Fluvoxamine augmentation of olanzapine in chronic schizophrenia: pharmacokinetic interactions and clinical effects

Usefulness of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Pharmacogenetics for a Patient Treated with Olanzapine, Buspirone, and Fluvoxamine: A Case Study

BACKGROUND

A patient, with a mental disorder caused by an intracranial infection, treated with olanzapine, fluvoxamine, and buspirone. The plasma exposure of olanzapine was too high at standard doses, with evidence indicating that it was caused by drug-drug interactions.

METHODS

Using pharmacogenomics and therapeutic drug monitoring to guide drug dose adjustment for a patient in clinical practice.

RESULTS

The patient underwent pharmacogenetic testing in addition to therapeutic drug monitoring as part of a pharmacist-led comprehensive evaluation of medication therapy management in a clinical setting, resulting in improved clinical efficacy that allowed discharge from a psychiatric hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

This case study demonstrates that therapeutic drug monitoring combined with pharmacogenetic-guided dose adjustment can aid in the management of patients receiving complex pharmacological treatments.

Detecting drug-drug interactions that increase the incidence of long QT syndrome using a spontaneous reporting system

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Drug-induced long QT syndrome (diLQTS) is a rare but serious adverse drug reaction. Drug-drug interaction (DDI) is one of the risk factors for the development of diLQTS. However, the combinations of drugs that increase the risk of diLQTS have not been extensively investigated. This study was performed to analyse the potential DDIs that elevate the incidence of diLQTS using a spontaneous reporting system.

METHODS

The Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database from April 2004 to January 2020 was used to assess adverse event reports. We calculated the reporting odds ratio and 95% confidence interval for signal detection.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Signals for concomitant use risk were detected in 31 drug combinations. Combinations of antipsychotics and antidepressants were the most common (olanzapine & fluvoxamine, olanzapine & trazodone, quetiapine & paroxetine, sulpiride & fluvoxamine, sulpiride & trazodone). Sixteen, 17 and 21 combinations were designated as requiring precaution for concomitant use in at least one of the package inserts in Japan, the United States and the United Kingdom, respectively, although no such precautions were described for the remaining combinations. On the contrary, a combination of bepridil & clarithromycin was categorized as "X (avoid combination)" and two combinations (chlorpromazine & haloperidol, amiodarone & metildigoxin) were classified as "D (modify regimen)" in the Lexicomp^® risk rating.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

This study identified 31 combinations of drugs that may elevate the risk of diLQTS. The use of these drug combinations should be monitored more carefully in future.

The Impact of Smoking, Sex, Infection, and Comedication Administration on Oral Olanzapine: A Population Pharmacokinetic Model in Chinese Psychiatric Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Prior olanzapine population pharmacokinetic (PPK) models have focused on the effects of sex and smoking on olanzapine clearance. This PPK model in Chinese adult psychiatric patients also investigated the influence of comedications and co-occurrence of infections on olanzapine clearance, and explored how to personalize oral olanzapine dosage in the clinical setting.

METHODS

A total of 1546 serum concentrations from 354 patients were collected in this study. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption was employed to develop the PPK model using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach. Covariates included demographic parameters, co-occurrence of infection and concomitant medications (including dangguilonghui tablets, a Chinese herbal medicine for constipation). Bootstrap validation (1000 runs) and external validation of 50 patients were employed to evaluate the final model. Simulations were performed to explore the personalization of olanzapine dosing after stratification by sex, smoking, and comedication with valproate.

RESULTS

Typical estimates for the absorption rate constant (K_a), apparent clearance (CL/F), and apparent distribution volume (V/F) were 0.30 h^-1, 12.88 L/h, and 754.41 L, respectively. Olanzapine clearance was increased by the following variables: 1.23-fold by male sex, 1.23-fold by smoking, 1.23-fold by comedication with valproate, 1.16-fold by sertraline, and 2.01-fold by dangguilonghui tablets. Olanzapine clearance was decreased by the following variables: 0.75-fold by co-occurrence of infection, 0.70-fold by fluvoxamine, and 0.78-fold by perphenazine. The model evaluation indicated that the final model's performance was good, stable, and precise.

CONCLUSION

This study contributes to the personalization of oral olanzapine dosing, but further studies should be performed to verify the effects of infection and comedications, including valproate and dangguilonghui.

Comorbidity in Schizophrenia: Conceptual Issues and Clinical Management

Schizophrenia is a complex psychiatric disorder that affects cognitive, perceptual, and emotional functioning. The currently available evidence suggests heterogenous intertwining of biological and psychosocial etio-pathogeneses. Clinical and research interests in the comorbidity issues of schizophrenia were borne out of the real-world clinical challenges that patients often present with multiple coexisting psychopathologies as well as comorbid medical conditions. The recent DSM-5 shift toward a symptom dimensional-based perspective, the NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative to examine biopsychosocial pathogeneses in mental illness, and the FDA's emphasis on real world-based clinical trial criterion all have promoted a shift in clinical research that has facilitated understanding and treatment of comorbidity in schizophrenia. This emerging conceptual shift as well as pharmacological developments that address the multidimensional pathogeneses in schizophrenia may pave the way for a better understanding and treatment.

Prediction of olanzapine exposure in individual patients using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation

AIM

The aim of the present study was to predict olanzapine (OLZ) exposure in individual patients using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation (PBPK M&S).

METHODS

A 'bottom-up' PBPK model for OLZ was constructed in Simcyp® (V14.1) and validated against pharmacokinetic studies and data from therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The physiological, demographic and genetic attributes of the 'healthy volunteer population' file in Simcyp® were then individualized to create 'virtual twins' of 14 patients. The predicted systemic exposure of OLZ in virtual twins was compared with measured concentration in corresponding patients. Predicted exposures were used to calculate a hypothetical decrease in exposure variability after OLZ dose adjustment.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetic parameters of OLZ from single-dose studies were accurately predicted in healthy Caucasians [mean-fold errors (MFEs) ranged from 0.68 to 1.14], healthy Chinese (MFEs 0.82 to 1.18) and geriatric Caucasians (MFEs 0.55 to 1.30). Cumulative frequency plots of trough OLZ concentration were comparable between the virtual population and patients in a TDM database. After creating virtual twins in Simcyp®, the R2 values for predicted vs. observed trough OLZ concentrations were 0.833 for the full cohort of 14 patients and 0.884 for the 7 patients who had additional cytochrome P450 2C8 genotyping. The variability in OLZ exposure following hypothetical dose adjustment guided by PBPK M&S was twofold lower compared with a fixed-dose regimen - coefficient of variation values were 0.18 and 0.37, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Olanzapine exposure in individual patients was predicted using PBPK M&S. Repurposing of available PBPK M&S platforms is an option for model-informed precision dosing and requires further study to examine clinical potential.

