Persistent hyperlipidemia in renal transplant patients

Lipid lowering in dialysis patients with cardiovascular disease who are awaiting kidney transplantation

Dyslipidemias are highly prevalent in chronic kidney disease, end-stage renal disease, and kidney transplant patients. These dyslipidemias are associated with high cardiovascular risk and mortality. Many clinical trials have shown that statin therapy can significantly reduce adverse cardiovascular events in chronic kidney disease patients and kidney transplant recipients. However, three major trials did not show a benefit of statin therapy in end-stage renal disease patients on dialysis. Major guidelines either recommend against the use of statins in patients on dialysis or provide no recommendations about statin use for this complex patient population. As a result, we suspect many patients on dialysis are not on statins, even if they have known atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. When these patients receive kidney transplants, the risk of adverse cardiovascular events increases in the peri-operative period. Although there are no randomized clinical trials looking at statin use in these patients, we suggest that statin use be considered in patients with a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, to potentially minimize peri-operative cardiovascular complications. We also recommend further research to determine whether statin therapy in dialysis patients awaiting kidney transplant is associated with better survival.

Statin therapy for preventing cardiovascular diseases in patients treated with tacrolimus after kidney transplantation

Background

Lipid abnormalities are prevalent in tacrolimus-treated patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the preventive effects of statin therapy on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients treated with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression after kidney transplantation (KT), and to identify the risk factors.

Methods

This observational cohort study included adult patients who underwent KT and were treated with tacrolimus. Patients who received any lipid-lowering agents except statins, or had a history of immunosuppressant use before transplantation were excluded. The primary outcome was the adjusted risk of the first occurrence of MACE. The secondary outcomes included the risk of individual cardiovascular disease (CVD) and changes in cholesterol level. Subgroup analyses were performed in the statin-user group according to the dosage and/or type of statin.

Results

Compared with the control group (n=73), the statin-users (n=92) had a significantly reduced risk of MACE (adjusted HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.13–0.74). In the Cox regression analysis, old age, history of CVD, and comorbid hypertension were identified as independent factors associated with increased MACE. The total cholesterol levels were not significantly different between the two groups. Subjects with higher cumulative defined daily dose of statins had significantly lower risks of MACE.

Conclusion

Statin therapy in patients treated with tacrolimus after KT significantly lowered the risk of MACE. Long-term statin therapy is clearly indicated in older kidney transplant recipients for secondary prevention.

Post-transplant dyslipidemia: Mechanisms, diagnosis and management

Post-transplant dyslipidemia is highly prevalent and presents unique management challenges to the clinician. The two major outcomes to consider with post-transplant therapies for dyslipidemia are preserving or improving allograft function, and reducing cardiovascular risk. Although there are other cardiovascular risk factors such as graft dysfunction, hypertension, and diabetes, attention to dyslipidemia is warranted because interventions for dyslipidemia have an impact on reducing cardiac events in clinical trials specific to the transplant population. Dyslipidemia is not synonymous with hyperlipidemia. Numerous mechanisms exist for the occurrence of post-transplant dyslipidemia, including those mediated by immunosuppressive drug therapy. Statin therapy has received the most attention in all solid organ transplant recipient populations, although the effect of proper dietary advice and adjuvant pharmacological and non-pharmacological agents should not be dismissed. At all stages of treatment appropriate monitoring strategies for side effects should be implemented so that the benefits from these therapies can be achieved. Clinicians have a choice when there is a conflict between various transplant society and lipid society guidelines for therapy and targets.

Etiology and management of dyslipidemia in children with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease

Lipids are essential components of cell membranes, contributing to cell fuel, myelin formation, subcellular organelle function, and steroid hormone synthesis. Children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) exhibit various co-morbidities, including dyslipidemia. The prevalence of dyslipidemias in children with CKD and ESRD is high, being present in 39-65% of patients. Elevated lipid levels in children without renal disease are a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), while the risk for CVD in pediatric CKD/ESRD is unclear. The pathogenesis of dyslipidemia in CKD features various factors, including increased levels of triglycerides, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, apolipoprotein C3 (ApoC-III), decreased levels of cholesterylester transfer protein and high-density lipoproteins, and aberrations in serum very low-density and intermediate-density lipoproteins. If initial risk assessment indicates that a child with advanced CKD has 2 or more co-morbidities for CVD, first-line treatment should consist of non-pharmacologic management such as therapeutic lifestyle changes and dietary counseling. Pharmacologic treatment of dyslipidemia may reduce the incidence of CVD in children with CKD/ESRD, but randomized trials are lacking. Statins are the only class of lipid-lowering drugs currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in the pediatric population. FDA-approved pediatric labeling for these drugs is based on results from placebo-controlled trial results, showing 30-50% reductions in baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Although statins are generally well tolerated in adults, a spectrum of adverse events has been reported with their use in both the clinical trial and post-marketing settings.

Posttransplant metabolic complications in living-related renal allograft recipients of Kashmir Valley

OBJECTIVES

Renal transplant offers a definitive therapeutic modality for patients with end-stage renal disease; however, 50% to 70% of these patients have graft dysfunction after the transplant. Proactive prevention management of metabolic complications may reduce posttransplant morbidity and mortality in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective and prospective review of 120 kidney transplant recipients during 5 years' follow-up was performed to analyze the incidence and status of the various metabolic complications after a renal transplant.

RESULTS

In our study, postrenal transplant diabetes mellitus was seen in 9 of 120 patients (7.5%). The incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus was 5% in tacrolimus-treated patients (n=6) compared with 2.5% in cyclosporine-treated patients (n=3). Dyslipidemia, as hypercholesterolemia and hyper-triglyceridemia, was seen in 31 recipients (25.83%). Significant posttransplant hyperlipidemia was documented (P < .05). Further, it was noted that 25 patients who developed hyperlipidemia (20.83%) were taking cyclosporine-based therapy, while 6 were treated with tacrolimus-based therapy (5%; P < .05). However, most subjects with hyperlipidemia had renal graft dysfunction. Posttransplant erythrocytosis affected 9 renal transplant recipients (7.5%) with a mean (±SD) hematocrit of 41.3%±6.7%. A statistically significant correlation was seen between prerenal and postrenal transplant hematocrit by 12 months. Hyperparathyroidism was observed in 1 renal transplant patient (1.25%).

