Safety and immunogenicity of one vs. two injections of Oka/Merck varicella vaccine in healthy children

Explore the optimal timing for administering the second dose of the varicella vaccine in China

The prevalence of varicella in China has been increasing annually, with a relatively high incidence rate of breakthrough cases. Administering two doses of the varicella vaccine (Varv) proves to be the most effective measure. The objective of this study is to assess the immunogenicity of two doses of the Varv at varying intervals and explore the optimal timing for administering the second dose of the Varv. Utilizing a prospective cohort study design, the quantification of varicella immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies' geometric mean concentrations (GMC) is conducted through glycoprotein-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (gpELISA). A total of 903 infants were included in the per-protocol population. After completing the first dose of the Varv, the GMC of antibody after 1 month (Group A) was 463.8 (447.6-480.1) mIU/mL. There was a statistically significant difference in GMC and seroconversion rates among the groups (B/C/D) that received the second dose of the Varv (p < 0.05). Multiple comparisons revealed that the group with a 3-year interval between the two vaccine doses had a higher GMC of 665.2 (622.6-707.8) mIU/mL compared to the group with a 1-year interval of 611.1 (577.1-645.3) mIU/mL and the group with a 5-year interval of 564.7 (540.1-589.4) mIU/mL. To effectively prevent and control the varicella epidemic in Jiangsu Province, two dose Varv vaccination is recommended, the optimal time point for the second dose Varv is 3 years after the first vaccination.

Relative efficacy of varicella vaccines: network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Although varicella vaccination is highly effective, no head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared the efficacy of different vaccine formulations. This study assessed the relative efficacy of different varicella vaccines using network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

We estimated the relative efficacies of varicella vaccines and dosing regimens from RCTs using Bayesian NMA. Modeling-based time-series NMA (MBNMA) was performed, accounting for differences in time since vaccination, to extrapolate long-term vaccine efficacy (VE).

RESULTS

Eight RCTs were included based on systematic review of biomedical databases. Efficacy data were reported for four varicella-containing vaccines: Varivax (V-MSD, one and two dose), Varilrix (V-GSK, one dose), Priorix-Tetra (MMRV-GSK, one dose), and Sinovac (V-Sinovac, one dose). All varicella vaccines were effective versus no vaccination. Two-dose V-MSD (98.29%, 95% credible interval [CrI] 96.08-99.23) showed significantly higher VE versus all one-dose varicella-containing vaccines, but no significant difference versus two-dose MMRV-GSK (95.19%, 95% CrI 90.3-97.63). Two-dose MMRV-GSK showed higher VE than one-dose V-GSK (66.47%; 95% CrI 43.02-79.43), but no significant differences in VE versus one-dose V-MSD or one-dose V-Sinovac. In one-dose comparisons, V-MSD showed significantly higher VE (93.09%, 95% CrI 89.13-95.96) than V-GSK, but no significant difference versus V-Sinovac (89.22%; 95% CrI 67.1-96.5). MBNMA indicated that protection against varicella was sustained without waning over the 10 year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reported higher VE for two-dose V-MSD and MMRV-GSK. Among one-dose formulations, one-dose V-MSD was more efficacious than one-dose V-GSK. Policymakers should take into consideration differences in VE when implementing one- versus two-dose strategies in universal vaccination programs.

Immune Responses to Varicella-Zoster Virus Vaccines

The live attenuated varicella vaccine is intended to mimic the tempo and nature of the humoral and cell-mediated immune responses to varicella infection. To date, two doses of varicella vaccine administered in childhood have been very effective in generating varicella-zoster virus (VZV) immune responses that prevent natural infection for at least several decades. After primary infection, the infecting VZV establishes latency in sensory and cranial nerve ganglia with the potential to reactivate and cause herpes zoster. Although, the immune responses developed during varicella are important for preventing herpes zoster they wane with increasing age (immune senescence) or with the advent of immune suppression. Protection can be restored by increasing cell-mediated immune responses with two doses of an adjuvanted recombinant VZV glycoprotein E vaccine that stimulates both VZV-and gE-specific immunity. This vaccine provides ~85-90% protection against herpes zoster for 7-8 years (to date).

Indian Academy of Pediatrics (IAP) Advisory Committee on Vaccines and Immunization Practices (ACVIP): Recommended Immunization Schedule (2020-21) and Update on Immunization for Children Aged 0 Through 18 Years

Justification

In view of new developments in vaccinology and the availability of new vaccines, there is a need to revise/review the existing immunization recommendations.

Process

Advisory Committee on Vaccines and Immunization Practices (ACVIP) of Indian Academy of Pediatrics (IAP) had a physical meeting in March, 2020 followed by online meetings (September-October, 2020), to discuss the updates and new recommendations. Opinion of each member was sought on the various recommendations and updates, following which an evidence-based consensus was reached.

Objectives

To review and revise the IAP recommendations for 2020–21 and issue recommendations on existing and new vaccines.

Recommendations

The major changes include recommendation of a booster dose of injectable polio vaccine (IPV) at 4–6 years for children who have received the initial IPV doses as per the ACVIP/IAP schedule, re-emphasis on the importance of IPV in the primary immunization schedule, preferred timing of second dose of varicella vaccine at 3–6 months after the first dose, and uniform dosing recommendation of 0.5 mL (15 µg HA) for inactivated influenza vaccines.

Phase 3, open-label, Russian, multicenter, single-arm trial to evaluate the immunogenicity of varicella vaccine (VARIVAX™) in healthy infants, children, and adolescents

Varicella (chickenpox) is a common, highly contagious disease caused by primary infection with varicella zoster virus (VZV), which can result in bacterial superinfection, central nervous system complications, and hospitalization. Stage 2 of this Phase 3 open-label study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03843632) enrolled 100 healthy infants, children, and adolescents (12 months–6 years, n = 37; 7–12 years, n = 33; 13–17 years, n = 30) without a clinical history of varicella. Participants aged 12 months–12 years were administered 1 dose of VARIVAX™ 0.5 mL (Varicella Virus Vaccine Live [Oka/Merck]) and adolescents aged 13–17 years were administered 2 doses 6 weeks apart. For participants seronegative at baseline (VZV antibody titer <1.25 glycoprotein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [gpELISA] units/mL), immunogenicity was assessed by seroconversion (VZV antibody titer ≥5 gpELISA units/mL) and VZV antibody geometric mean titers 6 weeks after the final dose. For participants who were VZV seropositive at baseline (VZV antibody titer ≥1.25 gpELISA units/mL), immunogenicity was assessed by antibody titer geometric mean fold rise and percentage of participants with ≥4-fold rise in antibody titer 6 weeks after the final dose. A Vaccine Report Card was used to report solicited and unsolicited adverse events through 42 days post-vaccination. After series completion among seronegative participants across age groups (n = 74), 98.6% demonstrated seroconversion 6 weeks post-vaccination; among seropositive participants (n = 26), 65.4% had ≥4-fold rise in antibody titer 6 weeks post-vaccination. No new safety signals were observed. Administering VARIVAX to infants, children, and adolescents resulted in an acceptable immune response with a safety profile consistent with the licensed product.

Safety surveillance of varicella vaccine using tree-temporal scan analysis

IMPORTANCE

Passive surveillance systems are susceptible to the under-reporting of adverse events (AE) and a lack of information pertaining to vaccinated populations. Conventional active surveillance focuses on predefined AEs. Advanced data mining tools could be used to identify unusual clusters of potential AEs after vaccination.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility of a novel tree-based statistical approach to the identification of AE clustering following the implementation of a varicella vaccination program among one-year-olds.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

This nationwide safety surveillance was based on data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance database and National Immunization Information System for the period 2004 through 2014. The study population was children aged 12-35 months who received the varicella vaccine.