The clinical potentials of adjunctive fluvoxamine to clozapine treatment: a systematic review

RATIONALE

New clozapine optimization strategies are warranted, as some patients do not achieve sufficient response and experience various adverse effects. Fluvoxamine is a potent CYP1A2 inhibitor and may increase the ratio of clozapine to its primary metabolite N-desmethylclozapine (NDMC).

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to review all pharmacodynamic effects and the adverse effect profile of changing the clozapine/NDMC ratio with adjunctive fluvoxamine.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched with the search terms "clozapine" and "fluvoxamine" without any time limit. Language was restricted to English, Scandinavian, Polish, and German. Studies were sorted for relevance based on title and abstract. Clinical recommendations of potential indications/effects were graded as level A, B, C, or D depending on studies of high, moderate, low, or very low quality, respectively.

RESULTS

Based on data from 24 case reports/series, seven cohort studies, and two randomized controlled trials, 241 patients were studied. Evidence (A) supported that adjunctive fluvoxamine increased clozapine plasma levels. This may increase the probability of response in patients, where sufficient clozapine plasma levels cannot be achieved. Adjunctive fluvoxamine reduced metabolic adverse effects of clozapine (B) but not agranulocytosis risk (B). Although depressive or obsessive-compulsive symptoms may improve, a SSRI with no CYP1A2 inhibition should rather be used (C). No studies investigated the effect of adjunctive fluvoxamine to minimize clozapine rebound psychosis (D) or to reduce the effects of smoking on clozapine plasma levels (D).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive fluvoxamine may have clinical potentials for optimizing clozapine treatment but further clinical studies are warranted to explore the clinical implications.

Mesoporous Hydroxyapatite as Olanzapine Carrier Provides a Long-Acting Effect in Antidepression Treatment

An antidepressant carrier was designed to maintain over 2 weeks of constant medication release. The carrier was injected into muscle, where cellular activity was employed to achieve the goal of constant release. Mesoporous hydroxyapatite (mesoHAP) was synthesized into an adequate size by a coprecipitation method; it then went through a series of hydrophobic surface modifications for olanzapine (OLZ) loading by physical absorption to produce mesoHAP-OLZ. Because of its hydrophobic nature, OLZ was not effectively released from mesoHAP-OLZ in an aqueous environment. However, once engulfed by macrophages, the lysosome/endosome hybrid ruptured due to alterations in osmotic pressure, resulting in the release of OLZ into the cytoplasm. OLZ was then exocytosed to the extracellular space due to a high calcium ion (Ca(2+)) concentration and finally reached the blood circulation. Our findings provide a useful treatment strategy to achieve long-term drug release with a single intramuscular (IM) injection, helping to solve the problem of nonadherent medication intake that often occurs in antidepressant therapy.

Improvement in verbal memory following SSRI augmentation of antipsychotic treatment is associated with changes in the expression of mRNA encoding for the GABA-A receptor and BDNF in PMC of schizophrenic patients

Verbal memory impairment in schizophrenia is associated with abnormalities in gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) systems. Recent evidence from animal and clinical studies that adding fluvoxamine to antipsychotics alters the expression of transcripts encoding for the GABA-A receptor and BDNF led us to postulate that fluvoxamine augmentation may improve memory in schizophrenia. To test this, we examined the effect of add-on fluvoxamine on verbal memory and other cognitive functions and related it to the expression of mRNA coding for the GABA-A receptor and BDNF in peripheral mononuclear cells (PMC) of schizophrenic patients. Twenty-nine patients completed a 6-week study in which fluvoxamine (100 mg/day) was added to ongoing antipsychotic treatment. Verbal memory, abstraction working memory, object and face recognition, and psychomotor speed and clinical symptoms were assessed at baseline and after 3 and 6 weeks of treatment. Blood samples were taken at baseline and weeks 1, 3, and 6 and PMC was assayed for the GABA-A beta3 receptor and BDNF mRNA by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR. Associative and logical verbal memory improved significantly and showed a significant correlation with changes in PMC BDNF and GABA-A beta3 receptor mRNA, which increased during treatment. Abstraction and object recognition improved, but this did not correlate with PMC measures. Negative and positive symptoms improved significantly; the latter showed significant correlations with changes in PMC measures. Addition of fluvoxamine to antipsychotics improves verbal memory. It is postulated that the mechanism involves enhanced GABA-A receptor/BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus.

Clinically relevant interactions between newer antidepressants and second-generation antipsychotics

INTRODUCTION

Combinations of newer antidepressants and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are frequently used by clinicians. Pharmacokinetic drug interaction (PK DI) and poorly understood pharmacodynamic (PD) drug interaction (PD DI) can occur between them.

AREAS COVERED

This paper comprehensively reviews PD DI and PK DI studies.

EXPERT OPINION

More PK DI studies are needed to better establish dose correction factors after adding fluoxetine and paroxetine to aripiprazole, iloperidone and risperidone. Further PK DI studies and case reports are also needed to better establish the need for dose correction factors after adding i) fluoxetine to clozapine, lurasidone, quetiapine and olanzapine; ii) paroxetine to olanzapine; iii) fluvoxamine to asenapine, aripiprazole, iloperidone, lurasidone, olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone; iv) high sertraline doses to aripiprazole, clozapine, iloperidone and risperidone: v) bupropion and duloxetine to aripiprazole, clozapine, iloperidone and risperidone; and vi) asenapine to paroxetine and venlafaxine. Possible beneficial PD DI effects occur after adding SGAs to newer antidepressants for treatment-resistant major depressive and obsessive-compulsive disorders. The lack of studies combining newer antidepressants and SGAs in psychotic depression is worrisome. PD DIs between newer antidepressants and SGAs may be more likely for mirtazapine and bupropion. Adding selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and SGAs may increase QTc interval and may very rarely contribute to torsades de pointes.