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of this study, we conclude that posttransplant diabetes mellitus occurred in 7.5% patients, hypercholesteremia and hyper-triglyceridemia occurred in 25.83% patients, posttransplant erythrocytosis affected 7.5% patients, and hyperparathyroidism occurred in 1 renal transplant patient (1.25%). Moreover, dyslipidemia, contributed to progressive graft dysfunction.

Ω3 fatty acids may reduce hyperlipidemia in pediatric renal transplant recipients

Life expectancy after pediatric renal transplantation remains lower than that of the normal population largely due to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Hyperlipidemia is a potentially modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity. Retrospective chart review of all available pediatric renal transplant patients (26) in a single center with assessment of anthropometry, renal function, steroid, calcineurin or mTOR inhibitor exposure and Ω3 FA supplementation. Eighteen transplant recipients without Ω3 FA supplementation served as control. Nutrition and supplement surveys were conducted with standardized questionnaires. Fasting cholesterol values were compared using the latest value prior to start of Ω3 FA and at last follow-up. Eight patients (five receiving mTOR inhibitor) started Ω3 FA supplementation at a mean dose of 29.2 ± 12 mg of EPA/kg and 16.1 ± 7.4 mg DHA/kg body weight. Median duration of treatment was 2.5 yr (range 0.8-5.9 yr) and their total fasting cholesterol at last follow-up dropped significantly from 5.08 ± 0.97 (control group 3.77 ± 0.81, p = 0.0084) to 4.17 ± 0.54 mm (p = 0.0158). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased not significantly from 1.74 ± 0.49 to 2.02 ± 0.93 mm. No patient had increased bleeding. Supplementation of omega-3 FAs may reduce hyperlipidaemia after pediatric renal transplantation.

Genetics or environment in drug transport: the case of organic anion transporting polypeptides and adverse drug reactions

INTRODUCTION

Organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) uptake transporters are important for the disposition of many drugs and perturbed OATP activity can contribute to adverse drug reactions (ADRs). It is well documented that both genetic and environmental factors can alter OATP expression and activity. Genetic factors include single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that change OATP activity and epigenetic regulation that modify OATP expression levels. SNPs in OATPs contribute to ADRs. Environmental factors include the pharmacological context of drug-drug interactions and the physiological context of liver diseases. Liver diseases such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, cholestasis and hepatocellular carcinoma change the expression of multiple OATP isoforms. The role of liver diseases in the occurrence of ADRs is unknown.

AREAS COVERED

This article covers the roles OATPs play in ADRs when considered in the context of genetic or environmental factors. The reader will gain a greater appreciation for the current evidence regarding the salience and importance of each factor in OATP-mediated ADRs.

EXPERT OPINION

A SNP in a single OATP transporter can cause changes in drug pharmacokinetics and contribute to ADRs but, because of overlap in substrate specificities, there is potential for compensatory transport by other OATP isoforms. By contrast, the expression of multiple OATP isoforms is decreased in liver diseases, reducing compensatory transport and thereby increasing the probability of ADRs. To date, most research has focused on the genetic factors in OATP-mediated ADRs while the impact of environmental factors has largely been ignored.

Dyslipidemia can be controlled in diabetic as well as nondiabetic recipients after kidney transplant

BACKGROUND

Patients with diabetes have been reported to have greater dyslipidemia after kidney transplant (KTX). Because postKTX management of diabetes has changed markedly since those reports, we hypothesized that lipids can be controlled as well in diabetic as in nondiabetic recipients.

METHODS

We compared lipid levels up to 2 years after KTX (n=192) between diabetic and nondiabetic recipients. The cohort was subdivided into nondiabetic (nonDM-K; n=123), type 2 (DM2-K; n=33), or type 1 diabetes after KTX (DM1-K; n=14), or type 1 after kidney-pancreas transplant (DM1-KP; n=22).

RESULTS

Mean age and body mass index of DM2-K were greater than the others (P<0.01), and diabetes groups had a higher pretransplant A1C than nonDM-K (P<0.001). After KTX, lipid levels were not higher in diabetic than in nondiabetic recipients, and did not increase in any group. Total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels decreased in DM1-K (P<0.001), high-density lipoprotein levels decreased in DM1-KP (P=0.02), and triglyceride levels were unchanged after KTX for all groups. A1C improved in DM1-K and DM1-KP (P<0.0001). There was less improvement in lipid levels with tacrolimus-sirolimus immunosuppression than with other steroid-containing regimens (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple mechanisms may contribute to better lipid levels in both groups as well as the lack of difference between diabetic and nondiabetic recipients compared with what has been reported previously: greater use of and more effective lipid-lowering agents, no significant weight gain, no difference in renal function between groups, and better control of glucose in the diabetic group. Thus, overall, lipids can be controlled as well in diabetic as in nondiabetic KTX recipients.

Long-Term Evolution of Body Composition After Renal Transplantation: 5-Year Survey

BACKGROUND

Thanks to advancements in immunosuppression, patients are living longer with kidney transplants, and nonimmunologic factors (particularly nutritional) have become a major source of morbidity and mortality after successful kidney transplantation (KTx). In this current study, we have prospectively assessed, in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients (KTR), the course of some nonimmunologic factors liable to hinder the long-term outcome of KTR.

METHODS

Forty-four consecutive KTR with stable functioning grafts received dietary recommendations and were on the lowest effective dose of steroids. Biochemical nutritional markers, C-reactive protein, lipid profile, and body composition determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were studied over the first year, 2 years, and 5 years after KTx.

RESULTS

No patients died during the follow-up. All patients but 2 were considered normotensive. Clinical diabetes developed in 3 patients. Visceral proteins stabilized at a normal range after the first year. Most of the patients normalized their inflammatory status. A significant improvement in lipid profile was observed. Female patients had a significant increase of weight (13.5%), mainly because of an increase in fat mass: 3.4 kg (19.4%) at 1 year and 5.6 kg (29.7%) at 2 years. In male patients, body composition remained stable and close to baseline values. The evolution of bone mass varied according to gender, total corticoid doses, and calcineurin inhibitors. Patients on low doses of steroids normalized their Z-score over the 5-year period. The increase in bone mass (paired t-test, P = .006) was only significant in patients treated with tacrolimus (analysis of variance for repeated measures, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Simple measures and dietary intervention to prevent or correct nonimmunologic disorders should permit improvement of long-term morbidity and mortality of KTR without compromising the functional outcome of their transplant.

