Resistance necessitates the sequential accumulation of multiple mutations.

The normalized inhibitory quotient of boosted protease inhibitors is predictive of viral load response in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected individuals

OBJECTIVE

The normalized inhibitory quotient (NIQ) has been proposed as a measure for refining the precision of HIV resistance testing when selecting antiretroviral therapy (ART). We undertook an assessment of NIQ and 48-week virological outcome in patients commencing ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) regimens.

DESIGN

A cohort of 87 HIV-infected individuals who all had extensive prior exposure to ART were assigned a new boosted PI regimen following resistance testing. PI therapy consisted of lopinavir, indinavir, saquinavir and amprenavir at 50, 32, 11 and 6%, respectively. Fold change (FC) for each PI was determined from the resistance test at baseline. Trough drug concentration (Cmin) was determined at week 4.

METHODS

NIQ was derived individually by taking the logarithm of the ratio of Cmin/FC divided by the fixed ratio of population mean trough drug concentration/clinical cut off. Associations between viral load (VL) response over 48 weeks with baseline VL, FC, Cmin, NIQ and selected PI were assessed.

RESULTS

Mean change from baseline VL reduced by 0.83 log at week 48. In multivariate analyses, baseline VL and NIQ were the parameters most associated with change from baseline VL at week 48 (P = 0.012 and 0.003, respectively). FC, Cmin and selected PI were not significantly associated with VL changes.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of highly treatment-experienced individuals treated with boosted PI regimens, baseline VL and NIQ were significantly predictive of virological response over 48 weeks whereas FC and Cmin were not. These results support the use of a NIQ at week 4, as a tool for predicting response to therapy in this setting.

Prevalence of resistance-associated mutations in newly diagnosed HIV-1 patients in Greece

The prevalence of HIV-1 drug resistance mutations in naïve patients has been previously shown to differ greatly with the geographic origin. The purpose of this study was to prospectively estimate the prevalence of HIV-1 drug resistance in Greece by analyzing a representative sample of newly HIV-1 diagnosed patients, as part of the SPREAD collaborative study. Protease (PR) and partial reverse transcriptase (RT) sequences were determined from 101 newly diagnosed HIV-1 patients, in Greece, during the period September 2002--August 2003, representing one-third of the total newly diagnosed HIV-1 patients in the same time period. The prevalence of HIV-1 drug resistance was estimated according to the IAS-USA mutation table taking into account all mutations in RT and only major mutations in PR region. The overall prevalence of resistance was 9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.2--16.2%]. The prevalence of mutations associated with resistance to NRTIs was 5% (95% CI: 1.6--11.2%), for NNRTIs was 4% (95% CI: 1.1--9.8%), while no major resistance mutations were found in PR. No multi-class resistance was detected in the study population. The prevalence of resistant mutations in the recent seroconverters was 22%. For two individuals, there was clear evidence for transmitted resistance based on epidemiological information for a known source of HIV-1 transmission. The prevalence of the HIV-1 non-B subtypes and recombinants was 52%.

The impact of the M184V substitution on drug resistance and viral fitness

Treatment of HIV/AIDS with antiretroviral therapy can result in HIV-1 drug resistance, limiting its use. Resistance mutations arise prior to therapy due to errors in HIV-1 replication, and are also spread by sexual and other modes of transmission. However, it is also generally believed that resistance is due to multiple drug mutations to any single or combination of antiretroviral agents selected during viral replication in the presence of incompletely suppressive drug regimens. In the case of protease inhibitors and most nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors, drug resistance is due to the accumulation of mutations in the HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase genes respectively. However, in the case of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, a single primary drug mutation is usually sufficient to abrogate antiviral activity. This is also true of certain specific mutations, such as M184V in the reverse transcriptase enzyme, resulting in resistance to the nucleoside analog, lamivudine (Epivir, GlaxoSmithKline). However, it is thought that lamivudine may still contribute to the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy, even after the appearance of the M184V mutation. M184V may affect sensitivity to other drugs, such as zidovudine (Retrovir, GlaxoSmithKline), in HIV-1 variants that already contain resistance mutations to zidovudine, during concomitant treatment with lamivudine. M184V also has a positive effect on HIV-1 RT fidelity, reducing spontaneous HIV mutagenesis. Processivity of the reverse transcriptase enzyme may be affected by mutations such as M184V, and this may be a major determinant of viral replication fitness.