Clinically significant drug interactions with atypical antipsychotics

Atypical antipsychotics [also known as second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs)] have become a mainstay therapeutic treatment intervention for patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorders and other psychotic conditions. These agents are commonly used with other medications--most notably, antidepressants and antiepileptic drugs. Drug interactions can take place by various pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and pharmaceutical mechanisms. The pharmacokinetic profile of each SGA, especially with phase I and phase II metabolism, can allow for potentially significant drug interactions. Pharmacodynamic interactions arise when agents have comparable receptor site activity, which can lead to additive or competitive effects without alterations in measured plasma drug concentrations. Additionally, the role of drug transporters in drug interactions continues to evolve and may effect both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions. Pharmaceutical interactions occur when physical incompatibilities take place between agents prior to drug absorption. Approximate therapeutic plasma concentration ranges have been suggested for a number of SGAs. Drug interactions that markedly increase or decrease the concentrations of these agents beyond their ranges can lead to adverse events or diminished clinical efficacy. Most clinically significant drug interactions with SGAs occur via the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system. Many but not all drug interactions with SGAs are identified during drug discovery and pre-clinical development by employing a series of standardized in vitro and in vivo studies with known CYP inducers and inhibitors. Later therapeutic drug monitoring programmes, clinical studies and case reports offer methods to identify additional clinically significant drug interactions. Some commonly co-administered drugs with a significant potential for drug-drug interactions with selected SGAs include some SSRIs. Antiepileptic mood stabilizers such as carbamazepine and valproate, as well as other antiepileptic drugs such as phenobarbital and phenytoin, may decrease plasma SGA concentrations. Some anti-infective agents such as protease inhibitors and fluoroquinolones are of concern as well. Two additional important factors that influence drug interactions with SGAs are dose and time dependence. Smoking is very common among psychiatric patients and can induce CYP1A2 enzymes, thereby lowering expected plasma levels of certain SGAs. It is recommended that ziprasidone and lurasidone are taken with food to promote drug absorption, otherwise their bioavailability can be reduced. Clinicians must be aware of the variety of factors that can increase the likelihood of clinically significant drug interactions with SGAs, and must carefully monitor patients to maximize treatment efficacy while minimizing adverse events.

Intracellular pathways of antipsychotic combined therapies: implication for psychiatric disorders treatment

Dysfunctions in the interplay among multiple neurotransmitter systems have been implicated in the wide range of behavioral, emotional and cognitive symptoms displayed by major psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or major depression. The complex clinical presentation of these pathologies often needs the use of multiple pharmacological treatments, in particular (1) when monotherapy provides insufficient improvement of the core symptoms; (2) when there are concurrent additional symptoms requiring more than one class of medication and (3) in order to improve tolerability, by using two compounds below their individual dose thresholds to limit side effects. To date, the choice of drug combinations is based on empirical paradigm guided by clinical response. Nonetheless, several preclinical studies have demonstrated that drugs commonly used to treat psychiatric disorders may impact common intracellular target molecules (e.g. Akt/GSK-3 pathway, MAP kinases pathway, postsynaptic density proteins). These findings support the hypothesis that convergence at crucial steps of transductional pathways could be responsible for synergistic effects obtained in clinical practice by the co-administration of those apparently heterogeneous pharmacological compounds. Here we review the most recent evidence on the molecular crossroads in antipsychotic combined therapies with antidepressants, mood stabilizers, and benzodiazepines, as well as with antipsychotics. We first discuss clinical clues and efficacy of such combinations. Then we focus on the pharmacodynamics and on the intracellular pathways underpinning the synergistic, or concurrent, effects of each therapeutic add-on strategy, as well as we also critically appraise how pharmacological research may provide new insights on the putative molecular mechanisms underlying major psychiatric disorders.

The Differential Effects of Steady-State Fluvoxamine on the Pharmacokinetics of Olanzapine and Clozapine in Healthy Volunteers

The combination of atypical antipsychotics and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors is an effective strategy in the treatment of certain psychiatric disorders. However, pharmacokinetic interactions between the two classes of drugs remain to be explored. The present study was designed to determine whether there were different effects of steady-state fluvoxamine on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of olanzapine and clozapine in healthy male volunteers. One single dose of 10 mg olanzapine (n = 12) or clozapine (n = 9) was administered orally. Following a drug washout of at least 4 weeks, all subjects received fluvoxamine (100 mg/day) for 9 days, and one single dose of 10 mg olanzapine or clozapine was added on day 4. Plasma concentrations of olanzapine, clozapine, and N-desmethylclozapine were assayed at serial time points after the antipsychotics were given alone and when added to fluvoxamine. No bioequivalence was found in olanzapine alone and cotreatment with fluvoxamine for the mean peak plasma concentration (C(max)), the area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to last sampling time point (AUC(0-t)), and from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0- infinity )). Under the cotreatment, C(max) of olanzapine was significantly elevated by 49%, with a 32% reduced time (t(max)) to C(max), whereas the C(max) and t(max) of clozapine were unaltered. The cotreatment increased the AUC(0-t) and AUC(0- infinity ) of olanzapine by 68% and 76%, respectively, greater than those of clozapine (40% and 41%). The presence of fluvoxamine also prolonged the elimination half-life (t(1/2)) of olanzapine by 40% and, to a much greater extent, clozapine by 370% but reduced the total body clearance (CL/F) of clozapine (78%) more significantly than it did for olanzapine (42%). The apparent volume of distribution (V(d)) was suppressed by 31% in olanzapine combined with fluvoxamine but was unaltered in the clozapine regimen. A significant reduction in the N-desmethylclozapine to clozapine ratio was present in the clozapine with fluvoxamine regimen. The effects of fluvoxamine on different aspects of pharmacokinetics of the two antipsychotics may have implications for clinical therapeutics.

Clinically relevant drug interactions in anxiety disorders

OBJECTIVE

Certain drugs used in the treatment of patients with anxiety disorders can interact with other psychotropic drugs and with pharmacological treatments for physical illnesses. There is a need for an updated comparative review of clinically relevant drug interactions in this area.

DESIGN

Relevant literature on drug interactions with medications used in the treatment of anxiety disorders was identified through a search in MEDLINE and EMBASE.