Effects of Immunosuppressive Drugs on Serum Lipid Levels in Renal Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Hyperlipidemia is an important metabolic disorder that is common among renal transplant recipients. This study investigated the possible effects of transplantation and immunosuppressive drugs on lipid profiles in this patient group.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the records of 179 patients who underwent renal transplantation between 1996 and 2000, recording lipid profile findings-total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc), and triglyceride (TG)-before and at least 6 months after transplantation. We also recorded patient demographics, underlying renal disorder, and immunosuppressive drug regimens.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine (38.5%) patients were women and 110 men (61.5%). The mean age (+/- SD) of the 179 recipients was 35.7 +/- 11.8 years (range, 11 to 62 years). The respective pre- versus posttransplantation lipid profile findings were: TC, 171.6 +/- 42.4 mg/dL versus 204.7 +/- 45.3 mg/dL, P < .001; LDLc, 114.5 +/- 34.5 mg/dL versus 142.2 +/- 39.7 mg/dL, P < .001; HDLc, 46.7 +/- 13.6 mg/dL versus 42.5 +/- 12.3 mg/dL, P = .001; TG, 142.9 +/- 55.7 mg/dL versus 178.8 +/- 71.8 mg/dL, P < .001. Increased lipid levels were found to be independent of patient age, sex, donor type, and immunosuppressive drug regimen.

CONCLUSION

The results suggested that antihyperlipidemic drugs should be administered routinely to renal transplant recipients irrespective of the immunosuppressive drug regimen or graft source.

Relationship of cyclosporin and sirolimus blood concentrations regarding the incidence and severity of hyperlipidemia after kidney transplantation

The influence of drug concentrations on the development of persistent posttransplant hyperlipidemia was investigated in 82 patients who received cyclosporin A (CsA) and prednisone plus sirolimus (SRL) (52) or azathioprine (AZA) (30) during the first year after transplantation. Blood levels of CsA and SRL, daily doses of AZA and prednisone, and cholesterol, triglyceride, and glucose concentrations were determined during each visit (pretransplant and 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 360 days posttransplant). Persistent hyperlipidemia was defined as one-year average steady-state cholesterol (CavCHOL) or triglyceride (CavTG) concentrations above 240 and 200 mg/dL, respectively. Mean cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations increased after transplantation (P < 0.01) and were higher in patients receiving SRL compared to AZA (P < 0.001). Patients receiving SRL showed a significantly higher number of cholesterol (> 229 or > 274 mg/dL) and triglyceride (> 198 or > 282 mg/dL) determinations in the upper interquartile ranges. CsA and SRL interquartile ranges correlated with cholesterol concentrations (P = 0.001) whereas only SRL interquartile ranges correlated with triglyceride concentrations (P < 0.0001). Only pretransplant cholesterol concentration > 205 mg/dL was independently associated with development of persistent hypercholesterolemia (CavCHOL > 240 mg/dL, relative risk (RR) = 20, CI 3.8-104.6, P = 0.0004) whereas pretransplant triglyceride concentration > 150 mg/dL (RR = 7.2, CI 1.6-32.4, P = 0.01) or > 211 mg/dL (RR = 19.8, CI 3.6-107.9, P = 0.0006) and use of SRL (RR = 3, CI 1.0-8.8, P = 0.0049) were independently associated with development of persistent hypertriglyceridemia (CavTG > 200 mg/dL). Persistent hypercholesterolemia was more frequent among patients with higher pretransplant cholesterol concentrations and was dependent on both CsA and SRL concentrations. Persistent hypertriglyceridemia was more frequent among patients with higher pretransplant triglyceride concentrations and was dependent on SRL concentrations.

Long term efficacy of simvastatin in renal transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine or tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

Hyperlipidemia is frequently developed following renal transplantation and results in worsening of the patient's prognosis.

METHODS

In this study, 14 patients who had hypercholesterolemia [total cholesterol (TC) >200 mg/dL] and hypertriglyceridemia [triglyceride (TG) >150 mg/dL] 1 month after renal transplantation (post-transplantation), seven patients each under the treatment with immunosuppressant, either cyclosporine or tacrolimus started simvastatin treatment of 5-10 mg/d and continued the treatment for 4 yr. The effect of simvastatin treatment was assessed by comparison in serum lipid levels (TC, TG, cholesterol in lipoprotein fractions, and apolipoproteins) and the lipid metabolism related enzyme activities for post-transplantation, after 6-month and 4-yr simvastatin treatment.

RESULTS

Simvastatin treatment of 4 yr significantly decreased the elevated levels of serum TC from 234.5 +/- 30.8 to 186.3 +/- 20.5 mg/dL (p < 0.001), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from 116.7 +/- 22.5 to 82.7 +/- 16.6 mg/dL (p < 0.05) and TG from 200.3 +/- 109.2 to 97.0 +/- 45.2 mg/dL (p < 0.001). In addition, there were significant decreases in elevated serum very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C) from 47.8 +/- 18.4 to 28.6 +/- 9.5 mg/dL (p < 0.001) and LDL2 cholesterol (LDL2-C) from 20.8 +/- 8.2 to 5.7 +/- 1.8 mg/dL (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that 4-yr treatment of simvastatin improves profiles of the atherogenic lipids in renal transplant patients with immunosuppressant caused hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia treated either cyclosporine or tacrolimus in similar manner.

Fluvastatin in the treatment of dyslipidemia associated with chronic kidney failure and renal transplantation

Premature atherosclerotic coronary heart disease driven by multiple risk factors is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among the 6 million patients in the United States with chronic renal failure. Consensus is that kidney failure and renal transplantation patients should be treated aggressively for dyslipidemia. Major medical literature databases were searched for published information about fluvastatin, a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, used in patients with impaired renal function. This article characterizes the dyslipidemia observed in these clinical settings and reviews the clinical experience with fluvastatin.

Preventing cardiovascular outcome in patients with renal impairment: is there a role for lipid-lowering therapy?

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), ranging from modest renal impairment to dialysis and transplant, have an increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Patients with CKD have both traditional and non-traditional risk factors for CVD. The role of lipids as risk factors for CVD in these populations has not been firmly established. In a recent prospective controlled trial, it was established that atherogenic lipids are indeed strong risk factors for CVD in renal transplant recipients, and that treatment with a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor reduced the incidence of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. For patients receiving dialysis, the association between serum lipid levels and cardiovascular outcome is uncertain and there is no evidence from controlled trials that lipid-lowering therapy does have a beneficial effect on cardiovascular outcome in these patients. Atherogenic lipids are probably a risk factor for patients with mild or moderate CKD, and five subgroup analyses have indicated a favorable effect of lipid-lowering therapy on cardiovascular outcome, although we still lack prospective controlled trials in these patients. CVD in patients with CKD has been a neglected area of research.

