Long-term improvement in renal function after cyclosporine reduction in renal transplant recipients with histologically proven chronic cyclosporine nephropathy

Trends in Precision Medicine and Pharmacogenetics as an Adjuvant in Establishing a Correct Immunosuppressive Therapy for Kidney Transplant: An Up-to-Date Historical Overview

Kidney transplantation is currently the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage kidney diseases. Although significant advancements in kidney transplantation have been achieved over the past decades, the host's immune response remains the primary challenge, often leading to potential graft rejection. Effective management of the immune response is essential to ensure the long-term success of kidney transplantation. To address this issue, immunosuppressives have been developed and are now fully integrated into the clinical management of transplant recipients. However, the considerable inter- and intra-patient variability in pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of these drugs represents the primary cause of graft rejection. This variability is primarily attributed to the polymorphic nature (genetic heterogeneity) of genes encoding xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes, transport proteins, and, in some cases, drug targets. These genetic differences can influence drug metabolism and distribution, leading to either toxicity or reduced efficacy. The main objective of the present review is to report an historical overview of the pharmacogenetics of immunosuppressants, shedding light on the most recent findings and also suggesting how relevant is the research and investment in developing validated NGS-based commercial panels for pharmacogenetic profiling in kidney transplant recipients. These advancements will enable the implementation of precision medicine, optimizing immunosuppressive therapies to improve graft survival and kidney transplanted patient outcomes.

Role of cyclosporin A in the treatment of kidney disease and nephrotoxicity

The clinical use of cyclosporin A (CsA) has led to significant advances and achievements in the field of transplantation and immune diseases. However, the nephrotoxicity of CsA is a major concern in current immunosuppression regimens. CsA causes abnormal kidney function while treating kidney disease, causing problems for clinicians and patients. Evidence of CsA nephrotoxicity is almost always present in transplant recipients after long-term CsA administration (up to 10 years), and similar phenomena occur with other calcineurin inhibitors. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms and influencing factors of CsA for the treatment of primary nephrotic syndrome. The mechanisms of CsA nephrotoxicity, clinical-pathological features, diagnosis, prevention strategies, and risk factors are summarized. We discuss the correlates and mechanisms of the switch between kidney disease prevention and nephrotoxicity of CsA to better understand the function of CsA in the kidney and to provide a basis for the prevention and treatment of CsA nephrotoxicity.

Peritoneal Dialysis in the Patient with a Failing Renal Allograft

Background

Patients returning to dialysis treatment after a period with a functioning allograft represent a special case in the integrated care model of renal replacement therapy. They are known to nephrologists— and thus are ideal candidates for a timely commencement of dialysis—but they have had time to accrue additional cardiovascular risk. Furthermore, they have been exposed to prolonged immunosuppression.

Purpose

The present study aimed to establish the clinical outcomes of patients returning to peritoneal dialysis (PD) with failing allografts [survival, technique survival, longitudinal residual renal function (Kt/VR), peritoneal membrane function (solute transport), and plasma albumin] and to compare those outcomes with outcomes in new, contemporary patients.

Setting

The study was conducted in a single center where prospective collection of data now known to be important in determining outcome on peritoneal dialysis (age, comorbidity, albumin, Kt/VR, and solute transport) has been performed since 1989.

Methods

All patients commencing PD between 1989 and 2001 after failure of an allograft that had functioned for more than 6 months were identified. Outcomes in that group were compared to outcomes in all new PD patients and in all dialysis patients with failed grafts who were returning to hemodialysis (HD) in the same period.

Results

The study identified 45 patients with failed allografts: 28 were commencing PD treatment, and 17 were commencing HD treatment. Those patients were significantly younger than the 469 new patients commencing PD [FailedTx→ PD 41.2 years, FailedTx→ HD 38.9 years, NewPD 54.7 years; analysis of variance (ANOVA): p < 0.001]. We saw no significant difference in the survival of failed transplant patients commencing PD as compared with those commencing HD (log rank: p = 0.11). Kaplan–Meier plots of patient survival were better for failed transplant patients as compared with all new PD patients. When corrected using Cox regression, the survival advantage was seen to be due to age and comorbidity at start of PD. Pure technique failure (excluding death) was not different between the groups. Compared with all new PD patients, patients with failed allografts had similar longitudinal plasma albumin and a tendency toward an earlier increase in solute transport, but a more rapid loss of Kt/VR, ( p < 0.05 at 6 – 48 months).

Conclusions

Peritoneal dialysis would appear to be a good option for patients with failing allografts. Co-morbidity is the predominant determinant of survival. That finding underlines the need for attention to factors that might prevent accrual of cardiovascular risk during the post-transplantation period. The earlier loss of Kt/VR in those patients might be prevented by developing strategies of continued immunosuppression after commencement of dialysis, although infection risk is an important issue.

Use of antioxidants to prevent cyclosporine a toxicity

Cyclosporine A (CsA) is a potent immunosuppressor that is widely used in transplant surgery and the treatment of several autoimmune diseases. However, major side effects of CsA such as nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, neurotoxicity and cardiovascular diseases have substantially limited its usage. Although molecular mechanisms underlying these adverse effects are not clearly understood, there is some evidence that suggests involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) . In parallel, protective effects of various antioxidants have been demonstrated by many research groups. Extensive studies of CsA-induced nephrotoxcity have confirmed that the antioxidants can restore the damaged function and structure of kidney. Subsequently, there have appeared numerous reports to demonstrate the positive antioxidant effects on liver and other organ damages by CsA. It may be timely to review the ideas to envisage the relationship between ROS and the CsA-induced toxicity. This review is comprised of a brief description of the immunosuppressive action and the secondary effects of CsA, and a synopsis of reports regarding the antioxidant treatments against the ROS-linked CsA toxicity. A plethora of recent reports suggest that antioxidants can help reduce many CsA’s adverse effects and therefore might help develop more effective CsA treatment regimens.