[HIV drug resistance and optimization of antiviral treatment in resource-poor countries]

HIV drug resistance has been associated with treatment failure in Western countries but the lessons learned can be useful in optimization of highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) in resource-poor settings. There is a need to improve access to HAART in such regions, but appropriate strategies must be rapidly implemented, such as adapted programs to facilitate adherence to therapy, rational use of genotypic drug resistance monitoring in specific situations, and use of alternative treatment regimens. The implications of HIV genetic diversity must also be considered in management of drug resistance.

Selection of Antiretroviral Therapy Guided by Genotypic or Phenotypic Resistance Testing

The phenotype/genotype (PhenGen) open-label, randomized, multicenter study evaluated the genotype/virtual phenotype (vPt) and real phenotype (rPt) for choosing a new highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen at failure. Patients with a plasma viral load (pVL) between 2000 and 200,000 copies/mL and a CD4 cell count >200/microL, failing > or =2 regimens (<6 drugs), were randomized for vPt or rPt. Three hundred three patients were enrolled: 111 and 108 patients received a new treatment in the vPt and rPt arms, respectively. The 2 groups were comparable for baseline patient characteristics and treatment history. The new therapy was in agreement with expert advice in 58.5% of cases. After 6 months, no statistical differences were found in the mean absolute change from baseline CD4 cells (+55 and +46 cells/muL; P = 0.7), mean pVL log decrease (-1.35 and -1.37; P = 0.8), or proportion of patients with a pVL <400 copies/mL (54.8% in vPt arm and 52.6% in rPt arm; P = 0.9). At multivariate analysis, variables independently associated with failure of the new regimen were: pVL at baseline (odds ratio [OR] = 1.81; P < 0.021), number of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-associated mutations (OR = 1.21; P = 0.001), number of protease mutations (OR = 1.15; P < 0.001), and recycling of indinavir (OR = 4.63; P = 0.019). Patients' adherence to the prescribed regimen (OR = 0.23; P < 0.001), number of active drugs in the new regimen (OR = 0.55; P = 0.001), and adherence to expert advice (OR = 0.37; P < 0.001) predicted virologic response. The vPt is as predictive of treatment outcome as the rPT. Use of expert advice significantly improved the response to therapy.

Diminished Representation of HIV-1 Variants Containing Select Drug Resistance-Conferring Mutations in Primary HIV-1 Infection

This study compared the incidence of HIV-1 variants harboring mutations conferring resistance to thymidine analogues, ie, thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs), nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors (NNMs), lamivudine (3TC) (ie, M184V), and protease inhibitors (PIs) acquired in primary HIV infection (PHI) (n = 59) to their observed prevalence in a corresponding potential transmitter (PT) population of persons harboring resistant infections (n = 380). Both of these populations in the context of this cohort analysis possessed similar demographics. Whereas the frequencies of observed TAMs, NNMs, M184V, and protease-associated mutations (PRAMs) were similar in the PT groups, the prevalence of M184V and major PI mutations were significantly lower in the PHI group (PHI/PT ratios of 0.14 and 0.39, respectively). There was a decreased prevalence in the PHI population of resistant viruses co-expressing NNMs or TAMs with M184V compared with viruses that harbored NNMs or TAMs in the absence of M184V (P < 0.0001). It was also observed that individuals in the PT subgroups who harbored RT mutations or PRAMs with M184V had lower levels of plasma viremia than individuals who lacked M184V (P < 0.05). These findings suggest that both decreased viremia and viral fitness in the case of M184V-containing HIV-1 variants may impact on viral transmissibility.

Impact of frequent natural polymorphisms at the protease gene on the in vitro susceptibility to protease inhibitors in HIV-1 non-B subtypes

BACKGROUND

Naturally-occurring polymorphisms at the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease which have been associated to resistance to protease inhibitors (PIs) in clade B viruses are frequently found in non-B subtypes, with unknown clinical significance.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the susceptibility of non-B viruses to different PIs.