Cardiovascular disease in stable renal transplant patients in Norway: morbidity and mortality during a 5-yr follow-up

BACKGROUND

Although cardiovascular disease is a major cause of death after renal transplantation (Tx), predictors for cardiovascular events have not been well defined. Aims of this cross-sectional study were first to assess cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in stable renal Tx patients, and to identify predictors for cardiovascular events during long-term follow-up.

METHODS

In all, 406 renal Tx patients (mean age: 47 yr, 60.1% males, 70.9% using cyclosporine A) commenced a baseline registration (median) 48 months after Tx, and 405 was thereafter followed in 5 yr. Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariate regression analysis (Cox proportional hazards model) were used to identify and characterize predictors for cardiovascular events.

RESULTS

There were 88 deaths (average annual mortality: 4.4%), and 74% of these were cardiovascular. In age groups 40-49, 50-59, and 60-69 yr, odds ratio for cardiovascular mortality in patients vs. general population was 46.2, 20.1, and 8.0, respectively. Death from ischemic heart disease (IHD) was independently predicted by baseline congestive heart failure (relative risk: RR 5.33), diabetes (RR 2.28), systolic blood pressure (mmHg, RR 1.02), age (yr, RR 1.06), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L, RR 0.36). Predictors for a major ischemic heart event (death from or onset of IHD) were in addition baseline total cholesterol (mmol/L, RR 1.18) and cerebrovascular disease (RR 2.98).

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, IHD was the major cause of death late after renal Tx, and a major ischemic heart event was predicted by baseline congestive heart failure, diabetes, age, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia.

Management of patients on chronic glucocorticoid therapy: an endocrine perspective

Glucocorticoids continue to be a potent therapeutic tool for various medical conditions; however, their medication side effects pose challenges. Steroid diabetes is treated primarily with prandial insulin, either regular or the rapid insulins (lispro or aspart). Intermediate insulin is indicated less frequently, for fasting hyperglycemia. Osteoporosis is the most debilitating of potential glucocorticoid side effects, with bisphosphonates the mainstay of prevention and treatment. Dyslipidemia can range from mild to significant, but it responds to therapy similar to that of nonglucocorticoid-induced lipid disorders. Glucocorticoid-induced adrenal withdrawal syndrome can occur even with short courses of longer-acting glucocorticoid therapy, but it responds to adjustment of glucocorticoid dose. When tapering down to near-physiologic dose, pituitary-adrenal axis responsiveness should be checked before discontinuing steroid use.

Lipid profile before and after renal transplantation--a longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

The data on lipid profile in renal transplant recipients from the Indian subcontinent is scant.

METHODS

Lipid profile was studied in 30 consecutive patients of end stage renal disease before renal transplantation (0 month) and prospectively posttransplantation at 1, 3, and 6 months. The results were compared with 30, age and sex matched, healthy controls. All the patients received triple immunosuppression (prednisolone, azathioprine and cyclosporine).

RESULTS

Pretransplantation, the hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia was present in 20% and 7% of the patients and the difference (elevation) in the mean values of various lipid fractions was not significant compared to healthy controls except a fall in HDL (p < .01). After renal transplantation, there was a significant elevation in the mean values of total cholesterol, triglycerides, VLDL, and LDL cholesterol at 1, 3, and 6 months. HDL cholesterol levels remained significantly lower as compared to healthy controls. Although, the mean values of serum triglycerides and cholesterol were significantly higher in diabetic end stage renal disease compared to nondiabetic ESRD, however there was insignificant difference in the lipid profile amongst diabetic and nondiabetic renal allograft recipients.

CONCLUSION

Our data shows distinct elevation in the lipids and lipoproteins after renal transplantation and immunosuppressive drugs seem to be the culprit.

Lipid Profile In Transplant Patients: A Clinical Study

15 renal transplant recipients were studied for their lipid profile. The patients were on regular post transplant follow up and had non clinical or laboratory evidence of graft dysfunction, intercurrent infection or post transplant diabetes mellitus for at least 3 months prior to the study. The mean duration of transplant was 15 ± 9.5 months (range 3-32 months). Majority (86%) were on triple immunosuppression therapy and received a mean prednisolone dose of 10.5 mg. An equal number of healthy subjects were randomly selected and studied for their lipid profile and served as control for the study group. There was no significant change in the HDL-cholesterol level as compared with controls. However, these patients showed a significantly higher LDL-cholesterol and total cholesterol levels. Further, a significant inverse correlation was observed between triglycerides and total cholesterol levels and transplant duration.

Hyperlipidemia: a risk factor for chronic allograft dysfunction

While the early results of renal transplantation have improved in the last years, but the long-term allograft survival have not improved to the same extent. The major cause of these graft losses is chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD). The pathogenesis of CAD is complex and results from a interaction of immune and nonimmune factors. Between these non-immunological related factors there are two cardiovascular risk factors, hypertension and especially hyperlipidemia, that have been implicated in the development and progression of CAD. Lipid profile abnormalities are very prevalent in renal transplant patients. In last years several authors have reported an association between different lipid profile alterations and CAD. We conducted an observational study in our group to determine the relationship between different lipid disturbances and CAD. The hypertriglyceridemia and the Lp(a)>30 mg/dL before and after transplantation were, between the lipid abnormalities, the two independent risk factors for CAD in a multivarite analysis.

Dyslipidemia in pediatric renal disease: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management

Dyslipidemia increases the risk of cardiovascular events among individuals with renal disease, and there is a growing body of evidence that it hastens the progression of renal disease itself. Children with nephrotic syndrome or renal transplants have easily recognized hyperlipidemia. Among those with chronic renal insufficiency or end-stage renal disease, detection of dyslipidemia requires more careful analysis and knowledge of normal pediatric ranges. Disordered lipoprotein metabolism results from complex interactions among many factors, including the primary disease process, use of medications such as corticosteroids, the presence of malnutrition or obesity, and diet. The systematic treatment of dyslipidemia in children with chronic renal disease is controversial because conclusive data regarding the risks and benefits are lacking. Hepatic 3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins), fibrates, plant stanols, bile acid-binding resins, and dietary manipulation are options for individualized treatment. Prospective investigations are required to guide clinical management.