Deferred pre-emptive switch from calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus leads to improvement in GFR and expansion of T regulatory cell population: a randomized, controlled trial

Background

Measures to prevent chronic calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity have included limiting exposure by switching to sirolimus (SIR). SIR may favorably influence T regulator cell (T_reg) population. This randomized controlled trial compares the effect of switching from CNI to SIR on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and T_reg frequency.

Methods

In this prospective open label randomized trial, primary living donor kidney transplant recipients on CNI-based immunosuppression were randomized to continue CNI or switched to sirolimus 2 months after surgery; 29 were randomized to receive CNI and 31 to SIR. All patients received mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. The main outcome parameter was estimated GFR (eGFR) at 180 days. T_reg population was estimated by flowcytometry.

Results

Baseline characteristics in the two groups were similar. Forty-eight patients completed the trial. At six months, patients in the SIR group had significantly higher eGFR as compared to those in the CNI group (88.94±11.78 vs 80.59±16.51 mL/min, p = 0.038). Patients on SIR had a 12 mL/min gain of eGFR of at the end of six months. Patients in the SIR group showed significant increase in T_reg population at 30 days, which persisted till day 180. There was no difference in the adverse events in terms of number of acute rejection episodes, death, infections, proteinuria, lipid profile, blood pressure control and hematological parameters between the two groups. Four patients taking SIR developed enthesitis. No patient left the study or switched treatment because of adverse event.

Conclusions

A deferred pre-emptive switch over from CNI to SIR safely improves renal function and T_reg population at 6 months in living donor kidney transplant recipients.

Registered in Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2011/091/000034)

Peritoneal dialysis in transplant recipient patients: outcomes and management

Transplant recipient patients performing dialysis represent a growing population in the integrated model of renal replacement therapy. This includes both patients with kidney allograft loss and non-renal organ transplant recipients requiring dialysis. Although a number of possible advantages of peritoneal dialysis over haemodialysis could hypothetically favour its choice when starting dialysis, peritoneal dialysis penetration is relatively residual in this population. Questions about its safety and adequacy in these patients can explain this fact. The purpose of this review is to address unfounded fears and document evidence that peritoneal dialysis should be considered a viable and safe choice in patients returning to dialysis. Specific issues that still need further investigation are also discussed.

Established and newly proposed mechanisms of chronic cyclosporine nephropathy

Cyclosporine (CsA) has improved patient and graft survival rates following solid-organ transplantation and has shown significant clinical benefits in the management of autoimmune diseases. However, the clinical use of CsA is often limited by acute or chronic nephropathy, which remains a major problem. Acute nephropathy depends on the dosage of CsA and appears to be caused by a reduction in renal blood flow related to afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction. However, the mechanisms underlying chronic CsA nephropathy are not completely understood. Activation of the intrarenal renin-angiotensin system (RAS), increased release of endothelin-1, dysregulation of nitric oxide (NO) and NO synthase, up-regulation of transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1), inappropriate apoptosis, stimulation of inflammatory mediators, enhanced innate immunity, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and autophagy have all been implicated in the pathogenesis of chronic CsA nephropathy. Reducing the CsA dosage or using other renoprotective drugs (angiotensin II receptor antagonist, mycophenolate mofetil, and statins, etc.) may ameliorate chronic CsA-induced renal injury. This review discusses old and new concepts in CsA nephropathy and preventive strategies for this clinical dilemma.

Efficacy on renal function of early conversion from cyclosporine to sirolimus 3 months after renal transplantation: concept study

Sirolimus (SRL) allows to minimize the use of cyclosporine (CsA), but de novo administration after transplantation is associated with various complications. We report a prospective, open-label, multicenter randomized study to evaluate conversion from a CsA-based regimen to a SRL-based regimen 3 months after transplantation. One hundred ninety-two of a total of 237 patients were eligible at 3 months to be converted to SRL (n = 95) or to continue CsA (n = 97). All patients were also given mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and oral steroids, planned to be discontinued at month 8. The primary endpoint, the clearance estimated according to Cockcroft and Gault at week 52, was significantly better in the SRL group (68.9 vs. 64.4 mL/min, p = 0.017). Patient and graft survival were not statistically different. The incidence of acute rejection episodes, mainly occurring after withdrawal of steroids, was numerically but not statistically higher in the SRL group (17% vs. 8%, p = 0.071). Sixteen patients discontinued SRL, mainly for adverse events (n = 11), and seven patients discontinued CsA for renal failure or acute rejection. Significantly, more patients in the SRL group reported aphthous, diarrhea, acne and high triglyceride levels. Conversion CsA to SRL 3 months after transplantation combined with MMF is associated with improvement in renal function.

[Mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine in the treatment of steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome with frequent relapses]

We describe the case of an 8-year-old patient, with steroid-dependent minimal lesion nephrotic syndrome, with frequent relapses despite treatment with cyclosporine. After the switch to mycophenolate mofetil the patient had new relapses, and there was difficulty in controlling the disease. The reintroduction of cyclosporine combined with mycophenolate mofetil obtained an optimal response, with a longer relapse-free time. Due to their kinetic variability, the blood levels of both drugs were closely monitored during follow-up.

Sirolimus versus cyclosporine therapy increases circulating regulatory T cells, but does not protect renal transplant patients given alemtuzumab induction from chronic allograft injury

BACKGROUND

In kidney transplant recipients with alemtuzumab induction maintained on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) immunosuppression, sirolimus (SRL) promotes significant expansion of circulating CD4+CD25high regulatory T cells (Treg). This might translate into more effective protection against chronic graft injury compared to cyclosporin A (CsA), which, in the same clinical setting, does not affect Treg.

METHODS

To assess this hypothesis, in the extension of a single-center, prospective, randomized, open, blind endpoint study aimed to assess the effect of low-dose SRL or CsA on circulating Treg, we compared the outcomes of renal transplant recipients on SRL (n=11) or CsA (n=10) by per-protocol biopsies and serial measurements of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), renal plasma flow (RPF), and 24-hour proteinuria over 30 months posttransplant.

