Diabetes mellitus after renal transplantation: as deleterious as non-transplant-associated diabetes?

Micro-vascular complications of post-transplant diabetes mellitus in renal transplant recipients- an observational study

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) ranges from 2.5% to 20% in kidney transplant recipients. Diabetic retinopathy (DR), diabetic kidney disease (DKD), and distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSPN) are the microvascular complications frequently seen in both type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). However, the data regarding these complications in patients with PTDM is lacking.

METHOD

A retrospective and prospective observational study of PTDM conducted at a tertiary care hospital from November 2018 to December 2020. 115 kidney transplant recipients who had PTDM of ≥5 years duration were included and analysed.

RESULTS

The mean duration of PTDM was 8.8 ± 3.0 years, and the mean of all available HbA1c values was 7.0 ± 0.9%. while none of the patients had evidence of diabetic retinopathy on direct ophthalmoscopy, 37.4% of patients (n = 43) had DSPN and this was associated with the duration of PTDM and age. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 59.24 ± 21.82 ml/min/1.73m2, and patients had a median proteinuria of 620 mg/day (IQR 1290). Out of 115 patients, 20% of them (n = 23) underwent graft kidney biopsy, and 10 biopsies were diagnosed as de-novo DKD. Patients with biopsy proven DKD had a mean PTDM duration of 143.3 ± 52.4 months; a mean HbA1c level of 7.9 ± 1.3%; a mean eGFR of 44.8 ± 21.8 ml/min; and a median proteinuria of 2653 mg (IQR 2758). An additional analysis of all 23 biopsied patients showed that HbA1c level and degree of proteinuria were significantly associated with de-novo DKD.

CONCLUSION

PTDM in transplant patients had milder microvascular complications than usually expected in Type 1/2 diabetes in non-transplant patients. DR was not strongly associated with DKD in PTDM patients. Furthermore, de-novo DKD development was associated with poor glycaemic control and increased proteinuria.

Empagliflozin in kidney transplant recipients with chronic kidney disease G3a-4 and metabolic syndrome: Five Japanese cases

Background

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been shown to exert cardiorenal protective effects in diabetic patients and are widely used clinically. In addition, an increasing number of reports now suggest these drugs may even be beneficial in non-diabetic patients. However, SGLT2 inhibitors are rarely prescribed for kidney transplant recipients due to the risk of renal graft damage and urogenital infections.

Case presentation

We report the cases of 5 renal transplant recipients with chronic kidney disease G3a-4 and metabolic syndrome who were administered the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin, which yielded beneficial results in 4 cases. With the exception of one patient with an initial estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 30 ml/min/1.73 m2, administration of empagliflozin elicited beneficial metabolic effects. There were no significant reductions in eGFR before or after empagliflozin administration, and no dehydration or urogenital infections were observed during the treatment course.

Conclusion

Empagliflozin showed some positive effects in 4 cases with better renal function than CKD stage 4. Further studies will be required to clarify the efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in a larger group of patients with similar medical conditions.

Early Post-Renal Transplant Hyperglycemia

CONTEXT

Though posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM, occurring > 45 days after transplantation) and its complications are well described, early post-renal transplant hyperglycemia (EPTH) (< 45 days) similarly puts kidney transplant recipients at risk of infections, rehospitalizations, and graft failure and is not emphasized much in the literature. Proactive screening and management of EPTH is required given these consequences.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to promote recognition of early post-renal transplant hyperglycemia, and to summarize available information on its pathophysiology, adverse effects, and management.

METHODS

A PubMed search was conducted for "early post-renal transplant hyperglycemia," "immediate posttransplant hyperglycemia," "post-renal transplant diabetes," "renal transplant," "diabetes," and combinations of these terms. EPTH is associated with significant complications including acute graft failure, rehospitalizations, cardiovascular events, PTDM, and infections.

CONCLUSION

Patients with diabetes experience better glycemic control in end-stage renal disease (ESRD), with resurgence of hyperglycemia after kidney transplant. Patients with and without known diabetes are at risk of EPTH. Risk factors include elevated pretransplant fasting glucose, diabetes, glucocorticoids, chronic infections, and posttransplant infections. We find that EPTH increases risk of re-hospitalizations from infections (cytomegalovirus, possibly COVID-19), acute graft rejections, cardiovascular events, and PTDM. It is essential, therefore, to provide diabetes education to patients before discharge. Insulin remains the standard of care while inpatient. Close follow-up after discharge is recommended for insulin adjustment. Some agents like dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists have shown promise. The tenuous kidney function in the early posttransplant period and lack of data limit the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. There is a need for studies assessing noninsulin agents for EPTH to decrease risk of hypoglycemia associated with insulin and long-term complications of EPTH.

Posttransplant Diabetes Mellitus and Immunosuppression Selection in Older and Obese Kidney Recipients

Rationale & Objective

Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (DM) after kidney transplantation increases morbidity and mortality, particularly in older and obese recipients. We aimed to examine the impact of immunosuppression selection on the risk of posttransplant DM among both older and obese kidney transplant recipients.

Study Design

Retrospective database study.

Setting & Participants

Kidney-only transplant recipients aged ≥18 years from 2005 to 2016 in the United States from US Renal Data System records, which integrate Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing records with Medicare billing claims.

Exposures

Various immunosuppression regimens in the first 3 months after transplant.

Outcomes

Development of DM >3 months-to-1 year posttransplant.

Analytical Approach

We used multivariable Cox regression to compare the incidence of posttransplant DM by immunosuppression regimen with the reference regimen of thymoglobulin (TMG) or alemtuzumab (ALEM) with tacrolimus + mycophenolic acid + prednisone using inverse propensity weighting.

Results

12.7% of kidney transplant recipients developed posttransplant DM with higher incidences in older (≥55 years vs <55 years: 16.7% vs 10.1%) and obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m² vs BMI < 30 kg/m²: 17.1% vs 10.9%) patients. The incidence of posttransplant DM was lower with steroid avoidance [TMG/ALEM + no prednisone (8.4%) and IL2rAb + no prednisone (9.7%)] than TMG/ALEM with triple therapy (13.1%). After adjustment for donor and recipient characteristics, TMG/ALEM with steroid avoidance was beneficial for all groups [age < 55 years: adjusted HR (aHR), 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.72); age ≥ 55 years: aHR, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.60-0.79); BMI < 30 kg/m²: aHR, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.60-0.78); BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²: aHR, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.57-0.79)]. However, IL2rAb with steroid avoidance was beneficial only for older patients (aHR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58-0.99) and for those with BMI < 30 kg/m² (aHR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46-0.87).

Limitations

Retrospective study and lacked data on immunosuppression levels.

Conclusions

The beneficial impact of steroid avoidance using tacrolimus on posttransplant DM appears to differ by patient age and induction regimen.

Effect of Early Steroid Withdrawal on Posttransplant Diabetes Among Kidney Transplant Recipients Differs by Recipient Age

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background.

Posttransplant diabetes (PTD), a major complication after kidney transplantation (KT), is often attributable to immunosuppression. The risk of PTD may increase with more potent steroid maintenance and older recipient age.

Methods.

Using United States Renal Data System data, we studied 12 488 adult first-time KT recipients (2010–2015) with no known pre-KT diabetes. We compared the risk of PTD among recipients who underwent early steroid withdrawal (ESW) versus continued steroid maintenance (CSM) using Cox regression with inverse probability weighting to adjust for confounding. We tested whether the risk of PTD resulting from ESW differed by recipient age (18–29, 30–54, and ≥55 y).