Lipid profile during rhGH therapy in pediatric renal transplant patients

To evaluate the effect of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) treatment on the lipid profile of pediatric renal transplant patients, we studied nine children treated with rhGH for 1 yr and a control group of 12 untreated patients matched in terms of age, renal transplant function and post-transplant follow-up. The levels of lipoprotein (a [Lp(a)], cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoprotein A (APO A) and apolipoprotein B (APO B), and the APO B/APO A ratio, were determined at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of follow-up. RhGH therapy had no effect on cholesterol, triglycerides or apolipoproteins. Mean serum Lp(a) levels increased from 6.7 +/- 5.7 mg/dL at baseline to 11.8 +/- 10.7 after 6 months (p = 0.018) and 13.6 +/- 15.1 after 12 months of rhGH treatment (p = 0.04), but did not change in the control group. Lp(a) is a risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity, and increased Lp(a) levels may be a side-effect of rhGH treatment in renal transplant patients. Although long-term follow-up of a large number of patients is needed to establish the duration and extent of the effects of rhGH treatment on Lp(a) levels in transplanted children, serum Lp(a) levels should be carefully monitored in those receiving rhGH therapy.

Apolipoprotein C-III and E polymorphisms and cardiovascular syndrome, hyperlipidemia, and insulin resistance in renal transplantation

Hyperlipidemia and insulin resistance frequently develop after renal transplantation, contributing to cardiovascular disease. Individual differences in response based upon genetic variations in proteins regulating lipidic and glucose tolerance metabolism could be expected. In the general population, the S2 allelic variant of the apoprotein (apo) C-III gene has been associated with hypertriglyceridemia and an insulin resistant state, whereas the E4 allele of the apo E has been associated with hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis. Its influence in renal transplant patients remains to be seen. In order to assess the impact of apo E and C-III major polymorphisms on atherosclerotic vascular disease, lipid profile and impaired glucose tolerance in renal transplant patients, we studied 110 consecutively examined patients undergoing kidney transplantation (age range 24-73 years). Atherosclerotic complications were detected in 25% of patients, with age, male sex and hypercholesterolemia being significant atherosclerotic risk factors. Among the male patients with E4 allele, the odds ratio for coronary disease and global atherosclerosis were 10.2 (95% CI) and 6.4 (95% CI), respectively. There were no significant differences in the frequency of any of the polymorphisms among patients with dyslipidemia and impaired glucose tolerance. As the number of patients in our sample was small, larger studies are needed to verify these issues. While in the studied population C-III polymorphism appears to have little association with the prevalence of atherosclerotic complications, E4 allele should be considered as a genetic marker of coronary artery disease and global atherosclerosis in renal transplant patients.

Calcineurin inhibitors and post-transplant hyperlipidaemias

Cardiovascular disease is now the leading cause of death in transplant recipients. This is due, in part, to the vulnerability of these patients to a complicated set of conditions including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and post-transplant hyperlipidaemia (PTHL). PTHL is characterised by persistent elevations in total serum cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels. The causes of PTHL are complex and not fully understood, however several classes of immunosuppressants including the corticosteroids, rapamycins and calcineurin inhibitors, appear to play a role. PTHL has been observed in most studies in which patients received calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens, and has been observed with both tacrolimus and cyclosporin. Comparing these calcineurin inhibitors with regard to the relative incidence or severity of PTHL occurring during treatment is difficult because of the use of higher doses of corticosteroids in cyclosporin-based regimens, as compared with tacrolimus-based regimens. However, current expert opinion suggests that the discrepancies in the relative incidence and severity of PTHL are largely accounted for by this difference in corticosteroid dose. At this point in time, evidence for potential differences is scant and inconclusive. Further study is needed, not only to investigate differences in lipid profile, but also of the relative effects of these immunosuppressants on long term graft function as well as on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. PTHL can be successfully managed with a combination of dietary management, reduction and, if appropriate, withdrawal of corticosteroids, and the administration of lipid-lowering drugs. With this combination of therapeutic options, the threats to long term health posed by PTHL may be effectively addressed.

Risk factors for and management of post-transplantation cardiovascular disease

The mortality rates due to cardiovascular disease (CVD) in transplant recipients are greater than in the general population. CVD is a major cause of both graft loss and patient death in renal transplant recipients, and improving cardiovascular health in transplant recipients will presumably help to extend both patient and graft survival. Further studies are needed to better evaluate the effectiveness of risk modification on subsequent CVD morbidity and mortality. There is no reason to consider risk factors for CVD such as hyperlipidaemia, hypertension and diabetes mellitus in transplant recipients differently from in the general population. In addition, there are specific transplantation risk factors such as acute rejection episodes and the use of immunosuppressive drugs. It is obvious that several of the immunosuppressive agents used today have disadvantageous influences on risk factors for CVD such as hyperlipidaemia, hypertension and post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM), but the relative importance of immunosuppressant-induced increases in these risk factors is basically unknown. This may be a strong argument for the selective use and individual tailoring of immunosuppressive agents based upon the risk factor profile of the patient, without jeopardising the function of the graft. Hyperlipidaemia is common after transplantation, and immunosuppression with corticosteroids, cyclosporin, or sirolimus (rapamycin) causes different types of post-transplantation hyperlipidaemia. However, to date, no studies have demonstrated that lipid lowering strategies significantly reduce CVD morbidity or mortality and improve allograft survival in transplant recipients. Several studies using preventive or interventional approaches are ongoing and will be reported in the near future. Post-transplantation hypertension appears to be a major risk factor determining graft and patient survival, and immunosuppressive agents have different effects on hypertension. Controlled studies support the opinion that post-transplantation hypertension must be treated as strictly as in a population with essential hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or chronic renal failure. As increasing numbers of immunosuppressive agents become available for use, we may be in a better position to tailor immunosuppressive therapy to the individual patient, avoiding the use of diabetogenic drugs, drug combinations, or inappropriate doses in patients susceptible to PTDM. Multiple acute rejection episodes have also been demonstrated to be a risk factor for CVD - a strong argument for the use of immunosuppressive drugs to reduce acute rejection. Until we have a better understanding from ongoing landmark studies on the management of CVD, presently available therapy to reduce risk factors needs to be used together with individual tailoring of immunosuppressive therapy with the aim of reducing CVD in these patients.