RESULTS

Drug interactions involving medications used to treat anxiety disorders may be pharmacokinetic, such as enzyme inhibition or induction in the cytochrome P450 system and transporter-mediated drug interactions, or pharmacodynamic, such as additive effects in causing drowsiness or additive effects at neurotransmitter receptors. Certain selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, and paroxetine) are particularly liable to be potentially involved in untoward pharmacokinetic interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential for drug interactions with medications used in anxiety disorders should be the cause of clinical concern, particularly in elderly individuals. However, the liability for harmful drug interactions may be anticipated, and the risk reduced. Although not all interactions are clinically relevant, careful monitoring of clinical response and possible interactions is essential.

Chronic treatment with serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant (SSRI) combined with an antipsychotic regulates GABA-A receptor in rat prefrontal cortex

INTRODUCTION

The combination of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants and antipsychotics is currently used for the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. However, the biochemical mechanism mediating the clinical effectiveness of this treatment remains obscure. Previously, we have reported that acute haloperidol (HALO)-fluvoxamine (FLU) in vivo and in vitro treatment regulated GABA-Aβ2/3 receptor subunits, and protein kinase C (PKC) and mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathways.

FINDINGS

In the present study, we demonstrated that chronic HALO-FLU treatment, but not each drug alone, significantly decreased GABA-Aβ2/3 receptor expression (25 ± 6.2% vs. control) and caused receptor translocation from the membrane to the cytosol in rat prefrontal cortex. Phosphorylation of PKC and ERK2 was affected differently by HALO-FLU combination than by the individual drug treatments. HALO and FLU each given alone increased PKC phosphorylation levels (29 ± 15% and 40 ± 11.8%, vs. control, respectively) and did not affect ERK2 phosphorylation, while HALO-FLU combined treatment did not alter PKC phosphorylation levels and significantly decreased ERK2 phosphorylation levels (58 ± 4.4% vs. control). GABA-A receptor downregulation in the brain was accompanied by a decrease in GABA-A function, as shown in muscimol-induced loss of righting reflex (22 ± 9.8 min).

CONCLUSIONS

We provide a brief heuristic overview of our preclinical and clinical studies with the SSRI-antipsychotic combination and argue that the finding that it causes similar dynamic changes in laboratory and clinical domains, specifically in GABA-A β2/3 receptor and PKC, strongly supports the hypothesis that the GABA-A receptors and their regulatory systems are involved in the molecular mechanisms underlying the clinical effectiveness of SSRI augmentation.

The effect of ethinylestradiol-containing contraceptives on the serum concentration of olanzapine and N-desmethyl olanzapine

AIM

To investigate the potential interaction between olanzapine, a CYP1A2 substrate, and ethinylestradiol-containing contraceptives (ECC).

METHODS

The study was carried out at a routine therapeutic drug monitoring service. To identify patients who were co-administered ECC or other contraceptives, a questionnaire was sent to the physician who ordered serum monitoring of olanzapine for women aged 18-40 years during an 18 month period. The physicians were asked to provide information about contraceptive use and smoking habits. When questionnaires were returned by the physicians, the respective serum concentration data were included in the analysis. Patients were stratified into users of ECC, progestogen-based contraceptives (PBC) or no contraceptives. Dose-adjusted serum concentrations of olanzapine and the metabolite N-desmethyl olanzapine were compared between the subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients were included in the study (10 ECC users and 10 PBC users). In users of ECC, we found no differences in serum concentrations of olanzapine, but significantly lower concentrations of the CYP1A2-mediated metabolite N-desmethyl olanzapine compared with users of PBC (P = 0.019) and non-contraceptive users (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

The present study confirms that ECC exhibit CYP1A2-inhibitory properties in terms of significantly lower exposure of N-desmethyl olanzapine. However, the inhibition does not provide clinically relevant changes in serum concentrations of olanzapine.

SSRI augmentation of antipsychotic alters expression of GABA(A) receptor and related genes in PMC of schizophrenia patients

Clinical studies have shown that negative symptoms of schizophrenia unresponsive to antipsychotic given alone can improve after augmentation with SSRI antidepressant. Laboratory investigations into the mechanism of this synergism showed that co-administration of SSRI and antipsychotic produces changes in GABA(A) receptor and related systems, which differ from the effects of each drug alone. To examine the clinical relevance of these findings, the current study examined the effects of SSRI augmentation treatment on GABA(A) receptor and related systems in schizophrenia patients. Schizophrenia patients with high levels of negative symptoms unresponsive to antipsychotic treatment received add-on fluvoxamine (100 mg/d). Blood was taken before and 1, 3 and 6 wk after adding fluvoxamine and peripheral mononuclear cells (PMC) isolated. RNA encoding for GABA(A)β3, 5-HT2A, and 5-HT7 receptors, PKCβ2, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) was assayed with real-time RT-PCR. Plasma BDNF protein was assayed using ELISA. Clinical symptoms were assessed with validated rating scales. We found significant increase in mRNA encoding for GABA(A)β3 and 5-HT2A, 5-HT7 receptors and BDNF and a reduction in PKCβ2 mRNA. Plasma BDNF protein concentrations were increased. There were significant correlations among the genes. Clinical symptoms improved significantly. mRNA expression of PKCβ2, 5-HT2A and 5-HT7 showed significant associations with clinical symptoms. Combined SSRI+antipsychotic treatment is associated with changes in GABA(A) receptor and in related signalling systems in patients. These changes may be part of the mechanism of clinically effective drug action and may prove to be biomarkers of pharmacological response.

Olanzapine approved for the acute treatment of schizophrenia or manic/mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder in adolescent patients

BACKGROUND

Severe and persistent mental illnesses in children and adolescents, such as early- onset schizophrenia spectrum (EOSS) disorders and pediatric bipolar disorder (pedBP), are increasingly recognized. Few treatments have demonstrated efficacy in rigorous clinical trials. Enduring response to current medications appears limited. Recently, olanzapine was approved for the treatment of adolescents with schizophrenia or acute manic/mixed episodes in pedBP.

METHODS

PubMed searches were conducted for olanzapine combined with pharmacology, schizophrenia, or bipolar disorder. Searches related to schizophrenia and bipolar disorder were limited to children and adolescents. The bibliographies of the retrieved articles were hand-checked for additional relevant studies. The epidemiology, phenomenology, and treatment of EOSS and pedBP, and olanzapine's pharmacology are reviewed. Studies of olanzapine treatment in youth with EOSS and pedBP are examined.