EXPOSURE

First-dose varicella vaccine.

OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

All incident ICD-9-CM diagnoses (emergency or inpatient departments) occurring 1-56 days after the varicella vaccination were classified within a hierarchical system of diagnosis categories using Multi-Level Clinical Classifications Software. A self-controlled tree-temporal data mining tool was then used to explore the incidence of AE clustering with a variety of potential risk intervals. The comparison interval consisted of days in the 56-day follow-up period that fell outside the risk interval.

RESULTS

Among 1,194,189 varicella vaccinees with no other same-day vaccinations, nine diagnoses with clustering features were categorized into four safety signals: fever on days 1-6 (attributable risk [AR] 38.5 per 100,000, p < 0.001), gastritis and duodenitis on days 1-2 (AR 5.9 per 100,000, p < 0.001), acute upper respiratory infection on days 1-5 (AR 11.0 per 100,000, p = 0.006), and varicella infection on days 1-9 (AR 2.7 per 100,000, p < 0.001). These safety profiles and their corresponding risk intervals have been identified in previous safety surveillance studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Unexpected clusters of AEs were not detected after the mass administration of childhood varicella vaccines in Taiwan. The tree-temporal statistical method is a feasible approach to the safety surveillance of vaccines in populations of young children.

Phase 3, open-label, Russian, multicenter, single-arm trial to evaluate the immunogenicity of varicella vaccine (VARIVAX™) in healthy adults

Varicella (chickenpox) is a common, highly contagious disease caused by primary infection with varicella zoster virus (VZV). Adults typically experience more severe symptoms than children and have a higher risk of developing complications. Stage 1 of this Phase 3 open-label study enrolled healthy adults in Russia aged 18-75 years without a clinical history of varicella infection. Eligible participants (n = 50) were administered 2 doses of VARIVAX™ (Varicella Virus Vaccine Live [Oka/Merck]) 0.5 mL 6 weeks apart. For participants seronegative at baseline (VZV antibody titer <1.25 glycoprotein enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assay [gpELISA] units/mL), immunogenicity was assessed by seroconversion (VZV antibody titer ≥5 gpELISA units/mL) and assessment of geometric mean titers of VZV antibody as measured by gpELISA 6 weeks after Dose 2. For VZV seropositive participants at baseline (VZV antibody titer ≥1.25 gpELISA units/mL), immunogenicity was assessed by geometric mean fold rise in antibody titer and percentage of participants with a ≥ 4-fold rise in antibody titer 6 weeks after Dose 2. A Vaccine Report Card was used to record solicited and unsolicited adverse events through 42 days post-vaccination. All participants who were seronegative (n = 26) at baseline demonstrated seroconversion 6 weeks after Dose 2. Among participants who were seropositive at baseline (n = 23), 60.9% had a ≥4-fold rise in antibody titer 6 weeks after Dose 2. Vaccination was generally well tolerated, with no new safety signals identified. Administration of 2 doses of VARIVAX in adults in Russia results in acceptable immune responses with safety data consistent with the licensed product (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03843632).

Indian Academy of Pediatrics (IAP) Advisory Committee on Vaccines and Immunization Practices (ACVIP): Recommended Immunization Schedule (2020-21) and Update on Immunization for Children Aged 0 Through 18 Years

JUSTIFICATION

In view of new developments in vaccinology and the availability of new vaccines, there is a need to revise/review the existing immunization recommendations.

PROCESS

Advisory Committee on Vaccines and Immunization Practices (ACVIP) of Indian Academy of Pediatrics (IAP) had a physical meeting in March, 2020 followed by online meetings (September-October, 2020), to discuss the updates and new recommendations. Opinion of each member was sought on the various recommendations and updates, following which an evidence-based consensus was reached.

OBJECTIVES

To review and revise the IAP recommendations for 2020-21 and issue recommendations on existing and new vaccines.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The major changes include recommendation of a booster dose of injectable polio vaccine (IPV) at 4-6 years for children who have received the initial IPV doses as per the ACVIP/IAP schedule, re-emphasis on the importance of IPV in the primary immunization schedule, preferred timing of second dose of varicella vaccine at 3-6 months after the first dose, and uniform dosing recommendation of 0.5 mL (15 µg HA) for inactivated influenza vaccines.

A double-blind, randomized, multicenter, controlled study to evaluate the immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of varicella vaccine (VARIVAX™) passage extension 34 (PE34) process administered concomitantly with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (M-M-R™ II)

The varicella vaccine passage extension (VAR-PE) process was undertaken to extend the availability of varicella zoster virus (VZV)-containing vaccines. This study (V210-A03; NCT03239873) assessed the immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of VAR-PE process in comparison with varicella vaccine commercial product 2016 (VAR) randomized 1:1 in 600 healthy children 12 to 23 months of age administered concomitantly with measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine. The VZV seroconversion rate at 6 weeks Postdose 1 in the PP population was 100% for both groups. VZV antibody response rates and GMTs of VZV antibodies to VAR-PE induced and were non-inferior to those induced by VAR 6 weeks Postdose 1. From Day 1 through Day 42, adverse events (AEs) were reported by 81.3% of participants Postdose 1 and 67.9% Postdose 2. From Day 1 through Day 42 Postdose 1, injection-site AEs related to varicella vaccine were reported by 31.1% and 29.7% of participants in VAR-PE and VAR, respectively, and Postdose 2, by 25.7% and 25.5% of participants in the VAR-PE and VAR groups, respectively. Systemic AEs were generally comparable for the 2 vaccination groups, with the exception of pyrexia and otitis media higher in VAR-PE, and diarrhea and teething higher in VAR. The incidence of systemic AEs was generally lower Postdose 2 compared with Postdose 1.

Immunogenicity and safety of a modified three-dose priming and booster schedule for the Hantaan virus vaccine (Hantavax): A multi-center phase III clinical trial in healthy adults

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome is a serious health problem in Eurasian countries. This study aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of formalin-inactivated Hantaan virus vaccine (Hantavax®) with a 3 + 1 vaccination schedule.

METHODS

A phase III, multi-center clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of Hantavax® (three primary doses and a booster dose schedule at 0, 1, 2 and 13 months) among healthy adults. Immune responses were assessed using the plaque reduction neutralizing antibody test (PRNT) and immunofluorescent antibody assay (IFA). Systemic and local adverse events were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 320 healthy subjects aged ≥19 years were enrolled. Following three primary doses of Hantavax®, the seroconversion rate was 80.97% and 92.81% by PRNT and IFA, respectively. With booster administration, seropositive rates were 67.47% and 95.68% at one-month post-vaccination according to PRNT and IFA, respectively. Solicited local and systemic adverse events were reported in 30.50-42.81% and 16.67-33.75% during the three primary dose vaccination, while those were reported 36.57% and 21.36% after the booster doses. Both local and systemic adverse events did not increase with repeated vaccinations.

CONCLUSION

Hantavax® showed a high seroconversion rate after the three-dose priming, and additional dose administration with 11-month interval induced good booster effects. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02553837).