Results.

Of 12 488, 28.3% recipients received ESW. The incidence rate for PTD was 13 per 100 person-y and lower among recipients who received ESW (11 per 100 person-y in ESW; 14 per 100 person-y in CSM). Overall, ESW was associated with lower risk of PTD compared with CSM (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = _0.720.79_0.86), but the risk differed by recipient age (P_interaction = 0.09 for comparison between recipients aged 18–29 and those aged 30–54; P_interaction = 0.01 for comparison between recipients aged 18–29 and those aged ≥55). ESW was associated with lower risk of PTD among recipients aged ≥55 (aHR = _0.620.71_0.81) and those aged 30–54 (aHR = _0.730.83_0.95), but not among recipients aged 18–29 (aHR = _0.811.18_1.72). Although recipients who received ESW had a higher risk of acute rejection across the age groups (adjusted odds ratio = _1.011.17_1.34), recipients with no PTD had a lower risk of mortality (aHR = _0.580.66_0.74).

Conclusions.

The beneficial association of ESW with decreased PTD was more pronounced among recipients aged ≥55, supporting an age-specific assessment of the risk-benefit balance regarding ESW.

Impact of diabetes mellitus developing after kidney transplantation on patient mortality and graft survival: a meta-analysis of adjusted data

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) occurs in 10-30% of kidney transplant recipients. However, its impact on mortality and graft survival is still ambiguous. Therefore, the current study aimed to analyze if PTDM increases mortality and graft failure by pooling multivariable-adjusted data from individual studies.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL, and Google Scholar were searched for studies comparing mortality and graft failure between PTDM and non-diabetic patients. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were pooled in a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Fourteen retrospective studies comparing 9872 PTDM patients with 65,327 non-diabetics were included. On pooled analysis, we noted a statistically significant increase in the risk of all-cause mortality in patients with PTDM as compared to non-diabetics (HR: 1.67 95% CI 1.43, 1.94 I² = 57% p < 0.00001). The meta-analysis also indicated a statistically significant increase in the risk of graft failure in patients with PTDM as compared to non-diabetics (HR: 1.35 95% CI 1.15, 1.58 I² = 78% p = 0.0002). Results were stable on sensitivity analysis. There was no evidence of publication bias on funnel plots.

CONCLUSION

Kidney transplant patients developing PTDM have a 67% increased risk of all-cause mortality and a 35% increased risk of graft failure. Further studies are needed to determine the exact cause of increased mortality and the mechanism involved in graft failure.

Diabetes mellitus in dialysis and renal transplantation

Diabetes mellitus is the commonest cause of end-stage kidney failure worldwide and is a proven and significant risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease. Renal impairment has a significant impact on the physiology of glucose homeostasis as it reduces tissue sensitivity to insulin and reduces insulin clearance. Renal replacement therapy itself affects glucose control: peritoneal dialysis may induce hyperglycaemia due to glucose-rich dialysate and haemodialysis often causes hypoglycaemia due to the relatively low concentration of glucose in the dialysate. Autonomic neuropathy which is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and diabetes increases the risk for asymptomatic hypoglycaemia. Pharmacological options for improving glycaemic control are limited due to alterations to drug metabolism. Impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes are also common in the post-kidney-transplant setting and increase the risk of graft failure and mortality. This review seeks to summarise the literature and tackle the intricacies of glycaemic management in patients with CKD who are either on maintenance haemodialysis or have received a kidney transplant. It outlines changes to glycaemic targets, monitoring of glycaemic control, the use of oral hypoglycaemic agents, the management of severe hyperglycaemia in dialysis and kidney transplantation patients.

Recent advances in new-onset diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation

A common challenge in managing kidney transplant recipients (KTR) is post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) or diabetes mellitus (DM) newly diagnosed after transplantation, in addition to known pre-existing DM. PTDM is an important risk factor for post-transplant cardiovascular (CV) disease, which adversely affects patient survival and quality of life. CV disease in KTR may manifest as ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and/or left ventricular hypertrophy. Available therapies for PTDM include most agents currently used to treat type 2 diabetes. More recently, the use of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i) has cautiously extended to KTR with PTDM, even though KTR are typically excluded from large general population clinical trials. Initial evidence from observational studies seems to indicate that SGLT2i, GLP-1 RA, and DPP4i may be safe and effective for glycemic control in KTR, but their benefit in reducing CV events in this otherwise high-risk population remains unproven. These newer drugs must still be used with care due to the increased propensity of KTR for intravascular volume depletion and acute kidney injury due to diarrhea and their single-kidney status, pre-existing burden of peripheral vascular disease, urinary tract infections due to immunosuppression and a surgically altered urinary tract, erythrocytosis from calcineurin inhibitors, and reduced kidney function from acute or chronic rejection.

Serum magnesium, hepatocyte nuclear factor 1β genotype and post-transplant diabetes mellitus: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Retrospective studies suggest that tacrolimus-induced hypomagnesaemia is a risk factor for post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM), but prospective studies are lacking.

METHODS

This was a prospective study with measurements of serum magnesium and tacrolimus at pre-specified time points in the first year after living donor kidney transplantation (KT). The role of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in hepatocyte nuclear factor 1β (HNF1β) was also explored because HNF1β regulates insulin secretion and renal magnesium handling. Repeated measurement and regression analyses were used to analyse associations with PTDM.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 29 out of 167 kidney transplant recipients developed PTDM after 1 year (17%). Higher tacrolimus concentrations were significantly associated with lower serum magnesium and increased risk of hypomagnesaemia. Patients who developed PTDM had a significantly lower serum magnesium trajectory than patients who did not develop PTDM. In multivariate analysis, lower serum magnesium, age and body mass index were independent risk factors for PTDM. In recipients, the HNF1β SNP rs752010 G > A significantly increased the risk of PTDM [odds ratio (OR) = 2.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-6.23] but not of hypomagnesaemia. This association lost significance after correction for age and sex (OR = 2.24, 95% CI 0.90-5.57). No association between HNF1β SNPs and PTDM was found in corresponding donors.

CONCLUSIONS

A lower serum magnesium in the first year after KT is an independent risk factor for PTDM. The HNF1β SNP rs752010 G > A may add to this risk through an effect on insulin secretion rather than hypomagnesaemia, but its role requires further confirmation.

Post-Transplantation Diabetes Mellitus

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) is an established therapeutic option for chronic disease resulting from end-stage organ dysfunction. Long-term use of immunosuppression is associated with post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM), placing patients at increased risk of infections, cardiovascular disease and mortality. The incidence rates for PTDM have varied from 10 to 40% between different studies. Diagnostic criteria have evolved over the years, as a greater understating of PTDM has been reached. There are differences in pathophysiology and clinical course of type 2 diabetes and PTDM. Hence, managing this condition can be a challenge for a diabetes physician, as there are several factors to consider when tailoring therapy for post-transplant patients to achieve better glycaemic as well as long-term transplant outcomes. This article is a detailed review of PTDM, examining the pathogenesis, diagnostic criteria and management in light of the current evidence. The therapeutic options are discussed in the context of their safety and potential drug-drug interactions with immunosuppressive agents.