STUDY DESIGN

Plasma samples from 58 drug-naive individuals infected with HIV-1 non-B subtypes (2A, 22C, 2D, 1F, 29G and 2J) defined by phylogenetic analyses of the protease gene were tested using a phenotypic assay (PhenoSense, ViroLogic, South San Francisco, CA, USA). Twenty of them were further analyzed with another assay (Antivirogram, Virco, Mechelen, Belgium). All 58 non-B viruses harbored amino acid substitutions associated with reduced PI susceptibility in clade B (positions 10, 20, 36, 63, 70, 77 and 82).

RESULTS

Using PhenoSense-HIV assay, all but two individuals harbored viruses completely susceptible to all six PIs tested (indinavir (IDV), ritonavir (RTV), saquinavir (SQV), nelfinavir (NFV), amprenavir (APV), lopinavir (LPV)). The two viruses with reduced susceptibility belonged to clade G. The first virus, which had K20I, M36I and V82I, showed 2.9-fold decreased susceptibility to APV, while the second virus showed 3.9-fold decreased susceptibility to both NFV and RTV, with amino acid substitutions K20I, M36I, L63P and V82I. Of note, several other viruses displayed the same constellation of mutations but without showing any reduced susceptibility, suggesting that these polymorphisms per se do not affect PI susceptibility.

CONCLUSION

PI susceptibility in HIV-1 non-B viruses seems to be preserved despite the presence of polymorphic changes which have been associated to PI resistance in clade B viruses.

Transmitted human immunodeficiency virus type 1 carrying the D67N or K219Q/E mutation evolves rapidly to zidovudine resistance in vitro and shows a high replicative fitness in the presence of zidovudine

Drug-naive patients infected with drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) who initiate antiretroviral therapy show a shorter time to virologic failure than patients infected with wild-type (WT) viruses. Resistance-related HIV genotypes not commonly seen in treated patients, which likely result from reversion or loss of primary resistance mutations, have also been recognized in drug-naive persons. Little work has been done to characterize the patterns of mutations in these viruses and the frequency of occurrence, their association with phenotypic resistance, and their effect on fitness and evolution of resistance. Through the analysis of resistance mutations in 1082 newly diagnosed antiretroviral-naive persons from the United States, we found that 35 of 48 (72.9%) persons infected with HIV-1 containing thymidine analog mutations (TAMs) had viruses that lacked a primary mutation (T215Y/F, K70R, or Q151M). Of these viruses, 9 (25.7%) had only secondary TAMs (D67N, K219Q, M41L, or F77L), and all were found to be sensitive to zidovudine (AZT) and other drugs. To assess the impact of secondary TAMs on the evolution of AZT resistance, we generated recombinant viruses from cloned plasma-derived reverse transcriptase sequences. Two viruses had D67N, three had D67N and K219Q/E, and three were WT. Four site-directed mutants with D67N, K219Q, K219E, and D67N/K219Q were also made in HIV-1(HXB2). In vitro selection of AZT resistance showed that viruses with D67N and/or K219Q/E acquired AZT resistance mutations more rapidly than WT viruses (36 days compared to 54 days; P = 0.003). To investigate the factors associated with the rapid selection of AZT mutations in these viruses, we evaluated fitness differences among HXB2(WT) and HXB2(D67N) or HXB2(D67N/K219Q) in the presence of AZT. Both HXB2(D67N/K219Q) and HXB2(D67N) were more fit than HXB2(WT) in the presence of either low or high AZT concentrations, likely reflecting low-level resistance to AZT that is not detectable by phenotypic testing. In the absence of AZT, the fitness cost conferred by D67N or K219Q was modest. Our results demonstrate that viruses with unique patterns of TAMs, including D67N and/or K219Q/E, are commonly found among newly diagnosed persons and illustrate the expanding diversity of revertant viruses in this population. The modest fitness cost conferred by D67N and K219Q supports persistence of these mutants in the untreated population and highlights the potential for secondary transmission. The faster evolution of these mutants toward AZT resistance is consistent with the higher viral fitness in the presence of AZT and shows that these viruses are phenotypically different from WT HIV-1. Our study emphasizes the need for clinical studies to better define the impact of these mutants on treatment responses and evolution of resistance.