RESULTS

Despite 4-fold higher CD4+CD25high Treg counts (22.1+/-12.2% vs. 5.7+/-4.2% of CD3+CD4+ T cells), SRL-treated patients, compared to CsA-treated patients, had a significantly higher tubular C4d staining score (1.1+/-0.6 vs. 0.2+/-0.3, P<0.01), with nonsignificant trends to higher chronic allograft damage index score (5.6+/-2.4 vs. 3.7+/-3.3), faster GFR (-2.92+/-0.33 vs. -0.28+/-0.44 ml/min/1.73 m2 per year), and RPF (-10.80+/-5.45 vs. -1.86+/-3.09 ml/min/1.73 m2 per year) decline, and more clinical proteinuria (n=6 vs. 4). There was no significant correlation between Treg counts and any considered outcome variable in the study group as a whole and within each cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that, despite enhanced Treg expression, low-dose SRL combined to alemtuzumab induction and MMF-based steroid-free maintenance therapy, does not appreciably protect renal transplant recipients from chronic allograft injury and dysfunction.

Early withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitors and rescue immunosuppression with sirolimus-based therapy in renal transplant recipients with moderate to severe renal dysfunction

Mammalian Target-of-Rapamycin inhibitors (mTOR inhibitors) can be used to replace the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) to prevent progression in chronic kidney disease (CKD) following organ transplantation. Discontinuation of tacrolimus in 136 recipients of kidney transplants with progressive renal dysfunction significantly decreased the rate of loss of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m(2)) (pre-intervention vs. post-intervention slopes, -0.013 vs. -0.002, p < 0.0001). Discontinuation of tacrolimus was associated with a sustained and significant improvement in graft function (pre-eGFR vs. post-eGFR; 26.0 +/- 1.1 vs. 47.4 +/- 2.1, p < 0.0001) in 74% of patients. This intervention was ineffective if the mean and (median) values of creatinine (mg/dL) and eGFR were 3.8 +/- 0.2 (3.4) and 18.4 +/- 1.9 (22.4), respectively, at the time of conversion therapy. During the follow-up (range, 1.5-34.6, months), a total of 13 patients had their first acute rejection following the conversion therapy, an annual incidence of less than 10% and none of these episodes resulted in graft loss. The salutary effects of sirolimus therapy following discontinuation of tacrolimus in patients with moderate to severe graft dysfunction due to allograft nephropathy even in high-risk patients improves kidney function and prevents acute rejection.

Mycophenolate mofetil substitution for cyclosporine-dependent myasthenia gravis and nephrotoxicity

Severe autoimmune myasthenia gravis is difficult to manage and may require immunosuppression with cyclosporine. However, cyclosporine dependency is associated with the risk of nephrotoxicity. Mycophenolate mofetil is a non-nephrotoxic alternative which should be considered to rescue cyclosporine-dependent, severe myasthenia gravis sufferers with renal impairment from progression to end-stage renal failure. However, the evidence is limited and studies have not assessed the outcome of a direct substitution in these cyclosporine-dependent patients. We study three such patients who successfully converted to mycophenolate mofetil, and briefly examine the evidence behind this option. We believe that total cyclosporine withdrawal is feasible, but strongly recommend overlapping mycophenolate mofetil treatment with cyclosporine.

Stable graft function after reduction of calcineurin inhibitor dosage in paediatric kidney transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Chronic calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity contributes to the development and progression of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN), which is still the major cause of transplant dysfunction and graft loss. Reduction in dosage of CNI may delay the development of CAN, leading to longer graft survival.

METHODS

Therefore, 19 paediatric kidney transplant patients under immunosuppressive therapy with CNI (12/19 ciclosporin A, CSA, 7/19 tacrolimus, Tac), mycophenolat mofetil and some patients on steroids were included in a prospective study. Over a period of 9 months CNI dosage was stepwise reduced from CSA trough levels of 100-150 ng/ml to 50-70 ng/ml and Tac trough levels of 5-8 ng/ml to 2-3 ng/ml, respectively.

RESULTS

Glomerular filtration rate was stabilized in patients after CSA and Tac reduction. One borderline rejection occurred in a patient prior to reduction of Tac. In patients on CSA, one interstitial cellular rejection (BANFF IA) was noted. Reduction of CNI had no significant effects on blood pressure, lipid status and the infection frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

In paediatric kidney transplant patients, reduction of CNI down to low trough levels stabilizes renal function. However, the risk of acute rejection episodes may be increased. Therefore, further studies based on protocol biopsies within a randomized trial are warranted.

Mycophenolate mofetil introduction stabilizes and subsequent cyclosporine A reduction slightly improves kidney function in pediatric renal transplant patients: a retrospective analysis

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is the major cause of late graft loss. Among others, chronic calcineurin inhibitor toxicity (CNI) contributes to the development of CAN. Therefore, reduction in CNI dosage may delay the development of CAN, leading to longer graft survival. It was the aim of the present retrospective analysis to investigate the effect of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) addition with subsequent cyclosporine A (CSA) reduction on renal function in pediatric kidney allograft recipients. Seventeen patients (aged 8.3-17.6 yr) with monotherapy with CSA and progressive loss of renal function at a median of 3.4 yr after kidney transplantation were enrolled. After at least three months of MMF treatment, CSA dosage was stepwise reduced to trough levels of 100, 80, and 60 ng/mL. In all patients, introduction of MMF prevented a further decrease of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The mean GFR 12 months before study enrollment was 96.1+/-24.5 and 71.0+/-21.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 at start of MMF. After introduction of MMF and unchanged CSA dosage GFR was stabilized to 71.1+/-23.8 mL/min/1.73 m2. After CSA reduction to trough levels of 60 ng/mL, GFR was slightly ameliorated up to 76.3+/-24.1 mL/min/1.73 m2. Within the follow-up period, one borderline rejection occurred in a patient in whom the CSA trough level was 60 ng/mL since seven months. In pediatric kidney allograft recipients with progressive loss of renal function reduction of CSA after introduction of MMF may stabilize and even slightly ameliorate renal function.