The how's and what's of vaccine reactogenicity

Reactogenicity represents the physical manifestation of the inflammatory response to vaccination, and can include injection-site pain, redness, swelling or induration at the injection site, as well as systemic symptoms, such as fever, myalgia, or headache. The experience of symptoms following vaccination can lead to needle fear, long-term negative attitudes and non-compliant behaviours, which undermine the public health impact of vaccination. This review presents current knowledge on the potential causes of reactogenicity, and how host characteristics, vaccine administration and composition factors can influence the development and perception of reactogenicity. The intent is to provide an overview of reactogenicity after vaccination to help the vaccine community, including healthcare professionals, in maintaining confidence in vaccines by promoting vaccination, setting expectations for vaccinees about what might occur after vaccination and reducing anxiety by managing the vaccination setting.

Varicella Pneumonia: Case Report and Review of a Potentially Lethal Complication of a Common Disease

Varicella zoster virus causes varicella (chickenpox). It can be reactivated endogenously many years later to cause herpes zoster (shingles). Although varicella is usually a benign disease in healthy children, it resulted in over 11 000 hospitalizations and over 100 deaths every year, in all ages, in the United States. Morbidity was considerably worse in older teenagers and adults. Between 5% and 15% of cases of adult chickenpox will produce some form of pulmonary illness. Progression to pneumonia risk factors include pregnancy, age, smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and immunosuppression. Typically, pulmonary symptoms occur 1 to 6 days after varicella zoster infection. They often include cough, fever, and dyspnea. Treatment is a 7-day course of intravenous acyclovir for varicella pneumonia. Early intervention may modify the course of this complication. This review illustrates practical features with a case of a 34-year-old female with severe varicella pneumonia. Despite the lack of significant past medical history and absence of immunosuppression, her pneumonia worsened and by using continuous positive airway pressure mask, intubation was avoided. More important, the radiographic progression of severe varicella pneumonia is shown. This highlights how a common disease of varicella can progress in an adult and manifest with significant organ malfunction.

Safety and immunogenicity of one versus two doses of Takeda's tetravalent dengue vaccine in children in Asia and Latin America: interim results from a phase 2, randomised, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Dengue is the most common mosquito-borne viral disease in human beings, and vector control has not halted its spread worldwide. A dengue vaccine for individuals aged 9 years and older has been licensed, but there remains urgent medical need for a vaccine that is safe and effective against all four dengue virus serotypes (DENV-1-4) in recipients of all ages. Here, we present the preplanned interim analyses at 6 months of a tetravalent dengue vaccine candidate (TDV), which is comprised of an attenuated DENV-2 virus strain (TDV-2) and three chimeric viruses containing the premembrane and envelope protein genes of DENV-1, DENV-3, and DENV-4 genetically engineered into the attenuated TDV-2 genome backbone (TDV-1, TDV-3, and TDV-4).

METHODS

An ongoing phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a TDV is being done at three sites in dengue-endemic countries (Dominican Republic, Panama, and the Philippines) to determine its safety and immunogenicity over 48 months in healthy participants aged 2-17 years who were randomly assigned (1:2:5:1) using an interactive web response system (stratified by age) to subcutaneous TDV injection (one 0·5 mL dose containing 2·5 × 10⁴ plaque-forming units [PFU] of TDV-1; 6·3 × 10³ PFU of TDV-2; 3·2 × 10⁴ PFU of TDV-3; and 4·0 × 10⁵ PFU of TDV-4) in different dose schedules (two-dose regimen at 0 and 3 months, one dose at 0 months, or one dose at 0 months and a booster at 12 months) or placebo. The primary endpoint of this 6 month interim analysis was geometric mean titres (GMTs) of neutralising antibodies against DENV-1-4 in the per-protocol immunogenicity subset at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after the first injection. Safety was assessed as a secondary outcome as percentage of participants with serious adverse events in all participants who were injected (safety set), and solicited and unsolicited adverse events (immunogenicity subset). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02302066.

FINDINGS

1800 participants were enrolled between Dec 5, 2014, and Feb 13, 2015. 1794 participants were given study injection as follows: 200 participants were given two-dose regimen at 0 and 3 months (group 1), 398 were given one dose at 0 months (group 2), 998 were given one dose at 0 months and will be given (trial ongoing) a booster at 12 months (group 3), and 198 were given placebo (group 4). These 1794 participants were included in the safety set; 562 participants were randomly assigned to the immunogenicity subset, of which 503 were included in the per-protocol set. TDV elicited neutralising antibodies against all DENV serotypes, which peaked at 1 month and remained elevated above baseline at 6 months. At 6 months, GMTs of neutralising antibodies against DENV-1 were 489 (95% CI 321-746) for group 1, 434 (306-615) for group 2, 532 (384-738) for group 3, and 62 (32-120) for group 4; GMTs of neutralising antibodies against DENV-2 were 1565 (1145-2140) for group 1, 1639 (1286-2088) for group 2, 1288 (1031-1610) for group 3, and 86 (44-169) for group 4; GMTs of neutralising antibodies against DENV-3 were 160 (104-248) for group 1, 151 (106-214) for group 2, 173 (124-240) for group 3, and 40 (23-71) for group 4; and GMTs of neutralising antibodies against DENV-4 were 117 (79-175) for group 1, 110 (80-149) for group 2, 93 (69-125) for group 3, and 24 (15-38) for group 4. No vaccine-related serious adverse events occurred; 15 (3%) of 562 participants in the immunogenicity subset reported vaccine-related unsolicited adverse events. The reactogenicity profile of TDV was acceptable, and similar to previous findings with TDV.

INTERPRETATION

TDV is safe and immunogenic in individuals aged 2-17 years, irrespective of previous dengue exposure. A second TDV dose induced enhanced immunogenicity against DENV-3 and DENV-4 in children who were seronegative before vaccination. These data supported the initiation of phase 3 evaluation of the efficacy and safety of TDV given in a two-dose schedule 3 months apart, with analyses that take into account baseline age and dengue serostatus.

FUNDING

Takeda Vaccines.

Safety of Second-Dose Single-Antigen Varicella Vaccine

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In 2006, routine 2-dose varicella vaccination for children was recommended to improve control of varicella. We assessed the safety of second-dose varicella vaccination.

METHODS

We identified second-dose single-antigen varicella vaccine reports in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System during 2006 to 2014 among children aged 4 to 18 years. We analyzed reports by age group (4-6 and 7-18 years), sex, serious or nonserious status, most common adverse events (AEs), and whether other vaccines were administered concomitantly with varicella vaccine. We reviewed serious reports of selected AEs and conducted empirical Bayesian data mining to detect disproportional reporting of AEs.

RESULTS

We identified 14 641 Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System reports after second-dose varicella vaccination, with 494 (3%) classified as serious. Among nonserious reports, injection site reactions were most common (48% of children aged 4-6 years, 38% of children aged 7-18 years). The most common AEs among serious reports were pyrexia (31%) for children aged 4 to 6 years and headache (28%) and vomiting (27%) for children aged 7 to 18 years. Serious reports of selected AEs included anaphylaxis (83), meningitis (5), encephalitis (16), cellulitis (52), varicella (6), herpes zoster (6), and deaths (7). One immunosuppressed adolescent was reported with vaccine-strain herpes zoster. Only previously known AEs were reported more frequently after second-dose varicella vaccination compared with other vaccines.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified no new or unexpected safety concerns for second-dose varicella vaccination. Robust safety monitoring remains an important component of the national varicella vaccination program.