Analysis of Risk Factors for Posttransplant Diabetes Mellitus After Kidney Transplantation: Single-Center Experience

OBJECTIVES

Posttransplant diabetes mellitus may severely affect the short-term and long-term outcomes of grafts and patient survival in kidney transplant recipients. The annual incidence rate of posttransplant diabetes mellitus ranges from 4% to 25%. In this study, our aim was to determine the possible risk factors in patients diagnosed with this disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From November 1975 to May 2019, our transplant team performed 3012 kidney transplant procedures at different units within Baskent University Transplantation Centers. We retrospectively analyzed data of patients who were diagnosed with posttransplant diabetes mellitus between 2010 and 2019. The diagnosis was made according to the 2001 American Diabetes Association criteria (fasting plasma glucose level ≥ 126 mg/dL [7 mmol/L] in 2 measurements or random blood glucose level ≥ 200 mg/dL [11.1 mmol/L] within 12 months posttransplant).

RESULTS

For this study, 400 patients (292 male, 108 female) with end-stage renal disease and without diabetes met the initial inclusion criteria; 270 received hemodialysis, 26 received peritoneal dialysis, and 104 underwent preemptive kidney transplant. In this patient group, 62 patients (15.5%) developed post-transplant diabetes mellitus. When we compared patients who developed and did not develop posttransplant diabetes mellitus, cause of end-stage renal disease, dialysis type and duration, type of donor (living or deceased), and graft survival posttransplant were similar between groups. Baseline fasting plasma glucose level was significantly higher in patients who developed posttransplant diabetes mellitus (90 vs 85 mg/dL; P = .034). Patients who developed the disease were significantly older.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, recipient age was the only risk factor for posttransplant diabetes mellitus. Older recipients should be examined more carefully for posttransplant diabetes mellitus, and less diabetogenic immunosuppressive drugs may be preferred.

Temporal trends of incident diabetes mellitus and subsequent outcomes in patients receiving kidney transplantation: a national cohort study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Allograft kidney transplantation has become a treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) has been associated with impaired patient and graft survival. Taiwan has the highest incidence and prevalence rates of ESRD with many recipients and candidates of kidney transplantation. However, information about the epidemiologic features of PTDM in Taiwan is incomplete. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the prevalence and incidence of PTDM with subsequent patient and graft outcomes.

METHODS

Using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), 3663 kidney recipients between 1997 and 2011 were enrolled. We calculated the cumulative incidences of diabetes mellitus (DM) after transplantation. Cox proportional hazards model with competing risk analysis was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between three targeted groups (DM, PTDM, non-DM). The outcomes of primary interest were the occurrence of graft failure excluding death with functioning graft, all-cause mortality, death with functioning graft and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and congestive heart failure (CHF). Subgroup analysis for graft failure excluding death with functioning graft, MACE and all-cause mortality was performed, and interaction between PTDM and recipient age was examined.

RESULTS

Of 3663 kidney transplant recipients, 531 (14%) had pre-existing DM and 631 (17%) developed PTDM. Compared with non-DM group, the PTDM and DM groups exhibited higher risk of graft failure excluding death with functioning graft (PTDM: HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.47-1.85; DM: HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.18-1.50), MACE (PTDM: HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.31-1.74; DM: HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.41-1.9), all-cause mortality (PTDM: HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.59-2.01; DM: HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.81-2.18), and death with functioning graft (PTDM: HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.71-2.20; DM: HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.71-2.21). Both PTDM and DM groups had increased cardiovascular disease-related mortality (PTDM: HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.43-3.20, p < 0.001; DM: HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.25-2.86, p = 0.002), cancer-related mortality (PTDM: HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.18-2.07, p = 0.002; DM: HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.25-2.86, p = 0.027), and infection-related mortality (PTDM: HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.14-1.90, p = 0.003; DM: HR 2.25, 95% CI 1.77-2.84, p < 0.001) compared with non-DM group. The subgroup analyses showed that the add-on risks of MACE and mortality from PTDM were mainly observed in patients who were younger and those without associated comorbidities including atrial fibrillation, cirrhosis, CHF, and MI. Age significantly modified the association between PTDM and MACE (p_interaction < 0.01) with higher risk in recipients with PTDM aged younger than 55 years (adjusted HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.40-1.92, p < 0.001). A trend (p_interaction = 0.06) of age-modifying effect on the association between PTDM and all-cause mortality was also noted with higher risk in recipients with PTDM aged younger than 55 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present population-based study, the incidence of PTDM peaked within the first year after kidney transplantation. PTDM negatively impacted graft and patient outcomes. The magnitude of cardiovascular and survival disadvantages from PTDM were more pronounced in recipients aged less than 55 years. Further trials to improve prediction of PTDM and to prevent PTDM are warranted.

An observational prospective study to evaluate the outcomes of new onset diabetes after renal transplantation (NODAT) in a tertiary care centre in eastern India

AIM

To analyse post-transplant outcomes of NODAT patients in comparison to the regular cohort (non-NODAT).

OBJECTIVES

To compare graft survival and rejection rate, patient survival rate, incidence of hospitalization (due to any cause) in between NODAT and non-NODAT groups in cases of renal transplantation.

METHODS

A single-centred prospective real-world observational study of 100 subjects who underwent renal transplantation over a period of two years. All NODAT cases evaluated for graft survival/rejection, incidence of hospitalisation/infection, mortality from all causes and compared with that of non-NODAT post-transplant recipients. Nominal categorical data between the groups are compared using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. p value < 0.05 was taken to indicate a significant difference.

RESULTS

Mean number of hospital admissions of subjects was 1.38 ± 1.38 and 0.29 ± 0.56 in NODAT and Non-NODAT respectively, p < 0.0001. Nineteen out of 24 NODAT subjects and 72 out of 76 Non-NODAT subjects had graft survival, p = 0.0342. Twenty out of 24 NODAT and 74 out of 76 Non-NODAT subjects had survived, p = 0.0282.

CONCLUSIONS

NODAT leads to adverse outcomes viz. increased rate of hospitalization, reduced rates of allograft survival and patient survival.

Late Conversion From Calcineurin Inhibitors to Belatacept in Kidney-Transplant Recipients Has a Significant Beneficial Impact on Glycemic Parameters

Background.

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and steroids are strongly associated with new-onset diabetes after transplantation, worsening of pre-existing diabetes, and cardiovascular events. We assessed the benefit of conversion from CNI-based to belatacept-based immunosuppression in diabetic kidney-transplant (KT) recipients on glucose control and cardiovascular risk factors.

Methods.

In this retrospective, noncontrolled single-study conducted between May 2016 and October 26, 2018, we recruited KT recipients converted from CNIs to belatacept at least 6 months after KT. The primary endpoint was the evolution of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) between baseline and after 6 months of treatment. Secondary endpoints included modifications to antidiabetic drugs, other cardiovascular risk factors, and renal function.

Results.

One hundred and three KT recipients were included. Of these, 26 (25%) had type 2 diabetes. The patients were either receiving oral antidiabetic drugs (n = 21; 75%) or insulin therapy (n = 14; 54%). Overall HbA1c decreased significantly from 6.2 ± 1 to 5.8 ± 1%, P < 0.001. In diabetic patients, HbA1c decreased from 7.2 ± 1 to 6.5 ± 1%, P = 0.001. HbA1c significantly decreased in the subgroup of patients with new-onset diabetes after transplantation and whether diabetes was controlled at inclusion or not (ie, HA1c ≤7% or >7%). Moreover, no diabetic patient increased the number of oral antidiabetic drugs and the dose of basal insulin was not statistically different from baseline to 6 months (16 international unit at baseline and 16 international unit at 6 mo, P = 1). One patient had to start treatment by insulin pump. During follow-up, the renal function, body mass index, and hemoglobin level of all 103 patients remained stable, 2 patients presented acute cellular rejection, and no patient suffered from graft loss.

Conclusions.