Verapamil P-glycoprotein transport across the rat blood-brain barrier: cyclosporine, a concentration inhibition analysis, and comparison with human data

To predict the magnitude of P-glycoprotein (P-gp)-based drug interactions at the human blood-brain barrier (BBB), rodent studies are routinely conducted where P-gp is chemically inhibited. For such studies to be predictive of interactions at the human BBB, the plasma concentration of the P-gp inhibitor must be comparable with that observed in the clinic. Therefore, we determined the in vivo EC(50) of P-gp inhibition at the rat BBB using verapamil as a model P-gp substrate and cyclosporine A (CsA) as the model P-gp inhibitor. Under isoflurane anesthesia, male Sprague-Dawley rats were administered i.v. CsA to achieve pseudo steady-state CsA blood concentrations ranging from 0 to approximately 12 microM. Then, an i.v. tracer dose of [(3)H]verapamil was administered, and 20 min after verapamil administration, the animals were sacrificed for determination of blood, plasma, and brain (3)H radioactivity by scintillation counting. The percentage increase in the brain/blood (3)H radioactivity (relative to 0 microM CsA) was described by the Hill equation with E(max), 1290%; EC(50), 7.2 microM; and gamma, 3.8. Previously, using [(11)C]verapamil, we have shown that the human brain/blood (11)C radioactivity was increased by 79% at 2.8 microM CsA blood concentration. At an equivalent CsA blood concentration, the rat brain/blood (3)H radioactivity was increased by a remarkably similar extent of 75%. This is the first time that an in vivo CsA EC(50) of P-gp inhibition at the rat BBB has been determined and the magnitude of such inhibition was compared between the rat and the human BBB at the same blood CsA concentration.

Blockade of angiotensin II with losartan attenuates transforming growth factor-beta1 inducible gene-h3 (betaig-h3) expression in a model of chronic cyclosporine nephrotoxicity

BACKGROUND

We recently demonstrated that upregulation of the transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1 inducible gene-h3 (betaig-h3) is associated with tubulointerstitial fibrosis (TIF) in a rat model of chronic cyclosporine A (CsA) nephrotoxicity. This study investigated the association between betaig-h3 expression and TIF during losartan treatment in this model.

METHODS

Adult Sprague-Dawley rats kept on a salt-depleted diet (0.05% sodium) were treated daily for 4 weeks with vehicle (olive oil, 1 ml/kg), CsA (15 mg/kg) or both CsA and losartan (10 mg/kg in drinking water). The effect of losartan on betaig-h3 expression was evaluated using in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting. Histopathology, expressions of TGF-beta1 and intrarenal angiotensin II were compared across treatment groups.

RESULTS

Concurrent administration of losartan significantly attenuated betaig-h3 mRNA and protein expression within the tubulointerstitium of CsA-treated kidneys. This was accompanied by the retardation of TIF (18 +/- 5 vs. 39 +/- 5%, p < 0.01 vs. CsA) and the expression of TGF-beta1 mRNA (336 +/- 49 vs. 685 +/- 63%, p < 0.01 vs. CsA) and the number of angiotensin II-positive glomeruli (18 +/- 5 vs. 38 +/- 6, p < 0.05 vs. CsA).

CONCLUSION

Losartan is capable of abrogating the upregulation of TGF-beta1 and betaig-h3 expression, and this is associated with attenuated tubulointerstitial fibrosis in chronic CsA nephrotoxicity.

Calcineurin nephrotoxicity

Calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, have improved allograft survival in solid organ transplantation. Indeed, they have reduced the incidence of acute rejection episodes of cadaveric allograft recipients. Although marked progression has been made in initial survival rates, long-term kidney graft survival has yet to show such encouraging results. Chronic allograft dysfunction is the major hindrance to long-term graft survival and many components contribute to this entity, both immunologic and nonimmunologic. Chronic calcineurin nephrotoxicity is a major factor in chronic allograft dysfunction. This review will highlight the current understanding and management of calcineurin nephrotoxicity in kidney transplantation.

What we CAN do about chronic allograft nephropathy: role of immunosuppressive modulations

Given the potency of modern immunosuppressive agents, kidney transplantation across alloantingen barriers is a routine phenomenon with excellent 1-year graft survival in most centers. However, the improvement in 1-year graft survival has not been matched by improvements in long-term graft function and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) remains the second commonest cause of graft attrition over time. Calcineurin inhibitors, namely cyclosporine A (CyA) and tacrolimus, have been implicated as causal agents in the development of the fibrotic processes that are the hallmarks of CAN. Many studies have, therefore, concentrated on the improvement of long term graft function through the modulation of immunosuppressive therapy. It is the purpose of this review to describe and appraise the available evidence for the prevention and management of CAN through modulation of immunosuppressive agents.

Strategies for minimizing immunosuppression in kidney transplantation

Immunosuppression remains the cause of most morbidity following organ transplantation. However, its use is also responsible for the outstanding graft and patient survival rates commonplace in modern transplantation. Thus, the predominant challenge for transplant clinicians is to provide a level of immunosuppression that prevents graft rejection while preserving immunocompetence against environmental pathogens. This review will outline several strategies for minimizing or tailoring the use of immunosuppressive drugs. The arguments for various strategies will be based on clinical trial data rather than animal studies. A distinction will be made between conventional immunosuppressive drug reduction based on over-immunosuppression, and newer induction methods specifically designed to lessen the need for chronic immunosuppression. Based on the available data we suggest that most patients can be transplanted with less immunosuppression than is currently standard.

Attenuation of interstitial inflammation and fibrosis by recombinant human erythropoietin in chronic cyclosporine nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests that recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) protects neurons and cardiomyocytes from acute insults. We investigated the protective effect of rHuEPO on cyclosporine (CsA)-induced renal injury.

METHODS

CsA (15 mg/kg/day) was given to rats for 1 or 4 weeks, and rHuEPO was concurrently administered at a dose of 100 units/kg (thrice weekly). Effects of rHuEPO on CsA-induced renal injury were evaluated with tubulointerstitial fibrosis (TIF) score, macrophage infiltration, expression of proinflammatory and profibrotic cytokines, and apoptotic cell death.