Immunogenicity and safety of different schedules of 2-dose varicella vaccination in China

We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of different time intervals for a second dose of varicella vaccine in children in Zhejiang Province, China. Participants had all received a first dose of varicella vaccine and were assigned to 4 groups according to age (2-7 years). A second dose of live attenuated varicella vaccine was administered 1 month, 1 year, 3 years, or 5 years after the first. A serology assay was conducted and fluorescent-antibody-to-membrane-antigen test performed to measure the antibody titers against varicella before and approximately 30 days after the second dose. Of 1,078 participants, most tolerated the second dose well. Age at first dose did not affect the response to vaccination. Geometric mean titers (GMTs) significantly differed between group 1 and all other groups, both before and after the second vaccination. The GMT for group 1 was higher than those for the other 3 groups prior to the second vaccination (GMT = 20.52, 14.68, 12.49, 12.29, respectively, p < 0.001 for all), while the opposite was true after the second vaccination (GMT = 51.14, 83.37, 85.01, 81.83, respectively, p < 0.001 for all). There was no significant difference in seropositive rate among the 4 groups prior to the second vaccination (p = 0.093), and these rates were all 100% after the second vaccination. The vaccine was well tolerated in healthy children, regardless of the timing of the second dose. GMTs showed a particularly high boost after the second dose when the interval between doses was more than 1 year.

Laboratory investigations of vaccinated patients with varicella

BACKGROUND

Accompanying varicella vaccination in children in Germany recommended with one (2004) and two (2009) doses, sentinel surveillance of varicella with a sample (n∼900) of private physicians was established in 2005. Physicians reported monthly aggregated data on all varicella cases and case-based on vaccinated patients, of whom skin lesion samples were laboratory investigated to identify varicella-zoster virus (VZV). We analyzed the impact of vaccination frequency on the number of cases and on laboratory results within the sentinel.

METHODS

Swabs were obtained with a Teflon tip and sent together with a case-based questionnaire to the reference laboratory. VZV wild-type and vaccine-type was identified by polymerase chain-reaction (PCR) and pyrosequencing methods. Case-based data and laboratory results were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

From April 2005 to March 2014, of all monthly reported cases (n=111,456) 4789 were vaccinated and eligible for further analysis. No differences were found between laboratory investigated and not investigated cases (1017 vs. 3772) except that the proportion of cases vaccinated twice was higher in lab-cases (29.4% vs. 16.1%). PCR remained negative in 69.6% (197/283) of breakthrough-cases vaccinated twice, in comparison to 22.7% (147/649) breakthrough-cases vaccinated once. VZV was confirmed in 500 (81) patients with breakthrough varicella after one (two) vaccination(s); identification of VZV wild-type, vaccine-type, or no further differentiation was possible in 485 (72), 5 (6), and 10 (3) cases, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Varicella breakthrough disease is rare in Germany and suspected clinical cases require laboratory confirmation. The lower confirmation rate of VZV after two vaccine doses suggests a better protection compared to one dose.

Successes and challenges in varicella vaccine

Varicella is a highly contagious disease caused by primary infection with varicella zoster virus (VZV). VZV infection, as well as varicella vaccination, induces VZV-specific antibody and T-cell-mediated immunity, essential for recovery. The immune responses developed contribute to protection following re-exposure to VZV. When cell-mediated immunity declines, as occurs with aging or immunosuppression, reactivation of VZV leads to herpes zoster (HZ). It has been almost 20 years since universal varicella vaccination has been implemented in many areas around the globe and this has resulted in a significant reduction of varicella-associated disease burden. Successes are reviewed here, whilst emphasis is put on the challenges ahead. Most countries that have not implemented routine childhood varicella vaccination have chosen to vaccinate high-risk groups alone. The main reasons for not introducing universal vaccination are discussed, including fear of age shift of peak incidence age and of HZ incidence increase. Possible reasons for not observing the predicted increase in HZ incidence are explored. The advantages and disadvantages of universal vs targeted vaccination as well as different vaccination schedules are discussed.

Vaccines for post-exposure prophylaxis against varicella (chickenpox) in children and adults

BACKGROUND

The prevention of varicella (chickenpox) using live attenuated varicella vaccines has been demonstrated both in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and in population-based immunisation programmes in countries such as the United States and Australia. Many countries do not routinely immunise children against varicella and exposures continue to occur. Although the disease is often mild, complications such as secondary bacterial infection, pneumonitis and encephalitis occur in about 1% of cases, usually leading to hospitalisation. The use of varicella vaccine in persons who have recently been exposed to the varicella zoster virus has been studied as a form of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of vaccines for use as PEP for the prevention of varicella in children and adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (2014, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1966 to March week 1, 2014), EMBASE (January 1990 to March 2014) and LILACS (1982 to March 2014). We searched for unpublished trials registered on the clinicaltrials.gov and WHO ICTRP websites.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs and quasi-RCTs of varicella vaccine for PEP compared with placebo or no intervention. The outcome measures were efficacy in prevention of clinical cases and/or laboratory-confirmed clinical cases and adverse events following vaccination.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted and analysed data using Review Manager software.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified three trials involving 110 healthy children who were siblings of household contacts. The included trials varied in study quality, vaccine used, length of follow-up and outcomes measured and, as such, were not suitable for meta-analysis. We identified high or unclear risk of bias in two of the three included studies. Overall, 13 out of 56 vaccine recipients (23%) developed varicella compared with 42 out of 54 placebo (or no vaccine) recipients (78%). Of the vaccine recipients who developed varicella, the majority only had mild disease (with fewer than 50 skin lesions). In the three trials, most participants received PEP within three days following exposure; too few participants were vaccinated four to five days post-exposure to ascertain the efficacy of vaccine given more than three days after exposure. No included trial reported on adverse events following immunisation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

These small trials suggest varicella vaccine administered within three days to children following household contact with a varicella case reduces infection rates and severity of cases. We identified no RCTs for adolescents or adults. Safety was not adequately addressed.

2013 IDSA clinical practice guideline for vaccination of the immunocompromised host

An international panel of experts prepared an evidenced-based guideline for vaccination of immunocompromised adults and children. These guidelines are intended for use by primary care and subspecialty providers who care for immunocompromised patients. Evidence was often limited. Areas that warrant future investigation are highlighted.

Primary versus secondary failure after varicella vaccination: implications for interval between 2 doses

BACKGROUND

Two-dose varicella vaccination is recommended for optimal control of varicella in populations with high (>90%) 1-dose coverage. Optimal timing of the second dose may depend on whether breakthrough varicella results from primary vaccine failure (no protective immunity after vaccination) or secondary vaccine failure (waning protective immunity).

METHODS

Published literature (1995 to 2012) on vaccine failure after varicella vaccination cited in PubMed and other online sources was reviewed.

RESULTS

Nineteen publications detailed 21 varicella outbreaks with breakthrough varicella rates ranging from 0% to 42%; the publications showed no consistent trend between breakthrough varicella rate and time since vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

Literature to date indicates a relatively high rate of primary vaccine failure and limited evidence of secondary vaccine failure among 1-dose varicella vaccine recipients, suggesting that a short interval between 2 doses might be preferable in countries considering implementation of universal varicella vaccination to reduce breakthrough varicella. However, any potential disruption to well-established vaccination schedules should be considered.