A late switch from CNI to belatacept was a valuable therapeutic option for diabetic kidney recipients and substantially improved glycemic parameters.

OGTT 2-hour serum C-peptide index as a predictor of post-transplant diabetes mellitus in kidney transplant recipients

Background

The high incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) necessitates the identification of new factors to explain its pathogenesis. This study aimed to clarify the association between the C-peptide index (CPI) and PTDM.

Methods

A total of 290 non-diabetic kidney transplant patients were analyzed. All subjects underwent a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Plasma glucose concentrations, serum C-peptide levels, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and other biochemical indicators were measured. CPI was calculated as the ratio of serum C-peptide to plasma glucose.

Results

Among the 290 patients, 36 (12.4%) developed PTDM at the end of 1 year. Patients with PTDM had older age (P<0.001), higher levels of body mass index (BMI) (P=0.004) and HbA1c (P=0.001), a higher proportion of deceased donors (P=0.045), and lower levels of 2 h-CPI (P=0.02) than those without PTDM. The OGTT 2 h-CPI was positively correlated with BMI, HbA1c, type of calcineurin inhibitor, albumin, and triglyceride. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox hazard model analysis showed that pre-transplant OGTT 2 h-CPI was an independent predictor for the development of PTDM, together with age, BMI, and HbA1c.

Conclusions

Of the pre-transplant factors studied, OGTT 2 h-CPI proved to be an independent predictor of PTDM.

Validation of Identified Susceptible Gene Variants for New-Onset Diabetes in Renal Transplant Recipients

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and candidate gene approaches have identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with new-onset diabetes after renal transplantation (NODAT). We evaluated associations between NODAT and SNPs identified in previous studies. We genotyped 1102 renal transplant recipients from the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY) database; 13 SNPs were assessed for associations with NODAT (occurring in 254 patients; 23.0%), within one year after transplantation. The frequency of the T allele at KCNQ1 rs2237892 was significantly lower in patients with NODAT compared to control patients (0.30 vs. 0.39; p = 8.5 × 10^-5). The T allele at rs2237892 was significantly associated with decreased risk of NODAT after adjusting for multiple variables, compared to the C allele (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.51-0.79; p = 5.5 × 10^-5). Dominant inheritance modeling showed that CT/TT genotypes were associated with a lower risk for development of NODAT (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.42-0.76; p = 2.0 × 10^-4) compared to the CC genotype. No other SNPs were associated with NODAT. Our study validated the protective effect of T allele at KCNQ1 rs2237892 on the development of NODAT in a large cohort of renal transplant recipients. Our findings on susceptibility variants might be a useful tool to predict NODAT development after renal transplantation.

Risk factors for new-onset diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation (NODAT): a Brazilian single center study

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to verify the new-onset diabetes after kidney transplant (NODAT) incidence in recipients within 1 year after kidney transplantation from a single center in Southern Brazil and to assess the associated conditions.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of 258 post-renal transplant patients was performed. Demographic (gender, age, ethnic background) and clinical (origin of graft, associated infections, body mass index (BMI) at transplant time and 6 and 12 months after, causes of renal failure, and comorbidities) data were analyzed. All patients were on tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone treatment. Patients with and without NODAT were compared.

RESULTS

A NODAT incidence of 31.2% was noted 1 year post transplantation. In the univariate analysis, patients with NODAT were older (p = 0.001), mostly had African-American ethnic background (p = 0.02), and had renal failure secondary to high blood pressure (HBP) (p = 0.001). The group of patients with NODAT also had more incidence of post-transplant HBP (p = 0.01), heart failure (p = 0.02), and dyslipidemia (p = 0.001). Logistic regression showed that African-American ethnic background, post-transplant HBP, and dyslipidemia were independently associated with NODAT.

CONCLUSION

This study shows a NODAT incidence that is greater in patients with African-American ethnic background and that is associated with HBP and dyslipidemia.

Immunogenetics of new onset diabetes after transplantation in Kuwait

Introduction and aim: New onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a serious metabolic complication following kidney transplantation. Although beta-cell dysfunction is considered the main contributing factor in the development of this complication, its exact etiology is yet to be identified. We aimed to investigate NODAT among kidney transplant cohort in Kuwait with special stress on correlation between its risk factors and interferon gamma genotyping. Materials and methods: We surveyed 309 kidney transplant recipients from Hamed Al Essa Transplantation Centre, Kuwait. The participants were categorized into cohorts according to the development of NODAT diagnosed based on the American Diabetes Association guidelines. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software. We genotyped interferon gamma as the leading immunosignature for T lymphocyte. Results: No relationship between ethnicity and the development of NODAT was identified. However, there was a significant difference in age between cohorts. Younger patients demonstrated a lower rate of NODAT while, NODAT reached its maximum in 40-60-year age group. IFNG TT genotype was significantly associated with NODAT (p=0.005), while IFNG AA was considerably higher in the non-NODAT group. Conclusion: Beside the conventional contributing factors of NODAT, our results might represent a suitable platform for a larger cytokine and chemokine spectrum genotyping.

Interleukin-2 receptor antagonists: Protective factors against new-onset diabetes after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to examine the association between interleukin-2 receptor antagonists (IL-2Ra) and new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) among renal transplant recipients (RTRs).

METHODS

Between January 1993 and March 2014, 915 patients underwent renal transplantation at Zhongshan Hospital. In all, 557 RTRs were included in the present retrospective cohort study. The incidence of NODAT in this cohort was determined and multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for NODAT and to show the association between IL-2Ra use and NODAT development among RTRs. The cumulative incidence of NODAT was compared between groups treated with or without IL-2Ra.

RESULTS

The mean ±SD postoperative follow-up was 5.08 ±3.17 years. The incidence of NODAT at the end of follow-up was 20.3%. After adjusting for potential confounders in the multivariate logistic regression (i.e. age, sex, body mass index, history of smoking, family history of diabetes, duration of dialysis, type of dialysis, donor type, recovery of graft function, acute rejection, hepatitis B or C or cytomegalovirus infection, fasting plasma glucose levels before and 1 week after transplantation, preoperative total cholesterol and triglyceride levels, daily dose of glucocorticoid, immunosuppressive regimen type, and immunosuppressant concentration after transplantation), IL-2Ra use was found to be related to a reduced incidence of NODAT.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of IL-2Ra is associated with protection against the development of NODAT in RTRs.

Steroid-free immunosuppression with low-dose tacrolimus is safe and significantly reduces the incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus following liver transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Corticosteroids (CS) are traditionally used as part of the basal immunosuppression (IS) following liver transplantation (LT) but are known to be associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM), cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the incidence of transient as well as persistent NODM, rejection rate and patient- and graft survival between patients receiving steroid-based and steroid-free maintenance IS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 238 patients liver transplanted (2008-2011) with deceased donor livers were divided into two groups, one group that received steroid-based IS (tacrolimus (TAC), corticosteroids (CS), ± mycophenolate mofetil (MMF); n = 155) (2008-2011) and another group of non-autoimmune recipients that received steroid-free IS (TAC, MMF; n = 83) according to our new maintenance IS-protocol starting January 2010. The primary and secondary end-points were patient- and graft survival, rejection rates and the incidence of NODM. The median follow-up times were 1248 days and 681 days, respectively.

RESULTS

The one-year patient- and graft survival in the steroid-based and steroid-free group was 92.7% and 93.3% (ns) and 87.6% and 84.9% (ns), respectively. The incidence of biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) was 27.7% in both groups (ns) during follow-up. The overall incidence of persistent NODM in the two groups were 16.8% and 2.9%, respectively (p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that steroid-free low-dose tacrolimus-based IS following LT is safe and decreases the incidence of NODM significantly.