RESULTS

Administration of rHuEPO decreased TIF score and the number of macrophages, which increased significantly in CsA-treated rat kidneys. At the molecular level, rHuEPO treatment decreased proinflammatory mediators (osteopontin and C-reactive protein) and profibrotic mediators (transforming growth factor-beta1 and transforming growth factor-beta1-inducible gene-h3). Increased apoptotic cell death in CsA-treated rat kidneys was significantly decreased with rHuEPO cotreatment, and apoptosis-related genes were regulated in favor of cell survival (increased Bcl-2 and suppressed caspase-3).

CONCLUSION

rHuEPO has a renoprotective effect against chronic CsA-induced renal injury.

Nephrotoxic aspects of cyclosporine

Over the last 20 years cyclosporine (CsA) has improved the survival of kidney, heart, and liver transplants. However, with increasing use, evidence has accumulated that CsA therapy carries a variety of side effects, the most important being renal toxicity. CsA can lead to a wide spectrum of renal function impairments, including a marked and rapidly reversible decrease in renal hemodynamics (acute CsA nephrotoxicity), and a chronic form of renal damage that potentially progress irreversibly to end-stage renal disease (chronic CsA nephrotoxicity). All these manifestations are the consequence of the drug toxic effects on renal vessels and the tubulointerstitium. A proper diagnosis of CsA toxicity at early stages, the combination of low CsA doses with non-nephrotoxic immunosuppressants, and the development of more feasible strategies to monitor daily CsA exposure may contribute to a better CsA management, improve quality of life of transplant recipients, and prolong graft survival.

Cyclosporine C2 monitoring improves renal dysfunction after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cyclosporine (CyA) toxicity is a potential cause of renal dysfunction, which occurs in 38% of lung transplant (LTx) recipients within 5 years. Reducing CyA to "sub-therapeutic" trough (C0) levels increases the risk of rejection. The 2-hour post-dose concentration (C2) is favored as the best single-point surrogate measure of CyA area under the curve (AUC), which reflects drug exposure. In this investigation we assess the effect of conversion to CyA C2 monitoring on renal dysfunction after LTx.

METHODS

Fifteen patients (M:F = 12:3), aged 47 +/- 14 years (range 28 to 62), 3.5 +/- 2.7 (0.2 to 9.0) years post-LTx, with C0 in the therapeutic range (maintenance 100 to 200 microg/liters) (Behring/EMIT immunoassay) and abnormal renal function, were converted from C0 monitoring to C2 monitoring with dose reductions targeting C2 levels of 300 to 600 microg/liter over a 12-month period.

RESULTS

CyA dose was reduced from 6.4 +/- 7.3 (1.2 to 27.9) to 3.1 +/- 2.7 (0.8 to 9.0) mg/kg/day (p = 0.04), with a reduction in C2 levels from 799 +/- 341 (299 to 1,466) to 390 +/- 148 (195 to 675) microg/liter (p < 0.001). Improvements in serum creatinine (0.20 +/- 0.07 [0.12 to 0.35] vs 0.16 +/- 0.04 [0.11 to 0.22] mmol/liter [p = 0.005]) were maintained during the study follow-up period of 1 year. Only 1 patient developed acute rejection and group mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) remained stable (2.4 +/- 1.0 [1.1 to 4.0] vs 2.4 +/- 1.2 [1.1 to 4.6] liters).

CONCLUSIONS

C2 monitoring is a practical method of improving renal dysfunction that allows safe dose reductions of CyA when formal AUC monitoring is not feasible. Extended use of this strategy is associated with long-term benefits.

Impact of kidney transplantation on the progression of cardiovascular disease

Kidney transplantation, of all the treatment modalities for end-stage renal disease, affords the greatest potential for prolonged survival and improved quality of life. Great strides in immunosuppressant therapy have improved graft survival and forced clinicians to consider other health-care needs of kidney transplant recipients. Chief among these needs is the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death among patients with a working renal allograft. Because therapies for primary and secondary prevention are successful in the general population, transplant clinicians are increasingly focused on preventing or limiting the progression of cardiovascular disease. Initiation of aggressive management of conventional atherosclerotic risk factors and uremia-related risk factors, ideally during the early stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) or after kidney transplantation, and efforts to delay the progression of kidney disease will hopefully reduce the cardiovascular burden in transplant recipients.

Preservation of renal function during maintenance therapy with cyclosporine

During the last 20 years the management of cyclosporine (CsA) has improved due to the introduction of microemulsion technology, C2 monitoring, and combination with other new immunosuppressants. All these modifications have reduced the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes to approximately 10%. However despite the wide experience, there are unanswered questions regarding CsA monitoring after the first year. Available clinical and histological data suggest that the therapeutic range to avoid nephrotoxicity or underimmunosuppression during the maintenance period is rather narrow. Furthermore, the combination of CsA with new immunosuppressants may modify the target CsA levels. Although the utility of C2 levels during the first year has been well characterized, there are few data on its utility for maintenance therapy, particularly the therapeutic range for C2 levels in patients receiving different immunosuppressive combinations. Since serum creatinine does not precisely reflect the progression of chronic allograft nephropathy, the efficacy of C2 monitoring during the maintenance period must be assessed not only by means of evaluation of renal function, but also histologic assessment using protocol biopsies.

Experience with cyclosporine

The introduction of cyclosporine (CyA) was a landmark in transplantation, and in the two decades that have followed, enormous experience has been acquired in its use. This has led to both an understanding of its mechanism, pharmacokinetics and toxicity, and the continued evolution of its clinical application. Many of the initial complexities related to the hydrophobic nature of the molecule, and its variable absorption were addressed by the introduction of the microemulsion formulation Neoral. Despite this, the therapeutic window for CyA remains narrow, and therapeutic drug monitoring, recognized early after its introduction, is essential. However, this too has been redefined with single-point, 2-hour, postdose monitoring being demonstrated to correlate better with dose and outcome than the traditional 12-hour trough level. Implementation of such techniques may impact on efficacy and the long-term effects of nephrotoxicity. The need to gain experience with new facets of CyA is likely to continue. In particular, the use of reduced doses to minimize nephrotoxicity during long-term management has produced favorable early results. Furthermore, in the near future the availability of generic CyA formulations will increase. It cannot be assumed that these will be bioequivalent to the current preparations, and modifications of therapy, outside of current experience, may be required. However, if 20 years of CyA usage has taught us anything, it is that different formulations may have very different biological behavior, and at least this situation can be approached with a caution gained from long experience.