The host immune response to varicella zoster virus

Varicella zoster virus (VZV) is a highly successful human pathogen, which is never completely eliminated from the host. VZV causes two clinically distinct diseases, varicella (chickenpox) during primary infection and herpes zoster (shingles) following virus reactivation from latency. Throughout its lifecycle the virus encounters the innate and adaptive immune response, and in order to prevent eradication it has developed many mechanisms to evade and overcome these responses. This review will provide a comprehensive overview of the host immune response to VZV infection, during the multiple stages of the virus lifecycle and at key sites of VZV infection. We will also briefly describe some of the strategies employed by the virus to overcome the host immune response and the ongoing challenges in further elucidating the interplay between VZV and the host immune response in an attempt to lead to better therapies and a ‘second generation’ vaccine for VZV disease.

Antibody persistence for 3 years following two doses of tetravalent measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine in healthy children

Two doses of a varicella-containing vaccine in healthy children <12 years are suggested to induce better protection than a single dose. Persistence of immunity against measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella as well as varicella breakthrough cases were assessed 3 years after two-dose measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella (MMRV) vaccination or concomitant MMR (Priorix™) and varicella (Varilrix™) vaccination. Four hundred ninety-four healthy children, 12-18 months old at the time of the first dose, received either two doses of MMRV vaccine (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals) 42-56 days apart (MMRV, N = 371) or one dose of MMR and varicella vaccines administered simultaneously at separate sites, followed by another MMR vaccination 42-56 days later (MMR + V, N = 123). Three hundred-four subjects participated in 3-year follow-up for persistence of immunity and occurrence of breakthrough varicella (MMRV, N = 225; MMR + V, N = 79). Antibodies were measured by ELISA (measles, mumps, rubella) and immunofluorescence (varicella). Contacts with individuals with varicella or zoster and cases of breakthrough varicella disease were recorded. Three years post-vaccination seropositivity rates in subjects seronegative before vaccination were: MMRV-measles, 98.5% (geometric mean titer [GMT] = 3,599.6); mumps, 97.4% (GMT = 1,754.5); rubella, 100% (GMT = 51.9); varicella, 99.4% (GMT = 225.5); MMR + V-measles, 97.0% (GMT = 1,818.8); mumps, 93.8% (GMT = 1,454.6); rubella, 100% (GMT = 53.8); and varicella, 96.8% (GMT = 105.8). Of the subjects, 15-20% reported contact with individuals with varicella/zoster each year. After 3 years, the cumulative varicella breakthrough disease rate was 0.7% (two cases) in the MMRV group and 5.4% (five cases) in the MMR + V group.

CONCLUSION

Immunogenicity of the combined MMRV vaccine was sustained 3 years post-vaccination. (208136/041/NCT00406211).

Actinic varicella vaccine rash

The case of an 18-month-old girl with vesicular rash confined to a sunburned area after significant ultraviolet radiation exposure is reported. The child had been vaccinated 32 days before presentation, and a high viral load of Oka strain virus was detected in vesicular fluid. Possible pathogenesis is discussed.

VZV T cell-mediated immunity

Primary varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infection (varicella) induces VZV-specific antibody and VZV-specific T cell-mediated immunity. T cell-mediated immunity, which is detected within 1-2 weeks after appearance of rash, and consists of both CD4 and CD8 effector and memory T cells, is essential for recovery from varicella. Administration of a varicella vaccine also generates VZV-specific humoral and cellular immune responses. The memory cell responses that develop during varicella or after vaccination contribute to protection following re-exposure to VZV. These responses are subsequently boosted either by endogenous re-exposure (silent reactivation of latent virus) or exogenous re-exposure (environmental). VZV-specific T cell-mediated immunity is also necessary to maintain latent VZV in a subclinical state in sensory ganglia. When these responses decline, as occurs with aging or iatrogenic immune suppression, reactivation of VZV leads to herpes zoster. Similarly, the magnitude of these responses early after the onset of herpes zoster correlates with the extent of zoster-associated pain. These essential immune responses are boosted by the VZV vaccine developed to prevent herpes zoster.

Incremental effectiveness of second dose varicella vaccination for outbreak control at an elementary school in Philadelphia, pennsylvania, 2006

BACKGROUND

In 2006, the Philadelphia Department of Public Health conducted an investigation of a varicella outbreak at an elementary school in which second-dose vaccination for outbreak control (VOC) was implemented. We evaluated the effectiveness of this intervention.

METHODS

Self-administered questionnaires collected varicella disease and vaccination information. Students eligible for second-dose VOC were 1-dose vaccine recipients without prior varicella disease. A breakthrough varicella case was defined as a maculopapulovesicular rash in a student with onset >42 days after 1-dose vaccination without other apparent cause. Vaccine effectiveness was evaluated using survival analysis techniques and analyzed by vaccine status (first dose versus second dose). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify statistical interactions and adjust for confounders.

RESULTS

The questionnaire response rate was 92% (342/370). Of the 286 eligible students, 187 (65%) received a second-dose VOC. The crude attack rate was 9/187 (5%) among second-dose VOC recipients; 43/99 (43%) among 1-dose recipients, and 5/6 (83%) among unvaccinated students. Second-dose VOC recipients had milder rashes, compared with 1-dose or unvaccinated students. The adjusted incremental second-dose vaccine effectiveness was 76% (95% confidence interval: 44%-90%) for students with classroom exposure. Incremental effectiveness was similar (79%) when we extended the immune response time from 4 days to 7 days after second-dose VOC.

CONCLUSIONS

Second-dose VOC resulted in a substantial reduction in varicella incidence for students with classroom exposure. Until high rates of routine second-dose vaccine coverage are achieved, clinicians should consider second-dose VOC an appropriate intervention to reduce disease transmission in institution-based outbreaks.

Safety, immunogenicity and immediate pain of intramuscular versus subcutaneous administration of a measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine to children aged 11-21 months

This study compared intramuscular and subcutaneous administration of two doses of measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) combination vaccine (Priorix-Tetra, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals) in children. Healthy children (N = 328) were randomised to receive MMRV either intramuscularly or subcutaneously. Reactogenicity was similar between treatment groups for immediate vaccination pain, vaccination site pain, redness and incidence of fever and rashes. Slightly less vaccination site swelling occurred during days 0-3 of the post-vaccination period after intramuscular administration. Seroconversion rates for all components, 42-56 days post-dose 2, ranged from 99.3% to 100% in the intramuscular group and from 98.6% to 100% in the subcutaneous. Cell-mediated immunity data supported the humoral immunogenicity findings. In summary, the MMRV vaccine is well tolerated and highly immunogenic when administered either subcutaneously or intramuscularly to children in the second year of life.

Impact of varicella vaccine on varicella-zoster virus dynamics

The licensure and recommendation of varicella vaccine in the mid-1990s in the United States have led to dramatic declines in varicella incidence and varicella-related deaths and hospitalizations. Varicella outbreaks remain common and occur increasingly in highly vaccinated populations. Breakthrough varicella in vaccinated individuals is characteristically mild, typically with fewer lesions that frequently do not progress to a vesicular stage. As such, the laboratory diagnosis of varicella has grown increasingly important, particularly in outbreak settings. In this review the impact of varicella vaccine on varicella-zoster virus (VZV) disease, arising complications in the effective diagnosis and monitoring of VZV transmission, and the relative strengths and limitations of currently available laboratory diagnostic techniques are all addressed. Since disease symptoms often resolve in outbreak settings before suitable test specimens can be obtained, the need to develop new diagnostic approaches that rely on alternative patient samples is also discussed.

Varicella: efficacy of two-dose vaccination in childhood

INTRODUCTION

Experience with one-dose varicella vaccination of children in the USA has shown that with high immunization coverage a marked decline in morbidity and mortality occurs. However, about one quarter of the vaccinees may develop breakthrough varicella. Although breakthrough infections are usually mild, the patients are potentially contagious.