Syndrome X following renal transplantation

The cardiovascular risk factors that accompany postrenal transplantation include an atherogenic lipid profile, hypertension, new-onset diabetes mellitus, and a chronic prothrombotic state. This picture describes the dysmetabolic syndrome or syndrome X, which can significantly aggravate not only the risk of cardiovascular disease and death in this population, but also the progression of allograft dysfunction. The recognition and aggressive management of the dysmetabolic syndrome in postrenal allograft recipients may have a favorable impact on the incidence of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in these patients and prolong allograft function.

Short-term effect of atorvastatin in hypercholesterolaemic renal-transplant patients unresponsive to other statins

BACKGROUND

Atherosclerosis associated with hyperlipidaemia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after renal transplantation. Atorvastatin is a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor that has shown a favourable profile of lipid reduction when compared with other statins. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in hypercholesterolaemic renal transplant patients who had previously been on statins with little or no effect.

METHODS

Atorvastatin, 10 mg/day, was administered to 10 renal transplant recipients with persistent hypercholesterolaemia (total cholesterol >240 mg/dl) for a period of 3 months. All of them had already been on statins for at least 3 months.

RESULTS

Atorvastatin exerted a satisfactory lipid-lowering effect in seven of 10 patients. On average, serum total cholesterol (311+/-36.2 vs 253+/-48.8 mg/dl; P:<0.05) and serum LDL cholesterol (184+/-30.9 vs 136+/-22.9 mg/dl; P:<0.05) significantly decreased after atorvastatin therapy, whereas serum HDL cholesterol (86+/-14.6 vs 84+/-22.1 mg/dl) remained unchanged. In five subjects with a baseline serum triglyceride level above 150 mg/dl, a marked reduction in triglycerides was also observed (261+/-80.3 vs 193+/-53.3 mg/dl; P:<0.05). Lp(a) did not significantly change (13+/-16.3 vs 15+/-23.9 mg/dl, P:=NS). Serum creatinine, transaminases, creatinine phosphokinase (55+/-21.3 vs 56+/-29.4 IU/l) and fasting cyclosporin A levels were unaffected. The drug was generally well tolerated and neither myositis nor rhabdomyolysis was reported.

CONCLUSION

Short-term therapy with the new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin, appears to be effective in lowering atherogenic lipids in renal transplant patients who had had little or no response to other statins.

Can low-fat/cholesterol nutrition counseling improve food intake habits and hyperlipidemia of renal transplant patients?

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of low-fat/cholesterol nutrition counseling on food intake habits and blood lipid levels of renal transplant patients.

DESIGN

Prospective practice-based outcome study.

SETTING

Acute care hospital post-renal transplant outpatient clinic.

PATIENTS

Forty-three renal transplant patients not on lipid-lowering medications referred to the renal dietitian for low-fat/cholesterol nutrition counseling between September 1994 and September 1997.

INTERVENTION

Individual assessment and counseling using the Healthy Heart Nutrition Guidelines Step 1 diet (<30% of total calories from fat, <300 mg cholesterol, and <10% of total calories from saturated fatty acids).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Three-day food records precounseling and 3-day food records (n = 13) or descriptive intake changes (n = 30) postcounseling (time interval: 2 to 8 months). Fasting/random serum total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), as available.

RESULTS

Total cholesterol (n = 43) and LDL-C (n = 22) decreased significantly (0. 54 mmol/L P <.000 and 0.53 mmol/L P <.000, respectively). There were no significant changes in HDL-C and triglycerides. Twenty percent of patients (n = 43) reached target levels of total cholesterol <5.2 mmol/L, and 35% of patients (n = 22) reached target levels of LDL-C <3.4 mmol/L. Percentage of total calories from fat decreased significantly (7.58% P <.03). Descriptive intake changes of lower fat choices were reported in the no post-food records group.

CONCLUSION

Patients can make changes in food intake habits after nutrition counseling. Serum lipid levels can improve after nutrition counseling, but many patients may still require lipid lowering medications to reach target levels. Nutrition counseling should be considered for the initial treatment of hyperlipidemia in renal transplant patients.

New insights into the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of statins

The beneficial effects of statins are assumed to result from their ability to reduce cholesterol biosynthesis. However, because mevalonic acid is the precursor not only of cholesterol, but also of many nonsteroidal isoprenoid compounds, inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase may result in pleiotropic effects. It has been shown that several statins decrease smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation and that sera from fluvastatin-treated patients interfere with its proliferation. Cholesterol accumulation in macrophages can be inhibited by different statins, while both fluvastatin and simvastatin inhibit secretion of metalloproteinases by human monocyte-derived macrophages. The antiatherosclerotic effects of statins may be achieved by modifying hypercholesterolemia and the arterial wall environment as well. Although statins rarely have severe adverse effects, interactions with other drugs deserve attention. Simvastatin, lovastatin, cerivastatin, and atorvastatin are biotransformed in the liver primarily by cytochrome P450-3A4, and are susceptible to drug interactions when co-administered with potential inhibitors of this enzyme. Indeed, pharmacokinetic interactions (e.g., increased bioavailability), myositis, and rhabdomyolysis have been reported following concurrent use of simvastatin or lovastatin and cyclosporine A, mibefradil, or nefazodone. In contrast, fluvastatin (mainly metabolized by cytochrome P450-2C9) and pravastatin (eliminated by other metabolic routes) are less subject to this interaction. Nevertheless, a 5- to 23-fold increase in pravastatin bioavailability has been reported in the presence of cyclosporine A. In summary, statins may have direct effects on the arterial wall, which may contribute to their antiatherosclerotic actions. Furthermore, some statins may have lower adverse drug interaction potential than others, which is an important determinant of safety during long-term therapy.

Fluvastatin in combination with cyclosporin in renal transplant recipients: a review of clinical and safety experience

Cardiovascular disease remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients who have undergone renal transplantation, with one of the main risk factors being post-transplantation hyperlipidaemia. To date, however, optimal management of elevated lipid levels in such patients has been hindered by the lack of both effective and safe treatments, coupled with concerns over probable interactions with immunosuppressive therapy, particularly cyclosporin. Numerous studies confirm that the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors, such as fluvastatin, are effective lipid-lowering agents in renal transplant recipients, supporting findings in other patients' groups. Moreover, based on investigations of metabolic profile and clinical observation, fluvastatin (at dosages of up to 80 mg/day) is well tolerated in renal transplant recipients receiving cyclosporin. In clinical trials to date, no instances of rhabdomyolysis have been observed during co-administration of fluvastatin and cyclosporin. The potential of fluvastatin for improving survival in renal transplant recipients, in terms of both cardiovascular mortality and graft rejection, is currently being investigated in two ongoing studies: ALERT (Assessment of Lescol [fluvastatin] in Renal Transplantation) and SOLAR (Study of Lescol [fluvastatin] in Acute Rejection). The results of these landmark studies should confirm the safe utility of fluvastatin in the renal transplantation setting.