Outcome of Patients With Small Vessel Vasculitis After Renal Transplantation: National Database Analysis

Background

Small vessel vasculitis commonly affects the kidney and can progress to end-stage renal disease. The goal of this study is to compare outcomes of patients who received a renal transplant as a result of small vessel vasculitis (group A) with those who received kidney transplants because of other causes (group B).

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of United Network for Organ Sharing registry data for adult primary kidney transplants from January 2000 to December 2014. Group A patients (N = 2196) were compared with a group B (N = 6588); groups were case matched for age, race, sex, donor type, and year of transplant in a 1:3 ratio.

Results

Renal and patient survivals were better in the group A (P < 0.001). New-onset diabetes after transplant developed in 8.3% of the group A and 11.3% of group B (P < 0.001). Seventeen (0.8%) patients in group A developed recurrent disease. Of these, 7 patients had graft failure, 3 of which were due to disease recurrence. Group A patients had significantly higher risk of developing posttransplant solid organ malignancies (11.3% vs 9.3%, P = 0.006) and lymphoproliferative disorder (1.3% vs 0.8%, P = 0.026). Independent predictors of graft failure and patient mortality were recipients' morbid obesity, diabetes, age, and dialysis duration (hazard ratio of 1.7, 1.4, 1.1/10 years, and 1.1/year for graft failure, and 1.7, 1.7, 1.6/10 years and 1.1/year for patient mortality, respectively).

Conclusions

Renal transplantation in patients with has favorable long-term graft and patient outcomes with a low disease recurrence rate. However, they may have a higher risk of developing posttransplant malignancies.

Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Post-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus among Renal Transplant Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Objective

To examine the association between HCV infection and the occurrence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) among renal transplant patients.

Design

Meta-analysis of observational studies.

Data Sources

We retrieved studies published in any language by systematically searching Medline, and Embase and by manually examining the references of the original articles, reviews, and monographs retrieved.

Review Methods

We included cohort and case-control studies reporting relative risk estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PTDM occurrence with HCV after renal transplantation. Thirteen studies providing information on a total of 30,099 unique patients were included in our meta-analysis.

Results

Study-specific relative risks were weighted by the inverse of their variance to obtain fixed- and random-effects pooled estimates. The pooled relative risk (RR) for PTDM after RT was 2.73 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.94; 3.83 (10 studies). In a stratified analysis including only large studies (2 studies), the pooled RR was 1.36 (95% CI, 1.21; 1.54). Egger's regression test showed some evidence of publication bias (p=0.0001), but our sensitivity analysis showed that this issue did not meaningfully change the results.

Conclusions

Our study shows a marked increase of the risk of post-transplant diabetes mellitus in anti-hepatitis C virus-positive renal transplant recipients. The excess risk of death in hepatitis C virus-positive renal transplant recipients may be at least partially attributed to post-transplant diabetes mellitus with its attendant complications.

Judicious Toggling of mTOR Activity to Combat Insulin Resistance and Cancer: Current Evidence and Perspectives

The mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), via its two distinct multiprotein complexes, mTORC1, and mTORC2, plays a central role in the regulation of cellular growth, metabolism, and migration. A dysregulation of the mTOR pathway has in turn been implicated in several pathological conditions including insulin resistance and cancer. Overactivation of mTORC1 and disruption of mTORC2 function have been reported to induce insulin resistance. On the other hand, aberrant mTORC1 and mTORC2 signaling via either genetic alterations or increased expression of proteins regulating mTOR and its downstream targets have contributed to cancer development. These underlined the attractiveness of mTOR as a therapeutic target to overcome both insulin resistance and cancer. This review summarizes the evidence supporting the notion of intermittent, low dose rapamycin for treating insulin resistance. It further highlights recent data on the continuous use of high dose rapamycin analogs and related second generation mTOR inhibitors for cancer eradication, for overcoming chemoresistance and for tumor stem cell suppression. Within these contexts, the potential challenges associated with the use of mTOR inhibitors are also discussed.

[Chronic kidney disease and kidney transplantation]

OBJECTIVES

To report epidemiology and characteristics of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients and renal transplant candidates, and to evaluate access to waiting list and results of renal transplantation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An exhaustive systematic review of the scientific literature was performed in the Medline database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and Embase (http://www.embase.com) using different associations of the following keywords: "chronic kidney disease, epidemiology, kidney transplantation, cost, survival, graft, brain death, cardiac arrest, access, allocation". French legal documents have been reviewed using the government portal (http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr). Articles were selected according to methods, language of publication and relevance. The reference lists were used to identify additional historical studies of interest. Both prospective and retrospective series, in French and English, as well as review articles and recommendations were selected. In addition, French national transplant and health agencies (http://www.agence-biomedecine.fr and http://www.has-sante.fr) databases were screened using identical keywords. A total of 3234 articles, 6 official reports and 3 newspaper articles were identified; after careful selection 99 publications were eligible for our review.

RESULTS

The increasing prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) leads to worsen organ shortage. Renal transplantation remains the best treatment option for ESRD, providing recipients with an increased survival and quality of life, at lower costs than other renal replacement therapies. The never-ending lengthening of the waiting list raises issues regarding treatment strategies and candidates' selection, and underlines the limits of organ sharing without additional source of kidneys available for transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Allocation policies aim to reduce medical or geographical disparities regarding enrollment on a waiting list or access to an allotransplant.

Controlling Diabetes After Liver Transplantation: Room for Improvement

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic illness with great impact on long-term outcome after liver transplantation (LT). Despite this, the current level of glycemic control and quality of screening strategies for diabetes-associated conditions that are being provided to liver transplant recipients with diabetes have not yet been assessed.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional, multicenter study that included 344 liver transplant recipients and examined the level of glycemic control and its associated factors, as well as the quality of screening strategies for diabetes-associated conditions.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients (21.8%) suffered from diabetes before transplantation, and 82 (23.8%) developed diabetes mellitus after transplantation. Adequate glycemic control (HbA1c < 7%) was achieved in 66.7% of the patients. Forty-eight percent of patients underwent regular screening for retinopathy, 47.1% for nephropathy, 4.5% for neuropathy, and 5.7% for foot ulcers. Diabetes was associated with higher frequency of cardiovascular disease and dyslipidemia both before and after LT. Multivariate analysis revealed association between poor glycemic control and arterial hypertension, presence of diabetes before transplantation, elevated GGT, and insulin use.

CONCLUSIONS

Glycemic control was inadequate in 33.3% of LT recipients with diabetes, and screening protocols for diabetes-associated conditions did not meet the standards for medical care set by the American Diabetes Association in any of the participating centers. Consequently, this study reveals a clear deficiency in the quality of diabetes care provided to patients after LT and, hence, we predict that future progress in this area will have a significant impact on medium-term to long-term outcome of these patients.

The Risk for New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus after Kidney Transplantation in Patients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

New-onset diabetes after kidney transplantation (NODAT) is associated with both renal allograft failure and increased rates of mortality. The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the risk for NODAT in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD).

METHODS

A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception through July 2015. Studies that reported relative risks, odd ratios or hazard ratios comparing the risk for NODAT in patients with ADPKD were included. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance method.