METHODS

Selective literature search, review of congress papers, and evaluation of the consensus statement of an expert panel on the use of monovalent varicella vaccines.

RESULTS

Recent studies on the causes, effects, and consequences of breakthrough varicella after one-dose vaccination show that varicella vaccine should be given in two doses at least four to six weeks apart to achieve effective, long-lasting protection against chickenpox. Breakthrough disease cannot always be prevented, but two-dose vaccination offers significantly better protection than a single dose. These findings were considered in the approval process for the measles-mumps-rubella-varicella combination vaccines, which are licensed only for use in a two-dose schedule.

DISCUSSION

The authors recommend the general implementation of a two-dose schedule for single-antigen varicella vaccines, which will continue to be available.

Large injection site reactions after a second dose of varicella vaccine

A second dose of varicella vaccine is routinely recommended. We report 2 cases of large local reactions after receipt of a second dose of varicella vaccine administered in the thigh. The reactions resolved with symptomatic therapy. Clinicians should continue to administer the second dose of varicella vaccine, but should use the preferred site in the arm.

Vaccines for post-exposure prophylaxis against varicella (chickenpox) in children and adults

BACKGROUND

Live attenuated varicella vaccines for the prevention of varicella (chickenpox) has been demonstrated both in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and in population-based immunisation programmes in countries such as the United States. However, many countries do not routinely immunise children against varicella, and exposures continue to occur. Although the disease is often mild, complications such as secondary bacterial infection, pneumonitis and encephalitis occur in about 1% of cases, usually leading to hospitalisation. The use of varicella vaccine in persons who have recently been exposed to the varicella zoster virus has been studied as a form of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of vaccines for use as PEP for the prevention of varicella in children and adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, 2008, Issue 1); MEDLINE (1966 to February 2008); and EMBASE (January 1990 to February 2008).

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs and quasi-RCTs of varicella vaccine for PEP compared with placebo or no intervention. The outcome measures were efficacy in prevention of clinical cases and/or laboratory-confirmed clinical cases and adverse effects following vaccination.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted and analysed data using Review Manager software.

MAIN RESULTS

Three studies involving 110 healthy children who were siblings of household contacts were identified as suitable for inclusion. The studies varied in quality, study design, vaccine used, and outcomes measured and, as such, were not suitable for meta-analysis. Overall, 13 out of 56 vaccine recipients (18%) developed varicella compared with 42 out of 54 placebo (or no vaccine) recipients (78%). Of the vaccine recipients who developed varicella, the majority only had mild disease (with less than 50 skin lesions). In the three studies, most subjects received PEP within three days following exposure; too few subjects were vaccinated four to five days post exposure to ascertain the efficacy of vaccine given more than three days after exposure. No included studies reported on adverse events following immunisation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

These small trials suggest varicella vaccine administered within three days to children following household contact with a varicella case reduces infection rates and severity of cases. No RCTs for adolescents or adults were identified. However safety was not adequately addressed.

Varicella disease among vaccinated persons: clinical and epidemiological characteristics, 1997-2005

Approximately 1 in every 5 children who receives 1 dose of varicella vaccine may develop varicella disease, also known as breakthrough disease, if exposed to varicella-zoster virus. Currently, in communities with high vaccination coverage, varicella cases mostly occur in vaccinated individuals. We report on the first population-based description of the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of varicella in populations with increasing vaccine coverage between 1997 and 2005. In vaccinated children 1-14 years of age, varicella was most often mild and modified; the atypical disease presentation may result in diagnostic challenges to health care providers. However, despite the generally mild nature of these cases, approximately 25% caused >50 lesions, and some resulted in serious complications similar to those occurring in unvaccinated individuals. Continued surveillance of the risk and characteristics of breakthrough disease will be needed, to monitor the effect of the new 2-dose vaccine recommendation for children.

Varicella immunogenicity with 1- and 2-dose regimens of measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine

A quadrivalent vaccine combining measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella antigens (MMRV) was developed to increase the coverage of varicella vaccine and reduce the number of injections children receive. Although the varicella antigen is as immunogenic in the latest formulation of MMRV vaccine as when it is administered alone, up to 14% of vaccine recipients do not achieve protective levels of anti-varicella antibodies after a single dose, which can result in breakthrough varicella. A second dose of varicella vaccine raises response rates to 99% and was recently recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Giving the second dose 3 months after the first (at approximately 15 months of age) would provide more protection against varicella but would necessitate a change in the childhood vaccination schedule, which currently calls for a second dose of MMRV vaccine between the ages of 4 and 6 years.

A role for genetics in the immune response to the varicella vaccine

BACKGROUND

A wide range in antibody titers has been found after immunization with the varicella vaccine, although the basis for these differences has not been described.

METHODS

To evaluate the contribution of a genetic component in the immune response to the varicella vaccine, concordance for six-week postimmunization antibody titers was evaluated among 248 biologic siblings who participated in varicella vaccine clinical trials by comparing all pairs of siblings (151 pairs) to all possible unrelated, nonsibling pairs created from within this same cohort (30,477 pairs).

RESULTS

Postimmunization antibody titers after 1 varicella vaccine dose were within the range observed historically among healthy vaccinees, with 85.4% of subjects having antibody responses greater than the approximate correlate of protection of 5 gpELISA units. Postimmunization antibody titers within sibling pairs clustered together more than or less than 10 gpELISA units when compared with within nonsibling pairs (P < 0.0001). Postimmunization titers within sibling pairs were also quantitatively closer together than were those within unrelated, nonsibling pairs (P = 0.022). The age-adjusted intraclass correlation coefficient indicated that the heritability of the varicella vaccine immune response is 45% (95% confidence interval of 15-75%).

CONCLUSIONS

Similarities in siblings' response to varicella vaccine are supportive of the hypothesis that genetic factors play a role in the antibody response to the varicella vaccine.

Analysis of factors associated with varicella-zoster virus susceptibility among children 0–12 years old in Taiwan

OBJECTIVES

Varicella is a highly infectious disease caused by varicella-zoster virus (VZV). The aim of this study was to explore the geographical difference of VZV antibody seroprevalence among children in private vaccination areas in Taiwan, controlling for potential factors relating to varicella susceptibility.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

A cross-sectional survey of the seroprevalence of VZV antibodies among children 0-12 years of age was conducted in Taiwan between August and December 2003. Sera of children visiting the outpatient unit of the participating hospitals around the island were collected. Six hundred and fifty-six parents among those of the 931 children studied agreed to answer the self-administered questionnaire regarding the possible factors associated with varicella susceptibility. IgG antibodies to VZV were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit, Enzygnost anti VZV/IgG.

RESULTS

The susceptibility was the highest at age 1 year, and then decreased as the age increased. Children living in southern and eastern Taiwan showed higher susceptibility to varicella than those living in northern area (odds ratio (OR) = 2.71 and 2.10, respectively). Prior history of varicella infection, varicella vaccination, and contact with cases remained to be associated with the susceptibility after multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Children who lived in tropical and rural regions and those who had no history of varicella infection, varicella vaccination, and contact with cases, might be more susceptible to varicella. Island-wide VZV seroprevalence surveillance is required to examine whether the geographical difference of susceptibility in Taiwan will become less significant or disappear after the mass varicella vaccination program initiated in 2004.