Strategies for ensuring effective surveillance in post-transplant patients: practical organization and clinical evaluation

Results of renal transplantation have improved steadily over the years. This article reviews the current status of patient and graft survival and discusses major causes of mortality and renal allograft failure. Review of recent literature demonstrates that the traditional enemies of transplantation, acute rejection and opportunistic infections are no longer major problems facing transplantation. Chronic graft nephropathy and death with functioning graft due to cardiovascular disease are the main challenges in the current era. An impact of an early graft thrombosis, recurrent renal disease and post-transplant malignancies are also reviewed. Chronic graft nephropathy is examined in a context of differences between two calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporin microemulsion and tacrolimus. Strategies of post-transplant surveillance are suggested.

Benefit-Risk Assessment of Ciclosporin Withdrawal in Renal Transplant Recipients

Ciclosporin is associated with significant toxicity, including nephrotoxicity, and with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Many attempts have been made to wean patients from ciclosporin. Before the availability of new immunosuppressive drugs, the acute rejection rate observed after ciclosporin withdrawal did not permit the widespread use of withdrawal regimens even though meta-analysis did not show that they adversely affected patient or graft survival. Nevertheless, maintenance therapy with azathioprine and corticosteroids has not become routine practice. The introduction of mycophenolate mofetil and subsequently sirolimus has increased the number of clinical studies of the effects of ciclosporin withdrawal. In stable patients, this withdrawal is associated with a small but significant increase in the incidence of acute rejection episodes. Declining renal function and other forms of ciclosporin-related toxicity have improved. However, this improvement was also observed when ciclosporin was only reduced (and not withdrawn), which did not increase the risk of acute rejection. More precise definition of the patients who could benefit from ciclosporin-withdrawal may help to optimise the immunosuppressive regimen in this setting. In patients with chronic allograft deterioration, ciclosporin withdrawal together with mycophenolate mofetil introduction has been shown to improve renal function significantly in many small studies, and a large prospective randomised study. For the time being, ciclosporin withdrawal is a good therapeutic option for patients with declining renal function and signs of chronic ciclosporin nephrotoxicity on renal biopsy. Finally, recent preliminary studies have reported the results of complete avoidance of calcineurin inhibitors after renal transplantation. These results are promising as regards the incidence of acute rejection, renal function and safety, but need confirmation in larger trials with a longer follow-up. Nevertheless, it has become clear that the concept of an immunosuppressive regimen with little or no nephrotoxicity after renal transplantation is more and more important and plays a crucial part in tailoring immunosuppression to the needs of specific patient populations.

Hypertension after kidney transplantation: impact, pathogenesis and therapy

Hypertension (HTN) contributes to the high incidence of cardiovascular disease mortality as well as chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) and late graft failure in renal transplant recipients. The mechanisms are complex and may involve pathogenic factors attributable to the host, allograft, and immunosuppressive drugs. Calcium channel blockers should be used to ameliorate the nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors in the early years after transplantation. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-2 type-1 receptor blockers are safe and effective, have antiproteinuric effects, slow the progression of CAN, and may provide survival benefits. Diuretics and/or beta-adrenergic receptor blockers are frequently added in combination regimen. Appropriate adjustment of the immunosuppressive drugs should also be considered for the long-term care of kidney recipients with HTN.

The impact of cyclosporine dose reduction with or without the addition of rapamycin on functional, molecular, and histological markers of chronic allograft nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Overexposure to cyclosporine is a risk factor for chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) and dose reduction has been advocated. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of adding the non-nephrotoxic immunosuppressant, rapamycin, after cyclosporine dose reduction in renal-allograft recipients with CAN.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with biopsy-confirmed CAN were prospectively randomized to receive a 40% cyclosporine dose reduction with (rapamycin, n=16) or without (control, n=15) the addition of rapamycin 2 mg/day. Renal function and side-effect parameters were assessed. Patients had renal allograft biopsies taken at recruitment and after 6 months. Glomeruli were isolated from these and underwent total mRNA extraction followed by RT-PCR-ELISA to assess transforming growth factor-beta1, collagen III, TIMP-1, TIMP-2, and matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression. Samples were also stained with Sirius red and the percentage interstitial volume fraction quantified by computerized histomorphometric analysis. Data are presented as mean (+/-SD).

RESULTS

Patient characteristics and cyclosporine trough levels after dose reduction (rapamycin 68 [+/-21] vs. control 56 [+/-19] ng/mL, P=NS) were similar in both groups. Rapamycin patients had a significant fall in Cr-51 radioisotope glomerular filtration rate (31.6 [+/-8.9] to 27.3 [+/-8.6] mL/min, P<0.01) that was not significant in controls (29.5 [+/-10.4] to 27.0 [+/-8.0] mL/min, P=NS). Transforming growth factor-beta1 expression fell over time in control but remained constant in rapamycin patients. Conversely collagen III expression increased over the 6-month follow-up in rapamycin patients but not in controls. Both had comparable increases in TIMP-1 and matrix metalloproteinase-2 but only rapamycin patients developed a significant increase in TIMP-2. Sirius red-stained interstitial volume fraction fell over the study in controls (15.3-11.2%, P=0.06) but not in rapamycin patients (16.2-16.3%, P=NS).

CONCLUSION

Rapamycin (2 mg/day) did not improve functional, molecular, or histological outcome in patients with CAN after cyclosporine dose reduction. Further studies involving larger numbers of patients are necessary to confirm these findings.