RESULTS

Included in the analysis were 12 cohort studies, which comprised 1379 patients with ADPKD of a total of 9849 patients who had undergone kidney transplants. The pooled RRs of NODAT in patients with ADPKD were 1.92 (95% CI, 1.36 to 2.70). When meta-analysis was limited only to studies with confounder-adjusted analysis, the pooled RRs for NODAT were 1.98 (95% CI, 1.33 to 2.94). However, the association between NODAT requiring insulin treatment was insignificant, with pooled RRs of 1.57 (95% CI, 0.75 to 3.27).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis demonstrates a significant association between ADPKD and NODAT in recipients of kidney transplants. The findings of this study may impact clinical management and follow up for patients with ADPKD after kidney transplantation.

Hypomagnesemia linked to new-onset diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

New-onset diabetes after kidney transplantation (NODAT) is associated with both renal allograft failure and increased mortality. The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the risk of NODAT in patients with hypomagnesemia.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception through May, 2015. Studies that reported relative risks, odd ratios or hazard ratios comparing the risk of NODAT in patients with hypomagnesemia were included. Pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance method.

RESULTS

Five cohort studies with 1699 patients were included in the analysis to assess the risk of NODAT in patients with hypomagnesemia. The pooled RR of NODAT in patients with hypomagnesemia was 1.25 (95% CI, 1.08-1.45). When meta-analysis was limited only to studies with the post-transplant hypomagnesemia, the pooled RR of NODAT was 1.22 (95% CI, 1.09-1.38).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis demonstrates a significant association between hypomagnesemia and NODAT in kidney transplant recipients. This finding suggests the need for a large randomized controlled trial-with very careful attention to assess the effects of normalizing Mg levels and the risk of NODAT.

Reduction in new-onset diabetes mellitus after renal transplant with erythropoietin-stimulating agents: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) protect mice against the development of diabetes through direct effects on pancreatic ß cells. However, the effect of ESAs on the incidence of diabetes in humans has not been well studied. It is unknown whether exposure to ESAs is associated with a reduced incidence of new-onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT).

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between ESA exposure post-renal transplant and the development of NODAT.

DESIGN

We performed a single center, retrospective cohort analysis.

PATIENTS

We compared patients who received a first live or deceased donor renal allograft, with any exposure to an ESA vs. those without such exposure and who developed NODAT and who did not. Patients with a prior history of diabetes mellitus or multi-organ transplant, including a second renal transplant were excluded.

MEASUREMENTS AND METHODS

NODAT was defined based on the 2008 Canadian Diabetes Association criteria. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors independently associated with NODAT.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-two (29 %) patients were exposed to an ESA, four of which developed NODAT compared to 128 who did not develop NODAT (p < 0.0001). Of those not exposed to an ESA, 15 % (48/319) developed NODAT. By Fisher's exact test, exposure to an ESA at any time post-transplant reduced the risk of developing NODAT; odds ratio (OR) = 0.08, 95 % confidence interval (CI) (0.018-0.352), p = 0.0008. Older age; OR = 1.41, 95 % CI (1.036-1.933), p < 0.02, higher random blood sugar at discharge; OR = 1.30, 95 % CI (1.077-1.57), p < 0.006 and deceased donor; OR 2.18 CI (1.009-4.729), p = 0.04 were associated with an increased risk of NODAT.

LIMITATIONS

The limitations of this study include its retrospective nature, single center, and homogenous population; thus, generalizability of the results must be approached with caution.

CONCLUSION

ESA exposure may be associated with a reduced incidence of NODAT in the post-renal transplant population. The role of ESA in preventing NODAT requires further investigation.

Post-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus: Causes, Treatment, and Impact on Outcomes

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a frequent consequence of solid organ transplantation. PTDM has been associated with greater mortality and increased infections in different transplant groups using different diagnostic criteria. An international consensus panel recommended a consistent set of guidelines in 2003 based on American Diabetes Association glucose criteria but did not exclude the immediate post-transplant hospitalization when many patients receive large doses of corticosteroids. Greater glucose monitoring during all hospitalizations has revealed significant glucose intolerance in the majority of recipients immediately after transplant. As a result, the international consensus panel reviewed its earlier guidelines and recommended delaying screening and diagnosis of PTDM until the recipient is on stable doses of immunosuppression after discharge from initial transplant hospitalization. The group cautioned that whereas hemoglobin A1C has been adopted as a diagnostic criterion by many, it is not reliable as the sole diabetes screening method during the first year after transplant. Risk factors for PTDM include many of the immunosuppressant medications themselves as well as those for type 2 diabetes. The provider managing diabetes and associated dyslipidemia and hypertension after transplant must be careful of the greater risk for drug-drug interactions and infections with immunosuppressant medications. Treatment goals and therapies must consider the greater risk for fluctuating and reduced kidney function, which can cause hypoglycemia. Research is actively focused on strategies to prevent PTDM, but until strategies are found, it is imperative that immunosuppression regimens are chosen based on their evidence to prolong graft survival, not to avoid PTDM.

Cardiovascular risk factors following renal transplant

Kidney transplantation is the gold-standard treatment for many patients with end-stage renal disease. Renal transplant recipients (RTRs) remain at an increased risk of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular (CV) events compared to the general population, although rates are lower than those patients on maintenance haemodialysis. Death with a functioning graft is most commonly due to cardiovascular disease (CVD) and therefore this remains an important therapeutic target to prevent graft failure. Conventional CV risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension and renal dysfunction remain a major influence on CVD in RTRs. However it is now recognised that the morbidity and mortality from CVD are not entirely accounted for by these traditional risk-factors. Immunosuppression medications exert a deleterious effect on many of these well-recognised contributors to CVD and are known to exacerbate the probability of developing diabetes, graft dysfunction and hypertension which can all lead on to CVD. Non-traditional CV risk factors such as inflammation and anaemia have been strongly linked to increased CV events in RTRs and should be considered alongside those which are classified as conventional. This review summarises what is known about risk-factors for CVD in RTRs and how, through identification of those which are modifiable, outcomes can be improved. The overall CV risk in RTRs is likely to be multifactorial and a complex interaction between the multiple traditional and non-traditional factors; further studies are required to determine how these may be modified to enhance survival and quality of life in this unique population.

New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus Associated with Sirolimus Use in Renal Transplant Recipients

New-onset diabetes after transplantation and impaired glucose tolerance are very common in renal transplant patients. New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, reduced graft and patient survival. Several risk factors for NODAT have been identified: age, obesity, family history of diabetes mellitus and HCV infection. In addition, steroid and calcineurin inhibitors also contribute to the development of NODAT. Sirolimus causes immunosuppressive effects by inhibiting mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and has well known side effects. The effects of sirolimus on glucose metabolism and contribution to NODAT development are not clearly known. In this report, we presented five RTX patients who developed NODAT under the treatment of sirolimus.

Hypomagnesemia and the Risk of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus after Kidney Transplantation

Several studies suggest a link between post-transplant hypomagnesemia and new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT), but this relationship remains controversial. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 948 nondiabetic kidney transplant recipients from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2011, to examine the association between serum magnesium level and NODAT. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to evaluate the risk of NODAT as a function of baseline (at 1 month), time-varying (every 3 months), and rolling-average (i.e., mean for 3 months moving at 3-month intervals) serum magnesium levels while adjusting for potential confounders. A total of 182 NODAT events were observed over 2951.2 person-years of follow-up. Multivariable models showed an inverse relationship between baseline serum magnesium level and NODAT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24 per 0.1 mmol/L decrease; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.05 to 1.46; P=0.01). The association with the risk of NODAT persisted in conventional time-varying (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.52; P<0.001) and rolling-average models (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.57; P=0.001). Hypomagnesemia (serum magnesium <0.74 mmol/L) also significantly associated with increased risk of NODAT in baseline (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.34; P=0.02), time-varying (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.29 to 2.45; P<0.001), and rolling-average models (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.30 to 2.57; P=0.001). Our results suggest that lower post-transplant serum magnesium level is an independent risk factor for NODAT in kidney transplant recipients. Interventions targeting serum magnesium to reduce the risk of NODAT should be evaluated.