Loss of vaccine-induced immunity to varicella over time

BACKGROUND

The introduction of universal varicella vaccination in 1995 has substantially reduced varicella-related morbidity and mortality in the United States. However, it remains unclear whether vaccine-induced immunity wanes over time, a condition that may result in increased susceptibility later in life, when the risk of serious complications may be greater than in childhood.

METHODS

We examined 10 years (1995 to 2004) of active surveillance data from a sentinel population of 350,000 subjects to determine whether the severity and incidence of breakthrough varicella (with an onset of rash >42 days after vaccination) increased with the time since vaccination. We used multivariate logistic regression to adjust for the year of disease onset (calendar year) and the subject's age at both disease onset and vaccination.

RESULTS

A total of 11,356 subjects were reported to have varicella during the surveillance period, of whom 1080 (9.5%) had breakthrough disease. Children between the ages of 8 and 12 years who had been vaccinated at least 5 years previously were significantly more likely to have moderate or severe disease than were those who had been vaccinated less than 5 years previously (risk ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 5.8). The annual rate of breakthrough varicella significantly increased with the time since vaccination, from 1.6 cases per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 1.2 to 2.0) within 1 year after vaccination to 9.0 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 6.9 to 11.7) at 5 years and 58.2 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 36.0 to 94.0) at 9 years.

CONCLUSIONS

A second dose of varicella vaccine, now recommended for all children, could improve protection from both primary vaccine failure and waning vaccine-induced immunity.

Vaccination-related adverse events

Vaccine-related adverse events are uncommon and typically mild. Children may experience conditions such as rashes, fevers, syncope, protracted crying, or seizures shortly after receiving their routine immunizations. When children are brought to the emergency department or clinic to be evaluated for one of these conditions, the health care provider may be called upon to determine the likelihood that it was caused by a recently administered set of vaccines. This determination has substantial implications for medical care, including the safety of administering future vaccines. This article reviews the current understanding of vaccine-related adverse events. Using this information, clinicians should be able to identify those events likely to be related to vaccine administration and those that are not. The appropriate management of vaccine-related adverse events is also discussed.

One dose of varicella vaccine does not prevent school outbreaks: is it time for a second dose?

OBJECTIVES

The implementation of a routine childhood varicella vaccination program in the United States in 1995 has resulted in a dramatic decline in varicella morbidity and mortality. Although disease incidence has decreased, outbreaks of varicella continue to be reported, increasingly in highly vaccinated populations. In 2000, a varicella vaccination requirement was introduced for kindergarten entry in Arkansas. In October 2003, large numbers of varicella cases were reported in a school with high vaccination coverage. We investigated this outbreak to examine transmission patterns of varicella in this highly vaccinated population, to estimate the effectiveness of 1 dose of varicella vaccine, to identify risk factors for vaccine failure, and to implement outbreak control measures.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study involving students attending an elementary school was conducted. A questionnaire was distributed to parents of all of the students in the school to collect varicella disease and vaccination history; parents of varicella case patients were interviewed by telephone. A case of varicella was defined as an acute, generalized, maculopapulovesicular rash without other apparent cause in a student or staff member in the school from September 1 to November 20, 2003. Varicella among vaccinated persons was defined as varicella-like rash that developed >42 days after vaccination. In vaccinated persons, the rash may be atypical, maculopapular with few or no vesicles. Cases were laboratory confirmed by polymerase chain reaction, and genotyping was performed to identify the strain associated with the outbreak.

RESULTS

Of the 545 students who attended the school, 88% returned the questionnaire. Overall varicella vaccination coverage was 96%. Forty-nine varicella cases were identified; 43 were vaccinated. Three of 6 specimens tested were positive by polymerase chain reaction. The median age at vaccination of vaccinated students in the school was 18 months, and the median time since vaccination was 59 months. Forty-four cases occurred in the East Wing, where 275 students in grades kindergarten through 2 were located, and vaccination coverage was 99%. In this wing, varicella attack rates among unvaccinated and vaccinated students were 100% and 18%, respectively. Vaccine effectiveness against varicella of any severity was 82% and 97% for moderate/severe varicella. Vaccinated cases were significantly milder compared with unvaccinated cases. Among the case patients in the East Wing, the median age at vaccination was 18.5 and 14 months among non-case patients. Four cases in the West Wing did not result in further transmission in that wing. The Arkansas strains were the same as the common varicella-zoster virus strain circulating in the United States (European varicella-zoster virus strain).

CONCLUSIONS

Although disease was mostly mild, the outbreak lasted for approximately 2 months, suggesting that varicella in vaccinated persons was contagious and that 99% varicella vaccination coverage was not sufficient to prevent the outbreak. This investigation highlights several challenges related to the prevention and control of varicella outbreaks with the 1-dose varicella vaccination program and the need for further prevention of varicella through improved vaccine-induced immunity with a routine 2-dose vaccination program. The challenges include: 1-dose varicella vaccination not providing sufficient herd immunity levels to prevent outbreaks in school settings where exposure can be intense, the effective transmission of varicella among vaccinated children, and the difficulty in the diagnosis of mild cases in vaccinated persons and early recognition of outbreaks for implementing control measures. The efficacy of 2 doses of varicella vaccine compared with 1 dose was assessed in a trial conducted among healthy children who were followed for 10 years. The efficacy for 2 doses was significantly higher than for 1 dose of varicella vaccine. This higher efficacy translated into a 3.3-fold lower risk of developing varicella >42 days after vaccination in 2- vs 1-dose recipients. Of the children receiving 2 doses, 99% achieved a glycoprotein-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay level of > or =5 units (considered a correlate of protection) 6 weeks after vaccination compared with 86% of children who received 1 dose. The 6-week glycoprotein-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay level of > or =5 units has been shown to be a good surrogate for protection from natural disease. Ten years after the implementation of the varicella vaccination program, disease incidence has declined dramatically, and vaccination coverage has increased greatly. However, varicella outbreaks continue to occur among vaccinated persons. Although varicella disease among vaccinated persons is mild, they are contagious and able to sustain transmission. As a step toward better control of varicella outbreaks and to reduce the impact on schools and public health officials, in June 2005, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended the use of a second dose of varicella vaccine in outbreak settings. Early recognition of outbreaks is important to effectively implement a 2-dose vaccination response and to prevent more cases. Although the current recommendation of providing a second dose of varicella vaccine during an outbreak offers a tool for controlling outbreaks, a routine 2-dose recommendation would be more effective at preventing cases. Based on published data on immunogenicity and efficacy of 2 doses of varicella vaccine, routine 2-dose vaccination will provide improved protection against disease and further reduce morbidity and mortality from varicella.

A combination measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella vaccine (ProQuad) given to 4- to 6-year-old healthy children vaccinated previously with M-M-RII and Varivax

BACKGROUND

In the United States, children receive primary doses of M-M-RII (Merck & Co, Inc, West Point, PA) and Varivax (Merck & Co, Inc) beginning at 12 months, often at the same health care visit. Currently a second dose of M-M-RII is given to 4- to 6-year-old children, to increase vaccination rates and to reduce the number of individuals without detectable antibodies. A second dose of a varicella-containing vaccine may result in similar benefits.

OBJECTIVES

To demonstrate that ProQuad (measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella virus vaccine live; Merck & Co, Inc) may be given in place of a second dose of M-M-RII or second doses of M-M-RII and Varivax for 4- to 6-year-old children.

METHODS

Four- to 6-year-old children who had been immunized previously with M-M-RII and Varivax were assigned randomly to receive either ProQuad and placebo (N = 399), M-M-RII and placebo (N = 195), or M-M-RII and Varivax (N = 205) and were then monitored for safety and immunogenicity.