Renal transplantation: can we reduce calcineurin inhibitor/stop steroids? Evidence based on protocol biopsy findings

How to combine antirejection drugs and which is the optimal dose of steroids and calcineurin inhibitors beyond the first year after kidney transplantation to maintain adequate immunosuppression without major side effects are far from clear. Kidney transplant patients on steroid, cyclosporine (CsA), and azathioprine were randomized to per-protocol biopsy (n = 30) or no-biopsy (n = 29) 1 to 2 yr posttransplant. Steroid or CsA were discontinued or reduced on the basis of biopsy to establish effects on drug-related complications, acute rejection, and graft function over 3 yr of follow-up. Serum creatinine, GFR (plasma clearance of iohexol), RPF (renal clearance of p-aminohippurate), CsA pharmacokinetics, and adverse events were monitored yearly. At the end, patients underwent a second biopsy. Per-protocol biopsy histology revealed no lesions (n = 5, steroid withdrawal), CsA nephropathy (n = 13, CsA discontinuation/reduction), or chronic rejection (n = 12, standard therapy). Reducing the drug regimen led to overall fewer side effects related to immunosuppression as compared with standard therapy or no-biopsy. Steroids were safely stopped with no acute rejection or graft loss. Complete CsA discontinuation was associated with acute rejection in the first four patients. Lowering CsA to low target CsA trough (30 to 70 ng/ml) never led to acute rejection or major renal function deterioration. Biopsy patients on conventional regimen had no acute rejection, one graft loss, no significant change in GFR, and significant RPF decline. No-biopsy controls: no acute rejection, one graft loss, significant decline of GFR and RPF. By serial biopsy analysis, severe lesions did not develop in patients with steroid discontinuation in contrast to patients on standard therapy over follow-up. CsA reduction did not adversely affect histology. Per-protocol biopsy more than 1 yr after kidney transplantation is a safe procedure to guide change of drug regimen and to lower the risk of major side effects.

Synergistic effects of mycophenolate mofetil and losartan in a model of chronic cyclosporine nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Combined treatments of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and losartan (LSRT) have synergistic effects on various renal diseases through their hemodynamic and anti-inflammatory effects. This study investigated whether MMF treatment is effective in inhibiting inflammatory processes in chronic cyclosporine A (CsA) nephrotoxicity, and whether combined treatment using MMF and LSRT affords superior protection compared with the respective monotherapies.

METHODS

Rats on a low-salt diet were given vehicle (VH group, olive oil, 1 mg/kg per day), CsA (15 mg/kg per day), CsA and LSRT (CsA+LSRT group, 100 mg/L per day), CsA and MMF (CsA+MMF group; 40 mg/kg per day), or CsA, LSRT and MMF (CsA+LSRT MMF group). Control groups received each drug without CsA treatment. Renal function, histologic parameters (arteriolopathy, tubulointerstitial fibrosis, and inflammatory cell infiltration), and mediators of CsA-induced nephrotoxicity (angiotensin-II, osteopontin, and transforming growth factor [TGF]-beta1) were studied.

RESULTS

The CsA-treated rats showed decreased renal function and increased histologic parameters compared with the VH-treated rats. The CsA+MMF treatment significantly improved renal function and histopathologic parameters compared with the CsA group, and combined treatment with MMF and LSRT further improved those parameters compared with the CsA+LSRT and CsA+MMF groups. At a molecular level, increased expression of angiotensin II protein, osteopontin, and TGF-beta1 mRNAs in the CsA group were significantly decreased with MMF, and further decrease was observed with the combined treatment using MMF and LSRT.

CONCLUSIONS

MMF treatment decreases CsA-induced nephrotoxicity, and combined treatment with LSRT has a synergistic effect in preventing chronic CsA nephrotoxicity.

Cyclosporine withdrawal and mycophenolate mofetil treatment effects on the progression of chronic cyclosporine nephrotoxicity

BACKGROUND

Recent clinical trials of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) demonstrated that the dose of cyclosporine A (CsA) is one of the critical factors in determining graft function in CAN, but the effect of MMF on chronic CsA nephropathy is undetermined. We undertook this study to evaluate the effect of MMF on CsA-induced nephrotoxicity in an animal model of chronic CsA nephropathy.

METHODS

In the first experiment, Sprague-Dawley rats on a low-salt diet were treated with CsA (7.5 mg/kg per day) for 10 weeks, or were treated with CsA for five weeks and then MMF (20 mg/kg per day) was administered five weeks later. In the second experiment, rats were treated with CsA for five weeks, and CsA was then withdrawn for five weeks with or without MMF treatment. Renal function, histologic parameters (tubulointerstitial fibrosis, arteriolopathy, ED-1-positive cells, renin-positive glomeruli, TUNEL-positive cells) and the expression of osteopontin and transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1 mRNA expressions were compared for different treatment groups.

RESULTS

CsA-treated rats showed decreased renal function and increased histologic parameters compared with the vehicle (VH)-treated rats. The addition of MMF did not improve these parameters compared with the CsA-treated rats. With CsA withdrawal, renal function and histologic parameters were significantly improved compared with the CsA-treated rats, and MMF treatment after CsA withdrawal further improved the histologic parameters. At the molecular level, the addition of MMF did not decrease the expression of osteopontin and transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) mRNAs, which were increased in the CsA-treated rat kidney. With CsA withdrawal, the expression of both mRNAs was significantly decreased compared with the CsA group, and a further decrease was observed with MMF treatment after CsA was withdrawn.

CONCLUSION

The combined treatment of CsA and MMF does not prevent the development of chronic CsA nephrotoxicity, but MMF treatment after CsA withdrawal does improve chronic CsA nephrotoxicity. This finding provides a rationale for MMF treatment in chronic CsA nephrotoxicity.