Historical cohort with diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation and associated factors of its development in adult patients of a transplantation reference center in the State of Ceará, Brazil

Post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is an important complication related to kidney transplantation (KT), and its occurrence is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, KT is considered to be the most effective treatment option that offers better quality of life for patients with end-stage kidney disease. This study aimed to describe the occurrence of PTDM and the risk factors associated with its development in kidney transplant patients of a transplantation reference center in the State of Ceará (Brazil). This historical cohort study, based on medical records data, included adult patients undergoing KT from January 2006 to December 2010 in a public tertiary hospital. Multivariate analysis was performed with the use of a logistic regression model, with PTDM presence as dependent variable and the possible risk factors under study as independent variables. Throughout the evaluated period, 430 KTs were performed; 92 patients were excluded. Diabetes mellitus was already present in 9.2% of patients before KT. Hyperglycemia during the 1st month after transplantation occurred in 34.5% of recipients, and the occurrence of PTDM to the end of study was 19.9%. Factors associated with PTDM development were: fasting plasma glucose 1 month after KT (P < .001; odds ratio [OR] 1.05), deceased-donor KT (P = .015; OR 3.53), impaired fasting glucose before transplantation (P = .014; OR 4.10), and acute rejection occurrence (P = .003; OR 6.43). High PTDM occurrence was found, in accordance with the literature. Identification of factors associated with PTDM development, as well as its early diagnosis, could result in long-term improvement in patient and graft survivals.

Is basiliximab induction, a novel risk factor for new onset diabetes after transplantation for living donor renal allograft recipients?

AIM

It was found that, by affecting populations of T lymphocytes and regulatory T cells, basiliximab also indirectly affects pancreatic β-cell function and glucose homeostasis.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, we included all renal transplant recipients from 1 July 2007 to 31 July 2011. The overall incidence of hyperglycaemia (transient hyperglycaemia, impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and new onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT)) was compared between patients with and without basiliximab induction.

RESULTS

Of the 439 eligible study patients, 105 patients received basiliximab induction and 334 patients did not. Overall hyperglycaemia (transient hyperglycaemia, IFG, IGT and NODAT) was detected in 102/334 (30.5%) patients without induction and 44/105 (41.9%) patients with induction (P = 0.03). Of the 102 patients with hyperglycaemia in patients without basiliximab, 46 (45.1%) patients improved, while only 10 (22.7%) of the 44 patients with basiliximab improved (P = 0.016) at the end of 3 months. Finally, NODAT was observed in 56/334 (16.7%) patients without induction and 102/334 (30.5%) patients with induction. Relative risk of NODAT with basiliximab was 2.3 (95% CI 1.4-3.9) compared to that of patients without induction. Basiliximab and hepatitis C virus infection were independent risk factors for NODAT. Risk of NODAT remained high with basiliximab despite adjusting the acute rejections episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Basiliximab induction prevents acute rejection; however, it is associated with increased risk of NODAT.

New-onset diabetes after renal transplantation

Renal transplantation has important benefits in people with end-stage renal disease, with improvements in mortality, morbidity and quality of life. Whilst significant advances in transplantation techniques and immunosuppressive regimens have led to improvements in short-term outcomes, longer-term outcomes have not improved dramatically. New-onset diabetes after transplantation appears to be a major factor in morbidity and cardiovascular mortality in renal transplant recipients. The diagnosis of new-onset diabetes after renal transplantation has been hampered by a lack of clarity over diagnostic tests in early studies, although the use of the WHO criteria is now generally accepted. HbA1c may be useful diagnostically, but should probably be avoided in the first 3 months after transplantation. The pathogenesis of new-onset diabetes after renal transplantation is likely to be related to standard pathogenic factors in Type 2 diabetes (e.g. insulin resistance, β-cell failure, inflammation and genetic factors) as well as other factors, such as hepatitis C infection, and could be exacerbated by the use of immunosuppression (glucocorticoids and calcineurin inhibitors). Pre-transplant risk scores may help identify those people at risk of new-onset diabetes after renal transplantation. There are no randomized trials of treatment of new-onset diabetes after renal transplantation to determine whether intensive glucose control has an impact on cardiovascular or renal morbidity, therefore, treatment is guided by guidelines used in non-transplant diabetes. Many areas of uncertainty in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of new-onset diabetes after renal transplantation require further research.

Predictors and prognostic implications of major adverse cardiovascular events after renal transplant: 10 years outcomes in 321 patients

Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice in patients with end-stage renal disease. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) are common after renal transplant, especially in the perioperative period, leading to excess morbidity and mortality. The predictors and long-term prognostic implications of MACE are poorly understood. We analyzed predictors and implications of MACE in a cohort of 321 consecutive adult patients, who received renal allograft transplantation between 1995 and 2003 at our institution. The characteristics of 321 patients were: age at transplant 44 ± 13 years, 60% male, 36% diabetes mellitus (DM), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 60 ± 16%. MACE occurred in 21 patients with cumulative rate of 6.5% over 3 years after renal transplant, 57% occurring within 30 days, 67% within 90 days, and 86% within 180 days. MACE was not predicted by any clinical or pharmacological variables including age, gender, hypertension, DM, prior myocardial infarction, smoking, duration of dialysis, LVEF, or therapy with β-blockers (BB), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, or calcium channel blockers. However, a clinical decision to perform a stress test or a coronary angiogram was predictive of higher MACE rate. MACE, irrespective of type, was independently associated with higher mortality over a period up to 15 years and this seemed to be blunted by BB therapy. MACE rate after renal transplantation decreases over time, most occurring in the first 90 days and is not predicted by any of the traditional risk factors or drug therapies. It is associated with higher long-term mortality.

De novo glomerular diseases after renal transplantation

Glomerular diseases developing in the kidney allograft are more often recurrences of the original disease affecting the native kidneys. However, in an undefined number of cases de novo, glomerular diseases unrelated to the original disease in the native kidneys can develop in the transplanted kidney. The clinical presentation and histologic features of de novo diseases are often similar to those features observed in patients with primary or secondary GN in the native kidneys. However, in transplanted kidneys, the glomerular, vascular, and tubulointerstitial changes are often intertwined with structural abnormalities already present at the time of transplant or caused by antibody- or cell-mediated allograft rejection, immunosuppressive drugs, or superimposed infection (most often of a viral nature). The pathophysiology of de novo glomerular diseases is quite variable. In rare cases of de novo minimal change disease, circulating factors increasing the glomerular permeability likely participate. Maladaptive hemodynamic changes and tissue fibrosis caused by calcineurin inhibitors or other factors may be involved in the pathogenesis of de novo FSGS. The exposure of cryptic podocyte antigens may favor the development of de novo membranous nephropathy. Many cases of de novo membranoproliferative GN are related to hepatitis C virus infection. Patients with Alport syndrome lacking antigenic epitopes in their glomerular basement membrane may develop antibodies against these glomerular basement membrane antigens expressed in the transplanted kidney. Infection may cause acute GN to have a heterogeneous clinical presentation and outcome. De novo pauci-immune GN in renal transplant is rare. Preexisting or acquired intolerance to glucose may, in the long term, cause diabetic nephropathy. The prognosis of de novo diseases depends on the type of GN, the severity of lesions caused by the alloimmune response, or the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy. In most cases, the management of de novo glomerular diseases is empirical or elusive.