The effect of pravastatin on renal function and lipid metabolism in patients with renal dysfunction with hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Pravastatin and Renal Function Research Group

The effect of pravastatin on renal function in hypertensive patients with mild renal dysfunction and hyperlipidemia was examined. A total of 57 subjects given dihydropyridine calcium blockers were randomly assigned to placebo (n = 25) and pravastatin groups (n = 32). The period of study was 6 months. In the placebo group, lipid metabolism did not change throughout the study period, but the serum creatinine concentration (Scr) increased from a baseline of 1.6+/-0.07 mg/dl to 2.1+/-0.2 mg/dl in the 6th month of study and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) increased from 26.2+/-1.1 mg/dl to 32.4+/-30.1 mg/dl. In the pravastatin group, the serum total cholesterol decreased from a baseline of 251.4+/-7.3 mg/dl to 218.2+/-6.5 mg/dl in the 6th month of study, while Scr (1.3+/-0.07 mg/dl vs. 1.3 +/-0.09 mg/dl) and BNU (20.5+/-1.2 mg/dl vs. 21.0+/-1.4 mg/dl) did not change. The change in Scr in the placebo group was significantly different from that in the pravastatin group (F = 3.75, p = 0.05). The slope of the change in 1/Scr was 0.02+/-0.07 dl x mg(-1) x month(-1) in placebo group and -0.01+/-0.03 dl x mg(-1) month(-1) in pravastatin group (P<0.05). The results indicate that pravastatin attenuates the deterioration of renal function in patients with mild renal dysfunction, together with an improvement of lipid metabolism.

Low-density lipoproteins enhance transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) expression induced by cyclosporin in human mesangial cells

Cyclosporin (CsA) is widely used in the treatment of renal disease and transplantation, which are often complicated by alterations of lipid metabolism. Both chronic administration of CsA and hyperlipidaemia have been shown to evoke an early macrophage influx and have progressively led to glomerular and interstitial sclerosis. MCP-1 is the major monocyte chemoattractant secreted by stimulated mesangial cells and TGF-beta 1 is a key mediator of fibrogenesis in chronic progressive renal fibrosis. Thus, the combined effect of CsA and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) on the gene and protein expression of MCP-1 and TGF-beta 1 in cultured human mesangial cells (HMC) was explored. Both agents induced an early and persistent increase of MCP-1 and TGF-beta 1 mRNA levels and protein release. The simultaneous addition of CsA and LDL did not display any additive effect on target gene expression, but it caused a synergistic effect on MCP-1 and TGF-beta 1 protein secretion into culture medium. On the other hand, CsA and LDL had different effects on cell proliferation: the latter increased DNA synthesis, whereas CsA inhibited both spontaneous and mitogen-stimulated mesangial cell growth. The study concludes that CsA and LDL display an additive effect on TGF-beta 1 and MCP-1 synthesis and release by HMC, thus possibly co-operating to induce an early macrophage influx and the subsequent mesangial expansion and increased extracellular matrix deposition. However, in contrast they seem to modulate HMC proliferation differently, which is a further critical event intimately involved in the development of glomerulosclerosis.

Effect of probucol on hypercholesterolemia in renal transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Hypercholesterolemia is a well-known complication in kidney transplant recipients, although its pathogenesis may be multifactorial. The therapeutic effect of probucol on post-transplant hypercholesterolemia was prospectively evaluated.

METHODS

Twelve hypercholesterolemic kidney transplant patients with serum total cholesterol > or = 250 mg/dl without diabetes mellitus or hypoproteinemia were prospectively treated with probucol (250 mg, bid, for three months). Before initiating and at the end of treatment, blood was drawn after at least a 12-hour fast to measure lipids in serum and lipoprotein fractions, apoproteins (apo), lipoprotein fractions, lethicin cholesterol acyl transferase (LCAT), free fatty acids (FFAs), and cholesterol ester. The lipid profiles of 17 healthy subjects were also examined.

RESULTS

After treatment with probucol, serum total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and apo AI were significantly decreased, whereas cholesterol ester increased significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-transplant hypercholesterolemia is featured with abnormalities in very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) metabolism. Although HDL cholesterol decreased, probucol might have acted as an antiatherogenic by modulating HDL metabolism and stimulating reverse transfer of cholesterol from peripheral tissue.

Effect of therapy with deflazacort on dyslipoproteinemia after pediatric renal transplantation

Deflazacort is an oxazolone compound derived from prednisolone, with similar immunosuppressive action but fewer side effects. Kidney function, weight/height ratio, serum triglycerides, cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, apolipoprotein A, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein (a) were studied before and 6 months after substitution of deflazacort (mean +/- SEM, 0.3 +/- 0.1 mg/kg per day) for methylprednisone (0.2 +/- 0.1 mg/kg per day) in 14 patients treated with cyclosporine, aged 3.1 to 20.3 years, 3 years after renal transplantation. Serum creatinine and calculated creatinine clearance did not change significantly, and weight/height ratio decreased from 20.0% +/- 7.1% to 12.5% +/- 6.5% (P < .005) during deflazacort therapy. Total cholesterol was reduced by 15.9% (from 233 +/- 15 mg/dL to 196 +/- 13 mg/dL, P < .01), LDL cholesterol by 25.5% (from 153 +/- 14 mg/dL to 114 +/- 12 mg/dL, P < .01), and TC/HDL cholesterol ratio by 28.3% (from 5.3 +/- 0.4 to 3.8 +/- 0.4, P < .01), whereas HDL cholesterol increased 18% (from 45 +/- 2 mg/dL to 53 +/- 2 mg/dL) and apolipoprotein A by 8.3% (from 122 +/- 5 mg/dL to 132 +/- 5 mg/dL, P < .05) during deflazacort therapy. Our data suggest that substituting deflazacort for maintenance methylprednisone therapy leads to an improvement in the lipoprotein profile of children after renal transplantation.