RESULTS

ProQuad was generally well tolerated. Similarity (noninferiority) was demonstrated in postvaccination antibody responses to measles, mumps, and rubella between recipients of ProQuad and all recipients of M-M-RII and in responses to varicella between recipients of ProQuad and recipients of Varivax. Postvaccination seropositivity rates for antibodies against all 4 viruses were nearly 100% in all 3 groups. Small fold increases were observed for measles, mumps, and rubella antibody titers. In contrast, substantial boosts in varicella antibody titers were observed among recipients of a second dose of varicella vaccine, administered as ProQuad or Varivax.

CONCLUSIONS

ProQuad may be used in place of a second dose of M-M-RII or second doses of M-M-RII and Varivax for 4- to 6-year-old children.

Evaluation of a quadrivalent measles, mumps, rubella and varicella vaccine in healthy children

BACKGROUND

A quadrivalent measles, mumps, rubella and varicella vaccine would facilitate universal immunization against all 4 diseases, improve compliance and immunization rates and decrease the number of injections given to children and visits to physicians' offices.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate 1- and 2-dose regimens of a combined measles, mumps, rubella and varicella vaccine (ProQuad, referred to as MMRV) manufactured with a varicella component of increased potency.

METHODS

In this partially blind, multicenter study, 480 healthy 12- to 23-month-old children were randomized to receive either MMRV and placebo or M-M-RII and VARIVAX. Injections were given concomitantly at separate sites. Subjects randomized to receive MMRV and placebo received a second dose of MMRV 90 days later. Subjects were followed for 42 days after each vaccination for adverse experiences. Immunogenicity was evaluated 6 weeks after each vaccination.

RESULTS

Measles-like rash and fever during days 5-12 were more common after the first dose of MMRV (rash, 5.9%; fever, 27.7%) than after M-M-RII and VARIVAX (rash, 1.9%; fever, 18.7%). The incidence of other adverse events were similar between groups. Response rates were >90% to all vaccine components in both groups. Geometric mean titers to measles and mumps were significantly higher after 1 dose of MMRV than after administration of M-M-RII and VARIVAX. The second dose of MMRV elicited slight to moderate increases in measles, mumps and rubella antibody titers and a substantial increase in varicella antibody titer (from 13.0 to 588.1 glycoprotein antigen-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay units/mL).

CONCLUSION

A 1- or 2-dose regimen of MMRV is generally well-tolerated when administered to 12- to 23-month-old children and has a safety and immunogenicity profile similar to that of M-M-RII and VARIVAX administered concomitantly.

Vaccine effectiveness and severity of varicella among previously vaccinated children during outbreaks in day-care centers with low vaccination coverage

BACKGROUND

Varicella vaccine effectiveness (VE) during outbreaks has been reported to be 71-100% against any disease and >90% against moderate/severe disease even in day-care centers (DCCs) and schools with low vaccination rates. A recent report suggested an effectiveness rate of 44% during a DCC outbreak despite a high vaccination rate.

AIMS

To reassess vaccination coverage, VE and severity of disease among previously vaccinated children after exposure during DCC outbreaks in northern Israel, where vaccination rates are low.

METHODS

During January to June 2003, active surveillance for varicella among children in northern Israel revealed outbreaks in 8 DCCs with children 3-6 years of age. Data concerning symptoms of the disease and the age at vaccination (for previously vaccinated children) were obtained from parents and health care providers for children who contracted the disease. Analysis of VE was limited to children who were continuously enrolled in DCCs during the outbreaks.

RESULTS

The overall vaccination rate was 37%. The incidences of natural varicella and breakthrough varicella (BV) were 79 of 153 [52%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 44-60%] and 37 of 89 (41.5%; 95% CI 31-52%), respectively. VE was 20% (95% CI 0-40%) against disease of any severity and 93.4% (95% CI 75-98%) against moderate/severe disease. Ninety-four percent and 14% of children with BV and natural varicella, respectively, had mild disease (P < 0.001). The odds ratio for BV was 17 (95% CI 2.18-118) for children vaccinated >2 years before the outbreak.

CONCLUSIONS

During varicella outbreaks in DCCs with low vaccine coverage, previous vaccination provided poor protection against chickenpox, mostly among children who had been vaccinated >2 years earlier, but the disease appeared to be much milder among children with BV than among nonvaccinated children.

The impact of varicella vaccination in the United States

The addition of varicella vaccine to the universal childhood immunization schedule in the United States in 1995 can be seen as a bold step. Shown to be safe and efficacious against varicella in extensive prelicensure studies, it is nonetheless the first vaccine against a herpesvirus and, furthermore, it is a live, attenuated vaccine. Both wild-type and vaccine strain varicella zoster virus (VZV) are noteworthy for their ability to establish latent infection within the host, with the subsequent possibility of reactivation. Therefore, at the population level, a successful vaccination program could result in the eventual displacement of wild-type VZV by the attenuated vaccine virus. The immediate objective of universal vaccination, however, was to reduce the significant morbidity and mortality associated with primary VZV infection. Data now accumulating suggest that the varicella vaccine as used in the United States has so far been highly effective. The challenge for the future is to predict how the resulting substantial reduction in circulation of VZV will affect immunity among both vaccinees and the unvaccinated. Vaccination strategies likely will need to be adjusted as the epidemiology of VZV in the United States continues to evolve.

Preventing varicella-zoster disease

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV), the cause of chickenpox and shingles, is a pathogen in retreat following the introduction of mass vaccination in the United States in 1995. The live attenuated Oka vaccine, which is safe and immunogenic, gives good protection against both varicella and zoster in the short to medium term. It has undoubtedly been highly effective to date in reducing all forms of varicella, especially severe disease. However, the huge pool of latent wild-type virus in the population represents a continuing threat. Both the biology and the epidemiology of VZV disease suggest that new vaccination strategies will be required over time.

Consensus: varicella vaccination of healthy children--a challenge for Europe

The seriousness of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infection as a public health issue is becoming clearer as country-specific epidemiologic and pharmacoeconomic data become available. In Germany, for example, studies have shown that >5.5% of immunologically healthy individuals develop varicella-related complications such as bacterial superinfections, acute neurologic disorders, pneumonia, bronchitis and otitis media; whereas in Italy, 3.5 to 5% of childhood cases of varicella cause complications such as upper respiratory tract and cutaneous infections. Varicella vaccines are now available. These live attenuated Oka strain vaccines have been shown in extensive studies to be highly immunogenic and well-tolerated in immunocompetent and immunocompromised children, with seroconversion rates ranging from 94 to 100% and 53 to 100%, respectively. These vaccines are also highly effective against clinical disease. These considerations led to a reevaluation of varicella vaccination policies. A routine varicella vaccination program targeting healthy children has already been implemented in the US, and data produced are encouraging and valuable. Similar strategies have not yet been adopted across Europe. The European Working Group on Varicella (EuroVar) was formed in 1998 to address the issues surrounding varicella epidemiology in Europe. After a series of meetings, the EuroVar members prepared a consensus statement recommending routine varicella vaccination for all healthy children between 12 and 18 months and to all susceptible children before their 13th birthday, in addition to catch-up vaccination in older children and adults who have no reliable history of varicella and who are at high risk of transmission and exposure. However, such a policy is recommended only if a very high coverage rate can be achieved. This could be reached with a measles-mumps-rubella-varicella combined vaccine.