RESULTS

Olanzapine is efficacious for EOSS and pedBP. However, olanzapine is not more efficacious than risperidone, molindone, or haloperidol in EOSS and is less efficacious than clozapine in treatment-resistant EOSS. No comparative trials have been done in pedBP. Olanzapine is associated with weight gain, dyslipidemia, and transaminase elevations in youth. Extrapyramidal symptoms, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and blood dyscrasias have also been reported but appear rare.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors conclude that olanzapine should be considered a second-line agent in EOSS and pedBP due to its risks for significant weight gain and lipid dysregulation. Awareness of the consistent weight and metabolic changes observed in olanzapine-treated youth focused attention on the potential long-term risks of atypical antipsychotics in youth.

Escitalopram in the treatment of negative symptoms in patients with chronic schizophrenia: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

Antidepressant medication treatment has been associated with improvement in negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of escitalopram for the treatment of negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. Under double-blind conditions, 40 patients with chronic schizophrenia were randomized to add-on treatment with escitalopram (up to 20mg) or placebo for 10weeks. The primary outcome measures were the scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)-negative subscale and the Social Functioning Scale (SFS). Secondary outcome measures included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)-total and positive scales, the Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS). Of 40 patients, 36 completed the study and another 2 were excluded after 8weeks due to side effects. Thus, 38 patients (19 on both treatment arms) were considered in the efficacy analysis. The reduction in the PANSS negative subscale score was 5% for escitalopram and 10% for placebo (NS). There were no significant inter-group differences in primary and secondary endpoints. Escitalopram was well tolerated, but was not more effective than placebo in the treatment of negative symptoms in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Further work in this field is needed to determine whether some subgroups of patients with negative symptoms may nevertheless respond to antidepressant medications.

Updates on cytochrome p450-mediated cardiovascular drug interactions

Cytochrome P (CYP) 450 is a superfamily of hemoproteins that play an important role in the metabolism of steroid hormones, fatty acids, and many medications. Many agents used for management of cardiovascular diseases are substrates, inhibitors, or inducers of CYP450 enzymes. When two agents that are substrates, inhibitors, or inducers of CYP450 are administered together, drug interactions with significant clinical consequences may occur. This review discusses CYP450-mediated cardiovascular drug interactions as well as noncardiovascular drug interactions that produced significant cardiovascular side effects. The principles in predicting drug interactions are also discussed.

Role of CYP pharmacogenetics and drug-drug interactions in the efficacy and safety of atypical and other antipsychotic agents

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) drug oxidases play a pivotal role in the elimination of antipsychotic agents, and therefore influence the toxicity and efficacy of these drugs. Factors that affect CYP function and expression have a major impact on treatment outcomes with antipsychotic agents. In particular, aspects of CYP pharmacogenetics, and the processes of CYP induction and inhibition all influence in-vivo rates of drug elimination. Certain CYPs that mediate the oxidation of antipsychotic drugs exhibit genetic variants that may influence in-vivo activity. Thus, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in CYP genes have been shown to encode enzymes that have decreased drug oxidation capacity. Additionally, psychopharmacotherapy has the potential for drug-drug inhibitory interactions involving CYPs, as well as drug-mediated CYP induction. Literature evidence supports a role for CYP1A2 in the clearance of the atypical antipsychotics clozapine and olanzapine; CYP1A2 is inducible by certain drugs and environmental chemicals. Recent studies have suggested that specific CYP1A2 variants possessing individual SNPs, and possibly also SNP combinations (haplotypes), in the 5′-regulatory regions may respond differently to inducing chemicals. CYP2D6 is an important catalyst of the oxidation of chlorpromazine, thioridazine, risperidone and haloperidol. Certain CYP2D6 allelic variants that encode enzymes with decreased drug oxidation capacity are more common in particular ethnic groups, which may lead to adverse effects with standard doses of psychoactive drugs. Thus, genotyping may be useful for dose optimization with certain psychoactive drugs that are substrates for CYP2D6. However, genotyping for inducible CYPs is unlikely to be sufficient to direct therapy with all antipsychotic agents. In-vivo CYP phenotyping with cocktails of drug substrates may assist at the commencement of therapy, but this approach could be complicated by pharmacokinetic interactions if applied when an antipsychotic drug regimen is ongoing.

Management of schizophrenia with obsessive-compulsive features

Although obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) in schizophrenia have been conceptually controversial and clinically challenging, recent evidence suggests that schizophrenia with OCS may constitute a distinct schizophrenic subgroup. Recent epidemiological and clinical findings have shown that the subgroup obsessive-compulsive (OC) schizophrenia is associated with poor outcome and is more frequent than previously realized. Emerging biological evidence suggests that OCS in schizophrenia has more than one pathogenesis, with distinct mechanisms that may require different treatment interventions. Therefore, the management of OCS in patients with schizophrenia requires an individualized treatment approach based on the pathogenesis and clinical status of the patient. For example, the atypical antipsychotics that are potent serotonin antagonists sometimes induce de novo or exacerbate preexisting OCS, which resolves if the patient is switched to an antipsychotic with a different profile or if adjunctive treatment with serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) is undergone. Regarding OC schizophrenia, SSRIs are often a necessary part of treatment, with knowledge of potential pharmacokinetic interactions with antipsychotic drugs essential. In this article, recent progress and current knowledge of OC schizophrenia is reviewed and treatment guidelines are offered for this complex and challenging subgroup of schizophrenic patients.

Updates on cytochrome P450-mediated cardiovascular drug interactions

Cytochrome P (CYP) 450 is a superfamily of hemoproteins that play an important role in the metabolism of steroid hormones, fatty acids, and many medications. Many agents used for management of cardiovascular diseases are substrates, inhibitors, or inducers of CYP450 enzymes.When two agents that are substrates, inhibitors, or inducers of CYP450 are administered together, drug interactions with significant clinical consequences may occur. This review discusses CYP450-mediated cardiovascular drug interactions as well as noncardiovascular drug interactions that produced significant cardiovascular side effects. The principles in predicting drug interactions are also discussed.

Multifunctional pharmacotherapy: what can we learn from study of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor augmentation of antipsychotics in negative-symptom schizophrenia?