Baseline Resistance and Virological Outcome in Patients with Virological Failure who Start a Regimen Containing Abacavir: Eurosida Study

Objectives

To investigate the ability of several HIV-1 drug-resistance interpretation systems, as well as the number of pre-specified combinations of abacavir-related mutations, to predict virological response to abacavir-containing regimens in antiretroviral therapy-experienced, abacavir-naive patients starting an abacavir-containing regimen in the EuroSIDA cohort.

Patients and methods

A total of 100 HIV-infected patients with viral load (VL) >500 copies/ml who had a plasma sample available at the time of starting abacavir (baseline) were included. Resistance to abacavir was interpreted by using eight different commonly used systems that consisted of rules-based algorithms or tables of mutations. Correlation between baseline abacavir-resistance mutations and month 6 virological response was performed on this population using a multivariable linear regression model accounting for censored data.

Results

The baseline VL was 4.36 log10 RNA copies/ml [interquartile range (IQR): 3.65–4.99 log10 RNA copies/ml] and the median CD4 cell count was 210 cells/μl (IQR: 67–305 cells/μl). Our patients were pre-exposed to a median of seven antiretrovirals (2–12) before starting abacavir therapy. The median (range) number of abacavir mutations (according to the International AIDS Society-USA) detected at baseline was 3.5 (0–8). Overall, the Kaplan–Meier estimate of the median month 6 VL decline was 0.86 log10 RNA copies/ml [95% confidence intervals (95% CI): 0.45–1.24]. The VL in those patients ( n=31) who intensified treatment by adding only abacavir decreased by a median 0.20 log10 RNA copies/ml (95% CI: -0.18; +0.94). The proportion of patients who harboured viruses fully resistant to abacavir among the eight genotypic resistance interpretation algorithms ranged from 12% [Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA (ANRS)] to 79% [Stanford HIV RT and PR Sequence Database (HIVdb)]. Some interpretation systems showed statistically significant associations between the predicted resistance status and the virological response while others showed no consistent association. The number of active drugs in the regimen was associated with greater virological suppression (additional month 6 VL reduction per additional sensitive drug=0.51, 95% CI: 0.15–0.88, P=0.006); baseline VL was also weakly associated (additional month 6 VL reduction per log10 higher=0.30, 95% CI: -0.02; +0.62, P=0.06). In contrast, the number of drugs previously received was associated with diminished viral reduction (additional month 6 VL reduction per additional drug=-0.14, 95% CI: -0.28; 0.00, P=0.05).

Conclusions

Our results revealed a high degree of variability among several genotypic resistance interpretation algorithms currently in use for abacavir. Therefore, the interpretation of genotypic resistance for predicting response to regimens containing abacavir remains a major challenge.

Detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 antiretroviral resistance mutations by high-density DNA probe arrays

Genotypic resistance testing has become an important tool in the clinical management of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Standard sequencing methodology and hybridization-based technology are the two principal methods used for HIV-1 genotyping. This report describes an evaluation of a new hybridization-based HIV-1 genotypic test of 99 clinical samples from patients infected mostly with HIV-1 subtype B and receiving treatment. This test combines RNA extraction with magnetic silica particles, amplification by nested reverse transcriptase PCR, and detection with high-density probe arrays designed to detect 204 antiretroviral resistance mutations simultaneously in Gag cleavage sites, protease, reverse transcriptase, integrase, and gp41. The nested reverse transcriptase PCR success rates at viral loads exceeding 1,000 copies/ml were 98% for the 2.1-kb amplicon that covers the Gag cleavage sites and the protease and reverse transcriptase genes, 92% for the gp41 amplicon, and 100% for the integrase amplicon. We analyzed 4,465 relevant codons with the HIV-1 DNA chip genotyping assay and the classic sequence-based method. Key resistance mutations in protease and reverse transcriptase were identified correctly 95 and 92% of the time, respectively. This test should be a valuable alternative to the standard sequence-based system for HIV-1 drug resistance monitoring and a useful diagnostic tool for simultaneous multiple genetic analyses.