Drugs causing dyslipoproteinemia

Diuretics and beta-blockers have a strong tendency to affect serum lipids adversely, whereas the peripherally acting alpha-blocking agents consistently result in beneficial effects. Most of the other antihypertensive agents (calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, and drugs that act centrally) are lipid neutral. The effect of steroid hormones varies with the drug, dose, and route of administration. In general, androgens lower HDL-C and have a variable effect on LDL-C. The effects of progestins vary greatly depending on their androgenicity, and estrogens are beneficial except when hypertriglyceridemia occurs with oral estrogens. Glucocorticoids raise HDL-C and may also increase triglycerides and LDL-C. Retinoids increase triglycerides and LDL-C and also reduce HDL-C. Interferons can cause hypertriglyceridemia. Following organ transplantation, a dyslipidemia often ensues. This is caused in part by the medications used to prevent rejection (glucocorticoids, cyclosporine, and FK-506) and requires close attention and, in some patients, drug therapy to prevent coronary artery disease.

Effects of tacrolimus on hyperlipidemia after successful renal transplantation: a Southeastern Organ Procurement Foundation multicenter clinical study

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus has been shown to have a less adverse effect on the lipid profiles of transplant patients when the drug is started as induction therapy. In order to determine the effect tacrolimus has on lipid profiles in stable cyclosporine-treated renal transplant patients with established hyperlipidemia, a randomized prospective study was undertaken by the Southeastern Organ Procurement Foundation.

METHODS

Patients of the 13 transplant centers, with cholesterol of 240 mg/dl or greater, who were at least 1 year posttransplant with stable renal function, were randomly assigned to remain on cyclosporine (control) or converted to tacrolimus. Patients converted to tacrolimus were maintained at a level of 5-15 ng/ml, and control patients remained at their previous levels of cyclosporine. Concurrent immunosuppressants were not changed. Levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, total high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), very-low-density lipoprotein, and apoproteins A and B were monitored before conversion and at months 1, 3, and 6. Renal function and glucose control were evaluated at the beginning and end of the study (month 6).

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients were enrolled; 12 patients failed to complete the study. None were removed as a result of acute rejection or graft failure. Fifty-three patients were available for analysis (27 in the tacrolimus group and 26 controls). Demographics were not different between groups. In patients converted to tacrolimus treatment, there was a -55 mg/dl (-16%) (P=0.0031) change in cholesterol, a -48 mg/dl (-25%) (P=0.0014) change in LDL cholesterol, and a -36 mg/dl (-23%) (P=0.034) change in apolipoprotein B. There was no change in renal function, glycemic control, or incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus in the tacrolimus group.

CONCLUSION

Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus can be safely done after successful transplantation. Introduction of tacrolimus to a stable renal patient does not effect renal function or glycemic control. Tacrolimus can lower cholesterol, LDL, and apolipoprotein B. Conversion to tacrolimus from cyclosporine should be considered in the treatment of posttransplant hyperlipidemia.

Health-related fitness and quality of life in organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to describe the levels of health-related fitness and quality of life in a group of organ transplant recipients who participated in the 1996 U.S. Transplant Games.

METHODS

A total of 128 transplant recipients were selected on a first reply basis for testing. Subjects with the following organ types were tested: kidney (n=76), liver (n=16), heart (n=19), lung (n=6), pancreas/kidney (n=7), and bone marrow (n=4). Cardiorespiratory fitness (peak oxygen uptake) was measured using symptom-limited treadmill exercise tests with expired gas analysis. The percentage of body fat was measured using skinfold measurements, and the Medical Outcomes Short Form questionnaire (SF-36) was used to evaluate health-related quality of life.

RESULTS

Participants achieved near age-predicted cardiorespiratory fitness (94.7+/-32.5% of age-predicted levels). Scores on the SF-36 were near normal. The active subjects (76% of total sample) had significantly higher levels of peak VO2 and quality of life and a lower percentage of body fat compared with inactive subjects (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although this is a highly select group which is not representative of the general transplant population, the data suggest that near-normal levels of physical functioning and quality of life are possible after transplantation and that those who participate in regular physical activity may achieve even higher levels.

Dietary selenium increases cellular glutathione peroxidase activity and reduces the enhanced susceptibility to lipid peroxidation of plasma and low-density lipoprotein in kidney transplant recipients

The glutathione system plays a major role in the protection of cells against oxidative stress in humans. The aim of the present study was to find out the relationship between the glutathione system and plasma lipid peroxidation in six renal transplant recipients (who are under oxidative stress and thus at high risk for atherosclerosis), by using dietary selenium to activate the glutathione system. 2,2'-Azobis-2-amidinopropane hydrochloride (AAPH)-induced plasma lipid peroxidation was increased (by 60%) in all six patients in comparison to normal subjects. A similar pattern of increased plasma lipid peroxidation was found even in the basal state (in the absence of added AAPH). CuSO4-induced low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation measured by peroxide formation was also significantly increased by 2.3-fold in the patients' LDL in comparison to normal LDL. Even in the absence of CuSO4, the LDL oxidation state was also increased in the patients' LDL in comparison to normal LDL. We thus analyzed the effect of dietary selenium (0.2 mg/day for a period of 3 months, followed by an additional 3 months on placebo) on plasma and on LDL lipid peroxidation. Selenium treatment resulted in a 50% reduction in AAPH-induced plasma lipid peroxidation. The susceptibility of the patients' plasma to lipid peroxidation returned toward baseline values 3 months after termination of the selenium treatment. Similar results, although less pronounced (only 15% reduction), were obtained for CuSO4-induced LDL oxidation. Analyses of the patients' red blood cell (RBC) glutathione system revealed low levels of reduced glutathione and decreased activities of RBC glutathione peroxidase and glutathione reductase by 23%, 18%, and 20%, respectively, in comparison to normal RBC. Selenium treatment resulted in a significant elevation of RBC glutathione peroxidase and glutathione reductase activities and in reduced glutathione content by 64%, 57%, and 11%, respectively; this effect was also paralleled by a 39% reduction in the RBC oxidized glutathione content. On termination of the selenium treatment, and after 3 months on placebo, all of these values of the glutathione system elements returned toward baseline levels. We thus conclude that dietary selenium, which activates the glutathione system, is a potent antioxidant against plasma and LDL lipid peroxidation in renal transplant recipients, and may thus be considered antiatherogenic.