Many patients suffering from major psychiatric disorders do not respond adequately to monotherapy and require additional drugs. To date, there are no objective guidelines for deciding which combination may be effective, and the choice is based on previous clinical experience and on trial and error. Even when combination drugs are effective, the biochemical mechanisms responsible for the value-added effect are unknown. Understanding the mechanism of such synergism may provide a rational basis for choosing drug combinations and for developing more effective drugs. In schizophrenia, negative symptoms respond poorly to antipsychotics, but may improve when these are augmented with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI). This augmenting effect cannot be explained by summating the pharmacological effects of the individual drugs. We proposed that the study of SSRI augmentation can serve as a window to understanding the biochemical mechanisms of clinically effective drug synergism. In a series of studies we identified unique biochemical effects of the combination, different from each individual drug, and proposed that some of these are involved in mediating the clinical effect. Here we review some of the findings and propose that the mechanism of action involves regionally selective modulation of the GABA system. The evidence indicates that the SSRI antidepressant-antipsychotic combination may be a useful paradigm for studying therapeutically effective synergistic drug interactions in schizophrenia. Although as yet limited in scope, the findings of definable molecular targets for synergistic SSRI-antipsychotic interaction provide new directions to inform future research and provide novel bio-molecular targets for drug development.

Clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug interactions with second-generation antidepressants: an update

BACKGROUND

The second-generation antidepressants include selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and other compounds with different mechanisms of action. All second-generation antidepressants are metabolized in the liver by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system. Concomitant intake of inhibitors or inducers of the CYP isozymes involved in the biotransformation of specific antidepressants may alter plasma concentrations of these agents, although this effect is unlikely to be associated with clinically relevant interactions. Rather, concern about drug interactions with second-generation antidepressants is based on their in vitro potential to inhibit > or = 1 CYP isozyme.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this article was to review the current literature on clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug interactions with second-generation antidepressants.

METHODS

A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted for original research and review articles published in English between January 1985 and February 2008. Among the search terms were drug interactions, second-generation antidepressants, newer antidepressants, SSRIs, SNRIs, fluoxetine, paroxetine, fluvoxamine, sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram, venlafaxine, duloxetine, mirtazapine, reboxetine, bupropion, nefazodone, pharmacokinetics, drug metabolism, and cytochrome P450. Only articles published in peer-reviewed journals were included, and meeting abstracts were excluded. The reference lists of relevant articles were hand-searched for additional publications.

RESULTS

Second-generation antidepressants differ in their potential for pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Fluoxetine and paroxetine are potent inhibitors of CYP2D6, fluvoxamine markedly inhibits CYP1A2 and CYP2C19, and nefazodone is a substantial inhibitor of CYP3A4. Therefore, clinically relevant interactions may be expected when these antidepressants are coadministered with substrates of the pertinent isozymes, particularly those with a narrow therapeutic index. Duloxetine and bupropion are moderate inhibitors of CYP2D6, and sertraline may cause significant inhibition of this isoform, but only at high doses. Citalopram, escitalopram, venlafaxine, mirtazapine, and reboxetine are weak or negligible inhibitors of CYP isozymes in vitro and are less likely than other second-generation antidepressants to interact with co-administered medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Second-generation antidepressants are not equivalent in their potential for pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Although interactions may be predictable in specific circumstances, use of an antidepressant with a more favorable drug-interaction profile may be justified.

Olanzapine-induced hyperglycemic ketoacidosis and corresponding acetone concentrations post-mortem: A forensic interpretation

Olanzapine has been shown to cause or have a contributory role in the development of hyperglycemia and diabetes mellitus. Without careful monitoring for the development of these conditions and control of the resulting adverse effects, patients receiving olanzapine may be at risk of developing fatal ketoacidosis. A review of post-mortem toxicological reports has revealed an increase in the incidence of post-mortem findings of acetone in decedents who were taking olanzapine over the past decade. A review of the current literature and a comprehensive review of case histories and toxicological findings were conducted at the Centre of Forensic Sciences (Toronto, Ontario). Olanzapine concentrations ranging from <62.5 to 858 ng/mL and acetone concentrations as high as 95 mg/dL were detected concurrently. Due to the unstable nature of olanzapine, in several instances quantitation was not possible despite elevated responses during qualitative screening procedures. Five cases suggesting olanzapine-induced ketoacidosis were identified based on the case history and toxicological findings. These data have been compiled and examined with respect to acetone concentrations following olanzapine use and the forensic relevance of post-mortem olanzapine and acetone concentrations are discussed.

Metabolic drug interactions with newer antipsychotics: a comparative review

Newer antipsychotics introduced in clinical practice in recent years include clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, sertindole, ziprasidone, aripiprazole and amisulpride. These agents are subject to drug-drug interactions with other psychotropic agents or with medications used in the treatment of concomitant physical illnesses. Most pharmacokinetic interactions with newer antipsychotics occur at the metabolic level and usually involve changes in the activity of the major drug-metabolizing enzymes involved in their biotransformation, i.e. the cytochrome P450 (CYP) monooxygenases and/or uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT). Clozapine is metabolized primarily by CYP1A2, with additional contribution by other CYP isoforms. Risperidone is metabolized primarily by CYP2D6 and, to a lesser extent, CYP3A4. Olanzapine undergoes both direct conjugation and CYP1A2-mediated oxidation. Quetiapine is metabolized by CYP3A4, while sertindole and aripiprazole are metabolized by CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. Ziprasidone pathways include aldehyde oxidase-mediated reduction and CYP3A4-mediated oxidation. Amisulpride is primarily excreted in the urine and undergoes relatively little metabolism. While novel antipsychotics are unlikely to interfere with the elimination of other drugs, co-administration of inhibitors or inducers of the major enzymes responsible for their metabolism may modify their plasma concentrations, leading to potentially significant effects. Most documented metabolic interactions involve antidepressant and anti-epileptic drugs. Of a particular clinical significance is the interaction between fluvoxamine, a potent CYP1A2 inhibitor, and clozapine. Differences in the interaction potential among the novel antipsychotics currently available may be predicted based on their metabolic pathways. The clinical relevance of these interactions should be interpreted in relation to the relative width of their therapeutic index. Avoidance of unnecessary polypharmacy, knowledge of the interaction profiles of individual agents, and careful individualization of dosage based on close evaluation of clinical response and, possibly, plasma drug concentrations are essential to prevent and minimize potentially adverse drug interactions in patients receiving newer antipsychotics.