Outcomes of de novo allograft diabetic nephropathy in renal allograft recipients

OBJECTIVES

Despite increased use of diabetogenic immunosuppressive drugs and increased incidence of new-onset diabetes after transplant in renal allograft recipients, there are few case studies on the subject of de novo allograft diabetic nephropathy and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy without specific glomerular changes. We sought to study the outcomes of allograft diabetic nephropathy and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy without specific glomerular changes in patients with new-onset diabetes after transplant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the case records of all new-onset diabetes after transplant patients who underwent graft biopsy for graft dysfunction from 1992 to 2010. We analyzed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of new-onset diabetes after transplant patients with de novo allograft diabetic nephropathy and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy without specific glomerular changes.

RESULTS

Of the 1989 recipients, 421 patients developed new-onset diabetes after transplant and 26 underwent graft biopsy. Of the 26 patients, 9 had histopathologic evidence of de novo allograft diabetic nephropathy, and 17 had interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy without specific glomerular changes. The mean duration from transplant to developing novo allograft diabetic nephropathy was 115.2 months (range, 33-192 mo), and from developing new-onset diabetes after transplant to allograft diabetic nephropathy, was 109.66 months (range, 27-188.4 mo). Of the 9 patients with de novo allograft diabetic nephropathy, 3 died (33.3%), 2 reached end-stage renal disease (22.2%), and 4 remained stable (44.4%). Of the 17 with interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy, 2 died (11.7%), 5 developed end-stage renal disease (29.4%), and 10 remained stable on triple immunosuppression and insulin therapy during follow-up (58.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

De novo allograft diabetic nephropathy is a significant cause of graft and patient loss in renal allograft recipients who develop new-onset diabetes after transplant.

Continuous glucose monitoring after kidney transplantation in non-diabetic patients: early hyperglycaemia is frequent and may herald post-transplantation diabetes mellitus and graft failure

OBJECTIVES

New onset of diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a known complication of renal transplantation, but early glycaemic status after transplantation has not been described prospectively. This study aimed to assess blood glucose (BG) levels immediately following kidney transplantation in non-diabetic subjects and to explore their relationship to later graft outcomes and NODAT occurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Over a 9-month period, 43 consecutive non-diabetic patients who received a kidney transplant were prospectively investigated. During the first 4 days after transplantation, fasting BG was measured and the 24-h BG profile assessed by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Capillary BG was measured on hospital admittance and at least four times a day for CGM calibration thereafter. All adverse events were recorded, and fasting BG and HbA1c were assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months and at the last visit to our centre.

RESULTS

Immediately following renal transplantation, capillary BG was 12.2 ± 3.8 mmol/L. On day 1 (D1), fasting BG was 9.9 ± 4.3 mmol/L and decreased to 6.0 ± 1.5 mmol/L on D3. The CGM-reported mean 24-h BG (mmol/L) was 10.2±2.4 on D1, 7.7 ± 1.3 on D2 and 7.5 ± 1.1 on D3. From D1 to D4, 43% of patients spent>12h/day with BG levels>7.7 mmol/L. While morbidity during the 3 months following transplantation appeared unrelated to BG, the first post-transplantation capillary BG measurement and fasting BG on D1 tended to be higher in patients who developed diabetes 3 months later. Tacrolimus treatment was associated with a higher incidence of dysglycaemia at 3 and 6 months. After a mean follow-up of 72 months, NODAT was frequently seen (18.6%), and was associated with tacrolimus medication (P<0.01) and a higher rate of renal transplantation failure (RR: 3.6, P<0.02).

CONCLUSION

Hyperglycaemia appears to be a nearly constant characteristic immediately following transplantation in non-diabetic kidney recipients. Higher BG values could identify patients at risk for later post-transplant diabetes and graft failure.

Immunosuppression in HCV-positive liver-transplant recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to evaluate the historical and recent literature as it pertains to current immunosuppression regimens in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive (+) liver-transplant recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent findings suggest that there are unique differences between HCV transplant recipients and non-HCV transplant recipients, not only in the graft's inflammatory response, but also to the treatments used to prevent and combat rejection.

SUMMARY

HCV (+) transplant recipients present unique challenges. Over the years, there has been progress but there is clearly no consensus regarding the optimal immunosuppressive medications or drug regimens; however, there continues to be advancements in the management of patients with HCV. Though current studies do not provide clear evidence as to optimal immunosuppression, they do identify questions ideally addressed by large, randomized controlled trials.

Hyperglycemia after renal transplantation: frequency and risk factors

BACKGROUND

Chronic renal failure is an important and common complication of diabetes mellitus; hence, renal transplantation is a frequent and the acceptable treatment in patients with diabetic nephropathy requiring renal replacement therapy. On the other hand, renal transplantation and its conventional treatment can lead to increased diabetes outbreak in normoglycemic recipients. Also, uncontrolled hyperglycemia may be increased and allograft lost thus decreasing patient survival.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the frequency of hyperglycemia in transplant patients and its risk factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A large retrospective study was performed on 3342 adult kidney transplant recipients between 2008 and 2010. Demographic and laboratory data were gathered for each patient. All tests were done in a single laboratory and hyperglycemia was defined as a fasting plasma glucose of > 125 mg/dL. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the risk factors of hyperglycemia following kidney transplantation.

RESULTS

There were 2120 (63.4%) males and 1212 (36.3%) females. Prevalence of hyperglycemia was 22.5%. By univariate linear regression, hyperglycemia was significantly higher in patients with CMV infection (P = 0.001), elevated serum creatinine (P = 0.000), low HDL (P = 0.01), and increased blood levels of cyclosporine (P = 0.000). After adjusting for covariates by multivariate logistic regression, the hyperglycemia rate was significantly higher for patients with Cyclosporine trough level > 250 (P = 0.000), serum creatinine > 1.5 (P = 0.000) and HDL < 45 (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicated that hyperglycemia is a common metabolic disorder in Iranian kidney transplant patients. Risk factors for hyperglycemia were higher Cyclosporine level, impaired renal function, and reduced HDL value.

Beta and angiotensin blockades are associated with improved 10-year survival in renal transplant recipients

Background

Mortality in allograft kidney transplant recipients is high, and cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in these patients. They have heightened activity of sympathetic and renin–angiotensin systems. We tested the hypothesis that blockade of sympathetic and renin–angiotensin systems in these patients may offer a survival benefit using a large cohort of patients with long‐term follow up.

Methods and Results

Medical records of 321 consecutive patients from our institution who had received renal transplantation between 1995 and 2003 were abstracted. Survival was analyzed as a function of pharmacological therapies adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidities. The characteristics of the 321 patients were as follows: age at transplant, 44±13 years; 40% male; 89% with hypertension; 36% with diabetes, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 60%. Over a follow‐up of 10±4 years, there were 119 deaths. Adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, and coronary artery disease, use of a beta‐blocker therapy (P=0.04) and angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor or receptor blocker (P=0.03) was associated with better survival. This treatment effect was seen across all major clinical subgroups and was supported by propensity score analysis. The propensity score–adjusted 10‐year survival was 95% in those taking both groups of medications, 72% in those taking either of them, and 64% in those taking neither (P=0.004).

Conclusions

Use of beta‐blocker and angiotensin blocking therapies is associated with higher survival after renal transplantation, indicating their potential protective role in this high‐risk population.