Effectiveness of Antiretroviral Therapy after Protease Inhibitor Failure: An Analytic Overview

To examine effectiveness of subsequent antiretroviral therapy (ART), studies published during the period of 1 January 1997 through 31 May 2003 involving patients who had failed a protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen and were switched to another regimen were reviewed. Twelve studies describing 1197 patients were analyzed. A total of 38% of patients had human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA levels of <500 copies/mL at 24 weeks. After adjustment for baseline HIV RNA level, the rate of virologic suppression ranged from 16% for patients switching drugs within previously failed classes to 54% for nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-naive patients switched to boosted PI- and NNRTI-containing regimens. ART regimens in patients who failed a PI-containing regimen provided virologic suppression only in a few patients. The best response was seen in NNRTI-naive patients receiving NNRTI- and boosted PI-containing regimens. New approaches are needed to achieve better suppression in pretreated HIV-infected patients.

The Role of Baseline HIV-1 Resistance Testing in Patients with Established Infection

Effective long-term treatment of HIV-1 infection is challenging because of several factors, including antiretroviral drug resistance. Antiretroviral resistance testing has short-term benefit for optimizing the choice of a rescue regimen after treatment failure. Resistance testing also is recommended before therapy in pregnancy and acute infection or recent seroconversion. The benefit of routine resistance testing before starting treatment for established infection is less clear. This report summarizes the accumulating evidence of persistence of resistant mutants after initial infection, detectability of resistant virus with standard assays before treatment of established infection, the potential adverse impact of this baseline resistance on effectiveness of therapy, and the increasing prevalence of resistance in treatment-naïve patients. Taken together, these data suggest that pretreatment genotypic resistance testing also may be useful in patients with established infection. Although further study is needed, clinicians are now encouraged to routinely obtain pretreatment resistance testing.

Persistence of Multidrug-Resistant HIV-1 without Antiretroviral Treatment 2 Years after Sexual Transmission

Objectives

To understand the virological mechanisms of 2-year persistence of multidrug-resistant virus without selective antiretroviral pressure in HIV-1-infected patients.

Patients and Methods

Two patients were contaminated recently by their HIV-1-infected partners, who had received, before the transmission, all available antiretroviral drugs and who exhibited a severe therapeutic failure. The resistance mutations analysis was performed by clonal sequencing of 1.2 kb of pol gene in plasma of index and sources patients. Sequencing of HIV-1 DNA was performed in PBMCs of index patients.

Results

Genotypic testing performed in index patients at time of seroconversion showed resistance mutations to three classes of drugs. All mutations were linked on the same viral genome and all quasispecies carried all mutations. No wild-type virus was detected. The same results were found in source patients and showed that all mutations were transmitted. In the index patients, all mutations persisted over 2 years without antiretroviral treatment. Moreover, the resistance mutations were all archived in the cellular reservoir. Viral load and CD4 count of index patients remained unchanged during 2 years of follow-up.

Discussion

Only multidrug-resistant viruses were detected in the source patients and could be transmitted in index patients. In the latter, an expansion of predominant multidrug-resistant quasispecies and the ‘archival’ of all mutations were observed. These results explain the persistence of mutations and suggest that it is highly difficult to return to a wild-type viral population, sensitive to an antiretroviral treatment. The treatment of index patients is limited and the major risk is the transmission of these multidrug-resistant viruses. This work was presented in part in the XII International HIV Drug Resistance Workshop, Los Cabos, Mexico, June 2003; and in the 2nd IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis & Treatment, Paris, France, July 2003.

Long‐Term Efficacy of Routine Access to Antiretroviral‐Resistance Testing in HIV Type 1–Infected Patients: Results of the Clinical Efficacy of Resistance Testing Trial

The long-term efficacy of making resistance testing routinely available to clinicians has not been established. We conducted a clinical trial at 6 US military hospitals in which volunteers infected with human immunodeficiency virus type-1 were randomized to have routine access to phenotype resistance testing (PT arm), access to genotype resistance testing (GT arm), or no access to either test (VB arm). The primary outcome measure was time to persistent treatment failure despite change(s) in antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen. Overall, routine access to resistance testing did not significantly increase the time to end point. Time to end point was significantly prolonged in the PT arm for subjects with a history of treatment with > or =4 different ART regimens or a history of treatment with nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors before the study, compared with that in the VB arm. These results suggest that routine access to resistance testing can improve long-term virologic outcomes in HIV-infected patients who are treatment experienced but may not impact outcome in patients who are naive to or have had limited experience with ART.