Characterization of the serotonin transporter in lymphocytes and platelets of schizophrenia patients treated with atypical or typical antipsychotics compared to healthy individuals

A rapidly growing body of data suggests that abnormalities in serotonergic function might be involved in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and that serotonergic mechanisms play a role in the therapeutic effects of antipsychotics. The activity of the serotonin transporter (5-HTT), as determined by [(3)H]5-HT uptake to blood lymphocytes, was measured in 38 medicated schizophrenia patients (15 of them treated with typical antipsychotics and 23 treated with atypical antipsychotics) and 15 healthy control subjects. In addition, the pharmacodynamic characteristics of platelet 5-HTT were assessed by [(3)H]citalopram binding. There were no significant differences in the density (B(max)) of platelet [(3)H]citalopram binding sites between the three groups. Similarly, the dissociation constant (K(d)) values were indistinguishable. There were no significant differences in the maximal uptake velocity (V(max)) of [(3)H]5-HT to fresh lymphocytes between the three groups. The affinity (K(m)) values of 5-HT to the 5-HTT were significantly higher in schizophrenia patients treated with typical antipsychotics compared with control subjects. The K(m) values in schizophrenia patients treated with atypical antipsychotics were significantly lower compared with those observed in the group of schizophrenia patients treated with typical antipsychotics; however, they were comparable to values in the control group. The high values of K(m) associated with typical antipsychotic treatment may be relevant to the high risk of developing extrapyramidal side effects (EPS). The role of the various components of the serotonergic system in the etiopathology of schizophrenia and the mechanisms by which antipsychotics achieve their therapeutic effects need to be further evaluated.

Hypersalivation induced by olanzapine with fluvoxamine

Hypersalivation has been reported as a side effect of atypical antipsychotics such as clozapine and olanzapine. As it is very common for antipsychotics to cause dry mouth due to anticholinergic effects, hypersalivation seems to be paradoxical. We present the case of a 34-year-old Japanese man with delusional disorder, somatic type (DSM-IV). He had chronic neck pain as well as somatic hallucination with hypochondriacal delusion for 4 years. Since combination therapy with atypical antipsychotics and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) has been introduced in the treatment of refractory psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, olanzapine (10 mg/day) was added to fluvoxamine treatment (200 mg/day) in this case. Subsequently, hypersalivation was induced without any extrapyramidal symptoms. It is suggested that hypersalivation was an adverse effect of olanzapine. Possible interaction olanzapine with fluvoxamine might increase the risk of the adverse effect. When combination therapy of atypical antipsychotics and SSRI is introduced, it should be used cautiously with careful observation. Underlying pharmacological and clinical problems will be discussed.

Assessment of CYP1A2 Activity in Clinical Practice: Why, How, and When?

The cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP1A2 mediates the rate-limiting step in the metabolism of many drugs including theophylline, clozapine, and tacrine as well as in the bioactivation of procarcinogens. CYP1A2 activity shows both pronounced intra- and interindividual variability, which is, among other factors, related to smoking causing enzyme induction, to drug intake and to dietary factors which may result in induction or inhibition. In contrast to these exogenous factors, genetic influences on enzyme activity seem to be less pronounced. Therefore, phenotyping of CYP1A2, i.e. the determination of the actual activity of the enzyme in vivo, represents a useful approach both for scientific and clinical applications. CYP1A2 is almost exclusively expressed in the liver. Since liver tissue cannot be obtained for direct phenotyping, a probe drug which is metabolized by CYP1A2 has to be given. Proposed probe drugs include caffeine, theophylline, and melatonin. Caffeine is most often used because of the predominating role of CYP1A2 in its overall metabolism and the excellent tolerability. Various urinary, plasma, saliva, and breath based CYP1A2 caffeine metrics have been applied. While caffeine clearance is considered as the gold standard, the salivary or plasma ratio of paraxanthine to caffeine in a sample taken approximately 6 hr after a defined dose of caffeine is a more convenient, less expensive but also fully validated CYP1A2 phenotyping metric. CYP1A2 phenotyping is applied frequently in epidemiologic and drug-drug interaction studies, but its clinical use and usefulness remains to be established.

Antidepressant treatment of psychotic major depression: potential role of the sigma receptor

Psychotic major depression is a severe condition that frequently proves difficult-to-treat. The most effective traditional treatments (electroconvulsive therapy and combinations of antipsychotics with tricyclic antidepressants) are associated with significant side effects, and the use of tricyclic antidepressants alone is largely ineffective. Recent evidence has indicated that the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, either alone or in combination with antipsychotics, may provide a desirable alternative to traditional treatments. Among selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, fluvoxamine has been the best studied and, somewhat surprisingly, has proven effective in several studies as a monotherapy without the need to combine with an antipsychotic. It is proposed that the apparent efficacy of fluvoxamine in psychotic major depression may be related to its unique property of high affinity for the sigma 1 receptor, which is thought to play a role in psychosis and in the action of some antipsychotic drugs.

Low-dose fluvoxamine as an adjunct to reduce olanzapine therapeutic dose requirements: a prospective dose-adjusted drug interaction strategy

Despite the advances in antipsychotic pharmacotherapy over the past decade, many atypical antipsychotic agents are not readily accessible by patients with major psychosis or in developing countries where the acquisition costs may be prohibitive. Olanzapine is an efficacious and widely prescribed atypical antipsychotic agent. In theory, olanzapine therapeutic dose requirement may be reduced during concurrent treatment with inhibitors of drug metabolism. In vitro studies suggest that smoking-inducible cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 contributes to formation of the metabolite 4'-N-desmethylolanzapine. The present prospective study tested the hypothesis that olanzapine steady-state doses can be significantly decreased by coadministration of a low subclinical dose of fluvoxamine, a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P450 1A2. The study design followed a targeted "at-risk" population approach with a focus on smokers who were likely to exhibit increased cytochrome P450 1A2 expression. Patients with stable psychotic illness (N = 10 men, all smokers) and receiving chronic olanzapine treatment were evaluated for steady-state plasma concentrations of olanzapine and 4'-N-desmethylolanzapine. Subsequently, olanzapine dose was reduced from 17.5 +/- 4.2 mg/d (mean +/- SD) to 13.0 +/- 3.3 mg/d, and a nontherapeutic dose of fluvoxamine (25 mg/d, PO) was added to regimen. Patients were reevaluated at 2, 4, and 6 weeks during olanzapine-fluvoxamine cotreatment. There was no significant change in olanzapine plasma concentration, antipsychotic response, or metabolic indices (eg, serum glucose and lipids) after dose reduction in the presence of fluvoxamine (P > 0.05). 4'-N-desmethylolanzapine/olanzapine metabolic ratio decreased from 0.45 +/- 0.20 at baseline to 0.25 +/- 0.11 at week 6, suggesting inhibition of the cytochrome P450 1A2-mediated olanzapine 4'-N-demethylation by fluvoxamine (P < 0.05). In conclusion, this prospective pilot study suggests that a 26% reduction in olanzapine therapeutic dose requirement may be achieved by coadministration of a nontherapeutic oral dose of fluvoxamine.

Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor augmentation in the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia

Negative symptoms are core features of schizophrenia that respond poorly to first-generation antipsychotics and present a major obstacle in rehabilitation. Patients may be somewhat more responsive to clozapine and second-generation antipsychotics but even then, considerable impairment remains. This paper reviews the use of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) augmentation of antipsychotics in the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Important methodological issues particular to the study of negative symptoms are also discussed. Current evidence indicates that at least two SSRIs, fluvoxamine and fluoxetine, can ameliorate primary negative symptoms in chronic schizophrenic patients treated with first-generation antipsychotics. Onset of improvement may be detected within 2 weeks of starting treatment. The combination is well-tolerated, although as antipsychotic drug concentrations may rise, close monitoring of drug doses and possibly drug concentrations is needed. So far, evidence regarding SSRI augmentation of second-generation antipsychotics is limited and in view of the increasing use of these newer agents, controlled studies are urgently needed. SSRI augmentation may be a useful addition to the treatment of schizophrenic patients with persistent negative symptoms. The paradoxical findings that both clozapine, a serotonin antagonist, and an SSRI antidepressant added to antipsychotics, can improve negative symptoms suggests that these pharmacologically distinct treatments may share common final mechanisms. A better understanding of these mechanisms can shed light on the pathogenesis of negative symptoms and provide new targets for drug development.

Olanzapine plus fluvoxamine and olanzapine alone for the treatment of an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia

The objective of the present study was to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of olanzapine plus fluvoxamine and those of olanzapine alone, in schizophrenic patients with acute exacerbation. A randomized, placebo-controlled, 6-week trial was carried out at a University Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. The efficacy and adverse effects were assessed biweekly by using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser side-effect scale, respectively. Twenty schizophrenic patients with acute exacerbation were randomly assigned to receive olanzapine plus fluvoxamine or olanzapine alone. The study found that the means of BPRS total and BPRS general psychopathology score changes were significantly larger in olanzapine plus fluvoxamine group (P = 0.037 and P = 0.045, respectively). The incidence of treatment adverse effects is comparable. In conclusion, the study findings suggest that fluvoxamine augmentation to olanzapine is well tolerated and more effective than olanzapine alone for short-term (6-week) treatment of an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. Due to a number of limitations, further studies are warranted to confirm.

Inhibition of human hepatic CYP isoforms by mGluR5 antagonists

Characterization of new chemical entities for their potential to produce drug-drug interactions is an important aspect of early drug discovery screening. In the present study, the potential for three metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists to interact with recombinant human CYPs was investigated. 2-Methyl-6-(phenylethenyl) pyridine (SIB-1893), 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl) pyridine (MPEP) and 3-[2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl) ethynyl]-pyridine (MTEP) were moderate competitive inhibitors of recombinant human CYP1A2 (Ki, 0.5-1 microM). SIB-1893, but not MPEP or MTEP, was also a moderate competitive inhibitor of CYP1B1. MPEP and MTEP were weak inhibitors of CYP2C19. None of the three compounds tested were significant inhibitors (IC(50) values >50 microM) of CYP3A4, 2C9, 2D6, 2A6, 2B6 or 2E1. The results suggest that MTEP is a selective inhibitor of CYP1A2 and may prove to be a useful tool in studying drug-drug interactions involving this enzyme.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor augmentation in the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia

The treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia presents a major clinical challenge. This review examines the evidence pertaining to the efficacy, tolerability and safety of adding selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) to antipsychotic agents in the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Important methodological issues such as differentiating primary and secondary negative symptoms are discussed. The balance of available evidence indicates that at least some SSRIs, fluvoxamine and fluoxetine, can ameliorate primary negative symptoms in chronic schizophrenia patients who are treated with typical antipsychotics. The combination is safe and well tolerated although, as antipsychotic drug concentrations may be elevated, attention to dose and drug monitoring should be considered as appropriate. The effect of SSRI augmentation of atypical antipsychotics requires further study. Combination with clozapine may require particular caution because of potential toxicity if serum clozapine levels rise steeply. SSRI augmentation may be a useful addition to the treatment of schizophrenia.

Metabolic drug interactions with new psychotropic agents

New psychotropic drugs introduced in clinical practice in recent years include new antidepressants, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and 'third generation' antidepressants, and atypical antipsychotics, i.e. clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone and amisulpride. These agents are extensively metabolized in the liver by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and are therefore susceptible to metabolically based drug interactions with other psychotropic medications or with compounds used for the treatment of concomitant somatic illnesses. New antidepressants differ in their potential for metabolic drug interactions. Fluoxetine and paroxetine are potent inhibitors of CYP2D6, fluvoxamine markedly inhibits CYP1A2 and CYP2C19, while nefazodone is a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4. These antidepressants may be involved in clinically significant interactions when coadministered with substrates of these isoforms, especially those with a narrow therapeutic index. Other new antidepressants including sertraline, citalopram, venlafaxine, mirtazapine and reboxetine are weak in vitro inhibitors of the different CYP isoforms and appear to have less propensity for important metabolic interactions. The new atypical antipsychotics do not affect significantly the activity of CYP isoenzymes and are not expected to impair the elimination of other medications. Conversely, coadministration of inhibitors or inducers of the CYP isoenzymes involved in metabolism of the various antipsychotic compounds may alter their plasma concentrations, possibly leading to clinically significant effects. The potential for metabolically based drug interactions of any new psychotropic agent may be anticipated on the basis of knowledge about the CYP enzymes responsible for its metabolism and about its effect on the activity of these enzymes. This information is essential for rational prescribing and may guide selection of an appropriate compound which is less likely to interact with already taken medication(s).