Strategies to reduce toxicities and improve outcomes in renal transplant recipients

Ongoing improvements in immunosuppression and posttransplantation care have dramatically improved patient and graft outcomes after transplantation. The frequency of graft loss due to acute rejection has declined considerably as a result of the availability of a variety of more potent immunosuppressive agents and probably also because of refined clinical care and follow-up. Complications of long-term administration of corticosteroids (steroids) and calcineurin inhibitors, however, have become increasingly apparent as patients live longer with their transplant, and attention is shifting to long-term issues. Use of both steroids and calcineurin inhibitors is associated with metabolic toxicities such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, bone loss, and cataracts. These contribute to posttransplantation morbidity and may negatively affect patient and allograft survival. A variety of troublesome cosmetic side effects, such as hirsutism, gingival hyperplasia, alopecia, obesity, and cushingoid appearance, also are associated with these drugs. These effects can detract from patient self-esteem and compliance with the immunosuppressive regimen. In the past 2 decades, the introduction of second-generation immunosuppressive drugs, such as tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, sirolimus, and anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibodies, has provided some alternatives to classic immunosuppressant choices. Patients experiencing undesirable adverse events now can be converted to another immunosuppressive regimen that ultimately will improve graft and patient survival rates and improve quality of life after transplantation.

Histological alterations in implant and one-year protocol biopsy specimens of renal allografts

BACKGROUND

The natural course of histological changes and their correlations with clinical parameters have not been studied in large numbers in renal allograft specimens. The aim of this study was to determine whether any histological alterations developed during the first posttransplantation year. Immunological and nonimmunological factors possibly associated with subsequent histopathological changes and development of chronic rejection were also assessed.

METHODS

We studied 102 cadaveric kidney allografts for which both implant and 1-year protocol biopsy specimens were available. The chronic allograft damage index (CADI) was used to quantify the extent of histological changes that developed during the first year.

RESULTS

Overall, an increase in histological alterations were seen during the first posttransplantation year, and the CADI increased significantly. The mean CADI was 0.7 in relation to implant biopsy samples and 2.9 in relation to 1-year biopsy samples (P<0.05). Although the degree of changes increased during the first posttransplantation year, they were seldom severe. Significant increases in incidences of interstitial inflammation and fibrosis, tubular atrophy, and basement-membrane thickening were seen. Vascular intimal proliferation and glomerular mesangial matrix increase and glomerular sclerosis were also noted. In contrast, anisometric vacuolization in the tubular epithelium decreased significantly in incidence during the first year. CADI values 1 year after transplantation were significantly affected by donor age, occurrence of acute rejection episodes, and prevalence of HLA-DR mismatches. CADIs were also significantly higher in grafts with decreased function.

CONCLUSIONS

Histopathological alterations increased in almost every graft, even well-functioning grafts, during the first year. The CADIs relating to alterations seen in cases of chronic rejection increased significantly and were strongly affected by both immunological and nonimmunological factors.

Impact of cyclosporine withdrawal on living related renal transplants: a single-center experience

High treatment costs force the discontinuation of cyclosporine (CSA) in a vast majority of renal transplant recipients in India. The impact of CSA withdrawal among 108 living related renal transplant recipients 12.54 +/- 4.2 months after transplantation was studied retrospectively. In 83 patients, CSA was withdrawn over a 12-week period (group I). Azathioprine dosage was increased to 2 to 2.5 mg/kg/d, and prednisolone, to 30 mg/d 2 weeks and 1 week before starting CSA withdrawal, respectively. In the other 25 patients, CSA had to be withdrawn faster (mean, 28.52 +/- 14.18 days; group II). Twenty-nine rejection episodes (26.9%) were noted in 22 patients (20.4%; 19% in group I and 52% in group II; P: = 0.008). Fifteen group-I patients (18%) and 11 group-II patients (44%) died or lost their grafts (P: = 0.017). There was no difference in age, donor source, HLA matches, pretransplantation cross-match positivity, delayed graft function, immunosuppressive drug doses, rejection episodes, or prewithdrawal serum creatinine levels between the patients who did or did not develop acute rejection after CSA withdrawal. On follow-up, 10 patients (50%) died or returned to dialysis among the rejection group compared with 16 patients (18%) in the nonrejection group (P: = 0.007). The mean creatinine level at last follow-up was greater in the rejection group (3.97 +/- 2.54 versus 1.65 +/- 1.1 mg/dL; P: < 0.001). CSA withdrawal because of economic constraints carries a significant risk for acute rejection and death and/or graft loss in Indian living donor renal transplant recipients, even after 12 months.

The use of mycophenolate mofetil in transplant recipients

With the development of new immunosuppressive agents, the focus of anti-rejection therapy has shifted from prevention of acute allograft rejection to an emphasis on sufficient immunosuppression with minimal toxicity. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a recently developed immunosuppressive drug, which acts to inhibit T and B cell proliferation by blocking the production of guanosine nucleotides required for DNA synthesis. It also prevents the glycosylation of adhesion molecules that are involved in attachment of lymphocytes to endothelium and potentially in leukocyte infiltration of an allograft during an immune response. High-quality randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that MMF, when used with cyclosporine (CsA) and steroids, reduces the frequency and severity of acute rejection episodes in kidney and heart transplants, improves patient and graft survival in heart allograft recipients and increases renal allograft survival at 3 years. It has also been effective in reversing acute and resistant rejection episodes in heart, kidney and liver recipients. The ability of MMF to facilitate sparing of other immunosuppressive agents, particularly in CsA-related nephrotoxicity, is also promising. By permitting reduction in CsA doses, MMF may stabilize or improve renal graft function in patients with CsA-related nephrotoxicity or chronic allograft nephropathy. Early results of phase I and II trials evaluating MMF therapy in liver and combined pancreas/kidney transplant recipients are encouraging. The main adverse effects associated with oral or intravenous MMF are gastrointestinal and hematologic in nature. Although the direct costs of using MMF vs. azathioprine (AZA) are higher, the decreased incidence and treatment of acute rejection in patients treated with MMF supports its use as a cost-effective option during the first year following transplantation.Thus, MMF has become an important therapeutic tool in the transplant clinician's armamentarium. Ongoing issues to be resolved in clinical trials include the role of MMF in the absence of other potent agents, e.g., as monotherapy or with a steroid but without calcineurin inhibitor; whether MMF will have an impact on chronic allograft dysfunction; and the cost-effectiveness of treatment following the first year of transplantation.